FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATION
Long Prairie, Minnesota
MINNESOTAPOLLUTIONCONTROL AGENCY
BRUCE A. LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.CONSUltING HVCKKXOGISTS
POOf ESSKDNAl GtCXO&STS
3131 Fernoook Lone. MN 5S441 • 612-6S9-1473
EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.
**5»,
APR 1 81985 ^
MINN. POLLUTIONCONTROL AGENOfi
LARSON• PETERSON <fe ASSOCIATES. ItJC.MUNICIPAL CHCIMCCN9
228830
FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATION
LONG PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Prepared For
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
Prepared By
BRUCE A. LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.3131 FERNBROOK LANEPLYMOUTH, MN 55441
(612) 559-1423
And
LARSON-PETERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC,522 W. MAIN STREET - BOX 150DETROIT LAKES, MN 56501
(218) 847-5606
This report ws prepared by meor under my direct supervision: April 15, 1985
- / /.
Kenneth P. OlsonHydrogeologistBruce A. Liesch Associates, Inc.
TABLE OF•4
Introduction 1-3
Geologic Conditions 4-7
Hydrologic Conditions 8-11
Area Domestic and Irrigation Ground Water Use 12 - 15
Mobility of Organic Contaminants 16 - 20
Area Organic Contaminant Concentration Maps 21 - 25
Task 8 - Rating of Alternatives 26 - 38
- Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater 26 - 34
- Well No. 6 Installation 35 - 37
- Hook - Up to Irrigation Wells 38
- Redevelopment of Well No. 1 38
Task 9 - Recommendations 39 - 43
- Proposed Recommendation 39 - 43
- Proposed Cost for Recommendation 43
- Project Cost for Recommendation if Well 6 isShown to be Suitable 43
Bibliography
Appendix
- Appendix A - MGS Well Logs/DNR AppropriationsPermit Information
ILLUSTRATIONS
-t
Figure
1 Location Map 2
2 Geologic Block Diagram 5
3 Monitoring Well/Production Well Location Map 6
4 Regional Groundwater Gradient Map 9
5 Water Table Contour Map 10
6 Domestic Well Location Map - Contaminated Area 13
7 Domestic and Irrigation Well Location Map 15
8 Conceptual Model of Chlorohydrocarbon Migration 18
9 Hydrogeologic Cross Section through ContaminantPlume 19
10 Organic Concentrations cis-l,2-Dichloroethylene 22
11 Organic Concentrations 1,1,2-Trichloroethylene 23
12 Organic Concentrations 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene 24
13 Conceptual Design - Activated Carbon Treatment 40
14 Conceptual Design - Well 6 Installation 42
TABLES
Table 1 - Density and Solubility Characteristics of the ChlorinatedHydrocarbons Identified in Long Prairie, Minnesota. 16
Table 2 - Carbon Treatment Cost Chart 33
LONG PRAIRIE
TASK 9 REPORT
Introduction:
The work team of Bruce A. Liesch Associates, Inc. (BAL) and Larson-Peterson
Associates, Inc. (LPA) was retained by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA) to conduct an Alternative Water Supply Investigation for the City of
Long Prairie. The study was commissioned by the MPCA after volatile organic
contaminants were identified in two of the five Long Prairie wells. The
Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) ordered that use of wells 4 and 5 be
discontinued owing to the high levels of organic contaminants. The MDH also
identified an advisory area where the MDH recommended that domestic ground-
water use be discontinued. The location of the contaminated area is shown on
Figure 1 - Location Map. With the loss of two production wells, the City of
Long Prairie could no longer provide the water needed to meet the peak de-
mands for the summer of 1984.
The primary objective of the study" is to develop a plan to provide water to
the City of Long Prairie to .meet the peak danands of the Summer of 1984. The
following tasks will be completed under this study:
- Review and compilation of existing data concerning area geology, hydrology
and contaminant conditions
- Review of historic municipal water demands
- Projection of water demands through at least the spring, suntner, fall and
winter of 1984 and the year 2000
- Review of capability of the existing municipal water system to
supply noneontaninated water
- Projection of potential future contaminant migration and impact ^
- Identification of potential alternatives for supply of sufficient volumes
of water during the spring and summer of 1984
bubslalion I"'T-- -y v—
1000 ?000 3000 4000 WOO
B A S E FROM U.S.G.S. Q U A D R A N G L E S
L
Bf?UCE A LIESCH ASSOCIATES. INC
ccxsm VJG«>OHS9O4M G<Cl COS'S -
MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84
L O C A T I O N M A P
1
Review of potential alternatives including:
- effectiveness of alternative as temporary, long term, and/or permanent
solution
- feasibility of alternative
- cost of alternative/ initial and continuing
- construction schedule of alternative
- effect of alternative on contaminant plume extent or shape
Rating of potential alternatives
Recommendation of alternative with justification of recommendation, es-
timated costs, schedules, and conceptual design
Preparation of final designs, specifications, bidding documents and other
materials as directed by State
-3-
Geologic Conditions:
The glacial terrain in the Long Prairie area Is associated with at least two
separate ice sheet advances. The upland areas to the east and west of Long
Prairie are underlain with ground morainal deposits identified as the
Alexandria Moraine of the Wadena Lobe Glaciation (Hobbs fit Goebel, 1982). An
outwash plain, which was developed during the Des Moines Lobe Glaciation,
bisects the ground morainal terrain. The City of Long Prairie is located on
the relatively level surface of the outwash plain and on the lower slopes of
the moraine.
The organic contamination in the northeast portion of Long Prairie was in-
itially identified in Wells 4 and 5 and subsequently in some residential
wells which all are supplied by ground water in the shallow outwash deposits
of the Des Moines Lobe Glaciation. The geologic block diagram (Figure 2)
illustrates the configuration and relationship of the glacial units in the
outwash deposits. The contaminated segments of the outwash deposits consist
mainly of fine to medium grained silty sand and sand approximately 50 feet
thick.
Logs of wells and soil borings in the area a indicate glacial till unit below
the outwash sands at an approximate elevation of 1240 feet (NGVD). The till
unit can be identified in the soil boring logs to the east of the
contaminated areas (BAL-1, BAL-2, BAL-3) as well as in municipal well no. 5
and MPCA boring location 4 (Figure 3 - Monitoring Well/Production Well
Location Map).
To the south of the contaminated areas (south of Central Avenue) till de-
posits are encountered from a depth of approximately seven feet to a depth of
at least 43 feet. The shallow depth to the till suggest that the surface
contact between the outwash deposits and the till lies to the east and south
at slightly lighter elevations.
The test borings to the east of the contaminated area encountered sporadic
sand deposits ranging from 1 to 13 feet in thickness below the blue till unit
encountered at approximately 1240 feet (NGVD). Indications of continuity in
-4-
CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATION
GEOLOGIC BLOCK DIAGRAM
LEGEND:
(D MUNICIPAL WELL
BAL-0 WATER SUPPLY TEST WELL
4 MPCA MONITORING WELL NEST
FEET
BnuCE A, U69CH ASSOClAIEi INC.
I
MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84
GEOLOGIC BLOCK DIAGRAM
CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATION
% DOUC31IC
ffi UUNICIPAL WtU.
o «••' WELL
LINE OF C U T A W A Y JCCTIOM
.} BAL-2
B A L - 2 A
* MONITOA'NO WELL13)
>ii NUMBER SHALLOW WELL DEPTH
2«t4 MUMBCH: UiODLt WELL DEPTH
3td NUMBER: DEEP WELL DEPTH
THIRD AVF. N.E
FIRST AVE. N.E.
BOUC£ A.-UESCH ASSOCIATES. INC MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE
MONITORING WELL /
PRODUCTION WELL LOCATION MAP
the lower sand units is lacking. There is no information from the
contaminated areas as to the geologic condition below the till units
encountered at the elevation of 1240 feet (NGVD).
The glacial drift in the Long Prairie area is over 200 feet thick and over-
lies lower Precambrian metasediirentary rocks. The bedrock in the area does
not represent a viable water supply source for municipal or domestic well
development but rather acts as a barrier boundary to the movement of ground
water.
-7-
Hydrologic Conditions:
A review of the U.S.G.S. Hydrologic Atlas HA-380 and the topographic maps of
the area indicates that the groundwater flow direction and the location of
discharge areas are controlled by the Long Prairie River.
Mapping of the lake level elevations from the U.S.G.S. topographic sheets
(Figure 4) illustrates the apparent ground water gradients associated with
the upland areas east of Long Prairie.
Surface water runoff flows to the east and west away from a local watershed
divide just east of Long Prairie. The groundwater gradients identified
through the topographic review appear to follow the topographic expression of
the land surface with a groundwater divide located along the surface water
drainage divide.
The site specific ground water flow in the vicinity of the contaminated zone
is defined by using ground water levels measured at the two-inch diameter
water table wells installed by MPCA to monitor water quality and water
levels. The MPCA under separate contract installed 15 wells at eight
monitoring sites in the contaminated" area. Two of the sites consisted of a
three well nest with wells at the water table (10 -20 feet) , at an
intermediate level (35 feet) and at a deeper level (50 feet) . Three of the
sites consisted of a two well nest with wells at the water table and inter-
mediate positions. The remaining well sites consisted of a single water
table well. The well locations and water table contours are shown on Figure
5, Ground Water Contour Map.
The configuration of the contours suggest that Well No. 4 & 5 have developed
a trough shaped ground water sink over years of pumping that interrupted the
natural flow toward the River and caused ground water to flow into the in-
fluence of the wells from all directions. As a result, recharge td, the
aquifer to replace the water pumped from the wells may be derived from the
River as well as from regional flow toward the River and local precipitation.
The development of the sink around Wells 4 and 5 probably accounts for the
configuration of the contaminant plume as a narrow band, as shown on the
-8-
WATER TABLE CONTOUR*
^ — 10 FOOT INTERVAL
^,. —-'"" • FOOT INTERVAL
E L E V A T I O N IN FEET (NOVO)
2000
SCALE
2000 4000
FEET
MDH ADVISORY AREA
Developed by Dr. H. O. Pfannkuch
N
o1316
BRUCE A LIESCH ASSOCIATES. INC
- CONSAflNG KVOOO.OGIS1J -
L3131 Lone
MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84
REGIONAL GROUNDWATER
GRADIENT MAP 4
CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATION
• MFCA UONITOHINQ WEIU3)
0 MUNICIPAL V4CIA
>••*..* WATER TABLE ELEVATION
—'... WATER TABLE CONTOUR LINE
MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE
W A T E R TABLE CONTOUR MAP
3/2 /04
The development cf the sink around Wells 4 and 5 probably accounts for the
configuration of the contaminant plume as a narrow band, as shown on the
water quality maps, rather than a broad plume"migrating toward the River.
The water table depression in the vicinity of Wells 4 and 5 is most likely~ " '*}
caused by the pumping at those wells along with the discharge from the
private residential wells. Accordingly, the cessation of pumping at Wells 4
and 5 could cause a recovery of water levels and re-establishment of the
groundwater flow direction and discharge to the Long Prairie River of greater
quantities of ground water than while the wells are in use. Other reasons
for the configuration of the contaminant plume could include geologic control
such as:
The trough could be caused by an area of higher permeable material
which focuses groundwater flow toward it.
