This book has been translated from Indonesian into English
and published with financial support from UNESCO Office,
Jakarta under UN Joint Programming in Telukdalam, South
Nias within the framework of UNDP Aceh-Nias Emergency
Response and Transitional Recovery (ERTR) Programme.
The author is responsible for the choice and the presentation
of the facts contained in this book and for the opinions
expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of
UNESCO.
ISBN 979-98772-1-0
First printing in Indonesian 2005
First printing in English 2007
English translation by: Gaura Mancacaritadipura
For futher information, please contact:
Medan Archeological Office
Jalan Seroja Raya, Gang Arkeologi
Medan Tuntungan, Medan 20134
Indonesia
Tel. (061) 8224363, 8224365
Fax. (061) 8224365
© Medan Archeological Office, 2007
This book has been translated from Indonesian into English
and published with financial support from UNESCO Office,
Jakarta under UN Joint Programming in Telukdalam, South
Nias within the framework of UNDP Aceh-Nias Emergency
Response and Transitional Recovery (ERTR) Programme.
The author is responsible for the choice and the presentation
of the facts contained in this book and for the opinions
expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of
UNESCO.
ISBN 979-98772-1-0
First printing in Indonesian 2005
First printing in English 2007
English translation by: Gaura Mancacaritadipura
For futher information, please contact:
Medan Archeological Office
Jalan Seroja Raya, Gang Arkeologi
Medan Tuntungan, Medan 20134
Indonesia
Tel. (061) 8224363, 8224365
Fax. (061) 8224365
© Medan Archeological Office, 2007
North Sumatra Heritage Series No. 0105
MEGALITHIC TRADITIONS
IN NIAS ISLAND
Lucas Partanda Koestoro <& Ketut Wiradnyana L
I
i
OWedan Archeological Office ¡s a
Technical Work Unit of the Department of
Culture and Tourism. It is under the National
Centre for Research and Development of
Archelogy, and conducts archeological
research within its working region which
encompasses the provinces of Nanggroe
Aceh Damssalam, Riau Islands, Riau, West
Sumatra, and North Sumatra. In order to
cany out this task, the Medan Archeological
Office has the following functions:
a. to carry out collection, maintenance,
preservation and presentation of articles
having cultural and scientific value in
connection with archeological research;
b. documentation and scientific study
related to the results of research;
d. giving educative and cultural guidance
to the public regarding objects of
cultural and scientific value related
to archeology.
In this connection, it may be said
that the work field of Medan Archeological
Office is cultural relics and their sites
with the goal of history and historical
cultural values of our nation. To achieve
this, the working method or procedure is
research collection and analysis of
data as interpretation of history.
The expected output is in the form of
propositions on the cultural history of our
nation and service providing archeological
information which it is hoped can be used
for various interests.
c. providing information and dissemination
of the results of research; Cover: Gowe in Onowaembo, Nias.
'Edítoríaí(Board'North Sumatra Heritage Series
Chairman : Ery Soedewo
Secretary : Suriatanti Supriyadi
Committee : Den! Sutrisna
Repelita Wahyu Oetomo
""iPS
Ä ShörtWörd fröm'the Publisher
Ctiis time we are publishing the writings
of the research staff of Medan Archaeological
Office regarding an object of study which
falls within the working area of Medan
Archaeological Office. Part of the working
area of this body consists of the islands
which stretch in the waters along the western
coast of Sumatra - known as the Indian
Ocean - beginning from Simeulue Island in
Nanggroe Aceh Damssalam Province as far
as the Mentawai Islands in West Sumatra
Province. One among this chain of islands
is Nias Island in North Sumatra Province.
Some experts believe that the inhabitants of
this island, who call themselves Ono Niha
(Nias People), are one of the first waves of
Austronesian speaking peoples who came
to the Nusantara Archipelago from some
place in mainland Asia. Evidence of the most
ancient civilization of the Nias people is
related to the growth and development of
megalithic traditions (megalith literally means
large stone), which are still visible till the
present day. Although part of this tradition
(for example, the constmction of megalithic
monuments) has disappeared with the
coming and development of Christian religion,
yet parts of the tradition still exist till this day
(in the form of traditional ceremonies). The
existence of relics of the ancestors of the
people of Nias such as statues of forefathers,
ceremonial tables, stone pillars etc,
and houses built using traditional local
architecture, and also customary ceremonies,
along with Nias' natural beauty, are objects
which attract tourists to the island.
However, we greatly regret that the
preservation of these evidences of the culture
ofthe ancestors ofthe Nias people has now
begun to be threatened because ofirresponsible hands which have caused these
artefacts to be damaged and to disappear.
Vandalism and theft of a number of megalithic
artefacts of Nias will unconsciously but surely
influence the understanding ofthe people of
Nias regarding their very own identity.
Damage to the cultural heritage of Nias by
human beings has now been even more
aggravated by natural disasters which hit
parts ofthe westem coast of Sumatra Island,
including Nias Island. The earthquake and
tsunami which occurred at the end of
December 2004 (with its epicentre off the
west coast of Aceh) did not only claim the
lives of hundreds of thousands of people,
and destruction of property, but also
devastated a number of cultural relics in Nias
island. The situation became even more
serious when around 22.55 WIB at night in
the beginning of March 2005 a terrible
earthquake occurred, and this time the
epicentre was not far from Nias island. The
consequence of this earthquake was once
again the loss of many lives due to collapse
of buildings, total destruction of property, and
devastation of cultural relics of Nias island.
Considering the important significance ofthe
cultural heritage in Nias, not only for the Nias
people, but also for the entire Indonesian
nation, action should immediately be taken
to save and preserve the national cultural
heritage in this island. Efforts to save and
presen/e this heritage will not only be useful
merely in ideological interests, but will also
bring benefits for more practical human
needs, or in other words they will bring
benefits towards inaeasing the prosperity of
the people.
The publication of this book is one
manifestation of the main duty of the Medan
Archaeological Office; namely, dissemination
of archaeological information. We hope that
through this book, the general public will
come to know of the cultural wealth of their
country, which will lead to the development
of a better understanding ofthe meaning of
our cultural heritage, and from this condition,
we hope that real appreciation of its existence
may grow.
We would like to thank UNESCO Office,
Jakarta under UN Joint Programming in
Telukdalam, South Nias Within UNDP Aceh-
Nias ERTR Programme which has provided
financial support for the translation of this
book from Indonesian into English and for
the reproduction of the book first printed in
Indonesian in 2005 .
The Publisher.
I
I
Preface
I
1
CToias Island is located in the north¬
western corner of Nusantara, occupying a
small area of the vast Indonesian Ocean.
Nias Island holds a unique, attractive and
exotic cultural potential. Various publications
in the form of research reports, books,
documentary films and exposes in the mass
media have presented the exotic life of the
residents of this island. Icons such as orno
hada Nias (traditional Nias house), hombo
batu (jumping over stone hurdles), maena
baluse (war dance), and others often appear
in presentations regarding this island located
in the Indonesian Ocean.
It can be said for certain that until recently,
tourists came to Nias Island (along with its
sun'ounding islands) not just to surf or enjoy
the island's natural panorama, but also to
witness Nias' unique culture. The existence
and preservation of part of this unique culhjre
is now most regretably threatened.
We often hear munmured womes that various
physical forms which are remnants of the
culture of the people of Nias may at some
time become extinct. We know that just a
few years ago there were many thefts and
sales of megalithic statues and otiier objects
which are relics of the old culture of the
people of Nias, whilst recently there were
threats that more objects might disappear
as a consequence of the tsunami which
came at the end of 2004. This was followed
by a devastating earthquake which shook
the island at the beginning of 2005. So many
traditional houses, old villages and megalitiiic
sites along with their various attractive
componentswere damaged. These
occurences naturally magnified existing
fears.
More serious treatment is clearly needed to
presen/e the culture of Nias. We should also
begin to optimize the utilization and
development of this culture. Government
policy in this regard should actually involve
the whole community. The people of Nias as
the practitioners of this kind of culture need
policies which motivate efforts to preserve
the material culture of Nias, and at the same
time stimulate utilization which will be able
to encourage economic development for the
people. We should also not neglect
consen/ation ofthe environment which makes
it possible for cultural activities to remain
viable and healthy, providing employment
as a source of Income, education for
increasing intelligence, skill and policies
which proceed smoothly. The same applies
to local wisdom which has belonged to the
people since fonner times as the heritage of
their forefathers. This local wisdom surely
needs to be applied in responding to existing
opportunities in order to create a prosperous
life for the people.
In this connection, this simple book on cultural
sources which can be said to be closely
related to megalithic tradition found
strangely enough on a relatively small piece
of land in the midst of the vast waters of the
Indonesian Oceanis an effort to provide
an understanding of the values contained
therein. We must realize tiiat in any case, in
tills life, human beings need a min-or so that
at every moment they may regulate and
an'ange their daily living behaviour. Living in
a wortd which feels as if it is "shrinking",
human beings need an understanding of
their own culture, besides being acquainted
witii the culture of other societies. In a broader
context, we need to arrange so that "clashes'
and "friction" resulting in losses to all parties
may not easily occur.
This book also accomodates a desire to
contribute knowledge and understanding
regarding the cultural sources of Nias in
connection with efforts to utilize them for
various wider interests. This is all the more
so when we remember tiie desire of the local
people to achieve prosperity in their lives.
The development carried out by the
govemment along with segments of society
still require information on the island's
cultural wealth and power.
In this way we have completed this book.
Assistance from various parties has helped
to accelerate tine finishing of tiie manuscript
to that it could reach the hands ofthe readers.
It is proper that we express our deepest
gratitude to all those who have contributed
by playing their various roles, especially our
collleagues at the Medan Archeological
Office.
Furthennore, just as there is never a piece
of ivory entirely free from cracks, in tiie same
way, we are always ready to accept critique
and suggestions for the improvement of Unis
book in the future. Thus we complete our
preface, and happy reading. Ya'ahowu I
Medan, the end of November 2005.
The Authors.
\
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A Short Word from the PublisherPreface
Table of Contents
Introduction
First Part:Nature AND Environment
Chapter I. Natural Environment
Chapter II. Location and Social Environment
Part Two:History and Cultural Diversity
Chapter III. History and Culture
Chapter IV. Megaliths and the Prehistoric Era
Part Three:Environment and Ancient Relics
Chapter V. Megalithic Relics in Nias Island
Chapter VI. Ancient Relics and Environmental Connections
Chapter VII. Osas and Human Statues Smuggled Out of Nias Island
Part Four:Nias in 2005
Chapter VIII. Conclusion
Bibliography
Introduction
Cyi ias Island is known to possess many
relics in the megalithic tradition, in various
forms, Including traditional customs. The
existence of these objects is often related to
folklore which has developed among local
society mentioning that there had been a
submigration of people from the Naga
community of Assam to Nias Island.
Results of archeological activity in Nias Island
indicate that the existence of a community
there far precedes the megalithic age, and
is related to the paleolithic age, from which
have been discovered relic artefactsstone
tools in the area of the course of the Muzoi
River. The same may be said of artefacts
and ecofacts from the Tögi Ndrawa Cave
site. Carbon dating analysis on samples of
moluscs from this site taken at a depth of
two meters below the surface indicate that
there had been human activities here at
period of 7.890 + 120 BP, or around eight
thousand years ago; while samples from a
depth of 4 meters are known to have come
from an era of 12.170 ± 400 BP, or around
twelve thousand years ago.
In connection with megalithic objects which
will be the topic of our discussion here, from
the results of his research, Geldern (1932;
1945) considers typologically that Indonesia
received megalithic influences from South-
Easl Asia in two waves during different
periods of time. However, later on other
experts have mentioned that the forms of
megaliths in Indonesia do not support
Geldem's opinion (Soejono ei al, 1993). It is
mentioned that megalithic tradition inspired
by ancestor spirit worship had an important
position in Indonesia because it provided a
fimi living basis for subsequent development,
especially preceding the arrival of Hindu-
Buddhist influences in subsequent eras.
Examples of the importance of megalithic
tradition can be cleariy seen in certain places
such as Nias, Bali, Sumba and otiiers, which
even now have ongoing megalithic h'aditions
(Wales,1953; Heekeren,1958; Mulia,1981).
As is the case with other parts of Nusantara
(Indonesia, Ed.), Nias and its sunounding
islands have also experienced times of
interaction with other peoples and cultures.
Overall, this is related to the classical eras
in Indonesia, tiie era ofthe coming of Islam,
followed by the era of Western influence
along with its Christian religion. For the local
inhabitants, megalithic traditions remain a
basis for responding to contact, exchange,
absorbtion and changes of culture which
occur. Its dynamics still leave traces in the
remnants of its material culture.
During the period of the Dutch occupation
of Indonesia, Nias Island was an island which
experienced the same problem as other
1areas. Villages which had originally been
built on hilltops were later moved to roadsides
mostiy located on tiie sides or bases of hills.
The reason for this action was more related
to facilitating Dutch efforts to maintain
observation and surveilance ofthe activities
of tiie people of the island. As a result of tiiis
action, many archeological relics were not
brought along to the present village sites.
Until around Uie 1950s, megalithic tradition
in Nias Island could still be said to be a living
monument, wherein several big ceremonies
performed by groups among the people
would be carried on by the erection of a
megalitiiic building (owasa), albeit on a small
scale. The condition of megalithic relics
abandoned by tiie people w/ho had previously
supported them resulted in these relics
becoming easily succeptable to theft of
Protected Cultural Objects or Benda Cagar
Budaya (BCB). Some megalithic relics
which were no longer living monuments
shifted in function, which caused them
to be easily damaged or bought and
sold as souvenirs.
We hope that this small book can give an
illustration regarding the form and function
of tiie cultural heritage of tiie people of Nias,
as well as acquaint the readers with the
various aspects of life which go on in the
island, in the form of written information
regarding some of these objects.
There is also a beneflt for the people of
Indonesia in general and the people of Nias
in particular, especially in relation to the
technological', social and ideological
developments in efforts to fomi an identity.
As an effort to document objects of cultural
history, the result of this activity will also be
useful for informing and promoting various
objects and varieties, and at the same time
we will leam more about tiie present condition
of these objects. Thus we will be able to
know the potential of these objects in our
efforts to presen/e, utilize and develop them.
If we are able to know of all the aspects
sun-ounding these historical cultural objects,
then a stronger and growing potential for
tourism will develop in order to increase
foreign exchange income of our country as
well as original local income, which will at
the same time have an effect upon the
prosperity of the local people.
10
Part One:Nature and Environment
<V.**t"
%
¡i?--^''
<^: \i..
mñ'''.t^4^' > y »Pb8l> !
m
ü
-í»?^:*
Chapter i.Natural Environment
Geographical Condition
Cyo las Island is located in tiie south-west
of tiie Province of North Sumati'a, around 85
nautical miles from the port of Sibolga on
the mainland ofthe island of Sumatra. Nias
Island is Uie largest of the 1 32 islands which
make up the Nias region, with an area of
5,449.70 km^. Tfie distiicts of Nias and Soutii
Nias togeUier have an area of 5,625 km^, or
7.8 % of the area of the Province of North
Sumatra. (BPS Kabupaten Nias, 2003).
