+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

Date post: 01-Dec-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Transcript
Page 1: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

Chia Ing ChukTechnical Manager

Desmet Ballestra Malaysia

Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining:How to Prevent the Formation of GE and

How to Eliminate GE Once Formed

Glycidyl Ester Development: Holding Glycidyl Ester (GE) in Check

Page 2: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

2

World Leading Specialist in Oils, Fats & Oleochemicals

Oilseeds

Edible oil

Animal Feed

Crude oilEdible fats

Biodiesel

Preparation Extraction

Refining

Fat Modifications

Oleochemicals & Biodiesel Glycerine

Fatty acidsFatty alcohols

Page 3: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

3

Global Coverage: Efficient Customer Service

Argentina

Brasil

Colombia

U.S.A.

Mexico

U.K.

Spain

FranceBelgium

ItalyTurkey

Russia

ChinaU.A.E.

MalaysiaIndia

Singapore

DB office or subsidiary

Indonesia

Page 4: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

4

Innovation through R&D: Backbone of Leading Technology

R&D centers

Malaysia

Argentina

U.K.

Pilot facilities

France

Belgium

Page 5: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

Source: Pudel,F. and Matthäus,B. (2012) - AOCS conference, Long Beach, CA,USA

* Occurrence in food oils first reported mid of 2000’s

* Were considered as potential harmful contaminant

* Oil processing industry was requested to reduce 3-MCPD/GE in refined food oils

* Efficient mitigation strategies were developed and are industrially applied

Challenge for Food Oils: 3-MCPD and Glycidyl Esters

Page 6: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

EU Regulatory Limits

3-MCPD GE

Vegetable oils (incl. palm)

Vegetable oils (for use in

infant food)

2.5

0.75

1.0

0.5

Limits for GE and 3-MCPD

Page 7: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

GE/3-MCPD esters are mainly issue for palm oil

Oil Glycidyl(ppm)

3-MCPD(ppm)

DAG (%)

RapeseedSunflower Coconut CornSoya

0.120.300.250.540.35

0.210.540.540.680.55

0.400.65N.A.2.120.40

Palm 1.03-7.5 0.15-13.7 4-10

(1) Palm Oil is most sensitive oil for 3-MCPD/GE formation

(2) GE content in refined soft oils is generally very low (< 0.5 ppm)

(3) 3-MCPD content can also be high(er) in soft oils (quality dependent)

Analysis of commercial oils (purchased in supermarket – 2016)

Page 8: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

8

Highest levels of 3-MCPD esters and GE are found in

palm oil

Main precursors

GE ← “DAG”

Main precursors

3-MCPDE ← “Chlorine”

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000Concentration (µg/kg)

2-MCPD3-MCPDGE

Levels of MCPDE and GE in food oils (2012-2015)

Mean Concentration (ppm) in 2015

Oil 3-MCPD GE

soybean

rapeseed

palm

0.4

0.2

3

0.2

0.2

4

Source: EFSA Scientific opinion. March 2016 doi:10.2903:j.efsa.2016.4426

3-MCPD & GE: High Levels in Palm Oil

Page 9: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

9

3-MCPD Esters Glycidyl Esters 3-MCPD GLYCIDYL (GE)

Toxicity Carcinogenic(Non-genotoxic)

Carcinogenic (Genotoxic)

Precursors Triglycerides, chlorineAcidic conditions

DiglyceridesHeat

Mechanism of formation Nucleophilic substitution(starting at 140°C)

Radicalar reaction (> 230°C)

Critical refining stage(for minimal formation)

Degumming - Bleaching(but formed during 1st stage

of deodorization)

Deodorization

Stability Can only be degraded with strong alkaline

Not volatile

Conversion to MAG with strong acid (BE)

Volatile

Different mitigation strategies for 3-MCPD esters and GE

Page 10: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

GE

ppm

Low DAG in CPO – Low GE

Page 11: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

11

GE Formation: Effect of Time and Temperature

Time (hr)

Gly

cidy

l est

ers

(ppm

)

- Almost no net formation of Glycidyl esters at T < 230°C.- Very fast formation at T > 240°C.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

