enrollment.mst.edu

Missouri S&T:The State’slean, mean

economic machine

QualityMeasures

ABET Accreditation Visit

On campus October 18-21, 2008 16 engineering programs evaluated

Aerospace EngineeringArchitectural EngineeringCeramic EngineeringChemical EngineeringCivil EngineeringComputer EngineeringElectrical EngineeringEngineering Management

Environmental EngineeringGeological EngineeringInterdisciplinary EngineeringMechanical EngineeringMetallurgical EngineeringMining EngineeringNuclear EngineeringPetroleum Engineering

Engineering laboratories and equipment Faculty size

On campus February 22-25, 2009

Two-year project

Institutional Self Study Report is available on-line at http://accreditation.mst.edu.

North Central Associationof Higher Learning Commission Accreditation

Focus On Outcomes: Career Success for Grads

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$44,000

$46,000

$48,000

$50,000

$52,000

$54,000

$56,000

$58,000

$60,000

513 576 668 673 644

$2,576 $2,603 $2,596 $2,647$2,749

$49,181

$51,059

$53,669

$55,975

$57,521

Employers Recruiting on CampusAvg. Co-op SalariesAvg. Starting Salaries

Year

Career Opportunities

Fall Career Fair- 174 employers – 80 from Missouri- 30 states- 2,500 students/alumni attended

Nucor Week- Largest single-employer event in S&T history- 26 Nucor representatives from 10 divisions on campus- Nucor invested over $120,000 and 1,380 hours- Nucor visited with 1,737 students

U.S. News: High School Guidance Counselors’ Rankings

800 guidance counselors from the top high schools in the US ranked national universities based on their knowledge of the institution’s academic record, curriculum, faculty, programs, and graduates.

National Universities- Missouri S&T is tied for 45th in the nation- Missouri S&T is ranked 2nd in Missouri

Public Universities- Missouri S&T is ranked 12th in the nation- Missouri S&T is ranked 1st in Missouri

U.S. News: High School Guidance Counselors’ Rankings

Examples of Key Schools

Arch Coal:

1 of 5 universities

Garmin International:

1 of 8 universities

Nucor Corporation:

1 of 4 universities

Toyota:

1 of 6 universities

US Steel:

1 of 12 universities

$191.1M

75months

0

12

24

36

48

60

72

84

0

50

100

150

200

Dollars Raised

Mon

ths

Dol

lars

(in

mill

ions

)

Advancing ExcellenceCapital Campaign Progress

As of September 30, 2009

Office of Sponsored Programs

FY09 vs. FY08:- Proposals awarded in total dollars: $42.5M

up 11%

- Proposals submitted in total dollars: $171.5M

up 13.5%

- Number of proposals submitted: 566

up 3.1%

- Research expenditures: $37.8M

up 0.5%

- F&A recovered: $6.9M

up 16%

- Number of active awards: 633

up 5.3%

Office of Sponsored Programs

FY10 activities through August and a year-over-year comparison are as follows:

- Proposals awarded in total dollars: $14.7M

up 7%

- Proposals submitted in total dollars: $49.1M

up 85%

- Research expenditures: $9.5M

up 20%

- F&A recovered: $1.7M

up 18%

- Number of active awards: 632

up 5%

E³=CEnergy

Environment = Civilization

Education

Innovative E³ Activities at Missouri S&T

Missouri Energy Summit

Energy Chair Professorship

Wayne and Gayle Laufer Energy Chair

- 1967 Civil Engineering graduate

- $3.4 million

- first endowed chair in the critical field of energy

- the largest ever received by any of the four University of Missouri campuses for a faculty position

DOD Appropriations

$3 M Advanced Polymer Systems for Defense Application—Power Generation, Protection and Sensing

$3 M High Performance Alloy Materials and Advanced Manufacturing of Steel Castings for New Light Weight and Robotic Weapon Systems

