Mira Mesa Community Planning Group Draft Agenda & Public ... · Mira Mesa Community Planning Group...

Mira Mesa Community Planning Group Draft Agenda & Public Notice

Date/Time: November 17, 2014 7:00pm Location: Vulcan Materials Conference Room, 7220 Trade Street, San Diego CA 92121

Action/Information: All items noted as (Action) items may be moved/seconded as a Question for discussion and vote. All items not so noted will be information items.

Order of Consideration: Items on this agenda may be discussed in an order different than shown here for the convenience of elected officials, representatives of government agencies or other participants. The Chair will present such changes in the order of consideration for unanimous consent if there are no objections, or subject them to a motion/second and 2/3 vote as indicated by Robert’s Rules (11th Ed., pg. 363).

Call to Order – In attendance:

1. Non-Agenda Public Comments: 3 Minutes per speaker. No discussion will be entertained noraction taken at this meeting on matters raised in Non-Agenda Public Comments, but a mattermay be referred for further study and possible action at a future meeting.

2. Adopt Draft Agenda (Action)

3. Adopt Previous Meeting Minutes (Action). The minutes will be circulated among the membersof the Executive Committee as a PDF document prior to the meeting via email. An opportunityto request corrections will be made at this point in the meeting. Should no such requests bemade, the Chair will deem the minutes adopted by unanimous consent.

4. Old Business

a. Pacifica Companies Self Storage - PID Amendment (Action)

5. New Business

a. Seaview Corporate Center Signage NUP

b. Mira Mesa/Camino Ruiz Development SCR

6. Elected Officials/Government Agencies

a. United States Congress – California 52nd Districtb. California Senate – District 39c. California Assembly – District 77d. San Diego County – Board of Supervisors District 3e. San Diego – Mayor’s Officef. San Diego – City Council District 6g. San Diego Unified School Districth. MCAS Miramar

Mira Mesa Community Planning Group: Draft Agenda & Public Notice - Page 1 of 2

Mira Mesa Community Planning Group Draft Agenda & Public Notice

i. CalTrans

7. Announcements: 2 Minutes per speaker. Community groups are encouraged to promote awareness of their events at this point in the meeting.

8. Reports

a. Report of the Chair:

i. Latest Cycle Review for Stone Creek is attached. ii. See other assorted information attached to the agenda.

b. Stone Creek Subcommittee

c. Community Planners Committee

d. Los Peñasquitos Canyon Citizen’s Advisory Committee

Adjourn: 8:30pm – 9:00pm

Mira Mesa Community Planning Group: Draft Agenda & Public Notice - Page 2 of 2

L64A-003A

Cycle Issues 10/29/14 1:12 pm

1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101-4154

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGODevelopment Services

Page 1 of 41

Project Information

STONE CREEK67943Project Nbr:

Daly, TimProject Mgr: (619) 446-5356 [email protected]

Title: *67943*

Review Information

Cycle Type: Submitted: 08/21/2014 Deemed Complete on 08/21/201463 Submitted (Multi-Discipline)

10/29/2014Closed:

LDR-Planning Review

09/24/2014

09/26/2014

08/21/2014Majas, Polonia

(619) 446-5394

Submitted (Multi-Discipline)

Review Due:

Next Review Method:

Reviewing Discipline:

Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED ON TIME

08/21/2014Cycle Distributed:

09/26/2014

Hours of Review: 1.50

[email protected]

. The review due date was changed to 10/15/2014 from 10/01/2014 per agreement with customer.

. We request a 11st complete submittal for LDR-Planning Review on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).

. The reviewer has requested more documents be submitted.

. Your project still has 15 outstanding review issues with LDR-Planning Review (15 of which are new issues).

. The reviewer has not signed off 1 job.

. Last month LDR-Planning Review performed 219 reviews, 58.0% were on-time, and 63.2% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Conditions

Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

182 The project may be developed in phases as specified within the Stone Creek Master Plan. In order to allow for appropriate review of each phase and to determine consistency with this permit, all plans associated with construction permits shall be submitted for a Substantial Conformance Review, Process 2. The project shall be consistent with the approved Exhibit A's and the Stone Creek Master Plan. Process 2 , Substantial Conformance Review shall include Long Range Planning. (From Cycle 47)

�

183 The Owner/Permittee shall design, construct, and implement the development of the project consistent with the Stone Creek Master Plan. The phasing of the mining and extractive uses shall be consistent with all the phasing requirements and conditions as established by the Stone Creek Master Plan. (From Cycle 47)

�

184 The mining and extractive facility shall conform to all the applicable regulations as specified in SDMC Section 141.1004 including the approved reclamation plans as demonstrated within the approved Conditional Use Permit Reclamation Plan Exhibits. (From Cycle 47)

�

185 Hours of operation for grading, excavating and hauling within 500 feet of any existing residence shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Prohibited days of operation include Sunday and legal holidays. (From Cycle 47)

�

186 Hours of operation for the mining and extractive facility including but not limited to grading, excavating and hauling within 500 feet of a school shall be coordinated with the school administrator to avoid conflicts during outdoor learning activities. (From Cycle 47)

�

187 Prior to issuance of building permits for the new residential development a noise mitigation plan shall be required that identifies any noise affiliated with the mining and extractive operation and any construction activity so as to cause, at or beyond the property lines of any property zoned residential, an average sound level greater than 65 decibels during the period from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Prohibited days of operation include Sunday and legal holidays. A letter, verifying compliance with the 65 decibles shall be prepared by a qualified acoustician. (From Cycle 47)

�

188 All storage areas, staging and repair areas shall be screened from the adjacent development and from the public rights of way. (From Cycle 47)

�

189 Areas of operations including the mining and construction shall be properly fences and gates to protect and prevent public access and entry. (From Cycle 47)

�

190 All contaminants, waste and other hazardous materials shall be properly disposed in accordance with local and State regulations. (From Cycle 47)

�

191 Air contaminants including smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, carbon, noxious acids, toxic fumes, gases, odors, and particulate matter, or any emissions that endanger human health, cause damage to vegetation or property, or cause soiling shall not be permitted to emanate beyond the boundaries of the premises upon which the use emitting the contaminants is located. (From Cycle 47)

�

192 All operating areas which emitt air contaminants shall be maintained as required and determined by the by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District. (From Cycle 47)

�

193 The project site shall be maintained in a neat, orderly manner, free of all junk, litter, trash and debris. (From Cycle 47)

�

194 Off street parking shall be maintained and provided on site at a level sufficient to serve the operation of the mining and extractive facility and within the phased development of the project site. (From Cycle 47)

�

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Planning Review' review, please call Polonia Majas at (619) 446-5394. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 2 of 41


195 All signs associated within the development shall be consistent with an established comprehensive sign plans of with the regulations of the underlying zone. (From Cycle 47)

�

196 All private outdoor lighting shall be shaded and adjusted to fall on the same premises where such lights are located and in accordance with the outdoor lighting regulations as specified in SDMC Section 142.0740. (From Cycle 47)

�

Revised Conditions


197 The project may be developed in phases as specified within the Stone Creek Master Plan. In order to allow for appropriate review of each phase and to determine consistency with this permit, all plans associated with construction permits shall be submitted for a Substantial Conformance Review, Process 2. The project shall be consistent with the approved Exhibit A's and the Stone Creek Master Plan. Process 2 , Substantial Conformance Review shall include Long Range Planning. (New Issue)

�

198 The Owner/Permittee shall design, construct, and implement the development of the project consistent with the Stone Creek Master Plan. The phasing of the mining and extractive uses shall be consistent with all the phasing requirements and conditions as established by the Stone Creek Master Plan. (New Issue)

�

199 The mining and extractive facility shall conform to all the applicable Conditional Use Permit regulations as specified in SDMC Section 141.1004 and the approved Conditional Use Permit Reclamation Plan Exhibits. (New Issue)

�

200 Hours of operation for the development of the project site including the extraction facility, grading, excavating and hauling shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Prohibited days of operation include Sunday and legal holidays. (New Issue)

�

201 Hours of operation for the mining and extractive facility including but not limited to grading, excavating and hauling within 500 feet of a school shall be coordinated with the school administrator to avoid conflicts during outdoor learning activities. (New Issue)

�

202 Prior to issuance of building permits for the new residential development a noise mitigation plan shall be required that identifies any noise affiliated with the mining and extractive operation and any construction activity so as to cause, at or beyond the property lines of any property zoned residential, an average sound level greater than 65 decibels during the period from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Prohibited days of operation include Sunday and legal holidays. A letter, verifying compliance with the 65 decibels shall be prepared by a qualified acoustician. (New Issue)

�

203 All storage areas, staging and repair areas shall be screened from the adjacent development and from the public rights of way. (New Issue)

�

204 Areas of operations including the mining and construction shall be properly fenced and gated to protect and prevent public access and entry. (New Issue)

�

205 All contaminants, waste and other hazardous materials shall be properly disposed in accordance with local and State regulations. (New Issue)

�

206 Air contaminants including smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, carbon, noxious acids, toxic fumes, gases, odors, and particulate matter, or any emissions that endanger human health, cause damage to vegetation or property, or cause soiling shall not be permitted to emanate beyond the boundaries of the premises upon which the use emitting the contaminants is located. (New Issue)

�

207 All operating areas which emitt air contaminants shall be maintained as required and determined by the by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District. (New Issue)

�

208 The project site shall be maintained in a neat, orderly manner, free of junk, litter, trash and debris. (New Issue)�

209 Off street parking shall be maintained and provided on site at a level sufficient to serve the operation of the mining and extractive facility. (New Issue)

�

210 All signs associated within the development shall be consistent with an established comprehensive sign plans or with the regulations of the underlying zone. (New Issue)

�

211 All private outdoor lighting shall be shaded and adjusted to fall on the same premises where such lights are located and in accordance with the outdoor lighting regulations as specified in SDMC Section 142.0740. (New Issue)

�

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Planning Review' review, please call Polonia Majas at (619) 446-5394. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 3 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

LDR-Geology

08/21/2014

10/01/2014

08/21/2014Quinn, Jim

(619) 446-5334

LDR-Geology(Submit)

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED LATE


09/26/2014


[email protected]


. The reviewer has indicated they want to review this project again. Reason chosen by the reviewer: Partial Response to Cmnts/Regs.

. We request a 10th complete submittal for LDR-Geology on this project as: LDR-Geology(Submit).


. Your project still has 23 outstanding review issues with LDR-Geology (17 of which are new issues).

. Last month LDR-Geology performed 79 reviews, 48.1% were on-time, and 68.1% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Cycle 38 Review (7/22/13)

Referennce


23 Stone Creek Conditional Use Permit, Reclamation Plan, prepared by BDS Engineering, Inc., dated July 17, 2013 (their project no. 04-23)

(From Cycle 38)

�

Comment


24 Submit an addendum geotechnical report or update letter that specifically addresses the proposed revised mining and reclamation plans referenced above.

(From Cycle 38)

�


References


25 Response to Review Comments, Stone Creek, Vesting Tentative Map No. 208328, PTS No. 67943, W.O. No. 42-2637, San Diego, California, prepared by Geocon, Inc., dated September 4, 2013 (their project no. 07524-32-02)

Stone Creek Conditional Use Permit, Mining and Reclamation Plan, prepared by BDS Engineering, Inc., dated January 31, 2014 (their project no. 04-23)

Stone Creek Vesting Tentative Map, No. 208328, PTS No. 67943, City of San Diego, prepared by BDS Engineering, Inc., dated January 31, 2014 (their project no. 04-23)

(From Cycle 47)

�

Comments


26 As previously requested, submit an addendum geotechnical report or update letter that specifically addresses the proposed revised mining and reclamation plans referenced above. If opinions regarding geologic hazards are provided, the addendum geotechnical report or update letter should be signed or sealed by a professional geologist.

(From Cycle 47)

�

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Geology' review, please call Jim Quinn at (619) 446-5334. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 4 of 41


27 Clarify if the soil and geologic reconnaissance report dated April 14, 2006 (revised May 10, 2006) addresses all potential geologic impacts related to the currently proposed Stone Creek Vesting Tentative Map and Stone Creek Conditional Use Permit (Mining and Reclamation Plans).

(From Cycle 47)

�

28 The Vesting Tentative Map shows the location of proposed storm water BMPs. If the proposed storm water BMPs result in active or passive storm water infiltration or percolations, the geotechnical consultant should address the BMPs in accordance with Appendix F of the City's Guidelines for Geotechnical Reports. (From Cycle 47)

�


References


29 Response to Review Comments, Stone Creek, Vesting Tentative Map No. 208328, PTS No. 67943, W.O. No. 42-2637, San Diego, California, prepared by Geocon, Inc., dated May 12, 2014 (their project no. 07524-32-02)

Stone Creek Conditional Use Permit, Mining and Reclamation Plan, prepared by BDS Engineering, Inc., dated August 18, 2014 (their project no. 04-23)

Stone Creek Vesting Tentative Map, No. 208328, PTS No. 67943, City of San Diego, prepared by BDS Engineering, Inc., dated August 18, 2014 (their project no. 04-23)

(New Issue)

�

Comments


30 The previous review comments have not been cleared and remain applicable. The following comments are offered to provide guidance regarding the previous comments.

(New Issue)

�

31 Provide a geologic map that shows the currently proposed Tentative Map, Reclamation Plan, and Mining Plan grades. Several maps could be necessary to clearly show the relationship of these plans with the site geology.

(New Issue)

�

32 Provide representative geologic cross sections showing the proposed mining grades, reclamation grades, and tentative map grades in relationship with the site geology. Show groundwater conditions on the cross sections.

(New Issue)

�

33 Note that California Public Resource Code 2772(c)(5) indicates that reclamation plan shall include the following information: "a detailed description of the geology of the area in which surface mining is to be conducted."

(New Issue)

�

34 Note that the site is partially located within Geology Hazard Category (GHC) 53 as shown on the San Diego Seismic Safety Study maps. GHC 53 is characterized as having adverse geologic structure. The consultant should address if the geologic structure of the site is adverse with respect to slope stability for the proposed mining, reclamation, or grading plan slopes.

(New Issue)

�

35 The consultant could consider updating their description of site geology to be consistent with current regional geologic mapping (Kennedy and Tan, 2008).

(New Issue)

�

36 In addition to the geologic hazards previously described in the referenced geotechnical documents the consultant could consider addressing the following geologic hazards with respect to the proposed mining plan, reclamation plan, and tentative map:

(New Issue)

�

37 Address differential settlement/ seismic compaction.

(New Issue)

�

38 Address hyrocompaction/ consolidation.

(New Issue)

�

39 Address gross and surficial slope stability.

(New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 5 of 41


40 Address flooding due to possible dam collapse.

(New Issue)

�

41 Address potential impacts, mitigation measures, and unmitigated significant effects.

(New Issue)

�

42 Indicate if the proposed mining, reclamation grading, or grading shown on the vesting tentative map will destabilize or result in settlement of adjacent property or the right of way.

(New Issue)

�

43 The seismic design criteria provided in the referenced soil and geologic reconnaissance report are not applicable. The consultant could consider providing updated information.

(New Issue)

�

44 As noted in the LDR-Engineering review comments (item 101), the analysis of permanent storm water BMPs cannot be deferred and must be addressed at this time. If the proposed storm water BMPs result in active or passive storm water infiltration or percolation, the geotechnical consultant should address the BMPs in accordance with Appendix F of the City's Guidelines for Geotechnical Reports.

(New Issue)

�

45 The engineer of work should show proposed reclamation grades in the southern part of reclamation plan sheets 6 and 7, north and adjacent to the proposed quarry walls.

(New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 6 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

LDR-Environmental

10/14/2014

10/14/2014

08/21/2014Blake, Martha

(619) 446-5375


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED LATE


10/01/2014


[email protected]


. We request a 10th complete submittal for LDR-Environmental on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Your project still has 8 outstanding review issues with LDR-Environmental (2 of which are new issues).


. Last month LDR-Environmental performed 111 reviews, 37.8% were on-time, and 35.7% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Environmental Impact Report (E


28 EAS is leaving open all comments noting the preparation of the EIR. As noted in comment 15, EAS expects that the majority of our issues will be vetted and resolved through the EIR process. (From Cycle 38)

�

Review 9/27/06


2 EAS staff has not yet received the first screencheck EIR and associated technical studies for the issues identified in the scoping letter dated September 15, 2005. Until these materials are received, the environmental timeline will be held in abeyance. (From Cycle 9)

�

April 24, 2007


3 As noted in the earlier review cycles, the project as proposed requires the preparation of an EIR. EAS understands that the first screencheck is in the process of being prepared, and will be submitted under separate cover when complete. The majority of comments from EAS will be through the review of the screencheck EIRs at this point. (From Cycle 12)

�

4 EAS has unchecked the 'needed again' for a number of the technical documents. EAS will need copies of any final approved technical reports, however until those documents are approved by the appropriate discipline, EAS will not need extra copies. Those technical reports may be dealt with through the EIR screencheck review process. (From Cycle 12)

�

January 8, 2009


5 Staff has determined the proposed project meets the definition of a "water demand" project, and there requires the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment, consistent with section 10910 to 10915 of the State Water Code. EAS will prepare a memo for the City Water Department to begin the preparation of the WSA. Staff may need additional detail from the applicant for this report. (From Cycle 18)

�

6 As noted in the earlier review cycles, the proposed project requires the preparation of an EIR, and the majority of the EAS staff review will occur through the screencheck review process. (From Cycle 18)

�

27 Staff and the applicant still need to coordinate on getting the WSA letter and technical information prepared to submit to the Public Utilities Department, Water in order to have a WSA prepared. (From Cycle 38)

�

29 EAS discussed the information that will be needed to draft the WSA request memo at a meeting on 2/20/2014. Please provide that information soon as possible, as it can take 90 days (or more) to have the memo prepared once all of the required information has been received by the Public Utilities Department. (From Cycle 47)

�

35 Public Utilities has responded to the request for a WSA, asking for additional project details. These questions have been provided to the applicant. (New Issue)

�

Revised Review (1/2012)

Greenhouse Gas Emissions


23 As noted under comment 19, this report will be submitted as part of the EIR review process. (From Cycle 38) [Recommended]

�

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Environmental' review, please call Martha Blake at (619) 446-5375. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 7 of 41

Biological Resources


24 Staff understands that coordination meetings have not yet occurred but that meetings will be arranged in the future. The applicant has indicated that staff will be informed of and invited to the meetings as needed. (From Cycle 38) [Recommended]

�

25 Staff realized that MSCP staff have not been a reviewer on this project, most likely because the project site is not within or adjacent to the MHPA. Howeer, given the wetlands impacts, MSCP will need to be a reviewer, and EAS staff has discussed this with the City's Project Manager to ensure this happens with the next review cycle. (From Cycle 38) [Recommended]

�

30 Please submit copies of the biology report (updated as necessary if it is more than 24 months old - please note the document cannot be more than 24 months old when any document is distributed to the public and agencies) for review with the EIR screencheck. (From Cycle 47)

�

General


22 EAS will defer to other disciplines for specific technical issues such as transportation, water quality, geology, etc., but will coordinate with those staff members as the environmental review progresses to ensure full disclosure of any potentially significant environmental impacts. (From Cycle 33)

�

March 2014


31 EAS has updated some comments above (see 29 & 30), but acknowledges most of EAS comments will be coming through the EIR review process. Please note that many technical studies may need to be updated or revised prior to circulation of any draft EIR to ensure the information contained in those reports are up-to-date at the time of EIR release. (From Cycle 47)

�

Police


32 The police department has provided the following information regarding response times: The project site is currently located within the boundaries of police beat 242. 2013 avereage response times are 7.2 minutes for emergency calls; 12.6 for priority one; 26.1 for priority two; 57 for priority three; and 59.6 for priority four calls. (From Cycle 47)

�

33 The SDPD recommended that a CPTED review be set up for this project, which the DPM has done. (From Cycle 47)

�

Fire


34 A request was made to SDFD for fire response times for this project. That information has not yet been provided. (From Cycle 47)

�

October 2014


36 At this time, EAS has no comments on the plans, but will be working through the EIR cycle and associated technical reports submitted with the EIR. (New Issue)

�

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Environmental' review, please call Martha Blake at (619) 446-5375. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 8 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

LDR-Engineering Review

09/04/2014

09/30/2014

08/22/2014Weston, Don

(619) 446-5281


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED LATE


09/26/2014


[email protected]



. We request a 10th complete submittal for LDR-Engineering Review on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Your project still has 52 outstanding review issues with LDR-Engineering Review (10 of which are new issues).


. Last month LDR-Engineering Review performed 82 reviews, 91.5% were on-time, and 34.8% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

FEMA Conditions


9 A portion of this project has been identified as being within the floodway of a Special Flood Hazard Area (Carroll Canyon Creek, panel 1344/1363F). No increases to base flood elevations are allowed. A Registered Professional Engineer shall submit a no rise certification along with a detailed engineering analysis to substantiate the certification. The analysis is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. (From Cycle 4)

�

10 If the engineering analysis shows the development will alter the floodway or floodplain boundaries of the Special Flood Hazard Area, the developer must obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision from the Federal Emergency Management Agency prior to issuance of any grading, engineering, or building permits. The developer must provide all documentation, engineering calculations, and fees which are required by FEMA. (From Cycle 4)

�

11 No structures except those allowed by Section 131.0222 (Use Regulations for Open Space Zones) of the Land Development Code shall be built within the floodway. (From Cycle 4)

�

12 Fill placed in the SFHA for the purpose of creating a building pad must be compacted to 95% of the maximum density obtainable with the Standard Proctor Test Fill method issued by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM Standard D-698). Granular fill slopes must have adequate protection for a minimum flood water velocity of five feet per second.

(From Cycle 4)

�

13 The developer shall denote on the final map and the improvement plans "Subject to Inundation" all areas lower than the base flood elevation plus 2 feet.

(From Cycle 4)

�

14 The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City waiving the right to oppose a special assessment initiated for the construction of flood control facilities and their perpetual maintenance.

(From Cycle 4)

�

15 The developer shall grant a flowage easement, satisfactory to the City Engineer, over property within the floodway. (From Cycle 4)

�

16 If this project proposes to construct nonresidential structures within the flood fringe of the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) for the Carroll Canyon Creek as shown on Flood Insurance Rate Map panel 06073C1968 F. No work is allowed within the regulatory floodway. All structures built within the SFHA must be constructed with the lowest floor elevated a minimum of two feet above the base flood elevation (BFE) at that location. Otherwise, the structures must be floodproofed to a minimum of two feet above the BFE.

(From Cycle 4)

�

17 If the structures will be elevated on fill, such that the lowest adjacent grade is at or above the BFE, the applicant must obtain a Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (LOMR-F) prior to occupancy of the building. The developer must provide all documentation, engineering calculations, and fees which are required by FEMA to process and approve the LOMR-F (From Cycle 4)

�

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Engineering Review' review, please call Don Weston at (619) 446-5281. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 9 of 41


18 If the structures will be floodproofed, they must be constructed to meet the requirements of the Federal Insurance Administration's Technical Bulletin 3-93. Additionally, a registered civil engineer or architect must certify prior to occupancy that those requirements have been met.

(From Cycle 4)

�

19 If this project proposes development in Zone A of a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Because there are no published base flood elevations for this reach, the applicant will be required to develop those elevations per the methodology set forth in Managing Floodplain Development In Approximate Zone A Areas, A Guide For Obtaining And Developing Base (100-Year) Flood Elevations, April 1995, Federal Emergency Management Agency prior to issuance of a grading permit.

(From Cycle 4)

�

20 Once the base flood elevations have been determined and approved by the City Engineer, all structures built within the SFHA must have the lowest floor elevated 2 feet above the base flood elevation at that location. (From Cycle 4)

�

Draft TM Conditions


35 The subdivider shall obtain a bonded grading permit for the grading proposed for this project. All grading shall conform to requirements in accordance with the City of San Diego Municipal Code in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer (From Cycle 12)

�

43 The subdivider has reserved the right to record multiple final maps over the area shown on the approved tentative map. In accordance with Article 66456.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Engineer shall retain the authority to review the areas of the tentative map the subdivider is including in each final map. The City Engineer may impose reasonable conditions relating to the filing of multiple final maps, in order to provide for orderly development, such as off-site public improvements, that shall become requirements of final map approval for a particular unit. (From Cycle 12)

�

44 In addition, the multiple map sequence will terminate the original Conditional Use permit (CUP) at each approved final map. (From Cycle 12)

�

49 Development of this project shall comply with all requirements of State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order No. 99-08 DWQ and the Municipal Storm Water Permit, Order No. 2001-01(NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002 and CAS0108758), Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated With Construction Activity. In accordance with said permit, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Monitoring Program Plan shall be implemented concurrently with the commencement of grading activities, and a Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the SWRCB. (From Cycle 12)

�

50 A copy of the acknowledgment from the SWRCB that an NOI has been received for this project shall be filed with the City of San Diego when received; further, a copy of the completed NOI from the SWRCB showing the permit number for this project shall be filed with the City of San Diego when received. In addition, the owner(s) and subsequent owner(s) of any portion of the property covered by this grading permit and by SWRCB Order No. 99 08 DWQ, and any subsequent amendments thereto, shall comply with special provisions as set forth in SWRCB Order No. 99 08 DWQ. (From Cycle 12)

�

Draft Engineering Permit Cond


53 Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall enter into a Maintenance Agreement for the ongoing permanent BMP maintenance, satisfactory to the City Engineer.

(From Cycle 18)

�

54 Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall incorporate any construction Best Management Practices necessary to comply with Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 1 (Grading Regulations) of the San Diego Municipal Code, into the construction plans or specifications, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 18)

�

55 Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the applicant shall incorporate and show the type and location of all post-construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) on the final construction drawings, in accordance with the approved Water Quality Technical Report, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 18)

�

56 The Permit shall comply with the conditions of the Stone Creek Vesting Tentative Map No. 208328. (From Cycle 18)

�

72 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Owner/Permittee shall obtain a grading permit for the grading proposed for this project. All grading shall conform to requirements in accordance with the City of San Diego Municipal Code in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.

(From Cycle 33)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 10 of 41


73 The drainage system proposed for this development and outside of the public right-of-way is private, shall be privately maintained and subject to approval by the City Engineer.

(From Cycle 33)

�

74 Development of this project shall comply with all requirements of State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order No. 2009-009 DWQ and the Municipal Storm Water Permit, Order No. 2009-009(NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002 and CAS0108758), Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated With Construction Activity. In accordance with said permit, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Monitoring Program Plan shall be implemented concurrently with the commencement of grading activities, and a Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the SWRCB. (From Cycle 33)

�

75 ..... A copy of the acknowledgment from the SWRCB that an NOI has been received for this project shall be filed with the City of San Diego when received; further, a copy of the completed NOI from the SWRCB showing the permit number for this project shall be filed with the City of San Diego when received. In addition, the owner(s) and subsequent owner(s) of any portion of the property covered by this grading permit and by SWRCB Order No. 2009-009 DWQ, and any subsequent amendments thereto, shall comply with special provisions as set forth in SWRCB Order No. 2009-009 DWQ. (From Cycle 33)

�

76 Prior to the issuance of any construction permits, the Owner/Permittee shall provide evidence of coverage under the General Industrial National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, in the form of a Notice of Intent (NOI) filed with the State Water Resources Control Board. (From Cycle 33)

�

9th Review Issues

Hydrology Study


90 The Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Report (Drainage Study) dated Jan 31, 2014 requires revision to address the revisions to the proposed hydromodification management facilities that are identified in the comments on the WQTR, and to address other issues identified below. (From Cycle 47)

�

108 Please revise Appendix E of the Preliminary Hydrology Study to udentify the return period of the storm event used in the Basin Storage Computations. (From Cycle 47)

�

109 Please revise Appendix F of the Preliminary Hydrology Study to address the discrepancy between the factors used for the "bioretention plus vault" and what would be expected from the proposed hydronamic separator plus vault. (From Cycle 47)

�

110 The assumption for the detention storage sizing, as stated in Appendix E, is that it only accommodates roadway impervious areas. This would imply that the site developments will not discharge runoff to the public storm drain system. Please confirm whether this assumption is correct. (From Cycle 47)

�

111 Please ensure that the hydraulic analysis for the CLOMR addresses the "Reclamation Phase" scenario that is described for the creek on Page 7. If the reclamation phase becomes the "final" phase of the project, the environmental conditions under this phase must be analyzed. (From Cycle 47)

�

100 The final drainage system shall be in accordance with the City of San Diego Drainage Design Manual, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The County's drainage manual is not acceptable to the City Engineer for construction permitting purposes. (From Cycle 47) [Recommended]

�

WQTR


91 The Water Quality Technical Report dated January 31, 2014 requires revision. (From Cycle 47)�

101 Please revise the WQTR to address how the proposed infiltration areas comply with Section 4.4.2 of the City's Storm Water Standards Manual. The analysis of the suitability of the areas for infiltration cannot be deferred. A Geotechnical Study must be provided as a part of the WQTR in accordance with Section 4.1.4 of the City's Storm Water Standards Manual. (From Cycle 47)

�

102 Please revise all discussions of the hydromodification requirements to be in regards to the 2-yr to 10-yr return storm range. While peak runoff volume for the 100-year storm is a conveyance capacity issue, hydromodification is related to the more frequent return storm events. Also address that the duration of drawdown from the hydromodification management facilities cannot exceed the 10% limit established in the City's Storm Water Standards Manual (Page 4-25). (From Cycle 47)

�

103 Please identify the outlet locations for the various discharge points that convey runoff from the proposed development as "points of compliance" for hydromodification consideration. (From Cycle 47)

�

105 Please revise the WQTR to address conceptually how the future developers of the lots will ensure that the developments will comply with the City's hydromodification management plan (HMP). For example, cite that areas of the sites will be allocated to bioretention, cisterns, etc.) (From Cycle 47)

�

106 The HMP facility is listed as "bioretention plus vault," but the cross-section does not include vegetative material. Section 4.4 of the WQTR states that a hydrodynamic separator is being used in lieu of bioretention. However, evapotranspiration is a key mechanism for the management of runoff and is eliminated with the proposed design. Please include the "bioretention" feature; or assume another HMP facility, and size it in accordance with the appropriate factors. The assumptions for a "bioretention plus vault" would not apply to the proposed HMP facility. (From Cycle 47)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 11 of 41

Overhead Encroachments


92 The approval of the proposed Grand Piazza over the Carroll Canyon Road right-of-way will require express City Council approval (Site Development Permit, Process Five) in accordance with SDMC 126.0502(e). (From Cycle 47)

�

94 The pedestrian bridge that is proposed over Camino Ruiz, as a privately maintained structure, will require City Council approval in accordance with SDMC 126.0502(e). (From Cycle 47)

�

95 Please revise Sheet 8 of 44 to show the prospective bent locations for the support of the Grand Piazza. Please show the clearance from the columns within the median area to the traveled way. The column footings must not conflict with proposed utility locations or unduly surcharge underground utilities. (From Cycle 47)

�

107 Support of the overhead encroachment for the Grand Piazza cannot be given, until the potential utility impacts and public safety considerations are evaluated. (From Cycle 47)

�

Floodplain


89 An approved Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) must be obtained from FEMA prior to public hearing of the subject project. The revised limits of the floodway and the floodplain must be considered by the respective hearing bodies as apart of the project approval. (From Cycle 47)

�

97 Please ensure that the hydraulic analysis of the floodplain appropriately models the proposed landscaping in the anticipated floodway. Generally, trees, as shown on Sheet 31 of 44 of the VTM, would impair the passage of floodwaters and should be avoided. (From Cycle 47)

�

112 Please ensure that the hydraulic analysis for the CLOMR addresses the "Reclamation Phase" scenario that is described for the creek on Page 7 of the Hydrology Study. (From Cycle 47)

�

Trail and Bike Paths


98 Please revise the VTM exhibit to include the gradients along the trails and bike paths that will lie within public access easements. (From Cycle 47)

�

Easements


96 Please revise Sheets 15-18 of the VTM to clearly distinguish drainage easements proposed to be granted to the City versus other proposed easements. The City will only assume maintenance responsibility for public drainage structures. Private developments on the proposed lots must satisfy their applicable storm water regulation requirements prior to their discharge to the public storm drain system. (From Cycle 47)

�

99 Please revise all sheets to clearly indicate for what purpose the respective easements are proposed and to whom they are proposed to be granted. (From Cycle 47)

�

Master Plan


93 Please revise the Grand Piazza cross-section provided on Page 8-32 of the Master Plan to show the anticipated columns that will be required to support the overhead structures. Please provide information on how the area under the Grand Piazza will be ventilated, and where the ventilation units and other appurtenances will be located. If other elements of the grand Piazza will encroach into the public right-of-way, their proposed locations will need to be evaluated. (From Cycle 47)

�

104 Please revise Section 7.3.3 of the Master Plan to include the hydromodification requirements of the City's Storm Water Standards Manual. (From Cycle 47)

�

10th Review Issues

Hydrology Study


119 Please include a narrative that describes how the detention facility for the 100-yr storm regulates discharge for hydromodification. Will there be an orifice to regulate the discharge? (New Issue)

�

120 Please revise the pagination of the Appendices to account for all of the pages that are included in each appendix. Only the inital page of each appendix is given a number from the table of contents. This method of pagination does not allow for the Appendices to be clearly followed. It also does not allow for the reader to discern if all all intended pages have been provided. (New Issue)

�

121 Please revise Appendix F of the WQTR to include the underlying assumptions for the sizing factors used, including the rain gauge and the lower flow threshold. (New Issue)

�

WQTR


122 Please revise Section 4.4 to provide the rain gauge used for the sizing calculations. (New Issue)�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 12 of 41

Overhead Encroachments


123 Please revise the candidate findings for the SDP to address the proposed overhead encroachments for the pedestrian bridge and the piazza. The basic findings for all SDPs should be made expressly for these encroachments. (New Issue)

�

Floodplain


115 The requested CLOMR from FEMA has not been submitted. The floodplain issues will remain unresolved until FEMA's adoption of the floodplain analysis. (New Issue)

�

Easements


113 The proposed public drainage easement shown on Lot 133 does not appear to support a public drainage conveyance. It is from a sedimentation basin that is not acceptable as a public maintenance obligation. Please delete this easement as being "public". Please revise any other proposed public easements that are subject to this consideration. (New Issue)

�

117 Please provide a minimum 15-foot wide easement to provide access to all public storm water management facilities (detention basins), in accordance with the City's Drainage Design Manual. The access easements may be coterminous with the easements over the proposed drainage conduits. (New Issue)

�

118 Please revise Note #17 on Sheet 18 of 44 of the VTM exhibit to indicate that the City storm drain easement is proposed to be vacated, not "quitclaimed". (New Issue)

�

Public Improvements


116 At intersections, curb ramps shall be of the "two-ramp" design based on City ADA compliance requirements. Please revise exhibits, as needed, to reflect City Standard Drawing SDG-130. Where proposed development abuts existing intersections, a "one-ramp" design may be approved, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 13 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

LDR-Transportation Dev

09/25/2014

09/26/2014

08/22/2014Elhamad, Ismail

(619) 446-5494


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED ON TIME


09/26/2014


[email protected]


. The reviewer has indicated they want to review this project again. Reason chosen by the reviewer: New Document Required.

. We request a 10th complete submittal for LDR-Transportation Dev on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Your project still has 132 outstanding review issues with LDR-Transportation Dev (7 of which are new issues).


