December 5, 2011 MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce Olson, Project Manager Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site and Environmental Reviews Office of New Reactors FROM: Peyton Doub, Environmental Scientist /RA/ Environmental Projects Division of Site and Environmental Reviews Office of New Reactors SUBJECT: MEETING NOTES FROM THE ONSITE MEETINGS ON AUGUST 8 - 9, 2011, TO DISCUSS THE FERMI 3 SITE LAYOUT AND CONCEPTUAL AQUATIC RESOURCE (WETLAND) MITIGATION PLAN Peyton Doub of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) attended two onsite meetings among Detroit Edison, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and other agencies involved with permitting wetland and terrestrial ecological impacts from the proposed Fermi 3 Nuclear Power Plant (Fermi 3) in Monroe, Michigan. Detroit Edison applied to the NRC in 2008 for a combined license (COL) for Fermi 3 and is in the process of submitting a Joint Permit Application (JPA) to USACE for work in waters of the United States and adjacent wetlands pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Wetland and terrestrial impacts are key issues addressed in the environmental impact statement (EIS) that the NRC (as lead agency) and the USACE (as a cooperating agency) are preparing for Fermi 3. Mr. Doub is the lead NRC terrestrial ecologist and wetland scientist assigned to the EIS. The August 8, 2011, meeting focused on Detroit Edison’s proposed least environmentally damaging practical alternative (LEDPA) and included a tour of the proposed site layout and wetlands potentially affected by the proposed project. Also discussed at the August 8, 2011, meeting were potential impacts to the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), which is Federally listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act, and is known to visit potential maternity roost trees. The August 9, 2011, meeting focused on Detroit Edison’s proposed conceptual aquatic resources (wetland) compensatory mitigation strategy plan and a tour of the proposed compensatory mitigation site.
Transcript
December 5, 2011 MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce Olson, Project Manager Environmental Projects Branch 2 Division of Site and Environmental Reviews Office of New Reactors FROM: Peyton Doub, Environmental Scientist /RA/ Environmental Projects Division of Site and Environmental Reviews Office of New Reactors SUBJECT: MEETING NOTES FROM THE ONSITE MEETINGS ON
AUGUST 8 - 9, 2011, TO DISCUSS THE FERMI 3 SITE LAYOUT AND CONCEPTUAL AQUATIC RESOURCE (WETLAND) MITIGATION PLAN
Peyton Doub of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) attended two onsite meetings among Detroit Edison, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and other agencies involved with permitting wetland and terrestrial ecological impacts from the proposed Fermi 3 Nuclear Power Plant (Fermi 3) in Monroe, Michigan. Detroit Edison applied to the NRC in 2008 for a combined license (COL) for Fermi 3 and is in the process of submitting a Joint Permit Application (JPA) to USACE for work in waters of the United States and adjacent wetlands pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Wetland and terrestrial impacts are key issues addressed in the environmental impact statement (EIS) that the NRC (as lead agency) and the USACE (as a cooperating agency) are preparing for Fermi 3. Mr. Doub is the lead NRC terrestrial ecologist and wetland scientist assigned to the EIS. The August 8, 2011, meeting focused on Detroit Edison’s proposed least environmentally damaging practical alternative (LEDPA) and included a tour of the proposed site layout and wetlands potentially affected by the proposed project. Also discussed at the August 8, 2011, meeting were potential impacts to the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), which is Federally listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act, and is known to visit potential maternity roost trees. The August 9, 2011, meeting focused on Detroit Edison’s proposed conceptual aquatic resources (wetland) compensatory mitigation strategy plan and a tour of the proposed compensatory mitigation site.
B. Olson - 2 - DAY 1 MEETING – PROPOSED FERMI 3 SITE LAYOUT ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS & TOUR Time: 9:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Location: Fermi Nuclear Training Center and Proposed Fermi 3 Project Site (all on Detroit Edison’s Fermi Plant Site in Monroe, Michigan) Attendees are noted in Table 1, below. This was a USACE pre-application meeting with Detroit Edison. USACE invited NRC, the FWS, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to attend for their situational awareness and to facilitate interagency collaboration on the proposed layout. Randy Westmoreland of Detroit Edison hosted the meeting. Representatives of two Detroit Edison contractors were present: Conservation Connects LLC, who assisted Detroit Edison in preparing the wetland delineation report and concept mitigation strategy and Black and Veatch, who conducted the terrestrial wildlife and vegetation surveys and reports for Detroit Edison’s COL application. The EPA will have to approve the EIS and can veto USACE permit decisions relative to the discharge of fill into waters of the United States, including adjacent wetlands, under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act. The NRC and USACE are required to consult with the FWS under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act prior to licensing or permitting any actions that could adversely affect threatened or endangered species.
Table 1 List of Attendees at August 8, 2011, Fermi 3 Onsite Meeting
Affiliation Name E-mail Detroit Edison Randy Westmoreland [email protected]
Detroit Edison’s Proposed On-Site Alternative Analysis Presentation (Randy Westmoreland): Colette Luff of USACE prefaced the presentation by explaining that the USACE evaluates projects proposing the discharge of dredged/fill material into waters of the United States, including adjacent wetlands, for compliance with the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines of the Clean Water Act. This requires, in part, an evaluation of alternatives and identification of a LEDPA to the proposed discharge. She noted that Detroit Edison would be presenting the alternative analysis it conducted to demonstrate compliance with the Guidelines and identify its proposed LEDPA. Ms. Luff qualified Detroit Edison’s proposed LEDPA by explaining that the USACE had not yet verified it as the LEDPA, but that it would be included in the draft EIS to allow public review. She further explained that the USACE would identify and document the LEDPA in its permit decision document.
B. Olson - 3 - Randy Westmoreland then presented an overview of Detroit Edison’s proposed Fermi 3 site layout. He explained how the layout went through four iterations.
• The initial version (Rev. 0) was developed prior to the 2008 wetland delineation. The environmental report (ER) included with the COL application relied on the Rev. 0 site layout.
• The second layout version (Rev. 1), released in 2009, substantially reduced wetland
impacts, especially to forested wetlands in the northwestern and southwestern parts of the site. Mr. Westmoreland highlighted several elements of Rev. 1 that reduced wetland impacts, such as clustering support facilities along the edge of the existing Fermi 2 developed area, maximizing use of an upland agricultural field owned by Detroit Edison, and building compact parking garages instead of larger flat parking lots. He emphasized, however, the need to establish separate access roads for traffic into Fermi 2 and Fermi 3, for both logistical and security purposes.
• A third layout (Rev. 2) was submitted by Detroit Edison in January 2011. Rev. 2 further
minimized wetland impacts by avoiding construction laydown in forested wetlands in the part of the site termed the “Pork Chop,” based on its shape on aerial photographs. Rev. 2 also calls for relocating an existing onsite segment of the Fermi 2 transmission line to a new route across the western part of the site, thereby freeing upland and wetland areas that were not previously usable for project features due to overhead clearances.