$6M Locating and Tracking Explosive Threats with Wireless Sensors and Networks

$3M Ultra-High Temperature Materials for Hypersonic Aerospace Vehicles

$2M Waves, Wind and Scavengers: Next Generation Renewable Energy Systems for Naval Applications

U.S. DOT

Awarded $2.7M – Federal Transit Administration

Scope of work:- Utilize Kansas City’s existing airport shuttle service as platform to

demonstrate viability of Plug-In Electric Vehicle (PEV) technologies - Evaluate pathway to integrate renewable energy into an electric vehicle fleet

Partners- Federal Transit Administration- City of Kansas City- Kokam America- Missouri Transportation Institute

City of KC PEV Demonstration

KC Aviation Division will utilize the Optare plug-in electric shuttle bus

City of KC Fleet operations will utilize the Ford Transit Connect EV (manufactured by Smith EV-US in Kansas City)

Expansion of PEV Demonstration

Additional federal funding received to expand Plug-in Electric Vehicle Demonstration

Will add a PEV Shuttle Bus on Missouri S&T campus

19

S&T

U.S. DOE Transportation Electrification

Awarded $5M – Advanced Electric Drive Vehicle Education Program

Scope of work:- Engineering curriculum- Advanced auto manufacturing, mechanic, and safety training- Public outreach and education

Partners:- Saint Louis Science Center- University of Central Missouri- Linn State Technical College- Smith Electric Vehicle

58% already considering graduate school

79% chose Missouri S&T as their 1st choice institution

58% were high school varsity athletes

94% plan to join a student organization

68% plan to join a student design team

44% would like to study abroad

26% plan to be involved in music and theatre

67% plan to complete a BS in 4 years or less

Miners’ Fall 2009 StatsBreaking National Trends

Band

/Musi

c

Intram

ural A

thleti

cs

Varsi

ty Ath

letics

Stude

nt Gov

ernmen

t

Thea

ter

Radio/

TV

Servi

ce Orga

nizati

on

Publi

cation

s

Debate

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

High SchoolCollege

Identifying interests of incoming students

SOURCE: ACT’s AIM 2008

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

839805

910

863 879 880

771 772754 764

738 733

1,0041,024 1,009 1,011

988 995

1,2321,204

1,259

1,2051,233

1,348

908

977 992

1112 11281163

Help with Writing 20%Help with Math Skills 16%Help with Reading 23%Help with Study Skills 20%Want to Study Abroad 26%

Inquiring students’ self-identified interests and needs

SOURCE: ACT’s AIM 2008

Student Design Teams

Formula SAE Michigan May 2009 Results- Over 100 teams from around

the world competed- S&T finished 6th in the world

and 3rd in the US- S&T design team won the Altair

William R. Adam Engineering Award

1 Graz Univ of Technology

2 Rochester Institute of Technology

3 Ecole De Technologie Superieure

4 Purdue Univ - W Lafayette

5 Univ of Applied Sciences - Graz

6 Missouri S&T

7 Univ of Michigan - Ann Arbor

8 Georgia Institute of Technology

9 Univ of Michigan - Dearborn

10 Centro Universitario Da FEI

11 Duke Univ

12 Universite Laval

13 Univ of Akron

14 McGill Univ

15 Auburn Univ

16 Univ of Evansville

17 Univ of Manitoba

18 Ohio State Univ

19 National Univ of Singapore

20 Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst

21 Univ of Florida

22 Univ of Pittsburgh - Pittsburgh

23 Penn State Univ - University Park

24 Univ of Pennsylvania

25 Brown Univ

Miner Recreation Building

Student Design Center PlansProposed Renovations

Innovation Park

Innovation Park

First building

Tenniscourts

Fitness Center

Fitness Center

State-of-the-art equipment to include:- 15 ellipticals with entertainment- 15 treadmills with entertainment- 15 bicycles with entertainment- 1 ergometer, 2 rowers, 2 climbers- Stretching and core strength equipment- Dumbbells, Olympic bars and plates, benches, and

racks- Selectorized weight machines

Fitness Center

Varsity Fitness Room

Varsity Weight Room

Toomey Hall Dedication

April 17, 2009

enrollment.mst.edu

Enrollment Update | Fall 2009Founded 1870 | Rolla, Missouri

Missouri S&T will increase its enrollment by improving access, expanding diversity, increasing retention, expanding extended learning activities, controlling tuition, and providing more endowed scholarships.

