Monitoring CBR: Collaborative development of a menu and
guidelines
Ros Madden, Sue Lukersmith, Tinashe Dune, Sally Hartley, Alexandra Gargett
The University of Sydney
Bounlanh PhaybounCooperative Orthotic and Prosthetic Enterprise, Laos
Nguyen Viet NhanOffice of Genetic Counseling and Disabled Children, Vietnam
Insert Partner Logo - Delete if not required
2
Outline
› Why monitoring?› Why a menu and guidelines?› Methods being used› Progress and next steps› Potential use
3
Why monitoring?
Monitoring differs from ‘evaluation’ in that it:
› Has an internal focus
› Provides ongoing information- About inputs and outputs as well as outcomes
› Is a local information system designed, managed and used by CBR managers and stakeholders
› Enables managers and staff to identify and check for progress, changes or problems (person or program) - Leading to possible program adjustments
4
Why a menu and guidelines?
Monitoring should be:
› In the hands of program managers and stakeholders
› Able to be adapted to local conditions
› Based on best practice and established knowledge- Promoting standards but allowing choice from a ‘menu’ of items
› Empowering
› Tools with guidelines, not a formulaic recipe book
Similar to the CBR guidelines!
CBR monitoring menu: methods being used
5
Collaborative information
design: agencies’ basic needs for
and uses of information
Literature reviews: CBR monitoring and
evaluation literature Ideas and
items (a menu or toolkit, with guidelines) for testing
Testing in country
Testing in country
Refined monitoring menu and guidelines
Communication, further research, new partners +
International Advisory Group
Literature review (1)
› What tools and methods have been used for monitoring and evaluating CBR?- Who used them?
- In what country or setting?
- Who was involved in providing information ?
- What is the goal of the program and how does it relate to CBR matrix?
- How do tools relate to CBR matrix?
- Does the monitoring and evaluation link to the CBR principles?
- Purpose of monitoring and evaluation?
- How were people with disabilities involved in the research?
6
7
Review of literature (2)
Can evaluations of CBR programmes be mapped onto the CBR Matrix and ICF framework?
Collaborative information design
We:› Discussed information
needs in terms of 4 basic questions
› Developed unstructured lists of items
› Grouped and related the items to standard frameworks where possible
PLACE IMAGE HERE
8
Why
How
Who
What
9
Much more work to do
Information needs
Information items for monitoring
Refining and structuring the monitoring menu together –
mapping to standards
Plans for testing and more collaborationPhotos from Google images
10
Possible uses of the monitoring menu in near futureLao PDR
› Designing information collection at village level, or database (central)
› Progress in the village/community – evaluating program
› CBR worker performance and development
› Monitoring service use and progress for people with disabilities
› Identifying and monitoring the influence of the environment on participation
› Empowering- Community role in creating empowering environment - Monitoring: Awareness–
acceptance, and then involvement
› Enhance knowledge and skills of the personnel in early intervention area with available resources (e.g. as a planning and awareness raising checklist)
11
DISABLED PEOPLE
Possible uses of the monitoring menu in near futureVIETNAM
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
NATIONAL POLICIES
LIVELIHOOD
EDUCATION
EMPOWERMENT
SOCIAL
HEALTH CARE
LOCAL HEALTH WORKERS
FAMILIES’ MEMBERS
EXPERT TEAMS
TRAINING PROGRAMS
TRAINING PROGRAMS
NETWORK
INCOME
LOCATION
12
Khop ChaiCám ơn
Thank you
If you are interested in discussing this project and perhaps participating in the future
please attend our workshop on Wednesday 7 December, 9.30 am
Room 022 Law School Annex (next door)