09-Nov-16, Clusta information day MIC, Nazareth, The Netherlands
Dr. Nanni Noël +31 6 468 472 96
Microbial corrosion & biofilms [email protected]
Microbiologically induced corrosion (MIC) How microorganisms attack different
materials
Corrosion and Antifouling research since 1964
Expertise:
Corrosion
Electrochemistry
Metallurgy
Antifouling
Microbiology
Coatings
Material durability in seawater (composites, adhesive joints)
Natural seawater
Outdoor exposure
Endures BV, Den Helder, The Netherlands
SEM/EDXAFM/ SKPFM
Stereo microscope
Fluorescence microscope
Ship tank model
MIC cultures
Sensors
Electrochemical techniques
Staining techniques
Monopile modelin natural seawater
Endures laboratory facilities
High pressure setup
Anaerobic glove box
Microbial influenced corrosion (MIC)
MIC is a rapid form of corrosion initiated or accelerated by microorganisms
Localized form of corrosion Direct or indirect mechanism Up to 20% of all serious corrosion events are related to MIC It affects a wide diversity of industriese.g. water distribution systems, oil and gas, maritime, offshore, food industry…
General facts about microorganisms:
Characteristics of microorganisms related to MIC: (Borenstein, 1994)
Microorganisms (MO’s) interact with surfaces and form a biofilm:
1. (a) = cells attach to the surface biofilm formation
2. (b) = aerobic and anaerobic zones are formed MO’s create their own environment
3. (c) = ions are trapped, chemical and physical gradients are created localized at the metal surface dissolving of the metal and pit formation
Biofilms, critical factor for MIC
Preferred sites for attachment are (micro-) scratches, cracks, crevices etc.
MIC and diversity of microorganisms
Uptake of nutrients out of liquid or soil, conversion to
acids and other corrosive by-products such as CH4,H2S
etc.
Change of local environmental conditions
acceleration of corrosion processes
resulting in pitting, cracking and other forms of
damagesDamage of materials such as metals, concrete or polymers is
possible!
- low oxygen concentrations under biofilm
- formation of electrochemical cell
region under the biofilm= anode (corrodes), region without biofilm = cathode
(Borenstein, 1994)
biofilm-formed oxygen concentration cell
aerobe
anaerobe
Concentration elements caused by biofilms:
Fungi
Methanogens
Organic Acid Producing Bacteria
Slime Forming Bacteria
Sulphate Reducing Bacteria (SRB)
Acid Producing Bacteria (APB)
Metal-Depositing Bacteria (MDB)
Metal-Reducing Bacteria (MRB)
Sulfur Oxidising Bacteria (SOB)
Iron/Manganese Oxidising Bacteria (IOB)
MIC diversity
Prerequisite for life
1. Water
2. Energy source (Light or chemicals)
3. Carbon source (CO2,C org)
4. Electron donor (anorg, org)
5. Electron acceptor - Oxygen aerob- SO4
2- , CO2 , H2
Example: Sulfur-related microorganisms
Environmental example:
Diversity of MIC
Presence of MIC:
• Fresh, brackish, or sea water
• Stagnant or flowing water
• Different materials are attacked: metals, polymers, concrete etc.
• Coatings: cracks, scratches, pits etc are favoured for bacterial attachment
• Weld: preffered spots for microbial attachment
- Surface roughness- Change of surface chemistry and microstructure (availability of nutrients from the bulk)- Generation of heterogeneous surface
D.N. French D.N. French
304 & 316 stainless steelpipes, chlorinated drinking water
Environmental examples: buried metallic pipelines
Corrosion systems in a buried pipe:
- External corrosion problems= with regard to the soil, the coating or cathodic protection system
- Internal corrosion= with regard to the fluid, lining
- Corrosion due to wrong material, wrong/ incomplete hydrotesting...
Lock infrastructure:
• Fresh water, can be stagnant
• High load of organic material
• Several centimeter thick tubercles were found
Lock infrastructures
microorganisms were detected
Lock infrastructures
Severe microbiological deterioration of concrete in a tank of a wastewater treatment plant. Due to
the damage the rebar has become exposed. Microbial corrosion was the reason due to the
activity of sulfur oxidizing bacteria.
MIC and concrete in wastewater systems
•Alkaline properties of concrete due to acidification decreased
• The protected environment of the reinforcing disappeared.
