of 29
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
1/29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Cecillia D. Wang ( Pro Hac Vice)
ACLU Foundation
Immigrants’ Rights Project
39 Drumm Street
San Francisco, California 94111Telephone: (415) 343-0775
Facsimile: (415) 395-0950
Daniel J. Pochoda
ACLU Foundation of Arizona
P.O. Box 17148
Phoenix, AZ 85011-0148
Telephone: (602) 650-1854
Facsimile: (602) 650-1376
Attorneys for Plaintiffs (Additional attorneys
for Plaintiffs listed on next page)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres,
et al.,
)
)
CV-07-2513-PHX-GMS
)
Plaintiff(s), )
) COMBINED PROPOSED
v. ) STATEMENT OF ISSUES
) FOR CONTINUED CONTEMPT
Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., ) HEARING
)
Defendants(s). )
)
)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 1 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
2/29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Additional Attorneys for Plaintiffs:
Andre I. Segura ( Pro Hac Vice)
ACLU Foundation
Immigrants’ Rights Project125 Broad Street, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Telephone: (212) 549-2676
Facsimile: (212) 549-2654
Priscilla G. Dodson ( Pro Hac Vice)
Covington & Burling LLP
One CityCenter850 Tenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001-4956
Telephone: (202) 662-5996
Facsimile: (202) 778-5996
Anne Lai ( Pro Hac Vice)
401 E. Peltason, Suite 3500
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
Telephone: (949) 824-9894
Facsimile: (949) 824-0066
Jorge M. Castillo ( Pro Hac Vice)
Mexican American Legal Defense and
Educational Fund
634 South Spring Street, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90014
Telephone: (213) 629-2512Facsimile: (213) 629-0266
Stanley Young ( Pro Hac Vice)
Michelle L. Morin ( Pro Hac Vice)
Hyun S. Byun ( Pro Hac Vice)
Covington & Burling LLP
333 Twin Dolphin DriveSuite 700
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418
Telephone: (650) 632-4700
Facsimile: (650) 632-4800
Tammy Albarran ( Pro Hac Vice)
Lauren E. Pedley (Pro Hac Vice)
Covington & Burling LLPOne Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 591-7066
Facsimile: (415) 955-6566
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 2 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
3/29
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to this Court’s oral order regarding a pretrial statement of issues and
documents, Plaintiffs submit the following statements of all parties and alleged non-
party contemnors, as received as of the time of this submission:
I. Statement of Issues for Continued Contempt Hearing
A. Plaintiffs’ Issues.
Plaintiffs intend to present evidence regarding the following topics during the
continued contempt hearing:
1. The three grounds of charged civil contempt in the February 12, 2015 Order to
Show Cause;
2. Any defenses to be raised by Defendants or individuals charged with contempt,
including any claim that violations of the preliminary injunction were based on
advice of counsel;
3. As bearing on the remedies for any contempt, the extent to which Sheriff
Arpaio’s or Chief Deputy Sheridan’s admitted contempt or any other MCSO
employees’ contempt of this court’s orders was knowing and willful;
4. As bearing on injunctive remedies for any contempt and the state of mind issues
described in Paragraph 3 above, the following issues:
a. the extent to which Sheriff Arpaio, Chief Deputy Sheridan, or any other
MCSO employee instigated, allowed, or encouraged an investigation of
the Court in order to improperly resist the Court’s orders and/or this
contempt proceeding;
b. the extent to which MCSO failed to retain adequate documentation of its
activities to presently identify all those who were detained in violation ofthe Court’s preliminary injunction, including outside of the Human
Smuggling Unit, and to ensure proper tracking and disposition of
property of members of the Plaintiff class;
c. Defendants’ continued non-compliance with orders to produce required
documents to both the Court-appointed Monitor team and to Plaintiffs,
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 3 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
4/29
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
including seized identification documents that may belong to Plaintiffs’
class members and documents relevant to the issues in this hearing;
5. Deficiencies in MCSO’s internal affairs investigation processes and
accountability systems;
6. The method and scope of adequate compensation for all victims of MCSO’s
violation of the preliminary injunction, see e.g., Int’l Union, United Mine
Workers v. Bagwell , 512 U.S. 821, 828 (1994) (citing United States v. Mine
Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 303-04 (1947)), including a process for providing
notice to and determining claims for compensation by victims.
B. Defendants’ Issues.1. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Sheriff Arpaio violated a
specific and definite provision of the Preliminary Injunction dated December
23, 2011.
2. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Chief Deputy Gerald
Sheridan violated a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary Injunction
dated December 23, 2011.
3. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that former Executive Chief
Brian Sands violated a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary
Injunction dated December 23, 2011.
4. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Deputy Chief John
“Jack” MacIntyre violated a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary
Injunction dated December 23, 2011.
5. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Lieutenant Joe Sousa
violated a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary Injunction dated
December 23, 2011.
6. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Sheriff Arpaio
violated a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary Injunction dated
December 23, 2011.
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 4 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
5/29
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
7. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Chief Deputy
Gerald Sheridan violated a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary
Injunction dated December 23, 2011.
8. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that former Executive
Chief Brian Sands violated a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary
Injunction dated December 23, 2011.
9. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Deputy Chief John
“Jack” MacIntyre violated a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary
Injunction dated December 23, 2011.
10. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Lieutenant Joe
Sousa violated a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary Injunction
dated December 23, 2011.
11. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Sheriff Arpaio violated
any specific and definite discovery obligations prior to the trial of this matter in
2012.
12. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Chief Deputy Gerald
Sheridan violated any specific and definite discovery obligations prior to the
trial of this matter in 2012.
13. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Deputy Chief John
“Jack” MacIntyre violated any specific and definite discovery obligations prior
to the trial of this matter in 2012.
14. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Lieutenant Joe Sousa
violated any specific and definite discovery obligations prior to the trial of thismatter in 2012.
15. Whether Plaintiffs can prove by clear and convincing evidence that Sheriff
Arpaio violated any specific and definite discovery obligations prior to the trial
of this matter in 2012.
16. Whether Plaintiffs can prove by clear and convincing evidence that Chief
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 5 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
6/29
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Deputy Gerald Sheridan violated any specific and definite discovery obligations
prior to the trial of this matter in 2012.
17. Whether Plaintiffs can prove by clear and convincing evidence that Deputy
Chief John “Jack” MacIntyre violated any specific and definite discovery
obligations prior to the trial of this matter in 2012.
18. Whether Plaintiffs can prove by clear and convincing evidence that Lieutenant
Joe Sousa violated any specific and definite discovery obligations prior to the
trial of this matter in 2012.
19. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Sheriff Arpaio acted in
derogation of a specific and definite provision of this Court’s May 14, 2014
Orders.
20. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Chief Deputy Gerald
Sheridan acted in derogation of a specific and definite provision of this Court’s
May 14, 2014 Orders.
21. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Deputy Chief John
“Jack” MacIntyre acted in derogation of a specific and definite provision of this
Court’s May 14, 2014 Orders.
22. Plaintiffs have the burden of proof in establishing that Lieutenant Joe Sousa
acted in derogation of a specific and definite provision of this Court’s May 14,
2014 Orders.
23. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Sheriff Arpaio
acted in derogation of a specific and definite provision of this Court’s May 14,
2014 Orders.24. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Chief Deputy
Gerald Sheridan acted in derogation of a specific and definite provision of this
Court’s May 14, 2014 Orders.
25. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Deputy Chief John
“Jack” MacIntyre acted in derogation of a specific and definite provision of this
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 6 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
7/29
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Court’s May 14, 2014 Orders.
26. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Lieutenant Joe
Sousa acted in derogation of a specific and definite provision of this Court’s
May 14, 2014 Orders.
27. Whether any violations of a specific and definite provision of the Preliminary
Injunction dated December 23, 2011, were intentional.
28. Whether any violations of specific and definite discovery obligations prior to
the trial of this matter in 2012 were intentional.
29. Whether any actions in derogation of a specific and definite provision of this
Court’s May 14, 2014 Orders were intentional.
30. Whether Plaintiffs can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any violation of
this Court’s specific and definite Orders occurred after May 28, 2013.
31. Defendants contend that any evidence on remedies for any contempt to be
determined by the Court is premature and should not be permitted by the Court
at this stage in the proceedings.
32. Defendants contend that the “Seattle investigation” is irrelevant to any finding
of contempt and that the inquiry into the “Seattle investigation” impinges on
Defendant Arpaio’s constitutional rights. Further, nothing alleged by Plaintiffs
with respect to the “Seattle investigation,” even if taken as true, is unlawful.
Plaintiffs cannot show the violation of any specific and definite Order of the
Court caused by any aspect of the allegations they set forth related to the
“Seattle investigation.”
33. As to “state of mind issues,” the following:34. The monumental efforts made by Defendants and MCSO to comply with this
Court’s Orders including, but not limited to, massive policy updates, changes,
and the training required to bring MCSO personnel current on all such new and
revised policies.
35. The extraordinary efforts made by MCSO personnel to investigate the
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 7 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
8/29
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
“Armendariz” matter in a reasonable, timely, and appropriate fashion and to
keep the Court-appointed monitors apprised at each stage of the investigation.
36. The extensive and continued efforts to comply with this Court’s Orders and to
provide information to the monitors, both voluntarily and by request, through
the date of this proceeding.
37. Compliance with the appropriate standard of care with respect to internal affairs
investigations.
38. The defense of advice of counsel.
39. Whether, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in McMillian v.
Monroe County, 520 U.S. 781 (1997), and applicable Arizona law, any liability
can be imputed to Defendant Maricopa County based on the matters at issue in
this proceeding.
40. Whether, if the Court finds that there was no substantial basis for Plaintiffs’
refusal to stipulate to dismissal of any of individual alleged contemnors, such
individual(s) are entitled to recover from Plaintiffs their attorney’s fees.
C. Alleged Non-Party Contemnor Sands’ Issues.
1. Whether Plaintiffs have proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that Chief
Sands failed to take reasonable steps to ensure distribution of the Court’s
December 23, 2011, Preliminary Injunction ruling to MCSO personnel.
2. Whether Chief Sands substantially complied with his obligation to disseminate
the Court’s Preliminary Injunction Order.
3. Whether other factors, such as Chief Sands’ retirement and his cooperation with
the Monitor’s investigation preclude or mitigate a finding of contempt againsthim.
4. Whether a finding of civil contempt against retired Chief Sands represents the
least possible power necessary to enforce the Court’s interest in adherence to its
orders.
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 8 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
9/29
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
10/29
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
2. Admission of other exhibits designated by Plaintiffs. A revised proposed list of
stipulated exhibits as of Oct. 12, 2015 is attached. The County and Retired
Chief Executive Sands have agreed to stipulate to certain exhibits, but Sheriff
Arpaio has not agreed to stipulate to any exhibits at this time.