Fine grained layers which confines groundwater flow and contaminant
migration toward the Long Prairie River.
In the event that the groundwater depression is partially or totally induced
by geologic factors then the cessation of pumping may have less of an effect
on water levels than previously discussed. With the present level of
information the actual cause of the groundwater trough and specific
groundwater flow directions cannot be determined.
-11-
Area Denes tic and Irrigation Ground Water Use:
The available water well information for the study area in Long Prairie was
compiled and reviewed to determine the water use characteristics of the City.
Information on domestic water use in the contaminated area was provided by
the MPCA. This information included the location of households not connected
to City water, well information from the well owner, and water quality in-
formation of samples collected by the MPCA. BAL reviewed the files of the
Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) and collected all geologic well logs and
well information for the area in and around Long Prairie. BAL also reviewed
the files of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to collect all
available information on the irrigation wells of the area.
Well location maps of the study area domestic wells and of the area wells
identified in the MGS and DNR files were presented in the City of Long
Prairie - Alternative Water Supply Investigation - Deliverable Set No. 1
submitted to the MPCA on February 13, 1984. The maps have been updated and
included in this report.
The Domestic Well Location Map - Contamination Area (Figure 6) shows all of
the domestic water users in and near the contaminated area that do not have
City water hook-ups. The information was provided by the MPCA with the
household locations field checked by BAL personnel on February 8, 1984.
The map separates the households into three groups: The households not at-
tached to the City system which have not been tested for organic
contamination (solid circles) , the households not attached to the system
which have been tested for organic contamination and were found to be clean
(solid triangles), and the households not attached to the City system which
have been tested for organic contamination and have been found to\ be
contaminated (open triangles). The identification numbers correspond to the
identification numbers assigned by the MPCA.
-12-
Tr--
N
0 Domestic Wells -No water quality analysis
A Domestic Wells -With water quality analysis
A Domestic Wells -With water quality analysisand ideptlfied organlcs
69 Well owner identification number
Base map from Laisen-Petei'son Assoc., Inc.
SCALE 1:4875
BRUCE A. UESCH ASSOCtAIES INC MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE
DOMESTIC WELL LOCATION MAP -CONTAMINATED AREA
MAR 84
The Domestic and Irrigation Well Location Map (Figure 7) shows the location
of the domestic and irrigation wells that are listed in the MGS and DNR files.
Well information presented on the map for the low capacity domestic wells is
limited to the well identification number and the well yield. Information on
the high capacity irrigation wells consists of the well owner, the well
identification number, the DNR appropriations permit number, and the reported
well yield. A list of the irrigation well characteristics and the Geologic
Well Logs from the MGS files are provided in Appendix A.
-14-
N
LEGEND
HIGH CAPACITY IRRIGATION HELLS
Well owner DNR permi t no.
Petron 75-3271600 gpm 132248
MGS we l l log u n i q u enumber
Recorded w e l l y i e l d
DOMESTIC HELLS
Reported well yield
125604 lOopm '
SCALE., rt-.=«=;:.
MGS well log uniquenumber
DATA BASE:- MGS well log files- DNR appropriations permit files
Base From U.S.G.S. Quadrangles
BftUCE A. UE9CH ASSOOATti INC
i
MPCA - CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84
DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION^ WELLLOCATION MAP
Mobility of Organic Contaminants:•4
The mobility of the organic contaminants identified in the ground water at
Long Prairie, Minnesota is dependent on many factors including the physical
and chemical characteristics of the fluid as well as the hydrogeologic con-
ditions in the study area. The fluid characteristics that can affect the
migration of contaminants include density, viscosity, solubility, surface
tension, and polarity (Schwille, 1981). The hydrogeologic condition that can
effect contaminant migration include permeability, hydraulic gradient,
hydraulic barriers, recharge boundaries and artificial alterations to the
natural flow field (ie. pumping wells, tile systems).
The most important physical characteristics of the three hydrocarbons
identified in Long Prairie are density and solubility in water.
The densities of the chlorinated hydrocarbons were abstracted fron Handbook of
Chemistry and Physics (1970). The solubilities of the hydrocarbons were
taken from Schwille (1981) and Horvath (1982).
TABLE 1
DENSITY" AND SOLUBILITY" CHARACTERISTICS
OF THE CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS IDENTIFIED IN
LONG PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Hydrocarbon Density at 20°C.
(g/ml)
Solubility at 10° C.
(mg/kg): (wt. %)**
cis-1.2-Dichloroethylene 1.2837
Tr ichloroethylene 1.4642
Tetrachloroethylene 1.6227
Water 1.0000
1070
160
.4000
.1061
.01488
* Schwille, 1981
** Horvath, 1982
-16-
The foregoing physical characteristics of the hydrocarbons indicate that the
hydrocarbons are heavier than water and as such should descend through a
water column. This suggests that the hydrocarbon could sink to and be re-
tained or retarded by a lower permeable bed. An illustration of this type of
flow was presented by Schwille (1981) and is reproduced as Figure 8. As the
illustration suggests, hydrocarbons sink to a lower permeability zone which
either impedes or retards any further downward migration. These conditions
lead to a situation where the heavier hydrocarbons could move down slope
along a geologic boundary, against the natural groundwater gradient.
The solubility information indicates that the solubility of the identified,it~ .H '/•
hydrocarbons ranges from approximately .1% to .8% solubility by weight. This
does not appear to indicate that the hydrocarbons are very soluble, but in a
groundwater flow field the identified concentration could easily be attained
from the dissolution of a slug of contaminant.
It is unknown at present whether any free phase hydrocarbon is still present
in the area.
The most significant unknown to the mobility of the organics in the Long
Prairie flow field is the variation in the subsurface deposits of the area.
The density contrasts between the organics and the ground water could account
for the highest concentrations of the organics observed in the intermediate
depth monitoring wells in the MPCA network. A lower permeability unit below
the intermediate depth wells (silty sand vs. sand) may represent a boundary
that alters the rate of vertical migration of the organics.
The data appear to support this concept in that the highest contaminant
levels are observed in the intermediate well depths at MPCA Sites No. 2 and 6
which are open to the sand unit which overlays a silty sand unit. The lower
organic levels observed in the intermediate well at MPCA Site No. 4 may be
caused by the location of the well, which is finished in the silty sand and
is not open to the overlying sand deposits. Figure 9 shows a cross section
through the MPCA multiple Well nests No. 2, 4 and 6 and municipal Wells No. 4 and
5. As the illustration shows, the highest concentration of
-17-
Ground surface
CMC phase
Unsaturated zone
•• •.X---^- ( j
. .1 ^CHC dissolved• • • • .in waterSaturated
Impermeable
Fig. 4. Chlorohydrocarbon migration pattern
DIAGRAM FROM SCHWILLE (1981)
L
BRUCE A LIESCH ASSOCIATES. INCVWCXO&Sli -GKXOGWS -
3131 FemOfOO* lor* • Mw>«coolll. MN
MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84
CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF
CHLOROHYDROCARBON MIGRATION 8
m\nih
TH
RO
UG
H
s io>o
GE
LO
QIC
CR
OS
S S
EC
TIO
NC
ON
TA
MIN
AN
T
PLU
ME
CD
TY
O
F L
ON
G
PR
AIR
IE
WlNEC T 2
1200
SAND
SILTY
TILL
SAN 3
LL
F WELL OR i WELLONCjENTRJmOM1 OF
YLENE IN ug/l
WELLS WELL 4
)
_!....
>
'In
«
1°'
tetrachloroethylene are observed in the wells open to the sands at an
elevation of approximately 1250 >feet. The other hydrocarbons tested also
show this same trend.
Owing to the paucity of data points in the intermediate and deeper well
positions, the theory to the migration of hydrocarbons in the Long Prairie
area is only speculation.
-20-
Area Organic Contaminant Concentration Maps-4
Tne MPCA has collected and tested numerous water samples from the domesticwells from the contaminated area in Long Prairie. The tests were used todelineate the area of contamination and to determine which domestic watersupplies were safe to use and which should not be used.
*.
Three organic constituents were present in the majority of the wells that
showed signs of contamination. . The constituents are Cis-1,
2-Dichloroethylene, Trichloroethylehe (TCE), and 1,1,2,
2-Tetrachloroethylene. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hasdeveloped recommended limit criteria for maximum human consumption for TCE
and tetrachloroethylene. No human health criteria have been developed for
dichloroethylene owing to insufficient data.
Both TCE and tetrachloroethylene are listed as carcinogenic and thus have a
recommended zero concentration for the maximum protection of human health
(EPA, 1980). To assess the degree of risk to a population, the EPA has de-
veloped a range of risks to a population associated with certain
concentrations in water. The 10~5 risk (1 additional case of cancer in a
population of 100,000) for the identified contaminants are presented below
(Sittig, 1981).
Hydrocarbon 10~5 Risk
Dichloroethylene No criteria developed
Trichloroethylene 27 (ug/1)*Tetrachloroethylene 8 (ug/1)*
*ug/l = parts per billion
IConcentration gradient maps for the three contaminants are shown on Figures10 - 12. All show a relatively narrow band of contaminants trendingsouthwest-northeast.
-21-
CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATION
OO"tS1tC WELL
MUNICIPAL WELL
OBSERVATION WELL
ORGANIC CONCENTRATION LEVEL (v«/ll
ORGANIC IDENTIFIED BELOW QUANTIFIABLE L£V£L
UPC* MOMtTOftING WELL(9)
ut MUuftCA- SHALLOW WELL W A T E R QUALITY (2nd NUMBER. MIDDLE WELL W A T C H QUALITY (
3rd NUMBER. DEEP WCL.L WMEft QUALITY lw«JI>
ORGANIC CONCENTRATION CONTOUR LINE (ug/l)
N
SCALE
FO
* *•»/
•Ji
1*
T
I/
FIFTH AVE
JATH AVE.
**
-'{
\
\HIRO
4s
t*
9
1
•
*VE
t
SECOMP AVE. ME
i rMUCt A. UtSCH ASSOClAIES INC MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84
ORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS
Cl* 1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEr'E 10
CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATION
DOMESTIC w
0 MUNICIPAL W£Ll
OBSERVATION WELL
7C ORGANIC CONCENTRATION LXVfL (•**/!)
r ORGANIC iDfNTif ico •CLOW QUANT* IAILC LIVIL
U»CA MOMTORIHO WILLIS)
111 NUUfCf) SHALLOW WttL WAlfiH OUALlTr (wp/D
2«4 NUUtCA. UtOOLl WiLL WATER OUALlTV
3rd NUMfCH. D£C» WELL WATCH DUALITY
OHOAHIC CONCENTRATION CONTOUM ItHt |«g/l>
SCALE
MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE
ORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS
1,1.2-TRICHLOnOETHYLENC
CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA
ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATION
DOMESTIC WELLMUNICIPAL WELLOBSERVATION WELL
ORGANIC CONCENTRATION LEVEL (wg/lt
OAQAN1C IDENTIFIED BELOW QUANTIFIABLE LEVEL
MPCA MONITORING WELLfl)
III NUMBER.
