Date post: | 15-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Economy & Finance |
Upload: | global-association-of-risk-professionals-garp |
View: | 96 times |
Download: | 0 times |
GARP Webcast Series
February 2016
On24 Tech Tips
• Make sure your speakers are on• Hit F5 any time your console freezes• For a LIVE event you should be hearing music now• Use the “Ask a Question” feature to report issues• Webcast starts at the top of the hour
Modeling Platform for the “Future” Analytical Banker Today
Martim RochaMartim Rocha, Advisory Business Solution Manager, SAS
Martim Rocha is currently an Advisory Business Solution Manager at the Risk and Quantitative Solutions Division at SAS. In this role, he focuses on the topics of stress testing, IFRS9, capital planning and risk and finance integration.
Martim has more than 20 years of experience in business analytics and data management. He has designed and managed projects for banks, insurance firms and other financial services companies in areas such as finance management, risk management, predictive analytics, financial and sales performance, strategy management, and customer analysis and segmentation. In addition, he has taught courses on advanced decision support systems, data warehousing and data mining at the Autonomous University of Lisbon and at the ISCTE Business School.
Before joining SAS, Martim was a partner on the Business Analytics focused consulting firm, Noscitare and worked in financial services companies.
Martim is Post-graduated in Business Administration from Nova SBE and Graduated in Computer Science from ISIG.
Dr. Venkat VeeramaniVenkat Veeramani, PhD, SVP, Head of Quantitative Analytics, Wintrust Financial Corporation
Venkat is an Enterprise Risk Management professional experienced in areas that span from Risk Strategy, Risk Appetite, Credit and Market Risk Management to Financial Modeling. Venkat currently oversees the bank’s risk and financial modeling and quantification efforts.
He is well versed with all areas of Enterprise Risk Management including Risk Identification, Measurement, Mitigation, Management, Validation and Reporting. He has previously worked at Morgan Stanley, Discover Financial Services (Spin-off from Morgan Stanley) and HSBC. Venkat is a published author on articles related to game theory and risk management which were presented at numerous industry and trade conferences at both national and regional levels. Venkat holds a Ph.D. in Ag Economics and an M.S. in Economics from the University of Kentucky.
Agenda• Overview of Landscape – Dr. Venkat Veeramani• Background and Context – Martim Rocha
• Drivers for change and action• Major Challenges• Recent stress-testing survey
• Integrated Risk Platform• The analytical lifecycle• Comprehensive architecture with a modular approach
• Data Management• Model Development & Management• Model Implementation• Consolidation and Reporting
• Conclusions
Landscape of Modeling Platforms and Data Systems
Higher levels of computing power, ease of access to information and innovations by financial disruptor firms are forcing the industry to develop real-time modeling solutions sitting on top of real-time data systems.
Real-time integrated Modeling and Data Systems offers significant benefits.
• Higher levels of efficiency• Holistic view• Comprehensive solutions• Faster decision making capability• Unlocks unknown Risk vs
Reward spectrum• Greater levels of transparency• Cheaper in the long run
Benefits do come with a cost• Requires heavy infrastructure
investment• Requires upgrade to legacy
processes and procedures• Requires resources with
advanced analytical skillsets
Silos Batch Integrated
Real-time Integrated
Mode
ling
Plat
form
s
Data Management Systems
Silos
Batch Integrated
Real-time Integrated
.
.
Modeling Platforms: Are you playing Catch-up?
6
Financial Technology (FinTech) disruptor firms are changing the interactions within and between financial institutions, while the traditional financial institutions are weighed down by legacy systems, processes and regulatory burdens.
Time
• Speed • Advanced Analytics• Personalization
Current
Current trend requires modeling platforms to be able to fluidly access data from different sources and produce comprehensive business solutions in real-time. A few buzzwords are:
• Ease of Use• Customer Engagement• Convenience
• Flexibility• Efficiency• Transparency
Data, Data and More Integrated Data
7
Meeting both Business and Regulatory requirements hinges around the availability of reliable data.