Missouri S&T will balance the academic portfolio and the student experience by increasing market share in areas such as life sciences and biotechnology, energy, business and management, communication, the liberal arts, and education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Increase enrollment and manage the academic portfolio:

2009 Incoming Class

Since the name change, our undergraduate freshmen out-of-state applications have increased by 27% and our out-of-state enrollment has increased 9%

Fall 2009 freshmen class was 1,134 students. Fall 2009 transfer class was 340 students. This is 60% larger than the class of 2000

- 24% female students

VERY talented Fall 2009 incoming class:- 4 with perfect 36 on ACT- 1 with perfect 1600 on SAT- Average ACT composite is 27.7 - 35% have ACT composite of 30+

41% Increase in Undergraduates (1507) 41% Increase in Female Students (+435) 73% Increase in Graduate Students (+682) 91% Increase in Minority Students (+342) 40% Increase in Non-Engineering Majors

Since 2005, 60% of Growth due to Increased Retention Rates 87% to 88% Retention Rate Achieved and Sustained 62% Graduation Rate Achieved. 65% possible by 2010

Lower discount rate from +38% to 27% Generated over $21 M in additional gross revenues

2001-2009 Enrollment Change

Actual

Original Goal

Goal

2000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 2010 2011 2012

Total Enrollment 4,626 5,858 6,167 6,371 6,815 6,300 6,425 6,550 6,550

Undergraduate Students 3,698 4,515 4,753 4,912 5,205 4,730 4,770 4,800 4,800

Graduate Students 928 1,343 1,414 1,459 1,610 1,570 1,655 1,750 1,750

Freshmen Class 696 977 1,051 1,056 1,134 1,005 995 985 975

Transfer Class 210 266 276 286 337 300 300 300 300

American Indian/ Alaskan Native 24 20 33 33 44 32 34 36 36

Asian-American 117 198 198 191 174 220 230 240 240

Black, Non-Hispanic 159 245 271 299 352 315 325 335 335

Hispanic-American 53 137 139 132 149 160 175 190 190

Total Female 1,071 1,326 1,391 1,419 1,485 1,425 1,450 1,480 1,500

Undergraduate Female 860 1,016 1,052 1,101 1,161 1,100 1,115 1,125 1,135

Graduate Female 211 310 339 318 324 325 335 355 365

Freshman Female 196 221 255 273 268 250 260 270 275

Transfer Female 45 70 74 67 89 85 90 90 90

On-campus 4,393 5,389 5,649 5,768 5,768 5,655 5,735 5,825 5,825

Distance Education 233 469 518 603 603 645 690 725 725

Strategic Plan Goals

#1 Question: How Did it Happen?

silver bullet

strike of lightening?

or

the truth is……….

silver buckshot: +92 strategic institutional, policy, market, facility, program and partnership changes.

