+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Moisture ontamination and its Effect on the Remaining ... · Whether your lube oil is designed for...

Moisture ontamination and its Effect on the Remaining ... · Whether your lube oil is designed for...

Date post: 03-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
6
Arizona Instrument LLC 3375 N. Delaware St. | Chandler, AZ 85225 Tel: (800) 528-7411 | Fax: (602) 281-1745 [email protected] Moisture Contamination and its Effect on the Remaining Useful Life of Bearings Determination and Analysis of Water Content in Lubricating Oils by RH Sensor G. Rowe, Q. Biamonte Arizona Instrument LLC Lubrication is Essential for Predictive and Preventative Maintenance Lubrication reduces friction, minimizes wear and tear on moving parts, decreases the likelihood that particle contamination will occur and helps maintain lower operating temperatures, all of which helps keep your machinery in optimum operation condition and extend its useful life. Lubrication is particularly important in regard to bearings. Bearings are the joints of a machine. They bear heavy loads and help execute and control the movement of the connected parts. When these joints fail, movement becomes less fluid and efficient and can eventually cause serious damage. Lubrication is a machine’s method of protecting its joints and ensuring that the machine as a whole is in good working order. It creates a barrier between the softer material of the bearings and the other parts of the machine. This helps defend the bearings against the excessive wear and tear that can dramatically reduce their useful life. When something threatens the potential effectiveness of lubrication, it not only affects the lubricant itself, but also the bearings and other moving parts that it was meant to protect. While each lubricant is designed with a specific purpose and application in mind, they all share a common nemesis: moisture contamination. This paper will discuss the dangers of moisture contamination, its effect on bearing life and the various techniques available for moisture analysis. Different Bearings Require Different Types of Lubrication The most common methods of lubrication associated with bearings are hydrodynamic and elastohydrodynamic. [2] An understanding of how these types of lubrication work will help demonstrate the important role that lubrication plays in ensuring that your machinery continues to run smoothly. Both hydrodynamic and elastohydrodynamic lubrication use the motion of moving machinery parts to force the lubricant around or between those moving parts. [4] In hydrodynamic lubrication specifically, the lubricant is pushed up and around the bearing, surrounding it in a thin layer of oil. The continued motion of the machinery allows for a constant flow of lubricating oil, creating a protective layer that is always intact. Fig. 1 Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Transcript
Page 1: Moisture ontamination and its Effect on the Remaining ... · Whether your lube oil is designed for an engine, turbine or even an assembly line, accurate control of moisture in lubricating

Arizona Instrument LLC

3375 N. Delaware St. | Chandler, AZ 85225

Tel: (800) 528-7411 | Fax: (602) 281-1745

[email protected]

Moisture Contamination and its Effect on the Remaining Useful Life of Bearings Determination and Analysis of Water Content in Lubricating Oils by RH Sensor G. Rowe, Q. Biamonte Arizona Instrument LLC

Lubrication is Essential for Predictive and Preventative Maintenance Lubrication reduces friction, minimizes wear and tear on moving parts,

decreases the likelihood that particle contamination will occur and helps

maintain lower operating temperatures, all of which helps keep your machinery

in optimum operation condition and extend its useful life.

Lubrication is particularly important in regard to bearings. Bearings are the

joints of a machine. They bear heavy loads and help execute and control the

movement of the connected parts. When these joints fail, movement becomes

less fluid and efficient and can eventually cause serious damage. Lubrication is

a machine’s method of protecting its joints and ensuring that the machine as a

whole is in good working order. It creates a barrier between the softer material

of the bearings and the other parts of the machine. This helps defend the bearings against the excessive wear and tear

that can dramatically reduce their useful life.

When something threatens the potential effectiveness of lubrication, it not only affects the lubricant itself, but also the

bearings and other moving parts that it was meant to protect. While each lubricant is designed with a specific purpose

and application in mind, they all share a common nemesis: moisture contamination. This paper will discuss the dangers of

moisture contamination, its effect on bearing life and the various techniques available for moisture analysis.

Different Bearings Require Different Types of Lubrication The most common methods of lubrication associated with bearings are

hydrodynamic and elastohydrodynamic.[2] An understanding of how these types of

lubrication work will help demonstrate the important role that lubrication plays in

ensuring that your machinery continues to run smoothly.

