Medicare Provider Agreement Assignment
Following Change of Ownership: Evaluating
Automatic Assignment vs. Rejection Identifying When a CHOW Occurs, Navigating Medicare Rules,
Weighing Benefits and Risks for Buyers and Sellers
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 2014
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Hedy Rubinger, Partner, Arnall Golden Gregory, Atlanta
Monica Wallace, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, Chicago
Jessica Grozine, Arnall Golden Gregory, Atlanta
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-866-869-6667 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can
address the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your
location by completing each of the following steps:
• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of
attendees at your location
• Click the SEND button beside the box
If you have purchased Strafford CLE processing services, you must confirm your
participation by completing and submitting an Official Record of Attendance (CLE
Form).
You may obtain your CLE form by going to the program page and selecting the
appropriate form in the PROGRAM MATERIALS box at the top right corner.
If you'd like to purchase CLE credit processing, it is available for a fee. For
additional information about CLE credit processing, go to our website or call us at
1-800-926-7926 ext. 35.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the ^ symbol next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Change of Ownership:
- Overview of Healthcare Transactions
- Implications for Skilled Nursing Facilities
Presented by Hedy Rubinger, Esq.
Sponsored by the Legal Publishing Group of Strafford Publications
July 23, 2014
6
Overview: What constitutes a CHOW?
Structure of transaction
– Change of control v. change of operator
– Asset sale v. Stock transfer
– Mergers
– Other transactions
Medicare
State Licensure
Certificate of Need
Medicaid
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
7
What constitutes a CHOW?
Definitions of a CHOW do not always contemplate certain common
transactions (e.g., internal reorganizations, real estate sales, stock
sales of distant parent)
Regulatory focus is often on the actual operating entity
If that entity (i.e., the entity that holds the license and provider
numbers) is changing, then there most likely will be a full CHOW
If the transaction is removed from the operating level, certain
agencies may not require full CHOW filings and may only
require certain abbreviated filings, or no filings at all
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
8
Diagram #1: What constitutes a CHOW?
Change in operator (Traditional CHOW)
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
Operator A Operator B
Parent A Parent B
Before After
9
Diagram #2: What constitutes a CHOW?
Change in immediate parent (often considered a CHOW)
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
Operator A Operator A
Parent A Parent B
Before After
10
Diagram #3: What constitutes a CHOW?
Change in grandparent (sometimes considered a CHOW)
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
Operator A
Parent A
Before After
Grandparent A
Operator A
Parent A
Grandparent B
11
What constitutes a CHOW for Medicare purposes?
(a) What constitutes change of ownership—
(1) Partnership. In the case of a partnership, the removal, addition, or
substitution of a partner, unless the partners expressly agree otherwise, as
permitted by applicable State law, constitutes change of ownership.
(2) Unincorporated sole proprietorship. Transfer of title and property to
another party constitutes change of ownership.
(3) Corporation. The merger of the provider corporation into another
corporation, or the consolidation of two or more corporations, resulting in
the creation of a new corporation constitutes change of ownership.
Transfer of corporate stock or the merger of another corporation into
the provider corporation does not constitute change of ownership.
(4) Leasing. The lease of all or part of a provider facility constitutes change
of ownership of the leased portion. 42 CFR 489.18
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
12
What constitutes a CHOW from a state
perspective?
State licensure, CON, and Medicaid agencies vary in
their positions with respect to whether a transaction
constitutes a CHOW and whether any filings are
required for various transactions
– State licensure agencies typically look to whether there is a
change in the entity or individuals that control the operations
– Medicaid agencies often defer to whether there is a change in
Tax ID or NPI
– Certificate of Need agencies vary, and may defer to licensure in
their determination
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
13
Skilled Nursing Facilities: Medicare
CHOW Process
CHOW Process New Owner/Purchaser must submit a “buyer” CMS-855A no later
than 30 days post-closing (can be submitted pre-closing)
Former Owner/Buyer must submit a “seller” CMS-855A no later than 30 days post-closing.
The Bill of Sale or equivalent transaction document is required to complete processing
Medicare Administrative Contractor will make a recommendation to the Regional Office, which may done through the state survey agency.