Geographically, Nias Island lies between 0°
12' - r 32' North Latitude and 97°- 98"
East Longitude. Nias Island shares borders
with Pulau Banyak in Nanggroe Aceh
Darussalam Province to the north; Pulau
Mursala in the district of Central Tapanuli to
the east; Pulau Mentawai in West Sumatra
Province to the south; and to the west it
directiy borders tiie Indonesian Ocean (SPS
Kabupaten Nias, 2003).
The Topography of Nias Island consists of
narrow sleep hills and mountains with an
elevation up to 800 meters above sea level.
Some 24% of the total area of the island
consists of low to undulating land, 28.8%
undulating to hilly land, and 51.2% hilly to
mountainous land {BPS Kabupaten
Nias, 2003). The lowlands found on the
edges of Nias Island are coral cliffs which
make access to the island from the sea
difficult. The mountainous area is in the
interior of the island.
12
According to sampling conducted by the Nias
District Statistics Centre (1 977}, Nias District
which is located in the Indonesian Ocean
has a high average rainfall of 3,145.1
millimeters per annum. It has an average of
273 days of heavy rain per year, or around
23 rainy days every month. The high rainfall
causes the natural condition of Nias to be
humid and wet. The temperature varies
between 14.3° - 30.4° Celdus with a relative
humidity of around 80-90%, and a wind speed
of 5-6 knots. The labile geographic stmcture
and high rainfall often cause mud slides
followed by shifting of river courses.
13
The Oyó and Eho rivers are two among the east direction. Anticlines and synclines do
few rivers which empty into the ocean on the * 'not join, and some incline straight down
west coast of Nias Island, The big surf which ^ towards the nortti-west or south-east TTiere
constantiy pounds the west coast along with Çu is an upward shift at a slope of 30°- 40°which
the scarcity of satisfactory natural landing *> Norms the junction between congkimerate and
places have resulted in no ports developing *^}^ older sedimentary rock. This rising shift is
on that side of the island. The reverse is ttie i^>-,'' ^ut by a flat and normal shift. The tectonic
case on the east coast of the island, where i process began during the Oligocène age
many rivers flow into the ocean. Some of which produced complex rising shifting,
ttiese rivers are ttie Muzoi, Gidö, kJanö Gawö, ^, - to the extent that ttie conglomerate rocks
Nalawo, 'Á, . i.:^ai¿, ... -^ . «ssn»..
Mezaya, and
Sungai Sa'ua.
The east coast
of Nias, which
faces the west
coast ofSumatra is
more
favourable for
the setting up
of ports, as we
may see today.
Stratographtc View of a Cliff on tfie Muzoi Rivef
Geographical Condition
Geographically speaking, Nias Island is in
an outer ring area which does not have any
volcanoes. We may present the following
information regarding the geographical
condition of Nias Island based on Uie report
of the Centre for Acheotogical Reseach in
Nias in 1997.
finished up on the surface. At around ttie
level of the conglomerate strata,
sedimentation occured forming Leiematua
and Gomo from the early Miocene till
Pliocene ages. During the Pliocene till
Pleistocene ages, lifting and twisting involving
all rock strata took place. (Driwantoro, 2003).
The geographical structure of Nias Island is
In the form of folds, shifted and straight,
generally oriented in a north-west - south-
Tectonic activity in the Nias Island area is
süli going on to ttie present day. Tîiis is shown
in layers with tertiary deposits from the
14
Gunung Sitoli formation. The existence of
Nias Island is delemiined by four coTelated
supporting factors, namely;
1. Aluvium sedimenting the rivers, swamps
and coast consisting of fragmented limestone,
sand, mud and clay. The aluvium is around
2-5 m. thick.
2. The Gunung Sitoli Formation comprising
well stratified and weakly folded reef
limestone, fine grain limestone, calcified
sandstone, fine silicate sandstone, red clay
and sandy clay. The age of this fomiation is
around Plio-Plelstocene and is sedimented
in the shallow marine area overiaying the
Gomo and Leiematua formations(Bemmelen, 1949). This fomiation is situated
in the northern part of Nias island, with a
thickness of 120m.
3. The Gomo Formation comprising clay,
red clay, sandstone, limestone, red clay tuff,
tuff and well stratifiedand strongly
folded peat. The ¡ntersedimentary
structure is generally parallel. This
fomnation contains fossils of Foraminifera
plankton consisting of Orbulinauniversa D'ORBIGNY, Globigerina
venezuelena HEDBERG, Globorotalla
manardii D'ORBIGNY, Sphaeroidinella
subdihiscens BLOW, Globoqudrina altispira
CUSHMAN & JARVIS, Sphaeroidinellopsis
seminulina PARKER & JONES,Hastigerina aequilateralis BRADY,
Foraminifera bentos Uvigerina sp., Gyrodina
sp., Panulina sp., Laticarinina sp., Pygro sp.,
and Nodosaria sp. (Pumamaningsih, 1988).
The age of this formation is around Middle
MioceneEariy Pleocene, sedimented in
subliloral - batial areas. Besides
Foraminifera, this formation also contains
various kinds of moluscs. The thickness of
this formation is around 1250-2500 m with
the deepest part parallel to the Leiematua
Formation and overiayed by the Gunung
Sitoli Formation. This formation is found in
the Gomo area in South Nias.
4. The Leiematua Formation, consisting of
sandstone, clay rock, silicate rock,
conglomerate and tuff interspersed with
tiiin fragments of coal. This fomiation is well
stratified and sti'ongly folded. The fomiation
contains fossils of Foraminifera plankton,
including; Hastigerina aequilateralis
BRADY, Globorotallia mayen CUSHMAN
& ELLISOR, Globigerinoides dimlnutus
BOLLI, Globigerinoides trilobus REUSS,
Praeofbulina glomerosa BLOW, Globorotalla
peripheroronda BLOW & BANNER,
Globogrinoides subquadratus BRONNIMAN,
Globigerinoide sicanus DE STEFANI,
Globogerinoides immaturus LEROY,
Globorotalla lenquaenesis BOLLI,
Globorotalla immaturus LEROY,
Globorotalla obesa BOLLI, Globorotalla
menardii D'ORBIGNY, Orbolina sp.,
Globigeropsis sp., Globigerinita sp.,
Globigerina sp. (Pumamaningsih, 1988).
I
15
Flora and Fauna of Nias
Nias ¡s a sufficiently large island in the
Indonesian Ocean which possesses a rich
biological diversity. Plants found in tiie island
consist of domestic crops cultivated by the
people, including rice {Oryza sativa) grown
in wet paddy fields or in dry fields, com (Zea
mays), yams {Convolvulus batatas), orange
{Shaddock Hindia B), durian {Durio
zibethinus), pineapple {Bromelia ananas),
langsat (Lansium donesticum), mango
{Mangifera indica), banana {Musa sp.),
rubber (Havea brassiliensis), coconut {Cocos
nucífera), coffee {Coffea spp.), cloves
{Eugenia aromática), cocoa (Theobroma
cacao) and patchouli {Pogostemon cablin),
as well as wild plants such as rattan, ferns
and gambir {Uncaria gambir).
In connection witii the flora in Nias, the Nias
people, both men and women, have the
habit of chewing betel nut (complete with
spices). The ingredients for betel chewing,
which also colour the flora of Nias, consist
of betel leaf, which come from a vine
with leaves having a rather hot taste
{Piper betle), which are chewed along
with ripe redish-yellow betel nut
{Areca catechu) the sediment obtained by
boiling down the steamed leaves of the
gambir plant {Uncaria gambit). Lime obtained
by processing limestone is also another
ingredient for betel chewing. Chewing betel
is habituating and people believe that it also
strengthens the teeth.
Various kinds of fauna are found on the
island, including varieties of fish {Pisces),
both in Uie sea, in ponds as well as in fresh
water, Chapteri {Sus sp.), buffaloe {Bovidae),
and goat {Capra sp.). Besides ttiis, in certain
areas, we may still find wild animals such as
deer {Cervidae), varieties of birds {Aves),
including tiie Nias mynah and forest Chapteri
{Sus scrofa). The Nias mynah {Gracula
religiosa) has shiny black feathers and can
be b-ained to imitate sounds. Such a special
bird has experienced misfortune strangely
enough because it is so special. At the
moment, the population of this bird which
was fomneriy considered a pest to crops has
reached such a low level that ttie species is
in danger of extinction. The govemment has
issued a regulation banning all hunting and
trading of this species of bird.
16
Kcp Hnoko
KjtJoionroya
Sotos ItatKfKitenitMkoto ttecomoton
H IbukotQ kabupaten
KEP. BATUTANAHêALA
17
Chapter II.Location and Social Environment
C^iere are two ways of reaching Nias
Island; namely, by air or sea transportation.
The flight from Polonia Airport, Medan to
Gunung Sitoli airport in Nias Island takes 45
minutes, and ttien ttie 120 km joumey from
Gunung Sitoli to Teluk Dalam by public
transport along a good sealed road takes 3
hours. TTiere is also sea ti'ansportation from
Sibolga to Gunung Sitoli, which takes 9
hours. One can also use sea transportation
directiy from Sibolga to Teluk Dalam, in which
case the voyage will take 12 hours.
The people of Nias are a patrilineal society,
wherein hertditary lines follow the male
members of the family or father only. This is
the same system as that of the Batak
community, and in contrast to the
Minangkabau community which has a
matrilineal system (lines of descent follow
the female side ofthe family only). In Nias
we also find mado (clans), exogamous and
unilinear family groups, ttie names of which
are always placed as a surname and which
indicate the family origins of every person.
Manufacture of means of water transportation In Nias
18
For example, we know of tiie mados named
Harefa, Hia,Telaumbanua, Hulu, Duha,
Zebua, etc.
The social behaviour of the people of Nias
is quite complex. Zaluchu (1993) mentions
that this is caused by a mixing of customs
and existing nonms. Among ttie Nias people,
the principle of working together is still
considered of prime importance. Family and
collaborative systems are quite prominent,
altiiough polarized between different religious
understandings. The majority of people in
Nias follow Christian Protestant religion,
followed in number by those who follow
Islam, and then Catholics.
In their daily lives, the people of Nias use
Nias language, albeit in different dialects in
each district. One very special feature of
Nias language is ttie use of dominant vowels
in every word or sentence, and tills is always
signified by a vowel ending.
Nias is not a very large island, surrounded
by the vast Indonesian Ocean. In short, we
may say that the people of Nias perform
almost all occupations. Their livelihood is
not limited to fanning wori<, but also includes
fishing, craftsmanship, mining and trading.
Although this is the case, we can feel that
the economic ability of those who carry on
these various occupations does not change,
and this is the result of the slovmess of the
process of development and modernization.
We may contrast ttie economic advancement
in Nias with that achieved by other
communities within the same province on
mainland Sumatra.
The general occupation ofthe inhabitants of
Nias is fanning and tending plantation aops.
The produce of this activity includes rice
{Oryza sativa), corn {Zea mays), yams
{Convolvulus batatas), patchouli{Pogostemon cablin), banana {Musa),
pineapple {Bromelia ananas), orange
{Shaddock-Hindia B), durian {Duiro
Zibethinus), langsat {Lansium donesticum),
mango {Mangifera indica, L), mbber (Hevea
brassiliensis), coconut {Cocos nucífera),
coffee {Coffea spp), cloves {Marsdenia
tinctoria), cocoa {Theobroma cacao) and
other crops.
Rice is cultivated botti in paddies {wetland)
and in fields {dryland), generally located in
low lying land, such as parts of valleys where
small rivers flow. Tree plantation crops such
as rubber and cloves are much cultivated in
hilly areas. Thus parts ofthe forest areas in
this island are utilized as plantations by the
people.
Rubber had once been a staple commodity
of this area. The same was the case with
copra (coconut dried to be used as a raw
material for making cooking oil), produced
from the coconuts harvested by the local
residents. Some time after that, patchouli
oil, distilled from the fragrant leaves of the
patchouli plant {Pogostemon cablin), which
has a high economic value, had also once
been the primadona produce of Nias. Now
V5
i
I
\
^=^3
19
people have begun to feel a decline in the
income obtained from these products.
Besides farming and plantation agriculture,
some of the people also raise domestic
livestock, fish and make fish ponds.
The livestock most frequentiy maintained
are pigs, cows, buffalos and goats,
fSevera I Varieties of wild animals live
in the forests of Nias, including boar (Sus
scrofa), deer (Cervus equimus), and several
varieties of birds such as mynah and ottiers.
In such a natural environment, sociologically
we can still feel that the society of Nias
was formerfy divided into three strata:
namely, siutu (the aristocracy), siiia (the
ministers), and banuasato (ordinary people).
In present daily life, these divisions are no
longer rigid, however, some people still
exhibit them in different ways. This is still
possible due to the existence of their
physical cultural manifestation.
Traditional houses of Nias usually
have high roofs made from sago
leaves witti the main body of ttie house made
from timber. The piles of the houses are
made from large round logs witti a diameter
of around one meter. These houses are
generally erected on the tops of hills, which
clearly requires considerable hard labour.
This indicates ttie sttong spirit of cooperation
among the people. °~~~"~^
A Village in So(jtí>+^nji u-.
Traditional House of Nortti Nias
It is only the house of the siulu (king)
which is referred to as a house for
traditional customs, whereas the homes of
the majority of people are not included.
There are two kinds of traditionalhouse {orno fiada) in Nias; namely,
ttiose of North Nias and those of Soutti Nias.
The main difference between the
two lies in the shape of the roof.
Traditional houses in North Nias have
roundish shaped roofs, while those
of South Nias are square shaped.
Examples of traditional homes of
North Nias may be found in Hitinaa
in the Gunung Sitoli subdistrict, white
examples of those of South Nias may be
found in Bawömataluo, Hilinawalö Fau
Hilinawalö MazinÖ (in Teluk Dalam
subdistrict).
Jn relation to regulation of the daily lives
of the people, long before the Dutch
introduced courts using a Western legal
system, Nias was a society having a district
legal system called banua. Local
governments were headed by a sanuhe or
siulu who managed everything related
to ttie regulation of ttie life of the people and
law carried out through an institution
called fondrakö. Matters were decided or
regulated through the fondrakö included
aspects of fondu or belief/religion; fangaso
(economy); fiao-hao/ele-ele (culture);
forara haofowanua (rights and duties); as
21
well as böwö or social justice.
In the interests of expanding itsjurisdiction, the sanuhe or salawambanua
would form alliances called öri/eri headed
by a chairman or influential person called
tuhenöri, assisted by a sanuhenöri. The öri
which was a collection of several banua also
utilized the institution of fondrakö for
regulating the valid laws. The place for
deciding and announcing a legal decision or
regulation was in the osali.
