+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction...

Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction...

Date post: 31-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: jesus-nowland
View: 218 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
32
Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge www.grantadesign.com/education/ resources © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see back page This lecture unit is part of a set created by Mike Ashby to help introduce students to materials, processes and rational selection. The Teaching Resources website aims to support teaching of materials-related courses in Design, Engineering and Science. Resources come in various formats and are aimed primarily at undergraduate education. Unit 12. Eco-selection and the Eco-audit tool Introducing students to life-cycle thinking
Transcript
Page 1: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

Mike AshbyDepartment of EngineeringUniversity of Cambridge

www.grantadesign.com/education/resources

© M. F. Ashby, 2011For reproduction guidance see back page

This lecture unit is part of a set created by Mike Ashby to help introduce students to materials, processes and rational selection.

The Teaching Resources website aims to support teaching of materials-related courses in Design, Engineering and Science. Resources come in various formats and are aimed primarily at undergraduate education.

Unit 12.

Eco-selection and the

Eco-audit toolIntroducing students to life-cycle thinking

Page 2: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Outline

Material consumption and life-cycle

Eco-audits and the audit tool

Strategy for materials selection

LCA - problems and solutions

Exercises

Resources Text: “Materials and the Environment”, Chapters 1 - 9 Text: “Materials: engineering, science, processing and design”, 2nd Edition, Chapter 20 Text: “Materials Selection in Mechanical Design”, 4th Edition, Chapter 16 Software: CES EduPack with Eco-Audit tool Poster: Wall chart of Eco-properties of materials

Demo

Page 3: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Material production

Concern 1: Resource consumption, dependence

96% of all material

Usage

20% of Globalenergy

Page 4: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Carbon to atmosphere

Concern 2: Energy consumption, CO2 emission

20% of all carbon to atmosphere

Page 5: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

The product life-cycle

LandfillCombust

Resources

Emissions and waste

Life cycle assessment (LCA)

Page 6: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Typical LCA output

Aluminum cans, per 1000 units• Bauxite 59 kg

• Oil fuels 148 MJ

• Electricity 1572 MJ

• Energy in feedstock 512 MJ

• Water use 1149 kg

• Emissions: CO2 211 kg

• Emissions: CO 0.2 kg

• Emissions: NOx 1.1 kg

• Emissions: SOx 1.8 kg

• Particulates 2.47 kg

• Ozone depletion potential 0.2 X 10-9

• Global warming potential 1.1 X 10-9

• Acidification potential 0.8 X 10-9

• Human toxicity potential 0.3 X 10-9

Life cycle assessment (LCA)

Roll up into an“eco-indicator” ?

Full LCA expensive, and requires great detail and skill – and even then is subject to uncertainty

How can a designer used these data?

Resource consumption

Emissionsinventory

Impactassessment

ISO 14040 seriesPAS 2050

Page 7: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Design guidance vs. product assessment

Product specification

Concept

Embodiment

Detail

Market need

Problem statement

Alternative schemes

Layout and materials

CAD, FE analysis, optimization, costing

ProductionLife cycle

assessment

Eco – audit ability

Page 8: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Eco-audit for design

Need: Fast Eco-audit with sufficient precision to guide decision-making

Distinguish life-phases

1 resource – energy (oil equivalent) 1 emission – CO2 equivalent

600

400

300

200

100

0

-100

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

Mat

eria

l

Man

ufac

ture

Tran

spor

tU

se

Dis

posa

l

EoL

cred

it

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

C0 2

equ

iv (

kg)

Mat

eria

l

Man

ufac

ture

Tran

spor

t

Use

Dis

posa

l

EoL

cred

it

This is the life-energy and life-CO2 (as prescribed in ISO 14040 and PAS 2050)

These are potential benefits (could be recovered at end of life)

Page 9: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Fast eco-audit

Eco-aware design: the strategy (1)

The stepsAnalyse

results, identifypriorities

Explore options with “What if..”s

600

400

300

200

100

0

-100

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

Mat

eria

l

Man

ufac

ture

Tran

spor

t

Use

Dis

posa

l

EoL

cred

it

Initial design600

400

300

200

100

0

-100

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

Mat

eria

l

Man

ufac

ture

Tran

spor

t

Use

Dis

posa

l

EoL

cred

it

What if ..Different material?