. Last month LDR-Transportation Dev performed 44 reviews, 84.1% were on-time, and 19.4% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

23422637 CPA/RZ/VTM/CUP 6th re


113 Additional comments/issues/conditions may be required, pending further review of the traffic study. (From Cycle 38)

�

Draft Conditions


100 Prior to the recordation of the first final map, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond that Street E2: Shall be constructed as a two-lane collector with a minimum pavement width of 40' (8' parking lane, 12' travel lane in each direction with 12' curb to property line) within 64' of right-of-way , satisfactory to the City Engineer.. (From Cycle 38)

�

23422637 CPA/RZ/TM/CUP 7th rev


114 Draft a condition for the ADT tracking (total ADT, AM in, AM out, PM in and PM out) and add it to the permit conditions (From Cycle 47)

�

175 Draft a condition for the light rail transit and add it to the permit conditions. (From Cycle 47)�

176 Draft a standard condition for minimum parking requirements per LDC Section 142.0560. (From Cycle 47)�

181 Draft conditions for TDM to be included in the permit conditions. (From Cycle 47)�

182 Draft condition for pedestrian bridge across Carroll Canyon Road and across Camino Ruiz to be included in the permit conditions. (From Cycle 47)

�

183 Draft a condition for a minimum of two enhanced bus transit stops to be included in the permit conditions. (From Cycle 47)

�

184 Will the trail condition be written by Park & Ride? Or Long Range Planning? (From Cycle 47)�

185 Pages 9-9 through 9-12 of the Stonecreek Master Plan document and indicate exactly how this matches the phasing called out in the TIS for the following TM conditions: (From Cycle 47)

�

313 In regard to comment # 78 above. your responded that that you met with Don Watson of Engineering and both agreed to a reduced turning radii for streets that do not meet the 100' turning radius in the Westside Neighborhood. However, staff does not recall such meeting. Design must always meet the City of san Diego Street Design Manual. (From Cycle 47)

�

314 Additional comments/issues/conditions in regard to Permit and VTM conditions may be required pending further review of the proposed project and the traffic study.. (From Cycle 47)

�

Permit Conditions


186 All on-site parking stalls and aisles widths shall be in compliance with requirements of the City's Land Development Code and shall not be converted and/or utilized for any other purpose, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the Development services Director. (From Cycle 47)

�

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Transportation Dev' review, please call Ismail Elhamad at (619) 446-5494. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 14 of 41


187 PHASE 1 - Phase 1 represents a level of development of 2,475 ADT. It is 165,000 square feet of light industrial space as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Stone Creek Master Plan Design Guidelines. This level of development was assumed to occur in Year 2015 in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under Phase 1 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for development in PHASE 1, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

188 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 1, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Maya Linda Road as a 4-lane Urban Collector from west of the intersection with Black Mountain Road to the first cul-de-sac (Street '13') with a 90 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, dual left turn lane/10-foot raised median, 15-foot parkways, and 6-foot wide Class II bike lane) within 120 feet of right-of-way (Section C-6); and as a 90-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, left turn lane/4-foot raised median, 15-foot (From Cycle 47)

�

189 parkways, parking, and 6-foot Class II bike lane) within 120 feet of right-of-way (Section C-5) from Street '13' to future Carroll Canyon Road, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

190 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 1, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '12' north of Maya Linda Road and Street '13' as 2-lane Collectors with a 40-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, and parking) within 64 feet of right-of-way (Section E-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

191 PHASES 2, 3 & 4- Phases 2, 3 & 4 represent a level of development of 11,299 ADT. It is 250,000 square feet of light industrial space, 135,000 square feet of business park space and 580 residential units as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Design Guidelines. This level of development was analyzed as Scenario 2025A in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under PHASES 2,3 &4 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for development in PHASES 2, 3 or 4, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

192 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 2, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Carroll Canyon Road as a 4-lane Major from Black Mountain Road to the east property boundary with a 74 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, single left-turn lane, 7-foot parkways, and bike lanes) within 88 feet of right-of-way (Section B-1); as a 4-lane Major from the east property boundary to Street '11' with a 74-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, single left-turn lane, 12-foot parkways, and bike lanes) within 98 (From Cycle 47)

�

193 feet of right-of-way (Section B); as a 6-lane Major from Street '11' to Street '8' with a 102- foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, single left-turn lane, 15-foot parkway on the south side of the street, 22-foot parkway on the north side of the street, and bike lanes) within 139 feet of right-of-way (Section A-1); as a 6-lane Major from Street '8' to Camino Ruiz with a 124 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, dual left-turn lane, right turn lane, 15-foot parkway on the south side of the street, 22-foot parkway on the north side of the street, and bike lane) within 161 (From Cycle 47)

�

194 feet of right-of-way (Section A-2); at its intersection with Camino Ruiz, Carroll Canyon Road shall be constructed as a 6-lane major with 136-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, dual left-turn lanes, dual right turn lanes, 15-foot parkway on the south side of the street, 22-foot parkway on the north side of the street, and bike lanes) within 173 feet of right-of-way (Section A-3); and as a 6-lane Prime Arterial from Camino Ruiz to the west property boundary with a 124 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, dual left-turn lanes, 15-foot parkway on the south side of the (From Cycle 47)

�

195 of the street, 22-foot parkway on the north side of the street, and bike lanes) within 154 feet of right-of-way (Section A-4), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

196 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 2, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Camino Ruiz to its 6-lane Major classification, from the north property boundary to the south property boundary, with a 124 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, dual left-turn lanes/raised median, 22-foot parkways, and bike lanes) within 168 feet of right-of-way (Section A), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

197 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 2, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '11' as a 4-lane Urban Collector with a 76-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, two-way left turn lane/14-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, and Class II bike lane) within 104 feet of right-of-way (Section C-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

198 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 2, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'C' East as a 2-lane Collector with a 40-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 64 feet of right-of-way (Section E-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

199 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 3, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' East as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street '10' to Street '9', with a 34-foot curb-to-curb width pavement (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within a 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

200 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 3, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '9' north of Carroll Canyon Road as a 2-lane Collector with a 48 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 10-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, and parking) within 76 feet of right-of-way (Section D-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 15 of 41


201 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 3, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '10' from north of Carroll Canyon Road to Street 'A' East as a 2-lane Collector with a 48-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 10-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, and parking) within 76 feet of right-of-way (Section D-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

202 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 4, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' East, between Street '9' and Street '8', as a 2-lane Sub Collector with a 34-foot curb-to-curb width pavement (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

203 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 4, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '8' as a 4-lane Urban Collector north of Carroll Canyon Road to Street 'A' East with a 82 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, 14-foot two-way left turn lane/raised median, 14-foot parkways, and Class II bike lanes) within a 110 feet of right-of-way (Section C-1); and as a 2-lane Collector from north of Street 'A' East to Street 'B' East with a 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, (From Cycle 47)

�

204 , and parking) within 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)�

205 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 4, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'B' East as a 2-lane Collector from Street '8' to Camino Ruiz with a 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E). At its intersection with Camino Ruiz, Street 'B' East shall be constructed as a 2-lane Collector with a 62-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot right turn lane, 10 14- foot single left turn lane, 8-foot raised median, (From Cycle 47)

�

206 15-foot parkway, and Class II bike lanes) within 92 feet of right-of-way (Section D-5), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

207 PHASES 5, 6 & 7- Phases 5, 6 & 7 represent a level of development of 28,639 ADT. It is 2,725 residential units and 24,000 square feet of commercial/retail as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Stone Creek Master Plan Design Guidelines. This level of development was analyzed as Scenario 2025B in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under PHASES 5, 6 & 7 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for development in PHASES 5,6 or 7, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

208 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 5, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond satisfactory to the City Engineer the construction of Street 'B' West as 4-lane Urban Collector, from Camino Ruiz to Street '7', with an 84-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, double left-turn lane, 15-foot parkways, and bike lane) within 114 feet of right-of-way (Section C); and as a 2-lane Collector from Street '7' to Street '5' East with a 58-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot planted median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike (From Cycle 47)

�

209 lane, and parking) within a 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D-1). (From Cycle 47)�

210 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 5, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' West as a 4-lane Urban Collector, from Camino Ruiz to Street '7', with a 92 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, single/dual left-turn lanes, 15-foot parkways, bike lanes, and parking on north side ) within 122 feet of right-of-way (Section C-3); and as a 2-lane Collector from Street '7' to Street '5' with a 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, (From Cycle 47)

�

211 and parking) within 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D-1, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)�

212 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 5, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '7' as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'A' West to Street 'B' West with a 36 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, a 12-foot parkway on the west side and a 14-foot parkway on the east side, and Class II bike lanes) within a 62 feet of right-of-way (Section E-1); and as a 2-lane Collector from 'Street 'B' West to Street 'C' West with a 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within (From Cycle 47)

�

213 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)�

214 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 5, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'C' West as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'Street '7' to Street '6' with a 36 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within a 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E); and from Street '6' to Street '4', as a 2-lane Sub Collector with a 34-foot curb-to-curb width pavement (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

215 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 5, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '6' as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street 'C' West to Street 'A' West, with a 34 foot curb-to-curb width pavement (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58' right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

216 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 5, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '5' as a 2-lane Sub Collector with a 34foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer .

(From Cycle 47)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 16 of 41


217 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 6, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'C' West as a 2-lane Sub Collector from Street '5' to Street '4' and from Street '3' to Street '2' with a 34-foot curb-to-curb width pavement (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F); and from Street '4' to Street '3' as a 2-lane Collector with a 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) (From Cycle 47)

�

218 within 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)�

219 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 6, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'B' West as a 2-lane Collector from Street '5' to Street '4' with a 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 86 foot right-of-way (Section D-1); and from Street '3' to Street '2' as a 2-lane Sub Collector with a 34 feet curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, (From Cycle 47)

�

220 , and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)�

221 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 6, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' West as a 2-lane Collector from Street '5' to Street '4' with 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D-1); as a 2-lane Collector from 'Street '4' to Street '3' with 36 feet curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) (From Cycle 47)

�

222 within 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E); and as a 2-lane Sub Collector with 34 feet curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

223 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 6, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '4' as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'A' West to Street 'B' West with 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D-1); and as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'Street 'B' West to Street 'C' West with 36 feet curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) (From Cycle 47)

�


225 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 6, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '3' as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street 'A-A' to Street 'C' West, with a 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

226 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 6, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '2' as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street 'C' West to Street 'A-A', with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

227 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 7, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'C' West as a Residential Local street, from Street '2' to Street '1', with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section G), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

228 Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in Phase 7, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'B' West as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street '2' to Street '1' West, with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

229 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 7, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A-A' as a residential local street, from Street '2' to Street '1', with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section G), satisfactory to the City Engineer (From Cycle 47)

�

230 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 7, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '1' as a residential local street, from Street 'A-A' to Street 'C' West, with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section G), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

231 PHASES 8 & 9 -Phases 8 & 9 represent a level of development of 43,957 ADT. It is 840 residential units, 175 hotel rooms, 150,000 s.f. of commercial/ retail space and 200,000 s.f. of commercial/office as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Stone Creek Master Plan Design Guidelines. This level of development was analyzed as Scenario 2030A in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under PHASES 8 & 9 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any (From Cycle 47)

�

232 occupancy permit for development in PHASES 8 or 9, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)�

233 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 8, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '9' south of Carroll Canyon Road as a 2-lane Collector with a 48 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 10-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, and parking) within 74 feet of right-of-way (Section D-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer .

(From Cycle 47)

�

234 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 9, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' East as a 2-lane Collector from Street '8' to Street '14' with 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 14-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 17 of 41


235 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 9, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '14' from Camino Ruiz to Street 'A' East as a 4-lane Urban Collector with 86 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, double left-turn lane, and 15-foot parkways) within 116 feet of right-of-way (Section C-4); and as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'A' East to Street 'B' East with 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) (From Cycle 47)

�


237 PHASE 10 -Phase 10 represents a level of development of 50,155 ADT. It is 300 residential units, 300,000 s.f. high technology and Stone Creek Central Park as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Stone Creek Master Plan Design Guidelines. This level of development was analyzed as Scenario 2030B in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under PHASE 10 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for development in PHASE 10, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

238 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 10, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '12' south of Maya Linda Road and Street '10' south of Carroll Canyon Road as 2-lane Collectors with a 48-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 10-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, and Class II bike lanes) within 76 feet of right-of-way (Section D-3), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

239 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development in Phase 10, the owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '15' as a 2-lane Collector with a 50- foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 78 feet of right-of-way (Section D-4), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

240 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the construction of the cul-de-sacs E2 (industrial and commercial srae) with pavement turning radius of 55 feet within 65 feet of right-of-way, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

241 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, owner/permittee shall assure by permit and bond the provision of traffic control at all street intersections, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

242 Prior to the recordation of the first final map, the subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the installation of traffic signals along Carroll Canyon Road at Streets: C1, D2, D3, Maya Linda Road, and at the intersection of Maya Linda Road and Street E2, and at the intersection of Camino Ruiz at Streets C3, C4 , satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

243 Prior to the recordation of the first final map, the subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the installation of traffic signal at the intersection of Camino Ruiz and Jade Coast Road , satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

244 The owner/permittee shall provide a secured bicycle racks and/or storage. (From Cycle 47)�

245 The owner/permittee shall provide showers and changing facilities within commercial buildings (From Cycle 47)�

246 The owner/permittee shall provide electrical plugs in parking garages for electric/electric hybrid vehicles. (From Cycle 47)

�

247 The owner/permittee shall provide preferred parking for carpools or vanpools. (From Cycle 47)�

248 The owner/permittee shall provide a kiosk or bulletin board that dispalys information on transit use, carpooling, and other forms of ridesharing. (From Cycle 47)

�

VTM Conditions


257 All driveways that intersects with public streets shall meet the minimum sight distance per AASHTO Guidelines, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

258 All intersecting streets shall meet the minimum sight distance per AASHTO Guidelines, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

259 PHASE 1 - Phase 1 represents a level of development of 2,475 ADT. It is 165,000 square feet of light industrial space as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Stone Creek Master Plan Design Guidelines. This level of development was assumed to occur in Year 2015 in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under Phase 1 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for development in PHASE 1, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

260 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 1, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Maya Linda Road as a 4-lane Urban Collector from west of the intersection with Black Mountain Road to the first cul-de-sac (Street '13') with a 90 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, dual left turn lane/10-foot raised median, 15-foot parkways, and 6-foot wide Class II bike lane) within 120 feet of right-of-way (Section C-6); and as a 90-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�

261 (4 travel lanes, left turn lane/4-foot raised median, 15-foot parkways, parking, and 6-foot Class II bike lane) within 120 feet of right-of-way (Section C-5) from Street '13' to future Carroll Canyon Road, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

262 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 1, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '12' north of Maya Linda Road and Street '13' as 2-lane Collectors with a 40-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, and parking) within 64 feet of right-of-way (Section E-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 18 of 41


263 PHASES 2, 3 & 4- Phases 2, 3 & 4 represent a level of development of 11,299 ADT. It is 250,000 square feet of light industrial space, 135,000 square feet of business park space and 580 residential units as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Design Guidelines. This level of development was analyzed as Scenario 2025A in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under PHASES 2,3 &4 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for development in PHASES 2, 3 or 4, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

264 Prior to the recordation of the first final map, for development in Phase 2, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Carroll Canyon Road as a 4-lane Major from Black Mountain Road to the east property boundary with a 74 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, single left-turn lane, 7-foot parkways, and bike lanes) within 88 feet of right-of-way (Section B-1); as a 4-lane Major from the east property boundary to Street '11' with a 74-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�

265 (4 travel lanes, single left-turn lane, 12-foot parkways, and bike lanes) within 98 feet of right-of-way (Section B); as a 6-lane Major from Street '11' to Street '8' with a 102- foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, single left-turn lane, 15-foot parkway on the south side of the street, 22-foot parkway on the north side of the street, and bike lanes) within 139 feet of right-of-way (Section A-1); as a 6-lane Major from Street '8' to Camino Ruiz with a 124 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, dual left-turn lane, (From Cycle 47)

�

266 , right turn lane, 15-foot parkway on the south side of the street, 22-foot parkway on the north side of the street, and bike lane) within 161 feet of right-of-way (Section A-2); at its intersection with Camino Ruiz, Carroll Canyon Road shall be constructed as a 6-lane major with 136-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, dual left-turn lanes, dual right turn lanes, 15-foot parkway on the south side of the street, 22-foot parkway on the north side of the street, and bike lanes) within 173 feet of right-of-way (Section A-3); (From Cycle 47)

�

267 and as a 6-lane Prime Arterial from Camino Ruiz to the west property boundary with a 124 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, dual left-turn lanes, 15-foot parkway on the south side of the street, 22-foot parkway on the north side of the street, and bike lanes) within 154 feet of right-of-way (Section A-4), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

268 Prior to the recordation of the first final map, for development in Phase 2, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Camino Ruiz to its 6-lane Major classification, from the north property boundary to the south property boundary, with a 124 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (6 travel lanes, dual left-turn lanes/raised median, 22-foot parkways, and bike lanes) within 168 feet of right-of-way (Section A), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

269 Prior to the recordation of the first final map, for development in Phase 2, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '11' as a 4-lane Urban Collector with a 76-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, two-way left turn lane/14-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, and Class II bike lane) within 104 feet of right-of-way (Section C-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

270 Prior to the recordation of the first final map, for development in Phase 2, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'C' East as a 2-lane Collector with a 40-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 64 feet of right-of-way (Section E-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

271 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 3, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' East as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street '10' to Street '9', with a 34-foot curb-to-curb width pavement (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within a 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

272 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 3, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '9' north of Carroll Canyon Road as a 2-lane Collector with a 48 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 10-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, and parking) within 76 feet of right-of-way (Section D-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

273 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 3, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '10' from north of Carroll Canyon Road to Street 'A' East as a 2-lane Collector with a 48-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 10-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, and parking) within 76 feet of right-of-way (Section D-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

274 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 4, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' East, between Street '9' and Street '8', as a 2-lane Sub Collector with a 34-foot curb-to-curb width pavement (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

275 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 4, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '8' as a 4-lane Urban Collector north of Carroll Canyon Road to Street 'A' East with a 82 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, 14-foot two-way left turn lane/raised median, 14-foot parkways, and Class II bike lanes) within a 110 feet of right-of-way (Section C-1); and as a 2-lane Collector from north of Street 'A' East to Street 'B' East with a 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�

276 (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

277 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 4, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'B' East as a 2-lane Collector from Street '8' to Camino Ruiz with a 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E). At its intersection with Camino Ruiz, Street 'B' East shall be constructed as a 2-lane Collector with a 62-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot right turn lane, (From Cycle 47)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 19 of 41


278 10 14- foot single left turn lane, 8-foot raised median, 15-foot parkway, and Class II bike lanes) within 92 feet of right-of-way (Section D-5), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

279 PHASES 5, 6 & 7- Phases 5, 6 & 7 represent a level of development of 28,639 ADT. It is 2,725 residential units and 24,000 square feet of commercial/retail as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Stone Creek Master Plan Design Guidelines. This level of development was analyzed as Scenario 2025B in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under PHASES 5, 6 & 7 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for development in PHASES 5,6 or 7, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

280 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 5, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'B' West as 4-lane Urban Collector, from Camino Ruiz to Street '7', with an 84-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, dual left-turn lanes, 15-foot parkways, and bike lane) within 114 feet of right-of-way (Section C); and as a 2-lane Collector from Street '7' to Street '5' East with a 58-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�

281 (2 travel lanes, 12-foot planted median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lane, and parking) within a 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D-1), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

282 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 5, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' West as a 4-lane Urban Collector, from Camino Ruiz to Street '7', with a 92 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, single/dual left-turn lanes, 15-foot parkways, bike lanes, and parking on north side ) within 122 feet of right-of-way (Section C-3); and as a 2-lane Collector from Street '7' to Street '5' with a 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�

283 (2 travel lanes, 12-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D-1, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

284 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 5, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '7' as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'A' West to Street 'B' West with a 36 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, a 12-foot parkway on the west side and a 14-foot parkway on the east side, and Class II bike lanes) within a 62 feet of right-of-way (Section E-1); and as a 2-lane Collector from 'Street 'B' West to Street 'C' West with a 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�


�

286 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 5, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'C' West as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'Street '7' to Street '6' with a 36 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within a 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E); and from Street '6' to Street '4', as a 2-lane Sub Collector with a 34-foot curb-to-curb width pavement (From Cycle 47)

�

287 (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

288 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 5, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '6' as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street 'C' West to Street 'A' West, with a 34 foot curb-to-curb width pavement (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58' right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

289 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 5, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '5' as a 2-lane Sub Collector with a 34foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

290 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 6, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'C' West as a 2-lane Sub Collector from Street '5' to Street '4' and from Street '3' to Street '2' with a 34-foot curb-to-curb width pavement (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F); and from Street '4' to Street '3' as a 2-lane Collector with a 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�


�

292 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 6, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'B' West as a 2-lane Collector from Street '5' to Street '4' with a 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 86 foot right-of-way (Section D-1); and from Street '3' to Street '2' as a 2-lane Sub Collector with a 34 feet curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�

293 (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

294 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 6, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' West as a 2-lane Collector from Street '5' to Street '4' with 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D-1); as a 2-lane Collector from 'Street '4' to Street '3' with 36 feet curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E); and as a 2-lane Sub (From Cycle 47)

�

295 Collector with 34 feet curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 20 of 41


296 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 6, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '4' as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'A' West to Street 'B' West with 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot raised median, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D-1); and as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'Street 'B' West to Street 'C' West with 36 feet curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�


�

298 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 6, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '3' as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street 'A-A' to Street 'C' West, with a 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

299 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 6, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '2' as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street 'C' West to Street 'A-A', with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

300 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 7, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'C' West as a Residential Local street, from Street '2' to Street '1', with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section G), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

301 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 7, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'B' West as a 2-lane Sub Collector, from Street '2' to Street '1' West, with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet right-of-way (Section F), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

302 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 7, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A-A' as a residential local street, from Street '2' to Street '1', with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section G), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

303 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 7, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '1' as a residential local street, from Street 'A-A' to Street 'C' West, with 34-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 58 feet of right-of-way (Section G), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

304 PHASES 8 & 9 -Phases 8 & 9 represent a level of development of 43,957 ADT. It is 840 residential units, 175 hotel rooms, 150,000 s.f. of commercial/ retail space and 200,000 s.f. of commercial/office as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Stone Creek Master Plan Design Guidelines. This level of development was analyzed as Scenario 2030A in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under PHASES 8 & 9 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for development in PHASES 8 or 9, satisfactory to City Eng (From Cycle 47)

�

305 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 8, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '9' south of Carroll Canyon Road as a 2-lane Collector with a 48 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 10-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, and parking) within 74 feet of right-of-way (Section D-2), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

306 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 9, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street 'A' East as a 2-lane Collector from Street '8' to Street '14' with 58 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 14-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 86 feet of right-of-way (Section D), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�

307 31. Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 9, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond satisfactory to the City Engineer the construction of Street '14' from Camino Ruiz to Street 'A' East as a 4-lane Urban Collector with 86 foot curb-to-curb pavement width (4 travel lanes, double left-turn lane, and 15-foot parkways) within 116 feet of right-of-way (Section C-4); and as a 2-lane Collector from Street 'A' East to Street 'B' East with 36-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (From Cycle 47)

�

308 (2 travel lanes, 12-foot parkways, and parking) within 60 feet of right-of-way (Section E) .

(From Cycle 47)

�

309 PHASE 10 -Phase 10 represents a level of development of 50,155 ADT. It is 300 residential units, 300,000 s.f. high technology and Stone Creek Central Park as listed on pages 9-9 thru 9-12 of the January 2014 Stone Creek Master Plan Design Guidelines. This level of development was analyzed as Scenario 2030B in the project transportation impact study and EIR. All improvements listed below under PHASE 10 shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for development in PHASE 10, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

310 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 10, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '12' south of Maya Linda Road and Street '10' south of Carroll Canyon Road as 2-lane Collectors with a 48-foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 10-foot single left turn lane, 14-foot parkways, and Class II bike lanes) within 76 feet of right-of-way (Section D-3), satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

311 Prior to the recordation of the first final map for development in Phase 10, subdivider shall assure by permit and bond the construction of Street '15' as a 2-lane Collector with a 50- foot curb-to-curb pavement width (2 travel lanes, 14-foot parkways, Class II bike lanes, and parking) within 78 feet of right-of-way (Section D-4), satisfactory to the City Engineer . (From Cycle 47)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 21 of 41


315 Prior to the recordation of the first final map , subdivider shall dedicate a 35' wide corridor for the Light Rail Transit on the south side of Carroll Canyon Road, satisfactory to the City Engineer. (From Cycle 47)

�

Design Guidelines


312 We have reviewed the Stone Creek Master Plan Design Guidelines dated January 2014 and have several comments. The comments will be sent via-email. (From Cycle 47)

�

23422637 8th rev 9/25/14

Plans Review


316 Draft a condition for a minimum of two enhanced bus transit stops to be included in the permit condition. Your response letter says two two transit stops are proposed within the transit reservation, however, they are not shown on the plans. (New Issue)

�

322 All VTM conditions should read "Prior to recordation of the first final map...." NOT " Prior to issuance of the first building permit....". Please revise accordingly. (New Issue)

�

Master Plan Review


317 6.2 Existing Circulation Network:

Carrol Canyon Road: Please revise where it says ".. Carroll Canyon Road is classified in the Mira Mesa Community Plan as a four lane collector between Sorrento Valley Road and Scranton Road as a four-lane major street between Scranton Road and Camino Santa Fe, as a six-lane primary arterial between Camino Santa Fe and Camino Ruiz, as a six-lane major street between Camino Ruiz and Maya Linda Road, as a four lane major between Maya Linda Road and I-15. The existing western section of Carroll anyon Road....is a two-lane undivided road TWLTL.The existing east (New Issue)

�

318 Page 6-10, Street Section "A": Change "duel" to "dual". (New Issue)�

319 Page 6-10, Street Section "A-4": Change "duel" to "dual". (New Issue)�

320 Page 6-37, Figure 6-5 with a comment says "why so many all-way stops so close to each other?".

Your response to this comment says some minor revisions were made on this figure but , however this figure with minor revisions was not included in the latest submittal. (New Issue)

�

Deviations Request Form review


321 We have reviewed the deviations from standards form for residential local street Street "G" and collector Street "E" for the turning radii that do not meet City standards on the westside neighborhood of the project west of Camino Ruiz.

You responded that Don Weston of Engineering agreed to the reduces turning radii of 45 feet for the local residential street "G" where 100 feet is required and 100 feet for collector street "E" where 450 feet is required. However, staff does not recall such meeting. (New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 22 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

Plan-Long Range Planning

09/22/2014

09/22/2014

08/25/2014Monroe, Dan

(619) 236-5529


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED ON TIME


09/26/2014


[email protected]


. We request a 10th complete submittal for Plan-Long Range Planning on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).



. Last month Plan-Long Range Planning performed 23 reviews, 82.6% were on-time, and 15.4% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

LRP Review March 2014


147 Park Planning Staff has requested revsions to the MMCP and LRP staff would like to review the final strikeout/underline cpa document once submitted. (From Cycle 47)

�

LRP Review Sept 2014


149 Should additional revisions to the proposed community plan amendment be required per other reviewing disciplines, please be sure to forward final proposed text and graphic changes to LRP. Once the final draft community plan amendment has been received. LRP will distributed the proposed amendment for a 45 day review period pursuant to SB 18 Native American Tribal Noticing Requirements. (New Issue) [Recommended]

�

For questions regarding the 'Plan-Long Range Planning' review, please call Dan Monroe at (619) 236-5529. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 23 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

Plan-Facilities Financing

08/26/2014

08/26/2014

08/22/2014Abeyta, Angela

(619) 533-3674


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED ON TIME


09/26/2014


[email protected]


. We request a 6th complete submittal for Plan-Facilities Financing on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Last month Plan-Facilities Financing performed 66 reviews, 95.5% were on-time, and 100.0% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Impact Fees

PFFP Required with CP Amendmen


7 The requested Community Plan Amendment will require approval of a Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) Amendment. The PFFP Amendment shall be processed concurrently for approval with the Community Plan Amendment as a Land Use Plan approval in accordance with Process Five (SDMC 122.0105). In accordance with the City of San Diego General Plan Sections PF-A.3, PF-C.1 and PF-C.6, at the Developers expense there shall be an evaluation and an amendment to the financing plan as determined necessary when the Community Plan is amended to increase density or intensity.

(New Issue) [Recommended]

�

8 The Development Project Manager (DPM) shall add the approval type "Financing Plan" to the project in the project tracking system (PTS). (New Issue) [Recommended]

�

9 The Facilities Financing reviewer will coordinate the PFFP review with the Long Range Planner and assure that the PFFP language is included in the Land Use Plan Amendment Resolution. (New Issue) [Recommended]

�

Discretionary & Prelim Reviews

DIF/FBA-Residential


10 Facilities Benefit Assessments (FBA) will be required at building permit issuance based on increased residential development and/or a change to existing land use. Check the City's Facilities Financing website for current residential and non-residential FBA rates. (New Issue) [Recommended]

�

HTF


13 Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Fees on non-residential development will be required at building permit issuance. These fees are deposited into the San Diego Housing Trust Fund to meet, in part, affordable housing needs in San Diego. The current HTF Fee Rates are $1.06 per sq. ft. for office use, $.80 per sq. ft. for research and development use, $.64 per sq. ft. for retail use, and $.27 per sq. ft. for storage use. Rates are subject to change. (New Issue) [Recommended]

�

For questions regarding the 'Plan-Facilities Financing' review, please call Angela Abeyta at (619) 533-3674. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 24 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

Community Planning Group

09/04/2014

09/04/2014

09/04/2014Daly, Tim

(619) 446-5356


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED ON TIME


09/26/2014


[email protected]


. The reviewer has indicated they want to review this project again. Reason chosen by the reviewer: First Review Issues.

. We request a 10th complete submittal for Community Planning Group on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Your project still has 1 outstanding review issues with Community Planning Group (None of which are new)

. Last month Community Planning Group performed 61 reviews, 62.3% were on-time, and 36.1% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Mira Mesa


4 Please contact the Chair for the Mira Mesa Community Planning Group, Mr. JOHN HORST at [email protected] to make arrangements to present your project for review at their next available meeting. This Community Planning Group is officially recognized by the City as a representative of the community, and an advisor to the City in actions that would affect the community. The Development Services Department has notified the group of your request and has sent them a copy of your project plans and documents. (From Cycle 47)

�

For questions regarding the 'Community Planning Group' review, please call Tim Daly at (619) 446-5356. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 25 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

Park & Rec

09/22/2014

10/06/2014

08/21/2014Harkness, Jeff

(619) 533-6595


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED ON TIME


10/13/2014


[email protected]



. We request a 5th complete submittal for Park & Rec on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Your project still has 16 outstanding review issues with Park & Rec (6 of which are new issues).


. Last month Park & Rec performed 35 reviews, 88.6% were on-time, and 63.0% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Review 2-1-13

VTM

General


13 The plans identify underground detention basins on future public park land. It is staff's understanding that these detention basins are to be privately owned and maintained. Responses to comments in regards to the OP-1-1 zone state that the park parcels identified for public park are to be dedicated to the City. The City does not allow private easements (in this case drainage) on public lands. This will need to be further discussed. (From Cycle 38)

�

14 Also, if it is determined that the detention basins are lotted out and privately owned and yet still provide a park amenity, they can not be zoned OP -1-1. This zone can only be used for park land dedicated to the City. (From Cycle 38)

�

24 The VTM does not identify any of the parcels to be deeded to the City as fee-owned park land. It is not clear that this issue has been resolved. However, the Precise Plan identifies OP-1-1 zoning over land that is either park or creek corridor. Any land to remain in private ownership can not have the OP-1-1 designation. (From Cycle 38)

�

29 If the parks are to be City fee-owned property, please indicate how access to the creek corridor will be achieved without requiring access through City fee-owned property. There can be no private easements, in this case for access, encumbering City fee-owned property. (From Cycle 38)

�

Specific Comments


16 Sht 23-D- lot lines are not clearly delineated so that staff can see Lot 145, that is proposed for developed park. (From Cycle 38)

�

Master Plan


25 Page 9-4 Zone Plan- The figure indicates private land has having the OP-1-1 zone. As discussed with the applicant's consultant, only land that is deeded to the City can have this zone. (From Cycle 38)

�

CPA


26 Page 59, Parks by Classification- Revise McAuliffe Park to read:Gross Acres 33.85Developable Acres 20.91Useable Acres Developed 13.41Future Acres 7.50 (From Cycle 38) [Recommended]

�

Draft Conditions

For questions regarding the 'Park & Rec' review, please call Jeff Harkness at (619) 533-6595. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 26 of 41


27 Please provide the following information prior to writing draft conditions;- land ownership of park parcels used to satisfy population-based park requirements (From Cycle 38)

�

Review 3-5-14

VTM


44 Sheet 1- identifies responsibilities for both park maintenance and stormwater structures outside of the public right of way. Once ownership and maintenance responsibility have been identified, these notes may need to be revised. (From Cycle 47)

�

34 Sheet 7- A 58' non-vehicular pedestrian access and general utility easement is proposed for Lot 12. This should be a Recreation easement and general utility easement. (From Cycle 47)

�

45 Sheet 7 - indicates a "58' utility easement to be paved" on Lot 12. How wide is the paved access within the easement? (From Cycle 47)

�

38 Sheets 7-10 - Note #6 states: "For detailed creek grading see landscape/creek grading plan sheet 19". The detailed grading of the creek area and parcel lines used for determining 100%/50% credit for population based parks are not clearly delineated and and in some cases appear to be the grading from the previous review cycle that are not consistent with the proposed parcel lines as shown on Sheets 3 - 6. (From Cycle 47)

�

41 It's staff's understanding that the grading will dictate the location of the floodway. If this is correct, a separate exhibit indicating the floodway and floodplain and parcels lines is requested to clearly convey the concept. (From Cycle 47)

�

40 Sheet 9, Slope Section I-I- Remove the 6' bench from the face of the slope. (From Cycle 47)

�

39 Sheets 9 and 17- Remove the trail center line from Lot 91. (From Cycle 47)

�

32 Sheet 15- Lot 52 should have a recreation easement. (From Cycle 47)

�

33 Sheets 15-16- Non-vehicular and pedestrian easments on Lots 3,4,5,6,9,10 and 66 should be replaced with a recreation easement. (From Cycle 47)

�

31 Sheets 15-18- All trail easements on private property should be recreation easements. (From Cycle 47)

�

36 Sheet 26- The planting shown in the creek corridor area does not follow the parcel lines as indicated on sheet 5, or the floodway lines as shown on Sheet 21. Please see previous comment #38 & #41 above for further discussion of this issue. (From Cycle 47)

�

General


30 - Staff has met with the applicant and are continuing the discussion of ownership of proposed parks and maintenance responsibilities. However, currently, per sheet 1 of 44, notes indicate that no parks or drainage structures outside of the public right of way will be City maintained. This may need to be revised upon final understanding of property ownership and maintenance responsibilities. (From Cycle 47)

�

Master Plan


46 Page 2-4, 2.12 - Per figure 2-1, and the revised plans, the park acreage should be 63.46 (From Cycle 47)

�

47 Page 3-20, 3.4.3- Be consistent in identifying park acreage. Revise park acreage to 43.42. Page 2-4 gave park acreage to this decimal place. (From Cycle 47)

�

48 Page 7-3- Per comment 43, revise the useable acreage of McAuliffe Park to approximately 4 acres. (From Cycle 47)

�

49 Page 7-3, last paragraph, last two sentences- Per staff's understanding from Facilities Financing at our recent meeting with the applicant, the 4.92 acre park requirement would not be fulfilled by payment of FBA fees, but by an ad-hoc fee/in-lieu payment. Please change text accordingly. (From Cycle 47)

�

50 The applicant has provided staff with a Park Elements graphic separate from the plan package. It is requested that this graphic be incorporated into the Master Plan as either part of Section 3 or as an appendices. (From Cycle 47)

�

Com Plan Amendment


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 27 of 41


43 Page 59- Recent agreements between the City and the San Diego Unified School District have resulted in the redistribution of land for McAullife Park, as well as since the last review, staff has updated acreage numbers for population-based parks in Mira Mesa. This information will be provided to the applicant in an alternative format. (From Cycle 47)

�

Review 10-13-14

VTM


51 Per requested revision from comment #38, grading within the proposed park area is now clearly delineated. As such, it does not appear that there is any park potential (trails) within Lots 136, 140, 141, 142 & 144. This totals 1.48 acres. At 50% population-based park credit, this would be .74 acres. (New Issue)

�

52 con't.- It appears that this difference has the potential to be made up by moving the Lot line between Lot 125 and 146 to the top of the slope of Lot 146, thereby increasing the size of Lot 125. Is that possible? (New Issue)

�

Master Plan


53 Page 7-3 and B-1- Direction has been provided to staff to remove the reference of 2.0 acres of neighborhood park and .8 acres of community park and replace with 2.8 acres of population-based park. (New Issue)

�

54 con't.- As such, please revise the paragraphs on these pages to read: "For the projected population of Stone Creek, based on full build-out of 4,445 residential units as presented in this Master Plan, Stone Creek will provide 35.16 acres of population-based parks. Assuming build-out of 4,445 residential units, the remaining park requirement of 4.92 acres....." (New Issue)

�

56 Previous comment 46.- The revised page was not submitted to confirm the revision. (New Issue)

�

CPA


55 Page 57 and Page 59- Staff has once again revised the acreage for McAuliffe Park. They are as follows: Gross acres: 21.30, Developable Acres: 8.57, Useable Acres Developed: 4.33, Future Acres 4.24.- Please revise each page accordingly. (New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 28 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

Housing Commission

09/04/2014

10/02/2014

09/04/2014Daly, Tim

(619) 446-5356


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED LATE


09/12/2014


[email protected]



. We request a 6th complete submittal for Housing Commission on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Your project still has 6 outstanding review issues with Housing Commission (1 of which are new issues).