The Parties are further engaged in ongoing discussions about a proposed
process for compensating victims of MCSO’s violation of the preliminary injunction to
determine if there are aspects of the process on which they can agree. To the extent the
Parties cannot reach agreement on any issues, they anticipate providing briefing to the
Court setting forth their respective positions with supporting affidavits, if any.
Plaintiffs have also been in discussions with the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) in regards to the subpoena served on DHS on February 26, 2015 for
documents related to the identification of victims. They expect DHS will provide
responsive documents very soon.
B. Defendants’ Proposed Stipulations.
As noted by Plaintiffs, the parties have reached an agreement to introduce
deposition testimony of witness Rollie Seebert.
Defendants proposed the following stipulation, which was not agreed to by
Plaintiffs:
1. “The information provided by Mr. [Dennis] Montgomery is not credible and the
entire ‘Montgomery investigation’ is not relevant to any of the issues in dispute
in the contempt proceeding.” Defendants further offered to stipulate that they
would not “seek to introduce any evidence concerning the ‘Montgomery
investigation’ at the contempt hearings.”
IV. Proposed Limits and Deadlines for Presentation of Evidence.
A. Plaintiffs’ Proposals.
1. Plaintiffs expect the witness order to proceed as follows, following
completion of testimony by Sgt. Tennyson: Capt. Bailey, Mr. Vogel,
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 10 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
11/29
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Chief Olson, Det. Mackiewicz, Mr. Zullo, Ruben Garcia, Lt. Jakowinicz,
and PI victim(s) including Mr. David Soto Gonzalez.
2. If permitted by the Court, the United States intends to call an expert
witness to testify about possible remedies to address deficiencies in
MCSO’s internal accountability systems, following the completion of fact
witness testimony. Plaintiffs join the DOJ’s request to submit expert
testimony.
3. Lt. Joseph Sousa. Direct examination will encompass the following
subjects: Scope and causes of violations of preliminary injunction order;
witness’s understanding of preliminary injunction order’s requirements;
documentation of violations of preliminary injunction order; adequacy of
MCSO’s internal investigations into “Armendariz spin-off” matters.
Plaintiffs anticipate using 3 hours for the direct examination, with
additional time as needed for redirect.
4. Sgt. Tennyson. Direct examination will encompass the following
subjects: MCSO’s general training, policies, and practices relating to
internal investigations; adequacy of MCSO’s internal accountability
systems to address issues relevant to this litigation and the Plaintiff class;
conflicts of interest in internal investigations; adequacy of MCSO’s
internal investigations into “Armendariz spin-off” and HSU matters;
MCSO’s investigations and responses to discovery of identification
documents; and adequacy of MCSO’s internal investigations on matters
relating to individuals involved in the “Seattle investigation.” Plaintiffsanticipate using 3 hours for the direct examination, with additional time
as needed for redirect.
5. Capt. Steve Bailey. Direct examination will encompass the following
subjects: MCSO’s general policies and practices relating to internal
investigations; adequacy of MCSO’s internal accountability systems to
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 11 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
12/29
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
address complaints of race discrimination or illegal detentions relevant to
this litigation; conflicts of interest in assignment of Capt. Bailey to
command of Professional Standards Bureau (“PSB”); adequacy of any
MCSO efforts to locate victims of violations of the preliminary injunction
order; adequacy of MCSO’s internal investigations into “Armendariz
spin-off” matters; MCSO PSB’s investigations and responses to discovery
of identification documents belonging to apparent members of the
Plaintiff Class, and related communications with the Court-appointed
Monitor Team; communications with individuals charged with civil
contempt relating to the “Seattle investigation” and propriety/legality of
funding sources for that investigation. Plaintiffs anticipate using 6 hours
for the direct examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.
6. Mr. Vogel. Direct examination will encompass the following subjects:
MCSO's internal investigations into (1) the failures of supervision over
Deputy Armendariz and (2) the violation of the December 23, 2011
preliminary injunction, and the MCSO's process for performing such
investigations and making decisions as to whether violations of MCSO
policy have occurred. Plaintiffs anticipate using 90 minutes for the direct
examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.
7. Chief Olson. Direct examination will encompass the following subjects:
MCSO’s internal investigations into (1) the failures of supervision over
Deputy Armendariz and (2) the violation of the December 23, 2011
preliminary injunction; the MCSO’s process for performing suchinvestigations and making decisions as to whether violations of MCSO
policy have occurred; and conflicts of interest in internal investigations.
Plaintiffs anticipate using 90 minutes for the direct examination, with
additional time as needed for redirect.
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 12 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
13/29
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
8. Plaintiffs expect to submit updated estimates for the direct examinations
of Mr. Mike Zullo and Det. Brian Mackiewicz upon review of discovery
received pursuant to their subpoenas of Mr. Zullo and the depositions of
Mr. Zullo and Det. Mackiewicz. The direct examinations of Sgt. Anglin,
Mr. Zullo, and Det. Mackiewicz will encompass the so-called “Seattle
investigation,” including the extent to which Sheriff Arpaio, Chief Deputy
Sheridan, or any other MCSO employee instigated, allowed or
encouraged an investigation, through the actions of Posseman Mike Zullo
and MCSO confidential informant Dennis Montgomery, into Judge Snow
in order to resist Judge Snow’s orders and/or this contempt proceeding.
At this time, Plaintiffs estimate using 90 minutes for the direct
examination of Sgt. Anglin, 2 hours for the direct examination of Det.
Mackiewicz, and 2-2.5 hours for the direct examination of Mr. Zullo, with
additional time as needed for redirect.
