MODELING AND PREDICTING TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS...

1

Final Report

MODELING AND PREDICTING TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AT

SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NORFOLK, VA

Sharad K Maheshwari

Associate Professor

School of Business

Hampton University

Hampton, VA 23668

757-727-5605

[email protected]

And

Kelwyn A. D’Souza

Professor

School of Business

Hampton University

Hampton, VA 23668

757-727-5037

[email protected]

October, 2011

Hampton University

Eastern Seaboard Intermodal Transportation Applications Center

(ESITAC)

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

2

DISCLAIMER

The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and

the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the

sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program, in

the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents

or use thereof.

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Content Page

Executive Summary 4

1. Introduction 5

2. Literature Review 6

3. Research Procedure 8

a. Methodology 8

b. Collected Data 9

c. Results and Analysis 11

4. Discussion 19

5. Conclusion and Recommendations 20

6. Acknowledgement 21

7. References 22

8. Appendices 24

4

Modeling and Predicting Traffic Accidents at Signalized Intersections in the City of

Norfolk, VA

Executive Summary

This research project is an extension of the previously completed study of accident-patterns in

the City of Norfolk. The multiple-regression model developed in the previous study was based

on variables related to intersection geometry. In this study, additional intersection factors are

accounted for, which include speed limit, road signage, vegetation and traffic light data. Despite

the expanded data set, many other factors like signal type, signal policies, road closures, road

conditions, and condition of road signs which could possibly impact the traffic accidents, were

not available at the time of the study. The motivation behind this research is based on the

literature that indicates that the intersection topography/design factors and traffic management

rules might contribute to the traffic accidents.

The objectives of this research were to develop comprehensive statistical exploratory and

predictive models for intersections accidents in the City of Norfolk, VA. The research analysis

was conducted in three phases. First, a linear regression model was developed using the same

techniques applied in the previous study. This was done to establish a baseline model for a

comparison of results. At the second stage, an exploratory data analysis technique (two-step

cluster method) was used in which the study sample of 58 intersections was divided into two

separate groups of clusters according to the type of roads meeting at the intersection arterial,

collector and/or local roads. The first cluster consisted of the intersections between a major

arterial road and a collector or local road, whereas the second cluster was made up of

intersections of a major arterial road with another arterial or a large collector road. Two

separate linear regression models were developed for each cluster.

An independent sample of 15 intersections was used for validation of these regression models.

All three models, showed about 15% to 21% variation between actual and predicted accident rate

values. In each case, however, the deviation between actual and predicted accident values was

statistically insignificant. The second cluster deviation was the least, suggesting that the

regression model for the intersections between major arterial roads or large collector roads had a

somewhat better predictive power than the model for intersections between major arterial roads

and collector or local roads.

5

Modeling and Predicting Traffic Accidents at Signalized Intersections in the City of

Norfolk, VA

1. Introduction

The main objective of this research was to study the signalized intersections in the City of

Norfolk to delineate intersection geometry, road signage and other design factors which may be

contributing significantly to traffic accidents. This research project is an extension of the

previously completed study on the accident-patterns in the same city in which a multiple-

regression model was developed on a selected set of intersections for the City. The City of

Norfolk is one of the largest and oldest cities in the Hampton Roads region; and is home to

roughly quarter million people. It is one of the most congested cities in the region by the

population density. Furthermore, in 2006 the Hampton Roads had the highest crash incidents in

the state compared to other regions on the basis of millions of VMT (vehicle mile traveled)

(Nichols, 2007). The City of Norfolk contributed roughly 17% of those crashes in the region

with annual traffic accident count of approximately 5,400. These data suggest that the traffic

safety study could be useful to the City and to the Hampton Roads region.

There is evidence in the literature suggesting that road design factors could impact the traffic

safety. Several highway engineering factors like lane widths, shoulder widths, horizontal

curvature, vertical curvature, super-elevation rate, median and auxiliary lane were estimated and

designed based on some traffic safety considerations. Additional factors like road signage,

vegetation, line of sight of a traffic signal, horizontal and vertical curvature, and number of

driveways close to an intersection have also been reported to have an impact on traffic safety.

To study the impact of these factors along with traffic control rules, researchers have utilized a

variety of statistical models (Maheshwari & D‘Souza, 2010; 2006). The most popular model is

the multivariate regression model where the dependent variable is generally based on traffic

accidents and a set of independent variables include roadway design, traffic control,

demographic variables and more. To mitigate the impact of large variability among the accident

rates on different intersections, a negative binomial model was employed in the regression

analysis. Regardless of statistical techniques used, research results show a relationship between

the various roadway design and control factors with traffic accidents. Research also indicates

divergence on the importance of individual factor on traffic safety. There is also a reported

difference based on the regional demographic factors indicating regional accident rate

differences due to interactions between design and control factors and the local driving

population. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the impact of the road design factors

on the traffic accident rate in a local area.

The previous multiple regression model established a relationship between road design factors

and accident rates but the predicted value from the model showed significant variability from the

actual accident rate (Maheshwari & D‘Souza, 2010). To improve upon the results from previous

study, both, the data set (expanded independent variables) and statistical techniques were

modified. Data on speed limit, vegetation and road signage were included in the dataset, along

with exploratory statistical method and cluster analysis to enhance the predictive power of the

regression model. Road signage data was limited to speed limit, name of the next street, turn

6

lane, next signal, chevrons and other safety related posting. The objectives of this proposal were

to:

Develop an exploratory statistical model that would provide a valid explanation of traffic

accidents. A set of geometric, design, control and road signage factors would be used as

independent variables for model development.

Validate the statistical model developed at step one.

2. Literature Review

Automobile accidents contribute to the staggering amount of property damage and the large

number of deaths in the United States. According to the Insurance Information Institute, New

York (Hot Topic and Issues Update: Auto Crashes, 2006), 42,636 people died in motor vehicle

crashes in 2004 alone and an additional 2,788,000 people were injured. There were over 6 million

police reported auto accidents in 2004. It is reported that about 50% of crashes occur at the

intersections (Hakkert & Mahalel, 1978; National Highway R&T Partnership, 2002). It is obvious

from everyday experience and from reports in literature that traffic volume is the major

explanatory factor for traffic accidents (Chao, Quddus, & Ison, 2009; Keay & Simmonds, 2005;

Mohamed & Radwan, 2000; and Vogt, 1999). However, studies have been carried out showing

that design and other related factors contribute towards 2% to 14% of accidents. Ogden, et al.,

(1994) reported that about 21% of the variation in accidents was explained by variations in traffic

flow volume, while the remaining majority of the variation was explained by other related factors.

Vogt (1999) provides a good review of the factors, which has been considered in past research

studies; these factors include channelization (right and left turn lane), sight distance, intersection

angle, median width, surface width, shoulder width, signal characteristics, lighting, roadside

condition, truck percentage in the traffic volume, posted speed, weather, etc. Besides these factors,

researchers have also considered other details such as ditches, side-slopes, surface bumps,

potholes, pavement roughness, pavement edge drop-offs, etc. (Graves, et al., 2005; and Viner,

1995).

The relationship between the accidents and pertinent factors is usually established using

multivariate analysis (Corben & Foong, 1990; Hakkert & Mahalel, 1978; Keay & Simmonds,

2005; Ogden, et al., 1994; Ogden and Newstead, 1994; Vogt, 1999). Keay & Simmonds (2005)

used hierarchical tree regression to analyze accidents on the rural roads in Greece. They reported

that geometric factors like the number of lanes, serviceability index, pavement types, road friction

and such are important contributing factors to accidents. They also found difference between tow-

lane and multi-lane rural roads. A study by Corben and Foong (1990) led to development of a a

seven-variable linear regression model for predicting right-turn crashes at signalized intersections.

This model explained 85% of the variance of accident occurrence. Another regression technique,

quantile regression, used factors like median, types of traffic controls, number of lanes and left-

turn lane which can be used to identify risk prone intersections (Qin, Ng, & Reyes, 2005).

In a FHWA study by Harwood, et al., (2000), quantitative data on accidents and other factors were

combined with the expert‘s judgment about design factors as well as expected impact of these

design factors on the accident rate. Mountain, Fawaz & Jarrett (1996) showed in a British study

that the road design features ―link length‖ relates to accident rate, especially in dual carriageway.

7

Retting, et at. (2001) studied the effect of roundabout on the traffic accidents and found that

replacing signals or stop signs with roundabouts could reduce traffic accidents. Road design

factors like, the curve radii, spiral lengths, lane width, shoulder width, and tangent lengths are

shown to relate the collision frequency (Easa and Mehmood,2008). It was exhibited through a

comprehensive study of Korean road accident data that three categories of factors influence the

accident rate: road geometric condition, driver characteristic and vehicle type (Lee, Chung &

Son, 2008). Wang, Quddus and Ison (2009) studied roadways based on congestion and reported

that besides traffic volume, segment length, number or lanes, curvature and gradient also

influence the accident rates. Malyshkina and Mannering (2010) studied the impact of design

exceptions allowed in the highway construction on the traffic accident rate (design exception:

safety deviation in roadway design factors). They found that exceptions don‘t necessarily

increase accidents in their dataset. In another analysis of the data of 10 Canadian cities, Andrey

(2010) related weather and accident rates and found that accident rates drop in severe weather.

The literature shows that multiple statistical models are used for traffic accident analysis. It is

evident that negative binominal or Poisson distribution is often employed in relating the

frequency of accidents to design factors (Lord, Guikema, Geedipally, 2008; Malyshkina and

Mannering, 2010; Shankar, Manning and Barfield 1995; and Wang and Abdel-Aty, 2008). The

technique is largely used to account for the higher variability in the frequency of accidents at

different intersections. For example, Shankar, et al., (1995) used negative binomial distribution

to show interaction between roadway geometric factors and weather accidents. They showed

that certain geometric elements are more critical during the severe weather conditions. Milton,

Shankar, & Mannering (2008) used a logit model to include several parameters like weather,

type of traffic, and road geometry.

Many researchers have studied various road signs and their relationship to road safety. Carson

and Mannering (1999) studied the effect of ice warning signs on ice-accident frequencies and

severities in the Washington state. They reported that actual signs may not have significant

effects on the accident rates as other road design factors accounted for all the variability in the

accident rates. It has also been reported that the common signs like speed signs, for example, are

not always used by drivers to adjust speed, however, drivers do pay attention to these signs

(Zwahlen, 1987). In a study of signage for severe bend in a road in France, Milleville-Pennel,

Jean-Michel, & Eliseother (2007) found that drivers do pay attention to the severity signage but

invariably underestimated the severity of the bend in the road. Cruzado and Donnell (2009)

reported that drivers reduced vehicle speed based on a variable speed measurement device on the

highway, but effect disappeared when the device was removed. Road signage does affect driver

behavior; however, its impact on safety is inconclusive.

In recent years, researchers have applied data mining techniques along with statistical modeling to

determine the impact of major factors like traffic volume and road design characteristics along with

minor factors such as potholes and surface roughness. Graves, et al., (2005) reported about the

impact of potholes and surface roughness on accident rates. However, due to the paucity of data, a

clear link could not be established between these surface factors (pot holes, roughness, etc.).

Washington, et al., (2005) performed an extensive study to validate previously reported accident

prediction models and methods by recalculation of original model coefficients using additional

8

years of data from a different state. The study reported that in addition to traffic volume, other

factors should be considered on a case-by-case basis for a given site.

Earlier studies show that a variety of factors affect the traffic accidents including road geometry,

layout and traffic control factors. However, there is divergence of opinion on which factors have

influence safety the most. Also, there are regional differences in the importance of factors which

influence safety. Similarly, studies on rural highways are not directly applicable to urban settings

as the traffic pattern and other factors differ at rural and city intersections. Furthermore, before and

after studies may be less valuable in rural settings as road design changes are not made as often as

in a city with growing traffic volume. Moreover, the literature shows that traffic accident analyses

are commonly conducted in a larger geographical area (one or more states). This research was

built upon past research and evidence from literature to apply a systematic approach of identifying

factors in accident-prone intersections in a mid size city, Norfolk, VA and analyzing factors, which

could significantly influence the accident rates in that specific area.

3. Research Procedure

The following steps were proposed and completed in the research work:

Data Collection: Data collation was conducted at 73 intersections in the City which

included intersections with high as well as low incidents rates during the study period

of 2000 through 2004. This sample set was divided randomly in two samples of 58

and 15. The larger sample was used to develop statistical models for accident rate

and the smaller sample was used for validation of the model. At each intersection,

data was collected on road geometry, road signage, and other related factors.

Analysis: Development of statistical models used data collected from intersections

and accident database. Linear correlation, cluster analysis and regression methods

were used to analyze the data. The statistical models were developed to establish

relationships between physical factors and accident rates as well as to predict the

future accident rate based on those physical factors.

Validation of Models: Validated statistical models developed in the previous step to

determine the accuracy of models. Despite a large variation between predicted and

actual values, differences between predicted and actual values from the models were

statistically insignificant.

Review of Results and Models: A review of results showed that there is a large

variability in the difference of the predicted accident rates from the models and actual

values of accident rates. These models could possibly be improved if more data, like

light control timing, road closures, etc. were available and data was collected during

the accident time frame.

a. Methodology

This research is a continuation of an earlier study by Maheshwari & D‘Souza, (2010)

which focused on intersections with high accident rates. In this research, the stratified

data sampling technique was used. The set of signalized intersection was divided into

two groups of intersections based on the total reported accidents during 2000 to 2004.

Our of a total of 73 intersections selected of which 39 were from high accident rates

(average accident rate of more than 10 per year) and rest of the intersections was selected

9

from the low accident rate group (average accident rate of less than 10 accidents per

year). The sample of 73 intersections was randomly divided into two parts of 58 and 15

intersections. The larger sample was used to develop statistical models and the smaller

sample was used for the validation of these models (see Appendix Tables VIII and IX for

makeup of each sample). Also unlike the previous study where several data points were

discarded due to lack of traffic volume data--Average Daily Traffic (AADT), in this

study the entire dataset was used. As traffic volume data was highly correlated to the

geometric design factors such as total number of lanes, turn lanes, etc., its effect on the

regression model, therefore, is not significant after the total number of lanes and turn

lanes were included in the regression model.

The City of Norfolk has accumulated traffic accident data in an electronic format for the

past 11 years from 1994 through 2004. Only accidents related to single vehicles were

considered in the study due to technical limitations of importing multi-vehicle

information into the available database. The City‘s accident database was developed

from individual police accident reports that currently included the type of accident, road

conditions, traffic signs and corresponding signals, drivers‘ actions, vehicle(s) conditions,

demographic data, nature of injuries, and other related information, all of which are

subsequently entered in the City‘s accident database. The traffic accidents without a

police report were not included in this database therefore those accidents were excluded

from this study.

The traffic volume data, Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT), was not available for

many intersections. Annual Average Week day Traffic (AAWDT) for 2003 and 2004

was available instead. This data was provided by the Hampton Roads Planning District

Commission (HRPDC) which is the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for

Hampton Roads, VA. The traffic count data on the several local and feeder roads were

also not available.

The accident models were developed using a generalized linear model (GLM). First, a

regression model was created using the entire data set. To refine this model, a two-step

cluster analysis was performed. This analysis created two clusters of intersections. The

membership in these clusters was largely based on the type of intersection. One cluster

made up the intersections of two major arterial roads and the other cluster was generally

made of a major arterial road and a local road. Two separate regression models were

developed for each cluster.

b. Collected Data:

The data collection was carried out on site between May and September 2010. The raw

data is presented in Appendix Table I and variables are defined in the Table 1. Data on a

total of 104 different independent variables was collected. Additionally, data on Annual

Average Week Day Traffic AAWDT and accident rate (dependent variable) were

obtained from related sources.

10

Table 1: Definition of the Variables

No. Variable Name Definition No.

Variable Name Definition

1 RTLNi

Number of right only turn lanes on ith

leg (i=1,2,3,4) of the intersection 15 SGNSi

Sign next street name on ith

leg

(i=1,2,3,4) of the intersection

2 LTLNi

Number of left only turn lanes on ith

leg (i=1,2,3,4) of the intersection 16 SGOTi

Sign others on ith

leg (i=1,2,3,4) of

the intersection

3 STLNi

Total number of straight only lanes

on ith

leg (i=1,2,3,4) of the

intersection 17 VEGEi

Vegetation on ith

leg (i=1,2,3,4) of

the intersection

4 TOLNi

Total number of lanes on ith

leg

(i=1,2,3,4) of the intersection 18 DRWCi

Drive-ways commercial on ith

leg


5 LNLNi

Left turn lane length on ith

leg

(i=1,2,3,4) of the intersection 19 DRWRi

Drive-ways residential on ith

ith

leg


6 LNRNi

Right turn lane length on ith

leg

(i=1,2,3,4) of the intersection 20 EXTR

Extra safety features on ith

leg


7 MEDNi

Median on ith

leg (i=1,2,3,4) of the

intersection 21 PEDXi

Ped -Xing (signalized) on ith

leg


8 MEDT

Median type(physical type) on each

leg 22 RAILi

Railway line on ith

leg (i=1,2,3,4)

of the intersection

9 PAVEi

Shoulder/ pavement on ith

leg

(i=1,2,3,4) of the intersection 23 OVUNi

Over/under pass on ith

leg


10 PAVT

Pavement type (physical type) on

each leg 24 SIG2i

Signal within 200' on ith

leg


11 SPLTi

Speed limit on ith

leg (i=1,2,3,4) of

the intersection 25 RTLTi

Right lane turn signal on ith

leg


12 SGLGi

Sign for street light on ith

leg

(i=1,2,3,4) of the intersection 26 LTLTi

Left lane turn signal on ith

leg


13 SGTLi

Sign for turn lane on ith

leg

(i=1,2,3,4) of the intersection 27 AAWDT Average annual weekday traffic

14 SGCHi

Sign chevron on ith

leg (i=1,2,3,4) of

the intersection 28 ACCT

Total number of intersection

accident from 2000-2004

The data on the physical attributes included intersection design, geometry and signage.

The design factors included number of lanes, type of lanes, existence of a median and

shoulder, and other safety features. Other geometric factors included the presence of

vegetation, number of driveways within 250‘ of the intersection (both commercial and

non-commercial) and more. The control factors included the presence of other traffic

signals within 250‘, speed limit, restricted left or right signal and more. Signage

variables included signs for the next street name, sign for next light, sign for turn lanes,

and other safety signs. A schematic of an intersection is shown in Figure 1.

