+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING THE VIET NAM … si/Tom tat luan an_Tieng Anh.pdf1. Pham Duc...

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING THE VIET NAM … si/Tom tat luan an_Tieng Anh.pdf1. Pham Duc...

Date post: 27-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
28
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING THE VIET NAM INSTITUTE OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES NGUYEN THE SON BUILDING INTEGRATED THEMES IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS IN HIGH SCHOOL Major : THEORY AND METHOD OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS Code: 62 14 01 11 SUMMARY OF DOCTORAL THESIS Ha Noi, 2017
Transcript

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING

THE VIET NAM INSTITUTE OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES

NGUYEN THE SON

BUILDING INTEGRATED THEMES IN TEACHING

MATHEMATICS IN HIGH SCHOOL

Major : THEORY AND METHOD OF

TEACHING MATHEMATICS

Code: 62 14 01 11

SUMMARY OF DOCTORAL THESIS

Ha Noi, 2017

The Thesis is completed at :

The Vietnam Institute of Educational Sciences;

Scientific supervisors:

1. Assoc. Prof., Dr.Pham Duc Quang, VNIES;

2. Dr. Pham Thanh Tam, VNIES.

Reviewer 1: ...................................................................

...................................................................

Reviewer 2: ...................................................................

...................................................................

Reviewer 3: ....................................................................

.....................................................................

The thesis will be proofed before the thesis review board meeting

at The Vietnam Institute of Educational Sciences, 101 Tran Hung

Dao, Ha Noi.

Time………..Date : ……………………..

The thesis could be found at:

- National Library;

- Library of VNIES.

LIST OF AUTHOR’S RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS

RELATING TO THE CONTENTS OF THESIS

1. Pham Duc Quang and Nguyen The Son (2012). Teaching

Mathematics in high school in the direction of relating to

reality, enhancing practice, application, interdisciplinary.

Journal of Education and Society, No.7, April 2012

2. Nguyen The Son (2012). Approach to integrated teaching in

Mathematics in high school. Journal of Education and

Society, No. 82, July 2012.

3. Nguyen The Son (2015). Orientation of integrated teaching

in Mathematics for secondary students. Journal of

Education, No.363, August 2015.

4. Pham Duc Quang and Nguyen The Son (2016). The integration

tendency in general education in some countries. Journal of

Education and Society, 60 (121), March 2016.

5. Nguyen The Son (2016). Suggest an Integrated Theme

building process in teaching Mathematics in high school.

6. Nguyen The Son (2016). Some measures to help teachers build

and teach Integrated Theme in Mathematics in high school.

Journal of Education and Society, 63 (124), June 2016.

1

PREFACE

1. Reasons to choose the thesis

1.1. The teaching of science in school must be coherently, logically

linked, especially in the context of international integration and the

knowledge economy.

In order to meet the above requirements, teachers need to

know how to integrate sciences in teaching, how to facilitate students

the ways to find, collect and process information sources, how to

flexibly apply knowledge in practice.

1.2. The development of general education curriculum in our country

needs to be changed in line with the international trend

The current general education curriculum has implemented

the integration of multiple disciplines in one subject, integrated many

global issues into many subjects and educational activities. However,

the content is still in favor of the scientific logic of each subject, not

rehearsing for students to find and solve problems in real life ...

Facing with the requirements for fixing the limitations, general

education curriculum will be radically renovated.

1.3. Integrated teaching trend is becoming popular in schools

around the world

Integrating subjects in schools around the world is an

indispensable trend. Therefore, we need to study, research and

advance in using Integrated Teaching in general schools, contribute

to meeting the requirements of developing general education

curriculum, in orientation of developing students‟ competencies.

1.4. The development of the mathematics curriculum in Vietnamese

schools is necessary to meet the needs of human resource

development in the context of international integration in our

country.

2

Deriving from the above reasons PhD candidate selected the

thesis: Building integrated themes in teaching Mathematics in high

school.

2. Purpose of the study

Suggest process and methodology for building Integrated

Themes in Mathematics with some specific Integrated Themes that

illustrate the process and methodology in order to contribute to

renewal and improvement of the quality of mathematics instruction

in high schools.

