PROCEE

Wo

M

EDINGS O

orkshop par

MOI UNIV

OF STAKEH

rticipants.

VERSITY A

HOLDERSKENYA O

AGSHARE

1 

S WORKSHON 28/02/20

PROJECT

HOP HELD011- 1/3/201

T 

D AT ASIS 11

HOTEL E

 

ELDORET,

,

 

Executive AgShare Pstakeholderenhance exfindings ofin the twosubsectors.discussionsworkshop w

1.

2.

3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

8. 9.

Overall it resolution to industrie

M

Summary Project Stakrs in the ag

xchange of if the Agsharo sub-sector. The workss of issues were:

Farmers’ pmeasures sfacing farmservice. CollaboratiidentificatiRole of smFarmers neFarmers shBottleneckCollaboratiavoid dupliWhole valuResearch-Edemonstrat

was notedof agricultues and also e

MOI UNIV

keholders wgricultural sideas and shre Maize anrs and brainshop was intemerging f

practices dshould be pumers in mai

ion among son.

mall scale traeed to be enlhould be assis in maize aion and coorication and ue chain appExtension-Ftions.

d that multural problemenables rese

VERSITY A

workshop at sector who haring of expnd Dairy subnstorm on tteractive anfrom the pa

do not matut in place tize/dairy su

stakeholders

aders in maizlightened onisted to devand milk mardination is gaps in servproach shouarmer linka

ti-stakeholdems is the wayearchers to d

AGSHARE

2 

Moi Univeincluded faperiences. Mbsector survthe way for

nd involved apers presen

ch recommto facilitate ubsector and

s is needed i

ze/dairy neen the best pr

velop proposarketing shoneeded amo

vice deliveryuld be adoptage should b

er approachy to go sincdraw their re

PROJECT

ersity was haculty, reseaMore specifiveys, isolatinrward for ipresentation

nted. The m

mended praadoption o

d to strengt

in research,

eds to be enractices in msals for acquould be tacklong organizy. ed in resear

be strengthen

h to develoce it enhanceesearch prob

T 

held to faciarchers, studfically the wng challengimproving pns by resour

major issues

actices; it wf technologthen govern

capacity bu

hanced thromaize and dauisition of cled. zations deali

rch and extened through

opment of es relevanceblems from

ilitate interadents, etc. a

work aimed aes faced by performancerce persons

s that emerg

was recommgies, to tacklnment (GOK

uilding and

ough capacitairy. redit.

ing with far

ension. h on-farm tri

teaching me of teachinthe commu

 

action of keand thereforat sharing thstakeholder

e of the twbefore pan

ged from th

mended thle constrainK) extensio

problem

ty building.

rmers to

ials and

materials anng curriculumunities.

ey re he rs

wo el he

at nts on

nd m

 

1. Introd

AgShare P“EconomicCollaboratimarketing number of along the mmodule thalearn in thstakeholdermodule, bustakeholder

2. WORK To

To

To

3. WORK

DAY OTIME 8.00 a.m

9.00 a.m10.00 a

10.30-111.00-1

11.30 a

12.00 a

M

uction

Project at Moc role of priive Mastersand price a

f stakeholdemaize and dat exposes mheory to ther involvemut also to grs in the res

KSHOP OBshare the fin

isolate the m

brainstorm

KSHOP PR

ONE

m-9.00 a.m

m-10.00 a.ma.m-10.30 a.

11.00 a.m 11.30 a.m

a.m-12.00 a.

a.m.-1.00 p.m

MOI UNIV

oi Universitices and apps in Agricuanalysis. Thers who incdairy value masters stude occurrencent was megive back tspective com

BJECTIVEndings of th

main challen

on the way

ROGRAM

MAA

O

m. O.m. A

sTTov

.m ToW

m. P

VERSITY A

ty was initiaproaches to

ultural and Ahe developmcluded studechains. The

dents to theoces in the reant to not to the comm

mmodity val

ES he Agshare M

nges faced b

forward for

MONDAY ACTIVITYArrival and

OPENING

Opening ReAgShare masurvey reporTea Break Technical prof maize brevalue chainTechnical Pof maize libWho gains wPresentation

AGSHARE

3 

ated with tho market anaApplied Ecment of thisents, farmere rationale ooretical conreal worldonly impro

munity in tlue chains.

Maize and D

by key stake

r improving

28TH FEBRY

registration

SESSION

emarks aize Stakehort

resentation eeding in th

resentation eralization iwho loses?n on the Rol

PROJECT

e purpose oalysis” whiconomics (Cs module wrs, faculty, of this approncepts, but a

via use of ove the appterms of ad

Dairy subse

eholders in

g performanc

RUARY 20

n

olders

on the role e maize

on impact in Kenya:

le of

T 

of developinch is the fir

CMAAE) cowas done th

researchersoach was toalso enablesf case studipropriatenesddressing is

ctor surveys

the two sub

ce of the tw

11 FacilitatMr. FranMs. ChriChair : DNyangwProf. M. Ms. Chri

Dr. L. M

Dr. L. M

DAO Ua

ng a modulerst topic in ourse titled rough invol

s and other o not only es them to linies. Additioss and relevssues raised

s

b-sectors

wo subsector

tor ncis Oduor istine UlumDr. P.

weso Odhiambo

istine Ulum

Mose (KARI

Mose(KARI-

asin Gishu

 

e for the topithe RegionAgricultur

lvement of stakeholder

end up with nk what the

onally, multvance of th

d by the ke

rs.

ma

ma

-HQs)

-Hqs)

ic al al a

rs a

ey ti-he ey

 

1.00 p.m2.00 p.m

2.30 p.m

DAY T9.00 a.m

9.30 a.m

10.30-111.00-1

11.45 a

12.30 a

1.00 p.m2.00 p.m

3.30 p.m

4. Works

4.1 Officia

Chair: Dr.

Prof Mark overview oMelinda Gstaff, studeopen educareported thAgShare pand milk sinvolved in

M

m.-2.00pm m. -2.30 p.m

m.-4.00 p.m

TWO m-9.30 a.m.

m-10.30 a.m

11.00 a.m 11.45 a.m

a.m-12.30 a.

a.m.-1.00 p.m

m.-2.00pm m. -3.30 p.m

m.-4.00 p.m

shop presen

al opening r

. Philip Nya

Odhiambo,of the proje

Gates Foundents and farational resouhat Neil Butroject. He e

safety in Ugn developm

MOI UNIV

MvL

m. To

m. PpT

. To

m ToTAs

.m PMD

m. PDvL

m. Pf

m. O

ntations

remarks by

angweso

the Projectect progress

dation aimedrmers. He eurces for altcher heads explained thganda whic

ment of a m

VERSITY A

Ministry of value chainLUNCH BRTechnical prof CGA in tPlenary discpresentationTuesday, MTechnical prof EAGC inTechnical prof KMDP inTEA BREAAgShare Dasurvey reporPresentationMinistry of DevelopmenPresentationDairy Boardvalue chainLUNCH BRPlenary discforward Official clos

y Prof Mark

t team leades. He indicd at developexplained thl disciplinesOER-Afric

hat Makererch emphasizmodule for

AGSHARE

4 

Agriculture

REAK resentation the maize vacussion on dns

MARCH 1, 2resentation

n the maize vresentation n the maize AK airy Stakehort n on the RolLivestock nt in milk van on the Rold(KDB) in t

REAK cussion on w

sing

k Odhiamb

er, welcomeated that A

pment and shat MSU ans. These resca and that re Universitzes safety, mfarmer org

PROJECT

e in maize

on the role alue chain day’s

2011 on the role value chainon the role value chain

olders

le of

alue chain le of Kenyathe milk

way

bo

d participanAgshare is asharing of l

nd OER-Afrsources inclufour Univerty’s mandatmarketing aanization a

T 

MR. Nel

Mr. Den

Irene Tar

n Jane Tum

Mr. Fran

DLPO U

a KDB Ar

DR. P. N

Prof Odh

nts to the woan initiativeiterature in

rica are engude books, rsities in thete is a projeand value aaimed at tra

lson Sumba

is Otieno

rus

m

ncis Oduor

Uasin Gishu

rea Manager

Nyangweso

hiambo

orkshop ande of MSU agriculture

gaged in devpapers and e region are

ect in Dairyaddition. USansforming

 

r

d gave a brieand Bill an for teachinvelopment omanuals. H

e involved iy Value chaiSIU-Africa farmers int

ef nd ng of

He in in is to

 

commerciaMasters inmodule forcourse Agrstudents, fMelinda Gmainly rese 4.2 AgSha

A summary

M

al entreprenen Agriculturr the topic ricultural mfarmers andGates Foundearch in HI

are maize st

y of present

Produthe de

An effor incprodu

MOI UNIV

eurs. Haramral and App“Economic

marketing and other stakedation is invIV/AIDS , fo

takeholders

tations is giv

FINDINGS UNIVERSITY AG

STAKEHOLDEVALUPRES

ULUMA

Febru

INTRO

uction and marketevelopment proce

fficient marketing creased and sustucts as it stimulate

VERSITY A

maya and Mplied Econoc role of prnd price anaeholders whvolved in a food security

s survey rep

ven in slide

FROM THE MOIGSHARE SURVEERS IN THE MAIUE CHAIN.ENTED BY :

A CHRISTINE

uary 2011

ODUCTION: cont

ting are a continuess

system is a pre-reained developmees production

AGSHARE

5 

Moi Universiomics (CMrices and apalysis. This ho providednumber of

y in Africa a

port by Ms

form.

I EY OF

ZE

td

um in

equisite nt of the

PROJECT

ity which arMAAE) prog

pproaches tis module

d case studif developmeand Agricul

s Christine

lack of rur

The majormaize sub low sounrelia pest in poor in marke low pr

T 

re participatgram were to market aI for M. Scies. He furtent activitieltural develo

Uluma

INTRODUCT

ral finance and poorly

r constraints affectb-sector include:oil fertility, able rainfall,nfestation,nfrastructure,eting and policy botrofitability

ting in the Cmandated t

analysis” inc. Level whther noted t

es which incopment in A

TION: contd

developed markets

ting growth of the

ttlenecks and,

 

Collaborativto develop

n the masterhich involvethat Bill anclude health

Africa.

e

ve a

rs ed nd h-

 

M

Maize

Abouannu

The sorganof far

The s

U

m

Targethe m

Data w2010

Respoquest

Separactor fam t tO

MOI UNIV

IN

e is the main stap

ut 1.6 million hectaally.

sector is both technizationally complrming characterizelow productivity an

poor infrastructure

MEstudy was carried the maize surplus

Ugishu Counties) a

maize deficit areas

et population was maize value chain

S

was generated throu

ondents were intervitionnaire. rate questionnaires ws in the maize value armers,maize millers,raders, ransporters, and

Other key informants

VERSITY A

NTRODUCTION

ple food in Kenya

ares are under ma

hnologically and ex due to dynami

ed by:nd low use of farm

e,

ETHODOLOGYout in two regionareas (Trans-Nzoi

and

s (Machackos Coun

all the stakeholdein Kenya

Study design

ugh a survey in Nove

iewed using a structu

were prepared for thchain including:

AGSHARE

6 

aize

c nature

inputs,

s:a and

nty)..

ers in

ember 

ured 

he key 

PROJECT

To comprecommvalue chTo find o

farmers maize vaTo recom

problem

M

The sam36 m

10 t

3 tra

3 m

8 co

The samsystema

Data collecteconomic 

Maize surplUasin‐Gishupurposively 

T 

OBJE

pare and contrast ended practices i

hain by the differenout the constraintsand other stakehoalue chain.mmend possible ss.

METHODOLOG

mple size comprisemaize farmers

traders

ansporters

millers

onsumers

mple was selectedatic random sampl

Study d

ted included biolog

us and deficit areasu, Trans‐Nzoia and m selected. 

