Mitigation program across multiple sectors
GHG Mitigation in Urban areas through a City-wide approach
Monali Ranade
First PMR Technical Workshop
October 26, 2011
Content
1. Cities and GHG mitigation
2. Multi-sector approach in Cities
3. On-going work in Cities on GHG mitigation
4. Illustration of a multi-sector initiative based on the city-
wide approach
5. MRV for a city-wide initiative
6. For Further Consideration
What is meant by multi-sector in a City context?
Solid Waste Water Energy Transport Greening
Urban Living
Land-use planning and regulation
Home
Work
Sources of GHG Emissions in Urban Areas
1. Why are Cities important for GHG mitigation?
Cities need to build infrastructure now, to support the large population inflow, making them the fastest growing source of GHG emissions
Cities continuously face the challenge to balance development and environmental needs
Access to finance is critical to facilitate low-GHG development in cities
67% of world's energy
supply
70% global GHG
emissions
Regulations such as building codes, vehicular
emission and specific awareness campaigns.
City Authorities
are responsible
for: Understanding the
needs of their growing population
Improving the quality of living for its residents
through urban planning and improved delivery of municipal services.
Urban services like transport, waste, public
buildings, water services and forestry
(parks, recreation areas).
Defining City’s future through exercises such as, Master plans and
development strategies that outline a vision for the city
Cities already work in a multi-sector framework
Conduct a baseline
inventory of global
warming pollutants
Develop a local Climate
Action Plan (CAP) to
implement actions that
reduce global warming
pollution
Implement the local
Climate Action Plan
Measure, verify and
report performance
Establish a target to
lower emissions
1
2
3
4
5
ICLEI’s Cities for Climate Protection Campaign
Cities are also engaged with climate change
The CCP’s 5 Milestones provides
a simple, standardized means to
enable communities to effectively
reduce the emissions from both
government operations and the
community as a whole.
3a. Multi-Sector CDM/VCS Programs
Amman Green
Growth Program
Urban
Transport Waste
Sustainable
Energy Urban
Forestry
Landfill gas to
energy
Plastics Recycling
slaughterhouse
waste-to-energy
EE street lighting
Residential CFL
Solar water heaters
Wind farm
Buildings EE
Bus Rapid Transit
system
Light Rail Transit
system
Fuel switch for
public vehicles
Plantations
Urban agriculture
Greater Amman Municipality
Main Features
Energy-based CO2
• Breadth – 95% of Tokyo’s emissions
• Simplicity – mostly commercial buildings, electricity consumed
• Precision – monthly electric or other fuel bill, emissions factors
Categories of facilities
• Cap for Large: annual consumption >1,500 kL crude oil-equivalent
• Mandatory reporting (no cap) for Small/Medium: companies with
multiple facilities where combined annual consumption >3,000 kL
Baseline: Average of any three consecutive years in the period 2002-7
Targets (to reach aim of 25% below 2000 levels, by 2020)
• 6-8% reduction in first compliance period (2010-2014)
• Further 17% reduction in second period (2015-2019)
3c. City-based sector-specific ETS
Tokyo Municipal Government
Main features of Tokyo’s ETS (II)
Carrots
• “Top level” facilities (outstanding progress in reducing emissions) have
compliance factor reduced by half
• “Quasi top-level”: compliance factor reduced by one quarter
Sticks (if emissions exceed allowance, & fail to purchase credits to cover shortfall)
• Fine of JPY 500,000 (~$6,000)
• Additional reduction obligation, beyond shortfall itself
• “Name and shame” scheme
Emissions audited by independent auditors accredited with TMG
Trading and offset arrangements
• Banking of accumulated credits, but no borrowing
• Credits from Small/Medium facilities that have voluntarily reduced
• Credits from outside Tokyo (max 1/3 of baseline emissions)
• Renewable energy credits: green electricity or Cool-Net (residential)
Key lessons identified from Tokyo
Legal and regulatory frameworks for ETSs are essential
• Initial voluntary scheme (from 2000) resulted in very limited reductions
Data helps to establish baselines and identify best practices
• Mandatory emissions reporting began in 2000
• Evidence base for showing how targets were reasonable
• Based on electricity and fuel bills (only energy-based CO2)
Stakeholder consultation, confidence building
Appropriate design for city’s circumstances and government’s goals
• Intensity-based cap considered, but would not have resulted in reducing
total emissions
• Focus on large facilities: avoid thousands of small facilities which would
have resulted in marginal total reductions
Developing and implementing an ETS takes time (since 2000)
Extracted from a World Bank case-study
4. Illustration of a multi-sector initiative
based on the city-wide approach
Please Note:
The program presented in the next 3 slides is strictly for illustration and does
not reflect views or opinion of the World Bank or the Government of India.