3. Research tasks

Clarify some theoretical issues about Integrated Teaching

(integration concept, characteristics of Integrated Teaching,

Integrated Teaching types ...);

Select the appropriate building process and structure

Integrated Themes in Mathematics teaching so that teachers can

build Integrated Themes in Mathematics for the future;

Suggest pedagogy to help teachers design Integrated Themes

of Mathematics and deploy teaching them;

Pedagogical experiments examine the thesis‟ feasibility.

4. Scientific hypothesis

If an appropriate integration model is identified and

implemented in an appropriate procedure to the proposed measures

in the thesis, it is possible to design Integrated Themes of

Mathematics in high schools and the teaching of those themes will

improve the teaching results of mathematics in high school.

5. Subjects and scope of the study

Research subjects: Integrated Themes in Mathematics in

Vietnamese schools.

Research subjects: Integrated Teaching in Mathematics in

Vietnamese high schools.

3

Scope of the study: The thesis focuses on the process of constructing

Integrated Themes in teaching mathematics in high school; illustrates

through some mathematics themes s in high school under the current

curriculum in Vietnam.

6. Research Methodology

Theoretical research; observation and investigation method;

pedagogical experiment research; experience summation method;

expert method.

7. New contributions of the thesis:

In theory: Clarify some issues related to integrated Teaching

such as concepts of: integration in teaching, teaching themes,

teaching integrated themes, ...; propose some models of integration

which is appropriate to Mathematics in Vietnamese schools; Propose

the process of building of Integrated teaching in Mathematics in

Vietnamese schools; initially clarify the method and form of

Integrated Teaching in Mathematics in Vietnam.

In practice: Propose pedagogical measures to help teachers

design and teach integration in mathematics in high school; design

some Integrated Themes in Mathematics in high school; give some

guidelines to help teachers design and develop mathematics in high

school.

8. Proposed points for Defense

- The proposed form of integration in mathematics in high

schools has scientific rationale and feasible in teaching mathematics

in our country.

- The designing process of Integrated Themes as proposed in the

thesis has scientific rationale and feasible in teaching mathematics in

our country;

4

- It is possible to design Integrated Theme in teaching

Mathematics in our country basing on the proposed process and the

standards of knowledge, skills in our current curriculum;

- Teachers can base on the guidelines to design and implement

Teaching Integrated Themes in Mathematics in our country,

following the current standards of knowledge and skills in our

current curriculum.

9. Thesis structure

In addition to the introduction, conclusion, the list of tables,

and the lists of references, the thesis consists of 3 chapters.

CHAPTER 1

SOME GENERAL ISSUES ON INTEGRATION

IN EDUCATION

In this chapter, we focus on the following main contents.

1.1. Concepts of integration

1.1.1. Some concepts of integration from foreign research

By studying some domestic and foreign studies, the majority

view that Integration derived from Latin with the meaning of

reconstructing the general, the whole, the system on the basis of

individual parts. In education, integration can be understood as the

consolidation of the various types of knowledge and the

corresponding disciplines.

1.1.2. Concept of integration in some domestic researches

Through the understanding that, up to now, although there

are many different approaches, there are also different notions of

integration, but there are some common points, such as: Integration

is a process of combining different objects into a unified whole.

The result of this combination process is the formation of a

new system or may include parts that are more or less relating to

5

previous systems, which are more closely interrelated and there is a

change in quality of each part‟s attributes.

1.1.3. Integration is an indispensable trend in educational

curriculum development

By studying some of the research on the integration of

authors in and outside the country such as Susan M. Drake, Robin

Fogarty or Xavier Roegiers, Tran Duc Tuan, Nguyen Anh Dung ... it

is shown that integration as indispensable trend in constructing

general education curriculum in 21st century.

1.2. Research on integration

1.2.1. Some models of educational curriculum of

integration

According to Susan M. Drake, Robin Fogarty or Xavier

Roegiers, or Nguyen Anh Dung ... shows that there are some models

of educational curriculum of integration

as followings:

Type 1. Multidisciplinary integration, subject teachers select

and organize the requirements, towards the common objectives,

across a common theme.

