+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Miniaturized Systems for Wireless...

Miniaturized Systems for Wireless...

Date post: 09-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
26
Prof. Brian Otis, Prof. Babak Parviz University of Washington Electrical Engineering Department Seattle, WA, USA Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoring
Transcript
Page 1: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Prof. Brian Otis, Prof. Babak ParvizUniversity of Washington

Electrical Engineering DepartmentSeattle, WA, USA

Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoring

Page 2: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

• Project goals

• Challenges & the state-of-the-art

• Our progress since last year:

– Digital sensor identification test chip– Low frequency on-chip system timer– Thermal energy harvesting

Page 3: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Goals: wireless monitoring

• Example: Structural monitors, fluid conductivity, flow rate, temperature, etc, at arbitrary locations

• Unrealistic to position thousands of complete sensing and chemical analysis units

?

• Use large number of inexpensive wireless monitors

• Network density provides high spatial resolution and robustness

Page 4: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Challenges: cost, size, reliability

• Necessary to integrate many different technologies in a very small volume:

– Various sensors– RF Transceiver/antenna– Microprocessor– Power storage/conversion– Quartz frequency reference

• Typically done with surface-mount PCB

– Too large for microscale sensing– Prohibitively expensive for ubiquitous deployment

Page 5: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

State-of-the-art: Passive tags

• RFID (example: Hitachi μ-chip)

• No battery or power supply

• (150x150x7.5)μm3 (168e-6 mm3)

• Si Density ρ=2330kg/m3

∴ mass of one chip = 0.393 μg (small)

• Millions of die/wafer

• < $0.10 US (cheap)

• Interrogator output power: 0.3W

• Range: 450mm (limited capabilities, no sensing)

M. Usami et. al, ISSCC 2006

Page 6: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

State-of-the-art: Active tags

Gen 1Softbaugh MSP board

Gen 3Gen 2Traditional Analog Transponder

• Peer-to-peer communication possible• Transceivers require multiple off-chip components, increasing size• Power consumption is too high, requiring large batteries

(typically 2 AA batteries) and frequent replacement• Limited sensing functionality Bowen, Burt

Page 7: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Room for improvement

• New techniques for miniaturizing RF transceivers

• Reduce the power consumption to shrink power supply

• Low power sensor interface circuitry

• Low cost self-assembly on arbitrary substrates

• Means of augmenting battery power through energy harvesting

In no particular order…

Page 8: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Self-assembled microsystems

1. Integrate circuitry, sensors, and power generationon arbitrary substrates

2. Inexpensive self-assembly process with modular architecture allows user customization

3. Ultra-low power RF subsystems that operate in peer-to-peer mesh network or RFID interrogation modes

Page 9: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Progress update: sensor identification

Page 10: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Digital IC fingerprinting

• Thousands of identical, inexpensive sensors

• How to differentiate?

• Take advantage of IC process variations to extract a unique digital fingerprint from each chip

1010111100110101

0111001

?

Lofstrom, ISSCC 2000

Page 11: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Latch-Based ID Cells

• Output of the circuit depends on random mismatch

B A

A

B

time(s)

volta

ge (V)

• Random process variation “freezes” a unique ID into circuit

• Use many (say, 128) ID cells to create digital fingerprint

Su, Holleman, Otis, JSSC 2008

Page 12: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

ID Output Codes• Vanishingly small probability of chip misidentification with

billions of fabbed chips

Page 13: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Combination SRAM/ID prototype• The latch is very similar to an SRAM unit

cell• Can we reuse ID circuit for memory

storage?• Will the data we store in SRAM

affect the ID over time?

Ying Su

Page 14: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Results-Averaged ID Output

• Averaged ID output over 18 chips for each individual SRAM cell– No noticeable artifacts exist, indicating that gradient, shadowing and

edge effects have been suppressed.

Page 15: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

The nodes spend most of their time sleeping…

How do we wake them up?

Page 16: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Motivation• Only need to

sense/compute/communicate every second or so

• Need a slow clock (approx 1 Hz) to act as a heartbeat to wake up the system periodically

• Trivial to make on-chip clocks that run from 100kHz to 1GHz, but difficult to make clocks slower…

J. Bowen

Page 17: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Relaxation oscillator using gate leakage

1. Replace the resistor in a standard relaxation oscillator with a thin-oxide transistor

2. The gate leakage of the tunneling transistor simulates a very large resistor

3. All gates except the tunneling device have thick gate oxides

Y. Lin et. al, IEEE CICC 2007.

Page 18: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

1 Hz timer schematic

Page 19: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Oscillator layout – 90nm CMOS

1mm

Consumes 30um x100umof die area

Consumes <1nW from a 0.35V supply

Ryan Ricchiuti

Page 20: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Results: 24hr stability

Far inferior to quartz, but quite good (in power and stability) compared to ring-oscillator based solutions

Page 21: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

How do we power these systems?Towards energy harvesting for autonomous

sensors

Page 22: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Good candidates for wireless process monitors: solar & thermal.

Energy harvesting

Energy scavenging eliminates maintenance costs and allows reduced energy storage volume

S. Roundy, B. Otis, Y.H. Chee, J. Rabaey, P. Wright, IEEE ISLPED 2003

Page 23: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Thermal power supply footprint

• System specifications:

- 1cm2 footprint- 10uW average power- First step: supply power

to a custom sensor interface preamplifier IC

Page 24: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Thermal power supply prototype

1cm

1mm

4-channel low power preamp

Page 25: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Output w/ voltage converter

Page 26: Miniaturized Systems for Wireless Monitoringdepts.washington.edu/.../2008/Wednesday/BrianOtis.pdf · Gen 1. MSP board. Traditional Gen 2. Gen 3. Analog Transponder • Peer-to-peer

Summary

1. We are developing a self-assembled system architecture to bridge the gap between passive and active wireless tags

2. We have demonstrated prototypes of a few key technologies:• SRAM/digital chip ID• Fully integrated, sub-uW system timer• Miniaturized thermal powersource• Low power temp sensor IC

3. The next step: self-assembly of wireless temp sensor onto a plastic substrate


Recommended