3n4 NUMBER: MIDDLE WELL WATER QUALITY Uff/0
NUMBER: DEEP WELL WATER QUALITY (wg/l>
OAGAMIC CONCENTRATION CONTOUR LINE
200 400 600 FEET
MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIEBf*JC£ A UESCH ASSOClAfES INC
ORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS
1.1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
It appears that the organic contaminants are moving toward the ground water
depression discussed in the area hydrology section. This would suggest that
the source of the contamination is southwest of Wells No. 4 and 5. The
actual source of the contamination is unknown at present.
-25-
Task 8 Rating of Alternatives•4
BAL and LPA conducted a review of all potential alternatives to solve the
Long Prairie water supply problem under Task 5 of the contract. During this
review BAL and LPA identified all of the potential alternatives that were
technically feasible and recommended four alternatives for additional
investigation. The alternatives selected for further study were:
-Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater
-Installation of Well No. 6
-Hook-up to Existing Irrigation Wells
-Well Redevelopment
TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED GPOONEWATER
FEASIBILITY: The feasibility of treatment of the water supply at Long
Prairie as a short term solution to contamination by chlorinated solvents
(tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, and chloroform) is
good. Either activated carbon treatment or air stripping in packed-bed,
countercurrent columns separately, or in tandem, should provide excellent
removal of these chemicals. From influent concentrations as high as 600 ug/1
one could expect effluent quality £ 2.0 ug/1, well below drinking water
criteria of 8.0 ug/1 for tetrachloroethylene.
The treatment of contaminated ground water represents a short term solution
and not a long term solution to the problem.
SUITABILITY OF ALTERNATIVE:
Air Stripping; Air stripping does not appear to be a suitable alternative
for the treatment of the contaminated ground water in Long Prairie owing to
the unavailability of lease/rental units. Of the three vendors surveyed
during this study only one (Calgon) recommended air stripping. Calgon
indicated that the air stripping units could only be purchased and were not
available for lease.
-26-
Technically, air stripping with activated-carbon polishing is a suitable
treatment alternative. The reason that air stripping works well for these
trace organics is because they are quite volatile, with Henry's Law Constants
in the range from 0.1 - 2.0 (mg/1 air)/(mg/l water). Rates of gas transfer
of these compounds from water to air are sufficiently rapid in packed-bed
columns. Feasibility of air stripping has been demonstrated in a number of
applications including: landfill leachate, wastewater treatment plants,
aquifer reclamation, and for treatment of contaminated water supplies.
If a vendor proposed to use air stripping with activated carbon polishing
and had units available for lease/rental, then air stripping would be a
viable alternative.
Carbon Treatment: Carbon treatment represents a viable alternative to the
treatment of the contaminated ground water in Long Prairie. All of the firms
surveyed developed treatment plans and preliminary cost estimates for carbon
treatment. The systems ranged from gravity fed carbon treatment with pre-
treatnent for iron and manganese to pressurized activated carbon systems.
Granular activated carbon treatment works well for removal of trace
organics because they are rather jiydrophobic, that is, they favor a more
organic matrix (like activated carbon) than the polar water solution. While
the capacity of activated carbon adsorption for these chemicals is not large
(x/m of 0.001 - 0.010 gm chemical per gm carbon at these influent
concentrations) , it is sufficient to ensure a high quality effluent with
consistent performance. It is because of the consistent effluent produced
from activated carbon treatment that activated carbon should be considered as
the preferred treatment strategy or as a polishing unit following air strip-
ping. Activated carbon treatment has been demonstrated recently as effective
treatment methods at New Brighton, Minnesota and Denver, Colorado.
-27-
COST: Cost and proposed designs were collected from three firms specializing
in the emergency treatment of contaminated water. Each firm was provided the
same background information and requested to provide estimates of
mobilization and demobilization costs, lease/rental rates, carbon costs, and
operating costs. The background information provided to the treatment firms
is as follows:
Concentration Criteria
(ppb) (ppb)
cis-l,2-dichloroethylene 6 to 8
1,1,2-trichloroethylene 6 to 7 27
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylene 100 to 280 8
chloroform 1 to 5 1.9
Iron concentration: 2 ppm
Manganese concentration: 0.2 ppm
Treatment volume: 300 gpm
Set-up: Must be pre-treatment plant
The proposed plans and projected costs are provided below. Each responding
firm would incur similar installation costs to hook-up their system to the
Long Prairie distribution system.
-Anticipated cost to hook-up to transmission line
from well 4 & 5 to treatment plant no. 2 $6,000.00
-Anticipated costs of electrical drops for
treatment system operation $2,000.00
$8,000.00
It is anticipated that it would take less than 1 week to provide actess
to the transmission line and the power drops.
-28-
CARBON SERVICES
The proposed system from Carbon Services consists of 2 gravity sand
filters operating at 200 gpm each followed by 2 gravity carbon filters also
operating at 200 gpm. The influent water would be aerated with a compressor
to precipitate the iron and manganese from solution. Filtration through the
gravity sand filters should bring the iron and manganese levels below the
water quality criteria of 0.3 mg/1 iron and 0.05 mg/1 manganese. Lift pumps
from the sand filters would lift the effluent into the carbon filters for
organic removal. The effluent from the carbon filter system could bypass the
water treatment plant and be pumped directly into distribution.
Maintenance of the system would consist of backwashing the sand filters
approximately every 3 days to remove the iron and manganese precipitates.
The projected costs to operate the system for 3 month and 9 month
periods are shown below.
Dnit Costs
Mobilization: Sand filter:
Carbon filter:
$3,000.00/unit/faonth
$3,000.00/unit/month
Demobilization: Sand filter:
Carbon filter:
$2,000.00/unit/faonth
$2,000.00/unit/faonth
Lease Cost: Sand filter:
Carbon filter:
$3,000.00/uni t/month
$3,000.00/unit/month
Carbon Costs $0.60/lb.
Projected Electrical Costs $25.00/day
-29-
Projected costs for 3 months of operation:
Mobilization: $12,000.00Demobilization: $8,000.00
Lease: $12,000.00
Carbon (9000 Ibs.): $5,400.00Electric Costs: $2,250.00
$39,650.00
Projected costs for 9 months of operation:
Mobilization: $12,000.00Demobilization: $8,000.00Lease: $36,000.00Carbon (27000 Ibs.): $16,200.00Electric Costs: $6,750.00
$78,950.00
O.H. MATERIALS
The system proposed by O.H. Materials consists of 2 pressure sandfilters operating at 150 gpm each followed by 3 pressure activated carbonfilters operating at 100 gpm each. The sand filters would be operated toremove any fine materials prior to carbon treatment. With the system under
pressure, the majority of iron and manganese should stay in solution throughthe system. The effluent from the sand/carbon treatment would flow into
treatment plant no. 2 for iron and manganese removal.
Maintenance of the system would consist of backwashing the units toclean the carbon and sand filters. The frequency of backwashing required isundetermined at present.
-30-
The projected costs to operate the system for 3 month and 9 monthperiods is presented below:
Unit Costs
Mobilization-Demobilization:
Lease costs:
First 90 Days:
Following 180 Days
Carbon costs:
Electrical Costs:
$10,000.00
$800.00/day
$450.00/day
$1.00/lb.
$25.00/day
Projected costs for 3 months of operation:
Mobilization-Demobilization:Lease:
Carbon (13500 Ibs.):
Electrical costs:
$10,000.00$72,000.00
$13,500.00
$2,250.00
$97,750.00
Projected costs for 9 months of operation:
Mobilization-Demobilization:
Lease:
Carbon (40500 Ibs.):
Electrical Costs:
Carbon Disposal:
$10,000.00
$153,000.00
$40,500.00
$6,750.00
N/A
$210,250.00
O.K. Materials indicated that the costs presented above represent vtryconservative cost estimates and that discounts and refinements could decrease
the actual cost.
-31-
CALGON
The proposed system from Calgon consists of a single pressurized carbon
treatment unit. The unit is approximately 10-feet in diameter and 10 feet
high. With the system under pressure the majority of the iron and manganese
should stay in solution. A lift pump would feed the system with a lift equal
to the head loss through the system.
The system would need to be set on concrete footings or railroad ties. The
system does not require backwashing.
The projected costs to operate the system for three months and nine months
periods are presented below:
Unit Costs
Mobilization, set-up, supervision,
1 load carbon, 1st months lease
Teardown - Refurbishing
Lease Cost:
Carbon Costs: (1 truckload should
last 4 to 5 months @ 300 ppb
tetrachloroethylene)
Electrical Costs:
Lift Pump Rental
$31,000.00-$33,000.00
$14,000.00
$l,600.00/foonth
$21,000/truck
$10.00/day
$10.00/day
Projected Costs for Three Months of Operation:
Mobilization - 1st months lease
Lease
Lift Pump Rental
Teardown
Electrical Costs
$31,000.00-$33,000.00
$ 3,200.00
$ 900.00
$14,000.00
$ 900.00
-32-
$50,000.00-$52,000.00
Projected Costs for Nine Months of Operation:
Mobilization - 1st months leaseLease
Lift Pump Rental
Carbon
Teardown
Electrical Costs
$31,000.00-533,000.00
$12,800.00
$ 2,700.00
$21,000.00
$14,000.00
$ 2,700.00
$84,200.00-$86,200.00
These costs do not include the rental of a crane to remove treatment unit
from flatbed trailer.
TABLE 2
CARBON TREATMENT COST CHART
3 Months of Operation 9 Months of Operation
Carbon Services $39,650.00 $78,950.00
Calgon $50,000.00-$52,000.00 $84,800.00-$86,200.00
OH Materials $97,750.00 $210,250.00
PERMANENT SOLUTION: Treatment of the contaminated groundwater does notrepresent a long term solution to the water supply needs of the City.Treatment of contaminated groundwater represent a short term solution to theproblem which can provide water to the system until a new water supply sourceis established.
-33-
EFFECT ON PLUME: The continued pumping of Wells 4 and 5 would most likely
continue to draw contaminated ground water from the most highly concentrated.j
areas southwest of the wells. It is anticipated that with continued pumping
the levels of contaminants in the pumped water would increase.
SCHEDULING: All three firms specialize in the emergency treatment of
groundwater. It is anticipated that systems could be installed and operating
within two weeks of contract implementation.
-34-
WELL NO. 6 INSTALLATION *
FEASIBILITY: Well 6 could provide up to 500 gpm on a continuous basis to
water treatment plant No. 2. To meet peak demands Well No. 6 could provide
up to 660,000 gpd (assuming 22 hours of pumping per day). This represents
64% of the peak demand of 1983. The preliminary work has been completed with
regards to well location and potential yield (BAL report of 1983).
Test results from a pumping test at Well No. 3 on February 20, 1984 indicated
that at a distance of less than 1500 feet there was no drawdown influence
observed from the pumping of Well 3 at 300 gpm. This would suggest that the
operation of Well No. 6 would not cause appreciable drawdown in the area of
Wells 4 & 5 and thus could represent a suitable water supply source. The
testing of Well No. 6 following its installation could confirm this
hypothesis. The use of Well No. 6 as a new municipal water source is
dependent on MDH approval.
An analysis of pumping conditions at an assumed well at Site No. 6 was conducted
by Dr. H.O. Pfannkuch using procedures outlined by Bear (1979). The
analytical procedures identified the theoretical stagnation point of a cone
of depression down gradient from"a pumping well. Dr. Pfannkuch used
hydraulic coefficients from the 1983 BAL testing procedures at Site No. 6 and
the identified ground water gradients of the area. Dr. Pfannkuch1 s analysis
identified a radius to stagnation point of less than 1500 feet which agrees
with the testing procedures at Well #3.