For each intersection, 104 different physical attributes data were collected. However, 24

of these variables were rarely present, therefore were ignored from further analysis. The

traffic volume for the 49 intersections was computed based on the Annual Average Week

Day Traffic (AAWDT) data obtained from Hampton Roads Planning District

Commission. The total AAWDT for each intersection was calculated by adding traffic

(AAWDT) traffic count on both roads of the intersection. The total AAWDT at an

intersection is the sum of the average of AAWDT for the each road as follows:

11

Intersection total AADT = [(Traffic Volume on the Leg 1 or 2) + (Traffic Volume on the

Leg 3 or 4)]

Figure 1. Schematic of an intersection

The raw AAWDT data is presented in the Appendix Table II. Out of the 73 intersections

for which topographical data was collected, AAWDT was available for only 49

intersections for the years 2003 and 2004 (Appendix Table VII). AAWDT data on

several feeder and local streets could not be obtained from the published sources.

The accident data between 2000 through 2004 were collected from the City‘s accident

database. The total number of accidents for each pair of streets at selected intersections is

listed in Appendix Table III.

c. Results and Analysis

Although topographical data for each leg of the intersection was collected, the accident

data was not available for each leg due to missing and/or incomplete information on the

police reports or the datasets that was provided to the research team. Therefore,

composite topographical variables were created for each intersection by adding values of

a variable from each leg of the intersection, i.e., instead of the total number of lanes on

the each leg of the intersection, a composite variable was created by adding all lanes on

each leg of the intersection. The length of left turn lanes (LNLN) and length of right turn

lanes (LNRN) were calculated using a scoring system for lane length. The lane length

scores (between 0 and 5) were assigned based on the length of the lane at a given leg of

Leg 3

Leg

4

Feeder/local Road (Lower AAWDT)

Major Arterial Road (Hi AAWDT)

Leg 1 Leg 2

Leg 4

12

an intersection and then the assigned score was multiplied by the number of turn lanes at

that leg of the intersection (see Appendix Table V for scoring system.) A list of all

composite variables is provided in the Appendix Table IV. Certain variables, like

shoulder, overpass, underpass, etc., were excluded from the study as very few

intersections in the study had those physical attributes. A list of all independent variables

used in the analysis is provided below in Table 2. These composite variables were

inputted into the regression models as well as in the cluster analysis as the independent

variables.

Table 2: Independent Variables Used in the Analysis

No.

Variable

Name Definition

1 RTLN

Total number of right only turn lanes (sum of all restrict right turn lanes on the

intersection)

2 LTLN

Total number of left only turn lanes (sum of all restrict left turn lanes on the

intersection)

3 TOLN Total number of lanes on the intersection (sum of all lanes on the intersection)

4 LNLN Left turn lane length (Total length of left turn lanes)*

5 LNRN Right turn lane length (Total length of right turn lane)*

6 MEDN Median (total number of legs with physical medium)

7

SPLM

(Max) Maximum speed limit among all legs of intersection

8 SPLA (Avg) Average speed limit of all legs of intersection

9 SGLG Sign for street light (total number of legs with sign for approaching light)

10 SGTL Sign for turn lane (Total of number of legs with sign for approaching turn)

11 SGNS Sign next street name (total number of legs with signs for next street)

12 VEGE Vegetation (total number of legs with vegetation)

13 DRWC

Drive-ways commercial (total number of commercial driveways within 200‘ of

intersection)

14 DRWR

Drive-ways residential (total number of residential driveways within 200‘ of

intersection)

15 DRWT Total Drive-ways (total number of driveways within 200‘ of intersection)

16 PEDX Ped -Xing (total number of legs with signalized pedestrian crossing)

17 SIG2

Signal within 200' (total number of signals within 200‘ of the intersection

understudy)

18 LTLT Left lane turn signal (total number of legs with signal for left turn)

19 AAWDT Average annual weekday traffic

The raw data for each of the variables in Table 2 is included in the Appendix Tables VI and

Table VII. To ascertain the association between dependent and independent variables,

Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. The value correlation coefficients are

shown in Table 3.

13

Table 3. Correlation Coefficient

No. Variable

Correlation

Coefficient

p-value

2-tail

test Significance

1 RTLN 0.509 0 Yes

2 LTLN 0.417 0.001 Yes

3 TOLN 0.569 0 Yes

4 LNLN 0.516 0 Yes

5 LNRN 0.41 0.001 Yes

6 MEDN 0.284 0.031 Yes

7 SPLM 0.586 0 Yes

8 SPLA 0.596 0 Yes

9 SGLG -0.058 0.666 No

10 SGTL 0.357 0.006 Yes

11 SGNS 0.48 0 Yes

12 VEGE -0.05 0.711 No

13 DRWC 0.339 0.009 Yes

14 DRWR -0.106 0.427 No

15 DRWT 0.245 0.064 No

16 PEDX 0.078 0.563 No

17 SIG2 0.006 0.967 No

18 LTLT 0.388 0.003 Yes

19 AAWDT 0.53 0 Yes**

It is evident from the above table that the six variables, namely: sign next light,

vegetation, number of residential driveways, total number of driveways, pedestrian

crossings, and signals within 250‘, are not showing any significant associations with

accident rates. However, the absence of the linear relationship does not preclude a

possibility of a non-linear relationship. To test if any of the variables in Table 3 have a

non-linear relationship, logarithmic, inverse and exponential relationships were tested for

these variables (see a summary of these tests in Appendix Table X and Figures I and II).

Total number of sides with medians showed a significantly better exponential

relationship (higher value of R-square.) Thus for the regression model, a transformed

median variable (MEDTRAN) was used instead of a total number of median (MEDN).

This is an exponential transformation of the variable, i.e, MEDTRAN is eMED

. A linear

regression model using a forward step-wise method was developed. All significantly

correlated variables and transformed variables were used in the analysis. Coefficients of

the regression model are presented below in Table 4 (for complete statistical analysis

results, please refer to Appendix Tables XI, XII, and XIII).

14

Table 4. Linear Model Coefficient

Linear Regression Coefficient

Variable Coefficients

(Constant) -85.483

TOLN 7.060

SPLM 2.885

LTLN -7.542

MEDTRAN* -.382

The linear model analysis showed that regression accounted for 59.2% of the variability

in accident rates. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the regression model showed

that the variability explained by the model was significant with p-value <0.000.

From the Table 4, the regression model (Model 1) can be written as:

ACCT = -85.483 + 7.060*TOLN + 2.885*SPLM – 7.542*LTLN – 0.382*eMEDN

---(1)

Where ACCT—Total number of accidents at an intersection,

This result is significantly different than the previous study (Maheshwari & D‘Souza,

2010), even though the R-square value is roughly the same. However, it includes speed

limit as a factor, which was not considered in the previous study.

To validate these results, the regression model (Model 1) was used to predict the total

number of accidents in a different sample of 15 intersections. It was found that the model

was predicting lower than the actual number of accidents. The predicted value of the

accident rates was on an average more than 21% lower than the actual recorded value of

the accident rates although a t-test conducted to test the significance of the difference

between the actual and predicted values was found to be insignificant with p-value of .91

(see Appendix Table XIV for t-test). Table 5 shows the results.

Simple exploratory data analysis technique (two-step cluster analysis) was used to further

analyze the dataset. Clustering was performed to create statistically significant groups of

intersections. The categorical variables used for the cluster analysis were the total

number of sides with median (MEDN), total number of sign for turn lane (SGTL), total

number of signs for the next street (SGNS) and total number of legs with restricted light

for left turn (LTLT). Two statistically different clusters were formed. Cluster 1 has 31

intersections and cluster 2 has 27 intersections. A closer look at these clusters shows that

cluster 2 was largely made up of the intersections of two major arterial roads, and cluster

1 was made up of intersections between a local/feeder street and an arterial road.

Membership of these clusters is presented below in Tables 6 and 7. For detailed cluster

analysis results, please refer to the Appendix Tables XV, XVI, and XVII).

15

Table 5. Difference between Predicted and Actual Accidents (Model 1)

Intersection

Number Actual Accident Predicted Accidents Diff

1 217 112.9 104.1

5 54 81.9 -27.9

19 36 59.4 -23.4

20 59 70.1 -11.1

25 97 62.3 34.7

30 39 70.6 -31.6

33 61 88.7 -27.7

37 142 105.3 36.7

39 308 125.6 182.4

40 291 118.5 172.5

42 73 124.0 -51.0

50 16 69.1 -53.1

59 66 68.2 -2.2

67 51 42.1 8.9

73 98 69.7 28.3

Average 107.2 84.6 22.6

Table 6: Cluster 1 Member Intersections

No. Street 1 Street 2 No. Street 1 Street 2

3 Hampton Blvd Baker St 47 Colley Ave 27th St

6 Hampton Blvd 49th St 48 Colonial Ave 27th St

7 Hampton Blvd 38th St 52

Ocean View

Ave 1st View St

8 Hampton Blvd

Princess Anne

Rd 54

Ocean View

Ave Chesapeake St

9 Hampton Blvd Beechwood Ave 55

Ocean View

Ave Capeview Ave

11 Little Creek Rd Diven St 56 Monticello Ave 26th St

12 Little Creek Rd Ruthaven Rd 57 Tidewater Dr Widgeon Rd

21 Brambleton Ave Granby St 58 Tidewater Dr East Bay Ave

22 Brambleton Ave Monticello Ave 60 Tidewater Dr Norview Ave

28 Tidewater Dr

Princess Anne

Rd 61 Tidewater Dr Willow Wood Dr

29 Tidewater Dr Goff St 62 Tidewater Dr Cromwell Dr

32 Chesapeake Blvd Sewells Point Rd 68 Colonial Ave 27th St

34 Military Hwy Johnstons Rd 69 Monticello Ave 27th St

44 Granby St Willow Wood Dr 70 Church St 27th St

45 Granby St 21st St 72 Little Creek Rd

Azalea Garden

Rd

46 Colley Ave 26th St

16

Table 7: Cluster 2 Member Intersections


2 Hampton Blvd

Little Creek

Rd 35 Military Hwy Norview Ave

4 Hampton Blvd

Admiral

Taussig

Blvd 36 Military Hwy

Azalea Garden

Rd

10 Little Creek Rd Granby St 38 Military Hwy

Princess Anne

Rd

13 Little Creek Rd

Old Ocean

View Rd 41 Military Hwy Poplar Hall Dr

14 Little Creek Rd

Tidewater

Dr 43 Military Hwy Corporate Blvd

15 Little Creek Rd

Sewells

Point Rd 49 Granby St Bayview Blvd

16 Little Creek Rd

Military

Hwy 51

Ocean View

Ave 4th View St

17 Little Creek Rd

Chesapeake

Blvd 53

Ocean View

Ave

Chesapeake

Blvd

18 Brambleton Ave Colley Ave 63 Tidewater Dr Lafayette Blvd

23 Brambleton Ave

St Pauls

Blvd 64 Newtown Rd Kempsville Rd

24 Brambleton Ave Boush St 65 Kempsville Rd

Kempsville

Circle

26 Brambleton Ave

Tidewater

Dr 66 Newtown Rd Center Drive

27 Tidewater Dr

Va Beach

Blvd 71 Little Creek Rd Halprin Ln

31 Chesapeake Blvd

Norview

Ave

It is clear with some knowledge of the City of Norfolk road network that two clusters

represent two different types of intersections. Cluster 1 is generally made up of the

intersection of a local and a major arterial road and cluster 2 is made up of two arterial

roads. One predictive model may not work for these two clusters the same way.

Therefore, two different regression analyses were performed, one for each cluster.

To perform the regression analysis for each cluster, a similar process was followed as in

the previous model. First, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to delineate

variables significantly associated with the accident rate. Both clusters show a different

set of independent variables to be significantly associated with the accident rate. Tables

8 and 9, show the correlation coefficients for each cluster.

17

Table 8: Correlation Coefficient for Cluster 1

Variable

Pearson

Correlation

Coefficient

p-

Value Significance

RTLN 0.286 0.118

LTLN 0.034 0.857

TOLN 0.146 0.432

LNLN 0.048 0.796

LNRN 0.061 0.742

MEDN 0.157 0.400

SPLM .636**

0.000 Sig

SPLA .498**

0.004 Sig

SGTL 0.024 0.898

SGNS 0.094 0.614

DRWC 0.080 0.670

LTLT 0.189 0.308

AAWDT 0.187 0.458

Table 9: Correlation Coefficient for Cluster 2

Variable

Pearson

Correlation

Coefficient

p-

Value Significance

RTLN 0.234 0.240

LTLN 0.293 0.138

TOLN 0.511 0.006 Sig

LNLN 0.512 0.006 Sig

LNRN 0.156 0.437

MEDN -0.272 0.170

SPLM 0.381 0.050 Sig

SPLA 0.442 0.021 Sig

SGTL 0.260 0.190

SGNS 0.285 0.150

DRWC 0.363 0.063 Sig

LTLT -0.047 0.817

AAWDT 0.462 0.030 Sig

Table 8 shows that the maximum speed limit is the most important factor for the

intersections of a local road and a major arterial road (cluster 1). Whereas Table 9 shows

the factors other than speed limit like total number of lanes, length of left turn lanes and

the number of commercial driveways are also significantly associated with the accident

rates for cluster 2 (intersection of two major arterials roads). Regression models for

clusters 1 and 2 are presented in Tables 10 and 11. Both models are statistically

significant with p-values <0.0001 for the ANOVA testing of the models. R-square for

cluster 1 is 0.53 and for cluster 2 is 0.52. This R-square is slightly less than the R-square

in Model 1 when all intersections are put as one group for regression analysis. For

detailed statistical results, please refer to Appendix Table XVIII and XIX.

18

Table 10: Regression Coefficient for Cluster 1



(Constant) -83.19

SPLM 3.78

LTLN -9.50

TOLN 3.30

Table 11: Regression Coefficient for Cluster 2



(Constant) -35.41

SPLA 3.44

TOLN 4.05

LNLN 1.34

The regression models for each cluster can be written as:

Regression Model 2 for cluster 1

ACCT = -83.19 + 3.78*SPLM -9.50*LTLN + 3.30*TOLN------------------(2)

Regression Model 3 for cluster 2

ACCT = -35.41 + 3.44*SPLA + 4.05*TOLN + 1.34*LNLN----------------(3)

Validation of regression Models 2 and 3, resulted in a statistically insignificant difference

(p-value approximately 0.57) between the predicted and actual value of the total number

of accidents. However, cluster 1 model (Model 2) was under-predicting the total number

of accidents by 15% and cluster 2 (Model 3) was over-predicting the same variable by

17%. Results are presented in the Tables 12 and 13. For detailed statistical results,

please refer to Appendix Tables XVIII, XIX, XX, XXI and XXII.

Table 12: Validation of Model 2 for Cluster 1

No. Actual ACCT Predicted ACCT Diff (Actual-Predicted)

1 217 145.7 71.3

20 59 91.9 -32.9

25 97 130.6 -33.6

33 61 124.1 -63.1

39 308 148.3 159.7

40 291 161.6 129.4

59 66 95.7 -29.7

73 98 123.2 -25.2

Average 149.6 127.7 22.0

19

Table 13: Validation of Model 2 for Cluster 2

No.

Actual

ACCT

Predicted

ACCT

Diff (Actual-

Predicted)

5 54 81.9 -27.9

19 36 28.9 7.1

30 39 63.1 -24.1

37 142 95.1 46.9

42 73 89.4 -16.4

50 16 75.5 -59.5

67 51 47.4 3.6

Average 58.7 68.8 -10.1

4. Discussion

This study attempted to expand the earlier study conducted to relate traffic accidents and

physical attributes of signalized intersections in the City of Norfolk. The previous study was

based on a smaller biased sample that included the high accident rate intersections, and had

excluded some important intersection design and control factors. In this study, a larger sample

of 73 random intersections was selected. Furthermore, the previous study did not include speed

limits, vegetation, and road signage data in the model. The analysis, conducted in the previous

section, shows that speed limit was a significant variable in regression models where as

vegetation and road signage did not play any role in the regression models. The R-square of the

overall model (Model 1) remained at around 60% as in the previous study, but validation results

improved significantly. There was no statistical difference between the model‘s predicted value

and the actual value of the accident rates whereas the model in the previous study failed to

validate the results.

The analysis techniques used in this study included the additional an exploratory technique: of

cluster analysis of the sample. The two-step clustering showed two distinct groups of the

intersections in the analysis. Both clusters had different regression models as different variables

showed an association with accident rates in the different clusters. The clusters were largely

based on the type of intersections. Accident rates showed a large dependence of the maximum

speed limit when a major arterial intersects a local road, whereas other variables such as length

of left turn lanes and total number of lanes play a significant part when two major arterial roads

intersect. Two separate regression models for two different clusters were developed (Model 2

and Model 3). Differences in the predicted and actual value of the accident rates were

statistically insignificant for the regression models for both clusters.

A stepwise regression technique was used for all three regression models to eliminate the affect

of multicollinearity. The models resulting from the forward stepwise regression were modified

by changing the ―entering‖ variable criteria. However, the ―entering‖ variable criteria were not

changed to simply include all variables. All the regression models resulted in a lower than

expected value of R-square (less than 60%).

20

The low values of R-square (57% to 59%) in all three models indicate that there is significant

room to improve statistical models. This improvement can be achieved either by more causal

variables which were not considered or were not available at the time of study, or by using

different statistical techniques. As stated in the literature review, engineering variables like

horizontal and vertical radii, grade of the road, etc. along with the traffic control rules could be

affecting the accident rates, yet this data could not be collected. Furthermore, weather, road

closures and other variables could be included to improve explanation of the accident rate

variability, but such data was not available. Similarly, a larger sample will allow better factor

analysis or other pattern recognition techniques to be applied that could improve predictability of

the models. Despite these shortcomings, this research has a practical application, especially in

predicting accident rates in cluster 2. Cluster 2 shows several significant variables in the model

(Model 3) as well as the regression model of this cluster show strong prediction capability as the

average difference between predicted and actual values was statistically insignificant. This

model (Model 3) can provide some insight in designing intersections.

5. Conclusion and Recommendation

This study of accident rate analysis of the signalized intersections at the City of Norfolk is based

on a stratified sample of 73 intersections. The intersection data set was divided into two groups,

namely, high and low accident rate intersections before sampling intersections for this study.

The first regression model was developed based on the entire sample and it accounted for

approximately 60% of variability in the accident rate. To enhance the results, the sample was

separated in two different groups using the two-step cluster analysis. The resultant groups from

the cluster analysis were largely divided based on the type intersection (i.e. intersection of two

major arterial roads and intersection of a major arterial road and a local road). Even though the

cluster based regression models could not reduce the amount of variation explained (R-square of

less 60%), it was clear that the factors which affect different group of intersections, are not the

same. Intersections of two major arterials require a different set of variables to explain the

accident rate variability compared to the set of variables needed to explain accident variability of

the intersections between a local road and a major arterial road. Some of the major findings are

listed below:

i. The maximum speed limit on any leg of an intersection between local road and

arterial road is the most significant factor. Other topographical factors contributed

explain little variability of the accident rate and therefore contribute little to the

regression model.

ii. When designing an intersection between a major arterial and local road, maximum

speed limit of all legs approaching the intersection should be kept as low as possible

to reduce accident rates.

iii. Total number of lanes, length of left turn lanes and average speed of all legs of an

intersection are significant factors when two major arterial roads intersect each other.

