+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Monitoring(and(evaluating(progress( towards(universal...

Monitoring(and(evaluating(progress( towards(universal...

Date post: 09-Dec-2018
Category:
Upload: dinhdung
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
47
Monitoring and evaluating progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil Mauricio L. Barreto 1 , Davide Rasella 1 , Daiane Machado 1 , Rosana Aquino 1 , Diana Lima 1 , Leila Garcia 2 , Alexandra Crispim 2 , Jackson Santos 1 , Juan Escalante 3 , Estela Aquino 1 , Claudia Travassos 4 1. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 2. National Institute in Science, Technology and Innovation in Health (CITECS), Salvador, Brazil 3. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Brasília, Brazil 4. Federal University of Santa Catarina, Floranopólis, Brazil 5. Secretaria de Vigilância a Saúde, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil 6. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (ICICT) / FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 1
Transcript

Monitoring(and(evaluating(progress(towards(universal(health(coverage(in(

Brazil!!

!!

Mauricio!L.!Barreto!1,!Davide!Rasella!1,!Daiane!Machado!1,!Rosana!Aquino!1,!Diana!Lima!1,!Leila!Garcia!2,!Alexandra!Crispim!2,!Jackson!Santos!1,!Juan!Escalante!3,!Estela!Aquino!1,!Claudia!Travassos!4!!

!!

1.  Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 2.  National Institute in Science, Technology and Innovation in Health (CITECS), Salvador,

Brazil 3.  Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Brasília, Brazil 4.  Federal University of Santa Catarina, Floranopólis, Brazil 5.  Secretaria de Vigilância a Saúde, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil 6.  Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde (ICICT) /

FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

! 1

•  Since! 1988,! Brazil! has! developed! a! dynamic,! complex! ! health!system!(the!Unified!Health!System;!SUS),!which!is!based!on!the!principles!of!health!as!a!ci*zen’s!right!and!the!state’s!duty.!!

•  The!SUS!aims!to!provide!comprehensive,!universal,!preven*ve!and! cura*ve! care! through! decentralized! management! and!provision! of! health! services,! and! promotes! community!parUcipaUon!at!all!administraUve!levels.!!

•  The!Brazilian!Health!Sector!Reform!occurred!at!the!same!*me!as! democra*za*on,! and! was! spearheaded! by! health!professionals! and! individuals! in! civil! society! movements! and!organisaUons.!!

Introduc*on!

4

Federal!Cons*tu*on,!art.!196!(1988)!

!  “health( is( a( right(of( all( citizens( and(a(duty(of(the( state,( granted( by( social( and( economic(policies( aimed( to( reduce( the( risk( of( diseases(and( the( universal( and( equitable( access( to(actions( and( services( to( its( promotion,(protection(and(recovery”.(

GINI Index – Social Inequalities

The Gini index is a measure of statistical dispersion and is used as a measure of inequality of wealth (eg. income) distribution. It varies from 0 to 1, where a value of 0 corresponds to perfect equality and a value of 1 corresponds to perfect inequality

!!!!!!!!Recent!Trends!in!Gini!Index!in!Brazil ! !!!

0.538

0.544

0.551

0.558

0.565 0.568

0.580

0.586

0.592

0.591

0.597 0.599

0.599 0.597

0.52

0.54

0.56

0.58

0.60

1994 1998 2002 2006 2010

Coe

ficie

nte

de G

ini

Ano

0,7 %/year 30

34

38

42

46

50

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980

Coe

ficie

nte

de G

ini

Ano

0.2 ponto/ano 27 anos

0.5%/year

16 ys.

30

34

38

42

46

50

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980

Coe

ficie

nte

de G

ini

Ano

0.6 %/ year 15 ys

UK!

USA!

Brazil

How!long!will!take!to!reach!the!level!of!other!large!federa*ve!countries?!!

30

34

38

42

46

50

54

58

62

1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008

Gin

i Coe

ficie

nt

Year

Brasil

Mexico

EUA

Canada

hiperinflação

0,7 pontos Gini/ ano

4 anos

22 anos

10 anos

USA

Canada

Brazil

Mexico

Infant!Mortality!Rates!

