MINUTES OF THE CITY OF CHARLES STURT COUNCIL MEETING HELD ... · MINUTES OF THE CITY OF CHARLES...

City of Charles Sturt 1. CL Minutes 10/10/11

[Note: These minutes are unconfirmed until 24 October 2011]

MINUTES OF THE CITY OF CHARLES STURT

COUNCIL MEETING

HELD ON MONDAY, 10 OCTOBER 2011

MEMBERS: Present: Her Worship the Mayor, Mrs K Alexander

Councillors Andriani, Ghent, Scheffler, Hanley, Fitzpatrick, Randall, Grant, Nguyen, Wasylenko, Keneally, Coppola, Ienco, Alexandrides, Auricht and Harley

STAFF: Present: Chief Executive Officer – M Withers

General Manager Asset Management Services – J Cornish

General Manager City Services – H Inat Manager Governance & Operational Support

– K Jackson Manager Customer & Community Services

– B Webster Manager Planning & Development – J Vanco Manager Open Space & Recreation – A Miller A/Manager Engineering & Construction

– P Hewitt Strategic Infrastructure Executive Officer – A Sykes

Coordinator Property Services ‐ P Nesbitt Community Engagement Coordinator ‐ M Mader TL Governance & Business Support – I Cooper

TL Marketing & Communications – D Gambiraza

TL Development Policy ‐ K Wundersitz Senior Policy Planner ‐ A Pullen Senior Policy Planner ‐ K Mader

Administration & Consultation Officer WPTW Project ‐ P Silvano EA to GM Asset Management Services – J Watson

MEMBERS: Apologies: Councillor Agius MEMBERS: Leave of Absence: Nil 1. COUNCIL OPENING The meeting commenced at 7.02 pm.



2. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES That the minutes of the previous meeting held on Monday, 26 September 2011

be taken as read and confirmed. Moved Councillor Fitzpatrick, Seconded Councillor Keneally Carried 3. REPORTS 3.1 Her Worship the Mayor That the report be received and noted, with amendments included. Moved Councillor Hanley, Seconded Councillor Fitzpatrick Carried Unanimously



TO: Council FROM: Mayor Alexander DATE: 10 October 2011

3.1 MAYORAL REPORT

Thursday, 1 September 2011

15.00 The Mayor, together with Councillors Craig Auricht, Tolley Wasylenko and Oanh Nyugen attended the Official Launch of the MYSA Multicultural Youth Education Development Centre at Building 7, Western Multicultural Precinct, 255 Torrens Road, West Croydon. MYSA Patron Dorinda Hafner gave a wonderful speech; then a cake that she had baked for the occasion was enjoyed by all, along with dancing and singing by MYSA members.

Friday, 2 September 2011

18.00 The Mayor attended the Oz Asia Festival 2011 launch at Government House Adelaide followed by an Opening Night Performance ‘Dreamscape’ part of Oz Asia Festival at the Adelaide Festival Centre, King William Street, Adelaide.

Saturday, 3 September 2011

10.00 The Mayor attended the Christmas Event Planning meeting with Councillors Juliann Andriani, Craig Auricht and Jim Fitzpatrick, and Council staff member Judith Robertson at the SA Rowing Club on Military Road, West Lakes.

12 noon The Mayor and Mr Neil Alexander attended the Eagles Football Club’s

President’s Pre Game Function at Woodville Oval, followed by a very hard fought match against Central Districts.

Sunday, 4 September 2011

14.00 Nil Monday, 5 September 2011

18.00 The Mayor chaired the Special Council meeting to discuss the demolition of the Cheltenham Racecourse Grandstand.

20.00 The Mayor attended the North West Corridor & Inner West Structure Plan

Workshop together with Councillors and senior Council staff in CC2‐3, Civic Centre, Woodville. Thanks to the DPLG representatives for their attendance and to Elected Members for their attendance and contribution of preliminary feedback on many aspects of the Plans.



MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

10.00 Mayor conferred with Michelle Mader on the Community Plan community consultation plans.

10.30 Mayor and Marketing and Communications weekly meeting. 11.00 Mayor and CEO weekly meeting. 12.00 noon The Mayor together with Mark Withers, Paul Sutton and Kerrie Jackson

reviewed the Council agenda. 14.00 The Mayor together with CEO Mark Withers met with Mark Devine, St Clair

JV representative to request that demolition of the Cheltenham Grandstand be halted while alternative uses for the facility are considered.

15.30 The Mayor attended a media call in the Council Chambers regarding the

Cheltenham Grandstand. 16.00 The Mayor spoke with Mix 102 News regarding the demolition of the

Cheltenham Grandstand. 16.30 Mayor and Executive Assistant to Mayor weekly meeting 17.00 The Mayor spoke to ABC Drive program regarding the demolition of the

Cheltenham Grandstand. Wednesday, 7 September 2011

10.30 Councillor Robert Randall attended the Launch of the Channel 9 Young Achiever Awards on behalf of the Mayor at HomeStart Finance Offices, 153 Flinders Street, Adelaide.

17.30 The Mayor together with Councillor Juliann Andrianni attended the Youth

Advisory Committee meeting at Youth Central, Woodville Road, Woodville to discuss planning for the Council Christmas Event.

18.30 The Mayor attended the Development Assessment Panel Meeting held at

the Civic Centre, Woodville Road, Woodville. Thursday, 8 September 2011 Nil



MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Friday, 9 September 2011 09.30 The Mayor attended the Official Launch of Mission Australia New Outreach

Service – Youth Beat at the Mercury Cinema at 13 Morphett Street, Adelaide. This service will provide support to young people in need of help on the streets.

12.00 noon The Mayor attended lunch with Jasmine Wood and Mayor Ken Rolland at the

Hotel Grand Chancellor on Hindley, 65 Hindley Street, Adelaide to hear the Hon Joe Hockey MP speak.

16.00 Councillor Joe Ienco attended the Reception to celebrate Eid al‐Fitr on behalf

of the Mayor; held by the Hon Grace Portolesi MP, Minister for Multicultural Affairs at Parliament House, North Terrace, Adelaide.

Saturday, 10 September 2011 10.40 The Mayor attended a photo shoot to promote the Walk to Work day. 16.30 The Mayor attended the Onam 2011 Celebrations held by the Adelaide

Metropolitan Malayalee Association (AMMA) at the Croatian Club, 15 Wood Avenue Brompton. AMMA is a community based voluntary organisation committed to the growth and togetherness of the ever growing number of Keralites (people from the Kerala State of India) in Adelaide, striving to promote and preserve Kerala's identity, tradition and heritage. Onam is a lovely celebration of the harvest and a time for enjoying food, music and dancing. The Mayor greatly enjoyed watching the lively performances and lighting the lamp at the opening ceremony.

18.00 The Mayor and Mr Neil Alexander attended the Maltese Association Dinner

Dance at the European Festival Function Centre 292 Findon Road, Findon, together with Councillor Edgar Agius and his wife Anna. The dinner was held in honour of Maltese National Day and was well attended by many people from the Maltese community in South Australia and Victoria. It was wonderful see so many join in the dancing!

18.30 Councillor Joe Ienco attend the Overseas Chinese Association of SA Inco Mid‐

Autumn Festival Dinner Banquet at J Restaurant, 130 Grote Street Adelaide. Sunday, 11 September 2011 15.30 The Mayor and family attended the Vietnamese Moon Lantern Festival held

at the St Clair Recreation Centre and had a wonderful time making lanterns together.



MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Monday, 12 September 2011 17.30 The Mayor met with Council staff in the Mayor’s Office to discuss the

protection of outdoor dining areas at The Governor Hindmarsh Hotel. 19.00 The Mayor chaired the Council meeting in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre,

Woodville Road, Woodville.

Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10.30 The Mayor met with Michelle Mader to discuss the Community Plan

consultation. 11.00 Mayor and Marketing and Communications weekly meeting. 11.30 Mayor and CEO weekly meeting.

13.30 The Mayor met with Councillors Jim Fitzpatrick and Robert Randall and

Council staff in the Mayor’s Office to discuss the Coast Park Henley Beach South consultation and options.

16.00 The Mayor and Bronwyn Webster met with Mark Streater regarding

Personal Helpers and Mentors (PHAMS) services in the City of Charles Sturt Council area. Mark highlighted that Charles Sturt is not well serviced by these services, which provide personal assistance to residents with mental health issues. A report will be provided to a future Council meeting on the availability of these services in Charles Sturt.

17.00 Mayor and Executive Assistant to Mayor weekly meeting Wednesday, 14 September 2011

Nil Thursday, 15 September 2011

10.30 Councillor Joe Ienco attended the Adult Learners Week Open Day of the Overseas Chinese Association of SA Inc at 110 Crittenden Road, Findon on behalf of the Mayor.

19.00 Councillor Edgar Agius and Councillor Mick Harley attended the Adelaide

36er’s 2011/2012 Launch on behalf of the Mayor at the Dome, 44a Crittenden Road, Findon.



MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Friday, 16 September 2011

07.30 The Mayor and CEO Mark Withers led the Cancer Council’s ‘Walk to Work

Day’ of Council staff with a “walk at work” from the Civic Centre, along Woodville Rd, Torrens Rd, Cheltenham Pde and Port Rd, ending back at Woodville Rd, followed by a healthy breakfast provided by OPAL and the Kidman Park Rotary Club. Great to see so many staff getting involved and being active!

17.00 The Mayor met with Michelle Mader regarding the Community Plan. 17.30 The Mayor attended a meeting with the CEO and Council staff to discuss the

agenda for the Gaming and Liquor Policy and Community Forum, together with Cr Juliann Andrianni, Cr Robert Randall and Cr Craig Auricht.

Saturday, 17 September 2011 11.00 The Mayor attended the ‘Doggy Day at the Beach’ in the Henley Square,

Henley Beach, together with her children and her dogs and all enjoyed the walk on the beach. Congratulations to all of the staff involved for a well‐run community event. Councillor Randall also attended the event.

Sunday, 18 September 2011

09.30 Councillor Joe Ienco attended the Feast in Honour of Our Lady of Perpetual

Grace, at the Mater Christie Parish on Grange Road, Seaton on behalf of the Mayor.

15.00 Councillor Edgar Agius attended the Eagles Qualifying Finals at AAMI

Stadium on behalf of the Mayor. 15.30 The Mayor and Councillor Joe Ienco and his wife attended the Findon Skid

Kids Annual Open Championships Presentation. Councillor Mick Harley gave a lively commentary on the event from the commentator’s box and the crowd greatly enjoyed the fast paced action from competitors of all ages. Great to see several generations of Skid Kids involved!

Monday, 19 September 2011 11.00 Councillor Robert Grant attended the Woodville High School’s Multicultural

Assembly at the Woodville High School on behalf of the Mayor. 17.30 The Mayor attended the Community Plan Steering Group Meeting in CC2‐3

at the Civic Centre, Woodville Road, Woodville. 19.30 The Mayor attended a Christmas Event meeting with Cr Juliann Andriani and

Cr Jim Fitzpatrick in the Mayor’s Office.



MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Tuesday, 20 September 2011

09.30 The Mayor met with Perry Nesbit and Richard Hughes for an inspection of the Carnegie Reserve clubrooms.

10.00 The Mayor and CEO Mark Withers attended the KESAB Sustainable City of

the Year Award Ceremony and morning tea in CC1, Civic Centre, Woodville Road, Woodville. Congratulations to all staff involved on winning the South Australian KESAB Sustainable City Award – well done!

11.00 Mayor and CEO weekly meeting 12.00 noon The Mayor together with Mark Withers and Kerrie Jackson reviewed the

Council agenda.

14.00 Mayor and Executive Assistant to Mayor weekly meeting 16.00 The Mayor together with Councillor Oanh Nyugen and Councillor Robert

Grant, Perry Nesbit and Richard Hughes met with a resident at the St Clair Recreation Centre to discuss maintenance of the Centre and issues with the leaking roof.

18.30 Councillor Raelene Hanley attended the Magarey Medal Presentation Dinner on behalf of the Mayor at the AAMI Stadium Function Complex, West Lakes

Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19.00 The Mayor and Mr Neil Alexander attended AFC Asian Qualifiers for the

2012 London Games – Final Round ‐ Australian U23's v UAE at the Hindmarsh Stadium, Hindmarsh.

Thursday, 22 September 2011 17.00 The Mayor met with Michelle Madder to discuss the Community Plan. 18.00 The Mayor and GM Asset Management Jan Cornish conducted a Citizenship

Ceremony in the Woodville Town Hall and welcomed our new Australian citizens. Thanks to Councillors Juliann Andriani, Tolley Wasylenko, Robert Grant, Jim Fitzpatrick, Oanh Nguyen and Deputy Mayor Angela Keneally for their attendance. The ceremony was also attended by Freemen of the City Lyle Gilligan, John Pinto and Former Mayor Harold Anderson – great to see them there too.



MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Friday, 23 September 2011 18.00 Councillor Raelene Hanley attended the Grange Lawn Tennis Club's

Presentation Evening at Kentdale Road Grange on behalf of the Mayor. Saturday, 24 September 2011 19.00 The Mayor and family attended the Woodville South Junior Football Club

Presentation for U11‐16 at the Woodville South Sports and Social Club, Ledger Road Woodville South. It was great to see a huge turnout for the event in the newly renovated clubrooms.

Sunday, 25 September 2011 12.00 The Mayor and Mr Neil Alexander attended the President’s Room and Eagles

Game at AAMI Stadium. Good to see the Eagles with a resounding victory over South Adelaide. The match was also attended by Cr Tolley Wasylenko and his wife.

Monday, 26 September 2011 08.30 Mayor and CEO meeting in the Mayor’s Office, Civic Centre 12.30 The Mayor together with Councillors Jim Fitzpatrick and Robert Randall met

with Natalie Fuller and Alison Miller in relation to the agenda for the Henley Square and Environs Community Workshop.

15.30 The Mayor attended the Youth Opportunities Personal Leadership

Presentation at the Woodville High School, Actil Avenue, Woodville. It was an inspiring afternoon hearing the stories of growth and seeing the growing confidence of the students involved. The Youth Opportunities program achieves some amazing results with the students – congratulations to Principal Meredith Edwards and the WHS Governing Council for their commitment to the program.

17.30 The Mayor attended Oxfam’s Launch of ‘Grow’ future of Food Forum at the

Civic Gallery for pre event refreshments at the Bradley Forum Hawke Centre, UniSA City West Campus, 50‐5 North Terrace, Adelaide

19.00 The Mayor chaired the Council meeting in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre,

Woodville Road, Woodville. Tuesday, 27 September 2011 08.45 Councillor Robert Randall attended the Western Regional Enterprise Day

Opening Ceremony on behalf of the Mayor at the University of Adelaide, Napier Building Lecture Theatre 102 in Adelaide.



MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Tuesday, 27 September 2011 Continued 08.30 The Mayor together with Councillor Edgar Agius attended the NAIDOC Prime

Minister’s Medal Presentation at the Flinders Park Primary School. The presentation was deferred until a later date as the recipient’s details were not known.

09.00 The Mayor attended the 5000+ Forum at the Adelaide College of the Arts, 39

Light Square, Adelaide 12.15 The Mayor and Cr Paul Alexandrides attended the NAIDOC Prime Minister’s

Medal Presentation awarded to Gav Patel at the Brompton Primary School, Napier Street, Renown Park. This is a wonderful award given to 12 children in South Australia (three from Charles Sturt) whose art work was selected from thousands of entries across the state. Congratulations to Gav and his proud parents – it was also wonderful to see the whole school celebrate his achievement.

14.00 Councillor Robert Randall represented the Mayor at the Friends of Queen

Elizabeth Hospital’s Annual General Meeting, Lakes Resort Conference Room 141 Brebner Drive West Lakes. Deputy Mayor Angela Keneally also attended.

16.30 The Mayor together with Adrian Sykes and Jan Cornish met with Susan Scott

from the Water Proofing West Community Reference Group and Michael Hood of Aurecon regarding the Water Proofing the West project in the Mayor’s Office, Civic Centre.

17.30 The Mayor together with Councillors Juliann Andriani, Craig Auricht, Raelene

Hanley and Jim Fitzpatrick attended the Christmas Event Volunteers meeting in CC2/3, Civic Centre. Thanks very much to the staff who have volunteered their time to assist with planning of this event.

18.00 The Mayor together with Mark Withers, Councillors Doriana Coppola, Robert

Randall, Tolley Wasylenko, Jim Fitzpatrick and Deputy Mayor Angela Keneally attended the review of CEO’s Performance Meeting in the Council’s Boardroom, Civic Centre.

Wednesday, 28 September 2011 08.30 The Mayor attended a photographic shoot for the Christmas Event. 17.30 The Mayor conferred with Phil Hewitt and Sam Adams in relation to the

Holland Street Bridge in the Mayor’s Office Civic Centre



MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Wednesday, 28 September 2011 continued 19.00 The Mayor and Councillors Robert Randall, Jim Fitzpatrick, Juliann Andriani,

Raelene Hanley and Paul Alexandrides attended the Henley Precinct Master Plan Workshop in the Henley Town Hall. It was good to see the workshop

well attended, with a lot of good ideas generated as a prelude to the next community workshop on 5th November in the Henley Town Hall.

Thursday, 29 September 2011 09.00 The Mayor and Councillor Oanh Nguyen attended the NAIDOC Prime

Minister’s Medal Presentation awarded to Omar Mohammed at the Challa Gardens Primary School. It was wonderful to see the whole school support and celebrate Omar’s achievement at a very lively and entertaining Assembly. Also lovely to see residents of the nearby retirement village are actively involved in the school community; they attended the assembly and morning tea that followed and provided some stories of the school history.

Friday, 30 September 2011 Nil



3.2 Deputy Mayor That the report be received and noted. Moved Councillor Alexandrides, Seconded Councillor Ghent Carried Unanimously 3.3 Members Being Representatives on Organisations That the report be received and noted. Moved Councillor Fitzpatrick, Seconded Councillor Keneally Carried Unanimously Motion That Item 6.175 be considered after Item 3.3. Moved Councillor Ghent, Seconded Councillor Randall Carried Unanimously [Note: Item 6.175 was considered after Item 3.3] 4. DEPUTATIONS Nil 5. PETITIONS 5.13 PETITION – REQUEST TO STOP THE PROPOSED DEMOLITION OF A PRE‐WAR

HOME AT 63 CHARLES STURT AVENUE, GRANGE 13

Brief

A petition has been received from the Charles Sturt Avenue Residents Group requesting to stop the demolition of a pre‐war home at 63 Charles Sturt Avenue, Grange.

Motion

1. That the petition be received and referred to the City Services & Strategic Development Committee on 14 November 2011.

2. That Council notify the head petitioner of Council’s decision.

3. That Council staff, the Mayor and Ward Councillors be invited to meet with the head petitioners.

Moved Councillor Hanley, Seconded Councillor Scheffler Carried Unanimously



5.14 PETITION – REQUEST FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC TOILETS IN THE BOWDEN/BROMPTON AREA 15

Brief

A petition has been received from Mr Terry Stoneman requesting the installation of public toilets in the Bowden/Brompton area.

Motion

1. That the petition be received and the Ward Councillors Alexandrides and Auricht and relevant staff meet with the head petitioner to discuss the request or submission contained within the petition.

2. That a report be tabled at the Asset Management Committee at the conclusion of these discussions.


Moved Councillor Alexandrides, Seconded Councillor Auricht Carried Unanimously 5.15 PETITION – OPPOSING DEVELOPMENT OF 498 GRANGE ROAD, FULHAM GARDENS

17 Brief

A petition has been received from Ms Maria Schultz opposing development of 498 Grange Road, Fulham Gardens.

Motion

1. That the petition be received and referred to the City Services & Strategic Development Committee on 14 November 2011.


3. That Council staff, the Mayor and Ward Councillors be invited to meet with the head petitioners.

Moved Councillor Ienco, Seconded Councillor Coppola Carried



6. BUSINESS Motion That having read and considered the reports in the agenda related to items: 6.179 MINISTERS SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION 6.180 WATER PROOFING THE WEST ‐ STAGE ONE COMMUNITY REFERENCE GROUP 6.182 ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET

WOODVILLE Council adopt the motions as printed. Moved Councillor Ienco, Seconded Councillor Andriani Carried Unanimously [Note: Item 6.176 was considered after Item 6]

6.175* 2011 SOUTH AUSTRALIAN EXCELLENCE IN STORMWATER AWARDS 19

Brief

To inform Council of the announcement that the City of Charles Sturt won the Category 1: Excellence in Strategic or Master Planning 2011 Award organised by the Stormwater Industry Association.

Motion

1. That the report be received and noted.

2. The Council formally recognise and congratulate the Water Proofing the West team on becoming the winner of the Stormwater Industry Association’s Category 1: Excellence in Strategic or Master Planning Award in Adelaide on Thursday 22 September 2011.

Moved Councillor Wasylenko, Seconded Councillor Keneally Carried Unanimously [Note: Confidential Item 13.7 was considered after Item 6.175]



6.176* COMMUNITY PLAN (B6764, B2279) 21

Brief

The purpose of this report is to update Members on planning for the Community Plan community engagement (stage one) to occur during November; and to present project theme papers for Members’ consideration.

Motion

1. That the report be noted.

2. That the Community Plan Steering Group continues to consider and respond to feedback provided by Resident/Community Groups in implementing the Community Plan engagement process, and in particular seeks to work with Groups to promote the project through community networks.

3. That the draft Community Plan theme papers contained in Appendix D be endorsed in draft form, with the Community Plan Steering Group delegated authority to make additions and refinements to them, including on the basis of discussion at the October 11 Population Study workshop and Resident Group feedback.

4. That finalised theme papers be placed in the online Community Plan project library and provided on request in hard copy form from Friday 28 October.

Moved Councillor Randall, Seconded Councillor Fitzpatrick Carried Unanimously 6.177* PROPOSED LIQUOR LICENSING AND GAMING POLICY (B136, B632) 31

Brief

To provide members with the Communications and Engagement Plan for the Council’s Liquor Licensing Policy review (to consider gaming machines).

Motion


2. That Council endorse the proposed engagement plan.

Moved Councillor Wasylenko, Seconded Councillor Andriani Carried Unanimously



6.178* BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP (B136) 37

Brief

To seek Council resolution on a further proposed variation to the Entertainment Consent at the premises known as Bacchus Wine Bar located at 253 Esplanade, Henley Beach SA 5022. The Application seeks to increase the overall entertainment consent to include Wednesday and Thursday from 7.30pm to 11.00pm

Motion

1. That the Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner be advised that Council agrees to the new proposal to vary the entertainment consent for the Bacchus Wine Bar located at 253 Esplanade, Henley Beach SA 5022 subject to the following agreed conditions;

a. The application is to permit live entertainment in Area 1 from 7.30pm until 11.00pm on Wednesday and Thursday.

b. Doors to Area 1 to be closed whenever live entertainment is provided and only open to permit the entry and exit of patrons and staff.

c. The live entertainment to include but not be limited to salsa dancing and one or two piece entertainers whose music may be amplified.

d. Noise levels to accord with EPA Guidelines and the liquor licensing regulations.

e. Whenever live entertainment is provided, an approved crowd controller is to be located at the entrance to the premises from 11.00pm until half an hour after close whose duties shall include the orderly dispersal of patrons within 60 metres radius of the entrance to the premises.

f. Signage to be placed at the exits to Area 1 whenever live entertainment is provided to the following effect: “Please leave these premises quickly and quietly so as not to disturb our nearby residents”.

g. The Bacchus Wine Bar shall be an active member of the Henley Beach Licensing Accord

h. The variation shall be for a trial period of 6 months at the end of which the application will be recalled by the commissioner with the intention being that providing there are no issues raised then the condition will become permanent subject to Council agreement at this time.

i. Staff and Ward Councillor(s) to monitor noise levels at agreed times, and basis during the 6 month trial (similar to recent Sandbar trial).



6.178* BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP Continued

2. That Staff write to those neighbouring persons originally consulted about the variation to the Entertainment Consent and advised of this trial arrangement, conditions imposed on the trial period and seek any comments they have during this time relating to issues associated with the Entertainment License.

Moved Councillor Fitzpatrick, Seconded Councillor Randall Carried Unanimously 6.179 MINISTERS SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION (B1938) 44

Brief

To provide members with information relating to a draft Ministers Specification for the attenuation of noise from outside sources and recommend comment to be provided to the State Government on the proposed specification.

Motion


2. That the letter contained in Appendix D is endorsed for submission to the Building Policy Branch at the Department of Planning and Local Government.

Moved Councillor Ienco, Seconded Councillor Andriani Carried Unanimously [Note: Item passed en bloc by Council] 6.180 WATER PROOFING THE WEST ‐ STAGE ONE COMMUNITY REFERENCE GROUP

(B6171) 53

Brief

This is an information report to inform Council on the outcome of the nominations for the Water Proofing the West – Stage One Community Reference Group.

Motion

That the report be received and noted.

Moved Councillor Ienco, Seconded Councillor Andriani Carried Unanimously [Note: Item passed en bloc by Council]



6.181* MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE (B5422) 57

Brief

McGregor Tan, an independent market research company was engaged to provide feedback on areas for review and improvement into Kaleidoscope. The results of that feedback are discussed within this report. The Consultants findings are included in Appendix A. The opportunity was also taken as part of the research to gain some feedback on the City’s broader marketing initiatives and web site.

Motion

1. That the report and the Appendix A be received and noted.

2. That staff provide a survey including free text areas for Elected Members to provide their views on Kaleidoscope by end of October.

3. That feedback on Councils communication techniques elicited via the Community Plan engagement process be captured and be the subject of a further report to Council at the end of that engagement process in order to inform future directions for kaleidoscope.

Moved Councillor Wasylenko At 9.38 pm Councillor Auricht left the meeting. Seconded Councillor Coppola At 9.41 pm Councillor Auricht resumed his seat. The motion was carried unanimously. 6.182 ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET

WOODVILLE (B3904) 69

Brief

The City of Charles Sturt is arranging a community Christmas Function in the Civic Centre and Town Hall which will flow onto the lawns and carpark. To manage safe access into the site, Norman Street Woodville will be closed to traffic, other than drivers authorised by a traffic control officer at the entrance at/near Woodville Road. The closure to traffic will occur on Sunday 20 November 2011 between 2:00pm and 9:00pm. It is recommended that Council make the order to close Norman Street for the purpose of this event, in line with the Notice to Councils from the Minister.

Motion

1. That Council exercise the power delegated to it by the Minister for Transport and Urban Planning under Section 11(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act and through the Instrument of General Approval, Part 1, Clause F: Delegation of Power to Close Roads and Grant Exemptions for Road Events to:



6.182 ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET WOODVILLE continued

(a) Declare the Christmas Function on 20 November 2011 an event to which Section 33(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 applies.

(b) Make an order to close the road specified in the schedule (refer Appendix A) to vehicles as provided in Section 33(1) of the Road Traffic Act.

(c) Make exemption for:

(i) Australian Road Rule 230 (Crossing a road – general)

(ii) Australian Road Rule 238 (Pedestrians travelling along a road).

(iii) Australian Road Rule 238: Pedestrians travelling along a road (except in or on a wheeled recreational device or toy).

Moved Councillor Ienco, Seconded Councillor Andriani Carried Unanimously [Note: Item passed en bloc by Council] 6.183* NOMINATIONS SOUGHT FOR THE ADELAIDE CEMETERIES AUTHORITY BOARD

(B35) 75 Brief

The Hon John Rau MP, Minister for Urban Design, Planning and the City of Adelaide has written to the LGA requesting nominations for a Local Government Member on the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board for a term commencing on 1 January 2012.

Motion

That Council nominates Councillors Grant and Ienco for the vacant position on the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board and the nomination be passed on to the Local Government Association for consideration.

Moved Councillor Wasylenko, Seconded Councillor Coppola Carried Unanimously 6.184* DISCRETIONARY WARD ALLOWANCE ‐ APPROVAL PROCESS (B6852) 82

Brief

To consider Discretionary Ward Allowance applications.

Motion

That the Discretionary Ward Allowance applications as detailed in Appendix A to this report be approved, as amended.

Moved Councillor Wasylenko, Seconded Councillor Hanley Carried Unanimously



DISCRETIONARY WARD ALLOWANCE – APPROVAL PROCESS Item 6.184

APPENDIX A

2011/12 DISCRETIONARY WARD ALLOWANCE APPLICATIONS FOR APPROVAL

Ward Project Allowance Available

Estimated Cost

Allowance Remaining

West Woodville

The Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange – youth driving awareness program

$25,206.47 $1,000 $24,206.47

Assessment

Date of receipt – 22/08/11

Application has been reviewed by the Chief Executive/Delegate

Amount and use are consistent with Council’s policy for Discretionary Ward Allowance

Application split between West Woodville, Grange and Findon Wards Note: Application has not been signed by Cr Scheffler due to him being on leave. Full application

attached as Appendix C.


Estimated Cost

Allowance Remaining

Grange The Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange – youth driving awareness program

$29,000 $1,000 $28,000

Assessment







Estimated Cost

Allowance Remaining

Findon The Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange – youth driving awareness program

$25,392.05 $1,000 $24,392.05

Assessment




Application split between West Woodville, Grange and Findon Wards Note: Application has not been signed by Cr Scheffler due to him being on leave. Full

application attached as Appendix C.



7. MOTIONS ON NOTICE 7.26 NOTICE OF MOTION – COUNCIL MEMBER CODE OF CONDUCT 87

Brief

A Notice of Motion has been received from Councillor Wasylenko to amend resolution 6.172 (Council Member Code of Conduct) endorsed by Council on the 26 September 2011 (refer Appendix B).

Motion

“1. That Council endorse the Council Members Code of Conduct Policy as Appendix “A” amended.

2. That a large framed version of the Codes Key Principles be created for signing by all Council Members and put on public display.

3. That the following text be added to the “Natural Justice” and “Initial Investigation” and “Making a Code of Conduct Complaint” process and compliance.

• “Natural Justice” Delete part 1. Replace with‐: The Council Member will be advised and provided with all the particulars, nature and materiality of the complaint and that no complaint should proceed unless these points are clearly provided. The Council Member will be given the opportunity to respond either orally or in writing.

• “Initial Investigation” Add: If the complaint is lodged by the C.E.O. there is a clear expression the Mayor or the Responsible Council Member (RCM) will seek their investigative support from external sources outside of Council.

• “Initial Investigation” Add: Affected persons of a complaint shall be allowed reasonable time to respond when the outcomes formulated from external investigating agencies are referred back to the RCM before proceeding to process such outcomes.

• “Making a Code of Conduct Complaint” Add: Any person regardless of their relationship with Council will be provided with reasonable administrative support to lodge the complaint under the Compliance with the Code of Conduct principles.”

Moved Councillor Wasylenko, Seconded Councillor Fitzpatrick Lost



7.26 NOTICE OF MOTION – COUNCIL MEMBER CODE OF CONDUCT Continued

Division Councillor Wasylenko called for a Division. Those voting in the affirmative were: Councillors Fitzpatrick, Nguyen, Wasylenko, Coppola, Alexandrides, Auricht and Harley (7). Those voting in the negative were: Councillors Andriani, Ghent, Scheffler, Hanley, Randall, Grant, Ienco and Mayor Alexander (8). The motion was lost.

7.27 NOTICE OF MOTION – ‘STREET CORNER’ MEETINGS 91

Brief

A Notice of Motion has been received from Councillor Agius regarding ‘Street Corner’ Meetings.

Motion

That the item be deferred to the next Council meeting.

Moved Councillor Harley, Seconded Councillor Ienco Carried Unanimously 7.28 NOTICE OF MOTION – TOURISM POLICY AND PLAN 92

Brief

A Notice of Motion has been received from Councillor Fitzpatrick requesting Council investigate the development of a Tourism Policy and Plan.

Motion

1. That Council investigates developing a City of Charles Sturt Tourism Policy and Plan.

2. That a report be brought back to the Council meeting of November 14, 2011.

Moved Councillor Fitzpatrick, Seconded Councillor Andriani Carried Unanimously



8. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES – PART I

Nil 9. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE 9.15 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ELECTED MEMBER INTERACTION WITH COUNCIL STAFF

(B57) 96

Brief

Questions on Notice have been received from Councillor Wasylenko regarding Council Member interaction with Council Staff.

9.16 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – LOCAL HISTORY PARTNERSHIP (B57) 103

Brief

Questions on Notice have been received from Councillor Fitzpatrick regarding the Local History Partnership.



QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS – LOCAL HISTORY PARTNERSHIP Item 9.16

APPENDIX A TO: Council FROM: Manager Customer & Community Services DATE: 10 October 2011

9.16 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS – LOCAL HISTORY

PARTNERSHIP (B57)

Brief

Questions on Notice have been received from Councillor Fitzpatrick regarding The Local History Partnerships (Item 9.16) Additional questions have since been provided.

Questions “1. What City of Charles Sturt funding did the

Henley & Grange Historical Society.

Hindmarsh Historical Society.

History Society of Woodville.

Fort Granville Historical Society.

receive in 2010/2011, 2009/2010 financial years (please list type, amount, date etc)? 2. When did the 4 historical societies sign the Local History Partnership agreements in

2009 to 2012 (please list dates for each society)? 3. Did any society miss out on funding in 2009 to 2011 and why (please list)?”



QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS – LOCAL HISTORY PARTNERSHIP Item 9.16 Continued Answers (Manager Customer & Community Service) 1. What City of Charles Sturt funding did the




Fort Granville Historical Society. receive in 2010/2011, 2009/2010 financial years (please list type, amount, date etc)?

The above historical societies received the following funding in 2010/11 and 2009/10:

Group Amount of Funding

Date allocated Funding type

$1600 June 2011 Local history project funding

Henley & Grange Historical Society

$1500 May 2010 Local history project funding

$1850 March 2011 Local history project funding (part 2)

$1850 November 2010 Local history project funding (part 1)

$1800 March 2010 Local history project funding (part 2)

$1800 November 2009 Local history project funding (part 1)

Hindmarsh Historical Society

$800 July 2009 DWA for dray restoration and open day

Woodville Historical Society

$4990 June 2010 DWA for rent

$2000 June 2010 Local history project funding

$1500 March 2010 Local history project funding

Fort Glanville Historical Association

$5000 April 2010 DWA funding for 130th celebrations



QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS – LOCAL HISTORY PARTNERSHIP Item 9.16 Continued

$2860 April 2011 DWA funding for History Month display

Combined societies (all four)

$1150 February 2010 DWA funding for History Week display

2. When did the 4 historical societies sign the Local History Partnership agreements in

2009 to 2012 (please list dates for each society)?

Societies signed partnering agreements for 2009/10 and 2010/11 on the dates detailed below. At this stage, societies have not been invited to enter into partnering agreements for 2011/12.

Group Partnering Agreement Period

Date signed by group

2010/11 29/9/10 Henley & Grange Historical Society 2009/10 31/7/09

2010/11 26/9/10 Hindmarsh Historical Society 2009/10 19/8/09

2010/11 28/5/2010 Woodville Historical Society 2009/10 No agreement

2010/11 10/11/10 Fort Glanville Historical Association 2009/10 21/10/09

3. Did any society miss out on funding in 2009 to 2011 and why (please list)

The Historical Society of Woodville did not receive funding from Council in 2010/11 as the society received DWA funding to cover the 12 month period of the 2010/11 agreement in May 2010.



9.17 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – CHELTENHAM PARK PLAYGROUND (B57) 105

Brief

Questions on Notice have been received from Councillor Grant regarding the Cheltenham Park Playground.

10. MOTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

Motion

1. Release $4,000 of the grant funds set aside in the 2011/12 budget ($1,000 each) for the Hindmarsh Historical Society, Henley & Grange Historical Society, Historical Society of Woodville, Fort Glanville Historical Association, as an immediate cash grant to accommodate cash flow issues the Societies are facing.

2. That this amount be deducted from any further 2011/12 grant provided to the Societies as part of their annual grant from Council.

Moved Councillor Alexandrides, Seconded Councillor Auricht Carried

Division Councillor Alexandrides called for a Division. Those voting in the affirmative were: Councillors Andriani, Ghent, Scheffler, Hanley, Fitzpatrick, Nguyen, Wasylenko, Coppola, Ienco, Alexandrides, Auricht and Harley (12).

Those voting in the negative were: Councillors Randall and Grant (2).

The motion was carried. 11. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

Nil 12. GENERAL BUSINESS [Note: Item 14 was considered after Item 12]



13. BUSINESS – PART II – CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS Declaration of Interest Councillors Wasylenko and Ghent disclosed an interest in Item 13.7 due to their membership on the Charles Sturt Development Assessment Panel and left the meeting at 7.17 pm. Recommendation – 7.18pm That pursuant to Section 90(2) of the Local Government Act 1999, Council hereby orders that the public be excluded from attendance at this meeting with the exception of the Chief Executive, Council’s lawyers and administrative staff currently in attendance in order to consider Item 13.7 LEGAL ADVICE ON LICENSED GAMING FACILITY AT CHELTENHAM RACECOURSE SITE in confidence as the matter falls within the ambit of Section 90(2)(h) “legal advice” and 90(3)(i) “information relating to the actual litigation, or litigation that the council or council committee believe on reasonable grounds will take place, involving the council or an employee of council.” Moved Councillor Fitzpatrick, Seconded Councillor Andriani Carried Unanimously Suspension of Proceedings – 7.19 pm That Council suspend the operation of Division 2 of the Local Government (Procedures at Meetings) Regulations 2000 for ½ hour to facilitate informal discussions regarding Item 13.7. Moved Councillor Grant, Seconded Councillor Ienco Carried Unanimously Resumption – 7.54 pm That Council resume. Moved Councillor Keneally, Seconded Councillor Grant Carried Adjournment – 7.54 pm That Council adjourn to consider Committee business. Moved Councillor Keneally, Seconded Councillor Scheffler Carried Resumption – 8.24 pm That Council resume. Moved Councillor Randall, Seconded Councillor Grant Carried Suspension of Proceedings – 8.26 pm That Council suspend the operation of Division 2 of the Local Government (Procedures at Meetings) Regulations 2000 to facilitate informal discussions regarding Item 13.7.



Moved Councillor Grant, Seconded Councillor Keneally Carried Unanimously Resumption – 8.55 pm That Council resume. Moved Councillor Grant, Seconded Councillor Andriani Carried Unanimously At 8.56 pm Councillor Keneally left the meeting. 13.7 LEGAL ADVICE ON LICENSED GAMING FACILITY AT CHELTENHAM RACECOURSE

SITE (B6260)

Brief

To provide members with legal advice in response to the motion without notice from Councillor Grant at the Council Meeting of 12 September 2011 (Item 10.11) and to recommend a possible course of action.

Motion 1. That Council write to the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner as per the

draft letter prepared by Wallmans Lawyers, as amended in accordance with advice from Mr Peter Hoban.

2. That Council be actively involved with the issuing of the “social effect

certificate”. 3. That a report be brought before Council with recommendations detailing

procedure and potential costs. 4. That pursuant to Section 91(7) of the Local Government Act 1999, the

Committee hereby orders that the report to the Council and appendices of this item be kept confidential for a period of 12 months, or until the matter is resolved, whichever is the sooner. [Note: The grounds for this order are outlined in the resolution above whereby the matter was considered in confidence by the Committee under Section 90(2)].

Moved Councillor Randall, Seconded Councillor Fitzpatrick Carried Unanimously At 9.10 pm Councillors Wasylenko and Ghent resumed their seats. [Note: Item 4 was considered after Item 13.7]



14. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES – PART II – CONFIDENTIAL

Nil 15. MEETING CLOSURE The meeting concluded at 10.36 pm. The foregoing minutes were taken as read and confirmed at the meeting of Council on Monday, 24 October 2011. K ALEXANDER, MAYOR ............................................................. DATED / /

NOTICE OF MEETING

To All Members of Council

I wish to advise that a meeting of Council will be held in the:

Council Chambers 72 Woodville Road, Woodville

commencing at 7.00 pm on Monday, 10 October 2011.

The Council meeting will adjourn at 7.30 pm at which time the Asset Management Committee and the City Services & Strategic Development Committee will meet concurrently in the Council Chamber and Committee Meeting Rooms 2 and 3 (CC2 & CC3) respectively. The Council meeting will resume at the conclusion of the Committee meetings. MARK WITHERS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Dated 6 October 2011 Please advise Kerrie Jackson if you are unable to attend this meeting or will be late. Telephone 8408 1115. We acknowledge that the land we meet on today is the traditional land of the Kaurna people. We respect their spiritual relationship with this land. We also acknowledge the Kaurna people as traditional custodians of the Kaurna land. We will endeavour, as Council, to act in a way that respects Kaurna heritage and the cultural beliefs of the Kaurna people.

City of Charles Sturt 1. CL Agenda 10/10/11

A G E N D A 1. COUNCIL OPENING

1.1 Prayer 1.2 Apologies for absence

2. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Confirmation of the minutes of the previous meeting held on Monday, 26

September 2011. Page No.

3. REPORTS 3.1 Mayor 1 3.2 Deputy Mayor 10 3.3 Reports of members and Council representatives on external

organisations 12 That the reports be received and noted. 4. DEPUTATIONS Nil 5. PETITIONS 5.13 PETITION – REQUEST TO STOP THE PROPOSED DEMOLITION OF A PRE‐WAR

HOME AT 63 CHARLES STURT AVENUE, GRANGE 13

Brief


5.14 PETITION – REQUEST FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC TOILETS IN THE BOWDEN/BROMPTON AREA 15

Brief



5.15 PETITION – OPPOSING DEVELOPMENT OF 498 GRANGE ROAD, FULHAM GARDENS 17

Brief


6. BUSINESS (i) Items to be starred (ii) Unstarred items to be adopted.

“That having read and considered the reports in the agenda related to items (list the number of each item and its title) adopt the recommendations as printed.”

6.175* 2011 SOUTH AUSTRALIAN EXCELLENCE IN STORMWATER AWARDS 19

Brief


6.176 COMMUNITY PLAN (B6764, B2279) 21

Brief


6.177 PROPOSED LIQUOR LICENSING AND GAMING POLICY (B136, B632) 31

Brief


6.178 BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP (B136) 37

Brief



6.179 MINISTERS SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION (B1938) 44

Brief


6.180 WATER PROOFING THE WEST ‐ STAGE ONE COMMUNITY REFERENCE GROUP (B6171) 53

Brief


6.181 MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE (B5422) 57

Brief


6.182 ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET WOODVILLE (B3904) 69

Brief


6.183* NOMINATIONS SOUGHT FOR THE ADELAIDE CEMETERIES AUTHORITY BOARD (B35) 75

Brief



6.184 DISCRETIONARY WARD ALLOWANCE ‐ APPROVAL PROCESS (B6852) 82

Brief

To consider Discretionary Ward Allowance applications.