9. Plaintiffs expect to present testimony of up to 2 class members harmed by
MCSO’s violations of the preliminary injunction, including Mr. David
Soto Gonzalez. Due to the challenges of locating class members affected
by MCSO’s violations based on incomplete information, identification of
class members who can testify is ongoing. Plaintiffs estimate using 30
minutes to 1 hour for the direct examination of class members.
10. Ruben Garcia. Direct examination will encompass the following
subjects: IA case 11-22 and underlying events. Plaintiffs anticipate using
45 minutes for the direct examination, with additional time as needed forredirect.
11. Lt. Jakowinicz. Plaintiffs expect to call Lt. Jakowinicz for the purpose of
authenticating documents for admission. Plaintiffs anticipate using 15
minutes for the direct examination, with additional time as needed for
redirect.
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 13 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
14/29
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
B. Defendants’ Proposals.
Defendants identify the following witnesses tentatively to be called:
1. Chief Deputy Gerard Sheridan: Direct examination may encompass some or all
of the following subjects: Ethical and legal standards to which MCSO deputies
are held and the consequences of their failure to comply with those standards;
MCSO’s commitment and extensive efforts to achieve compliance with this
Court’s orders; training provided by the United States for MCSO deputies
engaged in law enforcement activities under the 287(g) program, and its effects
on the practices of MCSO; MCSO procedures and practices related to
investigations conducted by Internal Affairs/Professional Standards Bureau;
investigations into matters concerning Charlie Armendariz arising out of facts
that came to light in the wake of his death; parameters of the “Seattle
investigation” and efforts to ensure no investigation of Judge Snow was
conducted; handling of the 1400+ identification documents surfaced by Sgt.
Jonathan Knapp; efforts to identify and gather video recordings of traffic stops
conducted by MCSO deputies, and the results of those efforts; and interactions
with the Monitor Team and assessment of the Monitor Team’s involvement in
the internal affairs of MCSO. Defendants anticipate using 3 hours for the direct
examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.
2. Tom Liddy. Direct examination may encompass some or all of the following
subjects: Events occurring prior to May 14, 2014 relating to the identification
and gathering of video recordings of traffic stops conducted by MCSO deputies,
plans for what was to be done with said video recordings once they had beengathered, and further steps taken after direction with regard to same from the
Court in the May 14, 2014 hearing. Defendants anticipate using one hour for
the direct examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.
3. Captain Steve Bailey. Direct examination may encompass some or all of the
following subjects: MCSO procedures and practices related to investigations
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 14 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
15/29
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
conducted by Internal Affairs/Professional Standards Bureau; investigations
into matters concerning Charlie Armendariz arising out of facts that came to
light in the wake of his death; handling of the 1400+ identification documents
surfaced by Sgt. Jonathan Knapp and communications with legal counsel and
the Monitor Team regarding same. Defendants anticipate using 2 hours for the
direct examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.
4. Chief Mike Olson. Direct examination may encompass some or all of the
following subjects: MCSO procedures and practices related to investigations
conducted by Internal Affairs/Professional Standards Bureau; his experience in
dealing with Internal Affairs/Professional Standards Bureau investigations
where high-level command staff are named as principals. Defendants anticipate
using one hour for the direct examination, with additional time as needed for
redirect.
5. Sgt. Stephen Fax. Direct examination may encompass some or all of the
following subjects: MCSO procedures and practices related to investigations
conducted by Internal Affairs/Professional Standards Bureau; his experience in
dealing with Internal Affairs/Professional Standards Bureau investigations,
including investigations into matters concerning Charlie Armendariz arising out
of facts that came to light in the wake of his death, and other investigations
made the subject of Plaintiffs’ case-in-chief in which he was involved; his
participation in a meeting in July of 2015 regarding the 1400+ identification
documents surfaced by Sgt. Jonathan Knapp. Defendants anticipate using 4
hours for the direct examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.6. Mike Zullo. Direct examination may encompass some or all of the following
subjects: Parameters of the “Seattle investigation;” his receipt and
understanding of instructions regarding the prohibition on pursuit of any
investigation of matters concerning Judge Snow; his observations and
assessments of Dennis Montgomery and the quality of information provided by
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 15 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
16/29
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
him during the “Seattle investigation.” Defendants anticipate using 2 hours for
the direct examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.
7. Captain Stephanie Molina. Direct examination may encompass some or all of
the following subjects: MCSO procedures and practices related to
investigations conducted by Internal Affairs/Professional Standards Bureau; her
knowledge of and participation in specific PSB investigations during her tenure
as the head of PSB. Defendants anticipate using 3 hours for the direct
examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.
8. Cpt. Russ Skinner. Direct examination may encompass some or all of the
following subjects: The extensive efforts of MCSO to achieve compliance with
this Court’s orders. Defendants anticipate using 3 hours for the direct
examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.
9. Cpt. Larry Farnsworth. Direct examination may encompass some or all of the
following subjects: The extensive efforts of MCSO to achieve compliance with
this Court’s orders. Defendants anticipate using 3 hours for the direct
examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.
10. Detective Brian Mackiewicz. Direct examination may encompass some or all of
the following subjects: Parameters of the “Seattle investigation;” his receipt and
understanding of instructions regarding the prohibition on pursuit of any
investigation of matters concerning Judge Snow; his observations and
assessments of Dennis Montgomery and the quality of information provided by
him during the “Seattle investigation.” Defendants anticipate using 2 hours for
the direct examination, with additional time as needed for redirect.11. Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio. Direct examination may encompass some or all of
the following subjects: MCSO’s commitment and extensive efforts to achieve
compliance with this Court’s orders; interactions with the Monitor Team and
assessment of the Monitor Team’s involvement in the internal affairs of MCSO.
