+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Modeling subsurface iron removal

Modeling subsurface iron removal

Date post: 12-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: eliora
View: 58 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Modeling subsurface iron removal. Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk. Harmen van der Laan. Faculty of Civil Engineering Msc. Water Management Specilization Drinking Water. Content. Subsurface iron removal Objective research Results Conclusions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
31
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie June 13, 2022 1 Modeling subsurface iron removal Geochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk Harmen van der Laan Faculty of Civil Engineering Msc. Water Management Specilization Drinking Water
Transcript
Page 1: Modeling subsurface iron removal

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie

April 21, 2023

1

Modeling subsurface iron removalGeochemical modeling of subsurface aeration at Schuwacht Lekkerkerk

Harmen van der Laan

Faculty of Civil EngineeringMsc. Water ManagementSpecilization Drinking Water

Page 2: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 2

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 3: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 3

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 4: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 4

Subsurface iron removal

O2

front

0

1

inje

cted

wat

er

O2

fro

nt

injected

water

Fe2+

front 0

1

Fe2+

front

Fe2+

front

0

1

0

1

Fe2+

front

inje

cted

wat

er

Injection Extraction

Page 5: Modeling subsurface iron removal

Measured data

5April 21, 2023

Page 6: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 6

Measured data

Development final iron concentration

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

injection - extraction cycles

Fe (

mg/

L)

July 1998 – June 2000 March 2004 – June 2005

Page 7: Modeling subsurface iron removal

‘Original’ Model

7April 21, 2023

V/Vi

Page 8: Modeling subsurface iron removal

Expanded model

8April 21, 2023

main limitation original model

No explanation for the phenomena of the increasing spread of the (iron) front over the successive cycles

Page 9: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 9

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 10: Modeling subsurface iron removal

Objective

The objective of this research project is to• Find a theoretical foundation to explain the

development of the iron front over the successive cycles

• Enhance the existing model to obtain a proper description of the measured iron concentrations

10April 21, 2023

Page 11: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 11

Content

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 12: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 12

Results

I. Goethite / FerrihydriteII. Ion exchange vs. AdsorptionIII.Transport modeling

Page 13: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 13

Goethite vs. Ferrihydrite

FerrihydriteHfo, FeOH3, Fe5HO8·4H2O

Unstable, unstructured Amorphous / Aquaeous Spec. area ≈ 600 m2/g 2 sites / nm2 pHPZC 8.1 Solubility log K = 2 –

4.5

Observed by: KIWA Research

Goethiteα-FeOOH

Stable Crystalline Spec. area ≈ 60 m2/g 2 - 10 sites / nm2 pHPZC 8.7 Solubility log K = -1

Observed by: Mettler (2002)

Page 14: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 14

Surface complexation theory

OHOH

OHOH

OH + / - depends

on pH

Number of sites

Surface area

Fe2

+

Fe2

+

Fe2

+

Page 15: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 15

Site density

Page 16: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 16

Surface characterization

Page 17: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 17

Goethite vs. Ferrihydrite ?

• Variations in site density and surface area only result in small bandwidth

• Differences between Goethite and Ferrihydrite not the main limitation

α-FeOOH

Ferrihydrite

‘solubility’ decreases in time

Page 18: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 18

Results

I. Goethite / FerrihydriteII. Ion exchange vs. AdsorptionIII.Transport modeling

Page 19: Modeling subsurface iron removal

Exchange

April 21, 2023 19

Page 20: Modeling subsurface iron removal

Exchange

April 21, 2023 20

Exchange and adsorption hard to distinguish

Exchange capacity = lumped parameter

Empirical formula

does not give correct output

CEC (meq/kg) = 7 · (% clay) + 35 · (% C)

Page 21: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 21

Results

I. Goethite / FerrihydriteII. Ion exchange vs. AdsorptionIII.Transport modeling

Page 22: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 22

Retardation / Front spreading

Page 23: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 23

Microdispersion Macrodispersivity

Injection well

Page 24: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 24

Dispersion

Page 25: Modeling subsurface iron removal

Stagnant zones

April 21, 2023 25

Page 26: Modeling subsurface iron removal

Stagnant zones

April 21, 2023 26

Page 27: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 27

Results

• Subsurface iron removal• Objective research• Results• Preliminary Conclusions• Next steps & Recommendations

Page 28: Modeling subsurface iron removal

Preliminary Conclusions

Objective is: Theoretical foundation and a better model

I. Many ‘flavors’, but I need too pick oneII. Model starts to describe the correct retardation

mainly because of dispersion / stagnant zones

April 21, 2023 28

Page 29: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 29

Possible explanation

Ferric

iron

I. Kinetics: decrease SI in time / combination Ferrihydrite – Goethite

II. Stagnant zones III. Or:

Biological activity?Complexes? Change groundwater composition?

Page 30: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 30

Next steps & Recommendations

Next steps Tracer in groundwater for dispersion? Implementation stagnant zones Influence conclusions on accumulation Finish model

Recommendations Column experiments:

separate transport model from geochemistry Research Ferrihydrite / Goethite

Page 31: Modeling subsurface iron removal

April 21, 2023 31

Questions?


Recommended