Molecular orbital theory approach to bonding in transition metal complexes
Molecular orbital (MO) theory considers the overlap of atomic orbitals, of matching symmetry and comparable energy, to form molecular orbitals.
When atomic orbital wave functions are combined, they generate equal numbers of bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals.
The bonding MO is always lower in energy than the corresponding antibonding MO.
Electrons occupy the molecular orbitals in order of their increasing energy in accordance with the aufbau principal.
Bond-Order = Electrons in bonding MOs – Electrons in antibonding MOs 2
2pz
1s
2pz
2s
2pz*
2s*
1s*
2s*
2px,2py*
2px
2px,2py
2s
1s
2py
2px* 2py*
2pz*
1s*
Molecular Orbitals for Homonuclear Diatomic Species
Molecular orbital descriptions of dioxygen species.
2p
2p*
2p*
2p
1560
121~128 ~149
1150-1100 850-740
3O2
Tripletoxygen
Singletoxygen
Superoxide Peroxide
1O2 (1
Singletoxygen1O2 (1 2O2
1O22-
Bond-order2.01.5 1.0
vibrational stretching frequency (cm-1)
Bond-length (pm)
Molecular orbital approach to bonding in octahedral complexes, ML6
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Combinations of atomic orbitals Molecular Orbital
4s ± 1/√6(σ1 + σ2 + σ3 + σ4 + σ5 + σ6) a1g
4px ± 1/√2 (σ1 σ2)
4py ± 1/√2 (σ3 σ4) t1u
4pz ± 1/√2 (σ5 σ6)
3dx2 - y2 ± 1/2 (σ1 + σ2 σ3 σ4) eg
3dz2 ± 1/√12 (2 σ5 + 2 σ6 σ1 σ2 σ3 σ4)
3dxy
3dxz Non-bonding in σ complex t2g
3dyz
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
MO diagram for -bonded octahedral metal complex
a1g
a1g*
t1u*
t1u
eg*
t2g
eg
4p
4s
3d
6 ligandorbitals (
Metal ion, Mn+ Ligand, L[ML6]n+
o
12 electrons
dn electrons
a1g
a1g*
t1u*
t1u
eg*
t2g
eg
4p
4s
3d
6 ligandorbitals
Metal ion, Mn+ Ligand, L[ML6]n+
o
LMCTtransitions
MLCTtransitions
d-d transitions
ligand electrons
d electrons
Electronic Transitions in d4 Octahedral Metal Complex
Since the metal 4p and t2 orbitals are of the same symmetry, e → t2 transitions in Td complexes are less “d-d” than are t2g → eg transitions inOh complexes. They are therefore more allowed and have larger absorbtivity values (
M.O. Diagram for Tetrahedral Metal Complex
t2b
t2*
a1*
a1b
e
t2
4p
4s
3d 4 ligandorbitalsf illed with lone pair electrons ( )
t
ML4M 4 L
3d electrons
Metal-ligand -bonding interactions
t2g orbitals (dxy, dxz, dyz) are non-bonding in a -bonded octahedral complex
ligands of -symmetry overlap with the metal t2g orbitals to form metal-ligand -bonds.
-unsaturated ligands such as CO, CN- or 1,10-phenanthroline or sulfur and phosphorus donor ligands (SR2, PR3) with empty t2g-orbitals have the correct symmetry to overlap with the metal t2g orbitals.
C O
Metal- d
*
Ligand overlap-
*(t2g)
M
C=O
Metal- d Ligand -
P
R
RR
d(t2g) (t2g)
M
acceptor interactions have the effect of lowering the energy of the non-bonding t2g orbitals and increasing the magnitude oct.
ML6 Complex
ML6 Complex
6 Ligand orbitals
t2g(occupied)
eg*eg
*
t2g*
t2gb
Ligand(vacant)
his explains why -acceptor ligands like CO and CN- are strong field ligands, and why metal carbonyl and metal cyanide complexes are generally low-spin.
