+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders...

Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders...

Date post: 10-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas Christoph Stork, Nilusha Kapugama & Rohan Samarajiva This work was carried out with the aid of a grant from the Interna@onal Ini@a@ve for Impact Evalua@ons (3ie)
Transcript
Page 1: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas

ChristophStork,NilushaKapugama&RohanSamarajiva

ThisworkwascarriedoutwiththeaidofagrantfromtheInterna@onalIni@a@veforImpactEvalua@ons(3ie)

Page 2: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

About the review • Whatdidwestudy?

•  Mobilephoneinterven@onsforimprovingeconomicandproduc-veoutcomesinruralareasinlowandmiddle-incomecountries(LMICs)

•  Economicandproduc@veoutcomes=changesin:•  Individualincome/savings/wages/expenditure•  Householdincome/savings/expenditure•  Businessprofit/produc@vity• Wastage•  Marketpricedispersionorvola@lity

2

Page 3: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

What did we do?

3

Studiesscreened:8671

Excluded:8630

Cri@callyAppraised:41

Included:14

Page 4: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

What did we do?

4

Studiesscreened:9,082

Excludeda\erdetailedabstractandfulltextreview:9,032

Cri@callyAppraised:48

Included:14

Qualita@ve,notmobile,urban,impactnotmeasured,theore@cal,descrip@vestats

Page 5: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

What did we find?

5

Page 6: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

MobilePhones

Impactsduetocoverageexpansionandaccesstoa

phone

Impactsduetomobilephonebased

services

6

Page 7: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

About the studies

7

Author Observa<ons Occupa<ons Dura<on Loca<on

Jensen (2007) 74,700 Fishers, traders 1997-2001 Kerala, India

Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger

Aker and Fafchamps (2011)

39,120

Traders, farmers 1999-2008 Niger

2,503

Labonne and Chase (2009) 2,092 Farmers 2003-2006 Philippines

Beuermann et al. (2012) 40,000 Cross-sectoral 2001-2007 Peru

Klonner and Nolen (2008) 57,486 Cross-sectoral 1996-2001 South Africa

Page 8: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

Findings Author Findings

Jensen (2007)

INR 5 reduc<on in Max-Min spread of prices between market

fishermen’s profits increased on average by 8% consumer price reduced by 4%

5-8% waste reduced to almost 0

Aker (2010) 10%-16% reduc<on in grain price dispersion. The effect is stronger for market pairs with higher transport costs

Aker and Fafchamps (2011)

50% reduc<on in the Max-Min price spread of farm-gate prices within a region

reduces producer price dispersion for cowpeas by 6%. No higher producer prices but lower intra-annual price risk for farmers.

LabonneandChase(2009) increaseingrowthrateofpercapitaconsump@on:15%(excludingcommunica@on)

8

Page 9: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

Findings

Author Findings

KlonnerandNolen(2008)

Employmentincreasesby15%whenalocalityreceivescompletenetworkcoverage(increasedemploymentbywomen).

Beuermannetal.(2012)

Wageincomeincreasesby15%a\er2yearscoverage,34%a\er6yearsofcoverage.Valueofhouseholdassetsincreasesby23%2yearsa\ercoverage,andincreasesto54%a\er6yearsofcoverage.

9

Page 10: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

Mobile network expansion has impact •  Causalmechanism

•  Improvescoordina@onbetweenbuyersandsellersinhithertoseparateagriculturalmarkets,ineffectmergingthemintoabiggermarket•  Reducespricedispersion(LawofOnePrice)andalignssupplyanddemand(Say’sLaw)

•  Hassimilareffectonlabormarkets•  Indirecteffectstoo•  InSouthAfricamobilecoverageincreasedlikelihoodofsomeonebeingemployedby33.7%

•  Economicimprovementswerereflectedinrisingdisposableincome,householdassetsandthusexpenditure(easiertomeasure)•  Expenditureincreasedby44.6%,sixyearsa\ercoveragearrivedinPeru•  Resultedinincreasedgrowthofconsump@on(about15%)amongfarmersinPhilippines,excludingcommunica@on-relatedconsump@on

•  Butenablingcondi@ons(whichvaryevenwithincountries)mustexist,e.g.,•  Evenifprice/demandinforma@onavailablefromnewloca@onthroughmobilecommunica@on,itmustbepossibleforthesupplier/tradertotakecommoditytothatplace:physicaltransport

•  Theins@tu@onalcondi@[email protected]/traderisnotempoweredtosellinnewloca@onbyownerofboat/grain,informa@onbyitselfwillnotimproveoutcomes

10

Page 11: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

MobilePhones

Impactsduetocoverageexpansionandaccesstoa

phone

Impactsduetomobilephonebased

services

11

Page 12: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

About the studies

Author Service Offered Sample/obs Dura<on Loca<on

Fafchamps and Minten (2011)

Price, weather and crop advisory informa<on via SMS

1,000 12 months Maharashtra,

India

Parker et al. (2012) Price informa<on via SMS

14,349 12 months (12

days) India

Camacho and Conover (2011)

Price and weather informa<on via SMS

1,107 26 weeks Colombia

12

Page 13: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

Findings Author Findings

Fafchamps & Minten (2011)

price dispersion Not generalizable

price received by farmers Notgeneralizable

crop loss Notgeneralizable

likelihood of changing crop varie<es and cul<va<on prac<ces

Notgeneralizable

Parker et al. (2012) Price dispersion for crops for each state

5.2% higher spa<al price dispersion during a bulk SMS ban

Camacho & Conover (2011)

sale price Notgeneralizable

farmers’ revenues Notgeneralizable

household expenditures Notgeneralizable

crop loss Notgeneralizable

13

Page 14: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

Reasons for impact (or inability to find impact)

•  Tooshorta@metofindeffects• Problemswithtarge@ng•  Didtheintendedbeneficiariesgettherelevantinforma@onattherelevant@me?

•  Languageissues•  Literacyissues–especiallywithSMS• Pushversuspullservice•  Experienceinusingtheservice

14

Page 15: Mobile phones èEconomic impact in rural areas · Kerala, India Aker (2010) 53,820 Traders 1999-2006 Niger Aker and Fafchamps (2011) 39,120 Traders, farmers 1999-2008 ... SMS 14,349

Causal mechanism & enabling condi<ons

• Causalmechanismsameaswithnetworkextension(differencebeingproac@vesupplyofinforma@on)•  HithertoseparatemarketsconsolidatedthroughICTs

•  Informa@onservicesreducedpricedispersionbutthedesiredimpactswerenotseen•  Samequalifica@onsreenablingcondi@ons

15


Recommended