+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

Date post: 02-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: kandice-burgess
View: 219 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend

of 78

Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    1/78

    Ruminants are unique

    - Ability to digest fibrous feedstuffs otherwise indigestible.

    - But produce methane --a potential greenhouse gas

    - As an unavoidable waste product of enteric fermentation,- Global warming.

    Enteric fermentation digestive process -CHO are broken

    down by MO simple molecules for absorption into the bloodstream.

    2

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    2/78

    Globally, ruminants produce 80 MMT of methane annually.(NRC, 2002)

    India has largest livestock population in the world & estimated toemit about 10.8 MMT of CH4 annually or 405.75 x 10

    8 Kcal/dayfrom enteric fermentation.

    (Singh and Sikka, 2007)

    Dairy animals are most popular livestock enterprises in the countryand account for nearly 60% of these enteric emissions.

    (Singhal et al., 2005)

    From agricultural sector, ruminants contribute major 49 %methane in India. (NATCOM, 2004)

    In ruminants, 87% CH4 is produced in the rumen & remaining13% from hindgut fermentation.

    (Moss et al., 2000)3

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    3/78

    GHG METHANE

    Global antropogenic sources of Methane

    Source: US-EPA, 2000

    http://www.epa.gov/methane/intlanalyses.html

    Natural gas

    15%

    Biomass

    burning

    5%

    Biofuel

    combustion

    4%Waste water

    10%

    Fuel mobile1%

    Enteric

    fermentation

    28%

    Rice

    11%

    Manure

    4%

    Oil

    1%

    Solid waste13%

    Coal

    8%

    4

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    4/78

    Per cent Contribution of methane by Different Categories of Livestock(enteric fermentation and manure management).

    (Swamy and Bhattacharya, 2006)

    Cattle Indigen- Buffalo Dairy Cattle Indigen- Buffalo Non- Cattle cross Cattle crossbred

    ous Non-dairy ous Dairy Dairy bred Dairy Non- dairy

    %Emission

    Bovines

    %Emission

    Small Ruminants & other Animals

    Goat Sheep Pigs Camels Horses and DonkeysPonies 5

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    5/78

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    Crossbred Indigenous Buffalo Average

    4-12 months 1-3 yr breeding bulls

    Working Breeding+ working Others

    Methane emission in India (kg/male/year)

    (kg

    /male/year)

    (Singhal et al., 2005)

    6

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    6/78

    Methane emission in India (kg/female/year)

    0.0

    10.0

    20.030.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    Crossbred Indi enous Buffalo Avera e

    4-12 months 1-3 yr Milking Dry cow s Heifers Others

    (kg/female/year)

    (Singhal et al., 2005)

    7

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    7/78

    State-wise methane emission from Indian livestockin 1994.

    (Singhal et al., 2005)

    8

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    8/78

    Distribution of methane density (Gg/sq. km/yr)

    (Swamy and Bhattacharya, 2006)

    9

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    9/78

    Why Inhibit Methane?

    I. Loss of feed energy:

    1 L of CH4 = 39.5 kJ of feed energy. Methane emission: 8 % GEI loss.

    - varies with diet from 2% (cattle in feedlots) to

    15% (animals eating very poor quality forage).(Johnson and Johnson, 1995)

    Disadvantage for both cows and producers as this energy could bechanneled for production purposes.

    II. Green House Effect & Global Warming:

    Methane contributes 15 - 20% of total GHG. CH4 has 21 times more GWP than CO2. (IPCC, 1996)

    -Weather change (By the year 2030 the world is likely to be12 C warmer than today).

    - Increase in sea level (17 - 26 cm rise in global mean sea level).(Khan et al., 2001)

    - Health hazards. (Moss, 1993)10

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    10/78

    Many practices to reduce GHG emissions increase production

    efficiency and profitability of agricultural operations.

    Producers verifiable, quantifiable GHG emission or carbonsequestration able to receive revenue from Carbon Trading

    markets in the future.

    So,The inhibition of CH4 production in the rumen would havesignificant economic and environmental benefits.

    11

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    11/78

    Substrates used in the

    process include:a) H2b) CO2

    c) Formate,

    d) Acetate,

    e) Methanol,f) Methylamines,

    g) Dimethyl sulfide,

    h) Some alcohols.

    Methanogensis

    }Prime precursor Need methanogens:

    Methanomicrobium

    Methanobacterium

    Methanosarcina

    37% rumen methanogenesis is due to methanogens living in

    or on the rumen protozoa.

    Methanogens use the process of formation of CH4 to generateenergy for growth.

    (Hegarty, 1999)

    (Baker, 1998 ; Jarvis et al., 2000)

    12

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    12/78

    VFA+CO2 +H2 +NH3VFA+CO2+H2

    CO2 + 4H2

    Pyruvate

    Formate

    Pyruvate formate

    lyase system

    Primary fermentersSecondary fermenters

    Sugars and proteinDietary starch and plant

    cell wall

    Methanogens,

    anaerobic condition

    More negative than -200 mV,

    No electron acceptor

    CH4 +2 H2O

    In Rumen

    Ruminobacter amylophi lus,

    Streptococcus bovis, R. albus,

    F. f lavifaciens, F.succinogenes

    Megasphaera elsdenii

    Treponema bryanti i

    (Mc Allister et al., 1996)

    G= -31 Kcal 13

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    13/78

    H2 produced by microbes in the rumen

    Methanogensis Uses H2 to reduce CO2 to form CH4 If we eliminate methanogens

    Reduces CH4But leaves high partial pressure of H

    2

    Inhibition of NADH reoxidation & ruminal Fermentn

    Reduced digestion of fiber and microbial growth.