7. MOTIONS ON NOTICE 7.26 NOTICE OF MOTION – COUNCIL MEMBER CODE OF CONDUCT 87

Brief


7.27 NOTICE OF MOTION – ‘STREET CORNER’ MEETINGS 91

Brief


7.28 NOTICE OF MOTION – TOURISM POLICY AND PLAN 92

Brief




(B57) 96

Brief



Brief




Brief


10. MOTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE [As previously identified and agreed to by Mayor.] 11. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE 12. GENERAL BUSINESS [As previously identified.] 13. BUSINESS – PART II – CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS 13.7 LEGAL ADVICE ON LICENSED GAMING FACILITY AT CHELTENHAM RACECOURSE

SITE

Recommendation ‐ Exclusion of the Public

That pursuant to Section 90(2) of the Local Government Act 1999, Council hereby orders that the public be excluded from attendance at this meeting with the exception of the Chief Executive, Council’s lawyers and administrative staff currently in attendance in order to consider the Item 13.7 LEGAL ADVICE ON LICENSED GAMING FACILITY AT CHELTENHAM RACECOURSE SITE in confidence as the matter falls within the ambit of Section 90(3)(h) “…legal advice” and 90 (3)(i) “…information relating to actual litigation, or litigation that the council or council committee believe on reasonable grounds will take place, involving the council or an employee of council.”

Brief



Nil 15. MEETING CLOSURE


Upcoming Meeting and Events Schedule Monday 17 October 2011 6.00pm Audit Committee – Special Meeting

Wednesday 19 October 2011 6.30pm Development Assessment Panel

Monday 24 October 2011 7.00pm Council

Wednesday 2 November 2011 6.30pm Development Assessment Panel

7.00pm Council

Monday 14 November 2011 7.30pm

Asset Management Committee

City Services & Strategic Development Committee

Wednesday 16 November 2011 6.30pm Development Assessment Panel

Monday 21 November 2011 6.00pm Finance Policy & Delegations Committee

Monday 28 November 2011 7.00pm Council

Wednesday 7 December 2011 6.30pm Development Assessment Panel

7.00pm Council

Monday 12 December 2011 7.30pm

Asset Management Committee

City Services & Strategic Development Committee

Monday 19 December 2011 6.00pm Audit Committee

Wednesday 21 December 2011 6.30pm Development Assessment Panel

City of Charles Sturt 1. CL Report 10/10/11

TO: Council FROM: Mayor Alexander DATE: 10 October 2011

3.1 MAYORAL REPORT

Thursday, 1 September 2011 15.00 The Mayor, together with Councillors Craig Auricht, Tolley Wasylenko and

Oanh Nyugen attended the Official Launch of the MYSA Multicultural Youth Education Development Centre at Building 7, Western Multicultural Precinct, 255 Torrens Road, West Croydon. MYSA Patron Dorinda Hafner gave a wonderful speech; then a cake that she had baked for the occasion was enjoyed by all, along with dancing and singing by MYSA members.

Friday, 2 September 2011 18.00 The Mayor attended the Oz Asia Festival 2011 launch at Government House

Adelaide followed by an Opening Night Performance ‘Dreamscape’ part of Oz Asia Festival at the Adelaide Festival Centre, King William Street, Adelaide.

Saturday, 3 September 2011 10.00 The Mayor attended the Christmas Event Planning meeting with Councillors

Juliann Andriani, Craig Auricht and Jim Fitzpatrick, and Council staff member Judith Robertson at the SA Rowing Club on Military Road, West Lakes.

12 noon The Mayor and Mr Neil Alexander attended the Eagles Football Club’s

President’s Pre Game Function at Woodville Oval, followed by a very hard fought match against Central Districts.

Sunday, 4 September 2011 14.00 Nil Monday, 5 September 2011 18.00 The Mayor chaired the Special Council meeting to discuss the demolition of

the Cheltenham Racecourse Grandstand.


MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued 20.00 The Mayor attended the North West Corridor & Inner West Structure Plan

Workshop together with Councillors and senior Council staff in CC2‐3, Civic Centre, Woodville. Thanks to the DPLG representatives for their attendance and to Elected Members for their attendance and contribution of preliminary feedback on many aspects of the Plans.

Tuesday, 6 September 2011 10.00 Mayor conferred with Michelle Mader on the Community Plan community

consultation plans. 10.30 Mayor and Marketing and Communications weekly meeting. 11.00 Mayor and CEO weekly meeting. 12.00 noon The Mayor together with Mark Withers, Paul Sutton and Kerrie Jackson

reviewed the Council agenda. 14.00 The Mayor together with CEO Mark Withers met with Mark Devine, St Clair

JV representative to request that demolition of the Cheltenham Grandstand be halted while alternative uses for the facility are considered.

15.30 The Mayor attended a media call in the Council Chambers regarding the

Cheltenham Grandstand. 16.00 The Mayor spoke with Mix 102 News regarding the demolition of the

Cheltenham Grandstand. 16.30 Mayor and Executive Assistant to Mayor weekly meeting 17.00 The Mayor spoke to ABC Drive program regarding the demolition of the

Cheltenham Grandstand. Wednesday, 7 September 2011 10.30 Councillor Robert Randall attended the Launch of the Channel 9 Young

Achiever Awards on behalf of the Mayor at HomeStart Finance Offices, 153 Flinders Street, Adelaide.

17.30 The Mayor together with Councillor Juliann Andrianni attended the Youth

Advisory Committee meeting at Youth Central, Woodville Road, Woodville to discuss planning for the Council Christmas Event.

18.30 The Mayor attended the Development Assessment Panel Meeting held at

the Civic Centre, Woodville Road, Woodville.


MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Thursday, 8 September 2011 Nil Friday, 9 September 2011 09.30 The Mayor attended the Official Launch of Mission Australia New Outreach

Service – Youth Beat at the Mercury Cinema at 13 Morphett Street, Adelaide. This service will provide support to young people in need of help on the streets.

12.00 noon The Mayor attended lunch with Jasmine Wood and Mayor Ken Rolland at

the Hotel Grand Chancellor on Hindley, 65 Hindley Street, Adelaide to hear the Hon Joe Hockey MP speak.

16.00 Councillor Joe Ienco attended the Reception to celebrate Eid al‐Fitr on

behalf of the Mayor; held by the Hon Grace Portolesi MP, Minister for Multicultural Affairs at Parliament House, North Terrace, Adelaide.

Saturday, 10 September 2011 10.40 The Mayor attended a photo shoot to promote the Walk to Work day. 16.30 The Mayor attended the Onam 2011 Celebrations held by the Adelaide

Metropolitan Malayalee Association (AMMA) at the Croatian Club, 15 Wood Avenue Brompton. AMMA is a community based voluntary organisation committed to the growth and togetherness of the ever growing number of Keralites (people from the Kerala State of India) in Adelaide, striving to promote and preserve Kerala's identity, tradition and heritage. Onam is a lovely celebration of the harvest and a time for enjoying food, music and dancing. The Mayor greatly enjoyed watching the lively performances and lighting the lamp at the opening ceremony.

18.00 The Mayor and Mr Neil Alexander attended the Maltese Association Dinner

Dance at the European Festival Function Centre 292 Findon Road, Findon, together with Councillor Edgar Agius and his wife Anna. The dinner was held in honour of Maltese National Day and was well attended by many people from the Maltese community in South Australia and Victoria. It was wonderful see so many join in the dancing!

Sunday, 11 September 2011 15.30 The Mayor and family attended the Vietnamese Moon Lantern Festival held

at the St Clair Recreation Centre and had a wonderful time making lanterns together.


MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Monday, 12 September 2011 17.30 The Mayor met with Council staff in the Mayor’s Office to discuss the

protection of outdoor dining areas at The Governor Hindmarsh Hotel. 19.00 The Mayor chaired the Council meeting in the Council Chamber, Civic

Centre, Woodville Road, Woodville Tuesday, 13 September 2011 10.30 The Mayor met with Michelle Mader to discuss the Community Plan

consultation. 11.00 Mayor and Marketing and Communications weekly meeting. 11.30 Mayor and CEO weekly meeting.

13.30 The Mayor met with Councillors Jim Fitzpatrick and Robert Randall and

Council staff in the Mayor’s Office to discuss the Coast Park Henley Beach South consultation and options.

16.00 The Mayor and Bronwyn Webster met with Mark Streater regarding

Personal Helpers and Mentors (PHAMS) services in the City of Charles Sturt Council area. Mark highlighted that Charles Sturt is not well serviced by these services, which provide personal assistance to residents with mental health issues. A report will be provided to a future Council meeting on the availability of these services in Charles Sturt.

17.00 Mayor and Executive Assistant to Mayor weekly meeting Wednesday, 14 September 2011 Nil Thursday, 15 September 2011 10.30 Councillor Joe Ienco attended the Adult Learners Week Open Day of the

Overseas Chinese Association of SA Inc at 110 Crittenden Road, Findon on behalf of the Mayor.

19.00 Councillor Edgar Agius and Councillor Mick Harley attended the Adelaide

36er’s 2011/2012 Launch on behalf of the Mayor at the Dome, 44a Crittenden Road, Findon.


MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Friday, 16 September 2011 07.30 The Mayor and CEO Mark Withers led the Cancer Council’s ‘Walk to Work

Day’ of Council staff with a “walk at work” from the Civic Centre, along Woodville Rd, Torrens Rd, Cheltenham Pde and Port Rd, ending back at Woodville Rd, followed by a healthy breakfast provided by OPAL and the Kidman Park Rotary Club. Great to see so many staff getting involved and being active!

17.00 The Mayor met with Michelle Mader regarding the Community Plan. 17.30 The Mayor attended a meeting with the CEO and Council staff to discuss the

agenda for the Gaming and Liquor Policy and Community Forum, together with Cr Juliann Andrianni, Cr Robert Randall and Cr Craig Auricht.

Saturday, 17 September 2011 11.00 The Mayor attended the ‘Doggy Day at the Beach’ in the Henley Square,

Henley Beach, together with her children and her dogs and all enjoyed the walk on the beach. Congratulations to all of the staff involved for a well‐run community event. Councillor Randall also attended the event.

Sunday, 18 September 2011 09.30 Councillor Joe Ienco attended the Feast in Honour of Our Lady of Perpetual

Grace, at the Mater Christie Parish on Grange Road, Seaton on behalf of the Mayor.

15.00 Councillor Edgar Agius attended the Eagles Qualifying Finals at AAMI

Stadium on behalf of the Mayor. 15.30 The Mayor and Councillor Joe Ienco and his wife attended the Findon Skid

Kids Annual Open Championships Presentation. Councillor Mick Harley gave a lively commentary on the event from the commentator’s box and the crowd greatly enjoyed the fast paced action from competitors of all ages. Great to see several generations of Skid Kids involved!

Monday, 19 September 2011 11.00 Councillor Robert Grant attended the Woodville High School’s Multicultural

Assembly at the Woodville High School on behalf of the Mayor. 17.30 The Mayor attended the Community Plan Steering Group Meeting in CC2‐3

at the Civic Centre, Woodville Road, Woodville.


MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued 19.30 The Mayor attended a Christmas Event meeting with Cr Juliann Andriani and

Cr Jim Fitzpatrick in the Mayor’s Office. Tuesday, 20 September 2011 09.30 The Mayor met with Perry Nesbit and Richard Hughes for an inspection of

the Carnegie Reserve clubrooms. 10.00 The Mayor and CEO Mark Withers attended the KESAB Sustainable City of

the Year Award Ceremony and morning tea in CC1, Civic Centre, Woodville Road, Woodville. Congratulations to all staff involved on winning the South Australian KESAB Sustainable City Award – well done!

11.00 Mayor and CEO weekly meeting 12.00 noon The Mayor together with Mark Withers and Kerrie Jackson reviewed the

Council agenda. 14.00 Mayor and Executive Assistant to Mayor weekly meeting 16.00 The Mayor together with Councillor Oanh Nyugen and Councillor Robert

Grant, Perry Nesbit and Richard Hughes met with a resident at the St Clair Recreation Centre to discuss maintenance of the Centre and issues with the leaking roof.

Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19.00 The Mayor and Mr Neil Alexander attended AFC Asian Qualifiers for the

2012 London Games – Final Round ‐ Australian U23's v UAE at the Hindmarsh Stadium, Hindmarsh.

Thursday, 22 September 2011 17.00 The Mayor met with Michelle Madder to discuss the Community Plan. 18.00 The Mayor and GM Asset Management Jan Cornish conducted a Citizenship

Ceremony in the Woodville Town Hall and welcomed our new Australian citizens. Thanks to Councillors Juliann Andriani, Tolley Wasylenko, Robert Grant, Jim Fitzpatrick and Deputy Mayor Angela Keneally for their attendance. The ceremony was also attended by Freemen of the City Lyle Gilligan, John Pinto and Former Mayor Harold Anderson – great to see them there too.


MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Friday, 23 September 2011 Nil Saturday, 24 September 2011 19.00 The Mayor and family attended the Woodville South Junior Football Club

Presentation for U11‐16 at the Woodville South Sports and Social Club, Ledger Road Woodville South. It was great to see a huge turnout for the event in the newly renovated clubrooms.

Sunday, 25 September 2011 12.00 The Mayor and Mr Neil Alexander attended the President’s Room and

Eagles Game at AAMI Stadium. Good to see the Eagles with a resounding victory over South Adelaide. The match was also attended by Cr Tolley Wasylenko and his wife.

Monday, 26 September 2011 08.30 Mayor and CEO meeting in the Mayor’s Office, Civic Centre 12.30 The Mayor together with Councillors Jim Fitzpatrick and Robert Randall met

with Natalie Fuller and Alison Miller in relation to the agenda for the Henley Square and Environs Community Workshop.

15.30 The Mayor attended the Youth Opportunities Personal Leadership

Presentation at the Woodville High School, Actil Avenue, Woodville. It was an inspiring afternoon hearing the stories of growth and seeing the growing confidence of the students involved. The Youth Opportunities program achieves some amazing results with the students – congratulations to Principal Meredith Edwards and the WHS Governing Council for their commitment to the program.

17.30 The Mayor attended Oxfam’s Launch of ‘Grow’ future of Food Forum at the

Civic Gallery for pre event refreshments at the Bradley Forum Hawke Centre, UniSA City West Campus, 50‐5 North Terrace, Adelaide

19.00 The Mayor chaired the Council meeting in the Council Chamber, Civic

Centre, Woodville Road, Woodville.


MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Tuesday, 27 September 2011 08.45 Councillor Robert Randall attended the Western Regional Enterprise Day

Opening Ceremony on behalf of the Mayor at the University of Adelaide, Napier Building Lecture Theatre 102 in Adelaide.

08.30 The Mayor together with Councillor Edgar Agius attended the NAIDOC

Prime Minister’s Medal Presentation at the Flinders Park Primary School. The presentation was deferred until a later date as the recipient’s details were not known.

09.00 The Mayor attended the 5000+ Forum at the Adelaide College of the Arts,

39 Light Square, Adelaide 12.15 The Mayor and Cr Paul Alexandrides attended the NAIDOC Prime Minister’s

Medal Presentation awarded to Gav Patel at the Brompton Primary School, Napier Street, Renown Park. This is a wonderful award given to 12 children in South Australia (three from Charles Sturt) whose art work was selected from thousands of entries across the state. Congratulations to Gav and his proud parents – it was also wonderful to see the whole school celebrate his achievement.

14.00 Councillor Robert Randall represented the Mayor at the Friends of Queen

Elizabeth Hospital’s Annual General Meeting, Lakes Resort Conference Room 141 Brebner Drive West Lakes. Deputy Mayor Angela Keneally also attended.

16.30 The Mayor together with Adrian Sykes and Jan Cornish met with Susan Scott

from the Water Proofing West Community Reference Group and Michael Hood of Aurecon regarding the Water Proofing the West project in the Mayor’s Office, Civic Centre.

17.30 The Mayor together with Councillors Juliann Andriani, Craig Auricht, Raelene

Hanley and Jim Fitzpatrick attended the Christmas Event Volunteers meeting in CC2/3, Civic Centre. Thanks very much to the staff who have volunteered their time to assist with planning of this event.

18.00 The Mayor together with Mark Withers, Councillors Doriana Coppola,

Robert Randall, Tolley Wasylenko, Jim Fitzpatrick and Deputy Mayor Angela Keneally attended the review of CEO’s Performance Meeting in the Council’s Boardroom, Civic Centre.


MAYORAL REPORT Item 3.1 Continued Wednesday, 28 September 2011 08.30 The Mayor attended a photographic shoot for the Christmas Event. 17.30 The Mayor conferred with Phil Hewitt and Sam Adams in relation to the

Holland Street Bridge in the Mayor’s Office Civic Centre 19.00 The Mayor and Councillors Robert Randall, Jim Fitzpatrick, Juliann Andriani,

Raelene Hanley and Paul Alexandrides attended the Henley Precinct Master Plan Workshop in the Henley Town Hall. It was good to see the workshop well attended, with a lot of good ideas generated as a prelude to the next community workshop on 5th November in the Henley Town Hall.

Thursday, 29 September 2011 09.00 The Mayor and Councillor Oanh Nguyen attended the NAIDOC Prime

Minister’s Medal Presentation awarded to Omar Mohammed at the Challa Gardens Primary School. It was wonderful to see the whole school support and celebrate Omar’s achievement at a very lively and entertaining Assembly. Also lovely to see residents of the nearby retirement village are actively involved in the school community; they attended the assembly and morning tea that followed and provided some stories of the school history.

Friday, 30 September 2011 Nil


TO: Council FROM: Deputy Mayor DATE: 10 October 2011

3.2 DEPUTY MAYOR'S REPORT (B35)

8 September The Launch of Peer VEET’s New Entry Level Training Facility. The official opening was conducted by The Hon. Kate Ellis MP. Jack Snelling MP also attended together with David Pisoni MP and the Mayor of Port Adelaide Enfield Council.

12 September Council and City Services & Strategic Development Committee – absent due

to interstate work commitments. 15 September Local Government Women’s Association – SA branch committee meeting. 19 September Woodville High School Multi cultural week Multicultural assembly.

Woodville High School is a richly diverse school with students from over 55 different cultural groups. In this assembly, the school and friends of the school celebrate the diversity through dance performances from many cultures. A particularly important part of the assembly was the official recognition of the school as a United Nations Peace School under the auspices of Save the Children Fund. Cr Grant and Judith Robertson, Diversity officer also attended.

21 September Toy Boys morning tea. Toy Boys hand make toys for distribution to

disadvantaged children at Christmas time. They are also affiliated with Rotary.

22 September Citizenship Ceremony at the Woodville Town Hall. The event not only fulfils

requirements under Australian citizenship law, but also provides an important opportunity to officially welcome new citizens as full members of the City of Charles Sturt community. The Mayor officiated at the event. Elected members attended as well as Freemen of the City Mr Harold Anderson and Mr Lyle Gilligan.

24 September Woodville South Football Club trophies event. Attended event with Cr

Wasylenko and presented award to under 9’s coach. 26 September Council


DEPUTY MAYOR’S REPORT Item 3.2 Continued 27 September 2.00pm Friends of the QEH 51st Annual General Meeting. Also attended by Cr

Randall. 6.00pm CEO Performance review panel meeting. 30 September Local Government Women’s Association – SA branch Diamond Do. A time to

get together with people from other Councils who have an interest in supporting gender equity in local government.

4 October Riverpark Estate Development Resident meeting. This meeting is a direct

response to the concerns of residents which were raised at street corner meetings in June.

5 October Youth Advisory Committee meeting. 9 October SANFL 2011 Grand Final Official Match Day Luncheon.


TO: Council FROM: Councillor Fitzpatrick DATE: 10 October 2011

3.3 REPORTS OF MEMBERS AND COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES ON EXTERNAL

ORGANISATIONS (B35)

Councillor Jim Fitzpatrick – External Organisations Report 13 September Attended the Henley Beach Primary School Council meeting. 16 September Attended the Spanish Group meeting at the Findon Community Centre, I

gave a talk on the structure and operations of the City of Charles Sturt, I answered many questions.

22 September Attended the Citizen Ceremony conducted by Mayor Alexander assisted

by Deputy Mayor Keneally, at the Woodville Town Hall, Cr. Wasylenko, Andriani, and Nguyen also attended.

27 September Attended the Henley High School Gym West meeting. 28 September Attended the Henley Square & Environs workshop at the Henley Town

Hall. Mayor Alexander, Cr. Alexandrides, Andriani, Randall and Hanley also attended.

Elected Members report (Henley Ward) Councillor Jim Fitzpatrick 14 September Attended the Henley Square Accord/Crime Prevention Group meeting.

Cr. Randall also attended. 15 September Attended the Combined Probus Club of West Beach visit to the Urrbrae

Wet Lands site. 25 September Attended the West Beach Surf Life Saving Club “Opening Season and New

Boat Christening” event, Cr. Randall also attended.


TO: Council FROM: Manager Planning & Development DATE: 10 October 2011

5.13 PETITION – REQUEST TO STOP THE PROPOSED DEMOLITION OF A PRE‐WAR

HOME AT 63 CHARLES STURT AVENUE, GRANGE (B35)

Brief


Recommendation 1. That the petition be received and referred to the City Services & Strategic

Development Committee on 11 November 2011. 2. That Council notify the head petitioner of Council’s decision.

Petition The petition was submitted by the Charles Sturt Avenue Residents Group, a copy of the petition is attached (refer Appendix A), which contains 11 signatures, all of which live in the City.


PETITION – REQUEST TO STOP THE PROPOSED DEMOLITION OF A PRE‐WAR HOME AT 63 CHARLES STURT AVENUE, GRANGE Item 5.13

APPENDIX A Appendix A contains 5 pages. TRIM Ref: 11/212388

Submission to the honourable Mayor and Councillors of the City of Charles Sturt Council from residents of Charles Sturt Avenue, Grange,, now forming the Charles Sturt Avenue Residents Group.

Date: September11, 2011

Submission

We the residents of Charles Sturt Avenue, Grange, respectfully present this submission to appeal to the honourable Mayor and Council to:

• 1. Stop the proposed demolition of a pre-war home at 63 Charles Sturt Avenue, Grange.

2. If the demolition cannot be stopped, ensure the desi9n of the proposed development is altered to ensure that it:

(a) Compl*ments and enhances the character of this stretch of our street (i.e. nearby pre and post World War Two homes);

(b) Does not overshadow adjacent homes

(ç) Is not three storeys high

(d) Ensures the privacy of nearby residents

(e) Does not compromise the potential for nearby residents to introduce sustainable energy initiatives.

3. Ensure that the section of Charles Sturt Avenue from Jetty Street to the iailway line is (consistent with other sections of our street) re-zoned as a "character area".

Sean & Annette Boyle

Sally Lewis & Matt Hollan

60 Charles Sturt Ave.


Meredith Neck - 65 Charles Sturt Ave.

Clyde Watson

ileA.- d&/tg Charles Sturt Ave.

Ken Rochou


Brendan Mahoney


Min & Greg Mc Hugh ,Z,'\-' 6Charles Sturt Ave.

Srie?r Ac

ii

1. Grounds of Submission:

The grounds for our submission, decided at a meeting of concerned residents and ratepayers of Charles Sturt Avenue, are as follows:

1.1 Impact on the desired character of Charles Sturt Ave. Grange: The Councils Development Plan - Mid Suburban Policy Area 16 (p 210) states:

Objeciivis 1. Development that contributes to the desired character of the policy area.

Desired Character • . . ."It is desirable that dwellings be designed to complement and enhance the high quality pre and post World War Two building styles and incolporating setback, sitings, materials, roof forms and features consistent with and enhancing the established character."

We understand that it is proposed that the current stone-fronted, post World War Two bungalow be replaced with a dwelling that:

• is a of ultra modern box-type design; • has two-storeys and a roof-top garden; • open balconies at both the front and back; and • is of a size that will take up most of the small block at 63 Charles Sturt

Ave, Grange.

In particular, the modern box-shaped dwelling proposed for this site, with its enclosed roof - top garden, will effectively add a third storey to the house and create a roof profile that it completely at odds with the roof forms of the "pre and post World War Two building styles".

(Note: The Macquarie dictionary defines a 'roof garden' as: The top or top storey of a building having a garden, restaurant or the like.)

Not only would such a dwelling not meet the Development Plan objective, that is to 'compliment and enhance' the pre-and post World War Two homes in our street, it would be so at odds with style of neighbouring properties and it will spoil the character of this section of Charles Sturt Avenue.

We note that before the Second World War, Charles Sturt Avenue, (or Sturt Street as it was known then) stretched from Grange Road to the railway line with a few farm-type dwelling scattered along its length. The post war boom saw the street fill with houses of that era - with the northern section (past the railway line) being the last section to fill with housing.

While some of these post-war properties have been interceded with cream-brick style units of the 70's or red-brick homettes of the 80's and 90's, such dwellings have mainly been built in the section of Charles Sturt Avenue between Jetty Street and Grange Rd. Ironically it is this section that has been zoned as a "character area" and our section of the street has not.

2

This has left our section of the street (i.e. from Jetty St up to the railway line) vulnerable to the sort of development proposed at No 63. It is in this context that we seek to have the "character zoning of Charles Sturt Avenue extended to cover our section of the street before any more modem-day monstrosities are approved.

This would ensure that even if existing character houses are demolished, their replacements are in character with the existing architecture of the street. The houses constructed/ renovated only meters away in Jetty (between Charles Sturt Ave and Military Rd) are admirable evidence that it is possible to build a modern house that complement and enhance existing high quality pre and post World War Two building styles.

1.2 Overshadowing of adjacent homes:

We are concerned that the height, close proximity and length of the proposed three-story development will block out the light and warmth of the North sun to an adjoining residents home and restrict the future installation and optimUm exposure of solar panels to sunshine on the Northern side of this families roof area.

We question if these important factors where not taken into account by Council during the initial assessment process and that this does not meet the intent of provisions in the Councils Development Plan - Residential Development (pages 66-67) which state;

7. The design and location of buildings should ensure that the direct winter sunlight is available to adjacent dwellings, with particular consideration given to:

(a) windows of habitable rooms (b) ground level open space (c) upper-level private balconies that provide prima!y open space area for any

dwelling (d) Access to solar energy.

1.3 Height of development

We are concerned that the height of the new foundation designed to assist future flood proofing of the proposed development, the height of the walls and the additional roof-top garden, will increase the total height of the development to well over 10 meters.

1.4 Privacy of nearby residents

We are very concerned about the impact this development will have for the privacy of families on both sides and to families in Baker Street living at the back of the proposed development. The main grounds for our concern relate to the lack of privacy families will have from people looking into their homes from the

3

third-storey roof garden and balcony to be built at the rear of theproposed new development.

1.5 Excess storm water into the street:

We are concerned about the sudden volume of excess rain water that could flow quickly from the top of this two-story development into the street and increase the risk of flooding to nearby properties. Existing drainage systems in Charles Sturt Avenue and outside number 63 are prone to flooding during heavy rainfalls.

1.6 Notification of proposed development to residents:

As long-standing residents and ratepayers of Charles Sturt Avenue we are very disappointed Council staff did not inform us about the proposed development on the site of 63 Charles Sturt Ave. particularly duringthe initial assessment process. We believe this contradicts Councils information to residents about when we should use the Development Plan (Page 6);

"Vvhen you believe you could be affected by a proposed development and you are given an opportunity to comment on it as part of the assessment process"

1.7 Future Sustainability:

We are concerned about the impact this and future developments of a similar type (2— 3 storeys) will have on sustainability, namely the over-shadowing of gardens and solar panels on the North side of homes. A number of families in our street have invested thousands of dollars from their personal savings and have increased mortgages to install solar panels. As such we respectfully ask Council to ensure that the concern raised by these families about overshadowin9 from developments is taken into account and that residents are notified and consulted during the initial approval process for any new developments in our street.

1.8 Consultation with residents about proposed future developments:

In addition to the above, there is a perception that Council has placed the rights of developers ahead of the rights of long-standing families and ratepayers in Charles Sturt AvenUe. This perception, whether right or wrong, is evidenced by some of the ad-hoc developments being approved by Council in our street. These developments not only impact the desired character of our street (i.e. to ensure pre and post war bungalows) they also have the potential to limit the appeal of our street to families wanting to live in an un-spoilt seaside suburb.

4

Conclusion:

in conclusion, we believe this submission provides a number of important points of conern.and we respectfully call on Honourable Mayor and elected members of Charles Sturt Council to:

1. Stop the proposed demolition of a pre-war home at 63 Charles Sturt Avenue, Grange.

I If the demolition cannQt be stopped,, ensure the desi9n of the proposed development is altered to ensure that it:

3. complements and enhances the character of this stretch of our street (i.e. nearby quality pre and post World War Two homes);

a. Does not overshadow adjacent homes

b. Is not three storeys high

c. Ensures the privacy of nearby residents

d. Does not compromise the potential for nearby residents to introduce sustainable energy initiatives.

4. Ensure that the section of Charles Sturt Avenue from Jetty Street to the railway line is (consistent with other sections of our stree re-zoned as a "character area".

We respectfully request a meeting with the Mayor and Councillors representing Charles Sturt Avenue, Grange, to discuss the concerns We have listed in our submission and an agreed model for consultation with representatives of the Charles Sturt Ave. Residents Group about any future developments in our street.

4.


TO: Council FROM: Coordinator Property Services DATE: 10 October 2011

5.14 PETITION – REQUEST FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC TOILETS IN THE

BOWDEN/BROMPTON AREA (B35)

Brief


Recommendation 1. That the petition be received and the Ward Councillors Alexandrides and

Auricht and relevant staff meet with the head petitioner to discuss the request or submission contained within the petition.

2. That a report be tabled at the Asset Management Committee at the

conclusion of these discussions. 3. That Council notify the head petitioner of Council’s decision.

Petition The petition was submitted by Mr Terry Stoneman, 22 Eleventh Street, Bowden. A copy of the petition is attached (refer Appendix A), which contains 23 signatures, all of which live in the City.


PETITION – REQUEST FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC TOILETS IN THE BOWDEN/BROMPTON AREA Item 5.14


jo\t

P1 ofr fr

4 ( (e+ b(

o /D4t' tx, ?o ke

cf Uc oi 1 Or

ro

- A c( cAr-5j iLi -

Z2- S'f.

r/ 0 130 •-

s9li (,~soo ,

7

4-) 3

L'T 22 thikcv Sl (odo

ft z,tv(a ft,e( r &A 1frL I/Jf)/tz7f-j

(Z. A ) tJ' A'vt

a !° &V1

~-1 (Cklfg5-7 /c

1 (o& vz I

to oP A

i)Qn

H EL ST

S. A. cooT

?-~L r (\Je-

M0 __h U r

-L)o5-ci! S q

rc r

fo of

Of 1J ç tA) F k r J,c r- O'-" cx/- 0 r

1e ''1 cf i3I Jo

t- ortj Ur$

rr J o5~)IiLy Pr- cL,(

ILA

Aflrj 3C S

4 ks- r

r k

on c k ( k '

OLL (O(

? r( 4 5 a or L 4 L r c

0 s r 1 Ii

I (rr


TO: Council FROM: Manager Planning & Development DATE: 10 October 2011

5.15 PETITION – OPPOSING DEVELOPMENT OF 498 GRANGE ROAD, FULHAM

GARDENS (B35)

Brief


Recommendation 1. That the petition be received and referred to the City Services & Strategic

Development Committee on 11 November 2011. 2. That Council notify the head petitioner of Council’s decision.

Petition The petition was submitted by Ms Maria Schulz of 4 Shaftsbury Avenue, Fulham Gardens. A copy of the petition is attached (refer Appendix A), which contains 38 signatures, all of which live in the City.


PETITION ‐ OPPOSING DEVELOPMENT OF 498 GRANGE ROAD, FULHAM GARDENS Item 5.15


PETITION OPPOSING DEVELOPMENT OF 498 GRANGE ROAD, FULHAM GARDENS

The following residents object to the demolition andl or refurbishment of the existing Service Station located at 498 Grange Road, Fulham Gardens We do not approve of the construction of a new Service Station Car Wash and Convenience Store

Our reasons are as follows:-

The existing service station is located in a fully residential area and this should remain the status quo.

This proposed development is not within the Character of the area.

The additional noise, traffic and pollution would directly affect elderly residents who reside directly opposite the existing service station. This corner is already congested at the best of times with cars using this street as a short cut between Grange Road and Marlborough Street During Football season residents in the street are unable to exit onto Grange Road to travel either West or East due to the traffic build up To add to this is asking for an accident to occur. We have already raised the issue of traffic in the Street to which a traffic monitor was set up The young children in the street would 'no longer be able to ride their bikes in the street due to the increased traffic and safety issue.

This proposed development is not going to serve the community. The area concerned already has 3 nearby service stations/car wash facilities all located within 1 km north south and east A Caltex service station on the corner of Grange Road and Tapleys Hill Road closed months ago due we believe due to a lack of income We don't.need another service station when the government is tryingto reduce greenhouse gas omissions and encourage residents to use public transport Further up the road along Grange. Road, Weltand thereis a purpose built 6 bay car wash. Another carwash has recently opened up on Tapleys Hill Road, Hendon.

Nearby heading west alongGrange Roadwe:have a. Drake Supermarket that caters for the residents grocery needs We don't need a large Service Station that sells confectionery, etc in competition with Drake Supermarkets. Drakes is a SA icon and has always supported the local community and we appreciate this and reciprocate by buying local where funds will be put back into the local community.

Having a Service Station operating 24/7 is a potential for breakins and there is a possibility that thieves may jump residents fences to evade police Service Stations are known as soft targets and this.rnay bring riff raffs into the area. We have already had recent incidentsof cars being set alight, vandalism to front yards and vehicles which have been reported to police.

Service Stations are dangerous places with potential for explosions. We have already had a service station fire in the Adelaide suburbs a few years ago We don t want another Service Station in the area with residents fearing for their lives on a daily basis. How do we knowthat the service station is going.to take all the correct measures to protect residents? How do we know that the Service Station is going to monitored for potential leaks?

NAME ADDRESS SiGNATURE

11 Am

1 4,

im'6 2 r5LI g y t1-'

. I' c<i •. .

k 44

Au-

4A Al '

PC 1 Iize2i1t ei j7

IV

- '1

'I (o'iz 7

LL*) k29 r1> i4 _ \LL eo1 i j _ c4(,_

cj7c LLc&, J±E

C 1 2)5f Im?

SiFyk7H___-J t) (C

I NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE S

___- --

C ---:T 1 Or

/

/ C

Va

ll

LkiL_L1 :i_ 4' $JL

NAME ADDRESS StGNATURE

ST R, ~,Tlk GROUP 68 E3I0NJT3

FNI. A N6 FuAPEs

Xk El S1'F R N

_i P

Alt D

E 3

JItL

"i' v)

crz

I L L I A C

WfLLI

__

I

L7EVNImft7

HO US hit Q C,4 w

w' UVIb2 ___ ___


TO: Council FROM: Chief Executive Officer DATE: 10 October 2011

6.175* 2011 SOUTH AUSTRALIAN EXCELLENCE IN STORMWATER AWARDS

Brief


Recommendation

1. That the report be received and noted. 2. The Council formally recognise and congratulate the Water Proofing the

West team on becoming the winner of the Stormwater Industry Association’s Category 1: Excellence in Strategic or Master Planning Award in Adelaide on Thursday 22 September 2011.

Status This report relates to or impacts upon the following Community Plan Outcomes:

A local organisation providing progressive leadership, accountable governance and quality services to the community

‐ Recognition as a leading organisation delivering best practice in local government management

Relevant Council policies are:

Staff Training and Development Policy Relevant statutory provisions are:

Not applicable


2011 SOUTH AUSTRALIAN EXCELLENCE IN STORMWATER AWARDS Item 6.175 Continued Background The Stormwater Industry Association of South Australia Excellence Awards is to encourage, recognise, promote and celebrate excellence in the innovation, development, completion and management of stormwater projects and the people involved. Category 1: Excellence in Strategic or Master Planning Award recognises excellence in strategic planning in the development of integrated stormwater management. The winner of each category will be entered into the National Awards in 2012. Conclusion The Council formally recognise and congratulate the Water Proofing the West team on becoming the winner of the Stormwater Industry Association’s Category 1: Excellence in Strategic or Master Planning Award in Adelaide on Thursday 22 September 2011.


TO: Council FROM: Community Engagement Coordinator DATE: 10 October 2011

6.176 COMMUNITY PLAN (B6764, B2279)

Brief


Recommendation 1. That the report be noted. 2. That the Community Plan Steering Group continues to consider and

respond to feedback provided by Resident/Community Groups in implementing the Community Plan engagement process, and in particular seeks to work with Groups to promote the project through community networks.

3. That the draft Community Plan theme papers contained in Appendix D be

endorsed in draft form, with the Community Plan Steering Group delegated authority to make additions and refinements to them, including on the basis of discussion at the October 11 Population Study workshop and Resident Group feedback.

4. That finalised theme papers be placed in the online Community Plan

project library and provided on request in hard copy form from Friday 28 October.



‐ Ensure the community is well informed and actively engaged


COMMUNITY PLAN Item 6.176 Continued Relevant Council policies are:

Community Engagement Model

Public Consultation Policy

Public Consultation Procedure

Charles Sturt Council Development Plan Relevant statutory provisions are:

Development Act 1993

Local Government Act 1999 Background At its meetings of 25 July, 2011 (refer CL, Item 6.137, 25/07/11) Council endorsed a broad approach to undertaking a combined Community Plan/ Section 30 Review process over the period October 2011 – August 2012. At that meeting the following was also endorsed: ‘That discussion papers for each theme area of the community plan/ section 30 review SDR process along with a detailed schedule of events and activities forming part of this initiative, be presented to the August meeting of Council.’ At its meeting of August 22, 2011 (refer CL, Item 6.154, 22/08/11) Council endorsed a schedule of events and activities, a discussion/ questions framework and an advertising and promotions schedule for the first community engagement stage of the Community Plan process. At that meeting, Council also endorsed the following: ‘That in line with discussions at the August 1 workshop of Council Members and local Residents Associations, a copy of the detailed engagement strategy for the community plan project be provided to the six participating Residents Groups, and other community groups as nominated by Members, for feedback.’ ‘That any feedback obtained from the community groups on the engagement process, within two weeks of requesting feedback, be taken into consideration in the final plan and be provided to Council if there is a material difference.’ ‘That discussion papers for each theme area of the Community Plan/ Section 30 Review process be presented to the September 12, 2011 meeting of Council.’


COMMUNITY PLAN Item 6.176 Continued Report Feedback from Residents/ Community Groups On the 25 August, in response to the Council motion above, six Resident Groups and approximately 50 community groups and individuals located in the Henley ward (and nominated by Cr Fitzpatrick) were forwarded the previous two reports to Council concerning the Community Plan and formally invited by letter to provide feedback on the engagement process outlined, by Friday 9 September. The letter also invited recipients to meet with the Mayor and Community Engagement Coordinator to provide and discuss feedback in person. Prior to this the six Residents Groups had been provided with the 25 July Community Plan Council Report and informally invited to provide feedback on it. Responses were received from the following:

WACRA (verbally at a meeting of Mayor Alexander, Michelle Mader, Jim Douglas and Paul Laris held on Tuesday 30 August and in writing)

Hindmarsh Greening (verbally at a meeting of Mayor Alexander, Michelle Mader and Philip Konings on Wednesday 31 August)

Val Wales (email)

Marine Discovery Centre (email and verbally via telephone call)

Kellie Holbrook (email) Key feedback was as follows:

extend the qualitative engagement phase and stagger the various engagement being undertaken over coming months to enable adequate time and opportunity for quality community participation

extend the steering group to include community

adopt deliberative democracy approach instead of the quantitative stage

pilot questions and discussion triggers with community

provide information about local government’s role and various business as part of project

discussion regarding relative merits of different promotions mediums and methods of distribution (including Messenger, Council newsletters)

work with existing community networks and Residents Groups to ‘spread the word’ about the project and encourage participation

undertake quality of output evaluation rather than just evaluation of people’s satisfaction with process

there are too many different mechanisms for feedback Full copies of feedback are provided as Appendix A. Feedback was presented to and discussed at the first meeting of the Community Plan Steering Group held Monday 19 September. At that meeting, in response to the feedback, the concept of extending the steering group to include community was discussed.


COMMUNITY PLAN Item 6.176 Continued It was acknowledged that involvement of community in shaping the Community Plan engagement process would be valuable, however given the tight timeframes it was decided that formally extending the steering group or establishing a community reference group to guide the process was not practical. Instead, the Group resolved to work with Residents Groups as individual reference points on process, on key areas of interest to Groups. In line with this the project plan has been forwarded to Groups with an invitation to them to advise how they would like to be specifically involved. Feedback will be considered by the Steering Group. The Groups have also been forwarded the recent Council report relating to the North West Corridor / Inner Metro Rim Structure Plan process (refer CL, Item 6.168 ,26/09/11) and invited to provide feedback on the community engagement process recommended as part of it. The Steering Group will further consider the feedback from the Groups (outlined above and included as Appendix A) in implementing the engagement process and in particular it is recommended that Council seek to work with Groups to promote the project through community networks. Project Planning Update Community Plan project planning is well underway, with the formal engagement period scheduled for Friday October 28 – Friday December 2. Individual initiatives have been scheduled as follows:

Initial project flyer to be letterboxed across the City on the weekend of 15 and 16 October (refer Appendix B for copy)

Main project brochure with reply paid survey to be letterboxed across City during the weekend of 29 and 30 October and to businesses during the week following (refer Appendix C for copy)

Smartphone app, online discussion forum and online project presence (including youth specific portal) live on 28 October

Community leaders and thinkers visioning workshop, Sunday 13 November, 1pm ‐4pm, Adelaide Entertainment Centre

Woodville West/ Findon Wards Open Evening, Tuesday 8 November, 4pm – 7pm, Findon Library

Henley/ Grange/ Semaphore Park Wards Open Evening, Tuesday 15 November, 4pm – 7pm, West Lakes Rowing Club

Woodville Ward Open Evening, Tuesday 22 November, 4pm – 7pm, Cheltenham Community Centre

Hindmarsh/ Beverley Wards Open Evening, Wednesday 23 November, 4pm – 7pm, Hindmarsh Library

Shopping centre staffed displays as well as message walls and displays at community centres and libraries is also scheduled

Workshops on request will be promoted


COMMUNITY PLAN Item 6.176 Continued

workshops and initiatives specifically targeting ‘hard to reach’ groups have also been scheduled

promotion including through banners, corflute signage, advertising in community newsletters, Messenger column advertising, mailouts and flyers across community networks and advertising on allied websites will also be undertaken

The purpose of the main project brochure is to promote the project, encourage participation and to provide key information to prompt and assist community discussion and feedback. Staff have worked with the Community Plan Steering Group to develop the initial flyer, main brochure, reply paid survey and detail of engagement activities. Theme Papers Detailed draft theme papers for the theme areas of the Plan as endorsed by Council (refer CL, Item 6.137, 25/07/11) as follows have been developed to provide key context information for residents/ stakeholders and to prompt and assist community discussion and feedback:

Overview Paper (current and forecast population and demographic analysis)

Environmental Sustainability

Community

Economy

Place

Liveability

Leadership The draft theme papers are attached as Appendix D. The theme papers have been developed by key staff across the discipline areas of Council matched to theme areas. The overview paper has been drawn from the Hugo, G and Harris, K, GICSA –The National Centre for Social Applications of GIS at The University of Adelaide, 2011, Draft Population Paper prepared for City of Charles Sturt. This paper was commissioned as a preliminary piece of work to provide input to the Community Plan process in line with the following 25/07/11 (refer CL, item 6.137) resolution of Council: ‘That an independent population study (as outlined in Appendix C to the report) to provide commentary on population scenarios for the City, including analysing the 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide population targets be commissioned.’ The preliminary draft paper was distributed to Members for information at the September 5 Structure Plan Workshop. A Council Member workshop with the paper’s authors has been scheduled for Tuesday, 11 October, 2011. The content of the paper, as well as next steps for the study as a whole, will be discussed at that workshop.