Trend Overview

Total Enrollment Fall 2000-Fall 2009

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

3,69

8

3,75

6

3,84

9

4,08

9

4,12

0

4,31

3

4,51

5

4,75

3

4,91

2

5,20

5

928

1,12

7

1,39

1

1,37

0

1,28

7

1,28

9

1,34

3

1,41

4

1,45

9

1,61

0

Undergraduate Graduate

47% Total Enrollment Growth: 2000: 4,626 2009: 6,81541% Undergraduate Growth: 1,507 Additional Students

73% Graduate Growth: 682 Additional Students

Campus and Distance/Online Enrollments Fall 2000-Fall 2009

40% Growth of Campus Enrollment: 1761 Additional Students184% Growth of Distance Enrollment: 428 Additional Students

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

4,39

3

4,57

5

4,84

8

4,98

3

4,93

6

5,10

1

5,38

9

5,64

9

5,76

4

6,15

4

233 308392 476 471 501

469518 607

661

Diversity of Enrollments

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2000 -2009 change

Undergraduate 3698 3756 3849 4089 4120 4313 4515 4753 4912 5205 41%

Graduate 928 1127 1391 1370 1287 1289 1343 1414 1459 1610 73%

TOTAL 4626 4883 5240 5459 5407 5602 5858 6167 6371 6815 47%

Enrollment By LocationOn-Campus 4393 4575 4848 4983 4936 5101 5389 5649 5764 6154 40%Distance or On-Line 233 308 392 476 471 501 469 518 607 661 184%

Enrollment By Ethnic GroupAmerican Indian/Alaskan Native 24 26 23 27 23 21 20 33 33 44 83%

Asian-American/Native Hawaiian 127 128 137 151 142 158 198 198 191 174 37%

Black, Non-Hispanic 168 197 213 230 218 237 245 271 299 352 110%

Hispanic-American 58 63 83 100 100 126 137 139 132 149 157%

Non-Resident, International 590 723 819 749 600 565 585 619 674 819 39%

Ethnicity Not Specified 171 179 209 253 298 253 250 242 248 291 70%White, Non-Hispanic 3,488 3,567 3,756 3,949 4,026 4,242 4,423 4,665 4,794 4,986 43%Total 4,626 4,883 5,240 5,459 5,407 5,602 5,858 6,167 6,371 6,815 47%

Total Minorities, Non-Caucasian US Citizens 377 414 456 508 483 542 600 641 655 719 91%% of Total 8% 8% 9% 9% 9% 10% 10% 10% 10% 11%

Under-Represented Minority US Citizens 250 286 319 357 341 384 402 443 464 545 118%% of Total 5% 6% 6% 7% 6% 7% 7% 7% 7% 8%

Non-Resident, International 590 723 819 749 600 565 585 619 674 819 39%% of Total 13% 15% 16% 14% 11% 10% 10% 10% 11% 12%

Enrollment By GenderFemale 1,050 1,097 1,133 1,248 1,209 1,224 1,326 1391 1419 1485 41%

23% 23% 22% 23% 22% 22% 23% 23% 22% 22%

Male 3576 3786 4107 4211 4198 4378 4532 4776 4952 5330 49%77% 77% 78% 77% 78% 78% 77% 77% 78% 78%

Total Female Students Enrolled F’00-F’0941% Increase: 424 Additional Female Students

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20091,000

1,050

1,100

1,150

1,200

1,250

1,300

1,350

1,400

1,450

1,500

1,050

1,097

1,133

1,248

1,2091,224

1,326

1,3911,419

1,485

Under-Represented Students F’00-F’09118% Increase 295 Additional Students

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

250

286

319

357341

384402

443464

545

Total International Students EnrolledFall 2000-Fall 2009

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

590

723

819

749

600

565585

619

674

819

Incoming New Freshman Class

Fall 2000 Fall 2005 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 20090

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

18682015 2080

22792388

2625

696914 977 1051 1056 1134

ApplicationsAdmittedEnrolled

Incoming New Transfer Students

Fall 2000 Fall 2005 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

398421

488459

532570

195

279 266 276 286

337

ApplicationsAdmittedEnrolled

Incoming New Graduate Students

Fall 2000 Fall 2005 Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 20090

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1907

1410

1781 1731

2052 2099

348 355 392 434 467 492

ApplicationsAdmittedEnrolled

Distribution by Academic GroupingsFall 2009

76%

10%8% 2%1%3%

Engineering

Business & Computing

Math & Natural Sciences

Liberal Arts

Social Sciences

Undecided & Non-Degree

Engineering60 % increase: 2000: 3272, 2007: 4666, 2009: 5149

Business, Computing & Information Sciences51 % increase: 2000: 454, 2007: 619, 2009: 687

