Date post: | 19-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Middlebury CollegeBanner
Implementation:Minerva Project
Kathy WeissAssistant Registrar for the Undergraduate
College&
Co-Lead for the Banner Student Implementation
ANCIENT HISTORY
In 1998, should we develop software “in-house?” August 1999, the Minerva Report suggests radical change September 1999, working group began systematic evaluation January 2000, appointed project manager February 2000, began formal requirements and evaluation Approximately 70% certain: vendor software Included “in-house” system in evaluation, formal RFP process Several rounds, scoped down to 5, then to 2 (PeopleSoft and SCT) Steering Team with input, selected SCT in August 2000 Signed a multi-year software and services contract on Sept. 28, 2000
WHY?
10. Improve the quality of the system for secondary users9. Take advantage of superior technology8. Take advantage of emerging technology7. Shift our resources to “value added” activities6. Avoid the cost of being a “development” shop5. Improvements in the quality of ERP products4. Take advantage of vendor customer base 3. Increase end-user self-sufficiency2. Easier Access to more timely and accurate information1. Integration
HISTORY
The Chart of Accounts New AP/Purchasing procedures, policies, processes Training of end users on Banner Selection of a reporting tool (Brio) Hiring of a Banner experienced Project Manager (Larry Tansey) The changing face of technology at Midd Creation of infrastructure to support project Go live on July 2, 2001
The Chart of Accounts
No more 26-184-20-TTR, now . . . We have 100010-210630-706200-300-100Indexes, PRAT01 (Provost, Athletics, Fund 01)What do we gain:
EncumbrancesFlexibilityReplace “Shadow Systems”Tailor to “Users” NeedsEnhanced Reporting Capabilities A shared management information system
Training of End Users
• Massive training effort• Documentation critical• Eye on “process improvement”
The Changing Face of Technology
A quick review of some jargon:instancecloneweb enabled“web for”formconversioninterfaceportaltables and views
The AS400, IBM quasi relational database, mainframeOracle 8i, relational database, web based formsShowcase to BrioSingle instance (version) of database to 6 instances of DB
Minerva Project Structure
Steering Team Implementation Oversight Team Leads Plus Team Data Standards Work Team Project Technical Team Change Management Training Sub-team Technology Sub-team (client group, server group, T3) User Support Sub-team Functional Work Teams (Technical and Functional Leads)
Finance (e.g., COA, AP/Purchasing)HRAlumniStudentFinancial Aid
Implementation Calendar (Q1 began Sept. ‘00)
Finance
HR
Alumni
Fin. Aid
Student
X10/00
X7/01
X1/02
X1/01
X1/02
X11/01
X8/02
X4/02
X8/03
X8/02
X2/03
YEAR 1 YEAR 3YEAR 2Oct-Dec
Oct-Dec
Oct-Dec
Jan-Mar
Jan-Mar
Jan-Mar
Apr-June
Apr-June
Apr-June
July-Sept
July-Sept
July-Sept
The Banner Systems
Student
Human Resources
Finance
Alumni
FinancialAid
RecruitingAdmissionsCatalogScheduleFaculty LoadAcademic HistoryLocation Mgt.RegistrationAccounts ReceivableCAPP
The Student Implementation
• The Student Module Implementation Team (SMIT) oversees the entire student implementation, providing guidance to needed work teams.
• Work teams formed around different functions: registration, admissions, recruiting, etc.
• These work teams may be broken out into even greater specificity: undergraduate registration, recruitment of special groups, etc.
Student Implementation Team Structure
Student Core Team • Lead group (co-leads; technical lead; consultant)• Attends training for each module (SCT lead)• Coordinates training schedule for work teams• Requests information on policy or procedural changes as needed• Meets regularly with Advisory Team and with liaison to Academic Affairs Committee.
SMIT Group – Core Team plus key functional specialists• Operational team; meets weekly• Develops strategies for implementation• Members serve as module leads and share information across modules• Plans work team compositions
SMIT Team Membership
• Likely to play a critical role on a work team• Understand what we do and how we do it• Think about how we can do things better• Translate this into a system• Communicate, communicate, communicate
Work Teams
• SMIT member as Team Lead along with other functional specialists from across campus.• Receive 3 day training from SCT for each module• Responsible for
• building and testing the module• developing training documents• training end users
Cross – Module Issues Teams
• May include people trained and not trained
• Each module / work team will need to address these issues:
• Data Standards
• IPEDS reporting
• Web Services
• Reporting / Datamarts
• Security
• Training
• Communications
• Create and train a work team of users/decision makers• Build Banner validations and rules• Test, refine and perfect the business process as it will exist in Banner• Develop security profile for the process• Build reporting infrastructure to support the process• Convert data and test for accuracy • Build any necessary interfaces or data bridges• Create end-user documentation• Train end-users on Banner and Brio
Steps for each Module:
Summer SchoolBilling
UG & Study Abroad Billing
First F.A.Packaging inBanner
First F.A.disbursement inBanner
First UG aid.disbursement inBanner
UG Housing
Housing ofFirst-years
Summer employeehousing
LS & Bread LoafHousing
CommencementHousing
Feb &returning studenthousing
Reunion housing
Homecoming/Family weekendHousing
First-yearReg.
Convert AprilRegistrations
WinterTerm Reg.
Spring Term Reg. (Web-based)
’03 Catalog(Summer/Fall)
Summer/Fall Sched.
Summer School Reg.
Academic History Converted
Resource 25 Interface
First transcriptsout of Banner
ConvertFirst-year Seminar reg.
Schools AbroadRegistration
First BannerCommencement
Dec.
Dec.
Dec.
Jan April July Oct.‘02
Jan April July Oct.‘04
Jan April July Oct.‘03
Proposed Student Module Timeline
Enter new prospectsand convert old ones
Regular Decision
Search Mailing
Summer School/SARecruiting
Early DecisionEnter UG Apps
Summer School/SA Admissions
Lessons Learned
• Buy-in and support from the top is essential • Backing on decisions is key• Expensive project to do right – costly and takes time• This is a good time to review processes• Team Leadership is important• Good Team members have a strong understanding of the functional areas; team players; positive communicators• Helpful having a project manager from outside of the College• Hire people who have experience in Banner / conversion experience• The simplest changes can create the biggest effect• You will need a reporting tool in addition to Banner• You have to make it FUN !
What you can do:
• Ask SCT for consultants who have experience with the IA conversion to Banner • Get on SCT Listserv’s• Networking is extremely helpful
• contacts at other schools who have gone through a conversion;• at professional conferences• do site visits to other schools
• Attend SCT annual conference – SUMMIT;• especially 2004