Model predictions are only as good as data.
Regulatory Requirements (i.e., DFAST, CECL, CFBP)
Business Requirements
Integrated Modeling Platforms
Background and context
Drivers for change and actionThe Regulatory push
Modelling Platform
BCBS239 Risk Data
Aggregation and Reporting
Basel III Capital Requirements and Liquidity
Recommendation A4 of
ESRB/2012/2Funding Plans
IFRS9/CECL Expected Credit
Loss
EBA, CCAR, APRA Regulatory
Stress-testing
10
New Requirements / New Challenges
Model-based risk and capital management
Data Collection
New InformationIndividual Account Level Forecasts / HistoricalSegmentation Individual Asset Level
= Massive Amount Data = More Granular Data
Forward Looking Calculations
Financial Impact Increased Measurement complexity Additional Data Collection More Risk Models
= New Analytical Models
Governance
Documentation Governance Change Control Regulatory Capital forecast Model Management
= New Control Framework
Moving from modeling focused on IRB and on model qualification in the statistical sense (building statistically correct atomic models, testing their predictive power, monitoring their performance). Associated with a low number of “risk models” (order of 10-100)
Future emphasis is in impact analysis on full portfolio performance (end measure), be sure that the correct atomic models are in place and get used, speeding the deployment. Future Overall model population can reach 1000 units.
Further ChallengesData discrepancies that require added reconciliation effort
IT systems are organized by departments – each uses it’s own coding, grouping, hierarchies, time reference, …Combined data doesn’t match, added effort for reconciliation and data quality
Cross reporting happens only in very aggregated levels, losing important detail and in many cases hiding problems that could otherwise be addressed pro-actively.
To overcome the difficulties on combining data, reporting is done in very aggregated levels – limits effectiveness
Difficulties on accurately calculate risk adjusted measures at the right level of detail, making decision around which products and which regions to invest almost only based on gut feeling.
The world is flat but each region, demographic group, provided service has its particular characteristics – the devil is in the details as well as the return
Undermine any attempt of creating a framework of predictive analytics due to the lack of historical integrated information.
To anticipate the future you should look into the past, the more detailed you have on the past the best estimate you do on the future
Reduce drastically the number and depth of scenarios analyzed for planning.The cumbersome and manual based processes you have today take too much time for each analysis you do thus limiting the scenarios you analyze
Recent stress-testing survey
• Manage granular level data
• Process large volume of calculations
• Consolidate Scenario Based Data
• Orchestration of firmwide Analysis
• Model Inventory• Model Validation• Model Review
• Data Quality• Data Lineage• Metadata Communication
Managing DataMonitoring
Model and Risk Performance
ImplementationCoordination
Key Areas of Readiness for future
changes in Stress Testing
Stress Testing: A View from the
Trenches, GARP, Sep 2015
For more details, please refer to the
SAS – GARP webinar
Integrated Risk Platform
The analytical lifecycle
DATAPREPARATION
DATAEXPLORATION
BUILDMODEL
VALIDATEMODEL
DEPLOY/ EXECUTE
MODEL
EVALUATE /MONITORRESULTS
Domain ExpertMakes DecisionsEvaluates Processes and ROI
BUSINESSMANAGER
Model ValidationModel DeploymentModel Monitoring Data Preparation
IT SYSTEMS /MANAGEMENT
Data ExplorationData VisualizationReport Creation
BUSINESSANALYST
Exploratory AnalysisDescriptive SegmentationPredictive Modeling
DATA MINER /STATISTICIAN
IDENTIFY ISSUES /
ADJUSTMENTS
POST RESULTS
Comprehensive architecture with a modular approachEnterprise Risk
Governance
Model Development Consolidation and Reporting
Aggregation and Allocation
Results Data Repository
Parameters
External Market Data
Collateral Transactions
GL Data
Modeling Workbench
Inventory of Models
Risk & Finance Data Collection, Quality assurance and Standardization
Rules, Metrics,Dynamic Hierarchies
Stress Testing Data Mart
Model Implementation
Model Management
Data and Model StagingData Validation and Aggregation
Portfolio Data
Data Sourcing
Validation and Governance
Scenario Management and Model Execution
Implementation Platform
Model Specification,Estimation and Calibration Regulatory and Management Reporting