Prevalence(of(undernutrition((<5(years)(by(family(income(and(year(of(survey,(1974/5((J((2006/7(

Lancet, 2011

!  To!explore!how!far!has!Brazil!advanced!in!terms!of!Universal!Health! Coverage! (UHC)! and! equity! regarding:! health!determinants,!primary,!secondary!and!terUary!care,!and!costs!for!individual!and!families.!

!!!  To!contribute!to!the!defini*on!a!set!of!indicators!to!monitor!health!coverage!and!equity!at!an!internaUonal!level.!

Objec*ves!

12

13

(!  Data!at!the!aggregate!level:!!

!!!!!!!!Health!StaUsUcs!made!available!by!the!Brazilian!Ministry!of!Health!(Datasus)!from!!!!!!!!!!!rouUnely!collected!data:!!!!!!!!!!!!W!Mortality!InformaUon!System!W!SIM!!!!!!!!!!!!W!InformaUon!System!on!Live!Births!W!SINASC!!!!!!!!!!!!W!NoUfiable!Diseases!InformaUon!System–!SINAN!!!!!!!!!!!!W!Primary!Care!InformaUon!System!W!SIAB!!!!!!!!!!!!W!OutpaUent!InformaUon!System!W!SIA!!!!!!!!!!!!W!Hospital!InformaUon!System!W!SIH!!!!!!!!!!!For!socioeconomic!and!demographic!variables!data!from!the!Brazilian!InsUtute!of!!

Geography!and!StaUsUcs!and!from!the!Human!Development!Atlas!of!the!UNDP.!

!  Data!at!the!individual!level:!!

!!!!!!!W!Health!Supplement!of!NaUonal!Household!Sample!Surveys!(PNAD):!1998W2003W2008!!!!!!!!W!Family!Expenditure!Surveys!(POF):!1996W2003W2009!!!!!!!!W!Surveillance!System!of!Risk!and!ProtecUve!Factors!for!Chronic!NonWCommunicable!!!!!!!!!!!!!Diseases!!through!Telephone!Interviews!(VIGITEL)!(

Methods:!Data!Sources!

14

(((!  Data! at! the! aggregate! level:! !MunicipaliUes! have! been! straUfied! according! to! quinUles! of! their!

Human!Development! Index! (HDI)! at! the!baseline! year!of! 2000.! Indicators!under! study!have!been!calculated! for! each! quinUle! as! the! raUo! between! the! sum! of! the! outcome! in! the! municipaliUes!divided!by!the!sum!of!the!populaUon.!For!each!indicator!quinUles!trends!!have!been!represented!in!graphs.!

!  This!analysis!allow! to! show!not!only!how!the!average!poverty! level!of! the!municipality! can!affect!health! service! uUlizaUon! and! outcomes,! but! also! –! in! case! of! health! services! placed! only! in! rich!urban! municipaliUes! –! how! the! same! aspects! could! be! affected! by! other! barriers! of! access!(geografical,!cultural,!economical).!

!  Data! at! the! individual! level:! ! For! each! survey! subjects! have! been! straUfied! in! quinUles! of! their!income!or!–!if!income!was!not!available!W!schooling!level.!For!each!indicator!trends!of!the!quinUles!have!been!represented!in!graphs.!

!  This!analysis!allow!to!show!how!individual!income!or!schooling!level!could!affect!the!outcome!under!study,!indipendently!form!the!place!of!residence!of!the!subjects!(ex.!rural!or!urban).!!

Methods:!Analysis!

2000! 2010!1st$quin)le$ 15.1! 16.3!2nd$quin)le$ 18.9! 20.8!3rd$quin)le$ 19.5! 22.1!4th$quin)le$ 29.0! 33.2!5th$quin)le$ 86.9! 97.9!

Total!popula*on!!(millions)!of!each!!HDI!quin*le,!2000Z2010!

(

15

Health!Determinants!!and!Risk!Factors!

16

17

FIGURE!3:!Trends!in!percentage!of!housing!without!piped!water!according!to!quin*les!of!municipal!lDH.!

Data!Source:!IBGE!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!the!richer!and!the!poorer!quin*les.!

0!

10!

20!

30!

40!

50!

60!

70!

80!

90!

100!

1991! 2000! 2010!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

0!

10!

20!

0!

50!

100!

1991! 2000! 2010!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUo!

