+ All Categories
Home > Education > Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Date post: 20-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: utah-section-society-for-range-management
View: 62 times
Download: 7 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Prevention of larkspur issues by grazing management.
Popular Tags:
18
larkspur poisoning on rangelands through the selection of cattle Ben Green Research Pharmacologist Poisonous Plant Research Laboratory Logan, Utah
Transcript
Page 1: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Update: Mitigation of larkspur poisoning on rangelands

through the selection of cattle

Ben GreenResearch Pharmacologist

Poisonous Plant Research LaboratoryLogan, Utah

Page 2: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

The Larkspur ProblemCattle losses

typically around 5% and can reach 15%.Producers move

cattle off of the larkspur containing pastures resulting in wasted high quality forage.

Loss of a cow leaves an early-weaned, poor performing calf.

Page 3: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Clinical signs of larkspur poisoning• Staggering gait.

• Muscle trembles.

• Collapse to sternal and then lateral recumbency (this can lead to death for various reasons).

• Death occurs from neuromuscular paralysis and/or bloat.

Page 4: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Grazing Management!1) Graze early before the larkspur flowers.

2) Remove cattle during the “toxic window”.

3) Graze late in the season when the seed pods begin to shatter.

Page 5: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Toxic Window

Pfister et al., 1999. J. Nat. Toxins. 8:81-94

Page 6: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Larkspur Breed StudyDeveloped two quantitative

measures of larkspur intoxication.Heart rate.Time to collapse (muscle

weakness).Evaluating cattle breeds for

susceptibility to larkspur intoxication.

Page 7: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Muscle WeaknessThe most obvious clinical sign

in poisoned cattle.Designed a protocol to

measure it.

Page 8: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Cattle responses to 8 mg/kg MSAL-type alkaloids.

Green et al., 2014. Rangelands. 36:10-15.

Page 9: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Average time (minutes) to exercise-induced clinical signs of poisoning.

Breed, (number of

animals)

Time to muscle fatigue,

(minutes)

Angus, 33 17.2 ± 2.7

Brahman, 13 9.4 ± 3.3

Line 1, Hereford, 48 7.4 ± 1.4

Holstein, 15 26.8 ± 3.4

Jersey, 14 29.3 ± 2.9

Green et al., 2014. Rangelands. 36:10-15.

Page 10: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

What’s next?

Page 11: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Genomic AnalysisIllumina Bovine SNPHD

genotyping array.777,962 polymorphisms across

the entire bovine genome.Breed associations currently

using the BovineSNP50 for the calculation of genome enhanced EPDs.

We are genotyping our steers in collaboration with MARC at Clay Center, Nebraska and identifying potential markers for further research.

Page 12: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Dendrogram of Genotypes from the Bovine SNPHD array.

Angus

Jersey

Brahman

Holstein

Line 1 Hereford

Analysis by John Keele

Page 13: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Cattle responses to 8 mg/kg MSAL-type alkaloids.

Green et al., 2014. Rangelands. 36:10-15.

Page 14: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Manhattan Plot of SNPHD Genotypes from 44 Steers

Analysis by John Keele

Page 15: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Genotype-Phenotype Concordance in Angus

Genotyped susceptible and resistant Angus.

One SNP on BTA 4 is significant in Angus.

In Angus, when 40 minute and zero minute animals are genotyped they are characterized by two alleles of a single marker on BTA 4.

Analysis by John Keele

Page 16: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

What’s Next?Prospective genomic

study to validate the marker in Angus Steers.

Next generation sequencing to identify neighboring polymorphism on BTA4.

Page 17: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

ConclusionsThere are more susceptible and less

susceptible cattle in every breed.We have identified a genetic marker for

larkspur.Currently validating that marker.May be possible to select for less

susceptible animals.

Page 18: Mitigation of Larkspur Poisoning on Rangelands Through the Selection of Cattle

Acknowledgements Dale Gardner, Steve Lee- Chemistry Isabella McCollum- Cell-Based Assays, Cattle Kevin Welch, Zane Davis, Rex Probst-Cattle

Experiments Jessie Roper- Larkspur Analysis Daniel Cook – Larkspur populations John Keele, Warren Snelling, Larry Kuehn, Tara

McDaneld- Genetics and Genomics Clay Center, NE

Vicki Leesburg- Pedigree analysis Miles City, MT


Recommended