Type 2. Interdisciplinary integration, lecturers teach or

lecture around common themes with all related subjects and can

contribute more or less to common goals and accomplishments.

Type 3. Transdisciplinary Integration instructional practice is

organized around and based on the issues that students care about,

attached to the real context.

Type 4. Internal integration, when subjects are discrete; The

connected; The Shared model/ The Nested.

Type 5. Integration through learners (includes 2 models: The

immersed / meditated model, the networked model).

6

Through exploring theories and practices, we find that

Mathematics in our high school has potential opportunities to deploy

integration in the models of: Integration within the subject;

Interdisciplinary integration, Transdisciplinary Integration;

Integrated by and through learning (immersed / meditated).

Moreover, according to the author's point of view, Teaching

Integration in mathematics should be carried out slowly, gradually

over time, so that teachers can absorb and implement effectively.

1.2.2. Research on integrated process of building

Integrated Themes

Researching some researches in Vietnam and overseas

shows that:

+ Susan M. Drake offers an 8-step process of integration.

+ Xavier Roegiers also identifies some processes in different

approaches: content based Integration process (conducted in 6

phases); Integrated approach based on integration objectives

(conducted in 5 phases); ...

+ According to Gary and Jerri-Ann Jacobs, the design 4-step

process of designing Integrated Themes.

+ According to The California Center for College and

Career, there are 11 main steps when building process of integrated

themes.

+ After researching this matter, Do Huong Tra and Nguyen

Van Bien proposed the 7 step process of sciences integration themes.

...

Comments: Due to the many different approaches to

integration, there are also many processes for building

INTEGRATED THEMES. Through research and study, the author

finds that Gary's and Jerri-Ann Jacobs's approach and process of

building the community is closest to mathematics curriculum.

7

1.2.3. Study and organize integrated teaching in some

countries around the world

1.3. The process of constructing integrated themes in

mathematics

1.3.1. Integrative concepts, integrated lessons, integrated

curriculum, and integrated instruction

a) An integrated theme is a situation related to learning that

teachers and students can exploit to discover and gain knowledge,

apply knowledge, form and develop competencies

b) An integrative learning lesson is the smallest unit of

learning in which it is capable of forming knowledge, skills and

attitudes needed for learners to solve a particular part task or a whole

task, contributing to the establishment of profession competence for

learners.

c) Integrated lesson plan is a design of activities and

situations intended to be organized for learners during class time to

address learning tasks.

d) Integrated teaching aims to create students „competencies

to effectively solve practical situations based on the mobilization of

contents, knowledge and skills in many different fields.

1.3.2. The process of constructing and integrating thematic

structures in Vietnam and abroad

Researching some national and international researches

shows that there are different processes, such as:

+ Gary and Jerri-Ann Jacobs of the Group “High Tech High

Charter School” thinks there are 4 steps: Identify integration goals;

Identify Integrated Themes; Plan the implementation, clarify the task

map; Project evaluation.

+ The Matt Perry team proposed 11 steps as constructing

Integrated Themes.

8

+ In the teacher training materials, MoET proposed the 6-

step process of constructing Integrated Themes, Boets apply and

design in details.

+ Nguyen Van Bien [24] suggested 7 step process of

constructing Integrated Themes for Natural sciences.

....

Based on the results of the study and practices of Education

in the country, the author proposes the process of constructing and

structuring an Integrated Theme of Mathematics in the following

steps: (1) Define learning objectives (2) Suggest Integrated Themes

for subjects. (3) Expect activities - Mapping, plan implementation.

(4) Assessment of integrated units.