Both hydrodynamic and elastohydrodynamic lubrication use the motion of moving

machinery parts to force the lubricant around or between those moving parts.[4] In

hydrodynamic lubrication specifically, the lubricant is pushed up and around the

bearing, surrounding it in a thin layer of oil. The continued motion of the machinery

allows for a constant flow of lubricating oil, creating a protective layer that is always

intact. Fig. 1 Hydrodynamic Lubrication

Page 2: Moisture ontamination and its Effect on the Remaining ... · Whether your lube oil is designed for an engine, turbine or even an assembly line, accurate control of moisture in lubricating

Arizona Instrument LLC

3375 N. Delaware St. | Chandler, AZ 85225

Tel: (800) 528-7411 | Fax: (602) 281-1745

[email protected]

This coating prevents the surfaces of the bearings and other machinery parts from

rubbing against one another. Without lubrication, small particulates would break

off, cause particle contamination and increase abrasion. As more particulates break

off, the rate of destruction increases exponentially, damaging both the bearing and

the machinery as a whole.

In elastohydrodynamic lubrication, the lubricant flows between two contact

surfaces. As flow pressure increases, the lube creates a film that completely

separates the two surfaces.[3] This is especially important because the softer

material of the bearing itself is more vulnerable to abrasion. The lubricating oil

provides an extra layer of cushioning that protects bearings and other moving parts

from excessive wear and tear.

Moisture Decreases Lubricant Efficiency and Causes Early Wear and Tear on Machinery Parts Hydrodynamic and elastohydrodynamic lubrication methods are both at risk of

failing when exposed to moisture contamination.[2] Not only does moisture

decrease lubricant efficiency and causes early wear of machinery parts, it also

increases maintenance costs and down-time while machinery is being repaired

and can have devastating effects on the lubricating oils themselves.

Whether from condensation due to temperature fluctuations during storage or

from exposure to ambient humidity, the threat of water contamination is always

there. From base oil to full synthetic, oil’s high susceptibility for water

absorption increases the likelihood that moisture contamination will occur.

Water also renders some additives ineffective while it reacts with others to

create excess sediment, hydrogen sulfide and other compounds.[5] All of this leads to pitting and particle contamination,

which in turn increase friction and decrease performance, reducing bearing life even further.[5]

Water can also cause premature breakdown of a lubricant itself through oxidation and additive precipitation.[9] Moisture

contamination can also change the viscosity of an oil. Excess water lowers an oil’s viscosity, negatively impacting the

lubricant’s ability to maintain the proper film thickness to protect the bearings and ultimately decreasing the load that

those bearings can support.[9] When this happens, corrosion and pitting are more likely to occur. This again leads to particle

contamination and further machinery damage.

As little as 100 ppm water can cause a 32-48% decrease in bearing life.[1] For this reason, it is essential to perform routine

moisture testing on lubricating oils. Not only does this ensure that they are in optimum operating range, but it also helps

to discover, correct and prevent moisture contamination problems before they cause costly or irreparable damage.

Historical Methods of Moisture Analysis Traditional methods for determining the presence of water in oils include the crackle (scintillation) test, Fourier transform

infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and Karl Fischer (KF) titration.[5] Of these options, only FTIR and Karl Fischer can give

quantitative data regarding the actual moisture content of an oil.

Fig. 2 Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication

Page 3: Moisture ontamination and its Effect on the Remaining ... · Whether your lube oil is designed for an engine, turbine or even an assembly line, accurate control of moisture in lubricating

Arizona Instrument LLC

3375 N. Delaware St. | Chandler, AZ 85225

Tel: (800) 528-7411 | Fax: (602) 281-1745

[email protected]

The Crackle Test is Subjective and Nonquantitative The crackle test is generally considered to be a reliable method of detecting the

presence of free or emulsified water in oils. It is most commonly used to give a

“yes of no” answer as to whether or not water contamination has occurred. In

other words, the crackle test is non-quantitative. Even when commonly

practiced, the interpreted data is only accurate as low as 500 ppm and is still

considered subjective at best.[8] Other limitations include the test’s inability to

measure chemically dissolved water and the imperceptibility of results when

test temperatures have reached higher than 160ᵒC.[8] Potential dangers of the

crackle test include eye injuries, burns and inhalation or contact with toxic

fumes and vapors.