. Last month Housing Commission performed 9 reviews, 44.4% were on-time, and 100.0% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Jan 2013


3 The submitted Master Plan indicates that affordable housing will be provided onsite; however, the developer has not yet submitted any proposals to the Housing Commission. Per City Council Policy 600-37, the impact and benefits of affordable housing shall be considered when making an initial determination. We encourage the developer to submit a proposal detailing the provision of affordable housing within the development so that the Housing Commission may evaluate these impacts and benefits. (From Cycle 38)

�

4 Potential benefits could be:1. Provide 15 percent of the units as affordable (20 percent below market) on-site;2. Provide 15 percent of the units as affordable (20 percent below market) within 10 miles of the site;3. Donate land to the San Diego Housing Commission sufficient to build 15 percent of the units as affordable housing;.4. Purchase existing apartment building(s) to provide 15 percent of the units as affordable housing. 5. Donate money to the San Diego Housing Commission to build 15 percent of the units as affordable housing. (From Cycle 38)

�

5 The most beneficial extraordinary benefit to the City would be the provision of affordable housing on-site that is affordable to a range of income levels through a variety of housing types. (From Cycle 38)

�

6 Cameron ShariatiFinancial AnalystReal Estate DepartmentSan Diego Housing Commission1122 Broadway, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92101 619-578-7474 (o) [email protected] (From Cycle 38)

�

Feb 2014


7 From: Cameron Shariati Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:55 PMSubject: RE: PTS 67943 - Housing Commission Comments

Hi Tim,I received a new set of plans for this project and don't have any additional comment at this time. The comments from the previous cycle still apply. We are waiting to hear from the developer regarding their affordable housing proposal.

Let me know if you have any questions.Thanks,Cameron ShariatiAssistant Real Estate ManagerReal Estate DepartmentSan Diego Housing Commission1122 Broadway, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92101 619-578-7474 (From Cycle 47)

�

For questions regarding the 'Housing Commission' review, please call Tim Daly at (619) 446-5356. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 29 of 41

Oct 2014


8 Please contact the SD Housing Commission directly to discuss development and affordable housing proposal. (New Issue)

�

For questions regarding the 'Housing Commission' review, please call Tim Daly at (619) 446-5356. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 30 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

Environmental Services Dept

08/29/2014

08/29/2014

08/29/2014Wood, Lisa

(858) 573-1236


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED ON TIME


09/12/2014


[email protected]



. We request a 6th complete submittal for Environmental Services Dept on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Your project still has 7 outstanding review issues with Environmental Services Dept (3 of which are new issues).

. Last month Environmental Services Dept performed 5 reviews, 80.0% were on-time, and 40.0% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Draft Waste Managment Plan


21 Page 18, middle of the page, change the word "may" to "will," and then select the bullet points this project will implement. Page 19, delete last sentence. Page 20, second bullet, Table 4 does not provide the necessary information regarding segregation. Please provide such a table with the materials types (and the proposed method of handling) specified. (From Cycle 38)

�

23 As identified previously, segregation is not specified. Unspecific language occurs throughout. For example p 11 says (twice) that certain strategies "might" be "considered." Developing specific requirements is deferred to "before the job begins" ... a "more clearly defined outline of the recycled material process would be determined with each future . . " but it is not clear what the trigger for a subsequent document would be. This plan needs to provide specific strategies, and specific trigger points to enable the City to ensure that the measures are implemented. (From Cycle 47)

�

24 Inappropriate strategies should be deleted. This plan includes identifying how demolition materials can be re-used. Demolition is not part of this action, it is part of the mining reclamation plan. (Mining operations typically do not provide materals such as light fixtures and doors that can be reused.) (From Cycle 47)

�

25 How will waste along trails and in parks be managed? According to page 8-3 LEED silver will be "considered" where "practicable." (From Cycle 47)

�

1 screen check


26 page 5.7-39/44 says "implementable" measures are listed, but "consider reuse of building materials. . ." ". . . .to the extent feasible" is not implementable/enforceable language. Refer to WMP Appendix N, or else provide specific targets.page 5.17-12. Change "Solid Waste Disposal" to "Solid Waste Management" Change "Recently signed Assembly Bill 341 has set . . ." to "Subsequently, Assembly Bill 341 set . . ." Add at the end of the second paragraph, "The City has established a Zero Waste goal, and has been directed by Council to develop a Zero Waste Plan." (New Issue)

�

27 page 5.17-15. Second paragraph, before "User fees have been" add, "In most of California, but not in San Diego, which is governed by a Municipal Code section enacted by the voters in 1919," After that sentence add, "In San Diego, the City's General Fund pays for collection from most single family homes on public streets."Page 6.23 In the third line up from the bottom replace "the demolition debris recycling strategies given by the City of San Diego Environmental Services Department" with "the Waste Management Plan in Appendix N." (New Issue)

�

28Page 6-24 Third line down from the top, replace "City" with "the Waste Management Plan." (New Issue)

�

For questions regarding the 'Environmental Services Dept' review, please call Lisa Wood at (858) 573-1236. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 31 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

Plan-MSCP

09/15/2014

09/26/2014

08/26/2014Smit-Kicklighter, Holly

(619) 236-6621


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED ON TIME


09/26/2014


[email protected]



. We request a 3rd complete submittal for Plan-MSCP on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Your project still has 27 outstanding review issues with Plan-MSCP (24 of which are new issues).


. Last month Plan-MSCP performed 26 reviews, 53.8% were on-time, and 56.0% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

MSCP 1stRevMarch2014


2 Please provide a site map which includes the abutting MHPA boundary, and identifies all wetlands by jurisdiction, floodplains and any required or proposed wetland buffer areas. This information should be included on both the project plans at the same scale as the project or a maximum scale of 1":200' and within a biology report. (From Cycle 49)

�

BIOLOGY REPORT


3 BIOLOGY REPORT REQUIRED -Please provide a biological resources report prepared pursuant to the City of San Diego "Guidelines for Conducting Biological Surveys" ( projects deemed complete on or after June 6, 2012 are required to utilize the 2012 revised Biology Guidelines. For those project that were deemed complete prior to June 6, 2012, the applicant has the choice of either moving forward with the City's 2002 version or the 2012 version. (From Cycle 49)

�

6 In addition, two vernal pool complexes were mapped in the vicinity, one approximately 3000 feet to the south, and one in the adjacent MHPA/chapparal in the abutting MHPA approximately 300 feet to the west. One star annotated species are City Council adopted narrow endemics and MSCP Covered Species, two star species are only the latter. These species and others found on the site must be discussed in the biology report in terms of how conditions of coverage and other local, state and federal requirements are being met for them with the project. (From Cycle 49)

�

7 The report should include which version of the Biology Guidelines has been used, a map depicting biological resources, project impacts; and MHPA boundaries. MHPA Guidelines, as described in the MSCP Subarea Plan, that apply to the site and any management conditions that would apply to the areas conserved as MHPA/open space should also be discussed in the report. If impacts to sensitive biological resources will occur, mitigation should be provided pursuant to the City's Biology Guidelines and measures should be included to address any narrow endemic species on-site. (From Cycle 49)

�

9 WILDLIFE CORRIDORS- The site is not located within a (regional) wildlife corridor within the MHPA however, the creek areas running through the site are depicted in the Mira Mesa Community Plan as being a local wildlife corridor (Figure 8). This habitat linkage and any potential impacts should be discussed in the biology report. (From Cycle 49)

�

10 NARROW ENDEMICS OUTSIDE MHPA -In the biology report, please assess the potential for Narrow Endemics (list of 15 on page 8 of the Biology Guidelines as mandated by the City Council), to be on-site or in the adjacent MHPA. Focused surveys would be required in any areas of the site showing a moderate to high potential for occurrence of these species. If located, measures to minimize impacts, if any, will need to be identified. Mitigation measures should include avoidance, management, transplantation and /or enhancement as determined appropriate for the species, pursuant to CON'T (From Cycle 49)

�

11 to the City's Biology Guidelines. Please see known list of narrow endemics and other sensitive species outlined in Items 4 & 5 above. (From Cycle 49)

�

12 WETLANDS -Part I -The project appears to be impacting wetlands (Carroll Canyon Creek and tributaries). The City's Biology Guidelines and MSCP Subarea Plan require that impacts to wetlands, shall be avoided, and that a sufficient wetland buffer shall be maintained, as appropriate, to protect resource functions/values. Where wetland impacts are unavoidable (determined case-by-case), they shall be minimized to the maximum extent practicable and fully mitigated per the City's Biology Guidelines. (From Cycle 49)

�

For questions regarding the 'Plan-MSCP' review, please call Holly Smit-Kicklighter at (619) 236-6621. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 32 of 41


13 The biology report should include an analysis of on-site wetlands (including city, state and federal jurisdiction analysis) and, if present, include project alternatives that fully/substantially avoid wetland impacts. Detailed evidence supporting why there is no feasible, less environmentally damaging location or alternative to avoid any impacts must be provided for City staff review, as well as a mitigation plan that specifically identifies how the project is to compensate for any unavoidable impacts. CON'T (From Cycle 49)

�

14 Avoidance is the first requirement; mitigation can only be used for impacts clearly demonstrated to be unavoidable. Unavoidable impacts will require deviation from the City's ESL. Due to limited availability of wetland mitigation sites, a feasible wetland mitigation plan is required to be submitted within the biology report during discretionary review. If the 2012 Biology Guidelines are intended to be used, any ESL or Wetland Regulation Deviations within or outside the coastal zone would require compliance with the deviation procedures starting on page 20 with an assessment included in the (From Cycle 49)

�

15 LAND USE ADJACENCY -Due to the adjacency to the MHPA, the development will need to conform to all applicable Land Use Adjacency Guidelines (Section 1.4.3) of the MSCP Subarea Plan. In particular, lighting, drainage, landscaping, access, and noise must not adversely affect the MHPA. Please address these issues in the project biology report and provide notes/conditions on the construction plans as appropriate. (From Cycle 49)

�

16 Lighting-Lighting should be directed away from the MHPA, and shielded if necessary. Please see Municipal Code §142.0740 for further information.

Toxins/Drainage-The use or generation of toxins should be avoided/reduced/and cleaned up on-site and prevented from entering storm water areas on-site. (From Cycle 49)

�

17 Landscaping-No prohibited species per the Municipal Code Landscape Standards- Section 1.3 shall be utilized anywhere on-site and no potentially invasive plant species shall be planted in or adjacent to the MHPA (i.e. 100 feet). Wetland, wetland buffer and MHPA adjacent specified plant palettes will be required on the landscape plans. (From Cycle 49)

�

18 Drainage-Drainage should be directed away from the MHPA, or if not possible, must not drain directly into the MHPA. Instead, runoff should flow into sedimentation basins, grassy swales or mechanical trapping devices prior to draining into the MHPA.

Brush Management -All Zone 1 brush management areas must be included within the development footprint and outside the MHPA. Brush management Zone 2 may be permitted within the off-site MHPA and is considered impact neutral; however permission from the adjacent property owner would be required. (From Cycle 49)

�

19 Access-Access to the MHPA, if any, should be directed to minimize impacts and reduce impacts associated with domestic pet predation. The use of appropriate barriers (boulders, bollards, fencing) and signage is encouraged.

Noise-Due to the site's location adjacent to a wetland and the MHPA, construction noise will need to be avoided, if possible, during the breeding season of the California gnatcatcher (3/1-8/15), least Bell's vireo (3/15-9/15), southwestern willow flycatcher (5/1-8/30). CON'T (From Cycle 49)

�

20 If construction is proposed during the breeding season for the species, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service protocol surveys will be required in order to determine species presence/absence. If the species is/are not identified within the wetlands/MHPA, no additional measures will be required.

If present, measures to minimize noise impacts will be required and should include temporary noise walls/berms.

CON'T (From Cycle 49)

�

21 If a survey is not conducted and construction is proposed during the species' breeding season, presence would be assumed and a temporary wall/berm would be required. Noise levels from construction activities during the bird breeding season should not exceed 60 dBA hourly LEQ at the edge of the occupied MHPA, or the ambient noise level if noise levels already exceed 60 dBA hourly LEQ. (From Cycle 49)

�

DEVELOPMENT PLANS



p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 33 of 41


22 Landscaping Sheets - Call out all Genus and species to be utilized.

Identify wetland, wetland buffer, and MHPA adjacent specified plant palettes on the landscape plans.

Specify container or hydroseed and include appropriate (indigenous to the area) native annuals in areas sensitive ESL areas.

Specify any wetland revegetation or restoration areas to be on-site for any potential/proposed wetland impacts. Note that restoration with a 5 year MMRP is required for mitigation credit. (From Cycle 49)

�

23 Note that certain species that have the potential to invade the wetland and abutting MHPA should not be used in or adjacent to the wetland buffer areas. Such species may include Olea, non-native grass species, and ground covers including Ganzia, Osteospermum, Hemerocalis and possibly others. Where possible when native Genus' are listed, specify a locally indigenous species (see San Diego Native Plants - James Lightner and A Flora of San Diego County - RM Beauchamp for reference). (From Cycle 49)

�

24 Cover Sheet - Please include the ESL Exhibit that is listed on the cover sheet. (From Cycle 49)�

COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE


25 MIRA MESA COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATES - The biology report should thoroughly discuss and justify the changes requested to Figures 5-8 and include a Wildlife Corridor paragraph that discusses the local corridor depicted in Figure 8. The existing creeks and their names should be included on a new figure or existing figure (i.e. Carroll Canyon Creek and tributaries). (From Cycle 49)

�

MSCP 2nd Rev Sept 2014


31 GENERAL - Show graphically and explain in the BTR, EIR and the Community Plan amendment how Carroll Canyon Creek and a wildlife corridor to the east will connect to the existing Carroll Canyon Creek east of the proposed project as the project proposes to change the location of the creek in the southeast corner of the proposed Stone Creek Development (see Figures 6, 7 and 8 of the Proposed MMCP SCDP Amendment). (New Issue)

�

COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE


32 COMMUNITY PLAN CHANGES -Per previous comment 25 - In addition to providing the response to staff comments, the BTR must also discuss and show the Mira Mesa Community Plan existing and proposed graphics for Figures 5 (native plants and habitats) and 6 (designated open space) side by side and explain the reduction in habitat acreages and the proposed realignment of open space and whether or not mitigation for these changes was required and provided for in the existing CUP. (Second refined request). (New Issue)

�

BTR 1st RevRECONJuly 2014


33 BTR GENERAL - No MHPA areas are present on-site and the site abuts MHPA area only at the southwest corner (while Figure 5 of the BTR shows this, inclusion of Figure 2.14 of the EIR which show the wider context of the MHPA should also be used in the BTR as Figure 5b).

The BTR should discuss measures to distinguish/protect the proposed Carroll Canyon Creek mitigation site from uses resulting from implementation of the population-based park space. (New Issue)

�

34 The ultimate buildout of the SCDP must be the utilized for the worstcase impact and mitigation analysis in the BTR in order to be consist with and support the EIR. The additional scenario(s) can be treated alternatives as they are in the EIR (with analysis placed in an appendix if desired/needed). Please revise the BTR as appropriate throughout. (New Issue)

�

35 BTR SPECIFIC - Section 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Please revise the project description to match the EIR. The EIR in Section 2.12 states that the baseline is the existing approved CUP reclamation plan completion stage and in Section 3.2, that the proposed project analysis based on the proposed ultimate build-out of the Stone Creek Development Plan. In contrast, the BTR has two project scenarios; the proposed amended CUP; and the Stonecreek Development Project.

(New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 34 of 41


36 The current CUP is expiring in 2015 and requires a new permit with various CUP permit components proposed to be amended. Provide the approved CUP and associated bio MMRP for the approved CUP at the next submittal. In the BTR and EIR and explain the proposed changes for the amended CUP.

INTRODUCTION Section 2 - Describe the SCDP with future potential tense rather that using words that indicate that the project is already built (i.e. has, are, etc ) use "would be", or "would have" instead. (New Issue)

�

37 METHODS SECTION 3 - Per the City's Biology Guidelines, surveys older than 24 months shall be updated. The surveys are now over three years old as June 28, 2011 is the most recent survey date. Please provide a update.

EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.1 - Reported soils types are indicated to have been mostly removed due to mining operations. Information from any new geology surveys should be included. The impact of the actual soil type on the proposed habitat restoration areas should be explored in the BTR and the restoration plan. (New Issue)

�

38 Section 4.2.1 - Open Water - The figures in the BTR show 4 distinct areas of non-jurisdictional mine ponds (i.e. Figure 6a). Clearly indicate that mine ponds are the only habitat this nomenclature is applied to or list other open water habitat that may be naturally associated with Carroll Canyon Creek. Indicate on all related figures that the mine ponds are considered "open water" habitat for clarity and cross comparison of the habitat/impact assessment and vegetation maps.

(New Issue)

�

39 Section 4.2 and Figures- Clarify if references to "the central drainage course" and "drainage course in the central portion of the site" indicate the main Carrol Canyon Creek channel. Number the main channel and all the other tributary drainage courses on the appropriate figures for easy reference to text descriptions.

Section 4.2.3 - Natural Flood Channel and Concrete Channel must be explained/quantified seperately as the former is considered a type of City Wetland pursuant to Table 2a and 2b of the 2012 Biology Guidelines. (New Issue)

�

40 Section 4.2.6 - Disturbed Wetland must be further described. If any native species remain in these areas it should be called disturbed willow scrub etc as appropriate. On Figure 5 southern willow scrub (SWS) and Disturbed Wetland appear to be the same color, please clarify why (perhaps DW is disturbed SWS?).

4.3.1 - Amphibians - Explain how likely these species are to use both the natural creeks and the man-made ponds. Update with appropriately timed surveys to clarify presence or absence.

(New Issue)

�

41 Section 4 - Link the habitat types to use by wildlife (i.e. explain if the man-made sedimentation ponds for minng are utilized by any type of migratory or otherwise sensitive native birds etc. The animal list, Attachment 2, must have the same habitat types crossrefenced as Attachment 1, which has all the vegetation types from Section 4.2 - Botany Section.

Figure 5 - Concrete channel legend is dark brown, include on the graphic. Use this color for concrete channel on all the figures. (New Issue)

�

42 WETLAND BUFFERS - Based on Figures 6b, 7a, and 7b provide a proposed wetland graphic buffer showing proposed wetland buffer areas for Carroll Canyon Creek and any other wetlands/waters of the US considered natural/jurisdictional on-site for the ultimate SCDP buildout .

(New Issue)

�

43 Section 5 IMPACTS-Section 5.1.1 - Third paragraph incorrectly states that the impact to SMC would be under the 0.10 acre upland threshold. This assumption is incorrect as the exemption applies if it is the only impact on-site. In this case, approximately 4 acres of wetland habitat would also be impacted by the project. Please revise this paragraph and all related text and impact/mitigation tables.

Explain in the impact section what project features would cause wetland/waters of the US impacts and what measures were taken to avoid these impacts in the project design(s). (New Issue)

�

44 Section 6 MITIGATION -First paragraph - The project is utilizing the 2002 rather than the 2012 guidelines, so remove the reference to the latter. The 2:1 ratios in the 2002 ESL Guidelines are required to be followed regardless of the elimination of temporal loss for City wetlands (i.e. there is no reduction in mitigation ratios when temporal loss is avoided in the City's regulations). Please revise Section 6.0 accordingly. (New Issue)

�

45 Information on wetland avoidance, minimzation, buffer areas, pre and post development functions and values of on-site wetland, and wetland mitigation consistent with the City's 2002 ESL Guidelines has not been provided for either the CUP and/or the SCDP scenario. Please provide. (New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 35 of 41


46 The site plans indicate the use of man-made materials within the existing and proposed wetlands on-site. Adding man-made materials in areas where mitigation credit would be given would be inconsistent with ESL regulations that require mitigation to consist of natural habitat. Clearly identify and tie the location of the four upfront wetland establishment mitigation sites mentioned in the Wetland Mitigation Plan to the BTR and the engineering site plans for project clarification and consistency. (New Issue)

�

47 Tables 6 and 7 - run spellcheck as requirements is spelled incorrectly on both tables 6 and 7. Revise these tables to correctly reflect impacts to both uplands and wetlands caused by the project and to reflect required mitigation ratios pursuant to the City's 2002 Biology Guidelines Tables 2 and 3.

(New Issue)

�

48 Section 6.1.1 - Second paragraph - second sentence, - Creation includes establishment of new wetlands, restoration is the term to be used for re-establishment. Due to potential failure and loss of natural wetlands, 1:1 creation/restoration is required to be accompanied by 1:1 ratio of additional wetland mitigation (preservation, creation, restoration, or enhancement). Revise section 6 and 6.1 accordingly.

Section 6.1.2 - Utilize the City's Standard Nesting Bird mitigation requirements which can be obtained from the EAS planner. (New Issue)

�

49 ATTACHMENT 5 - Burrowing owl (BUOW) and snowy plover potential are missing and must be included, please revise attachment. (New Issue)

�

53 JURISDICTIONAL WATERS DETERMINATION (JWD) -(RECON July 28, 2011), ATTACHMENT 6 - This is accepted except for the following:

Change the reference in the BTR Table of Contents which mistakenly references the stand alone Wetland Mitigation Plan (RECON March 2014).

(New Issue)

�

54 Figure 4 - Southern Willow Scrub and Concrete Channel are indistinguishable on the map from each other. Please change the legend to match the dark brown in the BTR to provide distinstinction and label the location of the concrete channel on the project site on the figure (Currently not showing here or in the BTR). (New Issue)

�

WetMitPlanMSCP 1st RevRECON Ma


50 WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN - (March 11, 2014,RECON)- Utilize comments provided for the BTR and amend this document as appropriate.

Section 4.1 - Site Preparation must include more than the use of herbicides (which should be watershed compatible) and include the use of soil amendments like top soil and mycrhorizzea to restore the soil function lost from the mining operation.

(New Issue)

�

51 Besides making this report consistent with the BTR as needed, and revision of Section 4.1; the rest of the plan components are acceptable to MSCP Staff. (New Issue)

�

1stRevHYDRO&WQTRAug2014


55 MSCP Staff has received and reviewed both the Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Report and the Water Quality Techincal Report for Stone Creek (both by BDS Eng. August 18, 2014) and has the following comments:

All relevant changes to the BTR and EIR documents shall be made in these reports as appropriate. Updated any graphics/figures for clarification of proposed modifications to the creek bed as shown in the Mira Mesa Community Plan updates figures 5 and 6, particularly in relation to the southeast corner of the project. (New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 36 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

PUD-Water & Sewer Dev

09/09/2014

10/09/2014

08/21/2014Ruiz, Alejandro

(619) 446-5414

Conditions

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED ON TIME


10/15/2014


[email protected]


. We request a 3rd complete submittal for PUD-Water & Sewer Dev on this project as: Conditions.


. Your project still has 14 outstanding review issues with PUD-Water & Sewer Dev (15 of which are new issues).

. Last month PUD-Water & Sewer Dev performed 115 reviews, 100.0% were on-time, and 76.2% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Water and Sewer comments, Cycl


1 The Public Utilities Department informed the consultant that the relocation of the 21-in Carroll Canyon Trunk Sewer will not be required. This change will allow the developer to meet all separation requirements. However, the plans submitted in Cycle 50 don't meet these separation requirements. Please revise all sheets. (From Cycle 50)

�

2 Minimum separation requirements edge to edge between utilities:" Between water and sewer 10 feet." Between water and reclaim water 6 feet." Between water and storm drain 6 feet." Between sewer and storm drain 6 feet.

(From Cycle 50)

�

3 Minimum separation requirements edge to edge between utilities and other structures:" Between water and face of curb 5 feet." Between sewer and face of curb 10 feet." Between sewer and trees 10 feet (Including medians)." Between sewer and face of median curb is 5 to 10 feet (Divide the depth in half). (From Cycle 50)

�

4 Sheet 2 of 44 - The street cross section "A" shows the proposed sewer under the gutter of the median. This is not acceptable. Please revise. (From Cycle 50)

�

5 Sheet 7 of 44 - Please check all separation requirements. (From Cycle 50)�

6 Sheet 8 of 44 (Reclaimed water) - Plans show the proposed reclaimed water main on top of the existing 16 inch PVC water main in Camino Ruiz. Please revise. (From Cycle 50)

�

7 Sheet 8 of 44 (Sewer) - It appears that the proposed 15 inch sewer main will be in conflict with the existing drain channel in Camino Ruiz. Please provide a detail and cross section. (From Cycle 50)

�

8 Sheet 8 of 44 (Sewer) - The proposed 15 inch sewer main does not meet the separation requirement from the face of the median curb. Please revise all sheets. (From Cycle 50)

�

9 Sheet 8 of 44 (Gran Piazza) - The details provided need to show all public utilities with vertical and horizontal separation in reference to the foundations. Please make sure that all wet utilities are outside the 45 degree pressure zone (Influence). (From Cycle 50)

�

10 Sheet 9 of 44 (Bridge) - Cross sections A is insufficient. Please provide a profile of the channel and bridge with the utilities and vertical elevation. (From Cycle 50)

�

11 Sheet 10 of 44 (Water) - The proposed water main is shown under the sidewalk in Maya Linda. Please revise all sheets. (From Cycle 50)

�

12 Sheet 10 of 44 (Water) - The proposed water and reclaimed water have no point of connection in Black Mountain Road. (From Cycle 50)

�

13 Sheet 10 of 44 (Sewer) - The proposed 10 inch sewer main in Maya Linda will be under the median. This is not acceptable. Please revise. (From Cycle 50)

�

14 Sheet 10 of 44 (Bridges) - Cross section C is insufficient. Please provide a profile of the channel and bridge with the utilities and vertical elevations. Show how the sewer main is going to be protected and replaced in the future. (From Cycle 50)

�

15 Sheet 10 of 44 (Easement) - Proposed 35 feet utility easement needs to be exclusive for public utilities. Please revise. (From Cycle 50)

�

16 Sheet 10 of 44 - The cross section shows 21 inch truck sewer that will not be required. Please check all notes. (From Cycle 50)

�

17 Sheet 10 of 44 - It appears that the proposed sewer will be in conflict with the existing storm drain in Carroll Canyon Road. Please revise. (From Cycle 50)

�

For questions regarding the 'PUD-Water & Sewer Dev' review, please call Alejandro Ruiz at (619) 446-5414. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 37 of 41


18 Please provide the following note on the Site Plans "If a 3" or larger meter is required for this project, the owner/permittee shall construct the new meter and private backflow device on site, above ground, within an adequately sized water easement, in a manner satisfactory to the Director of Public Utilities and the City Engineer". (From Cycle 50)

�

19 Please let us know if you need a meeting prior to the next submittal. (From Cycle 50)�

Sewer Study Comments:


20 1. Revise the cross-sections to show all horizontal separation between all proposed wet utilities. Please, show the dimensions from the proposed curb to the proposed wet utilities on the both side of the streets.

(From Cycle 50)

�

21 2. The Department of Health Services has reduced their separation requirements. The City is now accepting 6 foot edge to edge minimum separation between reclaimed water and water mains. Please revise if needed. (From Cycle 50)

�

22 3. Submit a Geotechnical Report and post settlement sewer calculations table for the areas located in fill soils. Provide post consolidation sewer profiles. (From Cycle 50)

�

23 4. In several locations, the proposed sewer main design is in conflict with the proposed storm drains. Please, redesign those reaches to achieve a minimum 6' horizontal separation edge to edge between the proposed sewer and proposed storm drain. (From Cycle 50)

�

24 5. In several locations, the proposed sewer main is too close to the proposed median curb. Please move the proposed sewer main 10 feet away from the median curb. (From Cycle 50)

�

25 6. The Deviation Requests submitted by the applicant will remain on hold until the outstanding issues are addressed.

(From Cycle 50)

�

26 7. Please reflect in the revised sewer study all discretionary review comments. (From Cycle 50)�

27 8. Additional comments or requirements may be made upon receipt of the above corrected information.

(From Cycle 50)

�

Sewer Study Comments:


28 The sewer study has been approved. The approval letter will be issued separately. (New Issue) [Recommended]

�

Permit Conditions:


29 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Owner/Permittee shall assure, by permit and bond the design and construction all public water and sewer facilities as required in the accepted water and sewer study for this project in a manner satisfactory to the Public Utilities Director and the City Engineer. Water and sewer facilities, as shown on the approved Exhibit "A", may require modification based on the accepted water and sewer study and final engineering. (New Issue)

�

30 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Owner/Permittee shall assure, by permit and bond, the design and construction of new water and sewer service(s) outside of any driveway or drive aisle, in a manner satisfactory to the Public Utilities Director, the City Engineer. (New Issue)

�

31 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Owner/Permittee shall apply for a plumbing permit for the installation of appropriate private back flow prevention device(s), on each water service (domestic, fire and irrigation), in a manner satisfactory to the Public Utilities Director and the City Engineer. BFPDs shall be located above ground on private property, in line with the service and immediately adjacent to the right-of-way. (New Issue)

�

32 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Owner/Permittee shall assure, by permit and bond the design and construction of reclaimed water main and irrigation service(s), in a manner satisfactory to the Public Utilities Director and the City Engineer.

(New Issue)

�

33 No trees or shrubs exceeding three feet in height at maturity shall be installed within ten feet of any sewer facilities and five feet of any water facilities.

(New Issue)

�

34 At the time of Ministerial Review, the proposed 12-inch sewer main between manholes 14 (MH-14) and 33 (MH-33) will need to be revised. The proposed manhole 14 will need to be relocated to the southeast in order to provide a 45 degree angle connection, between the proposed 12-inch sewer main (MH 33) and the proposed 15-inch sewer main (MH-14). This change will be hydraulically more efficient. (New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 38 of 41


35 At the time of Ministerial Review, please submit an approved soils report.

(New Issue)

�

36 All proposed private water and sewer facilities located within a single lot are to be designed to meet the requirements of the California Uniform Plumbing Code and will be reviewed as part of the building permit plan check. (New Issue)

�

37 The Owner/Permittee shall design and construct all proposed public water and sewer facilities, in accordance with established criteria in the current edition of the City of San Diego Water and Sewer Facility Design Guidelines and City regulations, standards and practices.

(New Issue)

�

TM Conditions:


43 The Subdivider shall grant adequate sewer easements, including vehicular access to each appurtenance for all public sewer facilities that are not located within fully improved public right-of-ways, satisfactory to the Public Utilities Director. Easements shall be located within single lots, when possible, and not split longitudinally. Vehicular access roadbeds shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide and surfaced with suitable approved material satisfactory to the Public Utilities Director and the City Engineer. (New Issue)

�

44 The Subdivider shall process encroachment maintenance and removal agreements (EMRA), for all acceptable encroachments into the sewer easement, including but not limited to structures, enhanced paving, or landscaping. No structures or landscaping of any kind shall be installed in or over any vehicular access roadway. (New Issue)

�

45 The Subdivider shall provide a 10 feet minimum (edge to edge) separation between the water and sewer mains, and provide a 5 feet minimum separation between the water main and face of curb, per the Water and Sewer Design Guide. (New Issue)

�

46 The Subdivider shall install fire hydrants at locations satisfactory to the Fire Marshal, the Public Utilities Director and the City Engineer. If more than two (2) fire hydrants or thirty (30) dwelling units are located on a dead-end water main then the Subdivider shall install a redundant water system satisfactory to the Public Utilities Director. (New Issue)

�

47 Prior to the recording of the Final Map, all public water and sewer facilities shall be complete and operational in a manner satisfactory to the Public Utilities Director and the City Engineer. (New Issue)

�


p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 39 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

Fire-Plan Review

09/29/2014

09/29/2014

08/26/2014Sylvester, Brenda

(619) 446-5449


Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED LATE


09/26/2014


[email protected]


. We request a 2nd complete submittal for Fire-Plan Review on this project as: Submitted (Multi-Discipline).


. Last month Fire-Plan Review performed 42 reviews, 73.8% were on-time, and 71.4% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Fire Department Issues


1 No corrections or issues based on this submittal. (New Issue)�

For questions regarding the 'Fire-Plan Review' review, please call Brenda Sylvester at (619) 446-5449. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 40 of 41

Review Information


10/29/2014Closed:

LDR-Landscaping

09/23/2014

10/02/2014

08/21/2014Spindell, Glenn

(619) 446-5353

Conditions

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:

COMPLETED LATE


09/26/2014


[email protected]


. We request a 8th complete submittal for LDR-Landscaping on this project as: Conditions.


. Your project still has 11 outstanding review issues with LDR-Landscaping (1 of which are new issues).


. Last month LDR-Landscaping performed 54 reviews, 74.1% were on-time, and 45.5% were on projects at less than < 3 complete submittals.