3rd Party Data
Data Management
Enterprise - One centralized place to collect all data, assure quality, standardize, reconcile and distribute
Governance – full control on what data is used for what
Consistency – Prepare data to feed into different risk engines, keep track of data used – One version of the truth
Results Data Repository
Parameters
External Market Data
Collateral Transactions
GL Data
Inventory of Models
Risk & Finance Data Collection, Quality assurance and Standardization
Rules, Metrics,Dynamic Hierarchies
Stress Testing Data Mart
Data and Model StagingData Validation and Aggregation
Portfolio Data
Data Sourcing
3rd Party Data
Comprehensive architecture with a modular approach
Model Development & Management
Enterprise – Use whatever language is convenient for model development but manage all models under the same framework/application
Governance – Model Inventory for enhanced governance on what model is being used with what results, why we have the model, who has developed, who has tested it, is still performant
Consistency – One process for Model development, Model calibration, Model validation, Model approval
Governance
Model Development
Modeling Workbench
Model Management Validation and Governance
Model Specification,Estimation and Calibration
Comprehensive architecture with a modular approach
Model Implementation
Enterprise - One consistent approach to manage scenarios and model execution
Governance – full control on which scenario was used for which run with which data, which model and produce which results
Consistency – Prepare data and scenario to feed into the different risk engines
Performance – Cutting-edge technology on model execution (in-memory, grid parallel processing)
Model Implementation
Scenario Management and Model Execution
Implementation Platform
Comprehensive architecture with a modular approach
Enterprise – One place for aggregation and consolidation of results including workflow to coordinate tasks and people interaction
Governance – Full control on how the results are generated, path from results to model, to data, to scenario
Performance – lower time to deliver, one place for orchestration able to trigger detailed calculation and aggregate results – quick refresh for iterative simulation
Consolidation and Reporting
Consolidation and Reporting
Aggregation and Allocation
Regulatory and Management Reporting
Comprehensive architecture with a modular approach
Conclusions
• Key Functionalities• Model Execution from a
Single Model Inventory • Scenario Management –
Regulatory & Ad hoc• Risk Engine - Multi-horizon
capabilities by scenario at Loan Level
• Value Drivers• Ability to implement the
most advanced modeling suites in the industry
• Reduce the time to develop models and using them in Production
• Simulation Capabilities for stress testing and beyond
Comprehensive architecture with a modular approach
Process to Aggregate and consolidate results
• Key Functionalities• Process orchestration with
status and timeline• Support for regulatory
cycles • Result consolidation,
reconciliation and aggregation
• Report generation • Regulatory and filing views
• Management• Ad-hoc
• Value Drivers• Process efficiency,
transparency • Better governance practices
for regulatory and internal scrutiny
• Leveraging process for Business Purposes and go beyond compliance only
Comprehensive architecture with a modular approach
Q & A
Creating a culture of risk awareness®
Global Association ofRisk Professionals
111 Town Square Place14th FloorJersey City, New Jersey 07310U.S.A.+ 1 201.719.7210
2nd FloorBengal Wing9A Devonshire SquareLondon, EC2M 4YNU.K.+ 44 (0) 20 7397 9630
www.garp.org
© 2015 Global Association of Risk Professionals. All rights reserved.
About GARP | The Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP) is a not-for-profit global membership organization dedicated to preparing professionals and organizations to make better informed risk decisions. Membership represents over 150,000 risk management practitioners and researchers from banks, investment management firms, government agencies, academic institutions, and corporations from more than 195 countries and territories. GARP administers the Financial Risk Manager (FRM®) and the Energy Risk Professional (ERP®) exams; certifications recognized by risk professionals worldwide. GARP also helps advance the role of risk management via comprehensive professional education and training for professionals of all levels. www.garp.org