CTIVES

best and n the maize nt stakeholders.s faced by older in the

solutions to these

GY: contd

ed of:

d using ling

design

ical and socio‐

s which included; machakos were 

 

 

M

Don

Groprof

Desmearela

c

L

Inadequ

CO

NST

RAIN

T

Thvalfun

Limcouma

Ma

MOI UNIV

Dane using (SPSS) and Micro

ss margin analysis was dofitability of an ideal and a

scriptive statistics  such asasures of central tendencytionships between variab

FIND

0 10 20 30

capital,

rop diseases and pests,

marketing,

Lack of improved inputs

Poor infrastructure,

uate extension services,

land scarcity

labour scarcity

Drought

FARMER’S C

FINDhe performance oflue chain is highlynctioning of the tra

mited transportatiountry limits the effarkets.

any traders don’t s

VERSITY A

ata Analysis soft excels

one to compare level of verage maize farm

s bar charts  percentages y were used to describe ebles.

DINGS: contd

40 50 60 70 80 90 100

PERCENTAGE

CONSTRAINTS

DINGS: contdf the millers in the y dependent on thaders and transpo

on capacity in theficiency of maize

store grain.

AGSHARE

7 

and emerging 

Surplus area%

Deficit area%

he orters.

PROJECT

Com

Def

Comparisoncategory

Farpra

Gross margin Ksh

Maize seed 7Kg

DAP 25K

CAN 10K

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Min

7

2.8

YIEL

D

The strucsignificanlevels.

small-scamarkets t

small-svillage

Decreasmarket o

T 

FINDIN

mparison of farpractic

ficit areas(ha) S

rmersactice

recommended Fp

hs.415 Kshs.4,890 K

g 20Kg 1

Kg 80Kg 5

Kg 80Kg 5

FINDING

Max Average Best Pra

36

19

38

20

7.19

YIELD PER REGION

FINDINGcture of Kenya’s maizntly depending on na

ale farmers have a vathrough which to sel

scale assemblers oplevel

sing importance ofoption for farmers

NGS

rmers and best ces

Surplus areas(ha)

Farmers practice

recommended

Kshs.8,260 Kshs.11,170

11Kg 25Kg

50Kg 150Kg

50Kg 150Kg

GS contd

actise

20

N

YIELD PER REGION Maize surplus

YIELD PER REGION Maize deficit

GS: contdze market change

ational production

ariety of potential l maize.

perating at the

f NCPB as a

 

s

t

 

M

REASEC

SOLU

TIO

N

Maizfollowmaizseve› ca› cro› infr› ex› im› ma› dr

Short-– Stim

• T• E

Long-– Prod

• E• Im

Mosaffecagric

An imaizappthe c

MOI UNIV

FIND

0 10 20 30

GOVERNMENT

NGO/CBOS

FARMERS

CH INSTITUTIONS

FARMER'S

COe farmers in both rwing as the constrae productivity, listere:

apital, , op diseases and perastructure,xtension services,

mproved inputs, , laarketing,rought, soil erosion

Polic

-termmulating productionTargeted fertilizer/seed suppoExpansion of irrigation

termductivity enhancing inve

Expansion of irrigation; roadsmproving access to producti

– Working with private sector farmers

CONCLUS

st of the constraincting the same gocultural productio

nterdisciplinary aze value chain resropriate strategy tconstraints.

VERSITY A

DINGS: contd

40 50 60 70 80 90

PERCENTAGE

S SOLUTIONS

ONCLUSIONregions perceive thaints limiting increaed from the most to

ests,

nd scarcity, labour

and theft.

cy suggestion

ort for short rains season

estmentss & railway infrastructure; R&ivity enhancing inputsr to improve access to seeds an

SION contd…

ts are interrelatedoal of increasing n,

pproach in the cosearch will be an to follow in addres

AGSHARE

8 

SURPLUS%

DEFICIT%

e ased least

scarcity,

ns

&D

nd fertilizers by

……..

d and

ntext of

ssing

PROJECT

The impgrain die

Market cacross in

Spatial and defic

Most rethe sourproblem

Many orequireimp

markreseinpu

signpeop

Peopleneed toconstraintsFarmerssystem ha

T 

FINDINGS: 

portance of maize et is shown to hav

channels for acquncome groups

price margins betcit regions are als

CONCLUSION

spondents view grce of solutions to

ms.of the constraintsgovernment actiorovements in inketing,earch and extensiouts, as prerequificant developmeple themselves.

CONCLUSION

ought to be edufind or initiat

s facing them by ts feel that theas improved.

contd

in urban staple ve declined

uiring maize vary

tween surplus so low.

N contd………..

government as o most of their

s identified wouldon such as:nfrastructure and

onfarmuisites for anynt initiated by the

contd………..

ucated about thete solutions tothemselvesmaize marketing

 

d

d

ye

eo

g

 

Reactio

Q- Mrsdriven e A-Mr. individuextensio Prof. Oservice, exclaim Mr. Chahead orather th

M

ons from au It wa It w

ecol Min

apprproj

It wreso

s. Asha, a extension ap

Mwambezual needs thon package f

Odhiambo: extension o

med that “the

hesereck, Aof Governmhan waiting

MOI UNIV

udience as noted tha

was also notlogical zonenistry of Agroach & pect(NALEP

was reportedorted to dem

farmer - qpproach? Wh

zi, a Minishat need to for each one

Noted thatofficers waie governmen

A Kenya Dment in prov

for farmers

VERSITY A

at about 30%ted that inpues. griculture isprojects sucP) which used that sinc

mand driven questioned hy not come

stry of Agbe express

e of them.

t while the it for the farnt may have

Dairy Boardvision of exs to solicit fo

AGSHARE

9 

% of cerealsut applicatio

s still activech as natioe focal area ce resourcesextension apwhy the me and educa

griculture sed before e

farmer waitrmer to repoe changed th

d official: Extension to for interventi

PROJECT

lost in storaon rates for

ely involveonal agricuapproach s are limitepproach.

ministry of Aate us period

official- Exextension ag

ts for extenort a problemhe approach

Explained tfarmers by ions.

T 

age. r various in

ed in extensulture and

ed the Min

Agriculture dically?

xplained thgents can f

nsion officerm that need

h, but who n

that the privtaking exte

nputs vary w

sion, but uslivestock

nistry of A

switched to

hat each faformulate ta

r to deliver resolving. Hotifies farm

vate sector ension to th

 

with agro-

ses Group extension

Agriculture

o demand

armer has ailor made

extension He further

mers.

has gone he farmers

 

3.3TechO. Mos

Slide 1

Slide 3

M

hnical presee

AG

M

MOI UNIV

entation on

Presen

GSHARE Project S

Moi University:  

FOOD CROP

Role of Ma

in Maize V

JOSEPH A. 

AGSHARE Project St

VERSITY A

n the role of

ntation at

Stakeholders W/S

February 28, 2

PS RESEARCH

ize Breeding

Value Chain

W. OCHIENG

takeholder WorkShop

AGSHARE

10 

f maize bre

Shop

0111

p

2

S

S

PROJECT

eeding in th

Slide 2

Slide 4

T 

he maize val

O

■ FO

■ NU

■ FIN

Value o

Food Crop

Maize

Beans

Cassava

lue chain B

Overarching Is

OOD SECURITY

UTRITIONAL SECU

NANCIAL SECURIT

of Food Crops (natio

Value (Billions of KShs

46.91

18.02

4.30

 

By Dr L.

ssues

URITY

TY

3

onally) in 2008

s)% Contributionto Total Value

44.15

16.96

4.05

4

n

 

Slide 5

Slide 7

Slide 9

M

SHOR

■ Ensure

■ Promot

■ Promot

■ Carry o

■ Do Bul

■ Revital

■ Kenya A

Revita

(Breed

Promo

Empow

• IncAgsusandExt

• Pu& Nall 

MOI UNIV

INTERV

Political

Conducive 

Technical 

RT-TERM INITIATIVES TO MITI

e “Njaa Marufuku Kenya (NMK

te “Kilimo Bora” to ensure G

te Water Harvesting Techniqu

out Food Production through

k Fertilizer procurement;

lization of Agricultural Mecha

Agricultural Productivity and

alized Research: Genomics,

ding for HPR, VAD traits and a

otion of Valued-added Drylan

werment of Farmer (Common

Strategic In

creasing Budgetaryricultural Sector (hstain continuous ted transfer, in ordertension activities to

tting in place an alNutrition Policy to stakeholders in Fo

VERSITY A

VENTIONS

l Goodwill

GoK Policies

Strategizing

IGATE FOOD INSECURITY SI

K)” programme is successful

Good Agronomic Practices (G

ues for Crop Production.

h Irrigated Agriculture Project

anization Services.

Agribusiness Project (KAPA

Proteinomics, and Gene Targ

against undesirable intractab

d Maize Varieties for the ASA

n Interest Groups).

nterventions

y Allocation to the hence MoA & KARI)echnology developmr to improve Reseao the clients;

l‐inclusive Food Seensure full particip

ood Security activiti

oc

AGSHARE

11 

5

6

ITUATION

l.

GAPs).

ts in ASALs

AP):-

geting:

ble traits);

ALs;

) to ment rch and 

curity  pation of ies;

7

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 6

Slide 8

Slide 10

T 

Str

● Expansiohold more

● Investme

Rehabilita

1,000,000

Diver

●Making gcrop entesuch as Spotato, areduce th

● Pursuing Marketindiversity harvest s

Othe

● Embracing whereby prmarkets an

● Investing min rural aretransportatredistributiareas and tshortages.

rategic Interve

on of Strategic Graine Maize Grain stoc

nt in irrigation in A

ation of irrigation s

0 Hectares (Vision 2

rsification of F

reater efforts in diverprises (drought toSorghum, Millets, Cand NERICA (uplandhe pressure on mai

an open Regional ng Policy to tap on tin food types, suppseasons. 

er Intervention 

market oriented prroducts are targetend surplus food sold

more in infrastructuas (by GoK) in ordetion costs and enhaion of food from suthereby avoid geog

 

entions

n Reserve   to ks;

ASALs:

chemes to

2030).

8

Foodstuffs

versification of olerant crops, Cassava, Sweet‐d Rice) in order to ize as a food crop;

Cross Border  the Regional ply and varying 

9

Strategies

roduction ed for niche d for incomes;

ural development er to reduce ance urplus to deficit graphical 

10

 

Slide 11

Slide 13

Slide 15

M

1 SO

Land (T

Enviro

Water P

ASDS (

Food S

Promo

Promo

Implem

3

STRATEINTERV

RevitalizeService (A

Revitalize

Invigorate

Empower

5 INT

IN

NRM

Cons

Wate

BulkFerti

MOI UNIV

OME INTERVENTPL

STRATEGICINTERVENTION

Tenure) Policy

n. Conservatn.