State Certification – must submit certification materials for providers and certified suppliers and prepare for potential compliance surveys
Once certification is complete, CMS will provide tie-in notice indicating New Owner/Purchaser is enrolled as a Medicare provider
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
14
Skilled Nursing Facilities: Medicare
Change of Information Process
A CMS-855A change of information filing must be submitted no later than 90 days following the change
– Changes to the authorized or delegated officials must be
submitted within 30 days
– The provider should receive a letter from the MAC confirming that PECOS has been updated to reflect the change of information
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
15
Skilled Nursing Facilities: Medicare 855-A
Enrollment Initiatives Under the Affordable Care Act – Overhaul of CMS-855A enrollment form
Expanded Ownership Interest and/or Managerial Control Information – Section 5 (organizations) and Section 6 (individuals)
Disclosure of lenders, trusts, holding companies
Organizational structure diagram
Identification of management entity
Individual owners’ titles and birth places
Percentage of ownership
Identification of holding companies
Permission for MAC to request documents not listed on the 855
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
16
Skilled Nursing Facilities: What constitutes a
CHOW for State licensure purposes?
CHOW analysis and filing requirements vary state by state.
Colorado: “The Department shall consider the following criteria in determining whether there is a change of ownership of a health care entity that requires a new license: . . .
– (D) Limited Liability Companies:
(1) The transfer of at least 50 percent of the direct or indirect ownership interest in the company shall be considered a change of ownership.
(2) The termination or dissolution of the company and the conversion thereof into any other entity shall be considered a change of ownership if the conversion also includes a transfer of at least 50 percent of the direct or indirect ownership to one or more new owners.
(3) Change of ownership does not include transfers of ownership interest between existing members if the transaction does not involve the acquisition of ownership interest by a new member. For the purposes of this subsection, "member" means a person or entity with an ownership interest in the limited liability company.” 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter II, Part 2.7.3.
– A change of control typically requires an abbreviated filing.
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
17
Skilled Nursing Facilities: What constitutes a
CHOW for State licensure purposes?
Pennsylvania: “(a) A health care facility shall notify the Department in
writing at least 30 days prior to transfer involving 5% or more of the stock
or equity of the health care facility. (b) A health care facility shall notify the
Department in writing at least 30 days prior to a change in ownership or a
change in the form of ownership or name of the facility. A change of
ownership shall mean any transfer of the controlling interest in a health
care facility. (c) A health care facility shall notify the Department in writing
within 30 days after a change of management of a health care facility. A
change in management occurs when the person responsible for the day to
day operation of the health care facility changes.” 28 Pa. Code § 51.4
– The agency reviews transactions on a case by case basis, which may
require an initial filing detailing the transaction (10 questions).
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
18
Skilled Nursing Facilities: What constitutes a
CHOW for State licensure purposes?
Maryland: “Transfer or Assignment of License. If the sale, transfer,
assignment, or lease of a facility causes a change in the person or
persons who control or operate the facility, the facility shall be
considered a "new facility" and the licensee shall conform to all
regulations applicable at the time of transfer of operations. The
transfer of any stock which results in a change of the person or
persons who control the facility, or the transfer of any stock in
excess of 25 percent of the outstanding stock, constitutes a sale.”
COMAR 10.07.02.03B(6)
– The licensure agency typically considers only a change of the
operator to be a CHOW.
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
19
Skilled Nursing Facilities: What constitutes a
CHOW for State Medicaid purposes?
Medicaid Enrollment
States have varying approaches with respect to Medicaid
enrollment
Some look to Medicare or other state agencies for direction with
respect to CHOWs
If a CHOW, must file Enrollment Application with state Medicaid
agency (or state’s contracted entity (e.g., ACS))
Some states require providers to be enrolled with Medicare in order
to participate in Medicaid
Some states impose successor liability whether or not providers
choose to accept or reject the provider agreement
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
20
Skilled Nursing Facilities: What constitutes a
CHOW for State Medicaid purposes?
Massachusetts: If there is a change in indirect
ownership, without a change in NPI, EIN, etc., an
updated ownership disclosure is required following the
transaction.
New Jersey: If licensure considers a transaction to be
a change of ownership (even though no change in
operator, NPI, EIN, etc.), Medicaid typically requires
new enrollment applications.
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
21
Skilled Nursing Facilities: CON CHOW
Process
Certificate of Need (CON)
Notice and filing requirements vary among states with
CON laws
Some states require simple notification which may
entail minimal review
Others may have more detailed notice requirements,
possibly including public notice requirements, and
detailed application review
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
22
Skilled Nursing Facilities: What Constitutes
a CHOW for CON Purposes?