• Subsequently, during detailed design of the access road along the western edge of the
site (Toll Road), Detroit Edison identified technical issues that necessitated realignment of the Rev. 2 road and the Fermi 2 transmissions lines (as realigned in Rev. 2) which resulted in the fourth layout version (Rev. 3). According to Detroit Edison, the Rev. 3 layout would further reduce unavoidable wetland fill impacts by avoiding wetlands (these wetlands were previously unaccounted for in Detroit Edison’s wetlands delineation and impact proposals) in exchange for a one-ac increase in the wetland vegetation trimming area necessary to provided the overhead clearance for the realigned transmission line. Detroit Edison has proposed the Rev. 3 layout as the LEDPA. The draft EIS currently in preparation by NRC and USACE also uses the Rev. 3 site layout data.
Detroit Edison is using the sequence of four site layout versions to demonstrate its effort to avoid and minimize wetland impacts. The consideration of alternative sites required by NRC serves as part of the avoidance effort, but the USACE also requires further detailed consideration of how to avoid and reduce wetland impacts once a site is selected.
B. Olson - 4 - Wetland Delineation & Functional Assessment Overview (Sheila Hess): Sheila Hess of Conservation Connects LLC (Detroit Edison consultant), made a detailed presentation addressing how the proposed Rev. 3 (fourth) site layout version affects wetlands and other waters of the United States. She noted that the project would unavoidably impact the wetland features noted in Table 2 (which presents the impact area data to be used in the soon to be published draft EIS):
Table 2 Proposed Impacts to Wetlands and Other Waters of the United States
Total (Wetlands) 8.3 2.5 23.7 34.5 Other Waters 5.2 0.0 0.0 5.2
Total (Wetlands and Waters)
13.5 2.5 23.7 39.7
Ms. Luff explained that USACE determined that approximately 1.9 ac identified as emergent wetlands in Detroit Edison’s wetland delineation report (that is part of the 6.1 ac proposed for permanent fill) are not adjacent to a navigable water of the United States and therefore are an area for which the State of Michigan has assumed Federal permit authority per Section 404(g) of the Clean Water Act and Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 23. She further explained that Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) subsequently determined that the site was not regulated by the state. While the EIS will note these unregulated impacts, the USACE is not factoring them into its mitigation requirements. EPA asked if USACE coordinated their “isolated” wetland determination with the EPA, as required. Ms. Luff explained that the USACE did not coordinate with EPA regarding the 1.9-ac area since USACE does not make isolated or otherwise determinations for “state assumed waters,” and therefore no coordination with EPA is warranted. She noted that this is the first instance she has encountered where “assumed waters” had not fallen under state jurisdiction. The state is not expected to require mitigation for the discharge of fill in the area in question. Indiana Bat Presentation (Ed Shaddrick): In a telephone call with the NRC, USACE, and Detroit Edison on July 26, 2011, Burr Fisher of the FWS had expressed concern over the clearing of trees capable of serving as Indiana bat maternity roosts. He indicated that the FWS may require Detroit Edison to conduct mist net field surveys for Indiana bats in forested areas containing potential maternity roost trees. As an initial step in addressing this issue, Detroit Edison tasked Ed Shaddrick, biologist with Black and Veatch (contractor to Detroit Edison), to visually inspect forested areas within the
B. Olson - 5- proposed project footprint (based on the Rev. 3 site layout version) for trees that could possibly function as maternity roosts. Mr. Shaddrick made a brief presentation discussing the results of this informal survey. He explained that for him to identify a tree as a possible maternity roost, it had to be at least 9 inches in trunk diameter at breast height (4.5 ft from the ground) and display substantial peeling or deeply furrowed bark or a pronounced deep split. Mr. Shaddrick identified five potential maternity roost trees in the project footprint. Three are in a forested wetland area just east of the Quarry Lakes that will be used for construction laydown and two are forested wetlands at the western site boundary. The latter two trees would have to be cut to accommodate the overhead clearance necessary for the Fermi 2 transmission lines that will be relocated as per the proposed layout (Rev. 3). Site Tour: Randy Westmoreland drove the group to inspect several areas of interest. He let representatives in the group request specific areas to visit. The first area visited was the site of a proposed temporary laydown area located southeast of the Quarry Lakes and immediately north of Pointe Aux Peaux Road. It is an area disturbed by past fill activities (possibly Fermi 2 construction) and contains some emergent wetlands that could be restored following usage. The second area visited was the forested wetland of the Quarry Lakes containing potential Indiana bat maternity roost trees. This area would be used as a temporary laydown area, and would require total vegetation clearing. The trees were healthy shagbark hickories (Carya ovata) with peeling bark (a trait common to this species) (Photo 1). Mr. Burr Fisher stated that the trees appeared to be too small and in too dense a tree canopy to function well as Indiana bat maternity roosts.
Photo 1: Potential Indiana Bat Maternity Roost Trees East of Quarry Lakes
B. Olson - 6 -
The third area visited was on the Lake Erie shoreline at the existing Fermi 2 intake and discharge structures (Photo 2). The proposed Fermi 3 intake and discharge structures would be built in this same area. The shoreline has already been armored and paved in connection with the previous Fermi 1 plant and currently operating Fermi 2 plant.
Photo 2: Proposed Shoreline Location for Fermi 3 Intake and Discharge Structures (Looking Southeast)
The fourth area visited comprised segments of man-made canal and lake features just west of the existing Fermi 2 developed areas (Photo 3). These surface water bodies; termed the north or overflow canal, south canal, and central canal; are surrounded by narrow fringes of phragmites (Phragmites australis) and steep, hardened man-made slopes. No emergent vegetation was visible in the north or central canals other than the narrow phragmites fringes. These areas would be filled to construct ancillary structures serving Fermi 3. The south canal would be “culverted” to allow the movement of construction equipment from the laydown area to the Fermi 3 construction site. The south canal contained an emergent fringe and also floating aquatic plants. According to Ms. Luff, the hydrology of the canals is tied to Lake Erie but existing connections would be maintained. Therefore, according to Detroit Edison, filling or culverting these waters would not negatively influence the hydrology of wetlands to the west. These impacts constitute the 5.2 ac of open water impacts reported in the JPA and draft EIS (see Table 2). The USACE requires permits to fill open waters of the United States and may require mitigation to replace the loss of aquatic functions. Ms. Luff explained that the MDEQ may consider these areas as emergent wetlands. If so, the MDEQ wetland mitigation requirements could be greater than currently proposed. This change would have to be reported in the final EIS.