18

Absence!of!Piped!Water!

Absence!of!Electricity!FIGURE!4!:!Trends!in!percentage!of!housing!without!electricity!according!to!quin*les!of!municipal!lDH.!

Source:!IBGE!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!the!richer!and!the!poorer!quin*les.!

0!

10!

20!

30!

40!

50!

60!

70!

80!

90!

100!

1991! 2000! 2010!

%!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

0!

20!

40!

60!

80!

0!

20!

40!

60!

1991! 2000! 2010!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUo!

19

20

Primary!Health!Care!

21

22

FIGURE!7:!!!Vaccina*on!coverage!according!to!quin*les!of!municipal!HDI.!!

Data!Source:!Na*onal!Immuniza*on!Program!(PNI)!!

0.0!10.0!20.0!30.0!40.0!50.0!60.0!70.0!80.0!90.0!100.0!

2003! 2004! 2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

1st!quintil!

2nd!quintil!

3rd!quintil!

4th!quintil!

5th!quintil!

Series6!

0.0!

10.0!

20.0!

30.0!

40.0!

50.0!

60.0!

70.0!

80.0!

90.0!

100.0!

2003! 2004! 2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

1st!quintil!

2nd!quintil!

3rd!quintil!

4th!quintil!

5th!quintil!

Total!

DPT!(Tetravalent)!!

Measles!(SRC)!!

23

Vaccina*on!Coverage!

FIGURE!8:!Trends!in!percentage!of!pregnant!women!without!any!prenatal!visit!at!the!moment!of!delivery!according!to!quin*les!of!municipal!HDI.!

Data!Source:!MS/SVS/DASIS!Z!Sistema!de!Informações!sobre!Nascidos!Vivos!Z!SINASC!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!the!PNV!of!the!richer!and!the!poorer!quin*les.!

0!

5!

10!

15!

20!

25!

30!

2000! 2001! 2002! 2003! 2004! 2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010!

%!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

0!1!2!3!4!5!6!

0!2!4!6!8!

10!12!

2000! 2005! 2010!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUon!

24

Prenatal!visits!

25

Secondary!Health!Care!

26

!FIGURE!14:!Trends!in!percentage!of!delivery!at!the!hospital!according!to!quin*les!of!municipal!HDI.!!

Data!Source:!Sistema!de!Informações!sobre!Nascidos!Vivos!Z!SINASC!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!the!!the!richer!and!the!poorer!quin*les.!

0!

10!

20!

30!

40!

50!

60!

70!

80!

90!

100!

2000! 2001! 2002! 2003! 2004! 2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

%!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

0.0!

0.2!

0.4!

0.6!

0.8!

1.0!

1.2!

0!

2!

4!

6!

8!

10!

2000! 2005! 2010!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUo!

27

Delivery!at!the!Hospital!

Data!Source:!Sistema!de!Informações!sobre!Nascidos!Vivos!Z!SINASC!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!!the!richer!and!the!poorer!quin*les.!

!FIGURE!15:!Trends!in!percentage!of!cesarean!delivery!according!to!IDH!quin*les!of!municipali*es!.!

0!

10!

20!

30!

40!

50!

60!

70!

80!

2000! 2001! 2002! 2003! 2004! 2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

%!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

0.0!

0.2!

0.4!

0.6!

0.8!

0!

10!

20!

30!

40!

2000! 2005! 2010!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff!! raUo!

28

Cesarean!Delivery!

Ter*ary!Health!Care!

29

30

Hospitaliza*on!for!Cardiovascular!Surgery!!FIGURE!17:!Trends!in!hospitaliza*on!rates!(per!100,000!inhab)!for!cardiovascular!surgery!according!to!quin*les!of!municipal!HDI.!

Data!Source:!!SIH!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!!the!richer!and!the!poorer.!

0!

10!

20!

30!

40!

50!

60!

70!

80!

90!

100!

2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

0.00!

0.10!

0.20!

0.30!

0.40!

0!

10!

20!

30!

40!

2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUo!

31

0!

10!

20!

30!

40!

50!

60!

70!

80!

90!

100!

2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

!FIGURE!29:!Trends!in!number!of!hemodialysis!!per!1,000!inhabitants!per!year!according!!to!quin*les!of!municipal!HDI.!

