+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Middlesex University Research Repository happens in... · 2019-04-14 · Small-scale exploratory...

Middlesex University Research Repository happens in... · 2019-04-14 · Small-scale exploratory...

Date post: 04-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
24
Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research Hafford-Letchfield, Trish ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0105-0678 and Bourn, Diana (2010) What happens in supervision? An exploration of the use of stylistic devices in professional management supervision and their role in mediating organisational and professional culture within a social services department. In: 10th International Conference of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 20-22 Jul 2010, Montreal, Canada. This version is available at: Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. See also repository copyright: re-use policy:
Transcript

Middlesex University Research RepositoryAn open access repository of

Middlesex University research

http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk

Hafford-Letchfield, Trish ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0105-0678 and Bourn, Diana(2010) What happens in supervision? An exploration of the use of stylistic devices inprofessional management supervision and their role in mediating organisational and

professional culture within a social services department. In: 10th International Conference ofKnowledge, Culture and Change Management, 20-22 Jul 2010, Montreal, Canada.

This version is available at: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/12661/

Copyright:

Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically.

Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright ownersunless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gainis strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or studywithout prior permission and without charge.

Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, orextensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtainingpermission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially inany format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s).

Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including theauthor’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag-ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and thedate of the award.

If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact theRepository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address:

[email protected]

The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.

See also repository copyright: re-use policy: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/policies.html#copy

Dr Diana Bourne and Trish Hafford-Letchfield

SW Task-Force (DCSF 2009): ◦ Poor communication and antagonistic

relationships between staff and managers in front-line SW

◦ Managers reported unmanageable work-loads, expressed unmet needs for support and continuing CPD

◦ Recommendation 7 – Clear national requirements for the supervision of social workers

Small-scale exploratory Aims: explore different roles managers perform within the

supervision contexts. Analysis of management actions and behaviours at this level to

help generate insights into how managers trade between the needs of the supervisee and the organisational context

Identify strategies that might enhance frontline relationships. Ethical approval Sample: 17 scripts, 8 AV recordings (30 – 90 mins) Methods:

◦ Literature review ◦ Visual analysis of AV recordings of supervision sessions ◦ Documentary analysis of students’ written reflective analyses of their

performance in the AV recordings

Data analysis – Preliminary themes

‘Supervision is a process by which one worker is given responsibility by the organisation to work with another worker(s) in order to meet certain organisational, professional and personal objectives which together promote the best outcomes for service users.’

(Morrison 2005 p32, adapted from Harris 1987)

Use of power and authority

Balancing organisational and administrative functions with empowerment / professional development of frontline staff.

Determined by organisational culture

Collaborative models and skill

(Bogo and Dill, 2008)

Functions of supervision Traditional model

Administrative (competent accountable

performance)

Professional development

Mediation

Personal support

Users/Carers

Professionals

Organisation

Multi-agency

partners

Government

STAKEHOLDERS

Yoo (2005) – estimated only 34 research reports between 1950 and 2002

Bogo and McKnight (2005) found only 22 studies (mostly small-scale) between 1994 and 2004 (half outside USA) suggesting that supervisory practice lacks a well developed empirical base

• 3 types of supervision process: active intrusive

passive avoidant

active reflective (Wonnacott 2003)

• Making a difference to practice: Relationship

Accurate assessment of competence

Empathy and emotional attunement

Enhancing practice (observation, feedback, modelling, skills development, intervention ideas and knowledge) (Morrison 2009 UL)

Trust and appropriate use of authority (Bogo and Dil, 2008)

Knowledge of SLT important in enhancing knowledge and skills (Dodenhoff 1981 in Kavanagh 2003)

Importance of clarity and agreement about supervision goals (Ronnestad and Skivholt 1993 in Quartro 2002)

Inexperienced staff prefer directive supervision; structured supervision and direction less important to experienced staff (vs consultation, reflection, discussion) (Swanson and O’Saben 1993 in Kavanagh 2003)

New supervisors likely to adopt an overly controlling and structured manner

Successful supervisory relationships are an outcome of how power and control issues are continually negotiated (Quatro 2002)