    Importance of Methahonogenesis

    Elimination of methanogens without alternative route ofelectron transfer affect the enteric fermentation.

    (Wolin et al., 1997) 14

    http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.msue.msu.edu/dairy/dairycd/rumen.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.msue.msu.edu/dairy/dairycd/cow6.html&h=210&w=300&sz=13&tbnid=F5xnhcm5rO0J:&tbnh=77&tbnw=110&start=5&prev=/images%3Fq%3Drumen%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3
  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    14/78

    Microbesinvolved in

    digestionMethanogens

    CH4CO2

    H2

    Possible intervention sites for lowering ruminant methane.

    Hydrogenformationinhibitors

    1. Alternative H2 sinks2. Increase microbial

    growth yields

    1. Anti-methanogens2. Removal of protozoa

    (Joblin, 1999) 15

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    15/78

    Influencing Factors

    Internal factors:-Methanogens, protozoa, feed residence time,animal species & its production level.

    External factors:

    Diet composition.

    Level of feed intake.

    Forage processing.

    Feeding frequency. Environmental factors.

    Internal factors are under strong influence of externalfactors.

    ( Jarvis,2000 : Lee et al.,2003)

    (Johnson et al., 1993)

    (Balch,1960)

    ( Takashi, 2001 ; Santoso et al., 2003)

    (McAllister et al.,1996)

    16

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    16/78

    Methane Abatement Options in Ruminant

    Dietary Manipulation

    Concentrate proportion

    Grazingmanegment

    Additives

    Molasses/ UMNB

    Fats,Oil

    Direct Inhibitors: bromochloromethane

    amichloral, chloroform,chloral hydrate etc

    Tannins, saponins

    Manegement Rumen manipulation

    Animal numbers

    Forage quality

    Efficiency/ Less RFI

    Geneticengineering

    Defaunation

    AntibioticsBacteriocin

    Vaccines

    Acetogenes

    Probiotics

    Longevity ofanimals

    Ionophores:monensin, lasalocid, salinomycin

    Propionate enhancers/Organicacids: fumarate, malate

    Essential oils

    digestibility of forage

    Methane oxidizers

    Conc. type

    Animal ProductivityLeguminous fodder

    17

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    17/78

    1. Increasing Animal Productivity(quite tough)

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    18/78

    Increased productivity/animal dairy cows

    25.821.6

    18.3

    0

    5

    1015

    20

    2530

    4000 5000 6000

    gCH4/k

    gmilk

    Annual milk production (l)

    Increasing milk yield from 4000 to 5000 kg/yr increases annual CH4

    emissions, but decrease emissions per kg of milk by 16% & 29% for 4000

    to 6000 kg/yr for a 600 kg cow. 19

    (Kirchgesser et al., 1995)

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    19/78

    Methane emission per kg of milk in dairy cow

    CH4(g/kgmilk)

    Milk (kg/d)

    (Tamminga et al., 2007)

    2030% reduction by increasing milk prod. from 10 to 25 kg/d.

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    20/78

    2. Reducing Livestock Population & Longevity

    Desirable economically also, considering the feed and

    fodder shortage in our country.

    May not be practically feasible strategy until: Shift in the rural areas from subsistence to

    commercial dairy farming

    National policy on slaughtering ofeconomicallyunviable animals

    religious and social taboos on animal slaughtering

    in India.

    21

    (Frank OMara, 2004)

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    21/78

    Effect of Age at Slaughter on LifetimeMethane Production

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28

    25 month

    25 month

    30 month

    16.5 % reduction in lifetime emissions and 12% reduction in emissions per

    kg carcass by going from a 30 to 25 month slaughter 22

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    22/78

    3. Management Practices:

    Pasture management:

    forage species selection inclusion of legumes. (McCaughey et al., 1999)

    continuous vs. rotational grazing strategies.

    Management-intensive grazing:

    - BMP- more efficient utilization of grazed forage crops via controlled

    rotational grazing

    - efficient conversion of forage into meat and milk.(DeRamus et al., 2003)

    Animal selection for increased production

    Use of growth promoting agents

    Application of more refined ration balancing technologies.

    23(Wittenberg, 2003)

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    23/78

    Monthly CH4 emission in beef cows on Best ManagementPractices v/s Conventional Forage Management Systems

    (De Ramus et al., 2003)

    Annual CH4 emissions in cows reflect a 22% reduction from

    BMP when compared with continuous grazing. 24

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    24/78

    4. Effect of Residual Feed Intake

    Low RFI group have lower MPR and reduced methane cost ofgrowth (24% of total CH4/d & 25% of CH4/kg ADG).

    (Hegarty et al., 2007)

    MOA:

    Differences in metabolizability Genetic link between methanogens and their hosts.

    (Hackstein et al., 1996)

    Useful for the efficient planning of breeding strategies toselect animals that eat considerably less to achieve a similar

    growth rate and body wt.

    25

    R l h f f dl RF h h d

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    25/78

    (Nkrumah et al., 2006)

    Trait RFI group

    High Medium Low

    Methane, L/kg of BW0.75 1.71c 1.68 c 1.28d

    Intake energy, kcal/kg of BW0.75 384.77 382.24 387.98

    Methane energy, kcal/kg BW0.75 16.08c 15.90cd 12.09d

    Methane Energy loss % of GEI 4.28c 4.25c 3.19d

    (25%)

    26

    28% & 24% less total CH4 prod. in low- RFI than high &

    medium RFI animals.

