1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Purpose of this consultation ...................................................................................2
How to have your say ...........................................................................................2
Section 1: Background ...............................................................................................3
National Health Committee project .......................................................................4
Why look at chronic conditions? ...........................................................................7
Inequalities in health .............................................................................................8
Why it is important to improve support for people with chronic conditions ...........9
Who needs to be involved in supporting people with chronic conditions? ..........10
Section 2: Approaches to supporting people with chronic conditions .....................12
Other countries ...................................................................................................12
New Zealand ......................................................................................................14
Support for self-managing chronic conditions ......................................................16
Role of complementary and alternative care ........................................................19
Section 3: Summary of issues – people with chronic conditions ..............................21
Part 1: Factors that help people with chronic conditions .....................................21
Part 2: Factors that hinder people with chronic conditions ..................................19
Section 4: Summary of issues – practitioners and agencies ......................................27
Element 1: Improved interactions between people and professionals ...................27
Element 2: Redesign of delivery systems and processes .......................................29
Element 3: Workforce planning and development ...............................................32
Element 4: Knowledge management ....................................................................34
Element 5: Partnerships within health, and between health and the community ..35
Appendix 1: Where to go for more information .......................................................38
Appendix 2: Initiatives around New Zealand ...........................................................39
Appendix 3: Contacts ...............................................................................................60
References ...............................................................................................................61
2
Purpose of this consultation
This consultation will contribute to the National Health Committee’s (NHC’s) advice to the Minister of Health on how to better support people with chronic conditions.
The NHC seeks your input to help it identify:
• whether the views and key issues from the initial round of meetings reflect wider views
• other key issues that are not presented here
• suggestions for change to help improve how people with chronic conditions are supported.
How to have your say
The NHC is seeking input from a wide range of individuals and organisations – including people with chronic conditions and those who work with them. People working in this area may be in organisations such as District Health Boards (DHBs), Primary Health Organisations (PHOs), Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) or consumer organisations, as well as from other sectors such as housing, transport or social services. If you are representing a collective view (eg, representing the views of an organisation or community), please make this clear in your submission. Please also state if you have a chronic condition/s yourself, or if you are a health professional. If you would prefer to discuss your input, please contact us. All input will be treated in confidence.
Throughout the paper there are questions designed to help you think through your ideas, but please do not feel constrained by them. We welcome your input on any level. However, we would ask that you address the three bullet points above to identify gaps in our analysis and to assist development of a way forward.
The project is focused on people with chronic conditions rather than on specific conditions or diseases. We are not seeking submissions on ‘best practice’ for clinical treatment of particular conditions, but input on the major issues facing people with chronic conditions, and those who work with them.
The NHC acknowledges that on many issues there will not be consensus, but the more submissions it receives, the better able it will be to judge the strength and diversity of views on any particular issue. We therefore encourage you to participate in this consultation.
SUBMISSIONS ARE DUE BY 31 MAY 2005Please send your input to:
Submissions to Chronic Conditions project National Health Committee PO Box 5013 WELLINGTON
Ph (04) 496 2088Or by email to [email protected]
3
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND
In New Zealand, as around the globe, the numbers of people living with chronic conditions are on the rise. The World Health Organization has stressed that “chronic conditions will not go away; they are the health care challenge of this century”1.
A fundamental culture change is required to shift our health sector from an acute focus to one that better meets the needs of people with chronic conditions. The health sector has traditionally focused primarily on medical needs, whereas a complex range of social, cultural and economic factors affect people’s health status, many of which lie outside the health sector.
This discussion paper introduces the issue of supporting people with chronic conditions and presents the findings of an initial round of meetings with people with chronic conditions, and those who work with them. Many of the views in this paper reflect those given in focus groups and other meetings and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NHC.
National Health Committee project
The NHC is an independent advisory group to the Minister of Health. It provides advice on a wide range of health and disability issues. The NHC was established in 1992 and is made up of 12 members from around the country who have knowledge of, and experience in, health and disability issues.
This project is looking at people’s experiences of living with chronic conditions in New Zealand, in order to suggest changes to improve the ways that services and professionals support people with chronic conditions. It has links with previous work by the NHC on quality improvement in health care and improving services for adults with intellectual disability.
The project’s objectives are:
1) to find out what helps and what hinders in living with chronic conditions
2) to identify the key issues in supporting people with chronic conditions
3) to advise the Minister of Health on changes to improve how people are supported.
This paper is just one strand of the work. The NHC’s final advice will be based on information collected in case studies involving groups of people with chronic conditions, to be undertaken in 2005, as well as the literature and consultation used to inform this paper and the subsequent submissions.
4
Flowchart of project components
NHC interest in people with chronic conditions
Initial round of meetings with providers, NGOs and
government agencies
Initial round of focus groups with people with chronic
conditions
DISCUSSION PAPER
Submissions from people with chronic conditions
Submissions from providers and agencies
Analysis of submissions
Case studies with people with chronic conditions
– people from under-served populations, families with children with chronic conditions, people with depression associated with chronic conditions
Appraisal of findings from submissions and case studies
Final report to Minister of Health
5
People with chronic conditions – a defi nitionThe National Health Committee is using a broad defi nition of people with chronic conditions – including people with any ongoing, long term or recurring condition that can have a signifi cant impact on a person’s life.
A wide range of physical and mental health conditions comes under this defi nition, including asthma, arthritis, diabetes, chronic neck or back problems, depression, HIV and cardiovascular disease. It is common for people to have more than one chronic condition, and for others to live with multiple conditions.
The NHC’s work focuses on people in the context of their whole life, rather than taking a disease-based approach. It is appropriate to take a holistic view, as people often live with more than one chronic condition and people’s experiences with chronic conditions are intertwined with their social and economic contexts. People with long-term conditions are often expert at managing their condition/s.
Chronic conditions can affect people’s mental, emotional and spiritual wellbeing as well as their physical health. Depression is a common ongoing condition in itself, and can be associated with many other chronic conditions such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease. For instance, depression is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and people with cardiovascular disease have a higher likelihood of experiencing depression than those without cardiovascular disease. In addition, people with mental illness experience relatively high levels of physical illness.2
The NHC believes that spiritual wellbeing should be an integral part of the concept of health and has a role in the support of people with chronic conditions. Our human nature is comprised of both body and soul, and our physical, emotional, and spiritual health are closely intertwined. Times of injury, disease, acute or long-term illness, and their accompanying suffering, often raise profound questions of human meaning, affecting whänau, families and individuals.
In the context of long-term conditions, it is important to address individuals’ spiritual health. An individual’s spiritual state, as expressed through relationships with their Creator, God, ancestors, environment or other people, can support or undermine efforts at maintaining or restoring physical and mental health.
This work by the NHC concerns people with chronic health conditions, rather than people experiencing disability. However, some chronic conditions may result in impairments and some people with chronic conditions may identify as having a disability. There is a need to avoid perpetuating the myth that disabled people are unwell, while recognising that disabled people with chronic health conditions may face similar challenges to others, and must have access to health services without discrimination.
Question for respondents
Do you agree with the NHC’s defi nition of people with chronic conditions?
6
Prevention and management of chronic illness
Key elements of better supporting people with chronic illness are to ensure early identifi cation of chronic illness, prevent complications where possible, slow the progression of disease and prevent other conditions from developing. Chronic conditions are largely preventable and share a range of common risk factors – such as inactivity, unhealthy diets, obesity, depression, stress, tobacco use and alcohol misuse.3 Prevention is, therefore, a critical issue in the management of chronic conditions. The World Health Organization promotes a ‘common risk factor’ approach to the prevention of chronic conditions, where a cluster of such factors contributes to chronic conditions.3 The 13 population health objectives in the New Zealand Health Strategy refl ect a focus on prevention.
As chronic conditions share common features both in terms of prevention and management, the NHC believes primary prevention must be considered as an integral aspect of supporting people with chronic conditions. There are still important opportunities for primary prevention once people have been diagnosed with a chronic condition/s. For example, if a person has diabetes, they will be at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Support for that person should include preventative measures to reduce their risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Chronic care management programmes present opportunities to encourage primary prevention of a range of related chronic conditions, as well as preventing complications of diagnosed illness. Different conditions will progress along the life course in different ways, with a number of potential intervention points for both prevention and management across the progression of illness.
This paper focuses on supporting people with chronic conditions rather than on prevention, but it incorporates aspects of prevention where relevant to effectively support people with chronic conditions.
What does support mean?Supporting people with chronic conditions (i.e., management) more effectively does not just mean better services or treatment. The NHC sees ‘management’ or support as encompassing everything that people do to live a full life with a chronic condition/s. This may include: • formal and informal social/community support• family/whänau support and involvement in living with chronic conditions• self-management of chronic conditions• prevention of complications• primary prevention of other conditions• access to better information on chronic conditions• access to culturally appropriate services and treatment (including complementary
and alternative health services).
The term ‘support’ is primarily used in this paper to refl ect a broader understanding than the traditional medical term ‘management’. It should not be confused with support services such as disability support.
7
Why look at chronic conditions?
In New Zealand and around the world, the numbers of people living with chronic conditions are rising dramatically. People are living longer with chronic illnesses and with more complex co-morbidities. This is due to ageing populations, change in lifestyles and societal factors such as urbanisation and global marketing of unhealthy products.1
Chronic conditions don’t just affect the individuals with the condition, but a much wider group including family members and society as a whole. For instance, family members who give up paid work to care for someone with a chronic condition earn less income and have less opportunity to save for retirement. These issues increase in importance as people survive longer with chronic conditions.
WorldwideNoncommunicable conditions and mental illness accounted for 46% of the global burden of disease in 2000.i By 2020 it is predicted to increase to 60% - with heart disease, stroke, depression and cancer the biggest contributors.1
In New Zealand• most New Zealanders now die of chronic conditions.
Chronic illness accounts for over 80% of all deaths13, ii
• the management of chronic conditions is the leading cause of hospitalisationsiii
• it is estimated that 70 percent of health care funds is spent on chronic disease4
• most of the 13 priority areas in the NZ Health Strategy are either chronic conditions, using the NHC’s defi nition, or risk factors for chronic disease.
The most common chronic conditions (by diagnosis)iv are:• chronic neck or back problems (one in four adults)• asthma (one in fi ve adults aged 15-44 yrs)• arthritis (one in six adults)• heart disease (one in ten adults)• stroke (one in 48 adults).5
i Global burden of disease is a single measure of health status, which combines the number of deaths and the impact of premature death, and disability. (source: http://www.ispn-psych.org/docs/global4_00)
ii Personal communication with Martin Tobias, Ministry of Health
iii Excluding normal pregnancy and childbirth
iv These are people living with chronic conditions, not the most common causes of death (deaths caused by chronic disease are dominated by ischaemic heart disease, stroke and cancers)
8
Some key facts on three examples of chronic conditions
Diabetes
• Diabetes is estimated to affect about 118,000 people in New Zealand, with a similar number predicted to have undiagnosed diabetes.6
• The number of new diagnoses of diabetes is predicted to double between 1996 and 2011.10
Mental illness
• Mental illness is experienced by approximately 20 percent of the population. About 3 percent require treatment from specialist services. The remaining 17 percent have less severe conditions that can be well managed in primary health care and do not usually require specialist treatment.
• Mental illness is estimated to cause 25 percent of years lost to disability (premature death). It is argued that, in some cases, the disability associated with mental illness is greater than that which results from major chronic physical diseases, including stroke and diabetes.
• Mental illness is predicted to account for 15 percent of the total ‘global burden of disease’ by 2020.
Arthritis
• One in six New Zealanders have been diagnosed as having arthritis.5
• More than one million New Zealanders will be affected by arthritis at some time in their lifetime.
• Arthritis is a major cause of impairment in New Zealand.7
• People of all ages can have arthritis, including children.7
Inequalities in health
Internationally, it is established that social position and ethnicity affect people’s health outcomes, with socially disadvantaged groups tending to have poorer health status, greater exposure to health risks, and less access to health services. In addition, indigenous peoples tend to experience worse health than other groups. Inequalities in health outcomes are well documented in New Zealand, between ethnic and socio-economic groups, as well as geographic, gender and age disparities. For instance, gaps in life expectancy between Mäori and Pacifi c peoples, and the rest of the population increased markedly during the 1980s and 1990s.8
The NHC argues for a strong focus on people with chronic conditions due to the large contribution of such conditions to health disparities.
9
Chronic conditions and disparities in health
• Chronic diseases contribute the major share of the growing disparity in life expectancy between Mäori and Pacifi c, and non-Mäori non-Pacifi c people.8
• In comparison with other groups, Mäori and Pacifi c peoples tend to get chronic disease at a younger age, and to experience more severe illness. In the Decades of Disparity study cited above, the Mäori and Pacifi c 45–64 and 65+ age groups were found to contribute substantially and about equally to the ethnic disparity in life expectancy at birth.8
• Diabetes is about three times more common in Mäori adults than non-Mäori.9 Mäori and Pacifi c people are more than fi ve times more likely to die from diagnosed diabetes than non-Mäori, non-Pacifi c people.10
• Mäori and Pacifi c people tend to be diagnosed with diabetes at a younger age than non-Mäori, non-Pacifi c people. The average age of diagnosis is 47-48 years for Pacifi c peoples compared with 54 years for New Zealand Europeans.10
• Some children have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes; almost all of these have been Mäori or Pacifi c children.6
As there are signifi cant inequalities in severity and onset of chronic illness, improving how people with chronic conditions are supported is an effi cient way to reduce health inequalities. As Barbara Starfi eld, Professor at John Hopkins University School of Public Health, has stated:
“Personal health services have a relatively greater impact on severity…than on incidence. As inequities in severity of health problems…are even greater than inequities in incidence of health problems, appropriate health services have a major role to play in reducing inequities in health.” 11
Preventing chronic illness (and risk factors such as inactivity and obesity) through a range of primary prevention initiatives and diagnosing people earlier will also play a major part in reducing inequalities in health.
Why it is important to improve support for people with chronic conditions
Chronic conditions affect the lives and wellbeing of many New Zealanders. Living with a chronic condition, or with several conditions, can have a signifi cant impact on peoples’ lives, including family wellbeing and capacity to undertake fulfi lling work and other activities.
Even though the majority of people using the health sector have chronic conditions, our health system is still largely based on an acute model of care. The traditional model of health care is cure-focused, and treats people using a problem-solving approach. This approach is not well suited to people with chronic conditions.
10
Instead, a focus on supporting people with chronic conditions emphasises:
• a ‘people-centred’, holistic approach with a focus on self-management
• attention to psychosocial, emotional and spiritual wellbeing
• a greater emphasis on communication, teamwork and integration across services
• ongoing, regular contact between people with chronic conditions and health care services – moving from episodic to continuous care.
As raised earlier, improving how people with chronic conditions are supported is also an effi cient way to reduce inequalities in health.
Who needs to be involved in supporting people with chronic conditions?
People with chronic conditions, and their families, have often lived with the effects of their illness for many years, and have expert knowledge of their own experiences and needs. Efforts to improve how chronic conditions are dealt with must involve people with chronic conditions and family members, and interventions must be planned and coordinated in partnership with the person with chronic illness.
Chronic conditions cannot be prevented or managed by the health sector alone. Many of the factors affecting whether people develop chronic conditions, their risk of developing complications and how effectively they manage lie outside the health sector – for instance, housing, income, transport, local government, education and social services.12 The issue of chronic conditions should be high on the agenda of the whole community. Tackling chronic illness demands an intersectoral approach and strong community engagement.
EXAMPLE OF WORKING ACROSS SECTORSCounties Manukau District Health Board is in the process of producing a fi ve-year, community-owned diabetes plan, “Let’s Beat Diabetes”, in partnership with Manukau City Council and other stakeholder groups. It is aimed at long-term structural changes to prevent, and/or reduce the number of people in the area diagnosed with, Type 2 Diabetes.v
Action areas (being consulted on at the time of writing) include:
• supporting community leadership and action
• enabling vulnerable families to make healthy choices
• changing urban design to support healthy active lifestyles
• developing a Schools Accord to support ‘fi t and healthy’ schools.
11
The best place for regular, proactive support of people with chronic conditions is the community setting, which includes primary health care.vi In the UK, people with chronic conditions account for up to 80 percent of primary health care consultations and it is likely that New Zealand would have a similar proportion.15 It has been suggested that up to 30 percent of hospital admissions in New Zealand could be prevented with timelier primary care intervention.13
Primary health care is an appropriate setting for chronic conditions management because it is based in the community, there is regular contact between people and health professionals (often over many years) and most people with chronic conditions can be supported well in primary health care with some specialist input. In addition, many conditions have a spectrum of severity, with most people being at the less severe end. Primary health providers have generalist skills, experience and networks that are useful in supporting people with chronic conditions.
The Primary Health Care Strategy, released in 2001, highlights the central role of primary health care in improving population health. The approach includes:
• a greater emphasis on population healthvii, health promotion and preventative care
• community involvement
• involving a range of professionals and encouraging multidisciplinary approaches to decision making
• improving accessibility, affordability and appropriateness of services
• improving co-ordination and continuity of care
• providing and funding services according to the population's needs as opposed to fee for services when people are unwell.viii
The Primary Health Care Strategy supports the broadening of primary health teams to include allied health professionals such as social workers, pharmacists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and podiatrists.
v See Counties Manukau DHB website http://www.cmdhb.govt.nz/Counties/LetsBeatDiabetes/Diabetes-Plan/diabetes-plan.htm, accessed 26/1/05
vi The community setting includes the home, community organisations, primary health care, social services, recreational groups, etc.
vii A population health approach is one that aims to improve the overall health of the population. It involves identifying patterns within a population, relating them back to individuals and groups at risk, and identifying a ‘menu’ of broad based and individually tailored interventions that can improve the population’s health over time. Population health must address social, cultural and economic determinants, be multi-disciplinary and multi-agency, and emphasise health promotion, principles of equity, health information systems, and decision-making support.
viii Ministry of Health website www.moh.govt.nz/primaryhealthcare
12
SECTION 2: APPROACHES TO SUPPORTING PEOPLE WITH CHRONIC CONDITIONS
Other countries
There are signifi cant moves in many countries to improve how care for people with chronic illness is structured and delivered. At the global level, the World Health Organization has advocated for an innovative approach to chronic conditions based on the ‘Chronic Care Model’, developed by Edward Wagner and used extensively in the United States and increasingly around the world ix.1
The World Health Organization set out eight essential elements for taking action, which build on the Wagner model for chronic care:
1. support a paradigm shift (from an acute to a chronic care model)
2. manage the political environment (to build political commitment for change)
3. build integrated health care
4. align sectoral policies for health
5. use health care personnel more effectively (eg, team models, new training, changing roles)
6. centre care on the patient and family (self-management, patient-centred care)
7. support patients in their communities
8. emphasize prevention
“As its ultimate goal, the chronic care model envisions an informed, activated patient interacting with a prepared, proactive practice team, resulting in high-quality, satisfying encounters and improved outcomes.” 14
The core features of chronic conditions models are similar, but terminology varies slightly across different contexts. Common elements of chronic care models include: changing the patient and carer role, process and system redesign, workforce planning and development, knowledge management, and partnerships between health and the community.15 Some examples of these fi ve elements are given in the following table.
ix The Chronic Care Model is used in over 500 health care organisations in the US and has been shown to have positive effects (Lewis and Dixon 2004 in BMJ Vol 328 24 Jan 2004)
x The elements and examples are adapted from Modernisation Agency 2004 Learning Distillation of Chronic Disease Management Programmes in the UK.