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) is Susceptible to a

Number of Interferences Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) is a method of analysis that

involves observing the interaction between various wavelengths of infrared

light and a sample, in this case a sample of oil. Additives and contaminants

absorb and reflect different wavelengths of infrared light, and those

measurements are then used to calculate the levels of those things that are

present. The problem with this method of moisture analysis is that there are

several interferences. Glycol, dust and soot, severe oxidation and certain

additives can falsely inflate or deflate moisture contamination readings.[6]

Karl Fischer Titration Requires Special Training and the use of

Hazardous Chemical Reagents Perhaps the most widely used method of moisture analysis is

Karl Fischer titration.[5] Although it is capable of producing

moisture specific results that are both accurate and precise, KF

titration is difficult to use unless operated by someone with the

proper training. A specially trained analyst also needs to be on

hand to repair or perform troubleshooting on the KF.

Common interferences of Karl Fischer that can bias test results

include mercaptans, ketones, high pH materials, various

functional additives and oxidation products.[5] Routine cleaning

and replacement of chemical reagents and expensive glassware

are major contributors to the high cost of ownership of a KF

titrator.

Fig. 3 Crackle Test

Fig. 4 FTIR

Fig. 5 Karl Fischer Titration

Page 4: Moisture ontamination and its Effect on the Remaining ... · Whether your lube oil is designed for an engine, turbine or even an assembly line, accurate control of moisture in lubricating

Arizona Instrument LLC

3375 N. Delaware St. | Chandler, AZ 85225

Tel: (800) 528-7411 | Fax: (602) 281-1745

[email protected]

Computrac Offers a Chemical Free, Moisture Specific Alternative to Karl Fischer With all of the interferences and limitations that

come with traditional methods of moisture analysis,

more and more reliability professionals are turning to

relative humidity (RH) sensing technology to make

moisture analysis easier, more accurate and less of a

financial burden. Relative humidity sensor moisture

analyzers have a comparable lower detection limit to

that of the KF (10 ppm) but are as easy to use as the

crackle test.[5] No guessing, no hazardous chemicals,

no fragile and expensive glassware and no specialized

training needed.

The RH method allows for a much more simplified

user experience. This decreases the chance of user

error and increases the reliability of test results.

Maintenance is also much less complicated. A yearly

calibration is virtually all that is needed to keep your

analyzer in working order. Because relative humidity sensors are moisture specific, there are also far fewer interferences.

The mercaptans that cause so much trouble in a Karl Fischer have no effect on the results of a relative humidity sensor

moisture analyzer, although methanol and acetonitrile can cause a slight interference when present in high

concentrations.

Comparing Moisture Analysis Test Methods Testing lubricating oils for moisture contamination is essential, but which method is ideal? The crackle test is simple to

perform, but any data gathered is subjective and non-quantitative. FTIR is more sensitive than the crackle test but is prone

to erroneous readings due to its many interferences. That leaves Karl Fischer titration and relative humidity sensing

technology.

For years Karl Fischer has been the gold standard for moisture analysis. Technicians with the proper training and education

are able to obtain accurate and repeatable results. If, however, the relative humidity sensor could be proven to be

equivalent to KF, it could revolutionize how we test for moisture contamination in lubricating oils. An RH sensor moisture

analyzer requires much less upkeep and is durable enough that it can be used not just in the lab, but on the production

floor.

In order to prove the RH sensor moisture analyzer’s equivalence to

KF titration, six lubricating oils with varying levels of moisture

contamination were tested. All were tested using volumetric KF

titration as well as the moisture analyzer with a built-in relative

humidity sensor.

The moisture analyzer used for this experiment consists of an RH

sensor with two plates that have a constant dielectric difference

between them. When moisture travels between the plates, it

changes the capacitance. That change is then used to calculate the

amount of moisture present in the sample.

