+ All Categories

Minton

Date post: 27-Sep-2015
Category:
Upload: vlad-preda
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
science
57
Was The Earth always at 1 AU? (and was the Sun always 1 Solar Mass?) David Minton Purdue University Collaborators Renu Malhotra (U. of Arizona/LPL) Hal Levison (SwRI) Bill Bottke (SwRI) David Nesvorný (SwRI) Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA) David Vokrouhlický (Charles) Bruce Simonson (Oberlin) Thursday, April 12, 2012
Transcript
  • Was The Earth always at 1 AU?

    (and was the Sun always 1 Solar Mass?)David Minton

    Purdue University

    CollaboratorsRenu Malhotra (U. of Arizona/LPL)Hal Levison (SwRI)Bill Bottke (SwRI)David Nesvorn (SwRI)

    Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA)David Vokrouhlick (Charles)Bruce Simonson (Oberlin)

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Was The Earth always at 1 AU?

    (and was the Sun always 1 Solar Mass?)David Minton

    Purdue University

    CollaboratorsRenu Malhotra (U. of Arizona/LPL)Hal Levison (SwRI)Bill Bottke (SwRI)David Nesvorn (SwRI)

    Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA)David Vokrouhlick (Charles)Bruce Simonson (Oberlin)

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • The FYSP solved 3 ways

    1. Mass-losing Sun

    2. Jumping Earth

    3. Archean Bombardment

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • The problem

    How to keep this line

    Above this line

    1-D radiative balance:(Pollack 1979)

    Time varying solar luminosity:(Gough 1981)

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Whitmire (1995)

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Whitmire (1995)

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Orbital adiabatic invariant

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Conserved

    Orbital adiabatic invariant

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Conserved

    Orbital adiabatic invariant

    More massive early Earth?...not considered here.

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Conserved

    Orbital adiabatic invariant

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Conserved

    Orbital adiabatic invariant

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Conserved

    Orbital adiabatic invariant

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Conserved

    Orbital adiabatic invariant

    Simple: Change the gravitational constant of the

    universe.

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Conserved

    Orbital adiabatic invariant

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the FYSP by fiddling with basic solar system parameters

    Conserved

    Orbital adiabatic invariant

    Increasing mass also decreases aSo lets try this first...

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Present-day mass loss~30% due to solar wind

    ~70% due to E=mc2.

    Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Present-day mass loss~30% due to solar wind

    ~70% due to E=mc2.

    Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • 2.5%? That doesnt sound so bad!

    Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • 2.5%? That doesnt sound so bad!

    2.5% Msun=26 Jupiters

    Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • 2.5%? That doesnt sound so bad!

    2.5% Msun=26 Jupiters

    Sustained mass loss

    Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Based on measurements of stellar winds from Wood et al. (2005)

    Minton & Malhotra (2007)Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Mass-losing Sun

    A mass-losing Sun could in principle solve the FYSP

    But you need sustained high rates of mass loss over ~2 Gy

    Required mass loss rates are at odds with inferred stellar wind mass loss rates of Sun-like stars

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • What about just semimajor axis?

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Ways of changing semimajor axis

    Type 1 & II migration (Goldreich & Tremaine 1979; Lin, and Papaloizou)

    Requires gas: T

  • Ways of changing semimajor axis

    Type 1 & II migration (Goldreich & Tremaine 1979; Lin, and Papaloizou)

    Requires gas: T

  • Planet-Planet Scattering

    Terrestrial planet system with an extra planet near Mars can stay stable for as long as ~1 Gy before losing the extra planet (Chambers 2007)

    ~1 % of simulations of our solar system lose Mercury within 5 Gy. In 1 out of ~2500 simulations ALL terrestrial planets went unstable 3 Gy into the future (Laskar & Gastineau 2009)

    Video from Fred Rasio Credit: Trent Schindler, National Science Foundation

    ...and Planet-Planet Collisions

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Laskar & Gastineau 2009

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Flaps w

    ings

    Doesnt flap wings

    1 year later 3 Gy later

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Flaps w

    ings

    Doesnt flap wings

    1 year later 3 Gy later

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • 0.75 Venus

    Earth

    0.25 Venus

    Planet-planet scattering

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Earth

    Venus

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Earth

    Venus

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Earth

    Venus

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Jumping Earth

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Could Earth have moved 2 Gy ago?

