+ All Categories
Home > Documents > METS Revisited

METS Revisited

Date post: 13-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: rimona
View: 39 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
METS Revisited. Bill Kehoe Metadata Working Group Forum December 19, 2003. METS. Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard Digital Library Federation Initiative Sibling: MOA2 Encoding Format. Why?. Complex digital objects vs physical objects Metadata containers Transfer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
22
METS Revisited Bill Kehoe Metadata Working Group Forum December 19, 2003
Transcript
Page 1: METS Revisited

METS Revisited

Bill KehoeMetadata Working Group

ForumDecember 19, 2003

Page 2: METS Revisited

METS

Metadata Encoding and Transmission StandardDigital Library Federation InitiativeSibling: MOA2 Encoding Format

Page 3: METS Revisited

Why?

Complex digital objects vs physical objectsMetadata containersTransferOAIS information packages

Page 4: METS Revisited

Simplest METS object: concept

METS document

Structural Map

Division

METS pointer

METS document

Structural Map

Division

File pointer

Page 5: METS Revisited

Simplest METS object: elements

<mets>

<structMap>

<div>

<mptr>METS document

Structure Map

Division

file pointer

Page 6: METS Revisited

Simplest METS object: XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<mets xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/METS/" >

<structMap>

<div>

<mptr LOCTYPE="URL">

http://www.library.cornell.edu/AnotherMETSDoc.xml

</mptr>

</div>

</structMap>

</mets>

Page 7: METS Revisited

METS document with a file

METS document

Structural Map

Division

File pointer

File Section

File Group

File

Page 8: METS Revisited

The File tag simplified

<File>

ID (required)

MIMETYPE

SIZE

CREATED

CHECKSUMTYPE

CHECKSUM

File location

File content(XML or Base64)

XOR

Page 9: METS Revisited

The full METS object: concept

METS document

METS Header

Structural Map

Structural Links

Behavior

Descriptive Metadata

Administrative Metadata

File Section

Page 10: METS Revisited

The full METS object: 7 basic elements

METS document <mets>

<metsHdr>

<structMap>

<structLink>

<behaviorSec>

<dmdSec>

<amdSec>

<fileSec>

Page 11: METS Revisited

Administrative Metadata Section

<amdSec>

<sourceMD>

<mdWrap>

<mdRef>

<digiprovMD>

<mdWrap>

<mdRef>

<rightsMD>

<mdWrap>

<mdRef>

<techMD>

<mdWrap>

<mdRef>

Page 12: METS Revisited

Descriptive Metadata Section

<dmdSec>

<mdWrap><mdRef>

Page 13: METS Revisited

METS Profiles

“…to specify limitations and restrictions…”“…to define a document class…”“…to promote interoperability and exchange of METS documents…”

From METS Profile 1.0 Requirements, Appendix 1: METS Profile XML Schema

Page 14: METS Revisited

The METS Profile: concept

METS ProfileCreation Date

Contact Information

Extension Schema

Related Profiles

Abstract

Short Title

URI

Sample File

Tools and Applications

Technical Requirements

Structural Requirements

Page 16: METS Revisited

What can be done with this METS object?

The Tokyo Tribunalhttp://dlib.nyu.edu:8083/xmldev/servlet/SaxonServlet?source=/newtokyo.xml&style=/METSFrameSX.xsl

any time thinking about cost models, except where it's obvious that building and maintaining something would be prohibitively expensive. I suppose I have enough opinions, but maybe not enough facts, for a satisfactory working dinner solely about cost models. 

Page 17: METS Revisited

Another example from NYU

Afghanistan Digital Library Page Turnerhttp://dlib.nyu.edu:8083/servlet/SaxonServlet?source=kalimat.xml&style=FrameSearch03.xsl

Page 18: METS Revisited

A Cautionary Tale

A presentation by Carl Fleischhauer:

The Library of Congress Audio-Visual Prototyping Projecthttp://lcweb.loc.gov/rr/mopic/avprot/METSopening2003_files/slide0001.htm

Page 19: METS Revisited

Two more demos from NYU

An archived web sitehttp://dlib.nyu.edu:8083/xmldev/servlet/SaxonServlet?source=ibarretxe20030907.xml&style=crl2.xsl

Multimedia: METS to SMILhttp://dlib.nyu.edu/metstools/mets2smilviewer/mmvwr04/output/index01.html

Page 20: METS Revisited

Discussion: METS ProsPotential for interoperability among CUL sites

Page 21: METS Revisited

Discussion: METS ConsA lot of up-front expense

Page 22: METS Revisited

Almost everything about METS…

The METS Official Web Site

http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/


Recommended