+ All Categories
Home > Business > Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform...

Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform...

Date post: 02-Dec-2014
Category:
Upload: juleah-swanson
View: 310 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
This presentation shares research on recent trends in usage of electronic content by platform, comparing patron usage at a publisher platform, Elsevier’s Science Direct, to patron usage of the same content at a locally hosted platform, OhioLINK’s Electronic Journal Center. From the data, this presentation will open up a discussion on whether there is a continued place for locally hosted digital collections in our libraries; as well as what the long term implications are for relying on publisher platforms for our collections.
Popular Tags:
9
Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform
Transcript
Page 1: Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Mine or theirs, where do users go?

A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Page 2: Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Juleah SwansonAssistant Professor,Acquisitions Librarian for Electronic ResourcesThe Ohio State University [email protected]

ALCTS CMS Collection Evaluation and Assessment Interest GroupJune 30, 2013

American Library Association Annual 2013Chicago, IL

Page 3: Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Overview

Page 4: Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Context

• 1995- Elsevier offered 1,100 of its journals in electronic form to subscribers

• 1997- Elsevier launches ScienceDirect

• 1998- OhioLINK Electronic Journal Center (EJC) goes live online

• 2000- 3,000 journal titles and over 1.9 million articles in the EJC

• 2009- ScienceDirect held 9 million articles, 4,700 e-books, for 11 million

researchers in over 200 countries.

• February 2009- OhioLINK & EJC system failure

• March 2009- EJC fully restored

• 2011- 15 Millionth article added to EJC

Page 5: Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Methodology Highlights

• Why ScienceDirect?• Ability to obtain OhioLINK wide data

• Substantial number of titles

• Parallel history

• Data reviewed from 2007-2012

• Title lists reviewed for matches

• Usage analyzed per 100 titles

Year Title Count

2007 1910

2008 2050

2009 2084

2010 2154

2011 2243

2012 2245

Number of matching titles

Page 6: Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Usage per 100 titles at the Electronic Journal Center and ScienceDirect

EJC Usage February 2009

Usage per 100 titles

ScienceDirect:y = 5.1748x - 198939R² = 0.4997

Electronic Journal Centery = -1.2238x + 54936R² = 0.2033

Page 7: Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Rolling 12-month average usage per 100 titles at the Electronic Journal Center and ScienceDirectUsage per 100

titles

Science Directy = 5.0881x - 196354R² = 0.8238

Electronic Journal Centery = -1.1064x + 50314R² = 0.6413

Page 8: Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Initial Findings, Thoughts & Implications

• Does it even matter that users seek content at a publisher platform over a

local platform?

• Should a local platform be transformed into something that competes with a

publisher/commercial platform? Or should it be transformed into something

that better serves the remaining users? Or should it just stay the same?

• What can be learned from the EJC to enhance other types of local

platforms being developed today (institutional repositories, digital archives,

data libraries)?

Page 9: Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform

Questions or Feedback?

Juleah Swanson

Acquisitions Librarian for Electronic Resources

Assistant Professor

The Ohio State University

[email protected]

Twitter: @juleahswanson


Recommended