Date post: | 03-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | cory-jordan |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Monitoring and Evaluation in Perspective
Lessons from International Experience
Delivering on the Promises of e-government
PREM WeekWashington DC – 26 April 2005
Bruno LANVINCITPO/GICT
The World Bank
Four points
• e-gov, e-strat, k-strat, d-strat• M&E as a strategic tool (WB approach)• Some lessons from experience • Avenues for action
Point 1
• e-gov, e-strat, k-strat, d-strat• M&E as a strategic tool (WB approach)• Some lessons from experience • Avenues for action
Global Information Infrastructure
Applications
Digital Divide
Content
Knowledge
Empowerment
1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003
Shedding different lights at a complex set of issues
2005
Missing Link(Maitland Report)
Infrastructure
Regulatory aspects
E-Strat, D-Strat and M&E StratRenewed ‘IS’ context(Information Society approach)
WSIS (Declaration and Plan of Action)
MDGs (Goals and specific
targets under Goal 8)
E-STRATEGY
Monitoring and Evaluation
M&E
OUTCOME(e-readiness, connectivity,
usage .. etc..)
Changes(PRSP, CAS, ..)
New ‘E’ context
Is ICT important
for the success of the country’s
D-Strategy ?
Evidence from ICT4D experienceDOT Force, etc ..
NO
YES
E-strategies and Development :from D to E to IS
Development StrategyD-STRATEGY
(PRSP, CAS, ..)
Monitoring and Evaluation
M&E
OUTCOME(growth, competitiveness,poverty, health, education,
etc ..)
Traditional ‘D’ context
Point 2
• e-gov, e-strat, k-strat, d-strat• M&E as a strategic tool (WB approach)• Some lessons from experience • Avenues for action
Monitoring & Evaluation Toolkit for E-strategies Results
METER: background and objectives
• Consideration of 50+ e-strategies• Identification of goals pursued and ways to
assess progress • Identification of linkages between ICT objectives
and sectoral/strategic needs (WSIS, MDGs e.g. )• Proposal for an M&E methodology and specific
implementation tools
Assumptions and risks
Resources
Actions
Key initiatives
Strategic priorities
Policy goals
From LogFrame to M&E
Indicators
Impact
Outcomes
Outputs
Deliverables
Background and rationaleBackground and rationale
MethodologyMethodology
Framework
• E-readiness• Security• Digital Divide
Infrastructureand ICT sector
• Rationale• Definition• Overview• M&E Tables• Assumptions and risks
Indicators and quantificationIndicators and quantificationAnnexes
Module 2
Module 1
Toolkit Structure
E-government
E-business
E-learning
E-health
• Rationale• Definition• Overview
• M&E Tables• Assumptions and risks
• Rationale• Definition• Overview
• M&E Tables• Assumptions and risks
• Rationale• Definition• Overview
• M&E Tables• Assumptions and risks
• Rationale• Definition• Overview
• M&E Tables• Assumptions and risks
Module 3 Modules 4 & 5
SectoralModules(6 & 7)
Create efficient, responsive, transparent
government
Publish: Provide valuable
on-line information
Interact: Engage society to
improve government
Contract: Offer cost-effective
online services
M&E : the 3 levels of E-government
e-g
overn
men
tG
enera
l fr
am
ew
ork
to incl
ud
e e
-govern
men
t in
e-s
trate
gie
s
Prerequisite Concern Activity (typical indicators)
Access Infrastructure, costs, competition/ regulation (hence includes proper regulatory and competition frameworks)
Equipment (PCs, kiosks, community centers) Teledensity Rule of law Pro-competitive ICT regulation (tariff and non-tariff barriers, competition in the ICT sector) Cost (fixed line calls and Internet access) Access for disadvantaged or excluded
Basic Skills Basic education, vocational training, ICT awareness
Literacy (alphabetization rates) E-literacy ratios per age/group/sex/region Vocational training
Content Value to government and citizens Questionnaires on value to users/citizens and government Content in local languages
Desire Political leadership and will to reform
Public statements/decisions Laws & regulations (perceptions of quality of legal system)
Engagement Commitment of all components of civil society
Broad involvement of civil society (questionnaire/survey) Local awareness of ICT potential for development (questionnaire/survey)
E-g
overn
men
tExam
ple
: “
inte
ract
” le
vel
Pyramid Layer
Objective Indicator Data source
Policy goals Create an efficient, responsive and transparent government
Perception of overall administrative burden Perception of government effectiveness
Office of Government and Ministry of Local Government
Strategic priorities
Bring valuable information online to the public, anytime anywhere a
Perception of government online presence % pop. using govt. sites Usage growth rate
E-government CIO’s Office
Key initiatives
Roll-out of online information services b Raise public awareness through online and offline channels
No. of agencies with web sites % of agencies with web sites % of information services rolled-out on time
E-government CIO’s Office
Actions Establish an independent central e-government group and M&E unit c Establish selection guidelines for information/content to be posted, including nature and volumeAssess technology and organizational needs/requirementsDevelop online information platformsOffer information services on line, including local language contentDevelop publicity campaign to promote new e-government initiativesSolicit feedback on usability and usefulness of online government services
Central e-government team and M&E unit established by month A Guidelines for M&E established by month B Relevant information sources identified by month C System functional requirements completed by month D Mid-term implementation review conducted by month E Public awareness survey results
Project team or Central M&E unit
(a) There should be a clear linkage between the type of content that is brought on-line and larger development goals, such as economic development, anti-corruption, and attracting FDI.(b) Criteria used for information publication should be related to cost and time savings and envisaged productivity gains.(c) Central e-government group responsible for interoperability and inter-agency consistency of e-government services, security, consolidation of records, and M&E.