Draft Conditions


54 Prior to issuance of construction permits for grading; the Permittee or Subsequent Owner shall submit landscape construction documents for the re-vegetation and hydro-seeding of all disturbed land in accordance with the Land Development Manual, Landscape Standards; the Stone Creek Master Plan; and to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department. All plans shall be in substantial conformance to this permit (including Environmental conditions) and Exhibit "A." (From Cycle 18)

�

55 Prior to issuance of construction permits for public right-of-way improvements, the Permittee or Subsequent Owner shall submit complete landscape construction documents for right-of-way improvements to the Development Services Department for approval. Improvement plans shall take indicate an area equal to 40 square feet around each tree which is unencumbered by utilities. Driveways, utilities, drains, water and sewer laterals shall be designed so as not to prohibit the placement of street trees. (From Cycle 18)

�

56 Prior to issuance of any construction permits for buildings; the Permittee or Subsequent Owner shall submit complete landscape and irrigation construction documents consistent with the Land Development Manual, Landscape Standards and the Stone Creek Master Plan to the Development Services Department for approval. The construction documents shall be in substantial conformance with Exhibit "A," Landscape Development Plan, on file in the Office of the Development Services Department. (From Cycle 18)

�

57 Prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, it shall be the responsibility of the Permittee or Subsequent Owner to install all required landscape and obtain all required landscape inspections. A "No Fee" Street Tree Permit shall be obtained for the installation, establishment, and on-going maintenance of all street trees. (From Cycle 18)

�

58 The Permittee or Subsequent Owner shall maintain all landscape in a disease, weed and litter free condition at all times. Severe pruning or "topping" of trees is not permitted. The trees shall be maintained in a safe manner to allow each tree to grow to its mature height and spread. (From Cycle 18)

�

59 The Permittee or Subsequent Owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of all landscape improvements in the right-of-way consistent with the Land Development Manual, Landscape Standards unless long-term maintenance of said landscaping will be the responsibility of a Landscape Maintenance District or other approved entity. In this case, a Landscape Establishment Maintenance Agreement [LEMA] shall be submitted for review by a Landscape Planner. (From Cycle 18)

�

60 If any required landscape (including existing or new plantings, hardscape, landscape features, etc.) indicated on the approved construction document plans is damaged or removed during demolition or construction, the Permittee or Subsequent Owner is responsible to repair and/or replace any landscape in kind and equivalent size per the approved documents to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department within 30 days of damage or prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (From Cycle 18)

�

61 Prior to issuance of construction permits for grading; the Permittee or Subsequent Owner shall ensure that all proposed landscaping, especially landscaping adjacent to native habitat and/or MHPA, shall not include exotic plant species that may be invasive to native habitats. Plant species found within the California Invasive Plant Council's (Cal-IPC) Invasive Plant Inventory and the prohibited plant species list found in "Table 1" of the Landscape Standards shall not be permitted. (From Cycle 18)

�

62 Prior to issuance of construction permits for grading; the Permittee or Subsequent Owner shall ensure that all existing, invasive plant species, including vegetative parts and root systems, shall be completely removed from the development area of the premises when the combination of species type, location, and surrounding environmental conditions provides a means for the species to invade other areas of native plant material that are on or off of the premises [LDC 142.0403(b)(2)]. (From Cycle 18)

�

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Landscaping' review, please call Glenn Spindell at (619) 446-5353. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

L64A-003A




Page 41 of 41


63 Prior to issuance of any construction permits for buildings a water budget shall be provided in accordance with the Water Conservation Requirements-Section 142.0413, Table 142-04I. An irrigation audit shall be submitted consistent with Section 2.7 of the Landscape Standards of the Land Development Manual. The Irrigation audit shall certify that all plants, irrigation systems, and landscape features have been installed and operate as approved by the Development Services Department prior to occupancy of use. (From Cycle 25)

�

Tentative Map Conditions


66 Prior to the recordation of the parcel, the subdivider shall submit complete landscape construction documents, including plans, details, and specifications (including a permanent automatic irrigation system unless otherwise approved), for the required right-of-way, slope revegetation and hydroseeding of all disturbed land in accordance with the Landscape Standards and to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.The landscape construction documents shall be in substantial conformance with Exhibit "A", Landscape Development Plan on file in the Office of the Development Services (From Cycle 25)

�

Review 092614


68 No revisions required. (New Issue)�

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Landscaping' review, please call Glenn Spindell at (619) 446-5353. Project Nbr: 67943 / Cycle: 63

p2k v 02.03.38 Tim Daly 446-5356

City of San Diego Water Conservation Program #WNWwednesday Directions and Tips Updated: November 5, 2014 Directions:

1) Change your Facebook profile picture on Wednesdays to the attached San Diegans Waste No Water graphic.

2) Post the weekly “San Diegans Waste No Water” tip. See the list of tips below. 3) Make sure to tag #WNWwednesday in every message. 4) Invite and challenge your friends and family to do the same. 5) Don't forget to like us on Facebook (@SanDiegansWasteNoWater).

Date Tip November 5, 2014 San Diego has a drought alert in effect. Water only 3 days per week.

This #WNWwednesday, make sure you know your 3 assigned days. Residences with odd-numbered addresses (301 Drought Street), water only Sundays, Tuesdays, and Thursdays. For even-numbered addresses (500 Conservation Avenue), water only Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays. For apartments, condos, and businesses, water only Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. For a list of all water use restrictions, go to www.WasteNoWater.org

November 12, 2014

Water at the right times. This #WNWwednesday, make sure you know that you can water on your assigned days before 10 a.m. and after 4 p.m. for only 7 minutes when using a standard sprinkler system. For a list of all water use restrictions, go to www.WasteNoWater.org

November 19, 2014

It’s #WNWwednesday. If you need to get your car cleaned, wash your car wisely. When you take your car to a car wash, use one that recycles water. When you wash your car at home, do it before 10 a.m. and after 4 p.m. using a bucket or a hose with a shut-off nozzle. For a list of all water use restrictions, go to www.WasteNoWater.org

November 26, 2014

This #WNWwednesday, we wanted to share with you a great tip to save water during holiday preparations. With the hustle and bustle for the holidays and guests in town, save time and water while you do chores. Run only full loads when using the dishwasher and clothes washer. For more ways to save, go to www.WasteNoWater.org

S M T W T F S

Residences with Odd-numbered Addresses(example: 301 Drought Street)Water ONLY on Sundays, Tuesdays & Thursdays

Residences with Even-numbered Addresses(example: 500 Conservation Avenue)Water ONLY on Mondays, Wednesdays & Saturdays

Apartments, Condos & BusinessesWater ONLY on Mondays, Wednesdays & Fridays

WATER AT THE RIGHT TIMES

› November 1 through May 31:Water between 4 pm–10 am for ONLY 7 MINUTES when using a standard sprinkler system.

› June 1 through October 31:Water between 6 pm–10 am for ONLY 10 MINUTES when using a standard sprinkler system.

WASH YOUR CAR WISELY

› When you take your car to a car wash, use one that recycles its water.

› When you wash your car at home, do it during the seasonal time-of-day watering times listed at left, using a bucket or a hose with a shut-off nozzle.

TURN OFF FOUNTAINS

› Turn off ornamental fountains, except for maintenance purposes.

FIX LEAKS

› Repair water leaks within 72 hours.

The City of San Diego has enacted a Drought Alert, which calls for specific additional mandatory water use restrictions to be enforced. These restrictions will help San Diego combat severe drought conditions existing statewide. We’ve been here before — and San Diegans responded impressively. However, current conditions require we increase our conservation efforts by complying with the following water use restrictions.

DROUGHT ALERT: MANDATORY WATER USE RESTRICTIONS START NOVEMBER 1, 2014

For a list of all water use restrictions, go to WasteNoWater.org

WATER ONLY 3 DAYS PER WEEK

Visit WasteNoWater.org for information on water conservation resources, rebate information and more.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONSBecause of the extreme drought conditions statewide and the uncertainty of future rainfall, the City of San Diego’s Drought Alert restrictions do not have a planned end date. Water supplies will continue to be monitored and the Drought Alert will stay in effect for as long as the City deems necessary, based on projected water supplies. It will lift the restrictions only when the need for them has ended.

How long will the Drought Alert be in effect?

No, you will not be immediately fined. In implementing the Drought Alert restrictions, one of the City’s primary goals is to educate water users on how to conserve water and avoid waste. If we receive a complaint about your water use, you will be notified by mail. Then, you will be given information about the restrictions and the opportunity and time to comply with them. If our efforts remain unresolved and the violation continues, the case could eventually be referred to a Code Enforcement Officer, who continues our efforts to gain your voluntary compliance by a certain date. If all efforts become exhausted, a fine may at that point be issued.

Am I going to be fined immediately if I am not in compliance with these restrictions?

Conservation is a way of life for all San Diegans. To do more, you would be surprised how much additional water you can save with a few simple adjustments to your daily routines. First, during the Drought Alert, outside your home make sure to water only on your three assigned days each week, for only the amount of time allowed and at the time of day allowed. In fact, consider watering one less day per week and/or for fewer minutes per station than you are allowed to see additional water savings. Second, when planting new plants, select water-wise, drought-tolerant plants for your landscaping. Inside your home, set a 5-minute timer to remind yourself to take shorter showers and only wash full loads in the dish and clothes washers. Remember, there are always ways to save. These are just a few. For more ideas, visit WasteNoWater.org.

I’m already conserving water as a result of the last drought and permanent restrictions that were enacted. How can I possibly do more?

If I see an incident of water waste, how can I let the City know about it?

There are three ways to let us know about water waste incidents you see: a new smartphone app, email and phone. The City recently released a free “Waste No Water” app for smart-phones such as iPhones and Androids. With this app, you can take a photo of a water waste incident and send it to the City’s Water Conservation Team in the Public Utilities Department. They will follow up on your complaint to educate the customer on the restrictions. To get the app, use the QR codes provided here - or go to the iTunes App Store for iPhones or the PlayStore for Androids. Search for “waste no water” and download the app to your phone. If you prefer to notify the City via email or a telephone, send the information on your complaint to [email protected] or call (619) 533-5271.

Download the iPhone App

Download the Android App

Before It Rains:

Sign up for Alert San Diego notifications for all your telephone numbers.

Make sure you know the safest routes to and from home should flooding occur.

Create a family communication plan to stay in touch with loved ones.

Protect your pets. Be sure they have proper identification (microchip).

Have transportation ready for all larger animals under your responsibility.

When Rains Begin:

Leave early if your property is in a flood zone. Water levels car rise fast once storms start so don’t hesitate to move.

Follow all instructions issued by public safety personnel.

Take advantage of shelters and staging areas. There will be important resources available should they be established during storms.

Important Online Resources: http://www.sandiego.gov/ohs/emergencynotification/ http://www.sddac.com/docs/Livestock%20in%20disasters%20brochure.pdf http://www.sddac.com/docs/Household%20Pets%20in%20Disasters.pdf http://www.countynewscenter.com/news/protect‐your‐pet‐part‐disaster‐preparedness http://www.countynewscenter.com/news/county‐rescuing‐animals‐threatened‐fires

Copyri

Cit

20PO

No

FIN

Documen

ight © 2014 by The S

ty of Sa

014 TOTOLICE

vember 6

NAL REPO

nt ID: 8032316v4

egal Group, Inc. All ri

an Diego

TAL COPOSITI

6, 2014

ORT

ights reserved.

o, CA

OMPENIONS

NSATIOON REPPORT –– REPRRESENTTED

TCNE

S

A

A

Ta b l e City of San DiNovember 6, 2Executive Sum

BackgrounSummary

Pay RaTotal C

Study FindingPay RangeCompensa

IncentivSpeciaPay SuLongevHiring

Paid LeaveHealth Ben

Health RetireeOther BWellne

RetiremenTotal Com

Appendix A –

Appendix B –

o f C oiego, CA Tota2014 mmary ..........nd ...................of Findings ....

anges ...............Compensation ...

gs ..................es ..................ation Policies .ve Pay .............

al Duty Pay........upplements .......vity Pay ............Practices ..........

e ....................nefits .............Savings Accou

e Health BenefitBenefits ............ess Benefits ......

nt Plans ..........mpensation ......

– Benchmark J

– Detailed Mar

n t e n t sal Compensat

......................

......................

........................................................................

......................

......................

...................................................................................................................................................

......................

......................nt .....................

ts ........................................................................

......................

......................

Job Summari

rket Data .......

s ion Survey Re

......................

......................

......................................................................

......................

......................

..............................................................................................................................................

......................

......................................................................................................................

......................

......................

es .................

......................

esults – Repr

......................

......................

......................

........................

........................

......................

......................

......................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

......................

......................

........................

........................

........................

........................

......................

......................

......................

......................

resented Polic

......................

......................

......................

........................

........................

......................

......................

......................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

......................

......................

........................

........................

........................

........................

......................

......................

......................

......................

ce Positions

......................

......................

......................

........................

........................

......................

......................

......................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

......................

......................

........................

........................

........................

........................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

........................................................................

......................

......................

...................................................................................................................................................

......................

..........................................................................................................................

......................

......................

......................

......................

i

... 1

... 1

... 3 .... 3 .... 4

... 5

... 5

. 10 .. 27 .. 33 .. 46 .. 47 .. 49

. 51

. 60 .. 69 .. 70 .. 71 .. 74

. 76

. 79

. 89

. 92

2

EB

Tco

Tp

T

2014 Police Total Co

ExecutivBackground

This report contcompensation pof July 1, 2014.

The primary objpolice ranks.

The 18 surveyed

mpensation Study as

ve Summd

tains the results olicies, paid lea

jective of the stu

d employers, lis

City of An

City of Ba

City of Ca

City of Ch

City of El

City of Es

City of Fr

City of Lo

City of Lo

s of November 6, 201

mary

of the City of Save programs, an

udy was to deter

ted below, refle

naheim, CA

akersfield, CA

arlsbad, CA

hula Vista, CA

l Cajon, CA

scondido, CA

resno, CA

ong Beach, CA

os Angeles, CA

14

San Diego 2014 nd benefits offer

rmine the City o

ect a combinatio

Total Compensred to the City’s

of San Diego’s p

on of cities and c

ation Study, whs represented po

position for both

counties identifi

City of Nationa

City of Oakland

City of Oceansi

City of Riversid

City of Sacram

City and Count

City of San Jos

City of Santa A

County of San D

hich includes infolice positions. M

h pay and benef

ied by the City o

al City, CA

d, CA

ide, CA

de, CA

mento, CA

ty of San Franci

se, CA

Ana, CA

Diego, CA

formation on paMarket data is e

fits among repre

of San Diego.

isco, CA

1

ay ranges, effective as

esented

2

TCb

Mst

R


The study includCity of San Diegbased on duties

Most surveyed estudy, surveyed through Police O

Represented Po

Police Recru

Police Offic

Police Offic

Police Offic

Police Detec

Police Serge

Police Lieut

Police Capta

mpensation Study as

des eight (8) Pogo’s structure, tand qualificatio

employers do noemployer Polic

Officer II pay ra

olice Positions

uit

er I

er II

er III

ctive

eant

tenant

ain


lice benchmark he survey instru

ons rather than r

ot separate Policce Officer pay raange maximum.

14

jobs. Since rankument containedrank title. Appe

ce Officer into tanges are compa

k structures amod job summariesendix A shows t

two classificatioared to the City

ong the surveyes to assist surveythe job summari

ons of entry and of San Diego’s

ed employers may respondents wies for each rank

journey level. Police Officer I

ay not be consiswith making job k.

For the purposeI pay range min

2

stent with matches

es of this nimum

2

S

P

Trm

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

O1

AT


Summary of

Pay Ranges

The City of Sanrange from 74%maximums rang

Police Benchm

Police Recruit

Police Officer I –

Police Officer III

Police Detective

Police Sergeant

Police Lieutena

Police Captain

Overall Market 1City of San Die

Appendix B conTable 4 shows d

mpensation Study as

f Findings

n Diego’s marke% to 91% of the mge from 82% to

mark Job

– II

I

e

t

nt

Average ego’s rank comp

ntains detailed ddetails regarding


t position for remarket average.90% of the mark

REPRESENAC

Count of Matc(out of 18, exclu

San Diego)

18

18

4

5

18

18

18

parison is measu

data associated wg the City of Sa

14

epresented police. The pay rangeket average.

TED POLICE CROSS ALL B

ches uding )

City oRan

Survey(inclu

1

1

1

1

1

ured at the pay r

with each rank an Diego’s base

e personnel is she midpoints rang

TABLE 1 PERSONNELENCHMARKSof San Diego’s nk Amongst yed Employersuding San Diego)

8 out of 19

9 out of 19

5 out of 5

5 out of 6

7 out of 19

6 out of 19

5 out of 19

range midpoint.

and each surveypay ranking am

hown in Table ge from 78% to

L MARKET POS PAY ONLY

s1

Cas a

Pay RanMinimu

74%

75%

88%

85%

82%

88%

91%

85%

yed employer. mongst the survey

1. The pay rang90% of the mar

OSITION

City of San Diea Percent of th

nge m

Pay RMidp

78

83

89

84

84

88

90

86

yed employers.

ge minimums forket average. Th

go Pay Rangeshe Market AveraRange point

PaMa

8%

3%

9%

4%

4%

8%

0%

6%

3

or each rank he pay range

s age

ay Range aximum 82%

88%

90%

84%

86%

88%

89%

87%

2

T

OD

Tj

P

PPPPPPP1

2

L MT


Total Compen

On a total compDiego’s market

To determine thjob: The calculat Total emplo

enrollment d The City of The current Maximum e

Police Benchm

Police Recruit Police Officer I –Police Officer IIIPolice DetectivePolice SergeantPolice LieutenaPolice Captain 1City of San Die2 Due to insufficLos Angeles.

More details regTable 67 shows

mpensation Study as

nsation

pensation basis, position is show

he total compens

ted midpoint of yer costs for all

distribution amoSan Diego’s totnormal costs asmployer contrib

MARKE

mark Job

– II I e t nt

ego’s rank compcient data, emplo

garding the calcus details regardin


taking into conswn in Table 2.

sation costs for e

the base pay ranl health related bong coverage tietal health benefissociated with thbution to both d

ET POSITION

City

parison is measuoyer total comp

ulations above ang the City of S

14

sideration base p

each surveyed e

nge (average of benefits (medicaers in the City ofit costs reflect thhe defined benefefined contribut

ACROSS ALL

y of San Diego’Surveyed Em

(including S

15 out 16 out

3 out 5 out

16 out 14 out 13 out

ured at the pay rensation costs c

are shown in Taan Diego’s tota

pay, health bene

employer, we ca

f the minimum aal, dental, and vf San Diego’s mhe average flex bfit retirement pltion and deferre

TABLE 2 L BENCHMAR

’s Rank Amongmployers1,2

San Diego)

of 16 of 16 of 3 of 5 of 16 of 16 of 16

range midpoint.cannot be calcul

able 66. l compensation

efit costs, and re

alculated the sum

and maximum baision), weighted

most populous mbenefit allotmenan, based on the

ed compensation

RKS TOTAL C

gst Ba(Rang

ated for City of

ranking among

etirement plan c

m of the followi

ase pay rates) d by City of San

medical plan (Kant for each bence most recent pln plans (includin

COMPENSATI

ase Pay ge Midpoint)

78% 83% 89% 84% 84% 88% 90%

f Carlsbad, City

gst the surveyed

contributions, th

ing for each ben

n Diego’s currenaiser HMO planchmark job titlelan valuation ng any employe

ON

EmployeCompensat

(Pay and B

77%81%87%83%82%88%90%

of El Cajon, an

employers.

4

he City of San

nchmark

nt n)

r match)

er Total ion Costs

Benefits) % % % % % % %

d City of

2

SP

Trm

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

O1

AT


Study FiPay Ranges

The City of Sanrange from 74%maximums rang

Police Benchm

Police Recruit

Police Officer I –

Police Officer III

Police Detective

Police Sergeant

Police Lieutena

Police Captain

Overall Market 1City of San Die

Appendix B conTable 4 shows d

mpensation Study as

indings s

n Diego’s marke% to 91% of the mge from 82% to

mark Job

– II

I

e

t

nt

Average ego’s rank comp

ntains detailed ddetails regarding


t position for remarket average.90% of the mark

REPRESENAC

Count of Ma(out of 18, exc

San Diego

18

18

4

5

18

18

18

parison is measu

data associated wg the City of Sa

14

epresented police. The pay rangeket average.

TED POLICE CROSS ALL B

atches cluding o)

City Ra

Surve(inclu

1

1

1

1

1

ured at the pay r

with each rank an Diego’s base

e personnel is she midpoints rang

TABLE 3 PERSONNELENCHMARKS

of San Diego’sank Amongst yed Employersuding San Diego)

18 out of 19

19 out of 19

5 out of 5

5 out of 6

17 out of 19

16 out of 19

15 out of 19

range midpoint.

and each surveypay ranking am

hown in Table 3ge from 78% to

L MARKET POS PAY ONLY

s

s1

Cas a

Pay RanMinimu

74%

75%

88%

85%

82%

88%

91%

85%

yed employer. mongst the survey

3. The pay rang90% of the mar

OSITION

City of San Diea Percent of th

nge m

Pay RMidp

78

83

89

84

84

88

90

86

yed employers.

ge minimums forket average. Th

go Pay Rangeshe Market AveraRange point

PaMa

8%

3%

9%

4%

4%

8%

0%

6%

5

or each rank he pay range

s age

ay Range aximum 82%

88%

90%

84%

86%

88%

89%

87%

2

P

PCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC


Police Benchm

Police Recruit City and County oCity of Anaheim, City of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCity of Long BeacCity of Carlsbad, City of Los AngelCity of Oakland, CCity of National CCity of EscondidoCity of El Cajon, CCity of Riverside, City of Fresno, CACity of Chula VistCity of OceansideCounty of San DiCity of SacramenCity of San DiegCity of Bakersfield

mpensation Study as

mark Job

of San Francisco,CA CA

a, CA ch, CA CA es, CA CA

City, CA o, CA CA CA

A ta, CA e, CA ego, CA - Sheriff

nto, CA go d, CA


Ba(range

, CA $

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4

's Office $4$4$4$4

14

BASE PAY

ase Pay e midpoint) R

ank

80,574 1

76,097 2

66,955 3

66,168 4

63,752 5

62,423 6

62,410 7

60,701 8

58,978 9

58,104 10

56,306 1

54,696 12

54,012 13

51,820 14

48,732 15

47,362 16

47,190 17

46,228 18

45,662 19

TABLE 4 MARKET RA

Ran

k Police

Police City an

2 City of 3 City of 4 City of 5 City of 6 City of 7 City of 8 City of 9 City of 0 City of 1 City of 2 City of 3 City of 4 City of 5 County6 City of 7 City of 8 City of 9 City of

ANKING

e Benchmark J

e Officer I - II nd County of San San Jose, CA Oakland, CA Santa Ana, CA Anaheim, CA Long Beach, CALos Angeles, CAChula Vista, CAOceanside, CACarlsbad, CA Escondido, CA National City, CARiverside, CA Fresno, CA

y of San Diego, CEl Cajon, CA Sacramento, CABakersfield, CA

f San Diego

Job

Francisco, CA

A A

A

CA - Sheriff's Offic

A

Base Pa(range midp

$96,369$91,229$85,751$80,430$79,644$79,278$76,672$74,496$73,692$73,552$73,122$72,872$71,592$69,300

ce $68,665$67,414$65,887$64,625$62,598

6

ay point) R

ank

9 1

9 2

1 3

0 4

4 5

8 6

2 7

6 8

2 9

2 10

2 11

2 12

2 13

0 14

5 15

4 16

7 17

5 18

8 19

2

P



Police Benchm

Police Officer ICity of National CCity of Los AngelCity of Chula VistCity of Carlsbad, City of San DiegCity of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

mpensation Study as

mark Job

III City, CA es, CA ta, CA CA

go CA d, CA CA o, CA A ch, CA CA e, CA CA

nto, CA of San Francisco,CA

a, CA ego, CA - Sheriff


Ba(range

$$$$$

, CA

's Office

14

BASE PAY


ank

85,825 182,362 282,032 377,231 472,873 5

-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --

TABLE 4 MARKET RA

Ran

k Police

Police City of

2 City of

3 City of

4 City of

5 City of- City of - City of - City of - City of - City of - City of - City of - City of - City of - City of - City an- City of - City of - County

ANKING

e Benchmark J

e Detective Long Beach, CALos Angeles, CAChula Vista, CARiverside, CA

f San Diego Bakersfield, CAAnaheim, CA Carlsbad, CA El Cajon, CA Escondido, CA Fresno, CA National City, CAOakland, CA Oceanside, CASacramento, CA

nd County of San San Jose, CA Santa Ana, CA

y of San Diego, C

Job

A A

A

A Francisco, CA


Base Pa(range midp

$100,542 $96,257 $82,032 $80,652 $72,873 $72,058

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

ce --

7

ay point) R

ank

1 2 3 4 5 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

2

P



Police Benchm

Police SergeanCity and County oCity of Anaheim, City of Oakland, CCity of San Jose, City of OceansideCity of Los AngelCity of Long BeacCity of Santa AnaCity of Riverside, City of EscondidoCounty of San DiCity of Chula VistCity of Carlsbad, City of National CCity of BakersfieldCity of SacramenCity of San DiegCity of El Cajon, CCity of Fresno, CA

mpensation Study as

mark Job

nt of San Francisco,CA CA CA

e, CA es, CA ch, CA a, CA

CA o, CA ego, CA - Sheriffta, CA CA

City, CA d, CA

nto, CA go CA A


Ba(range

, CA $1

$1$1$1$1$1$1$$$

's Office $$$$$$$$$

14

BASE PAY


ank

130,260 1122,699 2121,214 3110,198 4108,636 5104,264 6100,542 799,216 895,466 995,316 1095,119 194,362 1293,874 1392,676 1488,841 1586,087 1684,240 1783,772 1883,538 19

TABLE 4 MARKET RA

Ran

k Police

Police City an

2 City of 3 City of 4 City of 5 City of 6 City of 7 City of 8 City of 9 City of 0 City of 1 City of 2 City of 3 City of 4 City of 5 City of 6 City of7 City of 8 City of 9 County

ANKING

e Benchmark J

e Lieutenant nd County of San Anaheim, CA Santa Ana, CA Oakland, CA Riverside, CA Oceanside, CASan Jose, CA Los Angeles, CASacramento, CALong Beach, CABakersfield, CANational City, CACarlsbad, CA Chula Vista, CAEscondido, CA

f San Diego El Cajon, CA Fresno, CA

y of San Diego, C

Job

Francisco, CA

A A A

A


Base Pa(range midp

$148,74$135,33$133,99$133,52$132,29$131,85$127,60$122,68$120,88$119,28$116,78$116,51$113,80$113,24$109,62$107,20$104,62$102,40

ce $102,21

8

ay point) R

ank

46 1 36 2 92 3 25 4 94 5 50 6 08 7 81 8 82 9 80 10 89 11 8 12

00 13 42 14 26 15 04 1624 17 02 18 3 19

2

P



Police Benchm

Police Captain City and County oCity of Oakland, CCity of Anaheim, City of Santa AnaCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of Los AngelCity of San Jose, City of SacramenCity of Chula VistCity of Carlsbad, City of EscondidoCity of Long BeacCity of BakersfieldCity of San DiegCity of El Cajon, CCity of Fresno, CACounty of San DiCity of National C

mpensation Study as

mark Job


a, CA e, CA CA es, CA CA

nto, CA ta, CA CA

o, CA ch, CA d, CA

go CA A ego, CA - Sheriff

City, CA


Ba(range

, CA $1

$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1

's Office $1$1

14

BASE PAY


ank

187,954 1162,696 2159,245 3158,238 4156,228 5153,144 6148,468 7147,701 8142,340 9139,888 10137,900 1133,260 12132,882 13129,992 14127,328 15120,151 16118,218 17117,539 18100,498 19

TABLE 4 MARKET RA

Ran

k Police

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

ANKING

e Benchmark J

Job Base Pa(range midp

9

ay point) R

ank

2

C

T

Ts


Compensati

The survey docu

Pay schedul Pay increase Shift differe Standby or o Call-back pa Holiday pay Court time p Overtime pa Incentive pa Special duty Pay supplem Longevity p Hiring pract Signing bon

Tables 5 througsurveyed emplo

mpensation Study as

ion Policies

ument included

e adjustments foes (step or meritentials on-call pay ay y pay ay ay y pay ments pay policies tices nuses

gh 38 show the myer does not off


questions relate

or Fiscal Years t increases) for F

market study finfer the compens

14

ed to the followi

2014 through 20Fiscal Years 201

ndings for these ation policy.

ing pay policies

017 14 through 2017

compensation p

and practices:

7

policies and pracctices. Dashes ((--) indicate that

10

t the

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

mpensation Study as

PAY SC

ployer P

CA OL

d, CA

ODSL

CA OL

ta, CA OLC

CA OL

o, CA O

L

A OL

ch, CA OS

es, CA OSC

City, CA OSC

CA OL

e, CA OL


CHEDULE ADJ

Police Rank

Officer & SergeaLieutenant & CaOfficer, Senior ODetective Sergeant Lieutenant & CaOfficer, CorporalLieutenant & CaOfficer, Agent, SLieutenant Captain Officer, Agent, SLieutenant & CaOfficer & Sergea

Lieutenant & Ca

Officer & SergeaLieutenant & CaOfficer & LieutenSergeant & CaptOfficer, DetectiveSergeant, LieuteCaptain Officer, CorporalSergeant, LieuteCaptain Officer, SergeanLieutenant, CaptOfficer & SergeaLieutenant & Ca

14

JUSTMENTS

Co

ant 01ptain 07

Officer, 12

07ptain 07l, Sergeant 01ptain 01

Sergeant, 07ExUn

Sergeant 07ptain 07

ant 01

ptain MSa

ant 06ptain 06nant 10tain 10e,

enant 07

07l,

enant 07

Unt, tain 07

ant 02ptain 01

TABLE 5 FOR FISCAL

ontract Term

1/04/2013 – 07/7/01/2012 – 01/

2/11/2013 – 06/

7/01/2013 – 06/7/01/2013 – 06/1/01/2013 – 12/1/01/2014 – 12/7/01/2005 – 06/xtended: 06/30/nclassified, Sen7/01/2013 – 06/7/01/2013 – 06/1/01/2014 – 12/gmt and Unclasalary Plan 6/30/2013 – 06/6/30/2013 – 06/0/1/2009 – 09/30/1/2009 – 09/3

7/01/2011 – 06/

7/01/2011 – 06/

7/01/2011 – 06/

nrepresented M

7/01/2006 – 06/

2/19/2014 – 12/1/22/2014 – 12/

YEARS 2014

FY

03/2015 414/2016 0

30/2014 5

30/2015 330/2015 331/2014 031/2015 030/2010 /2014 0

nior Mgmt 330/2015 30/2015 31/2016 2ssified 0

30/2015 030/2015 00/2014 10/2014 0

30/2014 4

30/2014 4

30/2014 0

Mgmt

30/2015 0

31/2014 031/2015 0

THROUGH 2

Y 2014 FY 20

4.00% 8.16%0.00% 0.00%

5.00% 2.50%

3.50% 2.00%3.50% 1.00%0.00% --0.00% 0.00%

0.00% --

3.02% --NR 4.54%NR 4.54%

2.50% 4.55%

0.00% 0.00%

0.00% 4.04%0.00% 4.04%

.00% --0.00% --

4.05% --

4.05% --

0.57% 0.56%

NR 0.00%

0.00% 4.04%

0.00% --0.00% 0.00%

017

015 FY 2016

% -- % --

% --

% -- % --

-- % --

--

-- % -- % -- % 2.00%

% --

% -- % --

-- --

--

--

% --

% --

% --

-- % --

11

FY 2017

-- --

--

-- -- -- --

--

-- -- --

1.00%

--

-- -- -- --

--

--

--

--

--

-- --

2

S

C

C

CF

C

C

CS

C

1

1


Surveyed Emp

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County oFrancisco, CA

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San DiSheriff's Office

Mark

City of San Die

1City of San Dieg1% in FY15, 2% i

mpensation Study as

ployer P

CA OSL

nto, CA OSL

of San OSC

CA OL

a, CA OL

ego, CA - DL

ket Average

ego, CA1 OSC

o represented poin FY16, and 1%


Police Rank

Officer & DetectiSergeant Lieutenant & CaOfficer Sergeant Lieutenant & CaOfficer, InspectoSergeant, LieuteCaptain Officer, SergeanLieutenant, CaptOfficer & SergeaLieutenant & CaDeputy, SergeanLieutenant, Capt

Officer, DetectivSergeant, LieutCaptain olice positions recin FY17.

14

Co

ve 0707

ptain 030606

ptain 06or, enant, 07

t, tain 07

ant 07ptain 07nt, tain 06

ve, enant, 07

ceived a 2% non-

ontract Term

7/01/2009 – 12/7/01/2009 – 12/3/14/2014 – 03/6/28/2014 – 06/6/28/2014 – 06/6/16/2012 – 12/

7/01/2007 – 06/

7/1/2013 – 12/3

7/01/2013 – 06/7/01/2008 – 06/

6/27/2014 – 06/

7/01/2013 – 06/

pensionable incre

FY

01/2014 001/2014 014/2016 823/2017 23/2017 26/2014 0

30/2018 0

1/2015 4

30/2015 130/2014 1

21/2018 2

1

30/2018 0

ease in FY14. Th

Y 2014 FY 20

0.00% 0.00%0.00% 0.00%8.08% 0.00%

NR 3.00%NR 2.33%

0.00% 0.00%

0.00% 0.00%

4.00% 3.33%

.00% 0.00%

.00% --

2.00% 1.00%

1.58% 1.91

0.00% 0.00%

hey will receive n

015 FY 2016

% -- % -- % 0.00% % 3.00% % 2.33% % --

% 1.00%

% 3.33%

% -- --

% 3.00%

% 2.09%

% 0.00%

on-pensionable i

12

FY 2017

-- -- --

3.00% 2.33%

--

2.00%

--

-- --

2.00%

2.07%

0.00%

ncreases of

2

Feo

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C


For classificatioemployees are eonly), the averag

Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

mpensation Study as

ons with a gradeeligible for a stepge merit increas

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA


and step pay scp increase each se is shown in T

Police

OfficeLieuteOfficeSergeOffice

Office

OfficeLieuteOfficeOfficeLieuteOfficeCaptaOfficeLieuteCaptaOfficeLieuteOfficeOfficeLieuteOfficeLieute

14

chedule, the avefiscal year. For

Table 7.