1.4. Preliminary status of research and development on

integrated teaching in Vietnam

By researching documents, the author found that: with some

little integrated appearing subjects, like Math, there is still potential

idea of integration. Although not explicitly stated about integration,

the requirements for integration are quite evident in educational goal

of mathematics. At present, with Mathematics, there are also some

integrated exams, Interdisciplinary integration, but mainly internal

integration, some articles incorporate some contents directedly

involve to Interdisciplinary in suitable conditions. Themes discussed

by teachers include: Math equations; Exponent and exponent;

Statistics in life;

In general, integration has not become unified point of

views, across all levels. The use of integrated perspective is mainly

in subjects in elementary school, documents are limited. The

acquisition of foreign experience on the implementation of integrated

perspective is still not complete and authentic in defining aims,

contents, methods and assessment of students‟ learning outcomes ...

9

CONCLUSIONS OF CHAPTER I

Based on theory and practice of teaching in our country, it is

possible to design Integrated Themes in Mathematics in direction of:

Internal mathematics integration; Interdisciplinary integration;

Transdisciplinary Integration.

Through studying some materials of domestic and foreign

experiences as the rationale of theory and practice, the author has

proposed the process of building and structuring Integrated Themes

in Mathematics in our country, the process includes 04 steps: Define

learning objectives; Suggest Integrated themes for subjects.

Expected activities - Mapping, plan implementation; Assessment of

integrated units.

CHAPTER 2

SOME MEASURES TO HELP TEACHER BUILD

INTEGRATED THEMES IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS

In this chapter, we focus on the following main contents.

2.1. Orientations to set out measures

We need to rely on the following guidelines

Orientation 1: As design some themes for integrating

mathematics, it is necessary to consult some other related disciplines

and teaching methodology of theirs, to ensure the feasibility.

Orientation 2: Appropriately pay attention to both types of

teacher‟s activities including: design integrated themes and teaching

methodology.

Orientation 3: designing process and teaching methodology

of Integrated Themes should be feasible and effective; possibly

tested through pedagogical experiments.

Orientation 4: Measures should be consistent with theory

and practice, ensuring the goals of teaching mathematics in high

10

school: consistent with the theory of mathematics teaching in high

school; In line with the teacher training and fostering process;

2.2. Some measures helping teachers build and teach

integrated themes

Based on theoretical and practical research, we propose

pedagogical measures to help teachers effectively implement the

design and teaching of integrated mathematics instruction as follows:

2.2.1. Measure 1: Prepare teacher training materials for

integration and integrated teaching.

2.2.1.1. The rationale of the measure

a) Philosophy rationale: To do well, it is essential to master

theories and basic knowledge of the subject.

b) Psychology rationale: Encouraging learning and

recognizing learners' endeavors, creating the confidence of the

learner is the basis for effective teaching.

2.2.1.2. The purpose of the measure: To help teachers deeply

understand integration, Integrated Themes and Integrated Teaching.

2.2.1.3. How to implement measures

a) Compile training teacher materials on Integrated Teaching

On the rationale of the content presented in Chapter 1 of the

thesis, we proceed to compile training materials in order to

disseminate and equip the general staff with theoretical and practical

bases for peace of mind, firmly believe in design and teach

integration.

b) Train teachers on designing the process of integrated

themes: Organizing form: Combine the form of teaching in classes,

discussions and the appropriate amount of time for the participants to

11

engage in the training (can refer to some topics that we have

designed and presented in hhis thesis).

2.2.2. Measure 2: Organize for teachers to experience in

designing and teaching integrated themes

2.2.2.1. The measure rationale

+ Base on the education principle of "Learning with

Practicing": To master a skill requiring a focused practice with a

certain amount of time.

+ Psychological rationale: The meaning of practical

experience, the meaning of Integrated Teaching.

+ Reality of fostering teachers: The situation of training and

fostering for teachers, especially at the provincial and district levels

are still limited.

2.2.2.2. The purpose of the measure

Through experiencing and designing the teaching of

Integrated Themes help teachers actively design and implement of

teaching a school.

2.2.2.3. How to implement measures

+) Renovate contents, training methods, professional training

for core staff of BOETs.

+) Instruct teachers to know how to design integrated themes

The building of Integrated Themes is carried out following

the process described in the previous chapter. In this section, the

author gives out more clearly the activities in the steps of the process

including: Identify problematic situations; Identify the standards of

knowledge, skills, attitudes, capacities, ... anticipate learning

activities; Develop integrated theme content; Identify teaching

12

facilities and equipment; Design process of the teaching of integrated

themes.

