Date post: | 18-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | clementine-maxwell |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Money
04/18/23 1Econ 7920/Chatterjee
Serves as ◦Medium of exchange◦Store of value◦Unit of account
Helps measure “opportunity cost”
Types of Money: “Fiat” and “Commodity”
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 2
Interest Rate: ◦ Opportunity cost of holding money◦ “Price” of money relative to time
Exchange Rate:◦ Price of one currency relative to another◦ “Price” of money relative to other foreign currencies
Aggregate Price Level:◦ Average “value” of all goods and services produced◦ “Price” of money relative to goods and services
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 3
Changes in the quantity of money affect
◦ Interest RatesInterest Rates: affect incentives to save and invest
◦ Exchange RatesExchange Rates: affect exports, imports, and international financial transactions
◦ Price LevelPrice Level: creates inflation/deflation; affects spending decisions
How does money affect these variables?04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 4
Think in terms of demand and supply
Demand for MoneyDemand for Money: households, firms, financial institutions, government, and foreigners
Supply of MoneySupply of Money: Central Bank◦ Examples: Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, etc.
When money supply changes, what happens to its three prices?
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 5
$6799
M1 + small time deposits, savings deposits, money market mutual funds, money market deposit accounts
M2
$1391C + demand deposits, travelers’ checks, other checkable deposits
M1
$739CurrencyC
amount ($ billions)
assets includedsymbol
Would you like to receive $100 today or a year from now?
The interest rate is the “opportunity cost” of holding money today
When money supply increases, short-term interest rates fall (why?)
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 7
How does the Federal Reserve alter the quantity of money in the economy?
Three tools of Monetary Policy:◦ Discount RateDiscount Rate: The rate at which commercial banks
can borrow from the Fed◦ Reserve RequirementReserve Requirement: The fraction of each deposit
a bank must maintain as reserves (not to be lent)◦ Federal Funds RateFederal Funds Rate: The interest rate commercial
banks charge each other for overnight loans (guaranteed by deposits at the Fed) benchmark nominal interest rate in the economy
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 8
The Fed usually targets the Federal Funds Rate through its Open Market Operations
Open Market Purchase: Open Market Purchase: The Fed buys government bonds and other financial assets injects cash into the economy (money supply increases)
Open Market Sale:Open Market Sale: The Fed sells government bonds and other financial assets withdraws cash from the economy (money supply falls)
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 9
How many units of a foreign currency can one unit of the Home currency buy?
The US-Euro exchange rate: 0.7 Euros/$ (09/05/2008)
Example: What does it mean when ◦ the exchange rate falls to 0.6 Euros/$◦ the exchange rate rises to 0.8 Euros/$
Understanding “depreciation” and “appreciation” of an exchange rate
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 10
Country July 14, 2006 Sept 5, 2008
Euro 0.79 Euro/$ 0.70 Euro/$
Japan 116.3 Yen/$ 107.75 Yen/$
Mexico 11.0 Pesos/$ 10.46 Pesos/$
Russia 27.0 Rubles/$ 25.48 Rubles/$
South Africa 7.2 Rand/$ 7.99 Rand/$
U.K. 0.54 Pounds/$ 0.57 Pounds/$
Exchange Rate DepreciationDepreciation: a unit of the home currency can buy fewer units of a foreign currency
Exchange Rate AppreciationAppreciation: a unit of the home currency can buy more units of a foreign currency
If the US dollar has depreciated against the Euro, then the Euro has appreciated against the dollar
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 12
Consequences of a currency depreciation:◦Domestic (Home) goods are cheaper to the rest
of the world exports increase◦Foreign goods are expensive at Home imports
decrease
Anything that increases the demand for a country’s currency (money) will appreciateappreciate its exchange rate
When money supply increases, short-term exchange rates tend to depreciatedepreciate (why?)
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 13
An increase in money supply higher spending on goods and services increase in aggregate demand
If supply of goods and services cannot meet up with demand excess demand is created higher prices to clear markets inflationinflation
In general, an increase in money supply creates inflation
Countries that have high growth rates of money supply also tend to have higher rates of inflation
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 14
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
M2 growth rate
inflation rate
Over the long run, the inflation and money growth rates move together,
as the quantity theory predicts.