Policy

(Policy doc)

Security and Nutritional Policy

ote Kilimo Plus

ote Kilimo Biashara

ment Irrigated Agriculture

INTERVENTION STR

EGICVENTION

e Agricultural Mechanization AMS)

ed Research under KARI

ed Agric, / Extension Service

r Farmers

TERVENTION STRATEG

STRATEGICNTERVENTION

M: Land & Water

servation Agric

er Harvesting

k Procurement of ilizers

VERSITY A

TION STRATEGILACE

TARGETINGPOLICY ISSUE

Ministry of Lands; All Kenyan

Ministry of Environment; All

Ministry of Water & Irrigation

ASCU (Ministry of Agricultur

ASCU (Ministry of Agricultur

NAAIAP: 121,000 farmers

NAAIAP: 100,000 farmers

ASAL Areas

RATEGIES (Summar

TARGETINGINSTITITIONAL ISSUE

23 AMS stations, 10 ATDCs:

(85 tractors, 10 bull-dozers)

Critical Research areas

NALEP: 1,200,000 farmers

KAPAP: Farmers in 20 districts

GIES (Summary) cont

TARGETINTECHNICAL ISS

Farmers in Fragile Environment

Farmers in Specific l

145 water pans

and 200 micro-dams

1,240 farmers under Fertilizer Grant Proje

AGSHARE

12 

11

ES IN

GES

ns

Kenyans

n

re, etc.)

re, etc.)

ry)

12

ES

’d

13

NGSUES

ocation

2 KR ect

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 12

Slide 14

Slide 16

T 

has co

MA

Goal of

Contributi

developing

associated

technolog

food and n

Objec

1. To develop

2.  To develop options for

3.  To develop 

4. To develop

storage, pr

5.  To contribut

varieties in

6. To foster te

and interna

In Kenya

FOOD Shorta

ome to be synony

AIZE Shortage  ≡

f Maize Breedin

ion to KARI’s effo

g MAIZE varietie

d crop production

ies required to ad

nutritional securi

ctives of maize

p (breed) novel food

crop husbandry recr crop production;

crop protection me

p post‐harvest techn

rocessing and utiliza

te to the promotion

n order to catalyze 

echnical linkages: n

ational for collabor

 

age

ymous with

HUNGER

14

ng Programme

ort in

s and the

n

ddress

ity

15

e breeding

d crop varieties;

commendation 

ethods/options;

nologies:

ation;

n of new crop

adoption;

ational, regional

ative research.16

 

Slide 17

Slide 19

Slide 21

M

7 Plant B

► Screen

► Screen

► Seekinthoug

► Infusin

► Incorp

[ to en

►Availin

crop v

9 ►Dev

► Stab

►Devpest

►Dev

► Dev

►Dev

►Dev

quaand 

1

Stat

Hig

Tota

Tota

From

Ave

On-

Gro

Pop

MOI UNIV

General Activit

Breeding (Variety D

ning new introduction

ning local landraces fo

ng maximum genetic pgh hybrid plant breedi

ng HPR into potential 

porating pre‐harvest va

nhance probability of v

ng to farmers alternati

varieties for various ag

Specific Plant Br

velop high yielding f

bilize yields of food 

velop resistance to tts (insects and non‐

velop tolerance to d

velop tolerance to a

velop select against 

velop value added v

lities (high lysine, vbaking qualities (fo

NATIONAL M

tus

h per capita consumpti

al land area under maiz

al Production

m small-scale farmers

erage on-farm yields

-station yields

wth rate in production

pulation growth

VERSITY A

ties and Purpos

Development):

ns for adaptation;

or specialty traits;

potential of crop varieng (where applicable)

crop plants;

alue added traits: ……

variety adoption ] ;

ive choices of food

gro‐ecologies / uses.

reeding Activities

food crop varieties;

crop varieties;

the major diseases ‐arthropod);

drought and low N;

acid soils (Al toxicity

CNP (cassava);

varieties: nutritiona

vitamins, minerals), or wheat).

MAIZE STATISTI

Major staple

ion >125 kg

ze 1.5 Million he

2.3 Million to

70-80%

1.5 tons/ha

5-8 tons/ha

2.0%

>3.0%

AGSHARE

13 

se

ties);

.

17

s:‐

and 

y);

l

milling 

18

ICS

e food

ectares

ons

19

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 18

Slide 20

Slide 22

T 

K

N

Value C

Based o

KARI’s New Pe

MTP‐IV

(leading to

New Strategic

Chain Approach

on KARI’s New S

 

destal

o)

c Plan

20

 to Research

21Strategic Plan

22

 

Slide 23

Slide 25

Slide 27

M

3 Cha

Altitude (me

Annual Rainf

Growing seas

Maize area (

Maize area (%

Potential Yie

Farmer Yield

Yield gap (T/

Adoption rat

5 C

.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Area (‘0

Prodn (

Res. Yie

Farmer

Yield G

7

Low So

Striga

MA

Nutrie

MOI UNIV

aracteristics of Maiz

Kenyan

Highlands Mid-Alt M

etres a.s.l.) >1800 1400-180

fall (mm) >1800 1000-180

son (days) 180 170

‘000 Ha) 307 461

%) 30 36

eld (T/Ha) 6.7 5.2

d (T/Ha) 2.0 0.7

/Ha) 4.7 4.5

tes (%) 80 50

Causes of Maize Yie

Coast      M

Lo‐Int     M

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

000 Ha) 22.2 217.7  

(‘000 Tons) 53.0

eld (T/Ha) 3.3         

r Yield (T/Ha) 1.0         

Gap (T/Ha) 2.3         

oil Fertility

Foliar D

a weed

AJOR CAUSES OF

Gray Leaf S

ent Deficit

VERSITY A

ze growing Zones in K

Moist Mid-alt

Mid-alt. Transition Dry

00 1400-1800 1200-1600 900-1800

00 800-1200 <800 400-

120 100 90

118 118 11

10 10 10

3.7 4.3 2.

1.1 1.2 0.

2.6 3.1 2.

45 35 26

eld Gap in various A

Mid‐Altitude  Transitnl.  

MA‐E  MA‐Int   Med‐Late   

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

116.8      111.0  720.

238.0  232.0   1,234.0

   2.7      3.7  5.2 6.7

   0.5      1.1 0.7 2.0

   2.2      2.6 4.5 4.7

Moist

Diseases Insect

MAIZE YIELD LO

Spot Disease

Dr

AGSHARE

14 

Kenya

Coastal

Lowlands

- <900

-800 400-1400

0 120

8 33

0 4

.7 3.3

.5 1.0

.2 2.3

6 16

23

AEZs

Hi‐Alt

Late 

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

0

910.0

7

0

7

24

25

ture stress

t Pests

OSSES

rought

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 24

Slide 26

Slide 28

T 

With the fotake a strresearch 

1. Basic Reseresearch 

2. Strategicresearch 

3. Applied Rneeds/de

4.  Outreach 

Food

B

ST

A

Technology D

‘push’

Research Pro

Seed System

Info. System( Feedback )

KARI’s Posit

orgoing scenario in rategic position in itagenda to delve m

earch for cutting‐ed(Universities and IA

 Research to undermandate (local/oth

Research in order toemands (local partn

to answer to client

d Crops Program

BASIC RESEARCH (BI

TRATEGIC RES

ADAPTIVE RESEARC

Pivot to MPV

Delivery, Variety Pro

and Adoption 

” heave-ho ”

▲

omotion/Adoption P

 

tion

mind, KARI has to ts scientific 

more into:‐

dge scientific ARCs);

rpin its core   her partners);

o meet client  ners);

t demands.26

mme Set‐up 

IOTECH)

EARCH

H (OFR)

27

VC ?

motion

28

‘pull’

Production Marketi

Processing

C o n s u m p t i o n

ng

n

 

Slide 29

Slide 31

Slide 33

M

9 Recent

Ma

KH600-14E

H614D (Co

Ha under G

KH500-43A

H513 (Com

Ha under M

GAF-4 (Str

H511 (Com

Ha for Strig

‘

1

Gu

3 M

MOI UNIV

tly Developed Maize Varieunde

aize Variety Yield (T/Ha)

E (GLS-resistant) 7.0

ommercial Check) 6.3

GLS maize

A (MSV-resistant) 5.5

mmercial Check) 4.3

MSV maize

riga-resistant) 3.4

mmercial Check) 2.4

ga maize -----

RESEARCH INSTRA

uided by Crop

In the Plan

Maize Density

VERSITY A

eties’ Performance againsr Stress

Disease / Pest Sco

GLS (0.5-5.0)

MSV(0.5-5.0)

1.97 -----

2.15 -----

20,000

----- 1.00

----- 3.50

120,000

----- -----

----- -----

----- -----

NTERVENTION ATEGIES

p Suitability M

ning Process

y Map of Kenya

AGSHARE

15 

st Checks 

ore

Striga (0.5-5.0)

-----

-----

-----

-----

2.50

4.50

20,00029

aps

30

31

a

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 30

Slide 32

Slide 34

T 

Ma

Grain Basket(Acid Soils)

Western KenyaStriga weed& Poor Soils

1. Increasing g

2. Tapping that

2.1  Practicin

2.2  Protectin

2.3  Reducing

3. Promoting t

Crop Variety

4. Conducting (Milling, Bak

Qualities to e

aize Suitabilit

Kenya

R‐4‐D Aimsenetic potential of 

t potential thru:‐

ng GAPs (Crop Man

ng the Field Crop fro

g Post‐harvest (Stor

he improved techn

y and Production op

Pre‐ and Post‐harveking, Nutritional, Ta

enhance marketabi

 

32

33

ty Map

Central Kenya

(MSV & GLS disease

Coastal Landraces

(Loose Sandy Soils)

s at:Crop Plants;

agement)

om Pests

rage) losses;

ologies:

ptions (GAPs);

est Value  Additionste, ..)

ility.34

es)

s

)

n

 

Slide 35

Slide 37

Slide 39

M

5 Pro

1. Biotec

2. BreedD

3. GAPs►

►

4. Crop H

7 Maiz

9 Go

MOI UNIV

oductivity Enhance

ch:   Functional GenomGene Targeting –

ding: Marker Assisted BDoubled Haploid Bree

Host‐Plant Resis(Crop Management) ►Conservation AgricultAdvising on Farming aHealth: IPM on Field C

Reduce StoraTackle Aflatox

The Epicentre of a Brthe Pollination / Sele

ze Breeding Progr

Hand Pollina

ood Agronomic

Practicing GAP is essent

Application of GAP requ

VERSITY A

ement & Value Add

mics, Proteinomics and– VAD & Intractable TrBreeding – reduce timding – reduce timestance (HPR) Breeding► e.g. Multiple Croppiture (Minimum Tillageas a BusinessCrops ‐ Diseases & Pesage Losses ‐ LGB, weevxin Problem (thru’ IPM

reeding Programme is ection (Maize) Nursery

ramme & Breeding

ation in Progress

c Practices (GA

tial to close the Yield gap;

ires Access to Capital.

AGSHARE

16 

dition

d raitsme

g ing:e)

stsvilsM)

35

36

g Plans

37

APs)

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 36

Slide 38

Slide 40

T 

HIGH M

From

For

On

PromResearchers co

Good A

Mrs. Walela -

MAIZE CROP PRO

the Grain Baske

National Food

n‐farm Demon

motion: ‘Seeing is onsult with Farmers at a fa

Agronomic Pra

- happy with performance

 

ODUCTIVITY

38et of Kenya

Security

nstration

39

Believing’arm in Western Kenya

actice (GAP)

40of her crop in Kimilili

 

Slide 41

Slide 42

Comme I

yb

A

M

1

► Br

► Us

► Di

for 

2

ents on roleIt was notedyear while Kbreeding peA number o

Do you

Are you

Does KA

What do

What do

What is

MOI UNIV

Missin

roadening of Gen

sing Nano‐techno

iversification of P

Ecosystem, User

With these

KENYA  CATIDE OF

If only theIMPLEM

e of maize bd that FAO eKenya consuer farmer retof questions

recommend

u comfortabl

ARI trade in

o you do to

oes KARI d

the position

VERSITY A

ng Links 

netic Base

ology

Plant breeding ou

r System

e Strategies 

AN STEM THE F HUNGER

ey were fullyMENTED

breeding inestimates thumption aveturns must awere raised

d phasing ou

le with tech

n products o

new varietie

do about qua

n of KARI o

AGSHARE

17 

utputs 

41

42

S

n the maize hat 108 kg oerage is 125also be consd on New se

ut of old see

hnology / inf

of research?

es legally?

ality of seed

on GMOs?

PROJECT

Slide 43

value chainof maize sho5kg. It was aidered.

eed varieties

ed variety?

formation fl

ds?

T 

are Requ

n ould be consalso noted th

s adoption a

low from KA

PARTNERSH

uired in R-4-D

sumed per phat economi

as follows:

ARI to farm

 

HIPS

43

and Progres

person per ics of

mers?

ss

 

Respon H

mbpfcpr

4.3 Tech

lose

M

nses by Dr. MHe noted thmore depenbenefits of npromoted alfarm researcompanies products arregulates se

hnical Press? By Dr L

Imp

AG

Faan

Thse

MOI UNIV

Mose hat Sources nding on thnew varietielongside oldrch (R-E-F)(outreach a

re public geed quality in

sentation onL. O. Mose

pact of market land

Dr. Lawre

GSHARE WORKSHOP28th Feb-1s

Govt thru’ NCPB gu

armers stable prices andn organized outlet.

he pan-territorial, pan-easonal prices

VERSITY A

of maize che region. es. On varied ones. He s) and explaand partnergoods and n the countr

n impact of

iberalization: gad losers By

ence O. Mose

P, Moi University, Eldst March 2011

uaranteed

d

AGSHARE

18 

consumptionHe reporte

etal adoptiostressed thatained that rship …….)

