MODULE 5
Scaling Up for Next YearMaking It Work!
1
RtITrainingModules
MODULE 1Getting
Started with RtI
MODULE 2Data Meetings
& Problem Solving
MODULE 3Interventions & Progress Monitoring
MODULE 4Data-Based
Decision Making
MODULE 5Scaling Up
for Next Year
Training Modules
2
Outcomes – Module 5Participants will understand…
Foundations of RtI Federal Law (NCLB, IDEA)State Rules - Rule 6A-6.0331 TAP Activity – Final Word
Format of RtIDistrict Expectations – Manual Activity – Scavenger
HuntProblem Solving Teams
FidelityTier 1, Tier 2, & Tier 3
3
Problem Solving Skills???THE BROKEN ESCALATOR
4
FOUNDATIONS OFRtI
5
Primary CommonalitiesNCLB, IDEA, & FLDOE
1. Accountability
2. Highly Qualified Teachers
3. Effective Instruction
4. Early Interventions
5. Scientific-Based Research Programs
No Child Left Behind
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (2004)
Florida Department of Education PS/RtI
Student Performance
(achievement, graduation))
6
PS/RtI General Education
Interventions
Florida Department of Education Rules7
Must Tier 2 reading interventions occur outside of the 90 minute reading block?
Student Reading Intervention requirements in 6A-6.054 - immediate intensive intervention must be provided for all students who have been identified with a reading deficiency in addition to or as an extension of the 90 minute reading block in a smaller group size setting or one on one.
Rule 6A-6.054, F.A.C. – Highlight
8
Rule 6A-6.0331, F.A.C. – HighlightsGeneral Education Intervention Procedures
Why? – Provide a coordinated system of intervention support in general education.
Who? – Students needing additional support to succeed in the general education environment.
How? – Teams applying a problem solving process to develop and implement coordinated general education intervention procedures.
9
Exceptional Education Eligibility for Students with Specific Learning Disabilities (Rule 6A-6.03018, F.A.C.)
Exceptional Education for Students with Language Impairments and Qualifications and Responsibilities for the Speech-Language Pathologists Providing Language Services (Rule 6A-6.030121, F.A.C.)
Exceptional Student Education Eligibility for Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disabilities(Rule 6A-6.03016, F.A.C.)
10
Your Questions/Concerns – PS/RtI
Is there any way to streamline this process to make it less of a burden?
How often should data be collected and for how long?
How many weeks do I have to implement the intervention?
11
Formal Complaints/Parent Calls
“We have to finish RtI before we can evaluate your child.”
“It takes approximately… (fill in the blank) to go through the process for tier 1 and tier 2. We’ll evaluate him when/if we get to tier 3.”
“We can’t refer her yet – we don’t have enough data points to determine eligibility.”
Now that we do RtI, it takes longer to complete an evaluation.”
12
Generate Your Top 3
Questions
RtI Consensus
Infrastructure Implementation
13
Activity - The Final Word
An activity that combines Reflection, Cooperative Learning,
and Collaborative Discussion
14
PurposeTIPS FROM THE TAP
An in-depth Understanding of the Concepts
mentioned in the
Technical Assistance Paper 2011: General Education Intervention
Procedures15
The Final Word
Read the assigned pages of the Florida DOE TAP on General Education Intervention Procedures. Pages 1-9
Select three ideas that are compelling to you.
Be prepared to talk about why you think one of these is important. 16
Select a facilitator and timekeeper.One person volunteers to begin—
reference place in article, take up to two minutes to talk about that idea.
Moving in clockwise fashion, every other group member, in turn, takes up to one minute to respond to what the speaker had to say.
The Final Word
17
Finally, the opening speaker has one minute to make final comments.
Repeat the above process for the next person.
The Final Word
18
Listen actively.
Be open to what each speaker is saying.
Take notes.
Speak only when it is your turn.