22
Traditional
House
of
South Nias
23
Traditional
House
of
South Nias
23
Part Two:History and Cultural Diversity
24 . «i
Chapter ííiVHistory and Culture
Historical Background
¿¿>ntil now there are many theories
regarding the origins of the Nias people,
including those which state ttiat the people
of Nias do not hail from just one etiinic group,
but rather have developed as a mixture of
several communities. Archeological sources
through evidence discovered from the Tögi
Ndrawa Cave site indicate ttiat at least 10,000
years ago there were inhabitants in Nias
Island. Habitation even far eariier than ttiis
is known from Paleolithic relics in the form
of stone tools discovered in the banks of ttie
Muzoi River. Written Arab sources mention
that in around the 9th Century, Nias was
inhabited by many different ethnic
F
groups. However, the results of
archeological research also indicate that the
Tögi Ndrawa Cave was still used as a
residence by a group of people until ttie 12th
Century.
Tögi Ndrawa Cave located in the Gunung
Sitoli subdistrict of Nias District is a cave
complex consisting of two caves and 3 rock
shelters. These three rock shelters
are situated between two caves which lie in
line, from south to north. The location ofthe
caves is around 1 75 meters above sea level.
in Nias languages, Tögi Ndrawa means a
hole for wanderers.
25
"^^ Historical sources indicate that at the
beginning of the 17th Century, Sultan
Iskandar Muda developed Aceh to become
a strong kingdom in western Nusantara. He
took control of Deli 1612, Aru in 1613 and
also Johore. Subsequentiy in 1624/1625 tiie
Sultan succeeded in bringing Nias under his
influence (Ricklefs,1 998).
In the Hinako and Batu groups of islands to
the south-east of Nias, we find many Bugis
people - referred to as Maoi people - from
Soutii Sulawesi, and according to tiie stories
of these people, those who reside in this
area are the 17th or 18th generation
descendants. There are also Acehnese
people in Nias, usually refered to as Polem
people, who are at least 13th or 14th
generation descendants. There is an
interesting story ttiat ttiese Acehnese people
were there because they were forced to
remain by the Nias people. When a boat
carrying Acehnese people sailed up the river
towards the Foa village, tiie local residents
closed the river downstream, and thus the
Acehnese could no longer go out and return
to Aceh. The Nias people took that action at
tiiat time because tiiey needed ttie presence
of the Achínese to teach them skills related
to magical powers and the art of warfare. In
the future, the presence of the Acehnese
would enrich the traditional warfaring arts of
the Nias people. People know of the
existence of three traditional warfaring arts
in Nias; namely, simataha from Aceh; staria
from West Sumatra; and irapedo which is
a mixture of the previous two warfare arts.
The Dutch expanded tiieir influence to include
Nias, which at the beginning of the 19th
Century was not an important area for British
ti'ade. In 1825, an agreement was made to
end the slave trade; however, this activity
continued, and most of ttie slaves were sold
to Padang and Singapore. A Dutch trading
post was opened in Gunung Sitoli in 1840,
followed by a military expedition in 1847.
The Dutch embari<ed on military expeditions
again in 1855 and 1863, in order to
strengthen their authority over Nias
(Rlcklefs,1998). By 1914 Nias was fully under
tiie contiül of tiie Dutch colonial govemment
The story of the Japanese occupation of
Nias which ended the Dutch rule is related
as follows. On 17tti April 1942, tiie Japanese
amiy landed in Gunung Sitoli, and on 21st
April 1942 at Teluk Dalam. Hilisimaetano
was the final landing place occupied by the
Japanese on 22nd April 1942 (Anwar, 2004).
Nias was formeriy a place where people
could easily get slaves. The slave traders
who operated in Nias came from Aceh, West
Sumatra, China and Europe. Especially in
the north, in several places slaves were
taken by attacking villages. The situation in
the north differed from that in the south,
where the villages were generally better
guarded and not easily defeated. At the
beginning of their control of Nias, tiie Dutch
colonial government supported this slave
trade.
Slavery and the slave trade were quite
26
prominent during their era. We may know
this from the report of one Dutch authority
who mentions that as a result of this trade,
the population of North Nias had decreased
considerably. The slaves were taken to
various destinations. Those taken to Padang
mostiy became slaves because of debts. As
debitors, they had to work for their creditors
for many years. In ttiis connection, in several
places in Padang we can still find groups in
tiie community who are descendants of ttiose
who had come from Nias. Other records
mention Penang, Malaysia as a destination
for slaves-including those who came on a
Chinese ship from Nias in 1820. Other
records mention ttiat a French ship came in
1832 carrying around 500 slaves.
from Europe against the slave trade at the
beginning ofthe 19th Century made areas
outside tiie sphere of European control such
as Nias, Bali and Sulu more important as
supply areas for slaves. (Reid,2004).
Slavery was a source of suffering for human
beings. It is recorded that during the period
between 1790-1830, Nias lost 800 to 1500
of its inhabitants, or 0.4% of its population
every year to the slave trade. (Reid, 2004).
Regarding the population of Nias in former
times, we may compare this with the
population of Nias according to the 1990
census which was 588,643 persons.
Cultural Diversity
Covert slavery went on, for example in Nias,
Toraja and other port areas dominated by
aristocrats/traders such as Malaka, Aceh,
and Banten. For the slaves, the most real
suffering was not the loss of their freedom,
but rather the possibility of being sold to
some place even further away. Sometimes
slaves were even sacrificed as part of certain
ritual needs such as for funeral ceremonies
of tribal chiefs, or for beginning the
constitiction of a large building. This practice
is known to have gone on in Philippines,
Burma, Sulawesi, Nias and other places.
(Reid, 2004).
At the beginning of the 18th Century, the
main supply area of slaves for Batavia was
South Sulawesi, followed by Nias and Ball.
However, increasing government pressure
Megalithic relics in Nias Island are generally
divided according to two culturalcharacteristics; namely, the culture of North
Nias and that of South Nias. Both
these cultural characteristics are clearly
visible in the artistic style of their megalitiiic
statues and also in their respective
traditional houses. The artistic style of the
statues of South Nias (generallyencompassing South Nias District) is more
naturalistic with the statues in various
positions. The traditional homes of South
Nias are square in shape, not round like
those of North Nias. Based upon the fomi
and decorative motifs of megalithic relics
found in South Nias District, people
often relate them to New Megalithic
relics which developed in Indonesia
around the beginning of the Christian era.
£
27
In certain instances, we will also see that
this cultural wealth is divided into three
cultural pattems according to administrative
divisions and the customs of the local
inhabitants. This is related to the existence
of the cultural pattems of North Nias, Centi^al
Nias and Soutii Nias. Each of ttiese pattems
has its own special features, however one
tiling which is quite interesting is tiiat based
on the form ofthe traditional houses which
are the special feature of tiieir existence, we
only find two styles and not three. In Nias
we only find traditional houses in the style
of North Nias and ttiose in tiie style of Soutti
Nias.
One nomn in the location of these wooden
buildings is that tiiey occupy elevated land
surfaces, meaning on the tops of hills facing
the east. The special feature of these
buildings is that they do not use nails. Pegs
and dowels strengthen and lock the
constmction of these houses.
Traditional houses in North Nias are round
in style. The height of the floor in these
platfomi houses is medium, lower ttian ttiose
in South Nias style. On the other hand,
traditional houses in South Nias are square
in style, with a prominent high roof. These
old buildings can now be found only in a few
places. In the Teluk Dalam Subdistrict, in
South Nias District, we find these buildings
in the villages of Bawömataluo and
Hilisimaetano.
The main material used in the constmction
of ti"aditional houses is wood. In fomier times,
large logs of timber were easily obtained,
because the forest areas were still relatively
vasL Now on the other hand, the obstacle
for construction or renovation of these
buildings is the increasing difficulty in
obtaining supplies of timber. Forests having
certain kinds of timber which traditionally
(and also in relation to technical requirements)
were selected to make components for
construction are becoming increasingly
scarce or may even be said to have become
rare.
There are many traces of megaliths in Nias.
In many comers of Nias we find relics of the
past, mostiy not being looked after. Natural
stones of large dimensions have been
arranged and made into various forms of
cultural works in the megalithic tradition. In
Gowe, for example, there is a relic having a
strong ritual historical background.
The relic is in the form of two very
large stones, one cylindrical in shape
(resembling Uie male symbol) and one round
and flat (a female symbol). The material used
has been earned a considerably long distance
from the river to the place where the ritual
was conducted. Hundreds of men must have
been involved in carrying these stones, and
a skilled mason has diligently carved the
stones. Gowe was established as a memorial
for ttie residents of eri (an area of authority
in the past which combined several villages
and hamlets). This object is evidence that
ancestors had once held owase, a large
scale traditional party sacrificing a large
28
number of animals. This activity aimed to
increase social status and at Uie same time
prove ttiat Uie family who organized tiie event
indeed possessed elevated social power
(Zaluchu,1993).
In the matter of efforts for the security of
villages against enemies, in former times,
battles often took place between
tiie residents in Nias. Therefore, every village
had to always be prepared to be on guard
and ready to oppose attacking enemies.
It is not surprising that now the war dance
{maena baluse) is famous as one kind of
dance of the people of South Nias. This
fascinating dance is performed by tens of
dancers using various weapons of war in
its celebration.
Baluse is a kind of rather long wooden
shield. Toho is a spear with a barbed
point, while belewa is a long sharp
machete, the hilt of which has been
given a mantra. Kalabubu is a kind of
necklace made from coconut shell.
On first impression the kalabubu may
seem to be merely a decorative accessory.
However, the necklace may also be
interpreted as being simultaneously an
accessory giving a macho or male
impression, while actually being worn to
protect tiie neck of its wearer against wounds
by the sharp weapons of enemies.
We may compare this necklace with the
chain mail armour worn in battle in ancient
times (in Europe).
In this connection, stone hurdle jumping
{hombo batu) was compulsory for
every male member of the village. The
purpose of young men jumping over
stone hurdles arranged in levels from
2-2.5 meters in height was to develop
martial skills (for community battles),
so that they could pass over obstacles
set up by the enemy. It is related to the
ability ofthe warriors in peneü"ating fences-
forts, both when attacking as well as
when escaping when surrounded.
The famous stone hurdle jumping is found
In ttie village of Bawömataluo in Teluk Dalam
subdistrict.
%
29
Chapter IV.Megaliths and the Prehistoric Era
Ohe life periods in prehistoric times are
divided into four ages from the archeological
point of view, based upon technological
terminology. These comprise the paleolittiic,
mesolittiic, neolittiic and paleometalic ages.
Indicators ofthe paleolithic, mesolittiic and
neolithic ages are the discoveries of objects
in the form of stone tools each having its
particular distringuishing characteristics
archeological activities along the course of
the Muzoi River conducted by the National
Archeological Research Centre and the
Medan Archeological Office 1982 and 1999
have discovered stone tools. All ttiese tools
indicate the existence of prehistoric man
possessing paleolittiic culture.
Evidence of later humans having
Stone Axe fou m rse of the Muzoi River
based upon ttie number of varieties of tools
as well as the technique used in their
manufacture.
Few paleolithic relics have been discovered
to date in North Sumatra. However,
mesolittiic culture was discovered in ttie Deli
Serdang, Langkat and Nias Island areas.
Relics of the mesolithic age in Nias Island
were found in the Tögi Ndrawa Cave. The
discovery found not only stone chips and
animal bones which were used as tools
30
in fulfilling daily needs, but also molusc shells
and the bones of animals being tiie remains
of what appeared to be ttie food of ttie people.
Ottier discoveries included hematite (a soft
red stone material which could be used as
a coloured outer layer on ten-a cotta pottery,
and was also used in the burial process in
prehistoric times). This indicates that during
those times there had already been efforts
to handle corpses by perfomiing ceremonies.
Signs of life with neolithic culture have not
yet been found in North Sumatra, however
quite a lot of evidence of this has been
discovered in otiier parts of Indonesia. These
discoveries include polished stone axes in
Uie form of square pickaxes, picks and long
axes. In neolithic times, humans resided in
fixed places of residence, and engaged in
agricultural activities as well as manufacturing
terra cotta pottery. Experts have determined
ttiat tiie development of neolittiic culture went
on in Indonesia from 2500-1500 BC.
Subsequently, during the paleometalic age,
the skill in utilizing iron and bronze was
sufficientiy mastered. The indicators of this
cultural era are discoveries of kettle dmms,
statues, axes, jugs and ornaments in the
form of brooches, bracelets, and rings,
all made from bronze. Following on from
the neolithic times, we may understand that
human life in paleometalic times was more
advanced, as signified by ttieir skill in casting
metal. Unfortunately evidence of human
existence in paleometalic times which
extended from 1000 BC till the beginning
centuries of AD have not yet been
discovered in the northern part of Sumatra.
Furthermore, there is the megalithic age,
which is easily connected with humans
having neolithic and paleometalic culture. In
Indonesia, there is so much evidence of the
existence of megalithic culture. It may be
said that megalithic tradition goes on even
down to the present day. This is not only
related to Uie relics found in Nias Island and
Samosir Island, or in Mahat, West Sumatra
or in Pagar alam, South Sumatra, but also
to those found in West Java, Central Java,
East Java and on to ttie islands of Sulawesi,
Sumba and others.
The physical forms of cultural works of that
time are quite numerous. Terraced tombs or
sacred places are one of their main special
characteristics. Many people say that efforts
to learn about the background of the
appearance of megalithic culture are very
interesting. The results of research conducted
reveal that belief in ttie existence of a power
controlling nature; belief in life after death;
belief in ongoing relationships between
ancestors/departed spirits and those still
alive, fonn the bases for the continuation of
megalithic culture.
In relation to their function and religious
connotations, megalithic objects would be
built tiirough mutual collaboration among ttie
community, ttiough there were certain parts
which had to be handled by persons having
special skills. This would begin from ttie time
of seeking and choosing ttie material (stone)
31
"^=£3;^^i
4
neariDy the residential area, which would be
accompanied by a ceremony to request
safety. Then tiie stone would be ti^ansported
to the location of the making of the
megalithic object, preceded by a prosess of
selection and decision based on the
particular concepts followed. Then the
artisans or craftsmen would do their work.
All Ulis would be made perfect by mandatory
ceremonies, also conducted communally.
An interesting aspect which clearly
differentiates between the life in megalithic
times in Nias and tiiat in other places is that
in Nias, archeological remnants in the form
of megalithic objects are not only related to
the souls of ancestors, but also with efforts
to elevate the prestige and social status of
individuals. This was done by organizing
a party and installing a certain megalithic
object for ttie initiation of ttie particular person.
32
Part Three:Environment and Ancient Relics
Chapter vMegalithic Relics on Nias Island
^
j
CZ5^ Nias, we find many objects in the
form of menhir (a large stone like a
pillar or column deliberately erected on a
plot of land in commemoration and
as a symbol of the soul of ancestors),
stone thrones, etc. Stone thrones are
important objects which have developed
with decorative motifs of human figures
and lizards, and are still used by
respected leaders on certain occasions
such as meetings or religious ceremonies.