Kenya plary.

f maize libe

1

ainers

doret

5

PROJECT

n ratio figued that econn he suggest informatioKARI seed). He, in adant health

eralization i

T 

ures vary bunomic figusted that newon gap can bd unit markddition, eminspectorate

in Kenya: W

Outline

Why maize ma Chronology of The study on “

Justification Objectives Methodolog Results & D

Beyond marke Challenges Opportuniti

Why M

Contribution to e Employment Food (consum Income Area under m

Maize-livestock in

Kenya: Net impo

Shortage of maiz

ut generallyures are avaw varieties be tackled thkets seed w

mphasized the service (

Who gains

e of Presentation

arket liberalizationf maize market liberaliza“impacts of maize markn

gyDiscussionet liberalization

ies

Maize?

economy

mption..98kg/person/year)

maize

nteractions

rter of maize.

ze = Famine in Kenya

 

y some eat ailable on should be hrough on with other hat KARI (KEPHIS)

who

2

ationket liberalization”

3

 

M

By lawere

The1988(CSR

The C Ru NC Pri

Until NCPB

Proan

Propri

Protim

Gomi

Lo

Goex

Lo

MOI UNIV

Chronology of maiz

ate 1980s the parastataa burden to the exche

process of liberalizingunder the Cereals

P)

CSRP falls into three areules governing maize tradingCPB cost reduction; cing policy.

Why marketing Boa

late 1980s agricultural B) were state controlled

otect maize producers from d provide reliable outlets for

otect consumers from unaccces

omote food security throughmes within the country.

Implications of Gov

overnment bail-outs of ismanagement (inefficie

ong delays in payments

overnment input subsidxchequer

ow farm productivity pe

VERSITY A

ze market liberalizat

als - ineffective, inefficequer

the market was initiaSector Reform Prog

eas:g and movement;

ards?

commodity markets (e mainly to:

unacceptably low or unstabr sale

ceptably high or unstable co

h assurance of maize availab

vernment guarantee

NCPB increased due to encies)

for deliveries made to

ies became a burden to

rsisted.

AGSHARE

19 

8

tion

cient &

ated inramme

4

e.g.

ble prices,

onsumer

bility at all

6

es

gross

NCPB

o the

PROJECT

T 

Need for (Obje

Increasedfarmers

Increased(as sellers

increasedmaize ma

Broad O

Broad Objec Assess t

traders &

Research qu maize m do priva do sma

incentive has m

commerin maize

Chron

Maize move1990s

In early 199 In 1996, the

Corporation commerciali

The prevailinpolicy excepstabilization as food reliegovernment

ectives) of maize ma

d specialization in m

d market participatiors of maize and buyed private participationarketing

Objective/Resear

ctivethe impact of liberalisa& farmers

uestionsmarket connected througate traders exploit farmell-scale farming housees?

market liberalisationrcialisation, crop diversie markets?

nology of mz mark

ment restrictions we

95 maize marketing we NCPB was exempteAct and its activitieszed. ng market trends dept when the board is

function or any othef distribution on beht.

 

7

arketing liberalizatio

maize production by

on by producers ers of inputs)on in input-output

rch Questions

ation policy measures o

gh price?ers?eholds respond to pric

affected householdfication and participatio

9

ket liberalization

ere lifted in early

was fully liberalizeded from the State s were

etermine NCPB pricins carrying out markeer social function suhalf of the

n

on

ce

ds’on

ng et uch

 

M

10 Yelinger We

Coshi

Follow(unkn

Prim

Prim

Sec

MOI UNIV

Statement of the P

ears after maize marketredere the objectives achieved?

ould there be express gainersift?

wing sections respond tnown impacts of market

Data Types & Sou

mary Data : Household MDB Household Survey of Follow-up Household Surv

mary Data : Traders’ S 169 maize & 122 fertilizer 119 seed traders Survey conducted -Dec 20

condary Data Monthly wholesale maize Fertilizer & maize World a

Study Area

VERSITY A

Problem

t liberalization questions

? If yes, to what extent? If N

s and losers to this market P

to some of these concet liberalization)

urces

ds’ Surveysf 161 households (1992)vey of 1992 households (200

Surveytraders

003 & June 2004

prices (1992-2004)nd domestic prices (1980-20

AGSHARE

20 

10

s

No, why?

Policy

rns

03).

003)

12

PROJECT

T 

SAMPL

Sampling pro

Randomly selectclimatic zonatisurvey1992)

Data collecti

Highlig

Maize wholesaby price but treareas.

Maize farmers

Both commercincreased with m

Analyti

Maize markets Cointegration

Do traders exp Structure-Co

Farmer respon Error correct

Impact on HHparticipation Double differ

LING PROCEDURE

ocedure: (Multistage)

cted HHs from stratified tions, population density

ion: Survey– 161 house

ghts of major findi

ale markets in major townd not known in marke

are responsive to price

cialization (as expected)market liberalization (un

ical approaches

s connected through pricon analysis

ploit farmers?onduct-Performance

nse to price incentivestion model

H commercialization, di

erencing & Descriptive statist

 

& DATA

d random sample based ty and farm size (MDB

eholds (1992 and 2004)

ings cont’d

wns are well connectedets located in remote

e incentives

) and crop diversificationexpected)

ce

iversification and marke

tics

on

)

n

et

 

M

Com N

Incrcons M

ra(t

Trad C N

Lose Go

Fa

Gain Pr Go

ins Fa

M Co

MOI UNIV

Highlights of majo

mmodity markets are paNCPB still actively involved in

reased number of tradestrained. Maize traders lack essentials ates for borrowed capital; latargeting and even what to

ders are competitive buCompared with farmers, tradNo evidence of traders explo

Preliminary effects

ersovernment Reduced share of mar

reduced tax from mz darmers No interlocked credit t No guaranteed price fo Farmers in remote are Farmers in remote are

deliveries to middleme High year to year price

difficult

Preliminary effects

nersrivate traders -- Increovernment-- No lostitutionsarmers

Increased input availabilityWider choice of seed varietIncreased product marketi

illers -- Cheaper maizeonsumers -- Cheaper m

VERSITY A

or findings

artially liberalizedn mz marketing

rs after market liberaliz

for trade (storage; face higack necessary market informstore)

t non-exploitativeders have better market infoiting farmers adduced from

: gainers & losers

rket revenue from NCPBdeliveries to NCPB

transactionsfor maize producedeas pay more for inputs eas receive less for maizence variabililty makes farm

: gainers & losers

eased commodity markeonger bailing out

y (shorter km to markets)etiesing outlets

e sourcesmaize

AGSHARE

21 

zation but

h interest mation

rmationdata

20

B due to

s ize

m planning

19

et shareloss-making

PROJECT

T 

Prelim

Increased partsector In input mark In output ma

Reduced Gove

Improved mar

Increased dive(consumers ladysfunctional

Effects

Increased inte

NCPB still Price Maize quali

and relaxed Long delays

inary effects of mark

ticipation of private

ketsrkets

ernment Revenues

rket integration

ersification acking confidence in food markets)

s: Two decades later

er-seasonal price variab

e Leaderity (stringent) standardsd during shortages.s persist for maize deliv

 

18

ket lib

Large trader

25

22

r cont’d

ility (bad for planning)

s maintained during glu

vered to NCPB

ut

 

ReactioProf. Oclear. Htraders indicateargued tahead topotentiawho delthe 1970Associasend kidof outpufarmers

Dr. Ochdifferenthe costthat devplayers.farmers

M

Poor amids

Nono

On-ofmark

Cob-w

W

Challe Big

cas

Hocasfor

Roto asy

Hocomma

ons on liberOdhiambo nHe requested

increased bed that eventhat could do note that al areas deselay payment0s compare

ation and cods to schoolut. It was aget higher o

huodho repntiation resut of productiveloped cou He furtherdepending

MOI UNIV

Effects: Two decad

output market integratst plenty in North Rift c

o clear incentives for private t panacea– Holistic approac

ff use of input subsidiesket lib)

web price behaviour (su

Way Forward: Challe

engesg Yield Gap? How do we impse in point)

ow do we improve maize mases of famine in parts of Kenr their produce?

ole of private sector still dismprivate sector often viewed ymmetries)?

ow do we encourage farmersmparative advantage in? Faarkets and each of them wa

ralization ofnoted that thd the presenbut compet

n though wedid be the ca

small scaleerve higher t and KARI

ed to the noould purchal on time sinalso noted toutput.

ported that ulting in incrion has gonuntries still r noted thaton conditio

VERSITY A

des later

ion (famine in Turkana case in point)

sector to invest in these arech needed)

s (contrary to expectati

urplus followed by short

enges & Opportuniti

prove land productivity (with

arket integration? – Avoid scnya with others without a cl

mal. How do we improve farmas exploiters (partly due to

s to engage in crops they harmers have no faith in dysfunts to grow their own food i

f grain subhe effects o

nter to explatition couldelfare was nase of cost be farmers arprices. He a

I /Seed comow. They usase new tracnce the costthat Trainin

liberalizatioreased effic

ne up mentiosubsidize

t liberalizatons put in pla

AGSHARE

22 

21

and NEP-

eas (Mkt lib

ons of

tages)

23

ies

h maize as a

cenarios of ear market

mer attitudes information

ave unctional food i.e. maize

sector of maize libain the posid leave themnot capturedbeing highere poor butargued furth

mpanies. It wsed to acquictors. One ot of farmingng and Visi

on increaseiency and a

oning the catheir farmetion has alsace for liber

PROJECT

beralization ition of his m worse o

d, competitioer than returt efficient, bher that farm

was noted alsire cheaper of the farmeg is higher thit extension

ed more plaa decrease inase of chemiers and attriso affected ration of ma

T 

Way Forcont’d

Opportunities

Vision 2030 Irrigation?

land to be Fertilizer P

efficiency? Value Add

etc etc)

High Domesti

Versatile priva

on traders study. He n

off without on among mrn from maibut wonderemers have toso that farmimports thrers reportedhan income

n approach

ayers in then consumer icals and feibuted it tothe efficien

aize.

rward: Challenges &

? Water harvesting and use e put under irrigationPrice Reduction thru’ (fertiliz?, fertilizer subsidies (Highedition (Diversification of ma

ic and Regional Demand for

ate sector emerged (comme

and millersnoted that sm

support. Hmillers is heize farming?ed if farmeo contend w

mers were berough Kenyd that farmes generated in those da

e market anprices. He rtilizers. He

o the capacncy of inpu

 

24

& Opportunities

of dams (vision 2030) –mor

zer plant?, fertilizer use r taxes!!!)ize products – oil, animal fe

r Maize

ercial banks, IT, transporters

s were not mall scale

He further ealthy. He ? He went rs in high

with NCPB etter off in a Farmers ers cannot from sale

ays helped

nd product noted that

e regretted ity of the

uts use by

re

eeds

s)

 

4.4 PresAgr

The minservices1. Mar2. War3. Qua4. Food5. Mec6. Fert7. Prom8. Post

He also allocatio

Reactio

One of tthat the applicat

Technic

M

sentation oriculture Ofnistry of Ags on the follorket informare house recality regulatid security ( chanization tilizer subsidmotion of agt harvest ma

noted that ton.

on to presen

the participagross marg

tion is faced

cal presenta

S

MOI UNIV

n the Role fficial, UAS

griculture ofowing: ation ceipt systemion of seed afood produ– calibratiodies gricultural canagement p

they face a n

ntation

ants questiogin calculatd by the prob

ation on th

Strengthening thHolder Farmers

VERSITY A

of MinistrySIN GISHUfficial report

m and other in

uction, SGR)n of planter

credit practices – c

number of c

oned the sustion was bablem of acid

e role of CG

he Capacity of Sms to Access Mark

Presentation made at AsEldoret “AGSHARE ProWorkshop” on 28th Febr2011

By: Nelson Sumba

AGSHARE

23 

y of AgricuU ted that the m

nputs ) rs

cereal banks

challenges s

stainability osed on 25 bdic of soils.