+) Instruct teachers to organize learning activities basing on

integrated theme. Teachers should pay attention to some contents:

active teaching techniques; How to transfer tasks to students; How to

organize students to report; How to evaluate results.

+) Instruct teachers integrated teaching.

Basically, the method and form of integrated teaching are not out of

orientation for renewing teaching method in high schools.

About the organizing process, integrated teaching includes

the following steps:

Step 1: Identify integrated lesson.

Step 2: Compile the integrated lesson plan, including the

main tasks: Identify the objectives of the lesson; Identify the contents

of the lessons; Identify teaching and learning activities of teachers

and students; Identify the teaching aids used in the lesson; Determine

the time for each part. About determining the time, it is essential to

pay attention to the teaching-learning time for each skill mentioned;

Experiences are drawn after implementing the lesson plan:

Preparation, implementation, testing, assessment of knowledge, skills

and attitudes that students need to comprehend.

Step 3: Carry out the integrated lesson

Step 4: Check, evaluate.

+) In the thesis we illustrate in detail the above through the

example of the Subject: surface area and volume of the object

Step 1. Determine learning objectives. The main product of

step 1 is the following section A:

13

A. Objectives. After finishing this subject, the learners: get

understood about the surface area and volume of the object; be able

to calculates (or estimates) the surface area and volume of an object;

from that they are able to calculates the ratio between the volume

and surface area of the object; Know how to create objects with the

smallest surface area, but have the largest volume; get understood

the benefits or disadvantages through the relationship between the

ratio of surface area and volume of an object in daily life; Get to

know that mathematics has practical applications, inter-discipline.

Step 2. Propose integrated theme and assign responsibilities

Determine the focus of integrated theme: Area and volume in

reality. The product of this section is Section B below:

B. The main content of the topic.

(a) Structure frame of contents; (b) Core questions for the

topic; (c) What students want to do; (d) The order of implementing

sections of the topic: Give out problematic situation; Knowledge

(formula) of calculating area; Calculate the area of the object without

knowing the formula; Knowledge (formula) of calculating volume;

Calculate the volume of the object without knowing the formula;

Calculate the S / V ratio (where S is the surface area, V is the volume

of the object); Apply ratio between surface area and volume in

practice, inter-discipline; comprehensive training.

Step 3. Expect activities, diagram, plan implementation.

Based on the objectives, the main product of this section could be:

(1) Rationale. (2) The knowledge (formula) of calculating area. (3)

Knowledge (formula) of calculating volume of objects. (4) Ratio

between surface area and volume. (5) Application f ratio between

surface area and volume in real life, inter-discipline, including

14

contents: packaging manufacture, Surface area and volume in

biology; Surface area and volume in physiology; Surface area and

volume in life; Surface area, volume in aviation; Surface area and

volume in chemistry – physics; Balloon.

Step 4: Evaluate integrated units.

2.2.3. Measure 3: Organize teacher to evaluate and self-

evaluate on design results and teach integrated themes.

2.2.3.1. The basis of the measure

- General reasoning on evaluation of student performance;

Method, assessment tools which contribute to promote the self-

reliant spirit, activeness and creativeness of learners.

- Psychological rationale: According to cognitive theories,

the purpose of teaching is to create opportunities for learners to

understand the real world. Therefore, to achieve learning objectives,

not only learning outcomes, but also learning process and thinking

process are important.

2.2.3.2. The purpose of the measure

By evaluating and self-evaluating design results, teaching

integrated theme in Mathematics helps teachers to check the

feasibility of the design process and the results of integrated theme

constructed, from which adjust and supplement the finishing

integrated theme that was built.

2.2.3.3. Method of implementing measure

- Help teachers, students comprehend the evaluation of

learning outcomes through integrated teaching.

In addition to evaluating learning outcomes as tradition,

(assess by score, test), it should be combined with process

assessment, mental assessment, participating attitude,

15

communication and collaboration skills, product evaluation, ...

follow the direction of evaluating performance ability of students.