Over the long run, the inflation and money growth rates move together,
as the quantity theory predicts.
0.1
1
10
100
1 10 100Money Supply Growth (percent, logarithmic scale)
Inflation rate (percent,
logarithmic scale)
0.1
1
10
100
1 10 100Money Supply Growth (percent, logarithmic scale)
Inflation rate (percent,
logarithmic scale)
Singapore
U.S.
Switzerland
Argentina
Indonesia
Turkey
BelarusEcuador
International data on inflation and money growth, 1996-2004
Increase in Money Supply
The ultimate (long-run) effect on the economy is determined by the interaction of these three factors
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 17
Reduces interest rates
Depreciates exchange rate
Creates inflation
percent per year
-5
0
5
10
15
1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
inflation rate
nominal interest rate
1
10
100
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Inflation Rate (percent, logarithmic scale)
Nominal Interest Rate
(percent, logarithmic scale)
1
10
100
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Inflation Rate (percent, logarithmic scale)
Nominal Interest Rate
(percent, logarithmic scale)
Switzerland
Germany
Brazil
Romania
Zimbabwe
Bulgaria
U.S.
Israel
“Nominal” variables: measured in monetary units
◦ Examples: “dollar” value of GDP, wages and salaries, market interest rates and exchange rates
“Real” variables: measured in physical units
◦ Examples: above variables adjusted for prices and/or inflation Physical output produced (real GDP), wages adjusted for the price level (real wage), etc.
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 20
A country produces 100 units of output in 2006, at a price level of $5 per unit of output. ◦ Nominal GDP = 100 x 5 = $500◦ Real GDP = 100 units of output
In 2007, the country produced 100 units of output, but prices doubled to $10 per unit.◦ Nominal GDP = 100 x 10 = $1000◦ Real GDP = 100 units of output
Nominal GDP doubled, but real GDP remained unchanged: is the country richer or better off?
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 21
A country’s well-being is determined by changes in its real GDP real GDP and not nominal GDP
Economic Growth: percentage change in real GDP over time
Real GDP = Nominal GDP/Price level GDP deflator (Price Level)
= Nominal GDP/Real GDP
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 22
“Real” interest rate = Nominal interest rate – Rate of inflation
The real interest rate is determined by the demand for investment and the supply of savings
Nominal interest rate = real interest rate + rate of inflation
Positive relationship between nominal interest rates and inflation
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 23
Nominal Interest Rates tend to rise with inflation as creditors care about their command over future output (i.e., they care about the “real” interest rate)
An increase in money supply may reduce short-term interest rates, but by increasing inflationary expectations, can lead to an increase in the long-term interest rate.
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 24
Real exchange rates track changes in the value of goods across countries after adjusting for inflation
Example: ◦Suppose US-Mexico exchange rate is 1 Peso/$
today◦A shirt in the US costs $1, and in Mexico it costs
0.80 Pesos◦So, shirts are cheaper in Mexico relative to the US◦Americans will choose to buy Mexican shirts
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 25
Now, suppose the US-Mexico exchange rate falls by 25%◦ The new exchange rate is: 0.75 Pesos/$◦ The US currency has depreciated against the Peso◦ If prices remain constant, then the $1 shirt in the US will
cost 0.75 Pesos to Mexicans◦ The 0.80 Pesos Mexican shirt would now cost $1.07 to
Americans (=0.8/0.75)◦ American shirts cheaper to Mexicans, and Mexican
shirts more expensive for Americans◦ US exports to Mexico rise, but imports fall US trade
balance improves LessonLesson: an exchange rate depreciation
improves the trade balance
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 26
Let’s complicate things…Let’s complicate things… Next year, US inflation rose from 0 to 30%,
while in Mexico, prices remained stable.◦ So, the $1 shirt in the US now costs $1.30 ◦ The $1.30 shirt in the US will cost 0.98 Pesos to Mexicans