This indicates that the megalithicti-adition continues to go on until now in Nias,
and in Indonesia it is considered an old
megalithic tradition (Mulia,1981). Megalithic
style statues in Bali and stone thrones in
Nias until now remain media for worship of
the souls of ancestors or leaders
(Sutaba,1994).
We will now take the opportunity to present
several megalithic objects found in Nias. To
facilitate this, we will make our presentation
along district lines. Along with the
development of the structure of the
govemment in Indonesia, Nias was divided
into two districts. This includes Nias District
with its capital at Gunung Sitoli in the north,
and South Nias District with its capital of
Teluk Dalam in the south. We will discuss
several relics from tiiese two distiicts in order,
based upon their location in their respective
districts. Of course there are many
more sites and ancient relics in Nias
which are fitting to presented; however,
we hope to do this at some lateropportunity.
NIAS DISTRICT
Sirombu Subdistrict
The area of this subdistrict is 205.7 Km^
comprising 36 villages with a total
population of 17,394, comprising 9,937
males and 7,457 females, witti a population
density of 84 persons per Knf. The subdistiid
has 3,645 Ha of protected forest and
4.412 Ha of productive forest, 1.527
Ha of wet rice paddies and 20,853 Ha. of
dry fields. The animals raised include pigs
and goats, and the principal crops include
greenpeal {Phaseolus radiatus), coconut
and mbber.
Sisobandrao
The village of Sisobandrao is around 8 Km^
in area with a population of 160 families
or 720 persons. Most of the inhabitants
are farmers (wet rice paddy) or tend
plantations (coconuts being tiie main crop).
There are also some of raise livestock, witti
pigs as the principal livestock.
34
Sisobandrao village was originally located
at Ehomogosali, in Lahemi subdistricL
It then relocated to the hilltop near its
present location. At that time, tiie siulu of Uie
village was named Lelaana'a. Two of his
descendants named Sechema and
Todolala still reside on the hill. Megalithic
relics from the hill have been broken up
and the stone used as building material.
After that, the people relocated again to the
site of the present village of Sisobandrao.
At the time of the relocation, the siulu was
named Laogacha. His descendant was
named Lofahulo, whose descendants were
Luhumawa, Rusudi, and Aliasa (now aged
52 years). Aliasa has a son called Rome
Kurniawan (now aged 21 years).
The remains of ttie culture of the past in this
area is in form of a megalithic site located
at N. 00° 57' 39', E. 97° 27' 57", namely
behind ttie home of Ina Ibek Daell (50 years).
The location is also used as a public cemetary
with around 1 hectare in area.
Notable relics at the site are as follows:
1 . A stone statue made with simple carving,
124 cm in height, 40 cm wide, and 30 cm
thick. The face is carved square in shape
with a headgear (takula). The ends ofthe
thick eyebrows curve upwards. The nose is
thin (and broken), witti shoulder lengtti hair.
The right hand is can/ed in front ofthe chest
holding a kind of cross symbol, while the left
hand is in front of the stomach. The phallus
is erect and is carved on an angle to ttie right
2. A round flat stone in front of the stone
statue, with a diameter of 125 cm and a
thickness of 20 cm. The flat surface of the
stone is ornamented with carvings of a pair
of hands, a pair of footprints, kalabubu
and a human face. The kalabubu has been
carved rather elongated, 19 cm long and
13 cm wide. The human face is round, 16
cm long and 14 cm wide, complete with
eyes, nose and mouth, and long hair
twisted to the left and right sides.
3. A menhir located around one kilometer
from ttie stone statue. It is situated in Lorong
2 of Sisobandrao village. The menhir is made
of andésite stone and has not been fomied
in any way. It lies in ttie middle of ttie coconut
plantation belonging to Wage Hia (Ama Lista,
29 years), The menhir is 120 cm long, 50
cm wide, and 35 cm thick, and occupies tiie
edge of a ditch of the former village, which
had been moved to the edge of the road
during the time of Uie Japanese occupation.
The old ditch is 150 cm wide and 1 meter
deep on the east and west sides, each of
which is around 70 meters long.
Mandrehe Subdistrict.
This subdistrict is 269.71 Km^ in area,
comprising 62 villages. Mandrehe Subdistrict
has 46,787 residents, of 22.676 are male
and 24,111 are female. The population
density is 173 persons per Km^ The
subdistrict has 8,804 Ha of protected forest.
I\
Ii
35
7,432 Ha. of limited productive forest,
635 Ha of conversion forest and 35 Ha of
forest belonging to the people. There is
3,596 Ha of wet rice paddies and 25,724 Ha
Sisarahili Village I
a. Hili Gowe / Tuheo Guio Megalithic Site
The site is located in Sisarahili I village.
of dry fields in the area. The plantations
tended by the residents generally grow
oibber, coconut and cloves, and ttie livestock
maintained are pigs and goats.
Mandrehe subdistrict, at 01° 03' 578" N
longitude, 097° 29' 198" E latitude.
The village is layed out along the
sides of the village road. The megalithic
36
site is located behind the village,
on a flat plot in hilly land. The area
of the site is almost 1 hectare, more
than 160 metres long and 40-60
metres wide. The land is oriented on
an east-west axis.
In this location, we find stone statues, an
inscription, a stone table, a stone ball and a
menhir. These objects are placed in two
lines, following Uie shape of Uie plot of land.
The largest stone statue is located at the
westernmost end. The statue is in a sitting
position with both its hands on its chest
holding a vessel. The statue has a long
beard, and a kalabubu necklace around its
neck. The front part of tiie statue (part of the
face and the belly) have been repaired and
filled with cement. The statue stands 300
cm high, and is 90 cm wide and 80 cm thick.
The statue has been carved wiUi headgear
having pointed decorations all around the
head, a square face, small eyes, a long nose,
and a beard, part of which is damaged. The
right ear has circular earrings and the neck
is decorated witii a kalabubu. The right hand
has bracelets, and both hands are holding
a vessel in front of the chest, with a kris
slipped in at tiie waist. In front of ttie statue,
we find a flat stone which may have been
used as an altar. The stone is 70 cm long,
40 cm wide, and 20 cm thick.
There are tiiree smaller stone statues (behu).
These statues are in a squatting position,
and are in line with the large stone statue.
One of these statues has been cut, and the
remains are 135 cm long, 40 cm wide and
40 cm thick. The statue is still in a standing
position.
Another statue, which was discovered fallen
over, is 240 cm long, 50 cm wide and 60 cm
thick. The statue has been carved with
headgear with pointed ornaments around
the head, square shaped face, small eyes,
a long nose, and a beard, part of which is
damaged. The right ear has circular shaped
earrings and the neck wears a kalabubu
necklace. The right hand wears a bangle,
and both hands are holding a vessel in front
of ttie chest, and a kris is worn at the waist.
The phallus which is always carved erect in
Nias statues is also carved complete with
the testicles in this statue. The damaged
parts of this statue are that the base is
missing, and parts of Uie amis are damaged,
as is the case with the phallus.
An inscription found at ttie site is located at
the side of the large statue. The inscription
is rectangular in shape, written in Nias
language using roman letters. The inscription
records the year 1778. Another interesting
aspect of this site is the two andésite balls
25 cm in diameter. On one side the remains
of their cutting is still visible. In front of this
balugu we find the tomb of Si Oku/ Si Ndm-
ndru Tanö (it is not clear which figure is
meant) marked by a tombstone oriented
west-east. Aflat slab of stone fomis Uie wall
of the tomb.
There are 7 smooth upright stones or behu
"=¿=3
^
37
^í:3
^;
which are square and flat in profile.
Some are pointed at the top, while others
are round at their apex. 24 flat stones
{daro-daro) of various dimensions have
also been discovered on tiie site. The largest
of these stones is 125 cm long, 60 cm
wide and 25 cm tiiick.
Excavations conducted at thissite have unearthed fragments of terra
cotta pottery and charcoal. Carbon
dating of the charcoal samplesindicated a period of 260 ± 120 years
BP, or around 380-140 years ago.
b. The Tehembowo Statue
In the area of the village of Sisarahili I
in the subdistrict of Mandrehe there is
a statue placed in a walless tomb.
The statue is 100 cm in height with a
diameter of around 30 cm, and is
carved wearing headgear pointed
upwards at the back of the head.
The feet are folded as if in sitting
position. The statue is carved in the
form of a person carrying a baby on his or
her back.
ÍI
38
SOUTH NIAS DISTRICT
This district was created as a result of
administrative development, and occupies
the southern part of Nias island along with
tiie islands and island groups (Telle and Batu)
to the south-east up to the border with North
Sumatra Province. At Ulis opportunity, we will
only describe relics from mainland Nias
Island.
Teluk Dalam Subdistrict
Teluk Dalam Subdistrict has an area not less
ttian 490 km^ comprising 52 villages and one
municipal ward. Parts of this subdistrict in
Soutti Nias District contain a high
concentration of archeological objects. Up
till now, 11 villages in this area have been
noted as having ancient relics of megalithic
tradition. The villages are:
a. Bawömataluo,
b. Orahili Fau,
c. Hilifalage,
d. Hill Slmaetanö,
e. Hili Nawalöfau,
f. Lahusa,
g. HiliAmaetaniha,
h. Boto Hilitanö,
i. Hili Hondegeraya,
j. Bawögosali, and
k. Hili Namözaua.
The following is a brief description of
archelogical objects found in two of these
village areas. The hills in these villages are
of limestone, which is usually ttie raw material
for making objects in megalithic tradition.
The residents of these two villages seek
Uielr livelihood by fanning/tending plantations
and making handicrafts. The crops
cultivated include rubber, patchouli and
coconut, whilst ttie aaftsmen make souvenirs
for tourists who visit the area.
BAWÖMATALUO
Bawömataluo village is a traditionalvillage situated on a hill some 400 meters
above sea level. The village is 4 km after
taking a left turn off tiie road to Pantai Sorake
and Teluk Dalam. This road leading to the
village is a 4*^ class road.
In the local language, Bawömataluo means
sun hill. This traditional village is located in
the area of the village of Bawömataluo,
Teluk Dalam Subdistrict, Soutti Nias Disti-ict,
with the following coordinates: N. 00° 36'
831" and E. 097° 46' 173". The elevation
is around 270 meters above sea level.
This traditional village is a touristasset of Nias island, wherein one can
witness the attraction of stone hurdle
jumping {hombo batu), which in former
times was part of a series of ceremonies
intended for youths who were approaching
adulthood. This village on the ridge
of a hill has around 2000 residents.
The houses of the residents are closely
spaced
in lines along the main road, which is
Ii
'^
I
39
oriented south-east - north-west. In front of
these houses, dances of Nias are often
perfonmed, including ttie war dance {maena
baluse) performed by tens of dancers with
a dynamic accompaniment which enchants
audiences.
Megalithic objects in this village include
carved stones placed both horizontally
(sleeping) as well as vertically (standing).
Horizontal stones are called daro-daro, while
those placed vertically are called naitaro.
The positions of these stones are related to
ttieir respective gender. Tfie motifs of humans
have been carved in anthroponwrphic style.
There are also canred fauna such as snakes,
lizards, monkeys, crocodiles, gekkos and
other animals. Each stone has been carved
eittier omamented or plain.
Other megalithic objects include decorated
and plain menhirs placed in front of the
houses. There are also geometric motife on
ttie walls of houses or on ttie floor of yards.
^iF^^mmmmn
The Situation in the Viltage
The Bawömataluo site is a semi-macro
residential area located on a flathilltop with a south-east north-west
orientation. The layout or form of this
residential area appears to have
been built according to the situation of the
site. This means that the system of
building residential homes along with
ceremonial (religious) facilities has been
regulated according to the form of the
existing site. Such a situation seems
to have been the basic principle in
megalithic type residential sites, not only in
Nias, but also in Central Sulawesi, Sumba,
Flores, and Timor.
The fonn of ceremonial yands, the orientation
of places for holding ceremonies, the
location of large houses (houses for b^ditional
customs) were always related to the
condition of hills. If the hill stretched from
west to east, then the building of the
residences as well as places of worship
would also follow the same direction.
Thus Uie houses would be built in a line from
east to west.
a horizontal position are referred to as
daro-daro, while those in a vertical
position are called naitaro.These two kinds of megaliths illustrate
male and female types. Hundreds of
daro-daro and í7a/íaro are found in ttie yards
ofthe residents of high, middle as well as
lower classes.
The largest daro-daro is found in the yard
of the house of traditional customs. This
statue is 3 meters long and 2.3 meters wide,
and Is full of carved omamentation depicting
fish, humans, creepers and rings (which
according to the local residents illustrate
the inside parts of oranges). Not far from
this large daro-daro we will find two
naitaro each 3.5 meters high. These two
varieties of megalitiiic relics are found directiy
in front of the house of traditional customs
of Bawömataluo.
Daro-daro, or stone sitting places in front of
houses are usually ornamented witii carvings.
The na;/aro in Bawömataluo are eittier plain
or ornamented with carvings.
I
Bawömataluo is sunx)unded by steep ravines
and valleys. There is a spring producing quite
a large fiow of water in a nearby valley.
The people fulfill their needs for water by
piping water from a hill located quite some
distance from the village.
The megaliths found in Bawömataluo are
divided into those in a horizontal position
and Uiose in a vertical position. Megalitiis in
The forms of the carvings are:
a. human figures {antropomorfic) stylized
with legs wide apart;
b. fauna including lasara, snakes, lizards,
monkeys, crocodiles, domestic lizards,
roosters, etc.;
c. flora/plants, creepers; and
41
d. geometric motifs such as rings, broken
lines, batik lines, falangles; and
e.other manmade objects such as
carpentry tools.
The material used in making megaliths
may be divided into two types ; namely,
a kind of grayish sedimentary stone usually
called batu buaya (crocodile stone) and
whitish coloured limestone. The greyish
Daro-daro in front of the orno hada
From the aspect of the type of material
culture found in Bawömataluo, the
fomis of relics here are very limited in their
variations, types and functions, and
only include stone artefacts which
may be broadly classified as male
symbols (such as menhir and phallus)
and female symbols. Other forms such as
stone tombs, dakon stones (flat stones
with a series of round bowl-shaped
depressions in the surface, used to play a
traditional game), lined stones etc.
have not yet been found.
sedimentary batu buaya is sufficientjy hard
and dense to be used for ttie walls, foundation
or base of pillars of a building.
In Nias, people also know of karasatio (from
tiie word kara which means stone, and satío
which means black), a kind of black stone
found abundantiy in Nias and usually used
as a medium for canning,
ORAHILI FAU
The viltage of Orahili Fau occupies part of a
42
valley towards the north-west, near
Bawömataluo village. The village appears
to be suiïounded by hills. To reach ttie village,
we must walk down steps for 0,5 km.