West Virginia: “’Acquire a Health Care Facility’ means to obtain by purchase, donation, lease, stock transfer or comparable arrangement a health care facility’s assets used in the provision of health services or a majority of stock, including the transfer of a health care facility from a subsidiary corporation to its parent corporation or vice versa or including a change or transfer of the licensee of the health care facility.” See W. Va. Code St. R. § 65-7-2.1
Georgia: “Any person who acquires a health care facility [including a nursing home] by stock or asset purchase, merger, consolidation, or other lawful means shall notify the [Department of Community Health] of such acquisition, the date thereof, and the name and address of the acquiring person.” See O.C.G.A. § 31-6-40.1(a)
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
23
Skilled Nursing Facilities: Other CHOW
Requirements
Other facility-specific permits and authorizations may be required,
including, but not limited to:
Food Service
Pharmacy Permits
Accreditation
Certificate of Occupancy
General business license
Fictitious name registration
Beautician/barber permit
Radioactive materials permit
Solid waste handling permit
Passenger elevator operating permits
Boiler permits
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
24
Skilled Nursing Facilities: CHOW Implications if Landlord
Must Terminate Relationship With Operator
Landlord cannot bring in a new Operator without
regulatory approval
If Operator refuses to vacate, a court order may be
necessary for regulators to approve replacement
Operator
Regulators may expedite review process so that
resident care is not impacted
Exiting Operator Cost Reports
Transaction documents evidencing transfer
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
25
Skilled Nursing Facilities: CHOW
Implications for Internal Reorganizations
Internal Reorganizations
Example – presuming that the operating entity is Corp A, its parent is Corp B, the grandparent is Corp C, and the great-grandparent is Corp D, which is owned by individuals, and both Corp A and Corp B are transferred to a related entity owned by Corp D, regulators tend to view this as not constituting a CHOW, as the direct parent of the operating entity is not changing
Nonetheless, because certain previously disclosed information is changing, states may require an update filing to its application, most likely the submission of a new ownership disclosure
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
26
Skilled Nursing Facilities: CHOW
Implications for Sale of Real Estate
Sale of Real Estate
Common for operations and real estate to be held by unrelated entities
In the event of a sale of the real estate (i.e., bricks and mortar), there may be filing requirements.
Usually the state CON agency is the agency most concerned with sale of real estate and may consider it a CHOW under the CON regulations
CON is often tied to the land, and the owner of the real estate may hold the CON and leases the right to the property as well as the right to operate to the operator
Often formal notification / request for exemption from CON review will be required
State licensure often views these transactions as not triggering CHOWs.
However, they may require formal notification and submission of
transaction documents (i.e., bill of sale, new lease agreements)
Medicare and Medicaid typically require little to no action under these
circumstances
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
27
Skilled Nursing Facilities: CHOW
Implications for Change of Manager
Management Agreements
Some states explicitly regulate the management entity for the facility and
subject this entity to the same review process as the operating entity
Accordingly, when such management entity changes, some states may require CHOW filings similar to that seen for operating entities
If Operator relinquishes all operational authority, change in manager could trigger a CHOW
For example: If the governing body of a health care facility does not retain the "immediate authority and jurisdiction" to do the following, Rhode Island considers there to be a "change in operator"— – Hire or fire the chief executive officer of the health care facility;
– Maintain and control the books and records of the health care facility;
– Dispose of assets and incur liabilities on behalf of the health care facility;
– Adopt and enforce policies regarding operation of the health care facility.
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
www.mwe.com
Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Frankfurt Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan Munich New York Orange County Paris Rome Seoul Silicon Valley Washington, D.C.
Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices (Shanghai) © 2014 McDermott Will & Emery. The following legal entities are collectively referred to as "McDermott Will & Emery," "McDermott" or "the Firm": McDermott Will & Emery LLP, McDermott Will & Emery AARPI, McDermott Will & Emery Belgium LLP, McDermott Will & Emery Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater LLP, McDermott Will & Emery Studio Legale Associato and McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP. These entities coordinate their activities through service agreements. This communication may be considered attorney advertising. Previous results are not a guarantee of future outcome.
