+ All Categories
Home > Education > Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Date post: 10-May-2015
Category:
Upload: anil-basavaradder
View: 190 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
How Meiosis has driven Genome Variation in Plants is all about.
Popular Tags:
70
Heartily Welcome You all
Transcript
Page 1: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Heartily Welcome

You all

Liverwort

HornwortFern

cones

Meiosis-Driven Genome Variation in

Plants

Contents

bull Introduction

bull Mitosis amp Meiosis

bull How meiosis evolved

bull Insight of Genes for meiotic events in models

bull Meiosis-driven genome variation

bull Conclusion

1

bull Meiotic cell division is a complex and dynamic process with

molecular and cellular events

DNA and chromosome replication

Synapsis and recombination

Chromosome segregation and

Cytokinesis

bull Involved in gametogenesis

Word Meiosis from Greek root meaning ldquo to diminishrdquo 1st described by

Van Beneden in 1883 in the Ascaris

2

Meiosis is a conserved cytological process and serves as a physical foundation for Mendelian genetics

bull Meiosis includes two successive divisions ofthe nucleus with one round of DNAreplication and leads to the formation ofgametes with half of the chromosomes of themother cell during sexual reproduction

3

4

Independent assortmentAnaphase I

5

6

In humans

7

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 2: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Liverwort

HornwortFern

cones

Meiosis-Driven Genome Variation in

Plants

Contents

bull Introduction

bull Mitosis amp Meiosis

bull How meiosis evolved

bull Insight of Genes for meiotic events in models

bull Meiosis-driven genome variation

bull Conclusion

1

bull Meiotic cell division is a complex and dynamic process with

molecular and cellular events

DNA and chromosome replication

Synapsis and recombination

Chromosome segregation and

Cytokinesis

bull Involved in gametogenesis

Word Meiosis from Greek root meaning ldquo to diminishrdquo 1st described by

Van Beneden in 1883 in the Ascaris

2

Meiosis is a conserved cytological process and serves as a physical foundation for Mendelian genetics

bull Meiosis includes two successive divisions ofthe nucleus with one round of DNAreplication and leads to the formation ofgametes with half of the chromosomes of themother cell during sexual reproduction

3

4

Independent assortmentAnaphase I

5

6

In humans

7

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 3: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Contents

bull Introduction

bull Mitosis amp Meiosis

bull How meiosis evolved

bull Insight of Genes for meiotic events in models

bull Meiosis-driven genome variation

bull Conclusion

1

bull Meiotic cell division is a complex and dynamic process with

molecular and cellular events

DNA and chromosome replication

Synapsis and recombination

Chromosome segregation and

Cytokinesis

bull Involved in gametogenesis

Word Meiosis from Greek root meaning ldquo to diminishrdquo 1st described by

Van Beneden in 1883 in the Ascaris

2

Meiosis is a conserved cytological process and serves as a physical foundation for Mendelian genetics

bull Meiosis includes two successive divisions ofthe nucleus with one round of DNAreplication and leads to the formation ofgametes with half of the chromosomes of themother cell during sexual reproduction

3

4

Independent assortmentAnaphase I

5

6

In humans

7

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 4: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Meiotic cell division is a complex and dynamic process with

molecular and cellular events

DNA and chromosome replication

Synapsis and recombination

Chromosome segregation and

Cytokinesis

bull Involved in gametogenesis

Word Meiosis from Greek root meaning ldquo to diminishrdquo 1st described by

Van Beneden in 1883 in the Ascaris

2

Meiosis is a conserved cytological process and serves as a physical foundation for Mendelian genetics

bull Meiosis includes two successive divisions ofthe nucleus with one round of DNAreplication and leads to the formation ofgametes with half of the chromosomes of themother cell during sexual reproduction

3

4

Independent assortmentAnaphase I

5

6

In humans

7

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 5: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Meiosis includes two successive divisions ofthe nucleus with one round of DNAreplication and leads to the formation ofgametes with half of the chromosomes of themother cell during sexual reproduction

3

4

Independent assortmentAnaphase I

5

6

In humans

7

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 6: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

4

Independent assortmentAnaphase I

5

6

In humans

7

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 7: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Independent assortmentAnaphase I

5

6

In humans

7

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 8: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

6

In humans

7

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 9: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