B. Olson - 7 -
Photo 3: Man-Made Canal Subject to Fill to Build Fermi 3 (Looking Northeast from near Center of Site)
The fifth area visited was the 1.9-ac area unregulated emergent wetland (Photo 4). It is situated under existing transmission conductors (proposed for realignment in Rev. 3) serving Fermi 2. Most of the wetland supports a dense stand of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) with a small area of sedge (Carex spp.) near its center. The wetland was dry at the time of visit. A low ridge comprises its northern edge. A larger forested wetland is situated north of the ridge. Uplands to the east and west support Detroit Edison’s earlier tallgrass prairie project area. A portion of the tallgrass prairie would be permanently lost to accommodate the proposed Fermi 3 switchyard.
Photo 4: 1.9-ac Non-Regulated Wetland Subject to Fill to Build Fermi 3 (Looking North from Fermi Drive)
The last area visited was a strip of grassy upland and forested wetlands along the west edge of the Fermi site, where trees would be cut to accommodate the realigned Fermi 2 transmission lines (Photo 5). As previously discussed, the lines are proposed for relocation to further minimize proposed site layout wetland impacts. The forest consists of deciduous trees such as box elder (Acer negundo), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), shagbark hickory, and
B. Olson - 8 - green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). The ash trees had been killed by the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis), an introduced insect pest that has killed most ash trees in the region.
Photo 5: Uplands on Proposed Onsite Realignment Route for Fermi 2 Transmission Lines (Looking North along West
Perimeter of Fermi Site)
Ed Shaddrick had identified two potential Indiana bat maternity roost trees in the forested wetland portion of this area (Photo 6). Both were dead green ash trees. Mr. Fisher of the FWS stated that the trees did have the appearance of possible maternity roost trees. However, on discussion, he agreed that the trees were in an advanced state of decay and would not likely provide maternity roost functionality for much longer. Mr. Fisher suggested that further investigation may not be warranted unless Detroit Edison planned to clear the trees within the next year or two.
Photo 6: Potential Indiana Bat Maternity Roost Tree on Realignment Route for Fermi 2 Lines
B. Olson - 9 -
DAY 2 MEETING – PROPOSED OFFSITE FERMI 3 AQUATIC RESOURCE (WETLAND) COMPENSATORY STRATEGY AND SITE TOUR Time: 9:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. Location: Detroit Edison Monroe Activities Center, Monroe, Michigan Attendees are noted in Table 3, below. This was a USACE preapplication meeting with Detroit Edison. USACE invited other State, Federal and local governmental agencies for their situational awareness and to facilitate interagency collaboration regarding the proposal. Representatives of two Detroit Edison contractors were present: Conservation Connects LLC, who assisted Detroit Edison in preparing the Fermi 3 wetland delineation report and concept mitigation strategy and Tetra Tech, who assisted Detroit Edison in preparing the Fermi 3 alternatives analysis and JPA. Agencies present, in addition to NRC, included the USACE, EPA, and FWS.
Table 3 List of Attendees at August 9, 2011 Fermi 3 Mitigation Design Meeting
Overview Presentation (Randy Westmoreland): The day opened with a meeting in the Monroe Activities Center. Ms. Luff prefaced the presentation by explaining that the compensatory mitigation strategy to be presented by Detroit Edison is proposed as compensation for unavoidable aquatic resource losses associated with the proposed Fermi 3 site layout (Rev 3); the plan is conceptual in nature and has not been verified by USACE or MDEQ; will be made available for public comment in the draft EIS; and will be summarized in the USACE public notice. She further explained that the final compensatory mitigation requirements would be included in the USACE permit, if issued. Randy Westmoreland began the meeting with an overview of the Fermi 3 proposed site layout and the proposed aquatic resource mitigation. He explained that Detroit Edison’s mitigation planning for Fermi 3 is still at a conceptual stage and will be finalized to meet regulatory requirements as the planning process matures.
B. Olson - 10 - As presented by Detroit Edison, mitigation typically consists of examining opportunities to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources, followed by consideration of methods to compensate for the impacts (compensatory mitigation). The four iterations of the
B. Olson - 10 - proposed Fermi 3 site plan constitute Detroit Edison’s proposed avoidance effort. Use of best management practices to reduce sedimentation and runoff into wetlands and surface waters constitutes Detroit Edison’s proposed minimization effort. Detroit Edison’s proposed compensatory mitigation effort consists of two elements: 1) restoration in place of all temporarily disturbed wetlands and 2) offsite restoration and enhancement of wetlands. The remainder of the presentation focused on the proposed offsite effort. The proposed mitigation site is a tract of approximately 210 ac already owned by Detroit Edison as part of the existing Monroe Power Plant (coal-fired plant). The roughly rectangular parcel is located approximately 7 mi south of the Fermi site on Lake Erie. Most of the parcel is currently in agricultural use. The parcel is surrounded by man-made dikes. Lake Erie is located waterward of the easternmost dike. Drainage ditches are located inside the dike along the south and eastern perimeters of the site. The drainage from the ditches is pumped into the ash basin at the northeast corner of the site. According to Detroit Edison, they anticipate restoring and enhancing a total of 82 ac of wetlands on the site to compensate for Fermi 3 aquatic resource impacts. Although Detroit Edison has quantified its Fermi 3 wetland impacts, the USACE and MDEQ cannot determine the exact extent of required aquatic resource compensation until formal review of the JPA. Detroit Edison expects that the proposed offsite project will exceed requirements. A basin used to handle coal ash generated at the Monroe Power Plant is situated directly north of the site. Lake Erie is situated to the east. A marina and a Monroe County Schools recreation site are situated directly south of the site. Land directly west of the site accommodates an existing tallgrass prairie conservation project developed jointly by Detroit Edison and the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge. Overview of Proposed Offsite Compensatory Mitigation (Lisa Matis): Ms. Lisa Matis of Tetra Tech, contractor to Detroit Edison, provided an overview of the proposed concept. A historical 1897 navigation chart indicated that the site was largely wetlands with orchards occupying the western one-third, except for a waterway that flowed through the southwest. Historical aerial photographs from the 1950s indicate that this natural waterway, termed the Davis Drain, still flowed through the western part of the site and entered into La Plaisance Creek, which flows into Lake Erie to the south. Most of the site was still farmed. By the 1960’s it appears that dikes completely encompassed the site and that flow in Davis Drain had been rerouted south. Drainage ditches had been built elsewhere. Tile drains had been installed. Most of the site is still farmland today, except for dikes, drainage ditches, a drainage area that bisects the western two-thirds of the site and the former natural channel of Davis Drain, and an area at the foot of an old fill pile and forested wetlands in the northwest corner of the site.