    Relationship of feedlot RFI with methane production

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    26/78

    Dietary manipulation(strategic feeding)

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    27/78

    Principlesof reduction in EntericCH4 Production

    Reducing H2 & CO2 production (Ionophores).

    Reducing protozoa or Defaunation- prevention of interspecies H2transfer ( Fats, Saponins, UMMB).

    Enhancing propionate production (Acrylate, Organic acids)

    Rechanneling H2 & CO2 to acetate (Enhancing acetogenesis).

    Reducing or killing methanogens ( AQ, BES, Vaccines).

    Use of alternate electron sink ( OA, Nitrate, Sulfate).

    Enhancing hydrogen utilizers (Microbes) .

    28

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    28/78

    5. Effect of Concentrate

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    29/78

    A. Effect of Concentrate proportion

    Negatively correlated with methane emissions.

    (Holter and Young, 1992; Kurihara et al., 1998; Yan et al., 2000)

    propionate

    acetate (and sometimes butyrate).

    rumenpH

    Methanogens are pH sensitive

    animal performance

    (Johnson and Johnson, 1995)

    Forage replaced by concentrate rich diet

    lowered CH4 production by 40% (from 272 to 170 g/day).

    (Veen. 2000) Limitations:

    Required minimum level of physical structure in the diet

    Balance between energy intake and requirements

    (Kadokawa & Martin, 2006)

    30

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    30/78

    The effect of increasing the Proportion ofConcentrates in the diet

    (Yan et al ., 2000)

    methaneoutput

    Proportion of Concentrate

    Total DE,DMI and feeding level are kept constant

    31

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    31/78

    Effect of Concentrate Level on Methane Emissions andtheir relationship to animal productivity.

    (Lovett et al., 2005)

    Item Low concentrate

    (0.87 kg on DM basis)

    High concentrate

    (5.24 kg on DM basis)

    CH4 (g/d) 346 399

    CH4 (g/kg of DMI) 19.60 17.83 (9%)

    CH4 (g/kg of milk) 21.0 17.7 (15%)

    CH4 (g/kg of FCM) 19.26 16.02

    CH4 (g/kg of milk protein) 555 509

    CH4 (g/kg of milk fat) 525 428

    32

    Free - ranging dairy cows

    Effective within dairy industry

    M h d i b l i b ff l d

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    32/78

    Methane production by lactating buffaloes under

    different feeding regimes

    ParametersBerseem +

    Wheat straw

    Berseem+

    wheat straw +

    Concentrate

    Wheat straw +

    Concentrate

    Total DM intake (kg) 14.68 9.90 9.28

    Milk yield(kg/d/animal) 7.01 7.42 7.61

    Methane production

    Total production (g/d) 259.74a 162.67 b 177.03 b

    g /kg DMI17.76 a 16.52 ac 19.13 ab

    g /kg DDMI 22.31 b 22.08 b 30.20 a

    g /kg milk yield 38.16 a 22.12 b 23.45 b

    ( Singhal et al., 2006 ) 33

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    33/78

    B. Effect of Concentrate Type

    Variable to: Structural (cellulose, hemicellulose)

    Non-structural (starch, sugars) carbohydrates.(Ovenell-Roy et al., 1998)

    CH4 emision:

    For every g of cellulose digested = 3 hemicellulose = 5 solubleresidue. (Moe and Tyrrell, 1979)

    Soluble sugars > potential than starch.(Johnson & Johnson, 1995)

    Cattle in finishing phase fed with

    barley - 2.8 %

    corn based diets - 4.0% of GEI CH4 losses accounted.(Beauchemin & McGinn, 2005)

    Feeding more concentrates per cow, with a higher amount of (rumen

    resistant) starch and less sugars has a very positive effect.

    34

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    34/78

    6. Effect of Forage Quality

    Digestibility of cell walls in forages lower CH4 emission.(Johnson and Johnson, 1995)

    Forage maturity and physical form influence CH4

    production:

    Higher for:

    mature forage vs. immature forage,

    coarse chopped vs. finely ground or pelleted low quality

    forage, hay vs. silage.

    35

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    35/78

    Effect of Forage OM Digestibility on CH4 Emission

    (Boadi et al., 2002)

    Parameter Forage QualityHigh Medium Low

    IVOMD, % 61.5 50.7 38.5

    Ad-libitum

    DMI, kg/d 9.7a 8.9a 6.3c

    CH4, L/d 281.7a 289.8a 203.5b

    CH4, %GEI 6.0 7.1 6.9

    Restricted Intake (2% BW)DMI, kg/d 6.4 6.1 6.1

    CH4, L/d 224.6 193.3 195.6

    CH4, %GEI 7.6 7.1 7.1

    36

    Eff f F

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    36/78

    7. Effect of Forage Type Forage legumes:(lucerne or red clover)

    less CH4 emisssion (g/kg DMI) than grass.(Ramirez and Barry, 2005)

    Due to: - lower proportion of SC and faster passage rate.

    - Presence of tannin, saponin.

    (McCaughey et al., 1999)

    Fresh grass < Grass silage(CH4 emission)

    Maize silage and Whole Cereal Plant silage (WPS):

    High starch, less CH4 emission. (Tamminga et al., 2007)

    Replacing half of the 60% of grass silage with maize silage in mid-lactation dairy cattle reduced CH4 production from 6.0 to 5.8% of GEI.

    (Van Laar and Van Straalen, 2004)37

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    37/78

    8. Use of Molasses/ UMB

    Cost effective

    Potential to reduce CH4 emissions by 25 to 27%.

    (Bowman et al., 1992; Robertson et al., 1994)

    In India CH4 reduction from 10 to 15%.

