Monitoring results for ensuring real behavioral changes

Vilnius, 17 September 2013

Mr. Kris JoorisKey Driving Competences, Belgium

(c) IRU Academy 2013

ECOeffect Package

(c) IRU Academy 2013

• Training methodology for TTT and EDP training

• Licensing EETS as training tool to ECOeffect partners

• Follow-up on quality of trainings delivered

(c) IRU Academy 2013

RPM diagram

Speed

Accelerati-on

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption

Gear

# braking

# stops

Driver’s nameAccelerator Speed Green zone

Signals are taken from can bus on high frequency

EETS System

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Quality Assurance

REPORTING on training results with EETSFor Quality Assurance on the deployment of ECOeffect trainings: ALL training trips registered with EETS are stored on KDC server after replication by training company or internal fleet trainer

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Theory

ECOeffect main principles on eco-driving: Anticipation look further and wider.

Drive fluently, avoid unnecessary braking's and stops

Drive at a constant speed in the highest possible gear

(c) IRU Academy 2013

SAFETY

FIRST !!!

Individual training report

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Full release accelerator pedal

Lower # of brakings

TRIP 1 TRIP 2 Difference %Elapsed Time mm:ss 39:36 36:04 03:32 8,92%Average Speed km/h 34,25 37,53 3,28 9,58%Total Fuel Consumption l 11,67 9,21 -2,46 -21,09%Average Consumption l/100km 51,6 40,8 -10,8 -20,94%

Average Position Trottle % 27% 28% 1% 3,27%Time vehicle in motion - Zero Throttle mm:ss 08:42 10:24 01:42 19,54%Time - Use of Breaks mm:ss 06:12 03:18 02:53 46,65%Total Distance - Zero Throttle km 5,37 6,97 1,59 29,59%Total Distance - Use of Breaks km 2,60 1,34 -1,26 -48,54%Number of Brakings # 54 33 -21 -38,32%Gear shifts # 181 123 -58 -32,04%Gear shifts(upshift) # 116 72 -44 -37,93%

KEY DRIVING TRAINING SYSTEMEco-Proactive Driving Behaviour "What You Can't Measure, You Cant' Manage"

RESULTS

RESULT ANALYSIS

EETS TRAINING SYSTEM

Training results HSF Poland

(c) IRU Academy 2013

TRIP 1Average consumption

TRIP 2Average consumption

32,9 L/100 km 28,9 L/100 km

(deviation between 23,8 and 55L / 100km) (deviation between 22,6 and 45L / 100km)

Average reduction in consumption (L /100km) = - 4 L/100km

Average reduction in fuel consumption during training

Number of drivers trained: 670 drivers trained

Accomplished by: HSF Logistics and Vive Transport

Training results from May 2011 to August 2013 (14 months)

Training performed by 20 ECOeffect certified internal trainers, measured with EETS

Training trips: all kind of road circumstances, approx. 35 km

-12,24%

Training results Romania

(c) IRU Academy 2013

TRIP 1Average consumption

TRIP 2Average consumption

29,52L / 100 26,79L / 100

Average reduction in consumption (L /100km) = - 2,7L / 100 km

Average reduction in fuel consumption during training

Number of drivers trained: more than 700 drivers

Accomplished by: Cartrans Preda, Com Divers, Duvenbeck, Hoedlmayr, Holleman, Intl. Lazar Cy, Labirint, Lagermax, Logistics RO Tir, Vectra Intl, Willi Betz

Training results from May 2011 to August 2013 (15 months)

Training performed by certified trainers, at 11 companies, measured with EETS

-9,24%

Participants feedback

”By implementing the ECOeffect system, drivers learn to drive economically, to better manage the truck and the result is: fuel

economy, less cost for repairs and less downtime when the truck does not generate profit.

Until now we've trained 36 drivers and already we notice an improvement in truck exploitation. The greatest reduction in

fuel consumption during the course was 3,7 l / 100km.

We train 4 drivers per week, so until October 2013, we will train about 190 drivers from our company.”

Albu Attila, Fleet Manager Duvenbeck, Romania

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Participants feedback

”The ECOeffect program at which Hoedlmayr-Lazar Romania, had the honour to participate, can lead to a greater efficiency

of our business.

ECOeffect program will also help our company to save fuel, money and time. In the next period we have planned

theoretical and practical training through which will pass all company drivers, so they will be familiar with the new trends

in transport”.

