+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Modeling Nearshore Waves for Hurricane Katrina · 2006. 9. 25. · US Army Corps of Engineers...

Modeling Nearshore Waves for Hurricane Katrina · 2006. 9. 25. · US Army Corps of Engineers...

Date post: 28-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
27
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC Modeling Nearshore Waves for Hurricane Katrina Jane McKee Smith US Army Engineer Research & Development Center Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory
Transcript
  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Modeling Nearshore Waves for Hurricane Katrina

    Jane McKee SmithUS Army Engineer Research & Development Center

    Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Outline• Introduction• Modeling Approach• Hurricane Katrina Simulations• Sensitivity Analysis• Summary and Conclusions

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Hurricane KatrinaCat 3 on 27 August 2005 to Cat 5 on 28 AugPeak: 280 km/hr, 902 mbLandfall Louisiana: 29 Aug, Cat 3, 205 km/h, 920mbLandfall Mississippi: Cat 3, 195 km/hrHurricane force winds 190 km from centerOffshore wave heights ~17 m

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    IPETInteragency Performance Evaluation Task ForceEvaluate performance of Louisiana levee

    systemhttps://ipet.wes.army.mil/Review: ASCE and National Research

    CouncilHydrodynamic modeling methodologyCharacterize waves and water levels along

    entire periphery of the hurricane protection system

    Winds, waves, and surge

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Modeling MethodologyWind/Pressure

    Field Generation

    Offshore Wave Modeling

    Circulation Modeling

    Nearshore Wave Modeling

    Local-Scale Wave Modeling

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Wind and Atmospheric Pressure FieldsPrimary input to Wave and Storm Surge ModelingWind fields are blend of measurements and modeling• NOAA HRD H*Wind

    snapshots • Blended to NCEP model

    winds and data using IOKA wind analysis process (OWI)

    Most anemometers close to the storm failed near the peak

    Max wind speeds exceed 51 m/s

    Mark Powell, HRD

    Vince Cardone & Andy Cox, OWI

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Offshore Wave Model -- WAM

    Max Computed Wave Height – 16 m

    Basin – Regional WAM c4.5

    Resolution 0.1 deg, 0.0083 deg

    Wave-storm surge interaction neglected at basin & region level

    WAM-WAVEWATCH III comparisons

    WAM Basin

    Max Wave Height Map, ft

    WAM Regional

    Bob Jensen, CHL

    Barbara Tracy, CHL

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Buoy 42007Buoy 42040

    Wave Height

    Peak Period

    Mean Period

    Wave Dir

    Wind Speed

    Wind Dir

    Max 16.8

    Max 15 sec

    Max 13 sec Max 12 sec

    Max 15 sec

    Max 7 m

    Max 33.4 m/sMax 30.9 m/s

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    ADCIRC – Surge Model1165122 elements598240 nodes

    Joannes Westerink, Notre Dame

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Katrina STWAVE Grids

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    South Louisiana Wave Heights

    Mississippi River Delta

    Metro New Orleans Mississippi River

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    South Louisiana Wave Periods

    Mississippi River Delta

    Metro New Orleans Mississippi River

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Southeast Louisiana Wave Heights

    Chandeleur Islands

    Mississippi River Delta

    Lake Borgne

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Southeast Louisiana Wave Periods

    Chandeleur Islands

    Mississippi River Delta

    Lake Borgne

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Mississippi-Alabama Wave Heights

    Biloxi, MS Mobile, AL

    Mobile Bay

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Mississippi-Alabama Wave Periods

    Biloxi, MS Mobile, AL

    Mobile Bay

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Lake Pontchartrain

    Metro New Orleans

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Lake Pontchartrain Wave Heights

    Metro New Orleans

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Lake Pontchartrain Wave Periods

    Metro New Orleans

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Lake Pontchartraing

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    29.00 29.10 29.20 29.30 29.40 29.50 29.60 29.70 29.80 29.90 30.00

    Date (August 2005, UTC)

    Hmo

    (m)

    Hm0 Meas 22Hm0 Meas 23Hmo Meas 22 (24 DOF)Hmo Meas 23 (24 DOF)STWAVE

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    29.00 29.10 29.20 29.30 29.40 29.50 29.60 29.70 29.80 29.90 30.00

    Date (August 2005, UTC)

    Peak

    Wav

    e Pe

    riod

    (sec

    )

    Tp Meas 22 (24 DOF)Tp Meas 23 (24 DOF)Tp STWAVE

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Sensitivity Analysis• Wind Input

    +/- 5% wind speeds• Bathymetry

    degraded Chandeleurs Islands• Bottom Roughness

    pre- and post-Katrina roughness• Time Dependence

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Wind Sensitivity Wave Height Differences: +5% – Base

    Result: ± 0.3 m near the shoreline

    ± 0.3 to 1.0 m offshore

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Bathymetry Sensitivity Wave Height Differences: Degraded – Base

    Result: Maximum Difference 1.8 m

    near zero difference at the shoreline

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Roughness Sensitivity:Pre-Katrina – Post-Katrina Roughness

    Chandeleur Islands

    Mississippi River Delta

    Lake BorgneResult: 0.3-0.5 m decreased surge with decreased roughness

    0.2 m increase in surge in limited areas

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Sensitivity: Time DependenceTime-Dependent v. Steady-State SWAN

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    29.00 29.10 29.20 29.30 29.40 29.50 29.60 29.70 29.80 29.90 30.00

    Date (August 2005, UTC)

    Hm

    o (m

    )

    Gauge 22 (24 DOF)Gauge 23 (24 DOF)STWAVESteady-State SWANTime-Dependent SWAN

    Time step 1 min

    Steady 99% accuracy (15 iterations)

  • US Army Corpsof Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory - ERDC

    Summary• STWAVE Applied for Hurricane Katrina

    • High resolution, half- and full-plane mode• Interactions with surge critical• Results used to evaluate design/response

    • Results• Katrina wave heights near or exceeded design• Periods in many areas 2-3 times design values• Wave-surge-wetland interaction not simple “rule of thumb”• SHALLOW-WATER MEASUREMENTS NEEDED!

    • Continuing Work• More validation (Katrina, Rita, Camille, Ivan, Betsy, Andrew)• Design studies for Mississippi and Louisiana coasts• FEMA flood mapping


Recommended