+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Mens Rea

Mens Rea

Date post: 30-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: harrison-barton
View: 23 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Mens Rea. Learning Objectives To recall the elements required to prove mens rea for murder To identify and apply relevant cases Practice Past exam question on Murder. Mens Rea. Malice Aforethought. Express Malice Aforethought. Implied Malice Aforethought. Kill. Cause GBH. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
14
Mens Rea Learning Objectives To recall the elements required to prove mens rea for murder To identify and apply relevant cases Practice Past exam question on Murder
Transcript
Page 1: Mens  Rea

Mens Rea

Learning ObjectivesTo recall the elements required to prove mens rea for

murderTo identify and apply relevant cases

Practice Past exam question on Murder

Page 2: Mens  Rea

Mens ReaMalice Aforethought

ImpliedMalice Aforethought

ExpressMalice Aforethought

Intention to _____________ Intention to _____________Kill

Cause GBH

Vickers (1957)Cunnigham (1981)

Page 3: Mens  Rea

Mens ReaImplied

Malice Aforethought

Oblique intent: Aim was not the death of victim

For example

Page 4: Mens  Rea

CJA’1967 s.8

ImpliedMalice Aforethought

Foresight of consequencesD must have foresaw that he would cause

death or serious injury

Page 5: Mens  Rea

Do you remember what was decided in this case?

Page 6: Mens  Rea

Foresight of consequence is evidence of intention but not intention in itself.Moloney Guidelines –Lord Bridge1. Was death or really serious injury a

natural consequence of act?2. Did D forsee consequences as being a

natural result of act.

TaskCompare the Moloney guidelines with CJA’67

s.8

- What is the difference?- Which should be followed? Why?

Page 7: Mens  Rea

Lord Scarman (HL)“… the Moloney guidelines… are unsafe and misleading. They require a reference to probability. They also require an explanation that the greater the probability of a consequence the more likely it is that the consequence was foreseen…”

Page 8: Mens  Rea

Lord Lane (CA)1. How probable was

consequence that resulted from D’s voluntary act?

2. Did D foresee that consequence? Is this 2 fold test correct?

Page 9: Mens  Rea

Lord Steyn (HL)1. Jury should be directed that they

are not entitled to find the necessary intention unless they feel sure that death or serious injury was a virtual certainty as a result of D’s actions and D knew this

www.bailii.org

Page 10: Mens  Rea

Transferred MaliceDefendant can be guilty if he intended the crime against a different victim

Page 11: Mens  Rea

However

• If Mens rea is for completely different offence Defendant may not be guilty

• Eg Man throws stone intending for it to hit people. Stone actually hits and breaks window. Malice cannot be transferred.

• Pembliton (1874)

Page 12: Mens  Rea

Key Point

• For the offence of Murder to be successful both the the AR and MR must be present

• (Thabo Meli V R (1954)

Page 13: Mens  Rea
Page 14: Mens  Rea

Complete the past question


Recommended