    (Singh 2001; Srivastava et al., 2002)

    Increase milk production at the same time.

    Chemical upgrading of poor quality roughage.

    38

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    38/78

    Bio-hydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acid.

    Enhances propionic acid production.

    Protozoal inhibition. (Dohme et al., 1997)

    Coconut oil addition at 3.5 and 7.0% reduces CH4 production by 28 and

    73% respectively. (Machmullar and Kreuzer, 1997)

    Addition of mustard oil (68 mg) in WS + Conc. based diet reduced 18% ofmethane production in vitro.

    (Tyagi and Singhal, 1998)

    Fish oil at 7.5% reduces 80% methane production.

    (Fievez et al., 2003) Disadvantage:

    Decreases DMI and Fiber digestion (at 5% inclusion level).

    High oil prices and sustainability(Barun Bairagi and Mohini, 2005 )

    9. Effect of Dietary Oil/ Lipids

    39

    Eff f R fi d S Oil Wh l S b

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    39/78

    (Jordan et al., 2006)

    Effect of Refined Soy Oilor Whole Soybean

    Item Treatment

    Control Whole soybean(6% of DMI)

    Refined soy oil(6% of DMI)

    DMI, kg 7.88 6.32 7.52

    CH4, L/d 137.8 103.0 (25%) 83.9 (40%)

    CH4, L/kg of DMI 17.9 15.2 11.2

    CH4, % GEI 3.9 3.7 (5%) 2.3 (41%)

    CH4, L/kg of ADG 99.4 89.3 56.0

    CH4, L/kg of ADCG 141.4 125.1 85.2

    Protozoa, 106/mL 1.87 1.19 0.88

    Control: Barley/Soybean meal-based concentrate, (F:C = 10:90) 40

    Hi h f di t ith C l Oil CH i i

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    40/78

    (Beauchemin and McGinn, 2006)

    High-forage diet with Canola Oil - CH4 emissions

    Item Treatment

    Control Canola oil

    DMI 6.38a 5.07b

    Methane

    g/heifer 159.3a 108.0b (32%)

    g/kg of DMI 25.5 21.7

    % of GE intake 7.93ab 6.30a (21%)

    % of DE intake 12.76 11.97

    Angus heifers fed Canola oil (6% in DM) + barley silage (75%) + 19% barley grain

    Reduced CH4 emissions by 32%. 41

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    41/78

    A high-forage diet with Additives

    (McGinn et al., 2004)

    In beef cattle, the addition of sunflower oil (400 g/d or 5% of DMI)

    decreased CH4 emissions by 22% without -ve effect on DMI.

    Item Treatment

    Control Enzyme(1mL/kg DM)

    Monensin(33mg/kg DM)

    Sunflower oil

    (5% of DMI)

    DMI, kg/d 7.40 7.55 7.71 6.91

    Methane

    g/steer

    166.2b 164.4b 159.6b 129.0c(22%)

    g/kg of DMI 22.64b 22.11b 20.70b,e 18.81c

    % GE intake 6.47b 6.32b(3%) 5.91b,e(9%) 5.08c(21%)

    % DE intake 10.51bc 11.27b 9.31cd,e 8.76d

    42

    Effect of crushed seed oil on in vitro

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    42/78

    Effect of crushed seed oil on in vitromethanogenesis

    Without

    fat

    Rumen

    Protected

    fat

    Coconut

    oil

    Rape-

    seed

    Sun

    flower

    seed

    Linseed

    43

    (Machmulleret al., 1998)

    10 Pl t S d M t b lit

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    43/78

    10. Plant Secondary Metabolites

    Mechanism:

    1)Indirectly reduction in fiber digestion H2 prod.

    2)Directly inhibit the growth ofmethanogen.

    (Tavendale et al., 2005)

    Cichory (Chichorium intybus) promising forage also reduce CH4

    emission. (Ramirez & Barry, 2005)

    Potential plants / tropical MPT bioactive secondary plantmetabolites (saponins and tannins) able to suppress methanogenesis.

    (Carulla et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2006)

    A. Condensed tannins:

    Risk of bloat (Singh and Sikka, 2007)

    44

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    44/78

    B. Saponin No direct effect but reduce protozoa (50-60%).

    70% methanogenes associated with protozoa.(1983,Moss et al., 2001)

    Tea saponin (0.2 and 0.4 mg/ml) decreased (12.7% and 14.0%) CH4

    emission in in vitro.(Hu et al., 2005)

    Source:

    Extract of soapnut (Kamra, 1993)

    Yucca extracts (Wallace et al., 1994)

    Fruit ofSapindus saponaria (Diaz et al., 1999) Leaves ofEntrobium timoba (Gupta et al., 1993)

    Methanol extracts ofSapindus rarak fruit (Thalib etal.,1996)

    Tree leaves ofEnterolobium ciclocarpum (Alberto et al., 1992)

    45

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    45/78

    The effect of Condensed Tannin, PEG, BES

    (Tavendale et al., 2005)

    Medicago sativa: - condensed tannin, PEG (to bind condensed tannins)

    Lotus pedunculatus: + condensed tannin BES (to inhibit methanogens)

    Measured after 12 h.