Liberal Arts52 % increase: 2000: 83, 2007: 121, 2009: 126

Math & Natural Sciences42 % increase: 2000: 392, 2007: 524, 2009: 555

Social Sciences5 % decrease: 2000: 79, 2007: 98, 2009: 75

Undecided36 % decrease: 2000: 346, 2007: 139, 2009: 223

Growth by Academic Fields2000 to 2009

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20093000

3500

4000

4500

5000

5500

3272

3568

37683842 3852

4110

4409

4666

4829

5237

Growth by Academic GroupingsFall 2000 – Fall 2009

Engineering =

• AERO• ARCH• CERAMIC• CHEMICAL• CIVIL• COMPUTER• ENG MECH• ENG MGMT• ELECTRICAL• ENVIRNMTL• FRESHMAN•

GEOLOGICAL• GEOTECH • IDE• MATERIALS•

METALLURGY

• MINING• NUCLEAR•

PETROLEUM• SYSTEMS

60% INCREASE

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009300

400

500

600

700

800

454

491

563596 601

579601

619 627

687

392 405438

482505

520504

524505

555

Business, Computing & ISTMath & Natural Sciences

Growth by Academic GroupingsFall 2000 – Fall 2009

Business & Computing =

• MBA• BUS&MS• COMP SCI• IST

Math & Natural Sciences =

• BIOLOGY• CHEMISTRY• GEOLOGY• MATH• PHYSICS

51% INCREASE

42% INCREASE

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

8391

113 114 112 108119 121

115126

7991

7985 83 83 87

98 95

75

Liberal Arts Social Sciences

Growth by Academic GroupingsFall 2000 – Fall 2009

Liberal Arts =

• ENGLISH• HISTORY• TECH

COMM•

PHILOSOPHY

SocialSciences =

• ECONOMICS•

PSYCHOLOGY5% DECREASE

52% INCREASE

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

608

876

10611001

899963

10191060 1080

1198

539620

756696

563 574 597 590 557637

69

256305 305 336

389 422470

523561

Engineering (On-Campus) Engineering (Extended Learning)

