Date post: | 27-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lauren-chandler |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Model Bank Testing Accelerators
“Ready-to-use” test scenarios to reduce effort, time and money.
Model Bank Testing Accelerators
Model Bank Testing Accelerators Capabilities
Model Bank Testing Accelerators Design
Model Bank Testing Accelerators Coverage
1
2
3
4
5
Model Bank Testing Accelerators Benefits6
Business Challenges
As software vendors offer more flexible solutions to their clients, the need for
complex testing increases. This is further complicated by the need not just to test
applications in isolation but as an integral part of a larger application environment.
Bug fixes, patches, new development and upgrades have to be tested end to end
across all the involved platforms and systems. This process requires good
coordination, tremendous effort, time to execute the test scenarios and large
numbers of resources. All of this adds up when looking at the overall cost of testing.
Therefore the use of ready and properly structured test scenarios not only can
ensure the completeness of test coverage, but also significantly reduce deployment
and testing costs.
Test data
ready for use
with minor
changes for
client specific setup
Definition of financial
objects and mapping to
T24 ready for use
Test cases grouped into logical functions
at a granular level to enable selection of
relevant functions
Financial test cases built to cover all main banking
functions
Utilization of the product features of
re-usability
Reduction in effort in test preparation and quicker times
to delivery
Automated
test result
checks
To ensure completeness of test coverage, test cases have been designed
using the following principles:
Re-usability based on:
Site independence
System Date independence
Currency independence
Exchange and interest rate independence
‘Four Eyes’ principle of input and authorize
Input, Amend, Reverse and Delete
End to End check steps including limit updates, entry and delivery
message generation, General Ledger updates
Verification of SWIFT message output
Checks of interest calculations and currency conversions
Multiple users
Automatic triggered of COB and confirmation of successful completion
These test cases provide wide
coverage of the functional areas
of TEMENOS T24 Model Bank:
Core
Trade Finance and Guarantees
Arrangement Architecture
Wealth Management
SWIFT
Reporting / Accounting
We also provide coverage for
Canadian Platform Scenarios
Core 1650
In depth cover Bank specific products and
processes
Meet testing needs to cover local development
Reduce the effort and cost of testing by 60-
70% against testing on a manual basis
Increase reusability with available test
cases
Test cases, easy to use for testing through Web, GUI or OFS
Especially designed execution cycles to meet the needs of each bank, covering daily, monthly and quarterly
processing cycles
Test cases based on business workflows and
business scenarios
Manual Functional Testing
Systems Integration
Testing
Continuous Regression
Testing
Performance Testing
30% Faster on test case
creation60% Faster
than manual
-40% Due to Test data and
scenarios reusability
70% less effort by reusing the test artifacts
from SIT
60% less effort by reusing the test artifacts
from SIT
LimitationsNo Low level testing.Lack of Knowledge and Complex test transactions and enquiries.No qualitative test cases.No reusability
With AcceleratorsHighest Automation Required:EnquiresAdvanced EnquiriesTest DataAutomatic Business RulesComparison Rules
Highest Automation Required:EnquiresAdvanced EnquiriesComparison RulesAutomatic Business Rules
Highest Automation Required:Automatic Business Rules
Manual Functional Testing
Systems Integration
Testing
Continuous Regression
Testing
Performance Testing
70% Faster in any cycle
60% Faster on every cycle
80% Faster on every cycle
No comparison to manual as it is only automatic
Same Effort for all Cycles
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Cycle 3
Cycle 4
Cycle 1
Cycle 2
Cycle 3
Cycle 4Cycle 1
Cycle 2
Cycle 3
Automation – RUN 1
Infrastructure
On boarding
Test Case Creation
Automation Design
Run MTC% Reusability
Automation - RUN 2
Infrastructure
Test Case Creation
Automation Design
Run MTC
% Reusability
Automation – RUN 3
Infrastructure
Test Case CreationAutomation DesignRun MTC
% Reusability
COST $$
COST
$$
COST
$$
We would be happy to help.
Do You Have Any Questions?