At present, all indications are that Well Site No. 6 may represent a suitable
location for municipal well development.
SUITABILITY OF ALTERNATIVE: The development of additional wells in Long
Prairie represent a viable solution to the long term water needs of the ci y.
Well 6 could provide a usable water supply as long as the water quality of
the well remained above safe drinking water standards. It appears that Well
6 represents a safer water supply than that provided at Well 3 owing to the
relative distances of the wells from the contaminant plume.
-35-
COST: The following cost estimates were Developed by Larson-PetersonAssociates, Inc. and were presented in their December 1983 report titledPreliminary Engineering Report for Emergency Water System Improvements, LongPrairie, Minnesota.
Construction and testing of Well 6: $14,455.00*Pump rental for summer operation: $ 2,400.00Well pump: $ 8,000.00Well house and accessories: • $36,000.00Construction contingency: $ 2,925.00Engineering, Legal and Fiscal: $ 9,200.00*0bserve and Analyze pumping test: $ 3,000.00
$75,980.00
Transmission Line ConstructionConstruction costs: $41,037.50Engineering, Legal and Fiscal: $ 6,162.50
$47,200.00
* Costs developed by BAL
PERMANENT SOLUTION: The development of Well 6 represents a possible longterm solution to the groundwater problems of Long Prairie. Well 6 couldprovide water to the City for as long as the well remains clean. Furthertesting as part of this study will identify the potential for thecontamination of Well 6 from the identified plume. At present, Well 6 couldprovide the city with an additional water source. This water source wouldappear to be a safer supply than that provided by Well 3 as indicated by\ thedistances to the contaminant plume. Well 6 would also represent a new, cleanwell which is at least 40 years newer than Wells 1 through 3.
-36-
EFFECT ON PLUME: Unknown until further testing. Preliminary results from
the pumping test at Well No. 3 and analysis conducted by Dr. Pfannkuch sug-
gest that Well 6 should have little observable drawdown interference in the
identified area of the contaminant plume.
The ceasation of pumping at Wells 4 and 5, which would be part of this
alternative, should cause water levels in the watertable aquifer to recover to
their natural pumping condition
SCHEDULING: Well No. 6 could be drilled and developed within two weeks of
issuance of a contract. Construction of the water main to feed water plant
No. 2 could be completed in 20 working days. Construction of a pump house
could delay use of the well for up to one month. To decrease the time frame
of pumping, a submersible pump could be rented and installed for a six month
period to provide water during the peak demand season. When demand declines
a pump house could be installed with a line shaft turbine pump. It is
anticipated that within.two months of the issuance of a contract, Well 6
could be providing water to the water treatment plant No. 2. It is
anticipated that Well 6 could provide water to treatment plant 2 by July 1,
1984.
-37-
HOOK-UP TO IRRIGATION WELLS
•4
The preliminary alternative evaluation identified irrigation well owners who
were interested in discussing access agreements to their irrigation wells for
use during the surnroer of 1984. As part of the Task 7 Analysis, LPA visited
Long Prairie and field inspected the well sites and reviewed the area for
transmission line installation.
LPA concluded that above ground transmission line would be difficult to
install, maintain, and secure. With the other feasible alternatives'
available to Long Prairie, LPA concluded that the use of irrigation wells
would not represent a viable alternative to provide water to the City of Long
Prairie.
REDEVELOPMENT OF WELL NO. 1
Redevelopment of Well No. 1 does not appear to be a viable alternative under
this contract. Redevelopment of Well No. 1 could provide additional water to
treatment plan No. 1 which could relieve some of the stress off Well No. 2
but this increase in yield would not represent a real increase in available
water to the system.
-38-
Task 9 Reconnendations
•4
The work team of Bruce A. Liesch Associates, Inc. and Larson-Peterson
Associates, Inc. propose the following recommendations to meet the short term
and long term water supply needs of the City of Long Prairie. The proposed
solution consists of short term treatment of contaminated groundwater until
a permanent, new water supply source can be identified, constructed, tested,
and approved for use by the Minnesota Department of Health.
The recommended system and projected 'costs for the recommendations are
provided below. These costs were calculated by the individual treatment
firms and represent their best estimate of the costs of operating the system
each proposed. The results of our investigation indicates that the most
technically suitable and cost competitive means of treating the groundwater
for Wells 4 & 5 is through carbon treatment. Dr. Jerald Schnoor has further
indicated that carbon treatment will provide the most consistent effluent
quality, even with changing influent water quality.
Proposed Recommendation:
-Short term solution: The only short term solution that can provide
additional water to the system to meet peak water use demands of 1984 is the
treatment of the contaminated ground water at Wells No. 4 and 5. The
proposed treatment system would consist of activated carbon treatment of up
to 300 gpm of water from Wells 4 and 5.
A schematic of the proposed system is shown in Figure 13. The system would
consist of an activated carbon treatment unit which would treat the
contaminated ground water prior to water treatment plant 2. The system
would be installed either at Wells 4 and 5 or at the treatment plant.
Effluent from the carbon treatment system would be treated at treatment
plant no. 2 for iron and manganese removal or placed directly j^nto
distribution dependent on the treatment system design.
-39-
5)*i5<i|81 > i
> oo oH Z
5 O2 wo §
am
m
CO
O
ORGANIC TREATMENTACTIVATED CARBON
WELL 4 WELL SLIFT PUMP - LIFTEQUAL TO HEADLOSS THROUGHUNIT
300 ug/l
WATER TREATMENT
/
<8 ug/l
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TO DISTRIBUTION
The treatment alternative would be installed no later than June 1, 1984 andwould operate until an alternate water supply js located, developed, tested
and approved by the MDH.
-Long term solution: The most cost effective and technically feasible
long term solution is the development of (an) alternative water supply
source(s). This consists of the location and development of (a) new well
site(s) in Long Prairie. Two alternatives are available for the siting of
new water supply wells, those being the development and testing of the Well
No. 6 site and the exploration for new test well sites in areas distant form
the identified contaminant plume.
Phase I: Well Construction and Testing Procedures at Well Site No. 6
The installation of Well No. 6 as a test production well is the
first phase of an alternate water supply source investigation. Well 6
would be installed and tested to determine the suitability of the
well site as a municipal water supply source.
It is anticipated that the well could be installed within 20 days of
the issuance of a contract". Upon completion of the well, a pumping
test of not less.than 72 hours would be conducted to determine
' aquifer characteristics and areas of influence, and to detect
possible water quality changes. An analysis of the data generated
during the test will provide the information needed to determine
site suitability.
If the testing procedure results indicate that Well No. 6 could
produce uncontaminated water at an economic advantage over
treatment, then well house and transmission line construction could
commence. The system could be on line and ready for use no later
than August 1, 1984 and could be on line as early as July 1, 19fe4.
Once Well No. 6 is on line and producing water to the system,
treatment of water for Wells 4 & 5 could be discontinued. The
Schematic shown on Figure 14 illustrates this concept.
-41-
PROPOSED WELL 6
o
f»3
WELLS 4A5
UJzIII
zIIIo
flC
III
ORGANICTREATMENT
WATERTREATMENT
o-*-TO DISTRIBUTION
WELL 3
D ?^^J/\
^7~\1
|| ^
BRUCE A. UESCH ASSOCIATES INC.- coeuflNC MvoooiOGisn
Lon*
MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN -WELL 6 INSTALLATION 14
Phase II: Investigation to Site and Develop a New Well Site
If the results of the testing procedures indicate that Well No. 6 is
located in an unsuitable area, new proposed well sites will have to
be located. An investigative program to locate new well sites in an
area remote from the area of contamination should be initiated in
1984. The scheduling and scope of the initial phase of the
investigation will depend on the results of testing at Well No. 6.
The recommended plan should provide. the City of Long Prairie with a
water supply capable of meeting the peak demands throughout the summer.
Project Costs for Recommendation:
3 months of treatment of contaminated groundwater: $39,650.00-$97,750.00
Connection to system: $8,000.00
Installation and testing of Well No. 6: $75,980.00
Construction of transmission line: $47,200.00
$167,830.00-$225,930.00
Project Costs for Recommendation if Well 6 is Shown to be Unsuitable:
3 months of treatment of contaminated groundwater: $39,650.00-$97,750.00
Connection to system: $8,000.00
Installation and testing of Well No. 6 $26,500.00
6 additional months of treatment of
contaminated groundwater $39,300.00-$112,500.00
$110,450.00-$241,750.00
-43-
BIBLIOGRAPHY•4
Bear, Jacdb., 1979, Hydraulics of Ground Water: New York, McGraw-Hill, 567.
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 1970, Ohio, The Chemical Rubber Co.
Hobbs, C.H. and Goebel, J.E., 1982, Geologic Map of Minnesota - QuarternaryGeology: Minnesota Geological Survey.
Horvath, Ari L., 1982, Halogenated Hydrocarbons, New York, Marcel Dekker,Inc., 889.
Liesch, Bruce A., 1983, Long Prairie, Minnesota Test Drilling/Test Pumping.
Lindholjn, G.F., Oakes, E.L., Ericson, D.W., and Helgesen, J.O., 1972, WaterResources of the Crow Wing River Watershed, Central Minnesota:Hydrogeologic Investigations Atlas HA - 380, U.S.G.S.
Schwille, F., 1981, Groundwater Pollution and Porous Media by FluidsImmiscible With Water: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 21,p. 173-185.
Sittig, Marshall. 1981 Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals: NewJersy, Nbyes Publications.
APPENDIX
IRRIGATION WELL SURVEYLONG PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Location: T129 R33 Sec.4Owner: .Well log number: 129215Well information: 1 well, 16" diameter, 55' deep, 900 gpm (tested)Permit number: 77-3337Availability: Only available for emergency use such as fire.
Location: T129 R33 Sec.4Owner: Well log number: noneWell information: 1 well, 12" diameter, 120' deep, 600 gpmPermit number: 77-3033Availability: Could be available, may require a fee.
Location: T129 R33 Sec.5Owner: Well log number: 214697Well information: 1 well, 18" diameter, 51' deep, 400 gpmPermit number: 65-210Well log number: 132248Well information: 1 well, 14" diameter, 60' deep, 600gpraPermit number: 75-3271Availability: could not be reached prior to this report.
Location: T129 R33 Sec.5Owner: Well log number: 214696Well information: 1 well, 16" diameter, 40' deep, 400 gpmPermit number: 65-595Availability: Well is available free of charge. Any improvements to well
must remain with well. Not used since 1972.
Location: T129 R33 Sec.16Owner: Well log number: 214699Well information: 1 well, 16" diameter, 42' deep, 715 gpmPermit number: 68-240Availability: Not available.
Location: T129 R33 Sec. 32Owner: Well log number:221513Well information: 1 well, 12" diameter, 79' deep, 636 gpmPermit number: 75-3334 tAvailability: May be available. Fee may be required
Location: T129 R33 Sec. 33Owner: Well log number: 221406Well information: 1 well, 12" diameter, 51' deep, 500 gpmPermit number: 75-3334Availability: May be available. Fee may be required.