21

iv. When designing an intersection between two major arterial roads, the following road

design factors should be considered to reduce accident rate:

a. Reduce speed limit on each leg of the intersection,

b. Increase total number of lanes, and

c. Increase the length of left turn lanes, wherever possible.

v. A simple regression model can predict accident rate variability within tolerable limits,

i.e., the difference between predicted and actual accident rates is statistically

insignificant.

Despite some significant results, this study had many clear limitations:

i. Accident data is 6 years old compared to the recent data collection on the roadways.

ii. All three regression models were unable to account for more than 40% of accident

variations.

iii. Predictive capabilities of the models were statistically significant, but it has a

limitation. The statistical significance was influenced due to high variability in the

predicted and actual accident rate, i.e., standard deviation of the difference of

predicted and actual accident rate was very high.

iv. Impact of the controllable factors could be better studied if data was collected over

time to capture the effects of the changes made at the intersections.

v. Many design factors and other data were not available. These factors could have an

impact on the accident rates (e.g., signal policy, road closure, etc.)

vi. Sample size was still very limited: 58 intersections for modeling and 15 intersections

for validation.

6. Acknowledgement

The authors thank the City of Norfolk, Division of Transportation for providing data and inputs

during the conduct of the study and acknowledge HRPDC‘s assistance in providing traffic count

data.

22

7. References

Andrey, J. (2010). Long-Term Trends in Weather-Related Crash Risks. Journal of Transport

Geography. 18 (2), 247-258. Carson, J. & Mannering, F. (1999). The Effect of Ice Warning Signs on Ice-Accident

Frequencies and Severities. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 33 (1), 99–109.

Chao W., Quddus, M. A., & Ison, S. G. (2009). Impact of Traffic Congestion on Road

Accidents: A Spatial Analysis of the M25 Motorway in England, Accident Analysis &

Prevention. 41 (4), 798-808.

Corben, B. F. and Foong Chee Wai (1990). Pro-Active Traffic Engineering Safety Study:

Final Report Part 2 - Right-Turn-Against Crashes at Traffic Signals. Monash University

Accident Research Center Report Number 13, December, 1990, Victoria 3800, Australia.

Cruzado, I., Donnell, E.T. (2009). Evaluating Effectiveness Of Dynamic Speed Display

Signs In Transition Zones Of Two-Lane Rural Highways In Pennsylvania. Transportation

Research Record. 2122, 1–8.

Easa, S. M . and Mehmood, A. (2008) Optimizing Design of Highway Horizontal

Alignments: New Substantive Safety Approach. Computer-Aided Civil & Infrastructure

Engineering. 23 (7), 560-573.

Graves, S. J., Rochowiak, D. and Anderson, M. D. (2005). Mining and Analysis of Traffic

Safety and Roadway Condition Data. University Transportation Center for Alabama , The

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, UTCA Report # 04310.

Hakkert, A.S. and Mahalel, D. (1978). Estimating the Number of Accidents at the

Intersections Form a Knowledge of the Traffic Flows on the Approaches. Accident Analysis

and Prevention. 10, 69-79.

Harwood, D.W., Council, F.M., Hauer, E., Hughes, W.E., and Vogt A. (2000). Prediction of

the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways Report. US Department of

Transportation, Federal Highway Administration # FHWA-RD-99-207.

Hot Topic and Issues Update: Auto Crashes (2006) Retrieved July 25, 2006 from

http://www.iii.org/media/hottopics/insurance/test5./?table_sort_748377=6.

Keay, K., & Simmonds, I. (2005) The Association of Rainfall and Other Weather Variables

With Road Traffic Volume in Melbourne, Australia. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 37

(1) 109–124.

Lee, J., Chung, J. and Son, B. (2008). Analysis of Traffic Accident Size For Korean

Highway Using Structural Equation Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 40(6), 1955-

1963.

Lord, D., Guikema, S.D., Geedipally, S.R., (2008). Application of the Conway–Maxwell–

Poisson generalized linear model for analyzing motor vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis and

Prevention 40 (3), 1123–1134.

Maheshwari, S.K. & D‘Souza, K.A. (2006). Modeling Signalized Intersection Traffic

Accidents: A Pilot Study Conducted in City of Norfolk, VA. Under Review for publication.

Maheshwari, S.K. & D‘Souza, K.A (2010). Modeling Traffic Accidents at Signalized

Intersections In The City Of Norfolk, VA. US Department of Transportation Report.

Malyshkina, N.V. and Mannering, F. L (2010). Empirical Assessment of the Impact Of

Highway Design Exceptions On The Frequency And Severity Of Vehicle Accidents.

Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 (1), 131–139.

http://www.iii.org/media/hottopics/insurance/test5./?table_sort_748377=6

23

Matthew, G. K. & Golias, I. (2000). Effects of Road Geometry and Traffic Volumes on

Rural Roadway Accident Rates. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 34 (3), 357–365.

Milleville-Penne I., Jean-Michel, H. & Elise, J. (2007). The Use of Hazard Road Signs to

Improve the Perception of Severe Bends. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 39 (6), 721–730.

Milton, J.C., Shankar, V.N. and Mannering, F.L. (2008). Highway Accident Severities and

the Mixed Logit Model: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis. Accident Analysis &

Prevention. 40 (1), 260-266.

Mohamed A. A. & Radwan A. E. (2000). Modeling Traffic Accident Occurrence And

Involvement. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 32 (5), 633-642.

Mountain. L., Fawaz, B. and Jarrett D. (1996). Accident Prediction Models For Roads With

Minor Junctions. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 28 6) 695-707.

National Highway R&T Partnership. (2002). Highway Research and Technology: the Need

for Greater Investment. U. S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

Nichols, K.M. (2007). Hampton Roads Regional Safety Study: General Crash Data and

Trend 2007 Update.

http://www.hrpdc.org/Documents/Transportation/Gen_Crash_Data_Trends_07_Final.pdf

Ogden, K. W., Newstead, S. V., Ryan, P. K., and Gantzer, S. (1994). Factors Affecting

Crashes at Signalized Intersections. Monash University Accident Research Center Report

Number 62, October, 1994, ISBN 0732600618, Victoria 3800, Australia.

Ogden, K. W. and Newstead, S. V. (1994). Analysis of Crash Patterns at Victorian

Signalized Intersections. Monash University Accident Research Center Report Number 60,

February, 1994, ISBN 0732600596, Victoria 3800, Australia.

Qin, X.; Ng, M. & Reyes, P. (2010). Identifying Crash-prone Locations with Quantile

Regression. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 42 (6), 1531–1537.

Retting, R.A., Persaud, B. N, Garden, P.E. and Lord, D. (2001). Crash and Injury Reduction

Following Installation of Roundabouts in the United States. American Journal of Public

Health. V 9, N4, 628-631.

Shankar, V., Mannering, F., and Barfield,W., 1995. Effect of Roadway Geometrics and

Environmental Factors on Rural Freeway Accident Frequencies. Accident Analysis and

Prevention 27 (3), 371–389.

Viner, J. (1995). Rollovers on Sideslopes and Ditches. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 27

(4), 483–491.

Vogt, A. (1999), Crash Models For Rural Intersections: Four-Lane by Two-Lane Stop-

Controlled and Two-Lane by Two-Lane Signalized. US Department of Transportation,

Federal Highway Administration Report #FHWA-RD-99-128.

Wang, X., Abdel-Aty, M., 2008. Modeling left-turn crash occurrence at signalized

intersections by conflicting patterns. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40 (1) 76–88.

Wang, C., Quddus, M.A. and Ison, S.G. (2009). Impact of Traffic Congestion on Road

Accidents: A Spatial Analysis of the M25 Motorway in England. Accident Analysis &

Prevention. 41(4), Pages 798-808.

Washington, S., Persaud, B,, Lyon, C. and Oh, J. (2005). Validation of Accident Models for

Intersections. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Report #

FHWA-RD-03-03.

Zwahlen, H. T. (1987). Advisory Speed Signs and Curve Signs and Their Effect on Driver

Eye Scanning and Driving Performance. Transportation Research Record. 1111, 110–120.

24

8. Appendices

25

Table I: Raw Data Collected On Selected Intersections of the City of Norfolk Collected Between June-Sept 2010 (Part 1)

No Street 1 Street 2 Direction

Lanes right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left turn

lane

length

Right turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign for

street

light

Sign for

turn

lane

1

HAMPTON

BLVD

INT TERMINAL

BLVD

On HampBlvd From

ODU 1 1 3 5 100 0 1 0 35 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

INT

TERMINAL

BLVD

On HampBlvd To

ODU 0 2 3 5 150 0 1 0 35 0 1

HAMPTON BLVD

INT

TERMINAL BLVD

On IntTermBlvd From I64 1 1 1 4 100 100 1 0 45 0 0

HAMPTON BLVD

INT

TERMINAL BLVD

On IntTermBlvd To I64 1 1 2 4 30 100 1 0 30 0 1

2

HAMPTON

BLVD

LITTLE

CREEK RD

On HampBlvd To

ODU 0 2 3 5 100 0 1 0 35 1 0

HAMPTON BLVD

LITTLE CREEK RD

On HampBlvd From ODU 1 0 3 4 0 150 1 0 35 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

LITTLE

CREEK RD

On LittleCreekRd

From Wards Corner 1 1 1 3 50 20 0 0 35 0 0

HAMPTON BLVD

LITTLE CREEK RD

On LittleCreekRd To Wards Corner 1 1 0 3 100 40 0 0 35 0 1

3 HAMPTON BLVD BAKER ST

On HampBlvd To ODU 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 0 35 1 0

HAMPTON BLVD BAKER ST



On BakerStreet To the Intersection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAMPTON BLVD

BAKER ST (NO STREET) No Street 1 1 0 2 100 100 0 0 25 0 1

4 HAMPTON BLVD

ADMIRAL

TAUSSIG BLVD


26


Lanes right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left turn

lane

length

Right turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign for

street

light

Sign for

turn

lane

HAMPTON BLVD

ADMIRAL

TAUSSIG BLVD (NO ST) No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

ADMIRAL TAUSSIG

BLVD

On AdmiralTaussigBlvd

From I564 1 1 1 4 100 100 1 0 45 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

ADMIRAL

TAUSSIG BLVD (NO

STREET) No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5

INT

TERMINAL

BLVD DIVEN ST

On IntTermBlvd

From I64 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 45 0 0

INT

TERMINAL BLVD DIVEN ST

On IntTermBlvd To I64 0 1 2 3 70 0 1 0 45 0 0

INT TERMINAL

BLVD DIVEN ST

On DivenSt From

LttileCreekRd 0 1 0 2 150 0 0 0 25 0 0

INT TERMINAL

BLVD DIVEN ST

On DivenSt To

LttileCreekRd 0 2 0 3 100 0 0 0 25 0 0

6

HAMPTON

BLVD 49TH ST

On HampBlvd To

ODU 1 1 3 5 130 130 1 0 35 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD 49TH ST

On HampBlvd From

ODU 1 1 1 3 130 0 0 0 35 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD 49TH ST On 49thSt To ODU 0 1 0 2 50 0 0 0 25 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD 49TH ST On 49thSt From ODU 0 2 3 5 100 50 0 0 25 0 0

7

HAMPTON

BLVD 38TH ST

On HampBlvd To

ODU 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD 38TH ST

On HampBlvd From

ODU 1 1 2 4 130 130 0 0 30 0 0

27


Lanes right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left turn

lane

length

Right turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign for

street

light

Sign for

turn

lane

HAMPTON BLVD 38TH ST

On 38th From Down Town 0 1 0 2 100 100 0 0 25 0 0


On 38th To Down Town 1 1 1 3 100 100 0 0 25 0 0

8

HAMPTON

BLVD

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On HampBlvd From

I264 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

HAMPTON BLVD

PRINCESS ANNE RD

On HampBlvd To I264 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 30 1 0

HAMPTON BLVD

PRINCESS ANNE RD

On PrincessAnnAve To Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On PrincessAnnAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

9

HAMPTON

BLVD

BEECHWOOD

AVE

On HampBlvd From

ODU 0 1 3 4 50 0 1 0 30 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

BEECHWOOD

AVE

On HampBlvd To

ODU 0 1 3 4 50 0 1 0 30 0 0

HAMPTON BLVD

BEECHWOOD AVE

On BeechWoodAve From Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

BEECHWOOD

AVE

On BeechWoodAve

To Down Town 1 0 0 2 0 50 0 0 25 0 0

10

LITTLE

CREEK RD GRANBY ST

On Little Creek Rd

From ODU 1 1 2 4 50 75 0 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD GRANBY ST

On Little Creek Rd

To ODU 1 1 1 3 30 30 1 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD GRANBY ST

On GranbyBlvd To

I64 1 2 2 5 100 0 1 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD GRANBY ST

On GranbyBlvd From

I64 0 2 2 5 70 0 1 0 35 0 0

11

LITTLE

CREEK RD DIVEN ST

On LittleCreekRd

From ODU 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD DIVEN ST

On LittleCreekRd To

ODU 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 35 0 0

28


Lanes right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left turn

lane

length

Right turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign for

street

light

Sign for

turn

lane

LITTLE CREEK RD DIVEN ST

On DevinSt From IntTerBlvd 1 0 0 2 0 100 0 0 25 0 0

LITTLE CREEK RD DIVEN ST

On DevinSt To IntTerBlvd 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

12

LITTLE

CREEK RD

RUTHAVEN

RD

On LittleCreekRd

From ODU 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 35 0 0

LITTLE CREEK RD

RUTHAVEN RD

On LittleCreekRd To ODU 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 35 0 0

LITTLE CREEK RD

RUTHAVEN RD

On RuthavenRd To IntTerBlvd 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

RUTHAVEN

RD

On RuthavenRd From

IntTerBlvd 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

13

LITTLE

CREEK RD

OLD OCEAN

VIEW RD

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 1 1 2 4 30 30 1 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

OLD OCEAN

VIEW RD

On LittleCreekRd To

I64 0 2 1 4 70 0 1 0 35 0 0

LITTLE CREEK RD

OLD OCEAN VIEW RD

On OldOceanViewRd To Down Town 0 1 0 2 50 0 0 0 25 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

OLD OCEAN

VIEW RD

On OldOceanViewRd

From Down Town 1 1 1 3 25 25 1 0 25 0 0

14

LITTLE

CREEK RD

TIDEWATER

DR

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 1 1 2 4 50 150 0 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

TIDEWATER

DR

On LittleCreekRd To

I64 0 1 2 4 150 0 1 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

TIDEWATER

DR

On TideWaterDr To

Down Town 1 0 2 4 0 100 1 0 40 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

TIDEWATER

DR

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 1 1 2 4 0 100 1 0 40 0 1

15

LITTLE

CREEK RD

SEWELLS

POINT RD

On LittleCreekRd To

I64 0 1 1 3 50 0 1 0 35 0 0

29


Lanes right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left turn

lane

length

Right turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign for

street

light

Sign for

turn

lane

LITTLE CREEK RD

SEWELLS POINT RD

On LittleCreekRd From I64 1 1 2 4 30 30 1 0 35 1 0

LITTLE CREEK RD

SEWELLS POINT RD

On SeaWellPointRd From intersection 1 1 0 2 70 70 1 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

SEWELLS

POINT RD No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

16 LITTLE CREEK RD

MILITARY HWY

On LittleCreekRd From I64 1 1 2 4 50 150 1 0 35 0 1

LITTLE CREEK RD

MILITARY HWY

On LittleCreekRd To I64 0 1 2 3 150 150 1 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

PYTHIAN AVE

(MILITARY

HWY)

On Pythian Ave

(MilitaryHwy) To

Airport 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

MILITARY

HWY

On MilitaryHwy

From Airport 1 1 0 3 100 100 1 0 45 0 1

17

LITTLE

CREEK RD

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On LittleCreekRd To

I64 1 1 2 4 100 100 0 0 35 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 0 1 0 3 100 0 0 0 35 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On ChesapeakeBlvd

To Down Town 0 2 1 4 100 0 1 0 40 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On ChesapeakeBlvd

From Down Town 1 1 2 4 100 50 1 0 40 0 1

18

BRAMBLETON

AVE COLLEY AVE

On BrambletonAve

From Down Town 1 1 3 5 100 50 1 Solid 0 35 0 1

BRAMBLETON

AVE COLLEY AVE

On BrambletonAve

To Down Town 1 1 3 5 40 100 1 0 35 0 1

BRAMBLETON

AVE COLLEY AVE

On ColleyAve To

Down Town 1 1 0 3 75 100 1 Grass 0 25 0 1

BRAMBLETON

AVE COLLEY AVE

On ColleyAve From

Down Town 0 2 0 3 100 100 1 0 25 0 1

19

BRAMBLETON

AVE DUKE ST

On BrambletonAve

To Down Town 1 1 3 5 50 75 1 0 30 0 1

30


Lanes right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left turn

lane

length

Right turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign for

street

light

Sign for

turn

lane

BRAMBLETON AVE DUKE ST

On BrambletonAve From Down Town 0 1 3 4 75 0 1 0 30 0 0


On DukeSt To Down Town 1 1 0 2 40 0 0 0 25 0 0

BRAMBLETO

N AVE DUKE ST

On DukeSt From

Down Town 0 2 1 3 200 0 0 0 25 0 1

20 BRAMBLETON AVE BOUSH ST

On BrambletonAve From Down Town 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 30 1 0

BRAMBLETON AVE BOUSH ST

On BrambletonAve To Down Town 2 0 4 6 0 100 1 0 30 0 1


On BoushSt From Down Town 0 2 2 4 100 0 1 0 25 0 0

BRAMBLETON AVE BOUSH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

21

BRAMBLETO

N AVE GRANBY ST

On BrambletonAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 1 0

BRAMBLETON AVE GRANBY ST

On BrambletonAve To Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 1 0


On Granby Blvd From BoushSt 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 30 0 0