COMMUNITY PLAN Item 6.176 Continued Feedback on the draft theme papers was sought from the Community Plan Steering Group and minor amendments have been made to them on the basis of this feedback. An outline of the theme paper content has been forwarded to Residents Groups with an invitation to provide feedback as to additional information to be included/ other feedback. It is recommended that the theme papers be endorsed by Council in their draft form, and that the Community Plan Steering Group be delegated authority to make any additions/ refinements to them, including on the basis of discussion at the October 11 Population Study workshop and/or on the basis of Resident Group feedback. It is further recommended that the final theme papers be placed in the online project library and provided on request in hard copy form to people to refer to in providing input to the project. The main brochure ‘theme content’ has been drawn in summary form from the detailed draft papers attached. Community Engagement/Consultation Staff have worked with the Community Plan Steering Group to develop the initial flyer, main brochure, reply paid survey and detail of engagement activities discussed in this report. Resident / Community Group feedback has been sought, as described in the report, on the engagement process overall, theme papers and the proposed Structure Plan community engagement process. Conclusion The detailed theme papers appended in draft form to this report will help inform the Community Plan conversation. Endorsement of the papers in draft form will enable the Community Plan Steering Group to consider Resident Group feedback and make final refinements to them.


COMMUNITY PLAN Item 6.176

APPENDIX A Appendix A consists of 8 pages.

Summary of Community Groups Feedback on Community Plan Process

Feedback on Community Plan Engagement Process Provided by Community Groups

Background On the 25th August in response to a motion of Council six Resident Groups and approximately 50 community groups and individuals located in the Henley ward were invited to provide feedback on the engagement process for the community plan (as adopted by Council via July 25 and August 22 Reports) by Friday 9 September. Responses were received from the following:

WACRA (verbally at a meeting of Mayor Alexander, Michelle Mader, Jim Douglas and Paul Laris held on Tuesday 30 August and in writing)

Hindmarsh Greening (verbally at a meeting of Mayor Alexander, Michelle Mader and Philip Konings on Wednesday 31 August)

Val Wales (email attached)

Marine Discovery Centre (email and verbally via telephone call)

Kellie Holbrook (email only attached) Key feedback representing material change to what currently proposed or mentioned by more than one participant

extend the qualitative engagement phase

extend the steering group to include community

adopt deliberative democracy approach instead of the quantitative stage

pilot questions and discussion triggers with community

provide information about local government’s role and various business

discussion re relative merits of different promotions mediums and methods of distribution (inc Messenger, Council newsletters)

work with existing community networks and groups to ‘spread the word’ about the project and encourage participation

quality of output evaluation rather than just evaluation of people’s satisfaction with process

too many different mechanisms for feedback WACRA Feedback Written feedback was provided by WACRA and is reproduced following the dot points below. Additional discussion/ suggestions made at the meeting and not covered in the written feedback is as follows:

Extend the steering group to include community

Look at extending the qualitative engagement phase to enable community conversation to evolve and occur without time pressures

Look at adopting a deliberative democracy approach instead of the quantitative stage (eg establish a representative panel of approximately 40 community members/ stakeholders who would immerse themselves completely in the project from the outset to the very end, including being exposed to all of the information to be provided, to understand where they are at at the end in terms of vision, ideas and opinions)


Pilot questions and discussion triggers with community once they have been drafted

As part of the information being provided to people, provide information about local government’s role and various business involved with using easy to consume materials, graphics etc (possibly use ALGA campaign material)

Seek best value for money in selecting promotions mediums

Investigate development of ward based newsletters

Investigate providing in kind and financial support for establishment of resident groups for each ward

Use existing community networks and groups to ‘spread the word’ about the project and encourage participation

Promote the project on community group websites

Investigate supporting resident groups by negotiating a collective insurance arrangement that all groups can be covered by as insurance cover is a very large expense for groups

WACRA Submission



WACRA Email sent Friday 9 Sep

Dear Mark, Kirsten,Michelle


WACRA Executive met on Wednesday night and we discussed in considerable detail the Community Engagement process for the many projects that are forthcoming . We have had a close look at the North West Corridor as part of the 30 Year Plan and how it will effect residents in the west. We considered the time frame and just how much information and inclusion needs to occur to attain the best outcome . Having the Community Plan , the Section 30 Development Plan and the North West Corridor Plan to discuss,seek community input and determine all at the same time seems to us as being a almost impossible ask if we are to do this properly . In addition to all above, residents in Henley are going to be asked to partake in a Henley and environs Master Plan process that includes a review of the Traffic Management Plan for Henley. To top it off we also have the Antunes Development application to address in addition to the considerable concerns created by late night venues. WACRA are also alerted to the 5000+ initiative that will require community input . To us it is planning gone mad and it has the potential for non inclusive process,community overload and poor outcomes. As Paul Laris and I discussed with Michelle and Kirsten it would be better to slow things down and do it well than it becoming a piece meal process. WACRA are keen and committed to be involved in all process's BUT how can we[community] or Council do it justice with such a massive workload..? When we considered the Engagement Process as being proposed [ that we support and have made considerable comment] it would seem to us almost impossible to obtain a level of engagement that would have time to do justice to any of the Plans. The only fair and democratic way of engaging the community would be to adjust the time table and prioritise the order. The way we see things is that the Development Plan and Community Plan hold priority.. This may mean approaching Government for an extension and also Council needing to reconsider it's own time table of those matters directly controlled by Council. Our experience in community and as an active voice of community is, that very often there is a unreal expectation of what is achievable by those directing the process.. We are not being critical of Council of seeing the need to address all of the above issues however what we are asking is to see it from our position. We desperately want the best community engagement process to apply that will include as much community input as is necessary where we feel a sense of ownership and commitment to achieving the best outcomes and unless we collectively achieve this goal then we have all failed.


WACRA is not aware of the views and feelings of the other Community Resident and organised groups that originally requested Council to review and implement an engagement process to provide community with the best and most inclusive democratic means of being and feeling part of building better community and it could be advantageous to Council to canvass these views.. WACRA would like Council to give consideration to our concerns and we indicate our availability to discuss this further. Jim Douglas President Western Adelaide Coastal Residents Association Inc. www.wacra.org.au Hindmarsh Greening Feedback

Questions/ discussion re population needs to be carefully framed so that discussion doesn’t simply focus on immigration policy or other single issues

Higher densities/ heights are acceptable in specific centres if they are well designed

Need to ensure feedback loop – get back to people with results of engagement and next steps

Focus strongly on use of social media to encourage participation

Work with existing groups and networks to ‘spread the word’ about the project and to encourage participation ‐ particularly through use of online mediums

Facebook is favoured over Twitter as a social media tool

Employ specific strategies to ensure that indigenous people are included in the project and ask ‘how do you want to be recognised in the area’ and other key questions

Marine Discovery Centre Dear Michelle I'd like to strongly reinforce the following points for the City of Charles Sturt (CCS) to include in future planning: 1. providing the best possible local, marine and coastal environment for our future generations 2. Environmental Centres like the Marine Discovery Centre (MDC) are given the strongest possible support, both inkind and financial 3. coastal education signage provided by MDC is strongly supported by CCS 4. strong building regulations, ie not allowing high-rise buildings and avoiding becoming a version of Holdfast Shores - CCS needs to continue to create it's own identity with high quality, low-level eg maximum of 3 stories, environmentally sound housing Having had a quick look through the Planning documents, I think the objects, goals and strategies etc look very good. I will try and call you, time permitting, in the next day or two. Best Wishes


Tim Hoile Director Marine Discovery Centre Val Wales Hello Michelle, Thank you for furnishing us with the appropriate papers which I have ploughed through, it did take several sittings I must admit and I have read it twice. Overall I was very pleased with the report and other papers. It seems to me that the Councillors and Staff are very much of the same mind that I am myself and that there should therefore be very few serious differences between us that might impede the progress of this Community Review. The main things that I have concerns about are the following: I am an interested involved citizen but this is huge and I admit to getting somewhat confused myself when trying to sort it all out and this may turn some people off altogether as just too hard to sort one project out from another. One important point would be not to use acronyms when speaking to people from outside of the Council. I have concerns re the information going out to people and would like to see it go out in things such as the Rates notices, but it annoys me when I hear it over and over on the telephone along with other things. The column in the Messenger should be used every week in maybe a countdown fashion, i.e. week 1, week 2 etc. I have concerns re the method of delivery of the Kaleidoscope and the number of people who do not receive it, I have never received it not has my son who runs a business in Kilkenny and who also does not get the Messenger delivered. There are a number of units in his area and they also miss out on these things, business is important. The process of Data collection needs to be strictly controlled and available to all residents and ratepayers. I have in the past had problems with certain groups of people not getting the requisite forms to fill in and would like to see some form of control checking to see that things are happening as they should at various stages throughout the consultation. I personally do not like street corner meetings and would prefer that the ward meeting is in a community centre. I do think though that it is very important that the Community see their ward Councillor as a friend that they can turn to for help.


Short surveys such as the postcards, telephone and Kaleidoscope are very dependant on the type of questions asked and how they are put, how much weight is intended to be given them as opposed to more intensive surveys? The use of Televisions in the community centres with information running all the time updating people is a good idea, people appreciate regular updates and feedback. I think that it is critical that the community understands what they can influence and what they can't and that this should be continually em phased where needed so as not to raise unrealistic expectations. The issue of developers is a huge one and how to deal with them so that we get liveable places instead of just houses with huge walls that separate people and get drawn on. I agree that we need to challenge how accurate the 30 year assumptions are for us. Thank you for the opportunity to put my views. Regards Val Wales Could I please have acknowledgement that you have received this, thanks Kellie Holbrook Michelle, I received a large package from the council some time after Monday the 29/8. The package contained a fair amount of reading. However I put it aside to get to as I believe that having a say in our local government is important. As work has been very busy the last two weeks (I worked all of last week end) I did not get to the package until today- only to find that responses were due by yesterday. If you genuinely want community feedback then a bit more time would be appreciated. As it stands I feel that I will just become a part of the statistics that go to prove your efforts towards community involvement in decision making. I am left feeling that these efforts are not genuine. Yours sincerely, Kellie Holbrook



APPENDIX B Appendix B consists of 2 pages.

Charles Sturt is... planning for 2027 and wants to get inside your head.

Look out for the Community Plan project brochure and survey in your letterbox soon.

Open space, housing, environment, community facilities...

Join the conversation between Friday 28 October and Friday 2 December 2011

Full details in your letterbox soon.

www.yoursaycharlessturt.com.au8408 1111

What’s important to you?



APPENDIX C Appendix C consists of 14 pages.

Help us plan for 2027. What’s important to you?

Community Plan Project Brochure

2

www.yoursaycharlessturt.com.au

Imagine Tomorrow. Charles Sturt is planning for 2027. What’s important to you?

Imagine Tomorrow is exactly that. What do you want our City to look like in the future? We want you to have your say on what you love about the City and what needs improvement as part of our Community Plan. This will help set Council’s priorities for the next four years and beyond. There are many different ways for you to have your say as a resident of Charles Sturt, including the enclosed survey, a smartphone app, workshops and online discussions. Let us know what you think today about the Charles Sturt of tomorrow!

Message from the Mayor

Information in other languages

Η Δημαρχια του Charles Sturt προγραμματιζει σχεδιά για το 2027 και θέλουμε τη συμμετοχή σας. Για ένα φωτοαντίτυπο αυτού του φυλλαδίου στα ελληνικά, παρακαλώ τηλεφωνησετε την Ειρήνη στο 8408 1150.

In 2007, a plan based on the community’s aspirations for the City was developed. Four years on, the City is changing and it’s time to revisit and revise that plan. Imagine Tomorrow marks the beginning of that community plan review process; with community input gathered through it to also guide a review of the City’s Development Plan.

You are encouraged to tell us what you would like to see improved in the City, what you love about the City and also what is important to you in the areas of Sustainability, Community, Place, Economy, Liveability and Leadership. Further information about each of these theme areas is provided on the following pages as a starting point to assist your thinking and input.

Visit www.yoursaycharlessturt.com.au or call 8408 1111 for further information.

Charles Sturt is one of the oldest local government areas in the state. Our current population is just under 107,000 and growing. Population forecasts suggest that the City’s population may reach 126,000 by 2026 and 150,000 by 2036.

A high proportion of the City’s residents are older adults (over 65) and nearly a third of the City’s households are single person households. Both of these trends are set to continue. The City is also culturally diverse with almost a quarter of the population born overseas.

For further information about the City, visit www.yoursaycharlessturt.com.au and the following pages of this brochure.

Kirsten Alexander

About the Project

City Profile and Outlook

Thành phố Charles Sturt đang có kế hoạch cho 2027, và chúng tôi mong sự tham gia của bạn. Nếu muốn tài liệu này bằng tiếng Hy Lạp, xin gọi Nhung số 8408 1334.

Il Comune di Charles Sturt sta programmando attivita per il 2027 e chiede la vostra partecipazione. Per una copia dell’ opuscolo in Italiano, siete pregati di chiamare Chez al 8408 1209.

3


What’s happening in Charles Sturt?Charles Sturt is growing and changing. Like many other urban areas in Australia our population is set to increase. Major transport, residential and stormwater harvesting projects (depicted below) are planned for, or already underway in the City. These aim to accommodate growth, respond to key environmental challenges such as climate change and help create liveable, walkable communities.

What do you want to see improved in Charles Sturt in the future?

What do you love about the City that needs to be retained?

Have your sayJoin the online discussion www.yoursaycharlessturt.com.au

LegendTransit Oriented Development (TOD)

Local Growth Precincts Adjacent Key Stations

Water Proofing the West - Proposed Wetland

Major Railway Corridor

Main Roads

Greenway Cycling Path

Historic Conservation Area

Waterways

Council Boundary

Suburbs

Metro Council BoundariesNorth

Tramline extension

Woodville West Neighbourhood

Renewal

St Clair Residential

Development

Electrification of Rail Network and Upgrading

of Stations

Bowden Urban Village

Woodville Road Revitalisation

AAMI Stadium Residential/Mixed Use

Grange

Seaton

West Lakes

HendonAlbert Park

Seaton Park

St Clair

KilkennyPort Road

Torrens Road

Henley Beach Road

Grange Road

Woodville Road

sustainabilityImagineClimate changeAustralians produce more greenhouse gases per capita than anyone else in the world – driven largely by our heavy reliance on the private car, and reliance on fossil fuels for the production of electricity. More efficient use of transport, electricity and shifts to alternative forms of energy will be central to our environmental future, and can be influenced by Council policies and programs in a variety of ways.

Climate change is by far the most significant environmental issue facing our Council and community as a whole. Impacts that have been felt by Charles Sturt to date include increased frequency of flood events, increased frequency and severity of heat waves and death of trees and landscaping during heat waves.

In future, it is likely that these impacts will also include faster degradation and cracking of Council roads and footpaths, more frequent coastal storms and resulting infrastructure damage and a requirement for Council to develop policies that define a ‘line of protection’ or similar in coastal areas.

Moving to energy efficient public lighting is the single most important thing a Council can do to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, and its exposure to the financial impacts of rising electricity prices and a carbon tax. The City of Charles Sturt has

now negotiated the installation of energy efficient compact fluorescent and LED public lights in all major developments.

Water and BiodiversityCharles Sturt is a major user of water, and owns most of our community’s

stormwater infrastructure. Because of this responsibility for stormwater, Council policies and programs have the potential to significantly impact the sustainability of water management across our area. Waterproofing the West is a $62m joint stormwater harvesting and reuse project of Council and the State and Federal governments that will see stormwater harvesting in wetlands in three sites across the City. Biodiversity, not only in Council reserves but also along the River Torrens Linear Park and in the coastal dunes is also a priority area for Council.

Waste and recyclingOur blue-lidded waste bins still contain very high proportions of easily recycled items. On average, these bins still contain 40% food scraps (which can be sent for composting using the green organics bin) and 20% paper and cardboard (which could be recycled using the yellow-lidded recycling bin). Disposing of waste in landfill is also becoming more expensive over time and for the first time it is cheaper to recycle most general household items than to send them to landfill. The exception is electronic waste (e-waste) which is hazardous, costly and potentially dangerous to dispose of. The volume of e-waste has increased over time and is expected to peak in the lead up to the analogue television switch off in 2013.

Changing urban formUrban sprawl is not sustainable. The traditional practice in South Australia of developing more and more agricultural land for the purpose of building low density housing suburbs, that are located far from the centre of Adelaide, locks residents into car dependency and can’t be supported from a sustainability standpoint.

As a council area located close to the CBD, with a good network of public transport and cycling infrastructure either in place or planned for coming years, Charles Sturt is well placed to facilitate more compact, environmentally sustainable buildings and the adoption of more sustainable lifestyles by residents.

What should Council’s environmental

priorities be?

How important is it that Council plays a role in creating a more environmentally sustainable community?

4

Tenn

yson

Dun

es

5


communityCharles Sturt provides a range of community services and facilities to help build people’s links with one another, strengthen community and promote health and wellbeing. Moving forward, community services, facilities and activities need to adapt to a changing City and changing needs of residents. The following are a few of the areas we need to consider in planning for future community service provision.

Supporting Older Residents Charles Sturt has an ageing population. We currently provide a range of services specifically for older residents and we need to make sure that services and facilities, as well as design and development of the City as a whole, considers the needs of older residents. The ongoing contribution that older residents make to the community, including through volunteering also needs to be acknowledged.

Multicultural CommunityApproximately one quarter of the City’s population was born overseas and Charles Sturt is home to high numbers of Greek and Italian people who made their home here after the second world

war, a large Vietnamese community and more recently new arrivals from countries including Africa, India and China.

Community FacilitiesCommunity facilities provide places for people to gather, celebrate and meet each other. Charles Sturt provides community centres, libraries, sporting clubs, streets and reserves for use by residents. We also work to advocate for appropriate health and education facilities in the area.

Encouraging Strong Communities Encouraging strong, resilient, linked local communities is at the core of many Council activities. Community capacity building is about promoting the ‘capacity’ of local communities to develop, implement and sustain their own solutions to problems and issues.

Cultural Development Cultural development provides a means for communities to tell their story, build their creative skills and be active participants in the development of our culture. Cultural development describes collaborations between communities and artists which take place in any art form and can result in a wide range of artistic and cultural outcomes including events and public art. Cultural development can also be used as a tool for generating social connections, celebrating our history, economic development and revitalisation of targeted areas.

Young People Young people actively contribute to all aspects of community life and need to be heard and adequately represented. As a discrete sector of the population and recipients of the legacy we leave, we have an obligation to recognise the issues facing young people in our City and to determine appropriate responses.

Lifelong LearningGlobally as well as nationally, there has been a shift in governments’ and service providers’ concept of ‘education and training’ to the idea of ‘lifelong learning’. The concept recognises the importance of skills in the economy and the shift to a knowledge-based economy. On a daily basis our community centres and libraries provide lifelong learning opportunities, in both informal and formal ways.

Is it important for Council to have

a role in local community building?

What do you think are the key priorities for community services and facilities?

Imagine Queen Street Precinct, Croydon

Place tells a storyCharles Sturt is a unique City with a strong sense of place. Residents value the character and diversity of the area, its stories and history and the way these are played out in both the ‘look’ and ‘feel’ of the City.

The meaning that is brought to place is different for everyone. Some places can reflect our different and diverse communities, or the Kaurna heritage of the area. Place can tell a story about our past, or be a shining beacon of what might be in the future.

A good place is one that is vibrant and well used by the community. It is safe, interesting and somewhere people like spending time. City design, public realm, open space and development are the key areas where we can make a positive influence to place. Events and public art are also powerful ways to express ‘place’.

Popular Charles Sturt places include sports grounds, parks, the River Torrens Linear Park, Henley Square, the coast, Queen Steet in Croydon and the Grange precinct.

New Charles Sturt PlacesCharles Sturt is currently playing a role in delivering several major projects that will create some of the most important public places and neighbourhoods for our growing community in coming years.

Bowden Urban Village, Woodville West, Henley Square, St Clair and a revitalised Woodville Road will all be exciting places with connected communities and high quality public spaces. Charles Sturt

has been taking a coordinated and multi-disciplinary approach to these projects, working closely with the State Government and the community to

ensure the community’s vision for the future of these places is realised.

Preserving CharacterCouncil also plays an important role as a statutory authority to ensure our neighbourhoods look and feel right – through development approvals. It plays an important role in protecting local character through heritage listing buildings. We also encourage places to change and grow with changing communities, facilitating new development in the right areas.

What makes a place special is one that tells a story of the history of our community - thinking about why something should be conserved and for whom we are preserving it. Importantly, heritage conservation is not about locking things in the past. Places and buildings need to continue to be adapted to be relevant to our community as we continue to evolve. Introducing specific measures to encourage adaptive re-use, and to innovatively and creatively reuse older buildings is important.

Heritage is not just history. ‘Heritage’ also reflects culture and how culture in our community endures over time, and the meaning this continues to have. These elements can be artefacts, buildings, specific sites, stories, traditions, beliefs and values.

Further, heritage listing is about more than just keeping attractive architecture; it’s about ensuring that our local heritage places continue to reflect our City’s development and our community’s story. Involving our diverse cultural communities in the process of identifying places and spaces that are special to them is vitally important.

Working with communityHow we go about making great places is also important. The success of making great places is all about working directly with the people who currently, or will in the future live, work or visit that place.

What makes Charles Sturt a unique place?

Imagine

What are your favourite places within the City and why?

place

66

Chel

tenh

am

7


Charles Sturt’s Gross Regional Product (GRP) is about 4.7% of South Australia’s Gross State Product (GSP) and has been in steady economic decline relative to South Australia’s GSP since 1996. Charles Sturt’s economic growth rate from 1991-2009 has been only 2.1% p.a. (compared with South Australia’s 2.7 per cent p.a.).

Economic DriversTraditionally, manufacturing has been the key driver of the local economy however this sector has been in decline for some time. By contrast, current key economic drivers are wholesale trade (large share, average growth) and health care and social assistance (large share, slow growth). Intervention to arrest the decline in the manufacturing sector and to accelerate growth in health care will assist the local economy moving forward.

Skills baseIn 2009 about 40,000 persons commuted to work in Charles Sturt on a regular basis. In the same year about 46,000 persons commuted to work from Charles Sturt on a regular basis. This provides an indicator of the mismatch between employment capabilities of people living in Charles Sturt and the employment opportunities provided here. Manufacturing, wholesale trade, health care and social assistance are less dominant skills, while financial and insurance services, public administration, safety, professional,

scientific and technical services play a more significant role in the productive endeavours of residents. This suggests that further industrial diversification of Charles Sturt’s economy could provide a good fit with the capabilities of Charles Sturt’s residents.

Knowledge EconomyA very important element of a future economy less dependent on manufacturing and more focused on the knowledge sector (including finance, services, health, small business) will be for Charles Sturt to be attractive and appealing to knowledge sector workers including professionals and skilled people. This means a focus on the provision of high quality local amenity associated with planned residential developments.

Other Economic OpportunitiesNew technology and practices offer new economic opportunities. For Charles Sturt three examples are the National Broadband Optical Fibre roll out, low carbon technologies and accessibility to cheaper recycled water through the ‘Water Proofing the West’ project. Tourism also offers opportunities for growth in the local economy.

Is it important for Council to help grow

local business?

Is a strong local economy important to you?

The local economy is rapidly changing as a consequence of global competition and technological changes. Competition exists not only globally and nationally but also locally to attract, retain and grow business. Local government policy and actions can directly influence the local economy.

economyImagine Manufacturing - previously at Woodville North

Internationally, Adelaide is often cited as amongst the most liveable cities in the world because of its housing choice and affordability, access to public transport, minimal traffic congestion and travel times. Walking and cycling networks, open space, the quality of streetscapes and architecture also contribute to liveability.

HousingThere are approximately 42,000 dwellings in Charles Sturt with almost three quarters of these being separate houses and approximately one quarter being attached homes (townhouses, apartments and the like). Most of the City’s housing is considered low density. The large number of low density, separate homes relates back to the post war period when large tracts of housing were developed to cater for families including young migrating families and the ensuing ‘baby boom’. Sixty years on, the City now has an ageing population and almost one in three households are single person households. The median house price in Charles Sturt has risen from just under $200,000 in 2001 to $450,000 in 2010.

Population GrowthLike other Australian Cities, Adelaide is forecast to grow significantly over the next three decades. The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide is a State Government plan that aims to manage growth of Adelaide in a sustainable way.

It proposes a series of sites along key transport corridors for the establishment of medium density neighbourhoods to largely accommodate the projected growth, enabling the character of suburbs

outside of these areas to be protected.

The first of these liveable, walkable communities is underway at Bowden (at the former Clipsal site) and additional precincts are currently

underway or proposed in the City at Woodville West, Woodville (adjacent the Woodville train station) and West Lakes (AAMI Stadium site). The plan also proposes growth precincts in the main rail corridors of Charles Sturt at Kilkenny, St Clair, Hendon, Seaton, Seaton Park and Grange where rezoning will occur to enable more medium density residential development adjacent rail stations.

Transport and Traffic ManagementEstablishing precincts of medium density housing will also enable improvements to the public transport system to be made and the State Government plans to extend both the heavy and light rail transport systems within the City. A greenway (walking and bicycle pathway) is also planned to run alongside the outer harbour rail corridor to encourage safe commuter cycling to and from the CBD. The Council manages 570km of local and main roads and these, together with arterial roads, walking and cycling paths and the public transport system, provide the system for movement across and in and out of the City.

Open Space and StreetscapeChange in the City’s population and more family households with smaller private open space also has implications for the provision and design of public open space.

The Council provides and maintains over 390 ha of open space across the City, including parks, beaches, trails, sportsgrounds and play spaces including 110 playgrounds. There are also 950 km of constructed footpath in the City. These amenities are very important to the overall liveability of the City.

Community SafetyFeeling safe and comfortable within your home and community is critical to both individual and community wellbeing and an important contributor to liveability of the City.

What would make the City more liveable?

Imagine liveability

Is there enough housing choice in the City?

8

Wes

t Bea

chG

rang

e

9


The elected members of Council are chosen by the community as leaders, to advocate on behalf of the community, while at the same time acting as the board members of the organisation.

They are also responsible for making decisions in relation to the greater good of the community and the organisation. The elected Council guides the administration in delivering services to the community by ensuring the appropriate strategies, policies, delegations and budgets are in place to reflect community needs and aspirations.

Together the elected Council and the administration actively engage with the local community and other service providers and levels of government on matters that affect them and assist in good decision making and relevant service delivery.

Service ProvisionThe cost of delivering core services such as waste management and infrastructure replacement is increasing. Charles Sturt is committed to creating a more sustainable locality and improving the amenity and environment for local communities. For these reasons, we want to encourage increased community participation from all segments of the community in matters that affect them.

The following is a summary of the services Council provides:

• Animal Management• Food Hygiene• Immunisations• Community Centres & Programs• Library Services• Open Space Management• Waste Management• Roads & Footpaths• Street Sweeping• Development Planning• Parks, Reserves & Playgrounds• Sporting Facilities• Street Tree Planting & Maintenance• Environmental Initiatives• Community Services

Engaging the community in decision making We recognise that the community wants to be informed about and involved in decision making that affects them. Broad civic participation in decision making makes for stronger communities, a culture of active citizenship and ultimately for better, more responsive decision making.

What do you think should be the priorities

for your local Council over the next four years?

How do you want to be involved with and consulted about Council activities and decision making?

The functions of Council are outlined in the Local Government Act 1999. Essentially, Local Government has two purposes: firstly to govern and secondly to provide service delivery to the local community.

leadershipImagine Charles Sturt Council Members

10


State Policy Context

The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide is a State Government strategic plan that aims to manage the population growth of Adelaide in a sustainable way. It aims to limit unsustainable urban sprawl and to promote urban infill which will see the majority of new homes developed in the existing metropolitan footprint. The 30 Year Plan identifies that the western region of Adelaide will need to accommodate a population increase of 83,000 people by 2036. Charles Sturt’s share of this increase is between 40,000 and 44,000 people.

The Plan proposes a series of sites along key transport corridors for the establishment of medium density neighbourhoods to largely accommodate the projected growth, enabling the character of suburbs outside of these areas to be protected.

Immediately adjacent public transport, these growth precincts are commonly known as Transit Oriented Developments (TODs) or liveable, walkable neighbourhoods. They will aim to reduce car dependency, encourage walking and cycling, provide for housing diversity and choice including affordable housing.

See page 8 of this brochure for further information about liveable, walkable communities planned for Charles Sturt or go to www.dplg.sa.gov.au/plan4adelaide

The State Government is beginning to action the 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide by undertaking work known as ‘structure planning’. Through structure planning, the overall structure of growth precincts (including location of housing, open space, commercial activity and key public facilities) is determined.

The draft Inner Metro Rim and North West Corridor Structure Plans provide draft structure plans for the key growth precincts in Charles Sturt (at Bowden, Woodville, Woodville West and West Lakes). For further information about the Structure Plans and how to comment on them go to www.dplg.sa.gov.au

The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide

Inner Metro Rim and North West Corridor Structure Plans We all want our community to be

liveable, vibrant and sustainable; a place that embraces innovation and enhances our quality of life. Planning for the future is a shared responsibility and getting it right also means looking across Council boundaries and taking in the big picture. Which is where 5000+ comes in.

Led by the Integrated Design Commission SA, 5000+ is delivering a vision for urban renewal and redesign across the City of Adelaide and seven inner metro council areas - including the City of Charles Sturt. The project is supported by Local, State and Federal Government. The City of Charles Sturt is a 5000+ partner and Mark Withers, Chief Executive Officer of Charles Sturt, represents the inner councils on the 5000+ Leadership Team.

Everyone in our community can get involved in 5000+. Register with the 5000+ website and be part of a virtual ‘Town Hall’ style meeting where people can exchange ideas and have their say on designing the future. The website has great videos, articles and links to urban renewal projects from around the world to get you thinking.

www.5000plus.net.au

Councils are required to act in accordance with key State Government policies, plans and legislation. Described below are three such initiatives that Charles Sturt needs to consider in planning for the future of the City.

Community leaders and ‘thinkers’ active in local business or community life, with a passion for the City and a desire to shape its future, are invited to participate in a Community Leaders and Thinkers Visioning Workshop:

Sunday, 13 November1pm – 4pmAdelaide Entertainment Centre

Please come along ready to share and discuss your vision and ideas for the future of the City in the theme areas of • sustainability • liveability• community • leadership• place • economy

For the full workshop program visit www.yoursaycharlessturt.com.au Seats will be limited and bookings are essential. Telephone 8408 1111 to reserve your place.

Community Leaders and Thinkers Visioning Workshop

Drop by, enjoy light refreshments, talk to Council Members and staff about what is happening in the City and tell us about what is important to you in planning for the future of the City.

Local Open Evenings

Woodville West and Findon Wards Tuesday 8 November, 4pm – 7pm Findon Library, Findon Shopping Centre Cnr Findon and Grange Roads, Findon

Henley, Grange and Semaphore Park Wards Tuesday 15 November, 4pm – 7pm West Lakes Rowing Club100 Military Road, West Lakes Shore

Woodville WardTuesday 22 November, 4pm – 7pm Cheltenham Community Centre 62 Stroud Street North, Cheltenham

Hindmarsh and Beverley Wards Wednesday 23 November, 4pm – 7pmHindmarsh Library, 139 Port Road, Hindmarsh

What’s important to you? Open space, housing, environment, community... Have your say between Friday 28 October and Friday 2 December

Charles Sturt is planning for 2027.

Join the online discussion, complete an online survey, find out more www.yoursaycharlessturt.com.au

Imagine Tomorrow Community Leaders and Thinkers Visioning WorkshopSunday 13 November, Adelaide Entertainment Centre See page 11 for details

Post a message on the message wall at your local library or community centre

Download the free smartphone app

Local Open EveningsSee page 11 for details

Request a workshopStaff, Council Members and community members are available to speak with your group or organisation. Call 8408 1364 to arrange a time for an onsite workshop.

Complete the enclosed survey and/or make a written submission

Community Plan SurveyThe Charles Sturt Community Plan process provides an opportunity for all residents to influence the direction and shape of our City moving forward. You are invited to complete the questions below and to send the survey back reply paid by Friday 2 December. For further information or to provide more detailed comments call 8408 1111 or visit www.yoursaycharlessturt.com.au and go to Imagine Tomorrow.

Thinking about City of Charles Sturt today and in the future...

1. What are the top three things about the City that you feel need to be improved? a. b. c.

2. What are the top three things that you love about the City that need to be retained? a. b. c.

3. What makes Charles Sturt a unique place? How can we build on our strengths?

4. Please rate (by circling a number) how important the following are on a scale of 1 – 10 (where 1= not at all important and 10=extremely important)

Caring For Our Natural Environment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

A Strong Local Community 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strong Local Business 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5. Please rate (by circling a number) how important it is that Council has a role in these areas on a scale of 1 – 10 (where 1= not at all important and 10=extremely important)

Caring For Our Natural Environment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Helping Build Community 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Working With Business 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

6. How would you like to be involved with and consulted about council activities and decision making?

Fold here first

Fold here second

Affix with tape on all open sides - do not staple

Delivery Address:PO Box 1WOODVILLE SA 5011

City of Charles SturtReply Paid 1WOODVILLE SA 5011

No stamp requiredif posted in Australia

Note: It is the customerʼs responsibility to check that the artwork is correct and to provide the printer with authority to proceed with printing. Please check the delivery addressdetails and the addressee details below the barcode. Contact Australia Post if any changes are required.Note: Failure to conform to correct addressing and formatting standards will result in the customer being ineligible for the discounted Reply Paid small letter rate.

Font colour: Black onlyWidth: 97 mm X Length: 210 mm

Note: All components must be printed.Note: The artwork cannot be scaled.

Filename: S5419978600197210Y041020.pdf 20/10/2004 11:26:17 AM

- stiffness: cross direction of 1.5mN.- stiffness: machine direction of 3 mN; and,- thickness of 0.08 to 0.18 mm;- weight of 65 to 100 gsm;Summary: Envelope Paper Requirements:

bottom 20 mm of the reverse side.Note: No print content can appear in the

- stiffness: cross direction of 14 to 1140 mN.- stiffness: machine direction of 30 to 1140 mN; and,- thickness of 0.18 to 1.5 mm;- weight of 140 to 500 gsm;Summary: Card or Single Sheet Requirements:

Delivery Address: PO Box 1 WOODVILLE SA 5011

Delivery Address:PO Box 1WOODVILLE SA 5011

City of Charles SturtReply Paid 1WOODVILLE SA 5011

No stamp requiredif posted in Australia

Note: It is the customerʼs responsibility to check that the artwork is correct and to provide the printer with authority to proceed with printing. Please check the delivery addressdetails and the addressee details below the barcode. Contact Australia Post if any changes are required.Note: Failure to conform to correct addressing and formatting standards will result in the customer being ineligible for the discounted Reply Paid small letter rate.

Font colour: Black onlyWidth: 97 mm X Length: 210 mm

Note: All components must be printed.Note: The artwork cannot be scaled.

Filename: S5419978600197210Y041020.pdf 20/10/2004 11:26:17 AM

- stiffness: cross direction of 1.5mN.- stiffness: machine direction of 3 mN; and,- thickness of 0.08 to 0.18 mm;- weight of 65 to 100 gsm;Summary: Envelope Paper Requirements:

bottom 20 mm of the reverse side.Note: No print content can appear in the

- stiffness: cross direction of 14 to 1140 mN.- stiffness: machine direction of 30 to 1140 mN; and,- thickness of 0.18 to 1.5 mm;- weight of 140 to 500 gsm;Summary: Card or Single Sheet Requirements:

7. Any other feedback

Are you male female What is your postcode?

Which age range best describes you?12 and under 13 – 18 19 – 25 26 – 35 36 – 45 46 – 55 56 – 65 66 – 75 75+

If you would like to be put on the project mailing list please provide your name and email (preferred) or postal address below.

Thank you for completing this survey. Please fold it along the dotted lines, seal with tape on all open sides and mail back.



APPENDIX D Appendix D consists of 41 pages.

1

Evolution of the City and Moving Forward Charles Sturt is one of the oldest local government areas in the State. Our eastern boundaries border on the Adelaide city area, while the north western boundary extends to Port Adelaide and to the west, bounds the sea. In the post war period, Charles Sturt was the location for much of the manufacturing industry that expanded in the state. As a result, attracting a population that provided the manufacturing sector with its workforce. A large component of this population was derived from overseas, in the aftermath of the war in Europe, with large concentrations of Greek and Italian migrants arriving in the fifties and sixties. There were, of course, migrants from other countries, including the UK and Ireland, Germany and the Netherlands. Importantly, the industrialisation through manufacturing, especially with GM‐H car manufacturing at Woodville, gave rise to a population with a defined social composition. This growing population also generated a demand for a quite specific housing stock which was produced to house the population. The South Australian Housing Trust played a key role in creating the housing stock of the area. Since that time however, significant changes have occurred within the area, with associated impacts on industry and population. From an industrial perspective, there has been a substantial decline in levels of manufacturing activity, starting in the seventies and continuing through to the present. At the same time, the population that established in Charles Sturt in the fifties and sixties has aged. With the process of ageing a number of changes have occurred which have significance for the area at the present time. So, too, has the area’s housing aged. As the migrants who arrived in the post war period age, along with the children they and the Australian born produced in the post war baby boom, significant new processes emerge. As a result, there is going to be significant turnover of people and houses in Charles Sturt over the next two to three decades. New and younger people will move into the area. Whereas, a vacated dwelling may have housed one or two people, the new family moving in may comprise three or four, or more, people. As well, the new occupants are likely to be much younger and to be working. They therefore bring into the dwelling a higher household income. There are considerable additional implications that flow from this process. Highly valued character housing is passed on to new generations and in this way is preserved and continues to play a key role in maintaining our suburbs’ characters as well as providing quality accommodation. Poorer quality, post war housing can be demolished and replaced with more than one dwelling on the allotment. This kind of development can help to provide for the increasing number of smaller households, including lone person households, and also assist in providing housing choice.

Charles Sturt – An Overview

2

Further, as dwellings age large tracts can become available for redevelopment, and any new resident population in the new housing stock created will have significant implications for social change in the area. What this means is that changes are in store simply through “natural” processes which occur with time in any area. Already, for example, natural change has resulted in an increase in the number of persons in Charles Sturt with a university degree. Jobs bring into an area, new people. Significantly, they are not old people. Therefore, they offer an opportunity for replenishment of the area’s youth, as well as its skills, its spending power, its demand for housing, especially new housing relevant to the new population. This natural change represents an opportunity for Charles Sturt to experience demographic sustainability.

Population and Demographics Total Population The latest population estimate for the City is 106,995. This is the official Estimated Resident Population (ERP) for the City as at 30 June, 2009 (ABS, Catalogue 3218.0: Regional Population Growth Australia). This represents a 1.3% increase on the previous year.

Current Situation and Expected Population Change and Growth

Charles Sturt’s population is somewhat older than either Adelaide or Australia with almost one in five of the population aged 65 years or over and one in ten aged 75 years or more.

Not only is the older population of Charles Sturt made up of a larger proportion of the population than the Adelaide Statistical Division (ASD) but it is also growing faster than that of the ASD and Australia as a whole.

Charles Sturt is also a diverse City, with an above average proportion of its population made up of migrants. While numbers of early post war migrants are declining, the City is now attracting significant numbers of new migrants from overseas.

Population change moving forward will be impacted by a range of factors including Federal Migration policy. Forecasts of future population growth vary, with current Department of Planning and Local Government figures projecting an increase of 21,618 people between 2006 and 2026 to 125, 899 in 2026. This represents an increase on the 2006 population of 20.7 percent. The table below provides an overview of expected population change by age group in Charles Sturt to 2026 on the basis of Department of Planning and Local Government (DPLG) figures.