Impact on Hospitals and ASCs
July 23, 2014
Monica Wallace
Impact on Hospitals
CHOW rules apply to all providers (42 CFR 489.2(b))
Hospitals, including critical access hospitals and long-
term care hospitals, are providers
Complex transaction structures
– Medicare enrollment terminology
• Standard CHOW, Consolidation, Acquisition/Merger
– Survey and Certification terminology
• Acquisition, Combination
29
Impact on Hospitals
Acquisitions
– Person or entity purchases or leases a certified hospital
– With or without combination
– Automatic assignment of provider agreement
– New owner may reject assignment
30
Impact on Hospitals
Combination
– Two or more certified hospitals are combined under one provider agreement and one CCN
– One location becomes the main location and the remaining locations become provider-based
• Must satisfy provider-based criteria
• Must demonstrate compliance with applicable Medicare regulations as one hospital
– Medicare provider agreement subsumed (not terminated)
– CCN retired (not terminated)
– May have negative impact on participation or payment
31
Impact on Hospitals
Combination With Acquisition
– Owner of existing Medicare provider agreement acquires one or more
new providers and combines all or some of them under one Medicare
provider agreement
Combination Without Acquisition
– Owner of existing Medicare provider agreement combines two or more
providers the owner already owns under one Medicare provider
agreement
– No opportunity to accept or reject automatic assignment of Medicare
provider agreement
32
Impact on Hospitals
Mission Regional Hospital Medical Center (Mission) DAB CR
1248 (2011)
– Mission acquired assets of South Coast Medical Center (South Coast)
on 6/30/09
– South Coast voluntarily terminated its provider agreement and Mission
expressly declined to accept automatic assignment of South Coast’s
provider agreement
– Mission submitted a CMS-855A adding South Coast’s location as a
new Mission practice location effective 7/1/09 and intending to bill
under Mission’s CCN
33
Impact on Hospitals
Mission (Cont’d)
– CMS notified Mission that it could not bill for services at the new
location until a full Medicare certification survey was performed and
CMS determined that applicable Medicare requirements were met
which was 3/18/10
– DAB held Mission not entitled to Medicare reimbursement for services
provided at the new location from 7/1/09 to 3/18/10
– District Court affirmed DAB’s decision and rejected Mission’s request
for $1.4 million in Medicare reimbursement for services provided at the
new location
34
Impact on Hospitals
September 2013 CMS Policy Memorandum
– Issued to State Survey Agency Directors
– Confirmed that new owners that do not accept automatic assignment but want to participate in Medicare will be considered new enrollment applicants, subject to a lengthy enrollment period and unable to bill for services retroactively
– Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) must not complete review of CMS-855 until after the acquisition complete
– Initial certification surveys must not be conducted until after the acquisition is complete and the MAC issues its recommendation
– Initial surveys that take place shortly after acquisition will be suspect
– Reiterated outcome in Mission
35
Impact on Hospitals
Not uncommon for processing of initial enrollments to take
upwards of a year
Most transactions involving hospitals tend to be structured as
equity transactions or transactions involving acceptance of
the Medicare provider agreement
36
Impact on Hospitals
Notify applicable CMS Regional Office Survey and
Certification staff whether new owner will accept or reject
automatic assignment
– 45 days in advance
Notify applicable MAC by submitting CMS-855A
– CHOW may be reported up to 90 days in advance of effective date
– Ownership changes must be reported within 30 days following change
– Include detailed cover letter describing transaction
– Must submit final sales agreement/bill of sale before MAC processing
can be completed
37
Impact on Hospitals
State Medicaid CHOW Processing
– May or may not follow Medicare rules
– Typically new enrollment triggered
– Effective date of billing privileges key
38
Impact on ASCs
CHOW rules apply to suppliers that have category-specific
agreements with the Secretary of DHHS or must file cost reports
ASCs have agreements with the Secretary
Treated like providers despite enrolling in Medicare using CMS-
855B
– Limitations of CMS-855B
Issued new PTAN even if accept assignment
Mission equivalent?
State Medicaid CHOW Processing
39
Change of Ownership: Implications for Home
Health Agencies and Hospice Providers
Presented by Jessica Grozine, Esq.