Thus, in addition to the traditional assessment teachers also need to

combine different methods, such as: Observation, checklist, record,

...

It is possible to make a common table (or rubric), so that it

would easy to visualize the overall task, requirements that need to be

met. It is also possible to make a separate table (rubric), to clarify

each task, each aspect that require assessment: Knowledge

requirements; capacity requirement ... For example, as shown in the

following table:

Table 2.3: Rubric table showing the tasks, requirements to reach

Level

to reach Knowledge

Communicate

capacity ICT capacity ....

Level 1 Know .... Know how.... Innitially know

how to use .....

Level 2 Understand .... ......... .........

...... ......... .........

Level t Creative apply ... ......... .........

By the description above, we can quantify by the score for

each task performance, according to the specified learning content.

- Organize teachers to design evaluation forms

To assess the scientific, integrative, feasibility, and

effectiveness of the integrated themes proposed by groups, the design

of evaluation and self- evaluation forms must be designed. It is also

necessary to design evaluation forms on the interest of the learner, on

the teaching organization methodology; Combine teacher evaluation

and student learning outcomes.

16

- In the thesis, we illustrate in detail the above details

through: Teacher Feedback notes on integrated theme; Student

feedback notes on integrated theme lesson; Individual and group

evaluation forms.

CONCLUSIONS OF CHAPTER 2

In chapter 2, the author has proposed orientations and

measures to help teachers understand, build and be able to teach

integrated theme in mathematics in high school.

Measures proposed include: (1) Prepare training materials

for teacher on integration and integrated teaching; (2) organize

teacher to experience designing and carry out integrated teaching; (3)

Organize teachers to evaluate and self-evaluate the design results and

teach integrated themes.

These measures help teachers enhance their awareness of

integration, inter-discipline, have an appropriate understanding about

it in order not to diverge when approaching and conducting

construction of integrated theme as well as organization of integrated

theme.

Through experiential learning on design and teaching

integrated theme helps teachers understand and be active to design

and deploy to teach an integrated theme. This can be considered as

the central, core of the thesis. Moreover, this is the decisive stage of

quality of integrated theme.

Through evaluation and self-evaluation of the results of the

design and teaching, integrated themes help teacher test the

feasibility of the design process, integrated theme built, from which

to adjust and complete the integrated theme built.

17

CHAPTER 3

PEDAGOGICAL EXPERIMENT

In this chapter, we focus on the following main contents.

3.1. Purposes, requirements, tasks, organizational

principles and pedagogical experiment content

- The pedagogical experiment objectives: To initially test the

feasibility and effectiveness of proposed pedagogical measures.

- Pedagogical experiment content:

Session 1 (2 teacher training sessions). Session 2 (2 courses

teaching pedagogical experiment). The second experiment evaluation

is conducted in two forms: (1) Qualitative assessment: Teacher teach

and the group of teachers who observe give comments on the

feasibility and effectiveness of teaching integrated theme (using

questionnaire); Exploring the interest of students when studying

integrated theme, evaluation and self-evaluation of students, groups

of students ... (questionnaire). (2) Quantitative assessment: Based on

the results of the test and comparison between the experimental and

the control class.

3.2. Time, object, process, methods of evaluation of

pedagogical experiment results

- Time, pedagogical experiment subject:

Session 1. Training teachers is divided into 2 courses: the first (15-16

June 2015), 23 teachers; the second (22-23 / 6/2015), 83 teachers.

Session 2. Organize to teach experimental teaching: The first

(08-11 / 5/2016); the second: Experimental and control classes (May

15-18, 2016).

- Method to evaluate pedagogical experiment results: writing

examination; Q&A using teacher‟s questionnaire ; Survey

18

questionnaire for students; Class observation; Mathematical Statistics

method.

3.3. Pedagogical experiment content

3.3.1. Contents, results of pedagogical experiment – phase 1

- Pedagogical experiment content:

Session 1 (1/2 day): Gathering teachers; Training the

compiled contents; guide on further references materials of

integration.

Session 2 (1/2 day): Divide groups to discuss, study sample

lesson plan. On that basis, the training class unifies to synthesize and

complete the integrated theme.

