Minutes of meeting 03.10.2019 Final - Gujarat State … Minutes of the 555th I.pdf1 555 th meeting...

1

555th meeting of SEAC-Gujarat, dated 03.10.2019

Page 1 of 129

Minutes of the 555thmeeting ofthe State Level Expert Appraisal Committee held on 03/10/2019 at

Committee Room, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Sector 10A,Gandhinagar.

The 555thmeeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) was held on 03rd October

2019 at Committee Room, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Sector 10A, Gandhinagar. Following

members attended the meeting:

1. Dr. Dinesh Misra, Chairman, SEAC

2. Shri S. C. Srivastav, Vice Chairman, SEAC

3. Shri V. N. Patel, Member, SEAC

4. Shri. R. J. Shah, Member, SEAC

The regular agenda of Appraisal, Reconsideration, and Refer Back Cases&ToRcases were taken up. The

Committee considered the applications made by project proponents, additional details submitted as

required by the SEAC/SEIAA and details furnished in the Form-1, PFR, EIA-EMP reports.

Proposal No. Name and Address of the Unit Remarks

03. SIA/GJ/IND2/37526/2018

M/s. Shivam India Plasto Pack

169/1/A2, Phase –1, Opposite

Telephone Exchange, GIDC Naroda,

Ahmedabad

EC – Reconsideration

Category of the unit: 5(f)

Project status: New

• Project proponent (PP) submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND2/37526/2018 dated 27/08/19 for

obtaining Environmental Clearance.

• SEIAA issued TOR to PP vide their letter dated 26/11/2018.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by B. S. Rana, Ahmedabadbased on the TOR issued

by SEIAA.

• The project falls underCategory B of project activity 5(f) asper the schedule of EIA Notification 2006.

• PP was called for presentation in the SEAC meeting dated 05/09/2019.

• During the meeting dated 05/09/2019, technical presentation made by the Project proponent.

2


Page 2 of 129

• During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the EIA Report, and

details presented during the meeting.

• Committee noted that ToR on this proposal was issued considering it as new project as the existing products

does not require Environmental Clearance, however PP submitted earlier the project details considering it as

expansion project as per PFR, Form-1 & Format submitted to SEAC dated 21/05/2019 however query on

this project was raised in SEAC meeting dated 28/06/209 and in compliance of the query of point no. (3)

Revised product list by removing non-EC products PP submitted revised product profile by removing non –

EC products and SEAC recommended ToR vide letter dated 01/11/2019 to SEIAA considering it as new

project by eliminating non – EC product and SEIAA issued ToR to PP considering it as new project dated

26/11/2019.

• Further committee deliberated on EIA Report Preparation and noted that PP has tactfully eliminated Page

No. 41-44 in EIA report covering detail deliberation on “Land Requirement Details” in Chapter – 2 and asked

PP/Consultant to reply for the same however both of them could not reply satisfactorily for the same.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to defer the proposal and consider the same in one of the upcoming

meeting of SEAC only after submission of the following documents.

1. Revised EIA Report to be Prepared as per ToR granted by SEIAA dated 26/11/2018.

2. Details with respect to justification for proposed expansion: (1) To address proportionate availability of

space for production plant. (2) To address proportionate availability of storage area for raw materials

finished goods, utilities considering fire-safety norms & PESO standards and goods carrier movement

within premises. (3) To address proportionate captive/common infrastructure available to

accommodate additional load due to proposed expansion. (4) Environment impact and its mitigation

measures for common/ captive infrastructure due to proposed production by bifurcation of Existing

Area 1620 Sq. mt. in two viz (1) 620 Sq. mt. (Existing), (2) 1000 sq.mt. (Expansion) as per the EIA

Report Submitted dated 03/09/2019.

• Project proponent made presentation for the above mentioned query dated 03.10.2019 for the above

mentioned points.

• PP presented replied as below:

1. Revised EIA Report to be Prepared as per ToR granted by SEIAA dated 26/11/2018.

2. PP submitted that total area available with them is 1620 Sq. mt.

• This is a revised proposal for manufacturing of Synthetic Organic Chemicals as tabulated below:

Sr.

no.

Name of the Products CAS no. / CI no. of

raw materials.

Quantity

MT/Month

End-use of the

products

1. Reactive Black 5(Mix) 12225-25-1 200 • Dyes are used for

3


Page 3 of 129

2. Reactive Black WNN 17095-24-8 dyeing of cloths.

3. Reactive Black 39 205071

• Reactive Black 8 12225-26-2

• Reactive Black 31 12731-63-4

• Direct Black 22 6473-13-8

• Acid Black 210 99576-15-5

• Acid Black 194 61931-02-0

• Acid Black 234 157577-99-6

• Acid Black 113 3351-05-1

• Acid Black 10BX 1820-82-5

• Acid Black 193 12392-64-2

• Reactive Red 195 93050-79-4

• Reactive Red 250 125830-49-1

• Reactive Red 223 93051-43-5

• Reactive Red 111 88232-20-6

• Reactive Red 198 145017-98-7

• Reactive Red 120 61951-82-4

• Reactive Red CD 91-56-5

• Reactive Red 21 11099-79-9

• Reactive Red 222 93051-45-7

• Reactive Red 141 61931-52-0

• Reactive Red 3.1 23211-47-4

• Reactive Red 24.1 72829-25-5

• Reactive Red 31 12237-00-2

• Reactive Red 45 12226-22-1

• Reactive Red 218 113653-03-5

• Reactive Red 245 340977-00-6

• Direct Red 81 2610-11-9

• Reactive Yellow 145 93050-80-7



4


Page 4 of 129



• Reactive Yellow XLR 5809-16-7

• Reactive Yellow HEXL Mixture of

59112-78-6

77907-38-1

93050-80-7

• Reactive Yellow HE4G 59112-78-6

• Reactive Yellow W3R 12220-12-1

• Reactive Yellow RR 93050-80-7





• Reactive Yellow 210 Mix dyes





• Reactive Orange 122 79809-27-1



• Reactive Orange 2R 79809-27-1



• Reactive Orange W3R Mix dyes

• Reactive Orange

R(DABA)

12220-12-1



• Reactive Blue 160 71872-76-9

5


Page 5 of 129


• Reactive Blue 198 124448-55-1

• Reactive Blue

FNG(FNR)

Mix dyes

• Reactive Blue 220 128416-19-3

• Reactive Blue 39 -

• Reactive Blue 13(P2R) -


• Reactive Blue 203 147826-71-9

• Reactive Blue XLE(19) 2580-78-1






• Reactive Blue 203 147826-71-9

• Direct Blue 71 4399-55-7

• Reactive Scarlet W2R Mixed Dyes

• Reactive Brown 11 12225-68-2

• Acid Brown 355 60181-77-3

• Acid Brown 425 119509-49-8

• Acid Brown 75 8011-86-7

• Acid Brown 83(100) 13011-68-2

• Reactive Violet 46 -/17175

• Reactive Violet ME2RL Mixed Dyes

• Reactive Magenta MERL Mixed Dyes

• Salient features of the project including Water, Air and Hazardous waste management (Revised):

Sr.

no.

Particulars Details

A

6


Page 6 of 129

A Total cost of Proposed Project

(Rs. in Crores):

Total: 1.5 Crores

Details of EMP

Brief Details of EMP

Bifurcation of EMP cost:

Component Capital Cost of EMP Recurring Cost of EMP

(per year)

Total Cost 31,00,000 6,45,000

Operation Phase

Sr. No. Pollution Control Measures Capital Cost

(Rs.)

Recurring

Cost per

annum

(Rs.)

1 Air Pollution Control 15,00,000 3,00,000

2 Water Pollution Control 10,00,000 2,00,000

3 Noise Pollution Control 1,00,000 25,000

4 Environment Monitoring and

Management

1,00,000 20,000

5 Rain Water Harvesting 2,00,000 50,000

6 Occupational Health 1,00,000 25,000

7 Green Belt 1,00,000 20,000

Total 31,00,000 6,45,000

Details of CER as per OM dated 01/05/2018

Unit will allow fund for CER Activity for 3 Year (2019-2021)

CER

Activity

Education 0.30 Lacs/Yr

Drinking Water Supply 0.70 Lacs/Yr

Green Belt Development 2.00 Lacs/Yr

7


Page 7 of 129

Trees Plantation

Gardening Area Development

TOTAL 3 Lacs/Yr.

Cost in Lacs/Yr.

2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022

− 0.35 Lacs for drinking

water facility provided in

Limbadia, Raipur & Zak

village.

_Providing drinking water

facility (Water Jug) at road

side.

0.30 Lacs for Education at

Valad, Lalpur& Bhat_With

the help of local Trust (For

Education) & NGO

_Stationary provided at

Primary School at Raipur/

Limbadia&Village.



Valad, Lalpur& Bhat

village.


facility at Valad, Lalpur&

Bhat Villages.

− 2.0 Lacs for trees

Plantation at Limbadia,

Raipur , Zak, Valad,

Lalpur&

BhatVillage(Along with

Road Side) with help of

local people.

Total: 2.35 Lacs Total: 0.30 Lacs Total: 0.35 Lacs

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter)

Total:1620 Sq. m.

Green belt area

( sq. meter)

Total:330 Sq. m.

C Employment generation Total:30

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply

(GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply etc..)

GIDC Water supply

Status of permission from the concern authority. Allotment letter enclosed

8


Page 8 of 129

ii Water consumption (KLD)

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 1.5 Fresh Water

(B) Gardening

Industrial

Process 15.0 Fresh Water

Washing 5.0

Boiler 5.0

Cooling 1.0

Others 1.0

Industrial Total 27.0

Grand Total

(A+B+C)

28.5 Fresh water

1) Total water requirement for the project: 28.5 KLD

2) Quantity to be recycled: 0.0 KLD

3) Total fresh water requirement: 28.5 KLD

iii Waste water generation (KLD)

Category Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 1.4 -

Process - -

Washing 5.0 -

Boiler 1.0 -

Cooling 0.5 -

Others 0.5 -

Total Industrial

waste water

7.0 Treat in ETP

and spray dried

in premises.

iv Treatment facility within premises with � ETP: Primary treatment

9


Page 9 of 129

capacity

[In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary,

Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP

etc.

� ETP Capacity : 28.5 KLD

� Spray Dryer: 2.0 KL/Hr.

Treatment scheme including segregation at

source.

1.4 KLD Domestic effluents shall be

disposed through septic tank & Soak pit.

The total waste water generations from

Industrial will be 7.0 KLD. The waste water

shall generate mainly boiler blow down,

cooling tower, scrubber and plant process

cleaning water. The effluent will be treated in

ETP and sent to spray dryer for evaporation

in premises.

Note: (In case of CETP discharge) :

Management of waste water keeping in view direction under section 18 (1) (b) of the

Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1974 issued by CPCB regarding

compliance of CETP.

� Not applicable as there shall no discharge of any effluent to CETP

Brief note on adequacy of ZLD (In case of Zero Liquid Discharge):

� Spray dryer and primary treatment plant will be provided for ZLD. There is no

connection of CETP for discharge of effluent.

v Mode of Disposal & Final meeting point

Domestic: Domestic: Soak pit

Industrial: Industrial: ZLD

Total generated effluent will be treated in ETP and sent to self spray dryer.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE etc. Name

of CF

� Not proposed.

Membership of Common facility (CF)

(For waste water treatment)

Not proposed.

vii Simplified water balance diagram with reuse / recycle of waste water

10


Page 10 of 129

Intake

28.5

Domestic

1.5

Soak pit

1.4

Gardening

0.0

Industrial

27.0

Process

15.0

Washing

5.0

Boiler

5.0

Cooling

1.0

5.0 5.0 1.015.0

5.0 1.0

ETP

7.0

Spray dryer

in premises

Water Balance Diagram

Others

0.5

0.5 0.5

viii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD)

Total reuse 0.0 KLD

Source of waste

water for reuse

with quantity in

KLD (From where

it is coming)

Application

area with

quantity in

KLD (Where it

is used)

Characteristics of

waste water to be

reused (COD, BOD,

TDS etc.)

Remarks

regarding

feasibility

to reuse i.e.

- - -- -

E Air

i Flue gas emission details

No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

SR.

no.

Source of

emission

With

Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type of Fuel Quantity

of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of

emissions

i.e. Air

Pollutants

Air

Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1 Hot Air 13 m Solid Fuel 1.8 PM/ Cyclone

11


Page 11 of 129

Generator (Agro

Waste/Import

ed Coal/

White Coal)

MT/day

Agro

waste

Or 2000

SCM/day

NG

SO2/

NOx

Separator

2 Boiler

1 Ton

13 m Solid Fuel

(Agro

Waste/Import

ed Coal/

White Coal)

0.5

MT/day

Agro

waste

Or 200

SCM/day

NG

PM/

SO2/

NOx

Cyclone

Separator

3 DG Set 5 m Diesel 10 Lit/Hr PM/

SO2/

NOx

Adequate

Stack

Height

-

ii Process gas emission details i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

-Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

Type of

emission

Stack/Vent

Height (meter)

Air Pollution Control

Measures

(APCM)

1 Spray Dryer

(2 KL/day)

PM/

SO2/

NOx

20 m Cyclone Separator + Wet

Scrubber + Secondary

scrubber

iii Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures:

As below:

Proposed project is of manufacturing of S. O. Dyes . Followings measures will take for

existing & proposed project.

• Maintaining the house keeping regularly

• Transferring the liquid materials by pump

• To carry out regular leak detection and repair activities

Proper routine maintenance of equipment reduces the likelihood of leaks

12


Page 12 of 129

F Hazardous wastes

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement)

Rules 2016.

i

Sr.

No

.

Type/Name

of

Hazardous

waste

Source of

Generatio

n

Category

and

Schedule

as per HW

Rules.

Quantity Disposal Method

1. Discarded

Containers/

Bags

Packing 33.3 24.0

MT/Annu

m

Collection, storage,

Transportation, and sold

to the registered recycler

or reusing premises.

2. Evaporatio

n Residue

Spray

Dryer

-

12.0

MT/Annu

m

Collection,

Storage, Reusing

in Blending mixing

of dyes

3. ETP

Sludge

ETP 35.3 14.0

MT/Annu

m


transportation,

disposal at the

Approved TSDFsite

4. Used oil Machiner

y

5.1 0.02MT/A

nnum


Reuse withinpremises or

sold to the registered

recycler.

5. Iron sludge Process 26.1

432

MT/Annu

m


transportation,disposal at

cement factory co-

processing

6. Bleed

Liquor

Spray

Drying

(Scrubbin

g

- 125MT/An

num


transportation, Treated in

ETP

13


Page 13 of 129

Process)

Quantity of discarded containers must be in MT/Annum.

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc.

(For HW management)

We shall be a member of active

TSDF siteIike Eco Care

Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.,Viramgam

or Saurashtra Enviro Project Pvt.

Ltd or any active TSDS site

before applying CTE/CTO

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal

(MSW and others)

Plastic waste will sell to

registered recycler.

G Solvent management, VOC emissions etc.

i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery, reuse of recovered Solvents etc.

(Details in Table Format)

� No use of solvent

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures

� There is no any Solvent will use though we will provide closed transferring system of

raw materials during manufacturing to avoid any VOC.

H � Details regarding storage of Hazardous chemicals

Storage details Name of major

Hazardous chemicals

Remarks

Storage tanks

Sulphuric Acid 10 KL

Drum/Barrel storage HCl 30% Carboys

50 kg

Solid Materials

HDPE bags 50 kg

� Applicability of PESO :

� Not Applicable

• During SEAC meeting dated 03/10/2019, Committee asked for reply of query dated 05/09/19. PP informed

14


Page 14 of 129

that they have existing plant of spray drying of dyes but now they are not running plant for spray drying of

dyes. Hence Committee insisted for surrendering/Revoke CCA of GPCB for existing plant for spray drying of

dyes and submits documents regarding spray drying of dyes not existence in plant. Committee deliberated

on area adequacy of proposed plant and APCM adequacy and treatability report for ZLD scheme for

proposed project, PP not satisfactorily addressed about it during meeting. Committee insisted for revised air

matrix and Hazardous waste matrix mentioning regarding spent sulphuric acid generation from proposed

project.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to defer the proposal and consider the same in one of the

upcoming meeting of SEAC only after submission of the following documents,

1. Submit CCA revoke order of GPCB for existing plant of spray drying of dyes, blending and mixing of

dyes and plastic jars etc. as per the ToR granted and photographs regarding removal of existing

plant machinery from site. Also submit area adequacy for the proposed activity.

2. Adequacy and Treatability report by recognized schedule I auditor regarding proposed EMS for

effluent and air emission for proposed project.

3. Submit revised Hazardous Waste matrix with mentioning spent sulphuric acid generation and its

sound management.

04. SIA/GJ/IND2/37355/2018

M/s. Kinjal Chemicals (Unit II )

Plot No. 1605-1606, Phase No -II,

GIDCNaroda, Ahmedabad


Category of the unit : 5(f)

Project status: Expansion

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND2/37355/2018 dated 27/08/2019 for obtaining

Environmental Clearance.

• The SEAC had recommended TOR to SEIAA and SEIAA issued TOR to PP vide their letter dated

04/05/2019.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by M/s: B.S.Rana based on the TOR issued by

SEIAA.

• The project falls under Category B of project activity 5(f) as per the schedule of EIA Notification 2006.


• During the meeting dated 17/09/2019, technical presentation made during the meeting by project proponent.

• During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the EIA Report,and


15


Page 15 of 129

• The baseline environmental quality has been assessed for various components of the environment viz. air,

noise, water, biological and socioeconomic aspect. The baseline environmental study has been conducted

for the study area of 10 km radial distance from project site for the period November 2018 to January 2019.

Ambient Air Quality monitoring was carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, at Eight locations, including the

project site. Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The incremental Ground

Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using ISCST – 3 model. The resultant concentrations are

within the NAAQS. The modeling study proved that the air emissions from the proposed plant would not

affect the ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The ambient air quality around the

proposed project site will remain within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

• Risk assessment including prediction of the worst-case scenario and maximum credible accident scenarios

has been carried out. The detail proposed safeguard measures including On-Site / Off-Site Emergency Plan

has been covered in the RA report.

• This unit was established well before year 2006. They have valid CC&A for existing unit. Copy of CC&A, its

compliance report is submitted. PP ensured that there are no court cases pending and no public complaints

against the project.

• During SEAC meeting, committee noted that the proposal is for expansion of existing plant in GIDC. This

unit is having valid CC&A for existing unit. Copy of CC&A, its compliance report is submitted. One SCN

issued by GPCB and its compliance reply submitted by the unit. Committee asked about products which

mentioned in existing plant CCA of GPCB is not match with product profile of proposed project, PP agreed

that they have obtained CCA-amendment for change of product mix on dated 16/01/2019 which is differ

than existing product mentioned in application.Committee asked about compliance of Direction under

section 18(1)(B) of Water Act’74, PP informed that additional partly waste water will be sent to CMEE/spray

dryer of M/s Society for clean earth, Vatva. Committee disagree with proposal of sending waste water to

CMEE/spray dryer facility at Vatva which is critical polluted area(CPA).Committee asked about area

adequacy for proposed expansion, PP informed that at a time only two products instead of proposed all

products manufactured, Hence Committee asked for submit revised product profile considering area

adequacy of proposed product. Committee noted about process waste generation quantity and Iron sludge

generation quantity discrepancy with respect to ToR issued by SEIAA. Committee deliberated on waste

water management, APCM, HW management, baseline data, EMP, CER etc.

• After deliberation, SEAC unanimously decided to consider the proposal after submission of the following

details.

1. Submit revised EIA report with mentioning revised product profile, Hazardous Waste Management

and Waste water disposal management. Ensure that there is no increase in production quantity and

16


Page 16 of 129

pollution potential accordingly.

2. Submit membership certificate of CMEE/ spray dryer facility other than located at GIDC Vatva area

for additional waste water of proposed expansion project.