BRAMBLETO

N AVE GRANBY ST

On Granby Blvd To

BoushSt 0 1 0 4 100 0 1 0 30 0 0

22

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

MONTICELLO

AVE

On BrambletonAve

From BoushSt 0 1 0 4 30 0 1 0 30 0 0

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

MONTICELLO

AVE

On BrambletonAve

To BoushSt 0 1 0 4 50 0 1 0 30 0 0

BRAMBLETON AVE

MONTICELLO AVE

On MonticelloAve From Down Town 0 1 0 3 75 0 0 0 25 0 0

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

MONTICELLO

AVE

On MonticelloAve To

Down Town 1 1 0 4 100 100 0 0 30 0 0

23

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

ST PAULS

BLVD

On BrambletonAve

From BoushSt 1 1 0 4 75 100 1 0 30 0 0

31


Lanes right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left turn

lane

length

Right turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign for

street

light

Sign for

turn

lane

BRAMBLETON AVE

ST PAULS BLVD

On BrambletonAve To BoushSt 1 0 0 4 75 0 0 0 30 0 0

BRAMBLETON AVE

ST PAULS BLVD

On StPaulsBlvd To Down Town 0 2 0 5 100 0 1 0 30 0 0

BRAMBLETON

AVE

ST PAULS

BLVD

On StPaulsBlvd From

Down Town 0 2 0 4 100 0 1 0 30 0 1


On BrambletonAve From BoushSt 0 1 0 4 50 0 1 0 30 0 0


On BrambletonAve To BoushSt 0 1 0 4 30 0 1 0 30 0 0


On ChurchSt To Down Town 0 2 0 4 75 0 1 0 25 0 0


On ChurchSt From Down Town 0 1 0 3 75 0 1 0 25 0 0

25

BRAMBLETON

AVE PARK AVE

On BrambletonAve

To BoushSt 1 1 0 4 75 50 0 0 30 0 0

BRAMBLETON AVE PARK AVE

On BrambletonAve From BoushSt 0 1 0 4 75 0 0 0 30 0 0

BRAMBLETON AVE PARK AVE

On ParkAve To Down Town 0 2 0 3 100 0 0 0 25 0 1

BRAMBLETON

AVE PARK AVE

On ParkAve From

Down Town 1 0 0 2 0 100 0 0 25 0 0

26

BRAMBLETON

AVE

TIDEWATER

DR

On BrambletonAve

From BoushSt 1 2 0 5 100 50 1 0 30 0 0

BRAMBLETON

AVE

TIDEWATER

DR

On BrambletonAve

To BoushSt 1 2 0 6 75 50 1 0 30 0 0

BRAMBLETON AVE

TIDEWATER DR

On TideWaterDr From Down Town 1 1 0 5 35 100 1 0 35 0 0

BRAMBLETON

AVE

TIDEWATER

DR

On TideWaterDr To

Down Town 1 1 0 5 50 30 1 0 35 0 0

27

TIDEWATER

DR

VA BEACH

BLVD

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 1 0 0 4 0 50 1 0 35 0 0

32


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

TIDEWATER

DR

VA BEACH

BLVD

On TideWaterDr To

Down Town 1 0 0 4 0 75 1 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

VA BEACH

BLVD

On VABeachBlvd

From ChurchSt 0 1 0 3 100 0 1 0 30 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

VA BEACH

BLVD

On VABeachBlvd To

ChurchSt 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 30 0 0

28

TIDEWATER

DR

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 0 4 100 0 1 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On TideWaterDr To

Down Town 1 1 0 5 75 75 1 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On PricessAnneRd

From ChurchSt 0 1 0 3 75 0 0 0 25 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On PricessAnneRd

To ChurchSt 0 1 0 3 100 0 0 0 25 0 0

29

TIDEWATER

DR GOFF ST

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 0 4 50 0 1 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR GOFF ST

On TideWaterDr To

Down Town 0 1 0 4 50 0 1 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR GOFF ST

On Goff St From

ChurchSt 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR GOFF ST

On Goff St To

ChurchSt 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

30 TIDEWATER DR

LINDENWOOD AVE

On TideWaterDr To Down Town 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

LINDENWOOD

AVE

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 0 3 30 0 0 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

LINDENWOOD

AVE

On LindenWoodAve

From ChurchSt 1 1 0 3 30 50 0 0 25 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

LINDENWOOD AVE

On LindenWoodAve To ChurchSt 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

31 CHESAPEAKE BLVD

NORVIEW AVE

On ChesapeakeBlvd From water front 1 1 0 5 70 30 0 0 40 0 0

CHESAPEAKE BLVD

NORVIEW AVE

On ChesapeakeBlvd To water front 0 2 0 4 100 0 1 0 40 0 0

33


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

NORVIEW

AVE

On NorviewAve To

water front 1 0 0 1 0 100 1 0 25 0 0

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

NORVIEW

AVE

On NorviewAve

From water front 0 1 0 3 70 0 1 0 35 0 0

32

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

SEWELLS


CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

SEWELLS


CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

SEWELLS

POINT RD

ChsBlv-Seawell From

Down Town 0 1 0 2 100 0 0 0 25 0 0

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

SEWELLS

POINT RD

ChsBlv-Seawell To

Down Town 0 1 0 3 100 0 0 0 35 0 0

33 CHESAPEAKE BLVD

JOHNSTONS RD

On ChesapeakeBlvd From water front 0 1 0 4 100 0 1 0 40 0 0

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

JOHNSTONS

RD

On ChesapeakeBlvd

To water front 1 1 0 4 80 150 1 0 40 0 0

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

JOHNSTONS

RD

On JohnstonsRd

From Down Town 0 1 0 2 80 0 0 0 25 0 0

CHESAPEAKE BLVD

JOHNSTONS RD

On JohnstonsRd To Down Town 1 1 0 3 80 80 0 0 25 0 0

34 MILITARY HWY

JOHNSTONS RD

On MilitaryHwy To Down Town 1 1 0 4 300 30 0 1 Gravel 45 0 0

MILITARY HWY

JOHNSTONS RD

On MilitaryHwy From Down Town 0 1 0 3 50 0 0 1 45 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

JOHNSTONS

RD

On JohnstonsRd To

water front 1 1 0 3 50 50 0 0 25 0 0

MILITARY HWY

JOHNSTONS RD

On JohnstonsRd From water front 1 1 0 3 70 70 0 0 25 0 0

35 MILITARY HWY

NORVIEW AVE

On MilitaryHwy To Down Town 1 1 0 4 100 80 0 0 45 0 0

MILITARY HWY

NORVIEW AVE

On MilitaryHwy From Down Town 0 1 0 3 50 0 0 1 Grass 45 0 0

34


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

MILITARY

HWY

NORVIEW

AVE

On NorviewAve To

water front 1 0 0 3 50 0 1 0 30 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

NORVIEW

AVE

On NorviewAve

From water front 1 0 0 3 70 0 1 0 30 0 0

36

MILITARY

HWY

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On MilitaryHwy To

Down Town 1 1 0 4 100 70 0 1 Gravel 45 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On MilitaryHwy

From Down Town 1 1 0 4 50 100 0 1 45 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On AzeleaGardenRd

To water front 1 0 0 3 100 0 0 1 30 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On AzeleaGardenRd

From water front 1 1 0 3 100 100 0 0 30 0 0

37 MILITARY HWY

ROBIN HOOD RD

On MilitaryHwy To Down Town 1 1 0 4 30 50 1 1 Gravel 45 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

ROBIN HOOD

RD

On MilitaryHwy

From Down Town 1 1 0 4 60 70 1 0 45 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

ROBIN HOOD

RD

On RobinHoodRd To

water front 1 1 0 3 70 100 0 0 30 0 0

MILITARY HWY

ROBIN HOOD RD

On RobinHoodRd From water front 1 1 0 3 70 100 1 0 30 0 0

38 MILITARY HWY

PRINCESS ANNE RD

On MilitaryHwy To Down Town 1 1 0 4 50 100 1 1 Grass 45 0 0

MILITARY HWY

PRINCESS ANNE RD

On MilitaryHwy From Down Town 1 2 0 5 60 50 1 0 45 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On PrincessAnne/NHamp

To water front 1 2 0 5 80 100 1 0 45 1 1

MILITARY

HWY

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On PrincessAnneRd

From water front 1 1 0 4 100 100 1 0 45 0 0

39

MILITARY

HWY LOWERY RD

On MilitaryHwy To

Down Town 1 2 0 7 120 120 1 1 45 0 0

MILITARY

HWY LOWERY RD

On MilitaryHwy

From Down Town 1 1 0 5 50 100 1 0 40 0 0

35


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

MILITARY

HWY LOWERY RD

On LoweryRd To

water front 1 1 0 3 100 100 1 0 25 0 0

MILITARY

HWY LOWERY RD

On LoweryRd From

water front 1 2 0 4 60 30 0 0 25 0 0

40

MILITARY

HWY

VA BEACH

BLVD

On MilitaryHwy To

Down Town 1 2 0 5 60 100 1 0 25 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

VA BEACH

BLVD

On MilitaryHwy

From Down Town 1 2 0 5 60 100 1 0 25 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

VA BEACH

BLVD

On VABeachBlvd To

water front 1 2 0 6 100 100 1 0 45 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

VA BEACH

BLVD

On VABeachBlvd

From water front 1 2 0 6 100 100 1 0 45 0 0

41 MILITARY HWY

POPLAR HALL DR

On MilitaryHwy From water front 1 1 0 7 70 50 1 0 40 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

POPLAR HALL

DR

On MilitaryHwy To

water front 1 1 0 7 150 150 1 0 40 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

POPLAR HALL

DR

On PoplarHallRd To

Down Town 0 3 0 4 100 0 0 0 35 0 0

MILITARY HWY

POPLAR HALL DR

On PoplarHallRd From Down Town 1 1 1 3 100 70 0 0 25 0 0

42 MILITARY HWY HOGGARD RD


MILITARY HWY HOGGARD RD

On MilitaryHwy To water front 1 1 0 7 50 30 1 0 40 0 0

MILITARY

HWY HOGGARD RD

On HoggardRd To

Down Town 0 1 0 2 100 0 0 0 25 0 0

MILITARY HWY HOGGARD RD

On HoggardRd From Down Town 0 1 0 2 100 0 0 0 25 0 0

43 MILITARY HWY

CORPORATE BLVD


MILITARY HWY

CORPORATE BLVD

On MilitaryHwy To water front 1 2 0 7 70 30 1 0 45 0 0

36


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

MILITARY

HWY

CORPORATE

BLVD

On CorpporateDr

From Down Town 1 1 0 3 70 40 1 0 30 0 0

MILITARY

HWY

CORPORATE

BLVD

On CorpporateDr To

Down Town 1 1 0 2 0 50 0 0 30 0 0

44 GRANBY ST

WILLOW

WOOD DR

On GranbyBlvd From

Down Town 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 30 0 0

GRANBY ST

WILLOW

WOOD DR

On GranbyBlvd To

Down Town 0 1 0 4 50 0 1 0 30 0 0

GRANBY ST

WILLOW

WOOD DR

On WillowWoodDr

From water front 1 1 0 3 40 30 0 0 25 0 0

GRANBY ST

WILLOW

WOOD DR No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

45 GRANBY ST 21ST ST On GranbyBlvd From Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

GRANBY ST 21ST ST

On GranbyBlvd To

Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

GRANBY ST 21ST ST

On 21stSt From water

front 0 1 0 2 30 0 0 0 25 0 0

GRANBY ST 21ST ST On 21stSt To water front 0 1 0 2 40 0 0 0 25 0 0

46 COLLEY AVE 26TH ST On ColleyAve From Down Town 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 25 0 0

COLLEY AVE 26TH ST On ColleyAve To Down Town 0 1 0 3 70 0 1 0 25 0 0

COLLEY AVE 26TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

COLLEY AVE 26TH ST

On 26thSt To water

front 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

47 COLLEY AVE 27TH ST

On ColleyAve From

Down Town 0 1 0 3 80 0 1 0 25 0 0

COLLEY AVE 27TH ST

On ColleyAve To

Down Town 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 25 0 0

COLLEY AVE 27TH ST On 27thSt From water front 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

37


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

COLLEY AVE 27TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

48

COLONIAL

AVE 27TH ST

On ColonialAve

From Down Town 0 1 0 2 50 0 0 0 25 0 0

COLONIAL

AVE 27TH ST

On ColonialAve To

Down Town 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

COLONIAL

AVE 27TH ST

On 27thSt From

water front 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

COLONIAL

AVE 27TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

49 GRANBY ST

BAYVIEW

BLVD

On GranbyBlvd To

Down Town 0 1 0 3 30 0 1 1 35 0 0

GRANBY ST

BAYVIEW

BLVD

On GranbyBlvd From

Down Town 1 1 0 4 60 50 1 0 35 0 0

GRANBY ST

BAYVIEW

BLVD

On BayViewAve To

water front 0 1 0 2 50 0 0 0 30 0 0

GRANBY ST

BAYVIEW

BLVD

On BayViewAve

From water front 1 0 0 2 0 30 0 0 25 0 0

50 GRANBY ST

EAST BAY

AVE

On GranbyBlvd To

Down Town 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 35 0 0

GRANBY ST

EAST BAY

AVE

On GranbyBlvd From

Down Town 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 35 0 0

GRANBY ST

EAST BAY

AVE

On EastBayAve To

water front 1 0 0 2 0 30 0 0 25 0 0

GRANBY ST

EAST BAY

AVE

On EastBayAve From

water front 1 0 0 2 0 45 0 0 25 0 0

51

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 4TH VIEW ST

On OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 1 0 2 100 0 1 0 35 1 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 4TH VIEW ST

On OceanViewAve

From Hampton 1 0 0 3 0 50 1 0 30 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 4TH VIEW ST

On 4thViewSt To

intersection 1 0 0 2 0 100 1 0 35 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 4TH VIEW ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

52

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 1ST VIEW ST

On OceanViewAve

From Hampton 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 35 0

0

38


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 1ST VIEW ST

On OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 1 0 3 50 0 1 1 35 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 1ST VIEW ST

On 1stViewSt to

intersection 1 1 0 2 100 100 0 0 25 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 1ST VIEW ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

53

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On OceanViewAve

From Hampton 1 1 0 4 30 50 0 0 35 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 1 0 3 40 0 0 0 35 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On ChesapeakeBlvd

to intersection 1 1 0 2 100 100 1 0 35 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

54

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

ST

On OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 1 0 3 25 0 0 0 35 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

ST

On OceanViewAve

From Hampton 0 1 0 3 25 0 0 0 35 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

ST No Street 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 25 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

55 OCEAN VIEW AVE

CAPEVIEW AVE

On OceanViewAve From Hampton 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 35 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CAPEVIEW

AVE

On OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 1 0 3 40 0 0 0 35 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CAPEVIEW

AVE

On CapeViewAve to

intersection 1 1 0 2 60 60 0 0 30 0 0

OCEAN VIEW AVE

CAPEVIEW AVE No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

56 MONTICELLO AVE 26TH ST

On MonticelloAve To Down Town 0 1 0 3 30 0 0 0 30 0 0

MONTICELLO AVE 26TH ST


39


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

MONTICELLO

AVE 26TH ST

On 26thSt to

intersection 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

MONTICELLO

AVE 26TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

57

TIDEWATER

DR WIDGEON RD No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR WIDGEON RD

On WidgeonRd From

ocean front 1 1 0 2 20 20 0 0 25 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR WIDGEON RD

On TideWaterDr To

Down Town 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR WIDGEON RD

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 0 4 100 0 1 0 35 0 0

58 TIDEWATER DR

EAST BAY AVE


TIDEWATER

DR

EAST BAY

AVE

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 0 3 45 0 1 0 40 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

EAST BAY

AVE

On EastBayAve From

ocean front 1 1 1 3 30 20 0 0 30 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

EAST BAY AVE

On EastBayAve To ocean front 1 1 1 3 30 30 0 0 30 0 0

59 TIDEWATER DR THOLE ST


TIDEWATER DR THOLE ST


TIDEWATER

DR THOLE ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


On TholeSt to intersection 1 1 1 3 30 100 0 0 25 0 0

60 TIDEWATER DR

NORVIEW AVE


TIDEWATER DR

NORVIEW AVE


40


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

TIDEWATER

DR

NORVIEW

AVE

On NorviewAve

From ocean front 1 1 0 2 30 30 0 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

NORVIEW AVE No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

61

TIDEWATER

DR

WILLOW

WOOD DR

On TideWaterDr To

Down Town 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

WILLOW WOOD DR


TIDEWATER DR

WILLOW WOOD DR

On WillowWoodDr To ocean front 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

WILLOW WOOD DR No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

62 TIDEWATER DR

CROMWELL DR


TIDEWATER

DR

CROMWELL

DR

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 0 3 50 0 0 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

CROMWELL DR

On CormwellDr To ocean front 0 1 0 2 30 0 0 0 30 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

CROMWELL DR

TdWtr-Cormwell From ocean front 1 1 0 3 70 70 0 0 30 0 0

63

TIDEWATER

DR

LAFAYETTE

BLVD

On TideWaterDr To

Down Town 0 1 0 3 50 0 0 0 35 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

LAFAYETTE BLVD


TIDEWATER DR

LAFAYETTE BLVD

On LafayetteBlvd From ocean front 0 1 0 3 70 0 0 0 30 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

LAFAYETTE

BLVD

On LafayetteBlvd To

ocean front 0 1 1 3 70 0 1 0 30 0 0

64

NEWTOWN

RD

KEMPSVILLE

RD

On NewtownRd To

VABeach 1 1 2 4 100 100 1 0 35 0 0

NEWTOWN

RD

KEMPSVILLE

RD

On NewtownRd

From VABeach 1 2 1 4 0 0 1 0 35 0 0

41


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

NEWTOWN

RD

KEMPSVILLE

RD

On KempsvilleRd To

Down Town 1 1 2 4 80 150 1 0 35 0 0

NEWTOWN

RD

KEMPSVILLE

RD

On KempsvilleRd

From Down Town 0 1 1 3 70 0 1 0 35 0 0

65

KEMPSVILLE

RD

KEMPSVILLE

CIRCLE

On KempsvilleRd To

Down Town 1 1 0 4 100 50 1 0 35 0 0

KEMPSVILLE

RD

KEMPSVILLE

CIRCLE

On KempsvilleRd

From Down Town 1 1 0 4 50 100 1 0 35 0 0

KEMPSVILLE

RD

KEMPSVILLE

CIRCLE

On KempsvilleCircle

To VABeach 1 0 0 2 0 40 1 0 15 0 0

KEMPSVILLE

RD

KEMPSVILLE

CIRCLE

On KempsvilleCircle

From VABeach 1 0 0 2 0 20 1 0 15 0 0

66 NEWTOWN RD

CENTER DRIVE

On NewtownRd To VABeach 1 1 0 4 100 100 1 0 35 0 0

NEWTOWN

RD

CENTER

DRIVE

On NewtownRd

From VABeach 1 0 0 3 0 50 1 0 35 0 0

NEWTOWN

RD

CENTER

DRIVE No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NEWTOWN RD

CENTER DRIVE

On CenterDr to intersection 1 1 0 2 100 100 1 0 25 0 0

67 NEWTOWN RD

ETHEN ALLEN DRIVE

On EthenAllenDr To Down Town 0 1 0 2 50 0 1 0 25 0 0

NEWTOWN RD

ETHEN ALLEN DRIVE

On EthenAllenDr From Down Town 0 1 0 2 15 0 1 0 25 0 0

NEWTOWN

RD

ETHEN ALLEN

DRIVE

On NewtownRd To

VABeach 1 1 0 4 100 130 1 0 35 0 0

NEWTOWN RD

ETHEN ALLEN DRIVE

On NewtownRd From VABeach 0 1 0 3 70 0 1 0 35 0 0

68 COLONIAL AVE 27TH ST

On 27thSt to intersection 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

COLONIAL AVE 27TH ST No Street/oneway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