B. Olson - 11 - Key elements of the concept plan call for:
1. Breaking an opening into the eastern dike to enhance inflow of surface water from Lake Erie while maintaining the rest of the dike to protect against coastal erosion and flooding;
2. Returning a portion of the flow of Davis Drain to its former channel in the western part of the site;
3. Connecting the restored Davis Drain channel to Lake Erie by a created channel following
a naturally meandering route across the eastern part of the site and grading adjacent areas to provide for a variety of water levels and habitats;
4. Plugging the drainage ditch outlet at the northeast corner of the site and plugging or
removing agricultural tile drains;
5. Allowing surface water from Lake Erie and Davis Drain to flow over the currently farmed areas, restoring hydrological conditions conducive to wetland vegetation;
6. Building a low berm to separate restored and enhanced wetlands in the western and
eastern parts of the site;
7. Installing a water control structure in the new berm so that surface water levels in the western part of the site can be controlled;
8. Seeding restored and enhanced wetlands for a temporary monitoring period to ensure
that desired hydrological conditions have been successfully established;
9. Final planting of vegetation targeting wetland plant communities impacted at the Fermi site; and
10. Monitoring and maintenance of the mitigation project as long as required by regulatory
agencies. As explained by Ms. Matis, hydrology in the eastern part of the site would be driven primarily by water levels in Lake Erie. Hydrology in the western part would be fed primarily by inflow from Davis Drain. The proposed water control structure would release excess water from the western part of the site into Lake Erie and admit inflow from Lake Erie during high water events (such as seiches). Investigations indicate that surface soils throughout the site consist of high levels of clay with no water table in the upper 18 inches of the soil profile. Hence, the hydrology of the restored and enhanced wetlands would be driven almost completely by surface water rather than groundwater.
B. Olson - 12 - Several attendees questioned the need for the proposed new central dike and water control structure. They stated that the mitigation project would better replicate natural lakeside wetland systems if the entire site were directly open to inflow from Lake Erie and that the water control structure would indefinitely require ongoing regular maintenance. Ms. Matis explained that the need for the water control structure stems from MDEQ requirements for exactly replicating specific wetland plant communities impacted by the Fermi 3 project. Specific plant communities in wetland systems adjacent to large bodies of water such as Lake Erie typically reflect specific seasonal high water depths. According to Ms. Matis, use of a water control structure is the only way to reasonably ensure establishment of specific targeted wetland plant communities. Proposed Wetland Mitigation Site Tour: The tour began in the northwestern corner of the proposed site. A farm lane runs along a low dike following the western perimeter of the site (Photo 7). The farmland (right of the farm lane in the photo) appeared to be in active cultivation.
Photo 7: View North Along West Perimeter of Mitigation Site
The artificially channelized Davis Drain flows through a culvert located west of the proposed site and under a paved road to the south (left part of Photo 8) and into an artificially straightened canal leading to La Plaisance Creek, just upstream of its outlet to Lake Erie. The mitigation concept calls for directing a portion of the Davis Drain flow from a point farther upstream into the western part of the mitigation site. The flow would be used to inundate agricultural land to restore wetland conditions.
B. Olson - 13 -
Photo 8: Ditch Carrying Davis Drain Across Northwest Corner of Proposed Mitigation Site
A segment of the former natural channel of Davis Drain in the western part of the mitigation site presently supports phragmites, common cattail (Typha latifolia), and other emergent wetland vegetation (Photo 9). Redirected flow from Davis Drain would be returned to this shallow channel and allowed to inundate the adjoining agricultural land.
Photo 9: Emergent Wetland Vegetation in Former Natural Channel for Davis Drain (Looking East from near West-
Central Edge of Proposed Mitigation Site)
The outlet of the artificial drainage ditches to the pumping station would be plugged and tile drains would be removed from the agricultural land occupying most of the site (Photo 10). Surface flow from Davis Drain and Lake Erie would be allowed to shallowly inundate the agricultural land and support restored wetland vegetation. Recent investigations by Tetra Tech indicate that soils over most of the agricultural land on the site are or were hydric soils.
B. Olson - 14 -
Photo 10: Agricultural Land in Central Part of Proposed Mitigation Site (Looking South)
The Lake Erie shoreline directly east of the proposed mitigation site appears to be low energy (Photo 11). Much of the lake close to the dike has low enough wave energy to support dense cover by the floating emergent plant American lotus (Nelumbo lutea). Several attendees suggested that the low wave energy might allow for breaching a wider gap in the dike (or multiple gaps), thereby increasing contact between the restored wetlands and the lake. Ms. Matis responded that despite the low wave energy under normal conditions, the shoreline is still subject to episodic high wave energy during high winds and seiche events. Too wide a breach would subject the restored wetlands to a high risk of erosion during these events.
Photo 11: Lake Erie Just East of Dike on East Perimeter of Proposed Mitigation Site (Looking Southeast)
SUMMARY OF KEY DISCUSSION POINTS The following lists the key discussion points from both the August 8-9, 2011, meetings.
1. The proposed site layout for Fermi 3 used in the JPA and draft EIS is the fourth sequential iteration (Rev. 3) produced since 2008. Rev. 1 substantially reduced wetland impacts; Rev. 2 further minimized wetland impacts; and Rev 3 reduced wetland impacts
B. Olson - 15 - even more but increased the forested wetland area that would require cutting to accommodate the overhead clearance for the relocated Fermi 2 transmission line corridor. Detroit Edison believes that no further avoidance of wetland impacts is possible and proposes the Rev. 3 layout as the LEDPA.
2. Detroit Edison is presenting the sequence of site layout revisions in its JPA to document its consideration of opportunities to minimize wetland impacts. The proposed layout and associated impacts, including the unavoidable wetlands loss, have not been verified as the LEDPA by USACE. The USACE would determine the LEDPA during its permit evaluation process.
3. The proposed site layout still unavoidably affects approximately 39.7 ac of wetlands and
other waters of the United States, although approximately 1.9 ac of the wetland impacts involve an area identified as emergent wetlands by Detroit Edison but not regulated by the USACE or MDEQ.
4. The wetland impact acreage data used by NRC and USACE in writing the draft EIS as of
July 31, 2011, are consistent with the JPA at the present time. At the time of the meeting, USACE had not yet received the JPA.
5. Mr. Ed Shaddrick of Black and Veatch was tasked by Detroit Edison to identify potential
Indiana bat maternity roost trees within the proposed Fermi 3 footprint. Mr. Shaddrick identified two clusters of potential maternity roost trees, one in a forested wetland directly east of the Quarry Ponds and one in a forested wetland along the western property boundary.
6. Mr. Burr Fisher of FWS informally stated that the trees west of the Quarry Lakes did not
appear to have a high potential to serve as Indiana bat maternity roosts, while the trees near the western property boundary were in an advanced state of decay and may only provide the potential for maternity roosting habitat for one or two more years.