• In such acidic conditions, MIC is able to develop
Harbor piles
Situation: uncoated mooring posts in harbor beneath Low Water Level
and in soil, coated above Low Water Level
• Perforations after 5 years just beneath LW-level
• Corroded locations are characterized by:
-Very severe local attack from outside
-Pits bowl shaped, covered by red-orange colored corrosion products
-Underneath blank shiny steel
-On these spots no fouling
HT-LT zone
Aerobes SRB
SOB
EDX-spectrum
High sulfur content
Harbor piles
Failure of steel sheet pilings in a quay lock
Problem:- Fast corrosion- Holes with several diameters in quay wall- Unexpected mass loss
Action:Coupons were cut out of structure for microbial analysis and material related failure analysis
Type of microorganism or metabolism
Sample IRB IOB SRB SOB APB SF
#1 + - + + + +
#2 + + - + + +
#3 + - + + + +
#4 + + - + + +
Results of detection of corrosion relevant microorganisms; the color code indicates activity of microorganisms, green= low
activity, orange= moderate activity, red= high activity, + = growth present and - = growth absent.
Failure of steel sheet pilings in a quay lock
Location Sulfur [wt%]
Box 2 3.5
Box 3 4.2
Box 4 6.3
SEM-EDS results of metal coupon cut out of the steel sheet pilling of the quay lock.
Upper line: left= cross section of the metal coupon, right= EDS elemental mapping showing distribution of sulfur;
Middle line: left= overlay of images from cross section and elemental mapping, right= marking of analyzed area shown in EDS spectrum;
Lower line= EDS spectrum of analyzed area
SEM-EDS results from metal coupon cut out of the steel piling wall in the quay lock. Blue boxes indicate different positions of analyses, sulfur values are listed in the table.
MIC present and responsible for high mass loss
How can WE win this Battle???
Microbial Corrosion activities
Diagnosis and risk assessment Microbial presence/activity Microbial corrosive metabolites Characterization of corrosion damage
(electrochemical, metallographic)
Microbiology
Metallurgy
Direct observation (in-situ analysis)
Electrochemistry MIC
Monitoring In-situ, online detection
techniques Offline analyses
Mitigation (prevention and treatment) System design recommendations (e.g., material selection, substrate pre-treatment, coatings, anti-
microbials, etc)
What can we do about diagnosis?!
MIC diagnosis
Case documentation
Microbial analysis (growth- & DNA
based)
Microbial related failure analysis
Exclude other corrosion
mechanisms
• Case documentation (put available data in the right context) • Combine microbial analysis & microbial related failure analysis to collect
evidence of microbial presence and activity directly at the affected material surface
• Sampling should be done by trained person to exclude cross contamination
Case documentation
MIC diagnosis
Microbial detection methods: growth based techniques
Growth on selective media for corrosion relevant microorganisms Enriched cultures can be used for further corrosion tests
Disadvantages:- Only 1% of environmental microorganisms are cultivable- Microorganisms from extreme environments are difficult to grow- Selective bias can bring misleading results- Need days/ weeks for incubation
MIC diagnosis
Microbial detection methods: DNA based techniques
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR)
Several other techniques possible Requires no cultivation Fast results, hours instead of days/ weeks Even microorganisms from the extreme environments
can be detected
Disadvantages:- Target genes have to be known before analysis- Target gene not present for all relevant microorganisms
or activity genes
MIC related failure analysis
Analysis of corrosion products and microbial metabolites using SEM-EDX, photometric or chromatographic methods
MIC related failure analysis
3D microscopy: Pit depths, pit shape/ geometry
MIC related failure analysis
Visualization of microorganisms attached to the material EFM, AFM combined with fluorescent stain binding to DNA; live/ dead staining
Microscopic techniques to detect microbial presence
and activity directly at damaged spots
MIC related failure analysis
Exclude other corrosion mechanisms !
Galvanic corrosion
Stray current
- Often other corrosion mechanisms are not taken into account Failure in the choice of the correct mitigation strategy
- “Chicken or the egg” question: what was first?!Wrong choice/ failure of the material or presence/ activity of microorganisms
- Often MIC occurs combined with other corrosion mechanisms:
What can we do about diagnosis?!
MIC diagnosis
Case documentation
Microbial analysis (growth- & DNA
based)
Microbial related failure analysis
Exclude other corrosion
mechanisms
MICYes or no?!
Things to keep in mind:
• MIC needs to be analyzed on case by case basis
• Other corrosion mechanisms need to be excluded
• Prove not only the presence but also the activity of MIC relevant microorganisms
• Put all collected data/ evidence in the correct context
• Choose the correct transport and storing conditions
• Think about prevention strategy before structure is installed
• Choose the correct mitigation strategy once MIC is detected
• There is not one “powerful tool” against MIC, it is a combination of many factors such as:
- correct choice of material- planning & set-up of the structure/ system- cleaning of the system - availability of nutrients...
Bevesierweg 1 DC0021781 AT Den HelderP.O. Box 5051780 AM Den HelderThe Netherlands
0223-747001
www.endures.nl
Thank you for your attention!