Date post: | 27-Sep-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | vlad-preda |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Was The Earth always at 1 AU?
(and was the Sun always 1 Solar Mass?)David Minton
Purdue University
CollaboratorsRenu Malhotra (U. of Arizona/LPL)Hal Levison (SwRI)Bill Bottke (SwRI)David Nesvorn (SwRI)
Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA)David Vokrouhlick (Charles)Bruce Simonson (Oberlin)
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Was The Earth always at 1 AU?
(and was the Sun always 1 Solar Mass?)David Minton
Purdue University
CollaboratorsRenu Malhotra (U. of Arizona/LPL)Hal Levison (SwRI)Bill Bottke (SwRI)David Nesvorn (SwRI)
Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA)David Vokrouhlick (Charles)Bruce Simonson (Oberlin)
Thursday, April 12, 2012
The FYSP solved 3 ways
1. Mass-losing Sun
2. Jumping Earth
3. Archean Bombardment
Thursday, April 12, 2012
The problem
How to keep this line
Above this line
1-D radiative balance:(Pollack 1979)
Time varying solar luminosity:(Gough 1981)
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Whitmire (1995)
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Whitmire (1995)
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Orbital adiabatic invariant
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Conserved
Orbital adiabatic invariant
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Conserved
Orbital adiabatic invariant
More massive early Earth?...not considered here.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Conserved
Orbital adiabatic invariant
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Conserved
Orbital adiabatic invariant
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Conserved
Orbital adiabatic invariant
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Conserved
Orbital adiabatic invariant
Simple: Change the gravitational constant of the
universe.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Conserved
Orbital adiabatic invariant
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters
Conserved
Orbital adiabatic invariant
Increasing mass also decreases aSo lets try this first...
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012
Present-day mass loss~30% due to solar wind
~70% due to E=mc2.
Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012
Present-day mass loss~30% due to solar wind
~70% due to E=mc2.
Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012
Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012
2.5%? That doesnt sound so bad!
Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012
2.5%? That doesnt sound so bad!
2.5% Msun=26 Jupiters
Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012
2.5%? That doesnt sound so bad!
2.5% Msun=26 Jupiters
Sustained mass loss
Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012
Based on measurements of stellar winds from Wood et al. (2005)
Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012
Mass-losing Sun
A mass-losing Sun could in principle solve the FYSP
But you need sustained high rates of mass loss over ~2 Gy
Required mass loss rates are at odds with inferred stellar wind mass loss rates of Sun-like stars
Thursday, April 12, 2012
What about just semimajor axis?
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Ways of changing semimajor axis
Type 1 & II migration (Goldreich & Tremaine 1979; Lin, and Papaloizou)
Requires gas: T
Ways of changing semimajor axis
Type 1 & II migration (Goldreich & Tremaine 1979; Lin, and Papaloizou)
Requires gas: T
Planet-Planet Scattering
Terrestrial planet system with an extra planet near Mars can stay stable for as long as ~1 Gy before losing the extra planet (Chambers 2007)
~1 % of simulations of our solar system lose Mercury within 5 Gy. In 1 out of ~2500 simulations ALL terrestrial planets went unstable 3 Gy into the future (Laskar & Gastineau 2009)
Video from Fred Rasio Credit: Trent Schindler, National Science Foundation
...and Planet-Planet Collisions
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Laskar & Gastineau 2009
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Flaps w
ings
Doesnt flap wings
1 year later 3 Gy later
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Flaps w
ings
Doesnt flap wings
1 year later 3 Gy later
Thursday, April 12, 2012
0.75 Venus
Earth
0.25 Venus
Planet-planet scattering
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Earth
Venus
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Earth
Venus
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Earth
Venus
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Jumping Earth
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Could Earth have moved 2 Gy ago?
Planet-planet scattering could, in principle, solve the FYSP
Late-stage accretion simulations rarely have such large mergers beyond ~100 My
Maybe standard late-stage initial conditions are not quite right? (stay tuned for Minton & Levison 2012!)
Thursday, April 12, 2012
How can we test this?
Hypothesis: Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
How can we test this?