3. Submit revised Hazardous Waste matrix considering process waste and iron sludge generation.

• Project proponent made presentation for the above mentioned query on dated 03.10.2019 for the above

mentioned points.

• PP submitted revised product profile as below with subsequent change in salient features of proposed

project,

Sr.

no.

Name of the Products CAS no. /

CI no.

Quantity

MT/Month

End-use of the

products

Existing Proposed Total

1. Meta Amino Phenol 591-27-5 22.2 102.8 125 Dyes

Manufacturing 2. Aniline 2:5 Di sulfonic

Acid (ADSA)

98-44-2

3. Aniline 2:4 Di sulfonic

Acid (ADSA)

137-51-9

-

4. 2-Pyridone 142-08-5

5. G – Salt 842-18-2

6. 1-Amino 7-Napthol 118-46-7

7. Ortho Amino Phenol

Sulfonamide

98-32-8

8. 1,6 Naphasultan 629-11-8

9. Amido G Salt 86-65-7

10. 4,4-Diamino Benzanilide 785-30-8

11. 4-Nap 99-57-0

12. DMAP

Dimethyl Amino Phenol

91-68-9

Total 22.8 102.8 125


Sr. no. Particulars Details

A

17


Page 17 of 129


(Rs. in Crores):

5 Cr.

Details of EMP

Brief details of EMP

Component Capital Cost of EMP Recurring Cost of EMP

(Per Year)

Total Cost 31 Lac 6.45 Lac

Bifurcation of EMP Cost

Sr.

No

System Approximate

recurring

cost per

annum

(in Lacs)

Approximate

capital cost

(Rs. In Lacs)

Basis for cost estimates

1 Air pollution

control

3.0 15.0 The capital cost would

include cost of providing

adequate height of the

stack, ladder and platform,


Systems and recurring cost

would include cost of

monitoring of air

environment.

2 Water

pollution

control

2.0 10.0 Capital cost would include

cost of ETP. In capital cost

civil work, mechanical work,

Electrical work and piping

work is included. Recurring

cost is for ETP Operation &

Spray Drying Cost for

evaporation

3 Noise 0.25 1.0 The recurring cost would

18


Page 18 of 129

pollution

monitoring

include cost of noise

monitoring.

4 Environment

Monitoring

and

Management

& Laboratory

0.20 1.0 The recurring cost would be

incurred on hiring of

consultants and payment of

various statutory fees to

regulatory agencies.

5 Green Belt

& Rain water

harvesting

0.20 1.0 Development of Greenbelt

including Gardening and

Plantation.

6 Occupational

health (OHC) 0.25 1.0

Occupational health check

up of Employees and

workers

7 Rain Water

Harvesting 0.50 2.0

Capital cost would include

cost of rain water

harvesting system.

Total 6.40 31.0


Sr. No. Activities Social Benefits Expenses (Rs. Lacs)

1. Greenbelt

(Naroda GIDC,

Muthiya Village)

• Greenery for

ecological balance

• Enrich local

biodiversity

• Control Air and

Noise pollution,

windbreak

• Helpful to control

soil erosion

• Plan for plantations

2

19


Page 19 of 129

2. Water Utilize

(Muthiya Village)

• Drinking & sanitation

facilities in schools of

nearby villages

1

Total 3

Cost in Lacs/Yr

2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022


water facility provided .


facility (Water Jug) at road

side.

− 0.50 Lacs for Education at

Muthiya village

_With the help of local Trust

(For Education) & NGO

_Stationary provided at

Primary School at Muthiya

Village.



Muthiya village.

− 1.0 Lacs for trees

Plantation (Along with

Road Side) with help of

local people.

Total: 2.0 Lacs Total: 0.5 Lacs Total: 0.5 Lacs


Existing: 900.Sq. m.

Proposed: 00 Sq. m.

Total: 900 Sq. m.

Green belt area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 00.Sq. m.

Proposed: 44 Sq. m.

Total: 44 Sq. m.

C Employment generation

Existing: 19

Proposed: 0

Total:19

D Water

i


(GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply etc...)

GIDC, Naroda

Status of permission from the concern authority. NA

20


Page 20 of 129

Ii

Water consumption (KLD)

Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(C) Domestic 0.6 1 1.6 1.6 fresh

(D) Gardening - 0.4 0.4 0.4 fresh

Industrial

Process 2.4 47.6 50.0

12 fresh +38 recycled

treated w/w

Washing 1.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 fresh

Boiler 0.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 fresh

Cooling -- 5.0 5.0 5.0 fresh

Scrubber 0.1 1.9 2.0 2.0 fresh

Industrial Total 4.0 62.0 66.0

28 fresh + 38

recycled treated w/w

Grand Total

(A+B+C) 4.6 64.4 68.0

30 fresh + 38

recycled treated w/w


2) Quantity to be recycle: 38 KLD

3) Total fresh water requirement: 30 KLD

Iii

Waste water generation (KLD)

Category Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(B) Domestic 0.5 0.8 1.3

Discharge to

soak pit

Industrial

21


Page 21 of 129

Process 1.8 45.3 47.1 -

Washing 1 3 4 -

Boiler 0.1 0.8 0.9 -

Cooling - 1 1 -

Scrubber 0.1 0.9 1 -

Total Industrial

Waste Water 3 51 54

-

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity

[In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP

etc.

� ETP (Primary) + Tertiary (RO)

Treatment scheme including segregation at source.

Domestic: Soak pit

Industrial: ETP (Primary) + Tertiary (RO)


Management of waste water keeping in view direction under section 18 (1)

(b) of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1974 issued by

CPCB regarding compliance of CETP.

� As unit will be provided tertiary treatment the discharge quality and quantity to

the CETP, Naroda. And hence the unit will be comply Management of waste

water keeping in view direction under section 18 (1) (b) of the Water

(Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1974 issued by CPCB regarding

compliance of CETP.


� 3 KLD sent to the CETP, NEPL as per existing consent.

Remaining RO permeate 38 KLD reuse in the Process and RO Rejected 13 KLD

sent to the common spray drying facility of Society for Clean and Green

Environment Naroda.

V Mode of Disposal & Final meeting point

22


Page 22 of 129

Domestic:

Soak Pit

Industrial:

CETP, Naroda: 3.0 KLD RO permeate

Common Spray Drying Facility: 13.0 KLD

Recycled in process: 38.0 KLD

Vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE

etc. Name of CF

CETP, Naroda: 3.0 KLD RO permeate

Common Spray Drying Facility: 13.0 KLD

(Society for Clean & Green Environment, Naroda & NEPL Naroda.)



Not Required membership as unit will be achieved ZLD.



23


Page 23 of 129

Total reuse:38 KLD

Source of waste

water for reuse

with quantity in

KLD

Application area with

quantity in KLD

Remarks regarding

feasibility to reuse

i.e. w/w

characteristics (COD,

BOD, TDS etc.)

Diluted steam of

ETP

Manufacturing process 38

KLD

PH: 7.2

COD:500 mg/l

BOD:50 mg/l

TDS: 2500 mg/l

SS: 5 mg/l

Oil & Grease: 1.0 mg/l

Not be any effluent Recycle/Reuse.

E Air


No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr,

KVA etc.

SR

.

no

.

Source of

emission

With Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type of

Fuel

Quantity

of Fuel

Type of

emissions

i.e. Air

Pollutants

Air

Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1.

IBR Boiler

(600 kg/hr.)

(Nos-1)

12 Natural

Gas

( 600

SCM /

Day)

Particulate

Matter,

SO2,

NOx

Adequate

Stack

Height

2.

HAG

(500 kg / hrs.)

(Nos- 1)

12

Natural

Gas

( 150

SCM /

Day)

Particulate

Matter,

SO2, NOx

Adequate

Stack

Height

3. TFH

(4lac kcal) 12

Natural

Gas

( 100

SCM /

Particulate

Matter,

Adequate

Stack

24


Page 24 of 129

(Nos 3) Day) SO2, NOx Height

4.

TFF

(2lac kcal)

(No.1)

12

Natural

Gas

( 100

SCM /

Day)

Particulate

Matter,

SO2,NOx

Adequate

Stack

Height

5.

DG Set

(125 KV Stand

by) (Nos- 1)

12 LDO

(6

Litre/hr)

Particulate

Matter,

SO2, NOx

Adequate

Stack

Height

ii Process gas emission details i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx

etc.)

Sr.

no. Source of emission

Type of

emissio

n

Stack/Vent

Height (meter)

Air Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1. Dumping vessel

Product;

6 MAPSA, Aniline 2:5 Di

sulfonic Acid, Aniline 2:4

Di sulfonic Acid, G-salt,

4,4-Diamino Benzanilide, 4

NAP

SO2

&SO3

12 Alkali

Scrubber

2 Vent attached to the

Reaction Vessel

6 MAPSA, Aniline 2:5 Di

sulfonic Acid, Aniline 2:4

Di sulfonic Acid, G-salt,

4,4-Diamino Benzanilide, 4

NAP

SO2

SO3

HCl

12 Water & Alkali

Scrubber

3 Vent attached to the

Reaction Vessel-ONCBSA

product

NO2 12 Alkali

Scrubber

25


Page 25 of 129

4 SFD

(Drying Process)

Particulat

e Matter - Duct Collector


As below:

Proposed project is of manufacturing of S. O. Chemicals. Followings measures will

take for existing & proposed project.

• Maintaining the house keeping regularly

• Transferring the liquid materials by pump

• To carry out regular leak detection and repair activities

Proper routine maintenance of equipment reduces the likelihood of leaks.

F Hazardous wastes

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary

Movement) Rules 2016.

i S

r

.

n

o

.

Type/

Name of

Hazardo

us waste

Source of

generatio

n

Categor

y and

Schedul

e as per

HW

Rules.

Quantity

(MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

Exist

ing

Prop

osed

After

Propo

sed

1

.

ETP

Waste

ETP

35.3

0.24

0

8.760 9.00 Collection,

Storage,

Transportation,

Disposal at

Authorized TSDF

site.

2 Process

Waste

Manufact

uring

process

of MAP

26.1 48 917.0 965.0 Collection,

Storage,

Transportation,

Disposal to the

cement factory for

co-processing.

3 Used oil Machiner 5.1 0.02 0.5 0.52 Collection,

26


Page 26 of 129

y Storage,

Transportation,

Disposal by selling

to Registered

recycler.

4 Discarde

d

Containe

r

Raw

material

33.1

4.2

.

5.0

9.2

Collection,

Storage,

Transportation &

Disposal by selling

to Authorized

Decontaminator.

5 Bleed

Scrubbin

g Liquor

Scrubbin

g System

- 36 324 360 Collection,

Storage,

Transportation &

Treat in to ETP


(For HW management)

Enclosed in

EIA

Annexure X

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal(MSW and others) -


i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery, reuse of recovered

Solvents etc. (Details in Table Format)

� There is no any solvent recovery but distillation will be carried out for

product purification.


Unit will provide closed transferring system of raw materials during manufacturing

to avoid any leakages.


27


Page 27 of 129

Name of Raw

Materi

al

Storage

Facility /

Packing

Storage /

Packing

Capacity

(KL)

Storage

condition

Sulfuric Acid Tank/Drum 20 NTP

Oleum Tank 10 NTP

HCl Tank/Drum 10/38 NTP

Caustic Lye Tank 40 NTP

� Applicability of PESO :

� Not Applicable

• During SEAC meeting dated 03/10/2019, committee asked about revised product profile as per existing

CCA. PP informed that they have submitted revised product profile as per existing plant CCA-amendment

order. PP informed that they have considered worst case scenario for meta amino phenol. PP submitted

membership certificate of CMEE/common spray dryer for area other than CPA as per NGT order dated

10/07/19. Committee deliberated on process waste generation and iron sludge generation and its disposal.

Committee asked about change in production capacity and pollution load, technical expert of PP informed

that there is no increase in production capacity and pollution load and submitted revised product profile and

revised EIA report.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to recommend the project to SEIAA Gujarat for grant of


05. SIA/GJ/IND2/39334/2018

M/s. Paragon Poly Resins LLP

Survey No.: 782, Jakhwada, Ta -

Viramgam, Dist -Ahmedabad



Project status: New

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND2/39334/2018 dated 28/08/2019 for obtaining


28


Page 28 of 129


31/12/2018.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by M/s: T.R.Associates based on the TOR issued by

SEIAA.

• Public Hearing was conducted by Gujarat Pollution Control Board on 07/07/2019 at project site of

M/s:Paragon Poly Resins LLP located at Survey No.: 782, Jakhwada, Ta -Viramgam, Dist -Ahmedabad.

• This is a new unit proposes manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated below:

Sr.

No.

Name of the

Products CAS no. /CI no.

Quantity

MT/Month

End-use of products

1 Alkyd Resin

68333620 2000 Paints, Pigment paste, Ink,

Varnish, etc.

2 Polyamide Resin 63428842 1500 Ink, Pigment paste, etc.

3 Polyester Resin

Not available 2000 Lamination sheet, Mold,

roof, general purpose, etc.

4 Acrylic Resin

028262-63-7 2500 Paints, Emulsion,

Thickener, etc.

5 Rosin Ester 8050315 500 Paints, varnish, Ink, etc.

6 Epoxy Resin

25068386 1500 Lamination sheet, Varnish,

Pigment paste, etc.

7

Phenol

Formaldehyde

Resin

9003354

25 Lamination sheet, roof,

mold, etc.

8

Melamine

Formaldehyde

Resin

9003081


paints, varnish, etc.

9

Urea

Formaldehyde

Resin

27967299


paints, varnish, etc.

10 Ketonic Resin 25054062 5 Lamination adhesive, etc.

29


Page 29 of 129

Total 10080 --

• The project falls under Category B of project activity 5(f) asper the schedule of EIA Notification 2006.



• During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the EIA Report, various

issues raised during the public hearing and details presented during the meeting.


noise, water, biological and socioeconomic aspect. The baseline environmental study has been conducted

for the study area of 10 km radial distance from project site for the period October 2018 to December 2018.

Ambient Air Quality monitoring was carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO and VOC at Eight

locations, including the project site. Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The

incremental Ground Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using AERMOD model. The resultant

concentrations are within the NAAQS. The modeling study proved that the air emissions from the proposed

plant would not affect the ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The ambient air quality

around the proposed project site will remain within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

The pH of the ground water samples varying from 8.03 to 8.44 which is within acceptable limit. Other

parameters are found to be well within permissible limits. However, Flouride is found higher than permissible

limit in all sampling locations. The soils of project site and Karakthal village have pH more than 8.5 indicating

that the soils are highly alkaline in nature. pH values of remaining soil samples ranging from 7.66 to 8.36

revealing moderately alkaline soils.




• This is a green field project in Viramgam area and is out of notified area.

• During SEAC meeting, Committee asked about CGWA permission for ground water source, PP informed

that they have applied for CGWA permission and still not obtained CGWA permission. Committee

deliberated on issues raised during public hearing of proposed project, Technical expert of project proponent

informed that they have submitted reply of written instruction received during public hearing. Committee

asked about status of ToR compliance as asked in written during public hearing of proposed project, PP

informed about compliance of ToR issued to proposed project. Committee disagree with specific ToR like

proposed project CER activity is not need based CER, adequacy of ETP and Evaporator for waste water

treatment solvent wise LDAR etc., technical expert of PP could not satisfied ToR compliance during

meeting.

30


Page 30 of 129

• After deliberation, SEAC unanimously decided to consider the proposal after submission of the following

details.

1. Status of permission from CGWA for withdrawal of Ground water.

2. Technical justification regarding adequacy of in-house evaporator with stoichiometric mass balance

and reduction in pollutant.

3. Treatability report for ETP with stage wise reduction of pollutant.

4. Submit revised need based CER activity in nearby affected villages of proposed project.

5. Submit solvent wise LDAR programme with details regarding solvent generation, solvent recovery and

solvent losses at each stage in plant.

6. Ensure that all the ToR Points are complied in letter and spirit.


mentioned points.


1. Status of permission from CGWA for withdrawal of Ground water.

2. Technical justification regarding adequacy of in-house evaporator with stoichiometric mass balance

and reduction in pollutant.

3. Treatability report for ETP with stage wise reduction of pollutant.



solvent losses at each stage in plant.



Sr.

no.

Particulars Details


(Rs. in Crores):

9.5 Crores

Details of EMP Capital cost : 97 Lakh

Recurring cost : 60

Lakh/Annum

Details of CER as per OM dated 01/05/2018 19 Lakh Rs.

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter) 16532 m²

Green belt area 5546 m²

31


Page 31 of 129

( sq. meter)

C Employment generation Total 70

60 Local

10 Permanent

D Water

i



Borewell

Status of permission from the concern authority.

CGWA application in process

& it is in verification stage


Category

Quantity

KLD

Remarks

(E) Domestic 4.5 Fresh

(F) Gardening 5.5 Fresh

(G) Industrial

Industrial Activity

Process 0 --

Washing 1.2 Reuse

Cooling 13 Reuse

Industrial Total 14.2 (14.2

Reuse)

Reuse

Total (A + B + C) 10 Total fresh Water Requirement





Category Waste water

KLD

Remarks

(C) Domestic 3.8 To soak pit

32


Page 32 of 129

Industrial Activity

Process 13.6

To ETP

Washing 1.1

Boiler 0

Cooling 1.3

Total Industrial

waste water

16.0

Total [A + B] 19.8


[In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc..

Name of the Units Capacity No. of Units

Collection cum Neutralization Tank 20 KL 2

Chemical Oxidation Tank 20 KL 1

Nutsche Filter / Settling Tank 20 KL 1

Holding Tank 20 kL 1

Evaporator 1.5

KL/Hr.

1


o Industrial wastewater will be generated from process, cooling tower (blow-down) & washing.

o Wastewater generated from washing and process will be collected in collection cum neutralization

tank. Then wastewater will be given Chemical Oxidation treatment.

o After completion of Chemical Oxidation Treatment, wastewater will be taken to Nutch Filter/Settling

Tank for chemical sludge separation.

o Treated wastewater and cooling tower blow down will be collected in holding tank. After that it will be

sent to Evaporator followed by Condenser. Condensate water will be reused for industrial process.

o ETP sludge along with evaporation residue from Evaporator will be disposed off at TSDF site. Thus,

unit will maintain ZERO LIQUID DISCHARGE.


Management of waste water keeping in view direction under section 18 (1) (b) of the Water

(Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1974 issued by CPCB regarding compliance of CETP.

� NOT APPLICABLE

33


Page 33 of 129

Brief note on adequacy of ZLD (In case of Zero Liquid Discharge):Industrial wastewater will be

generated from process, cooling tower (blow-down) & washing activities. Wastewater will be generated

from washing and process will be collected in collection cum neutralization tank. Then wastewater will

be given Chemical Oxidation treatment. After completion of Chemical Oxidation Treatment, wastewater

will be taken to Nutch Filter/Settling Tank for chemical sludge separation. Treated wastewater and

cooling tower blow down will be collected in holding tank. After that it will be sent to Evaporator followed

by Condenser. Condensate water will be reused for industrial process. ETP sludge along with

evaporation residue from Evaporator will be disposed off at TSDF site. Thus, unit will maintain ZERO

LIQUID DISCHARGE.


Domestic:

Soak Pit via Septic Tank

Industrial:

To ETP, Reused in industrial activities, so the unit will maintain ZERO

Discharge

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE etc. , Name of CF

Not Applicable


34


Page 34 of 129


Total reuse 14.2 KLD

Source of waste

water for reuse

with quantity in

KLD

Application area with

quantity in KLD

Remarks regarding

feasibility to reuse i.e.

w/w characteristics

(COD, BOD, TDS etc.)

From ETP 14.2 KLD Various Industrial

Activities 14.2 KLD

-

E Air



Thermic Fluid Heater : 8 Lac Kcal./Hr. X 2 nos.,

Thermic Fluid Heater (1 No. stand-by): 6 Lac Kcal./Hr. &

35


Page 35 of 129

DG set (1 No. stand-by): 250 HP

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

With

Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type of

Fuel

Quantity

of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of

emissions

i.e. Air

Pollutants

Air

Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1

Thermic

Fluid

Heater -

1 (8

Lakh

Kcal/Hr.)

