Monongalia County Schools
Special Education Drop Out CommitteeYear 3 Update
March 2013NDPC SD and WVDE
Our CountyAs of the 2nd month report, Monongalia County
Schools has 11,029 students enrolled:Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools
Brookhaven 561 Mountaineer 503 Clay Battelle 452
Cheat Lake 805 South 748 MHS 1668
Easton 266 Suncrest 475 UHS 1256
Mason-Dixon 375 Westwood 422
Mountainview 777
Mylan Park 494
North 739
Ridgedale 449
Suncrest Primary 284
Skyview 456
Woodburn 299
Our Team
•Tiffany Barnett, Director of Special Education•Debbie Moore, Special Education Counselor•Pete Cheesebrorough, Assistant Principal UHS•Denise Corder, Assistant Principal, CBHS•John Lewis, Assistant Principal, MHS
Year 1
•Tiffany Barnett, Director of Special Education•Debbie Moore, Special Education Counselor•Pete Cheeseborough, Assistant Principal UHS•Denise Corder, Assistant Principal, CBHS•John Lewis, Assistant Principal, MHS•Rhonda Bolyard, Transition Specialist MTEC
Year 2
•Tiffany Barnett, Director of Special Education •Debbie Moore, Special Education Counselor•Denise Corder, Assistant Principal, CBHS•John Lewis, Assistant Principal, MHS•Gina Romme’, IEP Specialist•Katie Neal, IEP Specialist•Stephanie Oberly, Supervisor of Psychological Services•Megan Frontiera, Coordinator of Safe and Healthy Schools•Courtney Whitehead, Coordinator of School Improvement and
Assessment•Rhonda Bolyard, Transition Specialist MTEC
Year 3
Starting Points (before the project)…
• Following the CSADA 2008, (Comprehensive Self-Assessment Desk Audit) a committee was formed to address drop out rate.
• The following trends were observed by the committee:– Dropout rate for special education students was too high-especially
from high functioning ID and low functioning LD populations.– There was a high likelihood of dropout from low socio-economic
families.– Truancy is a problem.– Students struggle mainly in the core areas: Math, English, and
Science. Many students do not participate in Phys. Ed. – Students state that the subject matter is not interesting to them and
that school takes too long. They know others who have their GED and they are doing “just fine.”
Starting Points Continued...
• Learning Strategies Classes• Afterschool Tutoring• Co-Teach Classes• ID Core Classes• In-school suspension• Some early MTEC entry•Modifications through IEP
Star
ting P
oint
s
The b
eginn
ing of
a re
quire
d exit
inter
view
Student says, “I want to drop out.”
Complete GED Form
Send to adult learning center for follow up
They must schedule an exit interview with
the principal
Interview is conducted
Student returns to school
Student continues to drop out
Complete withdrawal
form
Required Exit Interview
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT/INTERVENTIONSNDPC-SD Technical Assistance
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT/INTERVENTIONS… IN CORRELATION WITH THE 6 FACTORS
• Responsive Classroom: Skyview, Brookhaven, North, Easton, Woodburn
• LYNKS: South, Westwood, Mountaineer, Suncrest, Clay Battelle
• 7 Habits: Mylan Park, Cheat Lake• Check In/Check Out by Dr. Cynthia Anderson
@ University of Oregon• Annual SAT, Crisis Team, FBA, and CPI training• Alternative Behavior Educator-Online FBA
program and Behavior Modules• Embedded PD by Board Certified Behavior
Analysts• Alternative Education at all levels• Behavior Contracts and BIPs• United Summit Center, Chestnut Ridge
Hospital, Valley Mental Health, MAYSAP• School-wide PBIS
Behavior
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT/INTERVENTIONS… IN CORRELATION WITH THE 6 FACTORS
• Vocabulary development, Next Gen/Common Core/Essential Elements Training
• Read 180 & System 44• Co-Teaching Strategies from Dr. Marilyn Friend• Embedded R/LA and Math with academic coaches• On Cloud 9, Wilson, RAVO, Barton, S.P.I.R.E., multi-
sensory approaches, University of Kansas Writing Strategies, Brain Research and students with SLD,
• WVDE sponsored academies• Autism/Asperger’s Sensory and ADHD seminar.• Credit Recovery• Learning Strategies and Algebra Support Classes• SWAP Program• GED Option Programs• Vocational Education Programs• Summer Exploratory• Afterschool tutoring
Course Performance & Academics
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT/INTERVENTIONS… IN CORRELATION WITH THE 6 FACTORS
• Parent Link• Monthly Rewards• Probation Officer• Final Exam Schedule