AVERAGE

e Rank

r & Sergeant enant & Captainr, Senior Officerant, Lieutenant,r, Corporal, Ser

r, Agent, Sergea

r, Agent, Sergeaenant & Captainr & Sergeant r & Sergeant

enant & Captainr, Sergeant, Liein r, Detective, Se

enant in r, Corporal, Ser

enant r r, Sergeant

enant & Captainr, Detective, Se

enant & Captain

rage step increar classifications

TABLE 6 E STEP INCRE

r, Detective , Captain rgeant

ant, Lieutenant

ant

eutenant,

ergeant,

rgeant,

ergeant

ase is shown in Twith an open ra

EASE

Contract Te

01/04/2013 07/01/2012 12/11/2013 07/01/2013 01/01/2013 07/01/2005 Extended: 007/01/2013 07/01/2013 01/01/2014 06/30/2013 06/30/2013

10/1/2009 –

07/01/2011

07/01/2011

07/01/2011

07/01/2006 02/19/2014 01/22/2014 07/01/2009 03/14/2014

Table 6. Pleaseange (no steps, m

erm

– 07/03/2015 – 01/14/2016 – 06/30/2014 – 06/30/2015 – 12/31/2014 – 06/30/2010

06/30/2014 – 06/30/2015 – 06/30/2015 – 12/31/2016 – 06/30/2015 – 06/30/2015

– 09/30/2014

– 06/30/2014

– 06/30/2014

– 06/30/2014

– 06/30/2015 – 12/31/2014 – 12/31/2015 – 12/01/2014 – 03/14/2016

e note that not aminimum and m

13

all maximum

Average Step

Increase 5.00% 5.00% 5.06% 5.06% 5.00%

5.33%

5.06% 5.06% 5.00% 4.97% 4.68%

5.75%

2.38%

1.53%

5.44%

7.09% 6.18% 4.88% 5.00% 5.05%

2

S

CC

C

C

CO

C


Surveyed Emp

City of SacramenCity and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San DiOffice

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

nto, CA of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

Market Av

ego, CA


Police

Office, CA Office

OfficeCaptaOfficeLieute

's DeputCapta

verage OfficeLieute

14

e Rank

r & Sergeant r r, Sergeant, Liein r & Sergeant

enant & Captainy, Sergeant, Liein

er, Detective, Senant, Captain

eutenant,

eutenant,

Sergeant,

Contract Te

06/28/2014 07/01/2007

07/1/2013 –

07/01/2013 07/01/2008

06/27/2014

07/01/2013

erm

– 06/23/2017 – 06/30/2018

– 12/31/2015

– 06/30/2015 – 06/30/2014

– 06/21/2018

– 06/30/2018

14

Average Step

Increase 5.00% 5.68%

5.00%

5.00% 5.00%

4.73%

4.96%

4.78%

2

SCC

C

C

C

C

C

C1

a2

s


Surveyed EmpCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula Vist

City of Escondido

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Sacramen

City of San Franc

MarkCity of San Die1City of Oakland, adjustment. 2City of San Franschedule adjustm

mpensation Study as

ployer PCA Lta, CA C

o, CA L

City, CA C

CA1 SC

nto, CA L

cisco, CA2 InL

ket Average ego, CA --

CA: Sergeant, Li

cisco, CA: Inspecment.


Police Rank

Lieutenant & CaCaptain

Lieutenant & Ca

Captain Sergeant, LieuteCaptain Lieutenant & Canspector, Serge

Lieutenant, Capt

- ieutenant, and Ca

ctor, Sergeant, Li

14

AVERAGE

Co

ptain 01Un

ptain MSaUn

enant, 07

ptain 06eant, tain 07

--

aptain are paid at

eutenant, and Ca

TABLE 7 E MERIT INCR

ontract Term

1/01/2014 – 12/3nclassified, Sengmt and Unclasalary Plan nrepresented M

7/01/2006 – 06/3

6/16/2012 – 12/2

7/01/2007 – 06/3

t a flat rate. Pay

aptain are paid at

REASE

FY

31/2015 0nior Mgmt 0ssified

Mgmt

30/2015 0

26/2014

30/2018 0

0

increases reporte

t a flat rate. Pay

Y 2014 FY 20

0.00% 4.000.00% --

NR NR

NR NR

0.00% 4.04

NR NR

0.00% 0.00

0.00% 2.68-- --

ed are the same a

increases reporte

015 FY 2016

% 3.50% --

R --

R --

% --

R --

% 1.00%

% 2.25% --

as the pay sched

ed are the same a

15

FY 2017

-- --

--

--

--

--

2.00%

2.00% --

dule

as the pay

2

SC

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

CCFC

C

CS

C1Cye2C


Surveyed EmpCity of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of SacramenCity and County oFrancisco, CA City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San DiSheriff's Office

City of San DieCity of Oakland, CAears. City of Riverside, CA

mpensation Study as

ployer CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA1

e, CA

CA2

nto, CA of San

CA

a, CA

ego, CA -

ego, CA A: Sworn Police Per

A: Sworn Police Pe


SHIFSecond Shift 6:00pm to 6:00-- -- Swing Shift:2.0-- Swing Shift The majority of5:00pm and 12-- -- Swing Shift:2:0The majority of5:00pm and 12Applies to 2nd a11:00pm to 7:00a8:30pm to 7:00am7:00pm to 7:00am

Swing Shift --

Night Shift:6:00

-- The majority of5:00pm and 7:

-- The majority o6:00pm

rsonnel receiving th

ersonnel must have

14

FT DIFFERENDefinition 0am (applies to

00pm to 12:00a

f the regularly s2:00am

00pm to 12:00af the regularly s2:00am and 3rd shift: m (5day/8hr workw

m (4day/10hr workwm (3day/12hr workw

0pm – 6:00am (

f the regularly s00am (applies t

of the regularly

he 2nd Shift Differen

e at least 5 years of

TABLE 8 TIAL FOR SE

2nd and 3rd shift

m

scheduled hours

m scheduled hours

week) week) week)

(applies to 2nd a

scheduled hoursto 2nd and 3rd sh

y scheduled ho

ntial must not be a

f experience to rece

ECOND SHIFT

t)

s must fall betwe

s must fall betwe

and 3rd shift)

s must fall betwehift)

ours must fall a

PSO or CRT and m

eive swing shift pay

T Shif2% -- -- $80 -- 2%

een $160

-- -- 1%

een 6.25

3%

$18 --

6.25

-- een App

pay

-- after 3.8%must be employed f

y.

ft Differential Aof base pay

per pay period

of base pay

0 per month

of base pay

5% of base pay

of base pay

per shift

5% of base pay

roximately 10%

% of base payfor more than 4 con

16

Amount

% of base

ntinuous

2

SC

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C1

f2



City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die1City of Oakland, four continuous y2City of Riverside

mpensation Study as

ployer CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA*

e, CA

CA**

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA CA: Sworn Polic

years. e, CA: Sworn Polic


SHThird6:00p-- -- 10:00Sun),-- GraveThe m12:00-- -- GraveThe m12:00Applie11:00p8:30pm7:00pm

Grave--

, CA Night-- The mbetwe

's Office -- The mafter

e Personnel rece

ce Personnel mu

14

IFT DIFFEREd Shift Definitiopm to 6:00am (a

0pm to 8:00am (, 6:30pm to 7:00

eyard Shift majority of the re0am and 8:00am

eyard Shift:9:00majority of the re0am and 7:00ames to 2nd and 3rd

pm to 7:00am (5daym to 7:00am (4day/m to 7:00am (3day/

eyard Shift

t Shift:6:00pm –

majority of the reeen 5:00pm and

majority of the 9:00pm

eiving the 2nd Shi

st have at least 5

TABLE 9 NTIAL FOR T

on applies to 2nd an

(Mon – Thurs), 0am (Fri – Sun)

egularly schedum

0pm to 7:00amegularly schedu

m d shift: y/8hr workweek) /10hr workweek) /12hr workweek)

– 6:00am (applie

egularly schedud 7:00am (applie

regularly sche

ift Differential mu

5 years of experie

HIRD SHIFT

nd 3rd shift)

2:30pm to 3:00a

uled shift falls be

uled shift falls be

es to 2nd and 3rd

uled hours must es to 2nd and 3rd

eduled hours m

st not be a PSO o

ence to receive gr

Shif2% -- --

am (Fri - $160

-- 4%

etween $240

-- -- 2%

etween 8.25

3%

$24 --

shift) 6.25--

t fall d shift)

Apppay--

must fall 5.3%or CRT and must

raveyard shift pay

ft Differential Aof base pay

0 per pay period

of base pay

0 per month

of base pay

5% of base pay

of base pay

per shift

5% of base pay

proximately 10%

% of base payt be employed fo

y.

17

Amount

d

% of base

r more than

2

S

C

C

C

C

CCC

C

C

C

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA o, CA A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA


StandAn empurposituatnormManaEmpltime dworkiIncideemplodesigemploand atakingPoliceStandadditiassigremacontacallba1 houNR NR -- OfficenotificstandOn-caDepaRequto dut-- Emplby an

14

TSTANDBY ORdby or On-Callmployee assignoses of being ontions arising at tal working hour

agement designoyee is to remaduring specific hng hours ent Stand-by is oyee is required

gnee, to remain oyee can reasoarrive in a safe ag only the time ne Department odby duty is definion to the emplonment during win at all times w

acted by telephoack to perform eur of notification

ers must report cation and not cdby all personnel wi

artment expenseuired to stand byty within a desig

oyee is placed on authorized sup

TABLE 10 R ON-CALL T Time Definitioed to standby dn-call to handle times other thanrs ates standby pa

ain available to whours outside of

defined as timed, by the Police at a place whernably expect to and expeditiousnecessary to ar

or other designaned as that periooyee's normal w

which the employwhere he or she one or pager reaessential service

within one hourconsume alcoho

ll receive pagere y and be availabgnated period o

on standby dutypervisor

TIME PAY on Sduty for

emergency n during M

ay work at any f normal

I8t

e in which an Chief or

re the respond

s manner rrive at the ted location

I$o

od of time in work week yee must can be

ady for e within one

$f

NN-

r of ol while on

rs at the

1Ths

ble to report f time 1

-y in writing $

h

Standby or On

Minimum 2 hou

In addition to an8-hour period othereof

In addition to an$22 for each 24or fraction there

$150 for each fufraction thereof

NR NR --

1x base pay forThe Chief of pohome vehicle asstandby pay in l

1x base pay for

-- $1.00 per hour hours per day

n-Call Time Pay

rs of pay

ny call-back, $4n standby or fra

ny overtime or c4-hour period oneof

ull bi-weekly pe

r 9 hours per welice may consids compensationlieu of pay

r every 6 hours o

up to a maximu

18

y

0 for each action

call-back, n standby

riod or

eek der a take n for

on standby

um of 24

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

N


Surveyed Emp

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die

NR- No response

mpensation Study as

ployer

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA


StandIn theduringfor thamouwork-- Emplto proand aafter must notific

Desig

, CA Emplnormreturn

Standwork Emplbut wleaveavailaby theregulastand

's Office -- The demplooff-duphoneable t

14

TSTANDBY ORdby or On-Calle event an emplg his/her standbat calendar day

unt of overtime c

oyees in a paid omptly respond arrive within a rebeing notified tobe able to arriv

cation

gnated by Mana

oyees required ally off duty andn to work to perf

dby duty performday oyees who are

who are requirede notice where thable to return toe department atarly scheduled w

dby duty

department may oyee be availabluty hours. Emploe or other electrto return to work

TABLE 10 R ON-CALL T Time Definitiooyee is called oby period, the sty shall be reducecompensation p

on-call status ato the designate

easonable perioo respond. Empve within 60 min

ager

to be on standbd to be instantly form their duties

med on a regula

released from ad by their departhey can be reac

o active duty whet any time otherworking hours,

require or requele to return to wooyees must be aronic communick within 1 hour o

TIME PAY on Sout to work tandby pay ed by the

paid for such

-are required ed location

od of time ployees utes of

4c

$a

by when available to

s

1(1(

arly assigned 23

active duty tment to ched and en required r than their shall be on

$

-est that an ork during available by ation and

of request

131yUo

Standby or On

--

4 hours at 1x bacontinuous 24 h

$30 per day up addition to base1x base pay for(regularly assig1x base pay for(regularly sched2 hour minimum3 hour minimum

$200 per week

-- 1 day of discreti300 hours of no10 days maximuyear Up to 300 hoursover.

n-Call Time Pay

ase pay for eachhours on-call

to $210 per wee pay r a minimum of 2ned work day)

r a minimum of 3duled day off) m (before shift)m (on day off)

ionary leave (DLn-court stand-by

um accrual of DL

s of DL may be c

19

y

h

ek, in

2 hours

3 hours

L) for every y accrued L per fiscal

carried

2

SC

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C



City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

mpensation Study as

ployer CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA


Call-BEmplEmpladditiwork

If an eplacedirectpart oshift

Whenafter requistart oReposchedAn undefinedays Any tday thday Any timmeconsi

Emplfor ot

Call-b

14

TCALL-B

Back Time Defoyee called out oyee directed toional services aperiod

employee is reqe of employmentted by the emplof the employee

never an employhe she has left red to return to of his or her nex

orting for duty ouduled shifts nscheduled or ued as one in whwas provided ime worked outhat is not within

ime worked prioediately followingdered as call-ba

oyees who are her than non-co

back pay

TABLE 11 BACK TIME Pfinition

for emergency o return to work

after completion

quired to return t or other work loyer at a time th

e's regularly sch

yee is called bahis or her work work before thext shift utside of regular

unplanned evenhich less than 7

tside the schedu the meaning of

or to the beginng a shift shall noack

called back to dourt appearance

PAY C

work 1k to perform

of regular 1

to his or her location hat is not eduled work

1(sces

ack to work site and is

e scheduled $b

rly

t shall be calendar

1Ehc

uled work f extended 1

ing or ot be 1

duty stations es

1ow

1od

Call-Back Time1.5x base pay

1.5x base pay;

1.5x base pay; (Minimums shasituations wherecontiguous withend of the emplscheduled work

$50.00 pay diffebase pay

1.5x base pay; Employees alsohalf-hour prior acall out at the ov

1.5x base pay;

1.5x base pay;

1.5x base pay for 1 hour of travwhichever is gre

1x base pay or on the number oday deployment

e Pay

minimum of 3 h

minimum of 4 hll not applicablee the call back i

h the commenceloyee's regularlyk shift)

erential, in addit

minimum of 2 ho compensated and the 1/2 hourvertime rate

minimum of 3 h

minimum of 3 h

for a minimum ovel time plus timeater

1.5x base pay dof hours workedt period

20

hours

hours e to s

ement or y

tion to 1.5x

hours for the r after the

hours

hours

of 2 hours me worked,

depending d in the 28-

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

N


Surveyed Emp

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die

NR- No response

mpensation Study as

ployer

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA


Call-B

Emplcomp

Emplhas chis/heEmplhas leIf callWhenoff thenext r

, CA Emplwork Calleleft thEmplduty tback to woeventovert

's Office The CappeahoursAn emworkcallednon-w

14

TCALL-B

Back Time Def

oyee is requiredpleting a normal

oyee is called bcompleted his/heer place of empoyee is called beft the worksiteed in for a mee

n the employee e police facility regularly schedoyee called bacday and departd back after shi

he premises oyees who are time due to theito work, employ

ork b/c of an emt, or employees ime Court may subpar in Court outss mployee who h

k and has left thd back to duty work location

TABLE 11 BACK TIME Pfinition

d to return to wowork day

back to work afteer regular shift aloyment

back to work afte

ting on his/her dis called back tprior to the staruled shift ck following comture from workspft is over and em

on call during thr assignment anyees who are orergency or unfothat sign up for

poena an employside of regular w

has been releahe workplace afrom home or

PAY C

ork after

1(bpbo

er he/she and has left M

er he/she 1

day off 2o work from

rt of his/her 1

mpletion of pace M

mployee has M

he their off-nd are called rdered back

oreseen r voluntary

1ti

yee to working 3

sed from and is

any other 1i

Call-Back Time1.5x base pay; (If call-back occbeginning of theperiod, then embase pay for 1 hovertime hours

Minimum of 2.5

1.5x base pay;

2 hour minimum

1.5x base pay;

Minimum of 3 h

Minimum of 3 h

1.5x base pay ftime (travel timeif employee volu

3 hours minimu

1.5x base pay;including trave

e Pay minimum of 4 h

curs within 3 houe employee’s re

mployee receivedhour more than worked)

hours

minimum of 3 h

m (Police Sergea

minimum of 4 h

ours

ours

for time worked e will not be comunteers)

m

minimum of 4el

21

hours urs of the

egular work d 1.5x the

hours

ant)

hours

and travel mpensated

4 hours,

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C1


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die1City of San Diego,

mpensation Study as

HOL

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA1

CA: Employees wh


LIDAY PAY FO

ReguEmplweekcomp2.5x bpay fo1x bavacat1.5x b

1x ba

1.5x b

Office

1x ba

1.5x b1.5x b2.5x b

For e

1x ba1x baholida

, CA 1.5x b1x ba1x ba

's Office 1.5x b

1.5x ho work on the holi

14

TOR WORK ON

ularly Scheduleoyees have the

kly pay with an 8pensation and nbase pay (Policor actual time w

ase pay (Employtion or compensbase pay

ase pay (Police

base pay and 1

ers accrue 8 2/3

ase pay (Employ

base pay base pay base pay

employees work

ase pay (Employase pay (Employay credit) base pay

ase pay ase pay base pay

base pay iday also receive an

TABLE 12 N REGULARLY

ed Holiday Paye option to receiv8 hour reductiono reduction to pe supervisors re

worked) yees scheduledsatory time off)

personnel recei

x base pay or c

3 hours per mon

yees receive 13

ing 3day/12hr s

yees accrue 1 hyees scheduled

n additional 8 hours

Y SCHEDULE

y ve additional pa

n to their paid lepaid leave accoueceive straight t

to work on a ho

ive 12 vacation

compensatory pa

nth as holiday le

3 additional “holi

shifts, additional

hour of holiday t to work on a ho

s of straight pay.

ED HOLIDAYS

ay equivalent to eave account, orunt time for the enti

oliday that desir

days per year i

ay

eave in lieu of ho

iday” days off p

l 4 hours of stra

time credit for eaoliday that desir

S

10% of their rer no additional

re workday plus

re the day off w

n lieu of holiday

olidays

er year in lieu o

aight time

ach how workedre the day off w

22

gularly bi-

s 1.5x base

ill utilize

ys)

of holidays)

d) ill utilize

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

CN


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San DieNR- No response

mpensation Study as

HOLIDA

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA


AY PAY WOR

Non-

Eligib

1.5x b

Eligib

1.5x b

Eligib

Eligib

OfficeEligibworke1.5x b

NR

2.5x b

For e

EmplIf givebase

, CA Eligib

Eligib

Eligib

's Office 1.5x b

1.5x

14

TRK ON FOR NO

Regularly Sche

ble for call-back

base pay

ble for call-back

base pay

ble for call-back

ble for call-back

ers accrue 8 2/3ble for call-back ed, whichever isbase pay

base pay

employees work

oyees accrue 1en less than 5 dpay

ble for call-back

ble for call-back

ble for call-back

base pay

base pay or co

TABLE 13 ON-REGULAR

eduled Holiday

pay (1.5x base

pay (1.5x base

pay (1.5x base

pay (1.5x base

3 hours per monpay (2 hours of

s greater)

ing 3day/12hr s

hour of holidaydays of notice, th

pay (1.5x base

pay (1.5x base

pay (1.5x base

ompensatory ti

RLY SCHEDU

y Pay

pay rate, minim

pay, minimum

pay, minimum

pay, minimum

nth as holiday lef overtime pay o

shifts, additional

y time credit forhen 1.5x base p

pay, minimum

pay, minimum

pay including tr

me for employ

ULED WORKD

mum of 2 hours)

of 4 hours)

of 2 hours)

of 3 hours)

eave in lieu of hoor 1 hour of trav

l 4 hours of stra

r each hour worpay for hours wo

of 3 hours)

of 3 hours)

ravel time)

yees working a

DAY

)

olidays vel time pay plus

aight time

rked orked plus 8 ho

a 10hr+ shift

23

s time

urs at 1x

2

SC

CCC

C

CC

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

CC



City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San DiCity of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer CA

d, CA CA ta, CA

CA

o, CA A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriffego, CA


REPRESENCour1x ba1.5x bMinim1.5x bMinimEl CaSupeDMV 1.5 x $36 pAttencall refor a 1.5x b(If coemplo1.5x b1.5x bappea1.5x b1.5x b1.5x ba sch1.5x bMinimMinim

, CA 1.5x bPremshiftMinimMinim1.5x bTrave

's Office 1.5x b1.5x

14

TNTED POLICErt Time Pay ase pay; minimubase pay if calle

mum 3 hours cobase pay; minim

mum of 3 hours ajon Municipal Cerior Court: 1 ho

telephonic heabase pay; minim

per day; minimudance at court eceive 1 hour ofshift will receivebase pay; minimurt time is withinoyee will receivebase pay; minimbase pay; minimarance on his/hbase pay; minimbase pay; minimbase pay; minim

heduled day off, base pay; minim

mum of 4 hours mum of 2 hours base pay; minim

mium pay will be

mum of 2 hours mum of 3 hours base pay; minimel time limited tobase pay; minimbase pay; mini

TABLE 14 E PERSONNE

um of 2 hours ofed after 5:00pmmpensation at t

mum of 4 hours of pay, includin

Court: 30 mins our travel and prrings: minimummum of 4 hoursm of 2 hours oris considered tof overtime; empe 3 hours of ovemum of 4 hoursn 1 hour of the be 1.5x base pay

mum of 2.5 hourmum of 4 hours er scheduled da

mum of 2.5 hourmum of 4 hours mum of 3 hours

during vacationmum of 2 hours(if subpoenaed (if subpoenaed

mum of 3 hours rounded to the

(before shift) (day off)

mum of 2 hours o 2 hours each wmum of 3 hoursimum of 4 hou

L COURT TIM

f pay (Emergency Cthe appropriate (Off duty persog any travel tim

of travel and prerep time + minim 2 hours overtim

s (off duty persor 1.5x base payo be an official dployees instructeertime or actual

beginning of they for a minimumrs (If employee is ay off) rs (If on day off) (If employee is

n, or on a holida

on a day off to before or after (If not schedulenext hour, if co

(If employee is way

rs

ME PAY

Call Out) rate of pay

onnel) me ep time + minimmum 2 hours of me pay onnel)

duty assignmened to be in courtime worked, w

e employee’s rem of 1 hour)

required to mak

required to makay)

appear in courtthe employee’s

ed to work) ourt time is befor

not scheduled

um 2 hours oveovertime pay

t; employees wrt who are not sc

whichever is grea

egular work perio

ke a job-related

ke a court appe

t) s shift)

re the start of a

to work)

24

ertime pay

ho are on cheduled ater

od, then

d court

earance on

scheduled

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA


OVE

Afte

Afte

Afte

Afte

, CA A

's Office Aft

14

TERTIME PAY P

When are NonPersonnel elig

er 9 or 10 hoursas

After 40

After 80 ho

After 80 hours

After 160

After 40

er 8, 10, or 12 hshift

After 86 hou

r 171 hours wor

After 80 hour

After 171 ho

r 10 or 12 hoursas

After 40

After 40

After 171 hours w

After 40

After 40 hours

After 85 hoter 8 or 10 hou

shift

TABLE 15 POLICIES – N

n-exempt Sworgible for overtim

s per day depenssignment

0 hours per wee

ours per pay pe

s in 14-day work

0 hours in 28 da

0 hours per wee

hours per day det assignment

urs in 2-week pe

rked in a 28-day

rs in a biweekly

ours in 28-day p

s per day depenssignment

0 hours per wee

0 hours per wee

worked in a 28-d

0 hours per wee

in a 7-day work

ours per pay peurs per day dept assignment

NON-EXEMPT

n Police me pay?

ding on shift

k

riod

k period

ays

k

epending on

eriod

y work period

period

period

nding on shift

k

k

day period

k

k period

riod pending on

Do you offeNon-exe

Yes (RecruSe

r compensatorempt Sworn PoPersonnel?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NR

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes uit, PO I-III, Deergeant only)

25

ry time to olice

tective,

2

2014 Police Total Compensation Study as

Surveyed Em

City of Anaheim

City of BakersfiCity of CarlsbadCity of Chula Vi

City of El CajonCity of EscondidCity of Fresno, City of Long BeCity of Los AngCity of National

City of OaklandCity of OceansiCity of RiversidCity of SacrameCity and CountyCity of San Jos

City of Santa AnCounty of San D

City of San D


OVE

mployer

m, CA

eld, CA d, CA ista, CA

n, CA do, CA CA

each, CA eles, CA City, CA

, CA de, CA e, CA ento, CA y of San Francisce, CA

na, CA Diego, CA - Sher

Diego, CA

14

TABERTIME PAY P

Do payYesservnorm

co, CA

riff's Office

BLE 16 POLICIES - EX

you pay any Fy or compensats, for special eveve as watch commally assigned

No (Captain

XEMPT

LSA Exempt Ptory time? ents when exemmmanders and pto non-exempt e

No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

n and Lieutena

Police overtime

mpt employees perform work employees

ants only)

e

26

2

I

Tp

M(T

T


Incentive Pay

The survey inclupersonnel:

Tuition Reim Educational P.O.S.T. Cer Physical Fitn

Most of the surv(either a percentTables 17 throu

Three (3) of the

mpensation Study as

y

uded questions r

mbursement/EduAttainment Payrtification Incenness Incentive P

veyed employertage increase or

ugh 19.

surveyed emplo


regarding four (

ucational Incenty ntive Pay Pay

s provide a baser flat dollar supp

oyers provide in

14

(4) different typ

tive Pay

e pay increase oplement), and a f

ncentives related

es of incentive b

r supplemental few provide reim

d to physical fitn

based pay increa

pay to recognizmbursement for

ness, as shown i

ases offered to R

ze educational orr education costs

in Table 20.

Represented Po

r certification ats. Details are sh

27

lice

ttainment hown in

2

S

CCC

C

CCC

C

CC

C

CCCCCC

C

CO

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist


City of Long Beac

City of Los AngelCity of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCA City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana


City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA CA

ta, CA

CA o, CA A

ch, CA

es, CA City, CA

CA

e, CA CA


CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA


TUITION REI

TuReimbu

EducationYY

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y, Y

Y

Y

's Y

Y

14

TMBURSEMEN

uition ursement/

nal Incentive?Yes Yes No

Yes

Yes No No

Yes

No Yes

Yes

Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

TABLE 17 NT/EDUCATIO

Policy

ReimbursemeSubject to app-- Employees areprofessional e$750 per fiscaThis benefit ha-- $375 reimburs$375 reimburs$400 reimburs$400 reimburs$120 reimbursTotal maximum-- $2,000 per fiscIf the employe$400; if the em$400; if the em$200 $2,000 per yea-- $1,500 per yea$500 per year $300 per year $1,500 per yeaCosts of $100 Costs of over $2,284 per yeaEmployees wtextbook/sup

ONAL INCENT

nt up to 75% ofproval

e eligible to receenrichment al year as been suspen

sement for 1-5.9sement for 1-7.9sement for 6 or sement for 8 or sement for Comm reimburseme

cal year ee receives an Amployee receive

mployee receive

ar

ar maximum maximum

ar maximum tuior less are 100$100 are 75% rar

will be reimburspplies fees up t

TIVE PAY

f the employee’s

eive up to $1,00

nded since 2009

9 semester units9 quarter units more semester more quarter un

mmunity Collegeent per fiscal yea

A, then 100% ofes a B, then 75%

es a C, then 50%

ition reimbursem0% reimbursablereimbursable

sed 100% of tuto $1000 per fis

s cost

00 per fiscal yea

9

s

units nits

e ar is $800

f the course cos% of the course% of the course

ment e

ition and scal year

28

ar for

st up to e cost up to

cost up to

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

CC

C

C

CCCC

C

COC


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac


City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San DiOffice City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA nto, CA of San Francisco,CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA


EDUCEduc

Attainm

Y

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

NN

Y

Y

NY

, CA NN

Y

's NN

14

TCATIONAL ATcational ment Pay? Po

Yes In aBa

No --

Yes De$5,

Yes $30$35$40

Yes 2.55%

Yes 1%2%

Yes 3%5%

Yes $20$37$47

No -- No --

Yes 1.54.55.5

Yes $30$60

No -- Yes 5%No -- No --

Yes ApApAp

No -- No --

TABLE 18 TTAINMENT IN

licy

addition to basechelor’s degree

pending on yea,668 per year fo00 per month fo50 per month fo00 per month fo

5% of base pay % of base pay fo% of base pay fo% of base pay fo% of base pay fo% of base pay fo

00 per month fo75 per month fo75 per month fo

5% of base pay 5% of base pay 5% of base pay 00 bonus for As00 bonus for Ba

% of base pay fo

proximately 5%proximately 10%proximately 15%

NCENTIVE PA

e pay, Lieutenane or 5% for a Ma

ars of service, edor obtaining a deor a Bachelor’s Dor a Bachelor’s Dor a Master’s Defor Associates Dr Bachelor’s Der Associate’s Dr a Bachelor’s dr Bachelor’s der Master’s/Doct

or Associate’s Dor Bachelor’s Deor Master’s Degr

for Associate’s for Bachelor’s dfor a Master’s d

ssociate’s degreachelor’s degree

r Bachelor’s de

% of base pay for% of base pay fo% of base pay fo

AY

nt and Captainsaster’s degree

ducational incenegree Degree Degree w/ Advaegree or higherDegree

egree egree degree gree torate

Degree egree ree

degree degree degree ee e

gree

r Associate’s defor Bachelor’s defor Master’s deg

s receive 2.5% f

ntive is either $3

anced/Superviso

egree egree

gree

29

for a

3,952 or

ory POST

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

CCC


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County oCA City of San Jose,

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA


P.O

P.O.S.T.Ince

,

14

TO.S.T. CERTIF

Certification entive?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

TABLE 19 ICATION INC

Policy

10% above P12.5% for an A5% of base pa10% of base p$180 per mon$312 per mon$200 per mon$300 per mon$350 per mon3% of base pa6% of base pa4% of base pa5.25% of base4% of base pa8% of base pa4% of base pa9% of base paNew employe1% of base pa2% of base pa1.5% of base 3% of base pa1.5% of base 4.5% of base $208 per mon$277 per mon7.5% of base 12.5% of base5% of base pa5% of base pa4.0% of base 6.0% of base 5.0% of base

ENTIVE PAY

olice Officer for Advanced POSay for Intermedipay for Advancenth for Intermednth for Advancednth for an Assocnth for an Advannth for an Advanay for Intermediay for Advanceday for Intermedie pay for Advanay for Intermediay for Advanceday for Supervisoay for Managem

ees are not eligibay for Intermediay for Advancedpay for Interme

ay for Advancedpay for Intermepay for Advanc

nth for Intermednth for Advancedpay for Interme

e pay for Advanay for Intermediay for Advancedpay for Intermepay for Advancpay for POST

r possession of ST iate POST ed POST iate POST certid POST certific

ciate’s Degree nced/Supervisornced/Supervisoriate POST d POST iate POST

nced POST iate POST d POST ory POST

ment POST ble for POST iniate POST d POST ediate POST d POST ediate POST ced POST iate POST d POST

ediate POST nced POST iate POST d POST ediate POST ced POST

an Intermediate

ification ation

ry POST ry POST w/ Bac

centive pay

30

e POST or

chelor’s

2

S

C

CO

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Santa Ana


City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA


P.O.S.T.Ince

's

14

Certification entive?

No

Yes

Yes

Policy

7.5% of base -- 5% of base pa7.5% of base 10% of base p6.0% of base8.5% of base

pay for Advanc

ay for Intermedipay for Advanc

pay for Managee pay for Interme pay for Advan

ced POST

iate POST ced POST ement POST mediate POSTnced POST

31

2

S

CCCCCC

C

CCCCCC

C

CCCCOC


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San DiOffice City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA

A

ch, CA es, CA

City, CA CA e, CA CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,CA


ego, CA


P

PhysicInce

Y

Y

, CA Y

's

14

TPHYSICAL FIT

cal Fitness entive? Po

No --No --No --No --No --No --

Yes

Thgococo

No --No --No --No --No --No --

Yes Ofda

Yes EmNo --No --

No --No --

TABLE 20 TNESS INCEN

olicy

he Wellness Prooals and maintaiordinator, indivimponents

fficers who partiays per week to mployees may re

NTIVE PAY

ogram provides ining standards,idual consultatio

cipate will be eluse City fitnesseceive additiona

for a monetary , the services ofons and screeni

ligible to use 60s equipment al days off

incentive for acf a health/fitnesings, and educa

0 minutes of paid

32

chieving s

ational

d time 2

2

S

Ta

T

K

K

S

I

F

B

E

H

F

A

A

M


Special Duty

Table 21 showsare shown on Ta

Type

K-9 Trainer Duty

K-9 Officer Duty

SWAT or Emerg

Investigative or

Field Training O

Bilingual Skills

Emergency Neg

Harbor Unit

Flight/Pilot Duty

Accident Investi

Administrative A

Motorcycle Duty

mpensation Study as

Pay

s a summary of tables 22 throug

y

y

gency Respons

Detective Duty

Officer

gotiator

y

igation Bureau

Assignment

y


the prevalence ogh 33.

e

14

of each type of s

TSPECIAL D

# of SuEmployer

(out o

1

1

8

1

1

4

0

1

special duty pay

TABLE 21 UTY PAY SUM

urveyed rs Offering of 18) 3

16

11

8

16

16

1

1

7

4

0

13

y for Represente

MMARY

% of SurEmployers

17%

89%

61%

44%

89%

89%

6%

6%

39%

22%

0%

72%

ed Sworn Police

rveyed s Offering

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

e personnel. Mo

City of SanOffers

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

33

re details

n Diego s?

2

S

CCCCCCCC

C

CC

C

CCCCCC

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National CCity of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA A ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA CA

e, CA



Counego, CA


K-9

, CA

's Office nt of Yes

14

TK-9 TRA

9 Trainer Duty (Yes or No)

No No No No No No No No

Yes

No No

Yes

Yes No No No No No

3 out of 18Yes

TABLE 22 AINER DUTY P

Pay? Policy

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Officer Sergea-- -- 4 hourshome15 hou-- -- -- -- -- 3.5% o

PAY

III paid on Scheant II paid on Sc

s at 1.5x base p

rs at 1.5x base

of base pay

edule 5 chedule 8

pay per week fo

pay per month

r kenneling can

34

nine at

2

S

CCCCCC

C

C

C

C

C

CCCCCC

C

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA CA


a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

Co

ego, CA


, CA

's Office

ount of Yes

14

TK-9 OFF

K-9 Officer DuPay?