MINN. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY
129215/1W E L L R E C O R DIfcttlitM UM.•!-.»«
tQlmiM )QDrl>«
M« <"]rMr »•••«
V- »ft ^ C^A r\d
<* *«>t t««rs «o
!-{• \i.-\ i • • . \ 0 '
UIKJKJ
.(I"'/'9 7-41-t- (R...7. 1-61)
K.&5U&1 V &i07HIHH
4 .955_ R V A T I O H D E P A R T M E H TI S I O N O F W A T E R S
WELL LOG STATEMENT
Mall Rspoit Promp91r\Tvfe<vicftlr, UtttJMPdf Vmteta. Centennial Office Bldg., St. Paul 1, Minn.
n i r c c i o c
CirounJ *.
</
W e l l No .
Location of 'Well (address) r f' () ^)~Locate Wei I . o nPlat of Section
Describe Further by Lot. Block, N««re»t Highway
Drilled for: _
v^^V- REPORT OF FI HAL PUMP I M« TEST.,~ ~^
of TType of weDug, Dri
Static Water Level "land surfaceow—
Screen: Length
Pump: Type
.* "Diameter /(•> Slot
Horsepower
Water Level While Pumping'.
: Domestic [ I Industrial'^ Irrigation
Public supply [ | Comnercial I I Stock Q
WELL LOG
Geologic FonationsKind. Col or, Hard or Soft
Depth in Feet.Fr To
Geologic FormationsKind, Color, Hard or Soft
Depth in FeetFron To
£
f-
f*-
LOCATCP BY.
Address Verificatiort1 -
2 ••? . 3-
Na.~ne on Mailbox1 n».nt<->/-t-
] Plat Book
--Info. From owner o c o
[h- Info. From Neighbor " L>
tTT
1J Other_
f 1 Can't Locale Siate Whv
7/7* »M
> /
(-.->*. l - C l ) A J^JttSERVAT I OH D E P A R T M E N TD I V I S I O N O F W A T E R S
WELL LOG S T A T E M E N T
4 . DiVISlOfJ OF WATtifc T.Mail Report Promptly To Director, Division Ot Voters. Centennial Off ice SWg.. Sc. P.iut 1, Mino.
I ' i r e i l u r
PuM. *'7r
W e l l No.
Locat ion of Well (address)/><*) ,A Locate W e l l onU f/ I'J J'lst of Section
C^lty or Town
Describe Further by Lot,0 Block, Newest Highly.
Drilled for:
Date of Completion REPORT OF F I N A L PUMPING TEST
alion of Test--2_~_Ilrs. Min.! of wellDug, Driven. Bored, Drilled
- •Casing dian«ter _inch, from
Ft.^r*'**'aland surface
While Puirping_^2__Ft.
Use: Domestic f~l Industrial fl Irrigation
Public supply Q Comrercial f~l Stock [~1Pump: Type
YDRO ENGINEERING, INC. •—wx- 98*
WEli DfllUJ*G AND REPAIR- PUMP SALES AMD SERVICE
/ /Young America. Minnesota 55397
612457-3100
C l WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION RECORD• '_ ' • ' S'-*
TO .._
7r>!H« March
CITY Long. Prairie STATE
LOG OF FORMATIONSSWL
0 (O 28 sand and jjravel
38... to J<? .clay.
Itft... to ..62 jnedauJL^ray. sand _. ...to ...
—.Minnesota
WELL DESIGNfa m n g
SWL
SCREEN WELL DATAMake of Screen . .^igator ___ ...... ______________ .........
Size: Diam. ______ -k?... Jn. Length ________ 20_._ ft. Slot Size ..7P#
Location In Well . ___ J2.!
Fittings: Top „ _ lead packer
Bottom _______ Plat?,
Other Screen Data
to . _____ .62,'_ ...... Screen Metal .. lo.w...carboa_.ateel
ROCK WELL DATA
Open borehole , diam. to It.
WELL TEST DATA
_620 ....... gpm. Static Water Level .._ ...... 16 .-- Pumping Water Level .....39 .......
____ H. ______ hours of pumping (Drawdown ------ ..... ft.)PUMP DATA
Make Lv.O.Kukl£_^0.^. _____ Type
Model _._ _________ ....... .__. Serial Number".. ________ ...... _ ...... - Size
HP .2C ..... Dro Pie Size .£ _______ " & Length ..#<?.._.Drop Pipe Size . _______ " & Length . . < . . _ . Shaft Size & Lengt
/ OFM Head ..._ _ ' RPM
Jkbr: _.._.^.Ci_./7./. \'ol;s Phase Cycles
Well Seal _ -
Water Analysis: Hardness — PP™. Iron ppm.
Signed -
toID ..._ OD
Wt. Jbs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld. _ _WeldedDrive ShoeCemented .
to ^ID OD
Wt Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld.WeldedDrive ShoeCemented
to
ID .._ ODWt. Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld.
WeldedDrive Shoe .-.- -.-Cemented
HYDRO ENGINEERING, INC. BOX 98WELL DRILLING MO REPAIR -PUMP SALES AHO SERVICE
•3. 2/ YJ2 7 You"9 Am8ri". Minnesota 55397' 652-457-3100 /
WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION RECORD 7Date ............. ... Nay en.be r. 2 ...... _.. 1.1 ~3 _____
TO
ADDRESS ...... -' p
• . - • * V X
CITY ... fi9....r\**V*7 STATE
LOG OF FORMATIONSSWL
..Q... to _.iSL^.-jf.Ane.,fiandtoto ....to ....to „to ...to
LOCATED BY
Q Address Verification5WL
I
I I .o
Q"CFn'l't"Locata"State'Why
. to
. toWELL DESIGN
pth measured from .....tQP_QJL_caain&_SCREEN WELL DATA
Make of Screen ...John3Qn..IrrigELtor.
Size: Diam. 1.2 In. Length -2Q ft. Slot Size ....$58-..l
Local Ion In Well 2-9-1 'to k9_' Screen Metal _
Fittings: Top '. .....
Bottom —
thcr Screen Data
Open boreholeBOCK \VELL DATAdiam. to . ft.
WELL TEST DATA. spm. Static Water Level ...~k\ Pumping Water Level .r
J. hours of pumping (Drawdown ft.)PU3IP DATA
Make . Type _ .._
Model Serial Number .". Size
HP Drop Pipe Size " & Length _. Shaft Size & Length
"FM Head ' RPM
Motor: _ Volts ._ Phase Cycles
\Vc!l Seal _ _.._ - - —-
Water Analysis: Hardness ppm. Ifon -
D.._ to -29. -... ID JL2_5/S. OD
Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld.WeldedDrive ShoeCemented .
to_____________ ID __________ ....... _ ODWt. _____ ....... _______ ...... Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld. ____________________Welded ___________ .......... __ ..... _..Drive Shoe ..._ ...... ------------------ .....Cemented ...... --------- ..... -----------
3.
_ ID _ _. ODWf Ibs. per ft.Thrd. &. Cpld.WeldedDrive Shoe - -Cemented —
W A I t M W C L l . n t l . U n j I<- T -
of Ixnar »r«iri«
J-.
KMMATKW IOO
• Lone Pr»ltl«, fti. 56347 4. WKU. MPTH
4-3-1977OM.M O iO
•a ..a
__ • >. -».Oil hail."
•a.«OAirO mi
JtSfiML
Clay20' ^.
JL31
«.40 alot-20 slot
ODD DCC
ItL rUMPIK UYP.
.>J<
iQi
Dr. o.
• __•IkQ
Boa
'//or ;
'-•—' .. 1—
lac. 73157
,:.. fe.-u.77
MINN. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY
M. Immml**
- JfcMAMISll K I C O . O I J / J 4 U
E
T
o c. /
KMMAnOHlOO
•ft*—«
jOr« «MI
O
oIJQ«M*
iQc . iO
a^
-:r
?
_B.
-ft.
£.:'-.
«..*.•
•. STATK WATCR UVtL
' n£]iMk~^^^^^^^^ l—<p^_
. WfcULHtAO COMPACTION
MINIM. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY1/74
Reporc Promptly To Direc
i^ I0;i:»t.r<v AT.'/ON D E P A R T M E N TD I V I S I O M OF W A T E R S
W E L L L O G S T A T E M E N T
•t.lion Of Va«f», Centennial Office Bldg., St. Paul 1, Minn.
Publ.
O'ouncl V.
V . c l l No.
I Loca t ion of V.'ell (address).
~7~^/c/
Locate W e i 1 onPlat of Section
C o u n t y C i t y o r To*n
Describe Further by Lot. Uloclt. Nearest
Drilled for:
Address_
Driller
o . i - ' ' " ' I
Tvrp. /3 ?
Hange
~Date of Completion
Type of
/VV ?/-?/ /
rvpt.h.Dug, Driven. Bored, Drilled ]
ffsing diameter__Z£_inch, from
-
inch, from
_ incli, from
sv REPORT OF F I H A L P U M P I H G TEST
' \ /I Duration of Test / Hrs.
Rate of Pumping
.Min.
_GPM
Static Water Level. Ft.A*weland surfaceBelow
Water Level While Pumping-"? 7 Fc.
Diameter /1- Slot size./**' Use: Dotnestic [~| Industrial Q Irrigation E
'., Horsepower x Public supply f~l Commercial {~1 Stock Q
W E L L L O GDepth in Feet Depth in FeetGeologic Formations
Kind, Color, Hard or SoftGeologic Formations
Kind,Color, Hard or Soft
Plat BooInfo.
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORGEOLOGICAL SURVEY
WATCH ROOUMCU BKAMCH
/> f • j? r1 - / 7
1. Location: State....
Nearest P. 0.
RECORD OF WELLMinnesota Todd
"
Distance from P. 0. •/*
County
Direction from ?. O. „. .__..
Vi sec. JLV_, T. 1&JK* R. *•if :.. •!„- • _ -i._-t -...i ....... i_. on *««t Blxie of road from Longi A in i^ni. v. irigF aL1 cci. nini I IHII IL^I ---- '
Pralrl* to1 Locate w«ll on i>Ut of McUon.
2. Owner:
Driller: 4b« Petcraon
Address Long Prairi*, Uinn>
Address Long Prairia, Minn.
St««p hillaida3. Situation: Is well on upland, in valley, or on hillside?-.
4. Elevation of top of well:
5. Type of well: ; kind of drilling1 rig used __
6. Depth of well:
ft the level of ._.(Abort or btlow)
{Doc. drlvvn. bond, or dritUd)
ft.; year in which well was finished
(So*, depot. Ulu. or Unon)
(Solid tool. {•vtln*, roUry. «U.)
Does well enter rock? ; if so, at what depth? ft.; kind of rock
7. Diameter: At top inches; at bottom : inches.
8. Principal water bed:
Depth to principal water bed(Gr«v*l. sand. cUjr. or rock. U rock. itaU kind)
ft.; thickness of bed ft.
If other water supplies were found, give depth to each
9. Casings: Kind ; size ; length ft.; between depths of and
Kind ; size ; length ft.; between depths of and
Kind ; size ; length ft.; between depths of and ft.
ft.
ft.
Packers (if any): Depth at which packers were used
Screen or Strainer: Was well finished with screen? —
length of screen ft.; diameter
—; kind of screen „
.; kind
inches; size of openings
10. Head: Does well at present overflow without pumping? 3T.?A_..; did it overflow when new? ;a
if flowing, give pressure Ib. per sq. inch; or height water will rise in a pipe..__. ft. above surface;
original pressure or head ; if not flowing, give water level in well ft. below surface.