Sponsored by the Legal Publishing Group of Strafford Publications
July 23, 2014
41
Home Health & Hospice CHOWs
Licensure and Certificate of Need Issues
State Specific Issues and Obstacles
Medicare CHOW Rules
– The 36 Month Rule for Home Health Agencies
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
42
HHA & Hospice: Licensure and CON Issues
CON Varies By State
– Home Health and Hospice is often exempted from CON
Deal Structure Can Impact Licensure and CON Timing
– Change of Ownership v. Change of Control
– Consolidation of existing providers / addition of practice
locations
Compliance with conditions of participation in structuring
creative transactions
– Employing Key Hospice Personnel
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
43
HHA & Hospice: Licensure and CON Issues
Multi-Site Licensure Issues
– Certain states license each location separately
– Proximity of locations
– Limitations on the number of inpatient units per license
– Staffing ratios
Scope of CON
– Radius or county limitations
– Size of operation
– Contiguous county rules
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
44
HHA & Hospice: State Specific CHOW
Determinations
Determination of CHOW v. Change of Control
Florida Licensure: “Change of ownership” means:
– (a) An event in which the licensee sells or otherwise transfers its ownership to a different individual or entity as evidenced by a change in federal employer identification number or taxpayer identification number; or
– b) An event in which 51 percent or more of the ownership, shares, membership, or controlling interest of a licensee is in any manner transferred or otherwise assigned. This paragraph does not apply to a licensee that is publicly traded on a recognized stock exchange.
– A change solely in the management company or board of directors is not a change of ownership. Florida Stat. 408.803(5).
Alabama CON: “(1) Any change in ownership of an existing health care facility, other than a stock purchase only, shall require that a notice of change in ownership be provided to the State Agency by the acquiring entity at least thirty (30) days before the transaction occurs.” Ala. Admin. Code r. 410-1-7-.04.
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
45
HHA & Hospice: Planning for Acquisitions
Ability to add new provider to existing Medicaid number
– Adding additional practice sites
Delays in application processing
– Licensure
– State Survey for Medicare
– Medicaid
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
46
HHA: Navigating the 36-Month Rule
The 36-Month Rule Applies to HHA Transactions
– 42 C.F.R. 424.550(b)(1)
– Goal is to prevent the “flipping” of HHA provider agreements and
to ensure that purchasers satisfy the Medicare Conditions of
Participation
Revisions since initial introduction in 2010
– CMS issued a transmittal that was subsequently rescinded
– Final Rule went into effect on January 1, 2011
CMS maintains that it will continue to monitor the rule
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
47
HHA: Navigating the 36-Month Rule
If there is a “change in majority ownership” within 36 months of
initial Medicare enrollment, or within 36 months following a change
in majority ownership, the provider agreement and Medicare billing
privileges do not convey to the new owner.
– The prospective owner must:
Enroll in the Medicare program as a new provider; and
Obtain a State survey or an accreditation from an approved
accreditation organization
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
48
HHA: Navigating the 36-Month Rule
What Constitutes a “Change in Majority Ownership”?
– An individual or organization acquires more than a 50
percent direct ownership interest (use of holding
companies avoids the 36-Month Rule)
– Including asset sale, stock transfer, merger, or
consolidation
– CMS will look to the cumulative effect of transactions
within the applicable 36 month period
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
49
HHA: Navigating the 36-Month Rule
Exceptions to the rule:
– The existing HHA has submitted two consecutive years of full cost reports
following initial enrollment in Medicare or within 36 months after the HHA’s most
recent change in majority ownership
Low utilization or no utilization cost reports do not qualify for the exception
– The HHA’s parent company is undergoing an internal corporate restructuring,
such as a merger or consolidation
– The owners of the existing HHA are changing the HHA’s existing business
structure, such as from a corporation to a limited liability company, and the
owners remain the same
– An individual owner of the HHA dies
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
50
HHA: Navigating the 36-Month Rule
Implications for HHA Transactions – Analyze implications prior to entering into any transaction
– Structuring your organization
– Consider adding holding companies
– Address short and long-term goals for the company from the outset of
the transaction
– Include warranties regarding changes of majority ownership in the deal
documents
– Make closing date contingent on the occurrence of an exception
– If necessary, build in time for new enrollment and certification
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
51
HHA & Hospice: Transaction Structures
Creative structures can streamline the process – Change in control v. CHOW
Acquisitions by existing providers offer the most potential for creative structures – Consolidation
– Merger
– Consider successor liability issues
Addition of Practice Locations – Must review state licensure proximity requirements and other
licensure limitations
Capitalization Requirements for HHAs – Applies to new enrollment and CHOWs (if the change of ownership
results in a new provider number being issued).
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
www.mwe.com
Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Frankfurt Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan Munich New York Orange County Paris Rome Seoul Silicon Valley Washington, D.C.
Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices (Shanghai) © 2014 McDermott Will & Emery. The following legal entities are collectively referred to as "McDermott Will & Emery," "McDermott" or "the Firm": McDermott Will & Emery LLP, McDermott Will & Emery AARPI, McDermott Will & Emery Belgium LLP, McDermott Will & Emery Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater LLP, McDermott Will & Emery Studio Legale Associato and McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP. These entities coordinate their activities through service agreements. This communication may be considered attorney advertising. Previous results are not a guarantee of future outcome.