3

Table 1: Forecast Population Change ‐ Charles Sturt (2006‐2026)

Cohort 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026

Males Females

0‐4 2695 3202 3348 3423 3481 2605 2991 3127 3193 32425‐14 5786 5739 6271 6862 7007 5605 5633 6012 6482 659215‐24 6745 7065 7192 6974 7374 6329 6660 7074 6916 713525‐44 14561 15358 15851 16227 16114 14134 14809 15084 15548 1569745‐64 12806 13587 14347 15345 16140 13688 14263 14914 15429 1584765‐74 4163 4364 5243 5762 6144 4806 5032 5875 6641 695975+ 4226 4231 4330 4905 6000 6122 6167 6369 6951 8157Total 50982 53546 56582 59498 62260 53289 55555 58455 61160 63629

2006‐2011

2011‐2016

2016‐2021

2021‐2026

2006‐2026

2006‐2011

2011‐2016

2016‐2021

2021‐2026

2006‐2026

Percentage change

0‐4 18.8 4.6 2.2 1.7 29.2 14.8 4.5 2.1 1.5 24.55‐14 ‐0.8 9.3 9.4 2.1 21.1 0.5 6.7 7.8 1.7 17.615‐24 4.7 1.8 ‐3.0 5.7 9.3 5.2 6.2 ‐2.2 3.2 12.725‐44 5.5 3.2 2.4 ‐0.7 10.7 4.8 1.9 3.1 1.0 11.145‐64 6.1 5.6 7.0 5.2 26.0 4.2 4.6 3.5 2.7 15.865‐74 4.8 20.1 9.9 6.6 47.6 4.7 16.8 13.0 4.8 44.875+ 0.1 2.3 13.3 22.3 42.0 0.7 3.3 9.1 17.4 33.2Total 5.0 5.7 5.2 4.6 22.1 4.3 5.2 4.6 4.0 19.4

0‐4 – this is the “children” group

5‐14 – this group comprises school aged children

15‐24 – this cohort is generally regarded as the “youth” cohort, and comprises early entrants into the workforce, as well as a the group undertaking non‐school education

25‐44 – persons in this age group represent the younger workforce

45‐64 – this group is the older workforce, and a proportion of them may be early retirees

65‐74 – typically, this group represents the “young old” and most will not be in the labour force

75+ ‐ this is the “old old” component of the population, most of who will be retired.

First, the largest cohorts in terms of absolute numbers are the 25‐44 and the 45‐64 years cohorts. Generally, the former is the larger, with the exception of females in 2026. These two cohorts are significant because they comprise the bulk of the independent population, (that group which is generally comprised of working people). These are the dominant earners and spenders in any community, and they play a vital role in the maintenance of any community’s viability. In Charles Sturt, numbers of males aged 25‐44 are expected to increase by 1,553 between 2006 and 2026, an increase of 10.7 percent. Female numbers in this cohort will increase to 15,697, an increase of 11.1 percent for the 20 years to 2026. For the 45‐64 years age group, male numbers of 12,806 in 2006 will increase to 16,140 in 2026, an increase of 26.0 percent over the twenty year period. Numbers of females in this cohort will rise from 13,688 to 15,847, representing a 15.8 percent increase.

4

In 2006, the next most numerous age group, for both males and females, comprised the 15‐24 “youth” group. In 2006, there were 6,745 males in this age group compared with 6,329 females. Male numbers in this cohort are expected to increase by 9.3 percent up to 2026, while female numbers ware likely to increase by 12.7 percent. Both male and female numbers are expected to experience a slight reduction in numbers between 2016 and 2021. Numbers of children aged 0‐4 years are projected to experience increases in each of the five year periods up to 2026, with the largest increases in the 2006‐2011 period. Males are projected to increase by 18.8 percent in this period, compared with 14.8 percent for females. The reason for this is most likely due to the “baby bonus” which has been paid by the Commonwealth government throughout the period. In each of the following periods, the rate of increase becomes considerably less. Nevertheless, children aged 0‐4 years are expected to number some 6,700 in 2026 compared with 5,300 in 2006. This is an area of growth which will be tested for its accuracy when the results of the 2011 Census become available in June 2012. At that time, some of the projections for the future may need to be refined. Youth numbers, or persons aged 15‐24 years, are expected to increase by 9.3 percent for males and 12.7 percent for females between 2006 and 2026. In absolute terms, their combined numbers will increase by 1,435 by 2026. Turning to the “young old” (persons aged 65‐74 years) cohort, numbers of males in this group are projected to increase by 47.6 percent by 2026, while female numbers in this cohort are likely to increase by 44.8 percent. These are the largest percentage changes recorded across the various cohorts. In absolute terms, females in this age group outnumber males. The number of women aged 65‐74 years was 4,806 in 2006, but by 2026 it is expected that numbers will be slightly over 6,900. The comparable numbers for males are 4,163 and 6,144. Cumulatively, persons aged 65‐74 years will increase by more than 4,000, an absolute increase matched by no other cohort. Clearly, the ageing process has significant implications for policy development in the City of Charles Sturt. Although there may already be in place provisions for an ageing population, consideration needs to be given as to whether current policies can accommodate the expected increases in numbers of older citizens. Finally, numbers of persons aged 75+ years in 2006 totalled some 10,350, of which 59.2 percent were female. Male numbers in this group are projected to increase by 42.0 percent between 2006 and 2026, compared with an expected increase of 33.2 percent for females in the cohort. By 2026, persons aged 70+ living in Charles Sturt are expected to number 14,157, meaning that their numbers are likely to increase by some 3,800 during the 2006‐2026 period. The extent of anticipated increase for this group has the same kinds of implications associated with the increased numbers in the 65‐74 years age group.

5

Within any jurisdiction, absolute numbers can be converted into percentages to allow the actual numbers to be compared relatively with other cohorts. Table 2 shows the representation of each cohort, for males and females, in the total population, for each of the key years. The percentages are column percentages, and total male and total female percentages sum to 100 percent. They show the proportion of any group present in the total population at any one time.

Table 2: Proportion of Cohorts in Total Population ‐ Charles Sturt (2006‐2026)

Cohort 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026

Males Females

0‐4 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 5‐14 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.2 15‐24 6.5 6.5 6.3 5.8 5.9 6.1 6.1 6.1 5.7 5.7 25‐44 14.0 14.1 13.8 13.4 12.8 13.6 13.6 13.1 12.9 12.5 45‐64 12.3 12.5 12.5 12.7 12.8 13.1 13.1 13.0 12.8 12.6 65‐74 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.8 4.9 4.6 4.6 5.1 5.5 5.5 75+ 4.1 3.9 3.8 4.1 4.8 5.9 5.7 5.5 5.8 6.5 Total 48.9 49.1 49.2 49.3 49.5 51.1 50.9 50.8 50.7 50.5

From Table 2 above, the following can be noted:

By 2026, young children will represent about 5.4 percent of the Council’s population, compared with about 5.1 percent in 2006.

In 2026 it is expected that about 10.8 percent of the population will be school aged children aged 5‐14 years. In 2006, the proportion was 10.9 percent of the total population. This suggests a relatively stable situation, although the raw numbers indicates that this group’s actual presence within the Council will increase.

The “youth” component of the population in 2026 is expected to be around 11.6 percent of the total population, down from the 12.6 percent representation in 2006. Although actual numbers have increased, the relative numbers are the result of even bigger impacts on total population by other cohorts within Charles Sturt, especially the growth in the older cohorts.

The working population aged between 25 and 44 years represented 53.0 percent of the Charles Sturt population in 2006, but is expected to reduce to 50.7 percent in 2026.

In terms of the aged population, comprising both the “young old” and the “old old”, their 2006 representation in the total Council population was 18.6 percent. In 2026, however, their representation in total population is expected to be 21.7 percent – slightly more than one fifth of total population.

Any analysis of the age structure of Charles Sturt, both at the present time, and at any point through to 2026, will reveal several key aspects:

A large concentration of population in the age groups 25‐44 and 45‐64 years

Smaller concentrations in the older (65‐74 and 75+) age groups, the youth group (aged 15‐24 years), and the school age children group (aged 5‐14 years)

The smallest concentrations are in the youngest (0‐4 years) age group

Very rapid growth of the 65‐74 years age group is projected over 2006‐21 and of the 75+ age group over 2021‐26. Most importantly, in 2021 it is predicted that there will be 5,300 more people aged 65+ in the City than there was in 2006, and by 2031 another 2,460. Even with

6

significant migration, and maintaining fertility at current levels there will be little, if any, net growth in the relative size of the younger working age groups. The clear implication is that in South Australia especially, growth needs to be maintained to counterbalance the massive growth of the older population.

The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide forecasts that SA’s population will continue to grow and that this growth will need to be accommodated in a way that is environmentally sustainable, assists the SA economy and promotes healthy, vibrant communities. In line with this, The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide aims to limit expensive and unsustainable urban sprawl moving forward. Under the Plan, 70% of all development in Greater Adelaide will need to occur in the existing metropolitan Adelaide footprint, with only 30% to occur on the fringes. The Plan forecasts the population growth that it expects will need to be accommodated in the Adelaide footprint. For the western region of Adelaide this is 83,000 by 2036. Charles Sturt’s share of the western suburb’s population is 49%. Using this figure as a base, the population growth identified by The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide that Charles Sturt may need to accommodate under the Plan is in the order of 40,000 ‐ 44,000 (or approximately 20,000 – 22,000 additional dwellings) by 2036. The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide proposes a series of urban village style communities along key transport corridors to be developed as mixed use (combining residential, commercial, retail and recreational uses) medium density precincts immediately adjacent public transport. These precincts, commonly known as Transit Oriented Developments or ‘liveable, walkable’ communities will aim to reduce car dependency, encourage walking and cycling, provide for housing diversity and choice including affordable housing, create unique places and nurture strong and vibrant community. The first of these liveable, walkable communities is underway at Bowden (at the former Clipsal site) and additional precincts are currently underway or proposed at Woodville West, Woodville (adjacent the Woodville train station), West Lakes (AAMI stadium site). The Plan also proposes growth precincts in the main rail corridors of Charles Sturt at Kilkenny, St Clair, Hendon, Seaton, Seaton Park and Grange where rezoning will occur to enable defined growth precincts of medium density development adjacent current rail stations. The State Government is undertaking work known as structure planning to plan for this and community input is invited. It is anticipated that collectively these growth precincts, together with the change in dwelling occupation that will occur as older character housing passes through to younger families, will accommodate the population growth projected to occur in Charles Sturt in a way that:

7

• is environmentally sustainable • provides for housing choice and diversity • accommodates changes in the demographic and particularly the rise in single

person households • manages traffic and car dependence. Having higher concentrations of people living in an area also makes for more viable and therefore improved public transport as well as localised provision of goods and services (eg local supermarket) in walkable proximity to where people live. In turn growing the local economy and encouraging healthier, more sustainable lifestyles. References Government of South Australia, Department of Planning and Local Government, Age Sex Structures by Statistical Local Areas, 2006 – 2026. Government of South Australia, Department of Planning and Local Government, 2010, The 30‐Year Plan for Greater Adelaide. Hugo, G.J. and Harris, K.R., 2011, ‘Draft Population Paper prepared for Charles Sturt’.

8

Sustainability – Theme Paper

Introduction Protecting and preserving the natural environment is a critical issue for the Council and for residents, visitors and businesses alike. Sustainability can encompass environmental, social and economic factors that affect the areas in which we live. Throughout this paper, when we refer to ‘sustainability’ we are referring to environmental sustainability. Australians produce more greenhouse gases per capita than anyone else in the world. High consumption levels are driven largely by our heavy reliance on the private car, and our reliance on fossil fuels for the production of electricity. More efficient use of transport, electricity and shifts to alternative forms of energy will be central to our environmental future, and can be influenced by Council policies and programs in a variety of ways. This theme paper outlines these policies and other environmental initiatives and issues that we are dealing with. ‘Towards One Planet Living’ was developed by Charles Sturt in 2008, with significant input from our community. This included four themed evening workshops held in February 2008 on climate change, water, biodiversity and waste issues respectively. Feedback provided at that time demonstrates that Charles Sturt residents and businesses place a high priority on environmental issues, and are keen for Council to take an active role in identifying, prioritising and leading environmental reforms over the coming years. The resulting plan (‘Towards One Planet Living: Greening the Western Suburbs’) provided a detailed and specific road‐map for how these reforms would be undertaken by the City of Charles Sturt in the years from 2008 – 2012. The plan is available on our website. Two years on from the Plan’s creation, the implementation of sustainable environmental practices is now well progressed. This theme paper outlines some of the progress to date, and also highlights some of the issues Council is facing as it implements the Plan.

Current Situation and Key Issues Climate change Climate change is by far the most significant environmental issue facing our Council, and community as a whole. Impacts that have been felt by Charles Sturt to date include:

Increased frequency of flood events, causing localised flooding in some areas

Increased frequency and severity of heat waves in Summer – with impacts felt right across our community but in particular by outside workers and by older and more vulnerable residents

Death of trees during heat waves – due to heat stress

Water restrictions – with significant impacts on irrigated areas including Council reserves

9

In future, it is considered likely that these impacts may also include:

Faster degradation and cracking of Council roads and footpaths, as a result of heat waves and localised flooding

More frequent coastal storms, and resulting infrastructure damage

A requirement for Council to develop policies that define a ‘line of protection’ or similar in coastal areas, and to clarify the nature of personal responsibility to protect assets in locations vulnerable to storm damage and sea level rise

When viewed on an international level, climate change is expected to result in:

• Direct consequences such as increased frequency and severity of floods, droughts, cyclones and bushfires

Indirect consequences such as increased regional competition for scarce resources such as land, food and water, increased numbers of refugees fleeing affected areas, war and political unrest

It is clear from the list above that these environmental changes are having serious impacts and can be expected to result in profound changes to the Charles Sturt community. Work to address climate change issues, as part of the implementation of Towards One Planet Living, and across a number of functional areas within Council has begun. Activities have included:

Energy efficient initiatives at Council, including a 30kW solar system installed on the roof of the Woodville Library

4 kW solar systems on Findon and Cheltenham community centre roofs

Preparation of a first‐class Climate Change Adaptation Plan in 2009 with the Local Government Association Mutual Liability Scheme

Understanding climate change impacts, and planning appropriate ways to combat the issues will be a major focus for Charles Sturt over the coming decade. We can’t address climate change in isolation, and will need to coordinate our efforts with other Councils. Climate change is a global problem that requires coordination of responses at a regional, state, national and international scale. The Cities of Charles Sturt, Port Adelaide Enfield and West Torrens have combined to undertake a major investigation into the likely impacts of climate change on our western suburbs communities, with support from both the State and Commonwealth Governments. The project will be undertaken over the next two to three years.

Energy Efficient Public Lighting Public lighting is a major emitter of greenhouse gas emissions, and generates large electricity bills for Councils to pay. The City of Charles Sturt currently has 10, 720 public lights, including street lights and lights that are located along the River Torrens Linear Park and in sporting grounds and reserves. Moving to energy efficient public lighting is the single most important thing a Council can do to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, and its exposure to the financial impacts of a carbon tax.

10

The City of Charles Sturt has negotiated the installation of energy efficient compact fluorescent and LED public lights in all major developments since the adoption of Towards One Planet Living in 2009. This places the City of Charles Sturt at the forefront of Councils in the move to more efficient and sustainable public lighting.

Water Charles Sturt is a major user of water, and owns most of our community’s stormwater infrastructure. Because of this responsibility for stormwater, Council policies and programs have the potential to significantly impact the sustainability of water management across our area. Towards One Planet Living identifies some key strategies and actions to move towards a more sustainable approach to water, including:

Introducing stormwater harvesting along Old Port Road, and as part of the development now known as St Clair

Identifying opportunities to use reclaimed wastewater within the City of Charles Sturt

Introducing elements of Water Sensitive Urban Design into all new developments, and advocating for recognition of wetlands and aquifer injection systems as an alternative to small rainwater tanks on new dwellings

Education, encouragement and enforcement of policies and legislation to prevent the pollution of water

To date, $61.3m in funding has been secured from a combination of State, Commonwealth and Local Government sources to fund the Water Proofing the West Stage One Project. More information is available on our website. We have further increased our focus on preventing water pollution, with increased community education and the employment of a full‐time compliance officer whose role it is to focus on new developments and building sites, to ensure they are not allowing silt and other pollutants to enter the stormwater system. Despite our strong focus on water issues, some challenges lay ahead. For example, the South Australian Government released a discussion paper on a proposed 'Water Industry Act' in November 2009, and has since released its draft Water Industry Bill 2010 and explanatory paper for review and feedback. The Bill (which is publicly available on the Water for Good website www.waterforgood.sa.gov.au) provides a framework for the regulation of the water industry in South Australia, including rules to govern the supply of recycled or reclaimed water. This would include, for example, the reclaimed stormwater provided to our community as part of Council's Water Proofing the West project. The full implications of the draft Bill are not yet clear. It has, however, focused attention on a number of legal matters relating to third pipe (recycled water) systems in new and existing suburbs. These issues include:

The importance of clear and reasonable guidelines for the water industry on setting a fair price for water, including reclaimed or recycled water

The value of independent technical regulation of plumbing standards and practices

11

Establishing an independent Water Industry Ombudsman, along with a Customer Advocacy and Advisory Council, to strengthen protection for consumers

Broadly speaking, these are positive initiatives and will pave the way for improved clarity and stability in the water industry in South Australia. Charles Sturt has identified a number of matters that have not been addressed in the Bill, but could be inserted and may offer some additional benefits. These include the opportunity to introduce some new powers for Councils, through the development assessment process, to require developers to install third pipe networks into new developments (potentially making it possible to supply recycled water to a greater proportion of future residents and to irrigate new reserves). Biodiversity and Community Gardens Biodiversity issues are a major priority for us, not only in Council reserves but also along the River Torrens Linear Park and in the coastal dunes. Some examples of the work Charles Sturt does in this area include:

Preparation of a heritage application to the State Government to list the Tennyson Dunes – a submission that was prepared by Council staff in close consultation with the Tennyson Dunes Group and members of the local community and is aimed at providing an increased level of legal protection for this important remnant native dune ecosystem

Supporting the work of community groups to care for the dunes, including the Semaphore Park and Tennyson Dune Care Groups

Preparing management plans for areas of biodiversity significance, and helping to implement the protection works identified in those plans

Conducting school planting and weeding days

Maintaining biodiversity sites that have been established, for example along the River Torrens Linear Park

Hosting Community Coastal Reference Group meetings, which involves 18 community members with an interest in coastal issues along with the Coastal Management Branch

Designing and constructing the Coast Park on a progressive basis, with the ultimate goal of a continuous shared use pathway along the entire length of the metropolitan coast, and designed to respect and enhance biodiversity values and educate the broader community about the value of these natural landscapes

In addition to these initiatives, Charles Sturt is in the process of establishing a network of wetlands as part of its Water Proofing the West initiative. New wetlands will be established in the new St Clair development, along Old Port Road and within Cooke Reserve. These are in addition to the wetlands already established privately as part of the Grange and Royal Adelaide Golf Clubs and on the land managed by the West Beach Trust. In addition to its role in biodiversity planting and maintenance, we are increasingly being approached by the community to support efforts to establish community gardens. To date, community gardens have been established in Green Street Brompton, at the Woodville High School, and at Pennington Primary School.

12

We have also provided significant support for community ‘Fruit and Vege Swap’ initiatives, as another way to combine support for shared, sustainable, healthy food while at the same time promoting connections between people and a sense of community wellbeing. Over time, the community’s interest in these initiatives has increased. Charles Sturt is currently reviewing its role in community gardening and similar community development activities, to determine what level of support it can offer and how it can best support these initiatives as interest in them continues to grow.

Adopt a Tree Program Recent years of drought and ongoing water restrictions have affected our trees. The Adopt a Tree program encourages residents to care for and assist in the establishment of street trees. We introduced the program to assist in the nurture of newly planted trees and to care for existing trees to create green and leafy streets for the future. Adopters are invited to care for a tree by: ‐ watering it on a weekly basis ‐ ensuring no weeds grow around the base ‐ observing the tree and reporting any issues Each adopted tree is identified and registered. Residents who sign up to adopt a tree are given information about their street tree, a bucket for watering and a pair of gloves for weeding. Council provides ongoing support and advice about caring for their street tree. The program has been received very positively by our community, with 74 households already registered. 42 of these have had new street trees planted, and 32 have started caring for their existing street trees. Over time, it is hoped that this program will improve survival rates for street trees within Charles Sturt, and improve the green cover and overall look of our streets.

Waste and Recycling Our blue‐lidded waste bins still contain very high proportions of easily recycled items. On average, these bins still contain 40% food scraps (which can now be sent for composting using the green organics bin) and 20% paper and cardboard (which could be recycled using the yellow‐lidded recycling bin). Disposing of waste in landfill is also becoming more expensive over time. The State Government waste levies are charged on every tonne of waste sent to landfill, and have increased over time, resulting in higher costs to Charles Sturt. In 2011/12, Charles Sturt was charged $35 for every tonne of waste sent for landfill disposal from metropolitan Adelaide. This increase in waste disposal costs has turned the tables on the economics of recycling, and means that for the first time it is cheaper to recycle most general household items than to send them to landfill. Encouraging all residents and businesses to use the 3‐bin service more effectively, and keep recyclable items out of rubbish bins, has the potential to deliver not only environmental benefits, but also generate significant cost savings for Council and its ratepayers. For these

13

reasons, an education program has been put forward as an area for increased focus over the coming few years. As with any rule, however, there is an exception. Electronic waste (e‐waste) and hazardous wastes are costly and potentially dangerous to dispose of. Strategies to address these difficult waste streams remain important, and were identified in Towards One Planet Living. Two years on, there is still no ongoing funding available at either State or Commonwealth level to support the recycling of e‐waste by Councils. The interim e‐waste recycling service currently offered by the City of Charles Sturt is funded entirely by ratepayers and is unsustainable in the longer term. Similarly, there is still no facility that can accept hazardous wastes from residents on most days. The State of South Australia relies on a one day per month drop‐off service operated at Wingfield by Zero Waste SA, and the occasional hazardous waste collection day (the last of which for the City of Charles Sturt was held in 2009).

e‐waste Twenty years ago, e‐waste made up only a tiny proportion of the waste stream. At that time, most households shared a single television, and the majority did not own a personal computer. Today, the average number of televisions and computers owned by each household within Charles Sturt is three to five. In 2009, 49% of residents said they have disposed of an old TV or computer within the last year, the majority of which were disposed of by residents using the kerbside hard waste service that is provided annually by Council. This number will have increased with the introduction of digital television, and is expected to peak in the lead‐up to the analogue television switch‐off in 2013.

Changing Urban Form Urban sprawl is not sustainable. The traditional practice in South Australia of developing more and more agricultural land for the purpose of building low density housing suburbs, that are located far from the centre of Adelaide and the services it offers, locks residents into car dependency and can’t be supported from a sustainability standpoint. It is also worth noting that experience shows that the provision of infrastructure and services across low density, sprawled development is more expensive on a per capita basis, resulting in the need for higher levels of expenditure and taxation over time. Ultimately, these costs are borne by residents. A more compact urban form that is well designed and desirable for residents therefore delivers environmental, social and financial benefits. And it can be done well. As a council area located close to the CBD, with a good network of public transport and cycling infrastructure either in place or planned for coming years, Charles Sturt is well placed to facilitate a more compact urban form, more sustainable building design and the adoption of a desirable and more sustainable lifestyle. To achieve this, there are some critical issues to be addressed: • Excellent public transport services with good links to the CBD and to major suburban

centres and destinations excellent walking and cycling networks, again incorporating good links to the CBD and to major suburbs centres and destinations

• Well‐planned urban redevelopments that provide high quality, medium to high density housing at a range of price‐points, including affordable housing, and are

14

close to public transport, walking and cycling paths, and that have shops and other basic facilities within easy walking distance of all dwellings

Careful design of public realm and essential services to ensure provision of: reclaimed and sustainable water supplies, sustainable and secure energy supplies, large and well designed areas of open space, with trees and vegetation also incorporated into streetscapes and recycling services suited to higher density living

Towards One Planet Living identified these needs, and has been working to address them since the adoption of the plan in 2009. Significant efforts have been made to incorporate these elements into the new developments proposed within Charles Sturt for coming years. It is important to note that the delivery of some of these elements is beyond Council’s direct control and relies on the Federal and State Governments. Examples of this include the State Government’s announcement of planned expansions to the tram network in the western suburbs, to be extended to both West Lakes and Semaphore in future years. The planned Greenway of cycling and walking paths to extend alongside the rail network from the Adelaide CBD to the coast is also a good example. Both of these projects are important to support the future sustainability of new developments at Bowden Urban Village, St Clair and Woodville West. Their implementation, within suitable timeframes, is critical to reducing car dependence in these new suburbs. Another challenge is the very ‘different’ nature of these more compact styles of development within a South Australian culture and context. With so many South Australians growing up in low density housing, the benefits and advantages offered by higher density dwellings are not always obvious. Put simply, higher density developments have an ‘image problem’. Higher quality, well executed examples of higher density lifestyles may be needed in Adelaide, and may need to be described clearly to South Australians, before our populace can accept and embrace the different lifestyle choices these developments offer.

15

Community Theme Paper

Introduction The City of Charles Sturt provides a range of services to the community that aim to build people’s links with one another and support them to be active members of the community. This is achieved through the provision of physical assets like community centres, libraries and sporting facilities, as well as services such as Home and Community Care and Community Development. The term ‘community’ in this paper refers to a group of people in a given geographical area or a group of people who are linked by an issue or interest.

Current Situation and Key Issues Ageing Population Similar to state and national trends, the City of Charles Sturt has an ageing population. The Ageing in Charles Sturt policy outlines our acknowledgement of the need to adequately plan for an ageing local population and to consider the needs of older people in the design and delivery of Council services and facilities. The ongoing contribution that older residents make to the community, including through volunteering also needs to be acknowledged. The way that the Ageing in Charles Sturt policy translates into programming and services requires ongoing review, especially as the face of our ageing population changes and the expectations they have for retirement also change. One area of Council that has responded to the changing needs of our ageing community is the area of volunteering. In February 2008, Charles Sturt adopted A Discussion Paper on the Impact of the Baby Boomer Generation on Volunteering Practices within the City of Charles Sturt. This paper highlighted that the traditional structure of full time and long term volunteering was no longer appropriate. We now know that when we create volunteering positions based on identified needs, we have to be more flexible to accommodate people’s lifestyles and provide the ability for volunteers to apply their working life skills to their volunteering roles. More recently, we have also seen a greater focus on ‘ageing in place’, with funding made available from the Federal Government to support people to remain living in their own home. Currently, Charles Sturt provides a number of Home and Community Care funded support programs that empower people to remain at home; including shopping, transport and socialisation programs. South Australia’s 2012 ‘Thinkers in Residence’ program will welcome Professor Alexandre Kalache, a former Director for the World Health Organisation, Department of Ageing and Life Course (WHO_ALC), to lead discussions on ‘Age Friendly Cities: A Society for All Ages’. Professor Kalache believes that ‘An age friendly city is an

16

environment where all the basic assets for you to have quality of life in an urban environment are present’. During his residency Professor Kalache will be working to develop strategies that allow a greater number of older South Australian’s to maintain their independence and participate in life as connected members of their community. The City of Charles Sturt will be actively involved in this project through the South Australian Age‐Friendly Environments and Communities: Local Government Pilot Projects. The project will require Councils to complete a self assessment that includes: planning to support positive ageing, housing and services, physical environment, health and wellbeing and participation. The underlying philosophy of ‘Age Friendly Cities’ is that if you design for older people, you design for all. New and Emerging Communities The western suburbs of Adelaide have a long tradition of new arrival communities settling in the area, beginning in the 1800’s with the arrival of Colonel William Light at Port Misery through to the 1970’s when Vietnamese boat people stayed in the Pennington Hostel. More recently the City of Charles Sturt has welcomed new arrivals from countries including Africa, India and China. How to best welcome newly arrived people to the community and support them to settle in is something Charles Sturt has approached in a variety of ways including encouraging new arrival communities to utilise our assets including community centres and providing the largest Languages Other Than English (LOTE) collection in Australia at the civic library. Being able to access items in their own language is one way that new communities can retain their cultural identity, while integrating with their new community. Social infrastructure Social and community infrastructure and services are provided in response to the needs of communities. They enhance quality of life and social well being through community support; safety and security; sports; recreation and culture; justice; housing; health and education. Social infrastructure provides places for people to gather, celebrate and meet each other. In Charles Sturt, we are responsible for providing community centres, libraries, sporting clubs, streets and reserves. We also work to advocate for appropriate health and education facilities in the area. In response to The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide, and the proposed infill development that is planned for many areas of our City, we have begun to look closely at the role social infrastructure has in supporting new and existing communities. This year, with funding from the Local Government Association’s Research and Development Scheme, Charles Sturt is coordinating a study that addresses questions about where social infrastructure should be located, what Council’s role is in the provision of social infrastructure and how we can encourage housing developers to invest in social infrastructure.

17

Community Capacity Building Community capacity building is about promoting the ‘capacity’ of local communities to develop, implement and sustain their own solutions to problems in ways that help shape and exercise control over their physical, social, economic and cultural environments. Capacity building is a term borrowed from the international development literature on how best to support developing countries and generally refers to the process of recognising and enhancing the strengths and resilience of communities and groups, which in turn strengthens the society as a whole. Five priority areas for action are: • Leadership and development • Policy research and advocacy • Information access, use and dissemination • Building alliances, coalitions, networks and partnerships • Financial sustainability Capacity operates at the individual, group, organisational, community and policy levels. It may result in increased resilience and it may help to uncover natural leaders in communities. Types of activities to build community capacity include: • Developing relationships • Developing agreed values • Developing skills, knowledge and confidence • Developing the organisational structures and strengths of community groups,

communities of interest and networks • Developing the availability of practical support There are many ways in which Charles Sturt supports community capacity building including: providing volunteering opportunities, undertaking community development activities through networking and projects and through providing grants and in kind support to groups and individuals. Examples of current Council programs that demonstrate our commitment to community capacity building include the Youth Advisory Committee (YAC), volunteering programs, library and community centres programs and community development programs like the ‘Women Inspire: Women’s Leadership Development Program’. Charles Sturt continues to strive to provide opportunities for our community to build their skills and networks through a range of programs and activities. Cultural Development Cultural development for this paper, is defined as giving communities the opportunity to tell their story and history, build their creative skills and be active participants in the development of our culture. Cultural development describes collaborations between communities and artists which take place in any art form and can result in a wide range of artistic and cultural outcomes.

18

As caretakers of much of the open space and public realm in our community, and key stakeholders in local community life, we are well placed to be creating systems and facilitating relationships that provide opportunities for cultural development. Cultural development activities such as public art and festivals can also be utilised as tools for generating social connections, economic development and revitalisation of targeted areas. In November 2010, the international peak body of local government, United Cities and Local Governments, declared that culture was the ‘fourth pillar’ of sustainable development. Its contribution as a domain of policy with social, economic and environmental domains is said to strengthen local communities. In 2012, the Federal Government’s Office for the Arts notified the community of their intention to begin consultation on a new National Cultural Policy. In seeking people’s input to this policy, the Federal Government is encouraging consideration of ways in which the arts and creative industries not only connect to and support broader government policy, but also the way they can shape the Australia of the future. The development of this policy acknowledges the importance of culture and art in our society. Youth The City of Charles Sturt’s Youth Policy recognises that young people actively contribute to all aspects of community life and need to be heard and adequately represented. As a discrete sector of the population and recipients of the legacy we leave, we have an obligation to recognise the issues facing young people in our City and to determine appropriate responses. Through our youth development activities we have sought to engage with young people and provide opportunities for them to build their skills and networks. The provision of Youth Central as a venue for young people to meet, recognises the need to provide dedicated spaces for young people, where they can be free to explore the opportunities that Council provides and network with their peers. We also recognise the need to include young people when we design all aspects of our community, to ensure that the places we create respond to their desire to congregate and have an active presence in their community. A key trend is young people’s interest in opportunities to develop their business skills and look at opportunities for initiating business enterprise. This is an area Council has yet to be active in and we will be working to develop opportunities for young people to develop these skills. Community Wellbeing For this paper, wellbeing refers to the condition or state of being well, contented and satisfied with life. Wellbeing has mental, physical, social and spiritual elements and can be used to describe how well a society satisfies people’s wants and needs.

19

The new South Australian Public Health Act 2011 recognises the links between improved wellbeing and improved health. It provides a practical way for the State Government, the Council and communities to plan together for better health and wellbeing. The legislation provides opportunities for Charles Sturt to develop partnerships with the State Government, non‐ government organisations and the community which will lead to joint action on protecting and improving public health. The five year Obesity Prevention and Lifestyle (OPAL) program, which is located in Charles Sturt, provides an example of Council working collaboratively with state and federal governments and the community to address the significant health issue of obesity. Public health in the 21st century is understood to be all those issues and factors which contribute to a healthy community. Public health touches upon and cuts across all aspects of Council’s activities and services. The new South Australian Public Health Act will provide a clear method for ensuring our City can lead coordinated action to protect and improve health and well being. Over the next two years the City of Charles Sturt has the opportunity to work with other levels of government and with the community to explore the full potential of the new legislation, before it is fully commenced in June 2013. Life Long Learning Globally as well as nationally, there has been a shift in government and service provider’s concept from ‘education and training’ to the idea of ‘lifelong learning’. The policy literature regarding lifelong learning has four distinguishing features: • The recognition of both informal and formal learning • The importance of self‐motivated learning • An emphasis on self‐funded learning • The idea that participation in learning should be universal Both the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) argue that lifelong learning is essential for both economic prosperity and social stability. The concept of lifelong learning recognises the importance of skills in the economy and the shift to a knowledge‐based economy. For Charles Sturt, informal learning and universal learning are the main features that effect our day to day operations in the community. On a daily basis our community centres and libraries bring people together to access information and provide opportunities to share skills and knowledge, in both informal and formal ways. Our ability to facilitate learning is influenced by a number of factors, most notably funding and resources. We rely on external funding for a large percentage of our learning programs and the support of volunteers in a number of roles including as tutors. Technology resources continue to be a challenge for our libraries and community centres to keep up with, and demand for access to technology for learning continues to increase.

20

The concept of universal participation in lifelong learning includes both informal and formal learning for all purposes – social, economic and personal. Our role is most focused on the social and personal aspects of lifelong learning, rather than the economic which is primarily the responsibility of State and Federal government. The OECD and UNESCO argument that lifelong learning is necessary for social cohesion in this era of rapid economic and social change is particularly relevant to Charles Sturt and confirms the need for us to have a role in helping facilitate and advocate for lifelong learning opportunities in our community.

21

Economy Theme Paper

Introduction The City of Charles Sturt has traditionally had a large manufacturing base. In recent years, this manufacturing and industrial sector has been in decline. The strength of our economy is closely linked to the quality of life enjoyed by our community. A vibrant, local economy provides local employment opportunities, services and facilities and reduces dependency on travelling to work which has associated environmental and social impacts. Our economy is rapidly changing as a consequence of global competition and technological changes. Competition exists not only globally and nationally but also locally to attract, retain and grow business. Local government policy and actions can directly influence the local economy.

Current Situation and Key Issues Global and National Context The world economy has grown at about 4%p.a., the Australian economy at about 3% pea and the South Australian economy at about 2.6% p.a. over the last decade. The Australian economy has a declining share of manufacturing in its industry mix, together with rising shares of mining, health, professional, scientific and technical activities. Charles Sturt’s Gross Regional Product (GRP) is about 4.7% of South Australia’s Gross State Product (GSP) and has been in steady economic decline relative to South Australia’s GSP since 1996. Charles Sturt’s economic growth rate from 1991‐2009 has been only 2.1% p.a. (compared with South Australia’s 2.7 per cent p.a.). By comparison, the City of Salisbury’s GRP is about 5.7% of South Australia’s GSP and has grown at the rate of 4.9% p.a. since 1991, significantly increasing its share of the South Australian economy over that period. Role of Local Government Local government plays an important role in Australia’s economy. It manages physical assets worth around $212 billion and spends around $25 billion each year, or 6%, of total public sector spending. Further, the core infrastructure services provided by local government, such as roads and bridges, facilitate economic activity and strengthen the Australian economy in the long term.

Charles Sturt encourages and works to attract economic expansion within the community. We understand that local planning decisions shape and support commercial growth,

22

opportunities and investment, which are integral to the economic wellbeing and future of local communities.

Charles Sturt’s Economic Drivers Industrial sectors that are not only driven by local demand, and that have a large share of an economy or that have a medium share and are growing at least as fast as the average, are the economy’s economic drivers. In Charles Sturt these sectors comprise 62% of our economy. They are:

Manufacturing (large share, in decline)

Wholesale trade (large share, average growth)

Transport, postal and warehousing (medium share, fast growth)

Financial and insurance services (medium share, above average growth)

Professional, scientific and technical services (medium share, fast growth)

Health care and social assistance (large share, slow growth) Employment and Small Business Overall, the employment rate in the City is consistent with the State average. Employment in manufacturing, wholesale trade, retail trade and information media and telecommunications has actually fallen since 1991. The fall in employment in retail trade is in sharp contrast with the solid growth in retail employment across the State generally.

Further, employment in health care and social assistance has increased far less in Charles Sturt than in the State generally, notwithstanding the presence in Charles Sturt of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. According to our estimates (based on an assumption that the distribution of employed persons in Charles Sturt in 2009 is the same as our estimate for South Australia in 2009), in 2009, there were about 14,000 persons employed in small businesses (employing fewer than 20 persons) in Charles Sturt, of whom about 6,600 were employed in personal and micro businesses (employing fewer than 5 persons). This means that small business employs just over one third of persons employed in Charles Sturt. In addition, about 1,300 persons are employers. Further, about 18,000 people are employed by medium and large businesses, and just under 6,000 are employed by the public sector. Since 1991, the estimated increase in employment in small businesses is about 2,200 persons, in medium/large businesses it is about 700 persons, and in the public sector it is about 1,400 persons. Over the past 18 years, about half of all the extra jobs in Charles Sturt were in small businesses employing fewer than 20 people. Skills Base If local residents are to easily access local jobs, they must possess the relevant skills required by local business. The pattern of economic development in Charles Sturt

23

from 1991‐2006 better matched the employment capabilities of people outside Charles Sturt than of people living in Charles Sturt. Similarly, the employment capabilities of people living in Charles Sturt better matched the opportunities provided by the South Australian economy outside Charles Sturt. Manufacturing, wholesale trade, health care and social assistance are less dominant skills, while financial and insurance services, public administration, safety, professional, scientific and technical services play a more significant role in the productive endeavours of the residents of Charles Sturt than they do in the economy of Charles Sturt itself. This suggests that further industrial diversification of Charles Sturt’s economy (away from manufacturing) could provide a good fit with the capabilities of Charles Sturt’s residents. Cultural Tourism This paper defines cultural tourism as providing visitors to the City with an opportunity to understand and appreciate the character, culture and lifestyle of Charles Sturt. For Charles Sturt, the overwhelming majority of visitors to the area would be ‘day trippers’. While there are no statistics on the number of day trippers, the number is likely to be relatively low as the criteria for a day tripper includes travelling from more than 50 km’s away and not for business purposes. In 2006, the South Australian Tourism Commission (SATC) explored local government’s engagement in tourism, including the integration of tourism related responsibilities within councils, strategic planning and implementation of tourism strategies, as well as resourcing and assisting the industry in promotion and management. A survey of 49 Councils in South Australia, including the City of Charles Sturt, analysed and compared each Council’s overall performance in relation to tourism participation. Charles Sturt rated 48 out of 49 councils surveyed. In responding to the survey, Charles Sturt identified improving amenity and efficiency of Council assets (i.e. improving access to beaches and parks) for residents was a greater priority than tourists. It was expected though that these improvements would also benefit tourists. However, the impact on residents from tourism activity, particularly along the coast in summer time, was stated as being the main deterrent to Charles Sturt becoming more actively involved in the development and promotion of tourism in the area. A brief examination of the Charles Sturt product available on the South Australian tourism website identified seven ‘attractions’ including Fort Glanville and AAMI Stadium Tours and nine accommodation providers including Discovery Holiday Park and Lakes Resort Hotel. While there are many positive opportunities for tourism in Charles Sturt, there are some issues and considerations that could limit or influence how tourism is developed. Tourism Development Opportunities in Charles Sturt

24

West Lakes ‐ having recently been upgraded to a national competition facility, the lake is capable and ready to host a number of national competitions including triathlons, rowing, canoeing and dragon boating competitions. Collaborative marketing and promotional opportunities with local businesses to encourage spectators and participants to spend more time in the region will be a focus for the future.

The SATC is actively pursuing the high yield cruise ship market. Given Charles Sturt’s proximity to Outer Harbour there may be some opportunities to tap into this market to attract international and interstate tourists. Encouraging and supporting the premier golf clubs located in Charles Sturt to develop golfing packages (comprising transport, golfing and meals) purely for the cruise ship market will be explored.

Hindmarsh/Croydon is considered by many residents to be culturally rich, with a high concentration of artists and public art in these areas. Opportunities to promote tourism include developing art trails of either public art and/or artists studios.

The Brompton Heritage Walk pod tour is a good example of an interpretative product that meets many of the objectives of the SATC, particularly through its use of technology. Registering the City of Charles Sturt with the Australian Tourism Data Warehouse in order to have the walk listed on the South Australia tourism website is being investigated.

Developing tourism around iconic precincts has been identified as the most sustainable way to start building tourism in Charles Sturt. Precincts which offer the most potential are Hindmarsh, Queen Street, Croydon, Henley Square, Hanson Road, Athol Park, as well as new ‘village’ developments like Woodville Road and Bowden Urban Village

Social Enterprise A Social Enterprise is a different way of doing business. A Social Enterprise is a business that trades for a social purpose. The social aims of the business are of equal importance to its commercial activities. Like any business, a social enterprise focuses on generating an income through the sale of goods and services to a market. The added value of a social enterprise comes from the way in which it uses its profits to maximise social, community or environmental benefits. The involvement of Local Government in this sector has been through non‐financial and / or limited financial support for specific activities, in particular through grant funding and the provision of premises, and infrastructure at subsidised rates or at no cost. We can enable, but not enforce social enterprise. In Charles Sturt there is scope for government to enable social and community enterprise through recognising and valuing the role of the social economy, partnering in specific initiatives, building a

25

supportive regulatory environment, enhancing access to technical and business assistance, direct financial assistance and/or leveraging investment and social venture capital, and support for a research effort around this field of activity. Linked to this area is also the issue of encouraging economic growth that considers social and environmental sustainability and wellbeing. Optical Fibre, Low Carbon Technologies and Recycled Water

The National Broadband Optical Fibre roll out, low carbon technologies and accessibility to cheaper recycled water through the ‘Water Proofing the West’ project are three examples of new technologies and practices offering new opportunities.

A prime focus for the future will be to provide high speed, big capacity telecommunications links – especially high speed broadband for businesses’ access to markets, to drive down business costs, to enable the development of on‐line Council services, and to support the provision of training programs on how to run a small business. Access to the internet is likely to be an important issue for the development of a strong set of small businesses in Charles Sturt.