30 m Bio-Coal &

Coal

5.0

MT/day &

3.5

MT/day.

SPM, SO2,

NOx

Multi

Cyclone

Separator

followed by

Bag - Filter

2

Thermic

Fluid

Heater –

2 (8

Lakh

Kcal/Hr.)

3

Thermic

Fluid

Heater –

3 (stand-

by)

(6 Lakh

Kcal/Hr.)

4

D. G.

Set

(1 X 250

HP)

5 HSD 43.33

liters/hr.

SPM, SO2,

NOx

Adequate

stack

height

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOxetc.)

There will be no process gas emission from manufacturing process

iii Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.

36


Page 36 of 129

As below:

There are chances of fugitive emissions due to manufacturing activities and storage & handling of raw

materials. Also, during operation stage, leakages through valves, pumps, emission from open drums

containing chemicals, storage tanks, etc. are the major sources of fugitive emissions. Following

measures are adopted to prevent and control fugitive emissions:

• All the raw materials are stored in isolated storage area and containers are kept tightly closed.

• Entire manufacturing activity is carried out in closed reactors / vessels and regular checking and

maintenance of the same will be carried out to avoid any leakages.

• All the motors of pumps for the handling of hazardous chemicals are flame proof and provided

with suitable mechanical seal with stand-by arrangement.

• The control of all parameters on a continuous basis is done by adequate control valves, pressure

release valves and safety valves etc.

• All the flange joints of the pipe lines are covered with flange guards.

• The spillages / leakages of specific chemical will be collected and used or drained to effluent

treatment plant.

• Precautionary measures are taken while handling various hazardous chemicals.

• There will be provisions of adequate ventilation systems in process plant and hazardous

chemical storage area.

• A regular preventive maintenance will be planned to replace or rectify all gaskets, joints etc.

• Transporters will be instructed to cover the trucks by tarpaulin sheets.

• TREM card will be provided to the driver during the transportation of Hazardous raw

materials/products.

• Sufficient information and training regarding characteristics and immediate actions in case of any

spillage or accident during transportation of hazardous chemical will be provided to the driver.

• The unit will develop green belt area within the factory premises to control the fugitive emissions

from spreading into surrounding environment.

• Moreover, unit will carry out regular work place monitoring.

F Hazardous wastes

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Trans boundary Movement) Rules 2016.

i

Sr. Type/Name Specific Category Quantity Management of

37


Page 37 of 129

no. of

Hazardous

waste

Source of

generation

(Name of

the

Activity,

Product

etc.)

and

Schedule

as per

HW

Rules.

(MT/Annum) HW

1 Used oil Plant and

Machineries 5.1

1.5

MT/Annu

m

Collection,

storage and Use

within premises

as a lubricant/

sell to registered

recycler

2

Discarded

Plastic

bags/Barrels

Raw

Material

Storage

Area

33.1

1260

MT/Annu

m

Collection,

storage and

decontamination

or Reuse within

premises/ sell to

approved scrap

vendor

3 ETP Sludge ETP 35.3

48.0

MT/Annu

m

Collection,

storage and

Disposal at

TSDF Site

4 Evaporation

Residue ETP 35.3

36.0

MT/Annu

m

Collection,

storage and

Disposal at

TSDF Site


(For HW management)

Unit will become member of

TSDF after obtaining

Environmental Clearance

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal None

38


Page 38 of 129

(MSW and others)


i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery. reuse of recovered Solvents etc. (details in

table format)

� All solvents used in process will be used as dilution purpose.

� Solvents will be directly pumped into reactors/day tanks from the storage tanks and drums

without involving any manual handling.

� VOC detection sensors will be provided with alarm system. Flame proof wiring and flame proof

electrical accessories shall be provided to avoid any mishap.


� Pump with double mechanical seals will be provided to control VOC emission

� Regular work place area monitoring will be carried out to find out concentration level in ambient air.

� Provision will be made for breather valve cum flame arrester to the solvent storage tank

� Routine & periodic inspection to check leakage and Preventive maintenance as well SOP will be

followed for maintenance.


Storage details Name of major Hazardous

chemicals

Remarks

Storage tanks

1. Toluene/Xylene/MTO/

C-9/Slop oil

-

Drum/Barrel storage

Ethylene diamine,

Methacrylate, Acrylates,

Rosin, Cyclohexanone

-

� Applicability of PESO : will be obtained from PESO Department after getting EC.

• During SEAC meeting committee asked about reply of previous meeting query, technical expert of PP

informed that they have applied for CGWA permission for ground water source in respective authority.

Committee asked about stage wise reduction in pollutants in ETP and adequacy of in-house evaporator,

technical expert of PP informed that COD, BOD and TDS reduction in stage wise ETP units and in

evaporator. Committee disagree with adequacy of in-house evaporator and stage wise reduction of pollutant

I ETP and insisted for third party NABL accredited academic institute treatability and adequacy report for

ETP and in-house evaporator. Committee deliberated on CER and LDAR programmed details which was

39


Page 39 of 129

not presented precisely by technical expert of PP.Committee insisted for submit LDAR programme for

solvent with mentioning about solvent losses at each stage like storage, pipeline, pumps, reactors etc. and

need based CER

After deliberation, SEAC unanimously decided to consider the proposal only after submission of the

following details.



solvent losses at each stage like storage, pipeline, pumps, valves, reactor etc. in plant area in place of

conventional note regarding LDAR programme.

3. Adequacy and Treatability report by recognized schedule I auditor regarding proposed ETP units and

in-house evaporator. Stage wise reduction in pollutants like COD, BOD, TDS etc. shall be

incorporated.


06. SIA/GJ/IND2/38454/2018

M/s. Ven Petrochem And Pharma India

Pvt. Ltd.

Nos.2903,05,07,09,10,& 2704 to 2708,

GIDC, Sarigam, Ta- Umbergaon, Dist -

Valsad.




• Project proponent (PP) submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND2/38454/2018dated 31/07/2019 for

obtaining Environmental Clearance.

• SEIAA issued TOR to PP vide their letter dated 10/01/2019.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by Anand Environmental Consultants Pvt Ltd,

Ahmedabadbased on the TOR issued by SEIAA.

• This is an expansion project for manufacturing of synthetic organic chemical as tabulated below.

Sr.

no.

Name of the Products CAS no. /

CI no.

Quantity MT/Month End-use of the products

Existing Proposed Total

1 Acebrophylline

179118-73-1 0.0

1.0 1.0 Anti-mucolytic

(for cough)

2 Ambroxol Hydrochloride 23828-92-4 0.0 6.6 6.6 Anti-mucolytic

40


Page 40 of 129

(for cough)

3 Bromhexine Base

3572-43-8 0.0 1.0 1.0 For manufacture of

Bromohexine Hydrochloride

4 Bromhexine Hydrochloride 611-75-6 3.0 3.0 6.0 Anti-mucolytic

(for cough)

5 Timolol Maleate 26921-17-5 0.0 1.2 1.2 Anti – Glaucoma

(for eye drops)

6 2-Amino-N-Methyl-N-

Cyclohexyl

Benzenemethanamine

57365-08-9 0.0 1.2 1.2 For manufacture of

Bromohexine Hydrochloride

Total 3.0 14.0 17

• The project falls underCategory B of project activity 5(f) asper the schedule of EIA Notification 2006.



• During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the EIA Report and



noise, water, biological and socioeconomic aspect for the study area of 10 km radial distance from project

site for the period January 2019 to March 2019. Ambient Air Quality monitoring was carried out for PM10,

PM2.5, SO2, NOx, HCl, HBr, & VOC as Benzene, Toluene & Xylene at eight locations, including the project

site. Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The incremental Ground Level

Concentration (GLC) has been computed using AERMOD. The resultant concentrations are within the

NAAQS. The modelling study proved that the air emissions from the proposed plant would not affect the

ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The ambient air quality around the proposed

project site will remain within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).




• During SEAC meeting on 19/08/2019, committee noted that the proposal is for expansion. This unit has valid

CC&A for existing unit. Copy of CC&A, its compliance report is submitted. PP ensured that there are no

court cases pending and no public complaints against the project. Source of water is GIDC. PP mentioned

that entire effluent generated after expansion from process, washing & scrubber will be incinerated in in-

house incinerator or will be sent to co-processing in cement industries. PP mentioned that effluent generated

41


Page 41 of 129

from boiler blow down & cooling tower blow down will be recycled back in the same process. Unit will

maintain complete ZLD. PP has proposed one boiler & one incinerator. Fuel used will be PNG. Committee

noted that PP has not addressed LDAR (Solvent Recovery) product wise and committee asked PP to submit

revised LDAR product wise. Committee also noted that PP has not addressed Hazardous Waste as per

HWR – 2016 and was asked the submit the revised table eliminating the by-product and incorporating the

same in Hazardous Waste Matrix. Committee also noted that PP has not satisfactorily address the likely

impacts of project and its mitigation measures along with technical details pertaining to best available

technologies (BAT) for the proposed project considering the expansion of existing products.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to consider the proposal only after submission of the following

documents:

1. Leak Detection and Repairing Programme (LDAR) for all the volatile organic solvent proposed for

use in-house with detailed chemical properties including vapor pressure. LDAR shall endeavor

prevention of losses of solvents to the best minimum extent. Address all the solvents product wise

separately.

2. Technical Justification for direct recycle/reuse of utility effluent along with its treatability & feasibility.

3. Technical details of the plant/s along with details on best available technologies (BAT), proposed

technology and reasons for selecting the same.

4. Anticipated environmental impacts due to the proposed project/production may be evaluated for

significance and based on corresponding likely impacts VECs (Valued Environmental Components)

may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted within the study area for all the

concerned/identified VECs and likely impacts will have to be assessed for their magnitude in order to

identify mitigation measures.

5. Revised Hazardous Waste Matrix addressing the by-product in Hazardous Waste as per HWR –

2016.


mentioned points.


1. Leak Detection and Repairing Programme (LDAR) for all the volatile organic solvent proposed for

use in-house with detailed chemical properties including vapor pressure. LDAR shall endeavor

prevention of losses of solvents to the best minimum extent. Address all the solvents product wise

separately.

2. Technical Justification for direct recycle/reuse of utility effluent along with its treatability & feasibility.

3. Technical details of the plant/s along with details on best available technologies (BAT), proposed

42


Page 42 of 129

technology and reasons for selecting the same.

4. Anticipated environmental impacts due to the proposed project/production may be evaluated for

significance and based on corresponding likely impacts VECs (Valued Environmental Components)

may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted within the study area for all the

concerned/identified VECs and likely impacts will have to be assessed for their magnitude in order to

identify mitigation measures.

5. Revised Hazardous Waste Matrix addressing the by-product in Hazardous Waste as per HWR –

2016.

• Revised product profile as above submitted along with Salient features of the project including Water, Air

and Hazardous waste management (Revised):

Sr.

no.

Particulars Details


(Rs. in Crores):

Existing: INR 4.50 Crores

Proposed : 20 Crores

Total : INR 24.50 Crores

Details of EMP

Sr. No.Area of

Expenditure

Capital

Cost

(Rs.)

Recurring

Cost /Annum

(Rs.)

Remarks

1. Air Pollution

Control

30,00,000 10,00,000 Capital cost would include air pollution

control devices and the recurring cost

would include operation and maintenance

of pollution control devices and stack

monitoring.

2. Water Pollution

Control

40,00,000 20,00,000 Capital cost would include cost of septic

tank and recurring cost would include

maintenance charges of incinerator,

manpower salary etc.

3. Noise Pollution

Control

2,00,000 1,00,000 Capital cost would include providing

adequate sound enclosures and recurring

cost would include monitoring of noise

level.

43


Page 43 of 129

4. Solid Waste

Pollution

Control

20,00,000 2,00,000 Capital cost would include expense for

providing storage area for hazardous

waste and recurring cost would be for

solid/ hazardous waste packing and for the

membership of TSDF site.

5. Green Belt 2,50,000 1,00,000 Capital cost would include development of

green belt and recurring cost would include

maintenance charges.

6. Rain Water

Harvesting

2,50,000 1,00,000 Capital cost would include development of

Rain water harvesting and recurring cost

would include maintenance charges.

7. Occupational

Health & Safety

3,00,000 1,00,000 Capital cost would include expense for

providing stock/storage of personnel

protective equipments and safety systems

etc. and recurring cost would include

maintenance charges.

Total 100,00,000 36,00,000 --


Activities Budgetary cost

(Rs.)*

Implementation

schedule

� Awareness Program about the Government schemes

with the help of wall painting, IEC material, LED

presentation.

1,00,000 2020- 2021

� To establish R.O water system with the budget amount

of CER in villages. 2,00,000 2021- 2022

� Help village panchayats for existing deepen ponds to

increase the capacity of water consumption 5,00,000 2022- 2023

� To promote modern low cost techniques in farming

amongst the farmers 2,00,000 2023- 2024

� To organize medical camp for the villagers weekly or

monthly. 4,00,000 2024- 2025

� Construction of Public Toilets in urban areas / RCC

roads in rural areas within villages. 4,00,000 2025- 2026

44


Page 44 of 129

� To provide solar panels to those households who does

not have electricity at their home with CER budget or

through government subsidy.

2,00,000 2026-2027

Total 20,00,000 2020 - 2026

B Total Plot area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 9690 Sq. m.

Proposed: 2300 Sq. m. (from 9690 sqm)

Total: 9690 Sq. m.

Green belt area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 970.67. Sq. m.

Proposed: 240 Sq. m.

Total: 1210.67 Sq.m. i.e. 1211 Sq. m

C Employment generation Existing: 83

Proposed: 62

Total: 145

D Water

i



G.I.D.C

Status of permission from the concern authority. Permission obtained from GIDC.


Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(H) Domestic 4 4 8 --

(I) Gardening

1 1 2 --

(J) Industrial

Process 2.0 3.4 5.4 --

Washing 1.1 0.9 2.0 --

Boiler 12 12 24 --

Cooling 6 2 8 --

Others 0.1 0.2 0.3 --

Industrial Total 21.2 18.5 39.7 --

Grand Total (A+B+C) 26.2 23.5 49.7 --

45


Page 45 of 129


2) Quantity to be recycled: 12 KLD


(Total water requirement = Fresh water + Recycled water)

(49.7 = 37.7 + 12)


Category Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(D) Domestic 2.4 2.4 4.8 --

(E) Industrial

Process 1.55 1.75 3.30 Incineration within premises.

Washing 1.1 0.9 2.0 Incineration within premises.

Boiler 4.5 3.5 8 Will be recycled.

Cooling 3.0 1.0 4 Will be recycled.

Others 0.1 0.2 0.3 Incineration within premises.

Total Industrial

waste water 10.25 7.35 17.6

--


[In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc.

� Existing : Capacity of Incinerator – 250 kg/hour , 2.75 KLD incinerated within premises, 7.5

KLD recycled back

� Proposed: Capacity of Incinerator –500 kg/hour, 2.85 KLD will be incinerated within premises,

4.5 KLD will be recycled back after treatment.

� i.e., after expansion total 5.6 KL/day will be incinerated within premises and 12 KL/day will be

recycled.

Treatment scheme including segregation at source. (Give Characteristics of each stream i.e.

COD, BOD, TDS etc.)

� 4.8 KL / day domestic waste water generated will be disposed into septic tank /soak pit system.

� 17.6 KL/day industrial waste water generated out of which 5.60 KL / day (3.30 KLDfrom

Process + 2.0 KLD from Washing + 0.3 KLD from Scrubber) will be incinerated in an incinerator

within premises AND 12 KL / day (8 KLD from boiler + 4 KLD from cooling) will be recycled.

46


Page 46 of 129



(Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1974 issued by CPCB regarding compliance of

CETP.

� NOT APPLICABLE.


� Unit maintains ZLD by incinerating industrial waste water in an incinerator within premises

and the same practice will be continued after expansion.

V Mode of Disposal & Final meeting point

Domestic: 4.8 KL / day (existing + proposed) domestic waste water generated will be disposed

into septic tank /soak pit system.

Industrial:

5.60 KL / day (3.30 KLD from Process + 2.0 KLD from Washing + 0.3 KLD from

Scrubber) (existing + proposed) will be incinerated in an incinerator within premises,

12 KL / day (8 KLD from boiler + 4 KLD from cooling) (existing + proposed) will be

recycled back.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE, CHWIF etc.

Name of Common facility (CF)(For waste water treatment)

� Not Applicable



� NOT APPLICABLE


47


Page 47 of 129

vii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD)

[Source of reuse & application area]

Total reuse 12 KLD

Source of waste

water for reuse with

quantity in KLD

(From where it is

coming)

Application area

with quantity in

KLD (Where it is

used)

Characteristics of

waste water to be

reused (COD, BOD,

TDS etc.)

Remarks regarding

feasibility to reuse i.e.

Boiler condensate

and cooling water

purge will be the

source of waste water

generated which is

planned to be used.

Approximately 8

KLD of boiler

condensate and 4

KLD of cooling

purge water will

be reused back

into the boiler as

well as back for

cooling makeup

� pH : 7- 8.5

� Suspended Solids

: 150 – 200 mg/l

� TDS:1000– 1200

mg/l

� Oil & Grease: 5 -

10 mg/l

� COD : 80-100

mg/l

� BOD : 10-20 mg/l

It is completely feasible

to use for Boiler &

cooling

E Air


48


Page 48 of 129


Existing & Proposed

- Existing

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

With Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type of

Fuel

Quantity of

Fuel

Type of

emissions i.e.

Air Pollutants

Air Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1 Boiler

1000 kg / hour

11 PNG 25 scm/hr PM

SO2

NOX

--

2 D.G. Set

(250 KVA)

5 Diesel 25 lit/hr PM

SO2

NOX

--

3. Incinerator

(250 kg/hr)

30** PNG

25 scm/hr PM

SO2

HCl

Dust Collector

followed by

scrubber

- Proposed

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

With Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type of

Fuel

Quantity of

Fuel

Type of

emissions i.e.

Air Pollutants

Air Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1 Boiler

1000 kg / hour

12 PNG 25 scm/hr PM

SO2

NOX

--

2 D.G. Set

(250 KVA)

5 Diesel 25 lit/hr PM

SO2

NOX

--

3. Incinerator

(500 kg/hr)

30** PNG

50 scm/hr PM

SO2

HCl

Dust Collector

followed by

scrubber

** This will be a common stack for existing as well as proposed expanded incinerator

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

49


Page 49 of 129

Existing & Proposed

-Existing

Sr.

no.

Specific Source of

emission

(Name of the

Product &

Process)

Type of

emission

Stack/Vent

Height (meter)


Measures

(APCM)

1 Bromination

Vessels

(2 Nos).

(Bromohexine

Hydrochloride &

During bromination

reaction )

HBr

Br2

12 Two separate two Stage Alkali

Scrubber

- Proposed

Sr.

no.

Specific Source of

emission

(Name of the

Product &

Process)

Type of

emission

Stack/Vent

Height (meter)


Measures

(APCM)

1 Bromination

Vessels

(2 Nos).

(Ambroxol

Hydrochloride/

Acebrophylline &

During Bromination

reaction,

Bromhexine base

& During

HBr

Br2

10 Two separate two Stage Alkali

Scrubber

50


Page 50 of 129

Bromination

reaction)


� Concrete road is/will be developed within plot premises to avoid fugitive dust due to vehicle

movement.

� Manufacturing activity will be carried out in closed reactors / vessels and regular checking and

maintenance of the same will be carried out to avoid any leakage and relative fugitive emissions.

� All the raw materials will be stored in closed containers and in sealed bags and will be handled

through closed system to avoid the handling losses and relative fugitive emissions.

� Water sprinkling will be done to avoid dust emission.

F Hazardous waste

(As per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.

Existing & Proposed

I Sr.

no.

Type/Name

of

Hazardous

waste

Specific

Source of

generation

(Name of the

Activity,

Product etc.)

Catego

ry and

Sched

ule as

per HW

Rules.