Metal- d Ligand -
L
p(t2g)
MLigand p (full)e.g. halide ion, X-
RO-
-interactions involving -donation of electron density from filled p-orbitals of halides (F- and Cl-) and oxygen donors, to the t2g of the
metal, can have the opposite effect of lowering the magnitude ofoct. In this case, the t2g
electrons of the -complex, derived from
the metal d orbitals, are pushed into the higher t2g* orbitals and
become antibonding. This has the effect of lowering oct.
(R)
ML6 Complex
ML6 Complex
6 Ligand orbitals
t2g(occupied)
eg*
t2g*
t2gb
Ligand(f illed)
eg*
Effect of ligand to metal donor interactions
-alkene organometallic complexes
HH
C
HH
C
Pt
Cl
Cl
Cl
Zeise’s Salt, K[PtCl3(C2H4)]
H
H
C
H
H
C
M
H
H
C
H
H
C
M
Metal Alkene ( Metal (t2g) Alkene ((dX2-y
2) donation -backbonding
L
L
L
L
L
L
C CHH
H HC C
HH
H H
-bonding MO (f illed) -antibonding MO
(empty)
*
acceptor interactions have the effect of lowering the energy of the non-bonding t2g orbitals and increasing the magnitude oct.
ML6 Complex
ML6 Complex
6 Ligand orbitals
t2g(occupied)
eg*eg
*
t2g*
t2gb
Ligand(vacant)
his lowering of the energy of the t2g orbitals also results in 9 strongly bonding M.O.’s well separated in energy from the antibonding orbitals
ML6 Complex
ML6 Complex
6 Ligand orbitals
t2g(occupied)
eg*eg
*
t2g*
t2gb
Ligand(vacant)
a1g
t1u
eg18 bonding electrons
6 -donor ligands (f illed)
Consequences of -bonding interactions between metal and ligand
Enhanced -splitting for -acceptor ligands makes -unsaturated ligands like CO, CN- and alkenes very strong-field ligands.
Stabilization of metals in low oxidation states. Delocalization of electron density from low oxidation state (electron-rich) metals into empty ligand orbitals by “back-bonding” enables metals to exist in formally zero and negative oxidation states (Fe(CO)5, Ni(CO)4
2-).
Accounts for organometallic chemistry of -Acid ligands
The application of the “18-electron rule” to predict and rationalize structures of many acidorganometallic compounds.
Electron donation by -unsaturated ligands
M
M
M
C C
M
AlkeneH2C=CH2
1,3-Butadiene C4H6
CyclopentadienylC5H5 (Cp)
BenzeneC6H6
CC
C
M
-Allyl C3H5
CH2=CH-CH2-
Ligand Hapticity, Electrons donated
CO M-CO 2
2
3
4
5
6
Ru
C C
CC
CO
O
OO
O Ru
5 CO 10
8
18
Ru(CO)5
6-C6H6
Mo
3 CO
6
6
6
18
Mo
C C
C
O O
O
Mo( C6H6)(CO)3
Examples of 18-electron organometallic complexes with -unsaturated (-acid) ligands
H H
Mo
C C
C
O O
O
C7H8
Mo
3 CO
6
66
18
W
C
CO
O
C5H5
5-C5H5
W
2 CO
3
54
6
18
W( C5H5)(5-C5H5)(CO)2
Fe Fe
C
CO
CO
CO
O
Fe 85-C5H5 5CO 22 -CO 2Fe-Fe 1 18
FeCl Fe 8
C3H5 33 CO 61 Cl 1 18
Fe( C3H5)(CO)3Cl
Scope of 16/18-electron rules for d-block organometallic compounds
Usually less than 18 electrons
Sc Ti VY Zr Nb
Usually18 electrons
Cr Mn FeMo Tc RuW Re Os
16 or 18Electrons
Co NiRh PdIr Pt
Fe
O
O of O2 (filled)
dz2 of Fe (empty)
O
O
Fe
of O2 (empty)
t2g (dxz,dyz) of Fe (filled)
*
*
Metal-ligand interactions involving bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals of O2