7. Mr. Fisher’s informal statements suggest that further field survey effort for the Indiana
bat may not be warranted unless Detroit Edison plans to clear trees within the next couple of years. However, Mr. Fisher did not make any official statement on behalf of the FWS.
8. Detroit Edison proposes two forms of compensatory aquatic resource mitigation: onsite
restoration of wetlands temporarily disturbed during construction of Fermi 3 and offsite restoration and enhancement of approximately 82 ac of wetlands on a tract of approximately 210 ac of agricultural land owned by Detroit Edison located south of the Monroe Power Plant. The USACE has not verified that the proposed offsite work would
B. Olson compensate for the unavoidasite, or the acceptability of th
9. Detroit Edison proposes to re
dike and allowing Lake Erie a(Davis Drain) back to its origagricultural tile drains; pluggiproviding topographical varia
10. Detroit Edison proposes to in
mix, monitor the site until it dsuccessfully established, andwetlands on the Fermi site.
11. Detroit Edison expects that t
resource mitigation requirem OTHER PHOTOGRAPHS The following additional photographs
Photo 12: Cedar Waxwings
- 16 -
able losses of aquatic resources at the proposed he proposed conceptual aquatic resource plan.
estore former wetlands on the mitigation site by baccess to the site; redirecting a portion of a “ditchinal channel, then to the site; plugging or removining the outlet of the drainage ditch system on siteances by grading to induce different wetland type
nitially seed the mitigation site with a native wetladetermines that the desired wetland hydrology had then plant native wetland plants that replicate th
he mitigation project will exceed the specific aquaments that would be required by the USACE and M
s were taken over the course of the two-day visit
(Bombycilla cedrorum) in Dead Ash Tree West of Fermi 2
Fermi 3
breaching a hed” drain ng e; and s.
and seed s been he impacted
atic MDEQ.
.
B. Olson
Photo 13: Great Crested Fly
Photo 14: Juvenile Bald Eagle (H
Photo 15: Mourning Do
Docket No.: 052-33 cc: See next page
- 17 -
ycatcher (Myiarchus crinitus) in Central Part of Fermi Site
Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Flying Over Proposed Mitigation S
ove (Zenaida macroura) in Dead Ash at Mitigation Site
Site
B. Olson
Photo 13: Great Crested Fly
Photo 14: Juvenile Bald Eagle (H
Photo 15: Mourning Do
Docket No.: 052-33 cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION: See next page ADAMS Accession No.: ML11332A158 OFFICE NRO NAME PDoub DATE 11 / 29 /1
- 17 -
ycatcher (Myiarchus crinitus) in Central Part of Fermi Site
Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Flying Over Proposed Mitigation S
ove (Zenaida macroura) in Dead Ash at Mitigation Site
NRONRO NRO ARedden BOlson
1 12 / 01 /11 12 / 05 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Site
O-002
/11
Memorandum to Bruce Olson from Peyton Doub dated December 5, 2011 SUBJECT: MEETING NOTES FROM THE ONSITE MEETINGS ON AUGUST 8 - 9, 2011,
TO DISCUSS THE FERMI 3 SITE LAYOUT AND CONCEPTUAL AQUATIC RESOURCE (WETLAND) MITIGATION PLAN
DISTRIBUTION: PUBLIC Docket No.: 052-33
Fermi Extended Mailing List cc:
Ena Agbedis 19601 Farmington Rd. Livonia, MI 48152 Ms. Dorothy Bailey 4130 E. Dunbar Rd. Monroe, MI 48161 Ms. Mary Faith Bell Sisters Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 610 W Elm Ave. Monroe, MI 48162 Tullio Bilen U.S. FWS 753 Ruff Dr. Monroe, MI 48138 J. R. Brown 30666 Oakleaf Franklin, MI 48025 Mr. Pete Burkit 13754 Ohio St. Monroe, MI 48161 Mr. Jim Calgie 406 W. Vienna Rd. Temperance, MI 48182 Jessie Pauline Collins 46264 Willow Road Belleville, MI 48111 Mr. Gary Davis 15277 LaPlaisance Rd. Monroe, MI 48162
Ms. Dorothy Diederichs Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 610 W. Elm Ave. Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Matthew T. Donofrio 9052 LuLu Rd. Ida, MI 48140 Ms. Marion Duggan Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 610 W. Elm Ave. Monroe, MI 48162 Ms. Dorothy Eddy Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 610 W. Elm Ave. Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Jacob Ellison 4702 Long Rd. Newport, MI 48166 Ms. Regina Feldpausch 14631 Ida West Rd Petersburg, MI 49270 Ms. Mitzi Forshee 22361 Meridian Rd. Grosse Ile, MI 48138 Mr. Dan Glencer 7416 Yellow Wood Lansing, MI 48917 Mr. Frank Green 2874 First St. Monroe, MI 48162
Page 1 of 6
Fermi Extended Mailing List cc:
Chris Hart 2317 Bahiamer Toledo, OK 43611 Ms. Margaret Ann Henige Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 610 W. Elm Ave., 119 Monroe, MI 48162-2909 Ms. Anna Holden Sierra Club 8430 E. Jefferson, #217 Detroit, MI 48214 Mr. Mike Ingels 1239 Country Club Adrian, MI 49221 Ms. Yvonne Jackson 1239 E. First St. Monroe, MI 48161 Ms. Josephine Karas Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 610 W. Elm Ave. Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Martin Kaufman 1515 E. Hurd Rd. Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Ken King 8190 LuLu Rd. Ida, MI 48140 Mr. Tom Krzyston 2929 E. Front St. Monroe, MI 48161
Mr. Patrick M. Lambrix 8404 Ida Ctr. Ida, MI 48160 Mr. Royce Maniko 125 E. 2nd St. Monroe, MI 48161 Pat Marida Ohio Sierra Club 1710 Dorsetshire Rd. Columbus, OH 43229 Mr. John Massengill 2967 E. Country Ln. Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Jim McDaniel 1490 Dazakow Dr. Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Paul McGrew 319 Glenwood Rd. Rossford, OH 43460 Florein E. Mentel 1731 Roman Dr. Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Richard Meyer 6167 Sterling Dr. Newport, MI 48166 Lee Miller 849 Winston Dr. Monroe, MI 48161 Grady Nance 38926 Plumbrook Dr. Farmington Hills, MI 48331
Page 2 of 6
Fermi Extended Mailing List cc:
Ms. Genevieve Petrak Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 610 W. Elm Ave. Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Gregory Pitoniak Southeast Michigan Community Alliance 25363 Eureka Rd. Taylor, MI 48180 Mr. Nick Puhl 1781 Fullington Rd. Toledo, OH 43614 Mr. John Ripple 211 Ready Rd. Carleton, MI 48117 Ms. Florence Ripple 819 W. Elm Ave., #207 Monroe, MI 48162 Ms. Charlotte Scales 8670 Canterberry Ln. Newport, MI 48166 Mr. Victor Siech 122 Eth St. Monroe, MI 48161 Ms. Nicole Tinnirello 368 Cranbrook Blvd. Monroe, MI 48162 Ms. Charlotte Walby Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 610 W. Elm Ave. Monroe, MI 48162
Ms. Margaret Weber 15015 Piedmont St. Detroit, MI 48223 Mr. Matt Weber IBEW Local 8 212 N. Perry St. Woodville, OH 43469 Mr. Ned A. Yarger 1796 Cady Rd. Erie, MI 48140
Beyond Nuclear Paul Gunter 6930 Carroll Ave., Ste. 400 Takoma Park, MD 20912 Michigan Natural Features Inventory Mason Bldg., 5th Flr. Box 30444 530 Aolegan St. Lansing, MI 48933 Don't Waste Michigan P.O. Box 463 Monroe, MI 48161 Citizens for Alternatives to Chemical Contamination Kathryn F. Cumbow 8735 Maple Grove Rd. Lake, MI 48632 Citizens Environment Alliance 1950 Ottawa St. Windsor, ON N84 1R7 Mr. Derek Bailey Chairman Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians 2605 N.W. Bayshore Dr. Suttons Bay, MI 49682 Mr. John Ballard Chief Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma P.O. Box 110 811 Third Ave., NE Miami, OK 74355 Mr. Jack Barnette Environmental Scientist US EPA Region 5 77 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604
Leaford Bearskin Wyandotte Nation P.O. Box 250 64700 E. Highway 60 Wyandotte, OK 74370 Ms. Sandra Bihn 6565 Bayshore Rd. Oregon, OH 43616 Lana Causley Interim Chairperson Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Michigan 523 Ashmun St. Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783 Mr. James G. Chandler International Joint Commission Great Lakes Water Quality Board United States Section 1250 23rd Street, NW Ste. 100 Washington, DC 20440 Ms. Mary Colligan Asst. Regional Administrator for Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Regional Office 55 Great Republic Dr. Gloucester, MA 01930-2276 Mr. Brian D. Conway Michigan State Historic Preservation Officer Michigan Historical Center Department of History, Arts, and Libraries P.O. Box 30740 702 W. Kalamazoo St. Lansing, MI 48909-8240
Page 1 of 6
Fermi Primary Mailing List cc:
Mr. Richard Coronado 808 Hall Ave. Windsor, ON N9A 2M3 Mr. Derek Coronado 808 Hall Ave. Windsor, ON N9A 2M3 Mr. William Creal Division Chief Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Div. 525 West Allegan St. P.O. Box 30458 Lansing, MI 48909-7958 Ms. Kay Cumbow 15184 Dudley Rd. Brown City, MI 48416 Ms. Kathrine David Water Resources Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Jackson District Office 301 E. Louis Glick Hwy. Jackson, MI 49201-1556 Mr. Burr Fisher U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service East Lansing Ecological Services Office 2651 Coolidge Road E. Lansing, MI 48823 Ms. Tamara Francis Cultural Preservation Office Delaware Nation P.O. Box 825 Bldg. 100, State Hwy 201 Anadarko, OK 73005
Mr. James Francis Senior Fisheries Biologist Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division 26000 W. Eight Mile Rd. Southfield, MI 48034 Mr. Wally Gauthier, Chief Permit Evaluation Branch B USACE Detroit-District 477 Michigan Ave. 6th Floor Detroit, MI 48226 Mr. Todd Grischke LEMU Fisheries Supervisor Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division P.O. Box 30446 Lansing, MI 48909 Mr. Colan Keith Gunter 15784 Whitby Livonia, MI 48154 Mr. Ken Harrington Chairperson Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians 7500 Odawa Cir. Harbor Springs, MI 49740 Ms. Gina Harrison Environmental Scientist US EPA Region 5 Air and Radiation Division /Air Enforcement and Compliance Branch 77 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604
Page 2 of 6
Fermi Primary Mailing List cc:
Mr. John H. Hartig Refuge Manager U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge 9311 Groh Rd. Grosse Ile, MI 48138 Mr. Scott Hicks Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service East Lansing Michigan Field Office 2651 Coolidge Rd., Ste. 101 East Lansing, MI 48823 Ms. Patricia Jones Ohio Natural Heritage Data Base Division of Natural Areas & Preserves Ohio Department of Natural Resources 1889 Fountain Sq. Bldg. F-1 Columbus, OH 43224-1331 Mr. Kevin Kamps 6930 Carroll Ave., Ste. 400 Takoma Park, MD 20912 Mr. Michael J. Keegan 811 Harrison St. Monroe, MI 48161 Mr. John Konik, Chief Regulatory Office USACE Detroit-District 477 Michigan Ave. 6th Floor Detroit, MI 48226
Mr. Dennis V. Koquom Chief Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan 7070 East Broadway Rd. Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Ms. Karen Krepps, Ph.D. District Archeologist & Tribal Liaison USACE-Detroit 477 Michigan Avenue, 7th Floor Detroit, MI 48226 Terry J. Lodge, Esq. Counsel for Petitioners 316 N. Michigan St., Ste. 520 Toledo, OH 43604-5627 Ms. Colette M. Luff USACE-Detroit District Regulatory Office 477 Michigan Avenue, 6th Floor Detroit, MI 48226 Mr. Leonard Mandeville 1280 S. Raisinville Monroe, MI 48161 Mr. Homer A. Mandoka Chairperson Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi, Inc. 2221 - 1 1/2 Mile Rd. Fulton, MI 49052 Mr. Frank Mantei 571 St. Mary's Ave. Monroe, MI 48161
Page 3 of 6
Fermi Primary Mailing List cc:
Mr. Edward McArdle 18841 Reed St. Melvindale, MI 48122 Mr. Kenneth Meshigaud Chairperson Hannahville Indian Community N14911 Hannahville B1 Rd. Wilson, MI 49896-9728 Marcee Meyers 1280 S. Raisinville Monroe, MI 48161 Mr. Reid Nelson Director Office of Federal Agency Programs Advisory Council of Historic Preservation Old Post Office Bldg. 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Ste. 809 Washington, DC 20004 Mr. Henry Newman 27156 Gail Dr. Warren, MI 48093-7538 Mr. Larry Romanelli Ogema Little River Band of Ottawa Indians 375 River St. Manistee, MI 49660 Mr. Jeffrey D. Parker President Bay Mills Indian Community 12140 W. Lakeshore Dr. Brimley, MI 49715