Quantity

(MT/Annum)

Management of HW

Existin

g

Propose

d

Tota

l

1 ETP Sludge

From Wet

Scrubbers 35.3

14.4 28.8 43.2 Collection, Storage,

Transportation and

Disposal at approved

TSDF.

From treatment

of water to be

recycled

-- 24 24

Total 14.4 52.8 67.2

2. Distillation

Residue

From

manufacturing

process

28.1 0.36 35.64 36 Collection, Storage,

Transportation and

disposed to cement

industries / RSPL –

Panoli for co -

processing.

3. Used Spent

Oil

From lubrication

or D.G. Set

5.1 0.08 11.92 12 Collection, Storage,

Transportation and

51


Page 51 of 129

Disposal by selling to

registered

reprocessors.

4. Empty

barrels /

containers /

liners

contaminate

d with

hazardous

chemicals /

wastes

From raw

materials

33.1 2.7 27.3 30

Collection, Storage,

Decontamination,

Transportation and

Disposal by selling to

authorized recycler.

5. Spent

Carbon

From

manufacturing

process of

Acebrophylline,

Ambroxol

hydrochloride,

Bromhexine

Base,

Bromhexine

Hydrochloride,

Timolol

Maleate,2-

Amino-n-

methyl-n-

cyclohexyl

benzenemethan

amine

28.3 1.2 13.2 14.4 Collection, Storage,

Transportation and

Disposed to cement

industries / RSPL -

Panoli.

6. Incineration

Ash

From

Incinerator

37.2 35 51.4 86.4 Collection, Storage,

Transportation and

Disposal at approved

TSDF site.

52


Page 52 of 129

7. Date

expired –off

specification

process

Expired

Products

28.4 0.005 0.115 0.12 Collection, Storage,

Incineration within

unit.

8. Sodium

Bromide

Solution**

From

manufacturing

process

- 128.4 1118.4 124

7


and sold to

authorized end users

registered under

Rule -9 and users

having PCB

Approvals.

9. Dimethyl

Hydantoin**

From

manufacturing

process

- 6 13.2 19.2 Collection, Storage,

and sold to

authorized end users

registered under

Rule -9 and users

having PCB

Approvals.

10. Bleed

Liquor

From Scrubbing - 1.2 2.4 3.6 Collection, Storage,

Incineration within

premises.

**- By-Products

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF

etc.

(For HW management)

BEAIL,RSPL,VWEMCL

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its

disposal(MSW and others)

--


i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery, reuse of recovered Solvents etc. (Details

in Table Format)

Name of Name of Input Output Loss Recovery Loss

53


Page 53 of 129

Products Solvent (Kg/Month) (Kg/Month) (Kg/Month) (%) (%)

Bromhexine

Hydrochloride

Mono chlorobenzene

(Stage – 1) 18000 17640 360 98 2

Methanol

(Stage- 2) 18720 17800 920 95 5

Toluene

(Stage 2) 41280 39620 1660

96 4 (Stage 3) 34800 33490 1310

Total 76080 73110 2970

Industrial

spirit

(Stage 2) 12000 11520 480

96 4 (Stage 3) 39200 37630 1570

Total 51200 49150 2050

2-amino-n-

methyl-n-

cyclohexyl

benzenemeth

anamine

Mono chlorobenzene

(Stage 1) 7200 7056 144 98 2

Methanol

(Stage 2) 7488 7120 368 95 5

Toluene (Stage 2) 16512 15860 652 96 4

Bromhexine

base

Mono chlorobenzene

(Stage 1) 3150 3087 63 98 2

Methanol

(Stage 2) 3276 3115 161 95 5

Industrial

spirit

(Stage 2) 2100 2016 84

96 4 (Stage 3) 936 900 36

Total 3036 2916 120

Toluene

(Stage 2) 7224 6902 322

96 4 (Stage 3) 5740 5542.3 197.7

Total 12964 12444.3 519.7

Ambroxol

Hydrochloride

Methanol

(Stage -1) 56160 53400 2760 95 5

Toluene (Stage 1) 41280 39600 1680

96 4 (Stage 2) 10320 9900 420

54


Page 54 of 129

(Stage 4) 51600 49560 2040

Total 103200 99060 4140

Industrial spirit

(Stage 3) 11700 11220 480 96 4

N-butanol (Stage 4) 15840 15240 600 96 4

Acebrophylline

Methanol (Stage 1) 6180 5870 310 95 5

Toluene

(Stage 1) 4540 4360 180

96 4

(Stage 2) 1135 1089 46

(Stage 4) 5676 5450 226

(Stage 5) 5830 5560 270

Total 17181 16459 722

Industrial spirit

(Stage 3) 1287 1235 52 96 4

Acetone

(Stage 4) 370 352 18

95 5 (Stage 5) 600 570 30

Total 970 922 48

N-butanol

(Stage 4) 1740 1670 70

96 4 (Stage 5) 3100 2980 120

Total 4840 4650 190

Timolol

maleate

Tert-butanol

(Stage 1 & 2) 5520 5280 240 96 4

Acetone

(Stage 3 & 4) 7680 7220 460 94 6

Toluene

(Stage 1 & 2) 6912 6528 384

95 5 (Stage 3 & 4) 5760 5520 240

Total 12672 12048 624

Recovered solvents will be reused in process.


� Closed loop systems, double mechanical seal pumps will be provided to reduce VOC emission

as much as possible.

55


Page 55 of 129


Storage details Name of major Hazardous chemicals Remarks

Storage tanks Hydrochloric acid --

Drum/Barrel storage

Acetic acid, Acetone, Benzaldehyde,

Benzoic acid, Hydrazine hydrate,

Industrial spirit, Liquor ammonia,

Maleic acid, Methanol, Mono

chlorobenzene, N-butanol, N-

methylcyclohexylamine, Ortho nitro

benzaldehyde, Ortho nitro toluene,

Sodium hydride, Sodium

hydrosulphite, Soidum borohydride,

Tert-butanol, Theophylline, Toluene,

Trans-4-amino cyclohexanol

--

� Applicability of PESO: Available for existing and will be obtained for proposed project.

• During SEAC meeting dated 03/10/2019, Committee deliberated on query point regarding adequate LDAR

for solvents and BAT for proposed project, Technical expert of PP informed about each solvent

storage,handling, solvent recovery and solvent losses details. They informed that for control of solvent

losses, solvent will be transferred from barrels to reactor under vacuum and canister containing carbon

granules attached with vent of solvent barrels for control of VOC in atmosphere. PP informed that BAT for

convert nitro compound into amino compound by using hydrazine hydrate instead of conventional method.

And for manufacturing of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Acebrophyline they will use an Aldehyde due to which

there will be no by-products as part of BAT in place of using esters. Committee asked about Technical

Justification for direct recycle/reuse of utility effluent along with its treatability & feasibility, technical expert of

PP informed that GIDC water supply is river water hence TDS value is only 300 mg/l as feed for boiler and

cooling tower. PP informed that they will reuse boiler blow down and cooling blow down after treatment like

for settling and filter method to treat for reuse. PP informed about the anticipated environmental impacts due

to the proposed project have been evaluated by carrying out the baseline status for the ambient air at 8

different locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, HCl, VOCs and HBr and informed results of ambient air

baseline data and mitigation measures for air pollution control. .Committee deliberated on Hazardous waste

details and technical expert of PP informed that previously mentioning by products is mentioned as

Hazardous waste and process wastewater will be incinerated in own incinerator instead of sending it to

56


Page 56 of 129

cement industries for co-processing.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to recommend the project to SEIAA, Gujarat for grant of


07. SIA/GJ/IND2/37351/2018

M/s. TransworldFurtichemPvt Ltd

Plot No. 353 to 367, Sector-4, KSEZ,

Gandhidham, Dist - Kutchh.

Appraisal

Category of the unit : 5(a)

Project status: New

• PP has submitted online application vide no SIA/GJ/IND2/37351/2018 dated 03/09/2019 for obtaining



16/10/2018.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by M/s: EQMS India Pvt. Ltd. based on the TOR

issued by SEIAA

• This is a new unit proposes manufacturing of chemical fertilizer as tabulated below:

Sr.

No.

Name of the

Products

CAS no. /CI no. Quantity

MT/Month

End-use of products

1 SSP 8011 -76-55 6000 Used as fertilizer

2 GSSP 10031-30-8 6000

(Under CTE)

Used as fertilizer

• The project falls under Category B of project activity 5(a) as per the schedule of EIA Notification 2006.


• Salient features of the project are as under:

Sr.

no.

Particulars Details

A


(Rs. in Crores):

5.0 Crores

Details of EMP 0.50 Crores

57


Page 57 of 129

Details of CER as per OM dated 01/05/2018 10 Lacks


9600 Sq. m.

Green belt area

( sq. meter)

670 Sq. m.


60 regular and 100

contractual persons

D Water

i


(GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply

etc...)

Water requirement will be

made available through

Gujarat water supply (NBCC)

Status of permission from the concern authority.

available

ii

Fresh Water consumption (KLD)

Category QuantityKLD Remarks

(K) Domestic 4.0

(L) Gardening 4.0

(M) Industrial

Process 40.4

Washing -

Boiler -

Cooling -

Others -


Total (A + B + C) 48.4

1) Total water requirement for the project 60.4 KLD

2) Quantity to be recycled: 12 KLD


(Total water requirement = Fresh water + Recycled water)

58


Page 58 of 129


Category Waste waterKLD Remarks

(F) Domestic 3 Disposed in

septic

tank/soakpit

(G) Industrial

Process 12

Washing -

Boiler -

Cooling -

Others -

Total Industrial

waste water

12 Recycle back

in process

Total [A + B] 15

-



� Domestic waste shall be disposed in septic tank/ soakpit

� Process waste shall be reused in process for acid dilution.


� NA

Note: (In case of CETP discharge) :Not Applicable

Management of waste water keeping in view direction under section 18 (1) (b)

of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1974 issued by CPCB

regarding compliance of CETP.

�


� About 15 KLD waste water shall be generated from the proposed unit. Out of

the total waste generated about 12 KLD shall be Process (Industrial) waste

and 3 KLD shall be domestic waste. Process waste shall be reused in

process for acid dilution, and domestic waste shall be disposed in Septic tank

and soak pit. The Effluent generation from the proposed unit will be Nil as the

59


Page 59 of 129

unit will operate on a principal of “Zero Liquid Discharge” and no waste water

shall be discharge outside the plant premises.


The unit will operate on a principal of “Zero Liquid Discharge” and no waste water

shall be disposed/discharge outside the plant premises.

Domestic:

3 KLD domestic waste shall be disposed in Septic Tank /soak pit

Industrial:

2 KLD shall be Process (Industrial) waste shall be reused in

process for acid dilution

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE

etc. Name of CF

� Not Applicable

Membership of Common facility (CF):

(For waste water treatment): NA


60


Page 60 of 129


Total reuseMM.KLD

Source of waste

water for reuse

with quantity in

KLD (From

where it is

coming)

Application

area with

quantity in

KLD (Where it

is used)

Characteristics of

waste water to be

reused (COD, BOD,

TDS etc.)

Remarks

regarding

feasibility

to reuse i.e.

Process Effluent 12 NA Reused for

acid dilution

61


Page 61 of 129

E Air


No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr,

KVA etc. NA

-

Sr.

no.

Source

of

emission

With

Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type

of

Fuel

Quantity

of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of

emissions

i.e. Air

Pollutants

Air

Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

ii Process gas emission details i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx

etc.)

Sr.

no.

Specific

Source of

emission

(Name of

the

Product &

Process)

Type of

emission

Stack/Vent

Height

(meter)

Air Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1 SSP Stack PM and

Fluoride

50

Cyclone

Separators,

Ventury

Scrubbers

2

Rock

drying

Section

Stack

PM

emission

30

Cyclone

Separators,

62


Page 62 of 129

Granulation

Section

Stack

PM

emission

40

Cyclone

Separators,

-


As below:

There is no source of fugitive emission as such except during transportation of rock

phosphate and handling of SSP. The rock phosphate is proposed to be transported

under cover truck only. The SSP process happens under shed and powder is in

moist conditions. As such all products remains confine to shed area only even if

become air borne. All precaution and provision are made for arresting the dust

particle during crushing of rock and handling of SSP which will include covered

conveyer system with dust collection system at transfer points and Water spraying

for dust suppression on heavy vehicles movement areas/ roads.

F Hazardous wastes

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary

Movement) Rules 2016.

i

Sr.

no.

Type/Name

of

Hazardous

waste

Specific

Source of

generation

(Name of

the

Activity,

Product

etc.)

Category

and

Schedule

as per HW

Rules.

Quantity

(MT/Annum)

Management

of HW

1 Discarded

Container/

barrels

From tores/

Drum yard 33.3 0.06 MTPA

Sale to

authorized

recycler

2 Spent/Used

Oil

From D.G.

set 5.1 720 Lit/year

Sale to

authorized

recyclers

3 H2SiF6 From 34.2 56 MTPA Reused

63


Page 63 of 129

scrubber

All solid waste and hazardous waste shall be disposed as per norm.


(For HW management)

NA


(MSW and others)

Commercial waste like empty

cement bags, Iron scrap etc.

will be sold to scrap buyers

after the construction phase.

Domestic waste like used

paper, label, cartoons will be

disposed to the scrap buyers.

Organic waste from canteen

will be disposed as per the

local Panchayath / Municipal

disposal mechanism.


NA

i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery, reuse of recovered

Solvents etc. (Details in Table Format)

� No Applicable


� Not Applicable


Storage details Name of major

Hazardous chemicals

Remarks

Storage tanks

Sulphuric Acid Brick lined

MS Tank

(1000 KLD)

Drum/Barrel storage

� Applicability of PESO : NA


Technical expert of PP informed that this is existing unit for non-EC applicable product NPK fertilizer and

64


Page 64 of 129

proposed new SSP product which is EC applicable. Committee asked about Existing plant CCA status, PP

informed that they have valid CCA for existing plant. Committee insisted for apply ToR-amendment as

expansion project instead of ToR obtained as new project.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to defer the proposal and consider the same in one of the

upcoming meeting of SEAC only after satisfactory submission of the following documents,

1. Submit ToR – Amendmentapplication as expansion project with mentioning details of existing

product NPK fertilizer and subsequent change in water, air and hazardous waste details.

08. SIA/GJ/MIS/21743/2016 M/s. Dr. H.K. Patnaik (Cairn Energy)

Bhogat, Dist - DevbhoomiDwarka. Ec-Reconsideration

• PP remained absent in the EC – Appraisal presentation held on 03/10/2019.

• The project proponent remained absent during the two consecutive meetings of SEAC i.e. 04/09/2019 &

03/10/2019.

• It was unanimously decided to delist the proposal from the list of applications pending with the SEAC and to

close the file of the project.

09. SIA/GJ/IND2/29282/2018

M/s. Jay Ganesh Industries

Plot No. 824/2, Sejal Glass Road,

GIDC Industrial Estate - Jhagadia,

Bharuch

Reconsideration of EC-

Refer Back Case



• M/s: Jay Ganesh Industries, applied for Environmental clearance and the SEAC recommended the

project for grant of environmental clearance vide this office letter no. EIA-10-2018/IND2/2605 dated

09/08/2019 for conditions as mentioned therein:

• The case was referred back by the SEIAA, Gujarat vide SEIAA minutes of 264th meeting dated

22/08/2019 with the following point:

1. To verify the details of treatability and feasibility study report submitted.

• Project proponent submitted reply vide their letter dated 22/09/2019 showing Characteristics of effluent

for the above mentioned points.

• PP has submitted as under:

1. PP has submitted characteristic of effluent with segregation of stream and stage wise

reduction of effluent in ETP.

65


Page 65 of 129

• The case was reconsidered in the SEAC meeting dated 03/10/2019.

• During the SEAC meeting dated 03/10/2019, the said reply was considered by the Committee.

Committee asked clarification regarding drastic reduction in TDS, COD and BOD value in ETP units,

technical expert of PP has informed that BOD and COD value after secondary treatment will be reduced

from 1020 mg/l and 2700 mg/l to 80 mg/l and 250 mg/l respectively. Committee disagree with drastic

reduction of BOD and COD value in secondary treatment plant. Hence, Committee asked for adequacy

and treatability report by recognized schedule I auditor for proposed ETP units.

After deliberation, SEAC unanimously decided to consider the proposal after satisfactory submission of

the following details.

1. Adequacy and Treatability report by recognized schedule I auditor regarding proposed ETP units. Stage

wise reduction in pollutants like COD, BOD etc. shall be incorporated.

10. SIA/GJ/MIS/35539/2018

M/s. Care BMW Incinerator

Sr. No 1186,Block No .3013/8, 3014/A,

3014 /B, Chhatral GlDC- Kalol, Dist -

Gandhinagar


Refer Back Case

Category of the unit: 7(d)

Project status: New

• M/s: Care BMW Incineratorapplied for Environmental clearance and the SEAC recommended the





1. To verify the distance of proposed site from the nearest human habitation and compliance of

the same in respect of guidelines published by GPCB.

• Project proponent submitted presentation for compliance of above query showing distance of proposed

site from the nearest human habitation and compliance of the same in respect of guidelines published by

GPCB.


1. PP has submitted distance of proposed site from the nearest human habitation and

compliance of the same in respect of guidelines published by GPCB.


66


Page 66 of 129


Committee asked distance of proposed project from nearby habitat area, technical expert of PP informed

that this CBWTF facility is involved in Common Bio medical waste treatment facility since 2002 at Santej,

Gandhinagar. Generation of waste and nos. of beds is increasing in existing HCUs, year by year. So as

considering future scenario, there is a need of expansion in biomedical waste treatment and disposal

facility. Expansion in present facility at Santej, Gandhinagar is not possible due to space constraint and

surrounding setup. Hence, management has decided to shift this facility at Survey No.-1186 Block

3013/B, 3014/A, 3014/B, Chhatral G.I.D.C, Taluka: Kalol, Dist: Gandhinagar which is located within

notified industrial area.According to the CPCB’s “Revised Guidelines for Common Bio-medical Waste

Treatment Facilities” published in December 21, 2016, it states under “Sr. No. 6 – Location Criteria as A

CBWTF shall preferably be developed in a notified industrial area without any requirement of buffer zone

(or)”. Proposed CBWTF is located within Chhatral GIDC which is notified as industrial area since 1993.

Due to Govt. notified area it does not attracts general sitting criteria and buffer zone requirement. Further

Project site is surrounded by other 25 nos. of plot and various other industries such as Shreeji paper

product, Uma Fabrics, DN Tubes Pvt. Ltd., Mornis Industries Wheelers, etc. The companies DN Tubes

Pvt. Ltd. and Mornis Industries Wheelers are located between project site and nearest human habitation.

PP submitted authenticated satellite map showing distance of proposed site from human habitation is

approx 200 meter.

• Committee asked about air quality modeling due to proposed project, technical expert of PP informed

that Air pollution control device will be designed to control PM, NOx, HCl, Hg, Total Dioxin and Furan

emissions up to 50 mg/Nm3, 400 mg/Nm3,50 mg/Nm3, 0.05 mg/Nm3 and ≤ 0.1 ng TEQ/Nm3

respectively, as per prescribe norms.

• Maximum incremental Ground Level Concentration (GLC) due to proposed project observed is 0.38

µg/m3 at 1.1 km in SW direction, in case of the steady state condition (80% calm), GLC observed is

0.31at 0.55 km in SW direction i.e. within Industrial area. Increase in Ground Level Concentration due to

proposed project will be only 0.3 µg/m3 in comparison to ambient concentration of PM i.e. around 90.0

µg/m3 is negligible. Moreover, as stated above nearest human habitation is located at 0.2 km in NW

direction, which is in cross wind direction. Hence, there will not be significant impact of air emission.

• Site specific meteorology data shows calm condition of 37%.