Attendance & Truancy Prevention
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT/INTERVENTIONS… IN CORRELATION WITH THE 6 FACTORS
• Clubs and athletics• Advisement/LINKS• Special events and
rewards• Instructional Practices
Inventory (IPI)- Mountainview, Eastwood, Ridgedale
• Transition Tour• Transition Fair• Middle School MTEC
Program
Student Engagement
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT/INTERVENTIONS… IN CORRELATION WITH THE 6 FACTORS
Family Engagement
• CAP day• Parent Link• School Newsletters• Future Palooza• Open House• Parent Teacher
Conferences• Elementary
Reading/Math Nights• North Elementary-
Farmer’s Market
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INTERVENTIONS…
IN CORRELATION WITH THE 6 FACTORS
School Climat
e
• School Culture & Climate Committee
• Student Clubs and Events• Professional Learning
Committees• Mentoring programs
Research• Overall data indicates that students with
Emotional/Behavioral Disorders are the most likely candidates for dropout. Monongalia County’s data suggests that students with Specific Learning Disabilities are at a high risk as well.
• Between the years of 2008-2012 an average of 45.4% of students with disabilities each year were able to graduate with their cohort. Each year, the highest graduating percentage comes from CBHS.
Initial PlanThe initial focus was on Morgantown High School, the largest
high school in the county. Students with Disabilities (specifically Intellectually and Learning Disabled) and those coming from low socioeconomic families were targeted for interventions. Exit interviews were conducted and the main reason students gave for wanting to drop out were:
1. Lack of interest in school2. They were behind on credits3. They felt no emotional attachment to the school4. Truancy or Discipline Issues
A small group of students were identified as at-risk for dropping out and interventions created by the committee were implemented.
Initial PlanThe selected interventions were:
Citizenship 101: a course for repeat offenders of safe school violations during which they would meet with law enforcement agencies such as police, judges, prior offenders, etc.
Principal’s Pin-awarded for random acts of kindness and responsible behavior
Mentor Training: to assist other students who are new to the school Principal’s Challenge: a behavioral contract between the student,
teachers, and principal School Activities: make all students aware of events happening at the
school and encourage participation Team Academies: students who are identified as “at-risk” by feeder
schools are placed with modified schedules in core classes with specific teachers.
Plan RevisionsThe interventions were reviewed with the following results:• There was no hard data to support the initiatives’
effectiveness• The committee was restructured to include a wider range of
county resources including psychological services and a transition specialist.
• The team wanted to focus on early intervention-potentially middle school students.
• The learning strategies classes are being reviewed to match CSO’s to the class components.
• The team wishes to include a teacher-to-student mentoring program
Final PlanD.O.T.S.
“Depending on Outreach and Teacher Support”
Students are identified using the early warning system.
Beginning with a smaller school to determine effectiveness before branching out to larger schools.
Teachers volunteer to mentor a “dot.” Students are unaware that they are being targeted for
intervention.
Plan Evaluation and Adjustments• Phase I: Initial Plan
Some interventions are still in place (Principal’s Challenge and Freshman Academies). The committee felt the school was too large and the data relative to the plan’s components and their effectiveness was too difficult to obtain.
• Phase II: Revised Plan Additional academic supports (credit recovery, learning
strategies/support classes, Intensive Reading programs at elementary and middle school levels)
Additional Behavioral supports (CICO, advisory, agency collaboration)• Phase III: Final Plan
Truancy and probation officers were integrated Use of the Early Warning System targets at-risk students Virtual School, GED option program, Alternative Education sites at all
levels. D.O.T.S. mentor program
County Developed Resources/Tools
• Exit Interview•Data wall for each high
school based on the three indicators of drop out.
