+ All Categories
Home > Education > Mire design review

Mire design review

Date post: 20-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: robert-auer
View: 530 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
20
MIRE Design Review Steven Wylie, Ivan Auer, and Max Tabor February 11, 2013
Transcript
Page 1: Mire design review

MIRE Design Review

Steven Wylie, Ivan Auer, and Max Tabor

February 11, 2013

Page 2: Mire design review

Scope

• Presentation of proof of concept • Requirements and functional decomposition

review• Design alternatives• Primary design choice• Engineering evidence to meet requirements • Subsystems should address key technical

issues

Page 3: Mire design review

Requirements

• Functional/Performance • Physical Size• Safety• Portability• Electrical/Software

Page 4: Mire design review

Functional Decomposition

Page 5: Mire design review

Key Technical Challenges

• Switch placement system• Arm sturdiness• Mobility and stability• Monitor support and display • Material choice

Page 6: Mire design review

Design AlternativesThree Unit System

Page 7: Mire design review

Design AlternativesOne Unit System

Page 8: Mire design review

Design Alternatives

• Box Mover Design

Page 9: Mire design review

Selection of Primary Design

Page 10: Mire design review

Selection of Primary Design

Page 11: Mire design review

Selection of Primary Design

Page 12: Mire design review

Selection of Primary Design

Weight Score Multiplied Weight Score Multiplied Weight Score Multiplied Weight Score Multiplied80/20 3 0.75 4 0.8 5 1.5 4 1 4.05Eco Shape 2 0.5 4 0.8 4 1.2 3 0.75 3.25L Bar Aluminum 1 0.25 5 1 2 0.6 2 0.5 2.35

Price $ Weight EofU Strength (Yield Strength)1 0.10 1 Heavy 1 Custom 1 7000 133992 0.15 2 Less Heavy 2 Heavy Machining 2 15000 213993 0.21 3 Light 3 Multiple Types of Premachine Material 3 23000 293994 0.26 4 Very Light 4 Fasterners and Raw Material Options 4 31000 389995 0.35 5 Lightest 5 Vast Amount of Interchangable Parts 5 39000 +

Table 7: Material Decision Matrix

1

Total WeightTotal ScoreItem Price Weight/ inch Ease of Use Strength

0.25 0.2 0.3 0.25

Page 13: Mire design review

Subsystem Development

Moniter/Arm Mounting System

Page 14: Mire design review

Subsystem Development

• Front Button Interface

Page 15: Mire design review

Subsystem Development

Moniter/Arm Height Adjustment System

Page 16: Mire design review

Engineering Analysis

Page 17: Mire design review

Engineering Analysis

• Moment analysis to prevent tipping• Weight and cost analysis of 80/20 using

material properties• Wheel size analysis for bumps in hospital• Weight analysis

• Is it light enough to be easily moved?• Comparative analysis of given specification

sheets of materials to design requirements

Page 18: Mire design review

Budget

X-Box Design

Device Name Amount Purchacing Location Price Per Part Total Price

Structure8020 - 1010 T-Slotted Profile 34 feet 8020.net $0.23 per inch $93.84

Arms Moffatt Arms 4 arms x 30" eachmoffattproducts.com $1.00 per inch $120.00

Monitor MountLX Wall Mount LCD Arm 1 ergotron.com

$169.00 per unit $169.00

Monitor Mount Locks

Single Flange Linear Bearing Brake 2 8020.net $38.60 per part $77.20

WheelsRWM Signature Solid Wheel 2 medcaster.com $30.00 per part $60.00

Total Cost: $520.04

Page 19: Mire design review

Project Plan

• Order parts immediately if given approval• Begin early testing and fabrication once

parts arrive

Page 20: Mire design review

Conclusion

• Primary design choice in summary

• Questions and comments from customers and advisors


Recommended