• Modeling has been carried out considering Incinerator’s stack height at 30 m, metrological data collected

during study period and other parameters i.e. exit gas velocity, exit gas temperature, stack diameter etc.,

which predicts maximum GLC as below,

67


Page 67 of 129

Maximum Ground Level Concentration from Proposed Source

Pollutant Co-ordinates Latitude &

Longitude

Average Maximum Ground

Level Concentration (µg/m3

)

Distance

(km) Direction

X Y

PM10

-500 -500 23°17'18.95"N

72°26'34.62"E

0.31 0.55 SW

NOX 1.47

HCl -500 0 23°16'47.36"N

72°25'50.06"E 2.17 0.5 W

• From the above table it can be concluded that even in the steady state condition (80% calm), GLC falls

in industrial area.

After detailed discussion, it was decided to recommend the project to SEIAA Gujarat for grant of

Environmental Clearance,

1. CBWTF shall install adequate APCM for control of parameter like Total Dioxins and furans for

proposed biomedical waste incinerator and shall construct boundary wall of adequate height

for control of fugitive emission from proposed CBWTF site.

2. Unit shall discontinue existing CBWTF running at Santej after getting EC and CTE of the

Board for proposed CBWTF site.

3. CBWTF shall install Continuous emission Monitoring system (CEMS) as per CPCB guideline

with stack attached to proposed incinerator.

4. Unit shall develop dense green belt of adequate width along periphery of the project

boundary.

11. Offline application

M/s. Dholu Earth Industries

Sr. No.92./2, Kalitalavadi, Bhuj, Dist -

Kutch


Referback

Category of the unit: 2(b)

Project status: New

• M/s: Dholu Earth Industries, applied for Environmental clearance and the SEAC recommended the





68


Page 68 of 129

1. To verify the details of disposal of hazardous waste especially spent sulphuric acid and its

viability.

• Project proponent submitted reply vide their letter dated 28/09/2019 showing revised proposal for the

management of spent sulphuric acid as the above mentioned points,


1. PP has submitted revised proposal with mentioning regarding spent sulphuric acid treated in

ETP and manufacturing gypsum instead of previously showing spent sulphuric acid disposal

to end -users.



Committee asked clarification regarding change of mode of disposal of spent sulphuric acid disposal.

Technical expert of PP informed that previously they have proposal of sending spent sulphuric acid to

end users like IFFCO but IFFCO is not ready for accept spent sulphuric acid of the unit. Hence PP

submitted revised proposal with sending spent sulphuric acid in ETP for wastewater treatment and

Gypsum mentioned as Hazardous Waste. Committee asked clarification regarding gypsum is Hazardous

Waste or not and justification regarding adequacy of ETP and treated waste water disposal, technical

expert of PP could not explain satisfactorily regarding it.

After deliberation, SEAC unanimously decided to consider the proposal after satisfactory submission of

the following details.

1. Submit MoEF&CC accredited laboratory report regarding gypsum characteristic with recommendation

regarding gypsum is Hazardous Waste or Non-Hazardous waste.

2. Sound management of concentrated acidic effluent stream.

12 SIA/GJ/IND2/38556/2019

M/s. AnjuLifescience

Plot No. C/261, GIDC Industrial Estate,

Saykha, Ta -Vagra, Dist -Bharuch

Screening & Scoping

Project / Activity No.: 5(f)

Project status: New

• This office has received an application vide their online proposal no. SIA/GJ/IND2/38556/2019 dated

29/08/2019 regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for preparation of EIA/EMP report.

• Project proponent (PP) has submitted Form-1, PFR and relevant details/information.

• This is a new unit proposes for Synthetic Organic Chemicals manufacturing plant as tabulated below:

Sr. Name of the Products CAS no. /CI Quantity End-use of products

69


Page 69 of 129

No. no. MT/Month

1 Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate & [its

itntermediate (diethyl (tosyloxy) methyl

phosphonate)]

202138-50-9

(31618-90-

3)

10 Anti-HIV medicine

2 Para hydroxyl phenyl acetonitrile 150810-68-7 70 Pharma Intermediate

3 N-Sulfomyl-3-chloropropionamide

hydrochloride[IF]

106649-95-0 Pharma Intermediate

4 Sulphonamide of Glimepiride 93479-97-1 20 Anti Diabetic

5 Adapalene 76824-35-6 Skin allergic

6 Tapentadol Hydrochloride 845273-93-0 Analgesic

7 Bromo OTBN 114772-54-2 Intermediate for

Losartan

8 Rusvastatin Calcium 7554-65-6 High cholesterol

9 1-3 dichloro Acetone 182815-44-7 Pharma Intermediate

10 Gunylthiourea 93479-97-1 Pharma Intermediate

11 Rabeprazole Sodium 5579-84-0 Pharma

12 Carvediol 106685-40-9 Hypertension

13 Clopidogrel Bisulfate 175591-09-0 Heart attacks

14 Tranexamic Acid 2114-02-5 Antifibrinolytic

15 Sildenafil Citrate 171599-83-0 Hypertension

16 Pregabaline 169590-42-5 Anti diabetes

17 Chlorohexidine Base 120202-66-6 Pharma Intermediate

18 Miconazole Nitrate 59-30-3 Antifungal

19 Ecanazole Nitrate 189005-44-5 Antifungal

20 Desloratadine 148553-50-8 Antihistamine

21 Loratidine 79794-75-5 Antihistamine

22 Gabapentine 60142-96-3 Anti-convulsant

23 Albendazole 54965-21-8 Moderate infestation

24 Citrezine Hydrochloride 83881-52-1 Anti allergic

25 Lasamide 2736-23-4 Anti Diuretic

26 Pioglitazone Hydrochloride 112529-15-4 High blood sugar

27 Mesalamine 89-57-6 Anti-inflammatory

70


Page 70 of 129

28 Febuxostat 144060-53-7 Anti hyperuricemia

29 Itopride Hydrochloride 122892-31-3 Anti Diabetes

30 Amodafinil 68693-11-8 Obstruct. sleep apnea

31 Quetipine Fumrate 111974-72-2 Anti-psychotic

32 Aripiperazole 129722-12-9 Antipsychotic

33 Amlodipine Besylate 111470-99-6 Anti hypertensation

34 Nebivilol Hydrochloride 152520-56-4 Cardioselective

35 Sevelamer Hydrochloride 106-27-4 Hyper phosphataemia

36 Sevelamer Carbonate 103-45-7 Hyper phosphataemia

37 Poly Allaylamine Hydrochloride 122-70-3 250 Pharma Intermediate

38 Phthalimido Amlodipine 88150-62-3 5 Pharma Intermediate

39 Sulfamide 7803-58-9 20 Antibiotics

40 Furfuryl Amine 617-89-0 40 Synthesis

of Barmastine

41 Methyl Acetate 79-20-9 100 Pharma Intermediate

42 Doxophiline Hydrochloride -- 20 Treatment of asthma

43 Ethyl (2-Nitro-4-Aminophenyl)

Carbamate

150812-24-1 Synthesis of

Retigabine

44 Milnacipran 92623-85-3 Serotonin-non repine

phrine reuptake -

inhibiter

45 Levomilnacipran 96847-55-1 Antidepressants

46 Ataluren 775304-57-9 Duchenne Muscular

Dystrophy

47 Pranlukast 103177-37-3 Antagonist

48 Suvorexant 1030377-33-

3

Sedative/ Hypnotics

49 Apixaban 503612-47-3 Anticoagulant

50 Luliconazole 187164-19-8 Antifungal

51 Venlafaxine 93413-69-5 Antidepressant

52 Tetra Butyl Ammonium Bromide 1643-19-2 Phase Transfer

Catalyst

53 Meta Bromo Anisole 2398-37-0 Pharma Intermediate

71


Page 71 of 129

54 N-Methyl Piperazine 109-01-3 Intermediate for

antibiotics

55 4- Methoxy Phenyl Acetone 122-84-9 Pharma Intermediate

56 3-Hydroxy Acetophenone 121-71-1 Anti-tuberculosis

agents

57 Albendazole 54965-21-8 Pharma Intermediate

58 Febendazole 43210-67-9 Pharma Intermediate

59 Oxfendazole 53716-50-0 Anthelminthic

60 Ricobendazole 54029-12-8 Anthelminthic

61 Oxyclozanide 2277-92-1 Anthelminthic

62 4-Hydroxy Cumerine 1076-38-6 5 Pharma Intermediate

63 Trimethyl ortho benzoate 707-07-3 Pharma Intermediate

64 2,4-thiazolidinedione 2295-31-0 Pharma Intermediate

65 1-Phenyl Piperazine 92-54-6 Pharma Intermediate

66 1-(2-Chloro Phenyl)piperazine 39512-50-0 Pharma Intermediate

67 2-Piperidone(2-PD) 675-20-7 Pharma Intermediate

68 Dimethyl Formamide Dimethyl Acetal 4637-24-5 Pharma Intermediate

69 1-methyl-4-piperidone 1445-73-4 Pharma Intermediate

70 1-(2,3-dichloro phenyl) piperazine HCl 119532-26-2 Pharma Intermediate

71 1-(3-chlorophenyl) piperazine HCl 65369-76-8 Pharma Intermediate

72 1-Methyl-3-Phenyl Piperazine 5271-27-2 Pharma Intermediate

73 4-chloro butyraldehyde dimethyl acetal 29882-07-3 Pharma Intermediate

TOTAL 540



• Salient features of the project including Water, Air and Hazardous waste management :

Sr.

no.

Particulars Details


(Rs. in Crores):

4.0 Crores

B Total Plot area( sq. meter) 4000 Sq. m.

Green belt area 1200 Sq. m.

72


Page 72 of 129

( sq. meter)

C Employment generation 30

D Water

i


(GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply

etc...)

GIDC Water Supply

Status of permission from the concern authority. Permission will be taken after

getting ToR


Category

Quantity

KLD

Remarks

(N) Domestic 5.0

(O) Gardening 3.0

(P) Industrial

Process 75.0

Washing 2.0

Boiler 20.0

Cooling 15.0

Others 2.0

Industrial Total 112

Total (A + B + C) 120

4) Total water requirement for the project: 120 KLD


6) Total fresh water requirement: 120 KLD



KLD

Remarks

(H) Domestic 4.0

(I) Industrial

Process 60.0

Washing 2.0

Boiler 2.0

73


Page 73 of 129

Cooling 1.0

Others 2.6

Total Industrial

waste water

67.6

Total [A + B] 71.6



In-house ETP consisting of Primary & Secondary Treatment facility @ 60 KL/Day &

In-house ETP consisting of Primary Treatment facility @ 5 KL/Day


Domestic: Domestic waste water (4.0 KL/Day) will be sent to Septic Tank & Soak

Pit.

Industrial: Out of 65 KL/Day Industrial effluent, 5 KL/Day High COD wastewater

will be sent to Common MEE of M/s. BEIL, Dahej after primary

treatment in ETP & 60 KL/Day Low COD will be sent to CETP of

Saykha after primary & secondary treatment in ETP for further

treatment & disposal.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE etc. ,

Name of CF

Common MEE Facility of M/s. BEIL, Dahej & CETP of Saykha



Common MEE Facility of M/s. BEIL, Dahej & CETP of Saykha


All figures are in KL/ Day.

74


Page 74 of 129


Total reuse: 0.0 KLD

Source of waste water

for reuse with

quantity in KLD

Application area

with quantity in

KLD

Remarks regarding feasibility to

reuse i.e. w/w characteristics

(COD, BOD, TDS etc.)

No Reuse/Recycle

E Air


No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA

etc.

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

Stack

Height

Type of

Fuel

Quantity

of Fuel

Type of

emissions

Air Pollution

Control Measures

75


Page 75 of 129

With

Capacity

(meter) MT/Day i.e. Air

Pollutants

(APCM)

1

Boiler

(Capacity:

1 TPH)

30 Briquettes

of Bio-

Coal/ Coal

5 MT/Day

/ 4

MT/Day

SPM

SO2

NOx

Multi-cyclone

Separator with Bag

Filter

2

Boiler

(Capacity:

2.0 TPH)

30 Briquettes

of Bio-

Coal/ Coal

10

MT/Day

/ 8

MT/Day

SPM

SO2

NOx

Multi-cyclone

separator with bag

filter

3

Thermic

fluid

heater

(Capacity:

4 Lakh

Kcal/ Hr)

30 Briquettes

of Bio-

Coal/ Coal

4 MT/Day

/ 3

MT/Day

SPM

SO2

NOx

Multi-cyclone

separator with bag

filter

4

Thermic

fluid

heater

(Capacity:

6 Lakh

Kcal/ Hr)

30 Briquettes

of Bio-

Coal

6 MT/Day SPM

SO2

NOx

Multi-cyclone

separator with bag

filter

5

D. G. Set

(250 KVA)

11 HSD 400

Lit/Day

SPM

SO2

NOx

Adequate Stack

Height


Sr.

no.

Specific Source of

emission

(Name of the

Product &

Process)

Type of

emission

Stack/Vent

Height

(meter)


Measures

(APCM)

1

Process Vent

(Chlorination)

(Product Name:

Cl2

HCl

11 Two Stage Water + Alkali

scrubber

76


Page 76 of 129

Rosuvastatin

Calcium)

2

Process Vent

(Sulphonation)

(Product Name:

Cetrizine

Dihydrochloride)

SO2 11 Two Stage Caustic scrubber

3

Process Vent

(Amination)

(Product Name:

Glimepride)

NH3

11 Two Stage Acid scrubber

4

Process Vent

(Bromination)

(Product Name:

Bromo OTBN)

HBr 11 Two Stage Water + Alkali

scrubber


As below:

• Enclosed Processed

• Minimum joints/flanges

• Auto handling for charging Raw Materials

• Pumps with double mechanical seals

• Proper Ventilation

• PPEs

F Hazardous wastes

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement)

Rules 2016.

i -

Sr.

no.

Type/

Name of

Hazardous

waste

Specific

Source of

generation

(Name of the

Activity,

Product etc.)

Category

and

Schedule

as per HW

Rules.

Quantit

y

(MT/

Annum)

Management of HW

77


Page 77 of 129

1 Discarded

HDPE

Drums/Bag

s

Raw Material

and Storage

Sch-I/

33.1

12 Collection, Storage,

Transportation and

sell to Register Re-

processors after

decontamination.

2 Used /

Spent Oil

Equipment &

Machinery

Sch-I/

5.1

120 Lit/

Year


Transportation and

sell to registered

recycler.

3 ETP

Sludge

ETP Sch-I/

35.3


Transportation and

sent to common TSDF

of M/s. SEPPL.

4 Distillation

Residue

Distillation Sch-I/

20.3


Transportation and

sent for co-processing

in cement industries or

sent to common

incineration of M/s.

SEPPL.

5 Spent

Carbon

Process

(Furosemide,

Benzbromarone

, Pregabaline)

Sch-I/

28.2


Transportation and



sent to common


SEPPL

6 Spent

Catalyst

Process

(Atorvastatin)

Sch-I/

28.3


Transportation and

sent to registered

regenerator.

7 Inorganic

Solid

Process

(Rabeprazole

Sch-I/

28.1


Transportation and

78


Page 78 of 129

Waste Sodium) sent to common TSDF

of M/s. SEPPL.

8 Organic

Waste

Process

(Rosuvastatin

Calcium)

Sch-I/

28.1


Transportation and



sent to common


SEPPL

9 Sodium

Chloride

Process

(Tenofovir

disoproxil

fumarate +

Amrodafinil)

Sch-I/

28.1


and sent to ETP.

10 Hydrochlori

c Acid (30

%)

Scrubber (312

MT + Process

(IF)(996 MT)

Sch-II/

B15

1308 Collection, Storage

and Reuse within

premises (For

manufacturing of

Polyallyamine

Hydrochloride (5000

TPA).

11 Potassium

Chloride

Process

(Benzarone)

Sch-I/

28.1

425


Transportation and

sold to end user

having permission

under rule-9.

12 Dil.

Sulphuric

Acid (80%)

Process

(Loratidine)

Sch-II/

B15

1550

13 Sodium

Bromide

(23%)

Process

(Albendazole)

Sch-II/

B36

564

14 Ammonium

Chloride

(30%)

Scrubber (115

TPA) + Process

(Lasamide)

(416 TPA)

Sch-II/

B15

528

79


Page 79 of 129

15 Sodium

Sulphite

(25%)

Scrubber Sch-II/

B36

60

16 Di

Potassium

Phosphate

Process

(Guanyl

Thiourea)

Sch-I/

28.1

420

17 Sodium

Hydroxide

Process

(Tenofovir

disoproxil

fumarate)

Sch-I/

28.1

1500

Collection, Storage

and Reuse within

premises (For

manufacturing of

Mesalmine (1704

TPA), Citrizine HCl

(724 TPA)).

18 Spent

Solvent

Process

(Zolpidic Acid,

Colistimethate

Sodium)

Sch-I/

28.6


in-house Distillation

and Reuse within

plant premises.

19 Off

Specificatio

n Products

From mfg.

Process

(Batch failure)

Sch-I/

28.4

10


Transportation and



Disposal at common

incineration site.

20 HBr (28%) Scrubber Sch-II/

B15


Transportation and

sold to end user

having permission

under rule-9.

21 NaBr

(23%)

Scrubber +

Process

Sch-II/

B15

180


(For HW management)

Membership of TSDF/ CHWIF will

be obtained.


(MSW and others)

No such wastes generate.


80


Page 80 of 129

• All the solvents shall be directly distilled from product mixes and; if required shall be

purified in packed column with the help of reflux and therefore there is no generation

of any distillation residue from the solvent distillation.

• The solvent distillation system shall be designed so as to achieve minimum 94.0 %

recovery of solvent.

• Pure solvent, crude solvent and distilled (recovered) solvent shall be stored only in

storage tanks and we shall not be using drums at any stage in the Solvent

Management System.

• Wherever required, the solvents shall be directly pumped into day tanks from the

storage tanks and shall be charged into the reactors without involving any manual

handling.

• All the pumps shall be mechanical seal type to avoid any leakage of solvent.

• All necessary fire fighting systems shall be provided with alarm system. Flame proof

wiring and flame proof electrical accessories shall be provided to avoid any mishap.

• All the storage tank and day tank shall be connected to a vent system through cooling

water and chilled brine condensers to prevent loss of solvents in the atmosphere.

• All the distillation column vents will be also connected to cooling water/chilled brine

condensers for maximum possible recovery of the solvents.

• All the vents will be connected to a common carbon Adsorber for removing traces of

solvent from vent gases.

• Residue generated from the distillation will be incinerated in-house or sent to BEIL

incinerator site.

• Coolant to be used

Primary Condensers Cooling Water

Secondary Condensers Chilled Brine up to -50C

i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery. reuse of recovered Solvents

LIST OF SOLVENTS ALONGWITH TOTAL RECOVERY

Name of Solvent

Total

Input

(Kg)

Qty. of

Recovered

Solvent

(Kg)

Qty. of

Losses

(Kg)

%

Recovery

%

Losses

Acetone 855 8150 407 95.24 4.76

81


Page 81 of 129

7

Butanol 117

0

1117 53

95.47 4.53

Dichloromethane 950

2

9075 427

95.50 4.5

Dimethylformamide 723 698 25 96.54 3.46

Ethanol 650 620 30 95.38 4.62

Hexane 528 505 23 95.64 4.36

Iso Propyl Alcohol 625

0

5997 253

95.95 4.05

Methanol 227

32

21766 966

95.75 4.25

Toluene 977

7

9295 482

95.07 4.93

Xylene 666

0

6432 228

96.58 3.42


• Enclosed Processed

• Minimum joints/flanges

• Adequate Condenser

• Brine will be utilised as chilling agent

• Pumps with double mechanical seals

• Proper Ventilation

• PPEs


• Committee noted that this proposal is new bulk drug unit in GIDC Saykha. Source of Water is GIDC.

Committee asked justification regarding capital project cost of proposed project with respect to size of

production plant, technical expert of PP could not explain satisfactorily. PP mentioned that effluent

generated from plant will be segregated in High COD and Low COD stream. High COD stream will be sent

to CMEE, Dahej while Low COD stream will be sent to CETP Saykha for further treatment and disposal.PP

informed that bio coal or coal will be used as fuel for boiler and MCS and bag filter as APCM will be provided

82


Page 82 of 129

with it. PP has addressed Hazardous Waste as per HWR – 2016.