Bogdan Cosmulescu, Fleet Manager Hoedlmayr-Lazar, Romania

(c) IRU Academy 2013

ATM approach

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Optimize results… by installing dynamic ATM model in your company

• Assessment

• Training• Monitoring

Good driving Practices

Assessment

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Analysis of the driver’s competences:

• Use an objective way to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of each driver

• Organise an evaluation trip with each driver

• Use a well known route (reference to know what to expect)

• Record trip and trip data

• Debrief results of evaluation trip with driver

Training

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Combination of practical and theory training works best:

• Two drivers per trainer

• Per driver: half day of training (not part of driver’s commercial activities)

• Focus on practice

• Supported by theory

• Public roads: predefined route

• Competence analysis: Report with measurement results and focus points for each driver in EETS

Monitoring

Follow-up of drivers’ performance results on a permanent basis:

• Analysis of reduction in fuel consumption in relation to situation prior to training:

- For the whole group of trained drivers

- For each individual driver

• Monthly feedback to trained drivers

• Quarterly analysis of “corrective actions”:

- Who needs corrective actions

- What type of corrective actions

- Who will undertake these actions

• Continued Follow-Up after corrective actions

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Why measure driver performance ?

jun jul aug sep oct nov dec20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Wei

ght (

tonn

e)Av

erag

e fu

el c

onsu

mpti

on (l

/100

km

)

Consumption decreases, then steadily increases

Average weight, not constant (33-41 T)

When did the driver perform well?

(c) IRU Academy 2013

FuelConsumption

DriverVehicleTypeWeight

EnvironmentTraffic density

Road TypeShort/long distance

Focus on driver

(c) IRU Academy 2013

How to measure driving behaviour?

Quantitative measuringMeasuring fuel events (e.g. fuel consumption)

Qualitative analysisEvaluating events

Objective ScoreQualitative analysis of driving behaviour, independent from vehicle, activity, environment,…

(c) IRU Academy 2013

QuaNtitative vs QuaLitative

QuaNtitative

Statistics of vehicle metrics are not directly related to driver performance

Difficult interpretation: very detailed knowledge of external conditions is needed

External conditions are changing from day to day, trip to trip, …

QuaLitative Evaluate the actions made

by the driver Fuel consumption is not an

input for the scoring A good driver score will

lead to a low fuel consumption

Ready to use for permanent evaluation and leader boards on driver competences

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Tools for monitoring

(c) IRU Academy 2013

A wide range of telematic providers .... which offer also features to monitor driver performance

EcoScore by KDC

(c) IRU Academy 2013

In order to improve on specific driving skills, subscores are available for:

-Anticipation - Gearing

-Acceleration - Idling

-Technology

Total score is weighted sum of subscores : Anticipation (1/3), Gearing (1/3), Acceleration (1/6), Idling (1/12)

and Technology (1/12).

EcoScore = objective evaluation of driver skills based on driver’s event queues while driving

Event Based Scoring

GOOD ?BAD ?

HOW GOOD ?HOW BAD ?

Score = evaluationof ‘good’ and ‘bad’

(c) IRU Academy 2013

ECOeffect monitoring

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Quantitative

evaluation

Quantitative

evaluation

HSF Polandlonger term results

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Seasonal trend in fuel consumption – impact of changing weather conditions Current level of fuel consumption significantly lower than before training in ECOeffect

project

Duvenbeck ROU longer term results

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Long-term downward trend in fuel consumption: 7% savings , measured 8 months after the ECOeffect project started

Seasonal trend in fuel consumption – impact of changing weather conditions Current level of fuel consumption significantly lower than before training in ECOeffect

project: savings are – 1,8L/100 km

Training – Impact on consumption

(c) IRU Academy 2013

A significant difference between the monthly consumption of the drivers trained (yellow line) versus untrained drivers (blue line): -4.4% as average for

6 months

Duvenbeck ROUCO2 savings

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Drop in CO2 -145 tons saved since start ECOeffect training,

cumulated on 2.750.000 kilometers driven after training

CO2 savings cumulated

(c) IRU Academy 2013

•Total savings CO2: 243.669 kg CO2•Total km driven: 13.404.961•Average savings: 18,18 g/km CO2

ECOeffect Competition

Champion driver selection is based on:

• personal training result registered with EETS – 30% weight;

• personal evolution in consumption before and after training measured 3 months after training – 70 % weight.

Champion company selection is based on:

• personal results during the training – 20% weight;

• company learning profile after training – 60% weight;

• coverage / roll-out within the company – 20% weight.

(c) IRU Academy 2013

(c) IRU Academy 2013

Thank you !