In humans

7

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 10: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Diploid somatic cells of Fungi Animals amp Plants chromosomal crossing over

known as lsquoMitotic crossing overrsquo

Significant contrasts between meiotic and mitotic recombination

1 Mitotic recombination takes at very much lower frequency than in meiosis

2 In mitotic cells Crossing over between sister chromatids is fairly frequent

meiosis is structured to promote crossing over between non-sister chromatids

3 As in yeast cells mitotic recombination is mediated efficiently by either of two

recA homologs rad51 and Dmc1 while meiotic exchange between homologs

requires Dmc1 specifically

Neale and Keeney 2006

8

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 11: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Earliest eukaryotic species were single-cell haploid forms having single set of

chromosomes and propagated by mitosis

bull Simplest contemporary eukaryotes Protists and fungi exhibit the mitotic propagation

of both haploid and diploid states diploidy is almost certainly a derived state

bull Very first diploid cells could have first arisen either by cell fusion or by

endomitosis

bull Hurst and Nurse (1991) First diploids probably arose via rare endomitotic errors

rather than by cell fusion

bull Either route to early diploid states is possible since non-sexual cell and nuclear

fusions can occur independently of sex (lsquolsquoparasexualityrsquorsquo)

9

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 12: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Liverwort

Hornwort

Club mosses

Cone bearing plants

Green AlgaeAnc

est

or

10

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 13: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull All the key molecules employed in eukaryotic mitosis are of

Prokaryotic homologs

Actins required for daughter cell separation in eukaryotes

Tubulins required in eukaryotes for the mitotic spindle and movement

of chromosomes and

bull SMC molecules must for chromosome condensation and

sisterchromatid cohesion members of the so-called Structural

maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) family

Hirano 2005 and Erickson 2007

11

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 14: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Tubulin family FtsZ genes which were first discovered in

Escherichia coli later found in many prokaryotes

bull Product of Ftsz involved in initiation of septum formation

bull minB locus regulate site of septum formation

bull MinCMinDMinE determines location of septum formation

bull The homologs of the SMC proteins are found throughout theEubacterial and Archaebacterial kingdoms

12

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 15: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

For genetic recombination recA family of proteins molecules in

prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Aboussekhra et al 1992

Shinohara et al 1992

Recombinational capacity is found throughout the prokaryotes

and considerably predate eukaryotes so meiosis arisen from pro

Levin 1988

Cavalier-Smith 2002

Marcon and Moens 2005

13

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 16: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Suppression of Kinetochore splitting in MI was key innovation

in meiosis

Cavalier-Smith2002

bull Selection pressure on homologous pairing and high levels of intergenic

recombination are prime force for origin of meiosis

Fisher1930 Muller 1932 Maynard Smith 1978Crow 1988

bull Efficient DNA ds breaks and repair system

Bernstein 19771988

Argueso et al2008

14

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 17: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Genetic cytological and immunochemical characterization done

in

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Arabidopsis thaliana amp

Drosophila melanogaster etc

15

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 18: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

16

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 19: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

17

bull SPO11 gene required for meiotic recombination by catalyzing DNA ds

Breaks

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 20: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Mutation of Spoll-1

(i) Drastic reduction in meiotic recombination and ascospore viability amp no

significant effect on vegetative growth or mitotic exchange

(ii) The low spore survival results from aneuploidy

(iii) It is epistatic to other recombination (Rec) mutants such as rad51 rad52

and rad57 that do not produce viable spores in the presence of spol3-1

alone but do so when spoll-1 is also present

(iv) It does not block either pre-meiotic DNA synthesis or synaptonemal

complex formation

18

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 21: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Conthellip

bull Unlike the RAD genes which can affect both meiotic and

mitotic recombination as well as DNA repair the SPO11

function appears to be meiosis specific and unrelated to repair

bull RNA analyses demonstrate that wild-type SPO11 gene acts relatively at

early in the meiotic recombination process or soon after the time of

chromosome pairing

CATHERINE L ATCHESON et al1987

19

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 22: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Arabidopsis thaliana 2n=2x=10

bull Scerviceae that initiates meiotic recombination

bull The Model plant Athaliana possesses at least 3 Spo11 homologues

bull Meiotic progression altered by EMS by which AtSpo11-1 gene was disrupted

bull Leading to non-synapsed chromosome in Prophase ndashI and non-functional

gametes due to random chromosome distribution in meiosis ndashI

20

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 23: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

6 weeks Wild type6 weeks mutant type

21

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 24: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Wild Type (97)

Pollen fertility

Mutant Type spo11-1

(11) Pollen fertility

Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) Microscopy observation

Mature embryo sacs were observedOnly 3 female

gametophyte were differentiated Intermediate stages

were seen Incomplete

differentiation lead to 2-4 nuclei

22

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 25: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Irregular Tetrads and

Polyads

23

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 26: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

24

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 27: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

25

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 28: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

26

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 29: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

27

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 30: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

28

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 31: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Structure Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC)

bull MRE11

bull RAD51 homologs

bull BRCA2

bull MSH4

bull MER3

bull ZIP1

bull Genes that encode components unique to plants such as POOR

HOMOLOGOUS SYNAPSIS 1 and AMEIOTIC 1 have been cloned

Hamant O Ma H Cande WZ 2006

29

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 32: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Knowledge of meiosis-driven genome variations