Defendants anticipate using 90 minutes for the direct examination, with
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 16 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
17/29
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
additional time as needed for redirect.
Since this proceeding is ongoing, and Plaintiffs continue to modify their list of
witnesses and exhibits, Defendants reserve the right to amend or supplement this list of
witnesses as deemed necessary through the close of Plaintiffs’ case. Defendants
reserve the right to offer all exhibits listed by Plaintiffs regardless of whether
withdrawn. Defendants will supplement this list of exhibits as this matter progresses
toward Defendants’ case-in-chief.
Defendants intend to retain and call all necessary expert witnesses to testify as
to all issues relevant to this Court’s determinations and to any possible remedies that
may be considered by the Court and to any additional injunctive relief to be considered
by the Court.
C. Alleged Non-Party Contemnors Sands’ Proposals.
1. Chief Sands requests that the Court set a deadline of October 9, 2015, for
Plaintiffs to complete their liability case on the alleged failure to disseminate
the Court’s Preliminary Injunction Order.
2. Chief Sands requests that the Court impose time limits for the examination of
each witness. If the parties cannot agree to a time limit for a particular witness,
each party shall submit a proposed time limit and the Court shall choose which
limit applies.
3. Chief Sands does not presently intend to call any additional witnesses.
However, he may testify if new testimony is elicited on issues relevant to the
charge against him. His testimony may address his understanding of the
preliminary injunction order, communications he had with others concerningthe order, and the steps he took to ensure compliance with the order.
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 17 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
18/29
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 12th day of October, 2015.
By: /s/ Stanley Young
Cecillia D. Wang ( Pro Hac Vice)
Andre I. Segura ( Pro Hac Vice)ACLU Foundation
Immigrants’ Rights Project
Daniel Pochoda
ACLU Foundation of Arizona
Anne Lai ( Pro Hac Vice)
Stanley Young ( Pro Hac Vice)
Tammy Albarran ( Pro Hac Vice)Michelle L. Morin ( Pro Hac Vice)
Lauren E. Pedley (Pro Hac Vice)
Hyun S. Byun ( Pro Hac Vice)
Priscilla G. Dodson ( Pro Hac Vice)
Covington & Burling, LLP
Jorge M. Castillo ( Pro Hac Vice)
Mexican American Legal Defense and
Educational Fund
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 18 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
19/29
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on October 12, 2015 I electronically transmitted the
attached document to the Clerk’s office using the CM/ECF System for filing and
caused the attached document to be served via the CM/ECF System on all counsel of
record
/s/ Stanley Young
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462 Filed 10/12/15 Page 19 of 19
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
20/29
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
PLAINTIFFS’ OCT. 12, 2015 PROPOSED STIPULATION OF EXHIBITS
____ Preliminary Injunction ______ TRO Non-Jury Trial _____ Jury Trial
X Evidentiary Hearing
Case Number CV-07-2513- PHX Judge Code GMS Date September 24, 2015
Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al. vs. Joseph M. Arpaio, et al.
X Plaintiff/Petitioner Defendant/Respondent
** This proposed stipulation does not list exhibits that have already been admitted into evidence.
Exh.
No.
Description
69 MCSO Memorandum to Bailey re determining if any HSU Members
removed property/evident for training purposes (MELC006122-123)
152 MCSO Memorandums regarding Video Recordings
1000 Court’s exhibit, MELC028130-MELC028159
2001 MCSO Memorandum from Commander Shaw to
Captain Skinner dated 8/5/2015 re July 21, 2015
Site Visit Request and MCSO Policy GC-17dated 9/5/2014 Employee Disciplinary Procedure (MELC416241-
MELC416261)
2010 MCSO PSB Background Packet IA 2015-0021 (MELC288144-
MELC288558)
2011 MCSO IA #2015-0357 (MELC209485-MELC209686)
2017 MCSO PSB Administrative Investigation IA 2014-0570(MELC161088-MELC161171)
2019 MCSO Memorandum from Lt Hoggatt to Captain Bailey re WeeklyStatus Reports on IA's 2014-0221/0295 dated 7/3/2014
(MELC005297-MELC005300)
2020 MCSO Memorandum from Lt Hoggatt to Captain
Bailey re Weekly Status Reports on IA's 2014-
0221/0295 dated 8/15/2014 (MELC010833 -MELC010837)
2022 MCSO Memorandum from Lt Kratzer to CaptainBailey re Weekly Status Report for IA 2014-0221
dated 12/23/2014 (MELC034352 -
MELC034355)
2031 MCSO HSU Criminal Inquiry IA 295, Transcribed Interview Dep.C. Lopez dated 6/17/2014 (MELC227064-ELC227070)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462-1 Filed 10/12/15 Page 1 of 10
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
21/29
2
Exh.
No.