GA in the m

mall kets

sis Hotel oject ruary

PROJECT

lture in ma

ministry’s r

s

uch as low

of subsidiesbags / acre.

maize value

T 

aize market

roles include

staff numbe

s. The Minis It was also

e chain By N

5

Objec

EstabAssoc

Facilitcereal

Underimprovenviro

ting by Dist

e giving adv

ers and budg

stry official o noted that

Nelson Sum

ctives

lish and strengthen ciations (SHAs) in th

tate linkage to suppols enterprise develop

rtake advocacy activve enabling policy a

onment in the cereal

 

trict

visory

getary

explained t fertilizer

mba

Smallholder e project area;

ort services for pment; and,

vity in order and regulatory s sub-sector.

 

Slide 3

Slide 4

M

2

W

3

Ge

CGco

8

A

MOI UNIV

Who is CGA?

National member base

Incorporated in the yea

Membership is over 20large, medium & small-

CGA, however reachesindirectly, > 95% being

Associate membershipmachinery, Financial in

CGA intervenes in the

eographical Foc

1. Nakuru

2. Narok

3. Bomet

4. Kisii

5. Nandi

6. Uasin Gishu

GA operates in over 10 ounties in Kenya includi

Greater integration of Scereals value chain

Reduced post-harvest

Reduced transaction c

Increased smallholder facilities

Increased smallholder accurate market inform

Improved trade linkageprocessors and food a

Anticipated Imp

VERSITY A

d, cereal farmers’ organ

ar 2000

,000 farming household-scale farmers

s over 500,000 farmers small scale

p (48) i.e. seed, agro-chnstitutions & insurance f

entire grain value chain

us

7. Trans Nzoia

8. Bungoma

9. Kakamega

10. Mount Keny(Meru & La

major cereal producingng:

Smallholder farmers int

losses

costs

farmers access to cred

farmers access to timemation

e between SHA and traaid agencies e.g. WFP P

pact

AGSHARE

24 

nization

ds – for

emical, firms

n

a

ya region ikipia)

g

to the

dit

ely and

ders, P4P

PROJECT

T 

4

CGA’s A

6

Mobilize Associati

Conduct Assessm

Conduct

Facilitatemillers &

Dialogueinstitutionbodies th

Major A

7

Major e

At leasttotal of 9

NumberWFP P4

90,720 transact

96 SHAHandlin

Areas of Cove

Farmers into groups (Sions or SHAs)

Capacity building of SHment findings

post-harvest handling t

e linkage between buyeWFP’s – P4Pand input

e with government minisns, bureaus of standardhat impact on cereals tra

Activities

expected outp

t 36 New SHAs form96 SHAs over three

r of smallholder prod4P and other organiz

MT of cereals are coted jointly

As are trained on Posng

 

rage …Map

Smallholder

HAs based on Needs

training

rs and sellers, includingt suppliers

stries, regulatory ds, and other national ade

uts

med; working with a years

ducers linked to zed markets

onsolidated and

st Harvest

g

 

Reactio

One of Valley. Valley bworld fo

M

12

10

Tr

ons to the p

the participThe Cerea

being the good program

MOI UNIV

Quotes:

“Manna no lon

……………………A

Go

raining … samp

resentation

pants questial growers’ rain basket.

mme.

VERSITY A

nger falls from Heaearn it”

– Pulling together helps -

………………………Asante sana!

od bless you!

ple certificate

n

ioned why massociation

. He also n

AGSHARE

25 

aven we

………

majority of n official exnoted that th

PROJECT

f the Cereal xplained thhis could be

T 

9

Challen

Unwillingroup

In most FOs rem

Poor / inthe intepractice

Uncoorddifferen

11

Participatraining, A

Growers sihat this is ae connected

nges

ngness of farmers to

project areas, youthmain a challengenadequate road netwrior areas where far

eddinated services to tt stakeholders in the

nts at a post harveAsis Hotel Eldoret

ites are basattributed tod to operatio

 

o work freely in a

h involvement in

work particularly in rming is greatly

the farmers by e sector

est handling (Dec 2009)

sed in Rift o the Rift ons of the

 

Technic

Slide 1

Slide 2

M

cal presenta

OuTr

• Pro

• Pro

• Lob

• ProCo

• Butrai

MOI UNIV

ation on th

Mission

ur mission is to prrading in the grain

EASTERN ACOU

ABOU

1st MARB

Irene

EAGC Oomote regional grain

ovide market informa

bby for harmonized

omote structured trammodity Exchange

ild Capacity ofinings

VERSITY A

e role of EA

Statement

romote Structuredn industry.

AFRICA GRAIUNCIL

T EAGC

RCH 2011BYe Tarus

Objectivesn trade

ation

trade policies & stan

ading systems e.g.

grain stakeholders

AGSHARE

26 

AGC in the

d

IN

ndards

WRS and

s through

S

S

PROJECT

e maize valu

Slide 3

Slide 4

T 

ue chain By

• The Easis a – non pr

– memb

– registe

• EAGC iUSAID

• Eligible– All sta

• Prod

• Servcom

• Farm

• Current M

• Active M– Comp

the coproces

• Affiliate– Nation

sectorsproces

• Associa– This is

industrorganizand ou

y Irene Tar

EAGC

stern Africa Grain

rofit

ber-based organizati

ered in Kenya in Dec

s currently suppoprograms and FS

EAGC M

e Membershipakeholders along theducers, Processors, Tra

vice Providers (Warehompanies and input supp

mer and Trader associa

Members are from UG,

MembershipMemberspanies or representativeore sectors; grain produssors.

e Membersnal associations that reps at the national level (pssors associations).

ate Memberss a broad member baseries, service providers, zations and individuals

utside the Council area

 

rus

C

n Council (EAGC)

ion

c 2006

orted by SIDA, SD

Membership

e grain value chainaders

ouse Keepers, inspectiopliers, Banks, Insurance

ations

KE, TZ and Rwanda

p Categories

e organizations from ucers, traders and

present the core producers, traders and

e which includes allied international who operate within of operation.

on e)

 

M

• C

• PNK

• T

• C

o

oo

o

• Quic

• PromSyste

• PromExch

• CollaCOM

MOI UNIV

Market Inform(www.

Crops update (KE

Prices (maize, riceNairobi, Eldoret, KKampala, Dar es

Trade projections

Cross border trad

EAGC

o Provide timely andmarket information

o Linking buyers to so Provide training on

arbitration, Wareh(WRS)

o Liaise with governauthorities on grai

EAGC SERVck dispute settleme

mote and coordinaem

motion of the devehanges e.g. in Tan

aborate with regioMESA, EAC)

VERSITY A

mation Serviceratin.net)

E,UG,TZ,RW)

e, beans & pulsesKisumu, MombasaSalaam, Kigali,

e flow

C SERVICE

d accurate regional gnsellersn trade contracts, stouse Receipt Syste

ments and regulaton trade policies

VICES cont…ent through arbitra

ate Warehouse Re

elopment of Commnzania

nal trading blocks

AGSHARE

27 

es

s): a,

S

grain

andards, m

ry

…ation

eceipt

modity

s(

PROJECT

T 

• Harmonstandarregion.

• Harmonrationalregionapolicies(import/bans, dlevies)

Cros• EAGC c

data on:-Volume flo

across th- Prices at

points- Source a

of comme.g. UgaKenya

Struct

• Organiz• Aggrega

• Providin

• Develop

• Use and

• Establis

• PromoteKenya.

Policy

nized maize rds in the

nization and ization of l trade /export uties,

ss border moollects :owing he bordert border

and direction modity flow

nda to

tured Trading activities

zing farmers ating volumes

ng market informa

p standard contra

d honoring contra

sh arbitration mec

e Warehouse Re

 

onitoring

System

ation

cts and rules

acts

chanism

eceipt System in

 

M

•

•

•

MOI UNIV

www.e

CoEAGC s

Tel: +254-grains@

Tra

Awareness creationon use of trade contracts.

Use of Warehouse Receipts.

Training on Trade finance tools available e.g. Tradecontract which are different from forward contracts.

VERSITY A

eagc.org

ontact:secretariat-20-3745840

@eagc.org

aining

n

e

AGSHARE

28 

PROJECT

T 

Co• Cereal Gro

Associatio

• Kenya NatFederationProducers

• Cereal MilAssociatio

• Ministry of

ollaborating owers

on(CGA)

tional n of s(KENFAP)

llers on(CMA)

f Agriculture

• S

• U

• FD

• A

• U

Thank Yo

 

institutions

SIDA

USAID-COMPETE

Financial Sector Deepening(FSD)

ACDI-VOCA

USAID-CNFA

ou

E

 

4.5 Tech

M

hnical pres

K

Obje

Outp1. I2. R3. I

Activhap

• USimp

• Stahouand

• Wo• Go

20Su

• Camilpeavarmayam

• ACInteAss

• USfirmin 4

• Its oppin a

• Its sysand

MOI UNIV

sentation on

KMDP’s role inCh

ective 1: INCREASE

putsncreased production

Reduced cost of proncreased adoption o

vities: Demo plots (harvesting, quality stadoption of new techproduction and gross

What isSAID funded Kenya Maiplemented by ACDI/VOarted in 2002 to run for usehold incomes througd by applying the value ound up in March 2009ot a 15 months extensio12 and preparations forpport of Food Security A

assava, sweet potatoes,let, green grams, dolichas, pearl millet, beans, rieties (OPVs) of maize aturing. Others that can ms, arrow roots, irish po

What is AC

CDI/VOVA – Agriculturaernational/ Volunteers isistance

S based international nom started in 1962, curre45 countriesmission is to promote bportunities, growth and agricultural value chains4 core areas of interest

stems 2) enterprise devd 4) community develop

VERSITY A

n the role o

the Maize VahainED PRODUCTIVITY

n per unit areaductionof new technologies

(input use, agronomytandards) , field dayhnologies, cost of s margin analysis

s KMDP?ze Development Progra

OCA7 years mainly to boostgh taking farming as a b chain approach

on from January 2011 tor a 5-year program calleActivities (SFSA), cowpeas, sorghum, finhos lablab, pigeon peaskatumani or open pollin e.g. katumani that are be included are banan

otatoes.