Page 10: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Fast eco-audit

Eco-aware design: the strategy (2)

The stepsAnalyse

results, identifypriorities

Use CES to select new Materials

and/or Processes

Recommend actions & assesspotential savings

Explore options with “What if..”s

600

400

300

200

100

0

-100

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

Mat

eria

l

Man

ufac

ture

Tran

spor

tU

se

Dis

posa

l

EoL

cred

it

Use eco-audit toindentify

design objective

Minimize: • material in part

• embodied energy

• CO2 / kg

MaterialMinimize:

• process energy

• CO2/kg

ManufactureMinimize:

• mass

• distance

• transport type

TransportMinimize:• mass• thermal loss• electrical loss

UseSelect:

• non-toxic materials• recyclable materials

End of life

Look at the first three steps

Page 11: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

The CES Eco-audit tool

User interface

Bill of materials

Manufacturing process

Transport needs

Duty cycle

End of life choice

User interface

Bill of materials

Manufacturing process

Transport needs

Duty cycle

End of life choice

User inputs

Eco database

Embodied energies

Process energies

CO2 footprints

Unit transport energies

Recycling / combustion

Eco database

Embodied energies

Process energies

CO2 footprints

Unit transport energies

Recycling / combustion

Data from CES

Eco audit model

Eco audit model

Outputs(including

tabular data)

Page 12: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Typical record showing eco-properties

Page 13: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

The simple Audit tool: Levels 1, 2 and 3

Add record

Eco AuditSynthesizer

Options….

^ 1. Material, manufacture and end of life ?

v 2. Transport ?

v 3. Use ?

v 4. Report ?

1 Component 1 Cast iron 30% 2.4 Casting Recycle

1 Component 2 Polypropylene 0% 0.35 Molding Landfill

HELP at each step

Name Choose material from CES DB tree

Enter mass

Set recycle content 0 – 100%

Choose process

Choose end-of-life path

How many?

Page 14: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

CES EduPack materials

tree

Material and process energy / CO2

Component name Material Process Mass (kg) End of life

Component 1 Aluminum alloys Casting 2.3 Recycle

End of lifeoptions

• Reuse

• Refurbish

• Recycle

• Combust

• Landfill

Component 2 Polypropylene Polymer molding 1.85 Landfill

Component 3 Glass Glass molding 3.7 Reuse

Total embodied energy Total process energy Total mass Total end of life energyAvailable processes

• Casting

• Forging / rolling

• Extrusion

• Wire drawing

• Powder forming

• Vapor methods

Page 15: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Transport

Transport stage Transport type Distance (km)

Stage 1 32 tonne truck 350

Stage 2 Sea freight 12000

Table of transport types: MJ / tonne.kmCO2 / tonne.km

Transport energy

Transport CO2

Page 16: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Use phase – static mode

Energy input and output

Power rating

Usage

Usage

Fossil fuel to electric

days per year

hours per day

1.2 kW

365

0.5

Energy conversion path

Fossil fuel to heat, enclosed system

Fossil fuel to heat, vented system

Fossil fuel to electric

Fossil fuel to mechanical

Electric to heat

Electric to mechanical (electric motor)

Electric to chemical (lead-acid battery)

Electric to chemical (Lithium-ion battery)

Electric to light (incandescent lamp

Electric to light (LED)

Total energy and CO2 for use

W

kW

MW

hp

ft.lb/sec

kCal/yr

BTU/yr

Page 17: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Bottled water (100 units)

Fossil to electric 0.12 kW 2 days 24 hrs/day

Use - refrigeration

1 litre PET bottle with PP cap

Blow molded

Filled in France, transported 550 km to UK

Refrigerated for 2 days, then drunk

Number Name Material Process Mass (kg) End of life

100 Bottles PET Molding 0.04 Recycle

100 Caps Polyprop Molding 0.001 Recycle

100 Water 1.0

Transport

14 tonne truckStage 1 550 km

Page 18: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

The output: drink container

The audit reveals the most energy

and carbon intensive steps…

… and allows rapid “What if…”

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

Car

bon

(kg)

100% virgin PETwith recycling

PET Glass ?

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

400

300

200

100

0

-100

-200

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

100% virgin PETwith recycling

Page 19: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Change the materials

Fossil to electric 0.12 kW 2 days 24 hrs/day

Use - refrigeration

1 litre glass bottle with aluminum cap

Glass molded

Filled in France, transported 550 km to UK

Refrigerated for 2 days, then drunk

Transport

14 tonne truckStage 1 550 km

Number Name Material Process Mass (kg) End of life

100 Bottles PET Molding 0.04 Recycle

100 Caps Polyprop Molding 0.0001 Recycle

100 Water 1.0

Soda glass Glass mold 0.45

Aluminum Rolling 0.002

Page 20: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Glass bottle replacing PET

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

Car

bon

(kg)

100% virgin PETwith recycling

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

400

300

200

100

0

-100

-200

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

100% virgin PETwith recycling

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

800

600

400

200

0

-200

-400

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

Change of scale

100% virgin glasswith recycling

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

-10

-20

-30

Car

bon

(kg)

Change of scale

100% virgin glasswith recycling

Page 21: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Use recycled PET instead of virgin?

Material Manufacture Transport Use End of life

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

Car

bon

(kg)

100% recycled PETwith recycling

100% recycled PETwith recycling

Material Manufacture Transport Use End of life

400

300

200

100

0

-100

-200

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

100% virgin PETwith recycling

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

400

300

200

100

0

-100

-200

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

Car

bon

(kg)

100% virgin PETwith recycling

Page 22: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Is it practical to use recycled PET?