Ms. Elizabeth Poole Environmental Scientist US EPA Region 5 77 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604 Mr. Sean Ramach Environmental Scientist US EPA Region 5 NPDES Branch, Water Division 77 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604 Mr. Joseph Robison Wildlife Biologist Michigan Department of Natural Resources Pte. Mouillee State Game Area 37205 Mouillee Rd. Rockwood, MI 48173 Mr. Jon Russell Water Resources Division Michgan Department of Environmental Quality Jackson District Office 301 E. Louis Glick Hwy. Jackson, MI 49201-1556 Mr. Alan Shively Chairman Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians P.O. Box 249 e23560 Choate Rd. Watersmeet, MI 49969
Page 4 of 6
Fermi Primary Mailing List cc:
Mr. Philip Shopodock Chairman Forest County Potawatomi Community of Wisconsin P.O. Box 340 5417 Everybody's Rd. Crandon, WI 54520 Kelley Smith Chairman Great Lakes Fisheries Commission Micigan Dept. of Natural Resources Mason Bldg. 8th Flr. 530 Aolegan St. Lansing, MI 48933 Mr. Ron Sparkman Chairman Shawnee Tribe P.O. Box 189 29 S Hwy 69A Miami, OK 74355 Mr. David K. Sprague Chairperson Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan P.O. Box 218 1743 142 Ave. Dorr, MI 49323 Mr. George Steinman 3011 Vivian Rd. Monroe, MI 48161 Ms. Shirley Steinman 3011 Vivian Rd. Monroe, MI 48161 Mr. Harold L. Stokes 26345 W. 7 Mile Redford, MI 48240-1980
Mr. Warren C. Swartz, Jr. President Keweenaw Bay Indian Community 1652 Beartown Rd. Baraga, MI 49908 Ms. Marilyn R. Timmer 507 St. Mary's Ave. Monroe, MI 48161 Mr. Matthew J. Wesaw Chairperson Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians 58620 Sink Rd. Dowagiac, MI 49047 Mr. Kenneth Westlake US EPA Region 5 77 West Jackson Blvd. Mail Code: E-19J Chicago, IL 60604-3507 Anne Woiwode Sierra Club MI Chapter 109 E Grand River Ave. Lansing, MI 48906 Mr. Dan Wyant Director Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality 525 West Allegan St. Lansing, MI 48933 Ms. Margo Zieske Government References Librarian Ellis Reference & Information Ctr. Monroe County Libraries 3700 South Custer Rd. Monroe, MI 48161-9716
David H & Bonnie L Ord Trust 4720 Long Street Newport, MI 48166 Gayle & Thelma Manor, Kenneth Brooks 5920 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Chasity Rorke & Don III Ros Horney 5908 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Debra Kennedy, Marilyn Baker, & John Qualey 4507 Goddard Newport, MI 48166 Jeffery & Heather Achinger 5866 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Michael & Julie Alexander 5944 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Alpena County Clerk 720 W Chisholm St., Ste. 2 Alpena, MI 49707-2488 Antrim County Clerk PO Box 520 Bellaire, MI 49615-0520 Susan & Scott Baltrip 5168 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Baraga County Clerk 16 N 3rd St. Lanse, MI 49946-1002
Barry County Clerk 220 W State St. Hastings, MI 49058-1849 Mr. Gerald Bassett Southwind Const Corp 14649 Highway 41 N Evensville, IN 47735 Ms. Carolyn Bassetti Abonmarche Consultants Inc 95 W Main St. Benton Harbor, MI 49022-3605 Mr. Bruce H Bauer BHE Environmental Inc 7041 Maynardville Hwy. Knoxville, TN 37918-5737 Bay County Clerk 515 Center Ave. Bay City, MI 48708-5941 Benzie County Clerk PO Box 377 Beulah, MI 49617-0377 Lauren & Kelly Boerner 5884 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Mr. Timothy J Boles 5182 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Bureau of Land Management Milwaukee District Office 626 E Wisconsin Ave., Ste. 200 Milwaukee, WI 53202-4618
Page 1 of 10
Fermi Corps Supplemental Mailing List cc:
Katherine & Robin Carmack 12600 Fessner Carleton, MI 48117 Mr. Dan Carmichael Flotation Docking Systems Inc PO Box 178 Cedarville, MI 49719-0178 Mr. Fred Chidester Supervisor Denton Township PO Box 289 Prudenville, MI 48651-0289 Ms. Sarah Chope Charles E Raines Company 17700 Fort St. Riverview, MI 48193-6633 City of Monroe Water Works 120 East First Monroe, MI 48161 Mr. Tyrone Crear US Army Corps of Engineers Detroit Area Office 6309 W Jefferson Ave., Bldg. 414 Detroit, MI 48209-3072 Ms. Christine R Day 6444 Trafalgar Drive Canton, MI 48187 John & Deborah Diehl 4772 Long Newport, MI 48166 Mr. John D. Dingell 23 E Front St., Ste. 103 Monroe, MI 48161-2256
Honorable John D Dingell House of Representatives 2328 Rayburn House Office Bldg. Washington, DC 20515-2215 DNR Wildlife Southfield Operations Service Center 26000 W. Eight Mile Rd. Southfield, MI 48034 Ms. Patricia Drummonds 6148 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Mr. David Durchman 5089 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Mr. Steve Dushane Assistant Refuge Manager Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge 9311 Groh Rd. Grosse Ile, MI 48138 Ms. Rose Ellison USEPA-SE Michigan Field Office Water Division 9311 Groh Rd. Grosse Ile, MI 48138-169 Michael & Laurie Ellison 4702 Long Newport, MI 48166 Mr. John Emig Port of Monroe 2929 E Front St. Monroe, MI 48161-1972
Page 2 of 10
Fermi Corps Supplemental Mailing List cc:
Mr. Marcus Faust Faust Corporation PO Box 36598 Grosse Pointe, MI 48236-0598 Ms. Bernice Fix 6394 Leroux Newport, MI 48166 Todd D & Diana J Flippin 4690 North Lake Road Newport, MI 48166 Kim Fortner Monroe Charter Township 4925 W Dunbar Rd. Monroe, MI 48161-9783 Maria & Shirley Gonzalez 3276 Chippewa Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Tom Gorenflo Inter-Tribal Fisheries and Assessment Program Sault STE Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians Director 179 W 3 Mile Rd. Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783-9216 Great Lakes Commission 2805 South Industrial Highway # 100 Ann Arbor, MI 48104-6791 Terry Heatlie Great Lakes Habitat Restoration Program NOAA/GLERL 4840 S. State Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48108-9719
Mr. Bill Hogan City of Trenton 2800 3rd St. Trenton, MI 48183-2918 International Transmission Co 27175 Energy Way Novi, MI 48377 Mr. Bruce D Jones Grosse Ile Nature & Land Conservancy PO Box 12 Grosse Ile, MI 48138-0012 Ms. Andrea Kline The Nature Conservancy-AK 101 E Grand River Lansing, MI 48906-4348 Mr. Tom Klochko Klochko Contractors 2782 Corbin St. Melvindale, MI 48122-1806 Michael H Lane PO Box 173 Wyandotte, MI 48192 Mr. Larry D Laskey 10623 Telegraph Carleton, MI 48117 Mr. Carl Levin United States Senator 477 Michigan Ave. Detroit, MI 48226-2523 Thomas & Anna Liedel 4802 Long Newport, MI 48166