WVDE: Cohort Document and Data
Cohort Grad. % RateCounty: SWD 47.1 ALL 73.7CBHS: SWD 44.4 ALL 79.7MHS: SWD 53.6 ALL 74.9UHS: SWD 39.7 ALL 70.7
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
Cohort Grad. % RateCounty: SWD 49.3 ALL 72.7 CBHS: SWD 63.6 ALL 88.1MHS: SWD 43.1 ALL 69.7UHS: SWD 54.4 ALL 73.9
Cohort Grad. % RateCounty: SWD 49.2 ALL 77.3CBHS: SWD 61.5 ALL 86.4MHS: SWD 44.8 ALL 77.6UHS: SWD 50.9 ALL 74.8
WVDE: Early Warning System Tool
• Access has been given to administrators, counselors, and IEP specialists in order to facilitate collaboration.
• We have just begun utilizing the early warning system this year. It is being used to identify students who are good candidates for the D.O.T.S. program.
• Since Clay Battelle is a small school, all students are used when applying the system.
• The tool, and the information gleaned, is utilized monthly at every school to align interventions with trends shown by the data.
Use of Funds
• 2011-travel for WVDE trainings and professional development
• 2012-travel for WVDE trainings and professional development, The Last Dropout ordered for book study
• 2013-travel for WVDE trainings, Learning Strategies class organizational supplies purchased
Data Trends-GraduationGender 2011 2012
Male 75% 78.7%
Female 64% 73.9%
Gender 2011 2012
Male 25% 21.3%
Female 36% 26.1%
Data Trends-Drop Out
Data Trends-Graduation and Exceptionality
Exceptionality 2011 Graduates Non-Graduates
2012 Graduates Non-Graduates
AU 100% - 100% -
E/BD 75% 25% 57% 43%
EG - - 100% -
HI 100% - 100% -
SLD 73% 27% 75% 25%
ID-Mild 75% 25% 73% 27%
ID-Moderate - - - -
ID-Severe - - 100% -
OH 58% 42% 78% 22%
Data Trends-OtherSchool Year SWD at or above
mastery R/LASWD at or above
mastery Math2009-2010 9.13% 11.52%
2010-2011 10.82% 11.07%%
2011-2012 9.51% 12.77%
LRE 0 Full-Time
LRE 1Part Time
LRE 2Separate Class
2009-2010 61.77% 29.65% 7.3%
2010-2011 63.66% 28.27% 6.75%
2011-2012 59.26% 32.73% 6.85%
2012-2013 53.49% 38.75% 6.13%
Projected Graduation/Dropout Results
Drop Out by Exceptionality
Drop Out by School
115 SLD2 ID1 OH3 BD
111 Clay Battelle7 Morgantown3 University
Moving Forward and Next Steps
oContinue with monthly review of EWS dataoContinue D.O.T.S. programoMonthly meetings of the county’s Drop Out
CommitteeoReview data monthly to determine
effectiveness
Key Components of Plan Development
Additional mentor training and strategies in order to assist at risk students
Increase attendance/truancy and parent engagement strategies
Key Components for MaintenanceAnnual Review of DataConsistency in Team MembershipSupport from Central Office StaffProfessional Development for
Teachers/Counselors/AdministratorsVertical Teaming (Elementary to Middle, Middle to
High)Celebrate Successes
Lessons Learned
You must have buy in from the committee members and people working in the schools directly with students.
Large scale ideas are difficult to implement and determine effectiveness.
As a team, you must determine how, when, and why you are collecting data.
Committee members must be able to take the ideas back to their schools and mold them to fit their student population’s needs.
Contact InformationTiffany Barnett, Director of Special Education [email protected]
Rhonda Bolyard, Transition Specialist [email protected]
Gina Romme’, IEP Compliance Specialist [email protected]
Katie Neal, IEP Compliance Specialist [email protected]
Thank you !