(=1.30 x 0.75)◦ To Americans, the cost of a Mexican shirt is still $1.07
(=0.80/0.75)◦ Mexican shirts now cheaper than American shirts◦ American exports decrease and imports increase US trade
balance worsens LessonLesson: it’s just not enough to compare changes in
“nominal” exchange rates when comparing goods prices one must keep track of inflation rates across countries too
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 27
% in real exchange rate = % in nominal exchange rate – (inflation rate in foreign – inflation rate at home)
In our example: though the US nominal exchange rate depreciated, its real exchange rate (relative to the Peso) appreciated
Inflation differential across countries (if large enough) can offset the effects of a nominal depreciation of the exchange rate
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 28
If a country is experiencing a rapid growth in money supply, then
◦Nominal exchange rates can depreciate
◦But inflation can cause a real exchange rate appreciation
◦Eventually, exports can fall and imports rise worsening of the trade balance
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 29
10
15
20
25
30
35
7/10/94 8/29/94 10/18/94 12/7/94 1/26/95 3/17/95 5/6/95
U.S
. Cen
ts p
er M
exic
an P
eso
10
15
20
25
30
35
7/10/94 8/29/94 10/18/94 12/7/94 1/26/95 3/17/95 5/6/95
U.S
. Cen
ts p
er M
exic
an P
eso
U.S. goods suddenly more expensive to Mexicans◦U.S. firms lost revenue◦Hundreds of bankruptcies along U.S.-Mexican
border
Mexican assets worth less in dollars◦Reduced wealth of millions of U.S. citizens as
there was substantial US investment in Mexican assets (through mutual funds, pension funds, 401 k’s, etc…)
In the early 1990s, Mexico was an attractive place for foreign investment:
◦ Mexican interest rates were high promise of higher returns on investment
◦ Mexican Central Bank maintained and had committed to a fixed exchange rate against the dollar
◦ This made returns from foreign investment very stable
◦ There were large capital inflows into Mexico in the early 1990’s, including a substantial portion from the US
The high interest rate in Mexico reflected inherent risk:risk:◦ During 1994, political developments made Mexico a risky place
to invest (peasant uprising in the Chiapas and assassination of leading presidential candidate)
◦ Capital outflows started as early as December 1993, but the information was concealed by the Central Bank
Mexican inflation rate was much higher than the US rate◦ The Federal Reserve raised U.S. interest rates several times
during 1994 to prevent U.S. inflation Though the Mexican nominal exchange rate was fixed,
there was substantial real exchange rate appreciation of the Peso
Maintaining the peg became increasingly difficult for the Mexican Central Bank
04/18/23Econ 7920/Chatterjee 34
These events put downward pressure on the peso
Mexico’s central bank had repeatedly promised
foreign investors that it would not allow the peso’s value to fall, so it bought pesos and sold dollars to “prop up” the peso exchange rate
Doing this requires that Mexico’s central bank have adequate reserves of dollars Did it?
December 1993 ……………… $28 billion
August 17, 1994 ……………… $17 billion
December 1, 1994 …………… $ 9 billion
December 15, 1994 ………… $ 7 billion
December 1993 ……………… $28 billion
August 17, 1994 ……………… $17 billion
December 1, 1994 …………… $ 9 billion
December 15, 1994 ………… $ 7 billion
During 1994, Mexico’s central bank hid the fact that its reserves were being depleted.
Dec. 20, 1994: Mexico devalues the peso by 13% (fixes the Peso at 25 cents instead of 29 cents per $)
Investors are SHOCKED!SHOCKED! – they had nono idea Mexico was running out of reserves.
nvestors start dumping Mexican assets, pulling their capital out of Mexico.
Dec. 22, 1994: central bank’s reserves nearly gone. It abandons the fixed rate and lets the Peso float.
Within a week, the Peso falls another 30%.
1995: U.S. & IMF set up $50b line of credit to provide loan guarantees to Mexico’s govt.
This helped restore confidence in Mexico, and reduced the risk premium on their interest rate.
After a hard recession in 1995, Mexico began a strong recovery from the crisis (also helped by NAFTA)
Moral of the Story: Had investors paid attention to the Peso’s real exchange rate, they could have saved millions of dollars