11. Pump: Is the well pumped? ; kind of pump ;
size or capacity of pump
12. Yield: Natural flow at present (if any)
well has been pumped at
; kind of power ....
gallons per minute; original flow gallons per minute;
gallons per minute continuously for hours;
Quantity of water ordinarily obtained from well _. gallons per day. \
13. Use: For what purpose is the water used?
14. Quality of the water:(Hard or wft. fiWi or Mlty. «tc.)
15. Cost of well, not including pump:
_„; is there an analysis? _..?.*• 55
Temperature of water ° F.
Date
Name of person filling blank
AddressOn th« b*«k «f Ihii ill**! (U« cb« nfmr4 •( IK* l ChrMffti which lh« w«ll p«»*«« mn4 *•/ aditr fart* n«t rtvvn akh««r
LOG OF WELL
KIND OP ROCK OR OTHER MATERIAL(Clf* «to» u4 Ml wbrtlw hud tt Mft)
I allow clay and Band streekj.
Data obtained by I. 8. llliaon.•
• •
8ottro« of datai Fll«« of Ulnn««o
•
•
r>EKTH. IN FEET
l>—
ba G«ol. J
•
T«—
umjf .
1
THICKNESS.1M FEET
4
REMARKS(Fijirlallf [nr*niullMi M to waUr f*»4)
•
\
»»..fOrtll»r
STATC OF NINNerrTA
Of "HtlM W A T E R W E L L R E C O R DL •jXAr.cii or *Com'-r '*»•
"Dlfltwie* and Dlrvctlcn rro« Ho*4 Int»n»ctloo« tfi> Scr««c A*.dr«»i «Ad Clcy of U«U Loc«cla«"•• ?rS-
125604
. ALL DCPm
i>• i~ '
»M of Co^l.Uo.
Jl[3 C«kl> tool
Qlollo. roJ
»QDrl«M
3Q"'
- 1 Au«.r
sroRMATIOI 100
L
15- REMARKS. ELEVATION. SOUBCI CP DATA, etc.tf»« a laecnJ «Ju«t. t/ nMd»ii.
:Q Irrt«>tloa
?r~| ladwt
<Q
CASUIBDLAM. T
ttiwud'Hi v.id^i Q 3suet rj-2 s^». n
V7U. to ft. d«ptk
rt.
_rt. d^«k
. '<•-??»..„.;„ ,oX
Or OMO. hol«
'' l ft. .»• ^ 'J ft.3«t b«tVMB
ft. >n4.
ft. ai*4
(t.
(t.
X • / -Pctf%. Y
STATIC vaa Ltm.
' •/-' _rt. |l»ad «ur
0. PUWING LZVEL [Mlow lAad furfac*)
C^ rt. .rt., / h».
ft. ajt<r hr». pu^plac
U. VSU, ULAD COHPLZTIOI
I{Q Pleln* «4»|>t«r 2Q Bu<>t>t offt«t 3Q At V«ut L2" abor,
U. 'J>L1 (rouuaf
[] T
O.pti: frt»_
from _rt. . „_
3. •••rose loure* or pottlbl* coatwila^lo
"u.u dlilafMtW um *° D
D«t« li
-Q»oi
of droj rtp*
H»t«rl>l of dro» »!B>_
<V^ -rt.) 'UJL-
»BMlqr_
o. VATEJ VS.L comtACTOii's cornnoiTic* \
Ttli mil w drill** inter ft Jurt»dlctlo« «id ul> nport !• trut to
th« b«t of 39 kaovlvdii* *>d boll«f.
»H ft T t B.JV
?/£'! *"; •-"«
, .• , - S**teh ••» of *«il li 4. WELL DUTH (c '.•.."•. PM« W Ci
H-«.
S•1 ovU-
-f-2
tiQ.
MTVti^tn lOl.il
4OF»hrl« ».»»•»-
hOHMATION LOU HAHimtJiSOff OK MAT) ON
•DC
o
/ fHEIGHT: At**/* _.,
f-/ ...» ^\ >
• 7W*t(M
/ >
I BC_«..
_«.
-«.
». STATIC WATER LEVEL
nn»M«nMr4.
VII. WftLL HtAO COMPUiTtON
id:
°r- 9* C'T*-jii(u*MttOt« . ^n
-£: *~.3l
iCT>ii»ii.itii
03
It. WATKR WELL CONTRACTOR 1 CERTIFICATION
T» -ril »^« tMMt ntm mj MXklln n< um t oit l» Of »
K. / r , r X V\ *--.•* S' - ' r '. I I • •~^^
II. Hr.UAKKS. tLkVATIOH. SOUKtltOK UATA.XC.
f fV
MINN. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY
STATE OF MIWtESOT*
DEfWrt-Bfr Of HEALTH
I. L3CATTO "if V*Co-itTj**^
• M A T E R «ELL R E C O R Da Sutvt*, LUI.Ol-.Ot
TistaUiev tvad OlrvcxloM Iat«r».Tetion* en*
S«CtlOn 1laaat»*r
iq fu*ll toc.itl.rn
125623
\_i^rvcy fVct: ,-. e ll < -k V~V T.«i?
roiuwnoi uw
fiD
/?<?£
9AAC
!/*« a ttamd aKaae.15. RCTAJUC3. ELEVATIOi, SOUVCZ OP DATA. «tc.
HARDHISS 07
t";
i n v i K i r-ci-ilOf.irAl <;i!OVFy rOPV
». «LL DOT* (coapUtad). Data1 of Coaclatloa
iQcaaia tool *Qiu«ar»a
iQ.
Zf~l Irrlotlo >aln<
J^j Udmtiy
sQcoaaarelal
T. C*3IJiODIM.
'DBlack \f\l . CalT. (_}'
"T to. to t I I ft. d.pthdap Ul
.ft. daptb
_ft. daptk
-Jol^ 'LU » i
HKICKT:
Ittrfaea
lb../ft.
Drt«a SkoaT T»
Or opaa hala
frua. rt. to
-^ •> 'C'X«.'' I Dla. •'••"''
Slot/O
It. (nd
(t. and
"•
1C.
). STATIC UATRI L£VB.
J ft. K] balovland lurfaca
<" • -~
10. PUV1BG UVO. (bclotf laad lurfacaT
ft. aftar hn. p«pln(_
_ft. aftar hra. punplnj|_
J.p.i
_f.f.i
11. 'JELL KIAD COHPLTT10»
SM™«OI offi«t JfcjJAt l<ut
QT.. QKO
Daptb: froa_
froa
_rt. to_
ft. to
L3. N«»r««t imirc* of
CWt
Data U»t»U»d
Maufaeturar'l Sa**
ft. capacltr
of dn» Dip*
5l 1 tae l»r
TbU v«ll »m> irlU»« undar ay Jurlidletloa aad tkl> nport l> tru« to
ti« bait of ay kDovladca «Kd WU.f .
• -Data ' / r ,' '
W A T E R W E L L R S C O H Oto* *»*' 5—»**
33 -it
j:^^ r s.4. *tLL OtPTM (
s-I ni
-.-I cA «•/_ II.
• •a
hOHMATION LCXJ»O <w o-Jio.
<2_
LA/At/".
' c Vi ti*> JG t, n
MINN. DEPT.OF NATURAL RESOURCES COPY
_n.
_n-
o-v SV» v?
10. PUuriNC LEVEL UMn- KM >i>r>c>>
. WtLL HEAU COMPLETION
Ov.
I J. N«W«M HH«1« of
«C3c iiiifiM 4O
14. WATU WXU. COHTKACTOK1 CCHnriCATIOH
i /-^fe ^»A
•(. i •, o P i'rred m»f at w«ll taciiiM. D.I. ^C«-W,I«.
J
*/- ? < - 7 7 ;
lOl-tM.no>
J2TLlOlnnl - iiQ
J 2^33-7 9 tffl
LOCAT!
1 -" n Address V erification1 . n N^rriA fin
3~D Lot-B!4 • D fiat Bool
6-Q Info. Frort7 -FT Other5\
Q Can't Lo<
'•'O'-"1' 'Vo!«!f«Sil°''' >"0>' I TO
0 BY
OwnerNeighborrri n- ""*•
ate State Wh>
>OM.iMtlp<l
f ' / '
oHblCHT: Aba««;»ttow
'"
,
, *
'// M. t. /// 1 n w*,n /•- '''•/ ii
_ to- » -
. In. !• .
'M|kl / ' - 7 ifc. 1*1
fl. w*ffel ifc^m.
ft. Wntht Ibtjtl.
S«f/Cn / ?
». STATIC V
intf MrfK*10. PUMP INC LEVEL (»«lo«» U*4 uwfer*)
ft. *fl«T - .-_ fl»». P^M
v- ^,.
zE3 fWMiM»lt«
CU.YA..
JO
D**lh: froM _
frOM.
_ft . t«
. ft. I*
J. "-f-ni ttrin-Tt ir* f*i.it*i fflrl—"--inn .. -
/ ///- >
T:?. 77
_ /.-f S
H>mU of tat nlf
i*. WATCH wtLLCOHT«Acro»-3cennrK:ATio«
M of my
x
MINN. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY
i
P. C. BETTENBURG & COMPANYREGISTERED
ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS
1437 MARSHALL AVENUE
i SAIMT PAUL. M:NWESSTA! NESTOR 61»l
I
NEW
r'TEST HOLE DATA
forWELL AT LONG PRAIHIE, MINN.
Data by Jftofc SohultaHole atarted Jan. 3, 1942
Location Material
Grouni to 12 ft. -Dry sand.* ' - ' - ' • . • : .
12 ft. to 21 ft. Fine sand and gravel '•-
21 ft. to 62 ft. Coarse sand and grtVf) ' '
62 ft. to 83 ft. Very fine sand, littif' clay
83 ft. to 106 ft. Gravel
Notes} Water struck at 12 ft. below ground. The water levelrose 2 ft. to a point 10 ft. below grade when sinkingtest hole between 83 ft. level and 87 ft.' Between 87ft. level and 95 ft. level it dropped 1 ft, to- a point11 ft. below grade. At 95 ft. level it returned tonormal level of 12 ft. below grade, where it regainedconstant for the balance of the test holt iurvey.
Water samples were taken e.t the 40 ft., 60 ft., 80 ft.;and 100 ft. levels. ! -• -
I GRAVEL PACK WELL DATAfor ..*:--«•:•••'" •
NEW WELL AT LONG PRAIRIE, MINN.
\ Data by McCarthy fell Co.
Well was completed June 9th, 1942. /' .
The final test on this well revealed the followingTtwltf. Thedepth to water at rest was 12 feet. While pumping at the rate of550 gallons per minute the water level became stabilised~at adepth of 25 feet. In other words, there was a 13 foot drawdownbelow static level which, converted to specific capacity oft thewell, gives * figure of 42.3 gallons of water per minute per footof drawdown. '•'
L l R E C O R DStatute* l56A.3l-.3t
for '"izm 123593To A 3 ..' I r> or s.. 3 J I. or v
>fco» exact loefttlcM of v»LL la MetLcn «rt4 vltA "*.'N
s
r .•i •*•
ronwnai LOO
o,O Ii \ ^ c\ v
f
li*« aR2MAAK5. ELEVATIOA, SOUPCS OP DATA, etc.