Rising skill levels among local residents provides a base for economic development to take place at a faster rate. The Charles Sturt community’s digital literacy skills will be critical to supporting jobs growth and enhancing quality of life. The Water Proofing the West ‐ Stage One Project is a $62 m water recycling project which will result in an extensive network of wetlands, aquifer storage and recovery and distribution networks providing water at reduced cost. This will provide businesses dependent on water with the opportunity of reducing its costs and increasing competitiveness. Where are People Commuting to and from for Work?

According to our estimates, in 2009 about 40,000 persons commuted to work in Charles Sturt on a regular basis. About 4,400 (11%) of these are absent for various reasons on a typical work day, so about 36,000 persons typically travel to work in Charles Sturt each day. About 30,000 (about 85%) of these people go by car, using about 28,000 cars for this purpose. On average, about one car in 13 carries a passenger apart from the driver. Fewer than 1,000 persons (about 3% of those working in Charles Sturt) use a bus or train. The remaining 12% working in Charles Sturt go by bicycle, motorbike, tram, use various combinations of transport, or walk.

This means that the biggest inward commuting issue for Charles Sturt is road access by car – and parking for the inward commuting car fleet during working hours. Again, according to our estimates, in 2009 about 46,000 persons commuted to work from Charles Sturt on a regular basis. About 5,500 (12%) of these are absent for various reasons on a typical work day, so about 40,500 persons typically travel to

26

work from Charles Sturt each day. About 26,500 (about 58%) of these people go by car, using about 24,000 cars for this purpose. On average, about one car in nine carries a passenger apart from the driver. More than 6,800 persons (about 15% of those commuting from Charles Sturt) use bus or train. The remaining 27% commuting to work from Charles Sturt go by bicycle, motorbike, tram, use various combinations of transport, or walk. This means that commuters from Charles Sturt are less car dependent and use public transport more than commuters into Charles Sturt. The use of cars to commute into the City is also much less than for other commuting destinations, mainly because of the greater use of train and bus transport. This augurs well for the likely take up of public transport options for City‐bound commuting from the transit‐oriented developments (TODs) scheduled to be developed in Charles Sturt under the 30‐year Plan for Greater Adelaide. Key Challenges A big change in the growth rate of Charles Sturt’s population and economy is expected to occur over the next 30 years. Major economic diversification will be required to be successful, continuing the trend of the past 20 years. This diversification will be towards smaller scale production units and services and away from large scale industry. Major improvements in the quality of housing and residential amenity will be required to attract and retain the professional and skilled population to the area. It will also be important for Charles Sturt for the decline in activity in manufacturing to be arrested and for growth in health care and social assistance to be accelerated While Charles Sturt is equipped with physical infrastructure and productive assets, a prime focus for the future will be to provide high speed, big capacity telecommunications links – especially high speed broadband for businesses’ access to markets, to drive down business costs, to enable the development of on‐line Council services, and to support the provision of training programs on how to run a small business.

27

Place Theme Paper

Introduction Our City is growing and changing at a rapid rate. Continued growth and change can place pressures on neighbourhoods and has the potential to cause a loss of sense of community. For the purpose of this paper, ‘place’ is the term given to any physical location that has some meaning or provides some function that matters to our community. Places can be neighbourhoods, streets, the local shop, a large shopping mall, the beach, or even your own backyard. These places can always be the same, or they can change over time, or even be temporary – like an event. The meaning that is brought to place is different for everyone. Some places can reflect our different and diverse communities, or the Kaurna heritage of the area. It can tell a story about our past, or be a shining beacon of what might be in the future. The theme of ‘place’ is a great way to capture the range of different elements that go in to making our City a great community to live in. Place can be the way our City and community expresses its personality and tells its story.

Current Situation and Key Issues What Makes a Great Place? What makes a great place is different for everyone, and different places can have different meanings or uses to different people at different times. Places that are important to our community are generally ones that we keep coming back to and ones we want to spend time in. Placemaking and cultivating a unique sense of place has the following benefits:

Designing places with and for people who live in and use those places results in better places and happier, healthier communities

Economic outcomes Expression of the diversity within communities Facilitation of sustainable development that respects the earth's resources More beautiful, enjoyable and soulful places

Great public places create opportunities to connect with our community. Local parks and attractive streets are great places where people can meet – even incidentally walking the dog or kicking a footy with your kids – all these meetings work towards creating safer, happier and more cohesive communities. With busy lifestyles we need to create opportunities to connect. Often we’re too busy, or don’t like to impose on other people’s lives. Despite this, human connection is an almost universal desire, and the way we design our neighbourhoods can contribute to this.

28

Great places can also have important health benefits. Walkable neighbourhoods, parks and reserves and being connected to places you can walk to (such as the local shop) all contribute to healthier lifestyles and obesity prevention. Helping to make our City easy to get around by walking and cycling , and ensuring neighbourhoods are well connected, is an important focus for Charles Sturt. Why is Place Important to Council? Council plays an important role in making and creating places within our community. The act of place making from a local government perspective is about an approach to improving our streets, activity centres and community hubs in a way that creates a high quality public realm, brings the community together and provides opportunity for connection and interaction, and often involves supporting or facilitating sustainable local economies. This means making sure our streets, parks and reserves, and neighbourhoods are places that we value, that we feel safe in and love to visit.

To Charles Sturt, a good place is one that is vibrant and well used by the community. It is safe, interesting and somewhere people like spending time. City design, public realm, open space and development are the key areas where we can make a positive influence to place. Charles Sturt is currently planning and delivering several major projects that will create some of the most important public places and neighbourhoods for our growing community in the coming years. Bowden Urban Village, Woodville West, Henley Square, St Clair and the revitalisation of Woodville Road (Woodville Village) will all be exciting places with connected communities and high quality public spaces. Charles Sturt has been taking a coordinated and multi‐disciplinary approach to these projects, working closely with the State Government and the community on ensuring the community’s vision for the future of these places is realised. Council also plays an important role as a statutory authority to ensure our neighbourhoods look and feel right – through development approvals. It plays an important role in protecting local character through heritage listing buildings. We also encourage places to change and grow with changing communities, facilitating new development in the right areas.

What makes a place special is one that tells a story of the history of our community ‐ thinking about why something should be conserved and for whom we are preserving it. Importantly, heritage conservation is not about locking things in the past. Places and buildings need to continue to be adapted to be relevant to our community as we continue to evolve. Introducing specific measures to encourage adaptive re‐use, and to innovatively and creatively reuse older buildings is important. Heritage is not just history. ‘Heritage’ also reflects culture and how culture in our community endures over time, and the meaning this continues to have. These elements can be artefacts, buildings, industrial sites, stories, languages, traditions, songs, beliefs, and values. Further, heritage listing is more than just keeping attractive architecture; it’s about ensuring that our local heritage places continue to reflect our City's development

29

and our community’s story. Involving our diverse cultural communities in the process of identifying places and spaces that are special to them is vitally important. What are our ‘Place’ Priorities? How we go about making great places is important. The success of making great places is all about working directly with the people who currently, or will in the future live, work or visit that place. Authentic relationship building is a consistent and critical part of all place making approaches. This means adapting our traditional community engagement approach to take the conversations out onto the street – where people are working, visiting, spending time and living nearby – to talk about what that place means to them. These relationships need to be built over time and provide a good way of managing expectations within the community about what can be achieved over each time frame.

Importantly, place making requires a flexible and adaptive approach, which seeks to achieve different things with different people for each unique place. There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach, but there are a common set of principles, and a common goal that place making seeks to achieve. Place making has often fallen to urban designers, planners and engineers. However place making occurs best when all these disciplines, together with other disciplines including community development, marketing, and economic development work together with the community to achieve results that meet the needs of everyone.

Great places aren’t just built and designed with the expectation of a ‘build and they will come’ approach. Even the best designed public place will not be loved and owned by the community unless they have reasons to come to it. Managing and activating places with activity, colour and vibrancy is a key part of creating places we want to be. Sports clubs and schools are great patrons of contributing to a sense of community and sense of place. As caretakers of much of the open space and public realm in our community, Council is well placed to be creating systems and facilitating relationships that create opportunities for both public and community art, and events and festivals. These activities can be used as tools for generating social connections, economic development and the revitalisation of areas. Good public places should be socially and physically accessible for everyone. Socially, they should feel comfortable for all people to be in a space and express themselves and their culture. Physically, it is important that public places are easy to get to and get around in for children, older people and people of all abilities. Popular Charles Sturt places include sports grounds, parks, the River Torrens Linear Park, Henley Square, the coast, Queen Street in Croydon and the Grange precinct. How are Places (is Place) Changing? With a growing population and increasing cultural diversity, our City is always changing. The State Government’s 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide paints a picture

30

for how our region is expected to grow and change over the next 30 years by providing population and employment targets. Council is working with State Government to understand what this means for how our City looks and feels, and where this new growth will occur. While protecting our heritage is important, it is also recognised that urban heritage is not just about buildings, but also about street design, furniture, trees, gardens, parks and the space between structures. Sense of place is about how an area ‘feels’ as much as it is about how an area looks. Communities can feel a sense of loss not just as a result of loss of physical heritage and character but also because their area just doesn't 'feel' the way it used to. Transitioning places means ensuring that renewal in heritage or older precincts doesn't copy the dominant architectural style nor completely override it. Rather it should adapt to it, take advantage of it, and enhance it. Our City is also experiencing a shift with growing popularity of ‘main streets’ rather than shopping malls mall. Traditional retail shopping precincts were often strip shopping along main roads – generally consisting of a range of local specialty stores servicing key needs. This model allowed for more opportunity to build relationships and make connections with local providers than is the case currently with large one‐stop‐shop supermarkets in shopping malls. More, localised mainstreet shopping precincts are also more likely to be accessed by walking or cycling than the larger shopping malls. According to Main Street Australia, main streets are one of the most important elements of our urban societies and their success is reliant upon a complex and interrelated range of economic, cultural, social and environmental factors. The economic benefits of place making to our local economy are enormous. Supporting local or small business makes a great contribution to our local economy and is often a bi‐product of place making. A great example of a main street in the City of Charles Sturt is Queen Street/Elizabeth Street in Croydon. Small and eclectic, Queen Street is a busy hub for locals and visitors alike. It has a unique combination of shops, cafes, bakeries, clothes and home wares shops alongside public transport and a park. This local example presents us with the opportunity to learn how we can create more places that work successfully. While it is not possible to replicate exactly the same model in different places , the ingredients that make up a great place – mix of uses, quality of public realm and public spaces, character, and others – are something we can learn from.

31

Liveability Theme Paper

Introduction Liveability relates to the extent to which a place meets the needs of the residents who live there. There are a range of factors that contribute to liveability and in this paper the following are discussed:

housing affordability and choice

public transport and traffic management

recreational and cultural opportunities

quality of streetscapes and architecture

land use planning

community safety Other theme papers associated with the Community Plan process discuss other aspects of liveability including community health, access to services, employment, natural environment and sense of place.

Liveability ‐ Current Situation and Key Issues Housing Diversity Housing diversity contributes to the liveability of an area through housing choice. It relates to the overall mix of housing available in terms of size, type and cost and the extent to which housing meets the needs of a wide cross section of the community, from first home buyers to homes for families, singles and older residents. Housing diversity and affordability contributes to: community health and diversity through provision of housing for the full

range of household and family types at all income levels social equity and community vitality

Census 2006 data indicates that in 2006 there were 42,476 dwellings in Charles Sturt, with dwellings increasing at an average of 168 dwellings per year over the preceding four years. Of these dwellings, 72% were separate houses, 12% were semi detached row, terrace, or townhouses and 10% were flats, units or apartments. Approximately 5,000 dwellings were owned by Housing SA. The large number of separate homes relates back to settlement of the local area with large tracts of housing developed in the post war period to cater for families (including newly arrived migrant families) and the ensuing ‘baby boom’. Around 4,000 (just under 10%) of the City’s homes are currently located in Residential Character Zones and Historic Conservation areas. As a total number this is the largest of any Adelaide metropolitan local government area.

32

In 2006, single person households made up 30% of all households in Charles Sturt, an 8% increase on 1996 figures. This trend is projected to continue to increase. Given this and the fact that the majority of the City’s housing is separate housing, there is likely to be a growing a mismatch between the needs of dwelling occupants and the current housing stock. Potentially, greater diversity of housing is required to meet the needs of the growing number of single person households. Housing Density Housing density relates to the number of dwellings per hectare in any given area. The State Government’s 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide defines low, medium and high density as follows: Low density: less than 35 dwellings units per hectare (du/ha) Medium density: 35‐70 du/ha High density: more than 70 du/ha Building height: Low rise: 1‐3 storeys Medium rise: 4‐10 storeys High rise: more than 10 storeys The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide identifies that SA’s population is expected to continue to grow and that this growth needs to be accommodated in a way that is environmentally sustainable, assists the SA economy and promotes healthy, vibrant communities. In line with this, The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide aims to manage growth and limit unsustainable urban sprawl whereby moving forward 70% of all development in Greater Adelaide will need to occur in the existing metropolitan Adelaide footprint, with only 30% to occur on the fringes. The Plan forecasts the population growth that it expects will need to be accommodated in the Adelaide footprint. For Western Adelaide this is by 83,000 by 2036. Charles Sturt’s share of the western suburb’s population is 49%. Using this figure as a base, the population growth identified by The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide that Charles Sturt may need to accommodate is in the order of 44,000 by 2036. The Plan proposes a series of urban village style communities along key transport corridors to be developed as mixed use (combining residential, commercial, retail and recreational uses) medium density precincts immediately adjacent public transport. These precincts, commonly known as Transit Oriented Developments or liveable, walkable neighbourhoods will aim to reduce car dependency, encourage walking and cycling, provide for housing diversity and choice including affordable housing, create unique places and nurture strong and vibrant community. The first of these liveable, walkable communities is underway at Bowden (at the former Clipsal site) and additional precincts are currently underway or proposed at

33

Woodville West, Woodville (adjacent the Woodville train station), West lakes (AAMI stadium site). The plan also proposes growth precincts in the main rail corridors of Charles Sturt at Kilkenny, St Clair, Hendon, Seaton, Seaton Park and Grange where rezoning will occur to enable defined growth precincts of medium density development adjacent current rail stations. The state government is undertaking work known as structure planning to plan for this and community input is invited. Collectively, it is anticipated that these growth precincts, together with the change in dwelling occupation that will occur as older character housing passes through to younger families, will accommodate the population growth projected to occur in Charles Sturt in a way that is environmentally sustainable, provides for housing choice and diversity, accommodates changes in the demographic and particularly the rise in single person households and manages traffic and car dependence. Having larger numbers of people living in the one area also means that public transport becomes more viable to operate and improvements can be made. Having a critical mass of people in growth precincts also makes localised provision of goods and services (eg local supermarket) in walkable proximity to where people live more viable. In turn growing the local economy and encouraging healthier more sustainable lifestyles. Housing Affordability Affordable housing is an important element of liveability and a healthy community. If housing is unaffordable, people are forced out of an area and need to travel longer distances to employment, education and to access services, family and other networks. In Charles Sturt the median house price has increased from just under $200,000 in 2001 to $450,000 in 2010. Under State Government legislation 15% of any new infill housing development needs to be Affordable Housing. Affordable Housing is housing that is sold to low/middle income purchasers at a given price point or rented to low/middle income earners. The vision promoted in The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide is to encourage infill growth in key precincts along the North Western Corridor (Outer Harbour and Grange rail corridors). This will provide opportunities for greater local housing diversity and affordability. Another opportunity presents itself through the regeneration and renewal of areas with high concentrations of Housing SA housing such as the Woodville West Neighbourhood renewal project. Walking and Cycling The ability to walk and cycle in a neighbourhood contributes significantly to liveability. Charles Sturt aims to have a footpath on one side of every street within the City (with the exception of some short streets and cul‐de‐sacs) and on both sides of major roads, collector roads and long local streets in order to provide a safe and linked walking network throughout the City.

34

The condition of our footpaths is currently being assessed with a view to preparing an Asset Management Plan that will direct funding to upgrade of high priority footpaths in future. At present the Council focus is on replacement and renewal of existing footpath assets with around 25% of the overall footpath budget allocated to the construction of new footpaths. A draft footpath strategy called ‘Active Living – Planning to Walk Strategy’ has been developed to encourage greater participation in walking related activities across the City. Finalisation of this strategy will assist Council in the development of integrated and linked footpaths based on principles around active lifestyles and accessibility. Further, a cycling strategy called ‘Active Living ‐ Planning to Cycle Strategy’ has been developed to assist Council in providing cycling facilities across the City. From major works like the Coast Path to the installation of bike racks, this strategy, interlinked with the State Government’s own cycling strategy, aims to encourage greater participation in cycling activities. Public Transport The integration of transport and land use planning is essential in promoting a liveable and sustainable community. Access to affordable and accessible public transport is a critical issue for many people, particularly older people. The provision of public transport is a responsibility of the State Government and the City is serviced by heavy and light rail (tram) and bus services. The State Government is planning to electrify the current rail network through the City and to extend the light rail network from the entertainment centre to West Lakes. Charles Sturt recognises that our population is likely to grow significantly along its major transport corridors. To assist and guide Council in its decision making process, a North West Corridor Transport Strategy is being developed as an update to the two previous traffic and transport strategies developed in 2005 and 2006 (Traffic Management Strategy 2005‐2025 and the City of Charles Sturt Transport Strategy). Public bus services are a vital mode of transport for many residents including those with a mobility disability. Charles Sturt has commenced a program to upgrade all bus stops to comply with the Disability Discrimination Act 1993. There are over 600 bus stops across the City and it is expected that all bus stops will be compliant with the current standard by the year 2022. Traffic Traffic congestion can negatively impact on liveability, particularly through the use of cars. It is important to provide for people’s daily needs and employment opportunities in close proximity to their homes to avoid an over reliance on cars. Charles Sturt has a role together with the State Government in managing transport infrastructure (including roads) across the City, allowing residents to commute and connect with other areas around Adelaide. The Council manages 570 kilometres of local and main roads (arterial roads are the responsibility of State Government), 950

35

kilometres of constructed footpaths in streets, 68 kilometres of pathways in reserves and 350 traffic control devices (including 146 roundabouts and 48 traffic aids), 17 kilometres of bike paths on roads and 20 kilometres of off road cycling paths and 8,500 pram ramps. Council will be auditing all of its roads in 2011/12 to assess the state of its roads system and to assist in the development of a forward 4 year works program for road reconstruction and reseal projects. Open Space Quality, usable and accessible open space is important to people’s health and overall amenity and liveability of an area. Open space also has a highly valued aesthetic and recreational value. With growth in medium density housing and less private open space, high quality public open space is becoming more important that ever before. There are various forms of open space in the Charles Sturt area ranging from pocket parks to regional reserves and Coast Park. They serve a range of needs from meeting places to passive and active recreation spaces. Private open space also makes a valuable contribution to liveability in the City. Golf courses are an example of privately owned land that provides amenity value to the City and offers opportunities for recreation. Primary and high school ovals also provide opportunity for shared use arrangements as school facilities are only used for a small proportion of the day and can be made available for public use and for sporting clubs outside of school hours.

The City of Charles Sturt has an Open Space Strategy that was developed to assist the management of open space throughout the City and to provide for future recreation and sport needs and forecast population growth. A review of that Plan is due to be undertaken to address areas of oversupply and undersupply, develop priorities for open space asset upgrades and to address key issues such as water management, stormwater management, biodiversity and habitat, sustainability, amenity, the provision of fit for purpose sporting facilities, balancing recreation and sport opportunities and improving environmental outcomes.

Council is also undertaking research through a Local Government Association Grant on the provision of open space in medium to high density development. It is expected that this research will be completed later in the year. Streetscape Streetscapes are broadly defined as the public area along the street which contains the road way, footpaths and vegetation. The area between the front of buildings and the property boundary also has an influence on the appearance of the streetscape. Landscaping and fencing can positively or negatively impact on the character of the streetscape.

Street trees are a significant component on the streetscape and also play an important role in providing connections between open space. Charles Sturt has

36

approximately 46,000 street trees. There are many advantages associated with street trees including amenity, shade, habitat for birdlife and opportunity to replace trees lost to urban infill. The Council has an Annual Street Tree Planting Program which involves the replacement of approximately 1500 street trees per year. Street trees have a limited life expectancy due to their harsh growing environment and resources need to be allocated on an annual basis to ensure an ongoing replacement programme.

While streetscapes, particularly footpaths, provide for transit links between places, increasingly streets are also being viewed as potential places themselves including places for neighbours to gather, for community art and cultivation of natural habitat. This is a trend particularly in more medium and high density development interstate where public open space is at a premium.

Public Infrastructure Council has a responsibility for the installation and maintenance of a range of public infrastructure including roads, footpaths, stormwater and public lighting. A significant current project is the stormwater recycling project: Water Proofing the West. The Water Proofing the West ‐ Stage One Project is creating the first stage of a region wide system that harvests, treats and stores stormwater and distributes recycled water through western Adelaide, sustaining a growing economy and enhancing our natural environment. The Project will result in improved water management and will treat approximately 2,400 mega litres of recycled water each year (this represents approximately 1,000 Olympic size swimming pools). The stormwater collected would otherwise drain untreated to West Lakes, Port River Estuary, Barker Inlet and the metropolitan Adelaide coast, further degrading seagrass meadows and polluting Gulf St Vincent’s coastal marine environment. Potential users of the recycled water include ovals and reserves managed by the City of Charles Sturt, West Lakes (formerly Riverside) Golf Course, and new developments including St Clair, Cheltenham and Woodville West. Land Use Land use is broadly defined by the type of activity that is being undertaken on any given piece of land. Key land use categories include ‘residential’, ‘industrial’, ‘commercial’, ‘retail’ and ‘recreational’. The Council has a role in shaping the local policy framework for land use through the Development Plan. The Charles Sturt Development Plan identifies planning zones, maps and rules which can guide what can and cannot be done on any piece of land in the City. These zones, maps and rules provide the detailed criteria against which development applications are assessed. The Plan segregates incompatible land uses such as residential and industrial, and promotes mixed land uses in appropriate locations. Mixed land use areas can contain commercial (offices), retail, residential and recreational uses.

37

Policies in Development Plans can only be changed through a formal, statutory Development Plan Amendment (DPA) process, which is prescribed in the Development Act 1993. The statutory DPA process can be started by either a Council or in some circumstances, the State Minister for Urban Development, Planning and the City of Adelaide. The DPA process includes a two month public consultation period. The Minister must ultimately approve all amendments to Development Plans. A DPA must be consistent with the State Government’s Planning Strategy which, for the City of Charles Sturt is The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide.

38

Leadership and Good Governance Theme Paper

Introduction The Local Government Act 1999 (the Act) is the legislation under which Local Government bodies are constituted. It contains detailed reporting and operational requirements which all Councils have a duty to comply with. The functions of Council are outlined in section 7 of the Local Government Act 1999. Essentially, Local Government has two purposes: firstly to govern and secondly to provide service delivery to the local community. Governance is about the processes, systems and relationships needed to facilitate informed and quality decisions in ways that are open, consistent, accountable and transparent. In other words, this is how Charles Sturt does its business. The governance function requires extensive policy formulation, strategic planning, regulation, custodianship of public assets, community development, responsible taxing and budgeting, leadership, advocacy, and the capacity to, where appropriate, participate with other councils and State and Commonwealth Governments in public policy and planning. Local Government consists of an elected body that is responsible for decision making and an administration that is responsible for the implementation of Council decisions, strategies and policies through the administration of day to day operations, and the systems, processes and reporting required to deliver services to the local community. The elected members of Council are chosen by the community as leaders, to advocate on behalf of the community, while at the same time acting as the board members of the organisation. They are also responsible for making decisions in relation to the greater good of the community and the organisation. The elected Council guides the administration in delivering services to the community by ensuring the appropriate strategies, policies, delegations and budgets are in place to reflect community needs and aspirations. The elected Council is also responsible for appointing the Chief Executive. The administration is appointed by the Chief Executive and his delegates to provide policy and strategy advice to the elected Council and to ensure services are delivered to the community in the most efficient and effective manner. Together the elected Council and the administration actively engage with the local community and other service providers and levels of government on matters that affect them and assist in good decision making and relevant service delivery.

Current Situation and Key Issues

39

The Council comprises 16 councillors, two (2) elected to represent each of eight wards of the City, plus the Mayor, elected at large. Each Ward has an average of 10,500 electors. The most important function of a Council Member is attending and participating in the decision making process of Council and committee meetings. The decisions made by the members at formal Council meetings provide the direction and authority for the ongoing operation of the Council. The decisions of the Council give direction to the Chief Executive. Council Decision Making Processes Council and Committee meetings are the formal decision making forums of the Council and provide the direction and authority for the ongoing operation of Council. Council members can discuss and debate the issues to make considered decisions in the best interests of the community. Many of the day to day administrative decisions are made by Council staff under delegated authority in accordance with legislation and existing policies and procedures.

Legislative Responsibility

Charles Sturt must comply with all of its statutory obligations, not only those contained within the Local Government Act 1999, but also of many other legislative requirements which impact on its activities. Processes must be in place to ensure that Council and management understand the range of legislation which impact on our activities and to ensure they are aware of any changes. External bodies such as the Local Government Association and legal advisors play a key role in communicating legislative requirements and changes. Council Committee Structure The current Council Committee Structure can be seen through the following link, and demonstrates the responsibilities for each Committee and reflects the extent and complexity of Council business. Councils are taking on ever increasing responsibilities as a result of changing demands and expectations of the community in relation to service delivery, changes to legislation that impose increased obligations on Councils for assessment and compliance, requirements for greater accountability and cost shifting from other levels of government. In addition, the cost of delivering core services such as waste management and infrastructure replacement is increasing. Charles Sturt is committed to creating a more sustainable locality and improving the amenity and environment for local communities. For these reasons, we want to encourage increased community participation from all segments of the community in matters that affect them. Community Engagement

40

Council has a Public Consultation Policy which sets out what Council must do to meets its legislative obligations under the Local Government Act 1999 for consultation. We also recognise that the community wants to be informed about and involved in decision making beyond the legislative minimum prescribed by the Local Government Act and that broad civic participation in decision making makes for strong, engaged communities, a culture of active citizenship and ultimately for better, more responsive decision making. Our community engagement policy and practices will be reviewed and revised on the basis of the feedback received through the Community Plan process about resident’s preferred ways of engaging in Council decision making and receiving information. Leadership & Strategic Planning Leadership and strategic planning involve coordinating the direction of activities within the organisation as a whole. There are a number of documents which collectively make up Council’s Strategic Planning Framework including: strategic drivers; corporate plans and strategies; forward financial estimates and budgets. Further, each year the community has the opportunity for input into the budget process to influence the type and scale of projects and/or expenditure the Council commits to. Financial Management Charles Sturt is committed to responsible financial management to ensure it remains solvent and able to meet its obligations. One of the key responsibilities in the financial management area is setting the annual budget. The budget can be viewed as the annual communication of the longer‐term financial plan. The budget reflects the Council plan in that it is the expression of how one year’s part of the Council plan is going to be resourced. Community Leadership Strong local communities depend on good leadership, as well as enthusiastic and motivated staff, community organisations that work well, and a long term ‘vision’ for the community with a strong focus on practical action to achieve the vision. Charles Sturt works collaboratively with individual residents as well as residents representing local sporting clubs and community groups. These people help Council to achieve goals and objectives by:

Creating positive change

Being involved in decisions that affect their community

Understanding how Council makes decision

Creating new networks

Thinking strategically about the future

41

Moving forward, Charles Sturt will need to continue to provide opportunities for improved planning, reporting and service delivery by working closely with community, other government agencies and local organisations with the aim of improve efficiency and customer and community satisfaction. Some of the identified challenges are:

Understanding the needs and priorities of the community to ensure informed decision making by Council which is in the best interest of the community at large

Increasing community participation from all segments of the community in matters that affect them

Ensuring strategies, policies, systems and processes are monitored and continually improved to deliver cost effective and efficient services

Working better with other levels of government to define responsibilities particularly in relation to areas of cost shifting

Understanding the implications of the State Government’s 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide


TO: Council FROM: Manager Customer and Community Services DATE: 10 October 2011

6.177 PROPOSED LIQUOR LICENSING AND GAMING POLICY (B136, B632)

Brief


Recommendation

1. That the report be received and noted. 2. That Council endorse the proposed engagement plan.


A safe and healthy City that supports vibrant community life ‐ Encourage strong, supportive local communities ‐ Contribute to the quality of life of all individuals in the community ‐ Encourage healthy lifestyle pursuits ‐ Contribute to an improved sense of safety ‐ Encourage sharing and celebration of our cultural diversity


‐ Ensure the community is well informed and actively engaged ‐ Recognition as a leading organisation delivering best practice in local

government management ‐ Ensure the organisation is financially accountable and sustainable ‐ Deliver quality service to our customers Relevant Council policies are:

Liquor Licensing Policy


PROPOSED LIQUOR LICENSING AND GAMING POLICY Item 6.177 Continued Relevant statutory provisions are:

Liquor Licensing Act 1997


Gaming Machines Act 1992 Background Council received a report providing members with information about the mechanisms in place to manage installation of, and access to, gaming machines in the Council area and the role Council has in this process (Refer FPD 15/08/2011, Item 3.47). That report generated two actions, the second of which will be addressed with the Communications and Engagement Plan outlined in this report: 1. That Council write to the Liquor and Gaming Commissioner formally indicating that

Council wants to be consulted when the application to apply either a Liquor or Gaming License is made for the new SAJC facility at Cheltenham.

2. That Council consult with the community in relation to the Liquor Licensing & Gaming

Policy including a public forum. Report As highlighted in the previous Council report on this subject (Refer FPD 15/08/2011, Item 3.47), the licensing of gaming machines is controlled under the Gaming Machines Act 1992 which is administered by the State Government’s Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner. In assessing applications for a Gaming Machine License, the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner has detailed regard to the likely social effect of granting the license on the local community particularly in relation to problem gambling and especially in areas of low socio‐economic status. At the time of a new licence application, the Commissioner is required to issue a public notification to inform local stakeholders including the relevant Local Government body of the application. A transfer of license will also usually undergo this process however the Commissioner may in special circumstances decide there is no requirement for public notification or consultation. Currently there are no other Local Government bodies that have a ‘Liquor Licensing & Gaming Policy’, only Liquor Licensing Policies which exist due to Council’s legislative responsibility as outlined in the Liquor Licensing Act 1997. In SA the State Legislation on gaming machines is very robust in part thanks to the contribution of ‘No Pokies’ MP Nick Xenophon, who is now championing this cause at a Federal level through his support of gambling reforms including a proposal to introduce a ‘pre‐commitment’ scheme to regulate gaming machine use nationally.


PROPOSED LIQUOR LICENSING AND GAMING POLICY Item 6.177 Continued The City of Charles Sturt’s Liquor Licensing & Gaming Policy Communications and Engagement Plan (Appendix A) has been prepared in consultation with the Finance and Delegation Committee and reflects the responsibility State and Federal Legislation (and its administrators) has for regulating gaming in our community. The plan also acknowledges the role that Local Government has in advocating for issues of this nature. There are two key documents for the communications outlined in the plan, Appendix B outlines the content of a public forum and Appendix C is a draft ‘Gambling in Charles Sturt: Factsheet’. Conclusion The Communications and Engagement Plan recognises the limited but relevant contribution that Local Government can make in relation to gaming machine regulation in our community. The public forum outlined in the plan is designed to give the community the opportunity to gain a better understanding of this issue and contribute to the development of a Liquor Licensing and Gaming Machine Policy to guide Council’s involvement in this matter.


PROPOSED LIQUOR LICENSING AND GAMING POLICY Item 6.177


Appendix A

Communications and Engagement Plan for Proposed Liquor Licensing and Gaming Policy

September 2011

Contact: Sarah Cleggett, Community Project Officer 8408 1173, [email protected]

Appendix A

Purpose The purpose of this Communications and Engagement Plan is to articulate the various measures that will be undertaken to ensure the community, stakeholders, Council members (including the Mayor) and staff are appropriately informed and engaged on this review. It is expected that this approach will improve project outcomes by maximising community and stakeholder knowledge on this issue. Background At its meeting on 15 August 2011, Council received a report providing members with information about the mechanisms in place to manage installation of, and access to, gaming machines in the Council area and the role Council has in this process (Refer FPD 15/08/2011, Item 3.47). That report generated two actions, the second of which will be addressed with this Communications and Engagement Plan: 1. That Council write to the Liquor and Gaming Commissioner formally indicating that

Council wants to be consulted when the application to apply either a Liquor or Gaming License is made for the new SAJC facility at Cheltenham.

2. That Council consult with the community in relation to the Liquor Licensing & Gaming

Policy including a public forum. Objectives The objectives of this Communications and Engagement Plan are:

Inform the community/stakeholders about the policy review and educate them about Council’s role in gaming regulation and the role of State and Federal Government.

Get feedback from the community/stakeholders on how we can encourage the community to provide feedback to the State Government’s Office for the Liquor and Gaming Commissioner when gaming license applications are lodged for premises in the Charles Sturt area.

Determine how Council can best advocate for the community on this issue.

Inform the development of Council’s Liquor Licensing and Gaming Machine Policy Decision statement The decision statement for this public consultation program is:

Council is reviewing its Liquor Licensing Policy with a view to incorporating consideration of gaming machines. While we recognise that Local Government has no legislative responsibility for gaming machine regulation, we acknowledge gaming machines and problem gambling are important issues in our community and want to empower residents to contribute to State and Federal consultation on this matter and highlight Local Government’s role in advocating for the community on this issue.

Appendix A

Current Status Local Government is consulted when a new gaming machine license application is lodged with the Office for the Liquor and Gaming Commissioner. Currently Council administration is responsible for providing a written response based on Council knowledge of the applicant and area. Stakeholders The following groups are considered to be the key stakeholders who will be engaged and communicated with during this project: Residents/property owners

General consideration

Businesses Licensed Premises in the City of Charles Sturt (total of 26) External stakeholders Office for Problem Gambling, Office for the Liquor and Gaming

Commissioner, Gaming Care (Australian Hotel’s Association) Community Groups Anglicare SA, Gam‐Anon, Aboriginal Family Support Services,

Gamblers Anonymous, Pokies Anonymous, Overseas Chinese Association, Vietnamese Community in Australia (SA), Relationships Australia SA

Internal stakeholders Planning, Community Services, Compliance

The ways that these groups will be communicated with/engaged is detailed further in table 1 below. Preliminary Issues Identification Potential issues that may arise during the consultation for this project might include (although not be limited to):

The community wishing Local Government to have more of a regulatory role on this issue, despite the legislation outlining State (and Federal) responsibility

Personal trauma and experience overwhelming the issue Key Messages

State Government through the Office for the Liquor and Gaming Commissioner are responsible for regulating gaming machines in SA. Residents can lodge their concerns with this office or through their local MP.

Local Government isn’t responsible for gaming machine regulation however we can advocate on behalf of the community on this issue. When we are notified of an application by the Office we provide input to the Commissioner based on our knowledge of the applicant and the area it relates to.

The details of support services in our area that can support those affected by problem gambling.

Appendix A

Consultation Materials The following materials will be produced to assist in informing the community and seeking feedback:

Gaming Machines in Charles Sturt factsheet

Direction to the Office of Problem Gambling for a list of current support services

Public Forum invitation flyer Cost It is anticipated that all engagement will be undertaken by Council staff. The only additional costs incurred will be for the production and printing of communications materials and any costs associated with the Public Forum. Communications and Engagement Strategy The following tables detail the intended ways information will be provided and the community and stakeholders engaged. This approach and associated timing will need to remain flexible and may be subject to change in response to the nature of issues raised and responses received. Table 1: Communications and Engagement

Communications Timing (approximate)

‘Gaming Machines in Charles Sturt’ factsheet created and placed on the Council website, link to Office for the Liquor and Gaming Commissioner website

October 2011

Direction to the Office of Problem Gambling website for a list of current support services, on the Council website and customer service reference database

October 2011

Public Forum invitation to be distributed via networks including libraries and community centres and through advertisement in the Messenger

October 2011

Engagement Timing

Public Forum 25 October 2011

Written Feedback welcome Submission due by 18 November

Feedback can be provided in the following ways:

Via participation in the public forum on 25 October 2011

Through written feedback to Council by 18 November 2011 It is envisaged that consultation will close on 2 December 2011.

Appendix A

Compiling and Providing Feedback

Following the engagement activities all responses will be summarised into a Consultation Report that will be provided to Council along with a covering report and recommendation for how to proceed with this project. It is anticipated that the level of community engagement in the review will be a key determinant for the recommendation to Council. All stakeholders and members of the community that participated in the engagement process will be sent a summary report of the results of the engagement, along with Council’s decision for the project, and where applicable what the next steps for this project will be. It will also be available on the Council’s website.



APPENDIX B Appendix B consists of 1 page.

Appendix B

Gambling: A Public Forum

Date: Tuesday 25 October 2011 Time: 6.45pm for 7pm‐9pm Location: Woodville Town Hall, 74 Woodville Road, Woodville Facilitator: (TBC) Panel Members (TBC): Office for Problem Gambling – Julie Petersen (Manager) Uniting Care Wesley Adelaide – Mark Henley (Policy Officer) City of Charles Sturt – General Manager City Services Session 1: 7.00pm‐7.40pm • Introduction of Issues – Facilitator A summary of gambling in our community (10 minutes) • Panel Member Introductions Summary of the panel members experience and knowledge on the issue (25 minutes) • Consumer Voice

Relationships SA program trains members of the community to be able to tell their story of problem gambling. One of the consumer voices will speak (5 minutes)

Break – 10 minutes, 7.40pm‐ 7.50pm, tea and coffee available Session 2: 7.50pm‐9.00pm • Panel Member response to submitted questions A selection of pre submitted questions will be answered (15 minutes) • Panel Member question and answer

Community members have the opportunity to ask questions of the panel (45 minutes) • Summary of Session – Facilitator

An overview of the issues and the next step in the engagement process (10 minutes)

City of Charles Sturt 72 Woodville Road, Woodville, South Australia 5011 T 08 8408 1111 F 08 8408 1122 www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au



APPENDIX C Appendix C consists of 1 page.

Appendix C

Gaming Machines in Charles Sturt – Factsheet

Who regulates gaming machines in SA? The licensing of gaming machines is controlled under the Gaming Machines Act 1992 and administered by the State Government’s Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner. Applications for new licenses are subject to a public notification to stakeholders including Local Government, who can provide feedback on the application. Transfers of licenses are not always subject to public notification. In assessing applications the Commissioner places considerable bearing on the socio‐economic status of the local area and how many licences are already granted in the area. There is also consideration of the location in relation to facilitates including schools, welfare organisations or similar at risk groups. Local Government has a role in advocating for appropriate licensing in our area and will advocate on behalf of the community to ensure they aren’t adversely affected by licensing decisions. How many gaming machines are there in the Charles Sturt area? The City of Charles Sturt is home to a relatively high number of licensed premises, perhaps due to the history of the area as home to a number of blue collar industries and their associated “local” pubs and hotels. A summary table of gaming (2009/10) in Charles Sturt, Port Adelaide Enfield, West Torrens and Marion are listed below:

Council Population No of Venues Total No of Gaming Machines

Charles Sturt 106,000 26 810

Port Adelaide Enfield 102,000 45 1252

West Torrens 55,500 11 337

Marion 80,000 11 347

What is problem gambling?

For most Australians gambling is an enjoyable past time. Most people gamble responsibly however for some people gambling can become a problem. Problem gambling is when a person’s gambling causes harm to themselves and/or to those around them such as a partner, family, friends, or other in the community. When gambling begins to consume more money and time than a person can afford it can affect many parts of their lives, including physical and emotional health, finances, relationships, work and study (Office for Problem Gambling 2011) In SA there is a total of 1.65 million people, an estimated 5,000 adults have a problem with gambling and another 15,000 adults are ‘moderately at risk’ of gambling becoming a problem (Office of Problem Gambling 2011). Who is at risk of problem gambling?

The propensity to gambling and gambling uptake appears to be influenced by a variety of factors including personality, other psychological issue and social factors like social isolation and loneliness. Availability and supply is another key factor influencing uptake of gambling (Gamblers Rehabilitation Fund 2005). This is especially apparent in observing the rapid rise in the popularity of online gambling. What support services are there for problem gambling? There are a number of support services available in the West for people struggling with problem gambling. For an up to date list visit the Office for Problem Gambling: http://www.problemgambling.sa.gov.au/aspx/region.aspx?regionID=11


http://www.problemgambling.sa.gov.au/aspx/region.aspx?regionID=11


TO: Council FROM: Manager Planning and Development DATE: 10 October 2011

6.178 BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP

(B136)

Brief


Recommendation

1. That the Office of the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner be advised that

Council agrees to the new proposal to vary the entertainment consent for the Bacchus Wine Bar located at 253 Esplanade, Henley Beach SA 5022 subject to the following agreed conditions;

a. The application is to permit live entertainment in Area 1 from

7.30pm until 11.00pm on Wednesday and Thursday. b. Doors to Area 1 to be closed whenever live entertainment is

provided and only open to permit the entry and exit of patrons and staff.

c. The live entertainment to include but not be limited to salsa dancing and one or two piece entertainers whose music may be amplified.

d. Noise levels to accord with EPA Guidelines and the liquor licensing regulations.

e. Whenever live entertainment is provided, an approved crowd controller is to be located at the entrance to the premises from 11.00pm until half an hour after close whose duties shall include the orderly dispersal of patrons within 60 metres radius of the entrance to the premises.

f. Signage to be placed at the exits to Area 1 whenever live entertainment is provided to the following effect: “Please leave these premises quickly and quietly so as not to disturb our nearby residents”.

g. The Bacchus Wine Bar shall be an active member of the Henley Beach Licensing Accord


BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP Item 6.178 Continued

h. The variation shall be for a trial period of 6 months at the end of

which the application will be recalled by the commissioner with the intention being that providing there are no issues raised then the condition will become permanent subject to Council agreement at this time.

2. That Staff write to those neighbouring persons originally consulted about

the variation to the Entertainment Consent and advised of this trial arrangement, conditions imposed on the trial period and seek any comments they have during this time relating to issues associated with the Entertainment License.