42


Lanes right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left turn

lane

length

Right turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign for

street

light

Sign for

turn

lane

COLONIAL AVE 27TH ST

Colonial & 27th St To Down Town 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 25 0 0


Colonial & 27th St From Down Town 0 1 0 2 60 0 0 0 25 0 0

69

MONTICELLO

AVE 27TH ST

On 27thSt to

intersection 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

MONTICELLO AVE 27TH ST No Street/oneway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0



MONTICELLO

AVE 27TH ST

On MonticelloAve

From Down Town 0 1 0 3 20 0 0 0 30 0 0

70 CHURCH ST 27TH ST

On 27thSt to

intersection 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

CHURCH ST 27TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CHURCH ST 27TH ST

On ChurchSt To

Down Town 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 30 0 0

CHURCH ST 27TH ST

On ChurchSt From

Down Town 0 1 0 3 120 0 0 1 30 0 0

71

LITTLE

CREEK RD HALPRIN LN

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 1 1 2 4 100 30 1 1 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD HALPRIN LN

On LittleCreekRd To

I64 1 1 2 4 130 130 1 0 35 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD HALPRIN LN

On HalprinLn From

Down Town 0 1 0 2 30 0 0 0 25 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD HALPRIN LN

On HalprinLn To

Down Town 0 1 0 2 50 0 0 0 25 0 0

72

LITTLE

CREEK RD

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On AzeleaGardenRd

From Down Town 1 1 2 4 30 30 1 1 40 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On AzeleaGardenRd

To Down Town 1 1 2 4 50 100 1 1 40 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 30 0 0

43


Lanes

right

turn

only

Lanes

left

only

Lanes

straight

only

Total

lanes

Left

turn

lane

length

Right

turn

lane

length Median

Median

type

Shoulder/

pavement

Pavement

type

Speed

limit

Sign

for

street

light

Sign

for

turn

lane

LITTLE CREEK RD

AZALEA GARDEN RD

On LittleCreekRd To I64 0 1 0 2 70 0 0 0 30 0 0

73 LITTLE CREEK RD SHORE DRIVE

On LittleCreekRd To base 1 2 1 4 100 30 1 1 40 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD SHORE DRIVE No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LITTLE CREEK RD SHORE DRIVE

On ShoreDr To Down Town 1 1 2 4 100 100 1 1 35 0 0

LITTLE CREEK RD SHORE DRIVE

On ShoreDr From Down Town 0 1 2 3 100 0 1 1 35 0 1

44

Table I: Raw Data Collected On Selected Intersections of the City of Norfolk Collected Between June-Sept 2010 (Part 2)

No Street Street Direction

Sign

chevron

Sign next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-ways

comm

ercial

Drive-ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right lane

turn

signal

Left lane

turn

signal

1

HAMPTON

BLVD

INT TERMINAL

BLVD

On HampBlvd

From ODU 1 1 1 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1

HAMPTON

BLVD

INT

TERMINAL

BLVD

On HampBlvd

To ODU 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

HAMPTON BLVD

INT

TERMINAL BLVD

On IntTermBlvd From I64 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

HAMPTON BLVD

INT

TERMINAL BLVD

On IntTermBlvd To I64 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

2

HAMPTON

BLVD

LITTLE

CREEK RD

On HampBlvd To

ODU 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

HAMPTON BLVD

LITTLE CREEK RD

On HampBlvd From ODU 0 1 0 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAMPTON BLVD

LITTLE CREEK RD

On LittleCreekRd

From Wards Corner 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

HAMPTON

BLVD

LITTLE

CREEK RD

On LittleCreekRd

To Wards Corner 1 1 1 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

3

HAMPTON

BLVD BAKER ST

On HampBlvd To

ODU 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD BAKER ST

On HampBlvd

From ODU 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0


On BakerStreet To the Intersection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

BAKER ST

(NO STREET) No Street 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

45


Sign

chevron

Sign next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-ways

comm

ercial

Drive-ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right lane

turn

signal

Left lane

turn

signal

4

HAMPTON

BLVD

ADMIRAL TAUSSIG

BLVD

On HampBlvd

From ODU 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

HAMPTON

BLVD

ADMIRAL

TAUSSIG BLVD (NO

STREET) No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

ADMIRAL

TAUSSIG

BLVD

On

AdmiralTaussigBl

vd From I564 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

HAMPTON

BLVD

ADMIRAL

TAUSSIG BLVD (NO

STREET) No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5

INT

TERMINAL

BLVD DIVEN ST

On IntTermBlvd

From I64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

INT TERMINAL

BLVD DIVEN ST

On IntTermBlvd

To I64 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

INT

TERMINAL

BLVD DIVEN ST

On DivenSt From

LttileCreekRd 0 0 1 0 5 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

INT TERMINAL

BLVD DIVEN ST

On DivenSt To

LttileCreekRd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

6

HAMPTON

BLVD 49TH ST

On HampBlvd To

ODU 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

HAMPTON

BLVD 49TH ST

On HampBlvd

From ODU 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

HAMPTON

BLVD 49TH ST

On 49thSt To

ODU 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

HAMPTON

BLVD 49TH ST

On 49thSt From

ODU 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

7 HAMPTON BLVD 38TH ST

On HampBlvd To ODU 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

46


Sign

chevron

Sign next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-ways

comm

ercial

Drive-ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right lane

turn

signal

Left lane

turn

signal


On HampBlvd From ODU 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1


On 38th From Down Town 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

HAMPTON

BLVD 38TH ST

On 38th To Down

Town 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

8 HAMPTON BLVD

PRINCESS ANNE RD

On HampBlvd From I264 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAMPTON BLVD

PRINCESS ANNE RD

On HampBlvd To I264 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

HAMPTON BLVD

PRINCESS ANNE RD

On

PrincessAnnAve To Down Town 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On

PrincessAnnAve

From Down Town 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

9

HAMPTON

BLVD

BEECHWOOD

AVE

On HampBlvd

From ODU 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

HAMPTON

BLVD

BEECHWOOD

AVE

On HampBlvd To

ODU 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

BEECHWOOD

AVE

On

BeechWoodAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HAMPTON

BLVD

BEECHWOOD

AVE

On BeechWoodAve

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10

LITTLE

CREEK RD GRANBY ST

On Little Creek

Rd From ODU 0 1 0 0 8 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD GRANBY ST

On Little Creek

Rd To ODU 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD GRANBY ST

On GranbyBlvd

To I64 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD GRANBY ST

On GranbyBlvd

From I64 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1

11

LITTLE

CREEK RD DIVEN ST

On LittleCreekRd

From ODU 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

47


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

LITTLE

CREEK RD DIVEN ST

On LittleCreekRd

To ODU 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD DIVEN ST

On DevinSt From

IntTerBlvd 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD DIVEN ST

On DevinSt To

IntTerBlvd 0 0 0 1 1 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

12 LITTLE CREEK RD

RUTHAVEN RD

On LittleCreekRd From ODU 0 0 0 1 3 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

LITTLE CREEK RD

RUTHAVEN RD

On LittleCreekRd To ODU 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

RUTHAVEN

RD

On RuthavenRd

To IntTerBlvd 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LITTLE CREEK RD

RUTHAVEN RD

On RuthavenRd From IntTerBlvd 0 0 0 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

13

LITTLE

CREEK RD

OLD OCEAN

VIEW RD

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

LITTLE CREEK RD

OLD OCEAN VIEW RD

On LittleCreekRd To I64 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

LITTLE CREEK RD

OLD OCEAN VIEW RD

On

OldOceanViewRd To Down Town 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

OLD OCEAN

VIEW RD

On

OldOceanViewRd

From Down Town 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

14

LITTLE

CREEK RD

TIDEWATER

DR

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 0 1 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

TIDEWATER

DR

On LittleCreekRd

To I64 0 1 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

LITTLE CREEK RD

TIDEWATER DR

On TideWaterDr To Down Town 0 1 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

TIDEWATER

DR

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1

15

LITTLE

CREEK RD

SEWELLS

POINT RD

On LittleCreekRd

To I64 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

48


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

LITTLE

CREEK RD

SEWELLS

POINT RD

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

LITTLE CREEK RD

SEWELLS POINT RD

On

SeaWellPointRd From intersection 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

SEWELLS

POINT RD No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

16 LITTLE CREEK RD

MILITARY HWY

On LittleCreekRd From I64 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1

LITTLE CREEK RD

MILITARY HWY

On LittleCreekRd To I64 0 1 1 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

PYTHIAN

AVE (MILITARY

HWY)

On Pythian Ave (MilitaryHwy) To

Airport 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

MILITARY

HWY

On MilitaryHwy

From Airport 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

17

LITTLE

CREEK RD

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On LittleCreekRd

To I64 0 1 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On ChesapeakeBlvd

To Down Town 0 1 0 0 7 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE CREEK RD

CHESAPEAKE BLVD

On

ChesapeakeBlvd From Down Town 0 1 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

18

BRAMBLETO

N AVE COLLEY AVE

On

BrambletonAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE COLLEY AVE

On

BrambletonAve

To Down Town 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

BRAMBLETO

N AVE COLLEY AVE

On ColleyAve To

Down Town 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE COLLEY AVE

On ColleyAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

49


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

19 BRAMBLETON AVE DUKE ST

On

BrambletonAve To Down Town 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1


On

BrambletonAve From Down Town 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1


On DukeSt To Down Town 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE DUKE ST

On DukeSt From

Down Town 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

20

BRAMBLETO

N AVE BOUSH ST

On BrambletonAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

BRAMBLETO

N AVE BOUSH ST

On BrambletonAve

To Down Town 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

BRAMBLETO

N AVE BOUSH ST

On BoushSt From

Down Town 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE BOUSH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

21 BRAMBLETON AVE GRANBY ST

On

BrambletonAve From Down Town 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

BRAMBLETO

N AVE GRANBY ST

On

BrambletonAve

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0


On Granby Blvd From BoushSt 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

BRAMBLETO

N AVE GRANBY ST

On Granby Blvd

To BoushSt 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

22

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

MONTICELLO

AVE

On BrambletonAve

From BoushSt 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

MONTICELLO

AVE

On BrambletonAve

To BoushSt 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

MONTICELLO

AVE

On MonticelloAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

50


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

BRAMBLETON AVE

MONTICELLO AVE

On MonticelloAve To Down Town 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

23

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

ST PAULS

BLVD

On

BrambletonAve

From BoushSt 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

ST PAULS

BLVD

On

BrambletonAve

To BoushSt 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

ST PAULS

BLVD

On StPaulsBlvd

To Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

ST PAULS

BLVD

On StPaulsBlvd

From Down Town 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1


On

BrambletonAve From BoushSt 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE BOUSH ST

On

BrambletonAve

To BoushSt 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1


On ChurchSt To Down Town 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1


On ChurchSt From Down Town 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

25

BRAMBLETO

N AVE PARK AVE

On

BrambletonAve

To BoushSt 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE PARK AVE

On BrambletonAve

From BoushSt 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE PARK AVE

On ParkAve To

Down Town 1 1 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

BRAMBLETO

N AVE PARK AVE

On ParkAve

From Down Town 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

26 BRAMBLETON AVE

TIDEWATER DR

On

BrambletonAve From BoushSt 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

BRAMBLETON AVE

TIDEWATER DR

On

BrambletonAve To BoushSt 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

51


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

BRAMBLETO

N AVE

TIDEWATER

DR

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

BRAMBLETON AVE

TIDEWATER DR


27

TIDEWATER

DR

VA BEACH

BLVD

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

VA BEACH BLVD


TIDEWATER DR

VA BEACH BLVD

On VABeachBlvd From ChurchSt 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

VA BEACH BLVD

On VABeachBlvd To ChurchSt 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

28 TIDEWATER DR

PRINCESS ANNE RD

On TideWaterDr From Down Town 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

TIDEWATER

DR

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On TideWaterDr

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

TIDEWATER DR

PRINCESS ANNE RD

On

PricessAnneRd From ChurchSt 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

TIDEWATER

DR

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On

PricessAnneRd To

ChurchSt 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

29

TIDEWATER

DR GOFF ST

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

TIDEWATER

DR GOFF ST

On TideWaterDr

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

TIDEWATER

DR GOFF ST

On Goff St From

ChurchSt 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR GOFF ST

On Goff St To

ChurchSt 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

30

TIDEWATER

DR

LINDENWOO

D AVE

On TideWaterDr

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

LINDENWOO

D AVE

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

52


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

TIDEWATER DR

LINDENWOOD AVE

On

LindenWoodAve From ChurchSt 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER DR

LINDENWOOD AVE

On

LindenWoodAve To ChurchSt 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

31

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

NORVIEW

AVE

On

ChesapeakeBlvd

From water front 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

NORVIEW

AVE

On ChesapeakeBlvd

To water front 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

NORVIEW

AVE

On NorviewAve

To water front 0 1 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

NORVIEW

AVE

On NorviewAve

From water front 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

32

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

SEWELLS


CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

SEWELLS


CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

SEWELLS

POINT RD

ChsBlv-Seawell

From Down Town 1 1 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

SEWELLS

POINT RD

ChsBlv-Seawell

To Down Town 1 1 0 0 7 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

33 CHESAPEAKE BLVD

JOHNSTONS RD

On

ChesapeakeBlvd From water front 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

JOHNSTONS

RD

On

ChesapeakeBlvd

To water front 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

CHESAPEAKE BLVD

JOHNSTONS RD

On JohnstonsRd From Down Town 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

JOHNSTONS

RD

On JohnstonsRd

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

34

MILITARY

HWY

JOHNSTONS

RD

On MilitaryHwy

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

53


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

MILITARY

HWY

JOHNSTONS

RD

On MilitaryHwy

From Down Town 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

JOHNSTONS

RD

On JohnstonsRd

To water front 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

JOHNSTONS

RD

On JohnstonsRd

From water front 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

35 MILITARY HWY

NORVIEW AVE

On MilitaryHwy To Down Town 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1

MILITARY HWY

NORVIEW AVE

On MilitaryHwy From Down Town 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

NORVIEW

AVE

On NorviewAve

To water front 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

MILITARY HWY

NORVIEW AVE

On NorviewAve From water front 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

36

MILITARY

HWY

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On MilitaryHwy

To Down Town 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY HWY

AZALEA GARDEN RD

On MilitaryHwy From Down Town 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY HWY

AZALEA GARDEN RD

On

AzeleaGardenRd To water front 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On

AzeleaGardenRd

From water front 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

37

MILITARY

HWY

ROBIN HOOD

RD

On MilitaryHwy

To Down Town 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

MILITARY

HWY

ROBIN HOOD

RD

On MilitaryHwy

From Down Town 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

MILITARY HWY

ROBIN HOOD RD

On RobinHoodRd To water front 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

ROBIN HOOD

RD

On RobinHoodRd

From water front 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

38

MILITARY

HWY

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On MilitaryHwy

To Down Town 1 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

54


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

MILITARY

HWY

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On MilitaryHwy

From Down Town 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On

PrincessAnne/NHamp To water

front 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

PRINCESS

ANNE RD

On PrincessAnneRd

From water front 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

39

MILITARY

HWY LOWERY RD

On MilitaryHwy

To Down Town 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

MILITARY

HWY LOWERY RD

On MilitaryHwy

From Down Town 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY LOWERY RD

On LoweryRd To

water front 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

MILITARY

HWY LOWERY RD

On LoweryRd

From water front 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

40 MILITARY HWY

VA BEACH BLVD

On MilitaryHwy To Down Town 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

VA BEACH

BLVD

On MilitaryHwy

From Down Town 1 1 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

VA BEACH

BLVD

On VABeachBlvd

To water front 1 1 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1

MILITARY HWY

VA BEACH BLVD

On VABeachBlvd From water front 1 1 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1

41

MILITARY

HWY

POPLAR

HALL DR

On MilitaryHwy

From water front 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY HWY

POPLAR HALL DR

On MilitaryHwy To water front 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1

MILITARY

HWY

POPLAR

HALL DR

On PoplarHallRd

To Down Town 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

MILITARY HWY

POPLAR HALL DR

On PoplarHallRd From Down Town 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

42 MILITARY HWY

HOGGARD RD

On MilitaryHwy From water front 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

55


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

MILITARY

HWY

HOGGARD

RD

On MilitaryHwy

To water front 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

HOGGARD

RD

On HoggardRd To

Down Town 1 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

HOGGARD

RD

On HoggardRd

From Down Town 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

43 MILITARY HWY

CORPORATE BLVD

On MilitaryHwy From water front 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY HWY

CORPORATE BLVD

On MilitaryHwy To water front 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY

HWY

CORPORATE

BLVD

On CorpporateDr

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MILITARY HWY

CORPORATE BLVD

On CorpporateDr To Down Town 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

44 GRANBY ST

WILLOW

WOOD DR

On GranbyBlvd

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GRANBY ST WILLOW WOOD DR

On GranbyBlvd To Down Town 0 1 0 1 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

GRANBY ST WILLOW WOOD DR

On

WillowWoodDr From water front 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

GRANBY ST

WILLOW

WOOD DR No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

45 GRANBY ST 21ST ST

On GranbyBlvd

From Down Town 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GRANBY ST 21ST ST

On GranbyBlvd

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

GRANBY ST 21ST ST On 21stSt From water front 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

GRANBY ST 21ST ST

On 21stSt To

water front 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0


On ColleyAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0

COLLEY AVE 26TH ST

On ColleyAve To

Down Town 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

56


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

COLLEY AVE 26TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

COLLEY AVE 26TH ST

On 26thSt To

water front 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0


On ColleyAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

COLLEY AVE 27TH ST

On ColleyAve To

Down Town 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

COLLEY AVE 27TH ST On 27thSt From water front 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

