Date post: | 24-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | edgar-sanders |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Members: Jennifer Au, Anthony Bonomo, Laura Freyman, Brian Kwong,
Benjamin Li, Jessica Lieberman, Levon Mktrchyan, Michael Price,
Andrew Skoda, Mary Tellers, Andrew Tomaschko and Johnny Wu
Mentor: Dr. Fred MowrerLibrarian: Nedelina Tchangalova
1
OutlineIntroductionResearch QuestionLiterature ReviewMethodologyProject TimelineConclusion
2
3
FoundationTime is a critical factor in fire emergencies
Emergencies can develop quicklyEFRs don’t have enough time to make
decisionsBuilding sensors can detect various
environmental factorsMore information can be obtained soonerEducated decisions could be made with more
information
4
5
“The potential amount of information that can be available to first responders is staggering.”
-William Davis, Ph.D., Fire Research Group, NIST
Current TechnologyThere are specific sensors:
Photoelectric smoke sensorsIonization smoke sensorsHeat sensorsCO BasesManual Pull Stations
Examples of potential sensorsHVAC sensorsSecurity sensors
6
Heat Sensor
Surveillance Camera
Current TechnologyFire Panel Annunciator Systems
Honeywell Notifier Fire PanelSiemens MXLSimplex-Grinnell 4100U Network
BFRL Building Tactical Information ProjectONYX First Vision Panel
7
Problem and SolutionProblem:
Abstract and convoluted raw dataNot all sensor data used in emergencies
Solution:Compile data from sensor systems into
comprehensible formDisplay information in an effective
standardized interface to EFRs
8
Why Our Project is UniqueVariety of sensor types
SecurityHVACFire
Sophisticated analysisProcessing, interpolation and prioritization of
time sensitive informationDirect communication with EFRs in the
buildingi.e. Flashover
9
How can a system be created that takes How can a system be created that takes information gathered by various building information gathered by various building sensors and sends that information in real time sensors and sends that information in real time to the people who need it?to the people who need it?
10
11
Building Tactical Information ProjectFour objectives
1. Determine data most useful to EFRs2. Develop a data dispersion standard3. Demonstrate technology effectiveness4. Address security issues
12
Workshop for EFRsInformation Sets
“En-Route”“On the scene”
Information AreasStatic
Building plans Sensor layouts
Dynamic Direct sensor readings
Display of Information
13
Workshop for EFRsSystem should include
Sensor variety Fire HVAC Security Facilities management
ReliableEducational Video
14
StandardizationNEMA SB30
15
Activated Smoke Detector
Elevator
Fire
Activated Heat Detector
Communication MethodsProject 25 (P25) could bridge network
communication gapOPNETMobile radioStandard between agenciesVoice, video and data communicationWireless Access Points
16
17
Proposed SystemCurrent System Our System
18
TasksEstablish EFR needs
– “Workshop to Define Information Needed by Emergency Responders During Building Emergencies”
Develop Specifications– Perform a case study of sensors systems in buildings
Design and prototype– Use existing materials– Modular capabilities
Test and revise– Confirming accuracy of data returned by device– Usability testing
19
20
21
Phase 1: PlanningFall 2008- Fall 2009Sub-team 1 :
Case study and sensor survey Study building and fire codes Determine standard operating procedures
Sub-team 2: Further background research
NIST, on campus, corporate research
Sub-team 3: Obtain money and resources Keep corporate and government contact
22
Phase 2: ImplementationSpring 2009-Fall 2010
Begin thesisSub-team 1:
Establish algorithms Code interface
Sub-team 2: Design interface
Aesthetics and usability Run fire simulations
Sub-team 3: Create fire detection system mockup Test sensor output
23
24
Phase 3: AssessmentFall 2010- Spring 2011
Complete ThesisEvaluate
Reliability ValidityUsability
Synthesize Results
25
Validity• Internal validity
• Assure that the display and the sensor outputs correspond
• External Validity• Differences in building sensor organization• Anticipate all possible scenarios
26
ReliabilityRun fire simulations through the system
Assure consistency of resultsAssess material functionality
Withstand emergency environmentEvaluate interface success
Quick processing
27
UsabilityQualitative evaluationConstraints
Meet needs expressed by EFRsDovetail with SOPsSimplicity of use
28
•FFA’s system will:• Present critical situational information• Allow for informed decisions• Work with existing technologies• Interoperate between sensor brands• Facilitate communication between EFRs• Save lives and property
29
Referenceshttp://sensing.honeywell.com/index.cfm/ci_id/
16046/la_id/1.htmhttp://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire05/art105.htmlhttp://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire04/art021.htmlhttp://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire05/PDF/f05017.pdfhttp://www.notifier.com/products/datasheets/
DN_7051.pdfhttp://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire06/PDF/
f06044.pdfhttp://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build07/PDF/b07022.pdfhttp://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build07/PDF/
b07024.pdf
30
31