    Parameter Medicago sativa Lotus pedunculatus

    Control PEG BES PEG +

    BES

    Control PEG BES PEG

    + BES

    pH 6.48 6.48 6.47 6.21 6.14 6.50 6.30 6.26

    CH4(ml) 12.51 11.88 1.80 1.63 8.80 10.58 1.86 1.95

    CH4 (%) 18.13 11.88 1.80 1.63 15.19 16.25 3.86 3.31

    H2(ml) 0.14 0

    .17 6

    .55 6

    .57 0

    .07 0

    .14 1

    .94 3

    .30

    H2 (%)b 0.20 0.24 10.13 10.53 0.11 0.22 3.84 5.73

    46

    11 Di t I hibit

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    46/78

    11. Direct Inhibitors

    Halogenated methane analogues and related compounds.(Van Nevel and Demeyer, 1995)

    Chloroform (Bauchop,1967)

    Chloral hydrate- converted to chloroform in rumen.(Prins, 1965)

    Amichloral-(a hemiacetal of chloral and starch):

    safer but activity declined with prolonged feeding.(Johnson, 1974)

    Trichloroacetamide and trichloroethyl adipate(Clapperton, 1974 & 77)

    47

    Cont

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    47/78

    Cont.

    Bromochloromethane (Sawyeret al., 1974)

    Combination of bromochloromethane and -cyclodextrin(May et al., 1995)

    2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES):Specific potent inhibitor of methanogen, not inhibit other bacteria.

    (Sparling and Daniels, 1987)

    9,10-anthraquinone: Naturally occurring glycoside.

    Methyl Co A CH4

    (Odom et al., 1995)

    Methyl reductase

    Demethylation

    48

    h b b H l d d

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    48/78

    Inhibition by Halogenated Compounds

    Comp. Amount /day Inhibition (%) Animal

    TCE1 120 mg

    240 mg

    21-53

    53-59

    Sheep

    HCS

    2

    2.2 g 50-82 SheepTCA3 120 mg 94 Sheep

    CH4 4 g 100 Sheep

    BCM5 5.5 g 100 Steers

    BES6 0.03 mM 76 In vitro

    1) Trichloroethyl adipate 2) Hemiacetyl of chloral & starch 3) Trichloroacetamide

    4) Chloral hydrate 5) Bromochloromethane 6) Bromoethane sulfonic acid

    49

    Effect of 2 BES on methane emission from

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    49/78

    Effect of 2-BESon methane emission fromLucerne (L) & Maize (M)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    4 8 12 24

    M

    ethaneml/gDM

    L

    L+BES

    M

    M+BES

    (Agarwal et al., 2005)

    50

    Effect of 9 10 AQ (10 ppm/12 h)

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    50/78

    (Garcia-Lopez et al., 1996)

    In vitro microbial continuous culture fermentation

    10:90 forage concentrate diet.

    Effect of 9,10-AQ (10 ppm/12 h)

    51

    12 U f I h

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    51/78

    12. Use of Ionophores

    Monensin, Rumensin, Lasalosid, Salinomysin:

    - shift the H2 producing gram +ve gram ve

    - shift in fermentation from acetate to propionate

    - Reduction in voluntary feed intake causing fermentation.(Goodrich et al., 1984)- Selectively acetate (and therefore H2) production.

    (Slyter, 1979)

    - Inhibiting the release of H2 from formate.(Van Nevel and Demeyer 1977)

    Rumen microbes adapt to monensin on continuous feeding.(Johnson & Johnson, 1995; 2002)

    52

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    52/78

    Effects of Monensin lactating dairy cows

    Response* TMR

    Control Monensin

    DMI, kg/d 19.7 19.1

    Methane production, g/d 458.7a 428.7b (7%)

    Methane production, g/kg BW 0.738a 0.675b (9%)

    Methane production, g/gNDFI

    0.069 0.066

    (Odongo et al., 2007)

    (p

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    53/78

    Low-concentrate diet - ionophore (C); + monensin (M); or + either monensin orlasalocid (M/L) which were rotated every 2 wk in yearling steers.

    (Guan et al., 2006)

    * = P

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    54/78

    lonophore

    group

    Days after beginning

    on ionophore

    2-3 12-13 22-23

    CH4 production, l/d

    No ionophore 113a 107a 124a

    Monensin 96a 123b 124b

    Lasalocid 100a 115a 117a

    Avg 103a 115b 120b

    (Rumpleret al., 1986)

    Cation treatment

    Control Na K

    CH4 production, l/d

    107a 109a 124a

    123b 100a 110ab

    114ab 101a 124b

    115ab 103a 119b

    Effect of Ionophore and Dietary Cation (2.5%)

    55

    Steers fed a high grain basal diet

    Na addition CH4 prod. in the monensin group by 19%

    No significant effect of K addition on CH4 prod.

    P< 0.05

    13. Propionate enhancers or

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    55/78

    3. rop onate enhancers orAlternative hydrogen acceptors:

    Reduces CH4 production

    - In vitro (Asanuma et al., 1999; Newbold et al., 2002)-In vivo (Newbold et al., 2002)

    - The response was dose dependent.

    (Martin and Streeter, 1995)

    Dicarboxylic organic acids:

    Malate, Fumarate, Citrate, Succinate, Acrylate:

    i) Alter rumen fermentation as ionophores. (Martin, 1998)

    ii) Precursor of propionate (Ouda et al, 1999)

    56

    Effects of Myristic Acid - Lactating Dairy Cows

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    56/78

    (Odongo et al., 2007)

    Effects of Myristic Acid - Lactating Dairy Cows

    Response Control (TMR) Myristic acid(5% on DM basis)

    DMI, kg/d 15.2 14.2

    Milk yield, kg/d 14.9 13.4

    Milk fat, % 4.2 4.1

    Milk protein, % 3.5 3.6

    Methane production, L/d 608.2 390.6 (36%)

    Methane production, MJ/d 23.0 14.8 (36%)

    57

    Eff t f M l t in it

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    57/78

    Parameter Malate (mM)