COLLEY AVE 27TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

48

COLONIAL

AVE 27TH ST

On ColonialAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

COLONIAL

AVE 27TH ST

On ColonialAve

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

COLONIAL

AVE 27TH ST

On 27thSt From

water front 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

COLONIAL

AVE 27TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

49 GRANBY ST

BAYVIEW

BLVD

On GranbyBlvd

To Down Town 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

GRANBY ST

BAYVIEW

BLVD

On GranbyBlvd

From Down Town 0 1 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

GRANBY ST

BAYVIEW

BLVD

On BayViewAve

To water front 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

GRANBY ST

BAYVIEW

BLVD

On BayViewAve

From water front 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

50 GRANBY ST

EAST BAY

AVE

On GranbyBlvd

To Down Town 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

GRANBY ST

EAST BAY

AVE

On GranbyBlvd

From Down Town 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GRANBY ST

EAST BAY

AVE

On EastBayAve

To water front 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

57


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

GRANBY ST EAST BAY AVE

On EastBayAve From water front 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

51

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 4TH VIEW ST

On

OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 4TH VIEW ST

On

OceanViewAve

From Hampton 1 1 0 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 4TH VIEW ST

On 4thViewSt To

intersection 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 4TH VIEW ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

52 OCEAN VIEW AVE 1ST VIEW ST

On

OceanViewAve From Hampton 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE 1ST VIEW ST

On

OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

OCEAN VIEW AVE 1ST VIEW ST

On 1stViewSt to intersection 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

OCEAN VIEW AVE 1ST VIEW ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

53

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On

OceanViewAve

From Hampton 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD

On ChesapeakeBlvd

to intersection 1 1 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

OCEAN VIEW AVE

CHESAPEAKE BLVD No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

54

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

ST

On

OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

ST

On

OceanViewAve

From Hampton 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

58


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CHESAPEAKE

ST No Street 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

OCEAN VIEW AVE

CHESAPEAKE ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

55

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CAPEVIEW

AVE

On

OceanViewAve

From Hampton 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CAPEVIEW

AVE

On

OceanViewAve

To Hampton 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CAPEVIEW

AVE

On CapeViewAve

to intersection 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

OCEAN VIEW

AVE

CAPEVIEW

AVE No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

56

MONTICELLO

AVE 26TH ST

On MonticelloAve

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

MONTICELLO

AVE 26TH ST

On MonticelloAve

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MONTICELLO

AVE 26TH ST

On 26thSt to

intersection 1 1 0 1 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MONTICELLO

AVE 26TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

57

TIDEWATER

DR WIDGEON RD No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR WIDGEON RD

On WidgeonRd

From ocean front 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

TIDEWATER

DR WIDGEON RD

On TideWaterDr

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR WIDGEON RD

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

58

TIDEWATER

DR

EAST BAY

AVE

On TideWaterDr

To Down Town 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

TIDEWATER DR

EAST BAY AVE

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

59


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

TIDEWATER

DR

EAST BAY

AVE

On EastBayAve

From ocean front 0 0 0 1 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

TIDEWATER DR

EAST BAY AVE

On EastBayAve To ocean front 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

59

TIDEWATER

DR THOLE ST

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1



TIDEWATER DR THOLE ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


On TholeSt to intersection 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1

60 TIDEWATER DR

NORVIEW AVE

On TideWaterDr From Down Town 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

NORVIEW

AVE

On TideWaterDr

To Down Town 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

TIDEWATER DR

NORVIEW AVE

On NorviewAve From ocean front 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

TIDEWATER DR

NORVIEW AVE No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

61

TIDEWATER

DR

WILLOW

WOOD DR

On TideWaterDr

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

WILLOW

WOOD DR

On TideWaterDr

From Down

Town 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

WILLOW

WOOD DR

On

WillowWoodDr

To ocean front 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TIDEWATER

DR

WILLOW

WOOD DR No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

62

TIDEWATER

DR

CROMWELL

DR

On TideWaterDr

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

TIDEWATER DR

CROMWELL DR

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 1 1 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

60


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

TIDEWATER

DR

CROMWELL

DR

On CormwellDr

To ocean front 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

TIDEWATER DR

CROMWELL DR

TdWtr-Cormwell From ocean front 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

63

TIDEWATER

DR

LAFAYETTE

BLVD

On TideWaterDr

To Down Town 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

TIDEWATER DR

LAFAYETTE BLVD

On TideWaterDr

From Down Town 1 1 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

TIDEWATER DR

LAFAYETTE BLVD

On LafayetteBlvd From ocean front 1 0 0 0 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

TIDEWATER

DR

LAFAYETTE

BLVD

On LafayetteBlvd

To ocean front 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

64

NEWTOWN

RD

KEMPSVILLE

RD

On NewtownRd

To VABeach 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

NEWTOWN

RD

KEMPSVILLE

RD

On NewtownRd

From VABeach 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

NEWTOWN RD

KEMPSVILLE RD

On KempsvilleRd To Down Town 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

NEWTOWN

RD

KEMPSVILLE

RD

On KempsvilleRd

From Down Town 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

65

KEMPSVILLE

RD

KEMPSVILLE

CIRCLE

On KempsvilleRd

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1

KEMPSVILLE

RD

KEMPSVILLE

CIRCLE

On KempsvilleRd

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

KEMPSVILLE

RD

KEMPSVILLE

CIRCLE

On

KempsvilleCircle

To VABeach 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

KEMPSVILLE

RD

KEMPSVILLE

CIRCLE

On KempsvilleCircle

From VABeach 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

66

NEWTOWN

RD

CENTER

DRIVE

On NewtownRd

To VABeach 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

NEWTOWN

RD

CENTER

DRIVE

On NewtownRd

From VABeach 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

61


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

NEWTOWN

RD

CENTER

DRIVE No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NEWTOWN RD

CENTER DRIVE

On CenterDr to intersection 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

67

NEWTOWN

RD

ETHEN

ALLEN DRIVE

On EthenAllenDr

To Down Town 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

NEWTOWN RD

ETHEN ALLEN DRIVE

On EthenAllenDr From Down Town 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

NEWTOWN RD

ETHEN ALLEN DRIVE

On NewtownRd To VABeach 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

NEWTOWN RD

ETHEN ALLEN DRIVE

On NewtownRd From VABeach 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

68 COLONIAL AVE 27TH ST

On 27thSt to intersection 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

COLONIAL

AVE 27TH ST No Street/oneway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Colonial & 27th St To Down Town 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Colonial & 27th St From Down Town 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

69

MONTICELLO

AVE 27TH ST

On 27thSt to

intersection 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MONTICELLO AVE 27TH ST No Street/oneway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


On MonticelloAve To Down Town 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MONTICELLO

AVE 27TH ST

On MonticelloAve

From Down Town 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

70 CHURCH ST 27TH ST

On 27thSt to

intersection 1 1 0 0 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

CHURCH ST 27TH ST No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CHURCH ST 27TH ST

On ChurchSt To

Down Town 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

CHURCH ST 27TH ST

On ChurchSt

From Down Town 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1

62


Sign

chevron

Sign

next

street

name

Sign

others

Vege-

tation

Drive-

ways

comm

ercial

Drive-

ways

resi-

dential

Extra

safety

features

Ped-

xing

Railway

line

Over/

under

pass

Signal

within

200'

Right

lane

turn

signal

Left

lane

turn

signal

71

LITTLE

CREEK RD HALPRIN LN

On LittleCreekRd

From I64 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD HALPRIN LN

On LittleCreekRd

To I64 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD HALPRIN LN

On HalprinLn

From Down Town 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD HALPRIN LN

On HalprinLn To

Down Town 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

72 LITTLE CREEK RD

AZALEA GARDEN RD

On

AzeleaGardenRd From Down Town 0 1 1 1 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE

CREEK RD

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On

AzeleaGardenRd

To Down Town 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE CREEK RD

AZALEA GARDEN RD

On LittleCreekRd From I64 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD

AZALEA

GARDEN RD

On LittleCreekRd

To I64 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

73

LITTLE

CREEK RD SHORE DRIVE

On LittleCreekRd

To base 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

LITTLE

CREEK RD SHORE DRIVE No Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LITTLE


On ShoreDr To

Down Town 0 1 0 0 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

LITTLE


On ShoreDr From

Down Town 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

63

Table II: Weekday Traffic Volume (obtained from Hampton Road District Planning Commission)

FACILITY NAME SEGMENT FROM SEGMENT TO 2003 Weekday

Volume

2006 Weekday

Volume

21ST ST HAMPTON BLVD COLLEY AVE 8,467 9,024

21ST ST COLLEY AVE LLEWELLYN ST 14,686 16,180

21ST ST LLEWELLYN ST MONTICELLO AVE 10,202 9,833

26TH ST HAMPTON BLVD COLLEY AVE 3,617 3,640

26TH ST COLLEY AVE LLEWELLYN AVE 8,756 8,583

26TH ST LLEWELLYN AVE MONTICELLO AVE 9,440 9,276

26TH ST MONTICELLO AVE CHURCH ST 9,799 9,868

26TH ST CHURCH ST 27TH ST 9,481 9,229



27TH ST LLEWELLYN AVE MONTICELLO AVE 10,640 9,847

27TH ST MONTICELLO AVE CHURCH ST 10,640 9,847

27TH ST CHURCH ST 26TH ST 10,640 9,847



38TH ST LLEWELLYN AVE GRANBY ST 4,569 5,348

4TH VIEW ST I-64 OCEAN VIEW AVE 13,806 13,641

ADMIRAL TAUSSIG BLVD HAMPTON BLVD I-564 33,595 31,117

AZALEA GARDEN RD VA BEACH BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 11,624 12,051

AZALEA GARDEN RD PRINCESS ANNE RD SEWELLS POINT RD 16,705 17,535

AZALEA GARDEN RD SEWELLS POINT RD ROBIN HOOD RD 10,329 10,595

AZALEA GARDEN RD ROBIN HOOD RD I-64 10,713 11,057

AZALEA GARDEN RD I-64 MILITARY HWY 10,012 9,765

AZALEA GARDEN RD MILITARY HWY NORVIEW AVE 14,536 13,878

AZALEA GARDEN RD NORVIEW AVE LITTLE CREEK RD 14,536 13,878

BAINBRIDGE BLVD SCL NORFOLK S MAIN ST 1,551 1,307

BALLENTINE BLVD I-264 VA BEACH BLVD 27,525 27,572

BALLENTINE BLVD VA BEACH BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 14,383 13,866

BALLENTINE BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD 11,969 11,637

BAY AVE FIRST VIEW ST I-64 17,199 16,664

64


Volume

2006 Weekday

Volume

BAY AVE/OCEAN AVE I-64 GRANBY ST 2,460

BAYVIEW BLVD TIDEWATER DR CHESAPEAKE BLVD 12,939 12,276

BAYVIEW BLVD CHESAPEAKE BLVD CAPE VIEW AVE 6,722 6,456

BERKLEY AVE I-464 STATE ST 14,543 13,486

BERKLEY AVE STATE ST MAIN ST 13,263 13,370

BERKLEY AVE MAIN ST BERKLEY AVE EXT 12,967 14,545

BERKLEY AVE BERKLEY AVE EXT INDIAN RIVER RD 12,000

BERKLEY AVE EXT BERKLEY AVE/FAUQUIER ST WILSON RD 3,274

BERKLEY AVE EXT WILSON RD CAMPOSTELLA RD 3,074 3,444

BOUSH ST/WATERSIDE DR ST PAULS BLVD CITY HALL AVE 33,630

BOUSH ST CITY HALL AVE BUTE STREET

BOUSH ST BUTE STREET BRAMBLETON AVE

BOUSH ST BRAMBLETON AVE OLNEY RD 9,516 6,739

BOUSH ST OLNEY RD VA BEACH BLVD 9,516 6,739

BRAMBLETON AVE HAMPTON BLVD COLLEY AVE 30,840 34,404

BRAMBLETON AVE COLLEY AVE BOUSH ST 46,317

BRAMBLETON AVE BOUSH ST MONTICELLO AVE 36,426 34,700

BRAMBLETON AVE MONTICELLO AVE ST PAULS BLVD 36,426 34,700

BRAMBLETON AVE ST PAULS BLVD CHURCH ST 23,913 22,685

BRAMBLETON AVE CHURCH ST TIDEWATER DR 29,252 34,070

BRAMBLETON AVE TIDEWATER DR PARK AVE 36,846 38,235

BRAMBLETON AVE PARK AVE I-264 47,524 47,162

CAMPOSTELLA RD SCL NORFOLK/BERKLEY AVE EXT INDIAN RIVER RD 24,571 26,794

CAMPOSTELLA RD INDIAN RIVER RD WILSON RD 30,755 31,727

CAMPOSTELLA RD WILSON RD S. END CAMPOSTELLA

BRIDGE 43,395 43,858

CAMPOSTELLA RD S. END CAMPOSTELLA BRIDGE KIMBALL TERR 43,395 43,858

CAMPOSTELLA RD KIMBALL TERR I-264 43,395 43,858

CHESAPEAKE BLVD LAFAYETTE BLVD CROMWELL DR 22,116 20,635

CHESAPEAKE BLVD CROMWELL DR ROBIN HOOD RD 22,116 20,635

CHESAPEAKE BLVD ROBIN HOOD RD HYDE CIR 22,116 20,635

CHESAPEAKE BLVD HYDE CIR NORVIEW AVE 22,116 20,635

CHESAPEAKE BLVD NORVIEW AVE I-64 20,125 19,299

65


Volume

2006 Weekday

Volume

CHESAPEAKE BLVD I-64 JOHNSTONS RD 26,467 25,770

CHESAPEAKE BLVD JOHNSTONS RD LITTLE CREEK RD 26,467 25,770

CHESAPEAKE BLVD SHEPPARD AVE BAYVIEW BLVD 25,276 25,069

CHESAPEAKE BLVD BAYVIEW BLVD CHESAPEAKE ST 14,622 14,170

CHESAPEAKE BLVD CHESAPEAKE ST OCEAN VIEW AVE 6,864 6,392

CHURCH ST BRAMBLETON AVE VA BEACH BLVD 15,852 17,657

CHURCH ST VA BEACH BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 17,176 18,401

CHURCH ST PRINCESS ANNE RD 26TH ST 19,936 20,982

CHURCH ST 26TH ST 27TH ST 14,160 15,037

CHURCH ST 27TH ST MONTICELLO AVE 11,673 12,853

CHURCH ST MONTICELLO AVE GRANBY ST 29,000

CITY HALL AVE BOUSH ST GRANBY ST 8,000

CITY HALL AVE GRANBY ST MONTICELLO AVE 8,000

CITY HALL AVE MONTICELLO AVE ST PAULS BLVD 8,000

COLLEY AVE BRAMBLETON AVE OLNEY RD 18,211 19,756

COLLEY AVE OLNEY RD PRINCESS ANNE RD 14,704 16,264

COLLEY AVE PRINCESS ANNE RD 21ST ST 16,524 17,629

COLLEY AVE 21ST ST 26TH ST 15,483 17,304

COLLEY AVE 26TH ST 27TH ST 15,483 17,304

COLLEY AVE 27TH ST 38TH ST 14,476 14,187

COLLEY AVE 38TH ST 53RD ST 14,476 14,187

CROMWELL DR TAIT TERRACE DR CHESAPEAKE BLVD 15,980 16,711

CROMWELL DR CHESAPEAKE BLVD TIDEWATER DR 13,457 13,640

DUKE ST OLNEY RD BRAMBLETON AVE 9,951

GRANBY ST CHURCH ST 38TH ST 24,293 27,392

GRANBY ST 38TH ST LLEWELLYN AVE 24,293 27,392

GRANBY ST LLEWELLYN AVE WILLOW WOOD DRIVE 40,039 42,577

GRANBY ST WILLOW WOOD DRIVE THOLE ST 39,655 39,543

GRANBY ST THOLE ST LITTLE CREEK RD 32,156 32,967

GRANBY ST LITTLE CREEK RD I-564 27,824 28,418

GRANBY ST I-564 I-64 20,998 21,817

GRANBY ST I-64 BAYVIEW BLVD 20,998 21,817

66


Volume

2006 Weekday

Volume

GRANBY ST BAYVIEW BLVD BAY AVE 15,767 14,247

GRANBY ST BAY AVE TIDEWATER DR 15,767 14,247

GRANBY ST TIDEWATER DR OCEAN VIEW AVE 9,359 11,857

HAMPTON BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 21ST ST 38,698 37,415

HAMPTON BLVD 21ST ST 26TH ST 41,819 38,027

HAMPTON BLVD 26TH ST 27TH ST 41,048 41,767

HAMPTON BLVD 27TH ST 38TH ST 41,048 41,767

HAMPTON BLVD 38TH ST JAMESTOWN CRESCENT 40,780 40,887

HAMPTON BLVD JAMESTOWN CRESCENT LITTLE CREEK RD 40,780 40,887

HAMPTON BLVD LITTLE CREEK RD INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL

BLVD 37,387 41,701

HAMPTON BLVD INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL BLVD INTERMODAL CONNECTOR 0 34,242

HAMPTON BLVD INTERMODAL CONNECTOR ADM TAUSSIG BLVD 0 34,242

INDIAN RIVER RD MARSH ST WILSON RD 13,895 16,354

INDIAN RIVER RD WILSON RD CAMPOSTELLA RD 13,895 16,354

INDIAN RIVER RD CAMPOSTELLA RD CHESAPEAKE CL 24,852 24,043

INGLESIDE RD VA BEACH BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 15,623 16,050

INGLESIDE RD PRINCESS ANNE RD TAIT TERRACE DR 16,219 17,232

INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL BLVD HAMPTON BLVD I-564 29,711 29,815

JAMESTOWN CRESCENT 53RD ST HAMPTON BLVD 6,834 6,889

JOHNSTONS RD SEWELLS POINT RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD 6,869

JOHNSTONS RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD MILITARY HWY 13,730 12,297

JOHNSTONS RD/HALPRIN LN MILITARY HWY LITTLE CREEK RD 8,155 8,570

KEMPSVILLE RD NEWTOWN RD VA BEACH BLVD 23,257 24,497

KEMPSVILLE RD VA BEACH BLVD NORTHAMPTON BLVD 12,559 14,606

LAFAYETTE BLVD 27TH ST TIDEWATER DR 16,237 15,863

LAFAYETTE BLVD TIDEWATER DR CHESAPEAKE BLVD 22,169 21,419

LIBERTY ST STATE ST SOUTH MAIN ST 3,704 3,641

LIBERTY ST SOUTH MAIN ST NCL CHESAPEAKE 4,978 4,540

LITTLE CREEK RD HAMPTON BLVD GRANBY ST 23,930 25,121

LITTLE CREEK RD GRANBY ST I-64 38,860 30,631

LITTLE CREEK RD I-64 TIDEWATER DR 29,950

LITTLE CREEK RD TIDEWATER DR SEWELLS POINT RD 29,324 30,332

67


Volume

2006 Weekday

Volume

LITTLE CREEK RD SEWELLS POINT RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD 29,324 30,332