Description
2050 MCSO Memorandum from Deputy Cosme to Captain Bailey re
Video/Audio re Melendres Court Order dated 5/21/2014
(MELC098062-MELC098110)
2051 MCSO Memorandum from Lt. Seagraves (on behalf of CaptainBailey) to Chief Lopez re Video/Audio re Melendres Court Orderdated 5/21/2014 (MELC004088)
2052 Email chain: From Steve Bailey re "Fwd: Video/Audio RecordingsResponse CV-07_2513-PHX-GMS" dated 5/19/2014
(MELC829381-MELC829383)
2053 Email from Steve Bailey to Monitor Team re "Status Update of
DVDs and Investigation" dated 6/9/2014 (MELC004999-MELC005000)
2054 MCSO Memorandum from Lt Hoggatt to Captain Bailey re Weekly
Status Reports on IA's 2014-0253/0221/0295 dated 6/27/2014
(MELC005304-MELC005313)2055 MCSO Memorandum from Lt Hoggatt to Captain Bailey re Weekly
Status Reports on IA's 2014-0221/0295 dated 7/25/2014
(MELC005918-MELC005921)
2056 MCSO Memorandum from Lt Hoggatt to Captain Bailey re Weekly
Status Reports on IA's 2014-0221/0295 dated 7/18/2014
(MELC005599-MELC005598)
2057 MCSO Memorandum from Lt Hoggatt to Captain Bailey re WeeklyStatus Reports on IA's 2014-0221/0295 dated 7/11/2014
(MELC005335-MELC005340)
2058 MCSO Memorandum from Lt Hoggatt to Captain Bailey re Weekly
Status Reports on IA's 2014-0221/0295 dated 7/3/2014(MELC005297-MELC005300)
2059 MCSO HSU Criminal Inquiry IA 2014-0541 (MELC224936-MELC224940)
2060 Email from Mike Hall to Linda Walters and Steve Bailey re"Arriago, Luciano" dated 7/15/2014 (MELC005924-MELC005926)
2063 Documents from IA 2014-0544 (MELC160117-MELC160171)
2064 MCSO PSB Administrative Investigation, Documents from IA
2014-0570 (MELC161088-MELC161114)2068 Documents from IA 14-0564 (MELC160986-MELC161056)
2069 MCSO Memorandum from Lt Munley to Captain Bailey re Weekly
Status Report for IA 2014-0221/0295 dated 9/5/2014(MELC011654-MELC011656)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462-1 Filed 10/12/15 Page 2 of 10
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
22/29
3
Exh.
No.
Description
2071 Email from Tim Casey, forwarding his 12/23/2011 email, re
Melendres Order on Summary Judgment dated 11/6/2014
(CaseySub 000050-CaseySub 000053)
2073 MCSO Seattle Investigation (Exemplars of documents produced tothe Monitor on April 27, 2014 and contained on one external harddrive)
2075 Meeting request from CD Sheridan to Anglin re Conference Call--Lt. Anglin, B. Mackiewicz, and (tentatively) Capt. Bailey dated
4/28/2014 (MELC198504)
2076 MCSO PSB Inappropriate Conduct, Employee: Brian Mackiewicz,
CIA 2015-0055 (MELC258950-54, MELC258960)
2080 Case 2:07-0513-GMS Melendres, et al. v. Arpaio, et al Exhibit F-
Joe Arpaio Brief, Timeline/Charts re Montgomery Investigation
(Dkt. No. 1166, filed on 7/10/15) (MELC199917-35)2081 Confidential Informant File dated 12/6/2013 (MELC198428-30)
2084 Memorandum from Lee AnnBohn to Captain Russ Skinner re
Response to Document Request Regarding ITR 59 (records
associated with expenses related to the Seattle and GrissomInvestigations) dated 6/12/2015 (MELC233532-34)
2085 Document created to keep track of various expenditures
(MELC199632-33)
2088 Email from Dennis Montgomery to Mike Zullo attaching rejectionletters dated 4/13/2014 (MELC202291-302)
2089 Outlook invite from Sheridan Gerard to Anglin Travis re ConferenceCall - Lit. Anglin, B. Mackiewicz, and (tentatively) Capt. Bailey
scheduled for April 28, 2014 at 4PM (MELC199340)
2090 Email chain between Dennis Montgomery to Mike Zullo with a
subject line "Judge Snow" dated 2/2/2015 (MELC202222-24)
2092 Collection of memos, e.g. 1) January 16, 2014 Memorandum from
Detective Brian Mackiewicz to Travis Anglin re Investigative Trip
to Seattle WA; 2) January 16, 2014 Memorandum from Travis
Anglin to Captain Steven Bailey re Investigative Trip to Seattle, WAscheduled for 1/23-1/26/14; 3) January 21, 2014 Memorandum from
Brian Mackiewicz to Travis Anglin re Confidential Information
Payment; 4) January 24, 2014 Memorandum from BrianMackiewicz to Travis Anglin re Confidential Information Payment
(MELC198474-94)
2094 Case summary (MELC199506-12)
2104 Findings of MCSO IA 2014-0547
(MELC160761-985)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462-1 Filed 10/12/15 Page 3 of 10
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
23/29
4
Exh.
No.
Description
2106 Findings of MCSO IA 2014-0567
(MELC158915-37)
2112 Findings of MCSO IA 2014-0581
(MELC208295-370)2115 Findings of MCSO IA 2014-0576
(MELC208221-66)
2218 MCSO IA Administrative Investigation 14-0542 (MELC-IA011161-11303)
2219 MCSO IA Administrative Investigation 14-0543 (MELC209720-
209970)
2220 MCSO Professional Standards Bureau IA #2014-0543
(MELC211517-211586)
2221 MCSO Internal Affairs Investigation Report A 14-0543 Attachments
dated 4/6/2015 (MELC210440-210607)2223 Letter from Lee Ann Bohn to Don Vogel re assistance in conductionadministrative investigations for MCSO dated 12/18/2014
(DV000280-281)
2224 Letter from Deputy Chief Jack MacIntyre to Don Vogel re Privilege
Log on Production Request for IA Investigation dated 1/20/2015(DV000515)
2225 Email from Michele Iafrate to Don Vogel cc: Liddy Thomas, Newton Brandon, Cari Shehorn, Jill Lafornara re final report content
dated 2/4/2015 (MELC1397163-165)
2226 Email from Don Vogel to Chief Sheridan re investigation
completion date dated 2/27/2015 (DV000139-141)