A safe and healthy City that supports vibrant community life ‐ Contribute to the quality of life of all individuals in the community ‐ Encourage healthy lifestyle pursuits ‐ Contribute to an improved sense of safety

An economically prosperous, attractive and functional City ‐ Support and encourage a diverse mix of complementary land uses ‐ Encourage local business and employment opportunities



government management ‐ Deliver quality service to our customers Relevant Council policies are:

Liquor Licensing Policy Relevant statutory provisions are:

Liquor Licensing Act 1997


Local Government Act 1999


BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP Item 6.178 Continued Background On the 20 June 2011 Council received formal notification of the application lodged with the Office of Liquor and Gambling Commissioner for variation to the Entertainment Consent. Council was asked to consider this proposal at its meeting on the 12 September 2011 (Item 6.163) and resolved to oppose the variation as it failed to meet the provisions contained within Council’s Liquor Licensing Policy but also indicated conditions that should be applied if the Commission was of a mind to grant the entertainment Consent. The following information outlines the resolution of Council; 1. That the Office of Liquor and Gambling Commissioner be advised that Council

continues to oppose the variation to entertainment consent for the Bacchus Wine Bar located at 253 Esplanade Henley Beach SA 5022.

2. Should the Office of Liquor and Gambling decide to issue approval to the licence

variation, then such approval should be in accordance with Councils Liquor Licence policy with the following conditions on the Entertainment Consent being issued; a. The Licensee shall at all times ensure that noise levels should be in accord with

EPA Guidelines and the Liquor Licensing Regulations. b. The venue ensures a security guard patrols in and around a 60 metres radius of

the Bacchus Wine Bar on all nights entertainment is provided at the venue. c. Entertainment on Wednesday and Thursday shall be of an acoustic nature only. d. That Bacchus Wine bar licensee becomes an active member of the Henley Beach

Licensing Accord. e. That the Entertainment consent shall cease at 10pm on Wednesday and

Thursday. f. That a trial period of 6 months apply to the approval.

3. That Council staff and Ward Councillor(s) monitor the noise levels during the 6 month

trial (similar to the Sandbar). Report The Bacchus Wine Bar application for variation to entertainment consent was reconvened at the Office of the Liquor and Gambling commissioner on Thursday 14 September 2011 in the presence of the applicant, Council staff and local resident objectors. At this meeting Council’s representative put forward the motion moved by Council on 12 September 2011 and confirmed this by way of letter on the 16 September 2011. A copy of council’s letter is provided in Appendix A. The applicant responded to this letter on 23 September 2011 outlining a proposed position that meets the majority of Council motion with some minor variation. The applicants proposed amendment is contained in Appendix B.


BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP Item 6.178 Continued It is considered that the current proposal put forward by the applicant is a significant shift from the original proposal. It offers several measures to reduce the off site impacts of entertainment on the surrounding community including;

Entertainment will be conducted with all doors closed;

They will achieve an appropriate noise level to meet EPA and Liquor Licensing Regulations; and

Agreement has been provided to an approved crowd controller at the premises entrance from 11.00pm until half an hour after close within a 60 metre radius of the Bacchus Wine Bar.

Council considered at the meeting on 12 September 2011 the need to balance the requirements of the local community while ensuring the businesses in and around Henley Square provide a vibrant area for people to visit and be active. It is considered that this proposal can achieve this balance and the listed conditions placed on the licensee, by the Commissioner, would ensure the amenity of the location is protected. Council initially supported a 10.00pm finish time for entertainment and this proposal allows it to end at 11.00pm. Additionally originally Council required that entertainment not be amplified. The applicant has indicated that they do require amplification but this is limited to one or two piece bands and all doors will be closed to ensure off site noise impacts comply with EPA standards. The amendments go slightly beyond the previously endorsed conditions of Council but are still considered to adequately reduce off site impacts and achieve suitable hours for the entertainment activity on the site. It is considered reasonable for Council to agree to the variation to the Entertainment Consent with the recommended conditions being placed on the licence for the Bacchus Wine Bar to ensure the amenity of local residents in not impacted upon by this proposal. The arrangement will be reviewed at the end of the six month trial period and Council would need to endorse this continuing beyond this time. Financial and Resource Implications In opposing these recommendations Council will continue to incur legal costs. Community Engagement/Consultation It is envisaged that should the recommendations be approved by Council and placed onto the Bacchus Wine Bar Special Circumstances Licence, Council will continue to liaise with local residents by a follow up community consultation. Staff will write to all people initially consulted about the proposed variation and advise them of Council’s resolution providing them details of the conditions imposed by the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner. We will encourage the local community to be active in the Henley Square precinct by notifying both the Liquor and Gambling Commissioner and Council of any issues arising from this variation approval. Should issues arise then they will be discussed immediately with the licensee and later when the application is recalled at the end of the 6 month trial period.


BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP Item 6.178 Continued Conclusion That the report is received and Council agree to the proposed variation to Entertainment Consent subject to conditions for a 6 month trial period. Additionally the local community will be informed of this decision and asked to provide Council and the Commissioner with information on any impacts associated with the trial.


BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP Item 6.178

APPENDIX A Appendix A consists of 2 pages

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL By Email: <[email protected]> Ref: 275164\PSK01872467 16 September 2011 Peter Hoban Partner Wallmans Lawyers GPO Box 1018 ADELAIDE SA 5001

Dear Peter Bacchus Wine Bar – Variation to Entertainment Consent I refer to our attendance at the Liquor and Gambling Commission on Thursday 14 September 2011 for the conciliation of the above matter. I confirm that the Council resolved to continue its opposition to the variation. I confirm that the Council also resolved that should the Commission decide to issue an approval then the approval should be accordance with Council’s Liquor Licence Policy and the following conditions should be added to your client’s licence: 1. The Licensee shall at all times ensure that noise levels should be in accord with EPA

Guidelines and the Liquor Licensing Regulations.

2. The venue ensures a security guard patrols in and around a 60 metres radius of the Bacchus Wine Bar on all nights entertainment is provided at the venue.

3. Entertainment on Wednesday and Thursday shall be of an acoustic nature only.

4. That Bacchus Wine Bar licensee shall become an active member of the Henley Beach Licensing Accord.

5. That the Entertainment consent shall cease at 10:00pm on Wednesday and Thursday.

6. That a trial period of 6 months apply to the approval.

I confirm that during the mediation I made the following submissions which the Council has instructed me to pursue in addition to the above 6 conditions to be added to the licence:

1. In your proposal for compromise at point 7 you provided that when live entertainment is provided on a Wednesday or Thursday night during the daylight saving part of the year, an approved crowd controller is to be located at the entrance to the premises from 11pm until half an hour after close, whose duties shall include the orderly dispersal of patrons. My client questions why this proposal should only occur ‘during

- 2 -

16 September 2011

275164\PSK01872467

the daylight saving part of the year’ and wishes for those words to be deleted from your proposal 7.

2. In your proposal for compromise at point 9 you provide a trial period of 6 months shall apply to your client’s application. You further propose that if at the end of this period no issues have been raised then this approval will be permanent. My client does not accept this proposal and suggests that a trial period of 6 months shall apply and then be brought back before the Commission for further mention.

I confirm that you will seek your client’s instructions in relation to the above conditions and provide me with a response before 28 September 2011 so that my instructing client may put your position to their next Council meeting which is to be held on 10 October 2011.

I confirm that the application has been adjourned to 2:00pm on 17 October 2011 for further conciliation.

I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.

Yours faithfully Norman Waterhouse Paul Kelly Partner Direct Line: (08) 8210 1248 e-mail: [email protected]


BACCHUS WINE BAR ‐ VARIATION TO ENTERTAINMENT CONSENT ‐ FOLLOW UP Item 6.178

APPENDIX B Appendix B consists of 2 pages


TO: Council FROM: Manager Planning and Development DATE: 10 October 2011

6.179 MINISTERS SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION (B1938)

Brief


Recommendation

1. That the report be received and noted. 2. That the letter contained in Appendix D is endorsed for submission to the

Building Policy Branch at the Department of Planning and Local Government.


A safe and healthy City that supports vibrant community life ‐ Contribute to the quality of life of all individuals in the community

An economically prosperous, attractive and functional City ‐ Support and encourage a diverse mix of complementary land uses ‐ Encourage local business and employment opportunities


‐ Recognition as a leading organisation delivering best practice in local government management

‐ Deliver quality service to our customers Relevant Council policies are:

Nil


MINISTERS SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION Item 6.179 Continued Relevant statutory provisions are:


Development Regulations 2008 Background The 30 Year Plan for Greater Adelaide sets out objectives and principles guiding growth within the state. This is outlining that growth will be primarily achieved through infill development within existing urban areas comprising higher density and mixed land use outcomes. These will be located adjacent to major road and rail networks as well as in close proximity to major noise sources such as centres and industrial areas. In order for these communities to be enjoyable places to live the impacts of external noise sources need to be reduced within the built form design of any new development. Many current Development Plans contain provisions to address these impacts but these are guiding principles and do not ensure uniform design outcomes for all. Options for managing the impact of external noise have been investigated by the Building Policy Branch of the Department of Planning and Local Government. The preferred option they have identified is to mandate design outcomes in relation to noise attenuation through the Building Code of Australia using a Minister’s Specification. This will apply to new residential buildings and additions to existing residential buildings located within identified noise affected areas. The Government of South Australia has recently released a draft of a proposed Minister’s Specification SA8 “Construction Requirements for the control of external sound” for comment and this is provided in Appendix A. This has been released following investigations by the State Government into options for managing off site noise impacts on new residential development. The report outlining these investigations and findings is provided in Appendix B. An explanatory fact sheet has been released to explain the proposed system and this is provided in Appendix C. Comment to the State Government on the proposed system for managing noise impacts is required by 14 October 2011. Report The Proposed System The Minister's Specification SA 8 is part of an integrated system of development assessment that links state‐wide planning policies and building requirements. Once the specification is finalised, Council Development Plans will be amended to indicate the roads, rail lines and mixed land‐use areas where sound is likely to impact on new dwellings and alterations to existing dwellings.


MINISTERS SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION Item 6.179 Continued The sound‐affected areas in each council will be indicated on a 'Noise and Air Emissions' policy overlay map, which will trigger the application of the specification and identify where it applies. The overlay will be introduced to development plans through Development Plan Amendments (DPAs). The DPA process includes a statutory period of public consultation allowing affected land owners and the general public to have a say about the area covered by the overlay and therefore where the specification is applied. The State Government is also preparing design guidelines, to be available by the end of 2011, explaining how the specification applies to new building work and providing examples of how various designs could meet the specification requirements. An application submitted for planning approval, which is located within an area affected by noise impacts, will need to indicate as part of the application that they are going to comply with the Ministers Specification SA 8. No further consideration of this issue will be required at the planning stage. Assessment of compliance with the specification will be an assessment undertaken by either Local government Building Surveyors or Private Certifiers in the same manner as, for example, energy efficiency are considered as part of the assessment for building rules consent. The applicant can indicate via documentation compliance with the Minister’s Specification or alternatively they can provide an independent acoustic report outlining an alternative performance based solution which will need detailed review during the assessment process. An alternative solution would need to meet or exceed the standards prescribed in the specification in relation to acceptable dB(A) levels within bedrooms and living areas. At present the issue of noise impact is considered during the planning assessment phase of the decision making process. There are Australian standards that apply to noise attenuation and also a guide from the Environment Protection Authority which set standards that should be met in this regard. Acoustic reports are required from the applicant and these are usually sent to an independent acoustic engineer for review as part of the planning assessment. The exact standards required to be met vary across these documents and can lead to confusion for both the applicant and Council’s assessing staff about what is required. The new framework proposed by the State Government will simplify the assessment process in that there will be one standard to meet. It will also allow the detailed design measures needed to deliver the necessary outcomes to form part of the building documentation stage which fits better into the detailed documentation of the development than attempting to do so at the planning stage.


MINISTERS SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION Item 6.179 Continued The level of attenuation required is determined by the sound exposure category which is based distance the building is from the sound source and takes into account barriers between the properties that may reduce the impact of the sound. Once you have established the level of sound exposure category you are then able to determine the level of attenuation provided by the building envelope and ventilation system against airborne sound intrusion. This must be sufficient to provide internal sound levels not exceeding 35dB(A) for bedrooms between 10pm and 7am or 40dB(A) for other habitable rooms between 7am and 10pm for transport and people noise and 45dB(A) for a bedroom between 10.00pm and 7.00 am for music from entertainment venues. The Specification then outlines a number of construction techniques that will ensure compliance with the requirements. Issues for Council While the documentation indicates that plans would be included in Council’s Development Plan to facilitate application of the Specification whether this would be done by a Ministerial DPA or by Council is not specified. This should be clarified by the Minister as part of the introduction of this system and time frames for achieving such maps within the Development Plan provided. At this time it is also not clear what distance from the noise source will capture properties for the application of the Minister’s Specification. There will be additional assessment criteria to check at the building assessment stage and this will require staff training and may extend the assessment time frame depending on the approach taken by the applicant. An application indicating compliance with the specification may be more straight forward than one where the applicant proposes an alternative solution. Where an alternative solution is proposed Council would need to refer this to an acoustic engineer for checking to ensure the required standards have been met as building assessment staff are not trained in this area of speciality. The costs associated with this would be borne by Council. While this occurs now to some degree as a result of current Development Plan policy this could be expanded if the maps capturing properties affected are broader and thus include more sites than the current policy captures. Some thought should be given to ensuring assessment costs associated with this new approach are built into the application fees. It is also unclear whether complying forms of development would need to meet the specification and this should be addressed by the State Government as they move forward with this proposal. The assessment of an application against the Minister’s Specification has been likened to the Energy Efficiency six star rating system. Under this system the applicant can supply a report which indicates that the required standards have been met by the development. The current information released for comment does not specify whether this system would be applied to noise attenuation and this should be addressed before the implementation of this approach to ensure the checking of a deemed to satisfy application is simple. A letter of comment to the State government outlining Council’s issues is provided in Appendix D.


MINISTERS SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION Item 6.179 Continued Conclusion The proposal to integrate the assessment of noise attenuation measures into the building rules consent is supported with comment provided to the State Government seeking clarification of some aspects of the logistics for applying this system. The report should be received and the letter contained in Appendix D endorsed for submission to the State Government.


MINISTERS SPECIFICATION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION Item 6.179

APPENDIX A Appendix A consists of 24 pages



APPENDIX B Appendix B consists of 46 pages



APPENDIX C Appendix C consists of 2 pages



APPENDIX D Appendix D consists of 2 pages

Our ref.

29 September 2011 Building Policy Branch Department of Planning and Local Government GPO Box 1815 Adelaide SA 5001 Dear Sir/ Madam Ministers Specification SA 8 – Construction requirements for the control of external sound Council is writing to you to provide comment on the proposed Ministers Specification SA 8 – Construction requirements for the control of external sound which is currently out for public comment. Council is supportive of a system which ensures uniformity in the instances where this type of design issue is required to be addressed and the in the standards required to be met. This will ensure the quality of life for people living in higher density dwellings is improved and the impacts of off site noise sources are addressed. Council offers the following comments in relation to implementation of such a system and identifies areas where further documentation or clarification of how the system will work may be required. While the documentation indicates that plans would be included in Council’s Development Plan to facilitate application of the Specification whether this would be done by a Ministerial DPA or by Council is not specified. This should be clarified as part of the introduction of this system and time frames for achieving such maps within the Development Plan provided. At this time it is also not clear what distance from the noise source will capture properties for the application of the Minister’s Specification. There will be additional assessment criteria to check at the building assessment stage and this will require staff training and may extend the assessment time frame depending on the approach taken by the applicant. An application indicating compliance with the specification may be more straight forward than one where the applicant proposes an alternative solution. Where an alternative solution is proposed Council would need to refer this to an acoustic engineer for checking to ensure the required standards have been met as building assessment staff are not trained in this area of speciality. The costs associated with this would be borne by Council. While this occurs now to some degree as a result of current Development Plan policy this could be expanded if the maps capturing properties affected are broader and thus include more sites than the current policy captures. Some thought should be given to

2

ensuring assessment costs associated with this new approach are built into the application fees. It is also unclear whether Complying forms of development would need to meet the specification and this should be addressed as the implementation of this approach moves forward. The assessment of an application against the Minister’s Specification has been likened to the Energy Efficiency six star rating system. Under this system the applicant can supply a report which indicates that the required standards have been met by the development. The current information released for comment does not specify whether this system would be applied to noise attenuation and this should be addressed before the implementation of this approach to ensure the checking of a deemed to satisfy application is simple. Should you require any clarification in relation to the comments of Council please contact Dennis Farrow on 8408 1205. Yours sincerely Mark Withers Chief Executive Officer


TO: Council FROM: Strategic Infrastructure Executive Officer DATE: 10 October 2011

6.180 WATER PROOFING THE WEST ‐ STAGE ONE COMMUNITY REFERENCE GROUP

(B6171)

Brief


Recommendation

That the report be received and noted.


A safe and healthy City that supports vibrant community life ‐ Encourage strong, supportive local communities

An economically prosperous, attractive and functional City ‐ Support and encourage a diverse mix of complementary land uses ‐ Create attractive, well maintained streetscapes ‐ Establish and maintain a linked system of open space ‐ Manage the community’s infrastructure

A City which values, protects and enhances the natural environment ‐ Protect and restore the City’s biodiversity, natural ecosystems and water

courses ‐ Encourage our community to better manage and reduce their impact on the

environment ‐ Promote ecologically sustainable urban development within the City ‐ Reduce the environmental impact of Council’s operations


WATER PROOFING THE WEST ‐ STAGE ONE COMMUNITY REFERENCE GROUP Item 6.180 Continued



government management ‐ Ensure the organisation is financially accountable and sustainable ‐ Deliver quality service to our customers Relevant Council policies are:

Community Plan

City of Charles Sturt Development Plan

Environmental Sustainability Policy

Water Consumption Policy

Risk Management Policy

Procurement Policy

One Planet Living: Greening the Western Suburbs Strategy Relevant statutory provisions are:

Local Government Act 1999

Environment Protection Act 1993

Natural Resource Management Act 2004

Development Act 1993 Background Council at its meeting on 14 February 2011 (refer CL 14/02/2011, Item 6.18) agreed to form a Water Proofing the West – Stage One Community Reference Group which would consist of representatives from the City of Charles Sturt, Aurecon, local community, businesses and special interest groups with close links to the project study area. Members of the Group would be determined by a Community Reference Group Selection Panel comprising of Mayor Alexander, Counsellor Auricht, Counsellor Alexandrides, Counsellor Grant and Counsellor Wasylenko. Nominations to join the Water Proofing the West – Stage One Community Reference Group was advertised in local Messenger Newspapers (The Weekly Times and Portside) on 6 June, 15 June and 22 June 2011, available on Council’s website and letter distribution to local stakeholders groups.


WATER PROOFING THE WEST ‐ STAGE ONE COMMUNITY REFERENCE GROUP Item 6.180 Continued Nominations closed on 7 July 2011 with 10 nominations received (refer to Appendix A). A Community Reference Group Selection Panel meeting was held on 1 August 2011 and unanimous decision to select all 10 nominations was received. It was agreed that first Water Proofing the West – Stage One Community Reference Group meeting would be held on 25 August 2011 at Council offices. Report Sources Used Council/Committee Reports CL 12/07/10 Item 6.71 CL 14/12/09 Item 6.138 CL 22/06/09 Item 6.75 CL 09/07/07 Item 6.80 Community Engagement/Consultation A Community Engagement Strategy Review Document (Strategy Document) has been prepared by Aurecon and City of Charles Sturt staff, which sets out recommended approaches as well as having a series of ‘live’ action plans. At the meeting held on 24 January 2011 the Strategy Document was reviewed and as part of this review there was a strong recommendation that a Community Reference Group be formed with aims to represent a broad range of local community interests and views. Two Community Events have been held. Cooke Reserve Open Day held on Saturday 25 June 2011 in the Scout Hall on Cooke Reserve with over 50 local residents, businesses and special interest groups in attendance; and a Community Information Evening held on Wednesday 29 June 2011 at Council Offices. Conclusion This report informs Council on the progress of the Water Proofing the West – Stage One project and confirms the selection of the 10 nominations received to join the Community Reference Group along with representatives from the City of Charles Sturt and Aurecon.


WATER PROOFING THE WEST ‐ STAGE ONE COMMUNITY REFERENCE GROUP Item 6.180


Community Reference Group (CRG) Nominations Assessment Summary Water Proofing the West - Stage One City of Charles Sturt

Report ref:208406-002-01 25 July 2011 Revision 02

Document prepared by: Aurecon Australia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 55 Grenfell Street Adelaide South Australia 5000 Australia T: +61 8 8237 9777 F: +61 8 8237 9778 E: [email protected] W: aurecongroup.com

Document control

Document ID: 110725 CRG Nominations Assessment Summary.doc

Rev No Date Revision details Typist Author Verifier Approver

0 15/07/2011 Draft for CCS Review (issued to PSi) OAN OAN PSi ASy

01 19/07/2011

20/07/2011

Final Draft for e-issue to CCS

Amended Final Draft for e-issue to CCS OAN OAN ASy CCS

02 25/07/2011 Final for e-issue to Selection Panel for Review and

discussion at meeting OAN OAN CCS

Selection Panel

A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original

hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon.

Community Reference Group (CRG) Nominations Assessment Summary

Project 208406-002-01 | File 110725 CRG Nominations Assessment Summary.doc⏐ 25 July 2011 | Revision 02 Aurecon Page i

Contents

1. Introduction 1

2. Overview of the CRG 1

2.1 Purpose of the CRG 1 2.2 The call for nominations 1

3. Assessment of nominations 2

3.1 Receipt of nominations 2 3.2 Nominees and contact details 2 3.3 Comparison of nominations 3 3.4 Acceptance of meeting preference 5

4. A summary for the Selection Panel’s consideration 6

4.1 Acceptance of nominations 6 4.2 Council representation 6 4.3 CRG meetings 6

Appendix A

Call for Nominations, Nomination Form & Terms of Reference

Appendix B

Nominations received


Project 208406-002-01 | File 110725 CRG Nominations Assessment Summary.doc⏐ 25 July 2011 | Revision 02 Aurecon Page 1

1. Introduction The Community Reference Group (CRG) Nominations Assessment Summary is prepared to assist the Selection Panel (as resolved at the City of Charles Sturt Council Meeting on 14 February 2011) comprising of:

1. Councillor Wasylenko 2. Councillor Alexandrides 3. Councillor Grant 4. Councillor Auricht 5. Mayor Alexander

to select the representatives to reside on the CRG. This Summary Assessment includes: • Section 2 - Overview of the CRG including

– Section 2.1 - Purpose of the CRG – Section 2.2 - The call for nominations

• Section 3 - Assessment of nominations • Section 4 - A summary for the Selection Panel’s consideration

2. Overview of the CRG 2.1 Purpose of the CRG

The CRG will be a mechanism to inform key community stakeholders of the Water Proofing the West – Stage One Project and its progress as well as enable the City of Charles Sturt to gain an understanding of the issues of importance to the community in assessing the options for treatments such as landscaping at Cooke Reserve, Cheltenham wetlands and Old Port Road. The key purpose of the CRG will be to exchange information, views, and ideas and suggest ways to share information about the project. The CRG will facilitate open communication between the City of Charles Sturt Council and the community it serves.

The CRG will work with Council to: • Act as a representative for the community on the project: • Review and comment on community activities • Share information and ideas. Refer to the terms of reference in Appendix A for further information on the role of the CRG.

2.2 The call for nominations

CRG nominations were called from 15 June 2011 to 7 July 2011 and subsequently internally extended and sought until 15 July 2011. Members were called to represent the following categories: • Local Residents • Businesses in the Old Port Road/Port Road area • Educational • Environmental • Kaurna Community • Pedestrian and/or cycling group • Local Residents Associations The opportunity was advertised in local Portside and Weekly Times Messengers on 15 June 2011. See Appendix A for the call for nomination and nomination form. The opportunity was promoted at the Cooke Reserve Open Day and Community Information Evening held respectively on 25 and 29 June 2011.



3. Assessment of nominations 3.1 Receipt of nominations

Seven nominations were received by close of business on 7 July 2011 and an additional three nominations submitted by 19 July 2011, with two nominees (local resident and an aboriginal representative) to be finalised. Nominees and their contact details are provided in Section 3.2 and a summary assessment of the nominations received provided in Section 3.3. Section 3.4 provides confirmation of the nominees acceptance of the proposed meeting details. 3.2 Nominees and contact details

Table 3.2 lists the contact details of the nominees received.

Table 3.2 - Contact Details of Nominees

No. Person/Role Contact Telephone No. Email Address

1. John Hunt 0417 839 877 [email protected] 12 Martindale Avenue

Toorak Gardens SA 5065

2. Grant Ferguson 8130 6000 [email protected] 211 Glen Osmond Road

Frewville SA 5063

3. Meredith Edwards 0458 595 648 [email protected] Woodville HS

11 Actil Avenue

Woodville SA 5011

4. Harold Goodwin 08 8341 2553 [email protected] 68 Lochside Drive

West Lakes SA 5021

5. Susan J Scott 0403 001 909 [email protected] 9 Stanley Street

Woodville SA 5011

6. Edward Mark 08 8355 1431 [email protected] 16 Woodland Court

Grange SA 5022

7. Kylie Thomson 0411 442 997 [email protected] 13 Jeanette Street

Woodville Park 5011

8. Peter Thomas 0411 706 785 [email protected] 1013 Port Road

Cheltenham

9. Peter Jamieson 0417 781 516 [email protected] 13 Merle Martin Drive

North Haven SA 5018

10. Samantha Moody [email protected] 63 Recreation Parade Semaphore Park 5019

11. Jane McNamara TBA TBA Unit 1/18A Trafford Street

Athol Park SA 5010

12. Aboriginal Representative

TBA TBA TBA

Note: Yellow shading reflects the nomination form to be received.



3.3 Comparison of nominations

The nominations received have been collated in Table 3.3.

Table 3.3 - Comparison of nominations

No. Nominee

Lo

cal R

esid

ent

Bu

sin

ess

in t

he

Old

P

ort

Ro

ad/P

ort

Ro

ad

are

a

Ed

uca

tio

nal

En

viro

nm

enta

l

Kau

rna

Co

mm

un

ity

Ped

estr

ian

an

d/o

r cy

clin

g g

rou

p

Lo

cal R

esid

ents

A

sso

ciat

ion

Interests or experience

1. John Hunt • Foundation member of Urban Water Resources Best Practice Advisory Group

• Winner Australian Local Government National Infrastructure Award for Aquifer Recharge Project

• Project Director New Brompton Estate – Aquifer Recharge Project

• Member SA Government Contaminated Lands Task Force

• Consultant / Project Director Various Stormwater Management Projects

2. Grant Ferguson • Scouts

• West Lakes Triathlon Club

• Involved with SA Water project at Woodhouse Camp Site in Adelaide Hills

3. Meredith Edwards • Woodville High School is a key stakeholder in these developments

• Not only would Woodville HS like the school to be “water proofed” as a part of the St Clair residential development/Cheltenham plans (previously discussed with Mark Withers) but it will offer authentic curriculum projects for their students

4. Harold Goodwin • Retired driller that has worked on Aquifer Systems previously

5. Susan J Scott • National Resources Management:

– Soil Science

– Soil Chemistry

– Hydrogen Chemistry

– Soil Planning Science

• Groundwater hydrology

• Groundwater modelling



No. Nominee

Lo

cal R

esid

ent

Bu

sin

ess

in t

he

Old

P

ort

Ro

ad/P

ort

Ro

ad

are

a

Ed

uca

tio

nal

En

viro

nm

enta

l

Kau

rna

Co

mm

un

ity

Ped

estr

ian

an

d/o

r cy

clin

g g

rou

p

Lo

cal R

esid

ents

A

sso

ciat

ion


6. Edward Mark • Previous experience as a qualified Community Worker working on Aged and Youth projects for non profit organisations

• Long term interest in Coastal Fauna and Flora Management

• Member of the Tennyson Dunes Group

7. Kylie Thomson • A member of SCRRA

• Self employed horticulturalist and garden designer

• Apprenticeship and previous employment with local government including Councils and Salisbury Council (Nursery – including wetlands propagation)

• Interest and knowledge of native plants and wetlands

• A parent of small children who attend a local school

• Interested in community involvement

8. Peter Thomas • Business/land owner on Port Road – owner of Maughan Thiem

9. Peter Jamieson

• Chairperson Murray Darling Association Region 7 (Greater Metro)

• Member Penrice Community Consultation Group

• Member Le Fevre Pilot Air Quality Strategy Project Reference Group

• Elected Member Port Adelaide Council Outer Harbour Ward

• Member LGA State Executive

• Member SA Water Customer Council

• Member of ESCOSA Consumer Advisory Committee

10. Samantha Moody • Strikers would really like to be involved

• Work on Hendon Common, Hendon

• Reside in Semaphore Park

• Really felt it is something they would like to be involved in



No. Nominee

Lo

cal R

esid

ent

Bu

sin

ess

in t

he

Old

P

ort

Ro

ad/P

ort

Ro

ad

are

a

Ed

uca

tio

nal

En

viro

nm

enta

l

Kau

rna

Co

mm

un

ity

Ped

estr

ian

an

d/o

r cy

clin

g g

rou

p

Lo

cal R

esid

ents

A

sso

ciat

ion


11. Jane McNamara • Awaiting Nomination Form

12. Aboriginal Representative

• Awaiting Nomination Form

Total 7 2 1 2 1 1

Note: Yellow shading reflects the nomination form is yet to be received. 3.4 Acceptance of meeting preference

A general consensus was provided by the majority of the nominations received that the proposed meeting frequency, length and timing as provided in Table 3.4 were appropriate. One nominee identified a Tuesday evening as an exclusion.

Table 3.4 - Proposed CRG Meeting Preference

Meeting Details Consensus View

Frequency Bi-monthly

Meeting Duration 2 hours

Timing Week night

After Business Hours



4. A summary for the Selection Panel’s consideration

4.1 Acceptance of nominations

A total of 12 (10 received and 2 (local resident and aboriginal representative pending) nominations are anticipated representing a cross section of the categories as summarised in Table 4.1:

Table 4.1 - Nominees representation of categories

Categories Nominees Representation

• Local Residents 7

• Businesses in the Old Port Road/Port Road area 2

• Educational 1

• Environmental 2

• Kaurna Community

• Pedestrian and/or cycling group 1

• Local Residents Associations 1

It is recommended that the nominations received are considered for selection by the Selection Panel based on their nominations and representation of the categories sought. It is recommended that the nominees are advised of the outcome of the selection process by the end of July 2011. 4.2 Council representation

The representation from the City of Charles Sturt is to be agreed by the Selection Panel. 4.3 CRG meetings

The schedule of six (6) CRG meetings is to be agreed. A proposed schedule is provided in Table 4.3 for the Section Panel’s consideration. Agendas will be issued prior to the meetings for review and agreement.

Table 4.3 - Proposed CRG Meeting Schedule

CRG Meeting No. When Topic Speaker (as relevant)

1 August 2011 TBA

2 October 2011 TBA

3 December 2011 TBA

4 February 2012 TBA

5 April 2012 TBA

6 June 2012 TBA



Appendix A Call for Nominations, Nomination Form &

Terms of Reference


11/57425 Updated 7 June 2011

Community Coastal Reference Group ‐ Call for Nominations Water Proofing the West – Stage One Project The Water Proofing the West ‐ Stage One Project will create the first stage of a region wide system that harvests, treats and stores stormwater and distributes recycled water through western Adelaide sustaining a growing economy and enhancing our natural environment. This project is the largest capital works project to be embarked on by the City of Charles Sturt. Elements of Stage One include wetlands and Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) within Old Port Road, Cheltenham, Cooke Reserve and Riverside Golf Club. Opportunity 1 Community Involvement and Community Information Evening Council is committed to involving our local community to achieve a successful process and outcome. A number of activities are planned in the next 12 months including community information days and focussed workshops to provide local residents, businesses and schools with opportunities to access information and provide valuable input into the project. Council hopes that you take the opportunity to participate in this exciting project. An initial Community Information Evening will be held on Wednesday 29 June 2011 at 7.00pm in the Woodville Civic Centre to introduce the Project. You can also join our mailing list to receive regular updates:

Phone the Customer Service Centre at City of Charles Sturt on 8408 1111; or

Email Paola Silvano at City of Charles Sturt on [email protected] Opportunity 2 Nominate and join the Community Reference Group In addition if you wish to be more involved and wish to play a more “hands on” role in the project, Council is establishing a Community Reference Group to assist with the planning of community activities associated with the project. The key purpose of the Community Reference Group will be to exchange information, views, and ideas and suggest ways to share information about the project.

The Community Reference Group will work with Council to:

Act as a representative for the community on the project;

Review and comment on community activities; and

Share information and ideas. The group will comprise of approximately 12 members, with Council’s Project Managers, Aurecon acting as a facilitator. We seek community members that may include representatives from the following categories: Local Residents Businesses in the Old Port Road/Port Road area Educational Environmental Kaurna Community Pedestrian and/or cycling group Local Residents Associations If you would like to nominate please complete the Nomination Form which can be found on our website www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au or in hard copy on request by phoning 8408 1111. All nominations must be lodged with Council by 4.00pm, Thursday 7 July 2011.


Project 208406-002-01 | File 110725 CRG Nominations Assessment Summary.doc⏐ 25 July 2011 | Revision 021 Aurecon Page

Appendix B Nominations received

1

Olivia Nunn

Subject: FW: Water Proofing the West - Stage One Project - Information for Sam Moody, Western Strikers Soccer Club

From: Graham & Sam Moody [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 01:40 AM To: Paola Silvano <[email protected]> Cc: Georgina House Subject: Re: Water Proofing the West - Stage One Project - Information for Sam Moody, Western Strikers Soccer Club Hello Paola, Sorry had chaotic end of financial year, was ill and then it slipped through the cracks which is no excuse. I know. i really hope it is not too late. Hope it is not too late to submit my application to join the group. Strikers would really like to be involved and I work on Hendon Common, Hendon and live Sempahore Park so really feel it is something I would like to be involved in. I will need to send my application seperately as my scanner is not in working action. My name and adress to put in is Samantha Moody 63 Recreation pde Semaphore Park 5019 I can attend meetings most dates unless they clash with Strikers meetings or meetings with the Adelaide Untied members committee. But since they are each only one per month I should be OK. So sorry and desperately hope can submit a late application. Kind regards Sam


TO: Council FROM: General Manager Corporate Services and Team Leader Marketing &

Communications DATE: 10 October 2011

6.181 MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE (B5422)

Brief


Recommendation

1. That the report and the Appendix A be received and noted.

2. That staff provide a survey including free text areas for Elected Members

to provide their views on Kaleidoscope by end of October.

3. That feedback on Councils communication techniques elicited via the Community Plan engagement process be captured and be the subject of a further report to Council at the end of that engagement process in order to inform future directions for kaleidoscope.


A safe and healthy City that supports vibrant community life ‐ Encourage strong, supportive local communities ‐ Contribute to the quality of life of all individuals in the community ‐ Contribute to an improved sense of safety ‐ Encourage sharing and celebration of our cultural diversity



government management ‐ Deliver quality service to our customers


MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE Item 6.181 Continued Background In 2007 the City of Charles Sturt embarked upon a community planning process that allowed Council to understand what the community wanted from their City, and Council, at that time. This consultative process resulted in the creation of the City’s current Community and Corporate Plans. From this a Marketing and Communications Strategy was developed, that supported the strategies and actions from the Community Plan, but also proposed practical steps that could be implemented to enhance the reputation and knowledge of what the City of Charles Sturt has to offer. The desired outcome from the strategy was not only to consolidate Charles Sturt’s position as an attractive inner metropolitan region, but also to shape the direction that would firmly establish Charles Sturt as one of South Australia’s leading Local Government communities – a community that is highly regarded for its appeal, outstanding facilities, capacity for community participation and overall vitality. Importantly it sought to link the various communities and regions within the City to the Charles Sturt identity. The research undertaken at that time reflected a low level of awareness of the location (boundaries) of Charles Sturt and a low level of association by Charles Sturt residents with the City. Put simply the community had a low sense of cohesiveness toward Charles Sturt, identifying themselves as ‘Henley people’ or ‘Hindmarsh People’ or ‘Woodville people’. The strategy and action plan that were presented was not a premise to transform the City image overnight. It was, however, an important addition to the range of social, cultural and economic development strategies that were also put in train or were being revised as part of the implementation of the Community Plan. Together these initiatives would provide Charles Sturt with an identifiable brand and an opportunity to claim an identity for our City. These strategic directions along with the ideas proposed were to help further a City that is proud of its cultural diversity, expressive of its heritage and history and bases its actions on principles of excellence, community participation and sustainability. Through the strategy development it was identified that all current Council material be reviewed in its look, feel and format. The Council newsletter, then known as ‘City to the Sea’ was one of these items. City to the Sea was a newspaper style publication, and was very text heavy, with information being predominantly “Council” content, with less of a focus on the community. The changes implemented at that time sought to shift City to the Sea from a Council corporate publication, to a more vibrant community focussed publication that emphasised the impacts that Council programs, works and activities on the City have on people’s lives and the community as a whole.


MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE Item 6.181 Continued In 2008, the Marketing and Communications Strategy was endorsed by Council, part of the actions within the strategy was to review current forms of communication to the community, how they could be better utilised and where savings could be made. As a result of this review and implementation of the social branding strategy, Kaleidoscope was created. Report Sources Used Kaleidoscope survey 2010 McGregor Tan Research 2011 During the endorsement and implementation phases of the Marketing and Communications Strategy, a number of consultative processes took place with Elected Members regarding the transformation from City to the Sea to Kaleidoscope. Some of the reasoning and rationale behind the decisions are below as well as the current philosophies and research relating to the publication. The Name The main focus of the Strategy was to celebrate the Charles Sturt’s community’s diversity. The name Kaleidoscope was chosen because of the light refractions that the children's toy of the same name makes, creating a myriad of different colours, shapes and patterns which are symbolic of the diversity that the City of Charles Sturt openly embraces not only from its different people and cultures but its community spaces and iconic locations. The Design The publication was designed to have similar proportions to boutique magazines, such as The Adelaide Review, to give the publication a more valuable feel rather than another “local rag”. The publication was to be about the community as opposed to a corporate newsletter centred entirely on the organisation, its CEO or other ‘talking heads’. The size would also allow for it to be unique whether inserted (say with the Messenger Newspaper) or delivered to the community through letterbox drop. The design intentionally allowed for ‘white space’ within the layout, providing for breathing room to the reader and to help direct the eye letting the reader know where to begin. This form of layout also never overpowers the content, and the stories being told and is far more visually appealing and lends itself to supporting photographs and images thus drawing people into reading the articles.


MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE Item 6.181 Continued Editorial Rationale Both Kaleidoscope and City to the Sea have used a similar process in regards to the development of editorial content. The focus has however shifted from being centred around what Council does, to the impact that Council activities and programs have on the community. For example; how our volunteering programs have impacted directly on a resident, with the resident being the focus of the story and the impact that volunteers have had on his/her life style. A call out to Elected Members and staff is made via email announcing that we are seeking ideas for stories in the upcoming Kaleidoscope. From here, stories that fit with Council’s current themes, linking back to the Community Plan 2027 priorities, such as active lifestyles, environment and projects are identified for inclusion within the publication. Stories are considered for relevance to the community at that time. Prior to production the Mayor, General Manager Corporate Services and the CEO review the document. In 2010 the publication included a short survey to obtain an understanding of what readers enjoyed about it and wanted in the future. The survey asked residents to provide feedback on what they like about Kaleidoscope, how often they read it, how they felt about the look and design, what information they read, what they would like to read about, and asked for some demographic information. Over 70 residents responded. Key results from the survey included: 80% of respondents thought Kaleidoscope was a relevant publication 60% liked reading the publication. The majority of respondents like reading about:

Major developments and capital projects. Good news stories. Information about the environment.

Other comments proposed more detail to be included and suggested that more information be given about where volunteers were needed. From this particular survey, in collating and writing subsequent Kaleidoscope publications, staff have increased the focus on providing more detailed information in an easy to read format and including articles dedicated to works happening within the City capital projects and the environment while maintaining the strong social / community focus. It is always staff’s intentions to ensure that Kaleidoscope is kept relevant to the community and is continually looking for improvements that can be made. As a result a further more detailed and independent survey conducted by McGregor Tan Research was initiated this year.


MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE Item 6.181 Continued A CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview) survey of 250 residents of the City of Charles Sturt occurred in June 2011 and was spread across the eight Wards of Council. The presentation of results can be found as Attachment A. within this report. The research objectives with regards to the community magazine Kaleidoscope included but were not limited to:

The source of the magazine.

Likes and dislikes of the publication. Topics that residents enjoy reading. Topics that residents would like to see more of.

The relevance of the information provided in the publication.

Suggested improvements to the publication. Some of the results relevant to the editorial of the publication can be found below.

8. What do you like about the magazine? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

9%

3%

6%

18%

39%

66%

10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Don't know / not sure

Other

Design / lay out

Bright / colourful / attractiv e

Articles

Community focus of the magazine

Informativ e

% of respondents


11. Are there any new topics that you would like to see in the magazine? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

Yes22%

No70%

Don’t know / not sure9%

MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE Item 6.181 Continued

10. Are there any topics that you would like to see more of in the magazine? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

YES

3%

3%

3%

3%

3%

4%

5%

10%

30%

7%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Other

Council serv ices offered

Information for seniors - clubs, serv ices, ev ents etc

Budgets - how council spends money

Children's groups / activ ities / facilities

Police matters and crime

Planning and dev elopments - w hat's happening in the area

Community ev ents

General community / council information

TOTAL YES

% of respondents

9. Is there anything you dislike about the magazine? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

Yes17%

Nothing I dislike81%



MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE Item 6.181 Continued While generally much of the feedback with in the research was positive including high levels of satisfaction in the quality, content and layout, other positive feedback included:

81% of respondents who read Kaleidoscope indicated there was nothing they disliked about the magazine.

Two thirds (66%) indicated they thought the magazine was informative while other responses included the community focus of the magazine (39%).

Although there was positive feedback there are areas for improvement that include:

A review of the format and production.

Consider topics for articles to incorporate items on the arts, youth and unsung heroes of the community.