Fig. 6 Computrac® Vapor Pro® XL

Page 5: Moisture ontamination and its Effect on the Remaining ... · Whether your lube oil is designed for an engine, turbine or even an assembly line, accurate control of moisture in lubricating

Arizona Instrument LLC

3375 N. Delaware St. | Chandler, AZ 85225

Tel: (800) 528-7411 | Fax: (602) 281-1745

[email protected]

As you can see below, the RH Sensor method produces results that correlate well with Karl Fischer.

The nature of the RH sensing technology as well as the lack of chemical reagents means that the RH sensor method has

far fewer interferences than KF titration. A known interference for KF that causes positive bias when measuring moisture

content is sulfur.[5] Of the samples above, 4 contained sulfur. As you can see from the two samples with high levels of

sulfur, the KF reading was much higher than that of the RH sensor.

While there are methods and calculations that experts can employ to obtain unbiased results after a KF test is performed,

these are complicated and time consuming. Overall, the RH sensor technology has proven to be more accurate and precise

while being significantly easier and more intuitive to operate.

Conclusion Whether your lube oil is designed for an engine, turbine or even an assembly line, accurate control of moisture in

lubricating oils is critical to keeping your machines running at their fullest potential. Failure to control moisture in lube oils

can result in excessive pitting, oxidation and particle contamination, which in turn increases friction and decreases not

just the performance of machinery, but the length of its useful life.[9] For this reason, it is essential to routinely test your

lubricating oils so that you can discover, correct and prevent moisture contamination before it develops into a more

serious problem.

Of the methods available to test for moisture contamination, our evaluation has proven that an RH sensor moisture

analyzer is equivalent to Karl Fischer titration. While it is possible for a trained technician to obtain accurate and precise

results by using Karl Fischer, the instrumentation is much more complicated, fragile and expensive than a moisture

analyzer with a built in relative humidity sensor, making the RH sensor moisture analyzer ideal for testing lubricating oils

for moisture contamination.

87

5.2

5

23

19

.50

85

7.5

0

23

44

.00

22

.60

12

0.0

045

3.2

1

17

09

.00

90

9.9

1

21

77

.00

25

.20

12

2.0

0

0

250

500

750

1000

1250

1500

1750

2000

2250

2500

2750

3000

High Sulfur, LowMoisture Engine

Lubricant

High Sulfur, HighMoisture Engine

Lubricant

Low Sulfur, LowMoisture In-Service

Lubricant

Low Sulfur, HighMoisture In-Service

Lubricant

Ultra Low MoistureTurbine Oil

Low MoistureSynthetic Engine

Lubricant

PP

M H

20

Moisture in LubricantsKF Titration vs. RH Sensor

KF Titration RH Sensor

Page 6: Moisture ontamination and its Effect on the Remaining ... · Whether your lube oil is designed for an engine, turbine or even an assembly line, accurate control of moisture in lubricating

Arizona Instrument LLC

3375 N. Delaware St. | Chandler, AZ 85225

Tel: (800) 528-7411 | Fax: (602) 281-1745

[email protected]

References:

1. Cantley, Richard E. (1976). The Effect of Water in Lubricating Oil on Bearing Fatigue Life. ASLE Trans., 20(3), 244-

248.

2. Fitch, J.C. & Jaggermauth, Simeon. Moisture – The Second Most Destructive Lubricant Contaminate, and its

Effects on Bearing Life. http://www.maintenanceresources.com/referencelibrary/oilanalysis/oa-m.htm

3. Larsson, Roland. Luleå University of Technology. Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication – Part 1.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCM2YHcd8kU

4. Larsson, Roland. Luleå University of Technology. Modelling thin film flow & Lubrication theory – Part 1.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X6KPbpSg-o

5. Moore, James. Moisture in Oils: The Three-Headed Beast. http://www.azic.com/moisture-in-oils-the-three-

headedbeast/

6. Noria Corporation. Certification Series. Level II Couse Workbook Oil Analysis. 2014.

7. Noria Corporation. Lubrication Basics. http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/24100/lubrication-basics

8. Noria Corporation. Monitor Water-In-Oil with the Visual Crackle Test.

http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/301/visual-crackle-oil-test

9. Whitefield, C. David. Clean Up Your Oil – Revisited.

http://www.cashmanequipment.com/bently/publications/articles/4Q01whitefield.php


Recommended