2227 Letter from Michele Iafrate to Don Vogel RE: Arpaio, et al. adv.
Melendres, et al. U.S. District Court Case No: CV07-02513-PHX·GMS dated 3/2/2015 (DV000381-82)
2228 Email from Don Vogel to Chief Sheridan re Palmer emails ontraining scenarios dated 3/2/2015 (DV000142)
2232 Email from Don Vogel to Lee Stein re Palmer emails dated3/16/2015 (DV000155)
2233 Email from Don Vogel to Sharon Kiyler FW: Melendres v. Arpaio:Sousa-Palmer E-mail and Privilege Log. Attachments: Sousa-Palmer
email 1.19.12; Privilege Log-2 2015-2-27 dated 3/23/2015(DV000209)
2234 Email from Don Vogel to Michele Lafrate re 14-0542 report dated
3/20/2015; attachments included (DV000172)
2235 Email from Don Vogel to Michele Lafrate re 14-0542 dated
3/31/2015 (DV000171)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462-1 Filed 10/12/15 Page 4 of 10
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
24/29
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
25/29
6
Exh.
No.
Description
2267 Email from Mike to [email protected] - Re: Oz dated 12/9/2014
(MELC202048)
2268 Email from Mike to David Webb RE: CIA Names dated 1/20/2015
(MELC202170)2269 Email from David Webb to Mike Re: Lawsuit dated 1/22/2015
(MELC200001-03)
2270 Email from David Webb to Mike RE: Klayman dated 1/28/2015
(MELC202233)
2271 Email from David Webb to Mike re: Work dated 2/2/2015
(MELC202285-89)
2272 Email from Brian Mackiewicz to Mike Re: Blue Cross dated
2/5/2015 (MELC202159-62)
2273 Email from David Webb to Mike Re: No Work dated 2/11/2015
(MELC201828)2274 Email from David Webb to Mike Re: Arpaio dated 2/27/2015
(MELC202148)
2275 Email from David Webb to Mike Re: Progress dated 3/3/2015(MELC202131)
2276 Email from Larry Klayman to Mike Re: Progress dated 3/4/2015
(MELC202254-55
2277 Email from David Webb to Mike Re: Place yet dated 3/31/2015
(MELC202055-56)
2278 Email from David Webb to Mike Re: Place yet dated 3/31/2015
(MELC202249-50)
2279 Email from Larry Klayman to Mike Zullo copying David Webb and
Dennis Re: 2nd Request dated 4/20/2015 (MELC202142-45)
2527 Email from Carmen Hernandez to Travis Anglin re Investigativetravel dated 2/3/2014 (MELC198515)
2559D Employee Grievance Response to Sousa on 14-542 and WrittenReprimand on 14-542 dated 6/1/2015 (MELC-IA13635)
2559F Pre-Determination Hearing Worksheet on Sousa in 14-542 dated
5/15/2015 (MELC-IA013680-MELC-IA013683)
2707 MCSO Internal Affairs Investigation Report by Don Vogel,
containing information used during Sheridan's name-clearing
hearing dated 4/6/2012 (MELC-IA020592-IA020733)
2719 Email from Brian Mackiewicz to Brian Mackiewicz Fwd: Timelinedated 8/24/2014 (MELC1287446)
2720 Email from Brian Mackiewicz to Brian Mackiewicz Fwd: Summarydated 8/27/2014(MELC1287419 - MELC1287444)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462-1 Filed 10/12/15 Page 6 of 10
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
26/29
7
Exh.
No.
Description
2726 Email from Brian Mackiewicz to [email protected] Re: Elmer’s
case summary dated 9/4/2014 (MELC1292689 - MELC1292714)
2753 Memorandum to Captain Steve Bailey from Lt. Dave Munley Re:
Weekly Status Report dated 7/31/2014 (MELC006421-MELC006423)
2754 Memorandum to Captain Steve Bailey from Lt. Todd Hoggatt Re:
Weekly Status Report dated 8/8/2014 (MELC010335-MELC010337)
2757 Memorandum to Steve Bailey from Stephen Fax
Re: Documenting all personnel in HSU by year
and identifying the chain of command dated6/21/2014 (MELC010882-MELC010883)
2758 Memorandum to Captain Steve Bailey from Lt. Todd Hoggatt re:
Weekly Status Report dated 8/22/2014 (MELC010898-
MELC010900)2759 Memorandum to Captain Steve Bailey from Lt. Todd Hoggatt Re:
Weekly Status Report dated 8/29/2014 (MELC011158-
MELC011160)
2760 Memorandum to Steve Bailey from Stephen Fax
Re: Timeline for Ramon Charley Armendarizdated 8/1/2014 (MELC011630-MELC011647)
2767 MCSO Internal Affairs Division IA #14-0451
(MELC158124-MELC158541)
2770 Email from Peter Metzler to James Alger, Gerard
Funk, Jerry Scott, Chris Quattrini, Mark Parks,
Anthony Cruz, Sterling Bridges, Rudy Acosta,
Cesar Brodman, Walter Duncanson, Jeremy Blain dated 3/19/2014(MELC158540-MELC158541)
2772 MCSO Professional Standards Bureau IA # 2014-0546 dated
11/12/2014 (MELC158578-MELC158624)
2780 Email from Kim Seagraves to James Sparman Re:
Mac dated 7/29/2015 (MELC417466)
2781 Email from Kim Seagraves to Steve Bailey re
Brian Mackiewicz dated 5/11/2015(MELC417533)
2782 MCSO Administrative Investigation IA#14-0580 dated 11/26/2014(MELC676786-MELC676814)
2784 Letter to Sheriff Joe Arpaio from Hickley
Leonisio Abreu Re: Complaint
#070002391430501 dated 11/14/2014(MELC680167-MELC680377)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462-1 Filed 10/12/15 Page 7 of 10
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
27/29
8
Exh.