Genome evolution and

Genetic variability in plants and evolution in plants

Facilitates plant genome research

30

Meiosis-driven genome variation

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 33: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

31

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 34: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

32

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 35: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Asynapsis Homologous chromosomes may fail to synapse

bull Desynapsis Homologous chromosomes synapse with each other normally but

the association cannot be held until Anaphase I and they separate

prematurely

bull Both lead to univalents they either get lost or are randomly transmitted to

daughter cells resulting in chromosomally unbalanced gametes and

eventually aneuploids in the offspring

Misdivision such as transverse division lead to Telocentric Acrocentric and

Acentric chromosomes or Isochromosomes in wheat

Sears ER1952

Asynapsis and desynapsis induced aneuploidy in plants

33

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 36: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull For accurate segregation Proper Pairing Synapsis and

Recombination of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I are

prerequisites

bull Synapsed Bivalents held together until Anaphase I by the

chiasmata resulting from crossing-over and cohesin

34

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 37: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis

Watanabe Y Nurse P 1999

The rice Os-Rad21-4 an orthologue of yeast Rec8 protein is required for efficient meiosis

Zhang L2006

The Arabidopsis SYN1 cohesion protein is required for sister chromatid arm cohesion and homologous chromosome pairing

Cai X et al2003

AtREC8 and AtSCC are essential to the monopolar orientation of the

Kinetochores during meiosis

Chelysheva L et al2005

35

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 38: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Genes Asynapsis and Desynapsis

CROP ASYNAPSIS DESYNAPSIS ASSOCIATED REFERENCES

Soybean st2 st3 st8 st4 ast6 and st7 and st5

Male amp female sterility

Palmer RC Kilen RC1987Palmer RG Horner

HT2000Kato KK2003

Maize phs1 dy and dsy1 Telomere misplacement

Bass HW2003

Arabidopsis thaliana

asy1 dsy1 Male fertility Chaudhury AMet al1994

Single recessive genes amp Duplicated recessive factors

36

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 39: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull In many plant spp higher recombination frequency at gene-rich

regions than repetitive DNA sequences

At a number of gene loci in plants

bull In Rice (Oryza sativa) wx locus and

bull In Maize (Zea mays) A1 locus and bronze locus

In Arabidopsis at the csr1 locus intragenic recombination rate was

found almost same as the genome average

37

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 40: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Meiotic recombination can be

Intergenic recombination

Intragenic recombination

Generators of genetic diversity Plays important rolein gene evolution

Fisher 1930 Muller 1932

Maynard Smith 1978 Crow 1988

38

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 41: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Intragenic Recombination

bull First described in Drosophila melanogaster in 1940

bull In 1955 fungus Neurospora crassa

bull Results in disruption of a functional gene or generation of new

alleles at the gene locus

bull Reciprocally or via a non-reciprocal process called bdquogene conversion‟

39

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 42: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Intragenic recombination Evolution of disease resistance genes

Maize-Rust

Flax-Rust

Arabidopsis-Downy Mildew

Tomato-Leaf Mold

Wheat ndashLeaf Rust

Citrus- Tristeza

Maize rust resistance gene complex Rp1

Recombination within Rp1 gene complex mostly within the coding regions led to new rust resistance specificities

Richter TE 1995 Sun Q2001

40

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 43: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Flax (Linum usitatissimum)

gt30 rust resistance genes designated K L M N and P have

been identified

bull Extensive analysis of the L and M loci suggests

The L locus contains a single gene with multiple alleles

Anderson PA 1997

Bent A F 1996

41

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 44: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Sequence and genetic analysis of 13 natural and in vitro engineered

recombinant alleles at the L locus by intragenic recombination resulted in

mutant alleles that confer novel resistance specificities

42

Islam MR 1991

Mayo GME 1980

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 45: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8

McDowell et al 1998

Tomato (Lycopersicon) leaf mold resistance gene Cf-5

Dixon MSet al1988

Wheat (Triticum) leaf rust resistance gene Lr21

Citrus Citrus Tristeza virus resistance gene Ctv

Yang Zet al2003

Revealed occurrence of the recombination within the coding region of disease resistance genes in plants