Distribution The previous newspaper style publication City to the Sea was delivered via insertion with the Messenger Newspapers. Kaleidoscope is letterboxed as there was significant feedback at the time of the last review that many people do not read the Messenger and that is was never seen. Cost for distribution through the letterbox drop (LBD) service is similar (approx 20% cheaper) to the cost charged for insertion into the Messenger Newspaper. A review of distribution methods (letterbox vs Messenger) saw that the total cost of insertion into the Messenger, as at September 2011, was $2,858.50 per edition, compared to $2,324.13 via LBD. Reliability of distribution has from time to time been identified by some people as a concern. While there is no fail safe solution to the distribution methods that are cost effective such as insertion and LBD. Anecdotal evidence from other Councils has found that both methods result in occasional non delivery. Kaleidoscope is delivered to all homes, including those letter boxes marked as ‘no junk mail’ by a team of ‘walkers’. However, human error can still occur with non‐delivery to homes, or residents simply choosing to not read the publication. The current delivery method of LBD has a number of checks in place, with each walker having to verify time of completion of their distribution, and an area representative then auditing the walker’s area. Insertion into the Messenger is also not a perfect method, with only a certain demographic reading the Messenger on a weekly basis. From the research conducted in June 2011 the respondents stated that the preferred delivery method is via letterbox.



Financial and Resource Implications Both Kaleidoscope and City to the Sea are/were 12 pages in length. Cost of production of the 2 formats when evaluated by Council when considering the change of format demonstrated that the City to the Sea format was more costly to produce.

5. How would you like to receive the magazine? BASE: Aware of Kaleidoscope (n=127)

2%

2%

2%

3%

3%

7%

72%

8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%


Other

Read it at the library

Letterbox drop

Online

Prefer not to receiv e it

In the Messenger / local paper

In the mail

% of respondents

4. From what source do you receive the magazine? BASE: Receive Kaleidoscope (n=118)

3%

2%

3%

3%

7%

10%

77%

4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%


Other

I read it online

Various shops / cafes

Letterbox drop

I read it at the library


In the mail

% of respondents


MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE Item 6.181 Continued Per Quarter Costs and Production numbers

Print Run (per edition)

Edition Timing

Printing Cost (per edition)

Distribution (per edition)

Edition Total Cost

City to the Sea (as at July 2008)

49,600 $13,971 $2,516.24

$16,487.24 .33 cents per copy

Kaleidoscope (as at September 2011)

53,000

End Feb, End June, End Sept, End Nov

$11,967.12 $2,324.13 $14,291.25 .26 cents per copy

Hence the current format and distribution method saves just over $8,000 per year. With savings made and the ability to print more editions of the quarterly publication (for same cost), Kaleidoscope is now also distributed to café’s, shopping centres and other similar locations throughout the City of Charles Sturt at a cost of $500 for 1500. Further copies are distributed amongst our Libraries and Community Centres. This is intended to ensure that people who may routinely throw away all non letter items received in their letterbox or that whose letterbox may have been missed have the ability to source a copy elsewhere. Recycled Paper As part of the preparation of this report, investigation has occurred on the use of recycled paper stock. Prices shown below reflect the extra cost of the paper per issue (based on the current 53,000 print run).

Option 1: Using Ecostar 100% Recycled Silk 115gsm (coated) FSC Carbon Neutral is an additional $2375 + gst. Option 2: Using Maine Recycled Silk 115gsm (coated) 60% post consumer waste + carbon neutral is an additional $1320 + gst. Option 3: Using Impact 100% Recycled 90gsm (uncoated) 100% post consumer waste + carbon neutral is an additional $1735 + gst Papers in options 1 & 2 are both coated stocks and “look” similar to the paper stock currently used. Option 3 would give a different look that is similar in feel to regular copy/printer paper. Uncoated papers tend to be more bulky and appear thicker, and consequently the weight of option 3 has been dropped to 90gsm. These options are all based on the purchase of the paper via indentation as per our current method of Kaleidoscope. Note: Indentation is the pre purchase of the year’s paper stocks which are then held by the printer thus allowing for the best paper purchase price by maximising known volume requirements.


MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE Item 6.181 Continued Review and Improvements As seen in the June 2011 research, while the general feeling from respondents was that they were satisfied with publication, were happy with the articles and could not think of any improvements there are a range of areas where improvements could be made and a ’freshen up” could occur. Staff also believe that this is timely given the current publication has been in place for 3 – 4 years and the revision of the Community Plan.

15. Can you suggest any improvements to the magazine? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

Yes37%

Don't know / not sure3%

No61%

12. Level of agreement with the following. BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

RELATIVELY HIGH LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

3.6

3.7

3.7

3.9

3.9

1 2 3 4 5

The magazine contains information that is relev ant to me

I v alue the magazine

The magazine has a positiv e impact on the community

I like the look and feel of the magazine

I enjoy reading the magazine

Mean Score1=Strongly disagree : 5=Strongly agree



While a review could be commenced immediately, it could be better to undertake it concurrently with the Community Planning process such that changes can be timed with the conclusion of that and reflect any new themes or directions arising from that consultation and community engagement. To achieve this it is recommended that Elected Members provide input in the coming months and that a further report be brought back toward the end of the Community Planning process reflecting the members input as described above, together with any input gained from the community in order that a revised direction can be set with the changes timed to coordinate with the outcomes of the Community Plan. Further, and in order to not discount the feedback provided by the surveyed residents within the June 2011 survey and other anecdotal feedback, the editorial focus has begun to shift more toward stories on the arts, to possess an even stronger community focus angle along with capital works and major projects that are of interest. Conclusion In conclusion, the general feedback for Kaleidoscope is positive however there are areas for improvement. At the conclusion of the Community Planning process it will see a review of the current Kaleidoscope to be in line with the direction provided by the community of Charles Sturt.

IMPORTANCE OF AND SATISFACTION WITH - Kaleidoscope Magazine -

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5

Performance rating

Impo

rtan

ce r

atin

g

c. The ease of reading the magazine d. The quality of the information b. The content of the magazine

e. The frequency of publication a. The layout of the magazine

Important

Less important

Satisfactory Optimal


MARKET RESEARCH RESULTS INTO KALEIDOSCOPE Item 6.181


1

July 2011

Marketing and Kaleidoscope Survey

2

Background

• McGregor Tan Research was commissioned by the City of Charles Sturt to conduct research into the community's views on the community magazine Kaleidoscope, the current brand and the usability of the website.

3

Research Objectives: Kaleidoscope

• The research objectives with regards to the community magazine Kaleidoscope included:

• The frequency of reading Kaleidoscope

• The source of the magazine

• Likes and dislikes of the publication

• Topics that residents enjoy reading

• Topics that residents would like to see more of

• The relevance of the information provided in the publication

• Residents’ views on allowing advertising within the publication

• Suggested improvements to the publication

4

Research Objectives: Promotional Campaign

• In 2008 the City of Charles Sturt launched the “Hello, I’m Charles Sturt” Community Message Campaign”, and in relation to this Campaign, the objectives of the survey were as follows:

• Awareness of the campaign

• Among those who are aware of the campaign• Sources of awareness of the campaign• Residents’ views on the campaign• What they like and dislike about the campaign• How the campaign could be improved

5

Research Objectives: Website

• The research objectives in relation to the City of Charles Sturt website included:

• Residents frequency of visiting the website

• The perceptions of ease of navigation of the website

• Additional information or links that could be provided on the website

6

Methodology

• A CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview) Survey of 250 residents of the City of Charles Sturt, spread across the eight Wards of Council was conducted between June 28th and 30th 2011.

7

KEY FINDINGS

Kaleidoscope

8

Awareness of Community Magazines

1. Are you aware of any community magazines that are published by the City of Charles Sturt?

Yes58%

No42%

9

Awareness of Community Magazines

1. Are you aware of any community magazines that are published by the City of Charles Sturt?

YES

8%

4%

4%

22%

58%

22%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Yes - Can't recall name

Yes – Other

Yes - City to Sea / City to the Sea

Yes - Messenger

Yes – Kaleidoscope

TOTAL YES

% of respondents

10

Awareness of Kaleidoscope

2. Have you heard of the City of Charles Sturt’s community magazine called Kaleidoscope?

BASE: Kaleidoscope not named (n=194)

Yes37%


No59%

11

Magazine Frequency

3. How often do you receive the magazine? BASE: Aware of Kaleidoscope (n=127)

1% 2%

11%

37%

9%

1%5%

28%

7%

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%

Weekly Fortnightly Monthly Quarterly Ev ery sixmonths

Once ay ear

Less often Don’t know/ not sure

Nev er

% o

f res

pond

ents

12

Magazine Receipt

4. From what source do you receive the magazine? BASE: Receive Kaleidoscope (n=118)

3%

2%

3%

3%

7%

10%

77%

4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%


Other

I read it online

Various shops / cafes

Letterbox drop

I read it at the library


In the mail

% of respondents

13

Receipt Preference

5. How would you like to receive the magazine? BASE: Aware of Kaleidoscope (n=127)

2%

2%

2%

3%

3%

7%

72%

8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%


Other

Read it at the library

Letterbox drop

Online

Prefer not to receiv e it


In the mail

% of respondents

14

Magazine Readership

6. How often do you read the magazine? BASE: Receive Kaleidoscope (n=118)

2% 3%

11%

41%

10%

2%8%

21%

3%

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%

Weekly Fortnightly Monthly Quarterly Ev ery sixmonths

Once ay ear

Less often Don’t know/ not sure

Nev er

% o

f res

pond

ents

15

Kaleidoscope Readership

7. Which of the following best describes your readership of Kaleidoscope? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

26%

26%

28%

20%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

I read some of the magazine

I read it from cov er to cov er

I just flick through it

I read most of the magazine

% of respondents

16

Likes

8. What do you like about the magazine? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

9%

3%

6%

18%

39%

66%

10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%


Other

Design / lay out

Bright / colourful / attractiv e

Articles

Community focus of the magazine

Informativ e

% of respondents

17

Dislikes

9. Is there anything you dislike about the magazine? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

Yes17%

Nothing I dislike81%


18

Dislikes

• Among those who identified a dislike, some of the main reasons included too costly, format a bit large and could be more informative.

- Costly - comes out of rate payers pockets.

- Could be more informative.

- Sometimes the information is 'shallow', i.e. not much in-depth information.

- Its overdone, high gloss and I suspect very expensive. They could put the same information in the Messenger Press and save money.

- Format is a bit large. Could be smaller.

19

Favourite Topics

10. Are there any topics that you would like to see more of in the magazine?

BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

Yes30%

No62% Don't know / not sure

8%

20

Favourite Topics

10. Are there any topics that you would like to see more of in the magazine? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

YES

3%

3%

3%

3%

3%

4%

5%

10%

30%

7%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Other

Council serv ices offered

Information for seniors - clubs, serv ices, ev ents etc

Budgets - how council spends money

Children's groups / activ ities / facilities

Police matters and crime

Planning and dev elopments - w hat's happening in the area

Community ev ents

General community / council information

TOTAL YES

% of respondents

21

New Topics

11. Are there any new topics that you would like to see in the magazine? BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

Yes22%

No70%


22

Dislikes

• Among those who identified new topics, there was a broad range of responses provided, such as:

- Advice on disputes or resolutions where you need to go.

- The Arts.

- Traffic Management - Focus on how people are supposed to get from point A to point B, roads are getting too busy with new housing.

- Honest council reporting.

- More about scholarships and how the Council is assisting with grants.

23

Attitudinal Statements Kaleidoscope

12. Level of agreement with the following. BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)


3.6

3.7

3.7

3.9

3.9

1 2 3 4 5

The magazine contains information that is relev ant to me

I v alue the magazine

The magazine has a positiv e impact on the community

I like the look and feel of the magazine

I enjoy reading the magazine


24

Importance

13. Please rate the importance of the following in relation to the magazine. BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)

VERY HIGH LEVEL OF IMPORTANCE

4.1

4.2

1 2 3 4 5

The quality of the information

The ease of reading the magazine

Mean Score1=Not at all important : 5=Very important

25

Importance


RELATIVELY HIGH LEVEL OF IMPORTANCE

3.7

3.9

1 2 3 4 5

The lay out of the magazine

The content of the magazine


26

Importance


MIXED LEVEL OF IMPORTANCE

3.4

1 2 3 4 5

The frequency of publication


27

Satisfaction

14. Please rate your level of satisfaction with following in relation to the magazine.

BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)VERY HIGH LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

4.0

4.2

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

The lay out of the magazine

The ease of reading the magazine

Mean Score1=Very dissatisfied : 5=Ex tremely satisfied

28

Satisfaction

14. Please rate your level of satisfaction with following in relation to the magazine.

BASE: Read Kaleidoscope (n=115)RELATIVELY HIGH LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

3.7

3.7

3.9

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

The frequency of publication

The content of the magazine



IMPORTANCE OF AND SATISFACTION WITH - Kaleidoscope Magazine -

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5

Performance rating

Impo

rtan

ce r

atin

g

c. The ease of reading the magazine d. The quality of the information b. The content of the magazine

e. The frequency of publication a. The layout of the magazine

Important

Less important

Satisfactory Optimal

30

Improvements


Yes37%


No61%

31

Improvements


YES

2%

3%

4%

11%

37%

2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

Don't publish it - it's a w aste of money

Make a cheaper v ersion of magazine

Make it smaller - it's too big

More frequent publications

More in depth information - community / council / projects etc

TOTAL YES

% of respondents

32

Advertising

16. Do you believe that the City of Charles Sturt should allow advertising in the magazine?

BASE: Aware of Kaleidoscope (n=127)

Yes49%


No43%

33

Advertising

16. Do you believe that the City of Charles Sturt should allowadvertising in the magazine?

BASE: Aware of Kaleidoscope (n=127)YES

8%

15%

24%

49%

6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Other

Supports local businesses / people

If it has a local focus - is relev ant to community / council

Keeps the costs dow n for magazine, council rates

TOTAL YES

% of respondents

34

Advertising

16. Do you believe that the City of Charles Sturt should allowadvertising in the magazine?

BASE: Aware of Kaleidoscope (n=127)NO

7%

9%

10%

10%

43%

13%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Other

Should purely focus on council / community issues

It w ould be too cluttered / commercial - like the messenger

It's a community magazine and should not be used for adv ertising

Plenty of other outlets for adv ertising

TOTAL NO

% of respondents

35

KEY FINDINGS

Website

36

Incidence of Accessing Website

17. Have you ever accessed the Council’s Website?

Yes39%


No60%

37

Incidence of Accessing Website

17. Have you ever accessed the Council’s Website?NO

2%

4%

5%

22%

24%

60%

5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Other

Too busy

Not computer literate

No internet access / don't use internet

Don't hav e / use computers

No need / not interest - prefer personal contact

TOTAL NO

% of respondents

38

Website Visitation

18. How often do you visit the Council’s website? BASE: Accessed Council's website (n=98)

4% 3%

12%

20%

16%

23%20%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Once ortw ice a w eek

Once afortnight

Once amonth

Once ev erythree months

Once ev erysix months

Once a y ear Less often

39

Website Information

19. What information were you looking for? BASE: Accessed Council's website (n=98)

TOP RESPONSES

9%

14%

20%

20%

22%

9%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

Animal management

Council rates

Ability to pay for rates / fines / animal registrations etc.

Dev elopment assessment (Planning and Building)

Rubbish collection / recy cling / w aste management

Library

% of respondents

40

Website Access

20. Again thinking about the Council’s website, please rate your level of satisfaction with the following. BASE: Accessed Council's website (n=98)


3.6

3.8

3.8

3.9

3.9

1 2 3 4 5

The ease of nav igating the w ebsite

The look and feel of the w ebsite


The amount and ty pe of information av ailable on the w ebsite

The ease of reading the information


41

Website Satisfaction

21. Overall, how satisfied are you with the Council’s website? BASE: Accessed Council's website (n=98)

2%

1%

8%

9%

22%

54%

12%

66%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Don't know

Very dissatisfied

Quite dissatisfied

TOTAL DISSATISFIED

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Quite satisfied

Very satisfied

TOTAL SATISFIED

% of respondents

42

Additional Website Information

22. Is there any additional information or links on the website that you think should be provided?

BASE: Accessed Council's website (n=98)

Yes17%


No67%

43


• The responses were varied among those who suggested additional information and links.

- A better ward map. More information on what is happening in each ward, like food swaps and community gardens. Better informationon bike tracks and where I can ride my bike. Better information on local places of interest in each ward.

- Added information on essential safety provisions

44


- I think the bins information should be clearer from the time you log in. You should be able to click on what you need and then it takes you to an outlook program or email so you can do things that way. Maybe provide opening hours of the council and library and things like that. Maybe some maps for the locations of libraries.

- I would like more information on the arts in Charles Sturt, thehistory of the arts in Charles Sturt, guided tours, it's cultural assets.

- Information about cross council activity for example flood mitigation.

45

KEY FINDINGS

Promotional Campaign

46

Unprompted Campaign Awareness

23. Are you aware of any campaigns that are being run to promote the City of Charles Sturt?

7%

2%

2%

22%

34%

66%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Yes - other

Yes - banners / adv ertising along Port Road

Yes - can't recall specifics

Yes - Hello, I’m Charles Sturt campaign

TOTAL YES

NO

% of respondents

47

Prompted Campaign Awareness

24. The City of Charles Sturt launched the “Hello, I ’m Charles Sturt” community message campaign in 2008, are you aware of this campaign?

BASE: "Hello, I 'm Charles Sturt" campaign not named (n=182)

Yes42%


No56%

48

Source of Awareness

25. How did you become aware of the campaign? BASE: Aware of "Hello, I 'm Charles Sturt" campaign (n=139)

1%

6%

1%

3%

11%

89%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


Other

Library

Telev ision

Local paper (e.g. Messenger)

Banners / billboards

% of respondents

49

Most Liked About Campaign

26. What do you like about the campaign? BASE: Aware of "Hello, I 'm Charles Sturt" campaign (n=139)

16%

15%

6%

9%

14%

19%

29%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Don't know / hav en't thought about it

Other

Bright / colourful / ey e catching

Creates a sense of community / promotes the community

People / faces

Multiculturalism / div ersity of people

Nothing - don't like it / w aste of money

% of respondents

50

Dislikes About Campaign

27. Is there anything you dislike about the campaign? BASE: Aware of "Hello, I 'm Charles Sturt" campaign (n=139)

Yes27%

Don't know / not sure6%No, Nothing I dislike

67%

51

Disliked About Campaign

27. Is there anything you dislike about the campaign? BASE: Aware of "Hello, I 'm Charles Sturt" campaign (n=139)

13%

7%

9%

27%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Other

Waste of money

Unclear - doesn't giv e any information

TOTAL YES

% of respondents

52

Attitudinal Statements –“Hello, I’m Charles Sturt Campaign”

28. Please rate your level of agreement with the following.BASE: Aware of "Hello, I 'm Charles Sturt" campaign (n=139)


3.6

3.6

1 2 3 4 5

The campaign portray s residents that are representativ e of thearea’s population

The campaign portray s the City of Charles Sturt in a positiv e light


53

Attitudinal Statements –“Hello, I’m Charles Sturt Campaign”

28. Please rate your level of agreement with the following.BASE: Aware of "Hello, I 'm Charles Sturt" campaign (n=139)

MIXED LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

2.9

3.3

1 2 3 4 5

I feel a stronger sense of community as a result of the campaign

The campaign is good for the City of Charles Sturt


54

Campaign Improvements

29. Do you think there are any ways in which the campaign could be improved? BASE: Aware of "Hello, I 'm Charles Sturt" campaign (n=139)

10%

9%

2%

4%

4%

4%

6%

8%

57%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%


Other

Greater v isibility of banners - rotate and update regularly

Better communication

More adv ertising / promotion - community centres / brochures etc

Don't do it

More / better graphics - landmarks / people

More information - w hat does it mean

No

% of respondents

55

DEMOGRAPHICS

56

Ratepayer

30. Are you a City of Charles Sturt ratepayer?

Yes89%

No11%

57

Gender

31. Gender

Male45%

Female55%

58

Age

32. In which of these age groups do you fall?

34%

27%

26%

10%

2%

2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

65+

55 to 64

40 to 54

31 to 39

25 to 30

18 to 24

% of respondents

59

Employment and Occupation

33. Are you in paid employment (of 20 hours or more per week)?If yes: What is your occupation?

If no: Could you please tell me how you describe your occupation.

11%

6%

38%

55%

13%

16%

17%

45%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Other

Home duties

Retired

TOTAL NOT IN PAID EMPLOYMENT

Blue collar

Professional/ ex ecutiv e

White collar

TOTAL IN PAID EMPLOYMENT

% of respondents

60

Household Structure

34. Which of these groups best describes your household?

4% 2%7% 11%

19%

58%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%

Single people Young couple Young family Middle family Mature family Mature coupleor single

% o

f res

pond

ents

61

Gross Household Income

35. Which of the following best describes your gross household income?

16%

19%

9%

12%10%

16%18%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Under$20,000 pa

$20,000 -$39,999 pa

$40,000 -$59,999 pa

$60,000 -$79,999 pa

$80,000 -$99,999 pa

$100,000+pa

Refused

% o

f res

pond

ents

62

Ward

36. Ward of respondent

11%

12%

12%

12%

13%

13%

13%

14%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16%

Woodv ille Ward

West Woodv ille Ward

Findon Ward

Bev erley Ward

Semaphore Park Ward

Grange Ward

Henley Ward

Hindmarsh Ward

% of respondents

63

Suburb

37. Suburb of respondent.HINDMARSH WARD

1%

1%

2%

2%

2%

2%

5%

14%

Less than 1%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16%

Dev on Park

Bow den

Ov ingham

Kilkenny

Croy don

Brompton

Renow n Park

West Croy don

HINDMARSH WARD

% of respondents

64

Suburb

37. Suburb of respondent.HENLEY AND GRANGE WARDS

8%

13%

2%

4%

7%

13%

4%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

Tenny son

Grange

GRANGE WARD

Henley Beach South

West Beach

Henley Beach

HENLEY WARD

% of respondents

65

Suburb

37. Suburb of respondent.SEMAPHORE PARK AND BEVERLEY WARDS

1%

1%

3%

3%

4%

12%

3%

3%

7%

13%

1%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

Hindmarsh

Bev erley

Welland

Allenby Gardens

West Hindmarsh

Flinders Park

BEVERLEY WARD

Semaphore Park

West Lakes Shore

West Lakes

SEMAPHORE PARK WARD

% of respondents

66

Suburb

37. Suburb of respondent.FINDON AND WEST WOODVILLE WARDS

3%

4%

4%

12%

2%

3%

3%

4%

12%

Less than 1%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

Hendon

Woodv ille South

Roy al Park

Woodv ille West

WEST WOODVILLE WARD

Seaton

Fulham Gardens

Kidman Park

Findon

FINDON WARD

% of respondents

67

Suburb

37. Suburb of respondent.WOODVILLE WARD

1%

1%

2%

2%

4%

11%

1%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%

Cheltenham

Woodv ille Park

Athol Park

Pennington

Woodv ille North

Woodv ille

WOODVILLE WARD

% of respondents

68

Prepared by…


TO: Council FROM: Acting Manager Engineering & Construction DATE: 10 October 2011

6.182 ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET

WOODVILLE (B3904)

Brief


Recommendation

1. That Council exercise the power delegated to it by the Minister for

Transport and Urban Planning under Section 11(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act and through the Instrument of General Approval, Part 1, Clause F: Delegation of Power to Close Roads and Grant Exemptions for Road Events to:

(a) Declare the Christmas Function on 20 November 2011 an event to

which Section 33(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 applies. (b) Make an order to close the road specified in the schedule (refer

Appendix A) to vehicles as provided in Section 33(1) of the Road Traffic Act.

(c) Make exemption for: (i) Australian Road Rule 230 (Crossing a road – general) (ii) Australian Road Rule 238 (Pedestrians travelling along a

road). (iii) Australian Road Rule 238: Pedestrians travelling along a

road (except in or on a wheeled recreational device or toy).


ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET WOODVILLE Item 6.182 Continued Status This report relates to or impacts upon the following Community Plan Outcomes:

A safe and healthy City that supports vibrant community life ‐ Contribute to the quality of life of all individuals in the community ‐ Encourage healthy lifestyle pursuits ‐ Contribute to an improved sense of safety

An economically prosperous, attractive and functional City ‐ Provide and facilitate a safe, connected and well maintained transport network


‐ Deliver quality service to our customers Relevant Council policies are:

N/A Relevant statutory provisions are:

Road Traffic Act 1961 (SA) section 33 and section 11.

Road Traffic (Miscellaneous) Regulations 1999 Part 1A

The Australian Road Rules 1999 Background The City of Charles Sturt is arranging a community event being a Christmas Function for residents and visitors. The function will be held in the Civic Centre rooms including the Chamber and CC1, the internal street, Town Hall and on the lawn and carpark at the rear of the Civic Centre at 72 Woodville Road Woodville. The event will include a variety of local artists and community groups in performing arts and displaying and selling art and craft. Some activities will run concurrently across the various venues within Civic Centre and food and drink stalls will be set‐up in an area within the Civic Centre carpark (just off Norman Street). Section 33 of the Road Traffic Act (RTA) provides the Minister with the power to make orders for roads to be closed to traffic for the purposes of an event. The Minister has, by the Notice, delegated the power to make such orders to the Council. The term ‘event’ is defined by the RTA as ‘an organised sporting, recreational, political, artistic, cultural or other activity, and includes a street function’.


ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET WOODVILLE Item 6.182 Continued Report The function will include entertainment and food stalls located on the lawn and carpark along the southern side of the Civic Centre. This is the first event of its type held by the Council and at this location for many years. The number of persons attending is not known. As the event will flow into the Civic Centre lawn area and a section of the carpark, access to the Council carpark via Norman Street will be closed. It is safer to prevent drivers from entering Norman Street to enter the carpark. This will remove congestion and three‐point turns in the narrow and confined roadway. Norman Street will be closed between Woodville Road for about 140 metres to the traffic control outside house number 10 Norman Street; refer to Appendix B for map. The function will be held on Sunday 20 November 2011 commencing at 4:00pm and finishing at 8:00pm. To allow set up , Norman Street is proposed to be closed at 2:00pm and opened at 9:00pm allowing time for people to disperse, the road to be cleaned and the staging and stalls to be removed. A Traffic Management Plan will be prepared showing barriers and signs at Woodville Road where a traffic control officer will be in attendance at all times to allow customers into the Royal Indian Restaurant carpark and residents of house numbers 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 into Norman Street. Financial and Resource Implications Advertisement in Messenger Newspaper – approximate cost $200. Traffic management plan and control for the event – estimated cost (internal $100). Traffic control setup/removal and traffic control officer – estimated cost (internal $1,000). These costs can be covered from existing Council budgets. Customer Service and Community Implications N/A


ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET WOODVILLE Item 6.182 Continued Community Engagement/Consultation Subject to Council agreeing to the recommendations in this report, consultation with adjoining property owners will occur. In accordance with paragraphs F.6 to F.9 of the Delegation of Power to Close Roads and Grant Exemptions for Road Events under the Road Traffic Act, 1961, notification that the order to close the road(s) has been made will be sent to the Commissioner of Highways, Emergency Services, the Public Transport Division, the Traffic Control Centre, Metropolitan Region and the Commissioner of Police. In accordance with Section 33(3) of the Road Traffic Act, at least two clear days before the order to close the road to traffic takes effect a copy of this order is to be published in the local newspaper. Risk Management/Legislative Implications Traffic controls to make the road closure come into effect will be installed by an approved traffic officer in accordance with the Road Traffic Act 1961. Conclusion It is recommended that Council make the order to close Norman Street Woodville between Woodville Road and the traffic control outside house number 10 Norman Street for the purpose of a community event.


ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET WOODVILLE Item 6.182

APPENDIX A

THE SCHEDULE

Location

From To

Norman Street, Woodville, between Woodville Road and the traffic control outside house number 10 Norman Street.

2:00pm Sunday 20 November 2011

9:00pm Sunday 20 November 2011


ROAD CLOSURE FOR EVENT – CHRISTMAS FUNCTION – NORMAN STREET WOODVILLE Item 6.182

APPENDIX B AREA OF CLOSURE


TO: Council FROM: Governance Officer DATE: 10 October 2011

6.183* NOMINATIONS SOUGHT FOR THE ADELAIDE CEMETERIES AUTHORITY BOARD

(B35)

Brief


Recommendation

That Council nominates _____________________ for the vacant position on the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board and the nomination be passed on to the Local Government Association for consideration.



‐ Ensure the community is well informed and actively engaged Relevant Council policies are:

Nil Relevant statutory provisions are:

Nil


NOMINATIONS SOUGHT FOR THE ADELAIDE CEMETERIES AUTHORITY BOARD Item 6.183 Continued Background The Hon John Rau MP, Minister for Urban Design, Planning and the City of Adelaide has written to the LGA requesting nominations for a Local Government Member on the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board for a term commencing on 1 January 2012. Nominations must be forwarded to the LGA by COB Friday 4 November 2011. Report The Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board is a statutory corporation to which the provisions of the Adelaide Cemeteries Act 2001 apply. The Authority's primary functions are‐ (a) the administration and maintenance of the following as public cemeteries: (i) Cheltenham Cemetery; (ii) Enfield Memorial Park; (iii) West Terrace Cemetery;

and (b) the administration and maintenance of any other cemetery established or (a) acquired by the Authority; and (b) the burial or other disposal of human remains in an Authority cemetery; and (c) activities associated with the heritage or historical significance of an (d) Authority cemetery; and (e) any other function assigned to the Authority by or under this or any Act, or by (f)

the Minister. The Authority's functions may extend to the following as the Authority thinks fit: (a) activities or services relating to the burial or other disposal of human remains; (b) other activities or services utilising Authority property and buildings. Appendix A contains a copy of the Terms of Reference.


NOMINATIONS SOUGHT FOR THE ADELAIDE CEMETERIES AUTHORITY BOARD Item 6.183 Continued Appointments to the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board are for a period of three years, commencing 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2014. Cr Susan Clearihan of the Adelaide City Council currently represents the LGA. Cr Clearihan's term on the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board expires on 31 December 2011, and Cr Clearihan is eligible for re‐appointment. Members receive an annual fee of $12,383 plus 9% superannuation for attendance at meetings and this is paid on a quarterly basis. The Authority convenes 12 times per year, usually on the last Wednesday of the month alternating venues ‐ mornings at West Terrace Cemetery and afternoons at Enfield Memorial Park. LGA nominations on outside bodies will, unless determined otherwise by the LGA State or Senior Executive Committee, shall be currently serving Council Members or Council Staff. Nominations addressing the Selection Criteria provided in Appendix B for the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board must be forwarded to [email protected] by a Council using the attached Appendix C by COB Friday 4 November 2011. The LGA State Executive Committee will consider nominations received at its meeting on Thursday 17 November 2011. A copy of the LGA Circular is attached as Appendix D.


NOMINATIONS SOUGHT FOR THE ADELAIDE CEMETERIES AUTHORITY BOARD Item 6.183




APPENDIX B



APPENDIX C Representatives on Outside Bodies PART B: This form must be completed by Council electronically

and emailed to: [email protected] (Nominee’s details must not exceed this single page)

Name of Body: Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board

Council Name:

Full Name of Nominee:

Position/Title:

Address:

Work Phone: Facsimile:

A/H Phone: Mobile:

Email:

1. Summary of relevant skills, knowledge and/or experience

2. Other comments in relation to this role

DO NOT EXCEED ONE PAGE An email confirming receipt of your nomination will be forwarded



APPENDIX D Nominations Sought for the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board - Circular 38.14 Summary The Hon John Rau MP, Minister for Urban Design, Planning and the City of Adelaide has written to the LGA

requesting nominations for a Local Government Member on the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board for a term commencing on 1 January 2012. Nominations must be forwarded to the LGA by COB Friday 4 November 2011.

The Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board is a statutory corporation to which the provisions of the Adelaide Cemeteries Act 2001

apply.

The Authority's primary functions are-

(a) the administration and maintenance of the following as public cemeteries:

(i) Cheltenham Cemetery;

(ii) Enfield Memorial Park;

(iii) West Terrace Cemetery; and

(b) the administration and maintenance of any other cemetery established or

(a) acquired by the Authority; and

(b) the burial or other disposal of human remains in an Authority cemetery; and

(c) activities associated with the heritage or historical significance of an

(d) Authority cemetery; and

(e) any other function assigned to the Authority by or under this or any Act, or by

(f) the Minister.

The Authority's functions may extend to the following as the Authority thinks fit:

(a) activities or services relating to the burial or other disposal of human remains;

(b) other activities or services utilising Authority property and buildings.

Click here to view a copy of the Terms of Reference.

Appointments to the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board are for a period of three years, commencing 1 January 2012 to 31

December 2014. Cr Susan Clearihan of the Adelaide City Council currently represents the LGA. Cr Clearihan's term on the Adelaide

Cemeteries Authority Board expires on 31 December 2011, and Cr Clearihan is eligible for re-appointment.

Members receive an annual fee of $12,383 plus 9% superannuation for attendance at meetings and this is paid on a quarterly

basis.

The Authority convenes 12 times per year, usually on the last Wednesday of the month alternating venues - mornings at West

Terrace Cemetery and afternoons at Enfield Memorial Park.

LGA nominations on outside bodies will, unless determined otherwise by the LGA State or Senior Executive Committee, be

currently serving Council Members or Council Staff. To view the LGA Representatives on Outside Bodies Policy click here.

Nominations addressing the Selection Criteria provided in Part A for the Adelaide Cemeteries Authority Board must be forwarded

to [email protected] by a Council using the attached Part B by COB Friday 4 November 2011.

The LGA State Executive Committee will consider nominations received at its meeting on Thursday 17 November 2011.


TO: Council FROM: Chief Executive Officer DATE: 10 October 2011

6.184 DISCRETIONARY WARD ALLOWANCE ‐ APPROVAL PROCESS (B6852)

Brief To consider Discretionary Ward Allowance applications.

Recommendation

That the Discretionary Ward Allowance applications as detailed in Appendix A to this report be approved.


A safe and healthy City that supports vibrant community life ‐ Encourage strong, supportive local communities


‐ Ensure the organisation is financially accountable and sustainable Relevant Council policies are:

Discretionary Ward Allowance Policy Relevant statutory provisions are:

Nil


DISCRETIONARY WARD ALLOWANCE – APPROVAL PROCESS Item 6.184 Continued Report A table detailing applications received from Council members for the period 20 September to 4 October 2011 (refer Appendix A). Copies of the applications will be available for perusal at the Council meeting or by contacting Emma Morgan at [email protected] or on 8408 1100. Applications that have been approved for the 2011/12 financial year are detailed in Appendix B. Details of any applications where receipts for the full amount have not been provided within nine months following payment by Council: Nil



APPENDIX A

2011/12 DISCRETIONARY WARD ALLOWANCE APPLICATIONS FOR APPROVAL


Estimated Cost

Allowance Remaining

West Woodville

The Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange – youth driving awareness program

$28,206.47 $334 $27,872.47

Assessment







Estimated Cost

Allowance Remaining

Grange The Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange – youth driving awareness program

$29,000 $333 $28,667

Assessment







Estimated Cost

Allowance Remaining

Findon The Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange – youth driving awareness program

$25,392.05 $333 $25,059.05

Assessment








APPENDIX B Appendix B consists of 1 page.

Page 1 of 1

2011/12 APPROVED DISCRETIONARY WARD ALLOWANCE APPLICATIONS


Estimated Cost

Allowance Remaining

Date of Receipt

Status (as at 04/10/11)

Semaphore Park Semaphore Park Baptist Church – projector, screen and laptop

$30,000 $3,304.95 $26,695.05 June 2011 Cheque sent 22/08/11

Grange Charles Sturt Memorial Museum Trust – printing of museum education booklets: ‘Brothers in Arms’, ‘Sturt’s Forgotten Journeys’ and ‘Mount Bryan Expedition’

$30,000 $1,000 $29,000 29/08/11 Processing

Henley Henley & Grange Historical Society – meeting room chairs $30,000 $472 $29,528 June 2011 Cheque sent 22/08/11

Centacare – Family Service – ‘Nunga Touch’ carnival for 16 high schools held at Henley Beach High

$29,528 $1,497 $28,031 11/07/11 Funds transferred 09/09/11

Woodville Somali United Community Association of SA Inc. ‐ Somali Youth Educational and Employment Pathways Program

$30,000 $2,000 $28,000 15/04/11 Cheque sent 03/08/11

Diamond House – provide basic first aid training for members that are on a disability support pension

$28,000 $800 $27,200 09/08/11 Awaiting tax invoice

West Woodville Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange Inc. – materials to facilitate the manufacture of a range of quality wooden toys for distribution to the community

$30,000 $1,793.53 $28,206.47 01/08/11 Cheque sent 24/08/11

Woodville Community Dog Training Centre – upgrade of café kitchen to replace joinery and bench top

$28,206.47 $3,000 $25,206.47 01/08/11 Processing

Beverley Allenby Gardens Primary School – commission two artists in residence to teach and engage the school and school community in painting totem poles with messages for a sustainable future, a large wall mural and creation ceramic signs

$30,000 $4,000 $26,000 22/08/11 Processing

Hindmarsh Fitzroy Community Club – stage 1 of upgrade of floodlights $30,000 $5,000 $25,000 29/08/11 Awaiting tax invoice

Findon Madeleine Regan – ‘From the Veneto to Frogmore and Findon Roads: Stories of Italian Market Gardeners 1920s to 1970s oral history project

$30,000 $1,649.95 $28,350.05 29/06/11 Payments made to all parties (auspiced by Council) – 06/09/11

Madonna Di Tutte Le Grazie Sud Aust. – traditional feast day for Calabrian italian region

$28,350.05 $2,958 $25,392.05 22/08/11 Processing



APPENDIX C Appendix C consists of 8 pages.

oa

o OOo Oo OOOOOOOOO?OOOO. OO o Oo O.OO.OOOOOoOoOO

t +fao

.oOO OoOOO ooO Oa.ooa ooa

Discretionary Ward Allowance (DWA)ApplicotÍon Form

Council Ward: West Woodville

Section 1: Appllcant Organlsation lnformatian be ompteted hy danoilon

Name of Organisation: Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange

Contact Person: Mr Colin Williams(Mr/Mrs/Ms) (Fìrst Name) ftast Ndme)

Position: .Secretary

Postal Address: PO Box 4072 Seaton

Telephone: 83564489

Email:' williamsl@adam,com.au

ls your organisation (please tick)

/ Non-government For Profit

{ Nor for profit

South Australia 5023

Mobile: 0408 84 81 BO

Government

The ciw of charles sturt council will make allowances for goods and services tax (GST) with the agreed Discretionary wardAllowance upon receipt of the following information:

1. what is the ABN that relates to the operation of your crub or organisation?

77368298374

2. Are you registered for GST?

{ V.t (lf yes, go to Sectton 3)

'No (lf No, whot is your current 65T regístrotlon status?)

I have applied but am stiil walting for registratÍon. (prease attach evidence)I ¡ have no intention to register for GSTlf the organlsdt¡on ¡s not registered, only the opproved donøtion amount will be provided.

ç-ily"slgl'!d$ Itq¡*l¿W¡¡Elgß.¿g4 ¡t¡d:lls_üAiru rtes$ruÉ.&,r.r¿ev.íu

Auspice orgonisation: A lorger organisation thqt accepts ond monages grant money, on beholf of o smaller community group,which does not hove the necessary financial orrongements in place.

Name of Auspíce Organisation: \..,\.

Postal Address: "''\t\...

Postcode: Telephone (Business ttoiq):tt.

Email: t'..,

Declaration: '''-n

I certify that (Name of Auspice Organisation) '\\,r,

will auspice this proposal and take legal and flnancial responsíbility for thè.gdministration of any approved donation funds,"\\, \

Name of Authorised Officer of Auspicíng Organisation:

Titleof Authorised Officerof AuspicingOrganisation: "..\

Signature: Date:

ProjectType; / Communitysupport lnitiative MinorCapital Works project

TotalProiectCost: S 3000 DWAApplication Amount: S 1OOO[Pleoseincludeoslnglequoteforamountsuptoss,oo1,andatleasttwoquotestftheDwAappt¡cotionamotuntlsgreaterthon$s,000, euotesmustlncludethe suppllels ABN ønd must Include the Íuil dmount (tncludlng 65T).1

Províde a brief description on the initiative.'Presentat¡on of a NatÍonally approved Driver Awareness pro8ramrne involving speciðlist semÌnars from police, lnsurance and Motor¡sÈ organisations, HealthProfessionals, Driving Experts and crash victims alerting potential Learner Drivers to the reàlities of car ownership, Responsibilities and potentialcônsequences.

Describe the community (or target group) who benefits from the organisationeg whole community, youth, indigenou, aged, new ordvqls to Australlo,Year 11 students at local high s'chools ðnd potentiallv the community Ín terms of more responsible driving behaviour

How does this service align with Councíl,s Community plan Outcomes?

ldentiÍy whlch of the Council's Community Plon outcomes ond objectives dre best serued by thls inìtiative.Outcome 1 - Obiectives 7.L !,? and 1, 4

(Reler to the ottached DWA guide booklet for an outline of the Ømmunity plon outcomes & objectives.)

Page2 ot 4

How will you acknowled8e/market the donation provided by the c¡ty of charles sturt?

';:ri::,',:i; ptaque on the asset creoted, note of thanks i"*snøirs th; support of councit on pubrÌcatrons/incrusîon of

Acknowledgements on distr¡buted material and verbally ín forum presentatíons. Disprays of councir paraphernalia wourd be appreciated if these are

Please provide details of any previous or current support provided by Councí|.eg donotion, in-kind, rent subsrdy, wqrd a,owonce (incfuìíng o^irrí, ondì*nl.l"i:.H:HJ:,c,lived

from counci¡ to suppo.* the initial presentation of this programme in o*ober 2010 This event proved most successfur with220

y'¡i,J:ï::11:.1[J;"n"'application, have vou applied ror or received rundins or sponsorship rrom any other government(Funding body name, dmount souqht, dote and status of oppticøtion.)

from es llíre, Sapol, Service, Rotary Club of Largs Bay. Theiltil jJTï:"J'.Ï il',1,',1;jillp'duarnoürvciuns

are

¡on.

The informailonomission orfalse

tion is' to the best of my knowledge, true and correct and I understand that anypurpose or assess i::?ïi?:,:ljH;:,:'i"'"n' I agree that the citv or charles sturt øuncif ro, inå

I understand that this is a DWA application and may not necessarily result in donation approval,

should this applicatíon result in donation approval, council reserves the right to audit expenditure of grant funds. Receipts or:J::ili iJ'Iff,i::::l;:,|îi,"#î.;ï,",i::: ¡n rin" *iäìi"-*i,.ü"" and, ír this evidence is not supprie¿, co,n.ir

Signature:

Please print full name:

Position with organisation:

Date:

b,* danna- hut1¡l {'Cuuß {oq.a¡nzV .