From Mexico’s presentation
Urban NAMA
Increase in mortgage
penetration CONAVI INFONAVIT More
technolo
gie
s u
sed
CF
L
SH
W
Eff W
H
Imp
Insu
Eff R
ef E
ff AC
LED
ligh
t PV
PoA-2 Hipoteca
Verde
PoA-1 Esta es tu Casa
FOVISSSTE SHF
Residential NAMA
Urban NAMA
Reference Presentations by
Jorge Wolpert and CS Sinha Urban NAMA
National Registry/
Tracking System
International
Registry
Illustration: National City-wide Emission Reduction Initiative
City emission profiles and action plans were created for 41 cities in India by ICLEI. (Under a British High Commission supported initiative of ICLEI)
City Development Plans have been prepared by 60 cities. (under Govt of India’s Urban Renewal Mission)
Common Activities identified by cities:
1. Energy efficient street-lighting
2. Building level energy efficiency
3. Municipal water supply system
4. Transportation systems, including
improved public transport
5. Public awareness
6. Solid waste management
(and many others)
Illustration (contd.)
Building upon the work already done in Cities (last slide) A National City-wide Emission Reduction Initiative by synergizing
Cities’ Climate Action Plans and Development Strategies, where
a. Each city addresses GHG emissions from multiple sectors strategically and as part of their planning exercise
b. City authorities include the cost of undertaking low-carbon alternatives or climate resilience in their investment plans.
c. National initiative helps city identify, strategize and prioritize investment and provides advice on financing sources.
a. The Initiative establishes standardized city growth rates, other assumptions and a MRV framework to ensure transparency in setting baseline/reference scenario.
Illustration (contd…)
A National City-wide Emission Reduction Initiative can gradually improve the capacity and potentially market readiness of Cities
Phase 1: • Acts as aggregator of city-wide programs. • Builds capacity of cities to develop strong baselines, undertake MRV,
and implement projects • Assists in prioritize interventions and identify finance.
Phase 2: • Assign quantitative ER targets to each city, based on the data collected
and enhanced capacity • Allow for off-sets, PPP and all other options to involve private sector.
Phase 3: Depending on capacity, field-level experience, quality of data and a readiness assessment, introduce cities to a Domestic ETS.
Greater Amman Municipality
City-level GHG Inventory (10,256ktCO2e or 3.7tCO2e pc, 2008)
Private transport
(incl. air, marine)
Pub
G d s
S e r
Household SW
I nd
Buildings S e r
Raw
Was
F o r
2 1 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12
13
14
15
16
1. Improved public transport (BRT, LRT, MRTS)
2. Cycling, pedestrians, NMT 3. Vehicle improvement
5. Landfill gas 6. Composting 7. Recycling 8. Waste mgt
9. Renewable E 10. Appliances 11. EE buildings 12. EE services
13. EE equip 14. EE treatment 15. Green areas 16. Urban Forest
AMMAN MASTER PLAN 2025
Transport (3889 tCO2e) Waste
(1012 tCO2e
Energy (3827 tCO2e)
Wat-er
AR
Bending the emissions curve
Monitoring only the emissions inventory
as compared with a projected baseline
Inventory-based monitoring
6. For Further Discussion
A city-wide program is not a NAMA but a national program with
cities as the implementing counterpart can be.
Cities are willing, interested and able to reduce GHG emissions.
But, they need capacity and financial support
? How can markets help cities reduce GHG emissions?
To begin with, this requires strong linkage between national and
sub-national governments, incl. state/municipal governments to:
Climate change policies and domestic actions
National and State inventories (incl. UNFCCC reporting)
Project Types and ERs (tCO2e)
Select project type from menu;
Identify Boundary, Baseline scenario
Street Lighting
Water Pumping
District Heating
Boiler Efficiency
Buildings
And others…
Enter Name of City
Aggregates Emission Reductions
Manual
Automatic
Worksheet
Results
Legend
Enter Baseline and Project GHG
Emissions and Emission
Reductions (tCO2e)
for each project type
Enter Sector (e.g., Energy)
Critical for CDM PoA and VCS GPD
Transport
Model
Calibration
Base Year 2008
Roadway
and Transit
Networks
(Supply 2008)
Socio-Economic
Characteristics
Origin-Destination
Matrix
(Demand 2008)
Travel Time Vehicle Kilometers
Emissions Factors
2008
GHG Emissions
2008
Transport
Model
Application
Base Year 2010
Roadway
and Transit
Networks
(Supply 2020)
Socio-Economic
Characteristics
(Demand 2020)
Travel Time Vehicle Kilometers
GHG Emissions
2020
Emissions Factors
2020
Structure and
Parameters
EMBARQ Mitigation Action Accounting: Urban Transport
From case-study of Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Sector-level monitoring