13
Elements of chronic conditions models x
Some examples
Improved interactions between people and professionals
Support for self-management, patient-held records, person-centred care, care plan where person with a chronic condition sets their own goals
Redesign of delivery systems and processes
case management, care pathways, medicines management, non-physicians trained to support self-management, arrange for routine tasks (eg. eye exams, foot checks) and ensure follow-up
Workforce planning and development
Use of teams, including allied health professionals (eg, social workers, physios, podiatrists), nurse-led clinics, nurse specialists, GP specialists, salaried GPs, higher ratio of nurses to GPs, incentives for professionals, use of trained volunteers for tasks that don’t require clinical expertise, eg. patient education
Knowledge management
decision support tools, database of key information on all patients, use of clinical data to do risk stratification to better target resources, use of evidence-based guidelines, share information across all relevant health providers (better coordination across primary/secondary)
Partnerships within health and between health and community
an integrated system that works across primary and secondary care, and that works collaboratively with other services such as social services, housing, employment, transport. Formal relationships with the wider community, eg. using a local community centre for older peoples’ exercise classes. Intersectoral collaboration at both local and central government levels.
The UK is beginning to trial and test approaches to supporting people with chronic conditions in the context of the NHS, including key approaches from the US.15, xi Chronic illness, or long-term conditions, has been identified as a national priority in the NHS Improvement Plan.16 In addition, chronic disease is a key focus for several national service frameworks and the Expert Patient Programme is encouraging greater self-care, where patients take a more active role in managing their conditions (see the ‘self-management’ section of this paper). Improving support for people with chronic conditions is a pathway towards a more people-centred health system, and will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of health resources.15
xi A number of Primary Care Trusts in the UK are currently piloting three US models – Kaiser, Evercare and Pfizer.
14
The NHS Improvement Plan sets out a three-tiered population management model of service provision for people with chronic conditions.
• Level one is made up of the 70-80% of people who can usually ‘self-manage’ with advice and support.
• Level two consists of higher risk patients who require a more pro-active ‘disease management’ level of service provision (where multidisciplinary teams provide evidence-based care including the use of pathways and protocols).
• Level three consists of a minority of people who require a specialist ‘case management’ approach (active management using case managers).
New Zealand
In New Zealand a wide range of initiatives are occurring at both local and national levels. This section profi les two examples of initiatives to improve how people with chronic conditions are supported within the health sector; the Counties Manukau chronic care management programme and the Leading for Outcomes initiative by the Ministry of Health.
Please refer to Appendix 2 for a list of other current initiatives in New Zealand to improve support for people with chronic conditions.
Counties Manukau Chronic Care Management programme
Counties Manukau DHB is a leader in introducing and evaluating a structured chronic care management programme in New Zealand. The programme has had success in improving health indicators.
Counties Manukau DHB has introduced chronic care management for targeted patients, across community and hospital settings. The disease groups initially included were diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and COPD/asthma. The programme aims to support people in a coordinated care process of partnership with the patient, their whänau/family and the wider community.17
The programme involves quarterly visits with the GP, as well as six hours a year of nursing and health education visits. Electronic decision support based on evidence-based clinical guidelines is used. Information is collected using an electronic template, the data is sent to a central server, and the server sends back reminder information to the GP. For instance, the GP will be sent reminders of people overdue for check-up appointments, and will be notifi ed if current guidelines suggest different forms of treatment. This helps to provide consistency in practice and to promote the use of best practice clinical guidelines. Monthly reports from the server help practitioners to monitor progress and to identify individuals who are only responding slowly.
15
The Counties Manukau chronic care management model includes eight core components that inform the negotiation between people with chronic conditions and the health team – (1) culturally competent systems and provider skills, (2) information systems, (3) selection of target groups, (4) clinical guidelines and the education of patients and providers, (5) support from and linkage to secondary care – services and advice, (6) skills in behavioural change, patient care planning, (7) practice systems that encourage proactive care, and (8) evaluation, audit, feedback.
Compared with other models used internationally, the Counties Manukau model has a strong emphasis on cultural competence. This is defi ned as a set of academic, experiential and interpersonal skills that allow individuals to increase their understanding and appreciation of cultural differences and similarities within and among groups.xii
Leading for Outcomes
Leading for Outcomes is an initiative within the Ministry of Health that aims to support a ‘whole system’ shift in the focus of health sector activities toward outcomes.xiii Part of this shift is to encourage an agreed approach to supporting people with chronic conditions across New Zealand.
In order to achieve better outcomes for people with chronic conditions, Leading for Outcomes argues for a transformation in the way that health care is delivered in community settings. It suggests, for example, identifying people with chronic conditions earlier using a population health approach, providing continuous rather than episodic care, and encouraging stronger community engagement and self-management.
Leading for Outcomes is a framework to maintain a focus on the overall results of the health sector’s collective actions – on population outcomes. Chronic conditions, starting with diabetes and cardiovascular disease, are presented as a continuum ranging from early risk to end-stage and death. The approach encourages systematic rather than disconnected opportunities for intervention.
Questions for respondents
• What are your views on the best way/s to approach chronic conditions in New Zealand?
• What lessons can we learn from existing models to improve how people with chronic conditions are supported?
• What other key initiatives are going on around New Zealand (that are not included in Appendix 2)?xiv
xii For more information on the Counties Manukau chronic care management programme, see http://www.sah.co.nz/Counties/Service_Areas/Integrated_Care/IntegratedCareframe.htm
xiii See the Leading for Outcomes website www.leadingforoutcomes.org.nz
xiv Responses to this question will be incorporated into Appendix 2, which will be made available on the National Health Committee’s website www.nhc.govt.nz.
16
Support for self-managing chronic conditions
Self-management support is a core element of a chronic conditions approach, and is a way to encourage a more patient-centred model. In the New Zealand context, family/whänau involvement in managing chronic conditions is crucial. Some people may prefer the terms ‘shared management’ or ‘shared care’ to avoid implying that it is an individualistic approach.
Defi nition of self-managementThe NHC defi nes self-management as “people with chronic conditions having greater control in looking after themselves, with the support of their families/whänau (where desired), and in partnership with health professionals and community resources.”
It is important to recognise that many people already self-manage to some degree – for instance, in taking a range of medications, obtaining support from family/whänau members and friends or community resources, or by playing a key role in developing a care plan in partnership with health providers.
It should also be emphasised that self-management may not be appropriate for some people, or in some circumstances. For example, some children or people with illnesses such as dementia may not be in a position to self-manage.
Self-management is the norm
“Over 80% of all medical symptoms are self-diagnosed and self-treated without professional care” (David Sobel, Kaiser Permanente) 18
New Zealand’s diabetes consumer organisation has stated that “…for adults with diabetes 99.9% of all their diabetes management choices are made by themselves without the immediate help of their diabetes care team” (Quote from Diabetes NZ website)19
Self-management programmes
While people’s experiences of their chronic condition/s differ according to their symptoms and the treatment they receive, there are commonalities in the day-to-day challenges that people with chronic conditions face. Self-management programmes aim to equip people with the knowledge, skills and support to cope with these challenges and feel confi dent in managing their own lives with a chronic condition/s.
Increasing individuals’ self-effi cacy in managing the effects of their chronic condition/s is a key aspect of self-management programmes. Course participants are introduced to specifi c self-management techniques to this end. Programmes focus on how people manage both the medical aspects of living with chronic condition/s (eg, taking medications), as well as the lifestyle aspects (eg, fatigue, pain management, relaxation, exercise, and healthy eating).
17
EXAMPLE OF A SELF-MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME
“Living a Healthy Life With Chronic Conditions” is one of the most long-standing and widely used self-management programmes. Kate Lorig and colleagues at Stanford University developed the programme and it is delivered in groups of 10 to 15 people who have a variety of different chronic conditions.
The “Living a Healthy Life” programme involves one session per week (two and a half hours), for six weeks. The sessions are delivered to groups of 10 –15 people by a lay-leader who has had personal experience of chronic condition/s. People with any kind of chronic condition can attend the course, and many participants have more than one chronic condition. The course leader follows a detailed resource guide to take participants through a range of topics, and encourage the group members to share and learn from each other’s experiences. Topics include exercise, cognitive symptom techniques (eg, relaxation), nutritional change, fatigue and sleep management, use of medications and community resources, managing fear, anger and depression, training in communication with health professionals and others, health-related problem-solving, and decision-making.
The programme has been adapted for various cultures, including minority groups, in the US, and at least 12 countries around the world. Arthritis New Zealand currently provides this programme to groups of people in New Zealand, and trains lay-leaders to deliver the course. There is interest in adapting the programme to be run by Mäori for Mäori. Diabetes New Zealand has also recently started running the programme.
There is a large body of overseas evidence to show that self-management programmes can provide important benefi ts for participants. For example, in a number of evaluations of the Chronic Disease Self Management Programmes developed in the US, sustained improvements were obtained in individuals’ skills in self-management and in disease outcomes.20 In a fi ve-year research project, the programme was evaluated in a randomized study involving more than 1000 subjects. This study found that people who took the programme, when compared to people who did not, improved healthy behaviours (exercise, cognitive symptom management, coping, and communications with physicians), improved their health status (self-reported health, fatigue, disability, social/role activities, and health distress), and decreased their days in hospital.20
The UK has implemented the Expert Patient Programme, based on the Lorig model, as a key plank in their approach to supporting people with chronic disease. This programme has had some success in working with traditionally ‘hard to reach’ groups such as people from deprived areas and people with mental health issues. Participation rates in the Expert Patient Programme for people from black and ethnic groups are almost as high as their proportion of the total population (6.9 percent of those in the Expert Patient Programme are from black and ethnic groups, compared with a national percentage in England of 8 percent).18
Arthritis New Zealand has conducted two post-course evaluations for the “Living a Healthy Life” courses that they have delivered in New Zealand since 1998.21
18
These both concluded that the courses were relevant and useful to people with chronic conditions, and that the majority of participants felt they had benefi ted greatly from the course. The post-course evaluation of the courses delivered from 2000 to 2002 also concluded that participants’ self-effi cacy was greatly increased, and they were committed to the continual practice of positive self-management behaviours. Some participants felt, however, that the sessions were rushed.21
EXAMPLE IN NEW ZEALAND
HealthWEST PHO has piloted a self-management programme in West Auckland, which was well attended (no one dropped out of the courses and two extra people joined after hearing about the programme through word of mouth). There was a signifi cant participation by Mäori and Pacifi c people. The programme is led by health professionals and is based on the principles of empowerment. Waitemata DHB is planning to adopt the programme, and Mäori and Pacifi c groups are involved in further developing the programme to suit their needs. The next phase of the programme will be evaluated.
It should be recognised that a self-management programme is only one way to encourage self-management, and that not everyone wants to be part of a group programme. Other self-management interventions that are provided to individuals include patient-led care plans, patient-held records, and asthma self-management plans.
Questions for respondents
• Do you agree with the NHC’s defi nition of self-management?
• What role do you think self-management has in living with chronic conditions?
• Do you think self-management should be better encouraged and supported in New Zealand, and if so, how?
19
Role of complementary and alternative care
A signifi cant proportion of New Zealanders use complementary and alternative health practitioners to help manage chronic conditions.
Use of complementary and alternative health
• The 2002-2003 New Zealand Health Survey showed that one in four people visited a complementary and alternative health practitioner in the previous year.xv
• Almost a third of those who had seen a complementary and alternative health practitioner had a chronic condition or disability.22
The complementary and alternative health paradigm is well suited to people with chronic conditions, as it tends to involve longer, more holistic consultations and is more ‘people-centred’ than the disease-based biomedical approach. The complementary and alternative paradigm has tended to encourage self-management and acknowledge people’s spirituality and religious beliefs as part of holistic care. However, in reality most health practitioners, whether operating within complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) or mainstream health contexts, do not operate solely using one model. Many practitioners use other models as well as the biomedical, such as Mäori or Pacifi c health models, behavioural science or psychological models.
Some practitioners have trained in biomedical and CAM approaches and offer both interventions. A survey of Auckland GPs showed that a third of respondents practised one or more forms of alternative medicine, and two thirds referred patients for CAM therapies.23 Anecdotal evidence suggests a growing number of referrals by GPs to homeopaths for conditions such as glandular fever, chronic fatigue syndrome and recurrent ear/nose/throat infections.xvi However, in many contexts CAM therapies do not have the same status as biomedical interventions in terms of funding or support.
People with chronic conditions may use a combination of CAM products and biomedical pharmaceuticals, without practitioners from either approach being aware of what they are using. New Zealand research has identifi ed occasions where interactions between pharmaceuticals and CAM products have occurred.xvii Presenters to a symposium on the integration of CAM and mainstream medicine, held by the NHC in November 2004, highlighted the need for an adverse events reporting structure, and one presenter suggested doctors need to expand their patient drug histories to include questions on CAM products.
xv This estimate does not include people who buy CAM products from pharmacies or health food shops without seeing a CAM practitioner.
xvi Cited by Nicki Walker and Gwyneth Evans at the National Health Committee’s symposium ‘The Whole Picture: integrated management of chronic conditions in New Zealand’; which explored how mainstream and CAM sectors can work more closely together, 24 November 2004.
20
In addition, improving the relationship between the CAM and biomedical sectors may have the downstream effect of improving patients’ confi dence for revealing their use of CAM products to mainstream practitioners.
The development of PHOs with a population health and community focus is an opportunity for allied health professionals (such as physiotherapists, occupational therapists, podiatrists and social workers) to be integrated with primary health care, and ultimately for CAM practitioners to become part of the team.
Questions for respondents
• What role do you think complementary and alternative medicine has in living with chronic conditions?
• Do you think complementary and alternative medicine should be better encouraged and supported in New Zealand, and if so, how?
xvii CAM symposium, November 2004
21
SECTION 3: SUMMARY OF ISSUES – PEOPLE WITH CHRONIC CONDITIONS
The NHC believes it is crucial to canvas the views and experiences of people with chronic conditions to help provide relevant advice to the Minister of Health. People with chronic conditions have extensive experience in living with their conditions and in interacting with health and other services.
The NHC has held four preliminary focus groups with people with chronic conditions in the Wairarapa and Christchurch. More than seventy people were involved. Three groups were associated with Arthritis New Zealand and the Stroke Foundation, and the other was a support and exercise group for Pacific people.
People were asked to highlight the main factors that helped and hindered them in living with chronic conditions. The following information is an initial starting point in identifying the key issues for people with chronic conditions. Further information will be gained from this consultation and from case studies with people with chronic conditions that the NHC will carry out shortly. The views expressed here are reported as they were stated in the focus group context, and are not necessarily views held by the NHC.
Part 1: Factors that help people with chronic conditions
Support from others and self-help groups
Main themesPeople with chronic conditions emphasised that family support is crucial. Many people also highlighted self-management courses as a key factor that helped. Courses helped to provide a safe environment and shared experiences (“knowing you’re not the only one”). Attending courses helped people to be able to ask the ‘right questions’ of health and other professionals. Exercise groups were also helpful in encouraging people to exercise and feel part of a supportive group.
Relationships with health professionals and NGOs
Main themesHaving a good nurse and GP was seen as critical. Direct contact with specialists was appreciated, as well as specialist clinics in rural or provincial areas. For instance, one woman appreciated getting a phone call from her specialist to reassure her that she didn’t have throat cancer. The call helped her feel like “not just a name or number”.
Other commentsPeople said that NGOs and consumer organisations have a key role in providing support and advocacy. Being involved in matters affecting people with chronic conditions also helped, eg, a stroke group appreciated being involved in developing the stroke guidelines. Other factors that helped were occupational therapy and aids, physiotherapy and use of a hot pool, home-help support, use of traditional healing and the accessibility of rural nurses.
22
Income, employment and transport assistance
Main themesPeople highlighted the role of work in earning an income and in combating feelings of ‘uselessness’. The 2004 Budget changes to how benefi ts are adjusted in relation to part-time work were seen as helpful in making part-time work more feasible for those receiving a benefi t. Transport assistance such as the Total Mobility Scheme (taxi vouchers), Mobility Parking Permits, and the importance of public transport and ‘kneel-down’ buses were helpful factors for many people in living with chronic conditions.
Individual factors
Main themesMany people said that having a positive attitude and being assertive and independent helped them to manage. It was seen as important for people to accept their condition/s and to feel accepted by others. Interests and hobbies were signifi cant factors that helped, especially keeping physically active.
Other commentsLiving alone was seen as both an opportunity and a challenge for people with chronic conditions. People described using ‘short-cutting’ strategies to make life more manageable (eg, choosing not to dress up or to wear shorts because it’s easier, and wearing shoes with Velcro that are simpler to put on).
Spiritual health
Some people with chronic conditions said that spiritual beliefs and practices helped them in living with ongoing conditions. For example, a service provider talked about one man who had requested a kaumatua to say karakia with him, and the service had arranged for another man with depression to spend two hours with a kaumatua for counselling and support.
Questions for respondents
• Do you agree that these are the main factors that help people with chronic conditions?
• If not, what other factors are important?
• What suggestions would you make to help improve the ways that people with chronic conditions are supported?
• What is the role of spiritual beliefs and practices in helping people live with chronic conditions? How can these be better addressed by health and other services?
23
Part 2: Factors that hinder people with chronic conditions
Lack of coordination (within health and between health and other agencies)
Main themesMany people had experienced a ‘void’ in services after being discharged from hospital. People felt there is poor coordination and communication within the health sector (eg. the Stroke Foundation had only heard about a new hospital wing for people aged under 65 years through the ‘grapevine’). In particular, people thought there is poor coordination between their GPs and secondary/tertiary services.
Other commentsPeople also commented that some health practitioners did not refer people to community support services such as Arthritis New Zealand and Mobility Parking Permits for those with a disability. People often found it difficult to find out what they were entitled to, especially from Work and Income and other support organisations.
Societal attitudes and myths about chronic conditions
Main themesParticipants in the focus groups gave a range of examples where myths about chronic conditions were perpetuated, as well as experiences of discrimination or being misunderstood. These included:
• stroke and arthritis being seen as ‘older person’s diseases’
• feeling stared at or classified as someone with an impairment or problem
• a presumption that if people look ‘normal’ there’s nothing wrong with them (whereas they may be in pain from their condition)
• a young person had friends withdraw because they couldn’t handle the difficulties associated with arthritis
• people felt the public perception of arthritis is to “just get on with it” (whereas they were struggling with pain and depression).
Lack of understanding from health and social support sectors
Main themesIn particular, people talked about health and social services lacking understanding of chronic conditions and their impact on people’s lives. They felt there is limited understanding from health sector and Work and Income staff about the long term, ongoing nature of chronic conditions. People said there was a need for better training of GPs and nurses in specific chronic conditions. An example was given where a Plunket nurse told a young mother she wouldn’t need arthritis services, because she believed that arthritis only affected older people.
24
Other commentsSome participants had the experience of other people choosing not to talk directly to a person who had had a stroke. Rather than speaking to the person, they would choose to speak to their partner or carer. Doctors were seen as especially prone to doing this.
Inadequate information for patients
Main themesPeople in the focus groups said they do not consistently get the health information they needed, and that information is not always in an appropriate form. Many people felt that pamphlets are not always the best way to inform people. Information prior to having operations was seen as especially important and people felt that there is a particular lack of information about medicines.
Transport
Main themesParticipants said there is a lack of wheelchair facilities in buses and buildings, and that accessibility to buses is difficult. It was felt that some bus drivers lack awareness of people with mobility problems (if there was no visible indication such as a wheelchair). One focus group talked about difficulties crossing the road at pedestrian crossings, as they found the signals did not allow enough time for people with mobility problems to get across the road. The high cost of transport was a common issue raised, and transport to appointments from rural areas was especially difficult and costly.
