+ All Categories
Home > Documents > METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: gabriel-berry
View: 237 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
27
METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338
Transcript
Page 1: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH

PSYC 338

Page 2: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

ETIC APPROACHES

* Culture general

* Comparative

* Seeks to explore universals

* Uses culture as an IV

Page 3: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

CRITICAL ISSUE IN ETIC METHODOLOGY: EQUIVALENCE• Stimuli

• Conceptual (construct)

• Linguistic

• Functional

• Metric

Page 4: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

STIMULI EQUIVALENCEAppropriateness of stimuli/test materials; equivalent familiarity (or unfamiliarity) withtest materials across cultural groups

Page 5: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

THE CHITLIN TEST

By Adrian Dove

Page 6: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

WHICH WORD IS MOST OUT OF PLACE?

A) Splib

B) Blood

C) Gray

D) Spook

E) Black

Page 7: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

HOW LONG DO YOU HAVE TO COOK CHITLINS SO THAT THEY WILL NOT BE RUBBERY?

• One hour• 15 minutes• 6 hours• 24 hours• One week

Page 8: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

CONCEPTUAL EQUIVALENCE:

The meaning or essence of a constructis the same or equivalent

Page 9: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

CULTURAL CONCEPTIONS OF INTELLIGENCE

• Nzelu (Zambia)- wisdom• Obugezi (Uganda)-stable, cautious,

friendly• Gnom (Kipsigis)- readiness to carry out

tasks in the service of the community

Page 10: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

CULTURAL CONCEPTIONS OF INTELLIGENCE

Western tests may not adequately capture the notion of intelligence in other cultures

Page 11: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

LINGUISTIC EQUIVALENCE

* Appropriate translation of materials to ensure equivalence of meaning

* Relates to both stimuli and conceptual equivalence

Page 12: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

TRANSLATION METHODS

* Back translation

• Individual translation

• Team translation

Page 13: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

EXAMPLES OF TRANSLATIONS

Outside a Hong Kong tailor shop…..

In a Thai dry cleaners…

In a Greek hotel…

Ladies may have a fit upstairs

Drop your trousers here for best results

Visitors are expected to complain at the office between the hours of 9 and 11 am daily

Page 14: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

EXAMPLES OF TRANSLATIONS

At an Italian physician’s office….

Detour sign in Japan…

In a Greek tailor shop…

Lederer (1987)

Specialist in women and other diseases

Stop! Drive sideways

Order your suits here; because of big rush we will execute customers in strict rotation

Page 15: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENCE:

Exists when behaviours or processescompared serve the same or very similar functions across cultures

Page 16: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

EXAMPLES OF FUNCTIONAL INEQUIVALENCE

* Nonverbal behaviours such as gaze, proxemics, gestures

* Agreements with statements such as “I like myself alot”

Page 17: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

METRIC EQUIVALENCE:

the same coherent psychometric properties found in two or more sets of data from different cultural groups (includes scalar equivalence)

Page 18: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

METRIC CONSIDERATIONS

* Reliability, validity

* Factor structure, coefficient of congruence

• Scalar equivalence

• Item response theory

• Standardization

Page 19: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

EMIC APPROACHES

* Culture specific

* Seeks to understand culture in its own terms

* May unfold as indigenous or cultural psychology

Page 20: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

CRITICAL ISSUE IN EMIC RESEARCH

* A sensitive and appropriate methodology for the specific cultural context

Page 21: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

AN EXAMPLE FROM THE PHILIPPINES

Background:

indigenization from within

pakapa-kapa (inductive approach)

interdisciplinary perspectives

Method: Pagtatanong-tanong

Page 22: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

CHARACTERISTICS OF PAGTATATANONG-TANONG

• “Asking questions”

• Participatory

• Equal status

• Adaptable, flexible

• Can be integrated with other methods

• Ethical concerns

Page 23: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

PROCESS OF PAGTATATANONG-TANONG

• Preparation

• Selection of convenient and comfortable time and place

• Researcher and participant get to know each other

• “Asking questions” goes both ways

• Smooth ending

Page 24: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

LEVELS OF INTERACTION

A. Ibang-tao (Outsider category)

1. Pakikitungo (civility)

2. Pakikisalamuha (interaction with)

3. Pakikilahok (participation with)

4. Pakikibagay (in accord with)

5. Pakikisama (being along with)

Page 25: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

LEVELS OF INTERACTION

B. Hindi Ibang-tao (One of us category)

6. Pakikpagpalagayang- loob (mutual

trust)

7. Pakikisangkot (active involvement)

8. Pakikiisa (being one with)

Page 26: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

CONCLUDING CONCERNS

• Power sharing

• Ethical issues: treatment and dissemination of data

* Benefits for community

Page 27: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ETIC AND EMIC RESEARCH PSYC 338.

QUESTIONS:

• What are the critical methodological standards for emic and etic approaches?

• Can and do we meet these standards on our research?

• How would you use the information on methodologies to evaluate research on culture and psychology?


Recommended