Session 3 (1/2 day): Group discussion, new integrated theme

proposal. The groups proceed to discuss, each group continues to

divide into smaller ones (2-3 teachers/ 1 group) to study and discuss

with other subject teachers about new integrated theme.

Session 4 (1/2 day): Groups present; exchange sample lesson

plan, gained knowledge and complete new integrated theme.

- Pedagogical experiment results of the first stage

+) Qualitative

The training class atmosphere is exciting and active.

Trainees shows positive, active in exchanging and receiving training

knowledge. To evaluate the quality of the training (effectiveness of

measure 1), we conducted the survey on learners via the feedback

form (Appendix 7) and synthesized the results and found that the

majority of teachers attending the training have ticked good mark on

training contents (high ratio).

+) Quantitative

19

After 2 training sessions, the author and the group of

teachers in the city cluster have focused on discussing and

completing products: completing 01 sample integrated theme;

Proposing 01 new integrated theme: "The application of powers and

exponents in reality" (Appendix 2); Proposed integrated lesson plan:

"The sphere in spatial coordinates" (Appendix 3).

3.3.2. Content and results of experimental phase 2, the first

time

- Content of pedagogical experiment – phase 2, 1st time

Phase 1. Assigning, planning (1 period)

Forms: Teachers and students work together in class.

Activities: (1) Planning the implementation of the group; (2) Present

the group's work plan.

Phase 2: Groups on their own complete assigned tasks (2

periods, 1-2 cases: 1 lesson, 3 lessons: 1 lesson).

Stage 3: Report results (time: 1 period)

Activity (1) Groups report working result; (2) result evaluation.

- Result of the second phase, 1st time.

+) Qualitative

Collect the teacher‟s feedback form on the topic taught and

use the 8c form to conduct product reviews, individual and group co-

operation. Through synthesizing, analyzing, finding that: observing

teachers always have positive feedback on the feasibility of the topic;

pedagogical experiment class atmosphere is exciting and active.

Pedagogical experiment students are more active, more confident,

does not see subjects academically, and most students think that the

subject is important for some contents of other subjects, as well as

practical.

20

+) Quantitative

Comments: Through the examination, synthesis of results,

the author found that the class has a good, good score (7-10 points)

reached 50%. Some students are still confused when encountering

new mathematical form with LM factor, practical. Demonstration of

the implementation of statistical probability for students, has had a

certain impact on students when applying to solving problems with

practical factors.

3.3.3. Contents, results of pedagogical experiment phase 2,

second time

- Content of pedagogical experiment, phase 2 , 2nd

time.

Learned from the experimental results of the phase 2, the 1st time, the

author adjusts limitations of measures to ensure the feasibility of the

measures proposed.

- Pedagogical experiment results 2, 2nd

time

+) Qualitative

The teaching process compiled is appropriate to the teaching

reality; integrated theme has shown high feasibility, innovation in

teaching method, reasonable construction of integrated theme. The

majority of observing teachers have evaluated it brings back

creativity and effectiveness.

Classroom atmosphere of the experimental group was more exciting

and active than the control class.

Students in the experimental group are more visible in the ability to

mobilize knowledge to solve problems in reality, inter-discipline

faster, more appropriate. Activeness, group co-ordination of the

experimental class are clearly demonstrated through learning

activities.

21

+) Quantitative

Test 1. Evaluate the effectiveness of knowledge acquisition

in subject theory

Figure 3.2: Chart of Frequency of Score Test1 (phase 2, second time)

Evaluate of the average scores of the two groups:

Set assumption0H : The average scores for the acquisition of

subject theory of the two experimental and control groups after

experiment were similar;

1H is the average score of the acquisition of subject theory of

the experimental class is higher than that of the control group after

the experiment. We have:

The assumption is accepted. The average scores of the two groups

are similar.

Test 2. Evaluate the application of the acquired knowledge

of students to practice, inter-discipline, as a basis for assessing

capacity formed in the experimental classroom.