Other commentsSome people felt the Total Mobility Scheme (where taxis are subsidised for people whose disabilities prevent them from using public transport) should be more flexible and have a greater entitlement.
Income/employment
Main themesThe limited income on benefits, such as the Invalid’s Benefit, was noted. The effect of shifting from employment to a benefit was cited as particularly difficult, including the effect on the partner and family. Also, people emphasised that when their income does not meet costs of health services and medications it can lead to stress and depression. People said they were unable to afford some treatments to help with living with a chronic condition.
People noted it was difficult to find paid employment when struggling with the effects of living with a chronic condition. People said there was a lack of support from Work and Income. Examples included feeling penalised for choosing to work, and a frequent turnover of case managers. It was felt there is not enough flexibility in Work and Income entitlements. The high costs of heating were raised in the context of cold housing environments affecting people with chronic conditions.
25
Problems with support services to help in the home
Main themesParticipants in the focus groups highlighted problems with access to home support and variability of services across the country. People said that carers who come into people’s homes are often untrained and underpaid. One focus group talked about home support carers being unable to accommodate the person’s lifestyle (eg, a woman had a carer who could only arrive at 11am to shower her, whereas the woman wanted to have a shower earlier than that).
People highlighted a lack of support for carers who live at home with people with chronic conditions, and a lack of respite care. People wanted more recognition for families who care for other family members, eg, payment for caring and training for carers who are family or friends. It was felt that there is variability in entitlements and processes regarding equipment to help in the home, eg, one person waited for a shower stool for six months.
Access to services and facilities
Main themesMany people talked about a ‘distrustful environment’ with regard to accessing services, which made people dispirited and aware of a power imbalance. The requirement to see a GP before accessing services was seen as prohibitive, eg, before being able to apply for Mobility Parking Permits.
People felt they did not have access to sufficient time with their GP, due to short appointments. Excessive waiting times to see a specialist were raised, especially at tertiary level. People felt there is a need for more physiotherapists.
Age restrictions for entitlement to services were highlighted as an access problem (eg. there is no facility for younger stroke victims to have respite care so people aged under 65 have to go to rest homes. Also, the falls prevention programme run by ACC is only for those aged over 65 years). Access to some services is only intermittent (eg. a hydrotherapy service was available six weeks on, six weeks off).
Many people talked about variation in entitlements between ACC and disability support (eg. disparities in support for ACC recipients compared with people with a chronic condition or disability, ACC recipients tend to get more home-help and more rapid access to treatment). There was some concern about inequities in how people with different disabilities or conditions are treated (eg. someone may look well but be experiencing debilitating pain).
A lack of flexibility with some entitlements was highlighted (eg. the Workbridge Employment Scheme does not allow use of the funding for transport to get to work). It was felt that the needs assessment process (NASC) favours those who can advocate well for themselves.
The high costs of medication and doctors’ visits, and medical insurance, were seen as barriers to living well with chronic conditions. People highlighted the high cost of some medicines, especially for arthritis, Parkinsons and dementia. They felt that physiotherapy can be expensive and that complementary and alternative treatments had high costs.
26
Other commentsSome people commented that their local hospital lacked a Pacifi c peoples’ chaplain. Some participants found it diffi cult to access a pool and physiotherapy exercise class. They found there was often a lack of facilities to do what the doctor recommended, eg, for being physically active. Physical access problems were also highlighted, for instance, heavy doors, steps that are high, and lack of accessible public toilets.
Mental health and emotional factors
Main themesMany people felt there was a lack of attention at diagnosis on the person’s state of mental and emotional health. The stigma around mental health was emphasised, particularly in rural communities. People with chronic conditions felt there is not enough support for mental health issues, including depression associated with chronic conditions.
Participants talked about the effect of ongoing tiredness, depression and isolation on people’s ability to cope and advocate for themselves. People said they often did not have the strength to be assertive with doctors and other health professionals. Another issue was experiencing grief for what changes in a person’s life when they get a chronic condition.
Questions for respondents
• Do you agree that these are the main factors that hinder people with chronic conditions?
• If not, what other factors are important?
• What suggestions would you make to help improve the ways that people with chronic conditions are supported?
27
SECTION 4: SUMMARY OF ISSUES – PRACTITIONERS AND AGENCIES
The NHC conducted more than 50 meetings to find out the key issues in supporting people with chronic conditions in New Zealand. Interviewees were health professionals working with people with chronic conditions, government policy-makers, and people working in non-government agencies (NGOs).
The issues identified by the people interviewed are summarised here, under the five elements of effective chronic conditions management.15
1. Improved interactions between people and professionals2. Redesign of delivery systems and processes3. Workforce planning and development 4. Knowledge management5. Partnerships within health, and between health and the community
The views outlined are those of the people interviewed and are not necessarily endorsed by the NHC.
Element 1: Improved interactions between people and professionals
Interactions between people and professionals
Main themes■ The importance of a caring relationship between professional and patient,
including culturally appropriate behaviour, was emphasised.
■ Interviewees wanted patient involvement and ‘people-directed consultations’ where both parties jointly plan how to manage chronic illness. Examples were given of differing priorities of patients and practitioners, and the need to start with the patient’s immediate needs or goals.
■ The need for good communication between professionals and patients was emphasised. It was felt that it was particularly important for patients to get the information they needed and that this was not always happening.
■ It was felt that the health sector needed to improve how emotional issues associated with chronic conditions, such as grief and depression, are acknowledged and addressed.
■ The ‘broker’ role of health practitioners was emphasised, for example, negotiating with a hospital, attending appointments with a patient, and advocating on people’s behalf when appropriate.
■ Addressing the emotional and spiritual aspects of health was seen as important. Practitioners at a Mäori service gave an example of a 65-year-old man whose goal was to learn Mäori language, and the nurse linked him up with a course.
28
Other comments• The need to work with the whole family of a person with chronic conditions
was stressed. For instance, providing information to the children of people with chronic conditions, in order to encourage prevention among the next generation. Another example was a whänau approach to an alcohol and drug programme for young people where there was a combined outing with older people.
• It was felt there is particular stigma around mental health issues and that GPs need to be supported to feel more confident about treating mental illness.
• It was argued that in particular, children with chronic conditions needed appropriate support. People said that most services are currently aimed at adults and lack expertise in children’s issues.
• Several interviewees said that being a ‘by Mäori for Mäori’ service was important, and that some people chose to travel long distances to use their service.
• Practitioners at a Mäori health service said that providing food played a key role in helping people to feel comfortable. Social events such as a kaumatua Christmas dinner, and provision of transport, were also important.
• Examples were given of times when doctors spoke to the community health worker rather than directly to the patient. There were also instances of receptionists at GP clinics being disrespectful of people who had not paid their bill.
• The use of written letters to advise people of hospital appointments was not always appropriate, for instance, when people could not read them.
Self-management support
Main themes■ A general need for more self-management was highlighted. Interviewees felt that
DHB commitment to self-management was essential, as well as increased funding for patient education.
■ Better coordination to encourage self-management activities/groups was advocated. Consumer organisations and other NGOs need to be coordinated so it is easier to distribute information on self-management.
■ Interviewees felt there is a need for more Mäori and Pacific self-management groups.
■ At the same time, key informants noted that most people with chronic conditions already self-manage to some degree.
■ Interviewees also made the point that not all people with chronic conditions will want to self-manage, and it will not be appropriate or possible in all circumstances. For instance, living on a low income or being homeless may constrain people’s ability to self-manage.
29
Other comments• It was felt that the patient should defi ne the level of self-management they want.
• Language and cultural differences between clinician and patient were identifi ed as barriers to self-management.
• It was felt that self-management needed to address the person’s whole life, ie. the ‘non-medical’ aspects of their life as well as medical issues.
• The quality of the training in self-management programmes was seen to be important, therefore planned workforce development is essential.
• There was a view that self-management should be seen as the standard approach, with consultations with professionals added on when needed.
Questions for respondents:
• Do you have any comments on the issues raised in this section?
• What other issues do you think are important to add?
• What suggestions do you have to help improve the ways that people with chronic conditions are supported?
Element 2: Redesign of delivery systems and processes
Funding
Main themes■ People said that administration requirements and compliance costs with
delivering primary health care were currently too high.
■ It was felt that programmes to support people with chronic conditions should be better resourced. One DHB that had implemented chronic conditions management programmes noted that the start-up costs of new programmes are high.
■ Interviewees felt that the time needed for effective interactions with people with chronic conditions should be recognised and adequately funded. One nurse described the one-hour assessment with Care Plus patients as a ‘privilege’ (Care Plus is an initiative that provides funding to PHOs for people who use primary health care frequently due to chronic conditions or other complex needs. More information on Care Plus can be found at http://www.moh.govt.nz/primaryhealthcare and it is included in the list of initiatives in Appendix 2 of this paper). However, it was felt that Care Plus should be monitored to ensure that health practitioners are remunerated for the time they spend with people with chronic conditions.
Other comments• It was noted that the funding system should avoid giving incentives to DHBs to
encourage short stays and regular readmissions to hospital.
30
• It was felt that funding should be increased for prevention and early intervention regarding chronic conditions.
• People advocated that the funding for provision of equipment for children with chronic conditions should recognise the increase in complex conditions among children.
• Interviewees said that the funding arrangements do not recognise that it costs more to provide services with people with higher need and those with multiple chronic conditions.
• It was noted that funding for primary health care had not kept pace with the growing IT needs and growth in patient numbers.
• It was suggested that a separate category should be created for people with ‘complex and chronic conditions’, and that specific funding and policy initiatives be designed for this group. There should also be recognition of the higher costs of treatments for rare conditions.
• Work and Income’s approach to people with complex and chronic conditions was criticised as inappropriate, especially for people whose condition will never improve. It was argued that some categories of people with chronic conditions (eg, those with multiple conditions, or those with complex long-term needs) should be treated as a discrete group.
• It was noted that there is little funding assistance to help families where one parent stays home to care for a child with a chronic health condition.
Primary Health Organisations (PHOs)
Main themes■ Key informants felt that people with more than one chronic condition should
not be treated in disease ‘silos’. It was felt that a move away from contracting for disease-specific services was necessary to avoid continued fragmentation of services.
■ Interviewees said that PHO size should be increased to improve effectiveness, including cost-effectiveness.
■ It was felt that expectations of PHOs should be realistic, whereas early expectations had been overly optimistic in terms of what PHOs could deliver.
■ Interviewees asserted that PHOs needed more certainty of long-term funding in order to establish programmes to improve how to interact with people with chronic conditions.
Other comments• There was a view that there should be more flexibility in models for delivering
primary health care, such as a health professional visiting people at home, rather than people always going to a health clinic.
• Interviewees felt that PHO funding should be more flexible and less closely linked to GP registers.
31
• Interviewees at one health service said that the taxi chits provided by the PHO were really helpful in assisting people to get to hospital.
Barriers to accessing services
Main themes■ Interviewees stated that some people could not afford to pay for health care visits
or medication.
■ Waiting lists for specialist or allied health professional care were highlighted as a barrier to effective chronic care.
■ It was felt there are barriers to accessing hospital services for some people, as well as a high rate of not attending follow-up appointments after discharge. Social issues and transport difficulties were cited as key issues affecting people’s capacity to access services.
■ Practitioners said that some Mäori and Pacific people could be wary of attending hospital appointments out of fear. For instance, some Mäori may associate hospitals with death, or feel discomfort for ‘wairua’ reasons about people having passed away in the bed they are allocated. People may have had previous experiences in hospitals of misunderstandings or cultural insensitivity.
■ It was felt that variations in entitlements to support and compensation between those on ACC and people using disability support services should be addressed. There are also variations between the support that can be accessed by ACC recipients and people with chronic health conditions.
Other comments• It was noted that ethnic differences in the uptake of home support should be
reduced.xviii
• There was a view that chronic conditions programmes depend on enrolment, which risks putting resources into people who are good at accessing services, rather than those in most need of services. As specific programmes tend to focus on easily measured health outcomes, there is a risk of focusing on narrow outcomes rather than on the patient’s needs. These interviewees felt that it is crucial to strengthen primary health care across the board, rather than focusing on people with chronic conditions.
• Interviewees from one area talked about long waiting lists for GPs that were sometimes up to three days. In some cases the nurses would refer patients straight to hospital because the wait was too long.
xviii For instance, an evaluation found ethnic differences in the uptake of home support (Ne’emia S. 2003. Capital Support in the Lives of Pacific Peoples with Disabilities. Wellington: Capital Support ‘Links for Living’).
32
Questions for respondents:
• Do you have any comments on the issues raised in this section?
• What other issues do you think are important to add here?
• What suggestions do you have to help improve the ways that people with chronic conditions are supported?
Element 3: Workforce planning and development
Need for improved workforce capacity
Main themes■ Interviewees felt there needed to be more nurses in primary health care in order to
effectively deliver comprehensive support for people with chronic conditions.
■ It was felt that a major problem in supporting those with chronic illness in rural areas is the high use of locums, and high staff turnover, which results in a lack of continuity of care for people with chronic conditions. It also results in limited time for clinicians to spend with people.
■ A greater number of NGOs in some rural areas was seen as a way to improve how people with chronic conditions are supported.
■ A need for more home support workers was also highlighted.
Need for change and innovation in workforce roles
Main themes■ Interviewees talked about the changing roles and skill needs of health care
workers in the new primary care environment – such as needing to look at social issues as well as health, and responding to the increasing numbers of children with complex chronic conditions.
■ It was felt there is a need for more people-directed, multi-disciplinary team approaches, rather than professional silos (where each professional approaches the person within their realm of expertise and seeks out what they can fi x).
■ It was noted that a team approach requires that all professional groups respect and understand each other’s roles.
Other comments• Specifi c roles to help with building and strengthening links across services and
professional groups, such as GP Liaison Offi cers, were seen as important.
• It was felt that both GPs and practice nurses were well placed to take on a ‘caseworker’ role in a more intensive approach to supporting people with chronic conditions.
33
• It was advocated that training for health professionals in cultural appropriateness and cultural issues is needed.
• Interviewees said there is an increasing role for the use of complementary and alternative therapies (CAM), including traditional healing, in supporting people with chronic conditions. This growing role has workforce implications, for example, people may request information about complementary and alternative therapies from mainstream health professionals, who may not have this information or be able to refer on to a CAM practitioner.
• Interviewees also raised the question of how to deal with conflicting advice between traditional or complementary/alternative approaches and mainstream medicine.
• It was asserted that greater paediatric expertise in primary health care was needed and that home help services needed to be more appropriate for families with children with chronic conditions.
• Interviewees identified a need for more respite care and carer support.
• Practitioners at a Mäori service emphasised that podiatrist services are important, as people cannot be active if they have problems with their feet. They saw podiatrists as having a key role in preventing and managing chronic conditions.
• Interviewees at one health service said a helpful factor in supporting people with chronic illness was staff working together and not being rigid in their roles.
• People at a Mäori service said that at times they called in a kaumatua to help address people’s spiritual needs.
Role of nurses in supporting people with chronic conditions
Main themes■ Interviewees said that nurses should be upskilled in order to case-manage people
with chronic conditions. The specialist nurse role was seen as important, as well as nurse-led initiatives.
■ It was noted that the nursing role is becoming more like a social work role.
■ A key advantage of the rural nurse model in interacting with people with chronic conditions was flexibility with rural nurses’ time. A rural nurse can spend an hour with people if needed.
Other comments• One Mäori nurse said that working in people’s homes required a different model
of care, where the person and their family are “the boss”. She was aware that she was trained in the mainstream system, and had to learn new ways of operating, such as starting from people’s own goals and priorities.
34
Role of community health workers in supporting people with chronic conditions
Main theme■ A need was highlighted for generic community health workers in chronic care to
help connect people to social services and to be an advocate. Community health workers attached to Mäori health providers play a crucial role in working with families and connecting people to other services.
Other comments• Interviewees at one health provider said their community health workers are able
to “pave the way” for nurses to begin working with people. The workers noted that the community health workers “spoke the same language” as their clients, and were already part of the community.
• A similar model cited was the Mäori community welfare offi cer model where one person was selected by their whänau to be trained as a ‘health broker’ for the family.
Questions for respondents:
• Do you have any comments on the issues raised in this section?
• What other issues do you think are important to add here?
• What suggestions do you have to help improve the ways that people with chronic conditions are supported?
Element 4: Knowledge management
Main themes■ Interviewees emphasised that the use of decision support is crucial for effective
care for people with chronic conditions.xix
■ It was felt that there should be more standardised technical support for chronic conditions recording and treatment.
■ A need for better sharing of information using technology was highlighted. An example was the idea of having summary clinical information on patients accessible on a central server or a website with password access.
■ Interviewees felt that some rural areas lacked infrastructure for organising clinical information. An example was that some rural nurses did not have computer access.
xix Decision support in the health sector is the use of tools, including information technology, to encourage health practitioners to apply evidence-based practice such as clinical guidelines when working with patients.
35
■ Interviewees wanted better coordination of information on chronic conditions and more accurate data.
■ A need for better information for patients on chronic conditions was also identifi ed. In particular, it was felt that there is a lack of information about medications, and that understanding medications is critical for people with chronic conditions.
Other comments• It was felt that appropriate mechanisms for patient education are needed, and that
pamphlets were not necessarily the best way to get information across.
• Management of mixed messages to patients was viewed as important – for example, advice on healthy eating will vary for people with different conditions.
• Greater use of the Internet was advocated, for example, developing one website with key information for people with chronic conditions in a range of languages.
• Some interviewees questioned the use of only measurable health outcomes in working with people with chronic conditions (eg, blood pressure, glucose levels, weight). They felt that using a narrow set of outcomes could miss the patient’s needs, and that outcomes need to be useful to both the person and the health care team.
Questions for respondents:
• Do you have any comments on the issues raised in this section?
• What other issues do you think are important to add here?
• What suggestions do you have to help improve the ways that people with chronic conditions are supported?
Element 5: Partnerships within health, and between health and the community
Need for leadership and coordination – partnerships within health
Main themes■ Key informants felt there is a lack of national leadership to drive health
improvement in chronic conditions. It was emphasised that expertise in chronic conditions is fragmented across 21 DHBs and more than 70 PHOs.
■ The importance of key individuals with commitment to ‘make it happen’ in terms of improving support for people with chronic conditions was noted.
■ Interviewees felt there should be better coordination across health services, especially between DHBs and PHOs. People felt that work by some PHOs to improve support for people with chronic conditions was happening in isolation.
36
■ Key informants saw the primary/secondary interface as a crucial area for improvement in coordination and integration.
■ People also said that coordination within primary health care could be improved. An example was to ensure that patient information is shared appropriately. Interviewees emphasised the importance of team-based approaches in improving support for people with chronic conditions, such as primary health care teams that include pharmacists, dieticians and social workers.
■ Interviewees said that having a shared vision for supporting people with chronic conditions, and for primary health care overall, is critical.
Other comments• Some practitioners said that a focus on chronic conditions is too narrow, and that
the most important factor is to improve how services (especially primary health care services) are run. Elements such as having a shared vision, a team approach and community involvement were seen as essential.
• The transition from childhood to adulthood was seen as a difficult area – when children with chronic conditions move from paediatrics, where there is a care management system, to adult services where there is not always a structured way of managing care.
• The role of advocacy was emphasised, for example, at one hospital visit the patient, their family and the practice nurse who accompanied them understood the doctor’s explanation differently. Allowing time and space to ask questions was important.
Partnerships between health and the community
Main themes■ Interviewees felt that the transition from hospital to home was an interface that
should be significantly improved.