CDI/VOCA?

l Cooperative Developmn Overseas Cooperativ

on-profit business consuently managing over 90

broad-based economic development for coopes around the worldt: 1) food and agricultur

velopment 3) financial spment

AGSHARE

29 

of KMDP in

alue

Y

y, post ys,

am

t business

o June ed

nger s, chick nated early as,

ment ve

ulting projects

eratives

ral systems

PROJECT

n the maize

THE M

• The dethe late

• A baseconstrmaize sector

KMD

ObjectivePROD

Outputs1. Produce2. Produce

manage3. Apex or

Activities:developfacilitatestrategymobilizatool ( godevelopand exte

T 

value chai

ROLE OF KMMAIZE VALUE

Presented by Jaat

Assis Hotel, 1st M

Why KM

eclining performane 90’s

eline survey condaints experiencedfarmers leading tto provide tailor-m

DP’s role in theChain Co

e 4: INCREASED EFFDUCER ORGANIZATIO

er organizations establisheder organizations have accesement skillsrganizations strengthened

Train producer organizationpment, link producer organize quarterly EXCEL (Experieny) peer information sharing fation schemes, develop an oovernance, operations and mpment, financial managemenernal relations)

n By Jane T

MDP IN THEE CHAIN

ane Tum

March 2011

DP?

nce of agriculture

ucted indicated d by smallholder to private/ public made solutions

e Maize Value ont’dFECTIVENESS OF ONS

d and strengthenedss to improved business and

ns on leadership and group zations with value chain actonce CEntred Leadership forums, develop savings organizational development management, human resournt, business services deliver

 

Tum

E

in

d

ors,

rce ry

 

M

K

Obje

Out1. I2. M

Actiss

K

Obje

Outp1. Im2. B3. A

Activdsfabfesc

• ERthesinrisi

• SR

• V2indqua

• NA

• NA

• MD

MOI UNIV

KMDP’s role inChain

ective 2: INCREA

putsmproved village bas

Market linkages deve

ivities: post harvesstandards, Identify sstorage/ bulking

KMDP’s role inChain

ective 3: INCREASE

utsmproved financial access byBDS providers strengthenedAccess to VBAAs increased

vities: Assist ATC with cdevelopment, engage Vsatisfaction from their inarmers/ agro-dealers, s

build their capacity on eertilizer use on selected

stockists on technical adcommodity/ crop value a

Need for enhRS: for wealth and empe country’s economy bace 2002 when GDP greng gradually to 6.1% in

RA: -2004

2030: -2006: aims to trdustrialized middle incomality life to all its citizens

AEP:- 2006…

ARS:-2006…

DGs:- GDP to 10% an

VERSITY A

the Maize Van Cont’dASED TRADE

sed storage facilitieseloped and strength

sting, grades and quites for cereal satell

the Maize Van Cont’dED ACCESS TO BD

y BDS providers

curricula and institutionVBAAs and report on farnput, facilitate credit accselect rural agro-dealersembedded advisory servd crops, train and certifydvice and support, faciladdition

hancing P-P-ployment creation whicack on path to rapid growew from a low of 0.6% an 2006.

ansfer Kenya into a newme country providing a s

nually

AGSHARE

30 

alue

shened

uality ite

alue

DS

al rmers cess by s and vices on y itate

-Ph saw wth and

wly high

PROJECT

Outsta

• Training• Group, • Group g• Leverag

intellige• Staff an• Beyond

greenhoposho mploughs

Ou

• Farmingsignatu

• Annual (interfacommu

• Maize H• Promot

inputs itheir ac

• Trainingpost ha

Im

ACDI/VO

1. Cere

2. Farm

3. Keny(KAC

4. Easte

T 

anding achiev

g curricula developmmobilization develo

grantsge in terms of gettinence information e.gnd VBAAs mentorshd maize – horticulturouses), dairy (animamillers developments etc

tstanding ach

g as a business – Aure

business fairs –Eldce between farmers

unity)Handbook (Edtn 1 ation of new technolon appropriate quant

ccess and usegs- FaaB, Safe use

arvest handling

mplementation

OCA in strategic p

eal growers Assoc

m Input Promotions

ya Agricultural CoCE)

ern Africa Grain C

vements Cont’d

ment with ATCpment

g timely market g. Kencallhip and developmentre (mushrooms, al feed formulation),t), saccos, chisel

hievements

ACDI/VOCA’s

oret and Nakuru s and business

nd 2)ogies and packagingtities thus enhancing

of agro-chemicals,

n of KMDP

partnership with:

ciation (CGA)

s Africa (FIPS)

mmodity Exchang

Council (EAGC)

 

d

t

of g

ge

 

Reactio Mr. Chprogramparticipaservicesinitiativ It was initiativ

1. L2. I3. E4. I

4.6 AgS

Slide 1

M

ons on the r

heserek, a mme had doants questios from the ve does not c

noted that ves for exam

Low producImmediate cExtra expenInadequate

Share Dairy

FINAG

M(ST

MOI UNIV

role of Keny

Kenya Daione good joned why faKenya Mai

cover also li

farmers hample storage

ction – whatcash flow nenses at NCBfunding to i

y Stakehold

NDINGS OF MGSHARE PILO

DAIRY VA

BMR. FRANCIS OSTUDENT, M.PH

RESOUR1/3/2

VERSITY A

ya Maize D

iry Board ob to enco

farmers wereize Developivestock.

ave a myriaof maize. S

t is there to eeds - Dela

BP invest

ders survey

MOI UNIVERSOT PROJECT

ALUE CHAIN

BYONYANGO ODUHIL.AGRIC ECORCE MGT)/2011

AGSHARE

31 

Developmen

official noourage puble not movinpment initia

ad of reasoSuch reasons

store? ayed paymen

y report By

SITY T ON

UORON &

S

PROJECT

nt Program

oted that thlic private ng ahead toatives. Ano

ons why thes include:

nt from NC

Francis Od

Slide 2

T 

mme

he Kenya sector partn

o take advanther stakeh

ey do not a

PB

duor

I• KenyaestimatcontribGDP

• In AfricAfrica,domest

• SudanCOMESsatisfy

Maize Devnerships. Ontage of theolder asked

adopt some

NTRODUCThas the largest dated 4 million milkibutes 14% of Agr G

ca, Kenya is the onlythat produces en

tic consumption and

is the largest prodSA, but it does notboth domestic and e

 

velopment One of the e advisory d why the

e of these

TIONiry herd in SSA, wng cows (KDB). DaDP and 3.5% of to

y country, after Sounough milk for bod export

ducer of milk in tt produce enoughexport markets

ithairyotal

uthoth

theto

 

Slide 3

Slide 4

Slide 5

M

LARGEST PRODUCE

LARGEST 

LARGEST 

FAO statistics

COU

SUDA

KENY

EGYP

SOU

MORFAO stat

• TOREPR

• IDPO

MOI UNIV

COUN

MILK ER

INDIA

EXPORTER NEW 

IMPORTER MEXIC

s 2009

WORLD STA

AFRICUNTRY

AN

YA

PT

TH AFRICA

ROCCOtistics

OBJE

O COMPARE AND COECOMMENDED PRARACTICES

ENTIFY POSSIBLE COSSIBLE REMEDY

VERSITY A

NTRY VOLUME

A 108 MILLIO

ZEALAND 15 MILLION(95%)

CO 105,000 M

ATISTIC 2009

CA 2009VOLUME

5.32b Litres

4.07 b Litres

3.2 b Litres

3.09 b Litres

1.7b Litres

CTIVES

ONTRAST ACTICES AND CURRE

ONSTRAINTS AND 

AGSHARE

32 

ON TONS

N TONS 

MT

ENT 

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 6

Slide 7

Slide 8

T 

D

• Data was gNovember

• The targetKenya. 

• Systematic‐ 47 farme‐10 consum‐3 transpo‐2 process

‐3 key inform

‐12 trader

In MachakElgeyo/M

Nakuru an

• The methdescribe tcomparat

DATA

RESUFARMERS – SOC

PARAMETERS P

GENDER 8F

OCCUPATION 7FAFA

EDUCATION 5SP

DATA AND MET

generated through sur 2010. t population was all d

c random sampling wers, mers, orters, ors, 

mants 

rs 

kos, Trans Nzoia, Uaarakwet,  Baringo, 

nd Bungoma

od employed was dthe data and gross ive purposes.

TA AND METHO

ULTS AND DISCIO‐ECONOMICS

PERCENTAGES R

5% MALE ; 15% EMALE

Moho

0% FARMERS; 30% ARMING AND OFF‐ARM 

5% TERTIARY; 40% ECONDARY; 5% RIMARY

58n

 

THODS

urvey carried out in 

dairy stakeholders in

was used to select;

asin Gishu,   Nandi , 

descriptive to margin analysis for 

ODS Cont

CUSSION 

REMARKS

Male dominated, owners of assets and household heads. Focon male

55% of Tertiary and 87.5% of secondary hano formal employmen

n 

us 

adnt; 

 

Slide 9

Slide 10

Slide 11

M

FARMERS

PARAMET

OTHERSOURCES INCOME

COOPERA

FAMILY SI

FARM SIZ

RE

0 RE

1 • AVER•AVERA

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

L/COW/D

AY

MOI UNIV

S – SOCIO‐ECONOMICS

TERS PERCENTAGES

OF 50% DEPENDED ONTRANSFERS FROM FRIENDS AND RELA10% PETTY TRADE NONE

ATIVE 65% NOT MEMBER35% MEMBERS

ZE MEAN OF 6  PERSO

E MEAN OF 5 ACRES

ESULTS AND D

ESULTS AND D

MILK PRORAGE NUMBER OF COWS AGE MILK YIELD /COW/D

PERFORMANCE OF

Minimum

VERSITY A

REMARKS

N 

ATIVES, & 10 

A sign that dairy fneeds supplemenof income. NEED FACILITIES INLINEDAIRY FARMING

RS;  Recipe for informmarket and a cauprices being expe

ONS

DISCUSSION Co

DISCUSSION Co

ODUCTION= 4   (MIN 2 ; MAX 12 )

DAY = 13.75L (MIN 5; MAX

F DAIRY COW PER COUNTY

Maximum AVERAGE

AGSHARE

33 

farming ntary sources FOR CREDIT E WITH 

mal milk use of poor erienced

ont 

ont 

X 31)

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 12

Slide 13

Slide 14

T 

MILK M

Market 80%

Formal 28%

VARIABL

GRO

MARKETING CTotal 

production 13.75L

%

Domestic 8%Non‐formal 

52%

LE COSTS/L/C

SS MARGIN/C

 

CHANNELS

Non‐Market 20%

Spoil 0.15%Calve 11.85%

OW/DAY

COW/DAY

 

Slide 15

Slide 16

Slide 17

M

5 V

6 CH

• Na

• Ina

• Hig

• Low

• Pes

• Poo

• Exp

• Lat

• Poo

• Ina

7

MOI UNIV

VARIABLE COST

ALLENGES FACI

tural calamities e.g

adequate credit faci

gh cost of feeds 

w milk and milk pro

st and diseases

or infrastructure

ploitation by middle

te payment by buye

or breeds

adequate extension

VERSITY A

T COMPARISIO

NG DAIRY FARM

g. drought 

ilities

oduct prices

emen

ers

n services

AGSHARE

34 

ON

MERS

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 18

Slide 19

Slide 20

T 

R

• Strategic 

‐ to stabilizedry seaso

‐ Invest in p

• Absorb e

‐ Expand to 

‐ Investme

• Implemenguide andpreservat

TR

• ECONO• RETURN TCONTAINEREVENUE PRICE

• CHALLE• ILLIGALITYBARRIER TINDUSTRY

ECOMMENDA

milk reserve

e milk production son

processing of long li

excess production

nontraditional ma

nt in infrastructure

nt national livestocd promote on farm tion

TRANSPORTE

RANSPORTER

OMICSTRIP HAS EMPTY ALERS HENCE NO ADD – BUY LOW PRICE 

ENGESY OF INFORMAL MATO ENTRY INTO TRAY

 

ATIONS

shortfalls in the 

ife dairy products

arkets

e

ck feed policy‐ to feed 

ERS

S Cont

LUMINUM DITIONAL & SELL HIGH 

ARKET IS A ANSPORT 

 

Slide 21

Slide 22

Slide 23

M

1

REVEN

SALES OTOTAL R

COSTSTRANS

ADMIN

CESS ‐K

CHILLIN

PAYMETOTAL C

2

• CH• MQU

• UN

• HI

• RE• BA

3

• ARNE

• DI

• CH• UN

• MFA

• M

MOI UNIV

CHILLING / CHEPKORI

GROSS MARGIN A

Q

NUE

OF MILK (New KCC Ltd)REVENUE

SSPORT

NISTRATION

KDB

NG COST

ENT TO FARMERSCOST

CHILLING / B

HALLENGESILK DELIVERY AFTERUALITY

NTIMELY MILK COLL

GHER OPERATION C

EMEDYACKWARD OR FORW

PROC

RE MANY WITH THEEW KCC LTD, SPIN K

FFERENT QUALITY S

HALLENGESNDERCAPICITY UTIL

INIMUM STANDARDARMERS )