Hypothesis:
Is there evidence of relatively recent catastrophic resurfacing on Venus?
Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
How can we test this?
Hypothesis:
Is there evidence of relatively recent catastrophic resurfacing on Venus?
Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.
Yes!
Thursday, April 12, 2012
How can we test this?
Hypothesis:
Is there evidence of relatively recent catastrophic resurfacing on Venus?
Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
How can we test this?
Hypothesis:
Is there evidence of relatively recent catastrophic resurfacing on Venus?
Does Venus have some unusual differentiation history (Hf-W)?
How much debris does this impact generate, and is it consistent with inner solar system cratering?
Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Science Science FictionThis idea
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Science Science FictionThis idea
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Solving the Faint Young Sun Paradox is possible by invoking a more massive Sun, but requires sustained high solar rates of mass loss for ~2 Gy that may not be observed in solar analogue stars.
Solving the Faint Young Sun Paradox is possible by invoking planet-planet scattering of proto-Venuses (Venii?) 2.5 Gy ago, but this may not be compelling in the face of minimal constraints.
(Dont stop trying to solve it with atmospheric chemistry)
Thursday, April 12, 2012
A funny thing happened on the way to understanding some details in the modeling of the
Late Heavy Bombardment...
The asteroid belt looks like the source of the LHB impactors (Strom et al. 2005; Richardson 2009; Head et al. 2010)
But if the LHB was caused by giant planet migration & associated resonances sweeping across the main belt and exciting/depleting asteroids, it doesnt look like it lost more than ~50% of its mass (Minton & Malhotra 2009; 2011; Morbidelli et al. 2010)
Thats not enough mass to make all the craters!
Thursday, April 12, 2012
6
The dynamical structure of the asteroid belt
Thursday, April 12, 2012
The E-Belt
We placed bodies on main belt-like orbits in gap.
Pre-LHB: -600 My to 0 My Jovian planets in circular orbits between 5-12 AU.Mars started on a low-e orbit
Mars-Crossing Boundary
Hungaria Asteroids
Hungaria Asteroids
6 Resonance
Mars
Mars
Thursday, April 12, 2012
E-Belt and the Hungaria Asteroids
Our model E-belt objects after 4 Gy compared to the known H < 14 Hungarias.
Observed Hungarias (H < 14)
Mars
Mars
E-belt survivors after 4 Gy
The E-belt makes Hungarias!
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Depletion of E-Belt Population
Using observed Hungaria population, we predict Initial E-belt had population density similar to pre-LHB main belt. It produced ~9-10 lunar basins, with ~2-3 Imbrium/Orientale-sized.
Hungaria Population Today
Pre
-LH
BLH
B
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Basin Formation on the Earth and Moon
If the E-belt produced ~9 lunar basins:Normalize using youngest basin Orientale with age of 3.7-3.8 Ga.This predicts LHB starts at ~4.1-4.2 Ga and lasts ~400 My on Moon.
Earth
Moon
Archean Proterozoic
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Basin Formation on the Earth and Moon
If the E-belt produced ~9 lunar basins:Normalize using youngest basin Orientale with age of 3.7-3.8 Ga.This predicts LHB starts at ~4.1-4.2 Ga and lasts ~400 My on Moon.
Earth
Moon
LHB
Archean Proterozoic
Orientale (~3.7-3.8 Ga)
~900 km diameter
Thursday, April 12, 2012
The LHB doesnt really end on Earth until the late Archean/early Proterozoic (~ 2 Gy ago)
Supported by spherule layer abundances Could the high impact rate be related to climate and
biochemistry changes on Earth?
i.e. Providing a pathway for phosphorous reduction? (Pasek et al. 2007)
Can impacts be a factor in the oxidation of the atmosphere?
The E-Belt
Hot off the presses, April 26, 2012 in Nature
An Archean Heavy Bombardment From a Destabilized Extension of the Asteroid Beltby Bottke, Vokrouhlick, Minton, Nesvorn, Morbidelli, Brasser, Simonson, & Levison
(also check out the companion paper on impact spherules by Johnson & Melosh)
Thursday, April 12, 2012