Orahili Fau is situated at an elevation of 170
meters above sea level, with coordinates of
N. 00° 36' 811' and E. 097° 45' 940". This
village was a residential area before its
residents moved to the location of the
residential area of Bawömataluo. There is
only one way in and out, located at the
southern end of the village. The in-out
entrance has been provided with a stone
stairway and is enclosed with carvings of
lasara head.
As is the case with the Bawömataluo site,
the Orahili Fau site is oriented in a south¬
eastnorth-west direction, with entrances
In Uie soutti-east and north-wesL Orahili Fau
stretches along wiUi the form of its hill. The
pattern of Uie layout of ttie residential houses,
various ceremonial facilities and yards is in
a long line, going along with ttie topography
of ttie long hill. Considering ttiat ttie enttances
to Orahili Fau village are located to tiie soutti-
east and north-west, it is clear ttiat ttiese are
the areas for defence, while the south-west
and north-east which are Uie long sides of
the village are protected by cliffs and steep
ravines.
The condition we find in the Orahili Fau site
does not differ from ttiat encountered in ottier
villages. The principal relics of Orahili Fau
consist merely of various flat stones {daro-
daro) and erect stones commemorating
persons who had passed away, especially
from among local leaders and their family
members. Besides ttiis, we also find special
elements of the megalithic tradition in the
fomi of stones arranged to be used for the
ceremony of stone hurdle jumping, which
are located not far from the large house for
traditional customs. Carvings on the
megalithic objects depict craftsmens' tools
(made of iron) such as pliers, chisels,
hammers, etc.
The pattern of placement of the residential
houses with the house of the leader in the
centre along with those of other important
figures, seems to be the general pattern.
We find this pattern in almost all
megalithic sites which carried on. The
pattern seems to be based on certain
considerations; namely, placing the
elements of leadership in a sti^tegic position
in order to protect the leader and his family,
as well as making it easier for Uie prominent
figure in organizing, leading and managing
various ceremonies conducted in the
ceremonial yard.
Judging from the area of the village and ttie
forms of its megaliths, is seems that Orahili
Fau was on a smaller level than the
Bawömataluo site. This consideration is also
based on the fact that the daro-daro and
naitaro discovered in Bawömataluo have
grander size and decorative patterns.
Bawömataluo indeed appears bigger and
'=:=3
is
i
43
more sophisticated. The daro-daro at the
Orahili Fau are on average 75175 cm high,
while the naitaro are between 60-150 cm.
« From an interview with an elder who was
^l also a former village head of Bawömatal uo
I we could learn Uiat the size, grandness or
-; simplicity of megalithic objects was closely
_^ related to the status of the person who
estabished the megalith. The statement of
this informant at the Bawömataluo site
appears to conform with the conclusion
reached by Von Heine Geldern, that
megaliths erected through a party ofsen/ice
were an effort to indicate the prestige and
social status of a leader.
Considering the geographical location
and proximity of these two sites, we may
estimate that there was active contact
between the people of Bawömataluo and
Orahili Fau, and that there was no conflict
of interest between the two communities.
Probably they respected regulations and
agreements in various aspects of life. It is
likely that no conflicts occun-ed between tiie
peoples of these two different places,
considering that the locations were nearby
and no ravines or hills presented obstacles
to their communication.
Based upon observation of their material
cultural relics, there seems to be very little
difference between the megaliths of the two
places. At the Orahili Fau site, we find
omamental pattems for botti wood and stone
based on man-made objects. The
appearance of this omamental pattern and
the fact Uiat it is not found at Bawömataluo
site seems to have occurred as a result of
some local developmenL The appearance
of this decorative pattern does not mean a
difference in basic principle, but rather is
merely tiie result of tiie Inspiration of a figure
who wished to show his skill in working wood
or iron (craftsmanship).
HILIFALAWU
This site is located in the area of Hilifalawu
village in Teluk Dalam subdistiicL In Uie local
language, the word hili means hill or
mountain, while the word falawu means
abundant. Thus the word hill falawu means
a hill having abundant natural produce.
The coordinates of this location are N.00°
40' 619' and E. 097° 44' 022". This village
is located on a long hill which stretches from
east to wesL The house of the community
chief is located in the middle. This village
moved four times in the course of its history.
It began from the first village called
Bawösalawa, which then relocated to the
second village called Bamsalawa, later again
to the third village named Hili Ofonadanö,
and finally to the present village named Hili
Falawu.
The village shifted from above to lower
ground as a result of fire, epidemic and the
drying up of water sources. In the present
village, the water source is from wells with
a deptii of around 5 meters behind Uie homes
44
of ttie residents.
There are not many relics in the megalithic
tradition here. The two menhirs and
one flat stone located in ttie central square
of the village are more used merely as
monuments. The history from the first
village down to the present village extends
over 7 generations (around 140 years).
Before embracing Christianity, the local
residents followed an animistic belief called
fesi. Fesi itself is the name of a tree.
During ttie time of ttie first village, ttie peof^e
were followers of fesi beliefs, while
by ttie time ttie second village was occupied.
ttie people had become Christians. Followers
of fesi asked for medicine, power and
extermination of agricultural pests from a
large fesi tree. The compulsory ceremony
conducted one in a year consists of donation
of 1/10 of the produce of the village. The
residents of ttie village state that they hail
from Gomo.
HILISIMAETANO
There is another traditional village besides
Bawömataluo, located in the village of
Some megalithic relics used as a locotion for nahagaralnua.
45
Hilisimaetano. The coordinates of tiie location
are N 00° 38' 742" and E 097° 44' 924",
and the orientation is east - west. The
entrance to the village (usually called
bawögali) is via a stairway with carvings of
monkeys ornamented with stone balls on
either side. There are also a menhir and a
stone table. Another interesting feature is
stone chairs arrayed in a circle. On one of
the long sides of the circle there are two
chairs which have backrests, and which have
been made differenUy to the other chairs.
These two square chairs have been made
for the head of the village and the head of
traditional customs. This place is used for
meetings, and is called nahagarahua. It is
located in tiie front of Uie house for Uaditional
customs.
At certain times, we can witnessperformances of traditional dances of Nias
in this place, as well as see traditional
handcrafts of Nias produced in this area.
ofthe lines of statues and menhirs consists
of 3 menhirs, while the group on the right
consists of 3 stone statues. In the midst
of the group of menhirs and stone statues
we find three levels of stone tables.
Some of these stone tables are square,
while others are round. It is possible that
these tables were used as altars.
All these stone statues have been carved
wiUi their genitals erect.
BAWÖ HESI
This place is part of Lölö Wau subdistrict,
wiUi coordinates of N 00° 58' 291", E 097°
36' 614", at an elevation of 320 meti"es above
sea level. Here we find a stone statue
situated in front of the house for traditional
customs. The statue has been carved with
headgear, a moustache, kalibubu, hands on
the chest, and phallus erect.
EHOSAKHOZI
^
fLölöWau Subdistrict
OLAYAMA
Olayama is located at an elevation of 400
metres above sea level in Lölö Wau
subdistrict. On the side of the village
road there are 10 stone statues and 5
menhirs. The statues and menhirs are placed
in lines. At the very back, there are 7
stone statues and two menhirs, while in the
line in front of this there are two groups
of relics. The group on the right hand side
Located in Lölö Wau village witti coordinates
N00°01' 106", E 097° 36' 676" atanelevation of 380 metres above sea level. A
stone statue has been placed in front of Uie
office of ttie village head. The statue belongs
to the Guio family/clan, one of whose
descendants lives across the road from the
village head's office.
This statue was relocated from anoUier place
by the Guio family, accompanied by a
traditional ceremony. In order to guarantee
tiiat ttiis statue would not only be tiie property
46
of one member of Uie Guio familybut rattier
as Uie heritage of ttie Gulo extended family-
it was agreed to place the statue in the yard
of the office of the village head, where it
remains to this day.
The statue has been carved in the form of a
male figure with large ears, a moustache,
hands in front of tiie chest, and erect phallus.
Gomo Subdistrict
This subdistrict is located in the south-east
of Nias Island, and has no access to ttie sea.
One special feature of ttiis area is connected
with the statement of custodians of culture
and customs of Nias that their culture and
customs come from Gomo. The Gomo River
flows through this area.
Tundrumbaho
The coordinates of this location are N. 00°
51' 765", E. 097° 49' 918" in the village of
Telegewo, Gomo Subdistrict. The site is in
the form of a megalithic complex oriented
north - south witii an area of 1 500 m^ on a
plot of land at an elevation of around 220
metres above sea level. The site is
around 8 km to the south of the main town
of Gomo Subdistrict. To reach the site,
we must cross two big rivers, Uie Susua and
the Janutae.
In this place we find relics of megalithic
tradition in the form of menhirs (plain and
omamented), tiered stone tables, stone altars
and osa-osa (stone tables with ornaments
in Uie form of mystic heads, carved to give
a fearsome impression).
Archeological activities conductedat this place in 2003 revealed several
fragments of terra cotta pottery. Based on
this indication discovered at the surface, a
test pit was dug in archeological interests.
Carbon dating analysis on the results of this
excavation indicated Uiat acti'vities had gone
on at the Tundrumbaho site around 340 ±
120 years BP, or around 460-220 years ago.
47
Chapter VI.Ancient Relics and
Thejr Relation
Nature, Human Beings and Culture
«
Ohere are three factors which play very
important roles in Uie development of human
history; namely, nature, man and culture
along with its forms. The continuation of
human life is directiy influenced by Uie natural
and physical environment where man
resides. Human beings try to utilize the
environment by managing it in a sustainable
way to fulfill ttieir needs in life. These include
boUi physical needs such as food and shelter
as well as spiritual needs such are religion,
from a simple level up to a more complex
one.
Human beings, as a part of Uie life system
also create characteristics and fomis in ttieir
environment. This is because human beings
are blessed with thinking power which has
made possible the development of
technology. Technology is one element of
culture (Koentjaraningrat, 1999) which can
detemnine the level of human culture. If we
examine the development of human life
tiirough archeological relics, it is evident that
human beings through their culture will try
to respond to tiieir environment wherein tiiey
themselves are one element of that
environment.
Culture developed slowly during ttie Pliocene
age. This reflected the difficulties mankind
faced at Uie time in facing the challenges of
nature. Later during the Holocene age, the
environment underwent drastic changes
making it increasingly stable and providing
more alternatives for fulfilling culture. With
such a phenomenon, culture in that age
advanced faster compared to its
advancement during the previous age. In
Indonesia, culture during the Holocene age
was signified by the appearance of new
cultural groups through innovations in
technology as well as in the social and
economic fields. Examples of this culture
include the Hoabinhian culture, groups
involved in stone flint industry and groups
involved in Sampung bone industry, as well
as cultural groups involved in cave painting.
(Heekeren, 1972).
The involvement of human beings with the
natural environment will be visible in the
utilization of Uie natural landscape and stone
resources, as well as animals and plants
(Simanjuntak, 1996). Choice of residential
location is indirectly influenced by several
considerations, among ttiem Uie ready supply
48
of natural resources, security, easy access
to resources, effectiveness and efficiency of
operational energy in managing resources.
At ttie eariy stage, ttie character of residences
was more influenced by environment than
by intelligence (Fewkes,1910). Caves as
residences were one stage before life
became more stationary. Life at this stage
was temporary or semi-permanent,
influenced by the existence of resources in
the surrounding environment. In the next
stage, man began to reside pemrianentiy in
one place witti more complex life and needs,
including needs in religious life. During this
age, monuments directed towards religious
interests (megaliths) began to appear.
The process of the journey of prehistoric
culture from age to age can be discovered
in Nias, because the potential of ancient
matters is spread almost all over the island.
Human life in Nias island is very interesting .
for study because of its location and because
of tiie Uaditional culture which goes on down
to this day.
Characteristics of ResidentialSettlement and the Environment
We can feel the existence of a connection
between environment and ttie characteristics
of residential settlements in relation to the
existence of old villages in Nias Island.
Residential settlement here is understood
as being in a semi-macro or macro sense.
Semi-macro involves the relation between
individual residences, while macro involves
the relation between groups of residences.
In tills matter, we see a connection between
ttie systems of placement of buildings among
residences, done in such a way that this
aiïangement guarantees easy and consistent
relations between one residence and anottier
and between the residences of the people
and that of their leader. In each site, the
situation of the environment and ecology
divides social groups from each other
because of the existence of ravines,
steep hills, mountains, rivers, etc. These
natural features give rise to social groups
which do not know each other, or which
even sometimes generate friction involving
various interests in matters of hunting,
fanning, animal husbandry, etc. These inter
group frictions are caused by baniers which
are difflcult to penetrate. Such friction may
cause conflict between groups or
communities, and this directly or indirecUy
causes thoughts and actions to adapt the
forms of residential settlements which can
provide guarantees of safely to their
residents.
It is not surprising that in later times, sites
would be chosen which facilitated easy safety
and defence against attacks by enemies.
Proper places to be chosen for tills purpose
would be high hills surrounded by steep
ravines or rivers which were difficult to cross.
Location of residential settlements in areas
with high elevation which were difficult to
reach was the main alternative in facing
49
enemies and the existing environment,
and the people who supported megalithic
culture made such choices in accord with
their needs.
Macro settlements are signified by relations
between one residence and another, both
between ttiose of the people In general and
those of their leaders, using close in-line
settlement patterns placing the leadership
elements in the centre. Such a settlement
pattern makes quick communication among
the residents easier as well as facilitating
efforts to build union and unity among the
citizens, so that in times when they have to
face undesirable situations they will quickly
come to each others' aid.
It seems that the original elements of
megalithic tradition, such as the existence
of a mountain as a holy place (the place of
residence of the ancestors) is no longer a
principal factor for the supporters of
megaliths. In the early beginnings of
megaliths, namely megaliths in prehistoric
times, the element of a mountain as a
holy place directly influenced the
facing orientation and location ofresidential settlements. Places of ceremonies
and worship played an important role.
In prehistoric times, mountains were used
as a religious concept. Residential
settlements were in the mountains, graves
faced mountains, and other functions were
pushed aside by one practical function,
50
namely the choosing the best place for
defence. Thus various megalithicresidential areas in hills in Nias were no
longer selected because of religious
factors, but rather more stress was given to
the security aspect. However, this was
not the only consideration, because in
selecting locations for residential settlements,
supporters of megalitiiic culture in Nias were
very much influenced by otiier factors based
upon life sources. Some of these factors or
considerations are as follows:
1 . There being a relatively flat piece of land
of sufficient area on the top of a hill making
it possible to lay out residential plots for the
inhabitants to build houses and/or to organize
the necessary ceremonies.
2. The contour of the area enabling the
settlement to be sun-ounded by ravines or a
deep river, difficult to be aossed by attacking
enemies.
3. An adequate and easily accessible
supply of clean water, either in the form of
a spring or water source, or a flowing river.
At least these Uiree factors were points of
consideration for supporters of megalithic
culture in choosing a site for a residential
settlement. Moving the location of a
settlement would become a possibility if ttiese
minimum requirements were no longer
fulfllled; for example, if the water flow from
the source of clean water was no longer
sufficient to fulfill daily needs.