    0

    (0 mg/g)

    4

    (53.6 mg/g)

    7

    (93.8 mg/g)

    10

    (134 mg/g)

    pH 6.12 6.13 6.16 6.21

    CH4 (mM) 1.20 1.11 1.10 1.10

    TVFA (mM) 3.72 3.94 4.12 4.06

    A:P 1.50 1.43 1.42 1.38

    (Carro and Rannilla, 2003)

    RL from merino sheep fed lucerne hay + concentrate (300g)

    Malate source: Rumelato ( Disodium malate+ calcium malate 16:84)58

    Effect of Malate in vitro

    Effect of Fumarate in vitro

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    58/78

    Effect of Fumarate in vitro

    Fumarate (mM) CH4

    ( mM/L

    culture)

    VFA produced (m M) Final

    pH

    Added Consumed A P B

    0 0 15.2 29.3 12.7 6.7 6.3

    20 16.0 14.4 33.0 19.8 6.1 6.4

    30 27.0 13.5 32.6 20.0 6.6 6.6

    (Asanuma et al., 1999)

    Substrate: hay powder and concentrate

    RL from goat 20h post feeding

    Here 20 & 30 mM fumarate 34.8 & 52.2 mg/g substrate59

    14 Essential Oils

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    59/78

    Plant extracts

    Terpenoids and Phenolic compounds,(e.g monoterpenes,limonene, thymol, carvacrol) have antimicrobial activity.

    EuO and black seed extract could be a promising methane

    mitigating agent in vitro.

    (Sallam et al., 2007)

    The specific mode of action poorly characterized or understood.

    14. Essential Oils

    60

    Effect of plant extracts in vitro

    http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.thevibecenter.com/images/LivingOils2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.thevibecenter.com/YoungLivingOils.aspx&h=400&w=322&sz=22&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=oPBoLbw2rSTazM:&tbnh=124&tbnw=100&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEssential%2Boils%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DN
  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    60/78

    Sallam et al ., 2007

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    65

    Control

    T0.5

    T1.0

    T1.5

    F0.5

    F1.0

    F1.5

    G0.5

    G1.0

    G1.5

    BS0.5

    BS1.0

    BS1.5

    Plant extracts

    CH4

    Thyme

    Fennel

    Ginger

    B.seed

    Effect of plant extracts in vitro

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    220

    Contr

    ol

    T0.5

    T1.0

    T1.5

    F0.5

    F1.0

    F1.5

    G0.5

    G1.0

    G1.5

    BS0

    .5

    BS1

    .0

    BS1

    .5

    Plant Extracts

    G

    P

    Thyme

    Fennel Ginger

    B.seed

    61

    Effect of different levels of Eucalyptus Oil - in vitro

    http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.naturesflavors.com/images/herb_anise.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.naturesflavors.com/default.php%3FcPath%3D4&h=300&w=300&sz=160&hl=en&start=12&um=1&tbnid=GKNAAjkzCGtq-M:&tbnh=116&tbnw=116&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEssential%2Boils%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/999/50263301.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Health-and-Beauty/Alternative-Health/Natural-Pharmacy/Medicinal-Herbs/Australian/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum/Eucalyptus-Blue-Gum-2.html&h=638&w=768&sz=107&hl=en&start=59&um=1&tbnid=qrvn4dP6PFej5M:&tbnh=118&tbnw=142&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D40%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DN
  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    61/78

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    Control 25 l 50 l 100 l 150 l

    EuO levels

    CH4

    Effect of different levels of Eucalyptus Oil in vitro

    Sallam et al ., 2007

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Control 25l 50l 100l 150l

    EuO levels

    GP(ml/gDM)

    62

    R sult f Di t r M nipul ti n

    http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.happynaturaltherapies.com/shop/images/uploads/Eucalyptus-Leaves-Print-C12185475v1.jpeg&imgrefurl=http://www.happynaturaltherapies.com/shop/index.php%3Fact%3DviewProd%26productId%3D1&h=350&w=350&sz=29&hl=en&start=72&um=1&tbnid=Btin_RdaXLjpxM:&tbnh=120&tbnw=120&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D60%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.happynaturaltherapies.com/shop/images/uploads/Eucalyptus-Leaves-Print-C12185475v1.jpeg&imgrefurl=http://www.happynaturaltherapies.com/shop/index.php%3Fact%3DviewProd%26productId%3D1&h=350&w=350&sz=29&hl=en&start=72&um=1&tbnid=Btin_RdaXLjpxM:&tbnh=120&tbnw=120&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D60%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.happynaturaltherapies.com/shop/images/uploads/Eucalyptus-Leaves-Print-C12185475v1.jpeg&imgrefurl=http://www.happynaturaltherapies.com/shop/index.php%3Fact%3DviewProd%26productId%3D1&h=350&w=350&sz=29&hl=en&start=72&um=1&tbnid=Btin_RdaXLjpxM:&tbnh=120&tbnw=120&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D60%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://homepages.tesco.net/~chris.jrthomas/ifl_Eucalyptus.jpg&imgrefurl=http://homepages.tesco.net/~chris.jrthomas/ifl_5eucalyptus.html&h=653&w=600&sz=52&hl=en&start=27&um=1&tbnid=E9LiQx_iR82qvM:&tbnh=138&tbnw=127&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D20%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.happynaturaltherapies.com/shop/images/uploads/Eucalyptus-Leaves-Print-C12185475v1.jpeg&imgrefurl=http://www.happynaturaltherapies.com/shop/index.php%3Fact%3DviewProd%26productId%3D1&h=350&w=350&sz=29&hl=en&start=72&um=1&tbnid=Btin_RdaXLjpxM:&tbnh=120&tbnw=120&prev=/images%3Fq%3DEucalyptus%26start%3D60%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DRNWE,RNWE:2006-46,RNWE:en%26sa%3DN
  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    62/78