Page 23: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Combust instead of recycle

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

Car

bon

(kg)

100% virgin PETwith recycling

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

400

300

200

100

0

-100

-200

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

100% virgin PETwith recycling

Material Manufacture Transport Use

End of life

400

300

200

100

0

-100

-200

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

100% virgin PET with combustion

Material Manufacture Transport Use End of life

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

Car

bon

(kg)

100% virgin PET with combustion

Page 24: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Ship by air freight, refrigerate 10 days

Material Manufacture Transport Use

Disposal

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

Car

bon

(kg)

100% virgin PETwith truck transport

Material Manufacture Transpt Use

Disposal

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

-10

-20

-30

Car

bon

(kg)

100% virgin PETwith air freight

Change of scale

Material Manufacture Transpt Use

Disposal

1000

800

600

400

200

0

-200

-400

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

Change of scale

100% virgin PETwith air freight

Material Manufacture Transport Use

Disposal

400

300

200

100

0

-100

-200

Ene

rgy

(MJ)

100% virgin PETwith truck transport

Page 25: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Teaching with the CES Eco-audit tool

• Overview of the life cycle

• Shown how Eco Audit Tool works

• Pre-loaded projects

Which life phase dominates?

What could you do about it?

• Self-made projects

Bottled mineral water.prd

Hair dryer.prd

Electric kettle.prd

Portable space heater.prd

Family car.prd

Wind turbine.prd

Pre-loaded in CES Edu 2011

Material

Recycle content

Transport mode

Transport distance

Use pattern

Electric energy mix

End of life

Students can explore change of

Introductory level teaching

Page 26: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Jug kettle

2 kW jug kettle

Made SE Asia Air freight to UK Life: 3 years

6 minutes per day

300 days per year

3 years

Use

12,000 km, air freight

250 km 14 tonne truck

Transport

Bill of materials and processes

Page 27: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Eco audit: the jug kettle

What do we learn?

Little gained by change of material for its own sake

Much gained by insulation – double wall with foam or vacuum

Or make hot water on the fly – only as much as needed

Page 28: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

The enhanced Audit tool: Eco Design

Add record

Eco AuditSynthesizer

Options….

v 2. Transport ?

v 3. Use ?

v 4. Report ?

Joining and finishing

^ 1. Material, manufacture and end of life ?

Same as the simple model

Machining, grinding, %

removed

% recovered at end of life

1 Component 1 Cast iron 30% 2.4 Casting Fine machining 10% Recycle 95%

Component 1 Painting 0.55 m2

Component 1 Welding 0.7 m

Choose joining(adhesives, fastners,

welding)

and finishing(painting, plating, powder coating)

Set parameters

For advanced teaching the Enhanced Eco Audit Tool is available in the Eco

Design Edition of CES EduPack

Page 29: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

So what?

Tool 1. Eco-audits allows students to implement quick, approximate “portraits” of energy / CO2 character of products.

CES has two tools-sets to help explore the materials dimension of environmental design

Tool 2. Selection strategies allows selection to re-design products to meet eco-criteria, using systematic methods

They allow fast audits and systematic materials selection for redesign

Page 30: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Lecture Unit Series

These PowerPoint lecture-units are on the Teaching Resource Website

Each frame of each unit has explanatory notes. You see them by opening the PowerPoint slide in Notes view (View – Notes pages) or by clicking this icon in the bottom toolbar of PowerPoint

Page 31: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

Also Available for Sustainability

• Exercises with Worked Solutions

• Other Lecture Units

• White Papers

• Interactive selection case studies

• Webinar recording

• Poster

• Sample Eco Audit Project Files

• Links to other good resource sites

• Eco Indicator Database

On the topics of:

Eco Design & Eco Audits

Low Carbon Power Systems

http://teaching.grantadesign.com/open/eco.htm

Page 32: Mike Ashby Department of Engineering University of Cambridge  © M. F. Ashby, 2011 For reproduction guidance see.

www.grantadesign.com/education/resourcesM. F. Ashby, 2011

www.grantadesign.com/education/resources

M. F. Ashby, 2011

Granta’s Teaching Resources Website aims to support teaching of materials-related courses in Engineering, Science and Design.

The resources come in various formats and are primarily aimed at undergraduate students.

This resource is one of 23 lecture units created by Professor Mike Ashby.

The website also contains resources donated by faculty at the 800+ universities and colleges worldwide using

Granta’s CES EduPack.

The teaching resource website contains both resources that require the use of CES EduPack and those that don’t.

Some of the resources, like this one, are open access.

AuthorProfessor Mike Ashby

University of Cambridge, Granta Design Ltd.

www.grantadesign.com/education

www.eng.cam.ac.uk

ReproductionThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Please make sure that Mike Ashby and Granta Design are credited on any reproductions. You cannot use this resource for any commercial purpose.

The Granta logo, the Teaching Resources logo and laptop image and the logo for the University of Cambridge are not covered by the creative commons license.

AccuracyWe try hard to make sure these resources are of a high quality. If you have any suggestions for improvements, please contact us by email at [email protected]

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/


Recommended