"07FORMA710*
7i\A''f -
->r> > V
R
T
7f
MINN. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY
'JILL 33TS (co«H«t»a)
QDD»t« of Co»»L«tlo
loQou,
^f~1 HoUav r«4
7l_j I»d«t
!Q Air Condltla.il
r. cxsijoDIAM.
r«<ted£3lTh
Black
_lo. to
_1B. to
la. to
I v.ldtd Q] 1
| K«IOI->. ^f,—r*-,\
Surfac. f
••'O ft. d.pt&
_ft. dept*
ft. depth
d. SCKEBI
DrUw Sho«? I.. Bo
Or opm hou
fro. ft. to
Slot/C*tu«
3«t b«tw^». . V_/ ft. and _
ft. >nd
ft. and
ft.
ft.
fc.
9. STATIC UATTR L£VCL
""I -.) ft. 0 •»!•» f~] ••«»•laod mrfaca
Tae«)
_hr».
_bra. pt«pliic_
>~O ft. Uf r__2_l«. »«•!.« 3'l.tf1-! _g.p...
_»-P.»-
11. WtXL HZAD CWTLCTIOJI
">t L2* «bo»»
12. w«ll (routldt
[Xpth: fro. _ft. to_
ft. to
_ft.
ft.
13. N«ar»«t BOUTC« of po««lblo eeatu^natlon
IWt
V.U. 41»l>r«eud vpo. co^Utl«•* r«« C( '° CDtT7<
B«t» lut«U*4 Q- ' •' "I ' / /
^ Quo* l»t*il«4
..V" O ~ r ,T i^_
^ *— 'ft. e«e»cltT
Typt:
drop tlD» '• '
jQt.s. turn in. Q »«'•«'
16. vKmvEU. conucroics cnmnci-non ^
Ibl* v.11 v*a drlll^ wdffr ^r Jurlidietlo. Mid thll rvport !• tru* to
th« b«*t of tv kaovl«d«« *^ o«ll«f.
; . V S ; - ^ ! -'•- -:
Lic9H*»« Buntttf
Slsn«d_Authorlt*d
flan* of 5rlLl*r
-;•-"'^.•••'.• .. •„...• u.'s, ospr.-omf
-'-'. -'• MASTER C A R D -
.WELL SCHEDULEGEOLOGICAL SUR VS1T-
/ ': •< '
WAT£R'RESOURCES DIVISIONS
'•' :U.<
! 7
[14\&S\&\ Q! ?; q = 4 l.r; Q fTTol ' 'n^^
toc*l" . / fl 6 M
i i ij. i'••"• ' £"« sr-r^.i-^Hr iVisirl^i^S&.^iWl - i - i - i ' ! ' f ^^-
- ' " ' • • • - ---(o- .. (D ; co - .• (N) . < '-. • rs>"- - <w>
?; County, F«d. Cov't, Cicx,.Corp or C», P r iva te , State Agency, Vinter Dt»t
-.-—.','
> _ :'. -
(E) (F) G3f <O" (K> -(H) (P) W ''Pover, Fire, Deo, Irrt Had, Ind, 7 S, See,
:••) Recharge, Deaal-P S, Deaal-other, Other •
(«> (P) (B) "(T) ' (0)Oba. 011-ga>, Recharge, Tejc, Unoaad, V:
»/L m«j». :
«, Uaate, Destroyed' _ LxL
Field aquifer char.-."| j
ftp AD
' I ~] ' ' ' ~ • ' ' • " ' ^IJLJ _J Pump«a« Inventory: ^/T.)period,:
'Log
WEI L-DESCi»IPTION CARD
s.vi; AS 0:1 PASTES CASH | p«?th v«ii : f t i / ! ?< iKeaa.
Depth cas^d:(fir.t pert:) Ct
i) iO •! / ! C. .Caalnj
•M^ accuracy
; Diaa. •_ f
"•' '" (C) '•• " (F) %: '.'" " (C) (H) (0) (P) £& (V> (W) (X) (a)-... , \ ' porouj gravel v. • gravel v. horlz. open pert., •crcen, sd. pt.. ahored» poen •r1".13!'1 concrete, .(p«r«.) , (acreen) , gallery, end, ^ bole,. -otllef
..--: ;' • Hethodl :(.\) . -CB>'.,...CS3i- (D);(H) ' (J) 00 > .. (R) (T) . . 00 (W) . (Z) 'Drilled- *^r bored, cabTe, dug," hyd jetted, air • reverse trenching, driven, drive . •'• •
" —• - ' —• percusaton, ritery, •. waeh
VI
" % •'' £L££""^ • (type)
i 1 1 1——i • I netnoa b 1
» ! ! ! ' ••*- I °.t«r.lr.edL..J
Ift I . ! ! P Accuracy;
Sp. Conduce
Tatcc. color, ecc.
sl—I I—!—'—I ""•_« * 10 I J Teep. *FI i i 1 fJSple
1 . JH"d.~7T- p?.
J4 /• -rr
STlfE Of M1NKESTTA
DEPARTMENT OF
. -.c. j- .-,•««_,. IA
CEP«T>«T OF HWLIM/
/
______^
!TH f E R W E L L R E C O R DMHHSOT* MI9U* VIU K.
/ o r lH>t \~ \ _^.'-^y '~<vr,"
" • .- -i i •
StLOtf •
w
»ct lo»tl(M of vtll IBN
i i
'
-x
. -I— .
.....s
1 1 -rilf '
t. patmTKM
Mctloa grid vltk X.
E
J-*
LOO
<
uc
<
rv,...C // . . ." . ifr
'-'"' '/<.. ./'-"', i 1 , /
/x3* -5 "5
nj^l/
/</y /A/" //-'./•b-^cfT/4• -
- • " ;_. ....''..
15. RZHARXS. KLZYATIOI. SOUKS• a *«oon<
V
:
Sketch ••{
1 T O-O S'
COLOR
3/c...
s// '
/ /
C: -,,.*.,
,/c, , ,/
-?4»PPJ>
/^X5t
^
y T">
-- -. • -
— - •-•
-
lakMt, if nftJfd.
HAftDRSa 07FDfMATIOfl
•U;,/tlf- -',///wCO
J^B,(
^^
-
I'tJL' -
; -.-
, ,
.
-. ..
-
> or »«Li
, . <
Y 'rnoM
0'f*s
f — :
*?
)^
-
loeAtvon.
TO
7
x?7
.-— •
r^
^
—
OF DATA. etc.
AJIIMNI f^PD! OOICAI. SURVEY COPY
1. T^op ^ — Tt_~ / '
L f r ' F f - r f « « r ^ A ^~'V. USLI. Dzrtll (co^>l«t»d) D»U of CoivKtlon
-^"^r r.. y^-/C-7S~5.
tQ (UkU tool «Q ««^«n» 7[] Drl<n IdQ Bu«
jQ^t^r *Q J«tt^ °|~1 foi^r Au««r
6. UU
tQD6M«Ue «Dft*llo S^ftf J^lmiuttrr
T. CA8IXO 1 JtrlOIT: Abo»»/3«to«
•"-/ "* '72 1 / / < <7/ !•. ttf * — •' *^ ft. dvptJi Uvlflht ' '' ' > /Ibl./ft.
U. to ft. d»Ul
la. t« ft. dvptfc Orlw Soo«T T«« 9o^
8. SCHin Or opn hol<; , ! - > . < r
)taki1— '' 1 < 1 * -- V • • fro, ft. to ft.
T ^ ^ V t v , . . ! .> ^-^ '^/ ,'<•/„.. J"
31ot/C«iu« • '- 1 1 Uutk *"*"
S*t bvtwMa .*!!> ^. fe. «nd ^ ^ ft.
ft »d ft k - i -^- c n. fe rft. uri ft.
' 1 fcj^" fV| l—i I.- . f "1^~s! ^J ft. K I belov I 1 •kow D*t* ^••urwl * O ( * * /*^
Ian* «urfac«
ft. aftor hn. vuvlnc C.P.H.
U. VOX H£tD CCWLJTIOf
iQFltlna xterUr JQ Buoant off»t ¥0 At l»ul L2* «oo>»
12. V.ll trout.ar
l[~l»"«t eMnt JC?lj«toolt. 3f~l
.. Itoptk: m / ft. to '^/ r-'l ft.
tram ft. to rt. j
13. Mvamt aoure* of po««lal« eoataaioatloa
r««« UmtioB tn*
«.U dl.l.r.. ^o latio,, ,..# ..Q
l». PW»
»»to lm»taU>4 T*1 "^ ^ . ' _ ' * "
}&-•—- ;
Itotel li***r IT «olu
Uaxtb of drop rtpa ft. e*Mcl«r «.»...
•hMrlal of dm P!D>
*"' InlT"1"" Ji^JfCT ^1*l""""i
Il£, WARR WELL COVTIUCTOI'9 corrlflCAnaM \
Thli v«ll n« drJU*d iMd*r «r JiDH«dleti« aa« tkla r»port If tro la
tn« b*«t of >v k»ovl«d|i« «nd ballvf.
W'.,/ VvN Sir. < VUe" b»« ' : ' . ' . < • *•'£-'
. .. ,, ,3 z:iii, K \ , » . '^4/ ...Jtfr^' '.. »«¥^/-~•:.V,1: t^.TTc"»;..<. <> + I , i M , r H -
:<>n» or Orlll.r . .
,
Tr , . , ',W A T E R W E L L R E C O R D— ,„-„.-..,.» U3Q83
*
'
//, -idrirtw.
'
tOXUAnONLOG AKIH4K&Sl-OHMArKH
tC]AKCrm<ltl(Hdii< «d
t
>£>•«»
2dc.h.
HEIGHT: Aben/t
/ / i
:«-(;..ft. W«t|ftl
_fl. WligM
_n. wrirt..
-ft
-ft.
ft. SCREEN t> op«N Mitt
h' r 901/GMM
SH» _fl.
_B.
_n.
9. STArtCWATEK LEV^L
DIM u««u^ L-
10. PUMPING LbVCL (below lurf iwfjcv)
n. »n»f ^ kf& fmmffal
. hrv pumvini
II. WKLL HEAD COMPLETION
. W«i irowltdT
r- ^~
/- •C/--6 1C0«v<>: frw«. . n. !•
.«.!»'
— •ifir—<i~*^-
U«p» •* *™» H»*
MaMfM ol *0» 9*9*
T>r><
iDlrt
t*. WATKRWELLCDNTRACTOII-SCUTtFICATlONCDNTRACTOII-SCUTATlN .
«M«M«rMto4iM^««y|wMi«lMM4lMftrafwA>
> '. . T " * - ' .1 - 1 ) i A - - T / > '
II. KKMA»K5.tLkVATIOH.SOUKCIIOrOATA.>l>.
MINN. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY
DEPW»T>€NT OF HEMJH W A T E R H E L L R E C O R DJtatyt»» HH.3l-.ai 117652
TODDDl»*Mie>> <wd Dlrvctloa fro* *n*4 la
29 129 '1. or t.
33••4 Cltf of W.U Locicli
'••
Prairie"V
ratMATIOH LOO
Sand
12.9-33-29
1). RCMAfUa, tLCVATTOff. 50URCX OF DATA, «tc.