(Yes or No)Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

No

16 out of 18

Yes

TABLE 23 FICER DUTY P

uty

) Policy

2.5% o5.0% o4 hours3.5 hou1.5x ba1.5x baCity pasupplie$183.75Officer Sergea4% of b1.5x of $50 allo-- 15 hou40% of5% of b1 pay sApproxOfficer for dog

8 3.5% oIn addiOfficermainte

PAY

f base pay f base pay

s at 1.5x base purs at 1.5x basease pay for 30 mase pay for 4 hoys for Kennel in

es 5 per pay periodIII paid on Sche

ant II paid on Scbase pay state minimum

owance per mo

rs at 1.5x base f time caring for base pay for foostep increase ximately 5% of b

allowed 7 hours. The County p

of base pay ition to the Cityrs receive $350enance allowan

pay per week fore pay per weekmins per day, 7 dours per week n home, food, ve

d plus veterinaredule 4 chedule 3

wage for 15 honth for dog food

pay per monththe dog at 1.5x

od, supplies, and

base pay s of release tim

pays for food an

y’s regular uni0 for initial purcnce of $300 per

r care and main

days per week

eterinarian costs

rian costs

ours per monthd and care

x base pay d veterinarian e

e per pay periodd veterinarian e

form allowancchase of unifor fiscal year

35

ntenance

s, and

expenses

d to care expenses

e, Canine rm and a

2

S

CCCC

C

CCC

C

CC

C

CCCCCC

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National CCity of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA CA ta, CA

CA

o, CA A ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA CA

e, CA



Co

ego, CA


SWAT TEAM SWR

, CA

's Office ount of Yes

14

TOR EMERGE

WAT Team or esponse Team

(Yes or NYesYesNoNo

No

YesYesNo

Yes

YesNo

Yes

YesNoYesYesNoYes

11 out o

Yes

TABLE 24 ENCY RESPONEmergency

m Duty Pay? No)

P

5$--Su$$-PP3-5w1-51-5

f 18 3ISuf

NSE TEAM DU

Policy

5.0% of base pa$140.00 per mo-- -- SWAT membersuniforms and eq$75.00 per mon$275 per month-- Police Officer IIIPolice Sergeant3% of base pay-- 5 hours at 1.5x weapons trainin1.5x base pay fo-- 5% of base pay1 pay step incre-- 5% of base pay

3.5% of base pIn addition to tSWAT Officersuniform and a fiscal year

UTY PAY

ay onth

s receive an adquipment nth (Tactical Opeh

I paid on Schedt II paid on Sche

y

base pay per mng or Metro Team

y ease

y (Corporal)

pay he City’s regul

s receive $400 fmaintenance a

ditional $75 per

erations Unit)

dule 4 edule 8

month for physic

lar uniform allofor initial purchallowance of $3

36

r year for

al and

owance, hase of 300 per

2

S

CCCCCCC

C

CCCCCCCCCC

CN


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di


mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA A

ch, CA

es, CA City, CA CA e, CA CA



Coego, CA e


INVE

D

, CA


14

TESTIGATIVE O

Investigative Detective Duty P

(Yes or No)Yes No No No No Yes Yes

Yes

Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes

8 out of 18Yes

TABLE 25 OR DETECTIV

or Pay? )

Policy

5.0% o-- -- -- -- 5.0% o$275 pePolice Oassigne1% of b-- -- -- -- 5.5% o-- -- Approx5.0% o

8 5.0% o

VE DUTY PAY

f base pay

f base pay er month Officers, Corpored to the Detectbase pay

f base pay

ximately 2.5% off base pay

of base pay (Se

Y

rals, Sergeantstive Bureau will

f base pay

ergeants only)

, and Lieutenanreceive $300 p

37

nts er month

2

S

CC

C

C

C

CC

C

CCCCCC

C

CCC

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA A

ch, CA


nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA a, CA ego, CA - Sheriff

Count

ego, CA


F

FieOffic

(Y

, CA

's Office t of Yes 16

14

TIELD TRAININ

eld Training er Duty Pay?

Yes or No) Yes No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes

Yes

No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Yes

Yes Yes Yes

6 out of 18

Yes

TABLE 26 NG OFFICER

Policy

5.0% of base p-- $20 for each wfunction $4.00 per hourEmployees whextra $175 per5.0% of base p$500 per montPolice Officersshall receive 1each hour wor-- 3.0% of base p7.5% of base p6 hours at 1x bCompensatory9.5% of base p$550 per pay p$125 per pay p1 base pay incApproximately 5.0% of base p 5.0% of base In addition to Instructors remaintenance

DUTY PAY

pay

work shift in whic

r when an emploho serve 3 schedr month pay th s and Corporals 0% of the curre

rked in that assig

pay pay base pay per wey time of 1.25 hopay period (Officer), period (Station Ccrease

2.5% of base ppay (Corporal)

pay while perfothe City’s regu

eceive $200 for allowance of $

ch an employee

oyee is engageduled shifts with

assigned by Chent to step of Pognment

eek ours per 10 hou

$400 per pay pCoordinator)

pay

forming duties ular uniform alr initial purchas$100 per fiscal

e is engaged in

ed in a training fuhin 2 months qu

hief of Police to olice Officer or C

urs of training

period (Supervis

as a trainer llowance, Corese of uniform ayear

38

a training

unction ualify for an

be FTOs Corporal for

sor),

e and a

2

S

C

C

C

C

CCCC

C

C

C

C

C

C

CC

C

C

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County oCity of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA o, CA A ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,CA

a, CA

ego, CA - SheriffCo

ego, CA


B

, CA


14

TBILINGU

Bilingual Skills (Yes or No)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes Yes Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes 16 out of 18

Yes

TABLE 27 UAL SKILLS PPay?

) Policy

2.5% olevel), 7$40.00 $40.00 skills $200 peMust co$60 peVerbal $100 peAdditioNew emEmploy3% of b2% of b$25 pe$50 penon-En$1.73 pMust pa3% of b$20 peEmploy$35 biw$29 biw$40 to $Officers5% to 1$32.30

8 3.5% o

PAY

f base pay (stre7.5% of base pabiweekly per pay period

er month for regomplete a Bilingr month skills: $200 perer month nal $0.80 per homployees will noyees hired beforbase pay (Officebase pay (Lieuter pay period r pay period (If a

nglish speaking per hour ass bilingual exbase pay r pay period yee must be cerweekly weekly $175 per months) 10% of base paybiweekly

of base pay

eet level), 5.0%ay (court certifie

for performanc

gular use of bilingual Performanc

r month, Written

our ot receive bilingre 1/1/2010 receer and Corporalenant and Serg

assignment is cmembers of the

xam in Spanish o

rtified

h, based on prof

y, based on pro

of base pay (coed)

ce of Spanish bil

ngual skills ce Examination

n skills: $75 per

gual pay eive 2.75% of b) eant)

comprised of at e public)

or Samoan

ficiency (Non-S

oficiency (Sworn

39

omplex

lingual

month

base pay

least 50%

worn

n Officers)

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA A ch, CA es, CA




Coego, CA


, CA


14

TEMERGENC

EmergencyNegotiator Pa

(Yes or No)No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No

1 out of 18Yes

TABLE 28 CY NEGOTIAT

y ay? )

Policy

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.5x ba-- -- -- -- --

8 3.5% o

OR PAY

ase pay for Host

of base pay

tage Negotiation Team

40

2

S

CCCCCCC

C

CCCCCCCCCC

C


Surveyed Emp


City of Long Beac

City of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer


ch, CA




Co

ego , CA


, CA


14

THARB

Harbor Unit Pa(Yes or No)

No No No No No No No

Yes

No No No No No No No No No No

1 out of 18

Yes

TABLE 29 BOR UNIT PAY

ay? )

Policy

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- $350 peLieuten-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

8 4.0% oIn addiPatrol initial p$150 p

Y

er month (Policenants assigned t

of base pay ition to the Cityand Beach Enfpurchase of uner fiscal year

e Officers, Corpto the Port Secu

y’s regular uniforcement Offiniform and a m

porals, Sergeanurity Unit)

form allowanccers receive $3

maintenance all

41

nts, and

e, Harbor 350 for owance of

2

S

C

CCCCCC

C

C

CCCCCC

C

C

C

CN


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di


mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA A

ch, CA

es, CA



CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

Count

ego, CA e


Flig

, CA

's Office

t of Yes

14

TFLIGHT/

ght/Pilot Duty P(Yes or No)

Yes

No No No No No Yes

Yes

Yes

No Yes No No No No

Yes

No

Yes

7 out of 18

Yes

TABLE 30 PILOT DUTY

Pay? Policy

5.0% opay -- -- -- -- -- 20.5% $575 pe$275 peTacticaHazardrank) -- 5.0% o-- -- -- -- $250,00Standb-- 7.5% o12.5% service 11.5% 3.5% o

PAY

f base pay in ad

of base pay for er month (Helicer month (Helic

al Flight Officersd pay at Schedu

f base pay (Hel

00 life insuranceby pay when ord

f base pay (empof base pay (em

e)

of base pay (Pof base pay (Air

ddition to 2.5%

Chief Pilot copter Pilot) copter Observers and Helicopterules 7-12 (sched

icopter Unit Pilo

e policy dered

ployees with lesmployees with m

Primary Pilot) r Support Train

for special assig

r) r Pilots are eligibdule assignment

ot or Pilot Traine

ss than 5 years more than 5 yea

ners)

42

gnment

ble for t based on

ee)

of service) ars of

2

S

CCCCCCC

C

CCCC

C

CCCCC

C


Surveyed Emp


City of Long Beac

City of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer


ch, CA

es, CA City, CA CA e, CA

CA



Co

ego, CA


Ac

, CA


14

TACCIDENT I

ccident InvestiPay?

(Yes or NoNo No No No No No No

Yes

Yes No No No

Yes

No No No No Yes

4 out of 18

Yes

TABLE 31 INVESTIGATIO

gation

) Policy

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- $300 pLieutePolice-- -- -- Shift dInvest-- -- -- -- 5% of

8 4.0% oMust c

ON PAY

y

per month (Policenants assignede Officer III is elig

differential applietigation

base pay (Dete

of base pay complete POS

ce Officers, Cord to the Accidengible for Specia

es to officers as

ective)

ST Reconstruct

rporals, Sergeat Investigation D

al Pay at Schedu

ssigned to Accid

tion class

43

nts, and Detail) ule 4

dent

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CN


Surveyed Emp



mpensation Study as

ployer





Coego, CA e


A

, CA


14

TADMINISTRAT

AdministrativAssignment P

(Yes or No)No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

0 out of 18Yes

TABLE 32 TIVE ASSIGNM

ve ay? )

Policy

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

8 5.0% o

MENT PAY

of base pay (forr Sergeants)

44

2

S

CCCCCCC

C

C

CCCCCCCC

C

C


Surveyed Emp


City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer


ch, CA

es, CA



a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

Coun

ego, CA


Moto

, CA

's Office

nt of Yes

14

TMOTORC

orcycle Duty P(Yes or No)

Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No

Yes

13 out of 18

Yes

TABLE 33 CYCLE DUTY

Pay?Policy

5.0% of b2 hours o-- 2 hours a-- Helmet, m$275 per$350 perOfficer baMotorcycbased on4% of ba5% of ba4 to 6 ho3% of ba-- $414 per1 pay ste-- 7.5% of bAll motor 3.5% of bIn additioMotorcyuniform

PAY

base pay of pay per week

at 1.5x base pay

motorcycle pantr month; City pror month convertease hourly rate.cle Hazard pay an rank) ase pay (Officer,ase pay urs at 1x base p

ase pay

r month for empep increase

base pay and 4 rcycle safety gea

base pay on to the City’scle Officers recand a mainten

k; additional $10

y per week for m

ts, gloves, and ovides safety eqed to a percenta. at Schedules 4-

, Corporal, and

pay per week

ployees below th

hours of releasar provided by t

s regular unifoceive $725 for

nance allowanc

00 per year for u

maintenance of

boots provided quipment age of top step

-11 (schedule a

Sergeant)

he rank of Capta

se time for mainthe County

orm allowance,initial purchas

ce of $425 per f

45

uniforms

motorcycle

by the City

Police

ssignment

ain

tenance

se of fiscal year

2

P

S

CCC

C

CCC

C

C

C

CCC

C

CCCC

C


Pay Suppleme

Surveyed Emp


City of Chula Vist


City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ents

ployer

CA d, CA CA

ta, CA

CA o, CA A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA e, CA CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,CA


Count

ego, CA


UNIFOUnifoAllow

, CA

's Office t of Yes

14

TORM AND EQUorm and Equipwance/Pay Pol

Yes Yes Yes

Yes

Yes Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes No

Yes

Yes Yes No Yes

17 out of 18

Yes

TABLE 34 UIPMENT ALLment licy? Policy

Uniform$1,300 $700 pUniform$300 p$775 p$800 p$1,200 $500 foUniformfair wea$1,025 $350 inyear $400 in$700 pUniform$910 pEmployreceive$820 p$731 p-- $1,000 $900 pSpeciaallowato $800from $

LOWANCE/PA

ms and Equipmeper year

er year period fms and Equipmeer year Cleaniner year er year per year

or firearm (uponms are replacedar-and tear or dper year

nitial allowance f

nitial allowance fer year

ms and Equipmeer year yees authorizeded a voucher witer year er year

per year

per year for regal Duty Officersnce, an initial p0, and addition100 to $425 pe

AY

ent are provided

for purchasing aent are provided

ng Allowance

n completion of td at the discretiodamaged basis

for uniforms; $7

for uniforms

ent are provided

d to purchase a th a maximum v

gular Police Offs receive the repurchase allow

nal maintenancer fiscal year

d by the City

and maintenancd

training) on of the Police

750 uniform allo

d by the City

new bullet proovalue of $729

ficers egular annual uwance ranging ce allowances r

46

ce

Chief on a

owance per

of vest will

uniform from $200

ranging

2

L

SCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC1

w2

3

i4

5

6

7

8

9

a


Longevity Pay

Surveyed EmpCity of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San DiCity of San Diego, 1City of Chula Viswhen they have 12City of Escondid3City of Long Beancrease when th

4City of Los Ange5City of National C6City of Oakland, 7City of Oceansid8City of Sacramen9City and County applies to all rank

mpensation Study as

y

ployer CA d, CA CA ta, CA1

CA o, CA2

A ch, CA3

es, CA4

City, CA5

CA6

e, CA7

CA nto, CA8

of San Francisco,CA

a, CA ego, CA – SheriffCA

sta, CA: Captain i15 or more years o, CA: Police Off

ach, CA: Police Oey have 15 years

eles, CA: LongeviCity, CA: LongeviCA longevity pay

de, CA: Longevitynto, CA: Longevitof San Francisco

ks.


LON10 -- -- -- -- --

5% --

5% $2,422 $

-- $1,475 $

-- -- --

, CA9 -- -- --

f -- --

s not eligible for lof service.

ficers move from Officers receive a s of service. Longty pay applies onity pay is only avay begins at 7 yeary pay applies onlyty pay applies to o, CA: Longevity p

14

TNGEVITY PAY

11 12 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

5% 5% -- --

5% 5% $2,422 $2,422 $

-- -- $1,475 $1,475 $

-- $3,000 $-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

longevity pay. Of

Step 6 to Step 7 5% increase in thgevity pay does n

nly to Police Officeailable to employers of service and

y to Police Officerall ranks. pay of 2% at 23 y

TABLE 35 Y BY YEARS O

13 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

5% 5% -- --

5% 5% 10

$2,422 $2,422 $-- --

$1,475 $1,475 $$3,000 $3,000 $

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

fficer, Agent, Ser

after 10 years of heir base pay whenot apply to other er ranks. ees hired on or bapplies to all ran

r and Sergeant ra

years of service a

OF SERVICE15 16 -- -- -- -- -- --

3% 3% -- --

5% 5% -- --

0.25% 10.25% 10

4,865 $4,865 $4-- --

1,675 $1,675 $13,000 $3,000 $3

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

rgeant, Lieutenan

service. Longeven they have 10 yranks.

before June 30, 20ks.

anks.

and an additional

17 18 -- -- -- -- -- --

3% 3% -- --

5% 5% -- --

0.25% 10.25% 10

4,865 $4,865 $4-- --

1,675 $1,675 $13,000 $3,000 $3

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- -- -- --

nt receive a 3% in

vity pay does not ayears of service a

011.

4% (total of 6%)

19 20 2-- -- -- -- -- --

3% 3% 3-- --

5% 5% 5-- --

0.25% 10.25% 10

4,865 $7,287 $7-- --

1,675 $1,875 $13,000 $3,000 $3

-- -- -- $100 $-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

ncrease in their ba

apply to other ranand an additional

at 30 years of se

47

21 25 -- -- -- -- -- --

3% 3% -- --

5% 5% -- --

0.25% 10.25%

7,287 $7,287 -- --

1,875 $1,875 3,000 $3,000

-- -- $300 $300

-- 2% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

ase pay

nks. 5%

ervice

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C1


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die1City of National C

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA1

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA City, CA: Longevi


, CA

's Office

ity pay is only ava

14

TLONGE

Maximum AnLongevity Am

--

--

--

3%

--

5%

--

10.25%

$7,287

--

$1,875

$3,000

--

$300

6%

--

--

--

-- ailable to employe

TABLE 36 EVITY MAXIMU

nnual mount

ees hired on or b

UM

Years to Max

--

--

--

15

--

10

--

15

20

--

20

12

--

25

30

--

--

--

-- before June 30, 20

ximum Loco

011.

ongevity pay inovered compen

pensions

--

--

--

Yes

--

Yes

--

NR

Yes

--

Yes

No

--

No

Yes

--

--

--

--

48

ncluded as nsation for s?

2

H

S

C

C

C

C

C

CCC

C

C

C

CC

C

C

CC

C

C


Hiring Practic

Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of OceansideCity of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose, City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ces

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA A ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA


POLI

Can the

, CA

's Office

14

TICE RECRUIT

Police Recruitse minimum of th

Yes

Yes

NR

Yes

Yes

NoNoNo

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes--

Yes

Yes

NoYes

Yes

Yes

TABLE 37 TS HIRED ABO

s be hired aboheir pay scale?s

s

R

s

s

o o o

s

s

s

s

s

s

o s

s

s

OVE MINIMUM

ve ? Policy

May be hirIt is customsteps withNR May be hirabove minThe City hsalary for pdeemed a-- -- -- May be hirand/or expDepends oMay be hirapprove hDiscretionFlat rate foPolice RecManager ostep in theEmployeesHiring aboadditional -- May be hirMay be hirexperiencePolice Re

M

red above minimmary to hire at Sin the Trainee p

red at Step A (mnimum) has the right to eprobationary Poppropriate for re

red up to Step 4perience on their qualificared up to Step 3iring above Steary or Police Recruicruits typically hor designee maye range s are rarely hire

ove minimum allcertification and

red up to Step Cred above minime

ecruits are typic

mum of salary sStep 1, but therepay range

minimum) or Ste

establish the enolice Officers at ecruitment purp

4, based on edu

ations 3; City Administp 3

it hired at Step 1, y approve hiring

ed above the milowed in cases d for lateral hire

C mum, based on

cally hired at S

49

schedule e are 5

ep B (5.0%

try level a level

poses

ucation

rator may

but City g at any

inimum of

es

years of

Step D

2

S

CCC

C

CCCCCCCCCC

C

CCCCN


Surveyed Emp


City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San DiCity of San DieNR = No Respon

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA CA

ta, CA

CA o, CA A ch, CA es, CA


nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA a, CA ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA se


D

, CA

's Office

14

TSIGNI

Do you offer sig(Yes

NNN

Y

NNNNNNNNNN

Y

NNYN

TABLE 38 ING BONUSE

gning bonusesor No)

No No No

es

No No No No No No No No No No

es

NR No es

No

S

s? Policy

-- -- -- New hires enforcemeexperience$1,000 forup to five ($5,000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Lateral Hirpaid withincompletionNR -- $1,000 pe--

who come froment agency with e will receive latr each full year o(5) years of exp

res receive a $5n 30 days after tn of the FTO pro

r year of experi

m another publicexternal law en

teral incentive pof external expeperience or a ma

5,000 signing bothe employee’s ogram

ence, up to $5,0

50

c law nforcement pay of erience for aximum of

onus that is successful

000

2

P

T

D


Paid Leave

The survey inclu

Vacation tim Paid sick lea Bereavemen Holidays an

Details about ea

mpensation Study as

uded questions r

me accrual, incluave accrual nt leave d personal days

ach surveyed em


related to paid t

uding cash out p

mployer’s paid le

14

time off, includi

policies

eave policies are

ing:

e shown in Tables 39 through 445.

51

2


Surve

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City o

City a

City o

City o

Count

City o


eyed Employer

f Anaheim, CA

f Bakersfield, CA

f Carlsbad, CA

f Chula Vista, CA

f El Cajon, CA

f Escondido, CA

f Fresno, CA

f Long Beach, CA

f Los Angeles, CA

f National City, C

f Oakland, CA

f Oceanside, CA

f Riverside, CA

f Sacramento, CA

nd County of San

f San Jose, CA

f Santa Ana, CA

ty of San Diego, C

of San Diego, C

14

TTYPE OF PA

r

A

A

A

A

CA

A

n Francisco, CA

CA - Sheriff's Offi

CA

TABLE 39 AID LEAVE PR

ice

ROGRAM

Traditional LePaid Time Off Paid Time Off

Traditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional LeTraditional Le

Paid Time Off

eave or (PTO) (PTO) eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave eave

(PTO)

52

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

CD


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San DieDifference

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

Market Aego, CA


>12110101010109

12151915101014

, CA 101010

's Office 10Average 12

142

14

TPTO/VAC

Va1 3

21 210 110 110 110 110 19 9

12 115 119 115 110 110 114 110 110 110 110 112 114 12 2

TABLE 40 CATION ACCR

cation Days Ac3 5 1 23 0 15 0 10 0 15 0 10 0 14

9 9 2 15 6 16 9 23 5 15 0 10 0 15 4 14 0 10 0 10 5 15 0 15 2 14 4 14

2 0

RUAL

ccrued per Yea10 12 25 25 15 15 15 17 20 20 15 15 18 18 10 11 15 16 24 24 23 23 15 18 15 17 20 20 14 17 15 15 15 18 18 19 15 15 17 18 18 18 1 0

ar, by Years of15 20 27 27 20 20 19 20 25 25 15 20 23 23 11 12 17 20 24 24 27 27 20 20 20 25 20 20 17 17 15 20 23 23 20 25 20 20 20 22 18 22 -2 0

f Service 25 3029 3120 2020 2025 2520 2023 2314 1620 2024 2527 2725 2525 2520 2017 1720 2023 2325 2520 2022 2222 220 0

53

0 30+ 1 31 0 20 0 20 5 25 0 20 3 23 6 18 0 20 5 25 7 27 5 25 5 25 0 20 7 17 0 20 3 23 5 25 0 20 2 22 2 22 0

2

Ct

SCCCCC

CCCCC

CCCCCC

CC

C1

hf2

3

4


City of San Diegtraditional leave

Surveyed EmpCity of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, C

City of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National C

City of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose,

City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die1City of Escondidhour (4) hours offfirst pay period in2City of Fresno: M3City of Sacramen4City of San Jose

mpensation Study as

go has a paid time program with s

ployer CA d, CA CA ta, CA CA

o, CA1

A2

ch, CA es, CA

City, CA

CA e, CA CA

nto, CA3

of San Francisco,CA4


ego, CA o, CA Floating Hof during the holida October.

Members shall acnto, CA sworn po

e, CA: All classific


me off program,separate sick lea

OTH

, CA

's Office

Market Averag

oliday Pay: The Cay season. This a

crue eight and twolice personnel mcations represente

14

, which does noave accrual, as s

TAHER PAID LEA

SicInclud

geInclud

City provides fouradditional Holiday

wo-thirds hours peust have 10 yeared by the POA re

t offer separate shown in Table

ABLE 41 AVE DAYS PEck Days ded in PTO

12 12 12 12 12 8

12 12 10 12 12 10 12 13 12 12 13 12

ded in PTO r (4) hours of Holiy pay is added to

er month as holidrs of service to queceive a 5.623% s

sick leave. The41.

ER YEAR Holid

1117

11199

119

111-1111

day Pay in lieu oo the employee’s

ay leave in lieu oualify for the 3 perspecial pay adjus

e majority of sur

days 0 3 2

7 2 0 2

9 9 0 2

9 1 4 1

-- 1 1

11 0

of the past practicFloating Holiday

of the recognized rsonal days per y

stment in lieu of h

rveyed employe

Personal/FloaIncluded in

--152

0.524--41----34--1221

e of granting an iBank each year d

Holidays. year. oliday benefits.

54

ers have a

ating Days n PTO

nformal during the

2

T4h

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CD


The total paid le42. City of San have a traditiona

Surveyed Emp


City of San DieDifference

mpensation Study as

eave for each suDiego has a paial leave program

ployer





Market Aego, CA


urveyed employed time off progr

m with separate

>13135353436333137364340313143

, CA 382234


25-10

14

er, which includram, which doessick leave accru

TTOTA

To

1 331 335 335 334 336 333 331 337 336 343 440 431 331 343 438 322 234 336 335 325 2-10 -1

des vacation, sics not offer separual.

TABLE 42 AL PAID LEAV

otal Paid Leave

3 5 1 33 5 40 5 35 4 39 6 36 3 37 1 31 7 40 7 37 3 47 0 40 1 31 1 36 3 43 8 38 2 22 9 39 6 41 5 37 5 25

10 -12

ck leave, holidayrate sick leave.

VE

e Days per Yea

10 12 35 35 40 40 40 42 44 44 41 41 41 41 32 33 40 41 45 45 47 47 40 43 36 38 41 41 43 46 43 43 27 30 42 43 41 41 40 41 29 29 -11 -12

ys, and personalThe majority o

ar, by Years of

15 20 37 37 45 45 44 45 49 49 41 46 46 46 33 34 42 45 45 45 51 51 45 45 41 46 41 41 46 46 43 48 35 35 44 49 46 46 43 44 29 33 -14 -11

l days is shown f surveyed empl

Service

25 3039 4145 4545 4549 4946 4646 4636 3845 4545 4651 5150 5046 4641 4146 4648 4835 3549 4946 4645 4533 33-12 -12

55

in Table loyers

0 30+ 1 41 5 45 5 45 9 49 6 46 6 46 8 40 5 45 6 46 1 51 0 50 6 46 1 41 6 46 8 48 5 35 9 49 6 46 5 45 3 33 2 -12

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

CC

C

C

C

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac


City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA


BERBere

14

TREAVEMENT eavement Leave

3 or 1

--

3

8

3

5

4

3

3 --

5

3

5 or 1

3

TABLE 43 LEAVE DAYSe Policy

Bereavemefamily” or a BereavemeBereavemeemployee’s Employees floating holidplus 3 days Bereavemean additionaEmployees for bereaveBereavemeEmployees with the posimminent BereavemeEmployees Upon approrepresentatto an amouncharged agafamily deathCity for a peA permanenon account family – spochildren, fossiblings BereavemeBereavemeSick leave c

S PER YEAR

nt leave of 3 comaximum of 1 wnt leave taken fnt leave of 3 shfamily membermay use accumdays for bereavtravel time nt leave is 3 daal 2 days of sickmay use sick lement leave nt leave allows are granted up

ssibility of using

nt leave is 3 damay use sick le

oval of the depaive, an employent not to exceedainst vacation oh leave, an emperiod of three (3nt employee is eof the death of

ouse, registeredster children, gra

nt leave of 1 went leave of 1 dacan be used for

onsecutive workwork shift for otfrom sick leave

hifts of paid timer mulated sick leavement leave of

ays per year. Emk leave for bereaeave and, if nee

for 4 days per ito 3 days of pa up to 3 sick da

ays per incidenteave for bereavertment head or

ee may be grantd forty (40) houror sick leave. In ployee must hav3) consecutive meligible to take 3a member of th

d domestic partnrandparents, pa

eek for a spouseay for grandpare

additional bere

k shifts for “immether family mem

e off for the deat

ave, compensatof up to 5 calenda

mployees may uavement leave

eded, an additio

incident aid bereavementays when death

ement leave his/her designated family deathrs. Such leave sorder to be elig

ve worked full timmonths 3 days leave of

he employee’s imner, children, sterents, step pare

e, children, or pents or grandchieavement leave

56

ediate mbers

th of an

ory time, or ar days

use up to

nal 5 days

t leave, appears

ated h leave up shall not be gible for me for the

absence mmediate ep ents, and

parent. ildren

2

SC

C

C

C

C


Surveyed EmpCity and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA


BERBere

, CA

's Office

14

TREAVEMENT eavement Leave

--

5

3

3

5

TABLE 43 LEAVE DAYSe Policy

BereavemeEach full-timfor a period arising fromgrandparenan in-laws Employee isof death of aBereavemeat the time oimmediate fBereavemeemployee’sdaughter, o

S PER YEAR

nt leave taken fme employee is

of 40 work houm the death of a

t, great grandpa

s granted up to a member of thent leave is paid of death or funefamily ent leave of up s spouse, fatheor state-registe

from sick leavegranted bereav

urs to attend theparent, spousearent, grandchil

3 days leave we employee’s im leave which is

eral of a membe

to five (5) dayer, mother, broered domestic

vement leave wie customary obli, child, sibling, dren, domestic

without loss of pammediate familyavailable to an

er of the employ

ys upon the deaother, sister, sopartner

57

ith full pay igations

partner,

ay in case y employee

yee’s

ath of an on,

2

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C1

v2

m3

4

m


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa Ana

County of San Di

City of San Die1City of Escondidvacation credit. 2City of Fresno, Cmore than 15 yea3City of Long Bea4City of Santa Anmore than 20 yea

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA1

A2

ch, CA3

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA

a, CA4

ego, CA - Sheriff

ego, CA o, CA: Maximum

CA: For police perars of service, maach, CA: Vacationa, CA: For police

ars of service, ma


VACAT

, CA

's Office

vacation accrual

rsonnel with less aximum vacation an must be used by personnel with le

aximum vacation a

14

TTION AND SIC

l varies by years o

than 15 years of accrual is 360 hoy the end of the cess than 20 yearsaccrual is 320 ho

TABLE 44 CK LEAVE AC

Unused Vaca2x annual a

552 hou320 hou

2x annual a480 hou

235 – 528 280 or 3601x annual a2x annual a3x annual a

Unlimite300 hou

2x annual a112 hou400 hou

2x annual a240 of 3202x annual a

350 houof service. Police

service, maximuours. calendar year ands of service, max

ours

CCUMULATIOMaxim

ation/PTO accrual urs urs accrual urs hours hours

accrual accrual accrual ed urs accrual urs urs accrual 0 hours accrual

urs e personnel may

m vacation accru

d will not be cashimum vacation ac

ON um Accrual

In

Innot accumulate m

ual is 280 hours.

ed-out unless auccrual is 240 hou

Unused Sickncluded in PTO

960 hours Unlimited Unlimited 40 hours Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited 800 hours Unlimited 480 hours Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited 130 hours Unlimited

1,600 hours Unlimited

ncluded in PTOmore than 30 mo

For police person

thorized by Policrs. For police pe

58

O

O nths of

nnel with

ce Chief. ersonnel with

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCN1

2

b


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San DiCity of San DieNR = No Respon1City of Long Bea2City of Riversidebeginning Februa

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA A ch, CA1

es, CA City, CA CA e, CA CA2



ego, CA se

ach, CA: Vacatione, CA: If an emploary 17,2012, will b


, CA

's Office

n must be used byoyee has more thabe paid off in cash

14

TVACAT

At E2x an

551648U

68

U4

12

y the end of the can 2 years of acch on an hour-for-

TABLE 45 TION CASH-O

nd of Year nual accrual 52 hours 60 hours 0 hours 0 hours nlimited

-- -- --

4 hours 0 hours

-- nlimited 0 hours

NR --

NR --

25 hours

calendar year andcumulated and unhour basis at the

OUT

Vacation/

At Term175 552 UnliUnliUnliUnliUnliUnliUnliUnli47 hUnli

NNN

UnliN

UnliUnlim

d will not be cashnused vacation, th

employee’s regu

/PTO Leave

mination hours hours mited mited mited mited mited mited mited mited hours mited

NR NR NR mited

NR mited mited

ed-out unless auhe excess vacatioular hourly rate.

At Retire2x annual

552 hoUnlimitUnlimitUnlimitUnlimitUnlimitUnlimitUnlimitUnlimit

NRUnlimit

NRNRNR

UnlimitNR

UnlimitUnlimi

thorized by Policon accrual, as of

59

ement accrual

ours ted ted ted ted ted ted ted ted ted ted ted ted

ce Chief. pay period

2

H

Tm

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC1


Health Bene

The City of Sanmedical plan, as

Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San DiCity of San Die1City of Fresno, C

mpensation Study as

efits

n Diego’s most ps shown in Tabl

ployer

CA d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA A1

ch, CA es, CA




ego, CA CA: An HMO plan


populous medicale 46.

, CA

's Office

n is not offered. P

14

al plan is the Ka

THMO HEALT

Offer HM

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

PPO plan monthly

aiser HMO plan

TABLE 46 TH PLAN SUM

O? PreB

y cost is shown in

n. Almost all of

MMARY Includ

escription Benefits

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes --

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

n the following tab

f the surveyed em

ded in Medical

Dental Benef

No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No

bles.

mployers offer a

Premium?

fits Vision

YY

Y

YY

Y

60

an HMO

Benefits

Yes Yes No No No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No No No

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CI1

2


Surveyed Emp


City of San DieIncludes cost for 1Surveyed Emplo2Total Monthly He

mpensation Study as

TOTAL MON

ployer

CA1

d, CA1

CA1

ta, CA

CA1

o, CA

A2

ch, CA es, CA1

City, CA1

CA1

e, CA1

CA1

nto, CA

of San Francisco,CA


Market Aego, CA medical, prescrip

oyer does not offeealth Cost include


NTHLY HEALT

Sing

$58$38$64$51NR

$48$86

$1,2$59$47$86$69$48$69

, CA $63$54

$1,2's Office $44

Average $67$40

ption drugs, dentaer an Employee +es PPO monthly c

14

TTH COST (ME

Employ

gle EE + Children

83 -- 83 -- 48 -- 13 $1,286 R -- 82 -- 67 $867 257 -- 99 -- 74 -- 65 -- 98 -- 80 -- 96 $1,243 30 $1,542 48 $1,293 269 -- 42 $944 73 $1,196 00 $761 al, and vision prog Children plan tiecost, since an HM

TABLE 47 DICAL, PRESyer Cost ($)

n EE +

Spouse $1,161 $771 $975

$1,020 NR

$921 $867

$1,257 $1,111 $767

$1,594 $1,162 $850

$883 $1,260 $1,293

$1,269 $658

$1,048 $877

grams. er. MO plan is not off

SCRIPTION, D

Family Si

$1,635 $$1,141 $$1,186 $1,286 $

NR N$1,282 $$867 $

$1,257 $$1,245 $1,072 $$2,031 $1,314 $1,122 $$1,243 $$1,542 $1,293 $$1,269 $$944 $

$1,278 $$1,141 $

fered.

DENTAL, AND Emplo

ngle EE +Childre

106 -- $95 -- $0 --

$28 $99 NR -- $26 -- 217 $217208 -- $0 --

$39 -- $0 -- $0 -- 120 --

$68 $782$5 $262

$97 $238159 -- 171 $792

$79 $398$46 $88

VISION) oyee Cost ($) + en

EE + Spouse

$200 $193 $317

$53 NR $93

7 $217 $233 $17

$258 $0

$144 $345

2 $636 2 $15 8 $232

$232 2 $569 8 $221

$92

61

Family

$302 $285 $511 $99 NR

$182 $217 $258 $70

$396 $0

$361 $537 $782 $262 $238 $274 $792 $327 $219

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CI1

2


TOTA

Surveyed Emp


City of San DieIncludes cost for 1Surveyed Emplo2Total Monthly He

mpensation Study as

AL MONTHLY

ployer

CA1

d, CA1

CA1

ta, CA

CA1

o, CA

A2

ch, CA es, CA1

City, CA1

CA1

e, CA1

CA1

nto, CA

of San Francisco,CA


Market Aego, CA medical, prescrip

oyer does not offeealth Cost include


Y HEALTH CO

Sing

8580

10095NR

958086

10092

1001008091

, CA 998589


90ption drugs, dentaer an Employee +es PPO monthly c

14

TOST-SHARING

Employer C

gle EE + Children

% -- % --

0% -- % 93% R -- % -- % 80% % --

0% -- % --

0% -- 0% -- % -- % 61% % 85% % 84% % -- % 54% % 76% % 90%

al, and vision prog Children plan tiecost, since an HM

TABLE 48 G (MEDICAL, Post-Sharing (%

n EE +

Spouse 85% 80% 75% 95% NR

91% 80% 84% 98% 75%

100% 89% 71% 58% 99% 85% 85% 54% 83% 91%

grams. er. MO plan is not off

PRESCRIPTIO%)

Family Si

84% 180% 270% 093% 5NR N

88% 580% 283% 195% 073% 8

100% 078% 068% 261% 985% 184% 182% 154% 280% 184% 1

fered.