• Considering the above project details, after detailed discussion, the terms of reference (ToR) were

prescribed as below and as per the standard TOR for the Synthetic Organic Chemical projects

recommended by SEAC vide letter no. EIA-10-GEN-21/1480 dated 14/09/2017 and approved by SEIAA

in its 12th meeting dated 16/09/2017 for the EIA study to be done covering 10 Km radial distance from

the project boundary.

1. Compliance of MoEF&CC’s OM dated 01/05/2018 regarding “Corporate Environment Responsibility”

(CER). Fund allocation for Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER) shall be made as per

MoEFCC’s O.M. No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 01/05/2018 for various activities therein. The details of

fund allocation and activities for CER shall be incorporated in EIA/EMP report.

2. Submit CA certificate for proposed capital project with mentioning land, plant machinery, utility,

building shed etc. cost and justification regarding proposed project cost with respect to size of bulk

drug unit.

3. Membership certificate of CETP Saykha with valid CCA order of CETP saykha.

4. Adequate safety measures for hydrogenation process

5. Explore the use of renewable energy to the maximum extent possible. Details of provisions to make

the project energy-efficient through energy efficient devices and adoption of modes of alternative eco-

friendly sources of energy like solar water heater, solar lighting etc. Measures proposed for energy

conservation.

6. Leak Detection and Repairing Programme (LDAR) for all the volatile organic solvent proposed for use

in-house with detailed chemical properties including vapor pressure. LDAR shall endeavor prevention

of losses of solvents to the best minimum extent.

7. Technical details of in-house solvent stripper for stripping solvent from process with stoichiometric

mass balance and solvent recovery.

8. Safety precautions including flame proof electric fittings to be taken to avoid fire hazard during

unloading, storage, transportation, handling and processing of Solvents etc.

9. Membership certificate of Common facility (Common Spray dryer, Common MEE, Common

Incinerator etc.) with booking quantity in KLD along with other details/information like Spare capacity

of Common Facility (CF), quality of waste water by member industry and assurance by CF that there

is no adverse impact on Environment and Human Health due to treatment of waste water received

from your industrial effluent.

10. PP shall furnish status of all the applicable Rules, Acts, Regulation, Clearances in a tabular form.

• The TOR prescribed as above and as per the standard TOR approved by SEIAA and the model ToRs

83


Page 83 of 129

available in the MoEF&CC’s sector specific EIA Manual for ‘Synthetic Organic Chemical Industry’ shall be

considered as generic TORs for preparation of the EIA report in addition to all the relevant information as

per the generic structure of EIA given in Appendix III in the EIA Notification, 2006.

• Further Project Proponent may be advised to submit final EIA Report with EC application within 100 days

from the date of issuance of this ToR to expedite processing of Environment Clearance application.

• The project proponent shall have to apply for Environmental clearance through online portal

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/along with final EIA report.

13 SIA/GJ/IND2/40919/2019

M/s. Perivinc Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Plot No.: 257, GIDC Estate, Hansalpur,

Viramgam, Ahmedabad

ToR - Reconsideration




29/08/2019 made by project proponent (PP) regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for preparation of

EIA/EMP report.


• This is an existing unit for chemical manufacturing and now proposes for expansion in manufacturing of new

synthetic organic chemicals tabulated as below:

Sr.

No.

Name of the

Products CAS.NO

Existing Proposed Total after

Expansion Uses

MT/Month MT/Month MT/Month

1 Herbal Extract

(Vinea Alkaloids) - 0.5 -0.5 0.0 -

2 Trihexy Phenidyl-

HCl 52-49-3 0.0 0.70 0.70

Pharmaceutical

formulation

3 Procyclidine-HCl 1508-76-5 0.0 0.40 0.40

4 Pantoprazole

Sodium 164579-32-2 0.0 2.8 2.8

5 Levosulpride 23672-07-3 0.0 1.834 1.834

84


Page 84 of 129

6 Bromhexine-HCl 611-75-6 0.0 1.5 1.5

Total 0.5 7.234 7.234

Unit will stop manufacturing of existing product after obtaining EC, CTE and CTO for proposed

products.




• Committee noted that the name of the Project is “SELF REGISTRATION” and asked PP to clarify about the

same. PP mentioned that they have made an error while applying the application and they will submit the

required documents for the name change/correction of the same.

• Committee noted that this proposal is for expansion. Unit is located at GIDC, Hansalpur. Unit has valid

CC&A. Unit has submitted Compliance of CC&A. PP ensured that there is no court case and public

complaint against this unit. Source of water is GIDC. PP mentioned that they will surrender existing products

hence all the effluent coming out from existing plant will be NIL. PP mentioned that effluent generated after

expansion from process, washing, cooling tower blow down & boiler blow down will be treated in in-house

primary ETP and treated effluent will be sent to Common Spray Drying Facility developed by M/s. Chhatral

Environmental Management System Pvt. Ltd for final treatment and disposal. Committee noted that PP has

not satisfactorily addressed water balance diagram and water consumption and generation table. PP has

proposed one standby D.G. Sets. Fuel used will be HSD. Committee noted that PP has not addressed

process stack considering the mass balance of product profile and have not incorporated any APCM for the

same. Committee also noted that PP has not addressed Bleed Liquor in Hazardous Waste which will be

coming out of process stack.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to consider the proposal only after satisfactory submission of the

following details.

1. Revised Water Balance Diagram Considering Expansion scenario and addressing the Water

Consumption & Generation Table Considering the Same.

2. Addressing the Process Stack Considering the Expansion in Product Profile along with its APCM.

3. Revised Hazardous Waste Matrix Considering Bleed Liquor from APCM of Process Stack and Sound

Management of the Same.

4. Authenticated Documents for change of name of Project from “Self Registration” to “Perivinc

Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd”.

85


Page 85 of 129


mentioned points.


1. Revised Water Balance Diagram Considering Expansion scenario and addressing the Water

Consumption & Generation Table Considering the Same submitted.

2. Addressing the Process Stack Considerig the Expansion in Product Profile along with its APCM

submitted.

3. Revised Hazardous Waste Matrix Considering Bleed Liquor from APCM of Process Stack and Sound

Management of the Same submitted.

4. Authenticated Documents for change of name of Project from “Self Registration” to “Perivinc

Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd” submitted.


Sr.

no.

Particulars Details


(Rs. in Crores):

Proposed: Approx Rs. 1.4 Crores

B Total Plot area (sq. meter)

2248.5 Sq.m

Green belt area

( sq. meter)

744 Sq. m


Proposed: 25 people

D Water

i



GIDC water supply

Status of permission from the concern authority. Required permission obtained


Sr.

No

.

Source

Existing

Water

Consumptio

n as per CTO

Change/

Reduction/

Addition in Water

Consumption

Quantity of

water

Consumption

for Proposed

Total Quantity of

Water

Consumption

after Proposed

86


Page 86 of 129

due to Proposed

API

Products

API products Expansion

1. Domestic 3 .0 Nil 0 3 .0

2. Gardenin

g - -- 2.5 2.5

3. Industrial

A.

Process 14.0 -13.4* 0.6 0.6

B. Boiler 5.0 -3.0* 2.0 2.0

C.

Washin

g

3.0 -1.0 * 2.0 2.0

D. Cooling 0.0 +2.0 2.0 2.0

E. APCM 0.0 +0.2 0.2 0.2

Total

Industrial 22.0 -15.2 6.8 6.8

Total

(Domestic +

Industrial)

25.0 -- -- 12.3

Unit will stop manufacturing of existing product after obtaining EC, CTE, CTO for proposed

products. Therefore,

* After the proposed expansion, there will be

1. reduction of water consumption in process from 14.0 KLD to 0.6 KLD (reduction of 13.4

KLD)

2. reduction of water consumption in boiler from 5.0 KLD to 2.0 KLD (reduction of 3.0 KLD)

3.reduction of water consumption in washing from 3.0 KLD to 2.0 KLD (reduction of 1.0 KLD)

Total water requirement for the project: 12.3 KLD

Quantity to be recycled: 0 KLD

Total fresh water requirement: 12.3 KLD

87


Page 87 of 129


Sr.

No.

Source

Existing

Waste

Water

Generation

as per CTO

Change/

Reduction/A

ddition in

Waste Water

Generation

due to

Proposed

API

Products

Quantity of

Waste

Water

Generation

for

Proposed

API

products

Total Quantity

of Waste Water

Generation after

Proposed

Expansion

1. Domestic 2.5 Nil 0 2.5

2. Gardening - - - -

3. Industrial

A. Process 3.0 - 1.7* 1.3 1.3

B. Boiler 0.5 -0.2 * 0.3 0.3

C. Washing 3.0 -1.0 * 2.0 2.0

D. Cooling 0.0 + 0.3 0.3 0.3

E. APCM 0.0 + 0.2 0.2 0.2

Total Industrial 6.5 -2.4 4.1 4.1

Total

(Domestic + Industrial) 9.0 - - 6.6

* After the proposed expansion, there will be

1.reduction of Wastewater generation in process from 3.0 KLD to 1.3 KLD (reduction of 1.7

KLD)

2.reduction of Wastewater generation in boiler from 0.5 KLD to 0.3 KLD (reduction of 0.2 KLD)

3.reduction of Wastewater generation in washing from 3.0 KLD to 2.0 KLD (reduction of 1.0

KLD)



88


Page 88 of 129

ETP: 10 KLD, Stripper: 0.5 KL/hr


Domestic:

2.5 KLD Septic Tank/soak pit system

Industrial:

4.1 KLD Treated effluent will be sent to Common

Spray Drying Facility developed by M/s. Chhatral

Environmental Management System Pvt. Ltd.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE etc. , Name

of CF

Unit has already obtained membership for disposal of treated effluent at Common Spray

Drying Facility developed by M/s. Chhatral Environmental Management System Pvt. Ltd.



Obtained


89


Page 89 of 129


Total reuse: Nil

E Air



Sr

.

N

o.

Stack

Attached

to

Type of Fuel &

Rate of Consumption Stack

Heigh

t (m)

APC

M

Parameter &

Permissible

Limit

Existing Proposed

after

expansion

1

Steam

Boiler

(1 No.)

Wood –

200

Kg/day

Agro waste

Briquettes –

800 Kg/day

32 Bag

Filter

PM < 150

mg/Nm3

SO2< 100 ppm

NOx< 50 ppm

Proposed

*0.7 KLD generated

from manufacturing

process

90


Page 90 of 129

Sr.

No

.

Stack

Attached to

Type of Fuel

&

Rate of

Consumption

Stack

Height

(m)

APCM

Parameter &

Permissible

Limit

2

D.G Set -

1 Cap.

250 KVA

HSD: 10

lit/hr 12

Acousti

c

Enclos

ure

PM < 150

mg/Nm3

SO2< 100

ppm

NOx< 50 ppm


Existing: There is no process emission from the production of existing product.

Proposed:

Sr.

No.

Stack Attached

To

Stack

Height (m)

Air

Pollution

Control

System

Parameter Emission

1. Reaction

Vessel 15 m

Water

Scrubber HCl <20mg/Nm3

2.

Solvent Storage

Area & Process

Area

(Common)

8 meter

Packed

Carbon

Column

VOC --

ii

i

Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.

As below:

� Regular sprinkling of water is carried out & green belt is provided within premises to prevent

fugitive emissions due to vehicular movement. Regular maintenance of vehicles.

� Management to ensure proper handling of the spillages during transfer, charging operation

and provision of a Dust Collection System for collection of the air borne material wherever

applicable.

� Preventive maintenance of flange connections and glands of pumps.

91


Page 91 of 129

� Management will also ensure proper usage of the Personnel Protective Equipment by the

workers.

� Closed handling system shall be provided for chemicals.

� Reflux condenser to be provided over the reactor.

� The raw materials shall be taken from storage tanks to reactor through closed pipeline.

Storage tanks shall be vented through trap receiver

� Fugitive emissions in the work zone environment, product raw material storage area will be

monitored regularly.

-

F Hazardous wastes

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules

2016.

i

Sr.

No.

Type of

Waste Source

Categor

y

Existing

Hazardous

waste

Generation

Change/

Reduction

/ Addition

in

Quantity

of Haz.

Waste

Generatio

n

due to

Proposed

API

Products

Quantity of

Haz. Waste

Generation

for Proposed

API products

Total

Quantity

after

Proposed

Expansion

Mode

of Disposal

1. Used Oil

Plant

Machineri

es

5.1 0.5

MT/YEAR Nil

0.5

MT/YEAR

0.5

MT/year

Collection,

Storage ,

Transportat

ion , Reuse

and/or

Disposal

by selling

92


Page 92 of 129

to

Registered

Re-refiners

2.

Empty Barrels

Glass Bottle

Liners,

Containers

Storage of

Raw

Materials

and

Products

33.1 2.28

MT/YEAR

+ 3.72

MT/Year

6.0

MT/Year

6.0

MT/Year

Collection,

Storage,

Decontami

nation,

transportati

on,

disposal by

selling to

authorized

recycler.

3.

Process

Wastes,

Residues &

Wastes

Manufactu

ring of

existing

product

21.1 29.5

MT/Year

- 29.5

MT/Year Nil Nil ---

4. Spent Solvent

From

Manufactu

ring

process

26.4 540

MT/Year

+ 195.84

MT/Year

735.84

MT/Year

735.84

MT/Year

Collection

and

Distillation

in-

house/reco

very &

reused

5. Distillation

residue

Solvent

Recovery

26.3 Nil 6.0

MT/Year

6.0

MT/Year

6.0

MT/Year

Collection,

Storage,

Transportat

ion,

Disposal

by co-

processing

or

93


Page 93 of 129

Incineratio

n

6.

Chemical

Sludge from

wastewater

treatment

From

Effluent

Treatment

Plant

35.3 9.36

MT/Year

- 4.36

MT/Year

5.0

MT/ Year

5.0

MT/ Year

Collection,

Storage,

transportati

on and

disposal at

any

registered

TSDF site.

7.

Spent Acid

(HCl)

Scrubber

From

APCM Sch.II Nil Nil 70 MT/Year 70 MT/Year

Collection,

Storage, &

disposal by

sending to

ETP for

treatment

and finally

at common

Spray

drying

facility ,

Chhatral


(For HW management)

Will be obtained before

going for production

ii

i

Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal

(MSW and others)

--



Name of

Product

Reacti

on

Stage

Name of

Solvent

Input Recovery %

Recovery

Machiner

y End

Use Kg/

Mont

Kg/

Month Used

94


Page 94 of 129

h

Trihexy

Phenidyl-HCl

I & II Methanol 2870 2660 92.68% Separate

distillation

Col. With

Reactor

Re

used

in

next

batch

II Toluene& THF 3500 1645 94.00%

Procyclidine-

HCL

I & II Methanol 2050 1900 92.68%

II Toluene& THF 2500 2350 94.00%

Pantoprazole

Sodium

I Methanol 8800 8160 92.73%

II Acetone 9600 8920 92.92%

III Acetone 1120

0 10560 94.29%

Levosulpride I

Ethylene

Glycol 3850 3696 96.00%

Methanol 1155

0 10850 93.94%

Bromhexine-

HCL I Methanol 5400 5040 93.33%


� Breather valves will be provided on solvent tanks.

� To eliminate chances of leakages from glands of pumps, mechanical seal will be provided at

all solvent pumps.

� Entire process will be carried out in the closed reactors with proper maintenance of pressure

and temperature.

� Periodic monitoring of work area will be carried out to check the VOC emission.

Solvent recovery system will be provided with chilled water condenser system

• During SEAC meeting dated 03/10/2019, Committee asked for revised product profile, technical expert of

PP informed that they have submitted revised proposal and product profile as expansion project with

subsequent details of water, air and Hazardous waste as expansion project.PP informed that they will stop

production of existing plant after getting EC and CTE of the Board for proposed expansion project.

Committee asked about existing plant CCA status, PP informed that they have valid CCA of the Board for

existing plant.

• Committee deliberated on revised water balance diagram, air matrix and Hazardous waste matrix

considering bleed liquor disposal and ETP sludge generation quantity. Committee deliberated on

wastewater management and its disposal and PP informed that after primary treatment, treated waste water

will be disposed into common spray dryer of M/s Chhatral Environment management system pvt. Ltd,

95


Page 95 of 129

Chhatral. Committee asked about online status of unit showing name of unit as self registration, PP informed

that name change of self registration to M/s Perivinc Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd is not edited by them.



recommended by SEAC vide letter no. EIA-10-GEN-21/1480 dated 14/09/2017 and approved by SEIAA in

its 12th meeting dated 16/09/2017 for the EIA study to be done covering 10 Km radial distance from the

project boundary.

1. Unit shall discontinue production of existing product after getting CTE and EC for proposed

expansion.






measures for common/ captive infrastructure due to proposed production.

3. Compliance of MoEFCC’s OM dated 01/05/2018 regarding “Corporate Environment Responsibility”




4. Submit end use of each proposed bulk drug products instead of simply showing use in

pharmaceutical formulation units.




conservation.




7. Technical details of in-house stripper for stripping solvent from effluent with stoichiometric mass

balance and solvent recovery.




96


Page 96 of 129





10. Submit status of compliance of Environmental norms of existing Common Infrastructure of M/s:

Chhatral Environment management system pvt. Ltd, Chhatral.










14 SIA/GJ/IND2/40968/2019

M/s. ParasPharmaChem

Plot No. C-235, GIDC Industrial Estate,

Saykha, Ta--Vagra, Dist -Bharuch

ToR – Reconsideration


Project status: New



EIA/EMP report.


• This is a new unit proposes for manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated as below:

Sr.

No

Product Name CAS No. Proposed

Quantity

(MT/Month)

End Use Of Product

1. 1,3 DICHLORO DIMETHYL 112-36-7 Pharma & Water Treatment

97


Page 97 of 129

HYDANTOIN

750

2. 1,3 Dibromo-5,5- Dimethyl

Hydantion

77-48-5 Pharma Industries

3. 5,5 Dimethyl Hydantion 77-71-4 Pharma Industries

4. 2,2-Azobisisobutyronitrile 78-67-1 Pharma, Polymer,Paint

5. Benzoyl Peroxide 94-36-0 Paint & Polymer Industries

6. MEK Peroxide 1338-23-4 Paint & Polymer Industries

7. LABSA 27176-87-0 Use In Detergents Industries

8. Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) 80-62-6 Acrylic Resin, Paint & Plastic

Industries

9. Acrylic Emulsion 25067-01-0 Textile , Paper & Leather

Industries,

10. VAM Emulsion 108-05-4 Textile, Paint Industries

11. Sodium Hypochlorite 7681-52-9

350

Textile & Paper Bleaching

12 Calcium Chloride 7440-70-2 Paint & Dyes Industries

13 Benzalkonium Chloride (BKC-50) 8001-54-5 Clinical Products

14 Benzalkonium Chloride (BKC-80) 8001-54-5 Clinical Products

15 Amine Oxides 1643-20-5 Clinical Products

16 Pearl Essence 8039-79-0 Used in Paint and Plastic

Industries

17 Cobalt Octate 13586-82-8 Paint & FRP Plastic Industries

18 TRO Turky Red Oil 8002-33-3 Antifoaming Agent & Textile

Industries

19 Coco Diethanolamide 68603-42-9 Cosmetic & Toiletries

20 Solvent Based Paints ---- Use in Wooden,Metal,

Household & Industrial Use

TOTAL: 1100




• Committee noted that this proposal is new in GIDC Saykha. Source of Water is GIDC. Committee noted that

PP has addressed product profile considering end-use of some products in pesticides industry and asked

98


Page 98 of 129

PP to clarify the same, PP mentioned that they will submit revised product profile considering the same. PP

mentioned that effluent generated from process, washing will be treated in in-house ETP consisting of

Primary, Secondary & Tertiary treatment followed by RO, while effluent generated boiler blow down, cooling

tower blow down will be directly treated in RO. PP mentioned that RO – Permeate will be mixed with fresh

water and reused/recycled back while RO – Reject will be fed to Single Stage Evaporator, Condensate from

Evaporator will be reused back in utility while residue/salt will be disposed at approved TSDF.Committee

noted that treatment characteristic proposed by PP is not satisfactory. PP has proposed two Steam Boiler&

one Thermic Fluid Heater. Fuel used will be Briquette of Bio-Coal/Coal. PP has addressed Hazardous

Waste as per HWR – 2016.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to consider the proposal only after satisfactory submission of the

following documents:

1. Revised Product Profile eliminating the end-use of Products pertaining to Pesticides & Pesticides

Specific Intermediates (Address Water Balance Diagram, Consumption & Generation Details along

with Flue Gas Stack & Process Stack, Hazardous Waste Details).