    Result of Dietary Manipulation

    (Singh and Sikka, 2007)

    Method Extent of Reduction(%)

    Increase in Concentrate mixture 20 32

    Supplementation of Monensin

    a) Maintenance diet 14 23

    b) Medium production diet 23 32

    c) High producing diet 14 25

    Supplementation of UMMB 10 11

    Supplementation of green fodder 11 27

    63

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    63/78

    Rumen Manipulation

    15 Stimulation of Acetogens:

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    64/78

    15.Stimulation of Acetogens:

    Produce acetic acid by the reduction of CO2 with H2.

    As daily feed additive CH4 prod. in vitro.(Lopez et al., 1999)

    Do not compete in rumen with methanogens.(10 to 100 times higher affinity for H2)

    (Joblin, 1999)

    Genetically modified acetogens can compete more effectivelyin the rumen.

    65

    16 Methane Oxidisers:

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    65/78

    16. Methane Oxidisers:

    Oxidation of methane to CO2

    Methane oxidising bacteria isolated from the rumen.(Hanson, 1992)

    Methane oxidising bacterium from the gut of young pigs whenadded to rumen fluid in vitro CH4accumulation.

    (Valdes et al., 1997)

    66

    17 Defaunation:

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    66/78

    17. Defaunation: Removal of protozoa from rumen.

    Reduces CH4 production by 20 - 50 % & Improves the feed utilizationefficiency. (Pal et al., 1994)

    Defaunating agents:

    Plant secondary metabolites (Saponin)- without inhibiting bacterial

    activity. (Kamra, 2005; Thalib et al, 1995)

    Fat(USFA)

    (Mudgal et al., 2003)

    USFA inhibit methanogenesis even in the absence of rumen protozoa.

    Toxicity of long chain FA to methanogen.

    (Dohme et al, 1999)

    Pelleted concentrates fed. (Kreuzer and Kirchgessner, 1987)

    67

    18 Probiotics

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    67/78

    18. Probiotics

    Aspergillus oryzae(AO) - 50% CH4 prod. directlyreducing protozoal population (45%).(Frumholtz et al., 1989)

    Saccharomyces cerevisiae(SC) -

    CH4 by 10% (in vitro).(Mutsvangwa et al., 1992)

    Mode of action of probiotics:

    Reduce H2 availability to methanogens.

    Increased butyrate or propionate (Martin et al., 1989)

    Reduced protozoal numbers (Newbold et al., 1998)

    Promotion of acetogenesis as a sink for hydrogen.

    (Chaucheyras et al., 1995)

    68

    19 Immunisation

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    68/78

    19. Immunisation

    Immunise ruminants against their own methanogens.

    (Baker,1995)

    Developed vaccine containing Ag derived from rumenmethanogenic microorganisms.

    (Baker, 1998)

    Vaccine: cost-effective and long-acting to reduce CH4 emissionand enhance animal production under grazing.

    Natural development of Ab by lambs against mixed methanogens.(Holloway and Baker, 2000)

    In small ruminants (sheep) reduces CH4 emission by 7%.(Baker,1995)

    Development of a vaccination strategy is in progress.

    69

    20 Bacteriocins

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    69/78

    20. Bacteriocins

    Antibiotics- protein or peptide in nature, produced by bacteria.

    Many lactic-acid bacteria produce bacteriocins- effect onmethanogens rather than a direct pH effect.

    (Russell, 1998)

    Some strains ofButyrivibrioproduced inhibitory activity.(Kalmakoffet al., 1996)

    Lactococcus lactis (Nisin) - stimulate propionate production& 36% CH

    4

    (in vitro).

    (Callaway et al., 1997)

    Further research required to establish their adaptability & longterm effectiveness as a feed additive for methane supressor.

    70

    Evaluation of Mitigation Strategies in Indian

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    70/78

    Context

    Applicable to all types of dairy and non-dairy animals who are on poordiet.

    Cost of the technology for indigenous cows and buffaloes.

    I. Strategic Supplementation Using M olasses-Urea Products (MUP)

    Assumptions:(a)Adult animal 400 g/day & heifers 300 g/day.

    (b) CH4 reduction 11% /animal.

    (c) Milk yield increased by 10%.

    Existing avg lactation yield:

    local cows 1.8 litres/day (270 d lactation length)buffaloes 4.0 litres/day (280 d).

    (d) The cost of MUP 0.089/ kg.

    (e) Selling price of cow milk - 0.14/litre

    buffalo milk - 0.16/litre.

    (Sirohi et al., 2007)

    71

    Economics of MUP supplementation

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    71/78

    Ec n m c f MU upp m ntat n

    Type of

    animals

    Annual

    cost of

    supplem

    entation(C)

    Annual

    CH4emission

    Annual

    CH4

    reduction

    (RE)@11%

    Gross cost

    of

    reduction

    Gross

    cost of

    reduction

    Increased

    return from

    milk

    production(RM)@10%

    Net cost of

    reduction

    Net cost

    of

    reduction

    Units Kg/head Kg/head /kgCH4 /t CO2 /kgCH4 /t CO2

    Dairy Animals

    Adult

    animal:

    Local Cow 13.0 36 3.96 3.3 156.3 6.9 1.5 72.7

    Buffalo 13.0 77 8.47 1.5 73.1 18.0 -0.6 -28.1

    Heifer:

    Local cow 9.7 22 2.42 4 191.8 - -

    Buffalo 9.7 37 4.07 2.4 114.0 - -

    Non-Dairy Animals

    Adult male:

    Cattle 13.0 34 3.74 3.5 165.4 - -

    Buffalo 13.0 55 6.05 2.1 102.3 - - 72

    II. Economics of Increased Concentrate Feeding

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    72/78

    Type of animals Annual

    cost of

    addi.