ON, DENTAL, Employee

ngle EE +Childre

5% -- 20% -- 0% -- 5% 7%NR -- 5% --

20% 20%4% --

0% -- 8% -- 0% -- 0% --

20% -- 9% 39%1% 15%5% 16%1% --

28% 46%10% 24%

0% 10%

AND VISION)Cost-Sharing

+ en

EE + Spouse

15% 20% 25% 5% NR 9%

% 20% 16% 2%

25% 0%

11% 29%

% 42% % 1% % 15%

15% % 46% % 17% % 9%

62

) (%)

Family

16% 20% 30% 7% NR

12% 20% 17% 5%

27% 0%

22% 32% 39% 15% 16% 18% 46% 20% 16%

2

Tn

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

C1

2

a3

4

m5


Tables 49 and 5nearest dollar.

Surveyed Emp


City of San Die1Surveyed Emplo2City of Carlsbad,agreement. 3City of El Cajon, 4City of Fresno, Cmedical, dental, a5City of Santa An

mpensation Study as

50 show the cost

ployer

CA1

d, CA1

CA1,2

ta, CA

CA 1,3

o, CA

A 4

ch, CA1

es, CA1

City, CA1

CA1

e, CA1

CA 1

nto, CA

of San Francisco,CA

a, CA5

ego, CA - SheriffMarket A

ego, CA oyer does not offe, CA: Monthly cos

CA: The City hasCA and Police Peand vision for the a, CA contributes


ts and cost-shar

Sin

$5$3$5$4$5$4$8

$1,$5$4$7$6$4$6

, CA $5$5

$1,'s Office $4Average $6

$4er an Employee +st reported for Po

s a Cafeteria Benrsonnel contributemployee and th

s to the Santa An

14

ing arrangemen

THMO PLA

Employ

ngle EE + Children

58 -- 49 -- 92 -- 99 $1,253 92 -- 39 -- 67 $867 136 -- 23 -- 68 -- 28 -- 44 -- 80 -- 96 $1,243 65 $1,348 00 $1,245 179 -- 42 $944

625 $1,150 400 $761

Children plan tieolice Officer’s Ass

nefit Plan. The bee to the Fresno C

heir dependents. a Police Officers

nts for medical p

TABLE 49 N MONTHLY yer Cost ($)

n EE +

Spouse $1,122 $702 $975

$998 $950 $878 $867

$1,136 $1,035 $767

$1,457 $1,089 $850

$883 $1,124 $1,245

$1,179 $658

$995 $877

er. sociation member

enefit allowance iCity Employees’ H

An HMO plan is Association Med

plans only. Mon

COST

Family Si

$1,579 $$1,025 $$1,186 $1,253 $950

$1,239 $$867 $

$1,136 $$1,169 $1,072 $1,894 $1,219 $1,122 $$1,243 $1,348 $1,245 $$1,179 $$944 $

$1,204 $$1,141

rs. Police Manag

s $950.00. Health and Welfarnot offered. PPO

dical Insurance Tr

nthly costs have

Emplo

ngle EE +Childre

$73 -- $87 -- $0 -- $0 $0 $0 --

$18 -- 217 $217208 -- $0 -- $0 -- $0 -- $0 --

$54 -- $7 $628$0 $247

$88 $220155 -- 119 $643

$57 $326$0 $0

gement Associatio

re Trust. The moO plan monthly corust Fund.

e been rounded t

oyee Cost ($) + en

EE + Spouse

$141 $176 $209

$0 $234 $36

7 $217 $233

$0 $170

$0 $131 $226

8 $524 7 $5 0 $220

$225 3 $464 6 $178

$0

on members have

onthly premium inost is shown abov

63

to the

Family

$208 $256 $354

$0 $590 $54

$217 $258 $47

$253 $0

$329 $369 $628 $247 $220 $265 $643 $274 $76

e a different

ncludes ve.

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CN1

2

a3

4

m5


Surveyed Emp


City of San DieNR = No Respon1Surveyed Emplo2City of Carlsbad,agreement. 3City of El Cajon, 4City of Fresno, Cmedical, dental, a5City of Santa An

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA1

d, CA1

CA1,2

ta, CA

CA 1,3

o, CA

A 4

ch, CA1

es, CA1

City, CA1

CA1

e, CA1

CA 1

nto, CA4

of San Francisco,CA

a, CA5


ego, CA se

oyer does not offe, CA: Monthly cos

CA: The City hasCA and Police Peand vision for the a, CA contributes


HM

Sin

8880

100100100968085

1001001001009099

, CA 1008588


100

er an Employee +st reported for Po

s a Cafeteria Benrsonnel contributemployee and th

s to the Santa An

14

TMO PLAN MO

Employer C

ngle EE + Children

8% -- 0% -- 0% -- 0% 100%0% --

6% -- 0% 80% 5% -- 0% -- 0% -- 0% -- 0% --

0% -- 9% 66% 0% 85%

5% 85% 8% -- 9% 59% 3% 79% 0% 100%

Children plan tieolice Officer’s Ass

nefit Plan. The bee to the Fresno C

heir dependents. a Police Officers

TABLE 50 ONTHLY COSTCost-Sharing (%

n EE +

Spouse 89% 80% 82%

100% 80% 96% 80% 83%

100% 82%

100% 89% 79% 63%

100% 85% 84% 59% 85%

100%

er. sociation member

enefit allowance iCity Employees’ H

An HMO plan is Association Med

T-SHARING %)

Family Si

88% 180% 277% 0

100% 062% 096% 480% 281% 196% 081% 0

100% 079% 075% 166% 185% 085% 182% 159% 282% 794% 0

rs. Police Manag

s $950.00. Health and Welfarnot offered. PPO

dical Insurance Tr

Employee

ngle EE +Childre

2% -- 20% -- 0% -- 0% 0%0% -- 4% --

20% 20%5% --

0% -- 0% -- 0% -- 0% -- 0% --

1% 34%0% 15%5% 15%2% --

21% 41%7% 21%0% 0%

gement Associatio

re Trust. The moO plan monthly corust Fund.

Cost-Sharing + en

EE + Spouse

11% 20% 18% 0%

20% 4%

% 20% 17% 0%

18% 0%

11% 21%

% 37% % 0% % 15%

16% % 41% % 15%

0%

on members have

onthly premium inost is shown abov

64

(%)

Family

12% 20% 23% 0%

38% 4%

20% 19% 4%

19% 0%

21% 25% 34% 15% 15% 18% 41% 18% 6%

e a different

ncludes ve.

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CN1

2

3

4


Surveyed Emp


City of San DieNR = No Respon1Surveyed Emplo2Dental included 3The City of Oakla4City of Santa An

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA1

d, CA1

CA 1

ta, CA CA o, CA A2

ch, CA1

es, CA1

City, CA1

CA3

e, CA1

CA1


a, CA4


ego, CA se

oyer does not offein medical premiuand Police Officea, CA contributes


Sing

$2$3$4$1NR$4--

$11$7$6

$13$4$0$0

, CA $6$4$9

's Office $0Average $4

$0

er an Employee +um

ers Association ofs to the Santa An

14

TDENTAL PL

Employ

gle EE + Children

25 -- 34 -- 46 --

4 $33 R NR

43 -- - -- 11 --

76 -- 6 -- 37 $137

48 -- 0 -- 0 $0

61 $183 48 $48 90 -- 0 $0

46 $67 0 $0

Children plan tie

ffers Delta Dentala Police Officers

TABLE 51 LAN MONTHLY

yer Cost ($)

n EE +

Spouse $39 $69 $0

$22 NR $43 --

$111 $76 $0

$137 $64 $0 $0

$128 $48 $90 $0

$52 $0

er.

plan. The City pAssociation Med

Y COST

Family Si

$56 $$116

$0 $33 $NR N$43 --

$111 $76 $0 $

$137 $84 $0 $$0 $

$183 $48 $90 $0 $

$61 $$0 $

pays $136.87 perdical Insurance Tr

Emplo

ngle EE +Childre

$33 -- $8 -- $0 --

$20 $76 NR NR$0 -- -- -- $0 -- $0 --

$39 -- $0 $0 $0 --

$66 -- $53 $134$5 $15 $3 $3 $0 --

$43 $121$17 $58 $40 $78

r month per emplorust Fund.

oyee Cost ($) + en

EE + Spouse

$59 $17 $93

$38 NR $42 -- $0

$17 $88 $0

$11 $119

4 $101 $10

$3 $0

1 $85 $43 $80

oyee to the OPOA

65

Family

$94 $29

$131 $76 NR

$103 -- $0

$23 $143

$0 $28

$168 $134 $15 $3 $0

$121 $67

$124

A.

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CN1

2

3

4


Surveyed Emp


City of San DieNR = No Respon1Surveyed Emplo2Dental included 3The City of Oakla4City of Santa An

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA1

d, CA1

CA 1

ta, CA CA o, CA A2

ch, CA1

es, CA1

City, CA1

CA3

e, CA1

CA1


a, CA4


ego, CA se

oyer does not offein medical premiuand Police Officea, CA contributes


DEN

Sing

4381

10041NR

100--

10010013

100100

0%0%

, CA 9294

100's Office 0%

Average 670%

er an Employee +um

ers Association ofs to the Santa An

14

TNTAL PLAN M

Employer C

gle EE + Children

% -- % --

0% -- % 30% R NR 0% -- - -- 0% -- 0% -- % --

0% 100%0% -- % -- % 0% % 92% % 94%

0% -- % 0% % 53% % 0%

Children plan tie

ffers Delta Dentala Police Officers

TABLE 52 MONTHLY COS

ost-Sharing (%

n EE +

Spouse 40% 80% 0%

37% NR

51% --

100% 82% 0%

100% 85% 0% 0%

93% 94%

100% 0%

54% 0%

er.

plan. The City pAssociation Med

ST-SHARING

%)

Family Si

37% 580% 10% 0

30% 5NR N

29% 0--

100% 077% 00% 8

100% 075% 00% 100% 10

92% 894% 6

100% 00% 10

51% 30% 10

pays $136.87 perdical Insurance Tr

Employee

ngle EE +Childre

57% -- 9% --

0% -- 59% 70%NR NR0% -- -- --

0% -- 0% --

87% -- 0% 0%0% -- 00% -- 00% 100%8% 8%6% 6%0% -- 00% 100%

33% 47%00% 100%

r month per emplorust Fund.

Cost-Sharing + en

EE + Spouse

60% 20%

100% % 63%

NR 49%

-- 0%

18% 100%

0% 15%

100% % 100%

7% 6% 0%

% 100% % 46% % 100%

oyee to the OPOA

66

(%)

Family

63% 20%

100% 70% NR

71% --

0% 23%

100% 0%

25% 100% 100%

8% 6% 0%

100% 49%

100%

A.

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CN1

2

3

4


Surveyed Emp


City of San DieNR = No respons1Vision is included2Surveyed Emplo3The City of Oakla4The Santa Ana P

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA1

d, CA1

CA2

ta, CA CA o, CA A1

ch, CA2

es, CA1

City, CA1

CA3

e, CA2

CA1


a, CA4


ego, CA se d in medical prem

oyer does not offeand Police OfficePolice Officers As


Sing

----

$1$0NR$0--

$1----

$6--$0

, CA $4$0$0

's Office $0Average $3

$0

mium er an Employee +ers Association ofssociation offers a

14

TVISION PLA

Employ

gle EE + Children

- -- - -- 0 --

0 $0 R NR 0 -- - -- 0 --

- -- - --

Not A6 -- - -- 0 $0 4 $11 0 $0 0 -- 0 $0 3 $2 0 $0

Children plan tieffers Vision Servica vision plan. No

TABLE 53 AN MONTHLY

yer Cost ($)

n EE +

Spouse -- -- $0 $0 NR $0 --

$10 -- --

Applicable $9 -- $0 $8 $0 $0 $0 $3 $0

er. ce Plan (VSP).

o contribution is m

Y COST

Family Si

-- -- $0 $0 NR N$0 --

$10 -- --

$11 -- $0

$11 $0 $0 $0 $3 $0

made by the City.

Emplo

ngle EE +Childre

-- -- -- -- $0 -- $8 $23 NR NR$8 -- -- -- $0 -- -- -- -- --

Not$0 -- -- -- $8 $20 $0 $0 $6 $15 $4 -- $9 $28 $4 $17$6 $10

oyee Cost ($) + en

EE + Spouse

-- --

$15 $15

NR $15 -- $0 -- --

t Applicable $2 --

$11 $0

$9 $7

$20 $9

$12

67

Family

-- --

$26 $23 NR $25 -- $0 -- --

$4 --

$20 $0

$15 $9

$28 $15 $19

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CN1

2

3

4


Surveyed Emp


City of San DieNR = No respons1Vision is included2Surveyed Emplo3The City of Oakla4The Santa Ana P

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA1

d, CA1

CA2

ta, CA CA o, CA A1

ch, CA2

es, CA1

City, CA1

CA3

e, CA2

CA1


a, CA4


ego, CA se d in medical prem

oyer does not offeand Police OfficePolice Officers As


VIS

Sing

----

1000%NR0%--

100----

100--

0%, CA 100

0%0%

's Office 0%Average 40

0%

mium er an Employee +ers Association ofssociation offers a

14

TSION PLAN MO

Employer C

gle EE + Children

- -- - -- 0% -- % 0% R NR % -- - -- 0% -- - -- - --

Not A0% -- - -- % 0% 0% 100%% 0% % -- % 0% % 20% % 0%

Children plan tieffers Vision Servica vision plan. No

TABLE 54 ONTHLY COS

ost-Sharing (%

n EE +

Spouse -- --

0% 0% NR 0% --

100% -- --

Applicable 82%

-- 0%

100% 0% 0% 0%

28% 0%

er. ce Plan (VSP).

o contribution is m

ST-SHARING

%)

Family Si

-- --

0% 00% 10NR N0% 10--

100% 0-- --

73% 0--

0% 10100% 0

0% 100% 100% 10

27% 60% 10

made by the City.

Employee

ngle EE +Childre

-- -- -- --

0% -- 00% 100%NR NR00% -- -- --

0% -- -- -- -- --

Not0% -- -- --

00% 100%0% 0%00% 100%00% -- 00% 100%

60% 80%00% 100%

Cost-Sharing + en

EE + Spouse

-- --

100% % 100%

NR 100%

-- 0% -- --

t Applicable 18%

-- % 100%

0% % 100%

100% % 100%

% 72% % 100%

68

(%)

Family

-- --

100% 100%

NR 100%

-- 0% -- --

27% --

100% 0%

100% 100% 100% 73%

100%

2

H

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCN


Health Saving

Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San DiCity of San DieNR = No respons

mpensation Study as

gs Account

ployer





ego, CA se


H

Is

, CA

's Office

14

THEALTH SAV

s an HSA offereb

(Y

TABLE 55 INGS ACCOU

ed to supplemebenefits? Yes or No)

Yes Yes No Yes NR Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes NR No Yes No

UNT (HSA)

ent health If yes, are emploto(Y

oyer contributio the HSA? Yes or No)

Yes Yes --

No NR Yes --

No --

Yes No -- --

No No NR No Yes --

69

ions made

2

R

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC1

N


Retiree Health

Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San DiCity of San Die1Employees hired

NR = No Respon

mpensation Study as

h Benefits

ployer





ego, CA d prior to 2005 are

se


, CA

's Office

e eligible for retire

14

TRETIREE H

For employeeligible for

ee health benefits

TABLE 56 HEALTH BEN

ees retiring todr retiree health

(Yes or No) Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Yes1

s.

NEFITS

day, are they h benefits?

If yes, are emade to the

mployer contre monthly prem(Yes or No)

No Yes Yes NR NR No --

No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes -- --

70

ibutions miums?

2

OTs

S

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

CCOC


Other BenefitThe survey inclushown in Table

Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula Vist

City of El Cajon, C

City of Escondido

City of Fresno, CA

City of Long Beac

City of Los Angel

City of National C

City of Oakland, C

City of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa AnaCounty of San DiOffice City of San Die

mpensation Study as

s uded questions as 57 through 59

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA

CA

o, CA

A

ch, CA

es, CA

City, CA

CA

e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA


ego, CA


about basic life 9.

BAS

, CA

's

14

insurance, long

TSIC LIFE INSU

Employer

50% EmplNR

100% Emp

100% Emp100% Emp100% Emp

--100% Emp100% Emp100% Emp100% Emp100% Emp

100% Emp

100% Emp

--100% Emp100% Emp

Ye

100% Emp

g-term disability

TABLE 57 URANCE MON

Cost (%)

oyer Paid R

ployer Paid

ployer Paid ployer Paid ployer Paid -

ployer Paid ployer Paid ployer Paid ployer Paid ployer Paid

ployer Paid

ployer Paid

- ployer Paid ployer Paid

es

loyer Paid

y, and line of dut

NTHLY COST

1 x b

2x a

ty death benefit

Maximum

$

basic yearly earhighest $

$$$

$$$

$2$6,000 (

annual base sala$10,000 (

$50,000 (Capta

$$

$

ts. Detailed resu

Benefit Amou

$50,000 NR

rnings (rounded $1,000 multiple)$50,000 $25,000 $50,000

-- $20,000 $15,000 $50,000

NR 200,000 Police Officers)ary (Police Supv(Police Officersains and Lieute

-- $10,000 $20,000

NR

$50,000

71

ults are

nt

to the next )

vr & Mgmt) ) nants)

2


Surveyed EmCity of AnaheimCity of BakersfCity of CarlsbaCity of Chula VCity of El CajoCity of EscondCity of Fresno,City of Long BCity of Los AngCity of NationaCity of OaklanCity of Oceans

City of Riversid

City of SacramCity and CounCity of San JosCity of Santa ACounty of SanCity of San DNR- No respon


LON

mployer m, CA field, CA ad, CA Vista, CA n, CA

dido, CA , CA each, CA geles, CA al City, CA d, CA side, CA

de, CA

mento, CA ty of San Francisse, CA Ana, CA Diego, CA - SheDiego, CA nse

14

TNG TERM DISA

sco, CA

eriff's Office

TABLE 58 ABILITY MON

Em

$15

1

NTHLY COST

mployer Cost (

100% Employer--

100% Employer-- -- -- -- -- --

100% Employer--

100% Employer$10 (Police

5 (Police Supvr -- --

NR 100% Employer

-- 100% Employe

($ or %)

r Paid

r Paid

r Paid

r Paid e) & Mgmt)

r Paid

r Paid

72

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCC

C

C

C

C

CC

C


Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of Carlsbad, City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of Oceanside

City of Riverside,

City of Sacramen

City and County o

City of San Jose,

City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer


City, CA CA e, CA

CA

nto, CA

of San Francisco,

CA


ego, CA


LiDea

, CA

's Office

14

TLINE OF DU

ne of Duty ath Benefit?

NR No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No Yes

Yes

TABLE 59 UTY DEATH B

Surviving spouand conditionsage 21 Survivors will bContribution, re

The surviving sbenefit equivalpensionable pawhatever the eon years of Cit

Reasonable b$5,000 to famCity will pay heligible depen

ENEFIT

$250,000 fo

Up to $15,0

use may continus or elect to rece

be entitled to 10egardless of ye

spouse, domestlent to a minimuay of the highesemployee wouldty service, which

burial expensesily to be used a

highest cost HMndents

Policy

NR -- -- -- -- --

or Bomb Squad--

000 in funeral ex-- -- --

ue health coveraeive a lump sum

00% of the City ears of service

-- tic partner, or c

um of 50% of thst 3 consecutived have otherwisehever is higher

-- NR

s not to exceedat their discretMO plan for su

d or Pilot

xpenses

age under samem. Minors covere

Retiree Insuran

hildren receive e average annu

e year of servicee been eligible f

d $5,000 plus ation. Additionaurviving spous

73

e terms ed until

nce

a monthly ual e or for based

additional ally, the e and

2

W

S

C

C

C

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

C


Wellness Ben

Surveyed Emp

City of Anaheim,

City of Bakersfield

City of Carlsbad,

City of Chula VistCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Los AngelCity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

City of San Die

mpensation Study as

nefits

ployer

CA

d, CA

CA

ta, CA CA o, CA A ch, CA es, CA




ego, CA


REIMBR

well

, CA

's Office

14

TBURSEMENT FReimburse for lness activities

Yes

No

Yes

No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

TABLE 60 FOR WELLNE

s? Policy

Employeeprogram rleave andmembersh-- Employeeannual phThe annualifestyle chProgramsBlood ProMeasurem-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

ESS ACTIVITIE

es who successfreceive a health reimbursemenhip, fitness equi

es can be reimbhysical examinatal physical examhanges that pro

s include Compuofile, Nutritional Aments, Lung Ass

ES

fully complete thy day off up to tt up to $200 foripment, or fitnes

bursed up to $45tion and/or physmination offers

omote optimum uterized Heart RAssessment, Dsessment, and C

he wellness inctwelve (12) hour an annual heass competition e

50 for the cost osical fitness testinformation regahealth to memb

Risk Profile, Comiet Program, BoConsultations

74

entive rs of paid lth club entry fees

of an ting arding

bers mplete ody

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

C


Surveyed Emp


City of San Die

mpensation Study as

ployer





ego, CA


LOWERLow

con

, CA

's Office

14

TR EMPLOYEEwer employee

ntributions for wparticipatio

No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

TABLE 61 E MEDICAL COmedical wellness n?

Po

--------------------------------------

ONTRIBUTIO

olicy Summary

NS

y

75

2

R

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CN1

2

Ss


Retirement

Surveyed Emp


City of San DieNR = No respons1City of Fresno, C2City of San DiegSDCERS and ranservice are age 2

mpensation Study as

Plans

ployer

CA d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA A1

ch, CA es, CA




Market Aego, CA2

se CA: The City conto, CA: According

nge from 7.85% to25 to 29. The em


EmplNorm

Co(% of

19.718.819.419.618.020.322.018.515.720.219.020.218.917.4

, CA 19.210.919.6

's Office 14.1Average 18.4

14.4

ributes 1% of theg to the Actuarial o 14.24%. The dployee contributio

14

DEFINE

oyer mal

ost pay)

TotaEmplo

Contribu(% of p

79% 32.8188% 37.5448% 35.3463% 28.8603% 42.0631% 36.9209% 20.8352% 24.0672% 28.3522% 40.5902% 35.1525% 30.8097% 29.0440% 31.1225% 22.9498% 10.9864% 41.71

1% 37.4546% 31.4847% 12.00

e employee’s sharValuation as of J

distribution of activon reported abov

TABLE ED BENEFIT P

al oyer utionspay)

TotEmpl

Contrib(% of

1% 12.74% 12.74% 9.746% 9.006% 9.002% 12.23% 9.006% 8.995% 10.69% 9.005% 9.000% 12.24% 9.002% 12.04% 12.58% 10.91% 9.005% 14.18% 10.60% 10.5

re of the retiremeJune 30, 2013, emve members is sue is for an employ

62 PENSION PLA

tal oyee

butions pay)

Emploup of econtrib

75% N75% N4% N0% N0% N

25% N0% Y9% N

60% N0% N0% N

25% N0% N

00% N50% N98% N0% N1% N

66% 1 o57% N

ent contribution. mployee contributuch that the majoyee with entry at

AN

oyer pick employee butions?

Loncopar

ppe

No No NR No NR No Yes NR No No No No NR No No NR NR No of 11 8No

tions vary by ageority of employees

age 27.

gevity pay onsidered rt of base pay for ensions?

Ovin

ca

No Yes NR Yes NR Yes NR NR Yes Yes Yes No NR Yes Yes NR NR No

8 of 11 No

e at time of entrans with less than a

76

vertime pay ncluded in pension lculations?

No No NR No NR No No NR No No No No NR No No NR NR No

0 of 12 No

nce into a year of

2

Onc

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

C


Only one (1) of no respondents mcompensation p

Surveyed Emp


City of San Die1Police recruits amatches that con

mpensation Study as

the surveyed emmaking contribulan (a 457 plan)

ployer





Market Aego, CA are entered into antribution 100%.


mployers offer autions on behalf) with primarily

DEFINED

Offer401

, CA

's Office Average

a DC plan until the

14

a defined contribf of the employeonly employee

TCONTRIBUTI

r Defined Cont1 (a) retirement

(Yes or No)

No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No

1 of 18 Yes1

ey become sworn

bution plan (sucee. Twelve (12) contributions, a

TABLE 63 ION 401 (A) R

tribution t plan?

A

n officers after 6 m

ch as a 401a planof responding e

as shown in Tab

RETIREMENT

Automatic EmpContributio

($ or % of sal-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

0.00% -- -- --

0.00% 0.00%

months, whereby

n) to Representeemployers offer bles 63 and 64.

PLAN

ployer ons lary)

y they contribute 1

ed Police personr a voluntary def

Employer M($ or %)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

0.00%-- -- --

0.00%0.00%

11% of pay and t

77

nnel, with ferred

Match )

he City

2

S

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CN1CO


Surveyed Emp


City of San DieNR- No response City of Riverside,

Officer pay range m

mpensation Study as

ployer

CA

d, CA CA ta, CA CA o, CA A ch, CA es, CA

City, CA CA e, CA CA1



Market Aego, CA

CA: The City conmidpoint ($71,592


DEFERRED

Co

, CA

's Office Average

ntributes $200 pe2).

14

TD COMPENSA

Offer Deferreompensation 4

retirement pla(Yes or No)

Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes

14 out of 18Yes

er month. The tab

TABLE 64 ATION 457 (B)

ed 57 (b)

an?

A

8

ble above shows

RETIREMENT

Automatic EmpContributio

($ or % of sal

0.00% --

NR 0.00%

-- 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

NR 0.00% 0.00%

-- 3.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

-- 0.00% 0.28% 0.00%

this monthly cont

T PLAN

ployer ons lary)

tribution as a per

Employer M($ or %)

0.00%--

NR 0.00%

-- 0.00%0.00%0.00%

NR 0.00%0.00%

-- 0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

-- 0.00%0.00%0.00%

rcent of the City’s

78

Match )

Police

2

T

OD

Tj

P

PPPPPPP1

2

L MT


Total Compe

On a total compDiego’s market

To determine thjob: The calculat Total emplo

enrollment d The City of The current Maximum e

Police Benchm

Police Recruit Police Officer I –Police Officer IIIPolice DetectivePolice SergeantPolice LieutenaPolice Captain 1City of San Die2 Due to insufficLos Angeles.

More details regTable 67 shows

mpensation Study as

ensation

pensation basis, position is show

he total compens

ted midpoint of yer costs for all

distribution amoSan Diego’s totnormal costs asmployer contrib

MARKE

mark Job

– II I e t nt

ego’s rank compcient data, emplo

garding the calcus details regardin


taking into conswn in Table 65.

sation costs for e

the base pay ranl health related bong coverage tietal health benefissociated with thbution to both d

ET POSITION

City

parison is measuoyer total comp

ulations above ang the City of S

14

sideration base p

each surveyed e

nge (average of benefits (medicaers in the City ofit costs reflect thhe defined benefefined contribut

TACROSS ALL

y of San Diego’Surveyed Em

(including S

15 out 16 out

3 out 5 out

16 out 14 out 13 out

ured at the pay rensation costs c

are shown in Taan Diego’s tota

pay, health bene

employer, we ca

f the minimum aal, dental, and vf San Diego’s mhe average flex bfit retirement pltion and deferre

TABLE 65 L BENCHMAR

’s Rank Amongmployers1,2

San Diego)

of 16 of 16 of 3 of 5 of 16 of 16 of 16

range midpoint.cannot be calcul

able 66. l compensation

efit costs, and re

alculated the sum

and maximum baision), weighted

most populous mbenefit allotmenan, based on the

ed compensation

RKS TOTAL C

gst Ba(Rang

ated for City of

ranking among

etirement plan c

m of the followi

ase pay rates) d by City of San

medical plan (Kant for each bence most recent pln plans (includin

COMPENSATI

ase Pay ge Midpoint)

78% 83% 89% 84% 84% 88% 90%

f Carlsbad, City

gst the surveyed

contributions, th

ing for each ben

n Diego’s currenaiser HMO planchmark job titlelan valuation ng any employe

ON

EmployeCompensat

(Pay and B

77%81%87%83%82%88%90%

of El Cajon, an

employers.

79

he City of San

nchmark

nt n)

r match)

er Total ion Costs

Benefits) % % % % % % %

d City of

2

Polic

PolicCity oMarkCity PolicCity oMarkCity PolicCity oMarkCity PolicCity oMarkCity PolicCity oMarkCity


ce Benchmark

ce Recruit of San Diego ket Average of San Diego asce Officer I – IIof San Diego ket Average of San Diego asce Officer III of San Diego ket Average of San Diego asce Detective of San Diego ket Average of San Diego asce Sergeant of San Diego ket Average of San Diego as

mpensation Study as

TOT

k Job

s a % of Market A

s a % of Market A

s a % of Market A

s a % of Market A

s a % of Market A


TAL COMPEN

m

$$

Average

$$

Average

$$

Average

$$

Average

$$

Average

14

TNSATION MAR

Base Pay

(range midpoint)

WHea(Med

$46,228 $58,997

78%

$62,598 $75,810

83%

$72,873 $81,862

89%

$72,873 $86,308

84%

$84,240 100,33884%

TABLE 66 RKET POSITIO

Emplo

Weighted Total lth Benefit Cosdical, Rx, Dental,

Vision)

$9,8091

$11,924 82%

$11,0751

$11,924 93%

$11,6171

$11,924 97%

$11,0701

$11,924 93%

$11,3401

$11,924 95%

ON BY BENCH

yer Cost of Be

sts &

Retireme(DefineContrib

Co

$6,689$11,056

$9,058$14,207

$10,545$15,341

$10,545$16,174

$12,190$18,803

HMARK JOB

enefits

ent Benefit Coed Benefit, Definebution & Deferredompensation)

9 (14.47% of pay6 (18.74% of pa

61%

8 (14.47% of pay7 (18.74% of pa

64%

5 (14.47% of pa1 (18.74% of pa

69%

5 (14.47% of pa4 (18.74% of pa

65%

0 (14.47% of pa3 (18.74% of pa

65%

EmpCompen

(Pay a

sts ed d

y) $ay) $

y) $ay) $

ay) $ay) $

ay) $ay) $

ay) $ay) $

80

loyer Total nsation Costs and Benefits)

$62,726 $81,977

77%

$82,731 101,941 81%

$95,035 109,127 87%

$94,488 114,406 83%

107,770 131,065 82%

2

Polic

PolicCity oMarkCity PolicCity oMarkCity City

1

S


ce Benchmark

ce Lieutenant of San Diego ket Average of San Diego asce Captain of San Diego ket Average of San Diego asof San Diego, C

1 San Diego total San Diego to Seg

mpensation Study as

TOT

k Job

s a % of Market A

s a % of Market ACA as a % of Ove

health benefit cogal Waters.


TAL COMPEN

m

$$

Average

$$

Average erall Market

osts reflect averag

14

TNSATION MAR

Base Pay

(range midpoint)

WHea(Med

107,204121,41188%

127,328141,46390% 86%

ge flex benefit allo

TABLE 66 RKET POSITIO

Emplo

Weighted Total lth Benefit Cosdical, Rx, Dental,

Vision)

$14,1841

$11,924

119%

$15,2651

$11,924 128% 101%

otment ($) per be

ON BY BENCH

yer Cost of Be

sts &

Retireme(DefineContrib

Co

$15,512$22,752

$18,424$26,510

enchmark job title

HMARK JOB

enefits

ent Benefit Coed Benefit, Definebution & Deferredompensation)

2 (14.47% of pa2 (18.74% of pa

68%

4 (14.47% of pa0 (18.74% of pa

69% 66%

e. Data and calcu

EmpCompen

(Pay a

sts ed d

ay) $ay) $

ay) $ay) $

lations provided b

81

loyer Total nsation Costs and Benefits)

136,900 156,087 88%

161,017 179,897 90% 85%

by City of

2

P

PCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC1

C


Police Benchm

Police Recruit City and County oCity of Anaheim, City of Santa AnaCity of Long BeacCity of Oakland, CCity of San Jose, City of EscondidoCity of National CCity of Riverside, City of Fresno, CACity of Chula VistCity of OceansideCity of SacramenCity of BakersfieldCity of San DiegCounty of San DiCity of Carlsbad, City of El Cajon, CCity of Los Angel1 San Diego total City of San Diego

mpensation Study as

mark Job

of San Francisco,CA

a, CA ch, CA CA CA

o, CA City, CA

CA A ta, CA e, CA nto, CA d, CA

go ego, CA - SheriffCA CA es, CA health benefit co

o to Segal Waters


TOTAL

BaPa

(ranmidp

, CA $80,$76,$66,$63,$60,$66,$58,$58,$54,$54,$51,$48,$47,$45,$46,

's Office $47,$62,$56,$62,

osts reflect averags.