2. Properly Addressing Characteristic of Waste Water Based on Treatment Technology with Technical

Justification for % Reduction of Load (pH, COD, BOD, SS).

3. Technical Justification for use of Single Stage Evaporator Instead of Multiple Effect Evaporator

Considering the Product Profile and Characteristic of Waste Water to be generated.


mentioned points.


1. Revised Product Profile eliminating the end-use of Products pertaining to Pesticides & Pesticides

Specific Intermediates (Address Water Balance Diagram, Consumption & Generation Details along

with Flue Gas Stack & Process Stack, Hazardous Waste Details) submitted.

2. Properly Addressing Characteristic of Waste Water Based on Treatment Technology with Technical

Justification for % Reduction of Load (pH, COD, BOD, SS).submitted

3. Technical Justification for use of Single Stage Evaporator Instead of Multiple Effect Evaporator

Considering the Product Profile and Characteristic of Waste Water to be generated submitted

• Revised product profile with mentioning end use of product submitted as above and Salient features of the

project including Water, Air and Hazardous waste management (Revised):

Sr.

no.

Particulars Details

99


Page 99 of 129

A


(Rs. in Crores):

9.50 Crores

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter) 8304.338 Sq. m.

Green belt area ( sq. meter) 2689.11 Sq. m.

C Employment generation 80

D Water

i


(GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply, etc...)

GIDC Water Supply

Status of permission from the concern authority. Unit has obtained the permission

letter from GIDC.

Ref No:GIDC/EE(W/D)/BRH/585


Category

Quantity

KLD

Remarks

(Q) Domestic 3.0

(R) Gardening 10.0

(S) Industrial

Process 37.0

Washing 30.0

Boiler 9.5

Cooling 8.5

Scrubber 2.0


Total (A + B + C) 100.0

1) Total water requirement for the project: 100 KLD





KLD

Remarks

(J) Domestic 2.0

100


Page 100 of 129

(K) Industrial

Process 40.0 Stream-I: Low COD &

TDS: 69 KLD

Washing 29.0

Boiler 1.0 Stream-II:Utilites: 2 KLD

Cooling 1.0

Scrubber 2.795 Reuse and sell end users

having permission under

rule-9

Total Industrial waste

water

73.795

Total [A + B + C] 75.795

-

Iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity


� ETP (Primary,Secondary& Tertiary): 69 KLD


� Total 75.795 KL/Day (73.795 KL/Day: Industrial + 2.0 KL/Day: Domestic) of effluent shall be

generated.

� Stream-I: 69 KL/day low COD & TDS stream (from process & Washing) will be treated in ETP

giving primary, secondary & Tertiary treatment then sent to CETP Saykha for further treatment.

� Stream-II: 2 KL/day utilities stream (from Boiler, cooling) will be send to RO And then RO

reject will be sent to ETP And RO permeate shall be reuse/recycle in boiler or cooling.

� 2.795 KL/Day Scrubbing water Will be reused or sold to end users having permission under

Rule-9.




CETP.

� Treated effluent in ETP giving primary, secondary & Tertiary treatment then sent to CETP

Saykha for further treatment.

� Reference no of CETP letter: GIDC/BRH/DEF(DRG)/326 dated 10/06/2019

101


Page 101 of 129


Domestic: Domestic waste water (2.0 KL/day) will be disposed by septic tank

or soak pit system

Industrial: � Stream-I: 69 KL/day low COD & TDS stream (from process &

Washing) will be treated in ETP giving primary, secondary &

Tertiary treatment then sent to CETP Saykha for further

treatment.

� Stream-II: 2 KL/day utilities stream (from Boiler, cooling) will be

send to RO And then RO reject(0.3 KL/day) will be sent to ETP

And RO permeate(1.7 KL/day) shall be reuse/recycle in boiler

or cooling.

� 2.795 KL/Day Scrubbing water Will be reused or sold to end

users having permission under Rule-9.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE etc. Name of

CF

� CETP Saykha

� Reference no of CETP letter: GIDC/BRH/DEF(DRG)/326 dated 10/06/2019


102


Page 102 of 129


Total reuse: 1.7 KLD

Source of waste

water for reuse

with quantity in

KLD (From where

it is coming)

Application

area with

quantity in

KLD (Where it

is used)

Characteristics of

waste water to be

reused (COD, BOD,

TDS etc.)

Remarks

regarding

feasibility

to reuse i.e.

RO Permeate: 1.7

KLD

Boiler &

Cooling:1.7

COD: 50 mg/l

BOD: 25 mg/l

103


Page 103 of 129

KLD TDS: 80 mg/l

E Air



-

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

With

Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type of

Fuel

Quantity

of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of

emissions

i.e. Air

Pollutants

Air Pollution

Control Measures

(APCM)

1

Boiler

(Capacity:

500

KG/PH)

18 Briquettes

of Bio-

Coal/ Coal

1 MT/Day

/ 0.8

MT/Day

SPM

SO2

NOx

Multi-cyclone

Separator with Bag

Filter

2

Boiler

(Capacity:

1 TPH)

18 Briquettes

of Bio-

Coal/ Coal

5 MT/Day

/ 4

MT/Day

SPM

SO2

NOx

Multi-cyclone

separator with bag

filter

3

Thermic

fluid heater

(Capacity:

1 Lakh

Kcal/ Hr)

18 Briquettes

of Bio-

Coal/ Coal

4 MT/Day

/ 3

MT/Day

SPM

SO2

NOx

Multi-cyclone

separator with bag

filter

4

D. G. Set

(125 KVA)

11 HSD 300

Lit/Day

SPM

SO2

NOx

Adequate Stack

Height

5

D. G. Set

(125 KVA)

11 HSD 300

Lit/Day

SPM

SO2

NOx

Adequate Stack

Height

104


Page 104 of 129

-

ii Process gas emission details i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

Sr.

no.

Specific Source of

emission

(Name of the

Product & Process)

Type of

emission

Stack/Vent

Height

(meter)


Measures

(APCM)

1

Process Vent

(Chlorination)

(Product Name: AIBN,

DDH, DCDH)

Cl2

HCl

11 Two Stage Water + Caustic

Scrubber

2

Process Vent

(Sulphonation)

(Product Name: MMA

and LABSA)

SO2 11 Two Stage Caustic scrubber

3

Process Vent

(Ammoniation)

(Product Name: DMH)

NH3

11 Two Stage Acid scrubber


As below:

Following measures will be adopted to prevent and control fugitive emissions:

1. Airborne dust at all transfers operations/ points will be controlled either by spraying water or

providing enclosures.

2. Adequate ventilation will be provided.

3. Regular maintenance of valves, pumps, flanges, joints and other equipment will be done to

prevent leakages and thus minimizing the fugitive emissions.

4. Entire process will be carried out in the closed reactors with proper maintenance of pressure

and temperature.

5. Periodic monitoring of work area will be carried out to check the fugitive emission.

6. Stand by pumps will be provided on all scrubbers. Besides, scrubbers will be equipped with

on-line pH meter with hooter system for better operational control.

7. Close feeding system will be provided for centrifuges. Centrifuge and filtrate tank vents will

be connected to vent chillers.

105


Page 105 of 129

8. Minimum number of flanges, joints and valves in pipelines.

9. Regular inspection of floating roof seals and proper preventive maintenance of roofs and

seals for tanks.

10. Fugitive emission over reactors, formulation areas, centrifuges, chemical loading,

transfer area will be collected through hoods and ducts by induced draft and controlled by

scrubber/ dust collector.

11. Dedicated scrubber will be provided are used for fugitive emissions to control.

12. For dust emissions bag filter will be provided.

13. Enclosures to chemical storage area, collection of emission from loading of raw

materials in particular solvents through hoods and ducts by induced draft, and control by

scrubber / dust collector to be ensured.

F Hazardous wastes


2016.

i Sr.

no.

Type/Name of

Hazardous waste

Specific

Source of

generation

(Name of the

Activity,

Product etc.)

Category

&

Schedule

as per HW

Rules.

Quantity

(MT/

Annum)

Management of HW

1 Discarded

Drums/Bags

Raw

Material and

Storage

Sch-I/

33.1


Transportation and sell

to Register Re-

processors after

decontamination.

2 Used / Spent Oil Equipment

& Machinery

Sch-I/

5.1

200 Lit/

Year


Transportation and sell

to registered recycler.

3 ETP Sludge ETP Sch-I/

35.3


Transportation and sent

to common TSDF of M/s.

BEIL.

106


Page 106 of 129

4 Distillation

Residue

Distillation Sch-I/

20.3

100.68 Collection, Storage,


for co-processing in

cement industries or sent

to common incineration

site,BEIL Dahej.

5 Spent Catalyst Process

(Product

No:9,10)

Sch-I/

28.3


Transportation and

sent to registered

regenerator under Rule-

9 permission.

6 HCl (10%) Scrubber SCH-

1/26.1

263 Collection, Storage &

210 MT/Month (2520

MT/year)will be reused

within premises in the

manufacturing of Calcium

Chloride.

7 NaOCl (12%) Scrubber SCH-

1/26.1

270 Collection, Storage &

convert to product and

than sell as main product.

8 Sodium Sulphite

(25%)

Scrubber Sch-II/

B36

316.8


Transportation and sold

to end user having

permission under rule-9. 9 Spent Sulphuric

Acid (50%)

Process

(Product

No:7,8)

Sch-I/

26.3

2529

10 Ammonium

sulphate (15%)

Scrubber

Sch-II/

B15

1350

11 Ammonium

bisulphate (50%)

Process

(Product

No:8)

Sch-I/

26.3

1350

107


Page 107 of 129

12 Spent Solvent Process

(Product

No;17)

Sch-I/

28.6

3045


Distillation and Reuse

within premises.

13. Off Specification

Products

From mfg.

Process

(Batch

failure)

Sch-I/

28.4

20



for co-processing in

cement industries or

Disposal at common

incineration site,BEIL

Dahej.

-


(For HW management)

Unit has membership of

CETP,Saykha

Ref. No: BEIL/ANK/2019

dated13/09/2019


(MSW and others)

There will be no generation of

Non-Hazardous waste.


i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery, reuse of recovered Solvents etc.

(Details in Table Format)

Only one solvent is Used in process. Other Solvent is to be used as reactant.

Solvent

Boiling

Point

(0C)

Vapor

Pressure

Inpu

t

(MT/

mon

th)

Outpu

t

(MT/m

onth)

Loss %

Recovery

%

Loss

Toluene 110.6°C

3.8 kPa

(@

25°C)

420 400 39 95.25 1.85


During operation stage, leakage through valves/pumps, leakage and emission from open

drum containing chemicals, open feeding, storage tanks, etc. will be major sources of fugitive

108


Page 108 of 129

emissions and VOCs. Excess use of solvent/s may also results fugitive emission from the

process vessels.

• Solid raw material charging will be done through closed system.

• Entire process will be carried out in the closed reactors with proper maintenance of

pressure and temperature.

• Close feeding system will be provided for centrifuges. Centrifuge and filtrate tank vents

will be connected to vent chillers.

• Fugitive emission over reactors, formulation areas, centrifuges, chemical loading,

transfer area, will be collected through hoods and ducts by induced draft and controlled

by scrubber/dust collector.

• Emphasis will be given to solvent management/solvent loss prevention.

• Control by having proper scrubbing system.

• Condenser to trap VOC.

• Enclosures to chemical storage area, collection of emission from loading of raw

materials in particular solvents through hoods and ducts by induced draft, and control

by scrubber/dust collector to be ensured.

• Proper maintenance schedule will be adhered to avoid emissions through flange joints,

pump seals etc.

• Minimum number of flanges, joints and valves in pipelines.

• Proper gland packing will be maintained for pumps and valves and to the extent

possible pumps with mechanical seal.

• All the raw materials will be pneumatically transfer to the reactor.

• All rotating equipments like pumps will be installed with mechanical seals to arrest any

sort of emissions.

• A regular preventive maintenance schedule will be in place to replace or rectify all

gaskets and joints etc. as a part of ISO systems to ensure no fugitive emissions take

place.

• Periodic monitoring of work area will be carried out to check the fugitive emission.

• Solvent tank vents will be connected to vent chillers.

• Adequate ventilation will be provided.

• Airborne dust at all transfers operations/ points will be controlled either by spraying

water or providing enclosures.

109


Page 109 of 129

• Breather valves will be provided on solvent tanks.


Storage details Name of major Hazardous chemicals Remarks

Storage tanks

Acetone cynohydrin, Benzoyl

Chloride,Hydrochloric Acid,Sulphuric

Acid , Methanol or Toluene

Drum/Barrel storage

Liquid Ammonia, Hydrazine Hydrate,

Hydrogen peroxide, Dibuthyl Phthalate,

Acetone,IPA, Diethylamine, 2-

Ethylhexanoic acid

Cylinder,Bottle or

Tonner

Bromine and Chlorine

� Applicability of PESO: If Applicable, company will take permission.

• During the meeting dated 03/10/2019, technical presentation made by the Project proponent. Committee

asked about query reply regarding product profile change and end use of product, technical expert of PP

informed that there is no change in product profile and only change is in end use of product mentioning other

than pesticide.

• Committee noted that this proposal is new unit in GIDC Saykha. Source of Water is GIDC. Committee asked

waste water management, PP informed that total industrial effluent process and washing will be treated in

primary,secondary and tertiary ETP units and treated effluent alongwith utility effluent will be further treated

in RO plant.RO permeate will be reused back in process while RO reject will be evaporated in single stage

evaporator. Committee asked for adequacy of in-house single stage evaporator and drastic reduction of

COD in ETP units, PP could not explain during meeting .Committee asked for submit third party NABL

accredited academic institute report regarding adequacy of ETP and RO and single stage evaporator. PP

mentioned that MCS and bag filter will be as APCM with boiler and thermopack separately. PPhas

addressed revised Hazardous waste generation and its disposal details.






1. Unit shall submit Notarized undertaking regarding end use of proposed products areother than

110


Page 110 of 129

pesticide and its intermediate.

2. Compliance of MoEF&CC’s OM dated 01/05/2018 regarding “Corporate Environment Responsibility”




3. Submit third party NABL accredited recognized academic institute report regarding adequacy of ETP,

RO plant and single stage evaporator with stage wise reduction of pollutants like BOD, COD, TDS

etc.

4. Submit Membership certificate of CETP Saykha with valid CCA order of CETP saykha at a time of

appraisal.




conservation.















15. SIA/GJ/IND2/40220/2019

M/s. Industrial Chemical Work

Plot no. B-1/1+2+3, Phase – II, GIDC

Naroda, Ahmedabad



111


Page 111 of 129




EIA/EMP report.


• This is an expansion unit proposes for manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals tabulated as below:


SR.

NO PRODUCT NAME

CI Name/

CAS No.

Existing

MT/Month

Proposed

MT/Month

Total

Proposed

MT/Month

1 Para Amino Azo Benzene 4-sulfonic

Acid (PAAB4SA) 104-23-4 5.0 65.0 70

2 Ortho Anisidine para sulphonic Acid 98-42-0 1.0 NIL 1.0

3 4 Amino Di phenyl Amine 2 sulfonic

Acid 101-54-2 5.0 15.0 20.0

4 Para Nitro Toluene Ortho Sulfonic

Acid (PNTOSA) - NIL 70 70

5 Direct Dyes

- NIL 60 60

Direct Black 22

Direct Black 80

Direct Black 168

Direct Red 23

Direct Red 80

Direct Red 81

Direct Yellow 147

Direct Red 239

Direct Orange 39

Direct Red 153

Direct Red 152

Direct Red 154

TOTAL 11 210 221

112


Page 112 of 129



• Committee noted that this proposal is for expansion. Unit is located at GIDC, Naroda. Unit has valid CC&A.

Unit has submitted Compliance of CC&A. PP ensured that there is no court case and public complaint

against this unit. Source of water is GIDC. Committee noted that expansion is @ 22 times than the current

capacity and told the project proponent/expert consultant to revise the proposal and come again for the

presentation considering existing capacity.

• After detailed discussion, it was decided to defer the proposal and call the project proponent with revised

proposal considering existing production capacity.

• PP submitted revised application with considering existing production capacity and its presentation for

meeting dated 03/10/2019.

• This case was reconsidered in meeting dated 03/10/2019.

• PP submitted revised product profile as above and salient features of water , air and Hazardous waste

management as below(Revised):

Sr.

no. Particulars Details


(Rs. in Crores):

Existing: 0.60Cr.

Proposed: 4.30Cr.

Total: 4.9Cr.

B Total Plot area

( sq. meter)

Existing:4581Sq. m.

Proposed: NIL

Green belt area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 200 Sq. m.

Proposed: 200 Sq. m.

Total: 400 Sq. m.

C Employment generation Existing: 10

Proposed: 17

Total: 27

D Water

i



GIDC Naroda

113


Page 113 of 129

Status of permission from the concern authority


Sr

No Category

Water Consumption In KLD

Existing Additional Total

1. Domestic Purpose 0.5 1.5 2.0

2.

INDUSTRIAL

Mfg. Process Water 11.0 14.0 25.0

Washing 9.0 NIL 9.0

Boiler 1.0 19.0 20.0

Cooling 1.0 4.0 5.0

Total water Consumption ( Domestic) 0.5 1.5 2.0

Total water Consumption (Industrial ) 22.0 37.0 59.0


2) Quantity to be recycle: Nil

3) Total fresh water requirement: 61.0KLD


Sr

No Category

Waste Water Generation In KLD

Existing Additional Total

1. Domestic Purpose 0.5 1.5 2.0

2.

INDUSTRIAL

Mfg. Process 6.0 41.0 47.0

Washing 9.0 NIL 9.0

Boiler 1.0 2.0 3.0

Cooling 1.0 1.0 2.0

Total Waste water Generation

( Domestic) 0.5 1.5 2.0

Total Waste water generation

(Industrial ) 17.0 44.0 61.0

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity [For existing and Proposed]


Existing Low Concentration Effluent Treatment Plant

114


Page 114 of 129

Sr.

No. Name of Unit Capacity

1 Collection Tank 16.50 KL

2 Neutralization Tank 9.50 KL

3 Filter Press -

4 Primary Settling Tank 34.0 KL

5 Aeration Tank 32.0 KL

6 Secondary Settling Tank 15.0 KL

7 Filter Nutch -

8 Holding Tank 12.0 KL

9 Activated Carbon 5.0 KL

10 Sand Filter 2.0 KL

Proposed Dilute Stream Effluent Treatment Plant

Sr.


1 Collection Tank 16.50 KL

2 Neutralization Tank 9.50 KL

3 Filter Press -

4 Activated Carbon 5.0 KL

5 Sand Filter 2.0 KL

High Concentration Effluent Treatment Plant

Sr.


1 Collection cum Neutralization Tank 35 KL

2 Filter Press -

3 Holding Tank -2 Nos. 35 KL each


• Existing Low Concentration Effluent Treatment Plant

555th meeting of SEAC

• Proposed Dilute Steam Effluent Treatment Plant

• High Concentration Effluent Treatment Plant




CETP.

• Total industrial 61.0 KLD Waste Water Generation from Manufacturing Process and Other

Ancillary Operation.