MINN. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY
k. UIU. DOTH (coapl
tool *Q».».
rod CHMr
07-
C] Irrl«.Uoo,
3QT««» W.U
*Qr<*u« :
!Qur Coadltlomla«
CD»Q Co«>nlal
T. CASHODIAM.
H
i QI "«i«^ nj
_ft. d«*U
_ft. d*pU
_rt. i«pi»
Sffll'tn
KUOIT: Abo»/l.l<>
Surfaw^
»«l«trt lb../ft.
TuX J0
Or oom hoi*
fro* n. Co
20 slot
It. and
ft. in*
. ''•
ft.
[t.
9. STATIC WATER LZVEL
ft. Qb.lo» Qabo««" td turfim. pufiiie UVH. ;ui» i^d .0,-? .i
^O ft. aft^r hr». ptaapln|_
ft. kft*r bn.
11. UILI, KUAD CO»rtXTIOH
12. "«U (TDIIt>4!
n '•• c^«
Daptk: fra>_
1}. louro of po»Ul* cont»«l.«tlo« •
J.UU
\ h.~D.Flint. Walling
6/6/75n»«
totel luriwr
. Laa<U ft drop plp»_
Nttortal of drop pip>_
_ft..naparlty_
»«lt« 33Q
1Q I.P..
Lastic~L.a. Tui»loa
i's cntnncATToi
hl> nil vu 4rlU«d notr w Jurli<UetlA «n« •->!«
ttn k«t of v teooUl/i* »4 I
Clarissa, Minn.
Slawd
,/74
I 1 0 / 3 1 0
n
s•1 wii
• " -i .^ '
4. wtLL DCrTH (onpMM) • CMm X Co~pltl4o>
FORMATION LOU HAKIWt.S&OKOHMATION
Oc
lOr
19
7 -V S4 *
52/3.)A****• 3--C- H r"V > f-.f.\.
fl. and
fLaW
n. »*4
«. STATK: W A F K H LEVFL
/ 7 -9 -7H
10. PUMPING LCVEL (k^wUMl wr(act>
. Hft-fMiaJaf
II. WtLL MBAO COMPLtriOM
lOflaMfnvM offnt jQAi
j UCJA FED BY
i . I'eriffeatioi Mailbox
3-3-Boc<Frc TI Owner _ _.
6 ' D tnfo. Fro n NeighborOther^Can't t n Stata Wh
Utf « MCOM4 IJWL tfHttdf*.
av« g^.2dir<».Mrt<«
D lfer frofli. -ft.
_«.
,7-' ',-u
i ; _ . . j..DNX
HiMfMiuWt «•••
It. WATER WEU.CONT*ACTOII1CEHTIFICAriOM
fin > \TM
^"^"T"" " "*? ' I I . />»•//:. 7 \.^^-
II. Ht.MAMKl. tUVATIOM. SOU »t t O> DATA, •!«.
Ma** of Dnl1«r
MINIM. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY5ri« MM
HYDRO ENGINEERING, INC. "BOX 93WEIL DRJLU3G AND REPAIR-PUMP SALES AND SERVICE ~"
Young America. Minnesota 55337
612-467-3100
WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION RECORD 7s -3
ADDRESS .............
LOG OF FORMATIONS
SWLtoa., to <£ . H L - . * * . * ? .
. t o _<„ ...e.*ft.fcA . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
o to . ____ j.4..?.. to _£?
to
to
SWLJ-^ooi ;J 3V
? . . — ! • • l"_"i:; n ., t .. . • - - - , - — . ,
3 •:-! f - • • • - . .
to _„„J 6 - • i ;,;.-, • - , . . , .
to 7 ...... ":.™:::™ii:ii£sr-._.I ' - u cr.,-..;.,-tO ..pl-.p—^'T^Z^rr—rrszTa."I V-Lr'1 ' L/J-a'e Slate Whyto .to .
WELL DESIGN
1/lptli measured from _./^yD—~-6..£..-..C~49~*&S?—J -'SCREEN WELL DATA^_^^ . ^^
M<%ke of Screen "(teSTc It «*-» * AI> C#/f/»^.*/<?X< -
Size: Diam. ../*L.- in. Length ...AO.._._ ft. Slot Size
Location in Well ...-JT.?. to ?..?._ ^Screen Metal
Fittings: Top
Bottom _...4>«a./c£>/.
Other Screen Data
Make
Static Water Ilevrt-^fe«-.V? Pumping Water Level
hours of pumping (Drawdown ..._?*.£ ft.) y^ ^^ fePUMP DATA
Type-
Modei Serial Number ...T.S/. -S™ Size
.._£<?- Drop Pipe Size ..£' .." & Length ..£p—. Shaft Size & Length..--^/.*
Head ' RPM -
%Kfc° ./..!./. Phase - Cycles
M _
Well Seal -
Water Analysis: Hardness —- — PPm- Iron ppm-
CASING STRINGS
*._.._ to ._4T9i..._/S7>t_..._ ID „-../.&..- ODWt. .._ __ Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld _Welded *Drive Shoe
ICemented
ID ODIbs. per ft
Thrd. & Cpld.WeldedDrive ShoeCemented - — —
to - -ID _ OD
\Vt - • H«. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld.
WeldedDrive ShoeCemented - —
WDRQ ENGINEERING, INC.WELL QBILUNS AJJjJREPAIfl-PUMP SALES AND SERVICE
Young America, Minnesota
612-467-3',CO
553-47
.....13
r. .
/ ^-/ CV
....Ci- to ...•?— ...^.-l-.ri:1?— :..^~.fl ............... ----
to _ ____ .i'.v-?-
WELL DESIGN
WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION RECORD
Date .-.»'-'V- :^-- f t . ;
TO . '.
ADDRESS M..O..-.\. . /?..<:..•> •:.£.'..£...- - "'' ' / /<
STATE _... -
L'Od OF F ORMATIONS P[\3 5 -3 3> 3 ^SWL
SCREEN WELL DATA
M.-ike of Screen .^..c.^^^..:\.....-.^-jr..r..'..^.^'f(.i'. -
Size: Diam I2r. in. Length A2.'-..'J.'.-.... ft. Slot Size f.ff...f.f..3.f..?.
Location in Well -...£.$..'. to ...?'/ 1 Screen Metal „.._.*..__'__
Fittings: Top ...A.£.5.5* j&..3.£..*.?.£- - -
Bottom p.JA.T.C - - -
Dthcr Screen Data - - ~
BOCK WELL. DATA
Open borehole ...._ - diam. to It.
WELL TEST DATA
gpm. Static Water Level ..£..... Pumpins Water Level ..%A
" - '
.^^-
hours of pumping (Drawdown .—?../_ ft.)PUMP DATA
._ Type .0\.Make . . . . . . O ^ - - . . ^ . . . -
Model Serial Number - size_ _ _ _ _ _ _ • - - ••• •* ~ ••...—--- ^
, HP k°... Drop Pipe Siz* . (<! " & Length ...HO... Shaft Size i Length...?.?...'..V
:-M Head -' RPM - —
tP: ..6.C._-dU..7^ts - Phase - Cycles
Well Seal ....... _ ...... ---------
Water Analysis: Hardness . I ron-
CASING STRINGS
_. .. to ..ID
Wt IbsThrd. & Cpld
WeldedDrive ShoeCemented . ._ _
2.
to _ID ... . ...
Wt - IbsThrd & Cpld, . . .WekJed
Drive Shoe —
_ ^.. .
3.
ID ._Wt — - IbsThrd & Cpld
Welded
ODper ft-
..._. OD
. per ft.
.... OD. per ft
_
,-J-* '•Signed .W ^ £f fC ^^^
J ^ I E -if rimtifry' j — 'i^~7 i') ^\ — matsorn aiiqut nu. no-.CEPA«ThtNT or Htjti, / /X /> i W A T E R H E L L R E C O R D
ri. -JOTT.*-...^! £ ' / £ O x' ' *"'•**• "•«•« «••«-" 10, r/ " ~ ;;"
S. or 3. "g*. oKjfl
Show «x*ct locntloa of v«U i« **etiaa grid wlN
_ l . . . V. / (
Ui 1. -,- • •- Sk.tcb B^ of v«ll loc.tloa.
H - -|- - - + - - A. - E
H— • l"1'"M- 1
S -
1. K«M»TIC« 140
X? ,/
/^-7_34/-2/^ Z-£fy I*±
J>/ .'6V/ £'J£1
-—
. . — . .
i u«« a ttotma15- KZ>U]KS, ELZVATICCt, SOUKCI OF DATA. «tc.
\
i
colon
^c_..'•
L-;L $j\
/<^±"£
^ /A
... _.. .
.....
„
-
.I'M* 6. i/ ntmdtd.
iUAHBSK OfPOMMAnOM
>
-> * /•-
r>£
/ 6:
...
ratm
^
/ '"'-•'V C v
TO
J
^f
Li^
• -
> ^^»IWM r;pninr;irAi SIIUVFY COPY
V^3S7T*i OEFDi Cco»»Ul5<Or
^D«.4.
l[JC*bU tool *l 1 R.*»T». TQDrlvn
6. LSI
3f~]T».t W.U 6f~J
T. CASL23P1W.
?hr«ad^d py I v.ld*« [
T* IB. to -J £•* ft. «>pl
IB. to ft. d.vt
IB. to ft. dnt
9. SCKBI __ Or o
tn»- f> *". , • i 'ri '^2. t:-Zt d /
Slot/G.UM • O 1 -J
S.t fe»t».«« — ' »" ft. Md (" O (t.
' ^" rt.l^ x^/ ft. 1A1WAOV Ll BBO««iBad surf^tc.
' - . - - . fl- BfUr / hn. P«B>!
107381
Hr5«t. of Co^l.tlOB
»3 - 3 - -/^• ioQo>«
;
0——lalOTT: tbo»i/3«lo»
A w.idt ' *»'• ' / ib../rt.
A
A Orl<* SOO.T In I*X
p«t bol.
MB. -2 ''
— UncU 7FITTIteSi
"^ " *C '/ '*
DBW M.B..K4 -?• S -"/4
/ ':-•
ft. .ft«r dr.. pwvlBB •.•.•.
Ll. WILL JUAD COVUTIOli
D^th: fro* rt. to
From ft. to
. _fek« t u- ^
Cu. Tte.
ft.
f».
L3. li.*r«.t .our«« of pOB.ibla eoatwUaatla* -
f*>« . dlranlo* tn>
Moll dl.ur*ete« UVOB ecBwl*Ua»r T^"gJ" laQ
Ik. PUT . . . ._
D»>* U.ULU4
la «-- «_ . -
ItodBl I«BWr «F Tolu
. L«utk of dn» »M ft. >
HBtoTlBl Of dm BlB.
Tn»' ir~la«BM»r»ltl» 3Q<<-<- TurttH
(•••aitr - x.p'**
*niK. VAICT wru. comucfoii's comrtcATiai ^
T>il. nil vu driU.d. «id*r By Jurl.tictloi fat tti. nport 1« tr» «•
U< Vt»t of *r kBO»Ud«» "id Inlt.f .
.J ^"•••™"' J ' ' "J*' _
.!„„ • , - • ' (ff-^"""
. ^f
,«n-;,— ,' n-m-r