14

TABCOMPENSAT

ase ay nge point)

WeigHealth B(Medical

V

,574 $,097 $,168 $,752 $,701 $,955 $,104 $,978 $,696 $,012 $,820 $,732 $,190 $,662 $,228 $,362 $,423 $,306 ,410 $ge flex benefit allo

BLE 67 TION MARKET

Employer C

ghted Total Benefit Costs l, Rx, Dental, & Vision)

$13,647 $13,831 $15,228 $15,084 $18,066 $11,838 $10,981 $9,528 $9,953 $10,404 $11,282 $12,536 $11,763 $9,485 $9,8091

$8,490 $11,311

NR $11,582 otment ($) per be

T RANKING

Cost of Benefit

Retirement B(Defined BenContribution

Compen

$15,$15,$12,$11,$11,$7,3$11,$11,$12,$11,$10,$9,8$8,2$8,6$6,6$6,6

NR$10,

NRenchmark job title

ts

Benefit Costs nefit, Defined n & Deferred nsation)

,510 ,059 ,995 ,807 ,545 352 ,801 ,925 ,208 ,931 ,172 868 211 621 689 683 R ,152 R

e. Data and calcu

Employer ToCompensati

Costs (Pay and Bene

$109,732$104,987$94,391$90,643$90,313$86,145$80,886$80,432$76,857$76,347$73,273$71,136$67,163$63,768$62,726$62,535

NR NR NR

lations provided b

82

otal ion

efits)

Ran

k

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

by

2

P



Police Benchm

Police Officer ICity and County oCity of Oakland, CCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCity of Anaheim, City of Long BeacCity of OceansideCity of Chula VistCity of EscondidoCity of Riverside, City of National CCity of Fresno, CACity of SacramenCounty of San DiCity of BakersfieldCity of San DiegCity of Carlsbad, City of El Cajon, CCity of Los Angel

mpensation Study as

mark Job

I - II of San Francisco,CA CA

a, CA CA ch, CA e, CA ta, CA o, CA

CA City, CA A

nto, CA ego, CA - Sheriffd, CA

go CA CA es, CA


TOTAL

BaPa

(ranmidp

, CA $96,$85,$91,$80,$79,$79,$73,$74,$73,$71,$72,$69,$65,

's Office $68,$64,$62,$73,$67,$76,

14

TABCOMPENSAT

ase ay nge point)


V

,369 $,751 $,229 $,430 $,644 $,278 $,692 $,496 $,122 $,592 $,872 $,300 $,887 $,665 $,625 $,598 $,552 $,414 ,672 $

BLE 67 TION MARKET

Employer C


$13,647 $18,066 $11,838 $15,228 $13,831 $15,084 $12,536 $11,282 $10,981 $9,953 $9,528 $10,404 $11,763 $8,490 $9,485 $11,075 $11,311

NR $11,582

T RANKING

Cost of Benefit


Compen

$18,$16,$10,$15,$15,$14,$14,$14,$14,$15,$14,$15,$11,$9,6$12,$9,0

NR$12,

NR

ts


,551 ,310 ,017 ,796 ,761 ,682 ,923 ,624 ,851 ,979 ,735 ,308 ,464 689 ,201 058 R ,155 R


Costs (Pay and Bene

$128,567$120,127$113,084$111,454$109,236$109,044$101,151$100,401$98,954$97,524$97,135$95,012$89,114$86,844$86,311$82,731

NR NR NR

83

otal ion

efits)

Ran

k

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

2

P



Police Benchm

Police Officer ICity of National CCity of Chula VistCity of San DiegCity of Carlsbad, City of Los AngelCity of Anaheim, City of BakersfieldCity of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of Long BeacCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

mpensation Study as

mark Job

III City, CA ta, CA

go CA es, CA CA d, CA CA o, CA A ch, CA CA e, CA CA




TOTAL

BaPa

(ranmidp

$85,$82,$72,$77,$82,

--------------------

, CA ------

's Office --

14

TABCOMPENSAT

ase ay nge point)


V

,825 $,032 $,873 $,231 $,362 $- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

BLE 67 TION MARKET

Employer C


$9,528 $11,282 $11,617 $11,311 $11,582

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

T RANKING

Cost of Benefit


Compen

$17,$16,$10,

NRNR----------------------------

ts


,354 ,103 ,545 R R - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Costs (Pay and Bene

$112,707$109,416$95,035

NR NR -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

84

otal ion

efits)

Ran

k

1 2 3

2

P



Police Benchm

Police DetectivCity of Long BeacCity of Chula VistCity of Riverside, City of BakersfieldCity of San DiegCity of Los AngelCity of Anaheim, City of Carlsbad, City of El Cajon, CCity of EscondidoCity of Fresno, CACity of National CCity of Oakland, CCity of OceansideCity of SacramenCity and County oCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCounty of San Di

mpensation Study as

mark Job

ve ch, CA ta, CA CA

d, CA go es, CA CA CA CA o, CA A

City, CA CA e, CA nto, CA of San Francisco,CA



TOTAL

BaPa

(ranmidp

$100$82,$80,$72,$72,$96,

------------------

, CA ------

's Office --

14

TABCOMPENSAT

ase ay nge point)


V

0,542 $,032 $,652 $,058 $,873 $,257 $- - - - - - - - - - - - -

BLE 67 TION MARKET

Employer C


$15,084 $11,282 $9,953 $9,485 $11,070 $11,582

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

T RANKING

Cost of Benefit


Compen

$18,$16,$18,$13,$10,

NR--------------------------

ts


,620 ,103 ,002 ,604 ,545 R - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Costs (Pay and Bene

$134,246$109,416$108,606$95,147$94,488

NR -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

85

otal ion

efits)

Ran

k

1 2 3 4 5

2

P



Police Benchm

Police SergeanCity and County oCity of Oakland, CCity of Anaheim, City of OceansideCity of Long BeacCity of San Jose, City of Santa AnaCity of Riverside, City of EscondidoCity of Chula VistCity of National CCounty of San DiCity of BakersfieldCity of SacramenCity of Fresno, CACity of San DiegCity of Carlsbad, City of El Cajon, CCity of Los Angel

mpensation Study as

mark Job

nt of San Francisco,CA CA e, CA ch, CA CA

a, CA CA

o, CA ta, CA

City, CA ego, CA - Sheriffd, CA

nto, CA A

go CA CA es, CA


TOTAL

BaPa

(ranmidp

, CA $130$121$122$108$100$110$99,$95,$95,$94,$92,

's Office $95,$88,$86,$83,$84,$93,$83,

$104

14

TABCOMPENSAT

ase ay nge point)


V

0,260 $,214 $

2,699 $8,636 $0,542 $0,198 $,216 $,466 $,316 $,362 $,676 $,119 $,841 $,087 $,538 $,240 $,874 $,772

4,264 $

BLE 67 TION MARKET

Employer C


$13,647 $18,066 $13,831 $12,536 $15,084 $11,838 $15,228 $9,953 $10,981 $11,282 $9,528 $8,490 $9,485 $11,763 $10,404 $11,340 $11,311

NR $11,582

T RANKING

Cost of Benefit


Compen

$25,$23,$24,$21,$18,$12,$19,$21,$19,$18,$18,$13,$16,$14,$18,$12,

NR$15,

NR

ts


,075 ,055 ,282 ,999 ,620 ,100 ,486 ,308 ,359 ,523 ,739 ,421 ,773 ,979 ,454 ,190 R ,104 R


Costs (Pay and Bene

$168,982$162,335$160,812$143,171$134,246$134,136$133,930$126,727$125,655$124,166$120,943$117,030$115,099$112,829$112,396$107,770

NR NR NR

86

otal ion

efits)

Ran

k

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

2

P



Police Benchm

Police LieutenaCity and County oCity of Oakland, CCity of Anaheim, City of Santa AnaCity of Riverside, City of OceansideCity of Long BeacCity of SacramenCity of San Jose, City of National CCity of BakersfieldCity of Chula VistCity of EscondidoCity of San DiegCity of Fresno, CACounty of San DiCity of Carlsbad, City of El Cajon, CCity of Los Angel

mpensation Study as

mark Job

ant of San Francisco,CA CA

a, CA CA

e, CA ch, CA

nto, CA CA

City, CA d, CA ta, CA o, CA go A ego, CA - SheriffCA CA es, CA


TOTAL

BaPa

(ranmidp

, CA $148$133$135$133$132$131$119$120$127$116$116$113$109$107$102

's Office $102$113$104$122

14

TABCOMPENSAT

ase ay nge point)


V

8,746 $3,525 $5,336 $3,992 $2,294 $,850 $

9,280 $0,882 $7,608 $6,518 $6,789 $3,242 $9,626 $7,204 $2,402 $2,213 $3,800 $4,624 2,681 $

BLE 67 TION MARKET

Employer C


$13,647 $18,066 $13,831 $15,228 $9,953 $12,536 $15,084 $11,763 $11,838 $9,528 $9,485 $11,282 $10,981 $14,184 $10,404 $8,490 $11,311

NR $11,582

T RANKING

Cost of Benefit


Compen

$28,$25,$26,$26,$29,$26,$22,$21,$14,$23,$22,$22,$22,$15,$22,$14,

NR$18,

NR

ts


,634 ,396 ,783 ,316 ,528 ,700 ,091 ,033 ,011 ,560 ,050 ,229 ,265 ,512 ,621 ,422 R ,864 R


Costs (Pay and Bene

$191,027$176,988$175,949$175,536$171,775$171,086$156,455$153,678$153,458$149,606$148,323$146,753$142,872$136,900$135,427$125,125

NR NR NR

87

otal ion

efits)

Ran

k

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16

2

P



Police Benchm

Police Captain City and County oCity of Oakland, CCity of Anaheim, City of Santa AnaCity of OceansideCity of Riverside, City of SacramenCity of Chula VistCity of San Jose, City of Long BeacCity of EscondidoCity of BakersfieldCity of San DiegCity of Fresno, CACounty of San DiCity of National CCity of Carlsbad, City of El Cajon, CCity of Los Angel

mpensation Study as

mark Job


a, CA e, CA CA

nto, CA ta, CA CA

ch, CA o, CA d, CA

go A ego, CA - Sheriff

City, CA CA CA es, CA


TOTAL

BaPa

(ranmidp

, CA $187$162$159$158$156$153$142$139$147$132$133$129$127$118

's Office $117$100$137$120$148

14

TABCOMPENSAT

ase ay nge point)


V

7,954 $2,696 $9,245 $8,238 $6,228 $3,144 $2,340 $9,888 $7,701 $2,882 $3,260 $9,992 $7,328 $8,218 $7,539 $0,498 $7,900 $0,151 8,468 $

BLE 67 TION MARKET

Employer C


$13,647 $18,066 $13,831 $15,228 $12,536 $9,953 $11,763 $11,282 $11,838 $15,084 $10,981 $9,485 $15,265 $10,404 $8,490 $9,528 $11,311

NR $11,582

T RANKING

Cost of Benefit


Compen

$36,$30,$31,$31,$31,$34,$24,$27,$16,$24,$27,$24,$18,$26,$16,$20,

NR$21,

NR

ts


,181 ,945 ,514 ,078 ,636 ,182 ,767 ,460 ,218 ,610 ,065 ,542 ,424 ,114 ,585 ,321 R ,663 R


Costs (Pay and Bene

$237,782$211,707$204,590$204,544$200,400$197,278$178,870$178,630$175,757$172,576$171,306$164,019$161,017$154,736$142,614$130,347

NR NR NR

88

otal ion

efits)

Ran

k

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16

2

A

P

Alt

P

U


Appendi

Police Recruit

Attends Police Daw, laws of arretheory and meth

Must be age

High School

Must posses

Police Officer I

Under immediat

Must be 21 y

High School

Must succes

Must posses

mpensation Study as

ix A – Be

Department’s Baest, traffic laws, hods, and repor

e 20 and six mo

l graduate or eq

ss a valid State

I

te supervision in

years old

l graduate or eq

ssfully pass all c

ss a valid State


enchmar

asic Training Acjuvenile law, pr

rt writing).

nths at time of w

quivalency

Driver’s Licens

n a training prog

quivalency

components of t

Driver’s Licens

14

rk Job S

cademy. Complrinciples of law e

written test

e

gram, to perform

the Police Acad

e

Summari

etes courseworenforcement, ru

m increasingly re

demy or possess

es

rk assignments ules of evidence

esponsible law e

s a P.O.S.T. cer

related to law ee, rules of searc

enforcement an

rtificate

enforcement (e.gh and seizure, p

nd crime preven

89

g., criminal patrol

ntion duties

2

P

Jc

P

Uf

P

Upc


Police Officer I

Journey level. Ucarry out specia

Must be 21 y

Must have a

Must posses

Minimum of units or 3.75

Must posses

Police Officer

Under general sfunctions; to act

Must have a

Must posses

Police Detect

Under general sprevent crime. court proceedin

Must have a

Minimum of

mpensation Study as

II

Under general sual assignments i

years old

a minimum of tw

ss P.O.S.T. Cer

30 semester/455 quarter units)

ss a valid State

r III

supervision, to pt in a lead capac

a minimum of tw

ss a Bachelor's

ive

supervision, to pInterviews and gs. Manages c

a minimum of fo

60 semester/90


upervision, to pn the protection

wo (2) years of fu

rtificate

5 quarter college

Driver’s Licens

perform the morcity

welve (12) years

Degree in Crim

perform prelimininterrogates sus

confidential infor

ur (4) years of f

0 quarter college

14

atrol an assignen of life and prop

ull-time paid exp

e units OR addi

e

re difficult, sens

s of full-time paid

minal Justice OR

nary and follow-spects, victims, rmants.

full-time paid ex

e units OR poss

ed area in the eperty

perience as a sw

itional qualifying

itive, and specia

d experience as

R a P.O.S.T. Cer

up investigationand witnesses.

xperience as a s

session of a P.O

nforcement of la

worn peace offi

g experience (1

alized law enfor

s a sworn peace

rtificate

ns of crimes; to Provides expe

sworn peace offi

O.S.T. Certificat

aw and order an

cer

month of exper

rcement, patrol

e officer

perform surveillert testimony an

ficer

te

nd prevention o

rience = 2.5 sem

and crime preve

lance work to dend presents evid

90

of crime; to

mester

ention

etect or dence in

2

P

Fcp

P

Ssp

P

DaD


Police Sergean

First line supervcrime preventioperformance of

Must have a

Minimum of

Police Lieuten

Section commaspecialized sectperformance of

Must have a

Minimum of 9

Police Captai

Division commaand makes recoDepartment to t

Must have a

Must possess

mpensation Study as

nt

visor. Under genn and law enforsubordinates.

a minimum of fo

60 semester/90

nant

nder. Under diretion in the depasubordinates.

minimum of two (

90 semester/135

n

ander. Under dirommendations the City Mayor o

minimum of two (

s a Bachelor's De


neral supervisiorcement. Trains Oversees recr

ur (4) years of f

0 quarter college

ection, to commrtment. Directs

(2) years of exper

quarter college u

rection, to have to higher rankingor Council office

(2) years of exper

egree OR a P.O.S

14

n, to supervise s and advises poruitment and use

full-time paid ex

e units OR poss

mand or assist in, assigns, trains

rience as a Police

nits OR possessi

charge of a mag officers. Over

es regarding uni

rience as a Police

S.T. Management

an assigned sqolice officers in e of volunteers.

xperience as a s

session of a P.O

n the command s, and supervise

e Sergeant

ion of an Advance

ajor organizationrsees preparatiot activities.

e Lieutenant

t certificate

uad of law enfothe performanc

sworn peace offi

O.S.T. Certificat

of a departmenes the work of p

ed P.O.S.T. Cert

nal unit or a uniton of the unit's b

orcement officerce of their duties

ficer

te

ntal unit or a unipolice officers. R

ificate

t shift of the depbudget. Acts as

rs and related pes. Rates the wo

t shift. Takes cRates the work

partment. Subms a liaison from

91

ersonnel in ork

charge of a

mits reports the Police

2

A


Appendi

mpensation Study as

ix B – De


etailed M

14

Market DData

92

Maximum

Annual Scheduled Pay Range

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CA 2014 TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY1a - DETAILED SALARY DATA (UNADJUSTED)

Police Recruit

Matching TitleOrganization Name WorkweekMinimum Midpoint

Average Annual Pay

City and County of San Francisco, CA Police Officer (Academy) $80,57440 $80,574$80,574$80,574

City of Anaheim, CA Police Officer Trainee $61,42240 $90,771$76,097$61,935

City of San Jose, CA Police Recruit $66,95540 $66,955$66,955$66,955

City of Santa Ana, CA Police Recruit $59,73640 $72,600$66,168

City of Long Beach, CA Police Recruit $63,75240 $63,752$63,752$63,752

City of Carlsbad, CA Police Recruit $56,35140 $68,495$62,423

City of Los Angeles, CA Police Officer I (Academy) $62,41040 $62,410$62,410$62,410

City of Oakland, CA Police Officer Trainee $60,70140 $60,701$60,701$60,701

City of National City, CA Police Recruit $51,80340 $66,153$58,978$54,393

City of Escondido, CA Police Officer Trainee $56,68840 $59,520$58,104

City of El Cajon, CA Police Officer (Academy) $56,30640 $56,306$56,306$56,306

City of Riverside, CA Police Officer Trainee $54,69640 $54,696$54,696$54,696

City of Fresno, CA Police Officer Recruit $52,69240 $55,332$54,012

City of Chula Vista, CA Police Recruit $50,55640 $53,083$51,820

City of Oceanside, CA Police Recruit $48,73240 $48,732$48,732$48,732

County of San Diego, CA - Sheriff's Office

Sheriff's Cadet $47,36242.5 $47,362$47,362$47,362

City of Sacramento, CA Police Recruit $43,74240 $50,637$47,190

Data effective July 1, 2014

Maximum

Annual Scheduled Pay Range

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CA 2014 TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY1a - DETAILED SALARY DATA (UNADJUSTED)

Police Recruit

Matching TitleOrganization Name WorkweekMinimum Midpoint

Average Annual Pay

City of Bakersfield, CA Police Trainee $45,66240 $45,662$45,662$45,662

40 $41,933City of San Diego, CA Salary Data

82%74%

$50,523

City of San Diego, CA as a % of Overall Participant Average

Overall Participant Average

78%

$58,997

$46,228

82%

$58,623

$48,298

$61,319$56,674


Base Pay + Longevity Pay at Selected Years of Service

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CA 2014 TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY1b - DETAILED SALARY DATA (UNADJUSTED)

Police Officer I - II

Matching TitleOrganization Name WorkweekMinimum 6 Months 1 Year 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years 25 YearsMaximumMidpoint

Base Pay Range (excluding longevity)

2 Years 3 Years

$112,164City and County of San Francisco, CA

Police Officer* $80,574 $80,57440 $84,604 $106,626 $112,164 $114,407$112,164$96,369 $112,164$88,842 $96,850

$104,458City of San Jose, CA Police Officer $78,000 $78,00040 $81,900 $99,550 $104,458 $104,458$104,458$91,229 $104,458$85,995 $90,295

$101,531City of Oakland, CA Police Officer* $71,446 $71,44640 $83,370 $100,056 $101,931 $101,931$100,056$85,751 $101,731$86,563 $89,423

$88,260City of Santa Ana, CA Police Officer $72,600 $72,60040 $76,236 $88,260 $88,260 $88,260$88,260$80,430 $88,260$80,040 $84,060

$93,101City of Anaheim, CA Police Officer $66,186 $69,49340 $72,966 $93,101 $93,101 $93,101$93,101$79,644 $93,101$80,434 $84,448

$92,106City of Long Beach, CA Police Officer* $70,836 $74,78440 $74,784 $87,720 $96,711 $96,711$87,720$79,278 $96,711$78,828 $83,160

$90,849City of Los Angeles, CA Police Officer I - II* $64,916 $64,91640 $67,442 $83,791 $95,714 $95,714$88,427$76,672 $93,292$71,243 $75,168

$81,742City of Chula Vista, CA Peace Officer* $67,250 $70,61240 $74,143 $81,742 $84,194 $84,194$81,742$74,496 $84,194$77,850 $81,742

$86,544City of Oceanside, CA Police Officer* $60,840 $60,84040 $70,236 $86,544 $89,544 $89,544$86,544$73,692 $89,544$73,608 $77,520

$80,706City of Carlsbad, CA Police Officer $66,398 $66,39840 $69,718 $80,706 $80,706 $80,706$80,706$73,552 $80,706$73,204 $76,864

$83,748City of Escondido, CA Police Officer* $62,496 $65,61640 $68,892 $77,352 $83,748 $83,748$83,748$73,122 $83,748$72,348 $75,960

$81,738City of National City, CA Police Officer $64,006 $64,00640 $67,207 $81,738 $81,738 $81,738$81,738$72,872 $81,738$74,139 $77,846

$80,280City of Riverside, CA Police Officer $62,904 $66,04840 $66,048 $80,280 $80,280 $80,280$80,280$71,592 $80,280$69,360 $72,804

$77,724City of Fresno, CA Police Officer $60,876 $60,87640 $63,924 $77,724 $77,724 $77,724$77,724$69,300 $77,724$67,128 $70,488

$81,660County of San Diego, CA - Sheriff's Office

Sheriff's Deputy $55,670 $55,67042.5 $59,560 $72,422 $81,660 $81,660$81,660$68,665 $81,660$62,543 $65,681

$75,712City of El Cajon, CA Police Officer (Steps A-1 to E) $59,115 $62,15040 $65,291 $75,712 $75,712 $75,712$75,712$67,414 $75,712$68,598 $72,072

$72,296City of Sacramento, CA Police Officer* $59,478 $62,45240 $62,452 $72,296 $72,396 $72,596$72,296$65,887 $72,296$65,574 $68,853

*Job classification is eligible for longevity pay. See Table 35 for details.

City of San Diego pay progression is shown as follows: Step A of POI at minimum, Step C of POI after 1 year, Step C of POII after 2 years per MOU Article 34, Step D after 3 years, and Step E after 4 years




Police Officer I - II



2 Years 3 Years

$72,555City of Bakersfield, CA Police Officer - Senior Police Officer $56,695 $56,69540 $59,553 $72,555 $72,555 $72,555$72,555$64,625 $72,555$62,560 $65,728

$65,571 $84,343 $86,510$70,463 $87,215 $87,366 $87,502$86,050

40 $49,254 $49,254City of San Diego, CA Salary Data $54,163 $75,941 $75,941 $75,941 $75,941 $75,941$75,941

$66,843

75% 90% 88%77% 87% 87% 87%88% 74%



$62,598

$75,810

83%

$74,381

$69,014

93%

$78,276

$72,550

93%


City of San Diego pay progression is shown as follows: Step A of POI at minimum, Step C of POI after 1 year, Step C of POII after 2 years per MOU Article 34, Step D after 3 years, and Step E after 4 years




Police Officer III



2 Years 3 Years

$85,825City of National City, CA Police Corporal $85,825 $85,82540 $85,825 $85,825 $85,825 $85,825$85,825$85,825 $85,825$85,825 $85,825

$95,902City of Los Angeles, CA Police Officer III* $71,243 $71,24340 $75,168 $93,480 $100,767 $100,767$93,480$82,362 $98,345$79,929 $83,791

$90,011City of Chula Vista, CA Police Agent* $74,053 $77,75540 $81,643 $90,011 $92,711 $92,711$90,011$82,032 $92,711$85,725 $90,011

$84,743City of Carlsbad, CA Police Corporal $69,718 $69,71840 $73,204 $84,743 $84,743 $84,743$84,743$77,231 $84,743$76,864 $80,706

City of Anaheim, CA No Match

City of Bakersfield, CA No Match

City of El Cajon, CA No Match

City of Escondido, CA No Match

City of Fresno, CA No Match

City of Long Beach, CA No Match

City of Oakland, CA No Match

City of Oceanside, CA No Match

City of Riverside, CA No Match

City of Sacramento, CA No Match

City and County of San Francisco, CA

No Match

City of San Jose, CA No Match

City of Santa Ana, CA No Match


National City Corporals are paid at a flat rate.




Police Officer III



2 Years 3 YearsCounty of San Diego, CA - Sheriff's Office

No Match

$75,210 $88,515 $89,120$78,960 $90,406 $91,012 $91,012$88,515


$76,135

88% 90% 89%92% 88% 88% 88%90% 87%



$72,873

$81,862

89%

$82,086

$76,170

93%

$85,083

$79,747

94%


National City Corporals are paid at a flat rate.




Police Detective



2 Years 3 Years

$112,596City of Long Beach, CA Police Inspector $88,488 $93,13240 $93,132 $112,596 $112,596 $112,596$112,596$100,542 $112,596$98,232 $103,488

$104,087City of Los Angeles, CA Police Detective I $88,427 $88,42740 $93,480 $104,087 $104,087 $104,087$104,087$96,257 $104,087$98,616 $104,087

$90,011City of Chula Vista, CA Police Agent* $74,053 $77,75540 $81,643 $90,011 $92,711 $92,711$90,011$82,032 $92,711$85,725 $90,011

$88,500City of Riverside, CA Police Detective $72,804 $76,48840 $76,488 $88,500 $88,500 $88,500$88,500$80,652 $88,500$80,280 $84,288

$79,150City of Bakersfield, CA Detective $64,965 $64,96540 $68,245 $79,150 $79,150 $79,150$79,150$72,058 $79,150$71,710 $75,346

City of Anaheim, CA No Match

City of Carlsbad, CA No Match

City of El Cajon, CA No Match

City of Escondido, CA No Match

City of Fresno, CA No Match

City of National City, CA No Match

City of Oakland, CA No Match

City of Oceanside, CA No Match

City of Sacramento, CA No Match

City and County of San Francisco, CA

No Match

City of San Jose, CA No Match

City of Santa Ana, CA No Match


San Francisco Inspectors are paid at a flat rate.




Police Detective



2 Years 3 YearsCounty of San Diego, CA - Sheriff's Office

No Match

$77,747 $94,869 $94,869$82,598 $95,409 $95,409 $95,409$94,869


$80,153

85% 84% 84%88% 84% 84% 84%84% 82%



$72,873

$86,308

84%

$86,913

$76,170

88%

$91,444

$79,747

87%


San Francisco Inspectors are paid at a flat rate.




Police Sergeant



2 Years 3 Years


Police Sergeant* $130,260 $130,26040 $130,260 $130,260 $130,260 $132,865$130,260$130,260 $130,260$130,260 $130,260

$125,694City of Anaheim, CA Police Sergeant $119,704 $119,70440 $125,694 $125,694 $125,694 $125,694$125,694$122,699 $125,694$125,694 $125,694

$122,689City of Oakland, CA Police Sergeant* $121,214 $121,21440 $121,214 $121,214 $123,089 $123,089$121,214$121,214 $122,889$121,214 $121,214

$120,910City of San Jose, CA Police Sergeant $99,486 $99,48640 $104,461 $120,910 $120,910 $120,910$120,910$110,198 $120,910$109,684 $115,168

$111,276City of Oceanside, CA Police Sergeant* $105,996 $105,99640 $111,276 $111,276 $114,276 $114,276$111,276$108,636 $114,276$111,276 $111,276

$109,912City of Los Angeles, CA Police Sergeant I $98,616 $98,61640 $104,087 $109,912 $109,912 $109,912$109,912$104,264 $109,912$109,912 $109,912

$112,596City of Long Beach, CA Police Sergeant $88,488 $93,13240 $93,132 $112,596 $112,596 $112,596$112,596$100,542 $112,596$98,232 $103,488

$108,876City of Santa Ana, CA Police Sergeant $89,556 $89,55640 $94,044 $108,876 $108,876 $108,876$108,876$99,216 $108,876$98,748 $103,692

$102,432City of Riverside, CA Police Sergeant $88,500 $92,92840 $92,928 $102,432 $102,432 $102,432$102,432$95,466 $102,432$97,596 $102,432

$106,884City of Escondido, CA Police Sergeant $83,748 $87,93640 $92,328 $106,884 $106,884 $106,884$106,884$95,316 $106,884$96,948 $101,796


Sheriff's Sergeant $91,627 $91,62742.5 $96,201 $98,610 $98,610 $98,610$98,610$95,119 $98,610$98,610 $98,610

$103,540City of Chula Vista, CA Police Sergeant* $85,183 $89,44240 $93,914 $103,540 $106,646 $106,646$103,540$94,362 $106,646$98,906 $103,540

$103,005City of Carlsbad, CA Police Sergeant $84,743 $84,74340 $88,980 $103,005 $103,005 $103,005$103,005$93,874 $103,005$93,429 $98,100

$101,691City of National City, CA Police Sergeant $83,661 $83,66140 $87,844 $101,691 $101,691 $101,691$101,691$92,676 $101,691$92,236 $96,848

$97,488City of Bakersfield, CA Police Sergeant $80,194 $80,19440 $84,196 $97,488 $97,488 $97,488$97,488$88,841 $97,488$88,415 $92,841

$94,461City of Sacramento, CA Police Sergeant* $77,713 $81,59940 $81,599 $94,461 $94,561 $94,761$94,461$86,087 $94,461$85,679 $89,963

$92,019City of El Cajon, CA Police Sergeant $75,525 $79,35240 $79,352 $92,019 $92,019 $92,019$92,019$83,772 $92,019$83,336 $87,589


San Francisco Sergeants are paid at a flat rate.




Police Sergeant



2 Years 3 Years

$93,696City of Fresno, CA Police Sergeant $73,380 $73,38040 $77,052 $93,696 $93,696 $93,696$93,696$83,538 $93,696$80,916 $84,972

$93,200 $107,476 $107,558$97,698 $107,908 $107,925 $108,081$107,476


$94,601

82% 86% 86%86% 85% 85% 85%86% 81%



$84,240

$100,338

84%

$101,172

$88,046

87%

$104,300

$92,206

88%


San Francisco Sergeants are paid at a flat rate.




Police Lieutenant



2 Years 3 Years


Police Lieutenant* $148,746 $148,74640 $148,746 $148,746 $148,746 $151,721$148,746$148,746 $148,746$148,746 $148,746

$145,226City of Anaheim, CA Police Lieutenant $125,445 $125,44540 $131,726 $145,226 $145,226 $145,226$145,226$135,336 $145,226$138,320 $145,226

$143,784City of Santa Ana, CA Police Lieutenant $124,200 $124,20040 $130,416 $143,784 $143,784 $143,784$143,784$133,992 $143,784$136,932 $143,784

$135,000City of Oakland, CA Police Lieutenant* $133,525 $133,52540 $133,525 $133,525 $135,400 $135,400$133,525$133,525 $135,200$133,525 $133,525

$149,964City of Riverside, CA Police Lieutenant $114,624 $114,62440 $120,300 $146,292 $149,964 $149,964$149,964$132,294 $149,964$126,384 $132,708

$135,072City of Oceanside, CA Police Lieutenant $128,628 $128,62840 $135,072 $135,072 $135,072 $135,072$135,072$131,850 $135,072$135,072 $135,072

$140,046City of San Jose, CA Police Lieutenant $115,170 $115,17040 $120,928 $140,046 $140,046 $140,046$140,046$127,608 $140,046$126,974 $133,323

$129,310City of Los Angeles, CA Police Lieutenant I $116,051 $116,05140 $122,503 $129,310 $129,310 $129,310$129,310$122,681 $129,310$129,310 $129,310

City of Sacramento, CA Police Lieutenant $96,70640 $145,058$120,882

$131,784City of Long Beach, CA Police Lieutenant $106,776 $112,64440 $112,644 $131,784 $131,784 $131,784$131,784$119,280 $131,784$118,668 $125,040

$128,163City of Bakersfield, CA Police Lieutenant $105,414 $105,41440 $110,693 $128,163 $128,163 $128,163$128,163$116,789 $128,163$116,230 $122,048

$127,852City of National City, CA Police Lieutenant $105,184 $105,18440 $110,444 $127,852 $127,852 $127,852$127,852$116,518 $127,852$115,965 $121,764

City of Carlsbad, CA Police Lieutenant $92,90040 $134,700$113,800

$124,257City of Chula Vista, CA Police Lieutenant* $102,227 $107,33840 $112,705 $124,257 $127,985 $127,985$124,257$113,242 $127,985$118,340 $124,257

City of Escondido, CA Police Lieutenant $93,30040 $125,952$109,626

$114,920City of El Cajon, CA Police Lieutenant $94,328 $99,10840 $99,108 $114,920 $114,920 $114,920$114,920$104,624 $114,920$104,122 $109,396

$114,048City of Fresno, CA Police Lieutenant $90,756 $90,75640 $95,304 $114,048 $114,048 $114,048$114,048$102,402 $114,048$100,080 $105,084


Carlsbad, Escondido, and Sacramento Lieutenants have an open range pay schedule with pay increases based on performace.Sacramento Lieutenants are eligible for longevity pay of $100 at 20yrs and an additional $200 at 25yrs, which is not included above. San Francisco Lieutenants are paid at a flat rate.




Police Lieutenant



2 Years 3 Years


Sheriff's Lieutenant $91,030 $95,58342.5 $95,583 $113,395 $113,395 $113,395$113,395$102,213 $113,395$100,356 $105,373

$110,278 $131,761 $132,104$118,646 $132,366 $132,380 $132,578$132,545


$114,828

88% 89% 88%90% 88% 88% 88%88% 85%



$107,204

$121,411

88%

$123,268

$111,654

91%

$127,644

$116,813

92%


Carlsbad, Escondido, and Sacramento Lieutenants have an open range pay schedule with pay increases based on performace.Sacramento Lieutenants are eligible for longevity pay of $100 at 20yrs and an additional $200 at 25yrs, which is not included above. San Francisco Lieutenants are paid at a flat rate.




Police Captain



2 Years 3 Years


Police Captain* $187,954 $187,95440 $187,954 $187,954 $187,954 $191,713$187,954$187,954 $187,954$187,954 $187,954

$164,171City of Oakland, CA Police Captain* $162,696 $162,69640 $162,696 $162,696 $164,571 $164,571$162,696$162,696 $164,371$162,696 $162,696

$167,003City of Anaheim, CA Police Captain $151,486 $151,48640 $159,058 $167,003 $167,003 $167,003$167,003$159,245 $167,003$167,003 $167,003

$169,800City of Santa Ana, CA Police Captain $146,676 $146,67640 $154,008 $169,800 $169,800 $169,800$169,800$158,238 $169,800$161,712 $169,800

$159,852City of Oceanside, CA Police Captain $152,604 $152,60440 $159,852 $159,852 $159,852 $159,852$159,852$156,228 $159,852$159,852 $159,852

$173,580City of Riverside, CA Police Captain $132,708 $132,70840 $139,320 $173,580 $173,580 $173,580$173,580$153,144 $173,580$146,292 $157,440

$160,505City of Los Angeles, CA Police Captain I $136,430 $136,43040 $143,988 $160,505 $160,505 $160,505$160,505$148,468 $160,505$152,090 $160,505

$162,063City of San Jose, CA Police Captain $133,349 $133,34940 $140,016 $162,053 $162,063 $162,063$162,053$147,701 $162,063$147,017 $154,368

City of Sacramento, CA Police Captain $113,87240 $170,808$142,340

City of Chula Vista, CA Police Captain $126,28140 $153,495$139,888

City of Carlsbad, CA Police Captain $113,50040 $162,300$137,900

City of Escondido, CA Police Captain $113,41240 $153,108$133,260

$146,820City of Long Beach, CA Police Captain $118,944 $125,49640 $125,496 $146,820 $146,820 $146,820$146,820$132,882 $146,820$132,168 $139,416

$142,632City of Bakersfield, CA Police Captain $117,351 $117,35140 $123,211 $142,632 $142,632 $142,632$142,632$129,992 $142,632$129,370 $135,851

$131,976City of El Cajon, CA Police Captain $108,326 $113,81640 $113,816 $131,976 $131,976 $131,976$131,976$120,151 $131,976$119,586 $125,637

$131,928City of Fresno, CA Police Captain $104,508 $104,50840 $109,740 $131,928 $131,928 $131,928$131,928$118,218 $131,928$115,236 $121,008


Sheriff's Captain $104,666 $109,90342.5 $109,903 $130,412 $130,412 $130,412$130,412$117,539 $130,412$115,406 $121,174


Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Escondido, National City, and Sacramento Captains have an open range pay schedule with pay increases based on performace.Sacramento Captains are eligible for longevity pay of $100 at 20yrs and an additional $200 at 25yrs, which is not included above. San Francisco Captains are paid at a flat rate.




Police Captain



2 Years 3 YearsCity of National City, CA Police Captain $64,92340 $136,073$100,498

$127,205 $155,939 $156,054$140,697 $156,069 $156,084 $156,373$155,722


$136,537

91% 89% 89%90% 89% 89% 89%89% 85%



$127,328

$141,463

90%

$145,876

$132,642

91%

$150,977

$138,778

92%


Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Escondido, National City, and Sacramento Captains have an open range pay schedule with pay increases based on performace.Sacramento Captains are eligible for longevity pay of $100 at 20yrs and an additional $200 at 25yrs, which is not included above. San Francisco Captains are paid at a flat rate.


Date post:	20-Nov-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	duongdat
View:	237 times
Download:	0 times

Mira Mesa Community Planning Group Draft Agenda & Public ... · Mira Mesa Community Planning Group...

Documents