Only 1 in 10 SWs felt they could rely on their supervisors for support

Higher levels of stress amongst managers than practitioners (McClean 1999)

Poorly trained and supported (Kavanagh 2003): ◦ Only 50% had had supervision in the past 2 years

◦ only 38% had had any training

One qualitative study 20 case manager supervisors in long term

services (USA): Workload pressures & increasing demands &

pressures meant: o becoming “more of a business-minded person

than a social worker” (p. 36) o focusing more on workers filing forms on time than

on quality of outcomes oDescribed themselves as becoming less user

centered over time. (Bowers, Esmond, & Canales (1999):

Hensley 2002 in Bogo and McKnight 2005:

Qualitative study (20 supervisors in USA)

Found that practitioners gained in many ways from supervision: ◦ skills, often related to theory

◦ professional growth and support

◦ role modelling of professional and personal qualities

◦ and mutuality through an interactive supervisory relationship.

Available Knowledgeable these techniques to theory Hold practice perspectives and expectations

about service delivery similar to the supervisee Provide support and encourage professional

growth Delegate responsibility to supervisees who can

do the task Role models Communicate in a mutual and interactive style (Bogo and McKnight, 2005)

‘Riding the juggernaut’ (Giddens, 1990, 53)

Increasing surveillance and evaluation of professional practice

Prioritising confidence (in services) over trust & ‘moral motivation’

(Harrison and Smith, 2004)

Importance of supervisor’s own support Recording requirements detracts from full engagement Emotional impact of the work Emotional attunement: skills, time and ability to recognise

emotional component Awareness of self Supervising experienced/inexperienced staff Usefulness of observation and reflection for learning Helping supervisees manage complexity, anxiety, pain,

stress Impact of targets Lack of training, ‘learning on the job’, modelling practice

on own supervisory experiences Gender, race and power relations in supervision

Decision making

Trust and professional confidence

Reliance on anecdotal information/ playing for time

Use of language when discussing serious situations or risk (Menzies-Lythe, 1988)

Specialist knowledge base in interprofessional decision making.

Active listening – impact of recording

Use of authority (dissonance or incongruence between verbal and body language)

Mediating function

“Its a new rule that has been brought in – some people might see it as ‘upping’ the bar, when really we are just changing KPIs to reflect service changes”

“Will you do me a ‘shared practice’ (laughs) - well it is useful”

The central importance of relationships in supervision

Rewarding contact with colleagues

Quality of supervision

Attitudes of managers and human relations

Service user narratives?

Flexibility

Policy analysis rooted in real world analysis and enquiry (Cooper, 2004) including engagement of staff and their managers in the development of systems and structures.

Participatory management

Changing role of first line manager

Flatter management structures - decision-making closer to the front-line

Performance management - achieving targets and procedural compliance → dominance of management function

‘Covering your back’ – defensive supervisory practice

How to keep Users/Carers central –little research evidence

Reflective practice and analysis

Maintaining balance between professional and managerial elements

Role of leadership behaviours in creating, facilitating and enabling positive work environments.

Complexity of interprofessional work

Mediation function significant Lack of time/space Administrative and accountability vs consultancy/ professional guidance

Addressing equality and diversity issues

Bogo, M. and McKnight, K. (2006) ‘Clinical supervision in SW: a review of the research literature’ , The Clinical Supervisor, 24, 1, 49-67

Bogo, M., Dill, K (2008) Walking the tightrope. Using power and authority in child welfare supervision. Child Welfare, 87(6) 141-57

Bowers, Esmond, & Canales (1999) Gibbs (2005 or 2001???) ‘Maintaining front-line workers in child

protection: a case for refocusing supervision’, Child Abuse Review, 10, 323-335

Giddens, A. (1990) The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, Polity Harrison, S., Smith, C. (2004) Trust and moral motivation: redundant

resources in health and social care? Policy and Politics, 32 (3) 371 – 86 Menzies Lyth, I (1988). "The Functioning of Social Systems as a

Defence against Anxiety", in Containing Anxiety in Institutions, London: Free Associations,

Morrison, T. (2005) Staff supervision in Social care, Brighton, Pavillion Siegal 1999


Recommended