+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Mike Seidel on Vacuum Issues 9.9.2005 Pressure of 1x10**-5 not a problem for Undulator radiation...

Mike Seidel on Vacuum Issues 9.9.2005 Pressure of 1x10**-5 not a problem for Undulator radiation...

Date post: 05-Apr-2015
Category:
Upload: imma-raffel
View: 102 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
3
Mike Seidel on Vacuum Issues 9.9.2005 Pressure of 1x10**-5 not a problem for Undulator radiation damage due to electron-gas scattering (ca. 1000 years undulator life time) Ions below atomic mass of 100 do not get trapped (that takes care of the fast ion-instability) No noticeable reduction of the photon flux due to vacuum (found by comparing pressure and length to that of the gas absorber upstream of experimental hall)
Transcript
Page 1: Mike Seidel on Vacuum Issues 9.9.2005 Pressure of 1x10**-5 not a problem for Undulator radiation damage due to electron-gas scattering (ca. 1000 years.

Mike Seidel on Vacuum Issues 9.9.2005

• Pressure of 1x10**-5 not a problem for Undulator radiation damage due to electron-gas scattering (ca. 1000 years undulator life time)

• Ions below atomic mass of 100 do not get trapped (that takes care of the fast ion-instability)

• No noticeable reduction of the photon flux due to vacuum (found by comparing pressure and length to that of the gas absorber upstream of experimental hall)

Page 2: Mike Seidel on Vacuum Issues 9.9.2005 Pressure of 1x10**-5 not a problem for Undulator radiation damage due to electron-gas scattering (ca. 1000 years.

Simulation mit/ohne int. Pumpe

ohne Pumpe → stark Leitwertebegrenzt

Pumpgeschw. pro m

lokale Pumpe

NEG Streifen

mit NEG Pumpe

Page 3: Mike Seidel on Vacuum Issues 9.9.2005 Pressure of 1x10**-5 not a problem for Undulator radiation damage due to electron-gas scattering (ca. 1000 years.

Weitere Alternativen

• dünnwandiges Cu oder Stahlrohr, vergoldet?

• Vorteil: Wandstärke bis 0.3mm möglich

Lötverbindunggalvanische Goldbeschichtung


Recommended