■ A general lack of coordination between health and community services/NGOs was identified.
■ It was felt that much better coordination across government agencies and NGOs in assisting people with chronic conditions was needed.
■ NGOs were seen as playing a major role in supporting and advocating for people with chronic conditions.
■ Interviewees talked about the role of the church in Pacific communities – both the importance of spiritual beliefs and the potential role of the church in hosting and/or developing initiatives to support people with chronic conditions – such as the introduction of Pacific peoples’ exercise groups in church halls.
■ Interviewees said that housing has a big effect on the health of people with chronic conditions, including overcrowding and the temperature of homes.
37
Other comments• It was felt that NGOs and allied health professionals, such as social workers,
needed more incentives to become part of PHOs.
• It was noted that relationships with other organisations and sectors can play a role in encouraging people to use health services when needed – for example, a person with housing needs may have ongoing contact with a housing worker, who may see that they have chronic health needs and can suggest they go to a health clinic.
• A view was expressed that schools are not good at working with other agencies to help make the transition from school to the community. It was felt that many children with chronic conditions are leaving school without the support of social and employment agencies.
• The interface between health and welfare was highlighted as problematic. For instance, the Work and Income system is based on special benefi ts for illness being temporary, with regular reviews. It was felt this is inappropriate for people with complex and chronic conditions, particularly if severely disabled or in terminal stages.
Questions for respondents:
• Do you have any comments on the issues raised in this section?
• What other issues do you think are important to add here?
• What suggestions do you have to help improve the ways that people with chronic conditions are supported?
38
APPENDIX 1: Where to go for more information
The following is a brief list of key websites and other references to find out more information about supporting people with chronic conditions.
New Zealand
Counties-Manukau chronic care website http://www.cmdhb.org.nz/Counties/Service_Areas/Integrated_Care/IntegratedCareframe.htm
Gribben B. 2003. Implementing integrated care in Counties Manukau, Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 21 February 2003, Vol 116, No 1169.
Ministry of Health’s primary health care website http://www.moh.govt.nz/primaryhealthcare
Ministry of Health’s website on Care Plus http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/wpg_Index/-Primary+Health+Care+Care+Plus
Leading for Outcomes website http://www.leadingforoutcomes.org.nz
International
Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002, Oct 9; 288(14):1775-9.
Centre for Innovation in Primary Care 2003. The future of self-management education for people with chronic conditions; an aid for PCTs and other commissioners, October 2003. (accessed via www.innovate.org.uk)
Chronic care model bibliography (United States) – this website gives a bibliography divided into topics: http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/resources/bibliography/index.html
Department of Health (UK) The Expert Patient; a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st Century (accessed from Department of Health website)
Expert Patients website (UK) http://www.expertpatients.nhs.uk
Kings Fund 2004. Managing Chronic Disease; What can we learn from the US experience?
Lewis R and Dixon J. 2004. Rethinking management of chronic diseases. BMJ 2004;328;220-222.
NHS Expert Patients Programme 2002. Self-management of long-term health conditions; a handbook for people with chronic disease. Bull Publishing Company.
NHS Modernisation Agency (Matrix Research and Consultancy) 2004. Learning distillation of Chronic Disease Management programmes in the UK, July 2004. (accessed via the internet at: http://www.natpact.nhs.uk/uploads/Matrix%20CDM%20Evaluation%20Report.doc)
Wagner EH. 1998. Chronic disease management: What will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Effective Clinical Practice. 1998;1:2-4.
World Health Organization 2002. Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions; Building blocks for action. Global Report - Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, WHO.
World Health Organization Observatory on Health Care for Chronic Conditions
http://www.who.int/chronic_conditions/en/
APPENDIX 2: Initiatives around New Zealand The following tables give examples of initiatives around New Zealand to improve support for people with chronic conditions.
The examples included were given in response to a request to DHBs, PHOs, and NGOs for examples of initiatives aiming to improve how people with chronic conditions are supported. The list contains selected examples from the information received, rather than a comprehensive ‘stocktake’.
Initiatives are divided into five categories:
1. Generic initiatives to improve support for people with chronic conditions (across disease groups)
2. Single-disease initiatives to improve support for people with chronic conditions
3. Initiatives aimed at specific groups within the population
4. Self-management initiatives
5. Workforce-specific initiatives.
The following tables will be updated during 2005 and posted on the NHC’s website (www.nhc.govt.nz). You are invited to send in any other examples with your submission.
39
40
1) G
ener
ic in
itia
tive
s to
impr
ove
supp
ort
for
peop
le w
ith
chro
nic
cond
itio
ns (
acro
ss d
isea
se g
roup
s)
Nam
e of
in
itiat
ive
Org
anis
atio
n/s
invo
lved
Con
tact
per
son
Aim
s/de
scri
ptio
n of
initi
ativ
eW
orkf
orce
type
an
d m
ixEv
alua
tion
Car
e Pl
usM
inis
try o
f H
ealth
– fo
r im
plem
enta
tion
by P
HO
s
Min
istry
of
Hea
lth’s
prim
ary
heal
th c
are
team
Car
e Pl
us p
rovi
des
addi
tiona
l fun
ding
fo
r PH
Os
to g
ive
mor
e co
mpr
ehen
sive
ca
re to
peo
ple
who
use
hig
h le
vels
of
care
or h
ave
high
nee
ds b
ecau
se o
f ch
roni
c co
nditi
ons
or te
rmin
al il
lnes
s.
Prac
tice
nurs
es,
GPs
, alli
ed h
ealth
pr
ofes
sion
als
Inde
pend
ant e
valu
atio
n du
e m
id
2006
. Ini
tial p
roce
ss a
nd fo
rmat
ive
eval
uatio
ns h
ave
been
com
plet
ed
and
are
avai
labl
e at
http
://w
ww
.m
oh.g
ovt.n
z/pr
imar
yhea
lthca
re
Cou
ntie
s M
anuk
au
Chr
onic
Car
e M
anag
emen
t (C
CM
) pr
ogra
mm
e
Cou
ntie
s M
anuk
au D
HB
and
PHO
s
Kim
Arc
us,
Cou
ntie
s M
anuk
au D
HB
Vis
ion
- To
impr
ove
qual
ity o
f life
fo
r peo
ple
with
chr
onic
con
ditio
ns
whi
le re
duci
ng th
e un
nece
ssar
y us
e of
tre
atm
ent s
ervi
ces.
Mis
sion
-To
redu
ce p
rogr
essi
on
and
com
plic
atio
ns in
indi
vidu
als
with
chr
onic
con
ditio
n at
hig
h ris
k by
em
pow
erin
g pa
tient
s an
d th
eir
prim
ary
care
team
s.
Prim
ary
care
in
clud
ing
prac
tices
(G
Ps &
pra
ctic
e nu
rses
, com
mun
ity
heal
th w
orke
rs, a
nd
PHO
s). S
econ
dary
ca
re in
clud
ing
cons
ulta
nts
and
dise
ase
nurs
e sp
ecia
lists
.
Early
pilo
t eva
luat
ions
are
ava
ilabl
e at
ww
w.c
mdh
b.or
g.nz
und
er th
e pr
imar
y he
alth
car
e se
ctio
n.
Nor
thla
nd
Chr
onic
Car
e M
anag
emen
t
Nor
thla
nd
DH
B/M
APO
, N
orth
land
PH
Os,
Cou
ntie
s-M
anuk
au D
HB
Dr N
ick
Cha
mbe
rlain
To re
duce
mor
bidi
ty a
nd m
orta
lity
from
chr
onic
dis
ease
.G
Ps, p
ract
ice
nurs
es, M
äori
prov
ider
nur
ses,
ho
spita
l spe
cial
ists
, ou
treac
h nu
rses
.
Mon
thly
Rep
ortin
g on
Clin
ical
In
dica
tors
as
per C
MD
HB
CC
M
prog
ram
me.
Inde
pend
ent E
valu
atio
n by
CBG
Re
sear
ch.
Chr
onic
Car
e M
anag
emen
t Pr
ogra
mm
e
[Fun
ded
thro
ugh
Car
e Pl
us a
nd
SIA
(Ser
vice
s To
Im
prov
e A
cces
s)
fund
ing]
ProC
are
Net
wor
k N
orth
(PN
N)
Sarm
ila G
ray
Clin
ical
Pr
ogra
mm
es
Man
ager
To p
rovi
de s
truct
ured
car
e to
all
patie
nts
who
hav
e hi
gher
hea
lth
need
s th
an g
ener
al p
opul
atio
n (a
s de
fined
by
the
MO
H) a
nd h
ence
nee
d to
see
thei
r doc
tors
mor
e of
ten.
Eg.
pa
tient
s w
ith D
iabe
tes,
CV
D, C
HF
and
CO
PD.
Spec
ialis
t nur
ses
Tech
nica
l sup
port
from
Pra
ctic
e su
ppor
t fac
ilita
tors
Pr
ojec
t m
anag
emen
t ex
perti
se.
Det
aile
d ev
alua
tion
will
take
pla
ce
late
r in
2005
. Gre
at e
nthu
sias
m
from
sev
eral
pra
ctic
es. A
s of
14t
h Fe
b 20
05, 5
21 p
atie
nts
enro
lled.
Prog
ram
me
first
targ
eted
to
3 pr
actic
es w
ith h
ighe
st n
umbe
r of
high
nee
ds p
atie
nts.
Upt
ake
not
enco
urag
ing,
due
to b
eing
ava
ilabl
e on
ly fo
r hig
h ne
eds
patie
nts.
41
Bay
of P
lent
y D
HB
Chr
onic
C
ondi
tions
and
C
o-m
orbi
dity
pr
ojec
t
Bay
of P
lent
y D
HB
Shar
on K
letc
hko
Lite
ratu
re re
view
and
re
com
men
datio
ns to
man
age
prev
enta
ble
chro
nic
cond
ition
s an
d co
-mor
bidi
ty in
the
Bay
of P
lent
y re
gion
.
Com
mun
ity
Phar
mac
y M
enta
l H
ealth
Med
icin
es
Man
agem
ent
Pilo
t
Lake
s D
HB,
C
omm
unity
M
enta
l Hea
lth
Team
, Lak
es
Com
mun
ity
Phar
mac
y gr
oup.
Euge
ne
Berr
yman
-Kam
pTo
inve
stig
ate
a m
edic
ines
m
anag
emen
t app
roac
h in
men
tal
heal
th to
eva
luat
e th
e us
e of
m
edic
ines
man
agem
ent a
nd h
ow
such
an
appr
oach
will
impr
ove
heal
th
outc
omes
for m
enta
l hea
lth s
ervi
ce
user
s.
Psyc
hiat
rists
, men
tal h
ealth
ke
y-w
orke
rs, c
omm
unity
ph
arm
acis
t.
Pilo
t yet
to b
e ev
alua
ted.
Freq
uent
A
ttend
er C
ase
Coo
rdin
atio
n
Cap
ital &
Coa
st
DH
BPe
ter
Satte
rthw
aite
To p
rovi
de s
ervi
ce c
oord
inat
ion
or c
ase
man
agem
ent t
o se
lect
ed p
eopl
e w
ho
have
freq
uent
hos
pita
l adm
issi
ons.
Two
expe
rienc
ed
com
mun
ity n
urse
s.H
ospi
tal s
ervi
ce u
se e
g O
P,
bed
days
etc
pre
and
pos
t pr
ogra
mm
e.
(Exp
ande
d)
Hos
pita
l in
the
Hom
e (H
ITH
)
Cap
ital &
Coa
st
DH
BPe
ter
Satte
rthw
aite
Cre
ate
10 b
ed v
irtua
l war
d to
pro
vide
ex
pand
ed c
apab
ility
to m
anag
e pe
ople
in th
eir h
ome
rath
er th
an
hosp
ital
Regi
stra
r
HIT
H n
urse
s
Alli
ed h
ealth
pro
fess
iona
ls.
HIT
H b
ed d
ay u
se
Adv
erse
eve
nts
Hos
pita
l adm
issi
ons
avoi
ded.
Pred
ict
Bay
of P
lent
y D
HB,
Auc
klan
d Sc
hool
of
Med
icin
e,
Enig
ma
Publ
ishi
ng
Faye
Rya
nIn
trodu
ctio
n of
a c
ompr
ehen
sive
pr
imar
y ca
re b
ased
scr
eeni
ng a
nd ri
sk
man
agem
ent p
rogr
am th
at p
rovi
des
popu
latio
n sc
reen
ing
and
a ris
k/co
nditi
on m
anag
emen
t pro
gram
me
for a
ll ca
tego
ries
(at r
isk,
ear
ly s
tage
, ad
vanc
ed a
nd e
nd s
tage
nee
d).
Gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
, nu
rsin
g an
d co
mm
unity
w
orke
r wor
kfor
ces.
Mod
ifiab
le C
hron
ic
Con
ditio
ns S
ervi
ces
for
Impl
emen
tatio
n 20
05/0
6.
Popu
latio
n H
ealth
Stra
tegi
c A
ctio
n U
nit
Bay
of P
lent
y D
HB
Faye
Rya
nTo
ens
ure
deliv
ery
of c
ompr
ehen
sive
po
pula
tion
heal
th e
xper
tise
and
prac
tice,
to s
uppo
rt st
rong
Mäo
ri pu
blic
hea
lth a
ctio
n an
d to
reor
ient
he
alth
ser
vice
s to
war
ds p
opul
atio
n he
alth
, par
ticul
arly
prim
ary
and
seco
ndar
y ca
re s
ecto
rs.
Publ
ic a
nd P
opul
atio
n H
ealth
pra
ctiti
oner
s.
Con
tinue
d ov
er...
Nam
e of
in
itiat
ive
Org
anis
atio
n/s
invo
lved
Con
tact
per
son
Aim
s/de
scri
ptio
n of
initi
ativ
eW
orkf
orce
type
an
d m
ixEv
alua
tion
Car
e Pl
usM
inis
try o
f H
ealth
– fo
r im
plem
enta
tion
by P
HO
s
Min
istry
of
Hea
lth’s
prim
ary
heal
th c
are
team
Car
e Pl
us p
rovi
des
addi
tiona
l fun
ding
fo
r PH
Os
to g
ive
mor
e co
mpr
ehen
sive
ca
re to
peo
ple
who
use
hig
h le
vels
of
care
or h
ave
high
nee
ds b
ecau
se o
f ch
roni
c co
nditi
ons
or te
rmin
al il
lnes
s.
Prac
tice
nurs
es,
GPs
, alli
ed h
ealth
pr
ofes
sion
als
Inde
pend
ant e
valu
atio
n du
e m
id
2006
. Ini
tial p
roce
ss a
nd fo
rmat
ive
eval
uatio
ns h
ave
been
com
plet
ed
and
are
avai
labl
e at
http
://w
ww
.m
oh.g
ovt.n
z/pr
imar
yhea
lthca
re
Cou
ntie
s M
anuk
au
Chr
onic
Car
e M
anag
emen
t (C
CM
) pr
ogra
mm
e
Cou
ntie
s M
anuk
au D
HB
and
PHO
s
Kim
Arc
us,
Cou
ntie
s M
anuk
au D
HB
Vis
ion
- To
impr
ove
qual
ity o
f life
fo
r peo
ple
with
chr
onic
con
ditio
ns
whi
le re
duci
ng th
e un
nece
ssar
y us
e of
tre
atm
ent s
ervi
ces.
Mis
sion
-To
redu
ce p
rogr
essi
on
and
com
plic
atio
ns in
indi
vidu
als
with
chr
onic
con
ditio
n at
hig
h ris
k by
em
pow
erin
g pa
tient
s an
d th
eir
prim
ary
care
team
s.
Prim
ary
care
in
clud
ing
prac
tices
(G
Ps &
pra
ctic
e nu
rses
, com
mun
ity
heal
th w
orke
rs, a
nd
PHO
s). S
econ
dary
ca
re in
clud
ing
cons
ulta
nts
and
dise
ase
nurs
e sp
ecia
lists
.
Early
pilo
t eva
luat
ions
are
ava
ilabl
e at
ww
w.c
mdh
b.or
g.nz
und
er th
e pr
imar
y he
alth
car
e se
ctio
n.
Nor
thla
nd
Chr
onic
Car
e M
anag
emen
t
Nor
thla
nd
DH
B/M
APO
, N
orth
land
PH
Os,
Cou
ntie
s-M
anuk
au D
HB
Dr N
ick
Cha
mbe
rlain
To re
duce
mor
bidi
ty a
nd m
orta
lity
from
chr
onic
dis
ease
.G
Ps, p
ract
ice
nurs
es, M
äori
prov
ider
nur
ses,
ho
spita
l spe
cial
ists
, ou
treac
h nu
rses
.
Mon
thly
Rep
ortin
g on
Clin
ical
In
dica
tors
as
per C
MD
HB
CC
M
prog
ram
me.
Inde
pend
ent E
valu
atio
n by
CBG
Re
sear
ch.
Chr
onic
Car
e M
anag
emen
t Pr
ogra
mm
e
[Fun
ded
thro
ugh
Car
e Pl
us a
nd
SIA
(Ser
vice
s To
Im
prov
e A
cces
s)
fund
ing]
ProC
are
Net
wor
k N
orth
(PN
N)
Sarm
ila G
ray
Clin
ical
Pr
ogra
mm
es
Man
ager
To p
rovi
de s
truct
ured
car
e to
all
patie
nts
who
hav
e hi
gher
hea
lth
need
s th
an g
ener
al p
opul
atio
n (a
s de
fined
by
the
MO
H) a
nd h
ence
nee
d to
see
thei
r doc
tors
mor
e of
ten.
Eg.
pa
tient
s w
ith D
iabe
tes,
CV
D, C
HF
and
CO
PD.
Spec
ialis
t nur
ses
Tech
nica
l sup
port
from
Pra
ctic
e su
ppor
t fac
ilita
tors
Pr
ojec
t m
anag
emen
t ex
perti
se.
Det
aile
d ev
alua
tion
will
take
pla
ce
late
r in
2005
. Gre
at e
nthu
sias
m
from
sev
eral
pra
ctic
es. A
s of
14t
h Fe
b 20
05, 5
21 p
atie
nts
enro
lled.
Prog
ram
me
first
targ
eted
to
3 pr
actic
es w
ith h
ighe
st n
umbe
r of
high
nee
ds p
atie
nts.
Upt
ake
not
enco
urag
ing,
due
to b
eing
ava
ilabl
e on
ly fo
r hig
h ne
eds
patie
nts.
42
Nam
e of
in
itiat
ive
Org
anis
atio
n/s
invo
lved
Con
tact
per
son
Aim
s/de
scri
ptio
n of
initi
ativ
eW
orkf
orce
type
an
d m
ixEv
alua
tion
Out
reac
h C
linic
sW
aika
to P
HO
Eric
a A
mon
To im
prov
e ac
cess
to h
ealth
ser
vice
s in
a to
wn
with
no
GP
serv
ice.
GP,
pra
ctic
e nu
rse,
pha
rmac
ist,
com
mun
ity w
orke
r.
Eval
uatio
n of
impr
oved
acc
ess.
Com
plia
nce
Pack
agin
gW
aika
to P
HO
Mic
helle
Bay
ley
To im
prov
e co
mpl
ianc
e, re
duce
ad
vers
e ef
fect
s.Ph
arm
acis
tsBa
sic
eval
uatio
n
Act
ive
Hea
lth
Prog
ram
me
Hea
lthW
EST,
A
uckl
and
Regi
onal
Cou
ncil,
Sp
ort W
aita
kere
, W
aita
kere
City
C
ounc
il, S
PARC
Kay
Lind
ley
Offe
rs a
rang
e of
act
ivity
-bas
ed
optio
ns fo
r peo
ple
who
hav
e ch
roni
c co
nditi
ons
and
are
med
ical
ly
stab
le.