Returning to the Bawömataluo site, located
at an altitude of 400 mefa-es above sea level,
the site obviously has very favorable natural
resources. The area has a supply of clean
water capable of fulfilling the needs of the
residents all year round. The water source
is located in a valley to ttie north of ttie village,
only 450 m in the direction of the foot of tiie
hill. There we find a water source and a river
ti-ibutary witii a flow of water over a rock bed.
Besides this, choosing the location for a
settlement was also connected with thé
supply of material needed for building.
Abiotic resources are most important in
building a village. Besides water, stone which
is usually found in abundance in rivers or in
hills is also important Sources of building
materials should ideally be located neartiy.
In the case of the Bawömataluo site,
the source of raw materials was
in a place called Batu Buaya River, about 3
km away.
Stone material used for daro-daro and naitaro
in Bawömataluo, which is known as batu
buaya (crocodile stone), is a sedimentary
rock with a grayish-black color. This fine
stone can be used for constiucting megaliUis.
Its fine grain easily lends itself to sculpture.
Especially for the foundation of a nenak yard
(ceremonial yard) a slab stone was usually
used from the stone hills not far from the
Bawömataluo site.
There are such close relations between the
environment and ttie life of ttiose who support
I
I
51
megalittifc tradition. The femiliarity with boats
in utilizing water resources is presented
flirough two and three dimensional stone
can/ings.
A boat made in three dimensions from
sedimentary rock is found in Bawömataluo,
in the fomi of a large daro-daro located near
ine .liage community hall. This is a female
sytnhoi.
This indicates the close relations betwen
megalittiic society and boats as a mode of
water ttansport. As is the case viWh ttie Dayak
Ngaju people in Kalimantan, the Nias people
also know of a sacred ceremony using a
boat (a small sampan) as paraphernalia.
This carving of the forni of a boat as a cfaro-
daro has cleariy been inspired by the habit
ofthe people to use boats in utilizing water
resources (both the sea and rivers). Besides
a daro-daro in tiie fonn of a boat, in megalittiic
sites we also find can/ings in the form of fish,
for example at Botohilitanö site.
Artistic Creativity and theEnvironment
Besides this, in connection withornamentation on ancient objects at Nias
Island, it appears ttiat the environment has
influenced ttie creativity of the art produced.
44;ol
k^._
ii^^fe
- - Sv' '
/
fe^y^-^"-^^^^Kk.^^
>
1?
t
^1
.\
f
1 '
^tm
Carvings of human activities In a boat found on the walltraditional customs belonging to a l<ing,
52
Creativity of works involving the aspect of
patterns of omamentation of megaliths is
one characteristic of megalittiic life, especially
in the making of sophisticated (more
advanced) objects as an endeavour to uplift
the status of their ancestors. Decorative
pattems are very important in making articles
related to ceremonies. In this matter, the
environment (ecology) also speaks and
determines inspiration for the craftsmen or
sculptors in carrying out their task of
omamentation ttie ceremonial objects. Thus
the objects they create are closely related
wiUi the day to day incidents which they see
and experience.
in the life of traditional houses in Nias, we
often find cultural works which exhibit a
high artistic taste. For example, the
nahanadu, a throne built in the wall of a
house for traditional customs of Nias was
used for placing statues of ancestors,
or the saita, a rack for clothes and special
tools in traditional houses of Nias, was
usually fully ornamented with carvings.
The decorative motifs used are of a
wide variety, such as birds, monkeys,
fmits, etc.
The saita is installed joined to the wall
of the house in the interior part in the
house of a siulu or salawa (king).
Saita are also often installed in cholo-
cholo or tuwu (supporing pillars inside
houses).
The motifs we find at tiie Bawömataluo and
Orahili Fau sites indicate a close connection
with the environment These motifs includ
e flora and fauna, and other objects used
as equipment for working. The flora motifs
in the form of creepers indicate a fertile
environment. The round motifs found
in various places in corners of the
Bawömataluo site indicate a connection
between tiie can/ings and ttie oranges which
they often encountered in their daily lives.
The people's utilization of plant motifs,
especially creepers, in their cultural works
is not surprising. It is related to ttieir knowing
of Uie existence of various fem fronds which
they would frequentiy come across when
they worked their fields or plantations.
The tips of fern fronds, besides their
beautiful forms which are often related as
a symbol of something growing, are also
a main ingredient of delicious food.
53
^ In discussing artistic creativity and the
environment in Nias, we enter the aspect of
sora-sora, or varieties of ornamentation in
Nias language. The varieties of traditional
ornamentation of Nias are generally in the
form of humans/demons, animals, plants
and geometric lines. These forms have
certain objectives and significance and are
symbols which they have agreed upon and
believe in. Thus it is not surprising that
although in Nias we can identify two kinds
of traditional houses, the fact is that there
are no significant differences between the
varieties of ornamentation between South
Nias and other places on Nias Island.
1. Ni'o'asu, or a dog. This kind of animal
symbolizes a protector of the king and a
seeker of food. Besides being a companion
on a journey, dogs are also useful to track
the location of enemies or animals being
hunted. This is why Ulis kind of ornament is
usually used at the back part of the kitchen
or omo hada.
2. Bae, or a monkey is a symbol of a naughty
or bad person. This kind of ornamentation
decorates Uie walls of homes, and also the
hilts of kris or swords.
3. Bawi, Pig. In daily life in Nias,
pigs are the main kind of animal
which must be there in every ceremony
and traditional party. The utilization
of pork as food at various parties
has resulted in people evaluating
the greatness or smallness of a person
by the number of pigs sacrificed.
Bawi motifs are also often placed as
ornamentation in parts of the kitchen
or omo hada.
Ni'o'asu ¡dog
Saw/ /Pig
4. Cia-cia, or gekko lizards. We find many
of these motifs on inner walls and the bolts
of doors, which symbolize ttiose who are
able to predict the future.
54
Oa-ci'a / gekko lizard
5. Fofo, birds. This kind of motif symbolizes
the openness of Nias people in receiving
guests.
It is not surprising that this decorative motif
is also placed on battie headgear on pillars
and walls of houses.
6. Gogowaya, or hombill bird. The hornbill
is the biggest and strongest bird and
considered noble in Nias. Thus a can/ing of
this bird symbolizes power.
Gogowaya I hornbill bird
55
7. Ni'o'í'a, or fish, is related to cleverness
and quickness. This kind of omamentation
is carved on walls in the omo hada.
Ni'o'i'a / fish
8. Lazara. This kind of ornamentation
illustrates ttie form of a giant's head with its
mouth opöi vflde, with long, fearsome fangs.
This ornamentation is usualjy placed in a
prominent place in the firont of the house,
facing ttie n'ont yard. As a symbol of a male
demigod, a guide and auttiority, this motif is
used in homes whose owner is a great or
powerful man. This motif is also used as an
omamentation on gari tologu (the hilt of a
kris) as well as statues at ttie tombs of siutu.
9. Ni'oafi-afi. Geometric forms ofomamentation are often used, and are also
found on the cloths worn by aristocratic
vramen. The omamentation is in the form of
a small circle surrounded by oval-shaped
leaves, which symbolize aristocracy.
fJ. 0 äff- aft
10, Ni'obuaya, which means resembling a
crocodile. This fomri symbolizes ttie authority
of a siulu king who is just and protective
towards his people. In ttie ttadidonal thought
of Nias, ttie crocodile is ttie king of ttie waters.
A king crocodile accepts offerings of food
brought by his people. Omamentation in the
form of a crocodile is usually used on baluse
(war shields), and crocodile skin is used to
make battle dress. We also find this motif in
houses (such as in Hilinawalöfau, Teluk
Dalam), or in daro-daro (stone sitting places)
in omo hada yards in Nias.
Ni'obuaya
56
11. Ni'obutelai, which means shoots or
pointed ttiings. The fonms are simple, just a
triangle round at the bottom (male) or a
pointed friangle (female), symbolizing nobility,
greatness or aristocracy. This motif is used
frequently in head ornaments made from
gold.
13. Ni'ohaluyo. The word ni'ohaluyo itself
means resembling the tip of a spear. This
kind of geomehic omamentation symbolizes
the quality or spirit of heroism. It is an
ornamentation found on the edges of
traditional houses, on measuring cups for
rice (/auru), on krises or swords, and on
womens' and mens' clothes.
Î^StÏOINi'ohaluyo
Ni'obutelai
12. Ni'ogama. This form is a symbol of unity
and firm resolve.
14. Ni'oTozasai, resembling the tail feathers
of a bird. This form symbolizes heroism, and
is drawn in red. This motif is often used in
head bands worn by men going into battie,
or by a balugu {siulu) heading a meeting.
Ni'ogamê Ni'oiozasai
57
15. Ni'omeme Roto. The form resembles a
pair of breasts (because it is made in pairs),
symbolizing fertility, and at the same time
hopes for a continuing generation.
17. Ni'otalinga Woli-woli. Its form
resembles ferns which symbolize
fertility. Before, people used thisvariety of ornamentation to symbolize
fertility.
Ni'omeme
1 6. Ni'osolafiga. This variety of omamentation
symbolizes unity and cooperation. It is an
ornament in the form of creepers..
Ni'ofalinga wali-wali
Ni'osolafiga
58
Chapter VII.Osa-osa and Human Statues.SMUGGLED FROM N
Smuggling in the waters of Sibolga
La\\s affair began fitim infbmiation received
from Central Tapanuli Subdistrict Police and
Pandan, Central Tapanuli Military Post
regarding ttie acti'vities of a group of persons
attempting to smuggle ancient cultural objects
from Nias via the waters around Sibolga.
Officers from the above two official units
organized surveillance, and came to know
that around the area of Uie village of Lubuk
Tukko, Pandan Subdistrict, Central Tapanuli
Distiict, Uie ti^nsportation of tiie said objects
was being carried ouL A raid was made on
29th May 2000, which succeeded in
confiscating evidence in the form of two
stone statues.
Later on 31st May 2000, officers of the
Central Tapanuli police returned to Uie field
and conducted another raid. Three pieces
of evidence in the fomn of objects of ancient
culture had to be brought up from Uie bottom
ofthe sea because the smuggling suspects
had jettisoned them from their boat. One
more statue, however, remained on the
bottom in the waters around the mouth of
tiie Sibuluan River in ttie area of Lubuk Tukko
village. Pandan Subdistrict, Centi^al Tapanuli
District, North Sumati'a.
News of Uie foiling ofthe smuggling attempt
was reported in the daily newspaper Sinar
Indonesia Bam on 2"'' June 2000, and in
Harían Waspada on 3"^ June 2000. Following
up on this news, the Provincial Office ofthe
Department of National Education of North
Sumatra sent its staff member from the
museums and antiquities section, Mr. Hulmán
Napitupulu, along wiUi Culture Section Head
of the Central Tapanuli office of the
Department of National Education, Mr.
Jonisar Nasution, to carry out preliminary
identification of Uie abovementioned objects
on 8"^ June 2000. The results obtained
confirmed suspicions that the pieces of
evidence stored at Central Tapanuli police
headquarters were indeed objects of
ancient culture originating from Nias.
Subsequentiy, through coordination by the
Provincial Office of the Department of
National Education of North Sumatra,
represented by Uie Head of Uie Museum and
Antiquities Section, Drs. Syaiful A Tanjung
M.M., the Medan Archeological Office made
a visit to Central Tapanuli Police
Headquarters. Together with the Section
Head of Museums and Antiquities of the
\
^iP3
59
il
Provincial Office of the Department of
Education of North Sumatra and staff,
and the Section Head of Culture of
Central Tapanuli District, they identified the
objects which had been kept at Central
Tapanuli Police Headquarters at Sibolga as
well as those still at tiie location where they
had been jettisoned in the waters at the
mouUi of Sibuluan River, Lubuk Tukko village.
Pandan Subdistnct, Central Tapanuli.
Good coordination witti the Central Tapanuli
Police Headquarters under its Chief Lt. Col.
Drs. Cosmas Lembang and Head of
Detective Section 2"^^ LL Effendi Situmorang
and staff and head of Pandan Subdistrict
Police Office 2"^ LL Zalnul Arifin Harahap
and staff made tiie collection of archeological
data on the evidence along with
photographing and drawing proceed
without impediment
60
Some of The Evidence of Smuggling.
Evidence of Smuggling
Some of the identification of the evidence-
now all kept in the State Museum of North
Sumatra, Medan is as described below.
1. Osa-osa (male)
The object is made of tufaceaous limestone.
It is cleariy a cultural object of the people of
Nias. The basic form resembles a table with
legs, of which the flat part is omamented
with three lasara heads (a mythological
animal) on the front, while on the back we
find three of a kind of square rest, all
appearing as ttie tails of ttie abovementioned
animals. The centt^il flat part usually has the
function of a table or a sitting place. This
osa-osa is 100 cm long, 93 cm wide and 12
cm ttiick. The height of the lasara head is
50 cm, and ttie rests are 38 cm high, Alttiough
ttie end is broken, ttie phallus carved on the
bottom ofthe flat part of ttie osa-osa is dearly
visible, as shown ttirough ttie carving of two
testicles.
The bottom of the flat part of the osa-osa
has been cut in a prism shape. Thus, if the
osa-osa is turned upside down, it resembles
the roof of a house. The legs have been
carved simple and rigid, however they still
exhibit ttie difference between ttie ttiighs and
the calves through thin protruding rings
can/ed in ttie knee parts. One leg of the osa-
61
^
osa is broken. The side parts on the left and
right are rectangular in shape, with
meandering ornamentation (triangles with
one of their points opposed).Between the rows of points of triangles, we
find a rectangular border without any
omamentation. On the back of the body, we
find a meandering omamentation in a larger
size than other similar pattems on the body.
The neck has a nifatall (necklace), while Uie
sides and front of ttie neck have meandering
ornamentation in layers. On the upper part
of the nifatall we find ornamentation of
triangles following the fomi ofthe necklace.
The back part of Uie neck also has large size
meandering omamentation containing leaf
ribbing. This ornamentation illustrates the
long hair of the lasara animal described
above. The ears have eamng omaments in
the form of two rings close together,
which are small compared the those
usually illustrated on cultural objects from
Nias. It may be said that the form of these
earringsusually called fondruru ana'aare proportional to the size of tiie face of the
lasara. Furthennore, the face of the lasara
is carved with a stiff expression and
the mouth wide open, complete with
teeth and a tongue hanging ouL The nose
is illustrated pointed through triangular
carvings which are straight and their base
ends at the back part of the head (so they
resemble ttie crest which grows on ttie heads
of chickens).
On the back part, the tail of the lasara has
a different size, while in the middle the
dimension is the largest. In the front, the tail
resembles a square area with the same
omamentation; namely, rings with diamond
shapes in the centre in the direction ofthe
four points of the compass. In Uie centre of
this ornamentation, which divides the tail
section, we find raised sculpture in a vertical
position like a tail bone. The ornamentation
on the reverse side is in the fonn of a gekko
lizard {Hemidactylus frenatus) carved in a
different size. The gekko on the middle part
has been carved bigger. This gekko has
been carved thinly with a seemingly
elongated anatomy.