LITTLE CREEK RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD MILITARY HWY 46,106 41,915

LITTLE CREEK RD MILITARY HWY AZALEA GARDEN RD 31,264 29,863

LITTLE CREEK RD AZALEA GARDEN RD SHORE DR 25,524 26,285

LLEWELLYN AVE PRINCESS ANNE RD 21ST ST 10,763 10,290

LLEWELLYN AVE 21ST ST 26TH ST 9,198 8,906

LLEWELLYN AVE 26TH ST 27TH ST 9,198 8,906



LLEWELLYN AVE 38TH ST DELAWARE AVE 13,292 13,439

LLEWELLYN AVE DELAWARE AVE GRANBY ST 7,454 8,666

MIDTOWN TUNNEL PORTSMOUTH CL BRAMBLETON AVE 35,309 41,499

MILITARY HWY VA BEACH CL I-264 51,558 49,026

MILITARY HWY I-264 VA BEACH BLVD 52,785 50,683

MILITARY HWY VA BEACH BLVD LOWERY RD 54,028 48,361

MILITARY HWY LOWERY RD PRIN ANNE

RD/NORTHAMPTON BLVD 54,028 48,361

MILITARY HWY PRIN ANNE RD/NORTHAMPTON BLVD I-64 51,231 57,624

MILITARY HWY I-64 AZALEA GARDEN RD 31,651 28,301

MILITARY HWY AZALEA GARDEN RD NORVIEW AVE 30,362 29,827

MILITARY HWY NORVIEW AVE JOHNSTONS RD 31,077 28,417

MILITARY HWY JOHNSTONS RD LITTLE CREEK RD 31,077 28,417

MONTICELLO AVE CITY HALL AVE BRAMBLETON AVE 6,592 6,917

MONTICELLO AVE BRAMBLETON AVE ST PAULS BLVD 6,523 6,952

MONTICELLO AVE ST PAULS BLVD VA BEACH BLVD 28,887 29,656

MONTICELLO AVE VA BEACH BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 24,948 25,165

MONTICELLO AVE PRINCESS ANNE RD 21ST ST 24,948 25,165

MONTICELLO AVE 21ST ST 26TH ST 18,048 19,145

MONTICELLO AVE 26TH ST 27TH ST 18,048 19,145

MONTICELLO AVE 27TH ST CHURCH ST 18,048 19,145

NEWTOWN RD KEMPSVILLE RD I-264 32,264 32,526

NEWTOWN RD I-264 VA BEACH BLVD 40,196 38,647

NEWTOWN RD VA BEACH BLVD VA BEACH CL 38,699 40,109

68


Volume

2006 Weekday

Volume

NORTHAMPTON BLVD MILITARY HWY KEMPSVILLE RD 39,750 33,500

NORTHAMPTON BLVD KEMPSVILLE RD I-64 39,750 37,111

NORTHAMPTON BLVD I-64 WESLEYAN DR/VA BEACH CL 92,726 90,685

NORVIEW AVE TIDEWATER DR CHESAPEAKE BLVD 5,793 6,573

NORVIEW AVE CHESAPEAKE BLVD I-64 23,289 24,236

NORVIEW AVE MILITARY HWY AZALEA GARDEN RD 16,551 17,162

NORVIEW AVE AZALEA GARDEN RD NORFOLK INT AIRPORT 12,667 13,690

OCEAN VIEW AVE 4TH VIEW ST TIDEWATER DR 15,964 17,803

OCEAN VIEW AVE TIDEWATER DR GRANBY ST 15,964 17,803

OCEAN VIEW AVE GRANBY ST CHESAPEAKE BLVD 15,964 22,180

OCEAN VIEW AVE CHESAPEAKE BLVD 21ST BAY ST 18,765 19,495

OLNEY RD COLLEY AVE DUKE ST/VA BEACH BLVD 10,851 10,783

PARK AVE BRAMBLETON AVE VA BEACH BLVD 17,343 17,797

PARK AVE VA BEACH BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 14,120 15,532

PRINCESS ANNE RD HAMPTON BLVD COLLEY AVE 5,582 6,105

PRINCESS ANNE RD COLLEY AVE LLEWELLYN AVE 8,129 9,298

PRINCESS ANNE RD LLEWELLYN AVE MONTICELLO AVE 9,109 9,346

PRINCESS ANNE RD MONTICELLO AVE CHURCH ST 9,292 9,573

PRINCESS ANNE RD CHURCH ST TIDEWATER DR 14,066 14,052

PRINCESS ANNE RD TIDEWATER DR MAY AVE 18,253

PRINCESS ANNE RD MAY AVE PARK AVE 18,253

PRINCESS ANNE RD PARK AVE BALLENTINE BLVD 21,485 19,234

PRINCESS ANNE RD BALLENTINE BLVD INGLESIDE RD 23,075 23,483

PRINCESS ANNE RD INGLESIDE RD AZALEA GARDEN RD 23,075 23,483

PRINCESS ANNE RD AZALEA GARDEN RD SEWELLS POINT RD 25,125 24,897

PRINCESS ANNE RD SEWELLS POINT RD MILITARY HWY 25,125 24,897

ROBIN HOOD RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD SEWELLS POINT RD 7,344 7,084

ROBIN HOOD RD SEWELLS POINT RD AZALEA GARDEN RD 6,013 5,780

ROBIN HOOD RD AZALEA GARDEN RD ELLSMERE AVE 9,911 9,914

ROBIN HOOD RD ELLSMERE AVE MILITARY HWY 14,020 13,204

SEWELLS POINT RD PRINCESS ANNE RD AZALEA GARDEN RD 13,773 14,216

SEWELLS POINT RD AZALEA GARDEN RD ROBIN HOOD RD 13,773 14,216

69


Volume

2006 Weekday

Volume

SEWELLS POINT RD ROBIN HOOD RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD 13,773 14,216

SEWELLS POINT RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD PARTRIDGE ST 9,978 9,453

SEWELLS POINT RD PARTRIDGE ST PHILPOTTS RD 9,978 9,453

SEWELLS POINT RD PHILPOTTS RD I-64 9,978 9,453

SEWELLS POINT RD I-64 LITTLE CREEK RD 9,978 9,453

SHORE DRIVE 21ST BAY ST LITTLE CREEK RD 24,064 27,602

SOUTH MAIN ST I-464 BAINBRIDGE BLVD 1,300

SOUTH MAIN ST BAINBRIDGE BLVD LIBERTY ST

SOUTH MAIN ST LIBERTY ST BERKLEY AVE 2,300

ST PAULS BLVD WATERSIDE DR CITY HALL AVE 20,820 21,603

ST PAULS BLVD CITY HALL AVE I-264 RAMP/MACARTHUR

MALL 41,857 51,621

ST PAULS BLVD I-264 RAMP/MACARTHUR MALL BRAMBLETON AVE 41,857 51,621

ST PAULS BLVD BRAMBLETON AVE MONTICELLO AVE

STATE ST LIBERTY ST BERKLEY AVE 3,704 3,641

STATE ST BERKLEY AVE I-464 RAMP 1,069 1,314

THOLE ST GRANBY ST TIDEWATER DR 11,824 11,441

TIDEWATER DR CITY HALL AVE BRAMBLETON AVE 26,840 22,442

TIDEWATER DR BRAMBLETON AVE VA BEACH BLVD 33,916 33,221

TIDEWATER DR VA BEACH BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 32,714 32,481

TIDEWATER DR PRINCESS ANNE RD LAFAYETTE BLVD 32,714 32,481

TIDEWATER DR LAFAYETTE BLVD CROMWELL DR 26,724 30,853

TIDEWATER DR CROMWELL DR NORVIEW AVE 35,639 40,810

TIDEWATER DR NORVIEW AVE THOLE ST 34,507 36,506

TIDEWATER DR THOLE ST I-64 34,507 36,506

TIDEWATER DR I-64 LITTLE CREEK RD 24,746 28,702

TIDEWATER DR LITTLE CREEK RD BAYVIEW BLVD 15,461 19,162

TIDEWATER DR BAYVIEW BLVD GRANBY ST 11,404 9,495

TIDEWATER DR GRANBY ST OCEAN VIEW AVE 6,723 8,529

VA BEACH BLVD OLNEY RD GRANBY ST 5,285 5,749

VA BEACH BLVD GRANBY ST MONTICELLO AVE 5,795 6,310

VA BEACH BLVD MONTICELLO AVE CHURCH ST 14,724 16,135

VA BEACH BLVD CHURCH ST TIDEWATER DR 14,724 16,135

70


Volume

2006 Weekday

Volume

VA BEACH BLVD PARK AVE BALLENTINE BLVD 16,465 18,573

VA BEACH BLVD BALLENTINE BLVD INGLESIDE RD 30,684 32,697

VA BEACH BLVD INGLESIDE RD AZALEA GARDEN RD 30,684 32,697

VA BEACH BLVD AZALEA GARDEN RD JETT ST 30,894 32,831

VA BEACH BLVD JETT ST MILITARY HWY 30,894 32,831

VA BEACH BLVD MILITARY HWY GLENROCK RD 29,904 29,157

VA BEACH BLVD KEMPSVILLE RD NEWTOWN RD 36,304 32,238

WESLEYAN DR NORTHAMPTON BLVD NCL VA BEACH 20,419 19,652

WILLOW WOOD DR GRANBY ST TIDEWATER DR 12,077 13,054

WILSON RD BERKLEY AVE/CHESAPEAKE CL INDIAN RIVER RD 9,184 9,563

WILSON RD INDIAN RIVER RD CAMPOSTELLA RD 9,184 9,563

71

Table III: Total Number of Accidents in the City of Norfolk 2000-‗04 (Data Compiled from the City of Norfolk Dataset on Accidents)

No. Street 1 Street 2 Total Number of Accidents 2000-2004 (ACCT)

Yearly Average Number of Accidents 2000-2004 (ACCA)

1 HAMPTON BLVD INT TERMINAL BLVD 217 43.4

2 HAMPTON BLVD LITTLE CREEK RD 102 20.4

3 HAMPTON BLVD BAKER ST 56 11.2

4 HAMPTON BLVD ADMIRAL TAUSSIG BLVD 103 20.6

5 INT TERMINAL BLVD DIVEN ST 54 10.8

6 HAMPTON BLVD 49TH ST 44 8.8

7 HAMPTON BLVD 38TH ST 10 2

8 HAMPTON BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 51 10.2

9 HAMPTON BLVD BEECHWOOD AVE 39 7.8

10 LITTLE CREEK RD GRANBY ST 161 32.2

11 LITTLE CREEK RD DIVEN ST 90 18

12 LITTLE CREEK RD RUTHAVEN RD 65 13

13 LITTLE CREEK RD OLD OCEAN VIEW RD 74 14.8

14 LITTLE CREEK RD TIDEWATER DR 122 24.4

15 LITTLE CREEK RD SEWELLS POINT RD 48 9.6

16 LITTLE CREEK RD MILITARY HWY 74 14.8

17 LITTLE CREEK RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD 154 30.8

18 BRAMBLETON AVE COLLEY AVE 71 14.2

19 BRAMBLETON AVE DUKE ST 36 7.2

20 BRAMBLETON AVE BOUSH ST 59 11.8

21 BRAMBLETON AVE GRANBY ST 52 10.4

22 BRAMBLETON AVE MONTICELLO AVE 55 11

23 BRAMBLETON AVE ST PAULS BLVD 96 19.2

24 BRAMBLETON AVE BOUSH ST 62 12.4

25 BRAMBLETON AVE PARK AVE 97 19.4

72



26 BRAMBLETON AVE TIDEWATER DR 101 20.2

27 TIDEWATER DR VA BEACH BLVD 96 19.2

28 TIDEWATER DR PRINCESS ANNE RD 85 17

29 TIDEWATER DR GOFF ST 36 7.2

30 TIDEWATER DR LINDENWOOD AVE 39 7.8

31 CHESAPEAKE BLVD NORVIEW AVE 51 10.2

32 CHESAPEAKE BLVD SEWELLS POINT RD 56 11.2

33 CHESAPEAKE BLVD JOHNSTONS RD 61 12.2

34 MILITARY HWY JOHNSTONS RD 95 19

35 MILITARY HWY NORVIEW AVE 149 29.8

36 MILITARY HWY AZALEA GARDEN RD 125 25

37 MILITARY HWY ROBIN HOOD RD 142 28.4

38 MILITARY HWY PRINCESS ANNE RD 99 19.8

39 MILITARY HWY LOWERY RD 308 61.6

40 MILITARY HWY VA BEACH BLVD 291 58.2

41 MILITARY HWY POPLAR HALL DR 137 27.4

42 MILITARY HWY HOGGARD RD 73 14.6

43 MILITARY HWY CORPORATE BLVD 78 15.6

44 GRANBY ST WILLOW WOOD DR 44 8.8

45 GRANBY ST 21ST ST 17 3.4

46 COLLEY AVE 26TH ST 62 12.4

47 COLLEY AVE 27TH ST 41 8.2

48 COLONIAL AVE 27TH ST 37 7.4

49 GRANBY ST BAYVIEW BLVD 59 11.8

50 GRANBY ST EAST BAY AVE 16 3.2

51 OCEAN VIEW AVE 4TH VIEW ST 51 10.2

52 OCEAN VIEW AVE 1ST VIEW ST 50 10

73



53 OCEAN VIEW AVE CHESAPEAKE BLVD 42 8.4

54 OCEAN VIEW AVE CHESAPEAKE ST 48 9.6

55 OCEAN VIEW AVE CAPEVIEW AVE 36 7.2

56 MONTICELLO AVE 26TH ST 54 10.8

57 TIDEWATER DR WIDGEON RD 93 18.6

58 TIDEWATER DR EAST BAY AVE 53 10.6

59 TIDEWATER DR THOLE ST 66 13.2

60 TIDEWATER DR NORVIEW AVE 54 10.8

61 TIDEWATER DR WILLOW WOOD DR 65 13

62 TIDEWATER DR CROMWELL DR 68 13.6

63 TIDEWATER DR LAFAYETTE BLVD 68 13.6

64 NEWTOWN RD KEMPSVILLE RD 55 11

65 KEMPSVILLE RD KEMPSVILLE CIRCLE 35 7

66 NEWTOWN RD CENTER DRIVE 45 9

67 NEWTOWN RD ETHEN ALLEN DRIVE 51 10.2

68 COLONIAL AVE 27TH ST 37 7.4

69 MONTICELLO AVE 27TH ST 49 9.8

70 CHURCH ST 27TH ST 38 7.6

71 LITTLE CREEK RD HALPRIN LN 105 21

72 LITTLE CREEK RD AZALEA GARDEN RD 76 15.2

73 LITTLE CREEK RD SHORE DRIVE 98 19.6

74

Table IV: Variables

No. Variable Name Definition No.

Variable Name Definition

1 RTLN Total number of right only turn lanes (sum of all restrict right turn lanes on the intersection) 15 SGNS

Sign next street name (total number of legs with signs for next street)

2 LTLN Total number of left only turn lanes (sum of all restrict left turn lanes on the intersection) 16 SGOT

Sign others (total number of legs with other safety signs)

3 STLN Total number of straight only lanes (sum of all through traffic lanes on the intersection) 17 VEGE Vegetation (total number of legs with vegetation)

4 TOLN Total number of lanes on the intersection (sum of all lanes on the intersection) 18 DRWC

Drive-ways commercial (total number of commercial driveways within 200’ of intersection)

5 LNLN Left turn lane length (Total length of left turn lanes) 19 DRWR

Drive-ways residential (total number of residential driveways within 200’ of intersection)

6 LNRN Right turn lane length (Total length of right turn lane) 20 EXTR

Extra safety features (total number of extra-safety features on all legs of the intersection)

7 MEDN Median (total number of legs with physical medium) 21 PEDX

Ped -Xing (total number of legs with signalized pedestrian crossing)

8 MEDT Median type(physical type) 22 RAIL Railway line (total number of legs with railway lines)

9 PAVE Shoulder/ pavement (total number of legs with physical shoulder/pavement) 23 OVUN

Over/under pass (total number of legs with overpass or underpass)

10 PAVT Pavement type (physical type) 24 SIG2 Signal within 200' (total number of signals within 200’ of the intersection understudy)

11

SPLM (Max) and SPLA (Average) Speed limit 25 RTLT

Right lane turn signal (total number of legs with signal for right turn)

12 SGLG Sign for street light (total number of legs with signs for approaching light) 26 LTLT

Left lane turn signal (total number of legs with signal for left turn)

13 SGTL Sign for turn lane (Total of number of legs with signs for approaching turn) 27 AAWDT Average annual weekday traffic

14 SGCH Sign chevron (total number of legs with chevrons indication turn orther) 28 ACCT

Total number of intersection accident from 2000-2004

75

Table V: Independent Variables Used in the Analysis

Length (Approximate length in feet) Description Score

0 No Lane 0

25 Very Short 1

50 Short 2

75 Medium Short 3

100 Medium Long 4

125 Long 5

150 Very Long 6

76

Table VI: Independent Variables Data

Inter-Section No. RTLN LTLN TOLN LNLN LNRN MEDN SPLM SPLA SGLG SGTL SGNS VEGE DRWC DRWR DRWT PEDX SIG2 LTLT

1 3 5 18 21 8 4 45 36.3 0 2 4 2 9 0 9 0 2 1

2 3 4 15 14 7 2 35 35.0 1 1 3 1 14 10 24 1 1 1

3 1 2 9 6 4 2 35 31.7 1 1 0 2 14 0 14 0 1 0

4 2 2 9 8 8 2 45 40.0 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1

5 0 4 10 16 0 2 45 35.0 0 0 0 1 5 3 8 0 1 1

6 2 5 15 20 5 1 35 30.0 0 0 0 0 7 4 11 4 1 1

7 2 4 12 13 9 0 30 27.5 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 4 2 0