Man
aged
thro
ugh
the
Gre
en
Pres
crip
tion
Sche
me
(GRx
) and
co
mm
unity
gro
ups.
Fitn
ess
lead
ers
Lay
lead
ers
and
supp
orte
rs
Hea
lth p
rom
oter
s.
Num
ber o
f ini
tial a
nd o
ngoi
ng
parti
cipa
nts
Life
sty
le c
hang
es a
chie
ved
and
sust
aine
d es
peci
ally
thro
ugh
GRx
an
d G
Rx s
peci
al p
rogr
amm
es.
Gre
en
Pres
crip
tions
(GRx
)
Spor
t and
Re
crea
tion
NZ
(SPA
RC)
Dia
na O
’Nei
llTo
hel
p in
activ
e pe
ople
inco
rpor
ate
activ
ity in
to th
eir l
ives
thro
ugh
refe
rral
s fro
m p
rimar
y ca
re h
ealth
pr
ofes
sion
als
and
supp
ort f
rom
re
gion
al p
erso
nnel
.
Regi
onal
Spo
rts
Trus
ts
PHO
s.
Eval
uatio
ns h
ave
show
n ef
fect
iven
ess
and
cost
-effe
ctiv
enes
s of
GRx
in in
crea
sing
phy
sica
l ac
tivity
and
impr
ovin
g qu
ality
of l
ife
over
12
mon
ths.
GRx
has
pot
entia
l to
hav
e si
gnifi
cant
eco
nom
ic im
pact
th
roug
h re
duct
ion
in C
VD
and
oth
er
mor
bidi
ty a
nd m
orta
lity.
May
200
4 pa
tient
sur
vey.
Nov
embe
r 200
4 G
P su
rvey
(bot
h av
aila
ble
on re
ques
t).
... c
ontin
ued
from
pre
viou
s pa
ge
43
2) S
ingl
e-di
seas
e in
itia
tive
s to
impr
ove
supp
ort
for
peop
le w
ith
chro
nic
cond
itio
ns
Nam
e of
in
itiat
ive
Org
anis
atio
n/s
invo
lved
Con
tact
per
son
Aim
s/de
scri
ptio
n of
initi
ativ
eW
orkf
orce
type
an
d m
ixEv
alua
tion
Wai
rara
pa D
HB
Chr
onic
Dis
ease
M
anag
emen
t D
iabe
tes
Proj
ect
Wai
rara
pa D
HB
The
Doc
tors
M
aste
rton
Dav
id N
ixon
, Th
e D
octo
rs
Mas
terto
n
To im
prov
e ou
tcom
es fo
r a h
igh-
risk
popu
latio
n, d
evel
oped
from
the
Cou
ntie
s-M
anuk
au c
hron
ic c
are
man
agem
ent m
odel
.
Dia
bete
s le
ad
GP
and
prac
tice
nurs
e, d
iabe
tes
nurs
e ed
ucat
or,
Mäo
ri he
alth
car
e w
orke
rs, s
uppo
rt fro
m a
spe
cial
ist.
Impr
ovem
ents
in a
rang
e of
in
dica
tors
eg.
per
cent
age
of p
atie
nts
on c
hole
ster
ol-lo
wer
ing
drug
s an
d de
crea
ses
in b
lood
pre
ssur
e.
Impr
ovem
ents
sim
ilar i
n bo
th M
äori
and
Pake
ha p
opul
atio
ns.
Dia
bete
s Sh
ared
-C
are
Car
d Pr
ojec
tW
aira
rapa
DH
B,
Wai
rara
pa
Loca
lity
Dia
bete
s Te
am,
The
Doc
tors
M
aste
rton
Dav
id N
ixon
, Th
e D
octo
rs
Mas
terto
n
To fa
cilit
ate
chan
ge a
way
from
doc
tor-
cent
red
care
tow
ards
pat
ient
-cen
tred
care
with
a v
iew
to im
prov
ing
patie
nt
unde
rsta
ndin
g an
d cl
inic
al o
utco
mes
.
A p
atie
nt-h
eld
card
to re
cord
targ
et,
resu
lts, a
nd a
ppoi
ntm
ents
.
Mul
ti-di
scip
linar
y te
am
Prim
ary
Car
e IT
So
lutio
ns (I
T fo
r ca
rdio
vasc
ular
di
seas
e ris
k as
sess
men
t)
The
Doc
tors
M
aste
rton,
JESS
Sy
stem
s Lt
d
Dav
id N
ixon
, Th
e D
octo
rs
Mas
terto
n
Kevi
n Pr
esto
n,
JESS
Sys
tem
s Lt
d
Dev
elop
men
t of c
ompu
ting
softw
are
able
to e
xtra
ct d
ata
from
the
data
base
of
var
ious
PM
S sy
stem
s an
d ca
lcul
ate
risk
of C
VD
. To
ena
ble
GPs
to
quan
tify
the
CV
D ri
sk o
f ind
ivid
uals
or
pop
ulat
ions
– to
ena
ble
GPs
to
deve
lop
stra
tegi
es ta
rget
ed a
t hig
her
risk
indi
vidu
als
or p
opul
atio
ns.
Con
tinue
d ov
er...
44
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of in
itiat
ive
Wor
kfor
ce ty
pe
and
mix
Eval
uatio
n
Supp
orte
d di
scha
rge
for
CO
RD
Sout
hern
DH
B m
edic
al in
patie
nt a
nd
com
mun
ity a
llied
he
alth
ser
vice
s
Sue
McN
eill
To m
inim
ise
read
mis
sion
s fo
r pa
tient
s w
ith C
ORD
.
To im
prov
e he
alth
out
com
es a
nd
dise
ase
man
agem
ent.
Alli
ed h
ealth
sta
ff co
ordi
nato
r
Inpa
tient
sta
ff.
Dat
a fo
r 200
2 sh
owed
a d
ecre
ase
in
adm
issi
ons,
read
mis
sion
s an
d be
d ni
ghts
use
d fo
r pat
ient
s w
ith C
ORD
.
Dat
a fo
r 200
3 sh
owed
an
incr
ease
in
adm
issi
ons,
par
ticul
arly
in th
e fir
st 3
mon
ths
of th
e w
inte
r per
iod.
Ra
te o
f rea
dmis
sion
, bed
nig
hts
and
aver
age
leng
th o
f sta
y us
ed
rem
aine
d lo
wer
than
prio
r to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
prog
ram
me.
Dia
bete
s an
d C
ardi
ovas
cula
r Sc
reen
ing
Nor
thla
nd D
HB/
MA
PO,
Nor
thla
nd G
ener
al
Prac
tices
,
Kia
Ora
Nga
tiwai
M
äori
Prov
ider
, N
orth
land
Pat
holo
gy
Labo
rato
ry, E
nigm
a Pu
blis
hing
(Pre
dict
)
Dr N
ick
Cha
mbe
rlain
To re
duce
mor
bidi
ty fr
om d
iabe
tes
thro
ugh
early
det
ectio
n.G
Ps, p
ract
ice
nurs
es, M
äori
prov
ider
nur
ses.
Mon
thly
repo
rting
of a
ll re
sults
.
Spre
adsh
eet f
orm
at v
ia la
bora
tory
.
Shar
ed c
are
of
patie
nts
livin
g w
ith a
nd
man
agin
g ch
roni
c he
patit
is C
Can
terb
ury
Com
mun
ity
PHO
, Uni
on a
nd
Com
mun
ity H
ealth
C
entre
, Hep
atiti
s C
Re
sour
ce C
entre
Bill
Jang
Man
ager
Hep
atiti
s C
Re
sour
ce
Cen
tre, T
e W
aipo
unam
u
To d
evel
op b
ette
r ser
vice
s to
im
prov
e ac
cess
(man
y pe
ople
di
agno
sed
with
hep
atiti
s C
are
no
t hig
h us
ers
of p
rimar
y he
alth
se
rvic
es).
Soci
al w
orke
r, co
unse
llor,
GPs
, pr
actic
e nu
rses
, pr
actic
e m
anag
er.
Plan
ned
eval
uatio
n fo
r a y
ear’s
tim
e.
Com
preh
ensi
ve
mod
el o
f stro
ke
serv
ices
(CM
oSS)
Stro
ke F
ound
atio
n N
Z In
cBr
ian
O’G
rady
1. T
he re
duct
ion
of th
e in
cide
nce
of s
troke
2. T
he im
prov
emen
t of s
troke
se
rvic
es d
eliv
ery
natio
nally
w
ith b
ette
r clin
ical
and
soc
ial
outc
omes
.
Clin
icia
ns w
ith a
n in
tere
st a
nd
expe
rtise
in s
troke
. M
edic
al D
irect
ors
of th
e St
roke
Fo
unda
tion
and
the
CEO
.
21 in
tegr
ated
pro
ject
s w
ithin
the
thre
e st
rate
gies
bei
ng p
rogr
essi
vely
im
plem
ente
d. T
his
incl
udes
the
esta
blis
hmen
t of o
rgan
ised
stro
ke
serv
ices
.
... c
ontin
ued
from
pre
viou
s pa
ge
45
Rong
oa M
äori
Hua
nga
Ti H
auor
a
Te A
hure
wa
Te K
oper
e
Te R
apu
ora
Te W
hare
Ora
nga
Hin
enga
kau
Mar
ilyn
Vre
ede
Col
in R
icha
rds
Jane
t Roc
kwel
l
Faith
McL
achl
an
Piki
Tai
aroa
Piki
Tai
aroa
To re
duce
sym
ptom
s an
d to
en
cour
age
self
awar
enes
s an
d se
lf m
anag
emen
t of a
sthm
a sy
mpt
oms.
1 FT
E
Tohu
nga
Vol
unte
ers.
Ver
bal F
eedb
ack
Form
al Q
uarte
rly re
ports
Site
Vis
its –
2 m
onth
ly.
Ast
hma
educ
atio
n (3
+ Pl
an)
Ast
hma
Auc
klan
d
Jane
tte R
eid
(chi
ldre
n’s
asth
ma
educ
atio
n)
Ann
Whe
at
(col
lege
ast
hma
educ
atio
n)
Mar
li M
erho
ye
(trai
ning
for G
Ps
and
prac
tice
nurs
es)
To in
crea
se q
ualit
y of
life
issu
es in
ch
ildre
n w
ho h
ave
asth
ma.
To re
duce
hos
pita
l adm
issi
on ra
tes.
To b
ridge
the
gap
betw
een
prim
ary
sect
or a
nd s
econ
dary
se
ctor
to p
rodu
ce s
eam
less
he
alth
care
.
Refe
rral
s fro
m S
tars
hip
hosp
ital
offe
red
hom
e vi
sits
, als
o co
llege
st
uden
ts re
ceiv
e on
e-to
-one
as
thm
a ed
ucat
ion
at c
olle
ge)
Als
o tra
inin
g fo
r GPs
and
pr
actic
e nu
rses
in a
sthm
a an
d its
m
anag
emen
t
Ast
hma
nurs
e ed
ucat
ors.
Patie
nt s
atis
fact
ion
form
s.
Redu
ctio
n in
acu
te a
dmis
sion
s to
ho
spita
l (w
ill ta
ke m
ore
time
to
eval
uate
redu
ctio
n in
adm
issi
ons)
.
Incr
ease
d kn
owle
dge
of a
sthm
a.
Feed
back
from
par
ents
and
ca
regi
vers
is p
ositi
ve.
Qua
lity
of L
ife
Gra
nts
Oth
er e
xam
ples
pr
ovid
ed b
y th
e C
ystic
Fib
rosi
s A
ssoc
iatio
n w
ere
the
Info
rmat
ion
Libr
ary,
Fam
ily
Supp
ort W
orke
r (a
soc
ial w
ork
serv
ice)
and
Fa
mily
Edu
catio
n Pr
ogra
mm
e.
Cys
tic F
ibro
sis
Ass
ocia
tion
of N
ew
Zeal
and
Kate
Rus
sell
To a
ssis
t with
ext
ra c
osts
as
soci
ated
with
impr
ovin
g qu
ality
of
life
. The
se in
clud
e su
b se
ts
– ph
ysic
al a
ctiv
ity g
rant
s, te
rtiar
y gr
ants
, ass
ista
nce
with
med
ical
, ho
spita
l and
pre
scrip
tion
cost
s.
Nat
iona
l offi
ce
and
volu
ntee
r of
fice
hold
ers
at
loca
l lev
el.
Year
ly s
atis
fact
ion
surv
ey.
Con
tinue
d ov
er...
46
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of in
itiat
ive
Wor
kfor
ce ty
pe a
nd m
ixEv
alua
tion
Kidn
ey S
ocie
ty
dial
ysis
hou
seA
uckl
and
Dis
trict
Ki
dney
Soc
iety
and
C
ount
ies
Man
ukau
D
HB
rena
l dia
lysi
s se
rvic
e
Nor
a V
an d
er
Schr
ieck
(Kid
ney
Soci
ety)
Dav
e Li
lley
(Mid
dlem
ore
rena
l ser
vice
)
To p
rom
ote
hom
e ha
emod
ialy
sis
as a
way
for
rena
l pat
ient
s to
man
age
thei
r ow
n he
alth
at h
ome,
and
to
faci
litat
e tra
nsiti
on to
hom
e ha
emod
ialy
sis
by p
rovi
ding
an
unst
affe
d ho
me-
like
com
mun
ity
faci
lity
whe
re p
eopl
e ca
n di
alys
e.
Uns
taffe
d co
mm
unity
ho
use
man
aged
by
off-
site
Kid
ney
Soci
ety
offic
e st
aff.
Patie
nts
com
e an
d go
to
do
thei
r dia
lysi
s, th
ree
times
a w
eek
or a
ltern
ate
days
. D
ialy
sis
equi
pmen
t/su
pplie
s an
d m
edic
al
back
up m
anag
ed b
y M
iddl
emor
e re
nal a
s pa
rt of
hom
e ha
emod
ialy
sis
prog
ram
me.
Form
al e
valu
atio
n - n
ot y
et
carr
ied
out.
Info
rmal
ly, t
he
hous
e is
runn
ing
clos
e to
ca
paci
ty (1
0 pa
tient
s) m
ost o
f th
e tim
e, is
kee
ping
pat
ient
s ou
t of h
ospi
tal d
ialy
sis
units
an
d pa
tient
sat
isfa
ctio
n is
hi
gh. S
ome
peop
le h
ave
take
n, o
r are
pla
nnin
g to
ta
ke, a
mac
hine
to d
ialy
se a
t ho
me.
Vis
ion
New
Ze
alan
dRo
yal N
ew Z
eala
nd
Foun
datio
n of
the
Blin
d, R
etin
a N
ew
Zeal
and,
Dia
bete
s N
ew Z
eala
nd, T
he
Tong
an H
ealth
So
ciet
y, S
ave
Sigh
t So
ciet
y, C
entre
fo
r Citi
zens
hip
Educ
atio
n
Chr
is In
glis
, D
ivis
iona
l M
anag
er,
Blin
dnes
s A
war
enes
s an
d Pr
even
tion,
Ro
yal N
ew
Zeal
and
Foun
datio
n of
th
e Bl
ind
To in
crea
se th
e po
pula
tion’
s kn
owle
dge
abou
t blin
dnes
s, to
pr
omot
e bl
indn
ess
prev
entio
n an
d re
duce
pre
vent
able
bl
indn
ess
in N
ew Z
eala
nd.
Publ
ic h
ealth
spe
cial
ists
, m
edic
al d
octo
rs (G
Ps,
opht
halm
olog
ists
, op
tom
etris
ts),
blin
dnes
s co
nsum
er o
rgan
isat
ions
. W
orkf
orce
dep
ends
on
the
proj
ect d
one.
Eval
uatio
n m
etho
ds to
be
deve
lope
d an
d ta
ilore
d to
sui
t ind
ivid
ual p
roje
cts
unde
rtake
n by
Vis
ion
New
Ze
alan
d.
Hea
rt G
uide
A
otea
roa
Nat
iona
l Hea
rt Fo
unda
tion
(NH
F) a
nd T
e H
otu
Man
awa
Mäo
ri (T
HM
M) i
n pa
rtner
ship
NH
F St
epha
nie
Mun
cast
er
THM
M
Dr G
eorg
e G
ray
To im
prov
e ac
cess
to a
nd
com
plet
ion
of p
hase
II c
ardi
ac
reha
bilit
atio
n fo
r all
peop
le
expe
rienc
ing
hear
t eve
nt
by p
rovi
ding
a h
ome
base
d pr
ogra
m.
Mod
ify ri
sk fa
ctor
s an
d im
prov
es q
ualit
y of
life
.
Targ
eted
to p
eopl
e w
ho a
re
pres
ently
dis
enfra
nchi
sed
by th
e pr
esen
t mod
el o
f car
e.
Prog
ram
faci
litat
or- e
ither
a
Nur
se o
r hea
lth c
are
wor
ker.
Car
diac
car
e st
aff
with
in h
ospi
tal t
o id
entif
y pe
ople
who
will
use
this
se
rvic
e an
d lia
ise
with
pr
ogra
m fa
cilit
ator
.
Gen
eral
pra
ctic
e st
aff
liais
on w
ith fa
cilit
ator
for
ongo
ing
care
.
Aud
it pr
oces
s de
sign
ed to
as
sess
the
impa
ct o
n th
is
prog
ram
with
in p
ilot s
ites
prio
r to
natio
nal r
oll o
ut.
Dem
ogra
phic
det
ails
, ref
erra
l to
and
com
plet
ion
of c
ardi
ac
reha
bilit
atio
n, ri
sk fa
ctor
s m
odifi
catio
n an
d qu
ality
of
life
will
be
mea
sure
d.
... c
ontin
ued
from
pre
viou
s pa
ge
47
Hea
rt Fa
ilure
Proc
are:
Auc
klan
d D
HB:
Pete
r Did
sbur
y
Fellb
rook
M
edic
al C
entre
Vic
toria
Wils
on
Car
diac
Nur
se
Spec
ialis
t
Proc
are
Impr
oved
man
agem
ent o
f he
art f
ailu
re a
nd re
duct
ions
in
adm
issi
ons.
PHO
/IPA
and
DH
B.Fo
rmat
ive
and
outc
ome
eval
uatio
n.
Car
diov
ascu
lar
Proj
ect
Pan
Wai
tem
ata
DH
BD
iana
Nor
thRe
duce
the
impa
ct a
nd b
urde
n of
car
diov
ascu
lar d
isea
se a
nd
redu
ce in
equa
litie
s.
Sub
proj
ects
incl
ude
1. N
ew In
form
atio
n Sy
stem
for
CV
D a
nd D
iabe
tes
2. E
lect
roni
c D
ecis
ion
Supp
ort
for C
VD
, inc
lude
s M
äori
eval
uatio
n of
effe
ctiv
enes
s.3.
Car
diac
Reh
ab p
roje
ct –
the
Hea
rt M
anua
l pilo
t. In
clud
es
a M
äori
and
non-
Mäo
ri pi
lot.
4. P
acifi
c pe
ople
s pr
ojec
t for
C
VD
5. Q
ualit
y U
se o
f Med
icin
es fo
r C
VD
Publ
ic H
ealth
Loca
l Sch
ools
Hos
pita
l
Prim
ary
Car
e/PH
Os
NG
Os.
Mul
tiple
use
d in
clud
ing
quan
titat
ive
and
qual
itativ
e.