ILK PURCHASE IN V

VERSITY A

BULKINGO DAIRY LTD

ANALYSIS PER LITRE

QTY UNIT PRICE

1 32.5

1 2.5

1 2.8

1 0.2

1 1

BULKING Cont

R 2 HRS IMPACTING

LECTION BY PROCES

COSTS

WARD INTEGRATION

ESSORS

E MAJOR ONES BEINKNIT AND BROOKES

STANDARDS

LIZATION (56.25%)

D REQUIREMENT (8

VOLUMES NOT QUA

AGSHARE

35 

TOTAL

32.532.5

2.5

8 2.8

0.2

1

2632.5

t

G ON 

SSORS

N

NG IDE

80% OF 

ALITY

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 24

Slide 25

Slide 26

T 

• IRREGULAR

• TAXATION

• INFORMAL

• LESS FLEXI

• COPING• IMPORTATFRESH MIL

• REMEDY• INCREASED

• ENFORCEM

DIS

• ARE MAN

• BASED IN 

• CHALLE• STORAGE 

• INFORMA

RE

• ARE MAN

• HAWKERS

• COMPROM

• LOW CRED

• MOTIVATE

• RETAILERS

PROCESSORS R SUPPLY DUE TO W

L MARKET

BILITY IN PRICE

G MECHANISMION OF MILK POWDLK

YD PRODUCTIVITY

MENT OF LAW

STRIBUTORS/A

Y IN THE COUNTRY

URBAN CENTRES 

ENGEFACILITIES

AL MARKET

ETAILERS /HAW

Y IN THE COUNTRY

S

MISE QUALITY 

DIT ACCESS

ED BY CASH‐FLOW

S

 

ContWEATHER PATTERNS

DER TO MAKE 

AGENTS

Y

WKERS

Y

S

 

Slide 27

Slide 28

Slide 29

M

7 RET

8 • 10

• W

• Im

• Ra

• Bequ

• IM

• redmi

9

• CH

• STA

• PR

• PO

• NO

MOI UNIV

RETAILERS /H

TAILERS 

CONS00% CONSUMED FR

HY INFORMAL MAR

mmediate consumpt

aw milk perceived a

elieve that boiled muality requirements

MPACT

ducing the WTP a pilk

CONSUM

HALLENGES

TANDADIZATION (Un

RICE FLACTUATION

OOR HYGIENIC MILK

ON‐OBSERVANCE O

VERSITY A

HAWKERS Con

SUMERSRESH MILK 

RKET?

tion in small quanti

as creamer and rich

milk is safe (70% awa)

premium for pasteu

MERS Cont

nit Measure)

K HANDLING COND

OF CLINICAL REGULA

AGSHARE

36 

nt

ties

er

are of 

urized 

ITIONS

ATIONS 

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 30

Slide 31

Slide 32

T 

K

• Fine Ksh 

• Ksh 0.20 (Only for

• Ksh 0.20 

SIZE OF TRA

Mini‐dairies

Mini dairy (5

Large Proces

KENYA DA

KEYKENYA 

Steps Activit1 Registratio

2 Assessmen

of the 

processing

exercise

3 Collection 

the sample

4 Recommen

tion & 

certificatio

5 Issue of 1 

year permi

KEY INSTITUTI

3,000

 / L levy is chargedr the 35% farmers) 

 / L levy is charged

ADER

 (less than 5,000L per

5,000 to 100,000L Per

ssor (100,000L per day

AIRY BOARD

Y INSTITUTIONBUREAU OF Sty Processor Fees on Small firms 5,800

Big firms 20,000

nt 

g 

of 

e 

nda

on 

it 

FARMER

TRA

PROCESS

DISTRIBUTOR

RETAILER / HAW

CONSUMER

VALUE CHA

 

ONS

 to the farmers 

 to processors. 

LICENSE COS

(Ksh)

r day) 3,100

r day) 6,000

y) 25,000

NS ContSTANDARDS(Ksh) Remarks

Ksh 7,500 is charged

for every product 

ANSPORTER

CHILLING/BULKING

SOR

TRANSPORTER

RS

WKERS

AIN

ST 

d 

 

REACT

A numbdairy va

23

From fawhile cocosts Kexpressereported Dr. Moswas notthrough On the o16 wasproductiunder-e Addition

1. S2. W3. S

m

It emergexposin

Mr. Rutnumber feeding inferior farmers differen

M

TIONS TO

ber of questalue chain su

1. Is non-f2. How did3. Is explo

armers respoows require

Kshs. 50 / coed their pred to be comm

se asked wht illegal as

h adulteration

other hand M far belowion cost dustimated.

nal questionShould we bWas the preShould we milk?

ged that infng consumer

to, a Ministrof challengand labor. cows ownewere now

ntaite the cos

MOI UNIV

THE PRE

tions were urvey. Some

formal markd you compu

oitation by m

onses it was1 ½ bales o

ow / day, sference for mon. In add

hether it wahad been sn and reiter

Mr. Cheserw what is oue to leasin

ns raised by be aiming atesenter encohave cooler

formal markrs to unsafe

ry of Livestges which c

He recomed by farm

w worse offst of produc

VERSITY A

ESENTATIO

raised by se of the que

ket illegal? ute forage?

middlemen a

s noted thatof silage persale of heifthe informa

dition, the av

as possible ttated. The q

rated that the

ek, a dairy bobserved ing/renting o

stakeholdert 18L/cow/d

ouraging hawrs for small

ket was popuand adulter

tock Develocomprised smmended a mers. In add

f than befoction for hig

AGSHARE

37 

ON

stakeholdersestions inclu

a challenge?

t some farmr day at Kshfers contribual market duverage cow

to train hawquality of me cost of pro

board officin the field.f land. Add

rs included:day? wking? Whilholder farm

ular with farated milk.

opment officmall non-vigene pool

dition, he noore. It was gh potential

PROJECT

s on the preuded:

?

mers incur a h 170 / bale.ute to farmue to high mproduces 20

wkers. It wamilk had beoduction do

ial, noted thHe attribu

ditionally, l

:

ich is bettermers? Mainl

armers and

cial, reporteiable farm sof high yieoted that Aalso recom

areas and lo

T 

esentation o

cost of pro. It was rep

m profit. Mamargins. Pri0L of milk p

as noted thateen undermes not drop

hat the cost uted this tolabor cost c

r; hawking oly for Sund

consumers

d that the dsizes, high ielding breed

A.I. services mmended thow potential

of the findin

duction of Korted that w

ajority of thice variationper day.

t the informmined during

below Ksh

of productio underestimcould also h

or processinday milk an

despite the

dairy subsectinput costs ding stock t

were expehat the studl areas.

 

ngs of the

Ksh 23/ L while labor he farmers n was also

mal market g hawking 20.

on of Ksh mation of have been

g? nd evening

danger of

tor had a especially to replace

ensive and dy should

 

4.0 PresDist

The Disthat ther42 milliHe indicthat the

234

Reactio

When areportedinseminhas esca

4.1 Pres

Slide 1

M

sentation otrict Livesto

strict Livestore were abouion litres of cated that thdairy subse1. High co2. Pests an3. Inadequ4. Poor roa

ons to the p

asked about d that the nation servicalated as mi

sentation o

MOI UNIV

n the Role ock Produc

ock Productut 98,918 familk per ye

he Ministry ector was facost of feeds nd diseases uate capital fad network

resentation

the status osubsector

ces have beclk prices de

n the Role

KENYA DA

CORPORAKenya Dair

established by in 1958. The a

are governeIndustry Act Ca

of K

VERSITY A

of Ministryction Offici

tion Officialarmers in thear in the forwas reachincing a numb

for purchase

n

of the dairy swas not dcome expeneclined.

of the Keny

AIRY BOARD

ATE HISTORYry Board was act of parliamen

activities of KDBed by the dairy ap 336 of the lawKenya.

AGSHARE

38 

y of Livestoial, Uasin G

l reported thhe district. Hrmal marketng out to farber of challe

e of quality

subsector indoing wellnsive, milk m

ya Dairy B

nt

ws

S

PROJECT

ock DevelopGishu

hat the staffHe further ret and 2 millirmers througenges namel

breeding sto

n Uasin Gishcompared

marketing is

oard in mil

Slide 2

T 

pment in m

f: farmer ratieported that ion litres in gh field dayly;

ock

hu diastrict,to the 190

s constrained

lk marketin

• KDB is mapromote t

• VISION

• To be a wregulatory

milk market

io was 1: 13the district the informa

ys. He also r

, the livestoc070s since d and produ

ng-By Mr C

MANDATE

andated to regulatethe Dairy Industry i

orld class dairy devy authority

 

ting By

3795 and marketed al market. reported

ck official Artificial

uction cost

Cheserek

E

e, develop and in Kenya.

velopmental and 

 

Slide 3

Slide 4

Slide 5

M

• Wequexpropro

B

• M

• Ththe

• It bepo

• Att

• Da

• Ov

• 30

• Estlitr

• Fa

MOI UNIV

THE M

e are committd to ouality professional spectations of out stompt service and aompt dairy informa

BACKGROUND

ilk production per y

he dairy sub sect coe fastest growing se

is the most reliableeing used by many poverty

tractive to poverty 

NORTH R

airy cattle 1.2 millio

ver 100,000 dairy fa

0 strong farmer orga

timated milk produres/year

rmers Coolers – 15

VERSITY A

MISSION

offering the highestservice which meetstakeholders by givinavailing accurate anation as required.

D INFORMATIO

year = 4.1 billion lit

ntributes 8% of GDector‐4%.

e income earner thapartners to reduce 

reduction program

IFT REGION

on population

armers

anizations

uction = 360 million

AGSHARE

39 

t s the ng d 

ON

res

DP. It is 

at is 

mmes

n 

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 6

Slide 7

Slide 8

T 

MILK

• Processor

• Mini Dairi

• Milk Bars

• Small trad

• Western &

• Farmers c

• Home con

I

• The liberacreated  alot of conbeing sold

• Regulatio

• Promotio

• Developm

K MARKETING 

rs – 4 ‐ KCC, BroLessos, M

ies ‐ 12

‐ 150

ders ‐ 1000

& Nyanza  Markets‐

coolers  ‐ 15

nsumption ‐ Evening

‐ Unsold

INFORMAL SE

alization of the milka large informal milcerns on the qualitd.

KDB ACTIVIT

n

n

ment

 

OUTLETS

ookside, Doinyo Molo Milk

‐Milk bars/hotels

g milk

d  milk

CTOR

k market in 1992 k market causing a y of the milk 

TIES

 

Slide 9

Slide 10

Slide 11

M

• Kethe

• Unor micoprodereqsu

0

• Daco

• Daco

• Daco

• Dace

• Da

1 CA

• App

• Pro

• Mil

• Min

• Min

• Ass

• Mo

• Dai

• Pro

• Cot

• Coo

• Coo

MOI UNIV

1.KENYA DAREGUL

enya Dairy Board is e dairy Industry act

nder this Act, Kenyatheir appointed agilk collection centrettage industries, mocessing plants andetermine  their comquirements of this bsequent Issuance 

MILK SUP

airy farmers – collecnsumer.

airy farmers‐ small mllection centre – pr

airy farmers –small nsumers.

airy farmers – smallntre – milk bars/ho

airy farmers – consu

ATEGORIES OF INDUSTRY A

plication fee

oducer Licence

lk bar licence

ni Dairy licence

ni Dairy Licence

surance 

ovement Permit

iry Manager

ocessor

ttage Industry

oling Plant (below 5000 lit

oling plant (Over 5000 litr

VERSITY A

IRY INDUSTRYLATIONSmandated to regultivities.

a Dairy Board inspegents shall inspect fes, transporters, miini dairies, milk d milk retailers to mpliance to the regulation and of permits/licence

PPLY CHAIN

ction centre – proce

mobile traders –rocessor – consume

mobile traders –

 traders – collectiootels/shops – consu

umers

LICENCES: (DAACT CAP 336

‐ 600/=

‐ 1200/=

‐ 2500/=

‐ 2500/=

‐ 6000/=

‐ 2000/=

‐ 1000/=

‐ 1500/=

‐ 25,000/=

‐ 4000/=

tres) ‐ 1000/=

res) ‐ 2000/=

AGSHARE

40 

Y 

late 

ctors farms, lk bars 

.

essor –

er.

n umers

AIRY 

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 12

Slide 13

Slide 14

T 

MILK

• KDB monimilk testsbutterfat,adulterati

• Train andstandards

ENFIND

• Enforced in accorda

• Contract arrangeme

• Registration of dairsystem, Global stan

• Global markets are , production systemmost dairy produceon annual.