Growth by Academic GroupingsGRADUATE ONLY Fall 2000 – Fall 2009

Engineering =

• AERO• ARCH• CERAMIC• CHEMICAL• CIVIL• COMPUTER• ENG MECH• ENG MGMT• ELECTRICAL• ENVIRNMTL• FRESHMAN•

GEOLOGICAL• GEOTECH • IDE• MATERIALS•

METALLURGY

• MINING• NUCLEAR•

PETROLEUM• SYSTEMS

TOTAL ENGINEERING: 97% INCREASE

18% INCREASE

713% INCREASE

Geographic Presence

Students’ Home Counties

ADAIR

ANDREW

ATCHISON

AUDRAIN

BARRY

BARTON

BATESBENTON

BOONE

BUCHANAN

BUTLER

CALDWELL

CALLAWAY

CAMDEN

CARROLL

CARTER

CASS

CEDAR

CHARITON

CHRISTIAN

CLARK

CLAY

CLINTON

COLE

COOPER

CRAWFORD

DADE

DALLAS

DAVIESSDE KALB

DENT

DOUGLAS

DUNKLIN

FRANKLIN

GENTRY

GREENE

GRUNDY

HARRISON

HENRY

HICKORY

HOLT

HOWARD

HOWELL

IRON

JACKSON

JASPER

JOHNSON

KNOX

LACLEDE

LAFAYETTE

LAWRENCE

LEWIS

LINCOLN

LINN

MCDONALD

MACON

MADISON

MARIES

MARION

MERCER

MILLER

MONITEAU

MONROE

MORGAN

NEWTON

NODAWAY

OREGON

OSAGE

OZARK

PERRY

PETTIS

PHELPS

PIKEPLATTE

POLK

PULASKI

PUTNAM

RALLS

RANDOLPH

RAY

REYNOLDS

RIPLEY

ST. CLAIR

SALINE

SCOT-LAND

SCOTTSHANNON

SHELBY

STODDARD

STONE

SULLIVAN

TANEY

TEXAS

VERNON

WARREN

WAYNE

WEBSTER

WORTH

WRIGHT

MADRIDNEW

MISSIS-SIPPI

BOLLIN-GER

GIRARDEAUCAPE

WASHING-TON

JEFFER-

SON

ST

LOUIS

CITY

MONT-GOMERY

GAS-

CON-

ADE

SCHUY-LER

LIVING-STON

LOUISSTCHARLES

ST

PEMI-SCOT

GENEVIEVESTE

0

1

8

6

1

3

3

7

23

70 110 13

2

8

20

2

4

1

16295

5

1 1

4 12

11 6

1 8 3

8

4

34

7

23

9

13

811

74

7 3415

50

4701,119

122

20 153200

35

21

16

1781

2341

ST FRANCOIS

2411

80314

6

7

8

38

26

323170

23

37

67

2423

9

52

1116

6

50

7

718158

14

4

46

19

3

4 11 9 19

48 3

615

2

5

10 23

2

14

9

3

4

410

6

11

35

+50 students

30-49 students

10-29 students

1-9 students

0 students

Fall 2009

Fall 2009

RI

48

63

2

2

55

2848

194

51

126

38

2

32

4,673

64

10128

7

2

23

21

44126

16

30

15

14

22 22

7

17

13

19

22

15

22

6

143

6

13

Total Enrollment

- 49 states & 51 nations

- 73% Missouri residents

- 11% minority students

- 12% international students

DC 2

3

Students’ Home States

2

1

4

+25 students

10-24 students

1-9 students

RI

4.3

5025

100

80

150150

64.714.3

46.2100

10.5

1.6

11.6

60

39.1

25.4

5.9

16.729.3

0

71.4

15.0

90.9

15.752.9

0

87.5

36.4

22.2

15.8 120

40

41.7

333

26.7

46.7

36.4

3333

100

40 50

20

85.7DC 2

200

% Change in EnrollmentsFall 2006 - Fall 2009

100

0

0

25% or greater

10% – 24.9%

5% – 9.9%

4.9% – -4.9%

-5.1% – -9.9%

-10% – -24.9%

-25% or greater

Fall 2009 Inquiries – FreshmenGraphed by 3 Digit Zip Code

Red areas are metropolitan areas with largest inquiry growth

S&T’s Global Presence

Blue = S&T AlumniGreen = Current StudentsRed = MOA universities

Our Challenges

College Progression Rates in Missouri

NCHEMS 2006

For every 100 Ninth Graders

# Graduate from High

School

# Enter Colleg

e

# Are Still Enrolled Their

Sophomore Year

Percentage of 9th graders who

graduate from HS on time, go directly to college, return for their second year,

and graduate within 150% of program

timeMissouri

100 77.2 44.1 28.8 20.9Nation

100 68.6 42.3 28.4 19.7

Missouri’s P-16 Pipeline

Only 2 of 10 eighth graders ready for college prep curriculum in high school (ACT 2008)

College-Going Rate (%) - 2006 Fall First-Time Freshmen Directly out of High School

Missouri: 57.1 Nation: 61.6 A Larger Proportion of Missouri Students Starting at Community