Clo
se a
ssoc
iatio
n w
ith th
e U
nive
rsity
and
AU
T fo
r som
e pr
ojec
ts.
Car
diov
ascu
lar
Gui
delin
e Im
plem
enta
tion
proj
ect
Hea
lthW
EST
PHO
an
d pr
actic
esEn
igm
a (P
RED
ICT)
NZ
Gui
delin
es
Gro
upG
reen
Pre
scrip
tion/
SPA
RC
Adr
iann
e A
llen
To id
entif
y, tr
eat a
nd p
rovi
de
supp
ort f
or li
fest
yle
chan
ge fo
r hi
gh n
eeds
peo
ple
enro
lled
in
Hea
lthW
EST
prac
tices
who
are
in
NZ
Gui
delin
es ri
sk ta
rget
gr
oup.
Gen
eral
Pra
ctiti
oner
s,
Prac
tice
Nur
ses,
H
ealth
WES
T Pr
ojec
t sta
ff,
Enig
ma
(PRE
DIC
T)
Gre
en P
resc
riptio
n an
d co
mm
unity
wor
kers
.
Num
ber o
f peo
ple
parti
cipa
ting
Long
er te
rm im
pact
mea
sure
s to
be
arra
nged
.
Car
diov
ascu
lar
Dis
ease
Sout
h Li
nk H
ealth
Ther
esa
McC
lena
ghan
To im
prov
e ou
tcom
es fo
r pa
tient
s w
ith c
ardi
ovas
cula
r di
seas
e.
Gen
eral
pra
ctic
e st
aff
IPA
adm
inis
trativ
e st
aff.
Ong
oing
qua
lity
impr
ovem
ent u
sing
clin
ical
an
d tre
atm
ent e
valu
atio
nsFe
edba
ck d
urin
g pa
tient
pr
actic
e co
nsul
tatio
ns
Con
tinue
d ov
er...
48
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of in
itiat
ive
Wor
kfor
ce ty
pe a
nd m
ixEv
alua
tion
Dia
bete
s w
atch
(e
nhan
ced
“Get
Che
cked
” pr
ogra
mm
e)
Sout
h Li
nk H
ealth
Erin
a Re
wi
To im
prov
e ou
tcom
es fo
r dia
betic
pa
tient
s w
ith e
leva
ted
HbA
1c
leve
ls.
Gen
eral
pra
ctic
e st
aff
IPA
adm
inis
trativ
e st
aff.
Ong
oing
qua
lity
impr
ovem
ent u
sing
clin
ical
an
d tre
atm
ent e
valu
atio
ns.
Feed
back
dur
ing
patie
nt
prac
tice
cons
ulta
tions
Dia
bete
s Ey
e Sc
reen
ing
Wes
t Auc
klan
d PH
Os
Wai
tem
ata
DH
B
Com
mun
ity
Org
anis
atio
ns/v
enue
s
Pasi
fika
Fono
Luck
ens
Rd M
arae
Chr
istin
e Sm
ithPr
ovid
es m
obile
retin
al s
cree
ning
se
rvic
e an
d di
abet
es e
duca
tion
oppo
rtuni
ties.
Retin
al p
hoto
scre
enin
g te
chni
cian
Regi
ster
ed n
urse
(tra
inin
g as
dia
bete
s nu
rse)
TBA
com
mun
ity h
ealth
w
orke
rs.
Num
ber s
cree
ned
and
ethn
icity
DN
A ra
te
Refe
rral
s/Li
nkag
es to
pr
actic
es
Con
sum
er fe
edba
ck.
Let’s
Bea
t Dia
bete
sC
ount
ies
Man
ukau
D
HB
and
partn
er
orga
nisa
tions
Am
anda
D
unlo
p,
CM
DH
B
To b
eat d
iabe
tes
by ta
king
a
“who
le s
ocie
ty-w
hole
life
cycl
e-w
hole
fam
ily a
ppro
ach”
to th
e di
seas
e.
Mul
ti-se
ctor
pa
rtici
patio
n.Se
e w
ww
.cm
dhb.
org.
nz/
Cou
ntie
s/Le
ts B
eat D
iabe
tes.
Dia
bete
s-Pl
an.h
tm.
Dia
bete
s Pr
ojec
tPa
n W
aite
mat
a D
HB
Redu
ce th
e im
pact
and
bur
den
of
diab
etes
and
redu
ce in
equa
litie
s
Subp
roje
cts:
1. R
etin
al E
ye S
cree
ning
pro
ject
2. S
elf M
anag
emen
t Cou
rses
pr
ojec
t
3. E
mpo
wer
ing
prim
ary
care
team
s pr
ojec
t
4. In
divi
dual
ly ta
ilore
d su
ppor
t and
op
tions
for e
xtra
hel
p (e
stim
ated
at
20%
of p
eopl
e) p
roje
ct
5. D
evel
opm
ent o
f ser
vice
s ap
prop
riate
for M
äori
and
othe
r et
hnic
min
ority
peo
ples
pro
ject
6. Q
ualit
y im
prov
emen
t wor
k w
ith
high
nee
d pr
actic
es p
roje
ct.
Publ
ic h
ealth
Hos
pita
l
Prim
ary
care
/PH
Os
NG
Os
Qua
litat
ive
asse
ssm
ent.
... c
ontin
ued
from
pre
viou
s pa
ge
49
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of in
itiat
ive
Wor
kfor
ce ty
pe a
nd m
ixEv
alua
tion
Dia
bete
s w
atch
(e
nhan
ced
“Get
Che
cked
” pr
ogra
mm
e)
Sout
h Li
nk H
ealth
Erin
a Re
wi
To im
prov
e ou
tcom
es fo
r dia
betic
pa
tient
s w
ith e
leva
ted
HbA
1c
leve
ls.
Gen
eral
pra
ctic
e st
aff
IPA
adm
inis
trativ
e st
aff.
Ong
oing
qua
lity
impr
ovem
ent u
sing
clin
ical
an
d tre
atm
ent e
valu
atio
ns.
Feed
back
dur
ing
patie
nt
prac
tice
cons
ulta
tions
Dia
bete
s Ey
e Sc
reen
ing
Wes
t Auc
klan
d PH
Os
Wai
tem
ata
DH
B
Com
mun
ity
Org
anis
atio
ns/v
enue
s
Pasi
fika
Fono
Luck
ens
Rd M
arae
Chr
istin
e Sm
ithPr
ovid
es m
obile
retin
al s
cree
ning
se
rvic
e an
d di
abet
es e
duca
tion
oppo
rtuni
ties.
Retin
al p
hoto
scre
enin
g te
chni
cian
Regi
ster
ed n
urse
(tra
inin
g as
dia
bete
s nu
rse)
TBA
com
mun
ity h
ealth
w
orke
rs.
Num
ber s
cree
ned
and
ethn
icity
DN
A ra
te
Refe
rral
s/Li
nkag
es to
pr
actic
es
Con
sum
er fe
edba
ck.
Let’s
Bea
t Dia
bete
sC
ount
ies
Man
ukau
D
HB
and
partn
er
orga
nisa
tions
Am
anda
D
unlo
p,
CM
DH
B
To b
eat d
iabe
tes
by ta
king
a
“who
le s
ocie
ty-w
hole
life
cycl
e-w
hole
fam
ily a
ppro
ach”
to th
e di
seas
e.
Mul
ti-se
ctor
pa
rtici
patio
n.Se
e w
ww
.cm
dhb.
org.
nz/
Cou
ntie
s/Le
ts B
eat D
iabe
tes.
Dia
bete
s-Pl
an.h
tm.
Dia
bete
s Pr
ojec
tPa
n W
aite
mat
a D
HB
Redu
ce th
e im
pact
and
bur
den
of
diab
etes
and
redu
ce in
equa
litie
s
Subp
roje
cts:
1. R
etin
al E
ye S
cree
ning
pro
ject
2. S
elf M
anag
emen
t Cou
rses
pr
ojec
t
3. E
mpo
wer
ing
prim
ary
care
team
s pr
ojec
t
4. In
divi
dual
ly ta
ilore
d su
ppor
t and
op
tions
for e
xtra
hel
p (e
stim
ated
at
20%
of p
eopl
e) p
roje
ct
5. D
evel
opm
ent o
f ser
vice
s ap
prop
riate
for M
äori
and
othe
r et
hnic
min
ority
peo
ples
pro
ject
6. Q
ualit
y im
prov
emen
t wor
k w
ith
high
nee
d pr
actic
es p
roje
ct.
Publ
ic h
ealth
Hos
pita
l
Prim
ary
care
/PH
Os
NG
Os
Qua
litat
ive
asse
ssm
ent.
Dia
bete
s Ed
ucat
ion
Pilo
t (E
PIC
)
Hea
lth W
EST
(Wai
tem
ata
DH
B no
w ta
king
app
roac
h up
with
long
er te
rm
view
of r
epla
cing
cu
rren
t edu
catio
n fo
r pe
ople
with
new
ly
diag
nose
d Ty
pe tw
o di
abet
es)
Chr
istin
e Sm
ith
Lisa
John
son
To in
crea
se a
cces
s to
effe
ctiv
e di
abet
es a
nd s
elf-m
anag
emen
t ed
ucat
ion
for h
igh
need
s pe
ople
liv
ing
with
Typ
e 2
Dia
bete
s th
roug
h fre
e co
mm
unity
and
pra
ctic
e se
lf-m
anag
emen
t dia
bete
s ed
ucat
ion
and
train
ing
for h
igh
need
s pe
ople
w
ith d
iabe
tes.
(EPI
C p
rogr
amm
e).
Stru
ctur
ed 6
-wee
k co
urse
.
Dia
bete
s N
urse
N
umbe
r acc
essi
ng s
elf
man
agem
ent d
iabe
tes
educ
atio
n co
mpa
red
to
curr
ent s
yste
m
Long
-term
eva
luat
ion
of
patie
nt s
elf-c
ompe
tenc
e an
d cl
inic
al o
utco
mes
.
Dia
bete
s su
ppor
t fo
r hig
h ne
eds
adol
esce
nts
(Mäo
ri Pa
cific
Qui
ntile
5)
Hea
lthW
EST
PHO
Wes
t Kid
s
Futu
res
Wes
t
Tris
h La
wth
erTo
incr
ease
acc
ess
to e
ffect
ive
care
for i
ndiv
idua
l hig
h ne
eds
adol
esce
nts
livin
g w
ith d
iabe
tes
unab
le to
acc
ess
appr
opria
te c
are
from
mai
nstre
am s
ervi
ces.
Yout
h H
ealth
Spe
cial
ist
Paed
iatri
cian
Dia
bete
s N
urse
Spe
cial
ist
wor
king
in a
dvan
ced
self
man
agem
ent s
cope
of
prac
tice.
Indi
vidu
al c
linic
al a
nd
lifes
tyle
out
com
es.
Nat
iona
l M
etab
olic
Ser
vice
Fu
ndin
g is
nat
iona
l vi
a th
e na
tiona
l te
stin
g ce
ntre
and
St
arsh
ip, b
ut th
ere
is n
o m
echa
nism
fo
r var
iatio
n du
e to
th
e na
ture
of D
HB
fund
ing.
Dia
nne
Web
ster
Impr
ovem
ent o
f car
e fo
r peo
ple
with
inhe
rited
dis
orde
rs o
f m
etab
olis
m.
The
Nat
iona
l M
etab
olic
Ser
vice
aim
s to
impr
ove
diag
nosi
s an
d tre
atm
ent o
f peo
ple
with
inbo
rn e
rror
s of
met
abol
ism
.
Met
abol
ic p
hysi
cian
, cl
inic
al n
urse
spe
cial
ist
and
diet
itian
. Bi
oche
mic
al g
enet
ics
labo
rato
ry R
egio
nal
phys
icia
ns a
nd d
ietit
ians
.
Info
rmal
Rong
oa M
äori
Miri
miri
Back
Pai
n
Arth
ritis
Ti H
auor
a
Te A
hure
wa
Te K
oper
e
Te R
apu
ora
Te W
hare
Ora
nga
Hin
enga
kau
Mar
ilyn
Vre
ede
Col
in R
icha
rds
Jane
t Roc
kwel
l
Faith
McL
achl
an
Piki
Tai
aroa
Piki
Tai
aroa
To re
duce
sym
ptom
s
To e
ncou
rage
sel
f car
e an
d m
anag
emen
t
To re
lieve
pai
n
1 FT
E
Tohu
nga
Vol
unte
ers
Ver
bal F
eedb
ack
Form
al Q
uarte
rly re
ports
Site
Vis
its b
y Ta
umat
a H
auor
a 2
mon
thly
.
Con
tinue
d ov
er...
50
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of in
itiat
ive
Wor
kfor
ce ty
pe a
nd m
ixEv
alua
tion
Rong
oa M
äori
Mat
e H
uka
Ti H
auor
a
Te A
hure
wa
Te K
oper
e
Te R
apu
ora
Te W
hare
Ora
nga
Hin
enga
kau
Mar
ilyn
Vre
ede
Col
in R
icha
rds
Jane
t Roc
kwel
l
Faith
McL
achl
an
Piki
Tai
aroa
Piki
Tai
aroa
To in
crea
se s
elf a
war
enes
s
To p
reve
nt h
ospi
talis
atio
ns
To e
ncou
rage
sel
f car
e
1 FT
E
Tohu
nga
Vol
unte
ers
Ver
bal F
eedb
ack
Form
al Q
uarte
rly re
ports
Site
Vis
its 2
mon
thly
.
Car
ePlu
s
Enha
nced
Pa
lliat
ive
Car
e Su
ppor
t Pr
ogra
mm
e
Sout
h Li
nk H
ealth
as
Man
agem
ent S
ervi
ces
Org
anis
atio
n
Prim
ary
Hea
lth
Org
anis
atio
ns
Sara
h Ke
nned
yTo
impr
ove
qual
ity o
f life
for
patie
nts
deem
ed to
be
term
inal
ly
ill.
Car
ePlu
s C
oord
inat
ors,
G
ener
al P
ract
ice
Staf
f, IP
A/M
SO A
dmin
istra
tive
Staf
f
Surv
ey; P
artic
ipan
t fe
edba
ck a
nd re
view
.
Te W
ai O
Ro
na: D
iabe
tes
Prev
entio
n St
rate
gy
30 o
rgan
isat
ions
in
clud
ing
Wai
kato
and
La
kes
DH
Bs, r
esea
rche
rs
from
uni
vers
ities
in
Auc
klan
d an
d W
aika
to,
Spor
t Wai
kato
, priv
ate
labo
rato
ries,
and
oth
ers.
A
ll fiv
e Iw
i and
ten
Mäo
ri he
alth
pro
vide
rs.
Dav
id S
imm
ons
To ta
rget
Wai
kato
Mäo
ri m
ost
at ri
sk o
f dev
elop
ing
Type
2
diab
etes
ove
r a tw
o-an
d-a-
half
year
per
iod.
By
incr
easi
ng a
ctiv
ity
and
impr
ovin
g di
et, t
he a
im is
to
redu
ce th
e nu
mbe
r of n
ew c
ases
of
diab
etes
in th
at p
opul
atio
n by
35%
du
ring
the
perio
d of
the
stud
y.
Mäo
ri C
omm
unity
H
ealth
Wor
kers
, Nur
ses,
ac
adem
ics,
labo
rato
ry
wor
kers
etc
3 yr
rand
omis
ed tr
ial
Wai
kato
DH
B in
itiat
ive
with
W
ork
and
Inco
me
for p
eopl
e in
acu
te
men
tal h
ealth
uni
t
Men
tal H
ealth
and
A
ddic
tions
Ser
vice
,
Wor
k &
Inco
me
NZ
Initi
ativ
e m
ade
poss
ible
th
roug
h th
e W
ork
&
Inco
me
enha
nced
ca
se m
anag
emen
t for
Si
ckne
ss a
nd In
valid
s Be
nefit
s fu
ndin
g.
Chr
is H
arris
To e
nsur
e co
ntin
uatio
n (o
r in
itiat
ion)
of fi
nanc
ial s
uppo
rt w
hile
pe
ople
are
in th
e ac
ute
men
tal
heal
th u
nit,
ther
eby
redu
cing
stre
ss
for t
he c
lient
, and
the
likel
ihoo
d of
read
mis
sion
for s
ocia
l rea
sons
. W
ork
& In
com
e C
ase
man
ager
s ar
e ba
sed
on th
e ho
spita
l cam
pus
and
visi
t clie
nts
in th
e un
it to
add
ress
be
nefit
and
em
ploy
men
t iss
ues.
Clie
nts
MH
nur
ses,
MH
OTs
,
MH
soc
ial w
orke
rs
W&
I cas
e m
anag
ers,
Supp
orte
d em
ploy
men
t ag
enci
es.
Eval
uate
d th
roug
h W
ork
and
Inco
me
enha
nced
ca
se m
anag
emen
t in
itiat
ive.
... c
ontin
ued
from
pre
viou
s pa
ge
51
Hea
lthy
Hea
rts
Act
ion
Plan
ProC
are,
Rot
ary
Clu
b of
O
ne T
ree
Hill
and
the
Hea
rt Fo
unda
tion.
Stew
art E
adie
Car
diac
Car
e M
anag
er
Nat
iona
l Hea
rt Fo
unda
tion
Enco
urag
es ‘a
t ris
k’ a
dults
to v
isit
thei
r loc
al d
octo
r or p
ract
ice
nurs
e fo
r a c
ardi
ovas
cula
r ris
k as
sess
men
t.
PHO
/ NG
O s
ecto
rFo
cus
on s
elf
man
agem
ent,
with
ev
alua
tion
of u
ptak
e pl
anne
d.
Affi
liatio
n Pr
ogra
mm
e -
for c
ardi
ac s
uppo
rt gr
oups
to a
ffilia
te
to N
atio
nal H
eart
Foun
datio
n of
N
ew Z
eala
nd
Not
e:
This
is n
ot a
DH
B in
itiat
ive.
Nat
iona
l Hea
rt Fo
unda
tion
of N
ew
Zeal
and
Use
rs: C
onsu
mer
s liv
ing
with
hea
rt pr
oble
ms
Key
stak
ehol
ders
: GRx
, M
edic
al p
rovi
ders
, Fi
tnes
s pr
ovid
ers,
D
iabe
tes
grou
ps
Nat
iona
l Co
Ord
inat
or:
Gle
nis
Bell,
Hea
rt Fo
unda
tion
To g
ive
supp
ort a
nd e
ncou
rage
men
t to
peo
ple
and
thei
r fam
ilies
, fo
llow
ing
a he
art e
vent
.
The
4 E’
s ar
e en
cour
aged
:
Exer
cise
Educ
atio
n
Emot
iona
l Sup
port
Enjo
ymen
t
And
em
pow
erm
ent o
f clu
b le
ader
s.
2x H
eart
Foun
datio
n C
o-
ordi
nato
r’s to
man
age
the
prog
ram
me
The
actu
al s
uppo
rt cl
ubs
are
mai
nly
volu
ntee
r le
d/ru
n.
Som
e ar
e fit
ness
cen
tre
base
d an
d co
ord
inat
ors
are
paid
. Use
r pay
s.
Inte
rnal
eva
luat
ions
199
9,
2000
. Ext
erna
l eva
luat
ion
2001
.
If fu
ndin
g pe
rmits
, bas
e-lin
e au
dit o
f clu
bs 2
005
Feed
back
from
co
nsum
ers
obta
ined
by
5x a
nnua
l clu
b se
min
ars
(hui
).