Data!Source:!SIA!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!!the!richer!and!the!poorer!quin*les.!

0.00!0.10!0.20!0.30!0.40!0.50!

0!10!20!30!40!50!

2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUo!

32

Hemodialysis!

!FIGURE!30:!Trends!in!number!of!kidney!transplanta*ons!per!100,000!inhabitants!per!year!according!to!quin*les!of!municipal!HDI.!

Data!Source:!!SIH!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!!the!richer!and!the!poorer.!

Kidney!Transplanta*on!

0!

1!

2!

3!

4!

5!

6!

7!

8!

9!

10!

2000! 2001! 2002! 2003! 2004! 2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

0.00!

0.04!

0.08!

0.12!

0.16!

0.20!

0.0!

0.5!

1.0!

1.5!

2.0!

2.5!

3.0!

2000! 2005! 2010!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUo!

33

34

!FIGURE!16:!Trends!in!rate!of!admissions!to!hospital!!(per!100!inhabitants)!in!individuals!30Z59!years!old!in!the!past!12!months!according!to!income!classes!in!minimum!wages.!!

0.0!

0.2!

0.4!

0.6!

0.8!

1.0!

0.0!

0.5!

1.0!

1.5!

2.0!

2.5!

3.0!

3.5!

1998! 2003! 2008!

Ra*o

!

ifferen

ce!

diff! raUo!

0!

2!

4!

6!

8!

10!

12!

14!

16!

18!

20!

1998! 2003! 2008!

<!1!Minimum!wage!

!1!W!2!Minimum!wages!

!2!W!3!Minimum!wages!

3!W!5!Minimum!wages!

>!!5!!Minimum!wages!

Overall!

Data!Source:!PNAD!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!!between!!the!richer!and!the!poorer.!

35

Reported!Hospitaliza*on!

Health!Outcomes!

36

!FIGURE!31:!!Trends!in!underZfive!mortality!rates!according!to!HDI!quin*les!of!municipali*es!selected!for!the!quality!of!vital!informa*on.!

Data!Source:!SIM!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!!the!U5MR!of!the!richer!and!the!poorer!quin*les.!

0!

10!

20!

30!

40!

50!

60!

70!

80!

2000! 2001! 2002! 2003! 2004! 2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

Mortality!rate!(x10

3 )!!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

0.0!

0.5!

1.0!

1.5!

2.0!

2.5!

0!

5!

10!

15!

20!

25!

2000! 2005! 2010!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUo!

37

UnderZfive!Mortality!

FIGURE!32:!Trends!in!underZfive!mortality!rates!from!diarrhoea!according!to!IDH!quin*les!of!municipali*es!selected!for!the!quality!of!vital!informa*on.!

0!

1!

2!

3!

4!

5!

6!

7!

8!

9!

10!

2000! 2001! 2002! 2003! 2004! 2005! 2006! 2007! 2008! 2009! 2010! 2011!

Mortality!rate!(!x103)!!

1st!quinUl!

2nd!quinUl!

3rd!quinUl!

4th!quinUl!

5th!quinUl!

Overall!

0!

1!

2!

3!

4!

5!

6!

0!2!4!6!8!

10!12!14!16!

2000! 2005! 2010!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

raUo! diff!

UnderZfive!Mortality!From!Diarrhoea!

Data!Source:!SIM!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!between!!the!U5MR!of!the!richer!and!the!poorer!quin*les.! 38

39

Data!Source:!PNAD!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!!between!!the!richer!and!the!poorer.!

0.0!

0.2!

0.4!

0.6!

0.8!

1.0!

0.0!

1.0!

2.0!

3.0!

4.0!

5.0!

1998! 2003! 2008!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUo!

!FIGURE!34:!Trends!in!percentage!of!individuals!from!30!to!59!years!who!reported!physicianZdiagnosed!hypertension!according!to!income!classes!in!minimum!wages.!

0!

5!

10!

15!

20!

25!

30!

1998! 2003! 2008!

%!

<!1!Minimum!wage!

!1!W!2!Minimum!wages!

!2!W!3!Minimum!wages!

3!W!5!Minimum!wages!

>!!5!!Minimum!wages!

