+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Miller Channels Model

Miller Channels Model

Date post: 17-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: galia
View: 22 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Miller Channels Model. Tax-class clienteles, equilibrium, and capital structure. Review item. Explain why an increase in leverage doesn’t affect the value of a firm in a world without taxes or threat of bankruptcy. Answer. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
34
Miller Channels Model Tax-class clienteles, equilibrium, and capital structure.
Transcript
Page 1: Miller Channels Model

Miller Channels Model

Tax-class clienteles,

equilibrium,

and capital structure.

Page 2: Miller Channels Model

Review item

Explain why an increase in leverage doesn’t affect the value of a firm in a world without taxes or threat of bankruptcy.

Page 3: Miller Channels Model

Answer

Homemade leverage gives the investor the same effects as leverage in the firm.

Homemade leverage is costless. Therefore investors won’t pay extra for

leverage in the firm.

Page 4: Miller Channels Model

Recapitulation

Started with VU = VL

Corporate taxes Financial distress

Page 5: Miller Channels Model

B

Value, VL

Vu

V L = V u

+ T CB

Value of the firm

Cost ofFinancialDistress

Page 6: Miller Channels Model

Indirect costs of financial distress

Lost sales, delayed collection, slow deliveries.

Managers take large risks. Investors won’t support good projects. Equity “milks the property.”

Page 7: Miller Channels Model

Against-the-Wall MartAssets BV MV Liabilities BV MV

Cash 200 200 LT bonds 300 ?

Fixed Asset 400 0 Equity 300 ?

Total 600 200 Total 600 200

What happens if the firm is liquidated today?

LT Bonds = 200.

Equity = 0.

Page 8: Miller Channels Model

Managers take bad risksCost = $200 (all the firm’s cash)

The gamble Probability Payoff

Win Big 10% $1,000

Lose Big 90% $0

Required return is 50%

Expected CF from the gamble = $1000 x 0.10 + $0 = $100

NPV = - $200 + $100 / 1.5 = -$133 BAD PROJECT

Page 9: Miller Channels Model

Equity accepts the bad risk Expected CF to debt (bondholders)

= 300 x 0.10 + 0 = 30 Expected CF to equity (shareholders)

= (1000 - 300) x 0.10 + 0 = 70

PV of bonds without the gamble = 200 PV of stocks without the gamble = 0

PV of bonds with the gamble = $30 / 1.5 = $20 PV of stocks with the gamble = $70 / 1.5 = $47

Page 10: Miller Channels Model

The market won’t invest in good projects.

Government sponsored project t=0 t=1-300 +350

Required return is 10% NPV = -$300 + $350 / 1.1 = $18.18 GOOD PROJECT But … the firm only has $200 now.

Page 11: Miller Channels Model

Equity passes, debt passes

• New bondholders contribute the 100 by buying more bonds. They are owed 100 or ¼ of the firm’s debt.

• When the firm gets 350, the new bondholders collect ¼*350 = 87.5. They lose.

• New shareholders contribute the 100:They get 50 / 1.1 - 100 = -54.55

Page 12: Miller Channels Model

Summary of failure to contribute

Neither new equity nor new debt will contribute. Markets fail.

Note: old debt would contribute if it could do so in a coordinated manner. There is an externality element.

One purpose of bankruptcy is to coordinate the interests of debt.

Page 13: Miller Channels Model

Milking the PropertyLiquidating dividends ...are often illegal …or restricted by bond indenture.Other tactics to siphon money.Perks, compensation to

management.Sweetheart deals with shell

companies

Page 14: Miller Channels Model

Optimal Debt and Value

Debt (B)

Value of firm (V)

0

Present value of taxshield on debt

Present value offinancial distress costs

Value of firm underMM with corporatetaxes and debt

VL=VU+TCB=

V=Actual value of firm

VU=Value of firm with no debt

B*

Maximumfirm value

Optimal amount of debt

Page 15: Miller Channels Model

The final word on capital structure

Miller channels model. Restores MMI with important

differences

Page 16: Miller Channels Model

What's been left out so far?

Investor taxes. Supply and demand.

Page 17: Miller Channels Model

Financial officers as marketers … or arbitragers.

They package EBIT into either the debt channel or the equity channel,

depending on which has more value.

Page 18: Miller Channels Model

Taxes in the debt channel

Only TB, investor tax rate on bond income

Page 19: Miller Channels Model

Taxes in the equity channel

TC the corporate tax rate

TS investor tax rate on stock income

Stock income is partially or largely tax shielded: unrealized capital gains net capital gains

Page 20: Miller Channels Model

Channels$ of operatingcash flows

TB

TC

TS

1-TB (1-TC)(1-TS)

Corporatetaxes

Personaltaxes

Debtchannel Equity

channel

Page 21: Miller Channels Model

Clienteles for the channels

Dependent on tax rates which differ among investors

Page 22: Miller Channels Model

Clienteles for the debt channel

1-TB > (1-TC)(1-TS)

Low income investors (Low TB and TS )

Pension funds (TB = TS = 0)

IRA's (low TB, TS, because deferred)

Non profit organizations

Page 23: Miller Channels Model

Clienteles for the equity channel

1-TB < (1-TC)(1-TS)

High income investors (high TB, low TS )

Corporations (low TS on dividends)

Page 24: Miller Channels Model

Equilibrium of demand

The debt clientele demands debt. The equity clientele demands equity. But at what prices?

Page 25: Miller Channels Model

Value asequity

Value asDebt

Operating C.F.’s ofthe whole economy

D of InstitutionsD of ric

h investors

V* = 1/RB V* = 1/RS

as equityasdebt

Miller: Tax-class clienteles

Page 26: Miller Channels Model

Meaning of the Miller channels model.

Economy-wide debt-equity ratio is determinate.

For each firm, debt-equity ratio does not affect value.

Page 27: Miller Channels Model

Tax reform and leveraged buyouts in the late 1980's

Tax reform of 1986 Raised TC, which favors bonds

Raised TS, which also favors bonds

Page 28: Miller Channels Model

Value asequity

Value asdebt

Operating C.F.’s ofthe whole economy

tax reform

increaseddebt

...

Page 29: Miller Channels Model

Increase in demand for bonds

Raises economy-wide debt Rewards debt-for-equity swaps and leveraged buyouts.

Page 30: Miller Channels Model

Value asequity

Value asdebt

Operating C.F.’s ofthe whole economy

...

tax cut

increasedequity

Page 31: Miller Channels Model

Summary

Value is unaffected by leverage,

except when tax laws have changed

or something else affects the demands of clienteles.

Page 32: Miller Channels Model

Review item

In a world with corporate taxes, VL=VU+TCB. Why?

Page 33: Miller Channels Model

Answer: Present value of tax shield

Debt and other assets are perpetuities. Let rB be the market rate for the bonds.

Interest payments of BrB each year generate a tax shield of TCBrB

Present value of this perpetuity is found by dividing by rB. Result is TCB.

Page 34: Miller Channels Model

Recommended