+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16,...

Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16,...

Date post: 15-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: paula-seldon
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
16
Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff
Transcript
Page 1: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards

APPA National ConferenceJune 16, 2009Carl A. Mycoff

Page 2: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

A headhunter discussing Monitoring Organizational Performance for Governing Boards?

It’s what we do.

Page 3: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Driving Metric: Stakeholder Value

Quantitative

Qualitative

It’s first and foremost about the money, but CEO’s can just as easily lose their jobs over tree trimming.

Page 4: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Quantitative: Balancing conflicting forces

PricePower SupplyFinance

ReturnCustomer relationsEconomic DevelopmentStaff Development

Page 5: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Price competitiveness

Regional

National

Global

Page 6: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Power supply: THE largest

component of price

Large and vertically integrated

Distribution/joint action agency

- All requirements

- Project

Page 7: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Financial condition• Debt/equity: Rating agency ratings optimized to minimize interest expense.• Life of asset• Customers deriving benefit• Debt service impact on price • Where should the equity reside? - Distribution - Joint action

Page 8: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

ReturnCash transfer to general

fund; Payment- in-lieu of taxesShared service allocationFree servicesStreet paving

Page 9: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

San Antonio City Public Service (CPS)

Annual electric revenue $1.2 BillionResidential Revenue $672 MillionResidential Revenue under AEP $882 MillionRevenue Saving $210 MillionTransfer to the General Fund $245 MillionFranchise Fee and Property Tax $57 Million

CPS customer residents save annually $398 Million

Page 10: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Tacoma Public Utilities

Annual Retail Electric Revenue $267 MillionAnnual Retail Electric Revenue Under

Puget Energy $404 Million

Retail Revenue Savings $137 Million

Gross Revenue Tax $30 Million

Support Service Allocation $6 Million

Franchise Fee and Property Tax $13 Million

Tacoma Public Utility Customers save annually $160 Million

Page 11: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Customer Relations

Customer satisfaction

Reliability; CAIDI/SAIDI

Power quality/price

Chip manufacturer/irrigator

Page 12: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Economic Development

Build load and revenue- Load factor- Incremental cost to serve.

Mitigate customer dependence

Local job creation

Tax base

Page 13: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Staff Development

Turnover

Successor development Internal promotions Cost/benefit

Safety OSHA Recordable Lost time

Unions Grievances Arbitrations

Page 14: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Quantitative and Qualitative factors

Green resources: College/capital city or coal mining town Subscription rate/premium price

Energy efficiency:

Community culture: High tech/packing house

Staff impact on community relations:

Local hires/market compensation forces:

Page 15: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Qualitative Factors

Relationships/Communication: NO SURPISES

Governing body

Customers

Staff

Joint venture partners

Community

Legislature, administration, and regulatory

Page 16: Monitoring Organizational Performance for Utility Governing Boards APPA National Conference June 16, 2009 Carl A. Mycoff.

Questions?


Recommended