+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

Date post: 05-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: errin
View: 26 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States. Xiaoguang Zhang Oak Ridge National Laboratory Yan Wang and Xiu Feng Han Institute of Physics, CAS, China Contact: [email protected] Presented by Jun-Qiang Lu, ORNL. Outline. Phase accumulation model for quantum well states - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
12
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States Xiaoguang Zhang Oak Ridge National Laboratory Yan Wang and Xiu Feng Han Institute of Physics, CAS, China Contact: [email protected] Presented by Jun-Qiang Lu, ORNL
Transcript
Page 1: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

Xiaoguang Zhang

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Yan Wang and Xiu Feng Han

Institute of Physics, CAS, China

Contact: [email protected]

Presented by Jun-Qiang Lu, ORNL

Page 2: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Outline

• Phase accumulation model for quantum well states double barrier magnetic tunnel junctions Coulomb blockade effect magnetic nanodots

• Circuit model for spin transport Tuning magnetoresistance for molecular junctions Measuring spin-flip scattering Effect of quantum well states

• Conclusion

Page 3: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Phase Accumulation Model for Thin Layer

• Free-electron dispersion

• Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule

» Phase shift on reflection from left boundary

» Phase shift on reflection from right boundary

» Additional phase due to roughness

» Layer thickness

E = EL +h2 k

2

2m*

2kzt − Φ1 − Φ2 − Φ = 2nπ

Φ1

Φ

Φ2

t

Page 4: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Quantum Well States in Fe Spacer Layer of Fe/MgO/Fe/MgO/Fe Tunnel Junction

• (top) PAM model in good agreement with first-principles calculation

• (right) Experimentally observed resonances can be matched with the calculated QW states

PRL 97, 087210 (2006)

Page 5: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Coulomb Blockade Effect

• Experimental resonances all higher than calculated QW energies - difference due to Coulomb charging energy of discontinuous Fe spacer layer

• Using a plate capacitor model, Fe layer island size can be estimated from the Coulomb charging energy Deduced island size as a function of film

thickness agrees with measurement Resonance width proportional to the

Coulomb charging energy, suggesting smearing effect due to size distribution

PRL 97, 087210 (2006)

Page 6: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Phase Accumulation Model for Nanodots

• Disc shape with diameter d and thickness t

• QW energy divided into two terms

• Ez from 1D confinement PAM same as in the layer case

• E// from the zeros of the Bessel function Jn(x), for x=n

E = E z + E //

E // =μn

2h2

m2d

Page 7: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Quantum Well States in Nanodots

• (top) DOS of QW states for t=3 nm, d=6 nm (red) or d=9 nm (blue)

• A spin splitting is assumed. Inset shows spin polarization - note strong oscillation and negative polarization at some energies

• (bottom) Averaged DOS of discs with diameters over a continuous distribution between 6 and 9 nm.

• Coulomb charging energy (<0.2 eV) visible but causes minimal smearing effect

Page 8: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Circuit Model for Spin Transport

• A simple, two channel circuit model to represent an electrode-conducting molecular-electrode junction

• Each spin channel in the molecule has resistance 2RM

• Circuit model includes both (spin-dependent) contact tunneling resistances R() and the resistance of the molecule RM

• A spin-flip channel with a resistance RS connects the two spin channels

RM

RS

Spin up

Spin down

R+ RM

R+ RM

Spin polarization

P

Page 9: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Tuning Magnetoresistance

• Magnetoresistance ratio is

• Zero spin-flip scattering

“conductivity mismatch” if RM large

• For fixed RM and RS, maximum m is achieved if

m =R↑R↓RS

(R↑ + RM )(R↓ + RM ) RS + RM + 12 (R↑ + R↓ )[ ]

P 2

1− P 2

m =R↑R↓

(R↑ + RM )(R↓ + RM )

P 2

1− P 2

R↑R↓ = RM (2RS + 3RM )

Page 10: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Spin-Flip Scattering in CoFe/Al2O3/Cu/Al2O3/CoFe junctions

• For double barrier magnetic tunnel junctions, magnetoresistance ratio

• GS=1/RS

• GP, GAP are tunneling conductances of single barrier magnetic junctions

• GS extracted from magnetoresistance measurements show linear temperature dependence and scaling with copper layer thickness

• Spin-flip scattering length at 4.2K estimated to be 1m

PRL 97, 106605 (2006)

m =Gp − GAP

2GAP + GP + GAP γGS

Page 11: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Quantum well resonance in CoFe/Al2O3/Cu/Al2O3/CoFe junctions

• Spin-flip scattering proportional to spin accumulation in the copper layer

• For a single nonspin-polarized QW state near the Fermi energy, spin accumulation is

• E0=QW state energy• spin-splitting of chemical

potential• =smearing• Fitted spin-flit conductance agree

with experiment• MR diminishes at same bias of

QW resonancePRL 97, 106605 (2006)

N ∝ arctanΔμ /2 − E0

η+ arctan

Δμ /2 + E0

η

Page 12: Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Conclusions

• Spin-polarized QW states in nanoparticles may be a source of large magnetoresistance, but size distribution and Coulomb charging energy may smear the effect significantly

• Nonspin-polarized QW states can be a significant source of spin-flip scattering

• With fixed resistance in a molecule and fixed spin-flip scattering, maximum magnetoresistance can be achieved by adjusting the contact resistances which are spin-dependent


Recommended