Accepting Automatic Assignment
July 23, 2014
Monica Wallace
Accepting Automatic Assignment
Pros
–No break in Medicare participation
• Approved Accrediting Organization may extend
Medicare deemed status
– Will conduct an extension survey within 6 months
53
Accepting Automatic Assignment
Pros
–No break in Medicare payments
• New owner may bill during CHOW processing
– Payments sent to prior owner’s bank account until CHOW processed
– Purchase agreement should specify billing procedures
– CMS not bound by parties’ agreement
• New owner may wait to bill until after CHOW processed
– Payments retroactive to CHOW effective date
54
Accepting Automatic Assignment
Pros
–New owner entitled to any underpayments, including
those related to reimbursement appeals
–Data for IPPS calculations continue, including:
• Cost to charge ratio, wage index reclassification, GME
residency slots, EHR incentive payments
55
Accepting Automatic Assignment
Pros
– Hospital IPPS-excluded statuses continue as long as all requirements are met, including:
• Psychiatric hospital or unit, rehabilitation hospital or unit, long-term care hospital
– Special payment classifications continue as long as all requirements are met, including:
• Sole community hospital, transplant center, indirect GME costs, disproportionate share hospital
–
56
Accepting Automatic Assignment
Pros
–Grandfathering retained, including:
• Critical access hospital necessary provider
determination, co-location and provider-based distance
–Provider-based status retained depending upon
acquisition structure
57
Accepting Automatic Assignment
Cons
–New owner responsible for:
• Plans of correction
• Health and safety standards
• Ownership and financial disclosure requirements
• Compliance with Civil Rights requirements
58
Accepting Automatic Assignment
Cons
– New owner responsible for all known and unknown Medicare liabilities including any Medicare overpayments
• Regardless of who had ownership of the Medicare agreement at the time the overpayment was discovered
• Liabilities may result from billing noncompliance, financial relationships with referral sources, violations of conditions of participation or enrollment
• Liabilities may carry CMP or FCA risk
• Limited exception for fraud by prior owner
59
Change of Ownership:
- Rejecting a Seller’s Medicare Provider Agreement
- CHOW Best Practices
Presented by Jessica Grozine, Esq.
Sponsored by the Legal Publishing Group of Strafford Publications
July 23, 2014
61
Rejecting a Medicare Provider Agreement
New owners have the option to reject automatic assignment,
resulting in the termination of the prior Medicare provider
agreement.
If the new owner rejects assignment, the new provider is treated as
an initial applicant and will experience a period of time without
Medicare payments.
Generally, rejecting assignment precludes the new owner from
having successor liability for Medicare overpayments.
Purchaser must affirmatively reject the assignment of the provider
agreement by notifying the Regional Office in writing at least 45
days in advance of the CHOW’s effective date.
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
62
September 2013 CMS Memorandum
On September 6, 2013, CMS issued a policy memorandum to State
Survey Agency (SA) Directors regarding the CHOW process and the
assignment of Medicare provider agreements to new owners. The
memorandum emphasized policies meant to encourage automatic
assignment of the prior Medicare agreement.
CMS focused on survey timing in particular, stating that if an initial survey
of an applicant that rejected assignment is conducted shortly after the
CHOW date, it raises significant doubts that the survey was unannounced.
CMS also stated that SAs must not conduct initial surveys until they are
able to complete their higher priority workload. Also, CMS clarified that the
last day of an initial Medicare survey conducted by the SA or accreditation
organization will not necessarily be the effective date of the new Medicare
provider agreement.
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
63
CHOW Best Practices
Consider a variety of structures in planning an acquisition or sale
Contact state agencies to discuss implications of each transaction and the filing requirements
Consider liabilities that may be assumed in each transaction and whether they can or should be avoided.
Be mindful of deadlines for reporting CHOWs and changes of information
Understand cash flow implications of transaction
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
For more information, please contact:
All rights reserved. This presentation is intended to provide general information on various regulatory and legal
issues. It is NOT intended to serve as legal advice or counsel on any particular situation or circumstance.
© 2014. Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
Hedy Rubinger, Esq.
404.873.8724
Jessica Grozine, Esq.
404.873.8526
Monica Wallace
312.984.7757
© 2014. McDermott Will & Emery