43

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 46: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Intragenic recombination Generates allelic diversity

bull Sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) dwarf mutant dw3 mutant allele was

generated by a direct duplication of an 882 bp interval in Exon 5

bull Instability by loss of the duplication due to unequal crossing-over

between the duplicated regions

bull The intragenic unequal crossing-over event reverted the mutant

allele dw3 to the wild type allele Dw3

Multani D S et al2003

44

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 47: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Results in

bull Deletions

bull Duplications

bull Inversions and

bull Translocations

Disrupt the function of a gene

Generate new alleles at a gene

locus and

Cause variations in the genome

structure and size by counter

acting genome expansion

45

Impact

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 48: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

unequal crossing-over

bull Unequal alignment of homologous chromosomal regions

and then unequal crossing-over due to sequence

similarity among members of a gene family or other

tandem repeats

bull Unequal crossing-over was first documented at the

Bar locus in Drosophila melanogaster in the 1920s

Sturtevant AH1925

46

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 49: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Unequal crossovers Evolution of disease resistance gene families

bull In Tomato Cf-4 and Cf-9 reside within a large gene family on the short arm

of chromosome 1

bull Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance locus RPP5

Parker JE et al1997

bull In Soybean (Glycine max)Intragenic unequal crossing over in nucleotide-

binding-siteleucine-rich-repeat-like sequence lead to deletion of the

phytophthora resistance gene Rps4

Sandhu Det al2004

bull Rsv1 conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus

Hayes AJ 2004

47

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 50: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Unequal recombination Mechanisms for genome contraction

bull gt50 of nuclear DNA is Repetitive DNA sequences Including

transposable elements and variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs)

comprise a large portion of the genome in plant species

Flavell RB1974

bull Unequal crossing-over occurred within LTR (long terminal repeat)-

containing retrotransposons due to the LTRs at both ends of the element

removes the internal domain of the retroelement and leads to solo LTRs

Bennetzen JL1997

48

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 51: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull In the rice genome ratio of solo LTRs to intact LTR retroelements varies

with the retrotransposon families

Vitte C Panaud O 2003

bull In Rice Oryza sativa L Formation of solo-LTRs through unequal

homologous recombination counterbalances amplifications of LTR

retrotransposons

bull Over 190 Mb of LTR retrotransposon sequences have been removed from

the Rice genome in the last eight million years

Ma J et al2004

49

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 52: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull In Maize genome retroelements found to be intact a mechanism

to counterbalance genome expansion

SanMiguel P et al1996

bull Rapid genome divergence at orthologous low molecular weight

Glutenin loci of the A genome of wheat by sequence deletion in

the LTR retrotransposons due to unequal recombination

Wicker T et al 2003

50

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 53: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION

bull Orientation of sister Kinetochores

bull At both meiotic divisions govern chromosome segregation and transmission throughout meiosis

51

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 54: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Monopolar attachment of microtubules to the sister

Kinetochores at metaphase I is prerequisite to ensure accurate

segregation of homologous chromosomes at meiosis I

Watanabe Y2004

bull Bipolar attachment of the microtubules from opposite poles to

the sister Kinetochores ensures equational division of sister

chromatids at meiosis II

52

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 55: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

MEIOTIC RESTITUTION amp POLYPLOIDY

bull Meiotic restitution significant driving force behind speciation in plants

bull Normal meiosis includes

The first division is reductional and

The second is equational

bull Failure of the first or second division leads to the formation of restitution

nuclei with unreduced chromosomes

53

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 56: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

54

Ramanna MS Jacobsen E 2003

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 57: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

55

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 58: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull Wheat msg gene affect megasporogenesis leading to unreduced egg

Joppa LR 1987

bull Barley triploid inducer (tri) gene

Finch RA MD Bennett1979

bull Maize elongate (el) gene induces chromosome doubling

Rhoades MM Dempsey E 1966

56

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 59: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull In Potato

1 parallel spindles (ps)

2 premature cytokinesis-1 (pc-1) and

3 premature cytokinesis-2 (pc-2)

4 desynaptic (ds-1) and

5 synaptic mutants (sy-1sy-2 sy-3 and sy-4)

Jongedijk E Ramanna MS1988

6 omission of the second division (os)

Werner J E Peloquin SJ1990

57

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 60: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull In diploid Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Two single recessive genes

1 rp (restitution pollen) and

2 jp (jumbo pollen)

conditioning 2n pollen formation by disorientation ofspindles at metaphase II and failure of cytokinesis at thesecond division

McCoy TJ 1982 amp 1983

58

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 61: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

bull In Angiosperms gt30 of species were estimated to be of polyploid

origin

Stebbins GL 1950 amp 1971

bull Polyploidization is considered one of the major processes involved in

plant genome expansion

Bennetzen JL 1997amp 2002

bull Functioning of the unreduced gametes produced through meiotic

restitution lead to polyploidy

Ramanna MS2003

59

POLYPLOIDY

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 62: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

60

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 63: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

62

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 64: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

63

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 65: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

64

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 66: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

65

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 67: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

66

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 68: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Lilly (Lillium regale) 2n=2x=24

Welcome for rsquos

Page 69: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Welcome for rsquos

Page 70: Meiosis driven a genome variation in plants mr.anil basavaradder gpb uas dwd

Recommended