No.
Description
2790 MCSO Operational Manual dated 2/18/2015
(MELC1396796-MELC1396813)
2794 MCSO Investigative Report IA# 2015-0022 dated
5/23/2015 (MELC288559-MELC288574)2799 Memorandum to S. Bailey from K. Seagraves Re:
Action Plan - Reference to allegation of AnabolicSteroids purchase(s) made by Deputies Brian
Mackiewicz and James Kempher dated 3/26/2015
(MELC186297-MELC186300)
2820 Revised Call Signs dated 11/22/2013
(MELC112957)
2823 Freedom Friday YouTube page print - "Mike Zullo Does LIVE
Q&A on Freedom Friday with Carl Gallups" dated June 14, 2015
2843 Email from David Tennyson to Dave Zebro Re: Report Requestdated 4/27/2015 (MELC1397053)
2851 Spreadsheet of traffic stops (1 of 2) (MELC413860)
2852 Spreadsheet of traffic stops (2 of 2) (MELC413861)
2853 HSU 2011 Master Log
2854 HSU 2012 Master Log
2855 HSU 2013 Master Log
2860
Partial video of IA 14-547 stop dated 3/7/2012
2893 Interview of Mary Ann McKessey with David Tennyson re Case #
2015-0034 dated 3/27/2015 (MELC186200-MELC186266)
2895 Excerpt of PX 2559 - Written Reprimand in 14-0542 for Joseph
Sousa dated 5/18/2015 (MELC-IA013638)
2897 Excerpt of PX 2559 - Written Reprimand in 14-0542 for Joseph
Sousa (Crossed Out) dated 5/18/2015 (MELC-IA013679)
2900 Departmental Report: Occurance Location: Multiple / Maricopa
County Victim: Multiple Occurance Type: Computer Tampering /
Identity Theft (MELC185195-MELC185370)
2901 Email from Brian Mackiewicz to Mike Re: Updated Rev 3A dated
9/21/2014 (MELC202277)2902 MCSO Memo to Clint Doyle from Brian Mackiewicz Re:
Investigative Trip dated 11/30/2013 (MELC199821)
2903 Record of Informant and MCSO Memo from Clint Doyle to BrianMackiewicz re: Confidential informant payment dated 12/6/2013
(MELC198431-MELC198432)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462-1 Filed 10/12/15 Page 8 of 10
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
28/29
9
Exh.
No.
Description
2904 Email from Brian Mackiewicz to Jenise Moreno Re: Confidential
dated 1/9/2014 (MELC1386579)
2905 MCSO Property and Evidence Report dated 11/19/2014
(MELC266600)2906 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:
Confidential Informant Payment dated 8/12/2014 (MELC198465-MELC198466)
2907 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:
Confidential Informant Payment dated 8/27/2014 (MELC198467-
MELC198468)
2908 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:
Confidential Informant Payment dated 7/24/2014 (MELC198463-
MELC198464)
2909 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:Confidential Informant Payment dated 7/24/2014 (MELC198461-
MELC198462)
2910 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:Confidential Informant Payment dated 6/25/2014 (MELC198457-
MELC198458)
2911 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:
Confidential Informant Payment dated 6/9/2014 (MELC198455-MELC198446)
2912 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:Confidential Informant Payment dated 5/19/2014 (MELC198453-
MELC198454)
2913 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:
Confidential Informant Payment dated 5/16/2014 (MELC198451-
MELC198452)
2914 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:Confidential Informant Payment dated 4/16/2014 (MELC198449-
MELC198450)
2915 MCSO Memo from Travis Anglin to Brian Mackiewicz re:
Confidential Informant Payment dated 3/29/2014 (MELC198448)
2917 Excerpt of PX 2082 - Document 1: "Joe Arpaio
Brief" Timeline dated 1/1/2014
2918 Excerpt of PX 2082 - Document 2: "ArpaioBrief" Schematic dated 1/1/2014
2919 Excerpt of PX 2082 - Document 3:"Whisleblower Chronicles" (CIA Chronicles)
2920 Excerpt of PX 2082 - Document 4: "Names ofPeople Involved" dated 2/17/2014
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462-1 Filed 10/12/15 Page 9 of 10
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1462 | Combined Proposed Statement of Issues w Exhibit
29/29
10
Exh.
No.
Description
2921 Excerpt of PX 2082 - Document 5: "Check List
for Elmer" (Check List for Dennis) dated
3/27/2014
2922 Excerpt of PX 2082 - Document 6: "List 2" dated3/27/2014
2923 Excerpt of PX 2082 - Document 7: "DOJ / Arpaio
Timeline" dated 12/4/2013
2924 Excerpt of PX 2082 - Document 8: "Project
Courier" Hispanic Businesses in AZ (1 examplar
photo of a 113 page document)
2925 Excerpt of PX 2082 - Document 9: "Cover" dated
7/27/2014
2926 MCSO Special Investigation Division Interview with Confidential
Informant #1437 dated 9/6/2013 (MELC184916 - MELC185029)2927 MCSO Internal Affairs Division IA #13-0000, Interview
Confidential Informant dated 12/14/2013 (MELC185036 -MELC185144)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1462-1 Filed 10/12/15 Page 10 of 10