To be coltpleted by dgnotion rerlpt"rt

lt /V u,,

Declarat¡on

:iï5,|:::ilJli,;i5iilål1i the requrrements or the councirs Díscretionary ward Arowance poricy incrudrng the

IJffiilÏ;,:iå,tli application I have not breached the Locat Government Act and the councirs code of conduct in

Page 3 of 4

hIEÃ'T þsspvf u{-r6; I-¡A?-0

iNot Supported

"lw

othêrcómmeno.o;or¿,

frþea4¿L-h/^^J , ,/ /U -

-a'r/iSupported i Not Support€dDate: , l-- llg\rr\zort j

iYes ([ ves, ømptete the dtsctosarc betow) i /noDoes a Conflict of lnterest exist?

Detalls of the lnterest!

i

t-. .. .. .

Other comments to notêr

Application noted

Date,:2Klrln

f,ft^¡Oo¡,.i l¡)re-O

Chief Executive Officer 0.,.,,1 ltoþrl

'^n Cùè€ttT É /^rSag57

7. t /?þ' ,,

GÊ.AñqC WAKP

PaEe 4 of 4

1¿tl

20tt -20L2

The Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange lncFormed 27ñ May 2004

District 95ü1, Rotary lnternational.Chartered 2d June 1966

(Formally Woodville South and Grange Rotary Clubs)(woodville South Rotary Club chartered 2"d June 1956)

(Grange Rotary Club chartered 14th February 1975)Reach Wíthin to Embrace Human¡ty

16th August 20L1

Councillor Angela Keneally

West Woodville Ward

Charles Sturt Council

72 Woodville Road

Woodville SA 50L1

Dear Angela

ROTARY YOUTH DRIVING AWARENESS PROGRAM

We enclose our Discretionary Ward Allowance application for the above event being held atthe Christian Family Centre , Seaton on Thursdav 27'h October zOtL .

As requested also enclosed is our proposed budget for same totalling SSOOO . In doing so

we wish to point out that the items numbered 1 - 5 signify our fixed costs totall¡ne 52138for which we attach written confirmation from the sources involved with the balance beingvariable amounts at this point of time .

It would be appreciated if Council could consider some financial assistance in thepresentation of this special Rotary community event

Yours in Rotary Fellowship

Secretary

PresidentSecretoryVenue

Postol AddressMeetingTime

lan Bond ph 0419 805 557Colin Williams ph 8356tM89The Checkide Tavern AAMI Stodium, WEST IAKES SA

PO Box 4O72 SEATON SA 5023Mondoy 6.N pm for 6:3O pm

Colin Williams

The Rotary Club of Charles Sturt, Grange lncFormed 27th May 2004

D¡strict 95(X), Rotary lnternational.Chartered znd June 1966

(Formally Woodville South and Grange Rotary Clubs)(Woodville South Rotary Club chartered 2nd June 1966)

(Grange Rotary Club chartered 14th February 1975)Reach Within to Embrace Human¡ty

4rH August 2011

PROPOSED BUDGET FOR ROTARY YOUTH DRIVING AWARENESS PROGRAM TO BE HELD ONTHURSDAY 27TH OCTOBER 2011 ATTHE CHRISTIAN FAMILY CENTRE , SEATON .

1 . HIRE OF VENUE

2. DRIVING HAZARDS

3 . STOPPING DISTANCES

4 . CRASH SURVIVOR

5 . RYDA ADMIN COSTS

I ESTTMATED 140 STUDENTS @ 54 pER HEAD ]

MORNING TEAS

POSTAGES

ouR oF pocKET EXPENSES ISECRETARY]

GIFT TO PROGRAM DIRECTOR

GIFT TO METROPOLITAN FIRE BRIGADE

REACTION TIMER

LUNCHES, BBQ, FRUIT & WATER ETC

TOTAL

5zze

s 200

S ¿oo

S zoo

S soo

Sso

s20

s 100

Sso

S¿s

s 100

5 zgt

20tt-2012

S 3ooo

PresidentSecretoryVenuePostol AddressMeet¡ngnme

lan Bond ph M19 805 557Colin Williams ph 8356t1489The Checkside Tavern AAMI Stadium, WEST LAKES SAPO Box 4O72 SEATON SA 5023Mondoy 6.00 pm for 6:3O pm

Ghdstian Farrdly Cenfe186 Frederick RoadSEATON SA 5023

Quote

lnvoice #: 00002056AB-N.:31 [email protected].:

BillTo: Ship To:

city of chaÉec s:ftrrt Rúry club city of charles sturt Rotary GlubPOÈox4O'112 PO Box4072Seaton SA 5û23 Seaton SA 5023

SALESPERSON YOT'RNO. SHIP VIA SHIP DATE I TERMS DATE PG.

Net IUûÛaol1 1

QTY. |TEM NO. DESCRIPTION PRICE UNIT DISC 7o EXTENDED CODE

1

f44

1

¿

ShedAl rmmssduf,dearData ProjeciorCleanWderWard

Tdel Sh€d ComplexSe*r¡p and ClearSmalldatå ProjectorGbaning'WderAllor*anceEmergencyWarden

$450,00$55.00s55.00s27.50$10.00$33.00

1

I,|

1

1

1

10%

40o/o

$405.0($55.0(

$132.0($f 10.0($10.fi$86.0(

GSTGSTGSTGSTGSTGST

COMMENT

GSTN-T

RATE

'l0g09

GST

$78,73$0.00

SALE AMOUN]

$ô99.2i$0.0c

SALE AMOUNTFREIGHT

GST

TOTALPAID TODAY

$778.00$0,00 N-T

$78.73

$778.00$0.00

C¡¡stomerABN: BATANCE DUE $778.00

Prtrúed Aom ilìlOB rrw,nryob.conr¡u

Driving Hazalds - Ezyway Driver Training

Stopping Distances (2 facilihorcl - 123 Driye

Grash Suruivor - Effective Gonsulting & Rehabilitation Pty Ltd

RYIIA Australia LimitedA.BN17110667 706

Lv 2,10A Julius Ave, North Ryde NSW 2l 13

Ph: 1300 127 642. Fax 1300 321 127E4ail: [email protected] . www.rydaorg.au

$ zoo

$ 400

$ 2oo

To the SecretaryRotary Club of Gharles Sturt GrargeP.O. Box 4072Seaton SA 5023

To the Secretary

RYDA in conjundion with the Rotary Club of Charles Sturt Grange will be conducting aRoad Safety program known as the Rotary Youth Driving Awareness Program at theChristian Family Centre, Seaton on 27^ October 2011 .

The RYDA Program is taryeted at senior high school students (16-17 years old) andassembles in a coord¡nated presentation, community road safety experts to deliversophisticated, integrated and powerful road safety education to young people at thebeginning of their driving lives.

Your fixed costs in using the professional facilitators are as follou¡s;

RYDA Administraüon Gosts (estimated 140 studenæ @ ¡¿ per head) $ S0O

Total $ 1360

Thank you for your enquiry and we wish you a successful day .

lf you require any further information please don't hesitate to contact me on thenumbers belor.

Josh Donohoel.!ation¿l Progra m Venl:e l',,4¿1.¡cti

RYDA Australia Linlrtei:E: iosh(Ðryda.org.auP: (o:) 8874 433el.l: c¡,12- 625847

BËt CÉLåf,f.ñ'r"Qr¡,sâ,TÀsvEtSa

¡kt(BfàúçIr-Itiø.tæFqdi¡Bhbq

BOCA Member of The linde Group

9roga



7.26 NOTICE OF MOTION – COUNCIL MEMBER CODE OF CONDUCT (B53)

Brief


Proposed Motion “1. That Council endorse the Council Members Code of Conduct Policy as

Appendix “A” amended. 2. That a large framed version of the Codes Key Principles be created for

signing by all Council Members and put on public display. 3. That the following text be added to the “Natural Justice” and “Initial

Investigation” and “Making a Code of Conduct Complaint” process and compliance.

• “Natural Justice” Delete part 1. Replace with‐: The Council Member

will be advised and provided with all the particulars, nature and materiality of the complaint and that no complaint should proceed unless these points are clearly provided. The Council Member will be given the opportunity to respond either orally or in writing.

• “Initial Investigation” Add: If the complaint is lodged by the C.E.O.

there is a clear expression the Mayor or the RCM will seek their investigative support from external sources outside of Council.

• “Initial Investigation” Add: Affected persons of a complaint shall be

allowed reasonable time to respond when the outcomes formulated from external investigating agencies and referred back to the RCM before proceeding to process such outcomes.

• “Making a Code of Conduct Complaint” Add: Any person regardless

of their relationship with Council will be provided with reasonable support and co‐operation with their submissions under the Compliance with the Code of Conduct principles.”


NOTICE OF MOTION – COUNCIL MEMBER CODE OF CONDUCT Item 7.26 Continued Preamble (Councillor Wasylenko) “The intention of this motion is to amend resolution Item 6.172 of 26 September 2011. The changes will add clarity, certainty and fairness to the Council Members Code of Conduct Policy.”


NOTICE OF MOTION – COUNCIL MEMBER CODE OF CONDUCT Item 7.26


Council Members Code of Conduct Policy City of Charles Sturt 72 Woodville Road, Woodville, South Australia 5011 T 08 8408 1111 F 08 8408 1122 www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au

Council Members Code of Conduct Policy

Reference Number: 1.1

Type: Council Policy

Category: Council Members

Relevant Community Plan Outcome: A local organisation providing progressive leadership, accountable governance and quality services to the community

Responsible Officer(s): Manager Governance & Operational Support

First Issued/Approved: December 2000 (Council 27/11/00, Item 8.47)

Minutes Reference: PD 15/12/08, Item 3.39

Last Reviewed: August 2011

Next Review Due: August 2013

Applicable Legislation: Local Government Act 1999 Local Government (Procedures at Meetings) Regulations 2000 Whistleblowers Protection Act 1993

Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935

Related Policies: Obligations of Non‐Council Committee Members Policy

Council Member Access to Information Policy

Council Members Equal Opportunity, Discrimination, Harassment and Bullying Policy Gifts, Benefits and Hospitality Policy Council Member Electronic Communications Policy Whistleblowers Policy Council Member Training & Development Policy

Related Procedures: Code of Practice for Meeting for Procedures

1. Purpose

The Council Members Code of Conduct Policy is a public declaration of the principles of good conduct and standards of behaviour that members of the City of Charles Sturt commit to. By consistently applying these standards of behaviour, we enhance public trust and confidence in the elected body.

2

The Local Government Act 1999 (Chapter 5, Part 4, S62) set out the general duties of Council Members. The Act requires that Council Members:

act honestly and with reasonable care and diligence in the performance and discharge of official functions and duties;

must not make improper use of information acquired; and

must not make improper use of their position as a member of a Council.

The standards of behaviour in this Council Member Code of Conduct Policy complement and are in addition to any statutory requirements of the Local Government Act 1999, Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 or any other relevant Act or Regulation.

2. Scope

This policy applies to the Council Members of Council and appointed independents members of the City of Charles Sturt’s Section 41 Committees. It relates to our conduct not only in the chamber but when representing council whether formally or informally and when making statements that relate to our City.

3. Policy Statement The City of Charles Sturt conducts its business with integrity, honesty, respect and accountability. Council Members and appointed independent members are committed to discharging our duties conscientiously and to the best of their ability based on the following key principles:

Respect

Integrity and Honesty

Accountability

The standards of expected behaviour are detailed within each of these key principles:

Respect

We always endeavour to treat the community, staff and each other with respect and courtesy,

Relationships with the Community

We will be fair and honest in their dealing with the Community to ensure there is constructive communication between Council and the Community.

Relationship with Council Staff

We will enhance the relationship between themselves and staff encouraging two way communication and respecting each other’s professional opinion and expertise.

3

Relationship with Each Other

We will enhance the relationship between ourselves by respecting the diversity of opinions and listening to all points of view and behaving in a manner that is mature and strives to promote a healthy working relationship.

Corporate Image

In recognition of the respect of the role of Council, Members and appointed independent members will present themselves at meetings and official functions to reflect the professional corporate image of Council.

Integrity and Honesty

Council Members and appointed independent members will be fair and honest in our dealings with the community.

Influences on Decision Making

Council Members and appointed independent members must not influence any person in an improper way to try to obtain any advantage or favour. All decisions need to be, and be seen to be, fair and transparent.

Public Image of Council

Council Members and appointed independent members are responsible for providing an accurate and fair representation of Council decisions, and to behave in a manner that maintains and enhances the image of the Council.

Fraud

We must never make, or attempt to make, a deceitful or unlawful action that results in money or other benefits being received to which they or another person was not entitled.

Fraudulent acts against Council are unacceptable, may constitute a criminal offence and may be prosecuted.

Conflict of Interest

We understand that a conflict of interest arises if the person or close associate will have a reasonable expectation of enjoying a benefit, or suffering a detriment if a matter was decided in a particular manner. The benefits or detriments can be pecuniary (monetary) or non‐pecuniary, direct or in‐direct (refer the Local Government Act 1999, S73‐75).

If there is a conflict of interest we will disclose it to the Chair as early as possible and will leave the room and not take part in any discussion or vote on the matter.

Accepting Gifts and Benefits

We will carefully consider and avoid the acceptance of gifts or benefits, where it might in any way, either directly or indirectly, compromise or create influence. Any gifts or benefits that are accepted in their role as a public officer must be declared using the appropriate procedures [refer to Gifts, Benefits and Hospitality Policy].

4

Accountability

We are responsible for decisions that impact on future plans for the City of Charles Sturt and commit to discharging our duties conscientiously and to the best of our ability.

Use of Council Information and Resources

We will use information obtained in the course of our duties ethically and be careful to not use Council resources for private purposes.

Awareness of Legislative Requirements

It is our responsibility to make ourselves aware and to always be mindful of the provisions of the Local Government Act, Regulations and other relevant acts, By‐laws and policies of Council.

Training and Support

Council is committed to supporting Council members in fulfilling the role as Community Leaders and will provide members with the opportunity to participate in relevant training and development as detailed in Council Members Training and Development Policy.

Making a Code of Conduct Complaint Any person who believes a breach of this code of conduct may have occurred is encouraged to bring details to the attention of the Council. Complaints relating to behaviour allegedly contrary code of conduct will be investigated using the procedure detailed in Appendix A of the policy. Further Information Further information regarding any aspect of this code of conduct, Council policies or contact details for Council members can be obtained by contacting Council on 8408 1111. Specific queries can be directed to the Manager, Governance & Operational Support.

5

Appendix A

COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE OF CONDUCT Behaviour Contrary to the Code of Conduct

The Council is committed to supporting members in complying with the code of conduct and will investigate and address any complaints made relating to the code. Council has established a procedure to deal with complaints as they arise.

Making a Code of Conduct Complaint

Any person, regardless of their relationship with the Council, who believes behaviour contrary to the code may have occurred, is encouraged to bring details to the attention of the Mayor (and in the case of the Mayor’s behaviour, to the Deputy Mayor or in the case of behaviour of both the Mayor and Deputy Mayor, the CEO will refer the complaint to the appropriate external Agency for initial assessment and investigation) Complaints should preferably be raised in as timely a fashion as possible in the circumstances and will be promptly acted upon in accord with the steps outlined below.

A complaint concerning behaviour contrary to the code must be made in either writing or electronic format. Anonymous complaints should treated as Whistleblower complaints and dealt with in accordance with Council Whistleblower complaints policy. Any person regardless of their relationship with Council will be provided with reasonable support and co‐operation with their submissions under the Compliance with the Code of Conduct principles.

Initial Investigation

The Mayor will make an initial assessment of the complaint to determine the category (Level One, Two or Three) the allegation best fits. The process for each level of complaint is detailed below. Appropriate legal and other required support is available on request to assist the Mayor during both an initial assessment and investigation of a complaint. The Chief Executive (CEO) is to play no role in an investigation other than at the written request of the Mayor to compile information, answer questions or assist with the engagement of independent external professional assistance. All subsequent actions and responses of the CEO are to be documented in writing. A Council member against whom a complaint has been made has the right under natural justice to be heard by the decision maker regarding the allegation (see information regarding ‘Natural Justice’ in subsequent section).

All deliberations relating to a code of conduct complaint will be conducted in confidence but the number of complaints and their nature, status and outcomes will be publicly reported (see below). The Mayor (using Council’s records management system) will securely retain all records/material relating to a complaint and its investigation except where it is required to be referred to another external authority in connection with an investigation. If the complaint is lodged by the CEO there is a clear expression that the Mayor or the Responsible Council Member (RCM) will seek their investigative support from external sources outside of Council.

Formatted: Font: Calibri




6

Affected persons of a complaint shall be allowed reasonable time to respond when the outcomes formulated from external investigating agencies and referred back to the RCM before proceeding to process such outcomes.

Level One

Level One is the lowest category of code of conduct complaint. Level One complaints will generally relate to the behaviour of a Council member within the context of a Council or Council Committee meeting. However a complaint about such behaviour could be received after the meeting. If meetings are chaired well and the Chair gains the respect and support of the members, and members are mindful of the Local Government (Procedures at Meetings) Regulations then there should be very few of these complaints.

Examples

Disrespect to the Chair of the meeting

Disrespect to other members at a meeting

Interruption of another speaker, except on a point of order

Failure to accept the Chair’s ruling

Failure to observe Local Government (Procedures at Meetings) Regulations or the City of Charles Sturt Code of Practice for Meeting Procedures

Inappropriate comments regarding staff, members of the public or fellow Council members.

Origin of Complaint

Other Council members

Chief Executive or staff member

Member of the public present at the meeting.

Investigation

The Chair of the meeting should attempt to effectively deal with inappropriate behaviour in a meeting at the time it arises wherever possible and in accordance with the provisions in Regulation 29 of the Local Government (Procedures at Meetings) Regulations, regardless of whether a Council member alleges a code of conduct complaint during the meeting or not.

The Chair should make notes relating to the issue and its processing in their journal/diary following the meeting in order to assist the Mayor in investigating a possible subsequential code of conduct complaint (eg a complaint lodged after a meeting because of perceived repeated unruly behaviour in meetings or dissatisfaction with the outcome of a code of conduct complaint/Regulation 29 alleged breach made in a meeting and/or the way it was then handled).

If inappropriate behaviour in a meeting is dealt with to people’s satisfaction at the time it is unlikely to lead to a request for the behaviour to be subsequently investigated.

For a code of conduct complaint regarding behaviour at a meeting to be formally recognised and investigated subsequent to a meeting it must be alleged to the Mayor subsequent to the meeting. The Mayor will ascertain in the first instance whether they believe the matter was appropriately dealt with during the meeting. The matter will only be further investigated if the Mayor considers it was not effectively handled and resolved at the meeting.


7

Dealt With By

Chair of meeting (where complaint made in meeting) or the Mayor if complaint is made subsequent to a meeting.

Consequences

Ask that the remarks be withdrawn

Ask that the offender offer an apology

Additional training is provided

Counselling about appropriate behaviour expected from the Mayor or Committee Chair

A formal letter from the Mayor or Committee Chair

Censure motion (Regulation 29)1

Suspension from the meeting (Regulation 29)1. Reporting

Where a complaint is made in a Council or Council Committee meeting concerning behaviour at the meeting (either in the context of the code of conduct or in relation to Regulation 29 of the Local Government (Procedures at Meetings) Regulations or the City of Charles Sturt Code of Practice for Meeting Procedures there will be no public reporting, other than in the minutes of the meeting (as required by the Regulations1). In all other circumstances (including where the same complaint is reported to the Mayor subsequent to the meeting) the complaint will be reported as follows:

Quarterly report to Audit Committee on number and nature of complaints received and status/outcomes of investigations – no names

Annual Report on complaints received and the outcome of each complaint 1 Local Government (Procedures at Meetings) Regulations 2000

Level Two

Level Two complaints and include possible breaches of the Local Government Act and associated regulations that allege improper but not illegal behaviour (illegal behaviour being behaviour that can result in a legislatively specified penalty). They also include behaviour contrary to Council’s policies, codes and statements.

Example

Attempting to inappropriately (but not illegally) influence the decision of an officer of Council or Council contractor

Improper use of Council resources

Improper use the office of Council member

Harassment of Council staff or other Council members

Ongoing Level One complaint without corrective action

Improper use of confidential information (where this is not illegal)

Action contrary to a Council policy

Public behaviour that causes detriment to the image of Council.

8

Origin of Complaint

Anyone, eg:

Member of the public

Staff member

Council member

Contractor

Ombudsman

Member of Parliament.

Minister of Local Government

Investigation

By an appropriate independent investigator

Dealt With By

Independent Investigator with recommendations for action / consequences referred to back to full Council for a decision if required.

Consequences

Apology

Counselling (this could include access to Council funded external professional support similar to Employee Assistance Program)

Training

Censure motion by Council

Referral to another authority for investigation and consideration for prosecution (if it is determined that the matter meets Level 3 complaint criteria).

Reporting

Quarterly report to Audit Committee on number and nature of complaints received and status of investigations – no names

Annual Report on complaints received and the outcome of each complaint

9

Level Three

Level Three complaints are of a serious nature and allege illegal behaviour.

Example

Bribery

Conflict of interest

Theft

Misuse of public office

Misuse of confidential information for purposes of or resulting in pecuniary benefit or detriment.

Origin of Complaint

Public

Staff

Council member

Contractor

Ombudsman

Member of Parliament

Minister of Local Government

Whistleblower2

Investigation

A complainant may refer complaints that they consider to meet Level 3 criteria direct to

Minister/Office for State/Local Government Relations;

SA Police;

Other relevant investigation authority; or

Dealt With By

Appropriate authority.

Consequences

Decision made externally to Council following investigation.

If Agency unable to make a decision a referral back to full Council for a decision if required

Reporting

Quarterly to the Audit Committee

Annual Report on complaints received and the outcome of each complaint 2 Provisions of the Whistleblower Protection Act 1993 would apply

10

Natural Justice

A Council member is entitled to natural justice (procedural fairness) when a complaint concerning behaviour contrary to the code of conduct is being investigated. This means:

1. 1. The Council Member will be advised and provided with all the particulars, nature and materiality of

the complaint and that no complaint should proceed unless these points are clearly provided. The Council Member will be given the opportunity to respond either orally or in writing.

2. In responding the Council member will be given the right to appear before the Mayor or independent

investigator in person. 3. As the process is not meant to be adversarial, there should be no need for lawyers to be present for

either the Mayor or Council member at the time of interview. This can happen though, should a Council member so request. A Council member who engages legal or other professional advisors to assist them in responding to a code of conduct complaint shall have any request for such costs to be met by Council considered in the context of the Council Member Legal Advice Policy.

4. The Council member will be notified of the time, the place and the purpose of the interview and will

be given adequate time to prepare. If the member believes that insufficient time for preparation has been allowed, a reasonable extension of time will be granted.

5. The Mayor will make available details of all allegations and any documents, which are to be relied

upon, to the complainee as soon as practicable and at least 7 days prior to meeting with them. This provision of information will be subject to any laws relating to the release of information.

Deleted: The Council member may request that the Mayor appoint an independent expert to assist the Mayor in any or all aspects of their investigation and processing of the allegation.


NOTICE OF MOTION – COUNCIL MEMBER CODE OF CONDUCT Item 7.26

APPENDIX B Appendix A consists of 14 pages.



7.27 NOTICE OF MOTION – ‘STREET CORNER’ MEETINGS (B53)

Brief


Proposed Motion “1. That the Council develop a policy on Council Member "Street Corner"

meetings. 2. That the policy identifies a range of protocols and guidelines for

conducting street corner meetings. 3. That the policy be referred to the Finance, Policy and Delegations

Committee for its consideration and development prior to future Council consideration.”

Preamble A preamble to this Notice of Motion was not provided.


TO: Council FROM: Governance Officer DATE: 10 September 2011

7.28 NOTICE OF MOTION – TOURISM POLICY AND PLAN (B53)

Brief


Proposed Motion “1. That Council investigates developing a City of Charles Sturt Tourism Policy

and Plan. 2. That a report be brought back to the Council meeting of November 14,

2011.”

Preamble (Councillor Fitzpatrick) “Please see Appendix A containing the report presented to the CCRG meeting. This could be developed as part of the Local History Partnership review”


NOTICE OF MOTION – TOURISM POLICY AND PLAN Item 7.28

APPENDIX A



APPENDIX A Continued



APPENDIX A Continued



9.15 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ELECTED MEMBER INTERACTION WITH COUNCIL STAFF

(B57)

Brief


Questions “Brief: Seek to have fully explained how Elected Members (includes the Mayor) can personally direct council staff, request that professional reports be written in a particular way, request that staff carry out elected member directions and cease their given tasks by their immediate line Managers and determine what other authority elected members have over council staff. To determine what actions council staff can take if they are directed, have their work place interfered with or if they feel they are or have been harassed or bullied by an elected member. To understand and have explained what clear directions are in place by the C.E.O. so if required council staff are protected either from elected members or high profile community persons. The following questions have a direct relationship to functional, strategic and policy issues affecting staff, elected members, confidence from the community at large and the Corporation of the City of Charles Sturt. I submit the following: Questions: 1. Who is responsible for the administration of the council staff and where does that

authority come from? 2. Do elected members have any authority over council staff? Can elected members

direct staff? 3. If elected members attempt to direct staff what are the consequences for the staff

member and elected member?


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ELECTED MEMBER INTERACTION WITH COUNCIL STAFF Item 9.15 Continued 4. What known processes or directions has the C.E.O. in place that protects staff from

bullying, intimidation, interference or any other forms of abuse from any elected member/s?

5. Can Council direct the C.E.O (or staff) to write a report that is contrary to the

professional opinion of the council staff? If no ‐ What prohibits this from happening and what are the consequences for Council?

6. Should any staff members be directed by elected members to such a degree which

affects the staff member/s performance or jeopardizes their professional standing, what process would apply and what actually happens?

7. If staff members are affected in their work place or home in any form by any elected

member, what are they afforded by way support? Who decides if any support is required and how would that be granted? Would a formal complaint have to be lodged to trigger support or would it happen if simply requested?

8. Do council staff members have to go through a “full” code of conduct complaint

process to stop any elected member from directing or interfering with their role as employed council staff?

9. The Local Government Act meeting procedures clearly states that the Mayor or

Committee Presiding Members can only “speak” once during a debate and should remain impartial and not give themselves special privileges. (Other than with leave to speak twice). How can a Mayor or a Committee Presiding member continually express their opinion and continually enter a debate and speak more than once? Should this happen what can a committee or council member do to stop it?

10. Has the C.E.O. had any cause to act in the defence of the City of Charles Sturt and has

the C.E.O. been required to take action to support staff as a result of action/s directly or indirectly by an elected member?”


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ELECTED MEMBER INTERACTION WITH COUNCIL STAFF Item 9.15 Continued Answers (Chief Executive officer) 1. Who is responsible for the administration of the council staff and where does that

authority come from? The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the administration and for all Council

staff. Sections 99, 103 and 107 of the Local Government Act 1999 provide the relevant statutory authority. In particular Section 99(1) (b) provides that the Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the "day to day operations and affairs of the Council". In addition, the Chief Executive Officer is required to give effect to the principles of Human Resource Management prescribed by the Act and to apply proper management practices (Section 99(1)(i)). Section 103 recognises the Chief Executive Officer powers of appointment, management, suspension and dismissal whilst Section 107 imposes the obligation to apply sound Human Resources Management principles in the exercise of all of these functions.

2. Do elected members have any authority over council staff? Can elected members

direct staff? No.

Section 59(3) of the Act expressly provides that an elected member has no direct authority over an employee of the Council with respect to the way in which the employee performs his or her duties. The Act prohibits Elected Members from directing staff. This position is further reinforced by reference to the considerations articulated in the response to question 1 above.

3. If elected members attempt to direct staff what are the consequences for the staff

member and elected member? If a member were to conduct themselves in this manner it could give rise to at least

considerations under the Occupational, Health Safety and Welfare Act 1986. Depending on the nature of any exchange it could result in an employee feeling victimised, harassed, humiliated, undermined or threatened giving rise to action under Section 55A of the Act for bullying and harassment.

Such conduct can also negatively affect the morale of the working environment and can cause divisiveness in relationships, particularly between Council administration and the elected body.


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ELECTED MEMBER INTERACTION WITH COUNCIL STAFF Item 9.15 Continued

The additional consequences are, of course, that elected member conduct of this nature may be a breach of the Council's code of conduct, it is certainly a breach of the Local Government Act (for which an express penalty is not provided) and, in a worst case scenario gives rise to considerations of and an inability on the part of an elected member to claim the protection from civil liability set out at Section 39 of the Act. This could arise because he/she will not be acting in accordance with the powers, functions or duties of an elected member or even with due honesty in circumstances where the member knows they are acting contrary to the legislative scheme and the framework established by the Local Government Act.

This is most pertinent in circumstances where a member may be subject to a claim under OHSW laws.

4. What known processes or directions has the C.E.O. in place that protects staff from

bullying, intimidation, interference or any other forms of abuse from any elected member/s?

The Chief Executive Officer has a responsibility to provide a safe work place for all

staff. To that end there is a comprehensive set of policies and procedures to guide and support staff. There is also appropriate training in place for staff to manage issues that may arise in this area. Management of the Organisation also have their responsibilities in this area written into the job description and this obligation is assess as part of their annual performance review process.

5. Can Council direct the C.E.O (or staff) to write a report that is contrary to the

professional opinion of the council staff? If no ‐ What prohibits this from happening and what are the consequences for Council?

No.

To attempt to do so is contrary to the role and function of staff of the Council to assist the elected body in an advisory capacity. The Chief Executive Officer and staff have particular expertise in their relevant areas. Not only would such a direction be inconsistent with principles of good decision making but it could also result in a staff member breaching their fiduciary duty to their employer by fulfilling their work tasks consistently and to the best of their ability.

Such direction could also place the Council at risk of a civil liability claim for which the Mutual Liability Scheme may have grounds to reject. As the scheme relies upon the professional expertise of staff as a ‘control’ measure in the decision making process, to direct a report removes this control and as such puts the council and scheme at risk, a level of exposure that the scheme may not tolerate depending on the circumstances. (While the scheme recognizes the authority of a Council to make decisions in its own right).


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ELECTED MEMBER INTERACTION WITH COUNCIL STAFF Item 9.15 Continued

The role of Council staff is to provide information in a Council report that is thorough, balanced and demonstrates their level of expertise on the matter and their professional opinion. Based on this expertise the staff member will form a recommendation to the Council. It is then for the Council in exercising its decision making function whether it will accept the recommendation of the staff member or reject it by resolving in a different manner.

There are, however, limited circumstances where the Council may wish to achieve an objective which is not necessarily consistent with the recommendation of a staff member. It is appropriate for the Council in such circumstances, ordinarily through the Chief Executive Officer, to request the staff member to assist the Council with providing reasons for the outcome/objective that the Council wishes to achieve regardless of the fact that it is not consistent with the independent objective or professional opinion of that staff member. The risk, of course, is that if the decision of the Council should give rise to any form of legal proceedings the staff member may be called upon to give independent evidence to the Court which is contrary to the interests of the Council. This process has most often been seen in development application matters where the Council/DAP has not agreed with the officer recommendation to approve (with or without conditions) a development proposal and is seeking to refuse it, have required professional reasons to justify that refusal.

6. Should any staff members be directed by elected members to such a degree which

affects the staff member/s performance or jeopardizes their professional standing, what process would apply and what actually happens?

In addition to the comments in response to question 3, if such conduct were to impact

a staff member's professional standing, it could give rise to a claim against the relevant Council Member(s) in defamation or under OHSW laws.

7. If staff members are affected in their work place or home in any form by any elected

member, what are they afforded by way support? Who decides if any support is required and how would that be granted? Would a formal complaint have to be lodged to trigger support or would it happen if simply requested?

The Council administration has an Employee Assistance Program in place that

provides counseling and support. It is an independent and confidential service and a staff member is not required to request a referral via a supervisor. They can access the service on their own volition if they feel the need to do so. There are some longer term limitations on the service but in all regards the staff member’s anonymity is protected.

The staff member can also lodge a formal complaint with Management/CEO regarding the behavior of a Council Member and this will be dealt with as either a code of conduct issue for the Council Member or as previously defined as an OH&S issue.


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ELECTED MEMBER INTERACTION WITH COUNCIL STAFF Item 9.15 Continued 8. Do council staff members have to go through a “full” code of conduct complaint

process to stop any elected member from directing or interfering with their role as employed council staff?

No.

In the first instance it may be regarded as a matter which directly goes to the issue of maintenance of the safe working environment for staff members. In this regard it is the Chief Executive Officer's responsibility, not least as the responsible officer under the Occupational Health Safety and Welfare Act to take action to protect the Council officer. This position is, of course, further reinforced by the very fact that such conduct is in breach of the Local Government Act. In these circumstances, it is entirely appropriate for the Chief Executive Officer to implement protocols which are designed to prevent elected members interference with employee matters by restricting and/or limiting the elected member's ability to contact/communicate with such staff members.

For example there are a number of Council’s in metropolitan Adelaide that restricts Council Member access to the administrations’ office area. In some extreme cases contact with Council staff has also been restricted to the extent that only designated staff have authority to interact with Council Members.

9. The Local Government Act meeting procedures clearly states that the Mayor or

Committee Presiding Members can only “speak” once during a debate and should remain impartial and not give themselves special privileges. (Other than with leave to speak twice). How can a Mayor or a Committee Presiding member continually express their opinion and continually enter a debate and speak more than once? Should this happen what can a committee or council member do to stop it?

The Local Government (Procedures at Meetings) Regulations 2000 clearly state that a

member (which includes all elected members and hence the Mayor or Presiding Member of the Committee) may only speak once during debate without the leave of the meeting (see Regulation 13(10)). This is, of course, subject to any lawful variation made to this requirement by the Council for Council meetings or as imposed by the Council for Committee meetings. The Regulations do not make any provision in relation to impartiality or special privileges. Where a Mayor or a Presiding Member of a Committee flout this regulation or any other regulation the matter should properly be addressed under Regulation 28 as a point of order. As Council is aware, a point of order is defined at Regulation 4 to mean a point raised to draw attention to an alleged breach … of the Meeting Regulations in relation to the proceedings of a meeting. In the event that the Mayor or Presiding Member were to rule in their own interest then that ruling may be subject to a dissent notice in accordance with Regulation 28(5) ‐ (7).


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – ELECTED MEMBER INTERACTION WITH COUNCIL STAFF Item 9.15 Continued 10. Has the C.E.O. had any cause to act in the defence of the City of Charles Sturt and has

the C.E.O. been required to take action to support staff as a result of action/s directly or indirectly by an elected member?

The CEO has had to clarify several of the matters discussed above with some Council

Members. This is normal in a new Council. The answers above go to the extreme end of the continuum of behaviour. There have been no formal complaints regarding Council Members behaviour as it relates to staff interactions, and therefore, no action has been taken to date.

[The research for and preparation of these answers took 2 hours.]


TO: Council FROM: Manager Customer & Community Services DATE: 10 October 2011

9.16 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – LOCAL HISTORY PARTNERSHIP (B57)

Brief


Questions “Regarding the Local History Partnership (LHP) and the CM History Workshop held on August 23, 2011. 1. What is the current status of the Local History Partnership, in light of Council not

having made a decision yet as to its future, pending Council making a decision? 2. What is the status of the budgeted LHP Partners current year funding for the

following organisations (please list)?




Fort Granville Historical Society.

3. What is the 2011/2012 funding for each organisation, please list? 4. Has each organisation received this financial years funding? 5. If not, when will they receive the funding? 6. What other funding applications are outstanding? 7. Regarding the recent CM History workshop held on August 23 and the suggestion to

set up a Local History Reference Group, When will a History Futures report be brought back to Council following the workshop?”


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – LOCAL HISTORY PARTNERSHIP Item 9.16 Continued Answers (Manager Customer & Community Services) 1. It is assumed that the History Partners Group (as opposed to the Local History

Partnership) is the subject of this question. Given that the History Partners Group is awaiting the outcome of the review of the local history project and that as this has not been completed, at this stage the next meeting of the group has not been scheduled.

2. No funding has been provided to the historical societies for 2011/12, pending the

outcome of the local history project review. 3. $15,000 has been allocated for funding of historical societies for 2011/12. 4. Refer answer question 2. 5. Refer answer question 2. Alternatively Council could resolve that the funding be

allocated independent of the local history project review. 6. If the question relates specifically to funding applications by historical societies, there

are no applications outstanding. Historical societies have informally advised of the level of funding through the local history project required for 2011/12.

7. A report following up on the workshop including the scenarios discussed for moving

forward is being prepared and will be presented to Council in coming weeks. [The research for and preparation of these answers took 0.5 hours.]


TO: Council FROM: Senior Policy Planner DATE: 10 October 2011

9.17 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – CHELTENHAM PARK PLAYGROUND (B57)

Brief


Questions “1. Has the Charles Sturt Council tenure by way of a secure lease on the Cheltenham Park

playground property abutting associated car park? 2. Is the leased parcel of land subject to the35% open space component relating to the

Cheltenham Park Racecourse redevelopment site? 3. Is the lease registered upon the title deeds of this property? 4. Are there any encumbrances placed upon this property? 5. Has the lease been changed or adjusted to reflect the wishes of other parties? 6. Has the community title been removed from this property? 7. Who gave consent, not being the planning consent, to physically erect the commercial

advertising bill board in the playground property abutting associated car park? 8. Who signed for the change of lease arrangements to allow other parties the

permission to erect the bill board in the playground property abutting associated car park?

9. Were the community consulted to the alienation of their playground property

abutting associated Car park? 10. Is it appropriate to allow advertising bill boards portraying venues serving alcohol and

gambling in a children’s playground property abutting associated car park? ”


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – CHELTENHAM PARK PLAYGROUND Item 9.17 Continued Answers (Senior Policy Planner) 1. The City of Charles Sturt has a secure lease on the piece of land marked ‘A’ as

delineated in the Memorandum of Lease document included within this report as Appendix A.

The terms of lease between the City of Charles Sturt (lessee) and South Australian Jockey Club (lessor) commenced on the 3rd day of March 1995 and expires on the 2nd day of March, 2020 together with a right or renewal for a further twenty five years commencing on the day following the expiration of the initial term.

The leasable area, being the land marked ‘A’ is registered on the Certificate of Title as the leasable area and is subject to the terms outlined within the lease.

The abutting carpark land marked as ‘B’ does not form part of the leasable area. The purpose of the land marked ‘B’ is set out within the Memorandum of Lease, specifically the lessor agreed to lease the land marked as ‘A’ to Council in exchange for Council constructing a carpark and access road within the land marked as ‘B’

The Charles Sturt Council does not have a secure lease on the carpark area abutting the Cheltenham Park playground.

2. Legally the lease and 35% open space requirement in the City of Charles Sturt

Development Plan are unrelated. However the lease area incidentally falls within the area indicatively identified on a concept plan contained within the Charles Sturt Development Plan as open space. The lease provides Council with the security and option for this area to remain as open space for recreational purposes.

In relation to the future of the area subject to the lease the Council resolved at its 14 February 2011 meeting (Refer to Item 6.19) the following:

“That Council notes that the wetland and detailed open space design for the north western corner of the former racecourse site will be undertaken over the coming 12 months and this is likely to impact on the registered lease, which will require Council consideration and a decision in relation to a Certificate of Consent request. Prior to Council considering a report on the impact of the wetlands on the registered lease and a request to sign and seal a Certificate of Consent key stakeholder consultation will be undertaken. “

The detailed design of the Cheltenham Wetlands is expected to commence in the coming weeks. The design process will include input from a Community Reference Group established for the Water Proofing the West project.

3. Yes 4. No


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – CHELTENHAM PARK PLAYGROUND Item 9.17 Continued 5. The lease has not been changed since it was entered into in 1995. 6. No community land status or title is applicable to the lease area, or any other area of

the former racecourse. The title applying to the former Cheltenham Racecourse site including the area subject to the lease is a Torrens Title in the name of the SAJC. Progressively as the site is subdivided and reserves are created these will be vested with Council. These reserve areas vested with Council will automatically assume community land status.

7. The lessor does not require the consent of the lessee to erect signage. For background

on the planning approval relating to the signage refer to the following 7 April, 2010 DAP Agenda and Minutes.

http://www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Item_3‐09_615_Torrens_Rd_Cheltenham.pdf

http://www.charlessturt.sa.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Minutes_‐ _DAP_7_April_2010.pdf 8. The carpark area does not form part of the leasable area, this land is privately owned

and did not require a change to the lease. As per the answer to Question 7 the lessor does not require the consent to the lessee to erect signage as this is privately owned and managed land.

9. The advertising signage underwent Category 3 notification under the Development

Act. For details refer to the DAP website links in referred to in the answer to Question 7. The area of land in question continues to be used for open space purposes and as such has not been alienated.

10. The State Government Development Act does not allow for the content of third party

signage to be controlled through the development assessment process. The lease also does not allow for the lessee to regulate this matter. The nature of signage and its suitability is regulated by the Advertising Standards Bureau.

[The research for and preparation of these answers took 2 hours.]


QUESTIONS ON NOTICE – CHELTENHAM PARK PLAYGROUND Item 9.17





(B57) 96

Brief



Brief



Brief


10. MOTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE [As previously identified and agreed to by Mayor.] 11. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE 12. GENERAL BUSINESS [As previously identified.]


13. BUSINESS – PART II – CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS 13.7 LEGAL ADVICE ON LICENSED GAMING FACILITY AT CHELTENHAM RACECOURSE

SITE

Recommendation ‐ Exclusion of the Public

That pursuant to Section 90(2) of the Local Government Act 1999, Council hereby orders that the public be excluded from attendance at this meeting with the exception of the Chief Executive, Council’s lawyers and administrative staff currently in attendance in order to consider the Item 13.7 LEGAL ADVICE ON LICENSED GAMING FACILITY AT CHELTENHAM RACECOURSE SITE in confidence as the matter falls within the ambit of Section 90(3)(h) “…legal advice” and 90 (3)(i) “…information relating to actual litigation, or litigation that the council or council committee believe on reasonable grounds will take place, involving the council or an employee of council.”

Brief



Nil 15. MEETING CLOSURE

Date post:	14-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	dolien
View:	214 times
Download:	1 times

MINUTES OF THE CITY OF CHARLES STURT COUNCIL MEETING HELD ... · MINUTES OF THE CITY OF CHARLES...

Documents