METER: next steps
• Gather comments on the toolkit• Establish and launch METER website• Develop new modules (in partnership)• Launch revised version of toolkit at WSIS• Offer toolkit in different languages• Continue to contribute to continuous exchange
of best practices in the area of e-strategies M&E• Reflect outcome in WB practices• Identify, disseminate and promote best practices
Point 3
• e-gov, e-strat, k-strat, d-strat• M&E as a strategic tool (WB approach)• Some lessons from experience • Avenues for action
ICT &Knowledge Economy,Innovation
ICT & sectoral improvement
(e.g. educationhealth, etc..)
ICT access(infrastructure,
equipment,connectivity)
Measurable
Strategic
ICT’s Impact on DevelopmentMeasurable or strategic ?
ICT &Job creation,Productivity,
Competitiveness,Poverty
reduction
Readiness Access Usage Value
- Enhance produc- tive uses of ICTs in economy and ICT awareness in society- Foster SME com- petitiveness at home and abroad
- Promote visible E-government services with measurable impact on SMEs- Foster regional integration through on-line services to rural areas
- Establish a one- stop portal for SME registration- Allow and promote on line request/issuance of land titles and birth certificates through commu-nity access points
PolicyD- Strategy
E- Strategy
- Adapt legal syst. for on-line business registration (OLBR)- Create/promote portal for OLBR - Establish CAPs- Create/promote Adm. Doc. portal
Initiatives
Actions
Typical M&E indicators/ time horizon
# of SMEs regis- tered on-line# of CAP created
Example of a possible ‘e-gov’ implementation chain
Relevant M&E indicators
- Pursue a ‘knowledge-based’ competitiveness strategy-Improve image and efficiency of government- Enhance involvement of private sector in key areas- Redress local imbalances (social, geographic, eg)
SME rating of e-govRegional disp.index
ICT awarenessSME
competitiv.