• Low Concentrated Waste Water Treated in Primary, secondary ETP Plant and then

Treated Water Final Discharge though 5 KLD CETP Naroda (NEPL).

• High Concentrated Effluent @ 56.00 KLD including washing stream will be discharge

through Common Facility @ 28.00 KLD and remaining 28.0 KLD Water in house Spray

dryer for the Evaporation.


• Not applicable

Collection Tank

Neutralization Tank

Filter NutchHolding

Tank

Collection Tank Neutralization

Tank

meeting of SEAC-Gujarat, dated 03.10.2019

Page 115 of 129

Proposed Dilute Steam Effluent Treatment Plant

High Concentration Effluent Treatment Plant


ste water keeping in view direction under section 18 (1) (b) of the Water


Total industrial 61.0 KLD Waste Water Generation from Manufacturing Process and Other

Low Concentrated Waste Water Treated in Primary, secondary ETP Plant and then


High Concentrated Effluent @ 56.00 KLD including washing stream will be discharge

on Facility @ 28.00 KLD and remaining 28.0 KLD Water in house Spray



Filter PressPrimary Settling

Tank

Aeration Tank

Activated Carbon

Sand Filter Final

Collection Tank

Neutralization Tank

Activated Carbon

Sand Filter

115

ste water keeping in view direction under section 18 (1) (b) of the Water


Total industrial 61.0 KLD Waste Water Generation from Manufacturing Process and Other

Low Concentrated Waste Water Treated in Primary, secondary ETP Plant and then

High Concentrated Effluent @ 56.00 KLD including washing stream will be discharge

on Facility @ 28.00 KLD and remaining 28.0 KLD Water in house Spray

Secondary Settling

Tank

Final Collection Tank

116


Page 116 of 129


Domestic: The generated sewage will be disposed through soak pit/septic tank.

Industrial:

• Total industrial 61.0 KLD Waste Water Generation from Manufacturing Process and Other

Ancillary Operation.

• Low Concentrated Waste Water Treated in Primary, secondary ETP Plant and then


• High Concentrated Effluent @ 56.00 KLD including washing stream will be discharge

through Common Facility @ 28.00 KLD and remaining28.0 KLD Water in house Spray


vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE, CHWIF etc.

Name of Common facility

Sr No Method of Disposal Wastewater quantity in KLD

1. CETP Naroda 5.0

2. In House Spray Dryer 28.0

3 society for clean & green earth -Naroda 28.0

4 Common Spray Drier NEPL,


• society for clean & green earth -Naroda

• NEPL



Existing Water Balance Diagram


Total Proposed Water Balance Diagram


Page 117 of 129

Total Proposed Water Balance Diagram

117


vii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD)


Total reuse NIL

E Air



Existing & Proposed

Sr.

no Stack attached to

Stack

height

in meter

1 Small Industrial

Boiler 0.8 TPH

2 IBR Boiler (2 TPH)


Page 118 of 129



Stack

height

in meter

Fuel Consumption APCM

11 Fire Wood

(Removed) 10 MT/Month

Adequate

Stack

Height

15 Natural

Gas 1200 SCM/Day

Adequate

Stack

118


APCM Remark

Adequate

Stack

Height

Replace

with 2

TPH

Boiler

Adequate

Stack Proposed

119


Page 119 of 129

Height

3

Hot Air Generator

for SFD (800 Kcal

/Hr)

11 Natural

Gas 200 SCM/Day

Adequate

Stack

Height

Existing

4

Hot Air Generator

for SFD (800 Kcal

/Hr) 2 nos

11 Natural

Gas 400 SCM/Day

Adequate

Stack

Height

Proposed

5 Hot Air Generator

(10 lac Kcal /Hr) 15 Coal 3 MT/Day

Multi

Cyclone

Separator

with Bag

Filter

Proposed

6 Hot Air Generator

(30 Lac Kcal /Hr) 21 Coal 7 MT/Day

Multi

Cyclone

Separator

with Bag

Filter

Proposed


Existing & Proposed

-

Sr

no

Stack attached to Stack

height in

meter

APCM Type of

Emission

Remark

1 Sulphonation Vessel of

Vessel (OA4SA)

12 Two Stage

Alkali Scrubber

SO2 Existing

2 Sulphonation Vessel of

PNTOSA

SO2 Proposed

3 Spin Flash Dryer 11 - PM Existing

4 Tray Dryer 11 - PM Existing

5 Spray Dryer for Product

(1000 LPH)

15 Multi Cyclone

Separator With

Two Stage

PM Proposed

120


Page 120 of 129

Water Scrubber

6 Spin Flash Dryer 11 - PM Proposed

7. Spray Dryer for Water

Evaporation (2500 LPH)

21 Multi Cyclone

Separator With

Two Stage

Water Scrubber

PM Proposed


� The entire manufacturing activities will be carried out in the closed reactors and regular

checking and maintenance of reactors will be carried out to avoid any leakages.

� The tank vents will be equipped with either a carbon filter or an oil trap to prevent water vapor

from entering the tank as it breathes.

� All the motors of pumps for the handling of hazardous chemicals will be flame proof and

provided with suitable mechanical seal with stand-by arrangement

� Control of all parameters on a continuous basis will be done by adequate control valves,

pressure release valves and safety valves etc.

� All the flange joints of the pipe lines will be covered with flange guards.

� All the raw materials will be stored in isolated storage area and containers tightly closed.

� There will also be provision of adequate ventilation system in process plant and hazardous

chemical storage area

F Hazardous waste


2016.

Existing & Proposed

i

S

r

.

N

o

Types of

Hazardous

Waste

Sources Categ

ory

Existi

ng

MT/Ye

ar

Propo

se

MT/Ye

ar

Ultim

ate

MT/Y

ear

Disposal

1 ETP Sludge ETP

Plant 35.3 360 540 900


Transportation and

Dispose by sending to co-

processing OR Send to

121


Page 121 of 129

Active TSDF Site

2 Used Oil

Plant

Machiner

y

5.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 Collection, storage, Reuse

within premises.

3

Empty

barrels/

Container/

Liners

contaminated

Material

Storage

and

Handling

33.1

2.0 18.0 20.0 Collection, storage,

Transportation and

Dispose by selling to

Registered Recycler 2.5 22.5 25.0

4

Process

Waste

(Residue)

4

ADAPSA 26.1 1.2 NIL NIL ---

5 SBS

Scrubbin

g media

4

ADAPSA

PNTOSA

26.1 NIL 150 150

Collection, Storage and

reuse within plant

premises in PAABSA

process against total

requirements of @ 1300

MT/Year

6

Process

Waste

(Gypsum)

-- 26.1 120 NIL NIL ---

7

Process

Waste

(Iron Sludge)

4

ADAPSA 26.1 36 175 211


Transportation & Dispose

to Co processing or TSDF

8

Spent

Sulphuric

Acid (45% to

70%)

PNTOSA

OA4SA 26.2 62.0 1224 1286

Collection, Storage and

900 MT/Year Spent Acid

Reuse in PAAB4SA and

216 MT/Year Spent Acid

Reuse in 4-ADA2SA

manufacturing process

and remaining 170

MT/Year Spent Acid Send

to actual users having

122


Page 122 of 129

permission under Rule 9

Note: There is no generation of process residue and Gypsum waste from process. The acidic

effluent will treat in ETP.


(For HW management)

Not Applicable

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal(MSW and

others)

No



� There is no any type of solvent required


• Sources of fugitive emissions include storage of chemicals, raw material handling and,

hazardous waste storage area

Measures :

• The fugitive emissions in terms of handling losses will get reduced by proper storage and

handling.

• Hazardous chemicals will be stored as per standard criteria. • Periodically monitoring will

be carried out as per the post project monitoring plan.

• All materials must be stored in suitable packing to prevent contamination of air.

• Enclosed system & efficient procedures for materials charging shall be ensured.


Storage details Name of major Hazardous

chemicals Capacity Nos.

Tank

Sr

No

Name of Raw

Material

Max

Storage

MT

Nos of

Storage Tank

Rema

rk

1 Sulphuric Acid 20 1 -

2 Spent Sulphuric

Acid

20 1 -

3 Oleum 23 % 10 1 1

123


Page 123 of 129

4 Oleum 65 % 2 1 spare

tank

5 Formaldehyde 5 1

6 HCl 20 1

Drum / Barrel storage

Aniline Oil

Caustic Soda

Mix Cleave Acid

� Applicability of PESO: Not Applicable.

• During SEAC meeting dated 03/10/2019, Committee asked about reply of above query dated 14/8/19,

technical expert of PP informed that they have submitted revised proposal with curtail production and now

expansion of production is from 11 to 221 MT/Month of dyes intermediates and dyes. Committee asked

about area adequacy for proposed expansion, PP informed that proposed plot is having sufficient area for

accommodate proposed expansion. Committee asked about waste water management, technical expert of

PP informed that dilute stream from prosed expansion will be treated in primary and tertiary ETP units and

treated effluent will be sent to CETP of NEPL through tanker as per existing CCA. High COD effluent will be

partly evaporated in in-house spray dryer and rest of sent to common facility of M/s NEPL and M/s Society

for clean and green, Naroda after primary treatment.Natural gas will be used as fuel in boiler and hot air

generator. MCS with two stage scrubber will be provided with spray dryer. Committee deliberated on

Hazardous waste management and bleed liquor disposal details.






1. Unit shall submit third party NABL accredited recognized academic institute treatability report

regarding ETP units and adequacy of in-house spray dryer for effluent at a time of appraisal.






measures for common/ captive infrastructure due to proposed production.

124


Page 124 of 129

3. Compliance of MoEFCC’s OM dated 01/05/2018 regarding “Corporate Environment Responsibility”




4. Segregation of waste water streams based on characteristics and its proper management keeping in

view direction under section 18 (1) (b) of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1974

issued by CPCB regarding compliance of CETP. (COD, BOD, TDS etc. of each stream shall be

given)




conservation.

6. Adequacy of utilization of spent sulphuric acid back in process with material balance for various

products and management of balance quantity keeping Hazardous and Other Waste (Management

and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2016 in view.

7. Provision of spare tank as a safety precaution for Oleum storage and emergency transfer facility for

Oleum as per the prevailing Rules/ guidelines.






9. Submit status of compliance of Environmental norms of existing Common Infrastructure of M/s: NEPL

and M/s Society for clean and green earth, Naroda.









125


Page 125 of 129


16 SIA/GJ/IND2/35821/2019

M/s. Harsh OrganoChem (I) Pvt Ltd

Plot No. C-74, GIDC Saykha, Vagra;

Bharuch



• After detailed discussion, Committee decided to defer the proposal and consider the same after

reply is submitted from Project Proponent in one of the upcoming meeting of SEAC.

17. SIA/GJ/MIS/34441/2019

M/s. Industrial Waste Management

Services

Plot no.399,400,401,402,403,404,405/2 &

406,Saragvala,Ta- Dholka,Dis- Ahmedabad

Reconsideration of

ToR- Refer Back Case

Category of the unit: 7(d)

Project status: New

• M/s: Industrial Waste Management Services, applied for Terms of Reference (ToR) and the SEAC

recommended the project for grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) vide this office letter no. EIA-10-

2018/IND2/1217/2565 dated 08/08/2019 for conditions as mentioned therein:

• The case was referred back by the SEIAA, Gujarat vide SEIAA letter no- SEIAA/GUJ/ToR/1227/2019

dated 23/08/2019 with the following point:

1. To check the validity of TOR accorded by MoEF&CC in past and extension application if any.

2. To verify the reason/s for delay in project considering the TOR accorded previously by

MoEF&CC.

3. To check the proposed location of site with respect to land use pattern nearby & the water

bodies if any.

4. To verify the source of incinerable waste & feasibility of development of preprocessing facility

of incinerable waste along with TSDF looking to past scenario.

5. To verify the expertise of handling of different types of hazardous waste specifically

incinerable for AFR.

6. To verify the Risk Assessment Report looking to the village location @ 800 meter.

7. To verify the ground water level for post monsoon season.

• Project proponent submitted reply vide their letter dated 26/09/2019 for the above mentioned points.


126


Page 126 of 129

1. The validity of TOR accorded by MoEF&CC in past and extension application details

submitted.

2. The reason/s for delay in project considering the TOR accorded previously by

MoEF&CC submitted.

3. The proposed location of site with respect to land use pattern nearby & the water

bodies if any details submitted.

4. The source of incinerable waste & feasibility of development of preprocessing facility

of incinerable waste along with TSDF looking to past scenario submitted.

5. The expertise of handling of different types of hazardous waste specifically incinerable

for AFR submitted.

6. The Risk Assessment Report looking to the village location @ 800 meter submitted.

7. The ground water level for post monsoon season will be carried out in October 2019.



Committee asked clarification regarding validity of TOR accorded by MoEF&CC in past and extension

application details, technical expert of PP has informed that TOR had been accorded by MoEF&CC with

letter No. 10-11/2016-IA.III, 26th March, 2016 under Category 7 (d) “A” and valid up to 25th March, 2019

and extension of validity of ToR is not done by PP. Committee asked clarification regarding delay in

project considering the TOR accorded previously by MoEF&CC submitted, PP informed that due to

postpone of public hearing frequently for proposed project and hence delay in proposed project.

Committee asked about proposed location of site with respect to land use pattern nearby & the water

bodies, PP submitted goggle map of proposed site and nearby Bhogavo river distance. Committee

disagree with goggle image and asked them to submit adequate land use patter with classify regarding

proposed site land characteristic and is agriculture land or not. Committee asked about source of

Incinerable waste & feasibility of development of pre-processing facility of Incinerable waste along with

TSDF looking to past scenario, PP has informed general details regarding hazardous waste generation

in his presentation. Hence committee informed that you have to submit actual data of source of

Incinerable waste with feasibility report regarding pre-processing facility of Incinerable waste along with

TSDF looking to past scenario. Committee deliberated on the expertise of handling of different types of

hazardous waste specifically Incinerable for AFR, Risk Assessment Report looking to the village location

@ 800 meter and the ground water level for post monsoon season, PP has not submitted adequate

technical details regarding it.

127


Page 127 of 129

After deliberation, SEAC unanimously decided to consider the proposal after satisfactory and adequate

technical details submission of the following points,

1. To check the proposed location of site with respect to land use pattern nearby & the water

bodies if any.

2. To verify the source of Incinerable waste & feasibility of development of pre-processing facility

of Incinerable waste along with TSDF looking to past scenario.

3. To verify the expertise of handling of different types of hazardous waste specifically

Incinerable for AFR.

4. To verify the Risk Assessment Report looking to the village location @ 800 meter.

5. To verify the ground water level for post monsoon season.

18 SIA/GJ/IND2/34072/2019

M/s. Ambica Industries

Plot No. 1305/4 and 1305/05, Phase-

IV, GIDC, Naroda, Ahmedabad

Reconsideration of ToR

- Refer back Case



• M/s: Ambica Industries applied for Terms of Reference (ToR) and the SEAC recommended the project

for grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) vide this office letter no. EIA-10-2018/IND2/1220 dated


• The case was referred back by the SEIAA, Gujarat vide SEIAA letter no- SEIAA/GUJ/ToR/1228/2019

dated 23/08/2019 with the following point:

1. To verify the applicability of GPCB circular dated 03/11/2018 and compliance of the same

along with revised details submitted by project proponent and ZLD option.

• Project proponent submitted presentation for compliance of above query showing applicability of GPCB

circular dated 03/11/2018 and compliance of the same along with revised details submitted by project

proponent and ZLD option for meeting dated 03/10/2019.


• During the SEAC meeting dated 03/10/2019, committee asked for compliance of GPCB circular dated

03/11/2018 regarding dirty products. Technical expert of PP informed that Unit has valid Consent to

Operate (CTO) for existing products having total production capacity 10 MT/Month. 6- Acetyl

OAPSA falls in dirty product list. As per GPCB Circular 3rd November, 2018, 50 % additional capacity of

dirty product can be permitted to existing units. Therefore, they have applied for additional quantity of 2.5

128


Page 128 of 129

MT/Month of 6 Acetyl OAPSA. Committee disagree with reply submitted by the unit and informed PP to

submit compliance of GPCB circular dated 03/11/2018 with each and every condition of circular dated

03/11/2018.

After deliberation, SEAC unanimously decided to consider the proposal after adequate reply of SEIAA

query and submission of the following details.

1. To verify the applicability of GPCB circular dated 03/11/2018 and compliance of the same

along with revised details submitted by project proponent and ZLD option.

19 SIA/GJ/IND2/35510/2018

M/s. Atlas Life Sciences

Plot No:C-1,360 & 361, GIDC Odhav,

Ahmedabad

Appraisal


• After detailed discussion, Committee decided to defer the proposal and consider the same in one of

the upcoming meeting of SEAC.

20 SIA/GJ/IND2/32683/2019

M/s. Icon Pharmachem

Plot No. D‐2/CH/146, GIDC‐Dahej‐2,

.Vagra ,Bharuch


of Refer Back Case


Project status: EC-Amendment

• M/s: Icon Pharmachem applied for amendment of Environment clearance and the SEAC recommended

the project for grant of amendment of Environment clearance vide this office letter no. EIA-10-

2018/IND2/1862 dated 11/06/2019 for conditions as mentioned therein:

• The case was referred back by the SEIAA, Gujarat vide SEIAA meeting 272th dated 20/09/2019 with the

following point:

1. To verify the compliance of existing unit through SPCB’s last inspection report.

• Project proponent submitted presentation for compliance of existing unit through SPCB’s last inspection

report for meeting dated 03/10/2019.


• During the SEAC meeting dated 03/10/2019, committee asked for compliance of existing unit through

SPCB’s last inspection report, Technical expert of PP informed that GPCB visited this unit on 14/05/2019

and written instruction regarding unit have established 3KL Glass line reactor, Centrifuge & simple Nutch

Filter. In this regard unit shall have to submit product wise Plant capacity and Waste like spent Solvent of

129


Page 129 of 129

Distillation Residue, spent carbon & Organic process waste are mentioned in Environment Clearance but

not presented in CTO fresh application. Technical expert of PP informed that they have installed plant

machinery for product namely 2-Chloroethylamine Hydrochloride,N,N Bis(2‐Chloroethyl)Amine

Hydrochloride,1‐Acetyl‐4‐(4’‐ Hydroxyphenyl) Piperazine and 1‐(3‐Chlorophenyl) Piperazine only which

is zero liquid discharge product and hence not installed ETP and MEE. Also from this proposed products

for which CTO applied in which distillation residue, spent carbon and organic process waste is not

generated. Also technical expert of PP informed that no legal action taken by GPCB with respect to

inspection report dated 14/05/2019. Committee observed that there is no adverse remarks in last

inspection report of GPCB on dated 14/05/2019

• After detailed deliberation, SEAC unanimously decided to recommend grant of EC-Amendment

order as earlier submitted vide letter no-.EIA-10-2018/IND2/1862 dated 11/06/2019 for conditions

as mentioned therein.

Subject: Recommendation to return 151 proposals to respective Project Proponents regarding.

• The 151 proposals were considered in the SEAC meeting dated 01.08.2019 and accordingly

recommendation letters to de-list such proposals were sent to SEIAA, Gujarat.

• The project location of said 151 proposals fall under Critically Polluted Areas (CPAs) and Severely Polluted

Areas (SPAs) identified by the CPCB.

• Committee noted that these proposals attracts the General Condition (GC) of the Environment Impact

Assessment Notification, 2006.

• Committee felt that these proposals shall be returned to the respective Project Proponents.

• During SEAC meeting dated 03.10.2019, committee unanimously decided to recommend to return all 151

aforementioned proposals to the respective project proponent.

Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair.

Minutes approved by:

1. Dr. Dinesh Misra, Chairman, SEAC

2. Shri S. C. Srivastav, Vice Chairman, SEAC

3. Shri. R. J. Shah, Member, SEAC

4. Shri V. N. Patel, Member, SEAC

Date post:	13-Mar-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	7 times
Download:	0 times