260°C

240°C230°C

220°C

3 mbar 1% SS

Net GE formation at 260°C : ≈ 8 ppm/hr (= ≈ 0.13 ppm/min.)Net GE formation at 220°C : ≈ < 0.1 ppm/hr

Page 12: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

12

GE Formation: Effect of Packed FFA Stripping Column

Temperature(°C)

GE (ppm)

Color(R – 5,25”)

FFA (% C16:0)

220 0.10 20 0.12

230 0.14 19 0,09

240 0.17 14 0,07

260 0.20 12 0,04

Dual temp high temp fast stripping / low temp mild deodorisation

Short residence time at high(er) temperature gives: - Almost no formation of glycidyl esters, even at T > 240°C- Very efficient FFA stripping but only limited heat bleaching

10 min, 0.5% SS

Page 13: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

Can GE be Stripped During Deodorization ?

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

225 230 235 240 245 250 255 260 265

GE

(ppm

)

Temperature (°C)

3 mbar

2 mbar

1 mbar

Glycidyl esters can be stripped from the oil, but……- Stripping will only be significant at higher temperature/lower pressure

- Under ‘normal’ deodorizing conditions: formation > stripping

- Best strategy is therefore to limit formation (temp. < 240°C)

- Best compromise: strip at high T (250-260°C) , deodorise at low T (230-240°C)

The lower the P, the higher the NO losses

(MAG, DAG, Toco)

60 min, 1% SS

Page 14: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

14

Glycidyl Esters can be ‘removed’ from Refined Oil

Acid catalysed conversion to Monoglycerides

MonoglycerideH+

* To be applied on fully refined (deodorized) oil* Post-bleaching with acid activated BE followed by mild deodorization

* No effect on 3-MCPD esters

Double refining with higher operating cost but very efficient approach to get GE << 0.5 ppm in RBD Palm Oil (Fractions)

Page 15: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

15

Current Strategies for GE Mitigation

Page 16: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

16

GE Mitigation 1: Qualistock+TM Dual Temperature Deodorisation

TO VACUUM

Qualistock+ dual temp deodorising

Dual TempDeodorization• Packed column stripper

followed heat recoveryto lower temperature

Integrated Packedcolumn stripper • Short residence time • High temperature FFA

stripping

Tray type deodorizer• Longer residence time • Lower temperature• Heat bleaching/

deodorization

Page 17: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

17

GE Mitigation 1: Qualistock+TM Dual Temperature Deodorisation

Single Temperature Dual Temperature

Temperature °C 265 230 – 215

Sparging Steam % 0.6 1.2

Deodorising Retention Time

mins 60 120

FFA % 0.06 0.04

Colour R 2.3 2.3

GE ppm 4.81 0.36

Industrial Data

Page 18: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

3.59

3.02

1.73

3.27

0.69

0.19 0.14

2.68

0.580.260.36 0.25 0.22

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

5 10 15

GE

(ppm

)

Sparge Steam (Kg/MT oil)

200°C/1.5 mbar 210°C/1.5mbar 230°C/1.5 mbar200°C/3 mbar 230°C/3 mbar 260°C/ 1.5 mbar

Feedstock: RBD Palm Oil with 4.35 ppm GE

• Not enough GE Stripping at 200°C• More than 95% of the GE can be stripped when using proper stripping conditions

18

GE Mitigation 2: Stripping of GE from Refined Palm Oil

Level of vacuum will have big impact on GE Stripping

Page 19: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

19

GE Mitigation 2: Post Stripping

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Sparge steam (kg/ton)

Glyc

idyl

(ppm

) 200°C

210°C

230°C260°C

Top pressure : 1.5 mbar

GE Post-stripping will not only reduce GE, but will also create additional losses as other components will also be stripped (Toco, MAG, …)

Page 20: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

SUBL

IMAT

OR

-1 SUBL

IMAT

OR

-2

VEN

T

Sublimax 2G ice condensing

Stripping of GE from Refined Oil

Ice condensing for deep vacuum

Packed column for GE post-strippingExisting deodorizer

Page 21: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

21

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 1 2 3 4Sample number

3-M

CPD

+ G

E (p

pm)

RBD PO

Post-bleached

Redeodorizedat 260°C

Redeodorizedat 230°C

Attention! GE may again be formed during post-deodorization

low deodorization temperature required

4.3

0.1

2.8

0.3

Gly

cidy

l est

ers

(ppm

)

Post-bleaching : 0.5% Activated BE, 110°C, 30 min. Post-deodo : 0.5% stripping steam, 3 mbar, 60 min.