Page 3 of 10
Fermi Corps Supplemental Mailing List cc:
Long Est Summer Resort Assoc. 4802 Long Newport, MI 48166 John W & Karen E Madish 6394 Sterling Newport, MI 48166 Mr. Michael Maloney Ontonagon County Road Commission 415 Spar St. Ontonagon, MI 49953-1137 Mr. Randy Masserant 6001 Toll Newport, MI 48166 Mr. Gordon M McCarty 5194 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Mr. John P McCulloch Oakland County Drain Commissioner 1 Public Works Dr. Waterford, MI 48328-1907 Kay McDevitt 2682 Nadeau Road Monroe, MI 48162 Ms. Faith McGruther Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority 179 W 3 Mile Road Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783-9216 Michael & Bridget McLaughlin 6108 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Michigan DEQ Wildlife Division PO Box 30444 Mason Building, Fourth Floor Lansing, MI 48909-7944
Michigan DEQ Fisheries Division PO Box 30446 Lansing, MI 48909-7946 Michigan Hydraulic Dredging Inc 9100 Lake Court Cheboygan, MI 49721-9109 Michigan Nature Association 326 East Grand River Avenue Williamston, MI 48895 Monroe County Clerk 106 1st St. Monroe, MI 48161 Monroe County Health Department Director 2353 South Custer Rd. Monroe, MI 48161 Monroe County Historical Commission 126 South Monroe St. Monroe, MI 48161 Monroe County Historical Museum 126 South Monroe St. Monroe, MI 48161 Monroe County Road Commission Director 840 S. Telegraph Rd. Monroe, MI 48161 Monroe Frenchtown Raw Water Supply Co-Partnership 120 East First Monroe, MI 48161
Page 4 of 10
Fermi Corps Supplemental Mailing List cc:
Monroe Soil Conservation District 1137 South Telegraph Rd. Monroe, MI 48161 Mr. Larry Morrin US Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs 1 Federal Dr., Room 550 Fort Snelling, MN 55111-4008 Morrish-Wallace Construction Inc D/B/A Ryba Marine Construction Company 520 N Main St., Ste. 301 Cheboygan, MI 49721-1162 Mr. Albert Muniz 918 W Front St. Monroe, MI 48161-1629 Mr. John Nau Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20004-2501 Newport Beach Marina ATTN: Petty Thomas Toll Road Newport, MI 48166 Ninth Coast Guard District ATTN Commander 1240 E 9th St. Cleveland, OH 44199-2001 Darlin Edward Nothnagel 4704 St. Clair Street Newport, MI 48166
Orval Parker 5121 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Mr. Jeffrey D Parker Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority 179 W 3 Mile Rd. Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783-9216 Mr. Jack Parmater American Marine Constructors PO Box 103 Saint Joseph, MI 49085-0103 Mr. Aaron Payment Sault STE Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians 523 Ashmun St. Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783-1907 Richard & Charlotte Peer 5789 Newport South Newport, MI 48166 Planning & Compliance Office ATTN Environmental Coordinator National Park Service Midwest Region 601 Riverfront Dr. Omaha, NE 68102-4226 Ms. Cynthia Price 1357 W Summit Muskegon, MI 49441-3825 Nabih & Juliet Qassis 37119 Muirfield Drive Livonia, MI 48152 Ms. Carmon Reveron US Department of Housing & Urban Development 477 Michigan Ave. Detroit, MI 48226-2523
Page 5 of 10
Fermi Corps Supplemental Mailing List cc:
Mr. Dave Rich US Senator Carl Levin's Office 477 MIchigan Ave., Room 1860 Detroit, MI 48226-2576 Rockwood Post Office 22181 Huron River Dr. Rockwood, MI 48173-1121 Ms. Crystal Ruestig Cheyenne MFG Inc PO Box 25 Brush Prairie, WA 98606-0025 Mr. Gary Segrest USAED-Detroit Office of Counsel 477 Michigan Ave., 6th Flr. Detroit, MI 48226 Lonny & Linda Seres 4834 Long Newport, MI 48166 Ms. Mary Ann Sova Haywood Harrison PC 618 S Creyts Rd., Ste. B Lansing, MI 48917-8270 Robert & Beth Squier 5820 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Mr. Daniel Stefanski Monroe County Drain Commissioner 1005 South Raisinville Rd. Monroe, MI 48161 Mr. David L Sterling 5838 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166
Mr. Steve Stewart Michigan SCA Grant Extension 21885 Dunham Rd., Room 12 Clinton Township, MI 48036-1030 Ms. Meredith Strong Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation 1 Superior Way Ontonagon, MI 49953-1649 Ms. Eleanor Styles 6191 Highland Newport, MI 48166 Jack SR & Marilyn Taormina 8473 Renee Newport, MI 48166 Mr. Peter A Thomas 129 S Lake St. Port Sanilac, MI 48469-9620 Township Clerk Monroe Charter Township Hall 4925 East Dunbar Rd. Monroe, MI 48161 Township Clerk Frenchtown Charter Township 2744 Vivian Rd. Monroe, MI 48162 Mr. Godfrey A Udoji City of Dearborn - Engineering Division 4500 Maple St., Ste. 3 Dearborn, MI 48126-3548 US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 315 W Allegan St., Room 201 Lansing, MI 48933-1528
Page 6 of 10
Fermi Corps Supplemental Mailing List cc:
Lowell & Alice Yoas 6060 Pointe Aux Peaux Road Newport, MI 48166 Mr. James Younger Jay Cashman Inc 549 South St. Quincy, MA 02169-7318
Michigan Department of Environmental Waste and Hazardous Materials Division Radiological Protection & Medical Waste Sec. Nuclear Facilities Unit - Constitution Hall 525 West Allegan Street P.O. Box 30241 Lansing, MI 48909-7747 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspectors' Office 6450 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 Supervisor-Electric Operators Michigan public Service Commission P.O. Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 Wayne County Department of Homeland Security & Emergency Management 10250 Middlebelt Road Detroit, MI 48242 Mr. Jack M. Davis Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Detroit Edison Company Fermi 2 - 210 NOC 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 Mr. Bruce R. Maters Director - Legal Detroit Edison Company 688 WCB 1 Energy Plaza Detroit, MI 48226-1279 Mr. Ronnie A. May Senior Vice President-Major Enterprise Proj. Detroit Edison Company 2402 WCB 1 Energy Plaza Detroit, MI 48226-1279