The Final Word
19
First Speaker – 2 minutesPerson to left – 1 minutePerson to left – 1 minuteFirst Speaker – 1 minute for the
“Final Word”Repeat process
The Final Word
20
General Education Interventions
Florida requires districts to attempt to address students’ academic and behavioral challenges through the use of effective and systematic general education interventions and resources
Prevent unnecessary or inappropriate (i.e., inaccurate) “labeling”
“ESE placement” is a funding source, not a solution Should not conflict with good child find practice Assumes that effective instruction is the result of
systematic progress monitoring and data-based decision making
21
Evidence-Based Interventions
Developed through a PS/RtI process that uses student performance data to: Identify area of concern Analyze area of concern Select and implement interventions Monitor intervention effectiveness
Implemented as designed Intensity matched to needOngoing progress monitoring
communicated to parents in understandable format 22
Parent Involvement Opportunity for involvement in PS/RtI
process
Discussion of Student’s responses to intervention Supporting data Intervention modification Future action to address concern
Documentation of parent involvement 23
PS/RtI is…
Begley
Mr.Koch
HarrisSullivan
McMahon
Asner
O’Neill
Every Ed !24
RtI: 4 Priorities
1. Accelerating students at or above
proficiency Gifted Education Establishing benchmarks Enrichment in core instruction
25
RtI: 4 Priorities
2. Prevention: Identify students at-risk for
literacy failure BEFORE they actually fail. Kindergarten screening, intervention and
progress monitoring is key. No excuse for not identifying ALL at-risk
students by November of the kindergarten year.
This strategy prevents the GAP. Managing GAPs is more expensive and
less likely to be successful.26
RtI: 4 Priorities
3. Early Intervention Purpose here is the manage the GAP. Students who are more that 2 years
behind have a 10% chance, or less, or catching up.
Benchmark, progress monitoring data, district-wide assessments are used to identify students that have a gap of 2 years or less.
Students bumping up against the 2 year level receive the most intensive services.
This more costly and requires more specialized instruction/personnel 27
RtI: 4 Priorities
4. Intensive Intervention Reserved for those students who have a
GAP of more than 2 years and the rate of growth to close the GAP is unrealistic. Too much growth—too little time remaining.
Problem-solving is used to develop instructional priorities.
This is truly a case of “you cannot do something different the same way.”
This is the most costly, staff intensive and least likely to result in goal attainment
28
FORMAT OFRtI
29
Use Data Decision Rules to move
students between Tiers of Support
SPECIAL EDUCATION
30
Revisit Intervention – Tier 2 1) Additional cycle through the same skill 2) Smaller Group Size 3) Change intervention skill
Implement a Evidenced-Based Intervention –Tier 2N
onse
nse
Wor
d Fl
uenc
y
IPST targets root cause based on diagnostic data. Forms new Hypothesis and designs new intervention for Tier 3 Services.
Individual Problem Solving Team designs Tier 3 intervention. Collects additional diagnostic information.Mid-year cutoff low risk
Good & Cummings, 200731
Individual Problem Solving Team
Teacher DataTeams
School Based Leadership Team
32
33
34
35
36
Exploring the District RtI
Implementation
Manual 37
FIDELITY OFRtI
38
Show Me the Data!
Remember… if it is not documented
…Then IT DID NOT HAPPEN!39
Documentation of Data: Tier 1
Universal Screening data – Where was student as compared to peers based on the standard your district uses? DRLA Running Records DRMA FAIR
Teacher Documentation Lesson Plans Attendance Criterion Referenced Tests Student Products Parent Contacts
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Data Documentation: Tier 2
Baseline data; determination of baseline data
Aim Line or Goal Intervention selectedProgress monitoring dataComparison with national norms Interventions/FidelityObservations
48
49
Data Documentation: Tier 3
Updated Universal ScreeningUpdated BenchmarksSlope of Improvement Interventions/ Fidelity
DocumentationObservations
50
51