GE Mitigation 3: Mild Post Refining

Page 22: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

22

RBDPO (Feed) 2nd Bleached PO 2nd Deodorised PO

Phosphoric Acid Dosage

% - 0.05 -

Bleaching Earth % - 1 – 1.3* -

Temperature °C - 105 210Retention Time mins - 30 30

Sparging Steam % - 0.3 0.45FFA % 0.06 – 0.08 - 0.02 – 0.03

Colour R 2.9 - 2.1 – 2.5GE ppm 8 Not Detectable 0.15 - 0.40

Industrial Data

GE Mitigation 3: Mild Post Refining

* BE dosage of 1.3% was mainly due to colour reasons. Required consumption for breaking down GE is lower.

Page 23: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

23

Desmet BallestraSublimaxTM 2G

Page 24: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

SUBL

IMAT

OR

-1 SUBL

IMAT

OR

-2

VEN

T

Sublimax 2G ice condensing

24

Desmet Ballestra SublimaxTM 2G

Page 25: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

25

Desmet Ballestra SublimaxTM 2GSublimax: Vertical, with Falling film ammonia evaporation

Classical: Horizontal, with convective boiling liquid tubes

NH3 mass: <100 kg NH3 mass: >>100 kg

Ammonia liquid

Ammonia vapour

Tube

Page 26: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

26

Desmet Ballestra SublimaxTM 2G

Hot WaterIN

De-Icing

De-aerationMelting waterdischarge

Ammonia IN

Ammonia OUT

Main Advantages• Effective heat transfer with falling film

evaporation

• Low ammonia hold up in system

• Reduced heat loss during melting

• Reduced chiller peak load and electricity consumption

• Reduced motive steam and cooling water consumption for deaeration group

• Efficient cleaning with hot water spraying

• Self draining of refrigerant and melted ice

• Minimal welding joints

• Free vertical expansion of tubes

Page 27: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

27

Desmet Ballestra SublimaxTM 2G

Desmet Ballestra Conventional

Suction Pressure (mbara) 2.0 2.0

Suction Temperature (°C) 8 8

Water Vapour (kg/h) 300 300

Air (kg/h) 8 8

FFA (kg/h) 5 5

Chiller Power (kW) 140 180

Steam Eq. for Melting (kg/h) 100 110

Motive Steam (kg/h) 133 180

Cooling Water (m3/h) 108 154

Page 28: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

28

Desmet Ballestra SublimaxTM 2G

HIGH EFFICIENCY

LOW UTILITY LEAK FREE

Sublimax® HorizontalFreezing times Long ShortEnergy consumption Minimal, stable Higher, with peaksDrainage NH3 Gravity NoneIce removal tubes Effective PoorAmmonia leakage risk Negligible YesMass NH3 Very low High

Page 29: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

Final Conclusion

No « one fits all” 3-MCPD/GE mitigation solution

Best solution will depend on

(1) Plant configuration : chemical or physical , new or existing plant

(2) Required specs : special vs commodity; individual or formulated fat (CIE) (3) Technology development (efficiency – quality – sustainability)

New technical solutions (preventive and curative) are further explored and developed taking into account COST factor

final oil must remain affordable Reference : De Greyt W. and Kellens M., 3-MCPD and GE : A new Challenge

Oils and Fats International , 32(7) - 2016

Page 30: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

30

Technological Breakthrough with Continuous R&D

Page 31: Mitigating Process Contaminants during Palm Oil Refining ...

Thank You for Your Attention

[email protected]

MOSTA Event: Glycidyl EsterDevelopment: Holding Glycidyl Ester (GE) in Check

Recommended