2. Osa-osa (female)
The material and basic fonn of ttiis osa-osa
is the same as the one described above.
The length is 108 cm, width 106 cm, and
thickness 11 cm. The height of the legs is
47 cm, the height of the head of the lasara
(only as far as the neck) is 28 cm and the
height of the tail/rest is 36 cm. This object is
called a female osa-osa because it does not
have a phallus and on the front part we find
two protiusions which cleariy illustrate a pair
of breasts. The three lasara heads of this
osa-osa are broken at the neck. Two of the
broken heads have been found. The right
back leg is also damaged.
The legs of the osa-osa are folded, as if in
a position ready to attack. The legs have
been sculpted large and rigid, although the
ttiighs and calves are still differentiated. BoUi
the upper and lower flat parts ofthe body of
62
the osa-osa resemble the first (male) osa-
osa, only on the front part of the body we
find a pair of breasts carved. The upper part
of ttie front part of ttie body is decorated wiUi
meandering semicircular ornamentation,
while the part underneath is ornamented in
meandering triangles. Both frame the front
part of ttiis osa-osa, inside which we find the
inscription:
BALUGUSILABO : 0 :
: 9 : HULU . . .B
The neck part is carved with ornamentation
in the form of meandering triangles in a
random pattern. There is also Nifatall
(necklace) on the neck, and on the upper
partUiere is diamond shaped omamentation.
The Lasara is carved with diamond shaped
eyes, a long, stiff nose and the base of the
nose going as far as the back of the head
(like a cock's comb) and ear ornaments
fondruru ana'a (earrings). The front horns
found on the male osa-osa are not found on
the female one, and in their place we find
upper and lower fangs.
On tiie back of ttie head of ttie biggest lasara
there are osa-osa carvings with the upper
part omamented. The inner part of the tail
of this osa-osa has meandering
ornamentation with leaf ribbing placed on
bottom side, while on top we find circular
omamentation tiie edges of which are made
with meandering triangular ornamentation
resembling teeth. Inside we find diamond
shaped carvings facing Uie four points of ttie
compass. On the back of this part we find
an ornament in the form of a gekko lizard
carved deeply and sharply. On the body of
the biggest lizard (in the middle) we find
meandering ornamentation (reversed
triangles) and checked ornaments on the
tail. Generally speaking, it can be said that
this osa-osa has richer omamentation than
the male one described above.
3. Osa-osa (male)
This object has only one lasara, head and
tail, its dimensions are smaller ttian Uie oUier
two osa-osa; namely, 98 cm long and 7 cm
wide, with legs 28 cm high. The head is 46
cm high while the height ofthe rest/tail is 44
cm. The materials is tufaceaous limestone,
but harder ttian ttie tuff used in ttie previously
described osa-osa. The condition of this
piece is relatively complete, only a part of a
horn appears to have been repaired. The
rejoining ofthe hom has been earned out by
insertion of a nail as a pin or reinforcing. This
osa-osa has the same general form as the
oUiers, however, its phallus appears to have
been carved larger. The phallus on the
underside of the body has been carved in
an erect position, complete with testicles
behind it.
The legs have also been made large and
stiff, in a bent position, as is ready to attack.
The tiiigh and calf parts are still clearly visible.
The body of this osa-osa is round,
in contrast to the other osa-osa which are
squarish. The decorations on the right and
left sides of the body are the same.
63
The neck is decorated with large size
meandering triangular patterns with leaf
ribbing omamentation on ttie inside part. The
neck has a nifaiali (necklace) with
meandering pattems on both of its sides, so
it appears more regal. The character of the
face is the same as that of the previous
osa-osa, although the carving of the horns
is different. The previous osa-osa have been
made with one horn on the back of head,
while this one has two homs on the back of
head and two homs on Uie front ofthe head
on either side of Uie nose. On the front part
of the ears we find meandering triangular
ornamentation in a vertical position. On Uie
inner part of Uie tail has been can/ed a female
figure with large breasts and legs folded to
Uie side and hands extended, appearing to
be dancing. This figure has a round face.
The face also appears to have undergone
repairs, as evident from ttie difference in Uie
colour of the stone layer. The outside/rear
part of Uie tail has a carving of a gekko lizard
with diamond patterns on its body.
4. A Male Statue
Like the osa-osa, this statue has also been
made of tuff stone. The height is 180 cm
overall, the body is 44 cm wide and 28 cm
thick, and the head is 30 cm in diameter.
The base is 45 cm long and 10 cm thick.
The figure has been carved with thin hair,
and and ttie face has been carved complete
with diamond shaped eyes, small, thin
eyebrows, a wide moustache and ttiin, small
lips. The ears have been carved stiff, plain
and without any ornaments.The two hands have been carved stiff and
large, holding the genital, which has been
carved in an erect position, complete with
testicles. This statue has large, stiff legs,
while its two knees have been carved in
more detail witii prominent can/ing in circular
fonm.
5. A Female Statue
As is the case with the male statue, this
statue is made of tuff limestone. The overall
height is 165 cm, with a body 40 cm wide
and 25 cm thick. The base itself is 40 cm
long and 10 cm thick. The head is 29 cm in
diameter. This female character wears a
crown with meandering triangularomamentation. The face and its parts have
been can/ed more realistically. For example,
there are eyes, eyebrows, a long triangular
shaped nose, thin open lips with rows of
¡ntertocking teeth, large stiff ears with
earring ornaments. The neck is decorated
with a n/fafa// (necklace). The genitals and
breasts have been carved small.Below ttie genital there is a rattier long hole,
which from its position is cleariy the anus.
The hands are carved stiffly in a position
at the waisL The navel is round, and the
lines around the chest have been can/ed
faintly. The knees have been carved
the same as the male statue; namely,
having prominent rings. The toes are stiff.
The carving of the calves is not perfect,
leaving wide remnants where the stone
has not yet been carved.
64
6. Osa-osa
On the bottom of the mouth of the Sibulan
River at a depUi of around two meters, in tiie
village of Lubuk Tukko, Pandan Subdistrict,
Centi-al Tapanuli Disti-ict, there still remains
a submerged object waiting to be identifled.
A visit to the location and direct observation
only yielded the following results. In the
future, this object may be raised from the
bottom of the water. It is cleariy an osa-osa
120 cm long, 106 cm wide, with a body 12
cm thick. This square shaped osa-osa has
three /asara heads, all of which are broken,
leaving only the base of their necks.
Situlubagi/Sitelubagi
All the cultural objects stored as evidence at
Central Tapanuli police headquarters may
be divided into two groups. The first group
is osa-osa, four in number, while Uie second
is human statues, of which there are two.
One thing which can be said to be Uie same
among boüi groups, which also signifies tiiat
efforts have been made to carve these
objects anthropomorphically, is the carving
of genitals or other bodily parts such as
breasts which form a basis for sex
differentiation.
Based on the forms of the osa-osa as well
as the ornamentation found on them, we
may know that ttiese cultural objects come
from Nias Island. More specifically, all the
abovementioned osa-osa belong to the
category known as Osa-osa
Situlubagi/Sitelubagi. We come find many
examples of this cultural form in Uie centi^al
and south parts of Nias island. They are
usually placed alongside ottier cultural objects
which are a part of a megalithic tradition.
Examination of two of the osa-osa leads us
to suspect Uiat botti of ttiem are a pair which
may very well have come from the same
place or site. The osa-osa we are refening
to are ttie first osa-osa (male) and ttie second
osa-osa (female). These two osa-osa differ
from the third, which appears more simple
and not as regal as the first and second.
On the Uiird osa-osa, such omamentation in
the form of female carvings on the tail/rest
as well as ttie round shaped body are rarely
found in Nias. This indicates differences
which enable us to assume that this object
comes from a different place than the first
and second osa-osa. It means that these
ttiree objects come from at least two different
sites.
Carvings in the fom of humans on the back
of ttie Uiird osa-osa (male) remind us human
carvings found on an erect stone in Uie village
of Orahili Fau, in South Nias area.
Information obtained from research in this
village indicate a more recent era than that
of the culture found in Bawömataluo. We
may draw an analogy between Ulis ttiird osa-
osa and cultural objects found in the village
of Orahili Fau, wherein many of the
ornamentations found on megalittiic buildings
illustrate tools made of metal, which leads
X
VS
65
^
i<=>:*;
'v^^
us to suspect that these cultural objects
have been in existence since the end of
neolithic age, around the first century AD.
Of course in this village the third osa-osa is
far more recent Uian these cultural objects.
Furthennore, Uie two statues indicate a stiff
character with the bodily parts carved in a
way which is not proportional. The bases of
these two statues indicate Uiat both of them
had certain places wherein they had been
installed. This is because considering the
relatively small sizes of the bases of these
statues, they would have easily fallen over
if tiiey had been placed free standing witiiout
satisfactory places into which ttie bases were
inserted. Based upon the colour ofthe stone
from which these statues have been made,
we can know that these two objects are
relatively more recent compared to the osa-
osa. Examination of the can/ing technique
used reveals Uiat Uiese statues have not yet
undergone complete finishing. This is visible
on the work on the edge or point {Ungirán)
of the jaw which still looks sharp or square.
The same may be said of the other parts
which are square, which still appear sharp
and which reveal cracks.
Protected by Law
All the objects identified above are objects
wiUi considerable value for science, especially
involving Uie aspects of culture, religion and
manufacturing technology. This important
meaning is even more significant because
the data obtained during the process of
identification of these objects indicates that
the loss of this data would also have erased
the important infomnation contained therein.
Moreover, a large proportion of this
information is related closely witti the history
of the activities of the people of an island
known to have a megalithic tradition which
at the moment is a cultural asset of the
district that has long been proposed
to be made a part of the World Cultural
Heritage (?).
Examining the initial understanding of
Protected Cultural Objects according to Law
No. 5 of 1992, we may know that Protected
Cultural Objects are man-made objects,
tangible or intangible, as individual
units or in groups, or parts thereof, or their
remnants, which are more ttian 50 years old,
or having the style of an age more that 50
years in the past, and considered to
possess important values for history,
science and culture. Based upon this
understanding, the above mentioned
objects all constitute evidence of
smuggling of ancient cultural objects of
considerable size now kept in the State
Museum of North Sumatra in Medanwhich are more than 50 years old and
hence classified as Protected Cultural
Objects under the protection of the law.
They also belong to the cultural wealth
of the megalithic tradition of Nias.
66
.!ïÈi'7i*;'îv!,-
A
.a>,67
i^J-f
Chapter VIII.Conclusion
The Function ofthe Megaliths of Nias
ft^erry (1918), based on study of distribution,
function and association of megalithic
monuments in Indonesia, has stated that
among these monuments, some function as
places for conducting ceremonies such as
in the islands of Kei and Bada; some as
tombs such as the stone table tombs in
Sumba; or as commemorative signs and
thrones, such as is the case in Nias.
As we have stated in previous pages,
megaliths in Nias Island have undergone
deep changes. Megalithic tradition always
relates megalithic objects to the spirits of
ancestors. Megalitiis are built for ttie welfare
of departed spirits and for the safety of the
people they have left behind. Therefore,
the establishment of menhirs is oriented
towards the spirits of ancestors. A shifting in
function of megaliths is cleariy visible
in Uie megaliths of Nias. The forms of large
and small megaliths, both those placed
horizontally as well as vertically, are relics
or signs of there having been a leader,
his family, an aristocrat, etc. Here megaliths
are no longer established to guarantee
ttiat in deaUi souls will safely reach the spirit
worid, but more to stress the aspects of
prestige and honour as well as to safeguard
prosperity for the deceased as well as
their family (Geldern, 1945; Mulia, 1981).
Megalithic Sites and Their Utilization
in Botohilitanö
Megaliths are established so Uiat ttie people
may know of the prestige and honour of a
departed person. Therefore, in the method
of making as well as the fomis of megaliths,
efforts are made to make the megalith
beautiful, good, large, etc. in all respects.
The size of the stone used, ttie grandeur or
simplicity of the ornamental patterns used
very much depend on the person's status,
either as a feared and respected leader or
as a rich aristocrat whose family could afford
to hold a party (deatti ceremony) on a grand
scale.
Along with the ongoing development
of megaliths, changes in function have
taken place. The primary function of
megalitiis was oriented as a commemorative
sign for men and women which appeared
in the form of daro-daro and naitaro.
However, later on, a secondary function
appeared which was more oriented towards
practical functions. An informant said that
68
one of ttiese secondary functions is Uiat the
naitaro which is shaped like a lin hat' or ttie
tip ofthe male genital is used as a place for
keeping the hat of a leader while certain
ceremonies are being conducted.
One kind of relic which may be classified as
a megalittiic element is the stacks of stones
usually used for stone hurdle jumping
ceremonies. According to information
obtained from an elder at Uie Bawömataluo
site, the function of the custom of stone
hurdle jumping has two aspects; firstiy, for
sport and secondly as a means of initiation
for a person to be appointed as a warrior.
The reason behind this is in order that at
certain times the warrior would be able to
jump over the wall or fence of an enemy
village, so ttiat when he was being chased
he would not be caught inside a village having
a high fence. Stones used for stone hurdle
jumping have never been found at any otiier
prehistoric megalithic sites or as part of any
living megalithic tradition anywhere else in
Indonesia, and ttius those found in Nias are
cleariy very special megalithic elements.
We should also know tiiat in ttie can/ings on
megalithic works in Nias Island we find
illusb-ations of an animal refen-ed to as lazara
by the local people. This motif depicts an
ornament in the form of a giant, especially
for ti-aditional houses of kings In Nias. In ttie
Gomo area, this animal is considered a
protector who gives safety and prosperity to
human beings. The animal is a source of
supematural power beyond human thinking
power.
The lazara can/ings placed on the right and
left of Uie enti-ance doors of Uie front part of
the Bawömataluo complex and at the rear
enùBnce of ttie Orahili Fau complex appearto
be related to efforts to make ttie villages safe
from threats of danger. Supematural power
placed at Uie enUance door is considered to
repel forces. The lazara at Bawömataluo and
Orahili Fao sites have not been can/ed in
their complete fomis.
Utilization of Objects of MegalithicTradition
One kind of simple life closely related to
megalithic tradition which has been well
researched ttirough archeological as well as
anthropological study is that found in the
Nias area. Megalithic tradition on Ulis island
appears to still be strong, and therefore
experts consider Nias Island to be a place
having an advanced megalithic tradition.
We find at the moment that megalithic
creations such as gowe or behu (menhir)
batu nitaru (standing stones), harefa (stone
planks), daro-daro (altars) etc. are no
longer made. In several places in the
norUiem, eastem and westem parts of Nias
many of the megaliths are damaged.