Table 3.5: Experimental-control group frequency distribution

ix 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total of students x 2S

Experimental (1n) 1 2 8 11 10 6 2 0 40 6,33 1,87

0,052 2

1 2

6,32 5,921,143 1,671

2,48 2,29

40 38

TN DC

TN DC

X XT t

S S

n n

22

Control (2n) 4 5 10 10 6 3 0 0 38 5,47 1,93

Table 3.6. Frequency distribution of experimental-control group

scores

ix 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total of students x

Experimental 2,5 5 20 27,5 25 15 5 0 40 6,33

Control 10 12,5 25 25 15 7,5 0 0 38 5,47

Assumption 0H : The average scores for the two groups were

similar; The argument1H is the average score of the experimental

class is higher than the control (level 0,05 ). We have:

Assumption0H is rejected. So the average score of the

experimental group was higher than that of the control group.

We test the variance of the experimental and control groups with the

assumption 0H : the difference between the variance of the

experimental and control groups was not significant.

Because of this, we have chosen accreditation standards:

Value to term in the distribution table corresponds to level

and with degrees of freedom 39; 37 is 1.75. We see 1,032 <1.75 or <:

Accept the hypothesis ie there is no difference between the variance

of the experimental class and the control class.

CONCLUSIONS OF CHAPTER 3

Through the pedagogical experiment, it initially showed that:

teachers get understood integration, integrated teaching; Initially

understand the process and be able to design integrated theme. Some

0,052 2

1 2

6,33 5,472,75 1,671

1,87 1,93

40 38

TN DC

TN DC

X XT t

S S

n n

2

2

1,931,032.

1,87

DC

TN

SF

S

23

topics that we assign to teacher of pedagogical experiment

(described in detail in the Appendix) are considered as the illustration

of the feasibility of the process and the proposed measures.

Through the lesson of teaching integrated theme, it is shown

that: Teachers can teach integrated theme in Mathematics.

Moreover, the training contents we have mentioned above

shows that it is useful, teachers can understand and initially build

integrated theme, inter-discipline in math.

However, to teach integrated theme, it is necessary to train

teachers about the understanding as well as the process of

constructing lessons, especially how to implement project-based

teaching. Training content on lesson organization, project-based

teaching we mentioned above is practical, teachers can understand

and step by step teach integrated theme, inter-discipline in Math.

The good thing is that students can understand and initially

study with integrated theme, inter-discipline in Math. Most are

interested in being involved, many see the practicality, or the

meaning of the knowledge they have learned.

CONCLUSIONS OF THESIS

The thesis author has focused on researching to propose

integrated form, the design process of integrated theme in

mathematics, mainly based on current curriculum. Through studying

the thesis topic, the author has achieved the following main

outcomes:

1) Study domestic and international experiences on integration

through some studies by Susan, Forgaty ... to clarify the integrated

forms in high school.

24

2) Base on the theoretical basis and reality of teaching in

Vietnam to suggest integrating forms in math: Integration within

Math subjects; Interdisciplinary integration cross-disciplinary

integration (create new topics, cross-disciplinary subjects as in

traditional way).

3) Propose a four-step process for designing an integrated

theme in Math. Provides the framing of the integrated theme in Math

with five major contents (not required but flexible).

4) Have implemented the above to build some illustrative

integrated themes in integrated teaching of Math in high school,

namely the examples and appendix in the full-text thesis.

5) Have compiled training content (material)for the teacher

who participate in pedagogical experiment. Through pedagogical

experiment, it is visible that this content is useful, teacher

understands and are able to deploy the idea of the thesis author.

6) Have organized two training courses for 106 teachers of

high schools in Bac Ninh. Have carried out pedagogical experiment

with 01 integrated theme in Han Thuyen high school, Bac Ninh and

initially achieved good results, it is recognized through pedagogical

experiment that: school teachers are approached the new teaching

method and trust, are pleased to apply this method into the

appropriate lesson; students are very interested, creative and

passionate exploring.

Pedagogical experiment results have initially demonstrated the

feasibility of the proposed measures.

This leads to a conclusion: Acceptable scientific hypothesis;

Research missions and research purposes have been completed.


Recommended