GDP growth% P.S. in GDP
Inequality index
# of hits to site (awareness) for SMEs, titles,..
KOR
A pre-requisite for e-government: Internet Access
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Internet subscribers
per 100 inhabitants
Average cost for 20 hours
(day + evening) in $ PPP
FIN
TUR
ICL
DNK
FRA
GERAUT
CDN UK
USA
SWECH
NORNL
OECD
IRL
SPA
POR
MEXGRE
POL
LUX
BEL
SLK
HUNCZE
The ‘Nordic’ cluster
The ‘mature markets’ cluster
The ‘Emerging Europe’ cluster
Source : World Bank, based on OECD data
Internet Costs and Diffusion(OECD – 2002)
Governments’ functions
Governments’ roles
•E-government- Customs
- Taxes- Procurement
•Statistics/macro-ec managmnt•E-democracy/local government
•Fiscal and monetary policy•Trade/FDI policy•Diplomacy/defense•Education•Legal/regul/compet. policies•Justice/order etc. (“regalian”)
Informatization +Decentralization
Globalization +Market efficiency
CivilSociety +
IT
Demand/Supply for IT purchases
Technology supply, markets for IT
Limits to IT imports/exports
Labor supply for IT sector
Incentives/limits for IT market
Leadership +
Facilitation
E-strategy, national ambition/social project pursued through IT
Demand for IT solutions/leading through example
OLD (diminishing role)
NEW (increasing role)
Pro
du
cer
Fac
ilit
ato
rL
ead
er
Environment Readiness Usage
Provide and promote vision (KISS)• Address ‘Digital Divides’
• domestically• internationally
• Give signals to markets• ICT as a national priority• large projects or objectives
• Promote and defend national interests in international and global forums
G4
G3
Education policy• curricula/life-long learning• ICT training facilities• Wiring/networking of schools
New roles for governmentsG5
E-government• services on line• procurement• trade facilitation• civil society participation• good governance
G2Provide proper environment• Macro-economic environment• Fiscal policies (cost, innovation,
investment, VC, PPP)• Legal/regulatory environment for
ICT (competition, independent regulator, rule of law)
G1
Provide access (univ serv)• Lay out ICT infrastructure• Produce ICT equipment• Finance Public R&D
8.00
Leaders
Fac
ilit
ato
rs
y = 0.6839x + 1.93992
R = 0.3991
GUA
ZIM
PAR
BOL
VEN
ARG
HON
ECU
PAN
EGY
ELS
PHI
PER
INO
TUR
ROM
NICBAN
NIA
MAU
UKR
RUS
URU
GRE
BUL
DOM
JOR
SLK
POL
COS
COL
TRI
MEX
SAFSLV
LIT
LAT
VIE
JAM
THA
INI
CHL
ITA
BEL
GER
AUT
NOR
SRICZE
LUX
HUN
CHN
IRE
MLT
POR
BRA
NWZ
JAPEST
NETAUL
FRA
SPADEN
KOR
SWIICE
SWEUSA
HKG
UK
CAN
ISR
TAI
FIN
SIN
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00
Note : the ‘Government’ variable of the GITR index has been used as proxy for Government leadership (x), whereas ‘Competition in telecoms’ has been used as an indicator of the effectiveness of Governments as facilitators (y)
First circle (top performers)
Second circle (the contestants)
Third circle (ready or not)
e-government for ‘new’ government
Point 4
• e-gov, e-strat, k-strat, d-strat• M&E as a strategic tool (WB approach)• Some lessons from experience • Avenues for action
The A,B,C,D,E of the Digital Divide
Access
Basic skills
Content
Desire
Engagement
- Infrastructure, costs, competition/regulation
-Basic education, vocational training, entrepreneurship- Local value, languages
- Local will to reform
-Commitment of all compo- nents of civil society
Direct effets
• Increased public sector efficiency– Savings for governemnt (lower administrative costs)– Better management of public resources
• Better access to public services by firms and citizens– Savings for users (time and money) – Extended coverage (geographic, social, timewise: 24/7)– New services offered (e.g. itineraries, doc search & comparison,.)
• Improved economic governance– Data on traffic (flows of goods & services, payments, tracking, ..)
is more precise, quasi-instantaneous and cross-referentiable– Public service staff can find renewed motivation– Cooperation improved between public sector, private sector and
citizens
Indirect effects
• Transparency/governance– e-procurement (on-line tendering)– Selectivity systems in customs and other inspection-based services– Involvement of citizens in policy debates and decisions
• Business competitiveness– Faster services (registrations, licenses, authorizations,..)– Timely access to strategic data (prices, markets, laws/regulations,,..)
• IT knowledge and litteracy– learning-by-doing, incremental improvements to software, etc…– Breaking psychological barriers (public access points, ..)
• Building information societies– Turning local knowledge into value and competitiveness (culture, modus
operandi,..)– Attracting external partners (trade, investment, ..)– Contributing to global development efforts (MDGs)
e-government vs better government
• Consider and promote e-government as a government-centered effort
• Consider and promote e-government as a technology-driven effort
• Replace every paper-based process by an electronic process
• Offer ‘ministry-specific’ e-solutions
• Launch, measure, punish/reward
• Focus the e-government process on users (citizens & businesses)
• Focus e-government strategy on people (both on the government and on the users side); favor technology-neutral choices
• Use e-government as a tool to foster changes in attitudes and thinking, and as an instrument for reforms
• Rally government-wide energies and competence around common procedures and standards (back office), and an ‘all-of-government’ approach (front office)
• Adopt an early common approach to monitoring and evaluation (accountability, ownership, results)
Ways to fail Ways to go