    Planet-planet scattering could, in principle, solve the FYSP

    Late-stage accretion simulations rarely have such large mergers beyond ~100 My

    Maybe standard late-stage initial conditions are not quite right? (stay tuned for Minton & Levison 2012!)

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • How can we test this?

    Hypothesis: Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • How can we test this?

    Hypothesis:

    Is there evidence of relatively recent catastrophic resurfacing on Venus?

    Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • How can we test this?

    Hypothesis:

    Is there evidence of relatively recent catastrophic resurfacing on Venus?

    Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.

    Yes!

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • How can we test this?

    Hypothesis:

    Is there evidence of relatively recent catastrophic resurfacing on Venus?

    Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • How can we test this?

    Hypothesis:

    Is there evidence of relatively recent catastrophic resurfacing on Venus?

    Does Venus have some unusual differentiation history (Hf-W)?

    How much debris does this impact generate, and is it consistent with inner solar system cratering?

    Venus didnt finish accreting until ~2.5 Gy ago, and proto-Venus scattered Earth outward to 1 AU prior to the final giant impact.

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Science Science FictionThis idea

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Science Science FictionThis idea

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Solving the Faint Young Sun Paradox is possible by invoking a more massive Sun, but requires sustained high solar rates of mass loss for ~2 Gy that may not be observed in solar analogue stars.

    Solving the Faint Young Sun Paradox is possible by invoking planet-planet scattering of proto-Venuses (Venii?) 2.5 Gy ago, but this may not be compelling in the face of minimal constraints.

    (Dont stop trying to solve it with atmospheric chemistry)

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • A funny thing happened on the way to understanding some details in the modeling of the

    Late Heavy Bombardment...

    The asteroid belt looks like the source of the LHB impactors (Strom et al. 2005; Richardson 2009; Head et al. 2010)

    But if the LHB was caused by giant planet migration & associated resonances sweeping across the main belt and exciting/depleting asteroids, it doesnt look like it lost more than ~50% of its mass (Minton & Malhotra 2009; 2011; Morbidelli et al. 2010)

    Thats not enough mass to make all the craters!

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • 6

    The dynamical structure of the asteroid belt

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • The E-Belt

    We placed bodies on main belt-like orbits in gap.

    Pre-LHB: -600 My to 0 My Jovian planets in circular orbits between 5-12 AU.Mars started on a low-e orbit

    Mars-Crossing Boundary

    Hungaria Asteroids

    Hungaria Asteroids

    6 Resonance

    Mars

    Mars

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • E-Belt and the Hungaria Asteroids

    Our model E-belt objects after 4 Gy compared to the known H < 14 Hungarias.

    Observed Hungarias (H < 14)

    Mars

    Mars

    E-belt survivors after 4 Gy

    The E-belt makes Hungarias!

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Depletion of E-Belt Population

    Using observed Hungaria population, we predict Initial E-belt had population density similar to pre-LHB main belt. It produced ~9-10 lunar basins, with ~2-3 Imbrium/Orientale-sized.

    Hungaria Population Today

    Pre

    -LH

    BLH

    B

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Basin Formation on the Earth and Moon

    If the E-belt produced ~9 lunar basins:Normalize using youngest basin Orientale with age of 3.7-3.8 Ga.This predicts LHB starts at ~4.1-4.2 Ga and lasts ~400 My on Moon.

    Earth

    Moon

    Archean Proterozoic

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • Basin Formation on the Earth and Moon

    If the E-belt produced ~9 lunar basins:Normalize using youngest basin Orientale with age of 3.7-3.8 Ga.This predicts LHB starts at ~4.1-4.2 Ga and lasts ~400 My on Moon.

    Earth

    Moon

    LHB

    Archean Proterozoic

    Orientale (~3.7-3.8 Ga)

    ~900 km diameter

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

  • The LHB doesnt really end on Earth until the late Archean/early Proterozoic (~ 2 Gy ago)

    Supported by spherule layer abundances Could the high impact rate be related to climate and

    biochemistry changes on Earth?

    i.e. Providing a pathway for phosphorous reduction? (Pasek et al. 2007)

    Can impacts be a factor in the oxidation of the atmosphere?

    The E-Belt

    Hot off the presses, April 26, 2012 in Nature

    An Archean Heavy Bombardment From a Destabilized Extension of the Asteroid Beltby Bottke, Vokrouhlick, Minton, Nesvorn, Morbidelli, Brasser, Simonson, & Levison

    (also check out the companion paper on impact spherules by Johnson & Melosh)

    Thursday, April 12, 2012


Recommended