Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
Lie Detection for Compliance and Ethics Professionals
Michael W. Johnson, Esq., Clear Law Institute
(703) 312‐9440
www.ClearLawInstitute.com
2
About Michael Johnson
CEO of Clear Law Institute
Former attorney in the US Department of Justice
Has provided investigations seminars for dozens of organizations, including Google, the United Nations, and the EEOC
Graduate of Duke University and Harvard Law School
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
3
Overview
How to examine credibility in internal investigations
Common errors in lie detectionScientifically‐validated cues to deception
Investigations
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
5
Scenario
Jennifer’s assistant, Tony, complains that Jennifer frequently makes sexual comments to him at work. Tony also alleges that last week Jennifer tried to kiss him in her office. Jennifer denies the allegations completely. You investigate the matter and you believe that Tony is being truthful. However, you can find no eyewitnesses to support Tony’s allegations.
Could the employer legitimately conclude that Jennifer is guilty and discipline her?
6
Why try to reach a conclusion even in “he said/she” cases?
What message do you send to potential victims or whistleblowers?
What message do you send to potential wrongdoers?
But what if I get sued?
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
7
Credibility Assessment Factors
Corroboration
Motive to falsify
Past record
Content of the story and how the story is told
Behavior and statements during the interview
8
Polling Question: Are you good at detecting lies?
I believe I can correctly identify if a person is lying the following percentage of time:
a) 25%
b) 50%
c) 75%
d) 90%
e) 100%
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
9
Police interview of a murder suspect
10
Did Kevin show any “cues” to deception?
If so, what were they?
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
11
Polling Question: Kevin is:
A. Innocent
B. Guilty
12
Polling Question: Which are reliable predictors of deception?
a) Gaze aversion (person stops looking you in the eye)
b) Person is fidgety
c) Places hand over mouth when speaking
d) All of the above
e) None of the above
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
13
Examining “cues to deception”
We tend to pay attention to “cues to deception”that have not been scientifically validated and are not reliable predictors of lying
Three factors that impact cues to deception
Emotion
Cognitive Effort
Attempted Behavioral Control
Example: Gaze aversion
14
Questions
The average person can correctly spot what percentage of lies?
People who have received training on common techniques used by many law enforcement officers to spot deception can correctly spot what percentage of lies?
People do better at spotting lies by just hearing the person or by both hearing and seeing the person
The average person does better at spotting lies in person or by reading a transcript?
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
15
Common Errors in Lie Detection
Poor interviewing style
“Othello” Error
Confirmation Bias
Showing the witness that you are suspicious
Not letting the witness talk!
16
Guidelines for examining verbal and non‐verbal behaviors
Look only for cues that have been scientifically tested and shown to occur more often by liars than truth tellers
But remember there’s no such thing as “Pinocchio’s nose”
When you spot a cue or especially a cluster of cues
Can alert you to probe further on the topic
Ultimately could be part or your overall credibility determination
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
17
Non‐verbal cues to deception
Being fidgety
Liars tend to be less fidgety. They make fewer leg and foot movements.
Illustrators
Liars tend to use fewer illustrators (arm, hand, finger movements to illustrate what they are saying)?
Neuro‐Linguistic Programming
No empirical support for the belief that liars are more likely to look up and to the right
18
Is anything suspicious about these responses?
Q: Alice, have you ever run your fingers through Ronald’s hair?
A: Not that I recall.
Q: Henry, have you ever told an ethnic joke in the workplace?
A: Not really. Speaking of jokes, you should hear the ethnic jokes that Todd and Mark tell around here.
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
19
Drew Peterson
20
Verbal content hot spots from Drew Peterson video
Qualifiers
Illogical inconsistencies
Indirect responses
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
21
Congressman Anthony Weiner
22
Verbal content cues to deception from Weiner video
Indirect responses
Using passive voice instead of active voice
Avoiding use of first person pronouns (I, me)
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
23
Verbal cues to deception. Liars tend to:
Provide shorter responses
Provide less detail
Fail to elaborate with more detail when asked
Pause longer before answering questions
Repeat words and phrases more
Speak in a slower, carefully crafted manner
Speak in a higher pitched voice (though this could just be a sign of stress or fear)
24
Criteria‐Based Content Analysis (“CBCA”)
Tool for detecting truthfulness, not deception
Can be particularly helpful in an interview of an alleged victim (of harassment, for example) where the accused denies the event occurred
Some possible indicators of truthfulness in the manner in which person tells their story
Unstructured production
Statement rich in details
Reproduction of conversations
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
25
Advanced Interviewing Techniques
Researchers have found some techniques that can be used in certain types of cases allow investigators to better differentiate between truthful and deceptive witnesses
Reverse‐order storytelling
Unanticipated questions (especially those related to time and space)
Asking for a drawing
26
Free book chapter and webinar
For free access to a book chapter and webinar on detecting deception ($199 value), please:
Email [email protected]
or
Text 202‐550‐1460
Copyright 2014, Clear Law Institute, www.ClearLawInstitute.com
27
Questions?
Michael Johnson
CEO
Clear Law Institute
703‐312‐9440