Colleges Freshmen Headcount Distribution at Missouri Colleges & Universities

(DHE 2008) 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007

Community College 31% 24% 31% 30% 36% 41%Public College/University

51% 55% 47% 46% 42% 39%

Private College/University

18% 21% 22% 24% 24% 20%

Total Freshmen 39,505 33,560 35,034 35,184

41,135 48,181

The Midwest and Northeast will experience a 4% to 10% decline in high school graduates between 2009 – 2014 (WICHE)

The profile of college-bound students is rapidly becoming more ethnically diverse and female dominant (NCES, WICHE, ACT, College Board)

The number of students interested in engineering, computer science, and natural science degrees has declined to record lows (ACT, CIRP)

More full-time college freshmen are choosing to start at two-year colleges (IPED, MODHE)

More students are enrolling in more than one college at a time (National Student Clearinghouse)

Future student market growth will include more students requiring financial aid and loans to complete a degree (WICHE)

Key changes in the college-bound student markets

% change in Missouri general population by county 2000-2008

Source: USDA, Bureau of the CensusPublished by: University of Missouri Extension, April 2 2009

-14.4% - -0.1%

0% - 4.9%

5% - 9.9%

10% - 19.9%

20% - 39%

Missouri Average = 5.6%

By 2012, Missouri will have 4,000 fewer high school graduates each year

WICHE, 2008

College-going rates continue to fall

Source: CIRP

Change in Intended Major 1976-77 to 2006-07

0%

7%

14%

21%

28%

Business Engineering Education BiologicalSciences

ComputerScience

SocialSciences

Art, Music,Drama

HealthProfessions

76-77 86-87 96-97 06-07College Board, 2007

SOURCE: ACT EIS 2008

> 5%

20,000 fewer potential engineering majors

College Bound ACT Tested Students Interested in Any Engineering Field

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

40,000

45,000

50,000

55,000

60,000

65,000

70,000

High School Seniors: 72,467 High School Graduates: 61,752 ACT Testers/College Bound: 47,240 Any Engineering Interest (all testers): 1,768 Any Engineering Interest, (+21 testers): 1,256

(21 = MO average score / 50%) Engineering Interest, +24 comp. score: 961

(24 = UM minimum for auto admission) Missouri S&T Freshmen Engineering 681

Enrollees:

Missouri’s 2008 student funnel for ALL engineering fields

SOURCES: MODESE 2009, ACT EIS 2008, PeopleSoft

71% S&T market share

34% first-generation college students

+80% are receiving scholarships & financial aid

22% qualify for Low Income Pell Grants

82% plan to work while enrolled at S&T

29% have/carry a credit card12 already have a monthly balance over $1000

Financial Profile

Estimated 2009/2010Based on 30 credit hours per academic year

MO Resident

$ 7,3682,070

960 7,632

$ 18,030

Midwest Student Exchange

(IN,KS,MI,MN,NE,ND,WI)

$ 11,0522,070

960 7,632

$21,714

Non-Resident

$ 18,4592,070

960 7,632

$ 29,121

TuitionFeesBooks & SuppliesRoom & BoardTotal

- Room and Board based upon average residential life cost for the campus population.- Budgets based upon 8 hours of supplemental fee courses.

Cost of Education

How Do We Plan for the Future?

1. What is the total faculty’s teaching load? 2. How many classrooms and seats does the campus

have available? 3. How many science/engineering labs are available? 4. How many residence hall beds are available for paying

students? 5. How many parking spaces are reserved for students? 6. What is the per meal dining capacity?

Focus Our Future Plans on Optimizing the S&T’s Operational Capacity

Impact of the Economy?

46%: The Economy Has Changed Which College Students will Attend

SOURCE: Longmire & Company, Inc. 2009 “Study of the Impact of the Economy on Enrollment”

76% indicated they would be “somewhat” or “very likely” to consider a more expensive institution if it could deliver greater value.

SOURCE: Longmire & Company, Inc. 2009 “Study of the Impact of the Economy on Enrollment”

enrollment.mst.edu

Enrollment Update | Fall 2009Founded 1870 | Rolla, Missouri