    Conc.

    (C)

    Annual

    CH4emission

    Annual

    CH4

    reduction

    (RE)

    @11%

    Gross cost

    of

    reduction

    Gross

    cost of

    reduction

    Increased

    return from

    milk

    production

    (RM)@10%

    Net cost

    of

    reduction

    Net cost

    of

    reduction

    Units Kg/h Kg/head /kg CH4 /t CO2 /kgCH4 /t CO2

    Dairy Animals

    Local cow 40.2 36 5.4 7.4 354.1 6.9 6.1 292.8Buffalo 80.3 77 11.6 6.9 329.6 72.0 0.7 34.1

    Crossbred cows 100.4 39 5.9 17.0 810.1 141.6 -7.0 -322.8

    Non-Dairy

    Animals

    80.3 35 5.3 15.2 721.5 - - -

    m f g

    Assumptions:

    Less than 500 g conc. /animal/ day. or7.5% conc. (not sufficient)

    Recommended nutritional requirement for the Indian cattle:

    Concentrate: Roughage = 40 : 60 (DM basis).

    C :R = 50:50 (for high milk producing dairy animals)

    73

    III.Feed Additive Ionophore

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    73/78

    p(Monensin Sodium Salt)

    Assumptions:

    (a)100 mg of monensin/ animal/d.

    (b) CH4 reduction potential:

    maintenance ration : 20%, (Indigenous animals)medium production ration: 30%, (buffaloes)

    high production ration : 22%, (crossbred)

    (c) Increase in milk yield is 5%.

    (d) Rumensin ( 200g monensin -Na salt/ kg) costs 7.4/ kg.

    Pure monensin sodium salt costs about 35,714/kg.

    74

    Cost through Ionophore Feed Additive

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    74/78

    Type of animals Annual

    cost of

    ionopho

    re (C)

    Annual

    CH4emission

    Annual

    CH4

    reduction

    (RE)@11%

    Gross

    cost of

    reduction

    Gross

    cost of

    reduction

    Increased

    return from

    milk

    production

    (RM)@10%

    Net cost

    of

    reduction

    Net cost

    of

    reduction

    Units Kg/head Kg/head /kgCH4

    /t CO2 /kg

    CH4

    /t CO2

    Monensin premix (Rumensin)

    Local Cow 0.27 36 7.2 0.04 1.8 3.5 0.4 21.2

    Buffalo 0.27 77 23.1 0.01 0.6 9.0 0.4 -18.0

    Crossbred

    cows

    0.27 39 8.6 0.03 1.5 14.2 1.6 76.9

    Other animals 0.27 35 7.0 0.04 1.8

    Pure Monensin sodium salt

    Local Cow 651.78 36 7.2 90.5 4310.7 3.5 90.0 4287.8

    Buffalo 651.78 77 23.1 28.2 1343.6 9.0 27.8 1325.0

    Crossbred

    cows

    651.78 39 8.6 75.8 3609.0 14.2 74.1 3530.6

    Other animals 651.78 35 7.0 93.1 4433.9 75

    Conclusions

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    75/78

    Conclusions

    1. Many recommended on-farm practices will reduce

    enteric CH4 and total GHG emissions by reducing feed costsassociated with animal maintenance:

    Increasing productivity per cow to reduce methane emissions

    per kg of milk.

    When total output levels (e.g. total milk or beef produced)

    remain constant and livestock numbers are reduced.

    A lower culling age

    Best management practices and pasture management.

    Selection of Low RFI animals that achieve similar growth rate

    and body weight.

    2. By dietary manipulation through:

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    76/78

    Increasing proportion of concentrate rich in starch,

    High quality leguminous forage,

    Grinding and pelleting of forages, Inclusion fats and oils,

    TMR and UMMB,

    Organic acids (fumarate, malate)

    Tannin and saponin rich plants, Ionophores, like monensin, lasalocid, silnomycin

    Direct inhibition of methanogensis by using halogenated

    methane analogues (BES, AQ) is not found suitable.

    3. Through Indirect ways of altering rumen ecology :- Immunisation,

    - Elimination of ciliate protozoa,

    - Enhanced bacteriocin production,

    - Enhanced acetogenesis

    - Probiotics or Yeast cultures

    4 Biotechnology can play an important role by manipulating the

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    77/78

    5. Indian senario:

    Under Indian field conditions 25% CH4 reduction can be achieved.

    Due to poor genetic potential and low lactation yield, the net cost

    of CH4 reduction is very high in local cows. The gross cost will range from Rs. 39.2 -100.8/kg CH4.

    CH4 mitigation in local cows and buffaloes through increasingconcentrates in the diet is a more expensive option.

    Use of monensin premix is encouraging and the most costeffective technology.

    Strategic supplementation (energy, nitrogen and minerals) usingUMP is the second less expensive and feasible abatement option.

    4. Biotechnology can play an important role by manipulating therumen bugs to enhance the digestibility of poor quality feed stuffand lower or halt the production of methane.

  • 7/27/2019 Methane Mitigation Strategies From Livestock by Sk Asraf Hossain

    78/78

    Methane

    ThankYou


Recommended