8 0 0 6 0 0 0 30 27.5 1 0 1 0 3 17 20 1 1 0

9 1 2 11 4 2 2 30 27.5 0 0 0 3 16 7 23 0 2 1

10 3 6 17 15 4 3 35 35.0 0 0 3 2 21 2 23 4 1 1

11 1 0 7 0 4 0 35 30.0 0 0 0 1 20 12 32 3 1 0

12 0 0 6 0 0 0 35 30.0 0 0 0 4 7 18 25 1 1 0

13 2 5 13 8 2 3 35 30.0 0 0 0 0 26 3 29 2 2 1

14 3 3 16 8 14 3 40 37.5 0 1 4 0 36 0 36 0 3 1

15 2 3 9 5 3 3 35 35.0 1 0 0 1 24 0 24 0 1 1

16 2 3 11 12 10 3 45 35.0 0 2 3 2 31 4 35 0 1 1

17 2 5 15 20 6 2 40 37.5 0 4 4 0 35 9 44 4 1 1

18 3 5 16 16 10 4 35 30.0 0 4 0 3 7 0 7 4 0 1

19 2 5 14 18 3 2 30 27.5 0 2 2 2 8 0 8 4 2 1

20 2 2 13 8 8 3 30 28.3 1 1 1 2 5 0 5 3 2 0

21 0 1 9 4 0 2 30 25.0 2 0 1 2 5 0 5 4 2 0

22 1 4 15 10 4 2 30 28.8 0 0 1 0 8 0 8 4 2 1

23 2 5 17 19 4 3 30 30.0 0 1 3 3 1 0 1 4 2 1

24 0 5 15 12 0 4 30 27.5 0 0 3 3 6 0 6 4 0 1

77


25 2 4 13 14 6 0 30 27.5 0 1 4 0 11 0 11 4 0 1

26 4 6 21 17 9 4 35 32.5 0 0 4 0 10 0 10 4 0 1

27 2 1 13 4 5 4 35 32.5 0 0 4 1 4 0 4 4 0 0

28 1 4 15 14 3 2 35 30.0 0 0 1 1 15 5 20 1 2 1

29 0 2 12 4 0 2 35 30.0 0 0 0 0 5 1 6 4 1 1

30 1 2 10 2 2 0 35 30.0 0 0 1 1 4 10 14 2 0 0

31 2 4 13 12 5 3 40 35.0 0 0 3 2 18 0 18 4 1 1

32 0 2 5 8 0 0 35 30.0 0 0 2 0 13 3 16 2 0 0

33 2 4 13 13 9 2 40 32.5 0 0 0 0 5 9 14 0 0 1

34 3 4 13 12 5 0 45 35.0 0 0 0 1 16 0 16 4 0 1

35 3 2 13 6 3 2 45 37.5 0 0 2 0 14 1 15 0 2 1

36 4 3 14 10 10 0 45 37.5 0 0 1 0 22 1 23 0 0 1

37 4 4 14 7 12 3 45 37.5 0 0 1 0 7 0 7 0 1 1

38 4 6 18 16 14 4 45 45.0 1 1 4 0 5 3 8 0 1 1

39 4 6 19 18 13 3 45 33.8 0 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 0 1

40 4 8 22 24 16 4 45 35.0 0 0 4 0 26 0 26 4 0 1

41 3 6 21 24 10 2 40 35.0 0 0 2 0 13 0 13 1 1 1

42 2 4 18 12 3 2 40 32.5 0 0 3 1 7 0 7 0 1 1

43 4 6 19 10 5 3 45 37.5 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1

44 1 2 10 3 1 2 30 28.3 0 0 1 2 3 3 6 2 0 0

45 0 2 6 2 0 0 25 25.0 0 0 1 0 20 0 20 0 2 0

46 0 1 8 2 0 2 30 26.7 0 0 0 2 9 0 9 4 2 0

47 0 1 8 3 0 2 30 26.7 0 0 0 2 7 5 12 0 1 0

48 0 1 7 2 0 0 30 26.7 0 0 0 0 5 11 16 0 1 1

49 2 3 11 5 3 2 35 31.3 0 0 2 4 4 13 17 0 0 1

50 2 0 8 0 2 2 35 30.0 0 0 1 4 2 25 27 0 1 0

78


51 2 1 7 4 6 3 35 33.3 1 0 3 1 10 8 18 2 0 1

52 1 2 7 6 4 1 35 31.7 0 0 0 0 7 7 14 2 0 0

53 2 3 9 6 6 1 35 35.0 0 0 3 0 11 6 17 0 0 1

54 0 2 7 2 0 0 35 31.7 0 0 0 0 15 1 16 0 0 0

55 1 2 7 3 2 0 35 33.3 0 0 0 0 16 9 25 3 0 0

56 0 1 8 1 0 0 30 30.0 0 0 1 1 11 9 20 0 1 0

57 1 2 9 4 0 2 35 31.7 0 0 1 1 7 0 7 1 0 0

58 2 4 12 4 1 2 40 35.0 0 0 0 2 13 10 23 4 0 1

59 3 2 10 3 9 2 35 31.7 0 1 1 2 2 0 2 0 0 1

60 2 2 8 5 3 1 35 35.0 0 0 0 0 7 2 9 0 1 0

61 0 0 5 0 0 0 35 33.3 0 0 0 0 10 5 15 1 1 0

62 1 4 11 6 2 0 35 32.5 0 0 1 0 14 9 23 0 1 1

63 0 4 12 7 0 1 35 32.5 0 0 2 0 12 10 22 4 0 1

64 3 5 15 9 10 4 35 35.0 0 0 1 2 12 0 12 0 0 1

65 4 2 12 6 7 4 35 25.0 0 0 0 3 4 0 4 1 2 1

66 3 2 9 8 10 3 35 31.7 0 0 2 1 7 0 7 0 1 1

67 1 4 11 8 5 4 35 30.0 0 0 0 2 10 0 10 1 1 1

68 0 1 7 2 0 0 30 26.7 0 0 0 0 7 6 13 0 1 0

69 0 1 8 0 0 0 30 30.0 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 0 1 0

70 0 1 8 4 0 0 30 30.0 0 0 2 2 8 3 11 2 1 0

71 2 4 12 12 6 2 35 30.0 0 1 0 2 28 1 29 1 0 1

72 2 3 11 5 5 2 40 35.0 0 0 1 1 19 10 29 4 0 1

73 2 4 11 16 5 3 40 36.7 0 2 3 0 10 3 13 3 1 0

79

Table VII: Average Annual Weekday Traffic

No. AAWDT No. AAWDT No. AAWDT

1 66314 26 63168 51 29770

2 61317 27 48335 52 n/a

3 n/a 28 46780 53 25629

4 70198 29 n/a 54 n/a

5 n/a 30 n/a 55 n/a

6 n/a 31 43414 56 27847

7 47071 32 33267 57 n/a

8 44280 33 40197 58 20550

9 n/a 34 39232 59 46331

10 51754 35 47628 60 40300

11 n/a 36 44898 61 46584

12 n/a 37 n/a 62 49096

13 n/a 38 76356 63 54883

14 44785 39 64153 64 41305

15 39302 40 83932 65 n/a

16 62341 41 n/a 66 n/a

17 71382 42 n/a 67 n/a

18 62191 43 n/a 68 n/a

19 n/a 44 51732 69 28688

20 45942 45 n/a 70 21154

21 33128 46 24239 71 39419

22 42949 47 25116 72 45800

23 46047 48 n/a 73 60415

24 45104 49 18234

25 64867 50 33937

80

Table VIII: Sample for Modeling


2 HAMPTON BLVD LITTLE CREEK RD 38 MILITARY HWY PRINCESS ANNE RD

3 HAMPTON BLVD BAKER ST 41 MILITARY HWY POPLAR HALL DR

4 HAMPTON BLVD ADMIRAL TAUSSIG BLVD 43 MILITARY HWY CORPORATE BLVD

6 HAMPTON BLVD 49TH ST 44 GRANBY ST WILLOW WOOD DR

7 HAMPTON BLVD 38TH ST 45 GRANBY ST 21ST ST

8 HAMPTON BLVD PRINCESS ANNE RD 46 COLLEY AVE 26TH ST

9 HAMPTON BLVD BEECHWOOD AVE 47 COLLEY AVE 27TH ST

10 LITTLE CREEK RD GRANBY ST 48 COLONIAL AVE 27TH ST

11 LITTLE CREEK RD DIVEN ST 49 GRANBY ST BAYVIEW BLVD

12 LITTLE CREEK RD RUTHAVEN RD 51 OCEAN VIEW AVE 4TH VIEW ST

13 LITTLE CREEK RD OLD OCEAN VIEW RD 52 OCEAN VIEW AVE 1ST VIEW ST

14 LITTLE CREEK RD TIDEWATER DR 53 OCEAN VIEW AVE CHESAPEAKE BLVD

15 LITTLE CREEK RD SEWELLS POINT RD 54 OCEAN VIEW AVE CHESAPEAKE ST

16 LITTLE CREEK RD MILITARY HWY 55 OCEAN VIEW AVE CAPEVIEW AVE

17 LITTLE CREEK RD CHESAPEAKE BLVD 56 MONTICELLO AVE 26TH ST

18 BRAMBLETON AVE COLLEY AVE 57 TIDEWATER DR WIDGEON RD

21 BRAMBLETON AVE GRANBY ST 58 TIDEWATER DR EAST BAY AVE

22 BRAMBLETON AVE MONTICELLO AVE 60 TIDEWATER DR NORVIEW AVE

23 BRAMBLETON AVE ST PAULS BLVD 61 TIDEWATER DR WILLOW WOOD DR

24 BRAMBLETON AVE BOUSH ST 62 TIDEWATER DR CROMWELL DR

26 BRAMBLETON AVE TIDEWATER DR 63 TIDEWATER DR LAFAYETTE BLVD

27 TIDEWATER DR VA BEACH BLVD 64 NEWTOWN RD KEMPSVILLE RD

28 TIDEWATER DR PRINCESS ANNE RD 65 KEMPSVILLE RD KEMPSVILLE CIRCLE

29 TIDEWATER DR GOFF ST 66 NEWTOWN RD CENTER DRIVE

31 CHESAPEAKE BLVD NORVIEW AVE 68 COLONIAL AVE 27TH ST

32

CHESAPEAKE

BLVD SEWELLS POINT RD 69 MONTICELLO AVE 27TH ST

34 MILITARY HWY JOHNSTONS RD 70 CHURCH ST 27TH ST

35 MILITARY HWY NORVIEW AVE 71 LITTLE CREEK RD HALPRIN LN

36 MILITARY HWY AZALEA GARDEN RD 72 LITTLE CREEK RD AZALEA GARDEN RD

81

Table IX: Sample for Validation

No. Street 1 Street 2

1 HAMPTON BLVD INT TERMINAL BLVD

5 INT TERMINAL BLVD DIVEN ST

19 BRAMBLETON AVE DUKE ST


25 BRAMBLETON AVE PARK AVE

30 TIDEWATER DR LINDENWOOD AVE

33 CHESAPEAKE BLVD JOHNSTONS RD

37 MILITARY HWY ROBIN HOOD RD

39 MILITARY HWY LOWERY RD

40 MILITARY HWY VA BEACH BLVD

42 MILITARY HWY HOGGARD RD

50 GRANBY ST EAST BAY AVE

59 TIDEWATER DR THOLE ST

67 NEWTOWN RD ETHEN ALLEN DRIVE

73 LITTLE CREEK RD SHORE DRIVE

82

Table X: Curve Fitting for Significant Variables

Variable Model R-Square Sig Const Coeff,

AAWDT

Linear .280 0.00 20.09 0.00

Logarithmic .265 0.00 -450.39 49.42

Inverse .227 0.00 116.47 -1610624.10

Exponential .212 0.00 33.61 0.00

LTLT

Linear .151 0.00 52.91 26.40

Logarithmic . . 0.00 0.00

Inverse . . 0.00 0.00

Exponential .157 0.00 47.91 0.41

DRWC

Linear .115 0.01 52.24 1.37

Logarithmic .028 0.21 53.84 6.83

Inverse .003 0.68 67.92 8.73

Exponential .045 0.11 52.52 0.01

SGNS

Linear .231 0.00 54.96 11.71


Inverse . . 0.00 0.00

Exponential .192 0.00 50.63 0.16

SGTL

Linear .128 0.01 65.03 14.55


Inverse . . 0.00 0.00

Exponential .105 0.01 58.24 0.20

SPLA

Linear .355 0.00 -88.48 4.94

Logarithmic .357 0.00 -485.26 160.48

Inverse .354 0.00 230.08 -5054.83

Exponential .352 0.00 5.67 0.07

83

Variable Model R-Square Sig Const Coeff,

SPLM

Linear .344 0.00 -73.51 4.05 Logarithmic .347 0.00 -451.31 146.49 Inverse .344 0.00 217.35 -5129.25 Exponential .358 0.00 6.74 0.06

MEDN

Linear .081 0.03 57.31 6.88 Logarithmic . . 0.00 0.00 Inverse . . 0.00 0.00 Exponential .111 0.01 49.88 0.12

LNRN


LNLN


TOLN

Linear .324 0.00 16.171 4.711

Logarithmic 0.29 0.00 -46.95 49.27 Inverse 0.24 0.00 112.83 -431.58 Exponential 0.25 0.00 30.22 0.06

LTLN

Linear .174 0.00 46.476 7.972

Logarithmic . . 0.00 0.00 Inverse . . 0.00 0.00 Exponential 0.12 0.01 46.16 0.10

RTLN

Linear .259 0.00 48.857 13.025

Logarithmic . . 0.00 0.00 Inverse . . 0.00 0.00 Exponential .193 0.00 47.24 0.17

84

Figure I: Sample Curve Fitting ACCT (Total Accidents) vs MEDN (Median)

85

Figure II: Sample Curve Fitting ACCT (Total Accidents) vs AAWDT (Annual Average Weed Day Traffic)

86

Table XI: Linear Regression Model (Based on Entire Sample)

Model Coefficients Std.

Error t Sig.

(Constant) -85.483 23.780 -3.595 .001

TOLN 7.060 1.751 4.032 .000

SPLM 2.885 .708 4.076 .000

LTLN -7.542 3.690 -2.044 .046

MEDTRAN* -.382 .221 -1.724 .090

* Transformed variable (eMEDN

)

Table XII: ANOVA of Linear Regression Model (Based on Entire Sample)

Model Sum of Squares df

Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 33759.68 4.00 8439.92 15.27 0.000

Residual 29288.34 53.00 552.61

Total 63048.02 57.00

Table XIII: R-Square of the Linear Regression Model (Based on Entire Sample)

Model R R

Square

Adjusted R

Square Std. Error of the

Estimate

.769 .592 .541 23.50766

87

Table XIV: t-test of the Validation Data

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Actual ACCT Predicted

ACCT

Mean 107.2 84.56601438

Variance 8493.6 693.0613923

Observations 15 15

Pooled Variance 4593.330696

Hypothesized Mean Difference 0

df 28

t Stat 0.914592868

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.368214786

t Critical two-tail 2.048407115

88

Table XV: TwoStep Cluster Analysis

(Categorical Significant Variables for Cluster Analysis: MEDN, SGTL, SGNS and LTLT)

Cluster Distribution

Cluster N

% of Combined % of Total

1 31 53.4% 53.4%

2 27 46.6% 46.6%

Combined 58 100.0% 100.0%

Table XVI: TwoStep-Cluster Analysis – Cluster Centroid


Cluster Centroid

Cluster ACCT Mean Std. Deviation

1 53.42 19.93

2 87.52 36.35

Combined 69.29 33.26

Table XVII: TwoStep Cluster Analysis – Cluster Frequencies


MEDN

0 1 2 3 4

Cluster Frequency % Frequency % Frequency % Frequency % Frequency %

1 16 94.1% 3 60.0% 12 63.2% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 1 5.9% 2 40.0% 7 36.8% 10 100.0% 7 100.0%

Combined 17 100.0% 5 100.0% 19 100.0% 10 100.0% 7 100.0%

89

SGTL

0 1 2 4

Cluster Frequency % Frequency % Frequency % Frequency %

1 30 62.5% 1 14.3% 0 .0% 0 .0%

2 18 37.5% 6 85.7% 1 100.0% 2 100.0%

Combined 48 100.0% 7 100.0% 1 100.0% 2 100.0%

SGNS

0 1 2 3 4

Cluster Frequency % Frequency % Frequency % Frequency % Frequency %

1 19 0.76 10 0.7692 2 0.2857 0 0 0 0

2 6 0.24 3 0.2308 5 0.7143 8 1 5 1

Combined 25 1 13 1 7 1 8 1 5 1

LTLT

0 1

Frequency % Frequency %

1 21 95.5% 10 27.8%

2 1 4.5% 26 72.2%

Combined 22 100.0% 36 100.0%

90

Table XVIII: TwoStep Cluster Analysis – Cluster Memberships — Regression – Cluster 1

Model Coefficients

Model Coefficients Std. Error t Sig.

(Constant) -83.19 25.14 -3.31 .003

SPLM 3.78 .728 5.26 .000

LTLN -9.50 3.58 -2.66 .013

TOLN 3.30 1.65 2.00 .055

Model ANOVA


Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 6309.350 3 2103.12 10.13 .000

Residual 5606.199 27 207.64

Total 11915.548 30

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R

Square Std. Error of the Estimate

.728 .530 .48 14.41

91

Table XIX: TwoStep Cluster Analysis – Cluster Memberships — Regression – Cluster 2

Model Coefficients

Model Coefficients Std. Error t Sig.

(Constant) -35.41 52.40 -.68 .51

SPLA 3.44 1.42 1.98 .06 TOLN 4.05 2.34 1.73 .10 LNLN 1.34 1.55 1.87 .09 MEDN -11.16 5.61 -1.99 .06

Model ANOVA


Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 17843.20 4 4460.80 5.94 .00

Residual 16509.54 22 750.43

Total 34352.74 26

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R

Square Std. Error of the Estimate

.72 .52 .43 27.39

92

Table XX: TwoStep Cluster Analysis – Cluster Memberships — Validation Sample

No. Street 1 Street 2 Cluster

1 HAMPTON BLVD INT TERMINAL BLVD 2

5 INT TERMINAL BLVD DIVEN ST 1

19 BRAMBLETON AVE DUKE ST 1

20 BRAMBLETON AVE BOUSH ST 2

25 BRAMBLETON AVE PARK AVE 2

30 TIDEWATER DR LINDENWOOD AVE 1

33 CHESAPEAKE BLVD JOHNSTONS RD 2

37 MILITARY HWY ROBIN HOOD RD 1

39 MILITARY HWY LOWERY RD 2

40 MILITARY HWY VA BEACH BLVD 2

42 MILITARY HWY HOGGARD RD 1

50 GRANBY ST EAST BAY AVE 1

59 TIDEWATER DR THOLE ST 2

67 NEWTOWN RD ETHEN ALLEN DRIVE 1

73 LITTLE CREEK RD SHORE DRIVE 2

93

Table XXI: TwoStep Cluster Analysis – Cluster Memberships — Validation t-test – Cluster 1



ACCT

Mean 149.63 127.65

Variance 11157.70 605.56

Observations 8 8


Hypothesized Mean Difference 0.00

df 14.00

t Stat 0.57

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.29


Table XXII: TwoStep Cluster Analysis – Cluster Memberships — Validation t-test – Cluster 2



ACCT

Mean 68.77 58.71

Variance 569.17 1658.57

Observations 7 7


Hypothesized Mean Difference 0.00

df 12.00

t Stat 0.56

P(T<=t) two-tail 0.29


Date post:	03-Aug-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times