2.P

• To promoproducts

– Increaseand milk

– Demons

– Sensitizemilk.

Target – 20

Urban perperson/y

K QUALITY STA

itors compliance th – Density, preserva SNF, Toxins, antibioions and deception

d sensitize stakeholds

FORCEMENT ODUSTRY ACT Cance with the Act cap 336 – penalties.

ents between processors and farmers

ry producers to strengthen traceabilityndards focus on traceability as a factor

increasingly demanding to know – whm used. KDB has list of most dairy proders in  the country. Some  framers have

PROMOTIONA

te consumption of 

e consumption of milk k products, yoghurt, C

strate methods of add

e the public on the nu

00 lts/per person/yea

r capita consumption –year

 

ANDARDS

hrough qualitative atives, acidity, otics, s.

ders on the 

OF DAIRY CAP 336

y of milk produced, production r in food assurance.

ho are producing the milk,production duction system used. KDB has list of e registered and certificates issued 

L ROLES

milk and milk 

 of certified quality heese, ice cream etc.

ing value of milk

tritional value of 

r

– 125 lts/per 

 

Slide 15

Slide 16

Slide 17

M

5

• Trathrbar

• OrgthethematranMa

• Accto o

• Tecpro

6

• Pro

• En

• Pro

7

• Ac

• Incca

• Rebu

• Ac

MOI UNIV

3.DEVELOP

ining of stakeholders (farmough field days, workshoprazas.

ganizations of the milk mae Ministry of Co‐operativee sector to promote formarketing organizations for nsportation, milk collectioarketing Federations are b

creditation of service provoffer services to stakehold

chnology Promotion (Corrocessing)

To the Mi

ovide technical trai

nsure prompt paym

omote market for m

To the Milk

ccess to quality milk

creased milk volumpacity.

educed costs througulking  milk, training

ccess to technology/

VERSITY A

MENT ROLES

mers,traders processors),ps, demonstrations, ASK s

arketing channels – workie, Livestock Development,ation of strong farmers mefficient production,  on and service provision. being promoted now.

viders along the milk valuders.

rect equipments , packagi

lk Producer

ning

ent

milk

k Processsor

k

me, sustained supply

gh farmer organizatg to minimize losses

/equipments

AGSHARE

41 

 on GMP shows, 

ng with , NGOs in ilk 

e chain 

ng 

y and 

tions s

S

S

S

PROJECT

Slide 18

Slide 19

Slide 20

T 

• Good qua

• A wide ra

• Reliable s

• Managem

• Advice therelated to

• Most dair

• Inadequatsector is s

• Long  valuand imple

• Unregulat

• Frequent 

• Poor infra

To the Consu

ality and safe milk p

nge of milk product

upply

Other Role

ment of dairy data b

e Government on ao the dairy industry

CHALLENG

ry producers are sm

te training opportustill low.

ue chain complicateementation of quali

ted feeds sector

disease outbreaks

astructure – water, e

 

umer

products

ts

es

bank

all policy issues 

ES

mall scale

unities – private 

es further meeting ity standards.

electricity, roads

 

Slide 21

Slide 22

M

1

• La

• Rasys

2 • Fas

per

• ‐ Prcam

• ThetheMepro

• Theensext

MOI UNIV

co

rge informal sector

ain dependent feed/stem

CONCstest growing sector.  The rsons

romoting dairy in non tradmel milk, goat milk.

e need for training all thoe increasing demands/conedical certificates by Zamboducers, total solids in mil

e Board will remain a centsures the proper regulatioernally and also to promo

VERSITY A

ont

r

/ fodder production

CLUSIONentry of many young/ ret

ditional areas. and Inclusi

se along the value chain tnditions by external markebians, registration of dairyk (Uganda)

tralized regulatory body  ton of the industry locally aote and develop the secto

AGSHARE

42 

n 

tired 

on of 

to meet et Ref. y 

that and or.

S

PROJECT

Slide 23

T 

• Dairy sectpromote iprocessin

• I CALL UPPROMOTIMILK PRO

cont

tor is growing stroninvestments in ming

ON ALL OF US TO  CING CONSUMPTIONODUCTS

 

nger. Let us all i or major 

CONTINUE N  OF MILK AND 

 

ReactioThe parcamels ithat daapproximnutritionpromoti Dr. Mosissues oDairy Binspecti When aissued tothat the

234

He reitecans we

When apowder board obe kepteveningCooperadomesticoncluddairy su

M

on to the rorticipants wain terms of

airy goats mating 300nal value wing dairy go

se wanted tof traceabiliBoard officing farms, pr

sked whetho farmers anboard uses 1. They do2. They co3. They co4. They tra

erated that cere ok for tra

asked about from elsew

fficial report by smallhg milk and ative Compic supply ided by sayinubsector face

MOI UNIV

le of Kenyaanted to knothe value anare reared after they

while dairy goat productio

the Dairy Bity of milk al reported romoting us

er the boardnd also to clthe followin

o on-spot tesonduct afflatonduct antibain milkers

ertificates wansporting.

the workabwhere and wrted that ch

holder farm15 cooler

pany imporis insufficieng that Brooes many cha

VERSITY A

a Dairy Boaow more abnd nutrition

d mainly iwere imporgoats sell aon in the are

oard officiato prepare that the bo

se of cooler

d had laboralarify use ofng measuresst with mobtoxin tests aiotics tests i

were require

bility of the why Brooksharcoal coolers. He addrs in Eldorrts powdereent. He reokside proceallenges.

AGSHARE

43 

ard out the non

n aspects of in Elgeyo/Mrted from M

at Ksh 9,000ea.

al to throw sfarmers to

oard is senss and encou

atories for quf aluminums to addressile car kits

at specializein the office

ed for all mi

charcoal coside does ners are not ded that larret region wed milk to eiterated thessed milk w

PROJECT

n-traditional their dairy

Marakwet Meru. He rep0. He furthe

some light oaccess wid

sitizing farmuraging publ

uality testinand stainles the aforem

d labs e

lk producer

ooler at farmnot process

in use becarge scale fawere in plbridge the

hat the boawhere its fac

T 

dairy sectoproducts. MCounty wiported that er reported

on what theder and globmers on traclic private p

ng and if cerss steel cont

mentioned qu

rs and assure

m level, themilk in Eld

ause there wfarmers hadlace. He ex

gap in locard regulatectory is loca

or like dairy Mr. Cheserekith their pgoat milk hthat FAO/I

e board wasbalized marceability of partnership.

rtificates wetainers, he r

uestions.

ed that Alum

e need to imdoret town,

was no exced modern coxplained thcal productes milk imated and rep

 

goats and k reported population has a high IFAD was

s doing on rkets. The

f products,

ere being reported

minum

mport milk the dairy

ss milk to oolers for

hat Kenya tion when

mports. He ported that

 

4

D

M

4.2 Ple

During the p

1. Nr

iii

2. Cp

3. Rb

4. F5. F6. B7. C

f8. W9. R

t

MOI UNIV

enary dis

panel discus

Noting that recommendi. Effort

/recommii. Constraiii. GOK exCollaboratioproblem ideRole of smabuilding. Farmers neeFarmers shoBottlenecksCollaboratiofarmers to aWhole valueResearch-Extrials and de

VERSITY A

scussion

ssion on the

farmers’ pded that:

should mmendations bints facing f

xtension servon among stentification.all traders i

ed to be enliould be assis in maize anon and cooravoid duplice chain apprxtension-Faemonstration

AGSHARE

44 

on way

e way forwa

practices do

made to faby farmersfarmers in mvice should takeholders

in maize/da

ightened on sted to devend milk marrdination is

cation and garoach shoul

armer linkagns.

PROJECT

forward

ard it was it

not match

acilitate ad

maize/dairy be strengthis needed in

airy needs to

the best praelop proposarketing shous needed amaps in servicld be adoptege should b

T 

d

resolved tha

recommen

doption of

should be tahened to meen research,

o be enhan

actices in mals for acquiuld be tacklemong organce delivery.

ed in researcbe strengthe

at:

nded practic

f technolo

ackled et demand bcapacity bu

nced through

maize and daisition of cred. izations dea

ch and extenened through

 

ces, it was

gies and

by farmers uilding and

h capacity

airy. edit.

aling with

nsion. h on-farm

 

4

S

M

4.3 Atte

S/No. Na

1. Bar

2. Law

3. Nic

4. Iren

5. Den

6. Mo

7. Dr.

8. Jan

9. Nel

10. Dr.

11. Ash

12. Piu

13. Fre

14. Ben

15. Em

16. Lea

17. Geo

18. JOh

19. Joy

MOI UNIV

endance Lis

ame

ranabas R. O

wrence O. M

cholas M. M

ne Tarus

nis C. Otien

ose Jared Isa

. Philip M. N

ne Tum

lson Sumba

. J.M. Mond

ha S. Salim

us Cheserek

edrick Wanj

n Limo

mmanuel Too

ah Boit

offrey Amu

hson Murre

yce Serem

VERSITY A

st

Olbarit

Mose

Mwambezi

no

aboke

Nyangweso

a

dothi

ala

o

usala

y

AGSHARE

45 

Desig

Farm

Resea

DistriOffic

East A

Resea

Resea

Resea

Progr

Cerea

Distri

JUMA

Mana

Distri

Farm

Farm

Distri

Mana

Farm

Minis

PROJECT

gnation

mer

archer(KAR

ict Agricultuer(DALEO)

African Gra

archer/AgSh

archer/AgSh

archer/ AgS

ramme Offic

al Growers A

ict Veterina

AKAKA (M

ager, Kenya

ict Agricultu

mer-Kapsoya

mer-Kapsoya

ict Livestoc

ager –Maize

mer-Moiben

stry of Agric

T 

RI)/Resource

ure and Liv) Eldoret Ea

ain Council(

hare Team m

hare Team m

Share Projec

cer ACDI/V

Association

ary Officer(D

Maize Farme

a Dairy Boar

ural Officer

a)(Elgeyo Bo

a)(Elgeyo Bo

ck Productio

e Milling Co

culture

e Person

estock Exteast

(EAGC)

member

member

ct Manager

VOCA

n

DVO)-Keiy

ers Group) T

rd, Eldoret

r’s office- N

order)

order)

on Officer –E

ompany

 

ension

yo South

Treasurer

Nandi North

Eldoret West

 

M

20. Sam

21. Laz

22. Dr.

23. Lau

24. Jam

25. Ulu

26. Far

27. Ok

28. Joh

29. Pet

30. Jos

MOI UNIV

muel Barma

zarus K. Ru

. Julius O. O

ura Inyanje

mes Gitaka

um Christin

rncis Oduor

kiiry Frankli

hn Karane

ter Rugu

shua Cheloti

VERSITY A

ase

uto

Ochuodho

Rotich

ne

r

ne

i

AGSHARE

46 

Farm

Distri

Dean

FaculResou

Fish F

M.Ph

M.Ph

Resea

Farm

Farm

Biblia

PROJECT

mer-Ainabko

ict Livestoc

n, School of

lty, Departmurce Manag

FM radio st

hil Student/A

hil Student/A

archer

mer

mer

a Husema S

T 

i Division

ck productio

Agriculture

ment of Econgement, Moi

ation

AgShare stu

AgShare stu

Studio

on Officer- M

e and Biotec

nomics and i University

udent partici

udent partici

 

Marakwet

chnology

Agriculturay

ipant

ipant

al