Overall!

40

SelfZReported!Hypertension!

SelfZreported!Diabetes!

Data!Source:!PNAD!Note:!The!small!graph!refers!absolute!difference!and!rate!ra*o!!between!!the!richer!and!the!poorer.!!

!FIGURE!35:!Trends!in!percentage!of!individuals!from!30!to!59!years!who!reported!physicianZdiagnosed!diabetes!according!to!income!classes!in!minimum!wages.!

0.0!

0.2!

0.4!

0.6!

0.8!

1.0!

1.2!

1.4!

0.00!

0.10!

0.20!

0.30!

0.40!

0.50!

1998! 2003! 2008!

Ra*o

!

Diffe

rence!

diff! raUo!

0!

1!

2!

3!

4!

5!

6!

7!

8!

9!

10!

1998! 2003! 2008!

%!

<!1!Minimum!wage!

!1!W!2!Minimum!wages!

!2!W!3!Minimum!wages!

3!W!5!Minimum!wages!

>!!5!!Minimum!wages!

Overall!

41

Health!Expenditure!

42

43

Discussion!

44

Summary!Points!!!  <!The!Brazilian!National!Health!System!(SUS)!has!guaranteed!

access!to!free!health!care!for!the!population!over!the!last!25!years,!but!one<quarter!of!Brazilians!(among!the!richest)!are!covered!by!private!health!plans.!!

!  <!The!relative!abundance!of!administrative!and!survey!data,!at!the!aggregate!and!individual!levels,!has!allowed!for!the!analysis!of!the!evolution!of!a!wide!range!of!health!determinants,!health!outcomes,!and!health!coverage!indicators!during!recent!years.!Using!an!integrated!approach!and!following!a!theoretical!framework,!recent!trends!in!several!health!outcomes!and!health!coverage!indicators!using!concentration!indices,!differences,!and!relative!inequality!measures!were!analyzed.!

!  <!Primary!health!care,!in!particular!through!the!expansion!of!the!Family!Health!Program,!succeeded!in!guaranteeing!near!universal!coverage,!in!particular!in!immunizations!and!antenatal!care.!!Secondary!and!tertiary!care!coverage!is!expanding!however,!while!large!social!and!geographical!!inequalities!still!persist.!!

45

Summary!Points!!

!  <!Health!expenditures!are!higher!but!decreasing!in!the!poorest!quintiles!of!the!population,!and!catastrophic!health!expenditures!are!minimal!but!still!present,!particularly!in!middle<income!households.!

!  <!The!overall!effect!of!the!SUS!on!the!health!outcomes!investigated!is!positive,!and!remarkable!decreases!have!been!registered!in!childhood!mortality,!particularly!that!associated!with!poverty<related!diseases.!

!  <!The!SUS!is!expanding!coverage!overall,!increasing!access!to!all!levels!of!care,!with!some!important!positive!trends!toward!equity;!however,!under<financing!and!inequalities,!in!particular!!in!secondary!and!tertiary!health!care!still!persist.!

46

Recommenda*ons!!!  To!strengthen!!monitoring!and!evaluation!Unified!Health!System!(SUS),!

defining!a!set!of!indicators!interconnected!by!a!consolidated!framework!that!must!reflect!the!several!levels,!components!and!effects!of!the!unified!heath!system,!relevant!health!determinants!and!health!outcomes,!with!greater!focus!on!equity;!!

!  Make!of!the!efforts!to!the!new!generation!of!health!information!systems!in!development,!including!the!individual!SUS!card,!to!be!integrated!in!the!monitoring!and!evaluation!efforts;!!

!  Integrate!to!SUS!health!information!systems!relevant!data!on!health!care!generated!by!private!health!plans;!

!  To!strengthen!initiatives!directed!to!expand!and!integrate!primary!health!care!(PSF)!!with!secondary!and!tertiary!care!!through!the!establishment!of!healthcare!regions,!underpinning!the!organisation!of!healthcare!networks!(hierarchy,!territorialisation!and!coordination),!making!all!the!efforts!to!decrease!social!and!geographical!inequities;!

!  Increase!funding!–!guarantee!through!law!enforcement,!cut!of!public!subsidies!and!investments!in!the!private!health!sector.!

47


Recommended