In central Nias, although megaliths are not
damaged by human hands, dilapidation
frequently occurs by the power of nature
such as weather, mould etc.. We find
megalithic relics which are still relatively
^
69
Megalittiic Sites and Ttieir Utilization
well maintained in the villages of
Bawömataluo and Hilisimaetane, in the
area of Teluk Dalam Subdistiid, South Nias.
These megaliths are the products of
a party commemorating service called
owasa which very much resembles
the ceremonies called iriau held in
the highlands of Kelabit, Sarawak.
Such parties are preliminary ceremonies
involving burial of bones, improvement of
standard of life and economic distribution.
The megaliths existing in Bawömataluo
and other sites were used as signs or
commemorations of a figure who had
passed away, and at the same time
were proof of efforts to demonstrate
the status, honour, prestige and fame
of that figure.
In Nias, menhirs are related to ceremonies
or honour paid to fertility, whilst in Flores
they are related to worship of the moon, sun
and animals (Hoop,1932). In ttieir subsequent
development, menhirs became menhir
statues, such as we find in Tundrombaho
(Nias), in Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta, or in
Toraja (Sulawesi). In Nias, as is the case in
Jabung, Central Lampung, there are also
menhirs in the shape of male genitals. Such
forms in Gunung Tampomas, West Java are
70
referred to as batu kontol (Koestoro,1987).
All these symbolize ancestors whose
protection is requested, and are also fertility
symbols.
Dolmen or tomb tables are often related to
a function of sen/ing as tombs for persons
respected by society. Often these dolmen
(lying stones) are discovered along with
menhir (standing stones). Such stones are
tiius considered to symbolize ttie female and
male, respectively. We find this not only in
Nias, but also in Pasemah, South Sumati'a,
Sumba and Flores in Eastem Lesser Sunda
Islands (Hoop, 1932).
In Nias we still find stone thrones having a
magical-symbolic function for the coming of
ttie spirits of ancestors of leaders considered
to have performed meritorious service,
and at the same time as symbols of the
presence of ancestors at certain times.
It is not surprising if these stone ttirones are
used as sitting places for community
leaders at tiie times of community meetings
and ttie performance of certain ceremonies
(Mulia,1981). They also reflect the social
status adhering to certain groups in society.
Stone thrones in Nias later developed to
become osa-osa made from timber,
and used as palanquins to carry a leader
and his wife in procession around a village.
Symbolically, this should also be
considered as religious action for giving
protection and prosperity to the citizens.
(Mulia,1981;Perry,1918).
One encouraging aspect is that until now,
the existence of sites of megalithic
tradition has been utilized as an attractive
feature for tourism. Such objects of
cultural tourism clearly require even
more attention so that their management
may maintain their existence which as time
goes by will naturally be threatened by
damage in many ways.
Efforts to make these sites a worid heritage
is an interesting idea which requires a wise
response. The motivation for this is cleariy
related to their presen/ation and utilization
for various interests of culture, economy and
peace.
Nias in 2005
When the tsunami hit on 26th December
2004, iTiany ancient relics in Nias
also became victims of the disaster.
Severe damage was sustained in
several coastal areas of Nias Island.
Data had not yet been compiled of the
tsunami damage when a second disaster
occurred. This time it was an earthquake
of a magnitude of 8.7 on the Richter
Scale, which took place at 23.10 on 28th
March 2005. This earthquake shook and
devastated even more objects which
had been the physical evidence of the
traditions of Nias. In addition, there
were still aftershocks which although
of smaller magnitude were stilleffective enough to add to the severity
of Uie damage.
71
One of tine Megalithic Sites Devastated as a Result of the Eofttiquoke
In response to the earthquake disaster,
the government initially declareda state of emergency. The activities
which went on gave more importance to
efforts to save lives, and to alleviate the
suffering of ttie people who were victims of
the disaster. After that followed periods of
reconstruction and rehabilitation. The
planning of these programmes focused on
reconstruction of public facilities such as
hospitals, schools, bridges and a small
number of residential homes. These all
constituted efforts by the government to
repair the condition of the people which-it
must beadmitted-was deteriorating more
and more.
Imperfection is a part of human life. That
there have been evaluations of things
lacking in the process of planning and
execution of the reconstruction and
rehabilitation of Nias after the disasters is a
very palpable fact. And this is related to
field of culture. It was as if culture was
considered something not very important
compared to the priority of meeting
basic needs (nine essential commodities),
hospitals and school buildings. The
existence of the remains of megalithic
tiradition, among them traditional houses-
omo hada Nias seems to have been
allowed to remain threatened with
desttuction. This has occurred in almost the i
entire area struck by the disaster.
There is a general fear that the destmction
of the omo hada Nias traditional houses will
also cause the disappearance of the
traditional villages. In any case, we still all
agree Uiat ttie existence of ti'aditional houses
and architecture of Nias is identical with
traditional Nias villages. Therefore, we can
imagine Uiat if Uiese objects no longer exist,
then Nias will lose its physical identity along
witti Uie implicit values contained Uierein, as
well as opinions and history in the process.
This would cause us to enter a condition of
vacuum with regard to the nobility, cultural
opulence, expertise and wisdom of ttie people
of Nias. Fears arise that the community of
Nias which is unique in the worid may lose
everyttiing, and we may only be able to know
of ttiese things as memories. Of course this
would be a great pity, and cleariy it does not
need to happen.
It is interesting to note several matters with
regard to ttie existence of megalittiic fradition
in Nias Island and its connection with the
natural disasters which struck some time
ago. When Uie tectonic earthquake hit, Uie
area which experienced ttie greatest damage
was the city of Gunung Sitoli. We know that
this densely populated city had multistorey
buildings, and it is buildings over two storeys
high which tended to collapse. Very few of
these buildings sun/ived the earthquake.
This is in sharp contrast to small wooden
houses, very few of which were damaged.
with the exception of those which were
already dilapidated or which were built on
unstable land. The same applied to the omo
hada b-aditional houses of Nias. The level of
damage to traditional houses was smaller
compared to that sustained by reinforced
concrete buildings. The wooden material and
diagonal pillars in the stmctures made the
omo hada possess the resilience and
flexibility to withstand the shaking
of the earthquake when it came.
This means we must admit that the basic
idea of traditional architecture as a design
based on research and discovery of our
ancestors cenhjries ago which lately we have
begun to give up is obviously more
environment friendly. The awareness of our
forefattiers ofthe existence of disasters and
natural phenomenawhich even until now
are uncontrollable by human scienceis
strangely no longer maintained by their
descendants, man of today.
Hopes
Perhaps it is not incorrect if we say that the
remoteness of Nias is one crucial factor
which has caused the speed of its
development to lag far behind that of other
districts, for example those in the island of
Java.. Optimism must be developed that
utilization of all the potency the island
possesses promises many economic
improvement. One of these potencies is In
connection witii tourism. In ttie tourist sector,
Nias cleariy has an advantage. This is related
''î:^
73
to two things, firstiy the natural beauty of the
island and its coast and sun^ounding ocean,
and secondly Uie cultural wealUi of its people.
The potency of nature tourism in Nias cleariy
differs from that of other places whose
fijnction has shifted greaUy as a result of ttie
pressure of economic interests. Nias' beach
witti its expanse of white sand and pounding
waves proclaims Its attractiveness to tourists
from all over the worid who wish to sunbath
on ttie beach or surf ttie waves. An example
is Lagundri beach which is so famous for its
ocean waves rolling high in Soutii Nias. This
is a dream place, a heaven for surfers.
There are beaches in other parts of Nias
which are full of rows of coconut trees. Calm
waves in these places present an extensive
and unique seascape. It is difficult to find a
natural marine wealth to match that of Nias.
In Lahewa Subdistrict in the north of Nias
Island, diving can be done safely from the
shore of the Indonesian ocean which is
othenA/ise known for its big rolling waves.
The same is the case in the waters of the
islands in the south and south-east.
Anottier attractive feature of Nias is its cultural
diversity. As we have presented above, all
this awaits assistance to be preserved,
utilized and developed for various interests
which would make it possible to increase ttie
prosperity of the island.
There is a need to develop and improve
cultural infomiation ttirough a guidebook on
Nias. This is related to efforts to increase
the flow of tourists who clearly need
information, facilities and means of
transportation, facilities for tourism, and
development of tourist destinations supported
by increases in peoples' income.
Based on existing data, we know that from
year to year the development of tourist
travel in Nusantara has been encouraging.
It is also known that tourist travel by
Indonesian tourists has a greater
financial value compared with what is
spent by foreign tourists. This is from the
economic point of view. There is also anottier
benefit obtained from the development of
local tourism in Indonesia besides the
economic aspect, and that is the significant
benefit in helping to develop the union and
unity of the nation. This benefit is brought
about by tourist travel which grows and
develops from cities, spreads to villages and
vice versa, intercity, interisland and
interprovincial.
We can also envisage that for the younger
generation, tourist travel will motivate
them to increase their love of their country,
nature and the environment, as well as
appreciate more the potency and wealth of
nature. A good appreciation of culture
on the part of the younger generation of
Indonesia can be said to be an asset for
carrying on a brighter life in the future. We
must be convinced of that. Ya'ahowu!
74
Bibliography
Anwar, Rosihan, 2004. Sejarah Kecil "Petite
Histoire" Indonesia. Jakarta:
Kompas
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Nias. Nias
Dalam Angka 2003
Bellwood, Peter, 2000. PrasejarahKepuiauan indo-Maiaysia.
Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka
Utama
Feldman, Jerome, 1990. Nias and Its
traditional Sculptures, in Nias
Tribal Treasures Cosmic
reflections in stone, Wood
and Gold. Delft: Volkenkundig
Museum Nusantara, p. 21-38
Geldern, R von Heine, 1945. Prehistoric
Research In The Netheriands
Indies, in Science and
Scientiest in the Netherlands
Indies. New York
Hämmerte, Johannes Maria, 2001. Asa!
Usui Masyarakat Nias. Suatu
interpretas!. Gunung Sitoli:
Yayasan Pusaka Nias
Heekeren, H.R. van, 1931. Megalithische
overblijlselen In Besoeki, Java,
dalamDjawaVoLXI, p. 1-18
, 1958. The Bronze-Iron Age of
Indonesia, dalam KITLV Vol.
XXII. the Hague: Martinus
Nijhoff
Hoop, A.N.J. TH.A. Th. Van der, 1932.
Megalithic Remains in South
Sumatera. Trans by W.
Shiriaw. ZuUipen: W.J. Thieme
,1949, IndonesischeSiermotieven. Batavia:
Koninklijk BataviaaschGenootschap van Künsten en
Wetenschapen
Kempers, AJ Bernett, 1959. AncientIndonesian Art.Massachusetts: Harvard
University Press
Koestoro, Lucas Partanda, 1987. Sanghiang
Taraje, Tinggalan Tradisi
Megalitik Di GunungTampomas, dalam Berkala
Arkeologi Vlll(2). Yogyakarta:
Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta,
p. 36-46
Mulia, Rumbi,1981. Nias, the Only Older
Megalithic Tradition in
Indonesia, dalam Bulletin of
Research Center of
I
I
^v:^
75
Archaeology of Indonesia
No. 16. Jakarta: National
Archeological Research
Centre
Perry, WJ, 1918. The Megalithic Culture
of Indonesia. London:
Longsman, Green & Co.
Megalithic Tradition ofIndonesia, in BerkalaArkeologi. Yogyakarta: Balai
Ari<eologi Yogyakarta
-, 1990. The Megalithics of Nias
Island-Indonesia in Majalah
llmu dan Budaya XII No. 7-8
Reid, Anthony, 1992. Asia Tenggara Dalam
Kurun Niaga 14501680(translated by Mochtar
Pabotinggi). Jakarta: Yayasan
Obor Indonesia
-, 2004. Sejarah Modern Awal
Asia Tenggara (b'anslated by
Sort Siregar et al.). Jakarta:
' Pustaka LP3ES
1
^j^ Ricklefs, MC, 1998. Sejarah Indonesia
Modern (translated by
Dharmono Hardjowidjono).
Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada
University Press
Soejono, Raden Panji, 1953. Indonesia,
dalam Asian Perspective,
Bulletin of the Far Eastern
Prehistory AssociationIV/1-2
(ed), 1993. Sejarah Nasiona!
Indonesia I. Jakarta: Balai
Pustaka
Susanto, RM et al, 1995. Laporan
Penelitian ArkeologiPeneiitian Arkeometri di
Kabupaten Nias, Propinsi
Sumatera Utara. Medan:
Bagian Proyek Penelitian
Purbakala Sumatera Utara
(unpublished)
Sutaba, I Made, 1994. Preliminary Notes on
the Ancestor Statues in Bali,
dalam The 15"^ Congress ofthe Indo-Pacific Prehistory
Association, Chiang Mai,
Thailand
Tim Penelitian Medan Archeological Office,
1997. Laporan Hasil
Penelitian Arkeologi dan
Arkeometri Situs Gomo dan
Sekitarnya, Kecamatan
Gomo, Kabupaten Nias,
Provins! Sumatera Utara.
Medan: Medan Archeological
Office (unpublished)
Sukendar Haris, 1987. Description on the
-, 1993. Laporan Hasil Penelitian
Arkeologi Tradisi Megalitik
76
di Daerah Mandrehe dan
sekitarnya, Kab. Nias, Prov.
Sumatera Utara. Medan:
Medan Archeological Office
(unpublished)
Wagner, Frits A, 1983. Indonésie, l'Art d'un
Archipel. Paris: Editions Albin
Michel
Wales, HG Ouaritch, 1953. The Mountain
of God. London: Bernard
Ouaritch Ltd. Grafton Street,
New Bon Street
Wiradnyana, Ketut dan Lucas P Koestoro,
2000. Osa-Osa dan Arca
Manusia, Benda Cagar
Budaya dan Nias: Identifikasi
Barang Buktl Penyelundupan
diPerairan Sibolga, Sumatera
Utara, in Berkala Arkeologi
Sangkhakaia No. 8: Medan.
Balar Medan
Wiradnyana, Ketut, Nenggih Susilowati, dan
Lucas P Koestoro, 2002. Gua
Tögi Ndrawa, Hunian Mesolitik
di Nias Island, in Berita
Penelitian Arkeologi No. 8.
Medan: Balar Medan
Zaluchu, Sonny Eli, 1993. Nias Island: Butir
Zamrud Yang Tersembunyi,
dalam Hikmat Kurinia (ed.)
Nuansa Kampung Halaman.
Jakarta: Puspa Swara, p. 96-111
Zebua, FA Yana, 1987. Kebudayaan
Tradisional Ono Niha (Nias).
Gunung Sitoli: tp
I
77
Medan Are he a lógica I Offfee
alan Seroja Raya, Gang ArkeologiMedan Tuntungan, Medan 2013^Tel (061)8224363, 8224365Fax. (061)8224365
|[![|Jnltcd Nations
Educational. Sclentiflc andCyftural Organization
UNESCO Office, JakartaJl, GailJh (I!) No. 5. Kebayoran Baru,
Jakarta 12' -s
E-mail : jakf ^rg
Website : www. unesco. or. id