Nor
th K
ing
Cou
ntry
Car
diac
Re
habi
litat
ion
Educ
atio
n Pr
ogra
mm
e
Te K
uiti
Hos
pita
l C
omm
unity
Ser
vice
s
Loca
l Pha
rmac
y Pi
nnac
le M
edic
al
Cen
tre
Lesl
ey F
inn
Com
preh
ensi
ve p
rogr
amm
e to
pr
omot
e lif
esty
le c
hang
es fo
llow
ing
a ca
rdia
c ev
ent o
r to
prev
ent f
urth
er
card
iac
epis
odes
.
Car
diac
edu
cato
r Dis
trict
nu
rse
Die
titia
n
Phys
ioth
erap
ist
Soci
al W
orke
r
Phar
mac
ist
Gen
eral
Pra
ctiti
oner
.
Onl
y in
divi
dual
pat
ient
ev
alua
tions
, no
neg
ativ
e fin
ding
s, e
valu
atio
ns s
till
in p
rogr
ess.
Dia
bete
s H
ealth
Pr
ogra
mm
e an
d m
embe
rshi
p ca
rd
Mid
Cen
tral D
HB
Shirl
ey-A
nne
Gar
dine
r
Hea
lth P
lann
er,
Fund
ing
Div
isio
n
Mem
bers
hip
card
for p
eopl
e w
ith
diab
etes
, aim
ed a
t enc
oura
ging
the
pers
on a
nd th
eir f
amily
/whä
nau
to
feel
em
pow
ered
. Th
e ca
rd o
ffers
ac
cess
to c
are
and
ince
ntiv
es (e
g,
redu
ced
cost
foot
wea
r, di
scou
nt
vouc
hers
).
52
3) I
niti
ativ
es a
imed
at
spec
ific
grou
ps w
ithi
n th
e po
pula
tion
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of in
itiat
ive
Wor
kfor
ce ty
pe a
nd m
ixEv
alua
tion
Rura
l You
th
Clin
ics
Wha
ngan
ui R
egio
nal
PHO
Taih
ape
Med
ical
Tr
ust
Mau
rini H
aine
s
To p
rovi
de fr
ee a
cces
s to
yo
uth
med
ical
and
nur
sing
as
sess
men
t, ed
ucat
ion
and
treat
men
t ser
vice
as
an e
arly
in
terv
entio
n st
rate
gy to
offs
et
deve
lopm
ent o
f pot
entia
l ch
roni
c he
alth
issu
es in
hig
h-ris
k yo
uth
parti
cula
rly M
äori
and
Paci
fic Is
land
.
Reso
urce
d by
the
Taih
ape
Med
ical
Tru
st G
ener
al
Prac
tice.
GP
and
nurs
e pr
ovid
ed.
Clin
ics
held
in
out
reac
h se
tting
mos
t pr
efer
red
by y
outh
of t
hat
com
mun
ity.
Eval
uatio
n to
dat
e an
d in
crea
sing
num
bers
at
tend
ing
supp
ort
appr
opria
tene
ss o
f the
se
rvic
e.
Dat
a c
olle
cted
on
ethn
icity
/ di
seas
e co
de /
issu
e id
entifi
catio
n.
198
Yout
h H
ealth
Yout
h H
ealth
Tru
st in
co
ntra
ct w
ith C
ante
rbur
y D
HB
Chr
is W
oods
Pam
Whe
eler
Sue
Bags
haw
To m
ake
heal
th c
are
mor
e ac
cess
ible
to y
oung
peo
ple
‘at
risk’
from
10-
25 y
ears
.
GP,
pra
ctic
e nu
rse,
co
unse
llors
, pee
r co
unse
llors
, soc
ial w
orke
r, m
enta
l hea
lth p
ract
ition
er.
Last
eva
luat
ed in
199
8 - i
nclu
ded
patie
nt a
nd
orga
nisa
tion
satis
fact
ion,
an
d pa
rtici
patio
n ra
tes.
Car
diov
ascu
lar
Scre
enin
g of
Mäo
ri m
ales
in F
ar N
orth
Te T
ai T
oker
au P
HO
Rose
Lig
htfo
ot,
GM
Te
Tai
Toke
rau
PHO
To re
duce
mor
bidi
ty a
nd
mor
talit
y of
car
diov
ascu
lar
dise
ase
thro
ugh
early
det
ectio
n an
d pr
even
tion.
Mäo
ri Pr
ovid
er N
urse
s,
GPs
, Pra
ctic
e N
urse
s.
Mar
ae B
ased
C
linic
sW
aika
to P
HO
Shel
ley
Cam
pbel
lTo
impr
ove
acce
ss to
ser
vice
s.G
P, p
ract
ice
nurs
e.N
ot y
et
Hea
lth P
rom
otin
g C
hurc
hes
Paci
fic Is
land
s H
eartb
eat
(PIH
B).
6 Pa
cific
chu
rche
s &
1
Com
mun
ity g
roup
Hen
ga A
mos
a
Mel
iam
e C
ocke
r
To e
ncou
rage
Pac
ific
peop
le
to a
dopt
hea
lthy
lifes
tyle
s su
ch a
s he
alth
y fo
od c
hoic
es,
phys
ical
ly a
ctiv
e liv
es a
nd
smok
efre
e en
viro
nmen
ts.
Hea
lth/c
omm
unity
w
orke
rs, d
ietit
ians
, nu
tritio
nist
s.
Eval
uate
d in
200
2.
Cer
tifica
te in
Pa
cific
Nut
ritio
n (C
PN)
PIH
B/N
atio
nal H
eart
Foun
datio
n (N
HF)
and
A
uckl
and
Uni
vers
ity o
f Te
chno
logy
(AU
T)
Mar
ia C
assi
dy
Mafi
Fun
aki-
Tahi
fote
To im
prov
e th
e he
alth
and
w
ellb
eing
of P
acifi
c pe
ople
th
roug
h be
tter n
utrit
ion
and
regu
lar p
hysi
cal a
ctiv
ity.
Die
titia
ns, N
utrit
ioni
sts,
H
ealth
Pro
fess
iona
ls,
Med
ical
Doc
tors
/Sp
ecia
lists
Feed
back
giv
en o
n ev
alua
tion
form
s af
ter
each
cou
rse
mod
ule.
53
Smok
ing
Ces
satio
n Tr
aini
ngPI
HB/
NH
F, T
he Q
uit
Gro
up, a
nd H
ealth
Se
rvic
e Pr
ovid
ers
Hai
kiu
Baia
be
(Auc
klan
d &
Nor
ther
n Re
gion
)
Oliv
ia T
usa
(Cen
tral R
egio
n &
Sou
th Is
land
)
To p
rom
ote
the
bene
fits
of b
eing
sm
okef
ree
and
enco
urag
e Pa
cific
sm
oker
s to
qu
it.
Smok
ing
Ces
satio
n Sp
ecia
lists
/Pra
ctiti
oner
s,
Hea
lth P
rofe
ssio
nals
Feed
back
giv
en o
n ev
alua
tion
form
afte
r the
co
urse
– s
ame
as fo
r CPN
ev
alua
tion.
Impr
oved
Prim
ary
Hea
lth A
cces
s fo
r Pa
cific
peo
ple-
le
ader
ship
and
ad
vice
.
Hea
lthW
EST
PHO
SIA
ove
rhea
dTo
incr
ease
acc
ess
to p
rimar
y ca
re b
y Pa
cific
peo
ple
thro
ugh
advi
ce o
n in
crea
sing
acc
ess
for
Paci
fic p
eopl
e to
Hea
lthW
EST
mai
nstre
am p
rimar
y ca
re.
Paci
fic H
ealth
Pro
ject
M
anag
er
Paci
fic L
iais
on N
urse
Incr
ease
d Pr
imar
y D
iabe
tes
Supp
ort
for P
acifi
c Pe
ople
Hea
lth W
EST
PHO
Jenn
ifer T
uaga
luTo
incr
ease
acc
ess
to d
iabe
tes
and
self
care
for P
acifi
c pe
ople
th
roug
h Fu
ndin
g D
iabe
tes
Nur
se S
peci
alis
t and
Sel
f Car
e tra
inin
g fo
r Pac
ific
Clin
ical
Pr
ojec
t Nur
se.
Dia
bete
s N
urse
Spe
cial
ist
Car
ePlu
s
At R
isk
Elde
rly
Sout
h Li
nk H
ealth
as
Man
agem
ent S
ervi
ces
Org
anis
atio
n
PHO
Sara
h Ke
nned
yTo
ols
to a
ssis
t with
ass
essm
ent
and
ongo
ing
man
agem
ent o
f at
risk
eld
erly
pat
ient
s.
Car
ePlu
s C
oord
inat
ors
Gen
eral
Pra
ctic
e St
aff
IPA
/MSO
Adm
inis
trativ
e St
aff.
Parti
cipa
nt fe
edba
ck a
nd
revi
ew
Com
mun
ity F
IRST
an
d In
depe
nden
ce
FIRS
T
Pres
byte
rian
Supp
ort
Nor
ther
nJu
lie M
artin
To m
axim
ise
inde
pend
ence
fo
r old
er p
eopl
e w
ith h
igh
and
com
plex
nee
ds.
To o
ffer a
cho
ice
for o
lder
pe
ople
who
wou
ld o
ther
wis
e be
in re
side
ntia
l car
e. T
o im
prov
e qu
ality
of l
ife fo
r ol
der p
eopl
e an
d ca
rers
To a
void
unn
eces
sary
hos
pita
l ad
mis
sion
s.
Pred
omin
antly
trai
ned
supp
ort w
orke
rs g
uide
d by
mul
tidis
cipl
inar
y te
am in
puts
incl
udin
g a
coor
dina
tor (
regi
ster
ed
nurs
e), p
hysi
othe
rapi
st
and
occu
patio
nal t
hera
py
inpu
ts.
Part
of th
e A
SPIR
E ev
alua
tion
for a
gein
g in
pl
ace
initi
ativ
es. B
eing
un
derta
ken
by A
uckl
and
Uni
vers
ity. S
pons
ored
by
the
Min
istry
of H
ealth
.
Con
tinue
d ov
er...
54
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of
initi
ativ
eW
orkf
orce
type
an
d m
ixEv
alua
tion
Inte
grat
ed h
ome
and
com
mun
ity c
are
for
olde
r peo
ple
and
adul
ts
with
chr
onic
illn
esse
s.
See
web
site
:ht
tp://
ww
w.c
cdhb
.org
.nz
/prim
ary.
htm
Cap
ital &
Coa
st D
HB
Bene
dict
Hef
ford
or
And
rew
D
owne
s
To im
prov
e ca
re,
parti
cula
rly in
the
hom
e,
of a
dults
with
chr
onic
ill
ness
es. T
o en
cour
age
bette
r coo
rdin
atio
n of
car
e; s
tand
ardi
sed
asse
ssm
ent a
nd c
are
plan
ning
pro
cess
for t
his
patie
nt g
roup
.
Mai
nly
seni
or n
urse
s an
d al
lied
heal
th
prof
essi
onal
s.
Form
al e
valu
atio
n of
In
terR
AI a
sses
smen
t too
l (M
oH fu
nded
). A
lso
trend
s an
d in
dica
tors
su
ch a
s ra
te o
f avo
idab
le
hosp
ital a
dmis
sion
; pat
ient
sa
tisfa
ctio
n.
Ass
essm
ent o
f Old
er
Peop
le G
uide
line.
N
ew Z
eala
nd A
ssoc
iatio
n of
G
eron
tolo
gy, A
ge C
once
rn,
Don
ald
Beas
ley
Inst
itute
, G
ener
al P
ract
ition
er, R
NZC
GP,
Te
Ora
nga
Kaum
ätua
Kui
a D
isab
ility
Sup
port
Serv
ice,
C
olle
ge o
f Psy
chia
trist
s (R
AN
ZCP)
, NA
SC, T
e O
rang
a Ka
umät
ua, K
uia
Dis
abili
ty
Supp
ort S
ervi
ce, A
uckl
and
Pres
byte
rian
Supp
ort S
ervi
ces,
G
rey
Pow
er, N
ew Z
eala
nd
Ger
iatri
c So
ciet
y, A
CC
Step
hen
Jaco
bs
Seni
or A
dvis
or,
Hea
lth o
f Old
er
Peop
le
Dis
abili
ty S
uppo
rt Se
rvic
es, M
inis
try
of H
ealth
To re
duce
the
rate
s of
trea
tmen
t and
ho
spita
lisat
ion
for
cond
ition
s id
entifi
ed la
te.
Mul
tidis
cipl
inar
yTh
e to
ols
revi
ew th
at
acco
mpa
nied
the
GL
sugg
este
d In
terR
ai a
s a
poss
ibili
ty fo
r a n
atio
nal
asse
ssm
ent t
ool t
o su
ppor
t th
e as
sess
men
t pro
cess
.
GP
Link
Sout
hlin
k H
ealth
Erin
a Re
wi
To im
prov
e ou
tcom
es
for p
atie
nts
with
men
tal
illne
ss li
ving
in th
e co
mm
unity
.
Gen
eral
Pra
ctic
e st
aff
IPA
adm
inis
trativ
e st
aff.
Ong
oing
qua
lity
impr
ovem
ent u
sing
clin
ical
an
d tre
atm
ent e
valu
atio
ns.
Know
ing
the
Peop
le
Plan
ning
(KPP
)D
HB
men
tal h
ealth
ser
vice
sBa
rry
Wel
sh
To p
lan,
man
age
and
eval
uate
men
tal h
ealth
se
rvic
es fo
r tho
se w
ho
have
con
tact
with
MH
se
rvic
es fo
r mor
e th
an 2
ye
ars.
Con
sum
ers/
case
m
anag
ers/
team
le
ader
s, m
anag
ers/
fu
nder
s an
d pl
anne
rs
and
Min
istry
.
KPP
is a
n ev
alua
tion
tool
in a
nd o
f it s
elf.
An
inde
pend
ent e
valu
atio
n un
derta
ken
by H
RC w
ill b
e co
mpl
eted
by
Apr
il 20
05.
KPP
is th
e su
bjec
t of P
hD
rese
arch
con
duct
ed b
y Ba
rry
Wel
sh a
t Mas
sey
–
due
for c
ompl
etio
n 20
09.
... c
ontin
ued
from
pre
viou
s pa
ge
55
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of
initi
ativ
eW
orkf
orce
type
an
d m
ixEv
alua
tion
Inte
grat
ed h
ome
and
com
mun
ity c
are
for
olde
r peo
ple
and
adul
ts
with
chr
onic
illn
esse
s.
See
web
site
:ht
tp://
ww
w.c
cdhb
.org
.nz
/prim
ary.
htm
Cap
ital &
Coa
st D
HB
Bene
dict
Hef
ford
or
And
rew
D
owne
s
To im
prov
e ca
re,
parti
cula
rly in
the
hom
e,
of a
dults
with
chr
onic
ill
ness
es. T
o en
cour
age
bette
r coo
rdin
atio
n of
car
e; s
tand
ardi
sed
asse
ssm
ent a
nd c
are
plan
ning
pro
cess
for t
his
patie
nt g
roup
.
Mai
nly
seni
or n
urse
s an
d al
lied
heal
th
prof
essi
onal
s.
Form
al e
valu
atio
n of
In
terR
AI a
sses
smen
t too
l (M
oH fu
nded
). A
lso
trend
s an
d in
dica
tors
su
ch a
s ra
te o
f avo
idab
le
hosp
ital a
dmis
sion
; pat
ient
sa
tisfa
ctio
n.
Ass
essm
ent o
f Old
er
Peop
le G
uide
line.
N
ew Z
eala
nd A
ssoc
iatio
n of
G
eron
tolo
gy, A
ge C
once
rn,
Don
ald
Beas
ley
Inst
itute
, G
ener
al P
ract
ition
er, R
NZC
GP,
Te
Ora
nga
Kaum
ätua
Kui
a D
isab
ility
Sup
port
Serv
ice,
C
olle
ge o
f Psy
chia
trist
s (R
AN
ZCP)
, NA
SC, T
e O
rang
a Ka
umät
ua, K
uia
Dis
abili
ty
Supp
ort S
ervi
ce, A
uckl
and
Pres
byte
rian
Supp
ort S
ervi
ces,
G
rey
Pow
er, N
ew Z
eala
nd
Ger
iatri
c So
ciet
y, A
CC
Step
hen
Jaco
bs
Seni
or A
dvis
or,
Hea
lth o
f Old
er
Peop
le
Dis
abili
ty S
uppo
rt Se
rvic
es, M
inis
try
of H
ealth
To re
duce
the
rate
s of
trea
tmen
t and
ho
spita
lisat
ion
for
cond
ition
s id
entifi
ed la
te.
Mul
tidis
cipl
inar
yTh
e to
ols
revi
ew th
at
acco
mpa
nied
the
GL
sugg
este
d In
terR
ai a
s a
poss
ibili
ty fo
r a n
atio
nal
asse
ssm
ent t
ool t
o su
ppor
t th
e as
sess
men
t pro
cess
.
GP
Link
Sout
hlin
k H
ealth
Erin
a Re
wi
To im
prov
e ou
tcom
es
for p
atie
nts
with
men
tal
illne
ss li
ving
in th
e co
mm
unity
.
Gen
eral
Pra
ctic
e st
aff
IPA
adm
inis
trativ
e st
aff.
Ong
oing
qua
lity
impr
ovem
ent u
sing
clin
ical
an
d tre
atm
ent e
valu
atio
ns.
Know
ing
the
Peop
le
Plan
ning
(KPP
)D
HB
men
tal h
ealth
ser
vice
sBa
rry
Wel
sh
To p
lan,
man
age
and
eval
uate
men
tal h
ealth
se
rvic
es fo
r tho
se w
ho
have
con
tact
with
MH
se
rvic
es fo
r mor
e th
an 2
ye
ars.
Con
sum
ers/
case
m
anag
ers/
team
le
ader
s, m
anag
ers/
fu
nder
s an
d pl
anne
rs
and
Min
istry
.
KPP
is a
n ev
alua
tion
tool
in a
nd o
f it s
elf.
An
inde
pend
ent e
valu
atio
n un
derta
ken
by H
RC w
ill b
e co
mpl
eted
by
Apr
il 20
05.
KPP
is th
e su
bjec
t of P
hD
rese
arch
con
duct
ed b
y Ba
rry
Wel
sh a
t Mas
sey
–
due
for c
ompl
etio
n 20
09.
Cou
ntie
s M
anuk
au
Pers
onal
Liv
ing
Solu
tions
(Com
mun
ity
Livi
ng) S
ervi
ces
Cou
ntie
s M
anuk
au D
HB
Con
tract
s w
ith P
enin
a Pa
cific
LTD
, Cha
lleng
e Tr
ust,
Man
itahi
Tru
st, T
e Ko
row
ai
Aro
ha, F
ram
ewor
k Tr
ust
Ross
Phi
llip,
C
MD
HB
To a
llow
men
tal h
ealth
co
nsum
ers
to fi
nd th
eir o
wn
solu
tions
. Ser
vice
s ac
tivel
y as
sist
the
indi
vidu
al b
eing
se
rved
to d
efine
thei
r ow
n ne
eds,
pla
n an
app
roac
h to
mee
t the
m a
nd d
ecid
e up
on m
ore
desi
rabl
e fe
atur
es o
f the
ir liv
es.
Mix
ture
of c
linic
al
and
non-
clin
ical
su
ppor
t sta
ff an
d m
anag
eria
l sta
ff.
In c
olla
bora
tion
with
C
MD
HB
Clin
ical
Pr
ovid
er A
rm
Serv
ices
.
