Date post: | 12-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | archibald-wilkins |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Models of Development
How do the initial characteristics of the individual and of the
environment result in the behavior we see?
Typical v. individual development
Effects of experience on development of sound encoding
Spectral resolution development with normal experience
Age
Res
olut
ion
“Qua
lity”
(Q
10)
clicks
Spectral resolution development with abnormal experience
Age
Res
olut
ion
“Qua
lity”
(Q
10)
baby adult baby adult
Sanes and Constantine-Paton (1985)
Effects of experience on localization by barn owls
Reorganization of perceptionC
ue 1
Cue 2
Cue
1
Cue 2
Cue
1
Cue 2
Cue
1
Cue 2
Development of cortical EP in children with CI
Cellular mechanisms of cortical development: Long-term potentiation
LTP is involved in neural plasticity.
LTP is eliminated when cochlear input is eliminated.
Electrical stimulation of cochlea maintains LTP.
People differ, even in perception
How do individual differences arise during development?
Models of development Genes Genes set limits Gene-environment interaction Gene-environment transaction
Genes determine behavior
Genes set the limits
Genes set the landscape
Gene-environment transactions
How can experience change genes?
Genes make proteins
DNA Methylation
•Differentiation•Chromosome inactivation•Transcriptional silencing
•Can be triggered by experience•Can be heritable
Example: Maternal behavior and stress response
“Acquired trait” is heritable
Mechanism, Initial biases, Critical period
•Bad mother demethylates DNA•Genes start out methylated: Bias to be outgoing and good mother•The effect only occurs between P1 and P6 days•Stressed motherstressed babies – adaptive significance
GENES AND ENVIRONMENT CHANGE EACH OTHER
conclusion
Mother nature counts on experience to guide development
Imprinting: Genetic program for behavior?
Species-specific call recognition?
Gottlieb: Embryonic experience crucial to postnatal social behavior
Apparatus for testing postnatal social behavior
Gottlieb: Embryonic experience crucial to postnatal social behavior Devocalized duckling approaches chicken
call as often as maternal duck call Exposing embryo to embryonic duck call
reinstates preference for maternal duck call Exposure to chicken call leads to
preference for chicken call*
*only in ducklings who had tactile contact with other ducklings
Effects of prenatal experience What looks “innate” may result from
experience Dependence on experience as economical
approach Susceptibility to experience allows for
adaptation to environmental conditions
Could prenatal sound exposure be important for human development?
Newborns prefer speech to sine-wave speech
Effect of prenatal exposure to maternal voice
Newborns recognize mom’s voice
∆ Interburst interval
Infa
nt
Newborns’ voice recognition Can discriminate male voices, but don’t
prefer dad Prefer low-pass filtered version of mom’s
voice over full-spectrum version at birth
Do newborns prefer familiar speech?
OR
Why we can have lots of good fun if you wish, with a game that I call UP UP UP with the fish!
?
Newborns prefer familiar speech
Experimental Control
Native language perception by newborns Newborn infants prefer native speech over
nonnative Newborns discriminate native v. nonnative
across prosodic categories Five-month-olds discriminate native v. nonnative
within prosodic category Newborns?
Effects of prenatal exposure to speech Newborn infants respond differentially to
maternal voice Newborn infants have learned something
about the properties of their native speech Long-term effects?
Postnatal experienceStructure facilitates learning
VOT exaggeration
Expanded vowel triangle
Speech learning and social interaction
Speech learning depends on social interaction
Conclusions “Transactions” among genotype,
epigenotype and experience drive development.
Individual differences in any of these factors lead to differences in phenotype.
Many of the principles identified in epigenetic studies of nonhumans seem to apply to humans.