Eval
uatio
n in
futu
re
- ini
tiativ
e co
mm
ence
d m
id-2
004.
Fee
dbac
k al
so th
roug
h re
gula
r m
eetin
g w
ith p
artic
ipat
ing
orga
nisa
tions
and
DH
B cl
inic
al s
taff.
Impr
ovin
g ph
ysic
al
heal
th o
f peo
ple
with
m
enta
l illn
ess
Path
way
s Tr
ust,
Wan
ganu
i
GPs
in W
anga
nui
Mic
helle
G
lenn
y,
Regi
onal
M
anag
er
Empl
oym
ent o
f reg
iste
red
nurs
e w
ith g
ener
al n
ursi
ng
back
grou
nd to
impr
ove
the
phys
ical
hea
lth o
f pe
ople
with
ser
ious
men
tal
illne
ss in
resi
dent
ial a
nd
mob
ile s
uppo
rt se
rvic
es.
Man
y of
thes
e pe
ople
hav
e si
gnifi
cant
chr
onic
illn
esse
s as
wel
l as
a lo
ng-te
rm
psyc
hiat
ric d
isab
ility
.
Regi
ster
ed n
urse
, Pa
thw
ays
men
tal
heal
th c
omm
unity
su
ppor
t wor
kers
. M
ain
inte
rface
is
with
GPs
but
als
o lin
ks w
ith D
HB
Com
mun
ity M
enta
l H
ealth
Tea
m
psyc
hiat
rists
and
co
mm
unity
men
tal
heal
th n
urse
s.
Com
men
ced
in A
ugus
t 20
04 w
ith n
o fo
rmal
ev
alua
tion
yet.
Brie
f Int
erve
ntio
ns fo
r H
arm
ful B
ehav
iour
: Ef
fect
ive
App
licat
ion
of th
e TA
DS
Brie
f In
terv
entio
ns fo
r H
arm
ful B
ehav
iour
Tr
aini
ng P
rogr
amm
e to
PH
Os
in B
OPD
HB
Bay
of P
lent
y D
HB,
Auc
klan
d Sc
hool
of M
edic
ine,
BO
PDH
B PH
Os
Bria
n Po
into
nTo
est
ablis
h a
reso
urce
d w
orkf
orce
with
in p
rimar
y ca
re to
sup
port
the
deliv
ery
of p
rogr
amm
es d
esig
ned
to a
ddre
ss ri
sk b
ehav
iour
s th
at c
ontri
bute
to c
hron
ic
cond
ition
s.
Gen
eral
pra
ctiti
oner
, nu
rsin
g an
d co
mm
unity
wor
ker
wor
kfor
ces.
Brie
f Int
erve
ntio
ns fo
r H
arm
ful B
ehav
iour
: Ef
fect
ive
App
licat
ion
of th
e TA
DS
Brie
f Int
erve
ntio
ns
for H
arm
ful B
ehav
iour
Tr
aini
ng P
rogr
amm
e to
PH
Os
in B
OPD
HB.
Con
tinue
d ov
er...
56
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of
initi
ativ
eW
orkf
orce
type
and
m
ixEv
alua
tion
Prim
ary
Partn
ersh
ips
Men
tal H
ealth
Pro
ject
Hea
lthW
EST
PHO
, GP,
Pr
actic
e N
urse
s an
d re
cept
ion
staf
f
Wai
tem
ata
DH
B Sp
ecia
list
Men
tal H
ealth
ser
vice
s
Com
mun
ity M
enta
l Hea
lth
Serv
ices
Com
mun
ity P
harm
acis
ts
Sara
h H
ughe
sTo
incr
ease
prim
ary
care
ac
cess
and
effi
cacy
for
men
tal h
ealth
pat
ient
s w
ith
seve
re a
nd e
ndur
ing
men
tal
illne
ss.
GPs
, Pra
ctic
e N
urse
s
Psyc
hiat
rists
GP
Liai
son
Spec
ialis
t N
urse
s, C
omm
unity
M
enta
l Hea
lth K
ey
Wor
kers
, Con
sum
ers
and
fam
ily m
embe
rs.
Num
ber c
onsu
mer
s in
tra
nsiti
on o
r tra
nsiti
oned
to
prim
ary
care
.
Parti
cipa
nts
feed
back
(all)
.
Inte
rRA
I MD
S-H
CH
ealth
Wai
kato
,
Dis
abili
ty S
uppo
rt Li
nk,
WD
HB,
Te
Koro
wai
Hau
ora
O H
aura
ki
Jane
Hud
son
Fion
a M
urdo
ch
To s
ee if
this
par
ticul
ar to
ol
coul
d be
use
d to
intro
duce
a
stan
dard
ised
ass
essm
ent
proc
ess,
a n
atio
nal d
ata
set
and
a na
tiona
l ass
essm
ent
tool
sui
tabl
e fo
r old
er
peop
le. W
aika
to D
HB
is
one
of fi
ve D
HBs
pilo
ting
a di
ffere
nt a
sses
smen
t too
l, bu
t is
the
only
one
usi
ng a
M
äori
prov
ider
to tr
ial t
he
tool
.
OPA
T nu
rses
, OT
Com
mun
ity M
äori
Hea
lth N
urse
Eval
uate
d by
MO
H
cont
ract
ed e
valu
ator
s at
th
e en
d of
15
mon
ths
trial
.
... c
ontin
ued
from
pre
viou
s pa
ge
57
4) S
elf M
anag
emen
t In
itia
tive
s
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct
pers
onA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of In
itiat
ive
Wor
kfor
ce ty
pe a
nd m
ixEv
alua
tion
Can
cerV
oice
s N
ew Z
eala
ndC
ance
rVoi
ces
New
Zea
land
(a
n in
depe
nden
t gr
oup
of p
eopl
e af
fect
ed b
y ca
ncer
)
Judi
McB
ride-
Wils
on
To e
mpo
wer
and
giv
e vo
ice
to th
ose
affe
cted
by
canc
er. T
o in
fluen
ce th
e pr
oces
s an
d en
sure
equ
ality
in th
e pr
ovis
ion
of a
nd a
cces
s to
trea
tmen
ts
for a
ll ca
ncer
pat
ient
s.
Vol
unte
ers,
pat
ient
s an
d ca
regi
vers
mai
nly
- som
e se
rvic
e pr
ovid
ers.
All
have
firs
t han
d ex
perie
nce
of c
ance
r .
Subs
tant
ial i
nfor
mal
fe
edba
ck th
at th
is is
a lo
ng
over
due
deve
lopm
ent.
Hig
h N
eeds
Nur
se
Coo
rdin
ator
role
Wha
ngan
ui
Regi
onal
PH
ORi
hi K
aren
aD
evel
opm
ent o
f ind
ivid
ual c
ase
man
agem
ent p
lans
with
the
patie
nt/
whä
nau
and
GP
team
, aim
ing
to d
rive
self
dete
rmin
atio
n an
d ef
fect
ive
self
man
agem
ent o
f chr
onic
con
ditio
ns
and
addr
ess
barr
iers
to im
prov
ed
heal
th (e
g. h
ousi
ng, t
rans
port)
thro
ugh
advo
cacy
and
pra
ctic
al s
olut
ions
.
Regi
ster
ed n
urse
rece
ives
re
ferr
als
from
the
GP
Team
an
d w
orks
col
labo
rativ
ely
with
the
patie
nt/w
häna
u an
d he
alth
pro
fess
iona
ls a
nd
inte
rsec
toria
l age
ncie
s.
60%
pat
ient
s ar
e M
äori.
C
usto
mer
Sat
isfa
ctio
n Su
rvey
re
sults
are
pos
itive
.
Expe
rient
ial
Patie
nt E
duca
tion
Prog
ram
me
-C
hron
ic P
ain
Ota
go D
HB
Jess
ica
Ath
erto
n-C
linic
al N
urse
Sp
ecia
list
Chr
onic
Pai
n Se
rvic
e
A 6
-wee
k ou
tpat
ient
pro
gram
me.
A
im to
incr
ease
pat
ient
kno
wle
dge
and
appr
opria
te s
elf-m
anag
emen
t te
chni
ques
.
Clin
ical
nur
se s
peci
alis
t,
occu
patio
nal t
hera
pist
,
Clin
ical
psy
chol
ogis
t,
phys
ioth
erap
ist.
Pre
and
Post
test
s
Que
stio
nnai
res
Shor
t ver
bal ‘
debr
ief a
nd
eval
uatio
n’ b
y pr
ojec
t sta
ff m
embe
rs a
fter e
ach
sess
ion.
A1
Serv
ices
to
Incr
ease
acc
ess
to P
rimar
y H
ealth
C
are
for H
igh
Nee
ds P
eopl
e w
ith C
hron
ic
Con
ditio
ns:
Self
Man
agem
ent
Trai
ning
Hea
lth G
reen
Pr
escr
iptio
n
Arth
ritis
Fo
unda
tion
Stan
ford
U
nive
rsity
(H
ealth
WES
T PH
O)
Chr
istin
e Sm
ithTo
incr
ease
effe
ctiv
e se
lf m
anag
emen
t sk
ills
for h
igh
need
s pe
ople
livi
ng
with
chr
onic
con
ditio
ns th
roug
h pa
rtici
patio
n in
”Li
ving
Wel
l with
a
Chr
onic
Con
ditio
n” s
elf m
anag
emen
t tra
inin
g co
urse
. Lea
ders
hip
and
parti
cipa
tion
cour
ses
– fo
cus
on
deve
lopi
ng la
y le
ader
ship
.
Lay
and
staf
f lea
ders
Stee
ring
grou
p –
prov
ides
ac
adem
ic, c
ultu
ral a
nd
cons
umer
gui
danc
e.
Expl
orin
g re
sear
ch,
eval
uatio
n an
d m
onito
ring
optio
ns. S
ome
clin
ical
ou
tcom
es a
s ap
prop
riate
–
livin
g w
ell w
ith a
chr
onic
co
nditi
on is
the
focu
s.
58
5) W
orkf
orce
-spe
cifi
c in
itia
tive
s
Nam
e of
initi
ativ
eO
rgan
isat
ion/
s in
volv
edC
onta
ct p
erso
nA
ims/
desc
ript
ion
of in
itiat
ive
Wor
kfor
ce ty
pe a
nd
mix
Eval
uatio
n
Die
ticia
n w
ith a
Sp
ecia
l Int
eres
t in
Nut
ritio
n an
d G
eron
tolo
gy
(SIN
G)
New
Zea
land
Die
tetic
A
ssoc
iatio
nSa
ndra
Van
Li
l, N
utrit
ion
Serv
ices
, M
iddl
emor
e H
ospi
tal,
Car
ole
Gib
bs, N
ew
Zeal
and
Die
tetic
A
ssoc
iatio
n
To d
isse
min
ate
info
rmat
ion
rela
ting
to n
utrit
ion
and
the
elde
rly.
Die
ticia
nsTh
ere
is in
crea
sing
reco
gniti
on
of th
e im
porta
nce
of n
utrit
ion
in
impr
ovin
g he
alth
out
com
es.
Nur
se L
ed C
linic
s (e
g, d
iabe
tes,
nu
tritio
n, s
mok
ing,
ph
ysic
al a
ctiv
ity)
Haw
kes
Bay
PHO
pr
actic
e - T
he D
octo
rs
Nap
ier a
nd H
astin
gs
Shar
on F
allo
on,
Proj
ect
Coo
rdin
ator
for
Haw
kes
Bay
PHO
Self
man
agem
ent,
educ
atio
n an
d co
ordi
natio
n.Re
gist
ered
Nur
ses
Mon
thly
repo
rts:
- num
ber o
f pat
ient
s re
ferr
ed- e
thni
city
repo
rt- h
ealth
out
com
es
Satis
fact
ion
surv
eyLo
ng te
rm s
trate
gy fo
r the
pro
ject
Car
e Pl
us N
urse
ro
leW
hang
anui
Reg
iona
l PH
ORo
byn
Finu
cane
To a
ssis
t with
any
pat
ient
s w
ith
com
plex
med
ical
/sur
gica
l/m
enta
l pro
blem
s w
ho h
ave
been
enr
olle
d as
Car
e Pl
us
patie
nts;
impl
emen
ting
a ca
re p
lan,
and
invo
lvin
g th
e pa
tient
/whä
nau/
fam
ily w
ith
obje
ctiv
es/g
oals
to im
prov
e th
eir h
ealth
.
Regi
ster
ed N
urse
w
ho w
orks
alo
ngsi
de
GP
Team
s.
Role
com
men
ced
early
in
Nov
embe
r 200
4
Eval
uatio
n ye
t to
occu
r.
Gen
eral
feed
back
from
rura
l pr
actic
es v
ery
favo
urab
le.
Hom
e V
isiti
ng
Nur
se (p
ilot i
n Te
Ku
iti)
Wai
kato
PH
OEr
ica
Am
onTo
tria
l the
role
of a
nur
se
atta
ched
to a
med
ical
cen
tre,
doin
g ho
me
base
d as
sess
men
t an
d co
ordi
natio
n w
ith e
lder
ly
to re
duce
risk
.
Prac
tice
nurs
e w
ithin
a
rura
l pra
ctic
e.Ev
alua
tion
unde
rway
in fo
rm o
f RC
T.
Dis
ease
Sta
te
Man
agem
ent
Nur
se
Wai
kato
PH
O, R
auka
wa
Hau
ora
Tang
aroa
W
hitio
raTo
impr
ove
care
of M
äori
patie
nts.
Nur
se w
ho li
nks
with
lo
cal G
Ps.
Vol
umes
, sat
isfa
ctio
n
59
Mob
ile N
urse
C
oord
inat
or
Wha
ngan
ui R
egio
nal
PHO
Judi
th
Mac
Don
ald
To c
oord
inat
e ca
re fo
r co
mpl
ex h
igh
need
pat
ient
s.Re
gist
ered
nur
se
Targ
et g
roup
s
Ethn
icity
Dem
ogra
phic
pro
file
Refe
rral
s pe
r qua
rter
Dis
char
ges
per q
uarte
r
Dis
ease
sta
tes
Hea
lth p
lans
Inte
grat
ion
and
coor
dina
tion
with
oth
er s
ervi
ces
Barr
iers
to a
cces
s
Con
sum
er e
valu
atio
n.
60
APPENDIX 3: ContactsThis list of contact people for organisations involved in chronic conditions work was compiled from responses to the NHC’s request for information.
Organisation: Name: Position:
Counties Manukau DHB Chris Mules Chief Planning & Funding Officer
Waitemata DHB Dr Dale Bramley Manager of Health Gain and Public Health Physician
Southland DHB Sue McNeil Coordinator physiotherapy
Health Waikato: Provider Arm of the Waikato DHB_
Chris Higgins Manager: Service Development Unit
Cancer VOICES New Zealand Judi McBride-Wilson Trustee & acting Executive Officer
Hawkes Bay PHO Dr Sanja Sajatovic-Majstorovic General Manager
Asthma Auckland Janette Reid National Asthma Educator
Cystic Fibrosis Association of New Zealand
Kate Russell General Manager
The Auckland District Kidney Society Inc.
Nora Van der Schrieck Manager
Hauora Taranaki PHO Pauline Cruickshank Manager Clinical Projects
Royal New Zealand Foundation of the Blind
Chris Inglis Divisional Manager, Blindness Awareness and Prevention
SPARC Diana O’Neill Senior Advisor Health
Whanganui Regional PHO Rihi Karena High Needs Nurse Coordinator
PACT Anna Frost Service Manager Intellectual Disabilities
Te Hotu Manawa Mäori (THMM)
Dr George Gray
The National Heart Foundation of New Zealand
Stephanie Muncaster Phase I &II National Cardiac Rehabilitation Coordinator
The National Heart Foundation of New Zealand
Glenis Bell National Phase 3 Cardiac Rehabilitation Coordinator
New Zealand Guidelines Group
Catherine Marshall CEO
Ministry of Health Barry Welsh Senior Advisor
South Link Health Richard Whitney General Manager
Pinnacle Erica Amon Clinical Services Manager
Pacific Islands Heartbeat, The National Heart Foundation
Iutita Rusk Programme Manager
Presbyterian Support Northern Julie Martin General Manager, Services for Older People
Analysis, Planning and Service Development Unit
Faye Ryan Manager Qualitative Information
Pathways Trust Michelle Glenny Regional Manager
Taumata Hauora Trust Mars Delamere Clinical Manager
61
1 World Health Organization. 2002. Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions: Building Blocks for Action. Global Report. Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health.
2 Handiside A. 2004. ‘Our Physical Health…Who Cares? Occasional Paper No. 5. Wellington: Mental Health Commission.
3 World Health Organization. 2003. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases; Report of the Joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No.916 (TRS 916). Accessed March 2005 at http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/trs916/en/gsfao_background.pdf
4 New Zealand Guidelines Group. 2001. Chronic Care Management: Policy and Planning Guide. Compiled by the Disease Management Working Group.
5 Ministry of Health. 2004a. A Portrait of Health. Accessed November 2004 at www.moh.govt.nz.
6 Ministry of Health. 2004b. The Health and Independence Report 2004; Director-General of Health’s annual report on the state of public health. Wellington, December 2004.
7 Arthritis New Zealand website, accessed February 2005 at www.arthritis.org.nz
8 Ajwani S, Blakely T, Robson B, Tobias M, Bonne M. 2003. Decades of Disparity: Ethnic mortality trends in New Zealand 1980-1999. Wellington: Ministry of Health and University of Otago.
9 Ministry of Health. 2003a. Diabetes Toolkit. Only available on the web. Accessed December 2004 at http://www.newhealth.govt.nz/toolkits/diabetes/introduction.htm#burden.
10 Ministry of Health. 2002. Diabetes in New Zealand; Models and forecasts 1996-2011. Wellington: Ministry of Health. March 2002.
11 Department of Health. 2004a. Improving Chronic Disease Management. Accessed November 2004 at http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/07/52/13/04075213.pdf.
12 National Health Committee. 1998. The Social, Cultural and Economic Determinants of Health. Wellington.
13 Ministry of Health 1999. Our Health, Our Future: the health of New Zealanders 1999. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
14 Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002, Oct 9; 288(14):1775-9.
15 Modernisation Agency. 2004. Learning Distillation of Chronic Disease Management Programmes in the UK. July 2004. Accessed March 2005 at http://www.natpact.nhs.uk/uploads/Matrix%20CDM%20Evaluation%20Report.doc.
16 Department of Health. 2004b. The NHS Improvement Plan: Putting People at the Heart of Public Services.
REFERENCES
62
17 Wellingham J, Tracey J, Rea H, Gribben B. The development and implementation of the Chronic Care Management Programme in Counties Manukau. NZMJ 2003;116. 21 February 2003. Accessed March 2005 at http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/116-1169/327/.
18 National Primary Care Trust Development Programme. 2003. The Connectors publication, Episode 15, 11 November 2003. Accessed March 2005 at http://www.natpact.nhs.uk/engaging_communities/the_connectors/episode_15/episode15.pdf
19 Diabetes New Zealand website. Accessed November 2004 at http://www.diabetes.org.nz/managing/.
20 Department of Health. 2001. The Expert Patient: A New Approach To Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century. London: Department of Health.
21 Arthritis New Zealand. 2003. Arthritis New Zealand Self-Management Course ‘living a healthy life’: course evaluation report 2000 –2002. Wellington: Arthritis New Zealand.
22 Ministry of Health. 2003b. A Snapshot of Health; Provisional results of the 2002/2003 Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
23 Marshall R, Gee R, Israel M et al. 1990. The use of alternative therapies by Auckland general practitioners. NZMJ 1990:103(889)L213-15.